Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
When it comes to quality sleep, Ashley
0:02
has you covered, with top mattress brands
0:04
at winning prices. And with special financing
0:06
options available, you can snooze now
0:09
and pay later. Plus, your mattress
0:11
purchase helps give the gift of better sleep to
0:13
children in need and US Special Operations
0:15
forces. Visit your local Ashley store
0:18
or shop online today and make every snooze
0:20
count.
0:21
Financing is subject to credit approval. See
0:23
store or ashley.com for details.
0:27
Tonight on the Mehdi Hassan Show, it's
0:29
one year till the 2024 election and the polls do
0:32
not look good for Joe Biden. My
0:34
conversation on that and the war in Gaza with
0:36
Democratic Congressman Jamal Bowman. Plus,
0:38
Mary Trump is here to preview her uncle's big day in
0:42
court tomorrow as the ex-president gets ready to
0:44
testify in his own civil fraud trial. And
0:47
Gaza suffers another communications blackout amid
0:51
intense Israeli bombardment. I'll
0:53
speak with a top UN official who resigned from
0:55
the organization, citing the quote,
0:57
genocide of the Palestinians.
1:07
Good evening, welcome to the show. I'm Mehdi Hassan.
1:10
It's November the 5th, 2023, which
1:13
means exactly a year from now, November
1:15
the 5th, 2024, Americans will go to the polls to
1:18
pick their president. And it looks
1:21
like the president's going to be And
1:23
it looks almost certain that once again, they'll be picking
1:25
between Joe Biden and
1:27
Donald Trump. A choice that Americans are saying
1:29
in poll after poll that they do not
1:32
want. They don't want a rerun of 2020. They
1:35
don't want Democratic and Republican candidates
1:37
with the names Biden and Trump.
1:40
But here we are. And here's the bad news for
1:42
team Biden in particular. If the election
1:44
were held not a year from now, but today, the
1:47
twice impeached, four times indicted Donald
1:49
J. Trump would win the electoral college
1:51
with over 300 votes, easily defeating
1:53
President Biden. That's according to a
1:55
new poll out today from The New York Times and Siena
1:58
College, which shows Biden.
1:59
using to Trump in five of the six
2:02
key battleground states Arizona, Georgia,
2:05
Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania. The
2:07
President is ahead only in Wisconsin
2:09
and only by two percentage points there.
2:12
It's worth noting that Joe Biden carried all
2:14
six of these states back in 2020. But
2:17
that's not all. The new poll also points
2:19
to several other glaring liabilities
2:22
for the President, including
2:24
his age. 71% of voters surveyed say Biden,
2:27
who will turn 81 later this month, is
2:29
too old to be an effective president. That includes
2:31
a remarkable 54% of his own
2:34
supporters. The same doesn't apply,
2:36
weirdly, to 77-year-old Donald Trump.
2:38
Only 39% of the overall electorate say
2:40
that Trump is too old to hold office with
2:43
just 19% of his supporters sharing
2:45
that view. Another issue hurting Biden
2:47
is the economy. Voters buy a 59% to 37%
2:50
margin, plus Trump over Biden
2:53
on economic issues. That's the largest gap of any
2:55
issue surveyed in that poll. That's
2:57
despite the fact that just last week we learned that
2:59
strong consumer spending drove the US GDP
3:02
to its biggest rise in nearly two years,
3:04
growing 4.9%. And
3:06
right now unemployment is at one of its lowest rates
3:08
for 50 years. People don't seem to care
3:11
in the polling. There's also growing concerns
3:13
over President Biden's mental fitness.
3:15
According to the poll, 62% of voters say
3:18
the President does not have the mental sharpness
3:20
to be effective. And yet, believe
3:22
it or not, only 44% of voters believe
3:24
the same of Donald Trump.
3:27
However, Trump's declining mental acuity
3:30
is kind of hard to ignore. Here
3:32
he is just last night in Florida delivering yet
3:34
another incoherent, rambling mad
3:37
speech. Many
3:39
many terrorists are coming in. Thousands of
3:42
middle-aged men are coming
3:45
in. Young men are coming in. Everyone's
3:47
saying, how come they're all so young and
3:50
so strong and they're
3:52
coming from China? Everything's a lie. The
3:55
whole thing is a lie. The
3:57
whole election was a lie.
3:59
Why would
4:01
I do a debate when Christie,
4:04
sir, I'm sorry, he is not
4:06
a fat pig, okay? This man, he said,
4:10
he is not a fat pig. No,
4:16
it's true. And you can't,
4:18
you can't use the term fat. You're
4:22
allowed to use the word pig, but not fat.
4:26
He sounds totally, mentally fit to
4:28
be president to me. But
4:30
perhaps the most stark finding from that new poll
4:32
from the Times is this. Biden trails
4:34
Trump by five points nationally, but when voters
4:37
were asked about a hypothetical race involving not
4:39
Biden, but an unnamed generic Democrat,
4:42
that candidate actually leads Trump by
4:44
eight points. That's a 13 point
4:46
swing. So to call these poll
4:49
results anything other than savage for the president
4:51
of the United States for the Democratic Party,
4:53
and let's be honest, for the future of American democracy,
4:56
would be an understatement to pretend things are
4:58
fine and will be fine is mad.
5:01
Having said all that, let me say again tonight, as
5:03
I've said many times before on this show, we
5:05
also do need to calm down a bit, get
5:07
some perspective, especially historical perspective.
