Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
You are listening to a free version
0:02
of the majority report Support
0:04
this show at join the
0:07
majority report comm and get an extra
0:09
hour of content daily It
0:18
is Thursday June
0:21
13th 2024
0:23
my name is Emma Vigeland in for Sam
0:25
cedar and this is the five-time award-winning majority
0:28
report We are
0:30
broadcasting live steps From
0:32
the industrially ravaged Gowanus Canal
0:35
in the heartland of America
0:37
downtown, Brooklyn, USA On
0:40
the program today Greg Stoker former US
0:42
Army Ranger Post of the
0:44
colonial Alcaste podcast will be with us
0:46
to talk about Israel's many
0:49
strategic and military failures and
0:52
Later in the show Hayden Clark in
0:54
also known as the transit guy will
0:57
join us to talk about Kathy
0:59
Hochul's Insane
1:02
torpedo wing of New York's
1:04
congestion pricing plan Also
1:07
on the show breaking news and it's
1:09
good news. Finally the Supreme
1:11
Court unanimously Uphold's
1:13
myth of Christone access a
1:15
sigh of relief for abortion advocates
1:18
I Meanwhile
1:20
Southern Baptist the US's largest
1:22
denomination of Protestants votes
1:25
to condemn IVF yesterday
1:30
The US claims Hamas has rejected
1:32
the ceasefire Israel keeps rejecting
1:35
sources tell NBC Hamas
1:38
wants a firm timeline for Israeli
1:40
troop withdrawal Israel
1:44
strikes yet another designated safe zone
1:46
in southern Gaza and
1:49
the who Issures dire warnings
1:51
of famine again The
1:56
ACLU sues Biden over his asylum
1:58
ban at the US border.
2:02
Biden and Zelensky signed a 10-year security
2:05
deal between the US and Ukraine as
2:08
the US widened sanctions on Russia.
2:12
Hillary Clinton endorses yet another
2:14
primary opponent of Jamal Boman's.
2:18
Apex very own George Latimer, she did
2:20
that with the Elliott angle, did not
2:23
work out so well, so let's hope
2:26
that holds true.
2:31
The Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses a
2:33
lawsuit brought by Tulsa race
2:35
massacre survivors, likely
2:38
the last opportunity for them to
2:40
receive reparations. House
2:43
Republicans vote to hold Merritt Garland
2:45
in contempt of Congress, that'll
2:48
go nowhere. So
2:50
they didn't turn over audio from Biden's special
2:52
counsel interview, the one Biden is, like,
2:56
I don't know, pretty triggered about. I think it's not
2:58
a big deal, but. A
3:01
new AP poll finds over half of
3:04
US adults approve of Trump's felony conviction.
3:08
Elon Musk is being sued for harassment
3:10
by former SpaceX employees in
3:12
the least surprising headline ever.
3:14
He's a recidivist on that
3:16
front. Yeah. And
3:19
lastly, police crackdown on citizens in
3:21
Argentina, protesting Malay's
3:24
extreme austerity and privatization bill
3:26
that just passed the Senate. Very
3:29
scary times in Argentina. We should
3:31
be talking even more about that, honestly. All
3:34
this and more on today's
3:36
majority reports. Welcome
3:39
to the show, everybody. It is a
3:41
majority report Thursday. I am joined now
3:43
by Matt Lech and
3:45
Bradley Alsop. And in the fun half,
3:47
we've got Brandon Sutton. We've got Matt
3:49
Binder. Hello, my friends. Hello.
3:52
Hello. So let's
3:54
get right into this breaking news here. The
3:57
Supreme Court has unanimously rejected and
3:59
it's attempt to ban
4:01
mifepristone. That is great
4:03
news for abortion advocates, for women's
4:06
health advocates. Mifepristone, for people who
4:08
are not familiar, is one of
4:10
two drugs that are used in
4:13
a medication abortion. It's
4:16
mifepristone and mifepristol that are
4:19
used together. Sorry, my
4:21
allergies are out of control these days. I
4:23
don't know what's going on. Anyway, mifepristone,
4:26
one of two drugs used
4:28
in a medication abortion, mifepristone
4:31
and mifepristol are combined. Mifepristone
4:35
is the one that
4:37
basically blocks a hormone
4:39
called progesterone, which is
4:42
necessary for the pregnancy to
4:45
continue. Then, mifepristol contracts
4:47
the uterus. The person who's
4:50
pregnant expels the
4:52
pregnancy in the form of
4:54
a miscarriage. You
4:58
can actually use mifepristol, that second
5:00
drug that expels the
5:02
pregnancy on its own. It's available
5:04
over the counter in Mexico and it's
5:07
80% effective on that
5:09
front. Combined
5:13
with mifepristone, it's
5:15
extremely safe, extremely
5:17
effective, widely used,
5:19
the most common method in this
5:21
country to end a pregnancy, which
5:24
makes sense because an overwhelming
5:26
majority of abortions happen in
5:28
the first trimester. Around 90%
5:30
of abortions happen within the first
5:32
12 weeks. That's when the pills
5:35
are used before surgical abortions
5:38
are necessary, particularly when
5:40
complications rear their heads
5:43
potentially later on in
5:45
a pregnancy. It's so safe,
5:48
but that didn't really
5:50
prevent the plaintiffs here
5:52
from making the case that it wasn't. Kaiser
5:55
Family Foundation found that when those two
5:57
drugs are used together, It
6:00
terminates a pregnancy successfully 99.6% of the time, and
6:04
there's a 0.4% risk of major
6:06
complications. The mortality rate is less
6:08
than 0.001%. It
6:13
is an extremely
6:15
safe way to terminate
6:17
a pregnancy. These
6:20
lawyers wouldn't use the umbrella of
6:22
safety to, you know, try
6:25
to seek some other ends of, you know,
6:27
winding down women's right to, you know, access
6:29
to different types of healthcare, would they? You
6:32
would be wrong in your
6:34
naivete there, Matt. No, that
6:37
is exactly the argument that
6:39
they used, but the Supreme Court was
6:41
not buying the fact that these doctors
6:45
who brought the suit had standing here.
