0:00

to save this country from right wing nutjobs.

0:02

The demon rats are destroying America.

0:04

I'm voting to resist tyranny. No. I'm voting

0:07

to resist tyranny. What? You're a traitor.

0:09

No. You're a greater. I'm saving America from

0:11

terrorists who wanna use government to impress and

0:13

control. Your politician is a lying criminal.

0:15

Mine tells the truth. My politician tells the

0:17

truth that yours is a lying criminal. fascist,

0:20

communist. You're evil. Do you hear

0:22

yourselves your extremist sphere images

0:24

of each other? No. They're clearly the extreme

0:26

Your cult flavors may vary. But vying

0:28

for control of an institution that derives authority

0:31

through coercion and violence dressed up as representation

0:33

is more extreme than questioning this system

0:35

and their results is produced. Both sides are

0:38

so riled up because of legitimate fear

0:40

of their perceived enemy seizing control of this

0:42

violent government authority and using it to violate

0:44

get their rights. I only wanna use government plans

0:46

to force my opinions on others because I'm right

0:48

and know what's best for hundreds of millions of people.

0:50

What if I don't wanna be forced to fund or

0:52

it to any government enforced ideology. Whether

0:55

they swear to care about bodily autonomy

0:57

while flagrantly violating it or profess

0:59

to be anti government while actively supporting

1:01

mass of government. You've clearly been brainwashed

1:03

by fake news. And you're both petty tyrants

1:06

who think you have a right to pick master's for others

1:08

and take zero responsibility when that fails

1:10

and people don't like Now would be a good

1:12

time to stop arguing over which flavor of

1:14

authoritarian, dystopian boot tastes better,

1:16

gagging as they rob your wealth in Liberty's blind

1:18

because you're too busy blaming your fellow victims

1:20

for the crimes and inhumanity of the sociopaths

1:23

you've been indoctrinated to believe represent you.

1:48

Welcome to The Daily Wrap up, a

1:50

concise show dedicated to bringing

1:52

you the most relevant independent news

1:55

as we see it from the last twenty

1:57

four hours.

2:00

Tuesday, November eighth, November

2:03

eighth twenty twenty two. Thank you for joining

2:05

me today. I just absolutely

2:08

love. I can't even express to you how

2:10

much I truly love what we just played

2:12

right there. Huge shout out to the AIM wake

2:14

up from this morning. It was TLAB Tuesday this

2:16

morning. where I'm on a and wake up show,

2:18

and Steve and and Foster played that

2:20

to start. It is just so incredibly

2:22

I mean, it is I think

2:25

that's what most people see. I

2:27

genuinely believe that's what most people

2:29

right now, not the entire picture,

2:31

but that people are looking at those

2:34

on the extreme, and don't mean extreme in

2:36

the sense that they're using it, but just the furthest

2:38

reaches of the left and the right. And could

2:41

have there is definitely the stream parts of that, but

2:43

that's not my method to that moment. But the fur,

2:45

the stretches of those parties, we

2:47

look at them and we go like why are you still

2:49

playing this game? Like, the average grouping

2:51

of people in the middle? And then I think there's people

2:53

like us and the independent media and

2:55

elsewhere that I I believe that we're

2:57

more so, you know, aware of the way

2:59

it's used against us. That's my opinion. I

3:01

could be wrong. But I just think that's that's

3:04

such a breath of fresh air and it's so

3:06

logical and so

3:07

rooted in reality that I just

3:09

find it hard to believe that most people don't hear

3:12

that and go, yeah, I see the same thing.

3:14

I want everybody

3:15

out there to truly

3:18

question

3:19

whether or not that's the case right now. Even

3:21

if you to see everyone on the streets and

3:23

everyone's different than you feel like you're the only one

3:25

which may be true. But

3:27

just ask yourself, could it be possible that we

3:29

all see the same thing? that both the left and

3:31

the right are all lost inside this paradigm, and

3:33

that's a fringe grouping of people that they present

3:36

to you as the majority. You

3:37

just

3:38

a few percentile

3:41

that's a lot of people. You

3:43

could very easily make that the case.

3:47

By just simply projecting it a certain way,

3:49

think about the COVID-nineteen illusion, and

3:52

how we all pointed out that if it wasn't for

3:54

the media, If the media didn't exist in

3:56

the form it was today, would

3:58

you would how would they ever

3:59

have made that happen?

4:01

How would you ever known what they were

4:03

screaming about? If you look out your window

4:05

and it all looked fine, didn't it? Which

4:07

doesn't mean it is? But the cases that

4:09

we now know that they were lying about a lot, if not

4:11

everything had happened. And so the point is if it wasn't

4:13

for them, would that have even been possible?

4:16

Ask yourself that about because we're gonna talk

4:18

about the election today, just in a brief

4:20

point to show you the ridiculousness of it

4:22

all. we have an important show today in regard

4:24

to the election chaos. I

4:27

think it's entirely engineered. If

4:29

not, you know, meant to, you know, I

4:31

guess, the same point, meant to drive this into the

4:33

ground so it can be pointed out on all sides and say,

4:35

see, this is why we need whatever fill

4:37

in the blank. Next solution comes out of the

4:39

problem reaction prefaced.

4:41

But I think at this point, we can clearly see that

4:43

there's an evolution to all of this. And we're

4:45

gonna talk about how that's happening. We're gonna talk

4:47

about the machines balance and all the

4:49

different stuff that's entire like,

4:51

literally exactly what everybody thought was gonna happen. And, oh,

4:53

what do you know? Oh, it's all happening even though we

4:55

aren't allowed to question the integrity of the

4:57

election. We're gonna talk about foreign policy and

4:59

just the belligerence of it all that continues.

5:02

But I I pushed a lot off the show today

5:04

just so we could finish with the important part

5:06

that is a massive study done by

5:09

Kaiser Permenente of three hundred

5:11

thousand cases in what it shows you,

5:13

just in general what you already

5:15

know. that what we're seeing today.

5:18

Again, it could very well just be whatever

5:20

they're making that to be, flu or

5:22

nothing. But then, Omnicron, what's in

5:24

front of us? their study

5:26

shows is ten times less dangerous

5:28

than the flu. On top of that, the people that have

5:30

never gotten an injection, are

5:32

faring exponentially better.

5:35

It's like big surprise. That's

5:37

everybody who's barely looking past the

5:39

narrative can see that there's some of that happening.

5:41

This is showing you that people that have no injections

5:44

in their body have it like a a or

5:46

the the the severity of

5:48

this is going dramatically down from

5:50

something that by the way was always about a flu

5:53

problem, if not less, if that's even

5:55

what's there. Again, because I could point back to the

5:57

beginning in regard to pneumonia and flu

5:59

being combined, A PCR test, rife

6:01

with false positives, all these have been admitted

6:03

to mind you, for those who may be new to

6:05

the conversation. Literally,

6:07

many, we just saw a big discussion about the PCR

6:09

test. and how it's basically a coin flip and

6:11

these are the things we were sensitive for saying in the

6:13

very beginning. The point has always

6:15

been. If it was really the biggest pandemic

6:17

of a lifetime, Why would they have needed to

6:19

combine flu and pneumonia? Why would they have needed

6:21

the very liberal count just to be safe?

6:24

Which even then was not even as much as they

6:26

claimed it was or the numbers of the risk or

6:28

everything? infection fatality rate versus

6:30

the

6:30

case fatality rate,

6:32

relative risk reduction versus

6:34

absolute risk reduction. All these points played

6:36

a factory in making this look worse

6:38

than it was. How is that

6:40

even possible if it's the thing that I know the thing about

6:42

lifetime. We all know this. that

6:44

we're paying attention. But the

6:47

important part about this is that this is something

6:49

that is reaching the average person now.

6:51

and that's why the people the whole amnesty conversation

6:54

is my opinion is meant to really drive a wedge

6:56

in between people that are questioning this.

6:58

I'll give another shout out to the app the great work

7:00

on sub stack that Scott's been doing unless you check

7:02

out the article about the amnesty that came

7:04

out today. It's very important. But To

7:07

start off in general, I wanna make a shout

7:09

out to

7:11

Carrie Weddler,

7:12

who I I just it really just can't give high

7:14

enough praise. He really does see through it. And I

7:16

have maybe that's exactly why anti media was

7:18

wiped off the map way before people

7:20

were even aware of what's going on. I think that

7:22

they can sense that and that, you know, not to I

7:25

think people that are objective and see through

7:27

the paradigm are the biggest threat to what's happening

7:29

to them. And that's why they go after people like

7:31

that. That's why you don't see people like that

7:33

that rise up mean, ask yourself

7:35

even why that's how that's even possible. Why doesn't

7:37

somebody like a James Corbett ever rise up

7:39

into the conversation or get invited on these talk

7:41

shows? I mean, how's that? Because

7:43

It doesn't suit the agenda.

7:45

And even people who you argue may

7:47

be fighting for medical freedom and so on, the

7:49

larger people, the left and the right area,

7:52

are always still invested in the left

7:54

right paradigm. That

7:56

means no matter what, there's a level of

7:58

dishonesty somewhere in there. You may not

7:59

agree with that, but that's the reality. you

8:01

that's what we're seeing across the board.

8:03

So just a really great clip here that I hope you guys

8:06

will share. Oh, and one

8:08

thing before I jump into the election stuff, I

8:10

wanted to just I keep forgetting to make

8:12

this point. The links

8:14

on the shows. Now, this is the show from

8:16

November second. Have been

8:18

looking different? I'm sure many of you've noticed.

8:21

really quickly, I believe I'm

8:23

already gonna go back to the way I was doing it before.

8:25

The reason it's like this is because the

8:27

it's easier I can have these up before

8:29

the show goes live. When they

8:31

look like this, it's using the bookmark, the

8:34

bookmark settings, and I can just copy it

8:36

and post it. The problem is that they don't have the

8:38

link and they have, like, the title and it can be kind

8:40

of hard to look at. I don't end up having

8:42

the the categories in there and so

8:44

on. So let me I mean, I guess it's not

8:46

even let me know what you guys think. I guess I was gonna

8:48

ask that, but the point is essentially I plan

8:50

to go back. But that means

8:52

that I have to go one by one, copy

8:54

each one, paste it, then copy it, then paste the whole thing,

8:56

and it takes a little bit time. And it ends up

8:58

dragging it out, and that's why sometimes it doesn't

9:00

happen till the next day. And on that note, the show

9:02

from yesterday or the

9:04

last show we did. Unfortunately, I

9:06

accidentally closed the window and lost all the

9:08

tabs. I didn't have it saved, and so that's why the

9:10

links are not posted. Now that's one of the

9:12

reasons why this version is a little bit better

9:14

in the in the flow. But either way, let me

9:16

know what you think, I guess. If you guys are

9:18

okay with this version, but I do understand why

9:20

it's hard for some people. But how so last

9:22

point is how frustrating it is that I get a

9:24

lot of criticism despite it

9:26

always being there. there I

9:28

mean, there's very few people that even post

9:30

links at all. And yet, I get

9:32

pushback when it's different or more problematic,

9:34

and I get it. We've raised the bar, and I

9:36

wanna read that bar. So I'm sorry if it was more

9:38

complicated for people, but realize the links

9:40

will be there. Sorry for the ones before. But let

9:42

me know what you think on if you like this version,

9:44

maybe I'll change my mind. you know, just if you guys

9:46

can see it's just a little different. Any

9:48

case, let's start off with the oh,

9:50

actually, I forgot. I have a couple points on

9:52

Elon actually forgot about that. I

9:54

know I'll get to the election. Really short really

9:56

short cool point here. I just thought this was

9:58

interesting. You guys might wanna see the updates in

10:00

regard to some of this Elon Musk Twitter

10:02

conversations. This is actually pretty funny.

10:04

This says Elon Musk confirms, which is

10:06

probably not news to anybody, that some

10:08

Twitter employees had actually been selling

10:10

verification badges behind the scenes

10:12

under previous management. Now if there was

10:13

ever a reason why there is

10:16

actually some kind of

10:17

reality of Elon Musk

10:20

standing against the elite us even though he's

10:22

part of that group. You know, if there if there's any

10:24

I don't think that's the case, but if there's any reality

10:26

to that, this would be one by

10:27

the kind of insight they

10:28

don't want you realizing that they're no different

10:31

than you. They're not special. They

10:33

don't have a special blue badge that makes them part

10:35

of some special stuff. they're just like

10:37

you and usually not even

10:39

as intelligent when you really break it down, you know, the

10:41

people like the Brian Stelters of the world or these

10:43

people on TV that projected themselves as

10:45

being on the inside or if they're not look

10:47

at him now. I mean, they're not I don't mean,

10:49

pick on Stelter. He'll probably find his way back up

10:51

into the ranks of some garbage core

10:53

media platform. But the end of the day

10:55

is, they were still selling them to

10:57

people because people wanted that kind of cloud.

10:59

Now it may not have been the high low people. They probably

11:01

got it regardless. point is simply that

11:03

it's not what it appears to be.

11:05

I find that hilarious

11:06

personally, but

11:07

it's dishonest. Right? So just realize

11:09

that. It's not and by the way, I don't

11:11

think it's gonna get any better. That's just my

11:14

sad perspective, pessimistic, I

11:16

guess. But here's an interesting thing you might laugh

11:18

at. I can't actually verify whether this was real

11:20

or not, but this was posted. Somebody talked about it,

11:22

and I did I was able to find a

11:24

screenshot of it. But what's funny

11:26

is it's that's the world we live in today.

