Podchaser Logo
Home
3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

Released Friday, 7th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

3356 - Convicted Felon Donald Trump, & How The Democrats Talk About Him w/ Heather Digby Parton

Friday, 7th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey folks, today's episode brought to you

0:03

by one of my favorite

0:05

sponsors, Sunset Lake

0:07

Sebade. Sunset

0:10

Lake sebade.com use the code left is best

0:12

get 20% off. Get

0:14

20% off what you say Sam. Well,

0:17

only the best of Sebade products.

0:20

They've got tinctures. They've got tinctures

0:22

to help you sleep. They've got

0:24

tinctures with melatonin in two different

0:27

flavors in multiple concentrations. They've

0:29

got smokeables. They've got keef. They've

0:32

got flour. They've got pre rolls. They've

0:35

got fudge and

0:37

coffee. They've got salve

0:39

and lotions. They've got

0:42

gummies, all sorts of

0:44

gummies. Gummies with, to help you relax.

0:46

Gummies to help you focus. Gummies to

0:48

help you sleep. Gummies

0:51

to allow you to have a little bit of funs

0:53

because some of those have a Tage say

0:55

in them as well as

0:58

the Taltonine gummies.

1:06

All these products third party tested. They're

1:08

a great company. Sunset

1:10

Lake sebade.com $20 minimum

1:13

wage, mostly employee owned. They

1:16

have contributed thousands of

1:19

dollars to things like strike

1:21

relief funds and refugee

1:23

resettlement, carceral reform, Planned

1:26

Parenthood, mutual

1:28

aid, food pantries, just

1:31

a great company, great bunch of

1:33

folks up there. They take

1:36

care of the land, integrated pest

1:38

management, no pesticides, and

1:41

they regenerative farming

1:43

practices that they developed with

1:45

the University of Vermont. Check

1:48

it out. Sunset Lake sebade.com use

1:50

the coupon code left is best and

1:52

you will get, that's

1:55

right, 20% off. And

1:57

now for the show. The

2:01

Majority Report with Sam

2:04

Cedar. Where every day

2:06

is casual Friday. That

2:09

means Monday is casual Monday.

2:13

Tuesday, casual Tuesday.

2:16

Wednesday, casual hump day.

2:19

Thursday, casual Thursday. That's what

2:21

we call it. And Friday,

2:23

casual Shabbat. The Majority Report

2:25

with Sam Cedar. It is

2:28

Friday, June 7, 2024. My

2:40

name is Sam Cedar. This is

2:42

the five-time award-winning Majority Report. We

2:46

are broadcasting live steps from the industrially

2:48

ravaged Gowanus

2:51

Canal in the heartland of

2:53

America, downtown Brooklyn,

2:55

USA. On

2:59

the program today, Heather Parton. Call

3:03

him from salon.com or you may know her as Digby.

3:08

From the blog Hullabaloo. Also

3:11

on the program today, job growth

3:13

blows through expectations. Biden and Normandy

3:15

commemorating D-Day. New report Clarence Thomas

3:17

has accepted millions of dollars

3:20

worth of gifts. In

3:26

the past decade, Bannon

3:29

ordered to prison on July 1st, Netanyahu to address

3:32

a joint session of Congress on July

3:34

24th. U.S. and 16 countries call on

3:37

Hamas and Israel to close on a

3:39

cease-fire agreement. As

3:43

the NAACP calls on Biden to halt

3:46

weapons sales to Israel. Alex

3:51

Jones has agreed he

3:54

must sell info wars.

4:00

to pay off his

4:02

defamation suit. Polling

4:05

shows a slight change in the wake of

4:07

Trump's conviction. The

4:10

Biden administration scrambles to deal with fallout

4:13

from its new, probably illegal,

4:15

asylum policy. Lastly,

4:19

South Korean Samsung workers strike for

4:21

the first time ever. All

4:23

this and more on today's

4:27

majority report. Welcome ladies

4:29

and gentlemen, it is... Casual

4:32

Friday. There you go. Casual

4:34

Friday. So casual. Well, this

4:37

is going to drive me crazy. I got to do this. Oh,

4:40

there you go. Whoop. Yep, there

4:42

we go. Boom. Sorry. Yeah,

4:45

it's all good. Folks, welcome. It

4:48

is casual Friday. It is before

4:50

all the craziness begins.

4:52

Let me just acknowledge that yes,

4:55

summertime now. I have officially

4:57

moved to

5:00

wearing short sleeve shirts as

5:03

I do come

5:06

past Memorial

5:08

Day. Everybody knows

5:10

that Sam wears his short

5:12

sleeve shirts on Fridays. Of

5:15

course, I'm going to move soon to

5:17

my button down short sleeve shirts on

5:19

the weekdays, but it's inevitable. It'll be

5:21

a gradual transition so people don't get freaked

5:24

out about it. I didn't want to... Yeah, Friday

5:26

is the easiest way to introduce this to people.

5:29

Thanks for joining us folks at the end of the week. We

5:33

got a lot of talk about. Just a reminder,

5:36

it's your support that makes this show possible.

5:39

You can become a member at

5:41

jointhemajorityreport.com. When

5:43

you do, you get the free show free

5:46

of commercials and the fun half. And

5:49

your support really helps if you listen to the

5:51

show once or twice a week, three

5:53

times a week, five times a week.

5:56

By all means, it is our members that make the

5:58

show. show of

6:01

function, frankly. This

6:05

story keeps unraveling. We're

6:08

going to have some cases that theoretically

6:10

will be decided or at least determined

6:13

as to whether they'll go forward from

6:15

the Supreme Court regarding Donald Trump. Aside

6:20

from the general corruptness of someone like Clarence

6:22

Thomas, maybe we'll talk a little bit about

6:24

that later, Clarence Thomas, we've

6:27

seen this reporting from ProPublica. We know the

6:29

story of how this

6:32

developed. Clarence Thomas has received

6:34

millions of dollars dwarfing

6:37

any other number of gifts because now

6:39

he's had to go back and basically

6:41

check off which gifts he's gotten, et

6:43

cetera, et cetera, because he was caught

6:45

not recording these things. Millions

6:48

of guests from Harlan Crow, a

6:50

billionaire who was recruited by Leonard

6:53

Leo, who was the

6:56

former head of the Federalist Society, the guy who's

6:58

basically in charge of taking care of the judges.

7:02

When Clarence Thomas 20 years ago threatened to

7:04

quit the court because he didn't have enough

7:06

money to function, Leonard Leo

7:08

introduced him to what became his

7:11

new best friend, Harlan

7:13

Crow, a billionaire who then

7:15

proceeded to pay for things like his

7:17

mom's house, his kid's private

7:21

school education, and take him

7:23

on private jet vacations

7:25

multiple times a year for

7:28

years. Clarence

7:31

Thomas decided, you know what? My life as a justice

7:33

is not so bad. I think I'll stay on the

7:35

court. It's almost like getting

7:38

your payoff. It's really having your cake and

7:40

eating it too. While

7:43

Clarence Thomas clearly

7:45

... I don't know if he

7:48

changed any of his votes. He just found a

7:50

benefactor who appreciated his work and paid him to

7:52

stay on the court, essentially.

7:55

Sam Alito refuses

7:58

to recuse himself. I

10:00

was going to say, is it

10:02

liberal or is it like you

10:05

have your own job? No

10:11

felt divorce supporter. You

10:15

had the right to vote. Yeah,

10:19

go back. It can

10:21

be addressed to a woman, which is the C word.

10:23

Now, let me just break this down, Emily. You say

10:25

it was you who said those things. It was not

10:27

your now husband. But you say

10:29

Alito is lying here for another very basic

10:31

reason. Can you explain? So,

10:35

I, at

10:39

best, he's mistaken, but at

10:41

worst, he's just outright lying.

