Podchaser Logo
Home
3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

Released Thursday, 13th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

3360 - Why Israel Is Losing; Hochul Wrecks NYC Congestion Pricing w/ Greg Stoker, Hayden Clarkin

Thursday, 13th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You are listening to a free version

0:02

of the majority report Support

0:04

this show at join the

0:07

majority report comm and get an extra

0:09

hour of content daily It

0:18

is Thursday June

0:21

13th 2024

0:23

my name is Emma Vigeland in for Sam

0:25

cedar and this is the five-time award-winning majority

0:28

report We are

0:30

broadcasting live steps From

0:32

the industrially ravaged Gowanus Canal

0:35

in the heartland of America

0:37

downtown, Brooklyn, USA On

0:40

the program today Greg Stoker former US

0:42

Army Ranger Post of the

0:44

colonial Alcaste podcast will be with us

0:46

to talk about Israel's many

0:49

strategic and military failures and

0:52

Later in the show Hayden Clark in

0:54

also known as the transit guy will

0:57

join us to talk about Kathy

0:59

Hochul's Insane

1:02

torpedo wing of New York's

1:04

congestion pricing plan Also

1:07

on the show breaking news and it's

1:09

good news. Finally the Supreme

1:11

Court unanimously Uphold's

1:13

myth of Christone access a

1:15

sigh of relief for abortion advocates

1:18

I Meanwhile

1:20

Southern Baptist the US's largest

1:22

denomination of Protestants votes

1:25

to condemn IVF yesterday

1:30

The US claims Hamas has rejected

1:32

the ceasefire Israel keeps rejecting

1:35

sources tell NBC Hamas

1:38

wants a firm timeline for Israeli

1:40

troop withdrawal Israel

1:44

strikes yet another designated safe zone

1:46

in southern Gaza and

1:49

the who Issures dire warnings

1:51

of famine again The

1:56

ACLU sues Biden over his asylum

1:58

ban at the US border.

2:02

Biden and Zelensky signed a 10-year security

2:05

deal between the US and Ukraine as

2:08

the US widened sanctions on Russia.

2:12

Hillary Clinton endorses yet another

2:14

primary opponent of Jamal Boman's.

2:18

Apex very own George Latimer, she did

2:20

that with the Elliott angle, did not

2:23

work out so well, so let's hope

2:26

that holds true.

2:31

The Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses a

2:33

lawsuit brought by Tulsa race

2:35

massacre survivors, likely

2:38

the last opportunity for them to

2:40

receive reparations. House

2:43

Republicans vote to hold Merritt Garland

2:45

in contempt of Congress, that'll

2:48

go nowhere. So

2:50

they didn't turn over audio from Biden's special

2:52

counsel interview, the one Biden is, like,

2:56

I don't know, pretty triggered about. I think it's not

2:58

a big deal, but. A

3:01

new AP poll finds over half of

3:04

US adults approve of Trump's felony conviction.

3:08

Elon Musk is being sued for harassment

3:10

by former SpaceX employees in

3:12

the least surprising headline ever.

3:14

He's a recidivist on that

3:16

front. Yeah. And

3:19

lastly, police crackdown on citizens in

3:21

Argentina, protesting Malay's

3:24

extreme austerity and privatization bill

3:26

that just passed the Senate. Very

3:29

scary times in Argentina. We should

3:31

be talking even more about that, honestly. All

3:34

this and more on today's

3:36

majority reports. Welcome

3:39

to the show, everybody. It is a

3:41

majority report Thursday. I am joined now

3:43

by Matt Lech and

3:45

Bradley Alsop. And in the fun half,

3:47

we've got Brandon Sutton. We've got Matt

3:49

Binder. Hello, my friends. Hello.