11:28

One, it's probably very easy. There's

11:30

probably entire platforms designed to fake

11:32

tweets like I didn't even don't even

11:34

care looking at that. I'm sure that's probably the case.

11:36

Regardless, I wanted your guys' thoughts on this

11:38

because it really, it's a joke even if it

11:40

was real. It says users with they, them,

11:42

pronouns in their bio, will pay sixteen

11:44

dollars for verification instead of eight because

11:46

they identify as multiple people. I

11:48

just think that's funny. eat at the

11:50

very least. It's just meant to be a

11:52

joke. I highly doubt that would ever become a

11:54

policy because it's it's not

11:56

even real. Like, nope. They're not all know they're

11:58

actually identifying as two people. So it's

12:00

more of a a poke at them, which will be used to

12:02

argue that it was offensive and so

12:04

on. Either way, just think it's of

12:06

hilarious the way this is all being played out, that these

12:08

kind of things, even jokes will be used to

12:10

argue it's the right and extremist and

12:12

the whole thing, which is all the way this is where this is

12:14

going. I can't just that except that was

12:16

funny. But we saw the

12:18

independent saying having a blue check on Twitter is now

12:20

like wearing a mad hat. You'll know who to

12:22

avoid. Think about the kind

12:25

of that is what we're trying this is where this

12:27

even overlaps with, like, the amnesty conversation.

12:29

These are the kind of people we're talking about.

12:31

Now, again, the

12:33

point we talked about this morning is, The idea of

12:35

amnesty should not even be had on a general

12:37

population scale. We shouldn't be having this debate

12:39

publicly. It's your choice. Individually with

12:41

each relationship, between you and them and what

12:43

you want to do. Whether you want to say, I

12:45

forgive you or whether you want to say, I accept your apology,

12:47

but I will never forgive you. I will never

12:49

forget. but I understand you're trying to make amends or none of

12:51

that because I can tell you're lying. It's between

12:53

you. There's not a one size fits all

12:55

conversation. That's what they want us to be

12:57

doing so we divide, so we fight

12:59

each other. I

13:00

think that's if it's clear as day. But

13:02

this

13:04

this

13:05

these are the kind of groups that we, in

13:07

my personal opinion, again, who else just

13:09

put it this way based on what I just said, that

13:11

I will never forgive

13:13

or forget or accept an apology

13:15

from because look at the kind of victory all

13:17

they're spewing right now. Having

13:19

a blue check on Twitter is now wearing a so first

13:21

of all, why is wearing a hat hat. It means Make America

13:24

great again. And you're telling me that literally every

13:26

person out there wearing a MAGA hat is

13:27

exactly what you're framing them as. You know how

13:30

juvenile and ignorant that is?

13:32

That's that that if we were to say every

13:34

single person is this color skin is exactly

13:36

this way, they would lose their minds. But

13:38

it's okay apparently because it's this kind of

13:40

person, this color skin, it's crazy.

13:43

It's not

13:44

only crazy, it's ignorant, but

13:46

they're just broad brushing everything and

13:48

because they want to sell things. and

13:50

they want to divide. That's what I think.

13:53

Now here's what's funny by the way.

13:55

Kathy Griffin, who by the way, I think I've been

13:57

clear absolutely can't stand

13:59

on like a

13:59

internal

14:00

visceral level. And just and again, you

14:03

I mean, that's personal. you

14:05

not not not not even user something we get into on the

14:07

show at the end of the day. I just there's something

14:09

really everything about her

14:11

makes my makes my skin crawl.

14:13

I hate even to say that, but it's real. I can't I don't

14:15

know why. Very few people. I think

14:17

it's because of just how obviously everything

14:22

she's doing is just about promoting

14:24

herself and about trying to work

14:26

her way out from the d list and be more

14:28

popular and, like, shamelessly doing

14:30

so.

14:30

With Trump and the head cut off thing, remember

14:32

all that stuff, and it's just somebody that it's like you

14:34

know what it is? I think it's somebody who has clearly

14:36

lost the limelight and it's just so

14:38

desperate to do literally anything to and

14:40

and really gross kind of disgusting ways in

14:42

my opinion. Regardless of all that, it was all my personal

14:45

opinion, Kathy Griffin was apparently

14:47

banned from Twitter For in

14:49

person, Elon Musk, now here's an interesting

14:51

example. First of all, to

14:53

make this very clear, Elon Musk was

14:56

very they stated it, that that

14:58

would be the case. So regardless

15:00

of whether you agree when

15:02

it comes to these platforms, that's the line we made in

15:04

the past. Right? It's not it it it does

15:06

matter in regard to whether these platforms are

15:08

censoring people because they, you know, posted

15:11

something that they whatever. That

15:13

matters. If it's stated in their terms

15:15

of service, it matters that we don't

15:17

disagree with it, but at least they're going along with what

15:19

they say they were going to do and you can feel free not

15:21

to use the platform. The problem I

15:23

think is with these platforms on top of the

15:25

just general censorship is that they do

15:27

things outside of that. YouTube is

15:29

obvious, censoring things long before they even had term about medical

15:31

misinformation, just whatever they didn't agree

15:33

with, and then it just became a broad

15:35

category for anything they didn't want

15:37

people saying. whether or not it was in

15:39

their terms of service. My point here is that Elon

15:41

was said, if you do this, you will be

15:43

deleted, and she did it. I think it's because

15:45

she's desperate attention. It wants to be the one that gets

15:47

deleted, so this can happen. So then they

15:49

make a big stink about it. See, they're

15:51

censoring just like before. Well, yes, to

15:53

a degree, except this is like going

15:55

on Twitter and doing whatever they

15:57

explicitly have written down is the thing you're not supposed to do.

15:59

And then

15:59

going, oh, they

16:01

said you see the point, but all

16:03

that aside, is this

16:05

not still censorship? Right?

16:07

I mean, regardless of how we're talking about

16:09

it, is it actually a crime to

16:11

impersonate someone. Again, there's a line there.

16:13

Right? But I just the point is

16:15

interesting in how this is playing out. But on

16:17

top of all of that, I think

16:18

it's interesting at the right in

16:20

this case is relishing the fact that

16:22

she got kicked off. But it's not as easy. It

16:24

it would be much a better example. If this

16:27

was if this was a far left

16:29

person that just simply said Elon

16:31

Musk is ugly and then got deleted.

16:33

I still I would still argue that

16:35

the right would probably still relish that too and

16:37

say, yeah, screw them, Well, you know,

16:39

you never know. I'd be I'm guessing into the wind,

16:41

but I think this is an interesting

16:43

development because she was banned personally.

16:45

I don't like the girl. So at the end of the day

16:47

though, you can see that this can go into a

16:50

direction where it just kind of flip flops the

16:52

other way around. Here's

16:54

one step further on this. Tim Pool

16:56

in response to this guy saying, well,

16:58

first starting with this guy saying impersonation is

17:00

not free speech. fraud is

17:02

not protected by by the first amendment, and

17:04

this is about the same point. Right?

17:06

So there's the argument about

17:08

how this is not necessarily censorship.

17:10

Right? And again, I'm not is a right in

17:12

the middle example, which is why I'm so interested by

17:14

it. And again, that's exactly why she chose to

17:16

do this. She's, oh, don't do that. Well, I'm

17:18

gonna do that. And here's the other point to make

17:20

too is that if it was in reverse, they

17:23

would be screaming that it was acceptable.

17:25

Right? Well, because that that Republican

17:27

didn't do what the prop the platform said, go start

17:29

your own platform. But now in reverse, she's

17:31

gonna cry foul. You see how this works? The two

17:33

party paradigm is the problem today. But

17:35

it says this is one of the brilliant tech

17:37

pros

17:37

David Sachs guy,

17:39

I believe.

17:41

Yeah. It's that

17:44

the brilliant tech pros, Musk has brought on

17:46

to help him run Twitter. His

17:48

knowledge of the first amendment apparently consists of

17:50

reading a Wikipedia article and it shows.

17:52

Parity has protected speech under the first

17:54

amendment, which is correct. Right?

17:55

But here's the difference. And I I'm sorry to

17:57

go into deep on this. I just this kind of stuff

17:59

fascinates

17:59

me, is that ultimately, she

18:02

wasn't really doing parody because

18:04

she changed her image, she changed everything,

18:06

and it looked exactly like Elon's page.

18:08

And then went on and said a bunch of stuff that

18:10

was challenging his ideas and making him

18:12

look stupid. not really parody because it wasn't

18:14

even funny. You were doing this to make an

18:16

issue, to get deleted. That's my

18:18

opinion. Right? Regardless. But

18:20

Judd makes a great point. Here's

18:22

it goes even further. Kim Pool steps in and

18:24

says if

18:25

you have advocated for private control

18:26

by billionaires of media like Musk

18:28

and social media, in the past,

18:31

that I provide you no consideration when the hammer falls

18:33

on you. You gotta love this kind of like

18:35

absolutest, you know, where people can't

18:37

make mistakes. It's like kind of thing

18:39

in my mind, but it says first amendment arguments mean nothing to

18:41

me when I look forward to you reaping what you've

18:44

sown. This exactly is

18:46

what you should never be like. Right?

18:48

So you're so you no. You don't like,

18:50

say, you don't care about the first amendment or you

18:52

only don't care insofar as that he doesn't get

18:54

what he wants because he did something before you

18:56

think is stupid. Like, that's that's

18:59

ridiculous. Day by day, I have

19:01

less respect for this person here, but going

19:03

forward,

19:03

Jason Bassler step

19:04

steps up rightly so and I big respect

19:06

for Jason Bassler and the free thought project.

19:09

That's

19:09

funny, Tim. When our organization, the Free

19:11

Thought Project, was the platform by both Twitter and

19:13

Facebook on the same day, resulting in a loss

19:15

of nearly six million fans. By the way, same

19:18

time as the anti media and Carrie Weddler, you

19:20

told us we should have just obeyed terms of

19:22

service and community standards. Oh, how

19:24

things have shifted? Isn't that

19:26

interesting how that works? Right?

19:28

So this is called being inconsistent in your

19:30

logic and your stated policy,

19:32

stated perspectives. Regardless, It's

19:35

funny how things flip flop back and forth,

19:37

and this is what happens when you're stuck on the

19:39

two party paradigm, in my

19:41

opinion. Either way, I

19:43

think it's meant to be a

19:45

complete quagmire of

19:47

nonsense and back and forth. It's all leading us the same direction

19:49

in my opinion. It's a pipeline, the great reset,

19:51

digital ID, meanwhile, they get people arguing

19:53

back and forth about whether this is right

19:54

or wrong or left and right. At the end of the day, it's

19:56

the same people owning the same things driving you in

19:58

same direction.

19:59

I just wish

19:59

we could all see that. That's my

20:02

opinion.

20:02

And speaking of the same

20:04

things and the same people doing the same driving you

20:06

in the same direction, Welcome to Election Day.

20:09

Hooray. Don't we all love the the

20:11

smell of democracy in the morning? Oh,

20:13

wait. Excuse me. I think somebody left the trash

20:15

out. That's not democracy. My

20:17

bad. But here is a great tweet from

20:19

off guardian. The barely

20:21

contained chaos of the US

20:23

voting system is deliberately cultivated.

20:25

I completely agree.

20:27

It acts as a smokescreen

20:29

behind which the machinery of corruption

20:32

turns hundred percent mean,

20:34

guy it's it's oh, isn't that ridiculous

20:36

that they can like, literally, everybody has

20:38

been predicting that this is going to be ridiculous

20:40

for exactly the reasons that their screening

20:42

aren't going to happen, and then it

20:44

all happens instantly the moment this

20:47

begins. This you again, you couldn't if

20:49

you wrote this as a show, people would be like, well, that's

20:52

dumb. Like, that doesn't

20:52

even add up. That's the

20:54

problem here. It doesn't. And

20:55

it's obvious. And this is why

20:58

it's clumsy. This, in my opinion, is

21:00

exactly whether it's

21:01

meant to drive us into a position where all this melts

21:03

down, they justify the next thing,

21:06

or It's just so everybody can accuse everybody, everywhere

21:08

of cheating and nothing ever actually changes,

21:10

which again is exactly what they want.

21:12

I don't know, but this has already

21:14

started. Scottsdale, Arizona. I've got a I've

21:16

just five or six examples, but guys, this

21:18

is literally anywhere you look. Right now, go out

21:20

there and type in ballot mix up or ballot

21:23

discussion around pretty much every state, and you'll

21:25

find things like that right now being discussed. People

21:27

didn't get their ballots. These things aren't happening. Well,

21:29

miss miss machines

21:30

aren't taking them.

21:31

It's crazy. here's

21:32

here's the first clip. This is a lady speaking about

21:34

her experience. I don't

21:37

What's going on? Believe I We have this

21:39

one location and their voting machines are

21:41

not working properly.

21:42

They don't count the

21:45

ballots. You go in to register, they give

21:47

you a ballot, which takes like twenty minutes, which

21:49

is ridiculous. useless. You go

21:51

in. You place you do your

21:53

boating. You go in. You get it into the machine and it

21:55

won't take it. It says misread ballot.

21:57

every single person in there is getting a misread

21:59

ballot.