10:43

And there was a neighbor

10:45

who even witnessed this and

10:48

witnessed me using that unfortunate

10:50

term. And what

10:52

else I said in that interaction

10:54

is so important. I just want to say

10:57

kudos to this

10:59

lady for owning

11:01

up for saying that word and

11:04

also for deploying it in perhaps

11:06

one of the most appropriate and

11:08

maybe the only appropriate circumstance. A

11:10

righteous slur. 100%. What else I said in that interaction is

11:13

so important. And I

11:19

hope it's not getting forgotten in the

11:21

discourse around the word. In that interaction,

11:23

she approached us, started

11:25

screaming at us, used all of

11:28

our full names, which to me

11:30

felt like a threat because you're

11:32

a stranger. We don't know you. You don't know us. How

11:34

do you know our full names? And

11:37

I just, I started yelling, how

11:39

dare you? Because they both were there at

11:41

the same time. So I said, how dare

11:43

you? You're on the highest court in the

11:45

land. You represent the Supreme Court of the

11:47

United States. You're behaving this way. You're yelling

11:50

at a neighbor. You're harassing us. How dare

11:52

you shame on you? And I

11:55

did use the words. So if

11:58

that in any way, you know, John

14:00

Roberts to stand up and say, okay,

14:03

this seems to like, it's going a little

14:05

far here. And, you know, the guy should

14:07

recuse himself. He's lied to

14:09

Congress. We

14:12

know that he was a source of a leak during

14:15

the ACA, a decision

14:20

back in 2012. There's

14:22

every reason to believe that he

14:24

was the leak of the Dobbs

14:26

decision came from him. And

14:30

the guy is a category

14:33

he's lied to Congress. This

14:35

is a Supreme Court justice. Yeah.

14:39

It's in the idea that

14:41

Dick Durbin is

14:44

not hauling these people into Congress, even

14:47

if he can't impeach them, because

14:49

he doesn't have the votes. Even if they won't

14:51

show up. It's just amazing. Bring

14:54

that neighbor on, not on CNN. Why

14:56

is she on CNN instead of a

14:58

hearing that Dick Durbin is holding, right?

15:00

I mean, she lives right around the

15:03

corner in Washington, DC. It'd be pretty

15:05

easy to figure out the situation. Material

15:07

witness about this political symbolism coming

15:09

from- Exactly. ... political symbolism.

15:11

And now, every reason to

15:13

believe that the Supreme

15:15

Court justice has made

15:18

a deliberate lie to

15:20

Congress. I mean, not

15:23

a great look for one of

15:25

nine people who basically dictate the

15:28

laws of this country. And she

15:30

said it there too, which we've made this

15:32

point before, but she is not one

15:35

of the most powerful people in the country.

15:38

I mean, definitely in the top 50, we

15:40

have Sam Alito. The fact

15:42

that he felt the need to, and him

15:45

or his wife acting in

15:47

a rogue manner, which I have a hard time believing,

15:49

felt the need to not just exert

15:51

power on the rest of the country

15:53

through his immense ability to do so

15:56

as a Supreme Court justice, but to

15:58

do a troll move, not once, but twice. goes

22:00

to the Cayman Islands where if

22:02

Trump wins, I'll be depositing millions

22:05

of dollars as I try

22:07

and relocate and head to

22:09

a secure location. Also,

22:14

Jamaica and Cozumel,

22:18

I think in Mexico, but

22:20

also, you know, great food on the cruise.

22:22

And every day there

22:24

are talks

22:27

from writers. I'll probably interview a couple

22:29

of people. Check it out. nationcruise.com

22:33

slash MR. All right, quick break.

22:36

And we'll be talking to Heather

22:38

Parton. We

23:13

had a little bit of technical difficulties. They have

23:15

been resolved, ladies and gentlemen. It

23:18

is always a pleasure to welcome

23:21

back to the program, possibly

23:24

a longest running guest that

23:27

we've ever had. I

23:29

don't know. There's a

23:31

lot of competition because I'm now getting

23:34

very, very long in the tooth. But

23:36

ladies and gentlemen, Heather

23:38

Parton or Digby. Hi, Heather. How

23:40

are you? Hi, Sam. I'm

23:43

fine. How are you guys? Hanging

23:45

in there. What is long

23:47

in the tooth? Like, what does that originate

23:50

from? I just had that thought. Your

23:53

teeth actually grow when you get

23:55

older. Yeah, you'll see

23:57

really old women or men. Sometimes some of these

23:59

guys. that's

30:00

not going to work. It's just

30:02

an absurd concept. It's

30:04

offensive. It's incredibly

30:06

offensive. But who is that for? I

30:09

mean, who is that for? Every time these

30:17

people, because let's be clear, and I just want

30:19

to remind people of this, I think most people

30:22

know this. There

30:24

is a party that

30:27

is really built around ID,

30:29

the way that people identify.

30:35

They're homogenous

30:38

in this respect. Identity

30:40

politics is completely intertwined

30:51

with the existence of this party. That

30:53

party is the Republican Party. Really,

30:55

90% of its voters

30:59

are white people. Maybe

31:01

that's a little bit low. It may actually be a little bit

31:03

higher than that. When

31:07

they talk about black

31:10

people, brown people, and we should

31:12

say, Democrats lose the white vote

31:15

fairly consistently.

31:18

They attract

31:20

not just white people, but brown people,

31:22

and black people,

31:25

and Asian people, and just a much wider

31:27

range of people. This is indisputable. This

31:35

is just the fact. When the Republican

31:37

Party talks

31:39

about their appealing to black

31:41

people, it's usually in a

31:43

way that is just

31:46

to appeal to white people who

31:49

want to think that they're

31:53

not putting off black people

31:55

in some way. Isn't that

31:57

always the strategy? you

32:00

could see it in, I mean, you guys are there

32:02

in New York. So, you know, you saw this with

32:04

the, with that

32:06

rally that he held in the Bronx,

32:08

right? I mean, this was absurd. And

32:10

it was actually laughable. And New Yorkers

32:12

who were not, you know, Trumpers were

32:14

laughing at the whole concept. But, you

32:16

know, the fact is, is that in

32:18

the Bronx, there's, you know, quite a

32:20

few people who voted for Trump. I

32:22

mean, it's a big, big population there.

32:24

So of course, you know, you can,

32:26

you can bring in a few thousand

32:28

people to a rally, you could do it in my

32:31

neighborhood, you know, even though it was like 92% for

32:33

Biden. So, you know, there's, there's 8% of

32:36

people you could probably get. But, but

32:38

the idea what he did there by

32:40

sort of pretending like the crowd was

32:42

diverse, and that there were all these

32:44

black people from the Bronx, he brought

32:46

in a couple of rappers, two of

32:48

whom had, you know, were under indictment

32:51

for some kind of crimes. Again, that's

32:53

part of it. He wanted to say,

32:55

hey, look, you know, you're like

32:57

me, they all love me, the criminals love me.

32:59

But, you know, the

33:02

whole idea was there to show to

33:05

suburban white people that are kind of

33:07

queasy about all this racism thing that,

33:09

you know, Oh, don't worry, the black

33:11

people love him too. So you don't,

33:13

you don't have to be that that

33:16

is, I think exactly what it is. It's,

33:18

it's like, you know, they're gonna say that

33:20

we're racist. But if we were racist, would

33:22

we have rappers on the stage? I don't

33:24

think so. You know, it's like one of

33:26

those messages.

33:29

And I mean, it's interesting

33:31

about the rallies, and I want to get sidetracked by

33:33

this, but it

33:36

is very difficult to assess a

33:40

candidate's popularity

33:43

based upon, you know, a single

33:47

day or any in terms of like

33:49

turnout, right? I mean, I remember being

33:51

in Manchester in 08 for

33:54

the primaries and convinced like,

33:56

Oh my God, Ron Paul, Ron

33:59

Paul is going to i

34:01

don't know if he's gonna win this uh...

34:04

new hampshire primary in from the

34:06

republican primary but i was like he i'd be

34:08

surprised if he doesn't come in second or third

34:11

because everywhere you went there

34:13

were ron paul signed holders and

34:16

you know occasionally see one from it ron me

34:18

well i go around here and there and and

34:21

it turned out that uh... the

34:23

differences that everybody

34:26

who voted for ron paul also held a

34:28

sign and i thought a

34:30

lot of people it but they did

34:32

not represent they represent

34:34

ten voters or a hundred voters

34:36

or a thousand voters each

34:39

person represented exactly one voter

34:41

and all those people who held

34:44

the sign voted for him but no more and

34:46

uh... you know i think they came in six or

34:48

seven i don't remember what it was but uh...