6:47
There were 11 anti-abortion
6:50
doctors. One of them
6:52
is a Republican state senator from Indiana
6:54
who have a history of
6:57
being anti-abortion, and their
6:59
claim to the court was that they were
7:01
materially harmed, that's what standing means,
7:04
or harmed in some way, by
7:07
having to prescribe this
7:10
drug to their patients. And
7:13
Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote and delivered the
7:15
unanimous opinion here by the court, said
7:18
that standing didn't pass the smell test.
7:20
This was an excerpt that our
7:23
friend Mark Joseph Stern found
7:26
in the opinion this morning. And
7:28
Kavanaugh says here, consider some examples. EPA
7:30
rolls back emission standards for power plants.
7:32
Does a doctor have standing to sue
7:34
because she may need to spend more
7:36
time treating asthma patients? A local school
7:38
district starts a middle school football league.
7:41
Does a pediatrician have standing to challenge
7:43
its constitutionality because she might need to
7:45
spend more time treating concussions? A
7:47
federal agency increases the speed limit from 65 to 80 miles
7:50
per hour. Does an emergency room doctor have standing
7:52
to sue because he may have to treat more
7:55
car accident victims? The government repeals
7:57
certain restrictions on guns. Does a certain
8:00
have standing to sue because he might have to
8:02
operate on more gunshot victims. That's the
8:04
point here, right? If you're
8:06
basically working in a field
8:08
that is affected in some way by
8:11
a federal law or a statute that
8:13
may alter the way you do your
8:16
job or cause you to do your
8:18
job in a different way and
8:21
you may not like it, but does that
8:24
mean that you are the party that is harmed
8:26
by said law or are you
8:28
just in a field that has to respond
8:30
to the knock-on effects of said law? So
8:33
that's what the court unanimously found. I mean, from
8:35
Clarence Thomas to Alito to
8:37
Kavanagh here who wrote this majority opinion.
8:40
And if you're a
8:42
little bit concerned by the fact
8:44
that even these psychos like
8:46
Alito and Thomas signed
8:48
on to this and you're waiting for
8:50
the other shoot-a-drop, well, I do think
8:53
that you are justified here
8:56
because the court was clear
8:58
that this was a standing argument as
9:00
I keep repeating. The doctors had
9:02
no right to bring this case. They were
9:04
not harmed. It makes no sense. It opens
9:06
a Pandora's box, as Kavanagh was alluding
9:08
to here. But the fight is
9:10
not over because what this signals is
9:12
what Fox's Shannon Bream said, reacting
9:15
to the breaking news and
9:17
saying, this is probably
9:19
not over. Now,
9:22
here's the twist to this. There are a number
9:24
of states who tried to intervene in this case.
9:26
They wanted to be parties to the case. The
9:28
court did not allow that to happen. Those states
9:30
have said, if this case went the way that
9:32
many of us thought it would, they don't get
9:34
past the standing issue and don't get to the
9:36
merits of the case. Those states
9:38
say they are now standing by ready
9:40
to file their own challenges to the
9:42
way that the FDA has regulated mithropristone.