21:59

Oh, no. So what happens then? Like, I what's

22:02

supposed to happen, by the way? Like,

22:04

there's another interesting part about this is

22:06

that people brother, for example, wants to go

22:08

in. Yet, he doesn't still

22:10

wants to vote. Doesn't listen to me. But,

22:12

you know, he goes in. And

22:14

says,

22:14

well, I wanna scan it because apparently there's the option to to

22:16

scan it. Somebody catch the box in

22:18

the chat for me. Somebody tries to

22:21

scan it. or wants to scan it so they

22:23

can actually register their vote right

22:24

there in the moment. Otherwise, they

22:26

have to kick the ballot and they count

22:29

it later. which by the way, how do

22:29

you even include those two things

22:31

simultaneously? I mean, that guarantees this

22:33

is gonna be, you know, incongruent and,

22:35

you know, these things are counted

22:37

and put those there for now and we wait and we count

22:39

those later and then what's the possibility that you forget

22:41

to stamp it and it gets counted twice or what if you do it

22:43

on purpose because you like the boat? These are

22:46

human beings. The point is they're supposed to it as, you know, the

22:48

one you're not going to count, and then you could scan

22:50

it, you could leave with that ballot, or they throw it

22:52

away. I mean, there there is

22:54

an endless amount of opportunity for

22:56

cheating and for just mistakes literally

22:58

everywhere you look. Now, on top

23:00

of that, we've got machines that aren't

23:02

counting appropriately. And by the way, this

23:04

is confirmed all across the country. I'll show you

23:06

right next. There's there's one where a guy actually comes out

23:08

and says seventy five percent is all that

23:10

is reading. It's ridiculous. But

23:12

we're just supposed to go along with it

23:15

apparently. What happens next? Everybody

23:17

everywhere, even if there isn't who want

23:19

to make an issue about this problem, whether they lose

23:21

or not, they're gonna say world, this is what happened

23:23

and these machines were cheated on. These people did this. And you

23:25

know what? They're probably right. In every possible way,

23:28

and it continues

23:30

anyway. So now All

23:31

does it have to get thrown into the

23:34

box? hand count. Hand count. Hand

23:36

count. Supposedly hand count. Yeah.

23:38

My husband's

23:38

done two ballots he

23:40

had to do a canceled ballot. The second ballot he went in

23:42

to vote, same thing. So every

23:45

person in

23:45

that line now that standing there is

23:47

not gonna get counted properly

23:49

that we don't know. Right. Or at

23:51

the very

23:52

least, we don't know. Right? And this is

23:54

my problem with this is that we're they're if we've

23:56

seen the

23:56

last elections where you're they're pulling out

23:59

boxes full of ballots,

23:59

like slipping out the side of the box in

24:02

the middle of the night, which I mean, it's all

24:04

over. There's are you really

24:06

going to pretend that that person

24:08

couldn't just choose to do what they

24:10

want? Like, what's the idea that we're just

24:12

it's like, you were not allowed to question

24:14

the integrity of anybody chooses

24:16

to work in these small positions that are completely unaccountable.

24:18

I mean, it it's just it's this

24:20

is meant to be the speaking of

24:22

people like like pasta

24:25

from a and wake up. Craig, and the the

24:27

conversation we had about this and and the idea

24:29

that that this is design I mean, there's

24:31

places around the world that do this very differently.

24:34

and you can see that there situations and the ways that

24:36

they handle them that are done routinely

24:39

without

24:39

problems. And

24:40

yet somehow, I

24:42

don't somehow, it's designed in my opinion.

24:44

These actions are taken that allow these

24:46

situations, and I I genuinely think that's

24:48

the situation. They want there to be

24:51

doubt. Now, I I'm not spaying.

24:53

I know why exactly, but are

24:55

anybody really questioning that right now? Why would

24:57

these choices be made around

24:59

the across the board? that

25:01

all allow doubt and question and concern.

25:03

And then again, with day one,

25:06

literally everything kicks off and

25:08

breaks and I mean, is

25:10

anybody gonna take this

25:11

at face value? Like, let's

25:12

just say for a sake of conversation that

25:15

everything goes down as it's supposed to. like

25:17

aside from the glitches and problems they count

25:19

and they say, yet, but we still got it all. We can

25:21

verify every single vote. Eat

25:23

the people that want to are gonna say, no, I

25:25

don't buy it, you cheated, which

25:27

we know happens every single time. Now

25:29

for some reason I couldn't get this video download,

25:32

the old Twitter thing where they do two videos and

25:34

one tweet, I guess you can only get one of them. I'm

25:36

not sure. But here, I'll try and play this close.

25:38

Same kind of thing. This is another guy. Make

25:40

sure of the volume. Yes,

25:42

sir. Now I'm at the North Scottsdale,

25:45

United Smith, and his church.

25:48

on Tuesday, November the eighth.

25:50

Election day, and it's ten thirty three.

25:52

I'm trying to vote, and

25:56

Neither machine in there. Neither a valid machine will

25:58

accept the balance. There's

25:59

numerous people in line and every time it's

26:02

either rejected or misread. Wow.

26:04

And they said there's a for drop box, we could put

26:06

it in. They said it will be counted. I

26:09

was adamant, but I did not want a provisional

26:12

ballot. accounted. It

26:14

it it takes up. I want this balance

26:16

to be counted. And

26:17

I've tried to call a Republican, the

26:19

national party in Phoenix. and tried

26:21

to call the number that they gave me

26:23

inside here via 6025061511

26:28

and

26:28

it's just endless prompts.

26:30

There we get to talk to you by.

26:32

And the

26:33

name is Joe O'Neil. Scottsdale,

26:35

Arizona. Thank you. Yeah. I

26:38

mean,

26:38

there's literally no I

26:40

shouldn't say literally. I hate I hate that. I do that stuff. There

26:42

is no end of this. There's

26:45

absolutely no end. I mean, it goes on and

26:47

on and on. Here's the guy

26:49

speaking. Actually, I think I have this one downloaded.

26:51

Here's the guy speaking about the machines.

26:53

And and the point problem is that what he's saying is that he's

26:55

only properly reading seventy five percent

26:57

of these. And yet we're still using

27:00

them. Like, so are you how do you know for sure who could well,

27:02

however, whatever, seventy percent and you're counting the five, that's

27:04

not I mean, there this is

27:06

unaccountable. I mean, there's

27:08

probably so many better words to

27:10

use there, but the idea is that this is

27:13

I mean, I almost feel like at this point, if this

27:15

was happening in any other country, let's say this

27:17

was wrong or Venezuela. Can you even imagine what

27:19

the US government would be saying? You know what

27:21

they'd be saying and they'd probably call a halt to

27:23

the whole thing. Not this. Right? Same

27:26

thing. Same same joke with everything. I saw me,

27:28

you know, they started disjoint over into

27:30

COVID, but the idea is like, you know,

27:32

a a group, you know, a shipment

27:34

of lettuce. can be shown to have, you know,

27:36

get, like, ten people sick and they recall the whole

27:38

damn thing. Right? But these vaccines can be

27:40

reported all over the world and we're, oh, let's

27:43

giving it until we're sure. It's the same kind of

27:45

thing. Right? It's just it's there's obviously an

27:47

agenda to get this done regardless

27:49

for the for the meat for whatever they're trying to

27:51

accomplish. And if this was a fraction of

27:53

this was happening in places they wanted to call it out and,

27:55

of course, they would. And of course, I promise you

27:57

they're gonna frame this as Republicans just having

27:59

an issue with the system and not, you know,

28:01

it to it not being genuine concerns or

28:04

that they're not valid concerns rather. And if it was

28:06

in reverse, they would be and they'd be conspiracy fears

28:08

for not acknowledging it. It's

28:10

a joke. I'm saying

28:11

that everybody wants to make sure that it beats

28:13

and

28:13

everything is fine. Can you repeat that?

28:16

I promise. Can you can you start from the

28:18

beginning and repeat that? what

28:20

happens

28:20

is we have two tabulators. One

28:22

of the tabulators is not where

28:24

you. Okay? The other tabulators take

28:27

about seventy five percent successful

28:29

to that. So twenty five percent of

28:31

them are being misread, and it could be

28:33

a printer issue.

28:34

Wow. Or it could be the

28:36

tabulator itself. So when it's misread,

28:39

you have an option to put it into what's

28:41

called box free, and it gets

28:43

red, whether it goes downtown, gets red

28:45

manually,

28:45

or whether it gets resetting

28:47

into our tab. You don't wanna adjudicate.

28:50

Get red. I mean, does anybody feel good about

28:52

that? So, one,

28:53

are you certain that it didn't get read

28:55

the first time? Right. I mean, if we're

28:57

talking glitches and mistakes,

28:59

do you know for sure that it didn't get counted? And the

29:01

glitch is that it said it didn't get counted. I mean,

29:03

this is just ridiculous. On top

29:05

of that, you're

29:06

saying twenty five percent aren't being

29:08

read. How are

29:08

you so certain about that? Like, if there's mistakes

29:10

happening? And by the way, what about the ones that are

29:12

being misread? You said

29:13

misread? You didn't say

29:16

error, right? So

29:17

what do you mean misread? Is it is it marking down the wrong

29:19

person? Is it tallying the wrong vote?

29:21

I I just I can't

29:23

even express how ridiculous all this is. And you

29:25

guys, this this Why

29:27

is it so bad all of a

29:28

sudden, midterms? Was it that way? I

29:30

mean, I've always pointed out how ridiculous all this

29:32

is. And yes, people are more hypertune to

29:34

it right now. But

29:36

is I mean, this is everywhere you look across the

29:38

board. These things are breaking, not working, not

29:40

reading, having mistakes. Are we really

29:42

gonna

29:42

pretend like this isn't at the very least

29:45

I mean, what what's new today? What's new

29:47

with all the machines and all the processes that

29:49

weren't the same the last election well before?

29:51

Even though there was some of this, I've never seen

29:53

it like this. so instantly and so

29:55

across the board. Maybe I'm wrong. You tell

29:58

me. the

29:59

Okay. So no one's trying to

30:02

to see any of course, not an election day. Okay.

30:05

Okay.

30:05

Right. Why would you even

30:07

say that? Who's here implying

30:09

that you're trying to

30:10

deceive anybody? You

30:12

know

30:12

what I mean? Like, like, no. It's like coming out when someone

30:14

you're going, okay, I'm not lying to you right now.

30:16

It's like, well, first thing you're thinking is, like,

30:19

probably lying. Not

30:20

that that's the case, but, like, what a strange thing to say?

30:22

Like, the machine's glitching out. We're having

30:24

errors. We promise you, we'll do what we're supposed to. We're

30:26

gonna make sure they get counted. You don't need to go

30:28

No one's being cheated here. It's

30:32

just yeah. It's just this is

30:34

a clown show. That

30:35

would never happened. Right? No. That would never

30:38

happen. So so

30:40

choices are you guys

30:41

Sure.

30:50

Kate, you can't hear that

30:50

the point is she's saying, well, okay, what happens?

30:52

Can I just I wanna leave then.

30:54

I'm waiting in line. I haven't done this yet. I

30:56

don't even wanna engage with this

30:59

ridiculous process that's broken and apparently on the

31:01

accounting seventy five or misreading or

31:03

whatever. wanna go somewhere else. You can't. You're not allowed to leave with

31:05

that ballot. So now that you've you've already

31:07

marked, you can't leave. You have to you so

31:10

you're stuck. engaging with this

31:12

system that's completely up in the air at this

31:14

point. Now, somebody writes in

31:15

the chat of course, I smell a call for digital

31:17

IDs coming. Exactly. Right? If

31:19

You haven't picked up on that. Yeah. That's exactly what we're

31:22

talking about here. This is all of this is

31:24

going to drive in a direction where it is

31:26

something that they claim is know,

31:28

well, here's here's the funny part. Do you remember when we

31:30

were talking about blockchain technology a long time

31:32

ago? And the idea that the point is that you

31:34

can make blockchain ledgers for things like,

31:36

I don't know, military spending for

31:38

voting in a way that you that is accountable

31:40

that can be posted publicly that everybody can

31:42

see, that you can gauge with, you can see the the

31:44

whole system. Now that argument

31:47

still stands, and still argue that in an honest

31:49

situation, that is much

31:51

better than we're staring at. But I'm super

31:53

resistant to any of that because of

31:55

how un I don't trust what they would do

31:57

with this. or how they would alter it behind the

31:59

scenes. We wouldn't even

31:59

know what the bottom line is,

32:02

this

32:02

is going to be driven in a direction that

32:05

justifies that kind of step but I promise you

32:07

it is not gonna be publicly

32:09

available.

32:09

Everybody can look at any moment kind

32:10

of stuff. It's going to be their system just like

32:12

it is now and even trust what they put

32:15

out from I don't know why we would trust

32:17

that. I hope I'm wrong, but that's what I see

32:19

coming. So the drive into the

32:21

digital discussion is not what we

32:23

would want. because it will be

32:25

abused, like everything else. I don't I'm

32:27

taped to be so pessimistic. I think they've

32:30

proven that.

32:32

i

32:35

No. No way. Right?

32:37

Right. Right. Right. I'll come back.

32:41

And the point is there's every reason

32:43

to think that. I mean, there's videos abound

32:45

of everywhere you look, like, last so

32:47

many elections, you can find those videos I just

32:50

mentioned. late ballot box is being dumped in the middle of the night or

32:52

like literally having boxes come out of the

32:54

trunk. The bottom line is

32:54

whether you pretend that's a problem or not,

32:57

we know it can be.

32:59

because those things are there's a time when they are alone with those

33:01

things, and that's not how this is supposed to go.