34:51

it tell me a very valuable lesson about you

34:53

know sort of trying to assess uh...

34:55

because you can that measures the

34:57

debt of support but

35:00

not necessarily the breadth of support but

35:02

i will say this is that all the

35:04

reports i've been seeing from reporters who followed

35:06

uh... trump in twenty twenty

35:08

or twenty sixteen are

35:11

saying there is a massive drop-off of

35:14

uh... of people now i

35:17

don't know what that means really at

35:20

the end of the day i just don't

35:22

know what you what you can tell about

35:24

that but you know trump relied on some

35:26

very very intense voters and if they're

35:29

not intense about him they

35:31

may go and pull the lever against

35:33

uh... joe biden but it's it's a

35:35

different electorate this time around well

35:38

i think that's true and and it's one of

35:41

the things that the pollsters are starting to look

35:43

at you can even see you know that the

35:45

god of all poll polling is the new york

35:47

times cn a poll apparently anytime they you know

35:50

have a hiccup the entire uh...

35:52

journalistic community you

35:54

know skit goes on high alert uh...

35:58

even there which has been pretty

36:00

kind of predicting a, you

36:02

know, pretty grim prediction for Joe

36:04

Biden up to now, is

36:06

starting to make that shift. And it's not because

36:09

of any bias, it's because they're starting to look

36:11

at likely voters. That's what happens as you get

36:13

closer to the election. And likely

36:15

voters, that's a very, you know, that's more

36:17

art than science, but it, and it's a

36:19

little mystifying how they come up with it

36:21

in these days of weird polling

36:24

techniques, because they have to do a

36:26

lot more modeling than actually talking to

36:28

people, because people don't answer their phone

36:30

and blah, blah, blah, we know all about

36:32

that. But what they're starting to look at

36:34

is what the likely voter model is going

36:36

to be. And so you're seeing that

36:39

in some of the coverage and what some of

36:41

these pollsters are talking about. And it's very interesting

36:43

to me, because again, like I

36:45

said, it's more art than science. And from my

36:47

observation, what I see about

36:49

this election is that people, that a lot of

36:51

people are seeing it. First of all, they don't

36:53

want to hear about it. They don't want to

36:55

talk about it. They don't want to think about

36:57

it because it's depressing. Just, you

37:00

know, both sides are just, you know,

37:02

nothing new here, nothing inspiring, nothing, even

37:04

on the Republican side, there's a lot

37:06

of that. I mean, of course, there's

37:08

the hardcore maggots, but I mean, I

37:10

mean, just among, you know, normie Republicans

37:12

who don't necessarily live their lives around

37:14

politics. But what

37:16

I'm, they're seeing this as a rerun. It's

37:19

a rerun of the last election.

37:21

It's not very interesting. It's kind

37:23

of dull and kind of

37:25

depressing. So how that affects

37:28

turnout, it seems to

37:30

me is going to be very much a

37:32

part of the likely voter model that they're

37:34

trying to put together. And you're

37:36

just starting to see that. And one of the things

37:38

that I mentioned this earlier, that's very

37:41

interesting is that Biden and

37:43

the Democrats in general, not just Biden, just

37:45

do much, much better among people who've been

37:47

voting for the last three or four elections.

37:51

People who have voted before, and

37:53

that's including all the way up to the

37:55

special elections of this year, Biden is actually

37:58

quite a bit of a... a bit

38:00

ahead among those people. It's

38:02

only when you add in the new mix of

38:04

people who haven't voted in the past, which

38:07

like I said, includes some younger voters who

38:09

may very well this year, and they have

38:12

their own issues and their own cares, and that

38:14

certainly should be a concern for Biden. But

38:18

if you just look at the like of the

38:20

voters who've been voting, who've been engaged in politics

38:22

and who are the kind of people who just

38:25

vote, right? Like me. I mean- High

38:27

propensity voters is really what it is. Exactly.

38:31

And we've seen this, that's

38:33

why Democrats keep winning all these special elections.

38:36

That's why the, you know,

38:38

that's basically it. I mean, you see

38:41

that in the context of a special

38:43

election. The most obvious person who's

38:45

gonna come and vote

38:47

in a special election is a high

38:49

propensity voter, someone who has a high

38:51

propensity to vote. And I'm going

38:53

to be voting in the one where the least amount

38:55

of people end up voting because I vote,

38:58

whenever there's a vote, I'm on top of

39:01

it. And it's also, it's not one-to-one,

39:03

but you can also, there is a

39:05

very, very strong correlation to follow the

39:08

news, don't follow the news, in terms

39:10

of your high propensity voting. And

39:13

that's all reflected in every, all these pollings

39:15

that you're talking about in the way that

39:17

the Times revisited this. And

39:20

so it is, it's a

39:22

very different type of election

39:27

I think than we've ever seen,

39:29

really, because generally Democrats

39:31

want, we

39:34

want as many people to vote

39:36

as possible, because

39:38

broadly speaking, democratic,

39:43

at least aspirational policy

39:46

and, you know, actual

39:49

real policy when it

39:51

actually happens, favors

39:54

just a wider amount of people.

39:57

Why that, you know, and I think like, but.

40:01

there's all these headwinds, like Joe

40:03

Biden being, you know, not

40:06

necessarily on top of this game, at

40:09

least from the outside, you know, I mean, who

40:11

knows? Frankly, that's not

40:13

a huge issue for me because

40:15

I'm more concerned with like, what

40:18

are they doing at the FTC? What are they

40:20

doing at the Labor Department? What are they doing in

40:22

Congress? Like, all I need is him to sign a

40:24

bill if, you know, or to pick

40:27

a Supreme Court justice and, you know,

40:29

it's not like he's got all the,

40:31

any, you know, presidents got them

40:33

all in his mind. Well,

40:35

you know, Donald Trump is not a particularly

40:39

good at anything other

40:41

than, I'll take that

40:43

list from Heritage and yes, I'll appoint

40:45

these people's Supreme Court. But

40:48

there's all these headwinds. In one of

40:50

them though, but here's another question. From

40:53

a campaign perspective, let's watch Joe

40:55

Biden with the ABC's David Muir.

40:58

Biden is, this

41:02

took place on yesterday. So in

41:04

Europe, I guess, where Biden is

41:06

for the, you

41:10

know, the D-Day. The D-Day

41:12

anniversary. Yeah. And David

41:14

Muir asked him about Trump's

41:17

guilty verdict. I

41:20

want to talk about the way the Democrats

41:22

are talking about this or not talking about

41:24

this. What

41:27

do you think the American people should make of

41:29

this? How important do you think this conviction should

41:31

be in this race for president? That's

41:33

for the public to decide. But one

41:36

thing for certain is stop undermining the

41:38

rule of law. Stop undermining institutions.

41:41

That's what this whole effort is. All

41:44

the MAGA Republicans are coming out saying this is a fix, this was

41:46

a jury that, this

41:48

was a good judge that set up to

41:50

get Trump. Set

41:53

up to get Trump. There's no evidence

41:55

of any of that. None. He's

41:58

trying to undermine it. Look, you got a fair trial.

42:00

trial. The jury spoke like they

42:02

speak in all cases and it should be

42:04

respected. As we sit here in. I

42:07

mean, I think that's a good answer from

42:10

the president. You know, he's

42:12

basically, you know, talking about institutions and,

42:14

you know, the rule of law.

