Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey folks, today's episode brought to you
0:03
by one of my favorite
0:05
sponsors, Sunset Lake
0:07
Sebade. Sunset
0:10
Lake sebade.com use the code left is best
0:12
get 20% off. Get
0:14
20% off what you say Sam. Well,
0:17
only the best of Sebade products.
0:20
They've got tinctures. They've got tinctures
0:22
to help you sleep. They've got
0:24
tinctures with melatonin in two different
0:27
flavors in multiple concentrations. They've
0:29
got smokeables. They've got keef. They've
0:32
got flour. They've got pre rolls. They've
0:35
got fudge and
0:37
coffee. They've got salve
0:39
and lotions. They've got
0:42
gummies, all sorts of
0:44
gummies. Gummies with, to help you relax.
0:46
Gummies to help you focus. Gummies to
0:48
help you sleep. Gummies
0:51
to allow you to have a little bit of funs
0:53
because some of those have a Tage say
0:55
in them as well as
0:58
the Taltonine gummies.
1:06
All these products third party tested. They're
1:08
a great company. Sunset
1:10
Lake sebade.com $20 minimum
1:13
wage, mostly employee owned. They
1:16
have contributed thousands of
1:19
dollars to things like strike
1:21
relief funds and refugee
1:23
resettlement, carceral reform, Planned
1:26
Parenthood, mutual
1:28
aid, food pantries, just
1:31
a great company, great bunch of
1:33
folks up there. They take
1:36
care of the land, integrated pest
1:38
management, no pesticides, and
1:41
they regenerative farming
1:43
practices that they developed with
1:45
the University of Vermont. Check
1:48
it out. Sunset Lake sebade.com use
1:50
the coupon code left is best and
1:52
you will get, that's
1:55
right, 20% off. And
1:57
now for the show. The
2:01
Majority Report with Sam
2:04
Cedar. Where every day
2:06
is casual Friday. That
2:09
means Monday is casual Monday.
2:13
Tuesday, casual Tuesday.
2:16
Wednesday, casual hump day.
2:19
Thursday, casual Thursday. That's what
2:21
we call it. And Friday,
2:23
casual Shabbat. The Majority Report
2:25
with Sam Cedar. It is
2:28
Friday, June 7, 2024. My
2:40
name is Sam Cedar. This is
2:42
the five-time award-winning Majority Report. We
2:46
are broadcasting live steps from the industrially
2:48
ravaged Gowanus
2:51
Canal in the heartland of
2:53
America, downtown Brooklyn,
2:55
USA. On
2:59
the program today, Heather Parton. Call
3:03
him from salon.com or you may know her as Digby.
3:08
From the blog Hullabaloo. Also
3:11
on the program today, job growth
3:13
blows through expectations. Biden and Normandy
3:15
commemorating D-Day. New report Clarence Thomas
3:17
has accepted millions of dollars
3:20
worth of gifts. In
3:26
the past decade, Bannon
3:29
ordered to prison on July 1st, Netanyahu to address
3:32
a joint session of Congress on July
3:34
24th. U.S. and 16 countries call on
3:37
Hamas and Israel to close on a
3:39
cease-fire agreement. As
3:43
the NAACP calls on Biden to halt
3:46
weapons sales to Israel. Alex
3:51
Jones has agreed he
3:54
must sell info wars.
4:00
to pay off his
4:02
defamation suit. Polling
4:05
shows a slight change in the wake of
4:07
Trump's conviction. The
4:10
Biden administration scrambles to deal with fallout
4:13
from its new, probably illegal,
4:15
asylum policy. Lastly,
4:19
South Korean Samsung workers strike for
4:21
the first time ever. All
4:23
this and more on today's
4:27
majority report. Welcome ladies
4:29
and gentlemen, it is... Casual
4:32
Friday. There you go. Casual
4:34
Friday. So casual. Well, this
4:37
is going to drive me crazy. I got to do this. Oh,
4:40
there you go. Whoop. Yep, there
4:42
we go. Boom. Sorry. Yeah,
4:45
it's all good. Folks, welcome. It
4:48
is casual Friday. It is before
4:50
all the craziness begins.
4:52
Let me just acknowledge that yes,
4:55
summertime now. I have officially
4:57
moved to
5:00
wearing short sleeve shirts as
5:03
I do come
5:06
past Memorial
5:08
Day. Everybody knows
5:10
that Sam wears his short
5:12
sleeve shirts on Fridays. Of
5:15
course, I'm going to move soon to
5:17
my button down short sleeve shirts on
5:19
the weekdays, but it's inevitable. It'll be
5:21
a gradual transition so people don't get freaked
5:24
out about it. I didn't want to... Yeah, Friday
5:26
is the easiest way to introduce this to people.
5:29
Thanks for joining us folks at the end of the week. We
5:33
got a lot of talk about. Just a reminder,
5:36
it's your support that makes this show possible.
5:39
You can become a member at
5:41
jointhemajorityreport.com. When
5:43
you do, you get the free show free
5:46
of commercials and the fun half. And
5:49
your support really helps if you listen to the
5:51
show once or twice a week, three
5:53
times a week, five times a week.
5:56
By all means, it is our members that make the
5:58
show. show of
6:01
function, frankly. This
6:05
story keeps unraveling. We're
6:08
going to have some cases that theoretically
6:10
will be decided or at least determined
6:13
as to whether they'll go forward from
6:15
the Supreme Court regarding Donald Trump. Aside
6:20
from the general corruptness of someone like Clarence
6:22
Thomas, maybe we'll talk a little bit about
6:24
that later, Clarence Thomas, we've
6:27
seen this reporting from ProPublica. We know the
6:29
story of how this
6:32
developed. Clarence Thomas has received
6:34
millions of dollars dwarfing
6:37
any other number of gifts because now
6:39
he's had to go back and basically
6:41
check off which gifts he's gotten, et
6:43
cetera, et cetera, because he was caught
6:45
not recording these things. Millions
6:48
of guests from Harlan Crow, a
6:50
billionaire who was recruited by Leonard
6:53
Leo, who was the
6:56
former head of the Federalist Society, the guy who's
6:58
basically in charge of taking care of the judges.
7:02
When Clarence Thomas 20 years ago threatened to
7:04
quit the court because he didn't have enough
7:06
money to function, Leonard Leo
7:08
introduced him to what became his
7:11
new best friend, Harlan
7:13
Crow, a billionaire who then
7:15
proceeded to pay for things like his
7:17
mom's house, his kid's private
7:21
school education, and take him
7:23
on private jet vacations
7:25
multiple times a year for
7:28
years. Clarence
7:31
Thomas decided, you know what? My life as a justice
7:33
is not so bad. I think I'll stay on the
7:35
court. It's almost like getting
7:38
your payoff. It's really having your cake and
7:40
eating it too. While
7:43
Clarence Thomas clearly
7:45
... I don't know if he
7:48
changed any of his votes. He just found a
7:50
benefactor who appreciated his work and paid him to
7:52
stay on the court, essentially.
7:55
Sam Alito refuses
7:58
to recuse himself. I
10:00
was going to say, is it
10:02
liberal or is it like you
10:05
have your own job? No
10:11
felt divorce supporter. You
10:15
had the right to vote. Yeah,
10:19
go back. It can
10:21
be addressed to a woman, which is the C word.
10:23
Now, let me just break this down, Emily. You say
10:25
it was you who said those things. It was not
10:27
your now husband. But you say
10:29
Alito is lying here for another very basic
10:31
reason. Can you explain? So,
10:35
I, at
10:39
best, he's mistaken, but at
10:41
worst, he's just outright lying.