33:03

Even the discussion of the ballot drug is supposed to

33:05

be with people, but there was numerous videos of people

33:08

by themselves. I don't remember what

33:10

justification we're too busy. Well, we had to get it there by

33:12

a certain time. Doesn't matter. Every right

33:14

to be concerned about this stuff. Every

33:17

right. Postmillennial

33:19

or the, yeah, the postmillennial

33:21

points outbreak. Voting machines down in New

33:23

Jersey's Mercer County. Just down in

33:26

general. Oh, well, guess what? Now, you have to put it in the box. Now, you have

33:28

to rely on them counting it themselves,

33:30

rife with personal errors, mistakes, and

33:32

you know, just blatant cheating. Like, look,

33:34

if we're gonna pretend from either side,

33:36

by the way, that they haven't made arguments across

33:38

the board about why these people being

33:41

elected is like the end of the world.

33:42

Right? From the left side of the perceived

33:45

in the right? What are they

33:46

arguing? Just like they

33:47

argued last time, there was an entire article written

33:50

about some kind of secret cabal that took

33:52

action to stop Trump. Right? Okay?

33:54

Well,

33:54

that wasn't legal. That wasn't that wasn't in line with

33:56

the other Okay. So why wouldn't they make the same

33:58

argument this time? Well, they are in fact. So

34:00

the idea that we would It's unacceptable to

34:02

argue that this person involved might

34:04

accidentally change the vote for their own benefit because

34:06

they've been convinced that Trump or any Republican are's literal

34:09

Nazis going to destroy our

34:11

country like Biden has actually said. I mean, come on,

34:13

guys. It's all right in front of you. But

34:15

we're not allowed to question the integrity of the poll.

34:17

We're heard. Right? I mean, it's just it's a

34:19

joke. These things are being done like this

34:21

in my opinion to create a situation where these can

34:23

be manipulated. Now look, I'm not just I should

34:25

have said this in the beginning. I I often do

34:28

this when where I assume that you guys know my previous

34:30

dance, but I forget that there are new people on the show

34:32

and so on. What I'm doing by going

34:34

through all of this is

34:36

showing you how the

34:38

situation itself is being shown to

34:40

us to be broken. Now I truly think it's because

34:42

of what they want to present. You I should my

34:44

my point was I should have been outwardly clear from

34:47

the beginning for the new people that I don't think this even tally. Your votes don't make

34:49

a difference in this situation. I'm sorry to

34:51

say that. I think it's very obvious

34:53

throughout history, for example,

34:56

just like this, Clint Curtis in the past voting machine argues the

34:58

stealing the manipulation. Everything you've

35:00

seen from Biden's, from Trump's, to Obama's,

35:02

to Bush's, to all these elections,

35:04

to their constantly being shown to cheat and

35:06

manipulate.

35:06

Then ultimately, it's not your

35:08

votes don't translate into who gets

35:10

elected. that

35:12

doesn't mean that your votes don't have some kind of influence. I don't know for sure,

35:14

but I do know that we've seen provably that

35:16

those things get manipulated to the

35:18

point to where it does not translate

35:20

into who ultimately goes into power. I just I just I

35:23

I know people don't want to accept that

35:25

on this amazing day of election, but we

35:27

need to understand

35:30

that. I I, you know, at the very least,

35:32

question if that's possible. And if you're not willing to even entertain that idea,

35:34

that in and of itself shows you

35:36

something. But back to the

35:38

open the poll point, California

35:40

election results expected to be delayed for days. Why?

35:43

Same exact reason. What an

35:45

interestingly, perfectly simultaneous and

35:48

total coincidence that it's happening

35:50

everywhere. Weeks in some

35:52

Los Angeles areas. My God.

35:54

Weeks. Weeks and weeks and weeks and weeks. The

35:56

point is they're having issues

35:58

with the the bail the the the

35:59

the the mail ballots, the the machines, the minute

36:01

everywhere. Everywhere. Same thing here. Davidson County

36:03

voters

36:03

expressed their frustration after ballot

36:06

mix ups.

36:08

Davis

36:08

and county officials released a ten page list of voters who

36:10

in fact received incorrect ballots, and more

36:12

than four hundred and thirty voters were given

36:14

incorrect ballots and cast votes in

36:17

the wrong places. I mean, this has just

36:19

fallen apart left and right. Ballant returned deadline

36:21

to be extended now in Georgia

36:24

for over a thousand voters

36:26

who just not sent requested mail

36:28

balance. Now,

36:28

here's an interesting point that

36:31

I want to include. that

36:35

I'm I'm this is on November third. I'm sure many people saw this, but

36:37

realize that there's already been an example. This is what

36:39

I think is so hilarious in a

36:41

Macao sort of way. I

36:44

guess that's not the right word, but just I get anxious hilarious because people are ridiculous.

36:46

But the point did, you

36:48

can't question

36:48

this. Right? Especially

36:50

from a you know,

36:51

right leaning stock. You can't question

36:54

the integrity of the election. How dare you accept

36:56

Trump was elected by Putin, though? There, that's

36:58

okay. But the

37:00

point is, there's already been an example

37:02

of somebody being involved with election fraud. And yes, they got

37:04

fired. But

37:05

that doesn't matter in the

37:06

context of whether it's clearly

37:09

people are willing to cheat

37:11

because they've been convinced that this is the most of our election

37:13

of our lifetime.

37:14

Right? Every time. Donald

37:17

Donald

37:17

Donald points out, holy s,

37:20

Kimberly Zapda, the deputy director of the city

37:22

of Milwaukee election commission. So not

37:24

some little puls her, this is

37:26

a big time deputy director of the city of Milwaukee election commission, was fired

37:28

for committing election fraud by obtaining

37:30

fake military

37:32

ballots and sending them to

37:34

Assembly election committee chairman

37:36

general

37:36

the yeah know Brand

37:38

agenda. Okay. So

37:40

cheating. Right? Knowingly doing so because she wanted to make sure her

37:43

person won. There's no misunderstanding that and was

37:45

fired for it. Naked footsteps in and says

37:47

so, the Democratic mayor caught

37:50

it. fired the offender, and the offender is likely to face criminal charges. It

37:52

seems like the system worked exactly how cheap it,

37:54

just like with the receiving the

37:57

scene fella fellow. if

37:58

this one official was quickly caught from merely requesting

37:59

ballots. Okay. You get the point where that's going.

38:02

Well, first

38:03

of all, you

38:05

If

38:06

that isn't exactly what happened, you may argue that, but you still have

38:08

to acknowledge that people in politics,

38:11

cheat. Simple

38:13

the do that thought. You

38:14

can say it's one percent. You can say it's ninety nine percent, but it happens. Same thing

38:16

we talk about with COVID and all this stuff, but they would

38:18

nope. Nope. Fake news. No. Can't even ask

38:22

the question. because

38:22

you don't like it challenged. But here is what science chimes in says, the

38:24

Democratic mayor caught it because the Baltics

38:26

were sent to a Republican

38:27

city council member who

38:30

alerted authorities. Are you implying that

38:32

everyone who gets a fraudulent ballot will alert the

38:33

authorities? I mean, you see the point this guy is that this

38:35

and the heat reaction response is good

38:38

point for everyone's never lying.

38:40

This is their I

38:40

didn't see that responses either way. I thought he was going but he's not. Regardless, guys,

38:43

the problem is that this was already done. Now,

38:45

this is no way to suggest that Republicans aren't

38:47

doing the same damn thing.

38:50

I I just don't know why. No. I I would like to believe that a lot of

38:53

Republicans average people perceive

38:55

themselves as being the side not

38:57

willing to cheat and so on,

39:00

but they're the politicians? Not not even

39:02

close. A

39:02

hundred percent every single

39:04

one of them across the board in my opinion is absolutely

39:06

willing to do whatever it takes to keep

39:09

delight to you to achieve what they want.

39:11

Call

39:11

me a pessimist. Prove me wrong.

39:14

You show

39:14

me along the process of our elections

39:16

to now where I'm wrong.

39:18

and

39:18

I'll and I'll shut up it. but Ryan, this is

39:20

the

39:20

one. Okay. The only one out of

39:23

our history. The reality is guys that

39:25

it's always this way. We're

39:27

just seeing it more than ever. Milwaukee

39:30

elections official fired after allegedly

39:32

requesting military

39:34

talks catalog. Oh, it happened. Well, it's alleged, but she was fired for the

39:36

alleged the the allegation.

39:38

Yeah. Great job CNN. The point

39:40

is that they

39:42

just wanna a little bit of

39:44

doubt under this, but the

39:44

bottom line is fired fired for election

39:47

fraud. The official

39:49

the official Now, Alfred Desaias

39:50

from a international perspective says what

39:52

we should all be aware of by now,

39:54

but somehow can't manage to wrap our minds around

39:57

the US elections are such an exercise

39:59

in window

39:59

dressing. Make believe undemocratic

40:02

rituals, whether Democratic or

40:05

Democrat or Republican We will still get a

40:07

hawkish congress that will continue prioritizing war over peace and

40:10

giving billions to the military industrial complex. Oh

40:12

my god. Somebody who can see what's

40:14

going on. Now,

40:16

by the way, just case you forgot who he was, I've

40:18

interviewed him before, lawyer and

40:20

writer active in the field of human

40:22

rights and international law, serve

40:25

as the first UN independent expert on the promotion of a democratic

40:27

and equitable international order. So, you know, he

40:29

knows what he's talking about. And what he does

40:31

is go US is

40:34

not that. Isn't that perfect? Right?

40:35

So a guy whose literal job was

40:37

discussing Democratic situation is going, that's not what

40:39

the US government is. We need to see

40:41

this by

40:42

need to see this by now now.

40:44

And by the

40:45

way, most of these large countries in the west aren't also are also

40:47

not in that discussion. But I'm not I honestly

40:49

I don't even see an example anywhere that you could argue

40:51

with some kind of like

40:54

I mean, there are plenty of democracies out there. My

40:56

point is not to say that there are not situations where people

40:58

vote and it translates into somebody

41:01

coming into power. but there are other ways people can abuse

41:03

these situations. Like, especially like we can see from a

41:06

foreign policy perspective and abusing it that

41:08

way like the

41:10

US government But regardless of any of that, we can get into a whole

41:12

international discussion, which I love to have. The point

41:14

is where we are now, today, what we're

41:16

looking at, and

41:18

we just need to come to grips with what is in front of us as Americans today.

41:20

We can't change anything if we don't

41:22

first accept we have a problem. Now step

41:24

one, As Kevork al

41:26

Maysi, you know, these guys should be following as well as

41:28

by the way geopolitics and empire. I just

41:30

noticed him on the side here. As he

41:32

says, in Arabic, we say, different s,

41:34

different or same s, different smell, family friendly,

41:36

so SHIT And it's

41:38

the point, same, different smell. Endless

41:41

war, endless war, this regardless

41:43

of what side you pick. That's where we need to be at

41:45

today, guys, is realize, now I'm not even saying that

41:47

leads to we I don't know all the answers. I

41:49

don't have all

41:49

the solutions. but

41:52

I could damn sure tell you that doing the same thing will not

41:54

give you a

41:55

different result. Now here's the

41:58

last part on

41:58

the election

41:59

discussion today. Here's what CNN

42:02

Paulson is writing. Now just for

42:04

those, and again, I'm always willing to consider that I

42:06

could be wrong. In regard to in

42:08

this case, whether or not your vote translates. Now the thing I've always made

42:10

clear is that if you are ever going first of

42:12

all, it's your choice. I'm not telling you not

42:14

to do it. You wanna vote,

42:16

go vote. Like, every other thing

42:18

we talk about, wear a mask, wear a mask. I'll

42:20

I'll tell you I'll show you why you're wrong.

42:22

I'll try to prove to you that you're hurting yourself. Same

42:24

thing with the voting. I will do the

42:26

same thing. but you have a right to

42:28

do it if you believe in it. I've never tried to dissuade

42:29

anybody from doing so. I just try to let them know why I

42:31

think it doesn't translate the way they

42:33

think it does. and why in

42:35

some case it does give the you're essentially

42:38

saying, you know,

42:40

I I

42:40

six that

42:42

you're complicit essentially. Right? That you are consenting is what I'm looking

42:44

for. You are I'm consenting to let you

42:46

take my name and operate around the world

42:49

and do all the things that we're talking about that we know they're

42:51

doing and pretending they're fighting for freedom. That goes

42:53

for any government out there. It's

42:55

the same point. But if you're

42:57

ever gonna make a difference,

42:57

if there is any situation that is

43:00

still changing what's happening, it's local

43:02

politics.

43:02

Right? School board.

43:05

I

43:05

don't know what level I think it stops being or if any of

43:07

them, but the bottom line is if there ever is gonna be

43:09

something it's the local stuff. because you can argue, you

43:11

know, if your neighbor runs for school

43:14

board, that's That's pretty hard to pretend he's working for the CIA. It's

43:16

certainly possible. Right? Or anything

43:18

else. The point though is that you can get people in these

43:20

positions and you can't change stuff from a

43:22

local level. So

43:24

that's why I think this article

43:25

is being written. And what they're essentially turning this into is, oh,

43:27

the rage against the federal government is

43:29

now being pointed at the

43:32

local politics. not

43:34

because we

43:34

want change, but because, oh, they're they're

43:36

extremists and

43:37

they just hate

43:38

politics. They don't like democracy. Right?

43:40

It's just this clumsy that are completely

43:42

not rooted in reality, but it what's

43:45

interesting to me is I think it's

43:47

because they're genuinely concerned

43:50

about and this is a I think I've seen a lot of this happening in

43:52

the Republican discussion, which I think is smart,

43:54

turning around and focusing on the

43:56

local politics, the school boards. I saw this a

43:59

lot during COVID. where a lot of the the Republican

44:01

groups in in in Tennessee were were saying

44:04

let's focus on the local politics, the

44:06

school board, you know, the the city

44:08

council and do things that way, and then

44:10

work your way up. I mean, that's smart.