42:18

Maybe we're not applying that internationally in the same

42:20

way that we should be coming out

42:22

of the Biden administration, but strictly as a

42:24

political matter. That seems the most appropriate

42:26

way to respond to it. There

42:29

should be other Democrats elected Democrats

42:31

who are getting a little more aggressive about

42:33

it. And it seems like they've been

42:36

told don't do that. Well,

42:38

I don't know if they've been told. I don't

42:41

I don't know where that's coming from. But, you

42:43

know, there is apparently a big debate among Democrats

42:45

and I don't understand it at all. I

42:48

mean, this is such a layup that I

42:50

can't even believe anybody in politics would think

42:52

it makes sense to

42:54

to not make the most out of

42:56

the fact that the guy running for

42:58

president is has just been convicted of

43:00

34 felonies in

43:03

a court of law. It makes zero

43:05

sense. And I get what what happened

43:07

was, I mean, this is the how

43:09

the phenomenon sort of unfolded was

43:11

the minute. Well, they started it in the

43:13

last couple of weeks of the of the

43:16

trial when they had all those people come

43:18

to the trial. They had Mike Johnson and

43:20

Vivek Ramaswamy and the rest of them showing

43:22

up at their red ties and sort

43:24

of showing support and solidarity with Trump

43:27

and standing outside the courthouse and

43:29

just absolutely flaying the judge and

43:31

the system and the

43:33

rigged process and blah, blah, blah. They

43:35

were setting that up. They were setting

43:38

it up for a guilty verdict, at

43:40

which point the entire

43:42

Republican Party immediately

43:44

had let out a

43:46

collective primal scream. And

43:49

I have to say that it kind of

43:51

surprised, it's kind of shocked me. I mean,

43:54

not I shouldn't have been shocked, but I

43:56

kind of was was just how unanimous this

43:58

was this and They're

44:00

the ones who are being told from

44:03

on high, no doubt about it, that this

44:05

was a strategy. Come out

44:07

screaming the minute that verdict

44:09

comes in, that this was

44:12

rigged, that it's just absolutely

44:14

undemocratic, that the whole system

44:16

is absolutely imploding and we can't let

44:18

this happen and we're going to get

44:20

revenge and blah, blah, blah. Then it

44:23

was an intimidation tactic. And the Democrats,

44:26

as per usual, fell for it and

44:29

started questioning themselves, gee, should we say anything? I mean,

44:31

gee, I don't know, maybe it's a bad idea to

44:33

talk about Trump and his 34 felony convictions.

44:36

I mean, gee, that might upset somebody, so

44:38

we better not do it. Absolutely

44:41

ridiculous. Of course they should do it. And of

44:43

course, and I think Democrats in Congress, you know,

44:45

there's a limited amount they can do in the

44:47

House because they don't have the majority. But you

44:49

know, I don't know, is the Senate sleeping? What

44:52

is happening? The Senate is 100%

44:54

sleeping. 100% sleeping. I mean,

44:59

I just want to ... This is where

45:01

I got this, I mean, a semaphore reported

45:03

on Friday, last Friday, the

45:05

day of the conviction, I guess

45:07

it was Thursday, the next day, guidance

45:11

from the Democratic Policy and Communications

45:13

Committee advised partisans to stress that,

45:15

quote, our justice system worked as

45:17

it's supposed to, shows

45:19

Republican will bend the need to former President

45:21

Trump, but included no specific attacks around the

45:23

facts of the case. It

45:25

does not look likely to be much of an issue

45:27

going forward as well, especially if they're not getting the

45:30

signal from the top of the ticket to drive the

45:32

point home. I don't think

45:34

minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, or leadership

45:36

will use leadership capital to

45:39

talk about Trump, one senior Democratic aide

45:41

said. And the

45:44

... Now, maybe they've changed course from this, but I've

45:46

seen no evidence of it. The

45:49

reason why you talk about this is because

45:51

that's how you get the press to talk

45:53

about it. Of

45:56

course. It's just like this is

45:58

so remedial, it's unbelievable. I'm

46:01

stunned by it too, Sam. I

46:03

honestly could not believe, as I watched it

46:05

unfold, I didn't read that Semaphore article, so

46:08

I didn't get that this was actually a

46:10

talking point or some kind of instruction coming

46:12

from the Democratic Party. It's absolutely idiotic. You

46:14

know, I get it. It's unpleasant. This is

46:17

not a fun fight at all to have

46:19

because you see people like, and I feel

46:21

it too, I see Marco Rubio and, you

46:23

know, people who otherwise we might not have

46:26

thought of as, you know, in the Tommy

46:30

Tuberville School of Politics, you know,

46:32

just kind of ignorant and magga

46:35

and ridiculous, but they're all like

46:37

that now. So you just have

46:39

to accept that and recognize that

46:42

it's going to be mono, a

46:44

mono, hand-to-hand combat over

46:47

through the next few months until the election. And

46:50

that means, you know, you can't just sit

46:52

back and go, well, you know, we don't

46:54

really want to talk about that. We don't

46:57

really think that's important. They're talking about it,

46:59

for God's sakes. And people are listening to

47:01

what they're saying. And if the Democrats aren't

47:03

actually, you know, countering with anything, it just,

47:06

you know, this is why they're saying. It's

47:08

a vacuum. But we did. We've talked about

47:10

this with Democrats all the time. But in

47:12

this case, I didn't read that 74 article

47:15

either, Sam, but that quote about how they

47:17

need direction from the top of the ticket

47:19

seems exactly right, because we covered Biden's speech

47:21

a week ago today, where he came out

47:24

after the Trump count, you

47:26

know, guilty verdict to talk about

47:28

the Israeli ceasefire proposal that they're

47:30

not, that Israel's not agreeing to.

47:37

And he had this pre-planned moment clearly

47:39

when he's walking out and the reporter

47:41

asks him about it and he turns

47:43

around and makes a meme-able face for

47:45

all the kids on the internet. And

47:47

it just was like, why did you

47:49

choose to one, hold this press conference

47:51

now? Because the ceasefire hasn't gone through.

47:53

So it was like a deliberate way

47:55

to be presidential in

47:58

the wake of this conviction.

48:00

and look presidential, but

48:02

two, then not address it at all. It

48:05

seems like that's really, we're back

48:07

30 years ago to a mode

48:09

of politics where it's about, Biden

48:11

thinks the value of looking presidential

48:13

is way more valuable than doing

48:16

politics. And that is just not

48:18

the political reality that we live

48:20

in anymore. No,

48:22

and it's also, look, all of

48:24

this is about attention, right? I mean, you just

48:26

mentioned it earlier, Sam, that when

48:28

they looked, they did this polling on where, the

48:35

presidential race in light of where you get your news,

48:37

right? Yes. And

48:40

this was people who are paying

48:42

attention. I mean, Biden has

48:44

those people hands down, people who read newspapers,

48:46

watch cable TV, watch things like

48:48

this show, people who are politically engaged and

48:51

who actually keep up, no

48:53

doubt about it. I mean, Biden wins those people, but

48:55

the people, there are a whole lot of people

48:58

who are not paying any attention, but

49:00

somehow or another, they have an opinion.

49:03

And they're getting an opinion because this kind of stuff

49:05

just seeps in. It seeps into the culture. I mean,

49:07

you guys know this. I mean, it's- It's almost 100%.

49:10

It's almost, it happens in conversations around

49:12

the water cooler. It happens when you're

49:14

a jigger with your relatives. Somebody

49:17

says something, it happens in just

49:19

overhearing conversations. And it

49:21

happens on social media in places where you

49:23

least expect it. Somebody's

49:26

on Facebook, looking up their college roommate or

49:28

something, and something comes up and you see

49:30

it. And you don't necessarily consciously pay attention,

49:33

but there it is. And so they're getting

49:35

their opinions from somewhere. And the only way

49:37

that you can penetrate that, and there are,

49:39

it's a vast number of people. That's

49:42

what's shocking to me is how few people, I

49:44

mean, people really dropped out of the news cycle.

49:46

You can see this- People are really tuned out.