10:43
And there was a neighbor
10:45
who even witnessed this and
10:48
witnessed me using that unfortunate
10:50
term. And what
10:52
else I said in that interaction
10:54
is so important. I just want to say
10:57
kudos to this
10:59
lady for owning
11:01
up for saying that word and
11:04
also for deploying it in perhaps
11:06
one of the most appropriate and
11:08
maybe the only appropriate circumstance. A
11:10
righteous slur. 100%. What else I said in that interaction is
11:13
so important. And I
11:19
hope it's not getting forgotten in the
11:21
discourse around the word. In that interaction,
11:23
she approached us, started
11:25
screaming at us, used all of
11:28
our full names, which to me
11:30
felt like a threat because you're
11:32
a stranger. We don't know you. You don't know us. How
11:34
do you know our full names? And
11:37
I just, I started yelling, how
11:39
dare you? Because they both were there at
11:41
the same time. So I said, how dare
11:43
you? You're on the highest court in the
11:45
land. You represent the Supreme Court of the
11:47
United States. You're behaving this way. You're yelling
11:50
at a neighbor. You're harassing us. How dare
11:52
you shame on you? And I
11:55
did use the words. So if
11:58
that in any way, you know, John
14:00
Roberts to stand up and say, okay,
14:03
this seems to like, it's going a little
14:05
far here. And, you know, the guy should
14:07
recuse himself. He's lied to
14:09
Congress. We
14:12
know that he was a source of a leak during
14:15
the ACA, a decision
14:20
back in 2012. There's
14:22
every reason to believe that he
14:24
was the leak of the Dobbs
14:26
decision came from him. And
14:30
the guy is a category
14:33
he's lied to Congress. This
14:35
is a Supreme Court justice. Yeah.
14:39
It's in the idea that
14:41
Dick Durbin is
14:44
not hauling these people into Congress, even
14:47
if he can't impeach them, because
14:49
he doesn't have the votes. Even if they won't
14:51
show up. It's just amazing. Bring
14:54
that neighbor on, not on CNN. Why
14:56
is she on CNN instead of a
14:58
hearing that Dick Durbin is holding, right?
15:00
I mean, she lives right around the
15:03
corner in Washington, DC. It'd be pretty
15:05
easy to figure out the situation. Material
15:07
witness about this political symbolism coming
15:09
from- Exactly. ... political symbolism.
15:11
And now, every reason to
15:13
believe that the Supreme
15:15
Court justice has made
15:18
a deliberate lie to
15:20
Congress. I mean, not
15:23
a great look for one of
15:25
nine people who basically dictate the
15:28
laws of this country. And she
15:30
said it there too, which we've made this
15:32
point before, but she is not one
15:35
of the most powerful people in the country.
15:38
I mean, definitely in the top 50, we
15:40
have Sam Alito. The fact
15:42
that he felt the need to, and him
15:45
or his wife acting in
15:47
a rogue manner, which I have a hard time believing,
15:49
felt the need to not just exert
15:51
power on the rest of the country
15:53
through his immense ability to do so
15:56
as a Supreme Court justice, but to
15:58
do a troll move, not once, but twice. goes
22:00
to the Cayman Islands where if
22:02
Trump wins, I'll be depositing millions
22:05
of dollars as I try
22:07
and relocate and head to
22:09
a secure location. Also,
22:14
Jamaica and Cozumel,
22:18
I think in Mexico, but
22:20
also, you know, great food on the cruise.
22:22
And every day there
22:24
are talks
22:27
from writers. I'll probably interview a couple
22:29
of people. Check it out. nationcruise.com
22:33
slash MR. All right, quick break.
22:36
And we'll be talking to Heather
22:38
Parton. We
23:13
had a little bit of technical difficulties. They have
23:15
been resolved, ladies and gentlemen. It
23:18
is always a pleasure to welcome
23:21
back to the program, possibly
23:24
a longest running guest that
23:27
we've ever had. I
23:29
don't know. There's a
23:31
lot of competition because I'm now getting
23:34
very, very long in the tooth. But
23:36
ladies and gentlemen, Heather
23:38
Parton or Digby. Hi, Heather. How
23:40
are you? Hi, Sam. I'm
23:43
fine. How are you guys? Hanging
23:45
in there. What is long
23:47
in the tooth? Like, what does that originate
23:50
from? I just had that thought. Your
23:53
teeth actually grow when you get
23:55
older. Yeah, you'll see
23:57
really old women or men. Sometimes some of these
23:59
guys. that's
30:00
not going to work. It's just
30:02
an absurd concept. It's
30:04
offensive. It's incredibly
30:06
offensive. But who is that for? I
30:09
mean, who is that for? Every time these
30:17
people, because let's be clear, and I just want
30:19
to remind people of this, I think most people
30:22
know this. There
30:24
is a party that
30:27
is really built around ID,
30:29
the way that people identify.
30:35
They're homogenous
30:38
in this respect. Identity
30:40
politics is completely intertwined
30:51
with the existence of this party. That
30:53
party is the Republican Party. Really,
30:55
90% of its voters
30:59
are white people. Maybe
31:01
that's a little bit low. It may actually be a little bit
31:03
higher than that. When
31:07
they talk about black
31:10
people, brown people, and we should
31:12
say, Democrats lose the white vote
31:15
fairly consistently.
31:18
They attract
31:20
not just white people, but brown people,
31:22
and black people,
31:25
and Asian people, and just a much wider
31:27
range of people. This is indisputable. This
31:35
is just the fact. When the Republican
31:37
Party talks
31:39
about their appealing to black
31:41
people, it's usually in a
31:43
way that is just
31:46
to appeal to white people who
31:49
want to think that they're
31:53
not putting off black people
31:55
in some way. Isn't that
31:57
always the strategy? you
32:00
could see it in, I mean, you guys are there
32:02
in New York. So, you know, you saw this with
32:04
the, with that
32:06
rally that he held in the Bronx,
32:08
right? I mean, this was absurd. And
32:10
it was actually laughable. And New Yorkers
32:12
who were not, you know, Trumpers were
32:14
laughing at the whole concept. But, you
32:16
know, the fact is, is that in
32:18
the Bronx, there's, you know, quite a
32:20
few people who voted for Trump. I
32:22
mean, it's a big, big population there.
32:24
So of course, you know, you can,
32:26
you can bring in a few thousand
32:28
people to a rally, you could do it in my
32:31
neighborhood, you know, even though it was like 92% for
32:33
Biden. So, you know, there's, there's 8% of
32:36
people you could probably get. But, but
32:38
the idea what he did there by
32:40
sort of pretending like the crowd was
32:42
diverse, and that there were all these
32:44
black people from the Bronx, he brought
32:46
in a couple of rappers, two of
32:48
whom had, you know, were under indictment
32:51
for some kind of crimes. Again, that's
32:53
part of it. He wanted to say,
32:55
hey, look, you know, you're like
32:57
me, they all love me, the criminals love me.
32:59
But, you know, the
33:02
whole idea was there to show to
33:05
suburban white people that are kind of
33:07
queasy about all this racism thing that,
33:09
you know, Oh, don't worry, the black
33:11
people love him too. So you don't,
33:13
you don't have to be that that
33:16
is, I think exactly what it is. It's,
33:18
it's like, you know, they're gonna say that
33:20
we're racist. But if we were racist, would
33:22
we have rappers on the stage? I don't
33:24
think so. You know, it's like one of
33:26
those messages.
33:29
And I mean, it's interesting
33:31
about the rallies, and I want to get sidetracked by
33:33
this, but it
33:36
is very difficult to assess a
33:40
candidate's popularity
33:43
based upon, you know, a single
33:47
day or any in terms of like
33:49
turnout, right? I mean, I remember being
33:51
in Manchester in 08 for
33:54
the primaries and convinced like,
33:56
Oh my God, Ron Paul, Ron
33:59
Paul is going to i
34:01
don't know if he's gonna win this uh...
34:04
new hampshire primary in from the
34:06
republican primary but i was like he i'd be
34:08
surprised if he doesn't come in second or third
34:11
because everywhere you went there
34:13
were ron paul signed holders and
34:16
you know occasionally see one from it ron me
34:18
well i go around here and there and and
34:21
it turned out that uh... the
34:23
differences that everybody
34:26
who voted for ron paul also held a
34:28
sign and i thought a
34:30
lot of people it but they did
34:32
not represent they represent
34:34
ten voters or a hundred voters
34:36
or a thousand voters each
34:39
person represented exactly one voter
34:41
and all those people who held
34:44
the sign voted for him but no more and
34:46
uh... you know i think they came in six or
34:48
seven i don't remember what it was but uh...