3:52

Hello. So let's

3:54

get right into this breaking news here. The

3:57

Supreme Court has unanimously rejected and

3:59

it's attempt to ban

4:01

mifepristone. That is great

4:03

news for abortion advocates, for women's

4:06

health advocates. Mifepristone, for people who

4:08

are not familiar, is one of

4:10

two drugs that are used in

4:13

a medication abortion. It's

4:16

mifepristone and mifepristol that are

4:19

used together. Sorry, my

4:21

allergies are out of control these days. I

4:23

don't know what's going on. Anyway, mifepristone,

4:26

one of two drugs used

4:28

in a medication abortion, mifepristone

4:31

and mifepristol are combined. Mifepristone

4:35

is the one that

4:37

basically blocks a hormone

4:39

called progesterone, which is

4:42

necessary for the pregnancy to

4:45

continue. Then, mifepristol contracts

4:47

the uterus. The person who's

4:50

pregnant expels the

4:52

pregnancy in the form of

4:54

a miscarriage. You

4:58

can actually use mifepristol, that second

5:00

drug that expels the

5:02

pregnancy on its own. It's available

5:04

over the counter in Mexico and it's

5:07

80% effective on that

5:09

front. Combined

5:13

with mifepristone, it's

5:15

extremely safe, extremely

5:17

effective, widely used,

5:19

the most common method in this

5:21

country to end a pregnancy, which

5:24

makes sense because an overwhelming

5:26

majority of abortions happen in

5:28

the first trimester. Around 90%

5:30

of abortions happen within the first

5:32

12 weeks. That's when the pills

5:35

are used before surgical abortions

5:38

are necessary, particularly when

5:40

complications rear their heads

5:43

potentially later on in

5:45

a pregnancy. It's so safe,

5:48

but that didn't really

5:50

prevent the plaintiffs here

5:52

from making the case that it wasn't. Kaiser

5:55

Family Foundation found that when those two

5:57

drugs are used together, It

6:00

terminates a pregnancy successfully 99.6% of the time, and

6:04

there's a 0.4% risk of major

6:06

complications. The mortality rate is less

6:08

than 0.001%. It

6:13

is an extremely

6:15

safe way to terminate

6:17

a pregnancy. These

6:20

lawyers wouldn't use the umbrella of

6:22

safety to, you know, try

6:25

to seek some other ends of, you know,

6:27

winding down women's right to, you know, access

6:29

to different types of healthcare, would they? You

6:32

would be wrong in your

6:34

naivete there, Matt. No, that

6:37

is exactly the argument that

6:39

they used, but the Supreme Court was

6:41

not buying the fact that these doctors

6:45

who brought the suit had standing here.

6:47

There were 11 anti-abortion

6:50

doctors. One of them

6:52

is a Republican state senator from Indiana

6:54

who have a history of

6:57

being anti-abortion, and their

6:59

claim to the court was that they were

7:01

materially harmed, that's what standing means,

7:04

or harmed in some way, by

7:07

having to prescribe this

7:10

drug to their patients. And

7:13

Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote and delivered the

7:15

unanimous opinion here by the court, said

7:18

that standing didn't pass the smell test.

7:20

This was an excerpt that our

7:23

friend Mark Joseph Stern found

7:26

in the opinion this morning. And

7:28

Kavanaugh says here, consider some examples. EPA

7:30

rolls back emission standards for power plants.

7:32

Does a doctor have standing to sue

7:34

because she may need to spend more

7:36

time treating asthma patients? A local school

7:38

district starts a middle school football league.

7:41

Does a pediatrician have standing to challenge

7:43

its constitutionality because she might need to

7:45

spend more time treating concussions? A

7:47

federal agency increases the speed limit from 65 to 80 miles

7:50

per hour. Does an emergency room doctor have standing

7:52

to sue because he may have to treat more

7:55

car accident victims? The government repeals

7:57

certain restrictions on guns. Does a certain

8:00

have standing to sue because he might have to

8:02

operate on more gunshot victims. That's the

8:04

point here, right? If you're

8:06

basically working in a field

8:08

that is affected in some way by

8:11

a federal law or a statute that

8:13

may alter the way you do your

8:16

job or cause you to do your

8:18

job in a different way and

8:21

you may not like it, but does that

8:24

mean that you are the party that is harmed

8:26

by said law or are you

8:28

just in a field that has to respond

8:30

to the knock-on effects of said law? So

8:33

that's what the court unanimously found. I mean, from

8:35

Clarence Thomas to Alito to

8:37

Kavanagh here who wrote this majority opinion.

8:40

And if you're a

8:42

little bit concerned by the fact

8:44

that even these psychos like

8:46

Alito and Thomas signed

8:48

on to this and you're waiting for

8:50

the other shoot-a-drop, well, I do think

8:53

that you are justified here

8:56

because the court was clear

8:58

that this was a standing argument as

9:00

I keep repeating. The doctors had

9:02

no right to bring this case. They were

9:04

not harmed. It makes no sense. It opens

9:06

a Pandora's box, as Kavanagh was alluding

9:08

to here. But the fight is

9:10

not over because what this signals is

9:12

what Fox's Shannon Bream said, reacting

9:15

to the breaking news and

9:17

saying, this is probably

9:19

not over. Now,

9:22

here's the twist to this. There are a number

9:24

of states who tried to intervene in this case.

9:26

They wanted to be parties to the case. The

9:28

court did not allow that to happen. Those states

9:30

have said, if this case went the way that

9:32

many of us thought it would, they don't get

9:34

past the standing issue and don't get to the

9:36

merits of the case. Those states

9:38

say they are now standing by ready

9:40

to file their own challenges to the

9:42

way that the FDA has regulated mithropristone.