5:10
Yes, the polls are bad for the sitting president,
5:13
but we are still one year, exactly
5:15
one year out from the election, 12 whole months. The
5:18
Biden campaign for reelection hasn't yet fully
5:20
launched. The Trump criminal trials,
5:22
four of them haven't yet started. And we
5:24
know that incumbent presidents like Barack
5:26
Obama and Ronald Reagan also trail their expected
5:29
opponents at this stage in their first
5:31
terms, too, only to emerge victorious
5:33
a year later. We also know that Biden's
5:35
own poor approval ratings didn't really hurt
5:38
Democrats in the midterms either. Remarkably,
5:40
they held on to the Senate and prevented a red wave
5:42
in the House. They did it by focusing
5:44
on abortion rights and voting rights, which
5:46
they can and presumably will do
5:49
again next year. And in the meantime, Trump
5:51
is giving Democrats ample ammo
5:53
to use against him almost daily. According
5:56
to new reporting from the Washington Post out just this
5:58
morning, Trump and his allies have already started
6:00
mapping out specific plans for a second term
6:02
revenge mission. The Post reports that Trump
6:04
wants to exploit the power of the federal government to
6:07
punish his critics and opponents using
6:09
the Department of Justice to investigate one-time
6:11
officials, and previous allies of his
6:13
who have since become critical of him. But
6:15
he doesn't just want to take over the DOJ, advisors
6:18
for the ex-president have also discussed deploying
6:20
the military to quell possible
6:22
unrest on day one of his presidency. Yes,
6:25
his associates have begun drafting plans to potentially
6:27
invoke the Insurrection Act on Inauguration
6:30
Day to target civil demonstrations.
6:34
So it's very clear exactly what is
6:36
at stake in this next election.
6:39
Still, the Democrats probably need to find the
6:41
right balance between calm and
6:44
complacent. I mean, let's be clear,
6:46
it would be crazy for Biden and the Democrats
6:48
to just ignore the age issue, which just
6:51
won't go away for it. It would be crazy for Biden
6:53
and the Democrats to ignore how their message on the economy,
6:56
backed by, yes, actual facts and figures,
6:58
is still not getting through to people. And it would be
7:00
crazy for Biden and the Democrats to ignore the massive
7:03
rutcheons within their base, especially
7:05
among young voters and people of color and Muslims
7:08
who are vocally opposed to the administration's seemingly
7:10
unconditional support for Israel's brutal
7:13
bombardment of the Gaza Strip. According
7:16
to recent polling from Gallup, Biden's job approval
7:18
rating upon Democrats, among Democrats,
7:21
has tumbled 11 percentage points just
7:23
in the past month. Which is now at 75 percent,
7:26
which is the lowest it's ever been for him during his
7:28
presidency. Look, the truth
7:30
is that it's much harder for a Democratic Party leader
7:32
in charge of a party whose base is actually
7:35
diverse. That is an actual coalition
7:37
of younger and older voters, white and
7:40
non-white voters, quote unquote moderate
7:42
and quote unquote progressive. It's
7:45
much harder for a Democratic Party leader to
7:47
keep that coalition intact, united,
7:50
energized, in an era of political polarization.
7:53
And yes,
7:54
war. A war in the Middle East that I
7:56
want to be very blunt with you because because
7:58
of the backlash we're seeing. young voters, Arab-American
8:01
voters and others in swing states like Michigan
8:03
and Pennsylvania, a war that
8:06
could end up costing Joe Biden reelection.
8:09
The Republican base, on the other hand, rather conveniently
8:11
for Donald Trump, is pretty white, pretty
8:13
old, pretty universally conservative. In
8:16
the era of Trump, it's also become pretty
8:18
cultish. So they'll get behind him,
8:20
warts, crimes and all. The
8:23
only thing we can say for certain right now is once
8:25
again, everything is riding on the next
8:27
election. And once again, it's just
8:30
too close to call. Joining
8:32
me now to discuss all of this and more Democratic
8:35
Congressman, Jamal Bowman of New York Congressman.
8:37
Thanks for coming back on the show. Let's start
8:39
with that poll. It's no secret that
8:41
Joe Biden wasn't the first choice for you and
8:43
your fellow progressives back in 2020. You've
8:46
since all endorsed his reelection.
8:48
And yet today's poll shows even a generic
8:50
nameless Democrat fares better against Trump in 2024.
8:54
Is it time for Democrats such as yourself to consider
8:56
an alternative to Joe Biden? Even former
8:58
Obama advisor David Axelrod is suggesting that
9:00
today. It's
9:04
time for us. You mentioned that
9:06
we need to remain calm because we're one
9:08
year out from the election. I think
9:10
it's time for us to be anything but
9:13
calm. I think we have to get
9:15
to the business of urgent organizing,
9:18
boots on the ground, really engaging
9:20
voters in a direct and authentic
9:23
way. And not just people like myself,
9:25
the White House needs to do an exceptional
9:28
job of this. Because as you mentioned,
9:30
in your open, people of color
9:33
are disengaged. Muslims
9:35
are disengaged. The Arab
9:37
community is the human,
9:41
excuse me, upset at the president's
9:43
handling of what's happening in Gaza. So
9:46
there's a large part of the Democratic
9:48
base that is struggling to come
9:50
around to continue to support President
9:52
Biden. And so urgent organizing
9:55
has to be number one on our agenda
9:58
so that we can hopefully turn.