34:51
it tell me a very valuable lesson about you
34:53
know sort of trying to assess uh...
34:55
because you can that measures the
34:57
debt of support but
35:00
not necessarily the breadth of support but
35:02
i will say this is that all the
35:04
reports i've been seeing from reporters who followed
35:06
uh... trump in twenty twenty
35:08
or twenty sixteen are
35:11
saying there is a massive drop-off of
35:14
uh... of people now i
35:17
don't know what that means really at
35:20
the end of the day i just don't
35:22
know what you what you can tell about
35:24
that but you know trump relied on some
35:26
very very intense voters and if they're
35:29
not intense about him they
35:31
may go and pull the lever against
35:33
uh... joe biden but it's it's a
35:35
different electorate this time around well
35:38
i think that's true and and it's one of
35:41
the things that the pollsters are starting to look
35:43
at you can even see you know that the
35:45
god of all poll polling is the new york
35:47
times cn a poll apparently anytime they you know
35:50
have a hiccup the entire uh...
35:52
journalistic community you
35:54
know skit goes on high alert uh...
35:58
even there which has been pretty
36:00
kind of predicting a, you
36:02
know, pretty grim prediction for Joe
36:04
Biden up to now, is
36:06
starting to make that shift. And it's not because
36:09
of any bias, it's because they're starting to look
36:11
at likely voters. That's what happens as you get
36:13
closer to the election. And likely
36:15
voters, that's a very, you know, that's more
36:17
art than science, but it, and it's a
36:19
little mystifying how they come up with it
36:21
in these days of weird polling
36:24
techniques, because they have to do a
36:26
lot more modeling than actually talking to
36:28
people, because people don't answer their phone
36:30
and blah, blah, blah, we know all about
36:32
that. But what they're starting to look at
36:34
is what the likely voter model is going
36:36
to be. And so you're seeing that
36:39
in some of the coverage and what some of
36:41
these pollsters are talking about. And it's very interesting
36:43
to me, because again, like I
36:45
said, it's more art than science. And from my
36:47
observation, what I see about
36:49
this election is that people, that a lot of
36:51
people are seeing it. First of all, they don't
36:53
want to hear about it. They don't want to
36:55
talk about it. They don't want to think about
36:57
it because it's depressing. Just, you
37:00
know, both sides are just, you know,
37:02
nothing new here, nothing inspiring, nothing, even
37:04
on the Republican side, there's a lot
37:06
of that. I mean, of course, there's
37:08
the hardcore maggots, but I mean, I
37:10
mean, just among, you know, normie Republicans
37:12
who don't necessarily live their lives around
37:14
politics. But what
37:16
I'm, they're seeing this as a rerun. It's
37:19
a rerun of the last election.
37:21
It's not very interesting. It's kind
37:23
of dull and kind of
37:25
depressing. So how that affects
37:28
turnout, it seems to
37:30
me is going to be very much a
37:32
part of the likely voter model that they're
37:34
trying to put together. And you're
37:36
just starting to see that. And one of the things
37:38
that I mentioned this earlier, that's very
37:41
interesting is that Biden and
37:43
the Democrats in general, not just Biden, just
37:45
do much, much better among people who've been
37:47
voting for the last three or four elections.
37:51
People who have voted before, and
37:53
that's including all the way up to the
37:55
special elections of this year, Biden is actually
37:58
quite a bit of a... a bit
38:00
ahead among those people. It's
38:02
only when you add in the new mix of
38:04
people who haven't voted in the past, which
38:07
like I said, includes some younger voters who
38:09
may very well this year, and they have
38:12
their own issues and their own cares, and that
38:14
certainly should be a concern for Biden. But
38:18
if you just look at the like of the
38:20
voters who've been voting, who've been engaged in politics
38:22
and who are the kind of people who just
38:25
vote, right? Like me. I mean- High
38:27
propensity voters is really what it is. Exactly.
38:31
And we've seen this, that's
38:33
why Democrats keep winning all these special elections.
38:36
That's why the, you know,
38:38
that's basically it. I mean, you see
38:41
that in the context of a special
38:43
election. The most obvious person who's
38:45
gonna come and vote
38:47
in a special election is a high
38:49
propensity voter, someone who has a high
38:51
propensity to vote. And I'm going
38:53
to be voting in the one where the least amount
38:55
of people end up voting because I vote,
38:58
whenever there's a vote, I'm on top of
39:01
it. And it's also, it's not one-to-one,
39:03
but you can also, there is a
39:05
very, very strong correlation to follow the
39:08
news, don't follow the news, in terms
39:10
of your high propensity voting. And
39:13
that's all reflected in every, all these pollings
39:15
that you're talking about in the way that
39:17
the Times revisited this. And
39:20
so it is, it's a
39:22
very different type of election
39:27
I think than we've ever seen,
39:29
really, because generally Democrats
39:31
want, we
39:34
want as many people to vote
39:36
as possible, because
39:38
broadly speaking, democratic,
39:43
at least aspirational policy
39:46
and, you know, actual
39:49
real policy when it
39:51
actually happens, favors
39:54
just a wider amount of people.
39:57
Why that, you know, and I think like, but.
40:01
there's all these headwinds, like Joe
40:03
Biden being, you know, not
40:06
necessarily on top of this game, at
40:09
least from the outside, you know, I mean, who
40:11
knows? Frankly, that's not
40:13
a huge issue for me because
40:15
I'm more concerned with like, what
40:18
are they doing at the FTC? What are they
40:20
doing at the Labor Department? What are they doing in
40:22
Congress? Like, all I need is him to sign a
40:24
bill if, you know, or to pick
40:27
a Supreme Court justice and, you know,
40:29
it's not like he's got all the,
40:31
any, you know, presidents got them
40:33
all in his mind. Well,
40:35
you know, Donald Trump is not a particularly
40:39
good at anything other
40:41
than, I'll take that
40:43
list from Heritage and yes, I'll appoint
40:45
these people's Supreme Court. But
40:48
there's all these headwinds. In one of
40:50
them though, but here's another question. From
40:53
a campaign perspective, let's watch Joe
40:55
Biden with the ABC's David Muir.
40:58
Biden is, this
41:02
took place on yesterday. So in
41:04
Europe, I guess, where Biden is
41:06
for the, you
41:10
know, the D-Day. The D-Day
41:12
anniversary. Yeah. And David
41:14
Muir asked him about Trump's
41:17
guilty verdict. I
41:20
want to talk about the way the Democrats
41:22
are talking about this or not talking about
41:24
this. What
41:27
do you think the American people should make of
41:29
this? How important do you think this conviction should
41:31
be in this race for president? That's
41:33
for the public to decide. But one
41:36
thing for certain is stop undermining the
41:38
rule of law. Stop undermining institutions.
41:41
That's what this whole effort is. All
41:44
the MAGA Republicans are coming out saying this is a fix, this was
41:46
a jury that, this
41:48
was a good judge that set up to
41:50
get Trump. Set
41:53
up to get Trump. There's no evidence
41:55
of any of that. None. He's
41:58
trying to undermine it. Look, you got a fair trial.
42:00
trial. The jury spoke like they
42:02
speak in all cases and it should be
42:04
respected. As we sit here in. I
42:07
mean, I think that's a good answer from
42:10
the president. You know, he's
42:12
basically, you know, talking about institutions and,
42:14
you know, the rule of law.