49:49

I mean, yes. They are really tuned out. I

49:51

mean, I could see it in sort of our

49:53

numbers in terms of like, the

49:55

passerby's on YouTube and

49:57

whatnot. But here's the fact

50:00

that- People don't know, I would bet. I

50:02

think it's going to surprise everyone. You

50:04

can go look this up. The number of

50:06

people who heard about

50:09

Donald Trump's grab them by

50:11

the P word versus the number of

50:14

people who

50:16

heard about Hillary Clinton's emails. There

50:18

was actually less people who heard about the grab

50:21

them by the P word. And

50:23

that is because, no, I'm

50:25

talking specifically during the campaign though. I

50:27

mean, the emails. I mean, cause there

50:29

was literally polling about this. This

50:32

is not conjecture in my part. And

50:36

the polling on this, and I think

50:38

the, you know, why

50:41

that's the case, I suspect is

50:43

because Democrats step back and they're

50:45

like, we don't have to do anything with this because

50:48

this is so disgusting. And so, you know,

50:50

no one's going to like this guy present,

50:53

but they don't realize that like, this

50:56

stuff doesn't travel on its own. That we

50:58

are in a very different, I don't know

51:00

if we were ever in a different age

51:02

than we are now, but we're in a

51:05

different age where media, there's

51:07

so much to compete for

51:09

attention. The media constantly needs

51:11

something new because that's what's going to get

51:13

your most clicks. You know, if it doesn't

51:15

happen in the first 24 hours and

51:19

there's nothing more to that story. And

51:22

if, you know, Chuck Schumer doesn't

51:24

come out on Monday and then, you

51:26

know, Kamala Harris doesn't come out on

51:28

Tuesday, there's nothing new on that story.

51:31

Then they just move on to the next thing. And

51:33

that's why it seems like a year ago that he was

51:36

a convicted felon and he's not going out there and doing

51:38

it. And what they

51:40

do also is they will lard up

51:42

the news cycle with

51:45

other things. So Donald Trump is out

51:47

on the campaign trail and

51:51

he's now like moved the story past his conviction

51:55

into like the question of

51:58

revenge. So now,

52:00

Now all we're talking about is retribution

52:02

and revenge and not the underlying. Hey,

52:04

wait a second. You got convicted. You're

52:06

a convicted felon of an actual crime.

52:08

Here he is with Dr.

52:10

Phil of all people. The

52:15

word revenge is a very strong word, but

52:17

maybe we have revenge through success. But

52:19

that's what I'd like to see. I want to see the

52:21

country survive because this country is not going to survive like

52:23

this. And

52:26

really, the expression, I think it's the

52:28

greatest theme ever in politics maybe because

52:30

it's the biggest movement. We

52:32

want to make America great again, and that's what we

52:35

have to do. And I think you'd

52:37

be very proud of the job we did. The Pope

52:39

has a book out that he's written, and he says,

52:41

we are all brothers and sisters, and

52:43

there must be no resentment among us for

52:45

any war to truly end. Forgiveness

52:47

is necessary. Otherwise, what

52:50

we'll follow is not justice,

52:52

but revenge. And

52:55

that's true even in the cultural wars that

52:57

we're fighting here. I think you

52:59

have so much to do, you don't

53:02

have time to get even. You only

53:04

have time to get right. Well

53:06

revenge does take time, I will say that.

53:08

It does. And sometimes revenge can be justified,

53:11

but I have to be honest. Sometimes

53:13

it can. But is the country better or worse for

53:15

them going after you? I think the country is really

53:17

worse for what they've done, and I think you see

53:20

that when you look at the poll numbers. And you

53:22

see that almost $400 million

53:25

has poured in since this horrible

53:28

decision was made.

53:31

That was a few. Okay, aside from his

53:34

lying about his

53:36

fundraising numbers, he's

53:38

also including all the money that he

53:41

embezzled out of Truth Social into his

53:43

legal fund. That's also part of the

53:45

money. But here's

53:48

my point, is like what the strategy is

53:50

from Trump's perspective. The topic is now

53:52

about revenge. And whether he's going

53:54

to be good enough or not good enough to

53:56

seek revenge. What's the revenge

53:58

here? I'm going

54:00

to force them to also lie

54:02

on their business forms. Here,

54:05

then Dr. Phil shows up on CNN

54:07

saying, this

54:10

is really about whether Donald Trump is a

54:13

good man enough and can get by this.

54:15

Watch this clip. Is

54:19

his inclination because just today, he

54:23

said, for example, that he would indict

54:25

the January 6th committee members, like

54:28

presumptively the members of Congress who were on

54:30

that committee investigating what happened on January 6th,

54:34

are you more

54:36

or less convinced after sitting down with him

54:39

that he actually would follow through on those

54:41

kinds of pledges? Well,

54:45

I actually don't think he will. I think

54:48

this is a situation that, it's

54:51

a process. This is something that I think he's

54:53

had in his mind that there's only one way

54:55

to go and that's to get

54:57

even. And I think

54:59

I've really made some headway with

55:01

him that that is not the way to

55:04

go. I think

55:06

it's a process. I think he'll turn this over

55:08

and over in his mind. And I

55:10

don't think he will do that. And to

55:13

the extent that I have any opportunity

55:15

to lean into this

55:17

with him, I am

55:19

going to relentlessly try and

55:22

get him to not do that and to

55:24

get others to not do that. Look, we need to

55:26

stop this. This is a time where

55:29

America needs to come together, not be playing. Okay.

55:33

Well, I'm convinced, sure. But

55:36

aside from the sort of like shocking sort

55:38

of narcissism that

55:43

Dr. Phil has, that's not surprising. But

55:47

the amazing thing that's happening in the absence of

55:52

something for like an Abby Phillips,

55:54

let's say, to push back

55:56

on, like, because

55:58

there's a vacuum. of people saying

56:01

he got convicted of

56:03

a crime that was, you know,

56:06

did Alvin Bragg bring this

56:08

these charges because the prosecutor

56:11

is a political position and

56:13

they want to bring charges that, you know,

56:15

make them seem like they're doing their job?

56:19

More than likely, that's why every

56:21

prosecutor prosecutes, you know, they

56:23

may, but they

56:25

also don't bring cases they think they're going to lose. And

56:29

this was a case where a jury

56:32

found him guilty. And

56:34

this whole talk of like, will he or

56:36

won't he seek revenge? Well,

56:38

like, wait, how is this in

56:41

any way equal? He's going to make up

56:43

charges and try and imprison people because they

56:45

sat on a congressional committee? That should be

56:48

the question. And the Democrats are

56:50

not forcing that question. And the media is

56:52

certainly not going to do it because they're

56:54

more interested in Dr. Philip. You think, can

56:56

you change him through therapy? I mean, it's

56:58

crazy. Well,

57:01

I have a couple of points on this.

57:03

The first is, is that, you know, the

57:05

revenge thing, I mean, this has been true.

57:07

Trump has been, you know, a vengeance is

57:09

mine kind of guy ever since the 1980s.

57:12

It's all documented. I've written about it probably

57:14

a dozen times over the since Trump came

57:16

down that escalator, because it's a very fascinating

57:18

part of his personality, right? I mean, it

57:21

is it is there. And he's always been

57:23

that. But there's more to it than that.

57:25

I totally like a Roy Cohn figure for

57:27

his attorney general. That's who he

57:29

is. He's like, he's like a mob boss, you

57:31

know, you got to, you know, you got to

57:33

show him who's boss here. And then they'll, they'll

57:35

only respect you if you hurt them. You know,

57:38

that's always been his his credo. And

57:40

it's in his books. And he's given speeches,

57:42

he gave a speech to Liberty University back

57:44

in 2012, where he said,

57:47

you know, two things, bits of

57:49

advice, kids. I mean, Liberty University,

57:51

the religious right, Jerry Falwell University,

57:53

right? He said two things, kids.

57:55

First, always get a prenup. Second,

57:58

always, always get payback. And

58:01

this is all the Christian kids are going, yay,

58:03

that's it. We love Jesus. I mean, it was

58:05

just ridiculous. So

58:07

this has always been part of him

58:10

and nothing surprising in it. And the

58:12

idea that he's suddenly become so overwhelmed

58:14

with anger over what's happened

58:20

to him that he has simply has no choice.

58:22

It's ridiculous. He's always been this way.

58:24

The second thing is, though, there's a strategy here.