9:44

So this case is over. The doctors

9:46

didn't have standing access remains for the

9:49

drug, but now watch for two or

9:51

these three of these states to say that

9:53

they are going to now file their own legal challenges

9:55

and try to prove they do have standing to actually

9:57

get to the merits of how the case has been

9:59

handled. The drug has been handled by

10:01

the FDA. I've called that a boomerang

10:03

case, then Shannon. Shannon. It could be coming

10:05

back, all right? Stand by in

10:08

case there's more coming up momentarily, Shannon. So

10:10

that is the point here, which means

10:12

that the Republicans and the conservative activists

10:14

on this front are not done. They

10:17

have other states that are going to

10:19

try to challenge this from a different

10:21

perspective, maybe not from a doctor's harm

10:23

perspective, but from, I don't

10:25

know, maybe they'll be able to

10:28

find somebody who was harmed

10:30

in the process of getting

10:32

an abortion, and that will be the way

10:35

that they take it to the

10:37

Supreme Court. As I mentioned, those cases

10:39

are incredibly rare. But Dave Weigel, also

10:42

a friend of the show, had this point

10:44

this morning that I think is especially scary,

10:47

where he was essentially saying this

10:49

also allows for those

10:51

challenges to come up in conjunction with

10:54

Donald Trump getting elected, and he

10:56

could appoint someone to lead the

10:58

FDA as the FDA commissioner, that's

11:00

a presidential appointment, who

11:02

rescinds the approval of the drug. And

11:05

the Supreme Court does not preclude that in the way that

11:07

they ruled on this. So that

11:09

is the roadmap going forward. This is good news

11:12

in the moment, right? But

11:14

as I'm trying to reiterate, we will be

11:16

back here at some point. If I'm

11:18

a political activist for the conservatives, I

11:21

find with having a little bit of,

11:23

you're not giving the anti-abortion movement a

11:25

more sort of cause for energy ahead

11:27

of an election. And that really

11:29

could have been part of why Alito

11:31

and Thomas, who vote for everything that

11:33

conservative activists want, part of why they

11:35

stood down here. Yeah, find another day.

11:39

We saw this in Arizona, too. They

11:42

kept their secondary, more restrictive

11:44

abortion law in place, but

11:46

the Republican, like two or

11:48

three Senate Republicans

11:51

in Arizona moved to the other

11:53

side and rescinded the Civil

11:55

War era, pre-women's suffrage

11:58

abortion bans. that made

12:00

it extremely restrictive. So

12:03

they were, they're cognizant there of

12:06

the electoral implications for them.

12:09

And do we think that the Supreme

12:11

Court justices are above electoral concerns? I

12:14

certainly don't. And I also don't like him actually, now that

12:16

I think about it, mention the EPA like that, but anyway.

12:19

Oh yeah, well, right. It's

12:22

like an Escher painting, right? You get, you look and you

12:24

see new things. I'm

12:26

not an art person, that's the right. But it's also one

12:28

of those- Escher painting, right? Yeah. Sure. But

12:31

it's also one of those rhetorical devices of being

12:33

like, hey, if we give

12:35

you this, it could be used against

12:37

us in a way that's not, but

12:39

like he's making a cogent point, but

12:42

also in a way that's like self-serving

12:44

to Republican interests in a Republican administration.

12:46

Yeah, and that's the

12:48

fight that we will see in

12:51

probably the coming months and years. Another

12:55

reason why this election is so terrifying. All

12:58

right, with that folks, we are gonna take a quick

13:01

break, but just a reminder,

13:03

this show relies on your support. We

13:06

really appreciate the ability to be

13:08

independent, to say what we think,

13:11

to never be beholden to anybody else.

13:14

And that's because of our members, the fact

13:16

that, you know, like, you

13:19

know, I said this on social media

13:21

the other day, but Brianna Joy Gray

13:23

just fired from the Hill because she

13:25

was speaking critically of Israel. Katie

13:27

Alpert too from the same organization. Exactly,

13:31

and Brianna, you know, we publicly

13:33

had some disagreements, right? But this is the

13:35

kind of thing where, no, when you're on

13:37

the left, you were principally against this. And

13:39

so I just felt terribly that

13:41

she got fired for

13:44

speaking critically about the genocide. And

13:47

that's what happens when you

13:49

have kind of companies and media that's

13:51

consolidated with a lot of money and

13:53

corporate power, and they'll represent

13:56

the interests of the powerful. And

13:58

so with... I'm

14:00

grateful that we have an infrastructure here because

14:02

of the members like you to keep us

14:04

independent and to keep us From

14:07

feeling you know the the

14:09

guillotine over us so to speak So yeah,

14:11

I mean especially the join the majority report

14:14

calm because you know YouTube is nice and

14:16

it's been a big growth You

14:19

know since I've been a majority report, but I also

14:21

don't trust that I

14:24

mean they they change things all the time and

14:26

you can see it like oh in January of

14:28

this year They change something with regards to ads

14:31

and it just like cut off and we were doing very

14:33

well before and now it's just like

14:35

okay And then what if they make another change

14:37

and it's like okay now we have an

14:39

entire different economy We're dealing with and

14:41

thanks for join the majority report folks.