42:18
Maybe we're not applying that internationally in the same
42:20
way that we should be coming out
42:22
of the Biden administration, but strictly as a
42:24
political matter. That seems the most appropriate
42:26
way to respond to it. There
42:29
should be other Democrats elected Democrats
42:31
who are getting a little more aggressive about
42:33
it. And it seems like they've been
42:36
told don't do that. Well,
42:38
I don't know if they've been told. I don't
42:41
I don't know where that's coming from. But, you
42:43
know, there is apparently a big debate among Democrats
42:45
and I don't understand it at all. I
42:48
mean, this is such a layup that I
42:50
can't even believe anybody in politics would think
42:52
it makes sense to
42:54
to not make the most out of
42:56
the fact that the guy running for
42:58
president is has just been convicted of
43:00
34 felonies in
43:03
a court of law. It makes zero
43:05
sense. And I get what what happened
43:07
was, I mean, this is the how
43:09
the phenomenon sort of unfolded was
43:11
the minute. Well, they started it in the
43:13
last couple of weeks of the of the
43:16
trial when they had all those people come
43:18
to the trial. They had Mike Johnson and
43:20
Vivek Ramaswamy and the rest of them showing
43:22
up at their red ties and sort
43:24
of showing support and solidarity with Trump
43:27
and standing outside the courthouse and
43:29
just absolutely flaying the judge and
43:31
the system and the
43:33
rigged process and blah, blah, blah. They
43:35
were setting that up. They were setting
43:38
it up for a guilty verdict, at
43:40
which point the entire
43:42
Republican Party immediately
43:44
had let out a
43:46
collective primal scream. And
43:49
I have to say that it kind of
43:51
surprised, it's kind of shocked me. I mean,
43:54
not I shouldn't have been shocked, but I
43:56
kind of was was just how unanimous this
43:58
was this and They're
44:00
the ones who are being told from
44:03
on high, no doubt about it, that this
44:05
was a strategy. Come out
44:07
screaming the minute that verdict
44:09
comes in, that this was
44:12
rigged, that it's just absolutely
44:14
undemocratic, that the whole system
44:16
is absolutely imploding and we can't let
44:18
this happen and we're going to get
44:20
revenge and blah, blah, blah. Then it
44:23
was an intimidation tactic. And the Democrats,
44:26
as per usual, fell for it and
44:29
started questioning themselves, gee, should we say anything? I mean,
44:31
gee, I don't know, maybe it's a bad idea to
44:33
talk about Trump and his 34 felony convictions.
44:36
I mean, gee, that might upset somebody, so
44:38
we better not do it. Absolutely
44:41
ridiculous. Of course they should do it. And of
44:43
course, and I think Democrats in Congress, you know,
44:45
there's a limited amount they can do in the
44:47
House because they don't have the majority. But you
44:49
know, I don't know, is the Senate sleeping? What
44:52
is happening? The Senate is 100%
44:54
sleeping. 100% sleeping. I mean,
44:59
I just want to ... This is where
45:01
I got this, I mean, a semaphore reported
45:03
on Friday, last Friday, the
45:05
day of the conviction, I guess
45:07
it was Thursday, the next day, guidance
45:11
from the Democratic Policy and Communications
45:13
Committee advised partisans to stress that,
45:15
quote, our justice system worked as
45:17
it's supposed to, shows
45:19
Republican will bend the need to former President
45:21
Trump, but included no specific attacks around the
45:23
facts of the case. It
45:25
does not look likely to be much of an issue
45:27
going forward as well, especially if they're not getting the
45:30
signal from the top of the ticket to drive the
45:32
point home. I don't think
45:34
minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, or leadership
45:36
will use leadership capital to
45:39
talk about Trump, one senior Democratic aide
45:41
said. And the
45:44
... Now, maybe they've changed course from this, but I've
45:46
seen no evidence of it. The
45:49
reason why you talk about this is because
45:51
that's how you get the press to talk
45:53
about it. Of
45:56
course. It's just like this is
45:58
so remedial, it's unbelievable. I'm
46:01
stunned by it too, Sam. I
46:03
honestly could not believe, as I watched it
46:05
unfold, I didn't read that Semaphore article, so
46:08
I didn't get that this was actually a
46:10
talking point or some kind of instruction coming
46:12
from the Democratic Party. It's absolutely idiotic. You
46:14
know, I get it. It's unpleasant. This is
46:17
not a fun fight at all to have
46:19
because you see people like, and I feel
46:21
it too, I see Marco Rubio and, you
46:23
know, people who otherwise we might not have
46:26
thought of as, you know, in the Tommy
46:30
Tuberville School of Politics, you know,
46:32
just kind of ignorant and magga
46:35
and ridiculous, but they're all like
46:37
that now. So you just have
46:39
to accept that and recognize that
46:42
it's going to be mono, a
46:44
mono, hand-to-hand combat over
46:47
through the next few months until the election. And
46:50
that means, you know, you can't just sit
46:52
back and go, well, you know, we don't
46:54
really want to talk about that. We don't
46:57
really think that's important. They're talking about it,
46:59
for God's sakes. And people are listening to
47:01
what they're saying. And if the Democrats aren't
47:03
actually, you know, countering with anything, it just,
47:06
you know, this is why they're saying. It's
47:08
a vacuum. But we did. We've talked about
47:10
this with Democrats all the time. But in
47:12
this case, I didn't read that 74 article
47:15
either, Sam, but that quote about how they
47:17
need direction from the top of the ticket
47:19
seems exactly right, because we covered Biden's speech
47:21
a week ago today, where he came out
47:24
after the Trump count, you
47:26
know, guilty verdict to talk about
47:28
the Israeli ceasefire proposal that they're
47:30
not, that Israel's not agreeing to.
47:37
And he had this pre-planned moment clearly
47:39
when he's walking out and the reporter
47:41
asks him about it and he turns
47:43
around and makes a meme-able face for
47:45
all the kids on the internet. And
47:47
it just was like, why did you
47:49
choose to one, hold this press conference
47:51
now? Because the ceasefire hasn't gone through.
47:53
So it was like a deliberate way
47:55
to be presidential in
47:58
the wake of this conviction.
48:00
and look presidential, but
48:02
two, then not address it at all. It
48:05
seems like that's really, we're back
48:07
30 years ago to a mode
48:09
of politics where it's about, Biden
48:11
thinks the value of looking presidential
48:13
is way more valuable than doing
48:16
politics. And that is just not
48:18
the political reality that we live
48:20
in anymore. No,
48:22
and it's also, look, all of
48:24
this is about attention, right? I mean, you just
48:26
mentioned it earlier, Sam, that when
48:28
they looked, they did this polling on where, the
48:35
presidential race in light of where you get your news,
48:37
right? Yes. And
48:40
this was people who are paying
48:42
attention. I mean, Biden has
48:44
those people hands down, people who read newspapers,
48:46
watch cable TV, watch things like
48:48
this show, people who are politically engaged and
48:51
who actually keep up, no
48:53
doubt about it. I mean, Biden wins those people, but
48:55
the people, there are a whole lot of people
48:58
who are not paying any attention, but
49:00
somehow or another, they have an opinion.
49:03
And they're getting an opinion because this kind of stuff
49:05
just seeps in. It seeps into the culture. I mean,
49:07
you guys know this. I mean, it's- It's almost 100%.
49:10
It's almost, it happens in conversations around
49:12
the water cooler. It happens when you're
49:14
a jigger with your relatives. Somebody
49:17
says something, it happens in just
49:19
overhearing conversations. And it
49:21
happens on social media in places where you
49:23
least expect it. Somebody's
49:26
on Facebook, looking up their college roommate or
49:28
something, and something comes up and you see
49:30
it. And you don't necessarily consciously pay attention,
49:33
but there it is. And so they're getting
49:35
their opinions from somewhere. And the only way
49:37
that you can penetrate that, and there are,
49:39
it's a vast number of people. That's
49:42
what's shocking to me is how few people, I
49:44
mean, people really dropped out of the news cycle.
49:46
You can see this- People are really tuned out.