58:26

And this strategy is being pushed by the Republican

58:28

Party. And that is it some of

58:30

it has to do with Trump's court case that's before

58:32

the Supreme Court right now. It's the

58:35

immunity case. Remember, Judge Alito in

58:37

his questioning on that brought this

58:39

up. So what do we do

58:41

if we have a bitter president

58:44

who wants to go after his rival?

58:47

Don't we have to stop this cycle

58:49

of retribution? Don't we have to stop

58:51

it? So this thing is

58:53

percolating in their minds, this idea

58:55

that they have no choice but

58:57

to go after the Democrats to

58:59

do whatever it takes because they

59:01

have to stop this. They have

59:03

to stop the Democrats from doing

59:05

this horrible thing that they've been

59:07

doing. And what that

59:09

covers up for everybody is the fact that Donald

59:12

Trump and I don't know if he's got a

59:14

dozen or more, you know,

59:17

former and current associates

59:21

are all criminals. They're criminals. They're

59:23

being convicted. They're under indictment. They're

59:25

being convicted. There was one this

59:28

week in Wisconsin with Chesbrough and

59:30

others. I mean, they're

59:32

pleading guilty all over the place. They're being,

59:34

you know, I mean, this is not, you

59:36

know, if this is a conspiracy, then it

59:39

is the most voluminous conspiracy

59:42

in world history that everywhere

59:44

across America, they've got their

59:46

tentacles out to get Trump's

59:49

from the lowest to his highest

59:51

associates. These people are committing

59:53

crimes. And what this whole thing about

59:55

revenge, and you're absolutely right, they managed

59:58

to switch to flip the script. on

1:00:00

this in order to

1:00:02

cover up the fact that this

1:00:04

is real the Republican Party has

1:00:06

become a criminal enterprise and

1:00:08

this is this is what's happening and and nobody

1:00:10

you know that the press is kind of running

1:00:12

around following them and whatever and when

1:00:14

that when the Supreme Court comes out with their

1:00:17

case and I will not be surprised under these

1:00:19

circumstances to see and you know Sonia Sotomayor made

1:00:21

a comment the other day she says you know

1:00:23

I sometimes go behind my office door and cry

1:00:26

and I'm sure it won't

1:00:29

be the last time and yeah everybody

1:00:31

kind of goes oh geez oh my

1:00:33

god what's coming right it

1:00:36

may be that they do this that

1:00:38

the Supreme Court will is going to

1:00:40

let Donald Trump on his on his

1:00:42

federal criminal charges because of

1:00:45

this idea and and

1:00:47

they'll justify it I think by saying that well

1:00:49

we can't have this cycle of retribution going on

1:00:51

we can't have it and they'll sort of well

1:00:53

we've taken the high road Donald and Trump's sort

1:00:55

of indicated this too at some of his comments

1:00:58

kind of going well and I think it was

1:01:00

in the Time magazine interview he said well you

1:01:02

know if they if they

1:01:04

if the Supreme Court says I've got immunity then

1:01:06

I guess there's nothing I can do to Biden

1:01:08

otherwise I'm afraid it's gonna have to happen you

1:01:11

know he kind of said this right we're gonna

1:01:13

have to do it so you know all this

1:01:15

stuff is sort of circulating out there in the

1:01:17

ether on the right and the consequences

1:01:21

are going to be severe if they

1:01:23

actually do this because total assault on

1:01:26

the rule of law and

1:01:28

with the Republicans basically being

1:01:30

a criminal enterprise immunity

1:01:33

being conferred etc the Democrats

1:01:35

obviously don't have what

1:01:38

it takes to actually use that to

1:01:40

their advantage it's I mean they have

1:01:42

what it takes to use it it's

1:01:44

just all they need is a mouth

1:01:46

it's just that they they're the

1:01:49

and you know it's just they're bad at

1:01:51

politics sometimes I mean I don't know what

1:01:53

else to say Sam I

1:01:56

mean you and I been

1:02:00

talking about this for 20 years. I know. But

1:02:03

this inability to define their opposition

1:02:05

properly in

1:02:10

terms of what's actually happening, and then

1:02:12

use the system that exists in order

1:02:14

to fight it. For whatever reason, they

1:02:16

continue to cling to some old version

1:02:18

of politics that

1:02:23

doesn't exist anymore. I

1:02:26

also think there's something else that's going

1:02:29

on. Because you look at

1:02:31

these, put up, Bradley, do you

1:02:33

have that graph from the

1:02:35

New York Times that showed in

1:02:38

terms of people following the

1:02:40

case of that, whatever it was? I think it was about 1,900,

1:02:42

2,000 people, just

1:02:44

say for the sake of ease. 2,000

1:02:48

people that they had polled

1:02:52

in that Ipsos poll a

1:02:54

month ago. And

1:03:01

now there's how

1:03:03

often you pay attention to politics. No,

1:03:05

keep going. Scroll down. Scroll down, the

1:03:07

other one. There's another one about the

1:03:09

case. Yeah, here it is. Approval of

1:03:11

the verdict. Attention to the trial. Paid a lot

1:03:13

or some attention, 71%. Paid

1:03:16

a little or no attention, 28%. Now,

1:03:21

that 28% also correlates with

1:03:24

those people who don't

1:03:26

pay attention to the news much and

1:03:28

are low propensity voters and who swung

1:03:30

to Biden. Those are the people that

1:03:33

you need to reach. And

1:03:35

if you're Hakeem

1:03:37

Jeffries and you live in New York

1:03:39

City or if you're

1:03:41

Nancy Pelosi and you live

1:03:43

in San Francisco, you

1:03:46

don't understand how

1:03:48

people don't hear about these things. I'm just

1:03:50

using as an example. You're in Washington, DC.

1:03:53

You don't understand how people don't hear

1:03:55

about these things. Because

1:03:58

every piece of media, I'm that

1:04:00

you watch from Morning Joe

1:04:02

at the beginning and then Morning Joe

1:04:04

later in the morning is

1:04:07

talking about it and and so

1:04:10

what's going on we get the wrong

1:04:12

screen up there we just lost it

1:04:14

we became a graph there wait

1:04:17

still seer still seer she's on

1:04:19

the call it just her video yeah our video is

1:04:21

not coming up second one second all right we're gonna

1:04:23

work on that but I think we can hear you

1:04:25

Heather the

1:04:27

the the

1:04:30

notion it's as if they don't understand

1:04:33

what like the in

1:04:35

regards to what the polls say they

1:04:37

don't understand that the message is not

1:04:40

going to just automatically

1:04:42

get instilled in people

1:04:44

that you literally need to provide

1:04:48

it to people all

1:04:50

right we're back sorry folks a little

1:04:52

technical difficulty Heather is back you

1:04:56

were saying I don't

1:04:59

remember well the idea is

1:05:01

like you know the Democrats have a problem

1:05:03

with doing this and they need yeah

1:05:06

it's repetition and it's also like

1:05:08

you need to feed the media beast

1:05:11

and if if you decide you're not

1:05:13

going to talk somebody else is gonna

1:05:15

feed it like a nature

1:05:17

abor's of active vacuum and the media

1:05:19

abor's a vacuum even more and they

1:05:22

will fill it with whoever is providing

1:05:24

them content I mean this

1:05:26

is the thing that like Steve Bannon like

1:05:29

understood back in 2016 you know with the

1:05:32

oh I'm gonna we're gonna partner with the

1:05:34

New York Times with Clinton cash like they

1:05:36

need content and I'm if I'm the first

1:05:38

person there to give it to him and

1:05:41

you know like we experience

1:05:43

that in this show you know I

1:05:45

mean if people send us

1:05:47

a link to content it

1:05:50

is we're gonna look at

1:05:52

it or it's much more likely that that's

1:05:54

gonna have an opportunity for us to use

1:05:56

it I mean we we run across stuff

1:05:59

we pull stuff stuff. But if

1:06:01

people are pushing stuff on it, that's, you

1:06:03

know, everybody in media understands that. That's why

1:06:06

political reporters get a thousand, you know,

1:06:09

you know,

1:06:11

press releases. I mean, this is basic

1:06:13

stuff. It's very basic. And

1:06:15

it's also, as I was saying earlier, I don't

1:06:18

know if people heard this, was the idea of

1:06:20

repetition. You have to bless

1:06:22

you. You have to

1:06:24

repeat things over and over again

1:06:26

in order to penetrate this. There's

1:06:28

a cacophony of news and noise

1:06:30

and whatever good that's out there.