9:59
this around by next year because I
10:02
at the moment do not see another
10:04
candidate rising up from the ashes
10:06
and coming to oppose
10:09
Trump. I do not see that happening right now.
10:11
So we have to support who we have. So
10:13
you suggested that the White House needs to be doing much
10:16
more. And I'll come back to Gaza in a moment, but just on
10:18
the domestic politics, I want to get your reaction to
10:20
that new reporting from the Washington Post about Trump's
10:22
plot for revenge. He's already planning to use the DOJ
10:25
to punish his critics. He wants to deploy the military
10:28
against demonstrators if he wins. And
10:30
despite these terrifying and I would argue fascistic
10:33
reports, he still leads against
10:35
Biden in a lot of polls, not just overall, but on
10:37
specific issues like national security and
10:40
mental fitness. Surely
10:42
the Democrats have to own some of that, the
10:44
failure to actually properly hold Trump
10:46
to account, to message about him. This Biden
10:49
White House has often wanted to stay above the fray and
10:51
not talk about Trump. And yet here you are,
10:53
a year out from the election and Donald Trump is leading.
10:58
Well, Trump has a very loyal base.
11:00
He has a base that no matter
11:03
what he does, they seem to continue to support
11:05
him. And he has a base that wants
11:07
to see transformational leadership.
11:10
And they think he's the leadership that can provide
11:12
that transformation for them, especially
11:15
if they are white nationalists. I
11:17
mean, this is a president who attempted
11:19
a coup d'état and thankfully was
11:22
unsuccessful. I'm very worried
11:24
about what's going to happen in
11:26
our country and to our democracy if he
11:29
gets back into office. I've heard many people
11:31
say they don't think he's going to leave.
11:33
He will figure out a way to
11:35
stay in office. And in terms of policies
11:37
coming from the Republican party, they don't
11:39
have a chance when you compare their policies
11:42
to what's happening in the Democratic party
11:45
over the last several years. And to your
11:47
point about the economy, that's a big point because
11:50
no matter how much we're seeing the
11:52
job growth and all of that, people
11:54
are still struggling with affordability.
11:57
And that's an issue we need to hold the Republican
11:59
party accountable. affordable for? How are you making
12:01
life more affordable for
12:03
the American people? They're really not doing anything
12:06
on that front.
12:08
No, they're not. And yes,
12:10
as I say, they continue to lead in the polls at the national
12:13
level. I do want to talk about Gaza. Before
12:15
I get to that, though, I have to ask you about your recent
12:17
guilty plea to a misdemeanor after you pulled
12:19
a fire alarm at the Capitol back in September.
12:22
At the time, you said you activated the alarm by
12:24
mistake on your way to a vote. But now you're
12:26
pleading guilty and paying a fine. So I just want to clear this
12:28
up for our viewers. Do you accept what you did was
12:30
wrong or was it a mistake? Which one?
12:34
Both. It was a mistake
12:36
and it was wrong. It was in violation
12:38
of DC law. So I
12:41
had to take responsibility for that, which I
12:43
did. I look forward to paying a fine.
12:45
I look forward to it being dismissed in three
12:48
months. And so it was both a mistake.
12:50
It was both wrong. Got to take responsibility
12:53
for what you do, which I did, and looking
12:55
forward to moving on and continuing to serve my
12:57
district.
12:58
Let's talk about Gaza, Congress. But how much
13:01
damage is Joe Biden's support for
13:03
Israel doing to the Democratic base? And
13:05
how much is that going to cost him in places like Michigan
13:08
with younger voters, Arab American voters,
13:10
and a key battleground state, which thanks to that
13:12
new poll from The Times, we already know he's struggling in even
13:14
before this war. Could this war cost
13:17
him reelection?
13:20
Yes, it could. And let
13:23
me just be very clear. It's one thing to support
13:25
Israel, which the US has always
13:27
done and will continue to do. It's
13:30
another thing to never hold Israel
13:32
accountable for their behavior,
13:35
whether it's related to the occupation,
13:37
the open air prison that is Gaza,
13:40
or the war crimes that are taking place
13:42
right now during this siege. I
13:45
mean, Israel was very clear from the beginning,
13:47
we're going to cut off water, food, electricity,
13:50
they've used white phosphorus. In
13:53
terms of collective punishment, that's what's
13:55
happening right now, moving half the
13:57
country from one part of the, excuse me, half
13:59
the street. from one part of the strip to the
14:01
other, or trying to within 24 hours. These
14:04
are things that President Biden hasn't
14:06
been strong enough in holding Israel
14:09
to account. And the Muslim community,
14:12
the Arab community, and Palestinians hear
14:14
that loud and clear and receive
14:17
that as erasure, and even
14:19
further receive it as dehumanization.
14:22
And this is where this president has to do better, but
14:24
this is where the United States has to do better
14:26
as well, because it's not just this president
14:29
or this war. This is historical.
14:32
Historical just continuing to support
14:35
Israel without the proper critiques
14:37
and accountability led us to
14:40
what happened on October 7th, but
14:42
also what's happening now.
14:45
Congressman, you say that it could cost him reelection.