44:12

And that's why I think this is happening. This is

44:14

October twenty eight. How rage turned into a

44:16

tactic in local politics? politics. Americans

44:18

are used are used to voters being

44:20

angry at Congress and the president. Yeah.

44:23

Gee, why? Because they're doing things

44:25

that make you angry. Well, it's funny, by the way, is that's a majority we're

44:27

talking about there. But there's a new vein

44:29

of anger directed at local officials in

44:31

a nationwide coordination

44:34

in campaigns to recall or intimidate

44:36

county supervisors and school board members.

44:38

Think about the Clay Travis and the

44:42

the open you know, the the statement that was made that echoed around

44:44

the country and was used to argue that

44:46

the the riot as well as independent

44:48

media were threatening school members

44:51

I was there when that happened. I was right in that same meaning.

44:53

I thought it was pretty interesting the way that

44:55

happened. But regardless, I think what

44:57

this shows you first of all is they're

44:59

pointing at democracy. They just don't like

45:01

it. like the times. Where go well, you know, all these these

45:04

Republicans are are campaigning to get

45:06

these different people in. That's

45:08

a problem. so you don't like

45:10

democracy then. Now let's

45:12

just say that these were all open nazis.

45:14

Right? Open, like, what

45:16

flag carrying marching nazi as

45:19

ridiculous as that just save for fun. That's what

45:21

it was. And then let's just say ninety

45:23

percent of Americans voted

45:26

them in. That's

45:28

democracy.

45:28

This is why there's

45:29

a problem here because people can

45:31

be manipulated, people can be radicalized, like

45:33

we know the government and the media

45:35

are actively doing while calling the objective and and

45:37

non partisan people the extremist. It's ridiculous. Now, we're gonna get to

45:39

a point about Israel in a minute that makes this

45:41

point even more

45:44

clear. because that's what just overwhelming

45:46

number of people in the country voted

45:48

in the most extreme racist

45:50

people you could possibly imagine.

45:54

We'll talk

45:54

about it in a second. But what's interesting

45:56

is that

45:56

they don't like that. They don't like

45:59

what they're seeing or

45:59

at least they're framing it like that,

46:02

but it contradicts what they already

46:04

said. We we want democracy,

46:06

except when they vote this way. Like, think about

46:08

how dumb that is and it's right on

46:10

the surface. But it goes on to say,

46:12

by the way, the intimidate County supervisors, that's just simply what they're these are people that

46:14

are going and saying, How dare you force my son

46:16

take an injection that will kill them? How dare you

46:20

make daughter wear a mask. That's anger. Not

46:22

intimidation. The problem is that they're trying to frame

46:24

it that way when these people are not actually

46:26

representing

46:26

the we're presenting their constituent their constituents. I

46:28

don't know that in across the board situation. I intimidation happening, but that's

46:31

not what they're really pointing at. They're pointing at

46:33

people trying to change things on a

46:36

local level. with the unapologetic use of threats and violence,

46:38

which by the way, let's just look at the link and see what they're

46:40

pointing at. First, on seeing election workers to

46:42

be trained

46:44

with deal to oh, got it. So not even an article pointing at any

46:46

actual violence, an article talking about how there will be

46:48

violence, and now we're training them to deal with that.

46:50

Thank you. Great job

46:52

seeing it. what a

46:54

dumpster fire these people are, but that's

46:56

their their source. With

46:58

the unapologetic use of threat, if you

47:00

have a sentence like that, you damn well better

47:02

prove it. not point to how you're training people to deal with the thing you say might

47:04

happen. That's disgusting. But it says it

47:06

signals a more confrontational local

47:08

politics and it may be driving

47:10

local officials. Okay?

47:12

So local officials are responding to the people that I

47:14

mean, show me where a crime is committed. First

47:16

of all, what's intimidation? Is there a crime taking

47:18

place? are you just simply saying that

47:20

them saying, you better do what you promised? That's

47:23

intimidation to them. You know it

47:25

is. We've already seen this happen. The point

47:27

is that they're pointing at all of this and they're saying, well, oh, officials are changing. Other

47:29

people are getting into power and we're not okay

47:31

with that. Well, guess what? That's

47:34

democracy, CNN. CNN's

47:36

Kyung Law, a national reporter

47:38

based in Los Angeles, has encouraged,

47:41

encountered,

47:41

excuse me,

47:42

the anger in her reporting from around

47:44

the country. There's

47:45

what's funny. She has

47:47

put together a new documentary about what she experienced.

47:49

Now let me how much you wanna bet. It says not

47:51

the fact that she just organically picked up around

47:53

the country and goes, I'm gonna make a documentary. How

47:55

much you want to bet CNN said, we want you to

47:57

make a documentary. Go find this. That's

47:59

the

47:59

way that actually works. They wanna frame it though

48:02

to her as if she just had this organic idea about

48:04

what I was experiencing, what's not what's going on?

48:06

She

48:06

has put together a new documentary, perilous

48:08

politics, America's dangerous divide. literally what

48:11

their job is behind the scenes and this is the point. That the that

48:13

actual documentary is meant to

48:15

divide. That one at how

48:17

angry and confrontate and confrontation

48:20

are infiltrating anger and confrontation

48:22

are infiltrating mainstream America.

48:24

Gee, I

48:26

wonder why. maybe because you're calling MAGA People the threat

48:28

of the Nazis that are gonna

48:30

destroy the country. Yeah. No.

48:31

No. That can't be it. It can't be

48:34

the the highest

48:34

authority in the country, framing fifty percent of the country

48:37

as threats and terrorists. That can't

48:39

be it. Right? Nah.

48:42

Christina, I didn't mention it, so it must not

48:43

be the case. Right? We just How

48:45

can you even

48:46

write stuff like this and not or how about the

48:48

fact that when you actually watch stuff

48:50

or read what they're talking about, there's not a single mention of any

48:52

left violence, despite the fact

48:54

that

48:54

that's just as prevalent, if

48:56

is prevalent if not more not more. then

48:58

it goes on under noticing a new rage. And this is, of course, an interview going

49:00

back and forth between Wolf Blitzer and

49:02

this journalist. But it says, as

49:05

a field reporter, I was

49:06

seeing this type of rage at the

49:07

local level and that has usually been aimed at the federal level,

49:09

the national level, anger over how Congress is

49:12

working or that the federal government is coming to take

49:14

our guns. Right?

49:16

Because that's happening. Because these people are not

49:18

representing you and what they're doing is

49:21

literally unconstitutional. Like the idea that it's wrong

49:23

for people to be angry

49:25

at powerful people who

49:26

aren't listening to what you want when they pretend they're

49:28

representing you, who

49:29

are forcing you on quarantine and forcing you

49:31

to take medical injections. I mean, oh, gee,

49:33

I wonder why they're angry. I

49:35

think

49:35

idea of taking your guns is literally what they're

49:38

doing. This isn't even a joke anymore.

49:40

They are openly discussing how they want

49:42

that to be the case. It's

49:44

everywhere. But

49:44

because it doesn't happen,

49:45

your conspiracy theorists are pointing at what they just

49:47

said, apparently. Now what we're seeing

49:50

is the wheels of democracy that are most

49:52

intimately aligned with your average

49:54

person, your school, your city, your local

49:56

election, all of that becoming the focus of

49:58

extremism. There it

49:59

is, and

50:02

extreme anger. There's no

50:04

examples

50:04

you see. This is just narrative. But

50:06

when you actually look at the information, what you

50:08

see is that these people are getting elected.

50:11

the people that were previously there don't want to be in the position

50:13

anymore. And you could say that's because they're scared or being

50:15

intimidated, but the bottom line is people are being

50:18

elected and they don't

50:20

like that. the big

50:22

the wheels of our democracy, like, they only care

50:24

about what they weigh. The democracy is only when

50:26

they want people like it and that happens.

50:28

Right? Well, they don't want Trump and he gets elected. That's

50:30

not democracy. That's Russia. That's how dumb this is. And

50:33

what we're seeing is the same with is

50:35

the same rage that ugliness

50:37

in the national level across those spokes of

50:40

democracy, jamming in the small spokes of

50:42

democracy. Right. So is it the

50:44

same as the democracy taking place

50:46

in Ukraine? they're

50:47

sure as hell violence guiding that democracy. Right? You know,

50:49

that's not what we're talking about. Of

50:50

course not. But, you know, just anger

50:51

over here. Oh,

50:54

the streamest. but

50:56

make sure they fund those nazis over there to keep the freedom rolling.

50:58

It is it is having a significant impact

51:00

on how our communities function. Wolf

51:04

says, I love this too. This

51:06

is a question by Wolf the

51:08

journalist. A lot of these threats that you

51:10

document were aspired by COVID-nineteen.

51:12

Therefore, I've stated that fact with nothing to back it up. Let me then pose

51:14

the question. Have they dissipated with

51:16

the end of the pandemic? They

51:20

love that? A lot

51:21

of these threats are because COVID, can

51:23

you quantify that? Can you prove your statement? Nah.

51:25

They don't need any of that. Narrative. Now

51:28

question based on

51:30

Narrative. Go. This

51:30

is the current state of corporate journalism. Well, the pandemic's

51:32

over.

51:32

Have their craziness dissipated? because you know

51:35

what they're saying? It's the right. in

51:37

their minds, there's no there's no pandemic madness from the

51:39

left. No, no, no, it's all the right.

51:41

No,

51:41

they have changed. For example, in

51:44

this county, first it was masks,

51:46

and then it became critical race

51:48

theory. This large bucket item of critical

51:50

race theory fueled by conservative media.

51:52

Yeah. Because it's totally on it's totally

51:54

allowable and totally unjustified for

51:56

them to take issue that

51:57

that did make sense. It totally unjustified for them

51:59

to

51:59

take issue with the fact that you're

52:02

literally few teaching

52:04

children races You're you're literally training them to hate white

52:06

people. I mean, it's just in

52:08

case you have a look into this, these are the some

52:10

of the things from critical race theory are that you if

52:12

you're white, You are racist.

52:14

And if you're not white, then you can't be racist.

52:16

That's literally what it's

52:18

saying. This is the This

52:19

is woke madness. And

52:21

the point is that they have an

52:22

issue with that and teaching their kids to

52:24

be racist, and that's extreme. Oh,

52:26

and they were

52:27

talking mask, extreme.

52:30

not even their own people agree

52:31

with this stuff. It says, and then

52:33

it became transgender rights.

52:36

Right. So

52:36

not transgender rights. It's the

52:39

fact that you have dancing naked stripper

52:41

transpeople

52:41

in front of our children pretending

52:43

to read the books. That's the problem, but

52:45

you make it transgender rights like we're concerned about the fact these people

52:47

can exist. Some of them may be, but that's not

52:49

the issue across the board from the

52:52

general discussion. but

52:54

it says it's happening everywhere. Right? How dare they have

52:56

opinions about how their children should be raised?

52:58

What extremists? I hope our

53:00

viewers walk away with this understanding that

53:03

while stopped these communities, while we've stopped in these

53:05

communities, it is a problem that is ubiquitous in American

53:08

society

53:10

right now. viewing

53:12

violent threats as a legitimate form of

53:14

pressure. Okay? What about

53:16

antifa? What about black lives matter? What about the

53:18

idea that sometimes it takes a little bit of a I

53:20

mean, the hypocrisy

53:24

is

53:24

overwhelming.

53:26

They've

53:26

talked about this left and right

53:29

across the board. their kind

53:30

of violence is acceptable, but we can't have intimidation.

53:32

You see, they're not even talk you

53:34

point to me where somebody has actually violently

53:37

done something in context. They they didn't

53:39

have their examples. But what they're saying is, that's where

53:41

it's going. Oh,

53:44

no.

53:44

that guy's a little too excited about the

53:46

fact that his children being taught to be racist, he's

53:48

gonna become a violent terrorist tomorrow, except let's

53:51

promote this black lives matter violent

53:53

road protest that's led into a lot of

53:55

people breaking windows and doing all sorts of stuff that they

53:57

don't talk about. Now, of course, that's not everybody, just like

54:00

it's not everybody, the

54:02

other side. But

54:02

it's hypocrisy. People are leading local

54:04

government. Okay.

54:06

okay Is

54:08

that I mean,

54:10

this

54:10

is democracy. This is the point. Same point.

54:12

It's the end of

54:13

the day they're choosing. Nobody's dragging

54:15

them out by the neck.

54:17

Right? them deserve

54:18

that and I'm not calling for violence. These are

54:20

the people who deserve a voice. Okay. So

54:22

what they're ultimately saying is you don't.

54:25

Right? You people with your anger and

54:27

your opinions. You know, there's a voice. You

54:29

there's a voice are the local politicians.

54:31

The people who are being boxed out

54:34

essentially who are being voted out. We need to make

54:36

sure their voices get amplified. And there is your

54:38

illusion of media. We're like, we're gonna make them

54:40

more prominent and suddenly they appear more prominent. That's what's

54:43

happening. Now, this is a problem for

54:45

them that you're leaning into local politics. Don't

54:47

be what they think you

54:49

are. As Wall Street Silver points

54:52

out, just to make sure we

54:54

understand left right illusion, the

54:56

federal budget last year was six

54:58

point eight trillion dollars or about sixteen point

55:00

eight billion dollars a

55:02

year. Now, yes, it's gone up a lot since

55:03

Ukraine as well, but that was the same way

55:06

during Trump

55:06

every single year, the

55:08

same way with Obama. It just increases with

55:10

every reason, everything they're doing. It's the

55:12

same thing. The thing that never changes exactly

55:14

what you're looking at and war.