14:43

Yes, that's really it Join the majority

14:45

report calm and help us go on on

14:48

twitch too. We are close to what

14:50

is the landmark? 70,000 followers 69

14:54

a nice 508 so Subscribe

14:58

to us on Twitch all

15:00

right folks quick break and when we come back

15:02

we will be with Greg Stoker We

15:22

Are back and I'm thrilled to be

15:24

joined now by Greg Stoker former US

15:27

Army Ranger with a background in special

15:29

operations and military Intelligence he is now

15:31

an activist political and military analyst and

15:33

host of the colonial outcast podcast Which

15:36

I couldn't recommend more highly Greg. Thanks

15:38

so much for coming on the show

15:41

Thanks for having me. So um tell

15:43

us a little bit more about your background Why

15:47

or where did you serve for how long

15:49

and I guess how did you kind of

15:52

come to an anti-colonial? Perspective

15:54

or a perspective that was critical

15:56

of US Empire after your

15:58

time in the army All right.

16:01

Well, I mean, it's not a unique

16:03

story. I joined the United States Army

16:05

to get the heck out of wherever I

16:07

was. And it was the

16:09

easiest way to do it. Paid for college, stuff like

16:12

that. I was never like a huge gung-ho Captain America

16:14

type. But I did go into the Ranger

16:16

Regiment, which is a United States Special Operations

16:18

Unit. And I did four combat deployments to

16:21

Afghanistan. Started off as kind of like an assault

16:23

position. I was a fire team leader. And then

16:25

I transitioned more into a human human collect. Oh,

16:27

sorry. A human intelligence. And

16:30

I think what I started really questioning what was going

16:32

on when I got exposed to targeting kinetic strikes, I

16:34

drone strikes under the Obama administration. And there just really

16:36

wasn't a standard of proof for who we were dropping

16:39

in terms of kinetic strikes. If you're on the wrong

16:41

contact list, it could be green lit. As long as

16:43

you didn't destroy infrastructure, it was good. You could be

16:45

a baker. You could be a

16:47

baker who, you know, was had

16:50

like fourth

16:52

degree connections to

16:54

like the Taliban or the Connie or proto Islamic

16:57

State, you're still gonna potentially eat a missile. So

16:59

that was problematic. And

17:01

it didn't work. It was strategically stupid. And

17:03

then I got out started studying post-colonial studies

17:05

at the International

17:13

Relations and spent a 10 year journey to get

17:15

to where I am right now. So that's it

17:17

in a nutshell. Yeah,

17:24

I mean, and that that that

17:27

is part of what you bring to

17:29

your analysis, particularly of what's happening in

17:31

Gaza right now that I really appreciate.

17:35

Because for you

17:37

talked about how the under the

17:39

Obama administration, there really wasn't the scrutiny

17:41

that should be having a that should

17:43

have been there in terms of the

17:45

who the targets really were and what

17:47

their ties were to terrorist organizations. But

17:50

I mean, the United States Army looks

17:52

practically, I

17:54

guess, buttoned up compared to

17:56

what we're seeing in Israel. What

17:59

is that context? like, even though you had

18:01

those concerns as a part of the army,

18:03

and then it's on steroids

18:06

with how Israel's handling Gaza. I

18:08

mean, I will never be an apologist

18:10

for US Empire, but like, it's so bad

18:12

we're looking, I wouldn't say good, but like,

18:15

all right. So when,

18:17

apparently Israel is supposed to be fighting

18:19

a counterinsurgency, right? And since we brought

18:21

the US Army, the US military into

18:23

it, a US counterinsurgency doctrine is kind

18:27

of effective. It was more effective in

18:29

Iraq than it was in Afghanistan. Afghanistan

18:31

had a major foreign fighter problem.

18:33

So the fighters were coming in

18:35

from like Pakistan and Iran and

18:37

other parts. So complicating the situation,

18:39

but it's called COIN, counterinsurgency doctrine.

