Podchaser Logo
Home
186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

Released Monday, 9th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

186: Dr. Casey Means - Restoring the Pillars of Metabolic Health To Power Your Purpose

Monday, 9th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:05

Hello

0:05

and welcome to the Natural State Podcast.

0:08

I'm your host, Dr. Anthony Gustin. It

0:10

is my belief that the natural state of any living

0:12

organism's health and that our artificial

0:14

habitat has forced us into having artificial

0:16

health problems. This show is my attempt

0:18

to dive deep and learn about using nutrition, sleep,

0:21

movement, relationships, and more to help

0:23

you reclaim your natural state of health in a

0:25

modern world and show you how to thrive in an environment

0:28

that's stacked against you. If you enjoy

0:30

today's show, you can find out more details and information

0:33

at dranthonygustin.com.

0:35

Today on the Natural State Podcast,

0:38

I am honored to have Dr. Casey Means

0:41

on the show. This is not Cali Means. You

0:43

have her brother on here, just

0:45

the powerhouse of the family. Casey is

0:47

a medical doctor and she

0:50

is one of the co-founders of Lovells. Lovells

0:52

is a company that helps people get their metabolic

0:54

health back on track. We

0:57

talk a lot about that today in the episode of

0:59

metabolic health, why it's so important, but beyond

1:01

that, tons of just philosophizing,

1:04

I'd say, around why we're in the

1:06

state we're in from a national health crisis where

1:09

the vast majority of people are sick, overweight,

1:12

and honestly in a miserable state and what you can

1:14

do practically to get out of that. Lovells

1:17

is doing a lot of work to do that, obviously, and they're

1:19

doing a great job. We dive

1:22

into tons of different facets around how you

1:24

can reverse a lot of issues that might be holding

1:26

you back from reaching your peak state

1:29

of health. On top of that, Dr.

1:31

Means was very generous to

1:34

be able to offer

1:35

a potential to win a free Lovells

1:38

kit, which comes with a

1:40

continuous blood glucose monitor, an annual

1:42

membership to the Lovells program.

1:46

If you want to go to lovells.link

1:48

slash the natural state and input

1:51

your information, we're doing a giveaway where you can get

1:53

a free kit. Just put in your email, nothing

1:56

else needed. You don't have to buy anything. There's

1:58

a chance to win a free kit to see.

1:59

what it's like wearing a continuous blood glucose

2:02

monitor. I've posted about this for

2:04

a lot and I've used it a lot in my life and I use

2:06

a lot with patients as well. Just to get some feedback

2:09

of what actually happens when you eat certain

2:11

foods and it's remarkable how different it is from

2:13

person to person. So again head

2:16

to levels.link, L-I-N-K

2:19

slash the natural state

2:22

for your chance to win. And

2:24

other than that, tune in and I hope you enjoy the show.

2:28

Before we get into the show I'd like to introduce equip

2:31

foods if you guys haven't heard about it. The

2:33

brand that I started many years ago at this

2:35

point have kind of been off and on

2:38

with it throughout the years but we're starting to revive a

2:40

lot of the principles. I made it to

2:42

make real food supplementation a thing.

2:44

There were so many people in my

2:46

clinic that I dealt with that were struggling

2:49

with finding real food options. Of

2:51

course I think people should be eating real food. Of course

2:54

and it should be based upon local food as close

2:56

to them as possible. I don't care if it's plants or

2:58

animals. You do you. However

3:01

I made equip foods to be able to supplement, again

3:03

supplement not replace real

3:05

food. And so we created a line

3:07

a long time ago of beef protein

3:10

powder, sweet potato powder, greens powder etc.

3:12

to augment maybe areas where

3:14

you have like a convenience you need to fill in the gaps

3:17

etc. Traveling, what

3:19

have you. We're starting to add

3:21

a lot of products to the line and I'm really excited about these again. This

3:24

is something that you know it's been a project I had

3:26

to put on hold and it was just kind of an autopilot while

3:28

I was working on perfect keto for so many

3:30

years. And now that that is

3:32

off my plate we are focusing on

3:34

reviving a lot of the principles that we had early on and reimagining

3:37

what are the things that we should have that exist

3:40

for people.