55:16

That means the government would spend the entire wealth of Jeff Bezos or

55:19

Elon Musk in under two

55:22

weeks. A wealth tax of a hundred

55:24

percent on the entire Forbes four

55:26

hundred list wouldn't even pay for

55:29

two months

55:30

spending of spending. Can you

55:32

imagine what that money would do for the American

55:34

people? Yeah. In case you thought

55:36

that was what was happening, no, that's not what's happening.

55:39

The vast, vast fast

55:41

majority is war.

55:43

endless war out of the guise of freedom

55:46

that's being used to keep you

55:48

in check. Which now, in

55:50

fact, is being aimed at your body. It's disgusting.

55:52

Now, to talk

55:54

about Ukraine and foreign

55:57

policy before we finish with the

56:00

discussion of Omnicron and the very

56:02

important study. Breakthrough news

56:04

points out, again, it's the same context of what we're just discussing about the very

56:06

government that we're pretending is about democracy.

56:08

The world says no

56:10

to the illegal US blockade of

56:12

Cuba for thirtieth year in

56:14

a row. Case you

56:16

misheard that for the thirtieth

56:18

year

56:18

in a

56:19

row. Where

56:20

they vote? and a

56:21

vast majority of people go, no, we don't agree with what

56:24

you're doing. Now, don't

56:26

forget, that throughout

56:27

that thirty year period, every single

56:29

moment they can, they

56:29

stand up and argue that the world agrees what they're

56:31

doing. because, you know,

56:32

don't forget, Bolton's called in

56:34

the trachea, or the

56:35

teary everybody called the

56:38

tricky of tyranny. That was Cuba. I

56:40

think Venezuela. And what

56:41

was the other one? Iran, maybe?

56:43

I think it was Iran. The

56:45

point is that that's if you're gonna stand up and act

56:48

like the the international community

56:50

agrees that Cuba is a threat to

56:52

terror terrorist threat. That's

56:52

what they do every single time

56:55

except there's your reality, right there in front

56:57

of you. The vote was

56:58

a hundred and eighty five to two

57:01

with

57:01

two abstentions. With only the

57:03

US, Israel, and Brazil, excuse

57:06

me, the US and Israel voting against

57:08

stopping it with Ukraine and Brazil simply

57:10

abstaining. Think

57:12

about how stark that is. It's illegal.

57:14

You're hurting people. You know who suffers from

57:17

a thirty year blockade, the

57:19

average people. Clearly, the

57:21

government's not problematic. thirty years. We go

57:23

to thirty years, but the people suffer. Welcome to

57:26

the future of Syria. Welcome to the future of

57:28

any of these locations where they're gonna maintain this.

57:30

Look what's going on

57:32

in Syria. you know, long they've stopped a set, well, they're still doing what they're doing

57:34

on the ground, stealing burning wheat

57:36

fields, taking oil, but

57:39

they're maintaining destabilization. That's

57:42

what's

57:42

happening. It's happening in Yemen. There's been decades in

57:44

Yemen. It's still happening. It's still there's

57:46

a casual discussion of the worst humanitarian crisis

57:48

in the

57:49

world. No big deal. as

57:51

they're openly and illegally blockading the flow of food

57:53

and water and medicine or rather just, you know, food and water

57:55

and then attacking the water infrastructure? Yeah, that's

57:58

that's

57:58

a public discussion a public

58:00

discussion. But

58:00

but democracy and freedom though. Right? we care human life. I'm

58:03

speaking as the disgusting governments.

58:05

Right? Think about how

58:07

crazy this is. As

58:10

he points out, the only country is to

58:12

not vote against the blockade, Israel, Ukraine, Brazil.

58:14

And then it says the is

58:16

as the

58:19

Oh, in the US. Yeah. Obviously. Yeah. And that's

58:21

the point. It's a US blockade. These

58:24

are the criminals guys at the end of the day. And I'm not saying

58:26

any other governments for the most part

58:28

any better. But from an American perspective, these people are doing

58:30

bad, wrong. They're hurting people.

58:32

There is no benefit to national security

58:34

to you, to anything happening here other than

58:36

to control. many

58:38

different things. And there's a whole discussion to get into when it comes to Cuba.

58:40

But you know the conversations we've had about what's happening

58:42

with Yemen and Venezuela, the idea of what

58:45

they're ultimately trying to do. And

58:48

one of the main arguments is to keep

58:50

things problematic so the government

58:52

doesn't have one, a

58:54

successful country to point that. So you can always go look at how

58:56

bad it is. Look at what their their terrible

58:58

governance is doing to the people even though with them,

59:00

just like with the Braun and everywhere else. On top

59:02

of that, it keeps their people unhappy, so

59:04

they pressure the government to change. If somebody

59:06

to step in and remove them. This

59:08

is called regime change. Not about democracy,

59:11

it never has been. Now,

59:13

Sarah Abdul points out, this while they lecture

59:15

the world about human rights, the US drops

59:17

an average of forty six

59:19

bombs a day. Why should the world see the United

59:21

States as a force for peace? The

59:24

US has dropped at least three hundred and thirty seven

59:26

thousand bombs and missiles in

59:28

twenty years And now,

59:30

consciousness is pearls over

59:32

Russia. Now no one's trying to argue that what Russia

59:34

is doing is is, well, you know, you can't everyone

59:36

should have their own opinion here at the end of the day and

59:37

we have that right. I

59:39

don't

59:39

support war in any sense. As I've

59:41

always maintained, I don't support

59:42

them because what's going on at the end at the

59:45

end of the day is killing people. But It's

59:47

completely understandable why you can see what Russia did because

59:49

they've been forced into that position. You

59:51

could argue there's different things that could

59:53

have been done. But

59:56

who knows? At the end of the day, when you're driven there,

59:58

when you're murdering people on the ground, as I'm

1:00:00

speaking, as the Azov movement and so on,

1:00:03

the Don Bass region, Well, they're

1:00:05

obligated to do something about that if you believe their arguments. Still, I

1:00:08

don't agree with war, but if you can

1:00:10

understand why

1:00:12

it happened. And

1:00:13

here we're looking at a situation where they're screaming

1:00:15

and crying foul while doing

1:00:16

the exact same thing everywhere else.

1:00:19

That

1:00:19

those are bad people. And on

1:00:21

top of that, the US government just send the Ukrainian fascist

1:00:24

four hundred million more dollars in

1:00:26

weapons. Four hundred million more.

1:00:26

I mean, how much what is this

1:00:29

is an endless tally? trillions and trillions of

1:00:31

dollars just flying over there, even though we

1:00:33

all know

1:00:34

what's really going

1:00:36

on. And, guys,

1:00:37

this is the autism movement as of

1:00:40

November

1:00:42

fifth. In the

1:00:43

United States, speaking

1:00:46

with MSNBC, That's just

1:00:46

not a joke, and this is literally what this is. And we can point out

1:00:48

on clue this is I usually do, not just Ozov

1:00:50

documents prove the CIA has been cultivating fascism

1:00:52

in Ukraine since at least nine forty

1:00:55

eight when it was the OSS. This is the

1:00:57

reality, and it's all documented just like with

1:00:59

the BlueJeans in Afghanistan. This was

1:01:02

a plan, and it built its still going right now

1:01:04

and they're basically public about

1:01:06

that. On top of that, these

1:01:08

people, the awesome movement, which is a

1:01:10

movement, as I've made endlessly clear,

1:01:12

and as usual, pretty

1:01:14

early in the conversation. So now it's only

1:01:16

just now bubbling the surface and all of

1:01:18

our extensive work on it. It's gonna

1:01:20

be ignoring until the bigger guys

1:01:22

point at it, but the point is that this is

1:01:24

very obvious and always has been. But

1:01:26

these

1:01:26

people are fascist neo Nazis

1:01:28

and in fact actual Nazis.

1:01:30

they're

1:01:30

they're across the board. They're at high level positions in the government. They are the

1:01:32

police force. They are the the it's it's I

1:01:35

mean, I've gone over this extensively. and

1:01:38

have their international arms. It's not just some little

1:01:40

regiment if

1:01:41

they've got an international representation and

1:01:43

politicians that do so. Right? We've seen

1:01:45

them the Charlottesville march

1:01:48

the rise above movement. That was the Azov movements international

1:01:50

arm. Newsweek wrote about it for

1:01:52

crying out loud. They've got presence in Germany

1:01:54

all around the world. So when

1:01:57

you see

1:01:57

that March used to argue the right or Nazis and

1:01:59

to realize the

1:01:59

CIA has been the group that funded them who then

1:02:02

ended up having international arm that

1:02:04

created that

1:02:06

march G,

1:02:06

could it possibly

1:02:08

be organized? It's everywhere.

1:02:10

But normalization of nazis, exactly.

1:02:14

And why it really points out last year, and this blows my mind

1:02:16

that this wasn't I mean, it shows you how

1:02:18

controlled the media is. Only

1:02:20

two countries, the US and Ukraine,

1:02:23

Voted against a UN resolution that simply

1:02:26

condemned the glorification of nazism.

1:02:28

That's not a joke. I couldn't believe it

1:02:30

didn't get more discussion when

1:02:32

it happened. of

1:02:32

all people, US and Ukraine, while we're literally going Ukraine is

1:02:34

literally overrun by Nazis andbatches,

1:02:36

and they vote against the condemning

1:02:38

that and if nothing. No comment.

1:02:42

Guess what? This year, it

1:02:43

was fifty two. Fifty two

1:02:45

different countries voted against condemning

1:02:47

the glorification of Naziism. How do you

1:02:49

even how

1:02:52

We

1:02:52

have to even make sense of that.

1:02:54

Of course, it's gonna be all

1:02:55

the people you expect. There is

1:02:57

a major push

1:02:58

to normalize Nazis, but it's not

1:03:01

coming from Kairi and Kanye, it's coming

1:03:03

from our

1:03:04

government. What's interesting you

1:03:05

can look through

1:03:07

these and see, some

1:03:10

obvious interesting choices like

1:03:12

Israel. Right? How can

1:03:14

you even explain that? Anyway,

1:03:16

they were The

1:03:18

point is, guys, this is not what it looks like, and it never has been.

1:03:20

And here's an an insulting example of how

1:03:22

they project what they want you to see as

1:03:24

a a Melanie Jolie. FROM

1:03:27

THE -- I BELIEVE IT WAS. SHE'S

1:03:29

MINISTER OF FORN Affairs OF

1:03:32

CANADA ON THE

1:03:32

INTERNATIONAL DAY TO END IN PUTITY FOR

1:03:35

CRIMES AGAINST JOURNALISTS, REALLY? We won't

1:03:37

let journalist censorship persecution in-depth be invisible

1:03:39

to society except when we do it.

1:03:41

Except when we don't want you talking about it. Right?

1:03:43

Except when it's duly

1:03:46

this on. accept, accept, accept. Right? What we're just gonna sell you on

1:03:48

that? Well, funding Nazis who are

1:03:50

literally murdering journalists in

1:03:52

real time or in fact

1:03:54

bombing locations where they are, like, with Eva

1:03:56

Bartlett, and that was the

1:03:56

same group I'm talking about. But she's alive

1:03:58

is my point. She

1:03:59

chimes in and says, It says, we believe

1:04:01

that knowing the truth is protecting the

1:04:04

truth. Guys, people are disgusting. This is my this is

1:04:06

my point. That is the worst

1:04:08

of the worst of

1:04:10

the worst. You

1:04:11

believe that Melanie Jolie doesn't know about Jolie

1:04:14

and Assange? You pretend that she doesn't isn't

1:04:16

aware of how Canada is actively prosecuting journalists

1:04:18

that just don't say what they're supposed to?

1:04:21

that

1:04:21

they're were censoring people for saying wrong. I

1:04:23

mean, this is crazy. So these

1:04:24

people are worse than the ones

1:04:27

that actively stand up and

1:04:28

say, I do bad things. because

1:04:29

they're bad too.

1:04:30

These people do bad things, then stand up and go, I

1:04:33

do good things. Disgusting, like the worst of

1:04:34

the worst. And the bartlett

1:04:36

says, then

1:04:37

don't just virtue signal. tell

1:04:40

Ukraine to shut down. I forget how to pronounce this.

1:04:42

MyroTrevorats. It's the website where they

1:04:44

have a list of journalists that they wanna kill. And I

1:04:46

mean, all sorts of people on there.

1:04:49

Catalyst

1:04:49

journalist herself included along with

1:04:51

three hundred twenty seven children

1:04:52

and Ukrainian civilians acted as

1:04:55

political figures and it's openly been

1:04:57

used to take people out. and

1:04:58

did a whole segment

1:04:59

on this. But apparently she doesn't know that because she's

1:05:01

either too stupid to see what's happening or

1:05:04

actively doesn't

1:05:06

care. Either way, she shouldn't be somebody who's telling people what is right and wrong.

1:05:08

But Ukrainian president's office calls

1:05:10

on the world to recognize

1:05:12

Iran as

1:05:15

complicit. Isn't that isn't this just completely expected? I

1:05:17

mean, the whole drone conversation

1:05:18

is actually been disputed, at least

1:05:20

by Iran, by arguing, well, we sent drones

1:05:23

in the beginning, but haven't since then,

1:05:25

regardless. III don't even know if I believe that. I have no doubt that

1:05:27

Iran has been helping in in in

1:05:29

many different ways with groups that are actively

1:05:31

fighting against what they

1:05:34

perceive as threat to them too. What's interesting to me

1:05:36

is that it doesn't matter. You're talking about

1:05:38

an ally providing weaponry in a

1:05:40

war to

1:05:42

its ally. Is that not what the around

1:05:44

does illegally and not wartime

1:05:46

with very, very, very, very bad people all

1:05:48

the time?