9:44
So this case is over. The doctors
9:46
didn't have standing access remains for the
9:49
drug, but now watch for two or
9:51
these three of these states to say that
9:53
they are going to now file their own legal challenges
9:55
and try to prove they do have standing to actually
9:57
get to the merits of how the case has been
9:59
handled. The drug has been handled by
10:01
the FDA. I've called that a boomerang
10:03
case, then Shannon. Shannon. It could be coming
10:05
back, all right? Stand by in
10:08
case there's more coming up momentarily, Shannon. So
10:10
that is the point here, which means
10:12
that the Republicans and the conservative activists
10:14
on this front are not done. They
10:17
have other states that are going to
10:19
try to challenge this from a different
10:21
perspective, maybe not from a doctor's harm
10:23
perspective, but from, I don't
10:25
know, maybe they'll be able to
10:28
find somebody who was harmed
10:30
in the process of getting
10:32
an abortion, and that will be the way
10:35
that they take it to the
10:37
Supreme Court. As I mentioned, those cases
10:39
are incredibly rare. But Dave Weigel, also
10:42
a friend of the show, had this point
10:44
this morning that I think is especially scary,
10:47
where he was essentially saying this
10:49
also allows for those
10:51
challenges to come up in conjunction with
10:54
Donald Trump getting elected, and he
10:56
could appoint someone to lead the
10:58
FDA as the FDA commissioner, that's
11:00
a presidential appointment, who
11:02
rescinds the approval of the drug. And
11:05
the Supreme Court does not preclude that in the way that
11:07
they ruled on this. So that
11:09
is the roadmap going forward. This is good news
11:12
in the moment, right? But
11:14
as I'm trying to reiterate, we will be
11:16
back here at some point. If I'm
11:18
a political activist for the conservatives, I
11:21
find with having a little bit of,
11:23
you're not giving the anti-abortion movement a
11:25
more sort of cause for energy ahead
11:27
of an election. And that really
11:29
could have been part of why Alito
11:31
and Thomas, who vote for everything that
11:33
conservative activists want, part of why they
11:35
stood down here. Yeah, find another day.
11:39
We saw this in Arizona, too. They
11:42
kept their secondary, more restrictive
11:44
abortion law in place, but
11:46
the Republican, like two or
11:48
three Senate Republicans
11:51
in Arizona moved to the other
11:53
side and rescinded the Civil
11:55
War era, pre-women's suffrage
11:58
abortion bans. that made
12:00
it extremely restrictive. So
12:03
they were, they're cognizant there of
12:06
the electoral implications for them.
12:09
And do we think that the Supreme
12:11
Court justices are above electoral concerns? I
12:14
certainly don't. And I also don't like him actually, now that
12:16
I think about it, mention the EPA like that, but anyway.
12:19
Oh yeah, well, right. It's
12:22
like an Escher painting, right? You get, you look and you
12:24
see new things. I'm
12:26
not an art person, that's the right. But it's also one
12:28
of those- Escher painting, right? Yeah. Sure. But
12:31
it's also one of those rhetorical devices of being
12:33
like, hey, if we give
12:35
you this, it could be used against
12:37
us in a way that's not, but
12:39
like he's making a cogent point, but
12:42
also in a way that's like self-serving
12:44
to Republican interests in a Republican administration.
12:46
Yeah, and that's the
12:48
fight that we will see in
12:51
probably the coming months and years. Another
12:55
reason why this election is so terrifying. All
12:58
right, with that folks, we are gonna take a quick
13:01
break, but just a reminder,
13:03
this show relies on your support. We
13:06
really appreciate the ability to be
13:08
independent, to say what we think,
13:11
to never be beholden to anybody else.
13:14
And that's because of our members, the fact
13:16
that, you know, like, you
13:19
know, I said this on social media
13:21
the other day, but Brianna Joy Gray
13:23
just fired from the Hill because she
13:25
was speaking critically of Israel. Katie
13:27
Alpert too from the same organization. Exactly,
13:31
and Brianna, you know, we publicly
13:33
had some disagreements, right? But this is the
13:35
kind of thing where, no, when you're on
13:37
the left, you were principally against this. And
13:39
so I just felt terribly that
13:41
she got fired for
13:44
speaking critically about the genocide. And
13:47
that's what happens when you
13:49
have kind of companies and media that's
13:51
consolidated with a lot of money and
13:53
corporate power, and they'll represent
13:56
the interests of the powerful. And
13:58
so with... I'm
14:00
grateful that we have an infrastructure here because
14:02
of the members like you to keep us
14:04
independent and to keep us From
14:07
feeling you know the the
14:09
guillotine over us so to speak So yeah,
14:11
I mean especially the join the majority report
14:14
calm because you know YouTube is nice and
14:16
it's been a big growth You
14:19
know since I've been a majority report, but I also
14:21
don't trust that I
14:24
mean they they change things all the time and
14:26
you can see it like oh in January of
14:28
this year They change something with regards to ads
14:31
and it just like cut off and we were doing very
14:33
well before and now it's just like
14:35
okay And then what if they make another change
14:37
and it's like okay now we have an
14:39
entire different economy We're dealing with and
14:41
thanks for join the majority report folks.