14:47
Could this war cost you reelection from the other
14:49
direction? Because although you're hosting an event
14:51
against anti-Semitism and you've condemned Hamas,
14:54
you're still facing massive blowback over
14:56
your call for a ceasefire. Jewish leaders in your
14:58
district have denounced your approach. More than
15:01
two dozen local rabbis, I believe, have now called for
15:03
a primary challenger against you. Are
15:05
you willing to lose your seat over your stance
15:07
on Gaza?
15:10
My job and why
15:12
I ran for office and why
15:15
I was elected twice was to
15:17
provide moral leadership and moral
15:19
clarity to this district. And
15:22
while, yes, 26 rabbis did
15:24
write a letter to someone
15:27
to encourage him to primary
15:29
me, 50 individuals
15:33
who are part of an organization called Jews for
15:35
Jamal wrote a letter opposing
15:37
the rabbi letter in support of
15:40
my reelection. And so, as
15:42
we all know, like all communities, the Jewish
15:44
community is diverse, but I think
15:46
it's important in this moment to recognize
15:49
the pain and the trauma that
15:51
the Jewish community is experiencing as a result
15:53
of the Hamas terror attacks on October
15:56
7th, while also
15:58
doing the work on the ground. to
16:01
fight against antisemitism and
16:03
anti-hate in the real way. Not
16:06
political pandering, not virtue
16:08
signaling, not passing resolutions
16:10
in Congress that aren't gonna do anything, but
16:13
the pandering I'm talking about, we gotta do
16:15
the work on the ground and make sure we deal with
16:17
antisemitism and anti-hate in all those forms.
16:21
Well said, last question. You're one of the 20
16:23
or so members of Congress who has called for a ceasefire.
16:25
There's clearly a moral case for that. But what do
16:27
you say to your critics who argue that
16:29
a ceasefire would allow Hamas to just
16:31
regroup, rearm, and attack
16:33
Israel again?
16:36
You know, when you look at how we caught
16:38
Osama bin Laden, we were surgical,
16:41
we were strategic, we used special
16:43
forces to get Osama bin
16:45
Laden. We can do the same thing to
16:48
get Hamas because it is crystal clear
16:50
that Hamas needs to be dealt with and
16:52
deconstructed. But indiscriminately
16:55
bombing innocent civilians, 10,000 dead, 4,000
16:57
children, any
17:00
conflict that leads to the death of one child
17:03
close us that we need to take a different
17:05
approach. And so this approach right
17:08
now is killing tens of thousands of civilians,
17:10
injuring tens of thousands more,
17:13
and it's not the approach we need to take. And finally,
17:15
at the end of this, not even at the end,
17:17
right now, we need to be pursuing
17:20
a diplomatic approach to not
17:22
just ending this conflict, but finally
17:24
developing and building and creating a Palestinian
17:27
state. Because service to
17:29
that issue also has been something
17:31
that has contributed to the violence that's
17:34
been ongoing for decades.
17:37
Congressman Jamal Bowman, on that note, we
17:39
will have to leave it there. Thank you for your time, appreciate it.
17:42
Thank you.
17:44
After the break, I'll speak with a top UN official
17:46
who resigned after accusing the United Nations
17:48
of failing to address what he calls a textbook
17:51
place of genocide in Gaza. Thank
17:56
you. When
18:01
it comes to quality sleep, Ashley has
18:03
you covered
18:03
with top mattress brands at winning prices
18:06
and with special financing options available,
18:08
you can snooze now and pay later. Plus,
18:11
your mattress purchase helps give
18:12
the gift of better sleep to children in need
18:15
and U.S. Special Operations forces.
18:17
Visit your local Ashley store or shop online
18:19
today and make every snooze count.
18:21
Financing is subject to credit approval. See
18:24
store or ashley.com for details.
18:27
At Consumer Cellular, you get the
18:29
same exact coverage as the largest
18:31
carriers, but for up to half the cost. Same
18:34
thing, up to half the cost. Up to half the
18:36
cost for the same thing. 50% the money for 100% the
18:38
same thing. I
18:41
hope I'm making myself clear. Consumer
18:43
Cellular. When freedom calls, we're here
18:45
to answer. Call us at 1-888-FREEDOM. Half
18:48
the cost savings based on cost of Consumer Cellular single
18:50
line 5 gigabyte data plan with unlimited talk and text
18:52
compared to lowest cost single line post paid unlimited talk text
18:55
and data plan offered by T-Mobile and Verizon May 2023.
18:59
I've
19:02
been in a constant refrain
19:04
in some circles since the start of this conflict
19:06
between Hamas and Israel. There's
19:08
no difference between Hamas and the people of Gaza
19:11
because the Gazans elected Hamas
19:13
to quote Republican Senator Tom Cotton. The
19:15
citizens of Gaza voted for Hamas
19:18
to quote once liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz.
19:21
That's just false, incorrect, untrue.
19:24
First, half the population of Gaza are
19:26
kids under the age of 18. The vast
19:28
majority of them were not alive, let
19:30
alone old enough to vote the last time elections
19:32
were held in Gaza back in 2006, 17 years ago. Second,
19:38
Hamas didn't even get a majority of the vote
19:40
back in 2006. And in fact, even
19:42
this year, prior to the current conflict, one
19:44
survey found only 27% of Gazans,
19:47
barely one in four, picked Hamas
19:49
as their preferred party.
19:51
And third, even if everyone
19:53
in Gaza had voted for Hamas, supported
19:55
Hamas,
19:56
they're still civilians protected by international
19:59
humanitarian law.