49:49
I mean, yes. They are really tuned out. I
49:51
mean, I could see it in sort of our
49:53
numbers in terms of like, the
49:55
passerby's on YouTube and
49:57
whatnot. But here's the fact
50:00
that- People don't know, I would bet. I
50:02
think it's going to surprise everyone. You
50:04
can go look this up. The number of
50:06
people who heard about
50:09
Donald Trump's grab them by
50:11
the P word versus the number of
50:14
people who
50:16
heard about Hillary Clinton's emails. There
50:18
was actually less people who heard about the grab
50:21
them by the P word. And
50:23
that is because, no, I'm
50:25
talking specifically during the campaign though. I
50:27
mean, the emails. I mean, cause there
50:29
was literally polling about this. This
50:32
is not conjecture in my part. And
50:36
the polling on this, and I think
50:38
the, you know, why
50:41
that's the case, I suspect is
50:43
because Democrats step back and they're
50:45
like, we don't have to do anything with this because
50:48
this is so disgusting. And so, you know,
50:50
no one's going to like this guy present,
50:53
but they don't realize that like, this
50:56
stuff doesn't travel on its own. That we
50:58
are in a very different, I don't know
51:00
if we were ever in a different age
51:02
than we are now, but we're in a
51:05
different age where media, there's
51:07
so much to compete for
51:09
attention. The media constantly needs
51:11
something new because that's what's going to get
51:13
your most clicks. You know, if it doesn't
51:15
happen in the first 24 hours and
51:19
there's nothing more to that story. And
51:22
if, you know, Chuck Schumer doesn't
51:24
come out on Monday and then, you
51:26
know, Kamala Harris doesn't come out on
51:28
Tuesday, there's nothing new on that story.
51:31
Then they just move on to the next thing. And
51:33
that's why it seems like a year ago that he was
51:36
a convicted felon and he's not going out there and doing
51:38
it. And what they
51:40
do also is they will lard up
51:42
the news cycle with
51:45
other things. So Donald Trump is out
51:47
on the campaign trail and
51:51
he's now like moved the story past his conviction
51:55
into like the question of
51:58
revenge. So now,
52:00
Now all we're talking about is retribution
52:02
and revenge and not the underlying. Hey,
52:04
wait a second. You got convicted. You're
52:06
a convicted felon of an actual crime.
52:08
Here he is with Dr.
52:10
Phil of all people. The
52:15
word revenge is a very strong word, but
52:17
maybe we have revenge through success. But
52:19
that's what I'd like to see. I want to see the
52:21
country survive because this country is not going to survive like
52:23
this. And
52:26
really, the expression, I think it's the
52:28
greatest theme ever in politics maybe because
52:30
it's the biggest movement. We
52:32
want to make America great again, and that's what we
52:35
have to do. And I think you'd
52:37
be very proud of the job we did. The Pope
52:39
has a book out that he's written, and he says,
52:41
we are all brothers and sisters, and
52:43
there must be no resentment among us for
52:45
any war to truly end. Forgiveness
52:47
is necessary. Otherwise, what
52:50
we'll follow is not justice,
52:52
but revenge. And
52:55
that's true even in the cultural wars that
52:57
we're fighting here. I think you
52:59
have so much to do, you don't
53:02
have time to get even. You only
53:04
have time to get right. Well
53:06
revenge does take time, I will say that.
53:08
It does. And sometimes revenge can be justified,
53:11
but I have to be honest. Sometimes
53:13
it can. But is the country better or worse for
53:15
them going after you? I think the country is really
53:17
worse for what they've done, and I think you see
53:20
that when you look at the poll numbers. And you
53:22
see that almost $400 million
53:25
has poured in since this horrible
53:28
decision was made.
53:31
That was a few. Okay, aside from his
53:34
lying about his
53:36
fundraising numbers, he's
53:38
also including all the money that he
53:41
embezzled out of Truth Social into his
53:43
legal fund. That's also part of the
53:45
money. But here's
53:48
my point, is like what the strategy is
53:50
from Trump's perspective. The topic is now
53:52
about revenge. And whether he's going
53:54
to be good enough or not good enough to
53:56
seek revenge. What's the revenge
53:58
here? I'm going
54:00
to force them to also lie
54:02
on their business forms. Here,
54:05
then Dr. Phil shows up on CNN
54:07
saying, this
54:10
is really about whether Donald Trump is a
54:13
good man enough and can get by this.
54:15
Watch this clip. Is
54:19
his inclination because just today, he
54:23
said, for example, that he would indict
54:25
the January 6th committee members, like
54:28
presumptively the members of Congress who were on
54:30
that committee investigating what happened on January 6th,
54:34
are you more
54:36
or less convinced after sitting down with him
54:39
that he actually would follow through on those
54:41
kinds of pledges? Well,
54:45
I actually don't think he will. I think
54:48
this is a situation that, it's
54:51
a process. This is something that I think he's
54:53
had in his mind that there's only one way
54:55
to go and that's to get
54:57
even. And I think
54:59
I've really made some headway with
55:01
him that that is not the way to
55:04
go. I think
55:06
it's a process. I think he'll turn this over
55:08
and over in his mind. And I
55:10
don't think he will do that. And to
55:13
the extent that I have any opportunity
55:15
to lean into this
55:17
with him, I am
55:19
going to relentlessly try and
55:22
get him to not do that and to
55:24
get others to not do that. Look, we need to
55:26
stop this. This is a time where
55:29
America needs to come together, not be playing. Okay.
55:33
Well, I'm convinced, sure. But
55:36
aside from the sort of like shocking sort
55:38
of narcissism that
55:43
Dr. Phil has, that's not surprising. But
55:47
the amazing thing that's happening in the absence of
55:52
something for like an Abby Phillips,
55:54
let's say, to push back
55:56
on, like, because
55:58
there's a vacuum. of people saying
56:01
he got convicted of
56:03
a crime that was, you know,
56:06
did Alvin Bragg bring this
56:08
these charges because the prosecutor
56:11
is a political position and
56:13
they want to bring charges that, you know,
56:15
make them seem like they're doing their job?
56:19
More than likely, that's why every
56:21
prosecutor prosecutes, you know, they
56:23
may, but they
56:25
also don't bring cases they think they're going to lose. And
56:29
this was a case where a jury
56:32
found him guilty. And
56:34
this whole talk of like, will he or
56:36
won't he seek revenge? Well,
56:38
like, wait, how is this in
56:41
any way equal? He's going to make up
56:43
charges and try and imprison people because they
56:45
sat on a congressional committee? That should be
56:48
the question. And the Democrats are
56:50
not forcing that question. And the media is
56:52
certainly not going to do it because they're
56:54
more interested in Dr. Philip. You think, can
56:56
you change him through therapy? I mean, it's
56:58
crazy. Well,
57:01
I have a couple of points on this.
57:03
The first is, is that, you know, the
57:05
revenge thing, I mean, this has been true.
57:07
Trump has been, you know, a vengeance is
57:09
mine kind of guy ever since the 1980s.
57:12
It's all documented. I've written about it probably
57:14
a dozen times over the since Trump came
57:16
down that escalator, because it's a very fascinating
57:18
part of his personality, right? I mean, it
57:21
is it is there. And he's always been
57:23
that. But there's more to it than that.
57:25
I totally like a Roy Cohn figure for
57:27
his attorney general. That's who he
57:29
is. He's like, he's like a mob boss, you
57:31
know, you got to, you know, you got to
57:33
show him who's boss here. And then they'll, they'll
57:35
only respect you if you hurt them. You know,
57:38
that's always been his his credo. And
57:40
it's in his books. And he's given speeches,
57:42
he gave a speech to Liberty University back
57:44
in 2012, where he said,
57:47
you know, two things, bits of
57:49
advice, kids. I mean, Liberty University,
57:51
the religious right, Jerry Falwell University,
57:53
right? He said two things, kids.
57:55
First, always get a prenup. Second,
57:58
always, always get payback. And
58:01
this is all the Christian kids are going, yay,
58:03
that's it. We love Jesus. I mean, it was
58:05
just ridiculous. So
58:07
this has always been part of him
58:10
and nothing surprising in it. And the
58:12
idea that he's suddenly become so overwhelmed
58:14
with anger over what's happened
58:20
to him that he has simply has no choice.
58:22
It's ridiculous. He's always been this way.
58:24
The second thing is, though, there's a strategy here.