14:43
Yes, that's really it Join the majority
14:45
report calm and help us go on on
14:48
twitch too. We are close to what
14:50
is the landmark? 70,000 followers 69
14:54
a nice 508 so Subscribe
14:58
to us on Twitch all
15:00
right folks quick break and when we come back
15:02
we will be with Greg Stoker We
15:22
Are back and I'm thrilled to be
15:24
joined now by Greg Stoker former US
15:27
Army Ranger with a background in special
15:29
operations and military Intelligence he is now
15:31
an activist political and military analyst and
15:33
host of the colonial outcast podcast Which
15:36
I couldn't recommend more highly Greg. Thanks
15:38
so much for coming on the show
15:41
Thanks for having me. So um tell
15:43
us a little bit more about your background Why
15:47
or where did you serve for how long
15:49
and I guess how did you kind of
15:52
come to an anti-colonial? Perspective
15:54
or a perspective that was critical
15:56
of US Empire after your
15:58
time in the army All right.
16:01
Well, I mean, it's not a unique
16:03
story. I joined the United States Army
16:05
to get the heck out of wherever I
16:07
was. And it was the
16:09
easiest way to do it. Paid for college, stuff like
16:12
that. I was never like a huge gung-ho Captain America
16:14
type. But I did go into the Ranger
16:16
Regiment, which is a United States Special Operations
16:18
Unit. And I did four combat deployments to
16:21
Afghanistan. Started off as kind of like an assault
16:23
position. I was a fire team leader. And then
16:25
I transitioned more into a human human collect. Oh,
16:27
sorry. A human intelligence. And
16:30
I think what I started really questioning what was going
16:32
on when I got exposed to targeting kinetic strikes, I
16:34
drone strikes under the Obama administration. And there just really
16:36
wasn't a standard of proof for who we were dropping
16:39
in terms of kinetic strikes. If you're on the wrong
16:41
contact list, it could be green lit. As long as
16:43
you didn't destroy infrastructure, it was good. You could be
16:45
a baker. You could be a
16:47
baker who, you know, was had
16:50
like fourth
16:52
degree connections to
16:54
like the Taliban or the Connie or proto Islamic
16:57
State, you're still gonna potentially eat a missile. So
16:59
that was problematic. And
17:01
it didn't work. It was strategically stupid. And
17:03
then I got out started studying post-colonial studies
17:05
at the International
17:13
Relations and spent a 10 year journey to get
17:15
to where I am right now. So that's it
17:17
in a nutshell. Yeah,
17:24
I mean, and that that that
17:27
is part of what you bring to
17:29
your analysis, particularly of what's happening in
17:31
Gaza right now that I really appreciate.
17:35
Because for you
17:37
talked about how the under the
17:39
Obama administration, there really wasn't the scrutiny
17:41
that should be having a that should
17:43
have been there in terms of the
17:45
who the targets really were and what
17:47
their ties were to terrorist organizations. But
17:50
I mean, the United States Army looks
17:52
practically, I
17:54
guess, buttoned up compared to
17:56
what we're seeing in Israel. What
17:59
is that context? like, even though you had
18:01
those concerns as a part of the army,
18:03
and then it's on steroids
18:06
with how Israel's handling Gaza. I
18:08
mean, I will never be an apologist
18:10
for US Empire, but like, it's so bad
18:12
we're looking, I wouldn't say good, but like,
18:15
all right. So when,
18:17
apparently Israel is supposed to be fighting
18:19
a counterinsurgency, right? And since we brought
18:21
the US Army, the US military into
18:23
it, a US counterinsurgency doctrine is kind
18:27
of effective. It was more effective in
18:29
Iraq than it was in Afghanistan. Afghanistan
18:31
had a major foreign fighter problem.
18:33
So the fighters were coming in
18:35
from like Pakistan and Iran and
18:37
other parts. So complicating the situation,
18:39
but it's called COIN, counterinsurgency doctrine.
18:41
And one of the main pillars
18:43
of counterinsurgency doctrine is if you're
18:45
an occupying force, there's
18:48
an acronym called SWEAT MSO. It's
18:50
sewage, water, electricity, academics, trash, medical
18:52
safety and other. And
18:55
it holds that if you're an occupation of a
18:57
people and all of those sectors aren't up to
18:59
code and you cannot
19:01
live in a modern standard of living,
19:03
people are going to want to kill
19:05
you. So if you're looking
19:07
at it, so we would try to
19:09
protect all these sites. Hospitals, I mean,
19:12
Obama signed up on essentially bombing a
19:14
hospital in 2015 in Kunduz province. But
19:16
aside from that, we didn't have the
19:18
state policy of bombing hospitals. And
19:21
we'd protect roads. So if we look at
19:23
Gaza, they have destroyed the sewer pipes. A
19:27
lot of the J dams, the 2000
19:30
pound bunker buster bombs have an
19:32
unclassed penetration depth of six feet
19:34
of concrete, which isn't going to
19:36
collapse a tunnel, a hardened tunnel
19:38
50 feet underground, but it will
19:41
collapse sewer water pipes. Electricity
19:43
they hit power relay stations in
19:45
October. So that's always been a
19:48
problem. Academics, they've
19:50
destroyed every college or university
19:52
in Gaza. Trash, there is
19:54
no trash. Everything's rubble. There's
19:56
no civic infrastructure. Medical, there's
19:59
like one. to two trauma
20:01
surgeons left in North Gaza,
20:04
as a matter of state policy, they've
20:06
gone and destroyed hospitals as much as
20:08
they could while keeping their propaganda machine
20:11
alive. Safety, there is no
20:13
safety, and there's about to be a massive
20:15
biological event any time now.