19:59
they still can't be targeted.
20:01
The kind of people who think you can target
20:04
people for death because they voted the wrong way are
20:06
people like Osama bin Laden. That's literally
20:09
what he claimed in his open letter
20:11
to America back in 2002. Casualties,
20:15
however, in Gaza continue to mount. According
20:17
to the Gaza Health Ministry, at least 9,770 people
20:19
have been killed in total since October 7, including 4,008
20:25
children. In
20:29
Washington, D.C. on Saturday, huge crowds
20:31
of protesters turned out to demand the Biden
20:34
administration call for a ceasefire and
20:36
an end to the fighting. And last
20:38
week, a senior U.N. official in the New York
20:40
office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights quit
20:43
the organization, denouncing the U.N.'s
20:45
failing stance on the conflict. In
20:48
his resignation letter, human rights lawyer Craig
20:50
McIber, who worked for the U.N. for three
20:52
decades, referred to the, quote,
20:55
wholesale slaughter of the Palestinian people and
20:57
described it as a textbook case
20:59
of genocide. In a statement to
21:01
the Guardian, the United Nations responded to McIber's
21:04
statement, calling them his personal views
21:06
and saying, in part, quote, the position of the office
21:08
on the grave situation in the occupied Palestinian
21:11
territories and Israel is reflected in our
21:13
reports and public statements.
21:16
Craig McIber joins me now. Craig,
21:18
thanks so much for coming on the show. You left
21:20
the U.N. last week and in your last
21:23
letter to your boss, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human
21:25
Rights, you attacked the U.N. for failing to
21:27
stop the war in Gaza and you called what Israel
21:29
is doing a textbook case of genocide. Now,
21:32
you know, that's an explosive accusation for many.
21:34
There's been a lot of pushback. People say that's hyperbole.
21:36
It's a misuse of the term. You're an international
21:39
human rights lawyer. You were at the U.N. for three decades. Make
21:41
the case briefly to our viewers for why
21:44
you believe what we're seeing in Gaza right now
21:46
meets the legal definition of genocide. Well,
21:50
thanks, Matthew. I mean, first of all, my critique
21:52
was not of the entire U.N. And I want to be very clear
21:55
that I am not criticizing those
21:57
heroic humanitarian and human rights
21:59
workers. workers on the front line, but dozens,
22:01
for example, of unrolled workers who've been killed
22:04
under Israeli bombs in the last few
22:06
weeks. And in fact, people who work for
22:08
the UN all over the world who are very serious
22:11
about the norms and standards of the organization.
22:14
My critique is about the political
22:16
side of the house in the UN. And I really
22:19
believe they've abandoned those workers as
22:21
well as abandoning people on the ground. I
22:23
know that genocide is a very politicized
22:27
term. I know it's often abused. It
22:29
is, because of the politics, sometimes denied
22:31
where it exists and asserted where it does
22:34
not exist. But strictly, it's a matter
22:36
of international law. There are a couple
22:38
of exceptional things here. One is the number
22:40
of specific acts in the UN Genocide
22:43
Convention that have been perpetrated by
22:45
Israel against the civilian population
22:48
of Gaza, including intentionally causing
22:50
serious harm, including bodily harm, imposing
22:53
conditions of life that are designed to bring
22:55
about their destruction. We know about
22:58
this with the closure of the siege on Gaza, specifically
23:00
designed to do so. A
23:05
number of other acts that we could talk about. But what
23:07
is remarkable here is
23:10
how explicit Israeli leaders
23:12
have been about genocidal intent.
23:15
Normally, the difficult thing to prove in matters
23:17
of genocide is intent.
23:20
Here we've had the prime minister, the president,
23:23
cabinet ministers, senior
23:25
military officials, all explicitly
23:28
declaring genocidal intent on
23:31
the record and in public. There's
23:33
no question that there is at least a prima
23:35
facie case of genocide that's
23:37
being perpetrated here. I think the
23:40
context is also important here, because
23:42
this is just the latest in
23:44
a series of ethnic purges of
23:48
areas of historic Palestine that started in 1948 and
23:50
has continued to this day,
23:52
incrementally in the West Bank, to be sure,
23:55
and in Jerusalem, but in a very wholesale
23:57
way now in Gaza. It's
24:00
really important that the UN, which is the guardian
24:02
of these international norms and standards, calls
24:05
a spade a spade. And when you have such a clear case
24:07
as this, the term genocide needs to be applied.
24:10
Great. What would
24:12
you say to defenders of Israel who say, we're
24:14
attacking Hamas, not the Palestinian people.
24:17
And if it was a genocide, we would have killed 100,000 people by now, not 10,000. We
24:21
wouldn't be calling people telling them to leave their homes
24:23
before we strike. We wouldn't be dropping leaflets
24:25
telling them to evacuate. What's your response
24:27
to that line of argument, which I'm sure you've heard? Well,
24:30
first of all, that is not a legal defense,
24:32
to be clear. We can talk about to the degree to which it's
24:34
a moral defense, even less so. But the
24:37
idea that you are pursuing an enemy does
24:39
not give you carte blanche to use
24:43
massive weaponry in a disproportionate
24:45
way without distinguishing between
24:48
civilians and combatants, as Israel
24:50
has clearly been doing. You would have to be incredibly
24:53
naive or terribly mendacious
24:55
to think that when you have bad this number of civilians
24:58
being killed with each attack relative
25:00
to whatever minor number of presumed
25:03
combatants are being hit, that this
25:05
is just an effort to reach those combatants.