1:05:50

of

1:05:50

course, when their allies help each other, they have terrorism when it's a people we don't

1:05:52

like. It's just ridiculous the way this

1:05:54

is framed. But the interesting part about this is

1:05:56

how they're now pulling in Iran to

1:05:59

the conversation. and what

1:06:00

they're doing. That's been used to stop the discussions of the

1:06:03

JCPOA. Like like anybody ever believed that

1:06:05

Biden was different than Trump, and then he

1:06:07

weren't gonna do the same agenda It's

1:06:09

all narrative. It's all speaking about. We're

1:06:11

gonna stop the war and up there. We're gonna what

1:06:13

was it? Oh, Venezuela. We're gonna do this with Iran, and

1:06:15

all these things don't come to pass. Even the

1:06:18

Afghanistan conversation, It's not what it

1:06:20

appears to be. If you really believe the US

1:06:22

government is not active in Afghanistan, you're not

1:06:24

paying attention. There are mercenaries, there are

1:06:26

people involved, they have their own people on the ground that they've

1:06:28

been trained, its own illusion, guys. Just like everything

1:06:30

else we continue to see.

1:06:32

This is my opinion is about

1:06:34

drawing Iran into the conversation so it

1:06:36

can be

1:06:38

argued that mean, look at what they've been doing with the I the phantom of a

1:06:40

decade. Israel just bombs wherever it was

1:06:42

and just goes Iran was there. No one

1:06:44

needs to approve it. Nobody even

1:06:45

cares to question it.

1:06:47

They okay, Iran, bad guy. Here we go.

1:06:49

Now it's perfect. Now Iran's on the ground and

1:06:51

in Ukraine, and that's essentially what they're doing. And

1:06:53

what Ukraine is saying is they want the world

1:06:55

to recognize the the narrative

1:06:57

spinning that that is the case because we said so.

1:07:00

Well, sure enough, they

1:07:00

go, okay, you said so, we agree because that's

1:07:03

what we do now as we blindly

1:07:05

regurgitate whatever Ukraine says is happening. Iran

1:07:08

must recognize the consequences

1:07:09

of complicity. Now

1:07:11

they're threatening Iran. That's

1:07:13

actually what's

1:07:13

happening. They're saying, oh, well, the the

1:07:16

consequences of your complicity, which means

1:07:18

what? Army their ally.

1:07:20

Right. Exactly. now becomes a dirty

1:07:22

thing that you're helping them win a war that

1:07:24

they're involved in just like the other side is doing.

1:07:26

Right? But

1:07:27

there's consequences to that. Now

1:07:29

what does that mean? What's

1:07:30

gonna what's gonna happen now? Is is Ukraine going to argue that

1:07:32

Iran is now a target? I

1:07:34

mean, you can see how wild it

1:07:35

is gonna spin out of control, and I think that's

1:07:38

exactly the

1:07:40

point. here's

1:07:40

an interesting part about this is they're trying to draw Iran. At the same

1:07:42

time, they're arguing that there's all these,

1:07:44

like, they're they're literally stoking divide

1:07:46

in Iran trying trying to pretend

1:07:49

like there's they're

1:07:49

making or trying to, I guess, try regime change. I don't

1:07:52

think it's actually working. I think people can

1:07:54

see that it's not what it appears to be

1:07:56

especially Iranian.

1:07:57

That's how I

1:07:58

think they've lost their

1:07:59

influence, the US government, around the

1:08:01

world in a really

1:08:02

obvious way. But as Hadi points out,

1:08:04

as they're screening about these people that are doing

1:08:08

bad, and claiming it's just it's freedom protest. Exactly the

1:08:10

opposite when, you know, Trump says

1:08:12

good people on both sides kind of

1:08:14

a thing. we have the example of people being burned alive

1:08:16

in the streets in Iran. And they were

1:08:18

like fighting for freedom. We support that. It's

1:08:20

like, it could be

1:08:22

some of it. I do believe it started that way, but I don't think

1:08:24

that's what's happening now as Robert's written

1:08:26

about. As he

1:08:27

points out here,

1:08:29

massive. Millions of

1:08:32

patriotic Iranians in nine hundred cities. It's crazy.

1:08:34

Our taking the streets in this by the way was on the fourth, to mark

1:08:36

the anniversary of

1:08:39

the US in embassy takeover and to oppose

1:08:42

the violent foreign backed riots. Because they clearly see this is a US Saudi kind

1:08:46

of manipulation, The media won't show you this, anti government riots couldn't even

1:08:49

fill one street. Look at how gigantic

1:08:51

this is. There's

1:08:52

a reason they're not

1:08:54

showing you And they are standing up against

1:08:56

this, and the reality is

1:08:58

that this is the

1:08:59

majority of people that

1:09:00

can clearly see through what the US has

1:09:03

done in Iran in the past. That's why

1:09:05

you see the woman funded by the CIA and a bunch of

1:09:07

Kurdish followers and MEK being driven into the street. To act

1:09:09

like they're everybody

1:09:12

in Iran, and they KJP type stand

1:09:14

up and dutifully go everybody in Iran and we support them while ignoring things like this.

1:09:17

And this

1:09:20

is how the Western Saudi funded and trained thugs attack

1:09:22

Iranian police. Now, does this everybody? No, I will not be as stupid as they

1:09:25

are and do the same thing in reverse. I know if is

1:09:27

everybody the street, but I do know based on the

1:09:30

research so far that the the majority of

1:09:32

what we see in

1:09:34

these big protests are quite

1:09:36

violent. And that's that's reported by

1:09:38

local people. It's reported by everybody except the media who wants to fray, and this is a freedom peace rally. Right?

1:09:40

Last Friday, these killers

1:09:42

attack three officers.

1:09:43

The police, Right?

1:09:46

So the the authorities in the ground, the US government pretend

1:09:48

they're fighting for with as the

1:09:51

officers

1:09:51

officers were treated into the police vehicle,

1:09:53

they called on the riders to stop. They

1:09:55

were then beaten badly and repeatedly stabbed by

1:09:57

these people. These are the people that the US government are supporting. And

1:09:59

in this case,

1:09:59

this is what

1:10:01

we're talking about. Is it

1:10:03

everybody? I don't know. But

1:10:05

these are some of

1:10:07

the involved with blindly supported.

1:10:19

oh

1:10:29

Yeah. You know, good people fight for freedom. You know?

1:10:31

Now, at the end of the day, people have

1:10:33

their opinions, but what we're seeing

1:10:35

here is violence. Belligerent,

1:10:39

unjustified

1:10:39

violence against a police officer who

1:10:41

was trying to move, trying to go

1:10:44

away. That's what they're supporting.

1:10:45

And by and large, what's according

1:10:48

to Robert plenty of others reporting on this is

1:10:50

what we're ultimately seeing. Now, on top of all of this, guess what? Let's not post pretend like it's totally

1:10:52

not connected to the calls for Iran

1:10:54

to be

1:10:55

they're involved. Are you Ukraine

1:10:58

and the US acts. The United

1:11:00

States sends military aircraft towards Iran that's

1:11:02

meant to be a threat after

1:11:04

we're sheet recent reports that Iran is preparing

1:11:07

an attack on Saudi Arabia. And we already reported this, all

1:11:07

of this is spinning out of what none of

1:11:10

this is verified. None of

1:11:12

it.

1:11:13

none of it United States

1:11:15

sent warplanes towards the towards Iran

1:11:17

according to the Washington Post, awarded AZ poll

1:11:19

geopolitics. And the reality is that this

1:11:21

is meant to be a threat based on the narrative

1:11:23

they're spending by acting like, well, Ron's doing this, and they're threatening

1:11:25

that, and they're doing this in Ukraine. Well, that's what

1:11:28

you said, and then you're pointing

1:11:30

at your own statements to justify more

1:11:32

action. That's

1:11:33

exactly like the FBI leaking reports to the media that are pointing

1:11:35

at those reports as proof or rather as evidence that justifies their

1:11:40

investigation. Well,

1:11:40

they evidence is an evidence

1:11:41

because you link it to them. Then you pointed it to justify what you want. It's

1:11:43

the same idea. We are playing

1:11:45

by these people in every

1:11:48

possible moment. Now here,

1:11:50

the point that I

1:11:50

was gonna tell you about Israel to finish this off. Now, this is the frustrating part about this.

1:11:52

As they're all arguing, oh,

1:11:54

we're fighting against bad guys and

1:11:58

streamism and all the stuff they're pointing at.

1:11:59

Right? All the evil right

1:12:02

in their extremism except we

1:12:04

support Ukraine and their

1:12:06

wildly extremist open mentality. Oh,

1:12:08

they're openly extremist mentality,

1:12:10

and they support Israel, who

1:12:11

just enshrined even

1:12:16

more so that they are actively supporting the extremist mentality.

1:12:18

Now, here's an important point to make. Like I always say

1:12:20

that we

1:12:20

Did just like in the

1:12:22

just like

1:12:23

in any country could point

1:12:25

that that the government, if powerful

1:12:28

enough, if influential enough, can influence

1:12:30

people to adopt their extremist views.

1:12:32

I I I've maintained for the longest time

1:12:35

that by and large, the Zionist mentality is the problem here. There's plenty of Jewish

1:12:37

people that do not agree with

1:12:38

the government, and in fact, actively

1:12:42

and aggressively speak out against the kind of

1:12:44

things that they're doing. So to make this just

1:12:47

about Jewish people is ridiculous.

1:12:48

Now, but that being said,

1:12:50

what we're

1:12:51

talking about is a country in Israel,

1:12:53

occupy Palestine. We're talking about Israel

1:12:55

and the Jewish population they're in, and as well

1:12:57

as the people that are I actually, as far

1:12:59

as I understand it, most Palestinians, by

1:13:01

and large, can't even vote in this context or aren't allowed to in certain ways

1:13:03

or certainly the restricted. But the

1:13:06

bottom line is, the

1:13:08

vote

1:13:08

seventy

1:13:09

percent plus of the Jewish community absolutely voted for

1:13:11

the extremist, openly racist party. So that has to

1:13:13

be taken into consideration. That is

1:13:15

just the reality. So

1:13:19

ask yourself what that means, but realize that there's

1:13:21

a lot of

1:13:21

other people in there that do not

1:13:24

agree with that. So the still the

1:13:26

idea that we could just broad brush this

1:13:28

or that is just it's

1:13:30

it's meant to be divisive and it's meant to be

1:13:33

what's

1:13:35

the right word? subjective, I guess,

1:13:37

or just broad. Like, they wanna take include everything. The same way

1:13:39

that the the left or Biden is saying that

1:13:41

magna is all this. It's

1:13:43

the same thing. We

1:13:46

need to connect the dots how these same toys are used around the but this is

1:13:48

important. this

1:13:50

report

1:13:53

No. 00I

1:13:53

forgot to grab those links. I'll I'll grab as I go over right

1:13:55

here. Perfect. Oh,

1:13:57

you've got to

1:13:59

be getting That's

1:14:03

frustrating.

1:14:04

Well,

1:14:05

I'll

1:14:07

do my

1:14:08

best. I hadn't

1:14:10

highlighted for those in the podcast, but I'm sure I could pick

1:14:11

out the parts

1:14:14

I wanted.

1:14:17

I'm

1:14:17

trying to suppress my frustration. Okay. This was written

1:14:19

on the sixth article

1:14:23

entitled Netanyahu will

1:14:24

victory will

1:14:26

mean massive escalation in Palestine Israel conflict. Now it says the former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin

1:14:28

Netanyahu came out of

1:14:29

Israel's latest round of elections

1:14:32

with a comfortable

1:14:35

majority over his center right wing adversaries with the

1:14:37

aid of fellow far right alliances as

1:14:39

part of the Netanyahu block. Now

1:14:42

it says, yeah, this election is reportedly surpassing seventy

1:14:45

percent of the people came

1:14:47

out to vote.

1:14:50

Now, of course, this is Netanyahu.

1:14:52

Netanyahu. Right? The the person the

1:14:54

last person I wanna see in

1:14:56

power who still right now is

1:14:58

facing ongoing corruption charges and trial. Ask yourself

1:15:00

how is the impossible, how it's seemingly been ongoing for an

1:15:02

endless period of time, multiple corruption allegations, and now is being reelected.

1:15:06

What did I tell you? But the point is is going

1:15:09

along with some very,

1:15:11

very unsavory characters. Now,

1:15:13

the

1:15:14

point was it says, I'm realizing there's some weird tech stuff right there,

1:15:16

in any case.

1:15:19

It says

1:15:20

the Israeli Prime

1:15:22

Minister and ruling party This

1:15:24

meant that they must put themselves at

1:15:27

the mercy of smaller parties and make

1:15:29

concessions because of how their core

1:15:31

coalition based system works. They it says

1:15:33

in order to and Yahoo's lucrative party represents a far right brand of

1:15:35

Zionism. They've and by the way, it's

1:15:37

interesting, isn't it that the

1:15:40

they're rep they're supporting the far right

1:15:42

version over there, but acting like far right is the problem here, and Ukraine Nazis over

1:15:44

there, acting like they're fighting

1:15:46

white supremacy over here. Like, How

1:15:49

do we know? This

1:15:51

is ridiculous.