18:41

And one of the main pillars

18:43

of counterinsurgency doctrine is if you're

18:45

an occupying force, there's

18:48

an acronym called SWEAT MSO. It's

18:50

sewage, water, electricity, academics, trash, medical

18:52

safety and other. And

18:55

it holds that if you're an occupation of a

18:57

people and all of those sectors aren't up to

18:59

code and you cannot

19:01

live in a modern standard of living,

19:03

people are going to want to kill

19:05

you. So if you're looking

19:07

at it, so we would try to

19:09

protect all these sites. Hospitals, I mean,

19:12

Obama signed up on essentially bombing a

19:14

hospital in 2015 in Kunduz province. But

19:16

aside from that, we didn't have the

19:18

state policy of bombing hospitals. And

19:21

we'd protect roads. So if we look at

19:23

Gaza, they have destroyed the sewer pipes. A

19:27

lot of the J dams, the 2000

19:30

pound bunker buster bombs have an

19:32

unclassed penetration depth of six feet

19:34

of concrete, which isn't going to

19:36

collapse a tunnel, a hardened tunnel

19:38

50 feet underground, but it will

19:41

collapse sewer water pipes. Electricity

19:43

they hit power relay stations in

19:45

October. So that's always been a

19:48

problem. Academics, they've

19:50

destroyed every college or university

19:52

in Gaza. Trash, there is

19:54

no trash. Everything's rubble. There's

19:56

no civic infrastructure. Medical, there's

19:59

like one. to two trauma

20:01

surgeons left in North Gaza,

20:04

as a matter of state policy, they've

20:06

gone and destroyed hospitals as much as

20:08

they could while keeping their propaganda machine

20:11

alive. Safety, there is no

20:13

safety, and there's about to be a massive

20:15

biological event any time now.

20:17

So yeah, they actually destroyed

20:19

our own counterinsurgency doctrine that

20:21

we advise them on because

20:24

it is somewhat effective, but

20:26

no, they're not even pretending

20:30

to fight a counterinsurgency. It's just straight up

20:32

ethnic cleansing to make Gaza strip unlivable. Right,

20:35

and so, I mean, as you

20:37

describe that, that counterinsurgency doctrine that

20:39

the United States adopted, and supposedly

20:42

Israel, I guess, for some time

20:44

had been trying to follow to

20:47

keep up appearances, but I mean, I don't

20:49

know, I'm being overly generous there. Like that

20:51

is an explicit doctrine because

20:54

it's in the interest of the

20:56

party there, whether it

20:58

be the United States Army or Israel, like

21:02

to basically control the way that

21:05

they respond to something so that they can

21:07

have some sort of victory. But

21:09

when you abandon that, and it's really

21:11

just killing for the sake of it,

21:13

that runs a fly, I would imagine,

21:16

over some in, say, the United States

21:18

intelligence community or in the military brass,

21:21

who are less ideologically

21:23

genocidal and more interested in

21:25

maintaining empire or power. We've

21:29

noticed on this show how there's a

21:31

difference in how, say, Lloyd Austin or

21:34

Burns of the CIA talk, not

21:37

that we hear too much from Burns, but approach

21:40

Israel as it relates to how

21:42

they've been handling Gaza versus how

21:45

Blinken and Biden have stood

21:48

so steadfastly behind

21:51

Israel. Is that discrepancy

21:55

kind of laid bare there? Well,

21:58

well, first of all, Lloyd Austin. Israel

26:00

will end up having a victory because they

26:02

get Hamas to agree to a ceasefire, even

26:04

if it's not true at all. Yeah. And

26:07

so now they're trying to reframe this

26:09

whole thing is Israel has degraded Hamas

26:11

so much they're no longer a military

26:13

threat. And now they're willing now that

26:15

they've achieved their pseudo objectives, which were

26:17

never their objectives, they're now being gracious

26:19

and, you know, presenting Hamas with this.

26:21

But the thing is, Hamas doesn't need

26:23

to accept it because they can keep

26:25

fighting according to Israeli intelligence veterans and

26:27

like Marie, why net news, their

26:30

own intelligence officers say that they couldn't

26:32

defeat Hamas before 2026. And

26:35

personally, I believe that to

26:37

be completely optimistic. Right. Well,

26:41

Hamas is recruiting, we know, right? And

26:44

there is, there are some

26:48

insurgent Hamas fighters, I guess, in the north

26:50

who have been giving Israel

26:52

some grief. And

26:54

so the the hostage

26:56

rescue operation, how did that play

26:59

into the ceasefire talks? Because from

27:01

Israel's perspective, that's Netanyahu in the

27:03

far right getting to say, see,

27:07

we need to continue this

27:09

war genocide war for

27:11

to release the rest of the hostages

27:13

when we know, though, the overwhelming number

27:15

of hostages that were released were during

27:17

the temporary ceasefire. They only rescued four

27:19

in this instance and killed over 270

27:21

Palestinians. Now

27:24

there have been rumblings that the United

27:26

States may have provided intelligence

27:29

support for this operation. Oh, we do.

27:31

Oh, we did. OK. So

27:34

we provided intelligence support for an

27:36

operation that saved four hostages and

27:38

killed over 270 Palestinians as we're

27:40

trying to get this ceasefire over

27:42

the hump. Do you

27:44

think that that affected Hamas's position

27:46

here? Because they probably are

27:49

like, you guys are not honest brokers

27:51

here. You just you just OK this

27:53

operation. That was a slaughter. Right.

27:56

So no, it doesn't really

27:59

affect Hamas's. would

1:02:00

be 65 by the time the MTA

1:02:02

subway system was fully accessible.