25:08
The massive destruction that we are witnessing
25:10
in Gaza is clearly intended to
25:12
clear Gaza, to move
25:14
Gaza at least large portions,
25:17
if not all of Gaza, southward
25:19
and to make it uninhabitable. If
25:24
there was an intent, for example,
25:26
to hold accountable perpetrators of war crimes
25:29
on the 7th of October, there are ways
25:31
to do that under the rule of law that
25:33
don't involve wholesale massacres of
25:35
civilians. There is an obligation
25:38
of distinction. There is an obligation
25:40
of precaution under international
25:43
humanitarian law. None
25:45
of those obligations have been met. When you
25:47
pair them with the statements of intent, it's
25:49
very clear that there is a breach here. And by the
25:52
way, a breach also
25:54
by Western countries like the United States and the United
25:56
Kingdom That are actively
25:59
facilitating the containing Israel's
26:01
onslaught because they too have obligations
26:03
under international humanitarian law, not
26:05
just to respect what's in the Geneva Conventions,
26:08
but to ensure respect vis-a-vis other parties
26:11
over whom they have influence. And rather
26:13
than trying to ensure respect, we've actually seen
26:15
complicity demonstrated by the funding,
26:17
the armoring, the provision of intelligence
26:19
support, the provision of diplomatic cover
26:22
all the way up to the Security Council with the use
26:24
of the US veto to prevent even
26:26
a ceasefire or the protection of civilians
26:29
in Gaza. So this really is
26:32
my appeal to the UN was to move
26:34
away from amorphous political approaches and
26:36
return to international law. And that's what international
26:39
law says, many. Last
26:41
question for you, Greg. Your critics would say that you are,
26:44
as I'm sure you've heard this before, you're biased against
26:46
Israel. The Guardian reported this week that the UN
26:48
was reviewing your social media posts, apparently,
26:51
after a pro-Israel group complained about them. Some
26:54
people might say you didn't quit over the
26:56
UN's failure in Yemen or the UN's failure in
26:58
Sudan or the UN's failure in Syria, but
27:00
you did over Gaza. What do you say to them? Well,
27:04
I did in my letter express my frustration with
27:06
previous failures by the United Nations. And
27:09
I think it's fair enough
27:12
to lodge that critique if somebody
27:14
only spoke about one country. I've
27:16
been 32 years at the UN. I've dealt with dozens of countries
27:19
on all continents. I've criticized
27:21
the human rights violations by all of those countries.
27:23
I've never been attacked for those critiques.
27:26
In the UN, the only time you get criticized is when
27:28
you dare to raise Israeli violations of
27:31
Palestinian human rights. And
27:33
of course, there are Israeli lobby groups who
27:36
are constantly bringing complaints
27:38
to the UN about UN human rights officials
27:40
who dare to criticize Israeli violations, even
27:43
taking it sometimes to smearing you as an anti-Semite.
27:46
And we have been making the case over and over again. And
27:48
I think it bears repeating that criticism
27:50
Israeli human rights violations is not anti-Semitic,
27:53
just as criticism of Saudi violations is not
27:55
Islamophobic, criticism of Indian
27:57
violations is not anti-Hindu.
28:00
criticism of Myanmar violations is not
28:02
anti-Buddhist. If any of
28:04
those are true, then there's no
28:06
place for an international human rights framework. If
28:09
it only applies to Israel, that I
28:11
have said is a racist proposition to
28:13
suggest that only Palestinians
28:15
cannot have their human rights defended. Either one
28:17
of those propositions is unacceptable. And
28:19
I think we see very well that there
28:22
are, you know, with these accusations of
28:24
bias, we see people all over the world
28:26
standing up to reject this, to not be intimidated
28:28
by it. We see Jewish protesters standing
28:31
alongside Muslim, Christian and other protesters
28:34
saying that this is a question of international
28:36
law, of international human rights and of human
28:38
dignity, and not being intimidated
28:41
by these kinds of smears. And neither am I, Matty.
28:45
Craig McIber, we will have to leave it there. Thank you
28:47
so much for your time. Appreciate it.
28:49
Thanks for having me.
28:51
After the break, Ukrainian President Volodymyr
28:53
Zelensky has a new message for Donald Trump.
28:56
And don't forget, you can listen to The Mayor of the Essenger anytime,
28:58
free, wherever you get your podcasts. We'll
29:01
be right back.
29:09
In attempts to quality sleep,
29:10
Ashley has you covered with top
29:13
mattress brands at winning prices
29:15
and with special financing options available, you
29:17
can snooze now and pay later.
29:19
Plus, your mattress purchase helps
29:21
give the gift of better sleep to children in need
29:23
and to the US Special Operations Forces.
29:26
Visit your local Ashley store or shop online
29:28
today and make every snooze count.
29:30
Financing is subject to credit approval. See
29:33
store or ashley.com for details.
29:36
Major phone carriers make you sign contracts
29:38
with rigid data plans to trap you into
29:40
a kind of forced phonogamy. Sounds pretty
29:43
insecure if you ask me. At Consumer
29:45
Cellular, we believe in a more consensual and healthy
29:47
form of phonogamy, free of contracts
29:49
and more flexible to your data needs. This
29:51
way you stick around not because we force you to
29:53
with contracts and fees, but because you love
29:56
our phone plans. Like ardently
29:58
love our phone plans.