1:15:52

Very transparent.

1:15:53

In fact, the inverse. But

1:15:55

it says, We're talking about

1:15:58

the

1:15:58

the party religious dynamism. And it says, whilst the fan the fanatical right wing majority

1:15:59

of the

1:16:03

voters continue to countless irrational arguments against what

1:16:05

they called the left in Israel referring to Yair Lappied and his

1:16:08

allies, one talking

1:16:10

point that are currently

1:16:12

espousing absolutely correct that the people of

1:16:14

Israel have spoken. The Jewish Israeli population turned out in large numbers to vote in the

1:16:16

last round and the majority chose

1:16:18

to elect a fanatical racist alliance.

1:16:22

And this is not an opinion, guys. These people and

1:16:25

I'll show you what I mean.

1:16:27

It's outspoken. Let's see.

1:16:30

try to find the

1:16:31

spots before I just wanna read

1:16:33

through it, it'll

1:16:34

take too long. It's saying the

1:16:36

third

1:16:36

largest list was the was

1:16:39

this that was elected to the true Connecticut, which

1:16:41

is Netanyahu's party, it

1:16:44

says, was religious

1:16:46

Zionism. filled with i e logs that represent the

1:16:48

most radical, fashistic version of

1:16:50

Zionist belief. Before explaining

1:16:52

what's right here, the

1:16:54

religious Zionism and its potential impacts, their

1:16:56

two central characters, Ben Gevir and Basileo. I

1:16:58

don't know in this pronounce his

1:16:59

last name who brought together

1:17:00

their parties to form the

1:17:02

strong alliance to see today.

1:17:05

I guess he's gonna say

1:17:07

it a

1:17:07

few times. So it's Smotrick. Smotrick

1:17:09

of the National Unity Tucma Party has called for

1:17:11

segregated maternity wards. These

1:17:15

are these are the people that your government supports while they're

1:17:17

calling for equity, sustainability, and non

1:17:19

racism. Right? That's

1:17:22

the reality. Well, of course, what it's interesting dynamic is we

1:17:24

can see that they're essentially trying to act

1:17:26

like we don't support Netanyahu. Right? Or

1:17:28

acting like some of these left individuals in the

1:17:31

US are upset about what happened in Israel. But the point Robert banks in here

1:17:33

is it's obvious this was where it was going and they

1:17:35

knew this and they supported

1:17:38

it up to now. but they make these kind of false arguments about why they're

1:17:40

upset about it now. But it goes

1:17:42

on to say he made argument, says

1:17:46

they've called for segregated maternity wards. to keep Jews away from Arabs openly,

1:17:48

pope openly discussed. He says the

1:17:50

Jews are forbidden by god from selling

1:17:52

property to Arabs. This this is

1:17:54

the party that Yahoo just won with.

1:17:56

And he also is so extreme that the

1:17:58

leading pro Israel group in the United Kingdom, the board of

1:17:59

deputies of British Jews, told him

1:18:02

to leave the UK for his

1:18:04

hate provoking

1:18:07

ideology when touring Jewish communities there,

1:18:09

but Ninja got elected is real,

1:18:11

and the US

1:18:12

the us government supports

1:18:14

government supports him. Now, Innomar Ben

1:18:15

Gevir, the the of the Jewish

1:18:18

power party, which is actually what it's

1:18:20

called. I mean, this is so ridiculous.

1:18:22

On the other hand, is an extremist

1:18:24

activist. former Koch

1:18:26

Party member and this disciple of Mir Kehan. Kehan's followers

1:18:29

have to take

1:18:32

called Kehan's which subscribed to

1:18:34

their former leaders' fascist anti Arab ideology. Mirkahan's Cox Party was so

1:18:37

extreme that it

1:18:40

was banned from the Israeli

1:18:42

knesset in nineteen eighty eight for being literally quote, manifest racist.

1:18:46

racist manifestly racist and

1:18:47

was later prescribed prescribed as a

1:18:50

terrorist organization in both Israel

1:18:52

and the United States but is now

1:18:54

in power with a no

1:18:55

right now. with Netanyahu.

1:18:57

Then Gevir or excuse me, the the guy who's I aligned

1:18:59

with that ideology. Then Gevir took over

1:19:01

as leader of the

1:19:03

Jewish power party replacing

1:19:07

its colleague Ben Zion Gopstein,

1:19:09

who was banned from running for

1:19:11

the connection over extreme

1:19:14

racist remarks. These

1:19:15

are the people of power. Goldstein remains

1:19:16

an ally of BeneVir and

1:19:19

heads up the Lahaaba

1:19:22

group which

1:19:22

advocates against mixing mixed

1:19:24

marriage marriages between Jews and Arabs.

1:19:26

Mohammed has also involved in the organizing

1:19:28

of the infamous death to Arab

1:19:31

marches which happened all the time. They're openly chanting this. Remember the guy

1:19:33

who got got the end carved in his dead

1:19:35

body? These are kind of

1:19:38

people we're talking about. Now, Gavir owns a home in an in illegal

1:19:40

settlement where he's got a photo of this

1:19:42

person who allegedly massacre twenty nine Palestinians

1:19:45

in his home, on his wall. Vengkabir's record

1:19:47

of racist statements against Palestinians and Arabs

1:19:49

is never ending. He's admitted its

1:19:51

fifth indictment being dited fifty three

1:19:53

times on charges from supporting

1:19:55

a terrorist group to racism and violence

1:19:57

against Arabs. The Jewish power Jewish power party was labeled

1:19:59

as quote,

1:20:00

racist and reprehensible

1:20:02

by none other than APAC.

1:20:06

twenty twenty one if you can believe that. The

1:20:08

pro Israel anti defamation

1:20:09

league, the ADL, has actually now

1:20:11

warned that the religious

1:20:13

Zionism

1:20:14

alliance, which just was elected,

1:20:16

Will hurt Israel globally? Why? Because

1:20:18

it shows you what they're openly believing?

1:20:20

Oh, outward racism

1:20:23

towards the Palestinians.

1:20:24

Ben Gevir and and Smotrick are and

1:20:26

just so it's clear, this is not my opinion. Guys, this is stated that

1:20:28

they're openly espousing these ideas,

1:20:31

but for me to point

1:20:34

it out and call that racist, then in turn gets

1:20:36

me called racist. That's how we're we're

1:20:38

well in and broken everything is

1:20:41

today. They're

1:20:41

apparently, they're vying for leading cabinet positions with Netanyahu's

1:20:43

government, which it which

1:20:45

neither

1:20:46

of them seem

1:20:48

to be backing down on, meaning that

1:20:51

they will have a direct impact on Tel

1:20:53

Aviv's policy. The religious Zionism alliance's major policy positions include

1:20:55

overhauling the judicial system, Great.

1:20:58

Introducing a death penalty for Palestinians who

1:21:01

killed Jews, but not the other way around,

1:21:03

introducing immunity laws for Israeli soldiers

1:21:05

so that they cannot be part Percy

1:21:07

prosecuted for war crimes. annexing the illegal

1:21:09

Israeli settlements in the West Bank

1:21:11

into Israel, which is

1:21:13

still a illegal always

1:21:16

has been. deporting Palestinian

1:21:16

citizens of Israel for disloyalty to the

1:21:18

Jewish state and stripping them of their Israeli citizenship in

1:21:21

addition to introducing long

1:21:23

term prison sentences for illegal

1:21:26

immigrants. The list goes on with

1:21:28

a ten point plan put forth by

1:21:30

religious Zionism, which

1:21:31

even includes changing the Jewish

1:21:33

law

1:21:33

of return, to literally prevent people who have

1:21:36

been o who only have

1:21:38

one Jewish grandparent, but are not

1:21:40

a Jew by Jewish law

1:21:42

from becoming an Israeli citizen. Right? because it's

1:21:45

not completely about a Supremus' mindset at all.

1:21:47

Right? Hey, this is wild.

1:21:48

You can check this all

1:21:50

for yourself.

1:21:50

I hope that you do.

1:21:53

I'm gonna leave it there just so

1:21:54

I don't wanna keep, you know, trying to read through it all. But the bottom line is, guys, this isn't oh,

1:21:56

here. Let let me grab

1:21:58

the other one too.

1:21:59

Just like, was what I

1:22:02

was trying

1:22:03

to open when I lost on my highlighting. Right here.

1:22:06

prayer

1:22:08

the

1:22:08

point is, these are human

1:22:10

rights organizations. The leading human rights organizations around

1:22:12

the world is really apartheid,

1:22:14

a threshold crushed, crossed, excuse me.

1:22:18

Here's Amos International. Israel's apartheid

1:22:20

against Palestinians. On top of that, let's

1:22:22

see

1:22:22

how do you spell it.

1:22:27

Here we go. It's but sell them. Alright?

1:22:29

These are in these are three

1:22:30

of the leading human rights organizations in the world. A

1:22:32

regime of Jewish supremacy from the

1:22:34

Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea

1:22:38

this is apartheid.

1:22:40

But apparently, it's racist to point out

1:22:42

what the leading human rights organizations are proving.

1:22:45

This is this

1:22:46

is what they support. While acting like they're fighting these things around the world, we're being gained if you believe

1:22:48

that

1:22:52

at all. Now, to finish

1:22:53

with the Ukraine part of it, as they're still pushing all of this,

1:22:55

acting like they're fighting this stuff, Ukraine prepares for nuclear strike by Russia.

1:22:57

Like, I can't have laughed out loud when

1:22:59

I read this today. Like,

1:23:02

this

1:23:02

whole conversation had just dissipated. You know why? Because

1:23:05

Russia came out in a very smart move and

1:23:07

said, miss nuclear missiles are

1:23:09

off the table. nuclear bombs are not gonna

1:23:11

be used by us, which completely screwed up

1:23:13

their narrative, isn't it? So now what they're

1:23:15

gonna do? He's lying. Of

1:23:17

course, that's what they say. Right? But clearly, and so the point is, all they can do is

1:23:19

act like they're still concerned because they pretend

1:23:22

that's what's going to happen.

1:23:24

pretend that's what's going to happen based

1:23:26

on literally nothing other than what Zelensky claims.

1:23:29

That's it. That's the point. The

1:23:31

Ukraine held exercises on

1:23:33

Tuesday to prepare for a nuclear

1:23:35

strike. as fears about the use of these weapons continue to grow, why

1:23:37

exactly would they continue to grow

1:23:39

when literally the conversation's not even being

1:23:41

had as much? And he already pulled

1:23:43

off the table. because

1:23:45

they need this to

1:23:47

keep the fear mongering going, Ukraine's western region announced its telegram channel

1:23:48

that drills were

1:23:51

to

1:23:51

be held. to

1:23:53

eliminate the consequences of a nuclear strike. So now we're rolling

1:23:55

drills to keep the narrative going because we're scared about things that are

1:24:00

not happening. It says officials also discussed

1:24:02

the use of personal protective equipment. Right? Because masks will stop you from dying a nuclear

1:24:04

holocaust. Right? But make sure

1:24:06

they wear masks though.

1:24:08

Right? That's

1:24:10

not pretend they're talking about hazmat suits or

1:24:12

even like like that that wouldn't even do anything.

1:24:14

The point

1:24:15

is it comes days after Putin oversaw

1:24:17

his military carrying out nuclear

1:24:19

exercises. They they say, in Russia, which

1:24:21

simply included the launching of missiles. Right? So that's them

1:24:23

going nuclear stuff because we say

1:24:25

that's what he wants

1:24:28

to do. The bottom line is even the

1:24:30

New New New Newsweek was forced to put the truth in here. The Russian leader has warned

1:24:32

about his readiness to

1:24:35

use all means available to

1:24:37

fend off attacks on Russian territory. So

1:24:39

you're literally saying his statement about how

1:24:41

he will defend himself

1:24:43

if you bomb him Is

1:24:46

him threat to nuclear war? Does he

1:24:49

I mean, that's that's the best

1:24:51

you can do? Zelensky,

1:24:53

the wednesday Newsweek,

1:24:54

media, government, that's

1:24:56

pathetic. At the very least,

1:24:58

why? Say, he

1:24:59

threatened this? which is what

1:25:02

you do elsewhere. No. He says, I'll do whatever it takes to defend myself. And that's that's that's

1:25:04

him threatening nuclear

1:25:07

war. Got it. US

1:25:09

president Biden added to this. So understand. That's that's what he says.

1:25:11

I'll I I said that from the beginning because

1:25:14

it was the truth. All he

1:25:16

said was, I reserve the right to defend myself where the

1:25:18

US government says, we'll do whatever it takes first or not or whatever. We'll reserve the

1:25:20

right to strike first the nuclear

1:25:23

weapons. They still maintain that. Viden

1:25:26

speaks up

1:25:26

and says, Putin's not joking about his threats to escalate war. His

1:25:28

threats by saying, I'll defend

1:25:30

myself if you bomb

1:25:32

me. That's

1:25:35

what he just said. Here's his actual quote. And I read this before.

1:25:37

He and he this is being

1:25:39

reiterated by Biden. He's

1:25:41

not joking when he talks about potential use of

1:25:43

tax nuclear weapons. Oh, you mean two things

1:25:46

that weren't even mentioned? So he's

1:25:48

not joking when he doesn't mention

1:25:50

the things that you claim he's gonna

1:25:52

use. how do you possibly

1:25:54

make sense of that? He says because his military is, you might say, significantly underperforming. you lie

1:25:56

about what's happening so you can pretend that

1:25:58

he's losing. Therefore, that's why he's going to

1:26:02

bomb nuclear I mean, it was

1:26:04