1:06:32

And you have to repeat these

1:06:35

things over and over again. And

1:06:37

the idea, I mean,

1:06:39

this, going back to our original, you

1:06:41

know, discussion here, when the verdict happened

1:06:43

and there suddenly became this big

1:06:47

discussion of whether or not it was

1:06:49

wise to call Donald Trump a convicted

1:06:51

felon. It, you

1:06:53

know, okay. So they all said, okay, well, we'll call

1:06:55

him a convicted felon. It's not enough to do that

1:06:57

on a day, right? And just

1:07:00

say, well, he's a convicted felon now. Isn't

1:07:02

that terrible? You have to call him a

1:07:04

convicted felon over and over and over again,

1:07:06

because that's how you penetrate. And this is,

1:07:08

this is, and well, you know, we don't,

1:07:11

they don't really know what you mean by

1:07:13

convicted felon. I'm going, yes, they do. Americans

1:07:15

do understand the term convicted felon. You don't

1:07:17

need to elaborate. You don't need to do

1:07:19

anything. Just call him that. It's the truth.

1:07:22

And they get very upset by it.

1:07:24

As you're seeing on certain news programs

1:07:26

where Republicans are, they're getting angry

1:07:28

about it. They're like, how you call them a convicted

1:07:30

felon. Why do you keep doing that? Well, and all

1:07:32

they have to do is say it's the truth. He

1:07:35

is a convicted felon. So that, you know, I'm in

1:07:37

fact, we're just going with that. You just say it

1:07:39

over and over again. Look at Donald Trump, you know,

1:07:41

no obstruction, no collusion. You know, I mean, this is

1:07:43

how he does it. And he, Hillary,

1:07:45

I mean, he just, you

1:07:47

know, he's giving you the

1:07:50

clues on how he talks

1:07:52

to his people by repeating

1:07:54

these things over and over

1:07:56

again. I mean, this is, this

1:07:59

stuff is is so propaganda

1:08:02

101. It's so funny. Yes,

1:08:06

it's so frustrating. It's so frustrating because

1:08:08

these people are supposed to be professionals.

1:08:13

Well, I just heard the other day, I heard

1:08:15

Nancy Pelosi, and I don't know who was the

1:08:17

other one. Maybe it was one of her former

1:08:20

deputies, I can't remember, going on

1:08:22

and on about kitchen table issues again. And it's

1:08:24

like, I get it. The

1:08:28

economy is important, big issue. Everybody always says

1:08:30

the economy is the most important issue to

1:08:32

them. And yes, you have to address

1:08:34

it. But this idea that it's the only thing you

1:08:36

can talk about, and it's all about, we feel compassion

1:08:40

for the people who are suffering and blah, blah,

1:08:42

blah. This is like,

1:08:44

how many elections are we going to...

1:08:48

This is all you ever say. In other words,

1:08:50

this is it. This is the only thing you

1:08:52

ever have to say. There's no adjusting

1:08:55

for current circumstances in

1:08:57

their minds. It's

1:09:00

written in stone. Maybe it's

1:09:02

theosified sort of thinking of

1:09:04

people who have... I think so. Although... Even

1:09:07

the young ones are saying the same

1:09:09

stuff. What can

1:09:11

you do? Heather

1:09:14

wanted to talk a little bit more about a couple

1:09:17

other things, but we

1:09:19

covered some good ground. More opportunity

1:09:22

to talk in the coming months. One

1:09:25

thing that is fascinating to me is

1:09:27

that in August, we're going to see

1:09:29

the Democratic National Convention. The

1:09:32

Republican one is in July. We're

1:09:34

going to have a debate in 20 days. The

1:09:37

first debate is in 20 days between

1:09:39

Biden and Trump. It's

1:09:42

important too. This debate is currently really...

1:09:44

It's very important. I think this is

1:09:46

where Biden is hoping to reintroduce

1:09:48

Donald Trump to the country. It's

1:09:52

a great time to introduce him the day he

1:09:54

gets convicted of a felony. Right.

1:09:56

That's the term. Yeah.

1:09:59

That's the term. Oh, go ahead,

1:10:01

Sam. The interesting

1:10:03

thing is that sometime between

1:10:06

this first debate and

1:10:08

the Democratic National Convention, Joe

1:10:12

Biden will be

1:10:14

nominated, the presidential

1:10:17

nominee for the Democratic Party. It will

1:10:20

not happen at the Democratic National Convention.

1:10:23

We don't know the date yet. It's going

1:10:25

to be virtual. It

1:10:28

seems the strategy that the

1:10:30

Biden campaign has is, let's

1:10:34

be invisible on some level.

1:10:37

Let's just make this all about Donald

1:10:39

Trump, which makes the stuff about not

1:10:41

having at least surrogates and

1:10:43

other people come out and say convicted

1:10:46

felon that much more ridiculous. Exactly.

1:10:48

They've got a lot of them who could do it.

1:10:51

You get Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer and

1:10:53

J.D. Pritzker and Josh Shapiro.

1:10:55

These are all big names.

1:10:59

They're second tier.

1:11:01

We're going to hear a lot more about them in

1:11:03

the next couple of years. Kamala Harris, the rest of

1:11:05

them. There's a lot of people who can be out

1:11:07

there making this case and doing

1:11:09

it effectively. I

1:11:13

keep waiting. I've been sitting here going, well,

1:11:15

come on. They're going to

1:11:17

really launch here any minute. It's

1:11:20

getting late, guys. It's got to get

1:11:22

going now. It's getting late. I'm getting

1:11:25

a little bit anxious here. I'm

1:11:27

having some bad dreams at this point.

1:11:29

I'll be honest. I don't think I'm going

1:11:32

to have more than two and a half

1:11:34

hours of contiguous sleep for months.

1:11:38

Until November. Then maybe, I

1:11:40

don't know, I may never sleep again. I don't

1:11:42

know. I'm getting anxious.

1:11:46

I'm getting a little anxious. Well, Heather, we

1:11:48

will check in and see how your sleep is

1:11:50

going over

1:11:52

the next month. It's a pleasure.

1:11:55

Of course, we will put links

1:11:57

to your work at Salon. at

1:12:00

the Uber blog, hullabaloo.

1:12:03

Okay, thanks for having me. You guys have a

1:12:05

great weekend. You too, Heather. Bye bye. All

1:12:09

right, folks, we're going to take a quick

1:12:11

break. We were

1:12:14

supposed to have other guests on

1:12:16

for the second half of the show today. There's

1:12:22

a lot of very strange stuff

1:12:24

going on with this guy from

1:12:26

the birds aren't real. We

1:12:31

had him on a couple years ago. We

1:12:34

had him on a couple of years ago. Then

1:12:36

it seemed like he passed

1:12:39

away. It

1:12:42

seems like he passed away. Well,

1:12:44

that's the thing. I mean, that's why it seems

1:12:46

like he's passed away. And

1:12:50

but maybe he'll be back next

1:12:52

week. There's a strange thing going on with

1:12:54

these birds aren't real guys. And we'll talk

1:12:56

about it next week. But

1:13:00

just want you to know

1:13:03

that's, you know, we're on top of that and

1:13:05

we'll get to them soon. Have

1:13:08

we rescheduled them yet, Bradley? They're

1:13:12

good for next week, though. Next week? Yeah.

1:13:15

Okay. Oh, gosh. Will they be

1:13:17

involved or? I

1:13:19

don't know. We'll see. Folks,

1:13:23

again, your support makes this show possible. You

1:13:25

can become a member at join the majority

1:13:27

report dot com. And don't forget just coffee.