29:59
Onogamous. Consumer Cellular.
30:02
When freedom calls, we're here to
30:03
answer. Call us at 1-888-FREE-UM.
30:09
Just a few short hours from now,
30:11
Donald Trump will take to the stand to give testimony
30:13
that could help decide the fate of his business empire
30:16
in New York. The ex-president's niece,
30:18
Mary Trump, will join me to discuss her uncle's
30:20
big day under oath. That's in a
30:22
moment. But first, Richard Louis is here with some more
30:24
headlines. Good evening, Richard. Good evening to you,
30:26
Mehdi. Other stories were watching this hour for you.
30:29
Ukraine's president invited Donald Trump to visit
30:31
Ukraine. This comes after Trump said he could end
30:33
the war between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours if
30:35
elected. In
30:38
a Meet the Press exclusive, Vladimir Zelensky
30:40
said he only needs 24 minutes
30:43
to explain to Trump that he cannot manage
30:45
the war. A shooting in Washington
30:47
left two dead and three wounded. At 1.30 a.m.,
30:50
local time, police responded to reports at a
30:52
bar in Tacoma. Some of the victims
30:54
were bystanders. There are no arrests.
30:57
And soon there could be no more giant
30:59
pandas in the United States for the first
31:01
time since 1972. Three
31:04
pandas from D.C.'s national zoo were returned
31:06
to China this month. Zoo Atlanta will
31:08
have the last giant pandas in the country until
31:10
they also leave sometime next year. China
31:13
has gifted pandas known as panda
31:15
diplomacy to countries for years. However,
31:18
with the U.S. and its allies at odds
31:20
with China, efforts to renew the pandas
31:22
contracts were unsuccessful. More
31:25
than Mehdi Hassan show after this break.
31:31
You've got to feel sorry for the Trump family.
31:34
They all suffer, it seems, from really bad
31:36
memory problems. Memory
31:37
problems that were conveniently on full display
31:40
this week in the New York Attorney General's civil
31:42
fraud trial against the Trump family and the Trump
31:44
organization, which accuses them of
31:46
knowingly committing fraud by submitting statements
31:48
of financial condition that inflated the value
31:51
of their properties and other assets. Both
31:53
Don Jr. and Eric Trump testified
31:56
over the last few days. And you'd think
31:58
given that both sons are exactly the same. vice
32:00
presidents and trustees of the business, they'll
32:02
have a good understanding of how their company is run, and
32:05
a good memory of who does what at that company.
32:07
But when Don Jr. was asked whether he worked on his father's
32:10
statements of financial condition, a document
32:12
central to the fraud case, he replied, quote,
32:15
not that I recall. When he was asked if his
32:17
father was still a trustee of the Trump organization,
32:19
Don Jr. again said, I don't recall.
32:22
And he said he had, quote, no understanding of accounting
32:25
practices and heavily relied on company
32:27
accountants in his business dealings. Curiously,
32:30
Eric Trump seemed to have the same sort of memory
32:32
loss, saying he was never involved with his
32:34
father's financial statements. Prosecutors
32:36
actually had to present Eric with decade old emails
32:39
to jog that memory of his email
32:41
showing a fellow Trump organization executive asking
32:44
Eric for information on the financial statements he
32:46
had just denied ever working on. But
32:49
surely Donald Trump himself
32:51
would have a better memory, right? After all, the
32:53
former president has told us all the time
32:55
just how good his memory is.
32:59
I have a very good memory. I'm blessed with a great
33:01
memory. It's called like up here and
33:03
it's called memory and it's called other things.
33:05
What are the great memories of all time? Based
33:10
on his own words, you'd have to assume Donald Trump has
33:12
an excellent memory, the best of all time, at
33:14
least much better than his son's. But
33:16
then again, this is the same Donald Trump that said, I don't
33:18
remember 35 times during his 2015
33:21
deposition in the Trump University lawsuit.
33:24
When Donald Trump becomes the first former president to
33:26
testify in court tomorrow, I have
33:28
a feeling we'll be seeing that version of him all
33:30
over again. I don't recall. And
33:33
then there's Ivanka Trump, whose own memory problems
33:35
we don't quite know about yet, but
33:37
who clearly has a case of bad judgment. She
33:39
actually tried to avoid taking the stand by arguing
33:42
she would suffer quote, undue hardship if
33:44
she were forced to testify quote, in the
33:46
middle of a school week. Yeah,
33:49
can't do it in a school week. Fortunately,
33:51
a New York appeals court didn't buy that bit of ridiculousness
33:54
and denied her request. She's now scheduled
33:56
to testify on Wednesday of this coming week.
33:59
We'll see if she. He and her father followed Don Jr.
34:01
and Eric and come up with a sudden case of, I don't
34:04
recall itis. After
34:06
the break, who better to ask about the family
34:08
memory problem than
34:10
Mary Trump? She'll join you
34:12
next.
34:20
To discuss
34:22
Donald Trump's upcoming post-Semitic civil
34:24
fraud trial, who better to talk to than one of his own family
34:27
members? A critical family member? Mary Trump joins me
34:29
now. She's Donald Trump's
34:31
niece and the author of Too Much and Never Enough, How
34:33
My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. I think
34:35
that book title gives away her basic view of her uncle.