20:17
So yeah, they actually destroyed
20:19
our own counterinsurgency doctrine that
20:21
we advise them on because
20:24
it is somewhat effective, but
20:26
no, they're not even pretending
20:30
to fight a counterinsurgency. It's just straight up
20:32
ethnic cleansing to make Gaza strip unlivable. Right,
20:35
and so, I mean, as you
20:37
describe that, that counterinsurgency doctrine that
20:39
the United States adopted, and supposedly
20:42
Israel, I guess, for some time
20:44
had been trying to follow to
20:47
keep up appearances, but I mean, I don't
20:49
know, I'm being overly generous there. Like that
20:51
is an explicit doctrine because
20:54
it's in the interest of the
20:56
party there, whether it
20:58
be the United States Army or Israel, like
21:02
to basically control the way that
21:05
they respond to something so that they can
21:07
have some sort of victory. But
21:09
when you abandon that, and it's really
21:11
just killing for the sake of it,
21:13
that runs a fly, I would imagine,
21:16
over some in, say, the United States
21:18
intelligence community or in the military brass,
21:21
who are less ideologically
21:23
genocidal and more interested in
21:25
maintaining empire or power. We've
21:29
noticed on this show how there's a
21:31
difference in how, say, Lloyd Austin or
21:34
Burns of the CIA talk, not
21:37
that we hear too much from Burns, but approach
21:40
Israel as it relates to how
21:42
they've been handling Gaza versus how
21:45
Blinken and Biden have stood
21:48
so steadfastly behind
21:51
Israel. Is that discrepancy
21:55
kind of laid bare there? Well,
21:58
well, first of all, Lloyd Austin. Israel
26:00
will end up having a victory because they
26:02
get Hamas to agree to a ceasefire, even
26:04
if it's not true at all. Yeah. And
26:07
so now they're trying to reframe this
26:09
whole thing is Israel has degraded Hamas
26:11
so much they're no longer a military
26:13
threat. And now they're willing now that
26:15
they've achieved their pseudo objectives, which were
26:17
never their objectives, they're now being gracious
26:19
and, you know, presenting Hamas with this.
26:21
But the thing is, Hamas doesn't need
26:23
to accept it because they can keep
26:25
fighting according to Israeli intelligence veterans and
26:27
like Marie, why net news, their
26:30
own intelligence officers say that they couldn't
26:32
defeat Hamas before 2026. And
26:35
personally, I believe that to
26:37
be completely optimistic. Right. Well,
26:41
Hamas is recruiting, we know, right? And
26:44
there is, there are some
26:48
insurgent Hamas fighters, I guess, in the north
26:50
who have been giving Israel
26:52
some grief. And
26:54
so the the hostage
26:56
rescue operation, how did that play
26:59
into the ceasefire talks? Because from
27:01
Israel's perspective, that's Netanyahu in the
27:03
far right getting to say, see,
27:07
we need to continue this
27:09
war genocide war for
27:11
to release the rest of the hostages
27:13
when we know, though, the overwhelming number
27:15
of hostages that were released were during
27:17
the temporary ceasefire. They only rescued four
27:19
in this instance and killed over 270
27:21
Palestinians. Now
27:24
there have been rumblings that the United
27:26
States may have provided intelligence
27:29
support for this operation. Oh, we do.
27:31
Oh, we did. OK. So
27:34
we provided intelligence support for an
27:36
operation that saved four hostages and
27:38
killed over 270 Palestinians as we're
27:40
trying to get this ceasefire over
27:42
the hump. Do you
27:44
think that that affected Hamas's position
27:46
here? Because they probably are
27:49
like, you guys are not honest brokers
27:51
here. You just you just OK this
27:53
operation. That was a slaughter. Right.
27:56
So no, it doesn't really
27:59
affect Hamas's. would
1:02:00
be 65 by the time the MTA
1:02:02
subway system was fully accessible.