58:26
And this strategy is being pushed by the Republican
58:28
Party. And that is it some of
58:30
it has to do with Trump's court case that's before
58:32
the Supreme Court right now. It's the
58:35
immunity case. Remember, Judge Alito in
58:37
his questioning on that brought this
58:39
up. So what do we do
58:41
if we have a bitter president
58:44
who wants to go after his rival?
58:47
Don't we have to stop this cycle
58:49
of retribution? Don't we have to stop
58:51
it? So this thing is
58:53
percolating in their minds, this idea
58:55
that they have no choice but
58:57
to go after the Democrats to
58:59
do whatever it takes because they
59:01
have to stop this. They have
59:03
to stop the Democrats from doing
59:05
this horrible thing that they've been
59:07
doing. And what that
59:09
covers up for everybody is the fact that Donald
59:12
Trump and I don't know if he's got a
59:14
dozen or more, you know,
59:17
former and current associates
59:21
are all criminals. They're criminals. They're
59:23
being convicted. They're under indictment. They're
59:25
being convicted. There was one this
59:28
week in Wisconsin with Chesbrough and
59:30
others. I mean, they're
59:32
pleading guilty all over the place. They're being,
59:34
you know, I mean, this is not, you
59:36
know, if this is a conspiracy, then it
59:39
is the most voluminous conspiracy
59:42
in world history that everywhere
59:44
across America, they've got their
59:46
tentacles out to get Trump's
59:49
from the lowest to his highest
59:51
associates. These people are committing
59:53
crimes. And what this whole thing about
59:55
revenge, and you're absolutely right, they managed
59:58
to switch to flip the script. on
1:00:00
this in order to
1:00:02
cover up the fact that this
1:00:04
is real the Republican Party has
1:00:06
become a criminal enterprise and
1:00:08
this is this is what's happening and and nobody
1:00:10
you know that the press is kind of running
1:00:12
around following them and whatever and when
1:00:14
that when the Supreme Court comes out with their
1:00:17
case and I will not be surprised under these
1:00:19
circumstances to see and you know Sonia Sotomayor made
1:00:21
a comment the other day she says you know
1:00:23
I sometimes go behind my office door and cry
1:00:26
and I'm sure it won't
1:00:29
be the last time and yeah everybody
1:00:31
kind of goes oh geez oh my
1:00:33
god what's coming right it
1:00:36
may be that they do this that
1:00:38
the Supreme Court will is going to
1:00:40
let Donald Trump on his on his
1:00:42
federal criminal charges because of
1:00:45
this idea and and
1:00:47
they'll justify it I think by saying that well
1:00:49
we can't have this cycle of retribution going on
1:00:51
we can't have it and they'll sort of well
1:00:53
we've taken the high road Donald and Trump's sort
1:00:55
of indicated this too at some of his comments
1:00:58
kind of going well and I think it was
1:01:00
in the Time magazine interview he said well you
1:01:02
know if they if they
1:01:04
if the Supreme Court says I've got immunity then
1:01:06
I guess there's nothing I can do to Biden
1:01:08
otherwise I'm afraid it's gonna have to happen you
1:01:11
know he kind of said this right we're gonna
1:01:13
have to do it so you know all this
1:01:15
stuff is sort of circulating out there in the
1:01:17
ether on the right and the consequences
1:01:21
are going to be severe if they
1:01:23
actually do this because total assault on
1:01:26
the rule of law and
1:01:28
with the Republicans basically being
1:01:30
a criminal enterprise immunity
1:01:33
being conferred etc the Democrats
1:01:35
obviously don't have what
1:01:38
it takes to actually use that to
1:01:40
their advantage it's I mean they have
1:01:42
what it takes to use it it's
1:01:44
just all they need is a mouth
1:01:46
it's just that they they're the
1:01:49
and you know it's just they're bad at
1:01:51
politics sometimes I mean I don't know what
1:01:53
else to say Sam I
1:01:56
mean you and I been
1:02:00
talking about this for 20 years. I know. But
1:02:03
this inability to define their opposition
1:02:05
properly in
1:02:10
terms of what's actually happening, and then
1:02:12
use the system that exists in order
1:02:14
to fight it. For whatever reason, they
1:02:16
continue to cling to some old version
1:02:18
of politics that
1:02:23
doesn't exist anymore. I
1:02:26
also think there's something else that's going
1:02:29
on. Because you look at
1:02:31
these, put up, Bradley, do you
1:02:33
have that graph from the
1:02:35
New York Times that showed in
1:02:38
terms of people following the
1:02:40
case of that, whatever it was? I think it was about 1,900,
1:02:42
2,000 people, just
1:02:44
say for the sake of ease. 2,000
1:02:48
people that they had polled
1:02:52
in that Ipsos poll a
1:02:54
month ago. And
1:03:01
now there's how
1:03:03
often you pay attention to politics. No,
1:03:05
keep going. Scroll down. Scroll down, the
1:03:07
other one. There's another one about the
1:03:09
case. Yeah, here it is. Approval of
1:03:11
the verdict. Attention to the trial. Paid a lot
1:03:13
or some attention, 71%. Paid
1:03:16
a little or no attention, 28%. Now,
1:03:21
that 28% also correlates with
1:03:24
those people who don't
1:03:26
pay attention to the news much and
1:03:28
are low propensity voters and who swung
1:03:30
to Biden. Those are the people that
1:03:33
you need to reach. And
1:03:35
if you're Hakeem
1:03:37
Jeffries and you live in New York
1:03:39
City or if you're
1:03:41
Nancy Pelosi and you live
1:03:43
in San Francisco, you
1:03:46
don't understand how
1:03:48
people don't hear about these things. I'm just
1:03:50
using as an example. You're in Washington, DC.
1:03:53
You don't understand how people don't hear
1:03:55
about these things. Because
1:03:58
every piece of media, I'm that
1:04:00
you watch from Morning Joe
1:04:02
at the beginning and then Morning Joe
1:04:04
later in the morning is
1:04:07
talking about it and and so
1:04:10
what's going on we get the wrong
1:04:12
screen up there we just lost it
1:04:14
we became a graph there wait
1:04:17
still seer still seer she's on
1:04:19
the call it just her video yeah our video is
1:04:21
not coming up second one second all right we're gonna
1:04:23
work on that but I think we can hear you
1:04:25
Heather the
1:04:27
the the
1:04:30
notion it's as if they don't understand
1:04:33
what like the in
1:04:35
regards to what the polls say they
1:04:37
don't understand that the message is not
1:04:40
going to just automatically
1:04:42
get instilled in people
1:04:44
that you literally need to provide
1:04:48
it to people all
1:04:50
right we're back sorry folks a little
1:04:52
technical difficulty Heather is back you
1:04:56
were saying I don't
1:04:59
remember well the idea is
1:05:01
like you know the Democrats have a problem
1:05:03
with doing this and they need yeah
1:05:06
it's repetition and it's also like
1:05:08
you need to feed the media beast
1:05:11
and if if you decide you're not
1:05:13
going to talk somebody else is gonna
1:05:15
feed it like a nature
1:05:17
abor's of active vacuum and the media
1:05:19
abor's a vacuum even more and they
1:05:22
will fill it with whoever is providing
1:05:24
them content I mean this
1:05:26
is the thing that like Steve Bannon like
1:05:29
understood back in 2016 you know with the
1:05:32
oh I'm gonna we're gonna partner with the
1:05:34
New York Times with Clinton cash like they
1:05:36
need content and I'm if I'm the first
1:05:38
person there to give it to him and
1:05:41
you know like we experience
1:05:43
that in this show you know I
1:05:45
mean if people send us
1:05:47
a link to content it
1:05:50
is we're gonna look at
1:05:52
it or it's much more likely that that's
1:05:54
gonna have an opportunity for us to use
1:05:56
it I mean we we run across stuff
1:05:59
we pull stuff stuff. But if
1:06:01
people are pushing stuff on it, that's, you
1:06:03
know, everybody in media understands that. That's why
1:06:06
political reporters get a thousand, you know,
1:06:09
you know,
1:06:11
press releases. I mean, this is basic
1:06:13
stuff. It's very basic. And
1:06:15
it's also, as I was saying earlier, I don't
1:06:18
know if people heard this, was the idea of
1:06:20
repetition. You have to bless
1:06:22
you. You have to
1:06:24
repeat things over and over again
1:06:26
in order to penetrate this. There's
1:06:28
a cacophony of news and noise
1:06:30
and whatever good that's out there.