1:13:31

Just coffee dot co-op fair

1:13:33

trade coffee and hot

1:13:35

chocolate by

1:13:37

the majority report blend. Use

1:13:40

the coupon code majority get 10 percent off. Emma

1:13:43

E S V N. God, I

1:13:46

imagine there's going to be a

1:13:48

lot of talk about that amazing game last night.

1:13:50

There will be on Monday. They were all

1:13:53

like, we're going to play really good defense.

1:13:55

And then all of a sudden,

1:13:57

the first quarter, my

1:13:59

understanding is. there was a record

1:14:01

set last night for the largest

1:14:05

lead going

1:14:07

into the second quarter of any

1:14:09

championship basketball game in the history

1:14:11

of championship basketball games. It

1:14:13

looked like there was an opportunity for the

1:14:16

maps to come back in like the third

1:14:18

quarter, but then they slammed the door. That

1:14:20

was a historic performance by Porzingis for sure.

1:14:22

Celtics do like to play with their

1:14:24

food, but I am going with them

1:14:26

because the John Brown wore a free

1:14:28

Palestine bracelet in January. So he did.

1:14:30

So there, I mean, well, I, just

1:14:32

a quick, I'm very mad at some owns the

1:14:34

maps. Miriam Adelson owns the Dallas

1:14:36

Mavericks. Right. So that is a

1:14:39

big, uh, knock and

1:14:41

Mark Cuban, the libertarian is like a assistant

1:14:43

owner now. Yeah. He's now like a

1:14:46

president or in management. But, um,

1:14:48

so it's tough for me

1:14:50

because I hate Chris Saffs Porzingis

1:14:52

for obvious reasons. Um, and

1:14:55

what's the obvious reasons? I

1:14:57

mean, he forces way out of the Knicks. Uh,

1:14:59

there's more severe personal issues off

1:15:01

the court with him. Aren't there?

1:15:04

Yeah. Um, I will say, I will

1:15:06

say off care. I knew somebody that

1:15:08

knew him and, um, yeah,

1:15:11

I mean, he was accused of rape and

1:15:13

other things, but, uh, like the,

1:15:15

I don't think he's the best person, but

1:15:17

honestly, I'm like almost finding myself like, maybe

1:15:20

I just have to root for the Celtics

1:15:22

because of the more whole Miriam Adelson, uh,

1:15:24

Trump. I will give you many, a

1:15:27

lot of money if you annex the West bank thing. And

1:15:29

we have more, we have an update on that. And

1:15:31

it's not interesting. Um, all right.

1:15:33

So anyway, we talked about, we previewed the

1:15:35

NBA championship. We also, uh, the

1:15:37

NHL Stanley cup final we, we previewed.

1:15:39

Um, and then we talked about that Caitlin

1:15:42

Clark stuff, which we dove, uh, into

1:15:44

pretty deep on ESPN, but we'll be

1:15:46

back on Monday to give updates on

1:15:48

all those series youtube.com/ESPN show. Matt.

1:15:53

Uh, yeah. Left reckoning. Uh, Mike

1:15:55

Preisner, uh, talking about, uh, our

1:15:57

favorite, uh, Tulsi Gabbard, Mike, uh,

1:15:59

red. Tulsi's new book which he's

1:16:01

been working on for like eight years through

1:16:03

like three different political identities and

1:16:05

like several name changes I think it's called

1:16:08

like for love of country now There

1:16:11

are two chapters on how trans people are You

1:16:15

know attacking the country and just to

1:16:17

just two chapters on how trans people are

1:16:19

attacking the country I think there I

1:16:21

think there might be some sprinkles and some other chapters

1:16:23

too, but yes, you did devote two chapters of a

1:16:26

Book that I wanted to read but it was a

1:16:28

file sharing. I don't know. I think it's like 200

1:16:31

pages I need to look that up 200 pages and

1:16:33

there's two chapters in the

1:16:37

the The safety in

1:16:39

the future of the American of

1:16:41

America two chapters on trans people

1:16:44

it is Something

1:16:47

else I mean it's back to her roots

1:16:49

like she comes from a very homophobic Background

1:16:52

it's it's sort of what I

1:16:54

said the mic is like it's kind of like

1:16:56

how Kendrick Lamar had been sitting on how much

1:16:58

he hated Drake for so long because of Sort

1:17:01

of reasons to go along and now he's able

1:17:03

to fully admit how much he hates it And

1:17:06

that's how Tulsi Gabbard. I think feels about capable.

1:17:08

Yeah for love of country is I'm

1:17:11

trying to look at the how much pages it

1:17:13

is here. It's a full I Guess

1:17:16

that that detail is not important enough for Google books, but

1:17:18

yeah We begin in that

1:17:20

Mike prize or patreon.com says left reckoning I

1:17:23

never relate to you more than when

1:17:25

you shoehorn your latest obsession into Every

1:17:28

other element of your interest like

1:17:30

the Kendrick Drake beef is like X which

1:17:32

you've been doing for four weeks at this

1:17:34

point I do know Housewives

1:17:37

of sports I've been doing that

1:17:39

for since like March when like that

1:17:41

came out then we had Fantano on

1:17:43

my politics No, it's

1:17:46

just comforting to know that we share a personality

1:17:48

disorder All

1:17:51

right, we're gonna take a quick break head into the

1:17:53

fun half see you there

1:17:59

Three months for now, six months from now, nine months

1:18:01

from now. And I don't think it's going to be the

1:18:03

same as it looks like in six months from now. And

1:18:05

I don't know if it's necessarily going to be better six

1:18:07

months from now than it is three months from now. But

1:18:11

I think around 18 months out, we're going to look

1:18:13

back and go like, wow. What?

1:18:17

What is that going on? It's

1:18:19

nuts. Wait

1:18:21

a second. Hold on for hold on for a second. Emma,

1:18:27

welcome to the program. Matt.

1:18:32

What is up, everyone? No,

1:18:36

me. You did it. Let's

1:18:39

go Brandon. Let's go Brandon. Bradley,

1:18:44

you want to say hello? Sorry to

1:18:46

disappoint everyone. I'm just a random

1:18:49

guy. It's all the boys today.

1:18:51

Fundamentally false. No, I'm sorry. Women's.

1:18:53

Stop talking for a second. Where

1:18:55

is this coming from, dude? But dude, you

1:18:58

want to smoke this? Seven

1:19:00

eight. Yes. Five.

1:19:04

Me. You're safe?

1:19:06

Yes. Is

1:19:10

this me? Is it me? It

1:19:13

is you. Is

1:19:16

this me? All of us are safe? I think it is

1:19:18

you. Who is you? No

1:19:22

sound. Every single freaking

1:19:24

day. What's on your mind? We

1:19:27

can discuss free markets and we can discuss

1:19:29

capitalism. I'm going to go

1:19:31

to the line. Who libertarians? They're so

1:19:33

stupid though. Common sense says of course.

1:19:35

Gobbledygook. We fucking nailed him. So what's

1:19:37

79 plus 21? Challenge

1:19:40

Matt. Positively quivering. I believe 96 I

1:19:42

want to say. 857-210-35501. One

1:19:47

half. Three eights. 9-11 for instance. $6,543

1:19:54

trillion dollars sold. It's a zero-sum game.

1:19:56

Actually you're making me think less. But

1:19:58

let me stay. this call

1:20:03

that our same goes to satire on

1:20:05

top of it all my favorite part

1:20:07

about you is just like every day

1:20:09

all day like do it without

1:20:11

a duck hey buddy we see all

1:20:17

right folks folks folks it's

1:20:19

just the week being weeded

1:20:22

out obviously yeah sun's out

1:20:24

guns out I

1:20:30

don't know but you should know people

1:20:33

just don't like to entertain ideas in it I

1:20:35

have a question who cares our

1:20:39

chat is enabled I love it

1:20:42

I do love that look

1:20:45

gotta jump gotta be quick I get a

1:20:47

jump I'm losing it bro two

1:20:51

o'clock we're already late and the guy's being

1:20:54

a dick so screw him sent

1:20:57

to a glove like what is

1:21:00

wrong with you love

1:21:02

you bye love

1:21:05

you bye bye

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features