1:02:05
And this throws a massive wrench into
1:02:07
that. Because now we are
1:02:09
pausing all of these elevator
1:02:11
work, all of this elevator work until we can figure
1:02:14
out what is going on. I mean, that lawsuit
1:02:17
sounds like it has a lot of
1:02:19
merit. You're not allowed to. This is
1:02:21
that was one of the more successful,
1:02:23
honestly, regulatory moves that
1:02:25
the federal government has ever made,
1:02:28
which is to make every place
1:02:30
handy, handy, accessible. And
1:02:33
it's just not the case in New York City
1:02:36
whatsoever. And as you say, a majority of the
1:02:38
state, a majority of the stations, 69% don't
1:02:42
have elevators. That's a violation of
1:02:44
the federal statute. Absolutely. Yeah.
1:02:47
So that's, that's what we're now adding into
1:02:49
the mix. And also Second Avenue Subway, which
1:02:51
is supposed to move 150,000 people
1:02:55
a day once open is
1:02:57
completely told to stop work. Because one
1:02:59
of the things that we didn't realize,
1:03:01
or people don't realize, is that when
1:03:03
the federal government comes in and says,
1:03:05
Hey, for Second Avenue Subway, we're going
1:03:08
to give you three point something billion
1:03:10
dollars, that's a match to the state's
1:03:12
funding. And so when the state does
1:03:14
not have that funding anymore, the federal
1:03:16
monies that were earmarked
1:03:19
to it are now in flux and are not
1:03:21
kept. And so now we have to figure out
1:03:23
of like, are we have to going through this
1:03:25
whole funding process again, to fund
1:03:27
something that we've already started working on.
1:03:30
This is this is the Kathy
1:03:32
Hochul transportation plan
1:03:35
right now that we're that we're seeing.
1:03:37
And one thing she said was in
1:03:39
her speech, which was crazy about face
1:03:41
was, this will hurt small
1:03:43
businesses. And her was to add a payroll
1:03:46
tax in lieu of a usage tax for
1:03:48
that was going to be my
1:03:50
next question. Can you explain that?
1:03:52
Because the pay roll
1:03:54
tax is a tax on people making wages
1:03:57
and or, you know, like Like,
1:04:01
not everybody, right? But I don't know
1:04:04
how they would structure it, but like,
1:04:06
it's lower to middle to maybe even
1:04:09
middle upper income people, or it's a tax
1:04:11
on their paycheck to pay for this. But
1:04:14
it also, if you were to just
1:04:16
say, okay, that's the funding mechanism now,
1:04:18
we'll tax New Yorkers more. That
1:04:20
money was also supposed to go out
1:04:22
to train lines in the suburbs to
1:04:24
help improve them as well. So that's
1:04:26
money getting taken out of the pockets
1:04:29
of regular New Yorkers to help the
1:04:31
suburbs double. 10
1:04:34
percent of the 10 percent of the congestion
1:04:36
pricing in the law is that it
1:04:38
has to help Metro North, which serves
1:04:40
Connecticut and upstate New York, as well
1:04:42
as Long Island Railroad, which
1:04:44
serves Long Island. And so with her
1:04:47
idea, New Yorkers
1:04:49
would get taxed to
1:04:52
then pay for the suburban transit
1:04:54
systems and train systems of
1:04:58
drivers who would come in, still not have to
1:05:00
pay anything. And we would
1:05:02
have to pay their improvements for that. Right.
1:05:05
And while also not disincentivizing them
1:05:07
from coming into the city via
1:05:09
car, which is also
1:05:11
harmful for our environment, which should not get
1:05:14
lost in this discussion, is this also has
1:05:16
been endorsed by environmentalists, as you say. And
1:05:22
as we kind of wrap up here, Hayden, transit
1:05:26
or I should not transit congestion
1:05:28
pricing has happened in other cities in the world. It would
1:05:30
be this would have been the first of its kind in
1:05:32
the United States. But this is not
1:05:34
like New York is making this out of whole
1:05:36
cloth. I know London has congestion
1:05:39
pricing and it's really it's it's taken
1:05:41
effect and it's had some good results.
1:05:43
Can you talk a little bit about
1:05:45
that? Sure. You were
1:05:47
bringing a pedestrian and traffic
1:05:49
deaths. Traffic deaths since 2019
1:05:51
in London have gone down
1:05:53
40 percent since it was
1:05:55
implemented. Traffic's
1:05:57
gone down. in
1:06:00
the last London elections. I think it
1:06:02
happened, I wanna say maybe two months ago
1:06:04
was there were London elections for
1:06:06
the mayoral race. And the Sadik
1:06:09
Khan, who is the mayor
1:06:11
of London, who is a major
1:06:13
champion for congestion pricing, this
1:06:17
was a referendum on do we still
1:06:19
want to have congestion
1:06:21
pricing because this man wants to expand it.