1:06:32
And you have to repeat these
1:06:35
things over and over again. And
1:06:37
the idea, I mean,
1:06:39
this, going back to our original, you
1:06:41
know, discussion here, when the verdict happened
1:06:43
and there suddenly became this big
1:06:47
discussion of whether or not it was
1:06:49
wise to call Donald Trump a convicted
1:06:51
felon. It, you
1:06:53
know, okay. So they all said, okay, well, we'll call
1:06:55
him a convicted felon. It's not enough to do that
1:06:57
on a day, right? And just
1:07:00
say, well, he's a convicted felon now. Isn't
1:07:02
that terrible? You have to call him a
1:07:04
convicted felon over and over and over again,
1:07:06
because that's how you penetrate. And this is,
1:07:08
this is, and well, you know, we don't,
1:07:11
they don't really know what you mean by
1:07:13
convicted felon. I'm going, yes, they do. Americans
1:07:15
do understand the term convicted felon. You don't
1:07:17
need to elaborate. You don't need to do
1:07:19
anything. Just call him that. It's the truth.
1:07:22
And they get very upset by it.
1:07:24
As you're seeing on certain news programs
1:07:26
where Republicans are, they're getting angry
1:07:28
about it. They're like, how you call them a convicted
1:07:30
felon. Why do you keep doing that? Well, and all
1:07:32
they have to do is say it's the truth. He
1:07:35
is a convicted felon. So that, you know, I'm in
1:07:37
fact, we're just going with that. You just say it
1:07:39
over and over again. Look at Donald Trump, you know,
1:07:41
no obstruction, no collusion. You know, I mean, this is
1:07:43
how he does it. And he, Hillary,
1:07:45
I mean, he just, you
1:07:47
know, he's giving you the
1:07:50
clues on how he talks
1:07:52
to his people by repeating
1:07:54
these things over and over
1:07:56
again. I mean, this is, this
1:07:59
stuff is is so propaganda
1:08:02
101. It's so funny. Yes,
1:08:06
it's so frustrating. It's so frustrating because
1:08:08
these people are supposed to be professionals.
1:08:13
Well, I just heard the other day, I heard
1:08:15
Nancy Pelosi, and I don't know who was the
1:08:17
other one. Maybe it was one of her former
1:08:20
deputies, I can't remember, going on
1:08:22
and on about kitchen table issues again. And it's
1:08:24
like, I get it. The
1:08:28
economy is important, big issue. Everybody always says
1:08:30
the economy is the most important issue to
1:08:32
them. And yes, you have to address
1:08:34
it. But this idea that it's the only thing you
1:08:36
can talk about, and it's all about, we feel compassion
1:08:40
for the people who are suffering and blah, blah,
1:08:42
blah. This is like,
1:08:44
how many elections are we going to...
1:08:48
This is all you ever say. In other words,
1:08:50
this is it. This is the only thing you
1:08:52
ever have to say. There's no adjusting
1:08:55
for current circumstances in
1:08:57
their minds. It's
1:09:00
written in stone. Maybe it's
1:09:02
theosified sort of thinking of
1:09:04
people who have... I think so. Although... Even
1:09:07
the young ones are saying the same
1:09:09
stuff. What can
1:09:11
you do? Heather
1:09:14
wanted to talk a little bit more about a couple
1:09:17
other things, but we
1:09:19
covered some good ground. More opportunity
1:09:22
to talk in the coming months. One
1:09:25
thing that is fascinating to me is
1:09:27
that in August, we're going to see
1:09:29
the Democratic National Convention. The
1:09:32
Republican one is in July. We're
1:09:34
going to have a debate in 20 days. The
1:09:37
first debate is in 20 days between
1:09:39
Biden and Trump. It's
1:09:42
important too. This debate is currently really...
1:09:44
It's very important. I think this is
1:09:46
where Biden is hoping to reintroduce
1:09:48
Donald Trump to the country. It's
1:09:52
a great time to introduce him the day he
1:09:54
gets convicted of a felony. Right.
1:09:56
That's the term. Yeah.
1:09:59
That's the term. Oh, go ahead,
1:10:01
Sam. The interesting
1:10:03
thing is that sometime between
1:10:06
this first debate and
1:10:08
the Democratic National Convention, Joe
1:10:12
Biden will be
1:10:14
nominated, the presidential
1:10:17
nominee for the Democratic Party. It will
1:10:20
not happen at the Democratic National Convention.
1:10:23
We don't know the date yet. It's going
1:10:25
to be virtual. It
1:10:28
seems the strategy that the
1:10:30
Biden campaign has is, let's
1:10:34
be invisible on some level.
1:10:37
Let's just make this all about Donald
1:10:39
Trump, which makes the stuff about not
1:10:41
having at least surrogates and
1:10:43
other people come out and say convicted
1:10:46
felon that much more ridiculous. Exactly.
1:10:48
They've got a lot of them who could do it.
1:10:51
You get Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer and
1:10:53
J.D. Pritzker and Josh Shapiro.
1:10:55
These are all big names.
1:10:59
They're second tier.
1:11:01
We're going to hear a lot more about them in
1:11:03
the next couple of years. Kamala Harris, the rest of
1:11:05
them. There's a lot of people who can be out
1:11:07
there making this case and doing
1:11:09
it effectively. I
1:11:13
keep waiting. I've been sitting here going, well,
1:11:15
come on. They're going to
1:11:17
really launch here any minute. It's
1:11:20
getting late, guys. It's got to get
1:11:22
going now. It's getting late. I'm getting
1:11:25
a little bit anxious here. I'm
1:11:27
having some bad dreams at this point.
1:11:29
I'll be honest. I don't think I'm going
1:11:32
to have more than two and a half
1:11:34
hours of contiguous sleep for months.
1:11:38
Until November. Then maybe, I
1:11:40
don't know, I may never sleep again. I don't
1:11:42
know. I'm getting anxious.
1:11:46
I'm getting a little anxious. Well, Heather, we
1:11:48
will check in and see how your sleep is
1:11:50
going over
1:11:52
the next month. It's a pleasure.
1:11:55
Of course, we will put links
1:11:57
to your work at Salon. at
1:12:00
the Uber blog, hullabaloo.
1:12:03
Okay, thanks for having me. You guys have a
1:12:05
great weekend. You too, Heather. Bye bye. All
1:12:09
right, folks, we're going to take a quick
1:12:11
break. We were
1:12:14
supposed to have other guests on
1:12:16
for the second half of the show today. There's
1:12:22
a lot of very strange stuff
1:12:24
going on with this guy from
1:12:26
the birds aren't real. We
1:12:31
had him on a couple years ago. We
1:12:34
had him on a couple of years ago. Then
1:12:36
it seemed like he passed
1:12:39
away. It
1:12:42
seems like he passed away. Well,
1:12:44
that's the thing. I mean, that's why it seems
1:12:46
like he's passed away. And
1:12:50
but maybe he'll be back next
1:12:52
week. There's a strange thing going on with
1:12:54
these birds aren't real guys. And we'll talk
1:12:56
about it next week. But
1:13:00
just want you to know
1:13:03
that's, you know, we're on top of that and
1:13:05
we'll get to them soon. Have
1:13:08
we rescheduled them yet, Bradley? They're
1:13:12
good for next week, though. Next week? Yeah.
1:13:15
Okay. Oh, gosh. Will they be
1:13:17
involved or? I
1:13:19
don't know. We'll see. Folks,
1:13:23
again, your support makes this show possible. You
1:13:25
can become a member at join the majority
1:13:27
report dot com. And don't forget just coffee.