1:02:05

And this throws a massive wrench into

1:02:07

that. Because now we are

1:02:09

pausing all of these elevator

1:02:11

work, all of this elevator work until we can figure

1:02:14

out what is going on. I mean, that lawsuit

1:02:17

sounds like it has a lot of

1:02:19

merit. You're not allowed to. This is

1:02:21

that was one of the more successful,

1:02:23

honestly, regulatory moves that

1:02:25

the federal government has ever made,

1:02:28

which is to make every place

1:02:30

handy, handy, accessible. And

1:02:33

it's just not the case in New York City

1:02:36

whatsoever. And as you say, a majority of the

1:02:38

state, a majority of the stations, 69% don't

1:02:42

have elevators. That's a violation of

1:02:44

the federal statute. Absolutely. Yeah.

1:02:47

So that's, that's what we're now adding into

1:02:49

the mix. And also Second Avenue Subway, which

1:02:51

is supposed to move 150,000 people

1:02:55

a day once open is

1:02:57

completely told to stop work. Because one

1:02:59

of the things that we didn't realize,

1:03:01

or people don't realize, is that when

1:03:03

the federal government comes in and says,

1:03:05

Hey, for Second Avenue Subway, we're going

1:03:08

to give you three point something billion

1:03:10

dollars, that's a match to the state's

1:03:12

funding. And so when the state does

1:03:14

not have that funding anymore, the federal

1:03:16

monies that were earmarked

1:03:19

to it are now in flux and are not

1:03:21

kept. And so now we have to figure out

1:03:23

of like, are we have to going through this

1:03:25

whole funding process again, to fund

1:03:27

something that we've already started working on.

1:03:30

This is this is the Kathy

1:03:32

Hochul transportation plan

1:03:35

right now that we're that we're seeing.

1:03:37

And one thing she said was in

1:03:39

her speech, which was crazy about face

1:03:41

was, this will hurt small

1:03:43

businesses. And her was to add a payroll

1:03:46

tax in lieu of a usage tax for

1:03:48

that was going to be my

1:03:50

next question. Can you explain that?

1:03:52

Because the pay roll

1:03:54

tax is a tax on people making wages

1:03:57

and or, you know, like Like,

1:04:01

not everybody, right? But I don't know

1:04:04

how they would structure it, but like,

1:04:06

it's lower to middle to maybe even

1:04:09

middle upper income people, or it's a tax

1:04:11

on their paycheck to pay for this. But

1:04:14

it also, if you were to just

1:04:16

say, okay, that's the funding mechanism now,

1:04:18

we'll tax New Yorkers more. That

1:04:20

money was also supposed to go out

1:04:22

to train lines in the suburbs to

1:04:24

help improve them as well. So that's

1:04:26

money getting taken out of the pockets

1:04:29

of regular New Yorkers to help the

1:04:31

suburbs double. 10

1:04:34

percent of the 10 percent of the congestion

1:04:36

pricing in the law is that it

1:04:38

has to help Metro North, which serves

1:04:40

Connecticut and upstate New York, as well

1:04:42

as Long Island Railroad, which

1:04:44

serves Long Island. And so with her

1:04:47

idea, New Yorkers

1:04:49

would get taxed to

1:04:52

then pay for the suburban transit

1:04:54

systems and train systems of

1:04:58

drivers who would come in, still not have to

1:05:00

pay anything. And we would

1:05:02

have to pay their improvements for that. Right.

1:05:05

And while also not disincentivizing them

1:05:07

from coming into the city via

1:05:09

car, which is also

1:05:11

harmful for our environment, which should not get

1:05:14

lost in this discussion, is this also has

1:05:16

been endorsed by environmentalists, as you say. And

1:05:22

as we kind of wrap up here, Hayden, transit

1:05:26

or I should not transit congestion

1:05:28

pricing has happened in other cities in the world. It would

1:05:30

be this would have been the first of its kind in

1:05:32

the United States. But this is not

1:05:34

like New York is making this out of whole

1:05:36

cloth. I know London has congestion

1:05:39

pricing and it's really it's it's taken

1:05:41

effect and it's had some good results.

1:05:43

Can you talk a little bit about

1:05:45

that? Sure. You were

1:05:47

bringing a pedestrian and traffic

1:05:49

deaths. Traffic deaths since 2019

1:05:51

in London have gone down

1:05:53

40 percent since it was

1:05:55

implemented. Traffic's

1:05:57

gone down. in

1:06:00

the last London elections. I think it

1:06:02

happened, I wanna say maybe two months ago

1:06:04

was there were London elections for

1:06:06

the mayoral race. And the Sadik

1:06:09

Khan, who is the mayor

1:06:11

of London, who is a major

1:06:13

champion for congestion pricing, this

1:06:17

was a referendum on do we still

1:06:19

want to have congestion

1:06:21

pricing because this man wants to expand it.