1:06:24
And the places in which he wanted to
1:06:26
expand it were the biggest swings towards him
1:06:28
in this race. People see how good it
1:06:30
is. And I understand it's not popular to
1:06:33
think like, oh, I'm gonna get taxed to
1:06:35
live my day-to-day life. But once
1:06:37
it's actually implemented, these plans
1:06:39
have been super popular. And
1:06:42
it's just one of those things where it's really sad
1:06:44
because San Francisco has been thinking
1:06:46
about it and other cities have been thinking about
1:06:48
it as a way to make their transit better. And
1:06:51
if New York City is not gonna do it, it
1:06:54
really spells doom for the rest of all of
1:06:56
the cities who might potentially wanna do it. If
1:06:59
it's not good for New York City, then it's not good for anywhere.
1:07:02
And so that's kind of what Kathy Hochul
1:07:04
is doing. And also one last thing is
1:07:07
the political idea or like the
1:07:09
political thought to then three days
1:07:12
after canceling congestion pricing, go to
1:07:15
a car dealer fundraiser
1:07:17
for yourself. That
1:07:19
was called- A little on the nose. Dealer association
1:07:21
at $5,000 to $10,000 a head. The
1:07:24
math ain't mathing. You need
1:07:27
to fire your team and rehire
1:07:29
better advisors because that is
1:07:31
a crazy optics. Yeah,
1:07:34
it's a little much Kathy,
1:07:36
just toning down slightly. Well,
1:07:39
Hayden, really appreciate your time today.
1:07:41
And thanks for that wonderful explainer
1:07:43
about this. Hayden Clark in
1:07:45
the transit guy, you can follow him on Twitter.
1:07:47
Where else can people find your work, Hayden? I'm
1:07:51
on threads and Instagram, the transit guy.
1:07:53
And then on Twitter, the underscore trans
1:07:55
underscore guy. Elon will not give me
1:07:57
that. Will not
1:07:59
let me remove those unders- scores. All
1:08:02
right. Well, I appreciate you. Thanks
1:08:04
so much. Have
1:08:06
a great rest of your day, Hayden, and talk to you
1:08:08
soon. Thanks so much. Okay,
1:08:12
with that, we're going to wrap up the
1:08:14
first part of this program, the free part
1:08:17
of this program. Head into the fun half. The number
1:08:19
is 6462573920. We
1:08:22
will take your
1:08:24
calls, read your IMs. Matt, what's happening on
1:08:26
Left Reckoning? Yeah, Left Reckoning,
1:08:28
we had Ben Fong on, talk about the Odd Fellows. We
1:08:30
also talked about AOC
1:08:33
a little bit, and some outreach
1:08:35
to Zionists about hate, which
1:08:37
is not what I would do. And
1:08:39
we talked a little bit about what
1:08:42
happened in labor after Jimmy Corbin
1:08:44
was took over. So check that
1:08:46
out if you want. David and I discussing that. People
1:08:48
keep it high marks. And
1:08:50
so yeah, patreon.com, just Left Reckoning. We also
1:08:53
talk about what Jimmy Dorf hands are doing
1:08:55
these days. Oh my God. Which is stalking
1:08:58
Jill Stein for not going
1:09:00
on the Jimmy Dorf show. Ever increasingly
1:09:02
niche that they never,
1:09:04
they just keep narrowing that audience. On
1:09:07
ESVN, we talked a little bit about both
1:09:10
the championship series and our analysis for
1:09:12
the Celtics and MAV still holds now
1:09:15
that the Celtics are up 3-0. We
1:09:17
talked about the Panthers against the Oilers
1:09:19
also still holds because the Panthers are
1:09:21
up 2-0. And then we
1:09:23
did a pretty bit,
1:09:26
pretty deep dive into the WNBA
1:09:28
and media figures reaction to Caitlin
1:09:30
Clark being left off the Olympic
1:09:32
team and why
1:09:34
it's ridiculous. youtube.com/ESVN show. And
1:09:37
we have Brandon Sutton, like magic.
1:09:40
Hello. How are you, Brandon?
1:09:42
And what's happening on the
1:09:44
discourse? I'm doing
1:09:47
well, Emma. On the discourse this week,
1:09:49
we'll be talking about Hunter Biden's conviction,
1:09:52
Trump's hunt for his VP in
1:09:54
the upcoming presidential debates. There's
1:09:58
some double. Is your
1:10:00
audio doubled? Oh, I don't
1:10:03
know. Try it, Brennan. Hello. Hmm.
1:10:07
Okay. I don't know what I'm hearing. Um,
1:10:10
that might be me. Well, it
1:10:12
sounds good to everybody else, but check, check
1:10:14
out, uh, the discourse and we are wait,
1:10:17
we're waiting on Matt Binder. We'll see
1:10:19
him soon, but check out, uh, left reckoning
1:10:21
and every night. Jeez. Uh, check out skid,
1:10:24
left reckoning to scam economy and, uh, leftist
1:10:27
mafia and doomed. All
1:10:29
right, guys, we will head into the fun half 6 4 6 2 5 7 39 20. See
1:10:33
you there. Okay. Emma, please.