1:13:31
Just coffee dot co-op fair
1:13:33
trade coffee and hot
1:13:35
chocolate by
1:13:37
the majority report blend. Use
1:13:40
the coupon code majority get 10 percent off. Emma
1:13:43
E S V N. God, I
1:13:46
imagine there's going to be a
1:13:48
lot of talk about that amazing game last night.
1:13:50
There will be on Monday. They were all
1:13:53
like, we're going to play really good defense.
1:13:55
And then all of a sudden,
1:13:57
the first quarter, my
1:13:59
understanding is. there was a record
1:14:01
set last night for the largest
1:14:05
lead going
1:14:07
into the second quarter of any
1:14:09
championship basketball game in the history
1:14:11
of championship basketball games. It
1:14:13
looked like there was an opportunity for the
1:14:16
maps to come back in like the third
1:14:18
quarter, but then they slammed the door. That
1:14:20
was a historic performance by Porzingis for sure.
1:14:22
Celtics do like to play with their
1:14:24
food, but I am going with them
1:14:26
because the John Brown wore a free
1:14:28
Palestine bracelet in January. So he did.
1:14:30
So there, I mean, well, I, just
1:14:32
a quick, I'm very mad at some owns the
1:14:34
maps. Miriam Adelson owns the Dallas
1:14:36
Mavericks. Right. So that is a
1:14:39
big, uh, knock and
1:14:41
Mark Cuban, the libertarian is like a assistant
1:14:43
owner now. Yeah. He's now like a
1:14:46
president or in management. But, um,
1:14:48
so it's tough for me
1:14:50
because I hate Chris Saffs Porzingis
1:14:52
for obvious reasons. Um, and
1:14:55
what's the obvious reasons? I
1:14:57
mean, he forces way out of the Knicks. Uh,
1:14:59
there's more severe personal issues off
1:15:01
the court with him. Aren't there?
1:15:04
Yeah. Um, I will say, I will
1:15:06
say off care. I knew somebody that
1:15:08
knew him and, um, yeah,
1:15:11
I mean, he was accused of rape and
1:15:13
other things, but, uh, like the,
1:15:15
I don't think he's the best person, but
1:15:17
honestly, I'm like almost finding myself like, maybe
1:15:20
I just have to root for the Celtics
1:15:22
because of the more whole Miriam Adelson, uh,
1:15:24
Trump. I will give you many, a
1:15:27
lot of money if you annex the West bank thing. And
1:15:29
we have more, we have an update on that. And
1:15:31
it's not interesting. Um, all right.
1:15:33
So anyway, we talked about, we previewed the
1:15:35
NBA championship. We also, uh, the
1:15:37
NHL Stanley cup final we, we previewed.
1:15:39
Um, and then we talked about that Caitlin
1:15:42
Clark stuff, which we dove, uh, into
1:15:44
pretty deep on ESPN, but we'll be
1:15:46
back on Monday to give updates on
1:15:48
all those series youtube.com/ESPN show. Matt.
1:15:53
Uh, yeah. Left reckoning. Uh, Mike
1:15:55
Preisner, uh, talking about, uh, our
1:15:57
favorite, uh, Tulsi Gabbard, Mike, uh,
1:15:59
red. Tulsi's new book which he's
1:16:01
been working on for like eight years through
1:16:03
like three different political identities and
1:16:05
like several name changes I think it's called
1:16:08
like for love of country now There
1:16:11
are two chapters on how trans people are You
1:16:15
know attacking the country and just to
1:16:17
just two chapters on how trans people are
1:16:19
attacking the country I think there I
1:16:21
think there might be some sprinkles and some other chapters
1:16:23
too, but yes, you did devote two chapters of a
1:16:26
Book that I wanted to read but it was a
1:16:28
file sharing. I don't know. I think it's like 200
1:16:31
pages I need to look that up 200 pages and
1:16:33
there's two chapters in the
1:16:37
the The safety in
1:16:39
the future of the American of
1:16:41
America two chapters on trans people
1:16:44
it is Something
1:16:47
else I mean it's back to her roots
1:16:49
like she comes from a very homophobic Background
1:16:52
it's it's sort of what I
1:16:54
said the mic is like it's kind of like
1:16:56
how Kendrick Lamar had been sitting on how much
1:16:58
he hated Drake for so long because of Sort
1:17:01
of reasons to go along and now he's able
1:17:03
to fully admit how much he hates it And
1:17:06
that's how Tulsi Gabbard. I think feels about capable.
1:17:08
Yeah for love of country is I'm
1:17:11
trying to look at the how much pages it
1:17:13
is here. It's a full I Guess
1:17:16
that that detail is not important enough for Google books, but
1:17:18
yeah We begin in that
1:17:20
Mike prize or patreon.com says left reckoning I
1:17:23
never relate to you more than when
1:17:25
you shoehorn your latest obsession into Every
1:17:28
other element of your interest like
1:17:30
the Kendrick Drake beef is like X which
1:17:32
you've been doing for four weeks at this
1:17:34
point I do know Housewives
1:17:37
of sports I've been doing that
1:17:39
for since like March when like that
1:17:41
came out then we had Fantano on
1:17:43
my politics No, it's
1:17:46
just comforting to know that we share a personality
1:17:48
disorder All
1:17:51
right, we're gonna take a quick break head into the
1:17:53
fun half see you there
1:17:59
Three months for now, six months from now, nine months
1:18:01
from now. And I don't think it's going to be the
1:18:03
same as it looks like in six months from now. And
1:18:05
I don't know if it's necessarily going to be better six
1:18:07
months from now than it is three months from now. But
1:18:11
I think around 18 months out, we're going to look
1:18:13
back and go like, wow. What?
1:18:17
What is that going on? It's
1:18:19
nuts. Wait
1:18:21
a second. Hold on for hold on for a second. Emma,
1:18:27
welcome to the program. Matt.
1:18:32
What is up, everyone? No,
1:18:36
me. You did it. Let's
1:18:39
go Brandon. Let's go Brandon. Bradley,
1:18:44
you want to say hello? Sorry to
1:18:46
disappoint everyone. I'm just a random
1:18:49
guy. It's all the boys today.
1:18:51
Fundamentally false. No, I'm sorry. Women's.
1:18:53
Stop talking for a second. Where
1:18:55
is this coming from, dude? But dude, you
1:18:58
want to smoke this? Seven
1:19:00
eight. Yes. Five.
1:19:04
Me. You're safe?
1:19:06
Yes. Is
1:19:10
this me? Is it me? It
1:19:13
is you. Is
1:19:16
this me? All of us are safe? I think it is
1:19:18
you. Who is you? No
1:19:22
sound. Every single freaking
1:19:24
day. What's on your mind? We
1:19:27
can discuss free markets and we can discuss
1:19:29
capitalism. I'm going to go
1:19:31
to the line. Who libertarians? They're so
1:19:33
stupid though. Common sense says of course.
1:19:35
Gobbledygook. We fucking nailed him. So what's
1:19:37
79 plus 21? Challenge
1:19:40
Matt. Positively quivering. I believe 96 I
1:19:42
want to say. 857-210-35501. One
1:19:47
half. Three eights. 9-11 for instance. $6,543
1:19:54
trillion dollars sold. It's a zero-sum game.
1:19:56
Actually you're making me think less. But
1:19:58
let me stay. this call
1:20:03
that our same goes to satire on
1:20:05
top of it all my favorite part
1:20:07
about you is just like every day
1:20:09
all day like do it without
1:20:11
a duck hey buddy we see all
1:20:17
right folks folks folks it's
1:20:19
just the week being weeded
1:20:22
out obviously yeah sun's out
1:20:24
guns out I
1:20:30
don't know but you should know people
1:20:33
just don't like to entertain ideas in it I
1:20:35
have a question who cares our
1:20:39
chat is enabled I love it
1:20:42
I do love that look
1:20:45
gotta jump gotta be quick I get a
1:20:47
jump I'm losing it bro two
1:20:51
o'clock we're already late and the guy's being
1:20:54
a dick so screw him sent
1:20:57
to a glove like what is
1:21:00
wrong with you love
1:21:02
you bye love
1:21:05
you bye bye
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More