1:06:24

And the places in which he wanted to

1:06:26

expand it were the biggest swings towards him

1:06:28

in this race. People see how good it

1:06:30

is. And I understand it's not popular to

1:06:33

think like, oh, I'm gonna get taxed to

1:06:35

live my day-to-day life. But once

1:06:37

it's actually implemented, these plans

1:06:39

have been super popular. And

1:06:42

it's just one of those things where it's really sad

1:06:44

because San Francisco has been thinking

1:06:46

about it and other cities have been thinking about

1:06:48

it as a way to make their transit better. And

1:06:51

if New York City is not gonna do it, it

1:06:54

really spells doom for the rest of all of

1:06:56

the cities who might potentially wanna do it. If

1:06:59

it's not good for New York City, then it's not good for anywhere.

1:07:02

And so that's kind of what Kathy Hochul

1:07:04

is doing. And also one last thing is

1:07:07

the political idea or like the

1:07:09

political thought to then three days

1:07:12

after canceling congestion pricing, go to

1:07:15

a car dealer fundraiser

1:07:17

for yourself. That

1:07:19

was called- A little on the nose. Dealer association

1:07:21

at $5,000 to $10,000 a head. The

1:07:24

math ain't mathing. You need

1:07:27

to fire your team and rehire

1:07:29

better advisors because that is

1:07:31

a crazy optics. Yeah,

1:07:34

it's a little much Kathy,

1:07:36

just toning down slightly. Well,

1:07:39

Hayden, really appreciate your time today.

1:07:41

And thanks for that wonderful explainer

1:07:43

about this. Hayden Clark in

1:07:45

the transit guy, you can follow him on Twitter.

1:07:47

Where else can people find your work, Hayden? I'm

1:07:51

on threads and Instagram, the transit guy.

1:07:53

And then on Twitter, the underscore trans

1:07:55

underscore guy. Elon will not give me

1:07:57

that. Will not

1:07:59

let me remove those unders- scores. All

1:08:02

right. Well, I appreciate you. Thanks

1:08:04

so much. Have

1:08:06

a great rest of your day, Hayden, and talk to you

1:08:08

soon. Thanks so much. Okay,

1:08:12

with that, we're going to wrap up the

1:08:14

first part of this program, the free part

1:08:17

of this program. Head into the fun half. The number

1:08:19

is 6462573920. We

1:08:22

will take your

1:08:24

calls, read your IMs. Matt, what's happening on

1:08:26

Left Reckoning? Yeah, Left Reckoning,

1:08:28

we had Ben Fong on, talk about the Odd Fellows. We

1:08:30

also talked about AOC

1:08:33

a little bit, and some outreach

1:08:35

to Zionists about hate, which

1:08:37

is not what I would do. And

1:08:39

we talked a little bit about what

1:08:42

happened in labor after Jimmy Corbin

1:08:44

was took over. So check that

1:08:46

out if you want. David and I discussing that. People

1:08:48

keep it high marks. And

1:08:50

so yeah, patreon.com, just Left Reckoning. We also

1:08:53

talk about what Jimmy Dorf hands are doing

1:08:55

these days. Oh my God. Which is stalking

1:08:58

Jill Stein for not going

1:09:00

on the Jimmy Dorf show. Ever increasingly

1:09:02

niche that they never,

1:09:04

they just keep narrowing that audience. On

1:09:07

ESVN, we talked a little bit about both

1:09:10

the championship series and our analysis for

1:09:12

the Celtics and MAV still holds now

1:09:15

that the Celtics are up 3-0. We

1:09:17

talked about the Panthers against the Oilers

1:09:19

also still holds because the Panthers are

1:09:21

up 2-0. And then we

1:09:23

did a pretty bit,

1:09:26

pretty deep dive into the WNBA

1:09:28

and media figures reaction to Caitlin

1:09:30

Clark being left off the Olympic

1:09:32

team and why

1:09:34

it's ridiculous. youtube.com/ESVN show. And

1:09:37

we have Brandon Sutton, like magic.

1:09:40

Hello. How are you, Brandon?

1:09:42

And what's happening on the

1:09:44

discourse? I'm doing

1:09:47

well, Emma. On the discourse this week,

1:09:49

we'll be talking about Hunter Biden's conviction,

1:09:52

Trump's hunt for his VP in

1:09:54

the upcoming presidential debates. There's

1:09:58

some double. Is your

1:10:00

audio doubled? Oh, I don't

1:10:03

know. Try it, Brennan. Hello. Hmm.

1:10:07

Okay. I don't know what I'm hearing. Um,

1:10:10

that might be me. Well, it

1:10:12

sounds good to everybody else, but check, check

1:10:14

out, uh, the discourse and we are wait,

1:10:17

we're waiting on Matt Binder. We'll see

1:10:19

him soon, but check out, uh, left reckoning

1:10:21

and every night. Jeez. Uh, check out skid,

1:10:24

left reckoning to scam economy and, uh, leftist

1:10:27

mafia and doomed. All

1:10:29

right, guys, we will head into the fun half 6 4 6 2 5 7 39 20. See

1:10:33

you there. Okay. Emma, please.