1:10:35
Well, I just, I feel that my voice
1:10:38
is sorely lacking on the majority report.
1:10:40
Wait. Look, Sam is
1:10:42
unpopular. I do deserve a vacation at Disney
1:10:44
world. So ladies and gentlemen, it is my
1:10:46
pleasure to welcome Emma to the show.
1:10:49
It is Thursday. I
1:10:51
think you need to take over for Sam. Yes,
1:10:53
please. No, no, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna
1:10:55
pause you right there. Wait, what? You can't encourage
1:10:57
Emma to live like this. And
1:10:59
I'll tell you why. So it was offered to work
1:11:02
sushi and poker with the boys. Sushi
1:11:06
and poker with the boys. It was offered
1:11:08
to work sushi and poker
1:11:10
with the boys. Sushi
1:11:13
and poker. Tim's upset. Sushi
1:11:16
and poker. Sushi
1:11:19
and that's what we call it. Sushi
1:11:23
and poker. Sushi.
1:11:29
I just think that what you did to Tim
1:11:31
Poole was mean. Free speech. That's
1:11:34
not what we're about here. Look at how sad
1:11:36
he's become now. We shouldn't even talk about it
1:11:38
because I think you're responsible. I
1:11:40
probably am in a certain way, but let's get
1:11:42
to the meltdown here. Twerk. Sushi
1:11:45
and poker with the boys. Oh my God.
1:11:47
Twerk. Wow. Sushi. I'm sorry, I'm losing
1:11:49
my fucking mind. Someone's offered to twerk. Sushi
1:11:52
and poker with the boys. Logic.
1:11:54
Twerk. Sushi and poker with
1:11:56
the boys. Twerk. I
1:12:00
think I'm like a kid. Twerp? I think I'm like a little
1:12:02
kid. I think I'm like a little kid. Add this debate 7,000
1:12:04
times. I'm a little kid. I
1:12:06
think I'm like a little kid. I'm a kid. I
1:12:08
think I'm like a kid. Twerp? I'm losing my fucking
1:12:10
mind. Some people just don't understand. So I'm not trying
1:12:12
to be a dick right now, but like, I absolutely
1:12:14
think the US should be combining me with
1:12:17
life and kids. That's
1:12:20
not what we're talking about here.
1:12:22
That's not right. It's
1:12:24
not a fun job. Twerp? That's a real fit.
1:12:27
That's got to feel fit. Feel fit. Really, won't
1:12:29
work? That's a real fit. That's got to feel
1:12:31
fit. That's got to feel fit. Feel fit. Child
1:12:33
Action Show Twenty Ten That's
1:12:36
got to feel fit. Feel close. That's got to feel
1:12:38
fit. Real feel close. That's got to feel fit. Women's
1:12:40
Memorial Day Okay, ladies and gentlemen, church organ has done
1:12:42
it again. That's about it. What?
1:12:45
I think he might be blowing it up representative. What?
1:12:49
That's about it. Take
1:12:56
it easy. Twerp? You've
1:12:59
really gotten out of hand. Sushi and
1:13:01
poker with the boys' original. Deluded. Sushi,
1:13:03
you don't have a clue as to
1:13:05
what's going on. Live YouTube.
1:13:07
Sam has the weight of the world on
1:13:09
his shoulders. Sam doesn't want
1:13:11
to do this show anymore. He can't
1:13:14
do it anymore. It was so much
1:13:16
easier. When the majority report was just
1:13:18
you. You're happy. Let's change the subject.
1:13:20
Right. Rangers and Nick's doing great. Shut
1:13:22
up. How long do people
1:13:24
sing records things on your program? That's one
1:13:26
of the most difficult parts about this show.
1:13:29
It's a pro-killing podcast. I'm thinking maybe it's
1:13:31
time we bury the hatchet. Left is best.
1:13:33
Twerp. Don't be foolish.
1:13:35
And don't fucking tweet at me. And don't
1:13:37
bitch. The way I'm on this cocktail. These
1:13:39
people love it. That's from my hardest. So
1:13:42
I wrote my honors thesis about it. Oh.
1:13:45
Sorry. She wrote an honors thesis.
1:13:47
Yes. I guess I should
1:13:49
hand the main mic to you now. You
1:13:52
want to go right up to me on foreign policy. We already
1:13:54
phoned Israel, dude. Are you against us? That's a tough question. I
1:13:56
don't have an answer to it. I'm going to get it. Yeah.
1:14:01
That's an incredible theme song.
1:14:04
Hi, Bumbler. Emma Viglen. Absolutely
1:14:06
one of my favorite people. Actually,
1:14:08
not just in the game, like period.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More