34:38
Mary, thanks so much for coming back on the show. Why
34:40
do you think your poor cousins, Don Jr.
34:42
and Eric, have such poor memories? They
34:44
can't seem to recall anything. It's a real problem
34:47
for them.
34:48
It's very worrisome, especially
34:50
since Alzheimer's does run to my family. I
34:54
think we have a simpler, less scary explanation
34:56
for what's going on. Donnie and
34:58
Eric had, I think, three choices
35:01
going into their testimony. They could
35:03
either plead the fifth, which, as
35:06
we know, in a civil case, is
35:08
very different from pleading the fifth in a criminal case.
35:11
It could be used against you in a particular way. They
35:14
could lie, commit
35:16
perjury, or they
35:20
could tell the truth. I
35:23
think they chose a version
35:26
of the first one, which is simply to say
35:28
they remember absolutely nothing because
35:31
lying in a courtroom is very different from lying
35:34
outside of a courtroom and telling the truth
35:36
for these people is never a good
35:38
option.
35:39
On that note of telling the truth,
35:43
inside a courtroom versus outside where they constantly
35:46
lie, what is Donald Trump going to do
35:48
tomorrow? How do you put Donald Trump on
35:50
the stand? How do you put him under oath? The man
35:52
is a walking perjury trap. If you're his
35:54
lawyer, wouldn't you be just
35:56
heading your hands right now, Sunday night?
35:59
should be. But what I found interesting
36:01
about his lawyer's behavior in the last
36:05
week certainly is that they seem to
36:07
be acting as if they're not
36:09
in a courtroom either. They seem to be goading
36:11
the judge. The judge expanded
36:14
the gag order that had applied previously
36:16
only to Donald to include his
36:18
counsel. And I'm wondering
36:21
if they actually have forgotten that
36:23
the judge is not Donald's
36:26
base. He cannot be spun.
36:29
He's going to be looking at the facts and evidence.
36:32
And I think they would
36:34
be putting
36:37
themselves and their client in
36:39
a very difficult position
36:41
if they cannot impress upon him that
36:44
he needs either to tell the truth
36:47
or keep his mouth shut. And
36:49
I don't know how much control they have at this point
36:51
because again they seem to be feeding into Donald's
36:54
own desires about how
36:56
this case needs to be going.
36:59
I would pay to be a fly on the wall
37:01
when the lawyer for Donald Trump tells Donald
37:04
Trump. You've got to tell the truth and not purge yourself.
37:07
Let's talk about your cousin Ivanka who had a pretty
37:09
amazing excuse for not being able to testify
37:12
or trying to avoid testifying in the civil fraud trial.
37:14
Her lawyer said that Ivanka would suffer undue
37:16
hardship if she's required to testify
37:18
in New York during the middle of a school week. It's
37:21
kind of amazing that she thought she might have a chance
37:23
with that line of argument, is it not?
37:26
Well many, you have to understand it's very difficult
37:28
to be a member of a family crime syndicate. So
37:31
you know you have to
37:32
cut her a little bit of thought. But I think
37:34
it just speaks to the breathtaking
37:36
entitlement of these people that
37:39
they don't even think
37:41
that other people are going to look at their past
37:44
behavior to realize that they
37:47
leave their kids home all the time. Plus
37:49
they probably have lots of help that most
37:52
people with young children don't have
37:54
and she also seems to have forgotten that she has a husband
37:56
who could presumably
37:57
take care of their children.
38:01
Jared does the school run. Dad
38:03
of the year. Let me ask you this,
38:05
a set of New York Times, Siena Coleridge polls
38:08
published today found that 62% of registered
38:10
voters in battleground states think that
38:12
Biden doesn't have the mental sharpness to
38:14
be president. Just 44% said
38:17
the same of Donald Trump. We are only
38:19
three years away from the Trump presidency
38:21
ending from that car crash, from the PTSD
38:24
that a lot of us suffered. But apparently
38:27
Americans, not just
38:29
the Trump kids, have real memory problems,
38:31
have just memory hold how bad it was
38:34
and how unhinged your uncle was
38:36
and is. You're a psychologist. What do you make of
38:38
that poll finding?
38:41
I think it has to do with
38:44
what takes get exposure. For
38:47
example, we've been hearing endlessly
38:49
about Joe Biden's age, not just
38:51
from right-wing media that
38:53
are in the tank for Donald, but everywhere. We
38:56
see it in the headlines on the front page of major
38:58
newspapers. What we don't
39:00
hear about is Donald's
39:03
increasing inability to
39:06
remember where he is or who's president
39:08
of where or who he ran against
39:11
in the last election. Because
39:14
I think that the gravest danger
39:17
we're facing in this
39:19
particular context is that Donald's
39:22
egregious behavior, from his criminality
39:25
to his mendacity to his
39:28
lack of intelligence and
39:30
his total unfitness,
39:33
it's just baked in. It's not
39:36
news. It's not pointed out. It's
39:38
just a given. People
39:40
don't even pay attention
39:43
to it anymore. That's
39:45
very concerning.
39:47
So let me ask you this
39:49
quick last question.
39:51
I've been saying for a while that there will be violence at
39:54
the next election because Trump will either lose,
39:57
in which cases supporters will
39:59
not take it well.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More