1:10:35

Well, I just, I feel that my voice

1:10:38

is sorely lacking on the majority report.

1:10:40

Wait. Look, Sam is

1:10:42

unpopular. I do deserve a vacation at Disney

1:10:44

world. So ladies and gentlemen, it is my

1:10:46

pleasure to welcome Emma to the show.

1:10:49

It is Thursday. I

1:10:51

think you need to take over for Sam. Yes,

1:10:53

please. No, no, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna

1:10:55

pause you right there. Wait, what? You can't encourage

1:10:57

Emma to live like this. And

1:10:59

I'll tell you why. So it was offered to work

1:11:02

sushi and poker with the boys. Sushi

1:11:06

and poker with the boys. It was offered

1:11:08

to work sushi and poker

1:11:10

with the boys. Sushi

1:11:13

and poker. Tim's upset. Sushi

1:11:16

and poker. Sushi

1:11:19

and that's what we call it. Sushi

1:11:23

and poker. Sushi.

1:11:29

I just think that what you did to Tim

1:11:31

Poole was mean. Free speech. That's

1:11:34

not what we're about here. Look at how sad

1:11:36

he's become now. We shouldn't even talk about it

1:11:38

because I think you're responsible. I

1:11:40

probably am in a certain way, but let's get

1:11:42

to the meltdown here. Twerk. Sushi

1:11:45

and poker with the boys. Oh my God.

1:11:47

Twerk. Wow. Sushi. I'm sorry, I'm losing

1:11:49

my fucking mind. Someone's offered to twerk. Sushi

1:11:52

and poker with the boys. Logic.

1:11:54

Twerk. Sushi and poker with

1:11:56

the boys. Twerk. I

1:12:00

think I'm like a kid. Twerp? I think I'm like a little

1:12:02

kid. I think I'm like a little kid. Add this debate 7,000

1:12:04

times. I'm a little kid. I

1:12:06

think I'm like a little kid. I'm a kid. I

1:12:08

think I'm like a kid. Twerp? I'm losing my fucking

1:12:10

mind. Some people just don't understand. So I'm not trying

1:12:12

to be a dick right now, but like, I absolutely

1:12:14

think the US should be combining me with

1:12:17

life and kids. That's

1:12:20

not what we're talking about here.

1:12:22

That's not right. It's

1:12:24

not a fun job. Twerp? That's a real fit.

1:12:27

That's got to feel fit. Feel fit. Really, won't

1:12:29

work? That's a real fit. That's got to feel

1:12:31

fit. That's got to feel fit. Feel fit. Child

1:12:33

Action Show Twenty Ten That's

1:12:36

got to feel fit. Feel close. That's got to feel

1:12:38

fit. Real feel close. That's got to feel fit. Women's

1:12:40

Memorial Day Okay, ladies and gentlemen, church organ has done

1:12:42

it again. That's about it. What?

1:12:45

I think he might be blowing it up representative. What?

1:12:49

That's about it. Take

1:12:56

it easy. Twerp? You've

1:12:59

really gotten out of hand. Sushi and

1:13:01

poker with the boys' original. Deluded. Sushi,

1:13:03

you don't have a clue as to

1:13:05

what's going on. Live YouTube.

1:13:07

Sam has the weight of the world on

1:13:09

his shoulders. Sam doesn't want

1:13:11

to do this show anymore. He can't

1:13:14

do it anymore. It was so much

1:13:16

easier. When the majority report was just

1:13:18

you. You're happy. Let's change the subject.

1:13:20

Right. Rangers and Nick's doing great. Shut

1:13:22

up. How long do people

1:13:24

sing records things on your program? That's one

1:13:26

of the most difficult parts about this show.

1:13:29

It's a pro-killing podcast. I'm thinking maybe it's

1:13:31

time we bury the hatchet. Left is best.

1:13:33

Twerp. Don't be foolish.

1:13:35

And don't fucking tweet at me. And don't

1:13:37

bitch. The way I'm on this cocktail. These

1:13:39

people love it. That's from my hardest. So

1:13:42

I wrote my honors thesis about it. Oh.

1:13:45

Sorry. She wrote an honors thesis.

1:13:47

Yes. I guess I should

1:13:49

hand the main mic to you now. You

1:13:52

want to go right up to me on foreign policy. We already

1:13:54

phoned Israel, dude. Are you against us? That's a tough question. I

1:13:56

don't have an answer to it. I'm going to get it. Yeah.

1:14:01

That's an incredible theme song.

1:14:04

Hi, Bumbler. Emma Viglen. Absolutely

1:14:06

one of my favorite people. Actually,

1:14:08

not just in the game, like period.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features