3:41

And a

3:41

big one moving forward is you know

3:44

an unflavored grass-fed protein. So we launched

3:46

for all you carnivores out there an unflavored

3:49

grass-fed protein. Literally the only ingredient

3:51

in this is grass-fed meat.

3:53

And so we take huge chunks of

3:55

meat, chop it down, boil

3:57

it down. It's representative of college

4:00

and meat production. So essentially, you're getting like 30%

4:02

collagen, gelatin, and then the rest,

4:04

like you would say out of a way, so amino

4:07

acids that are found in meat. So it's exactly representative

4:09

of what is in a

4:11

animal.

4:12

Each scoop is about four ounces of meat. And

4:15

if the unflavored is a little too spicy

4:17

for you guys, we also have amazing flavors that

4:19

are, you know, just cacao powder, and stevia,

4:22

vanilla, strawberry, and launching

4:24

a peanut butter one as well soon.

4:27

So if you guys wanna try prime protein,

4:29

which is our grass-fed beef protein, or

4:32

any other stuff that we have on there, we have liver caps,

4:34

gonna be doing some awesome new products as well, go ahead

4:37

and check them out, equipfoods.com. And

4:40

if you wanna have a little discount, it's your first

4:42

time, feel free to enter in the code TNS

4:45

for the natural state, TNS, for 15%

4:49

off. Or just go ahead and go to equipfoods.com

4:52

slash TNS, and we'll

4:54

put together a little page for you there to get 15% off. And

4:56

really wanna just say thank you and

4:59

appreciate your support. This

5:01

podcast is not free to produce,

5:04

it's not free to do the newsletter, it's pretty expensive

5:06

actually to host all the subscribers we have on there. And

5:09

your support here helps me start doing, you know,

5:12

more research, and hopefully

5:14

putting out some more products, more episodes, and

5:16

allows me to dedicate time to doing this stuff, which

5:18

I love to do for sure, but it is a lot

5:21

of time and it's a lot of work. So I really appreciate

5:23

your support here. So again, if you wanna try out

5:25

equipfoods, just go to equipfoods.com

5:28

slash TNS or use the code TNS

5:30

at checkout for 15% off.

5:33

Doc, I have an important question for you. Yes. 50% of

5:35

people in the country or more, pre-diabetic

5:38

or type 2 diabetes, 70%

5:40

or more overweight or obese, 90%

5:43

or more metabolically broken. What

5:46

happened? I mean, also to put

5:48

some context, this wasn't the case 100 years ago,

5:50

these numbers were virtually zero.

5:52

So a lot of people think a lot

5:55

of different things, but curious your take. You

5:57

have to choose one and you have to answer in 30 seconds.

6:01

30 seconds. Oh, I like that challenge. Um,

6:04

it's the most important question

6:07

that we could be asking today. This,

6:10

what you just brought up in the question you just asked

6:12

is the

6:12

first order issue that

6:14

we need to be focusing on as a country. And I would

6:16

say above anything else.

6:18

And the reason for that is because all

6:21

societal problems,

6:23

all political, social

6:25

issues

6:25

arise from human

6:27

decision making that comes from a body

6:30

and a brain that's made of cells. And

6:32

right now the cells in the average

6:34

American body are broken and they're

6:37

broken because of metabolic dysfunction. And

6:39

that is largely preventable and reversible.

6:42

And so if we think about the highest leverage

6:44

things that we can do to empower

6:46

a more prosperous,

6:48

thriving, limitless population,

6:50

focusing on this exact issue is it.

6:53

So how did we get here? How did we get here so

6:55

rapidly over the last several decades?

6:58

My perspective is that it's because several

7:01

distinct factors of

7:03

our modern industrial quote unquote advanced

7:06

society are synergistically

7:08

hurting the specific part of

7:11

the cell that makes energy

7:13

the mitochondria. So you

7:16

look across several

7:18

different sort of pillars of what impacts

7:21

the mitochondria, the powerhouse of the cell, the thing

7:23

in the cell that makes the cellular energy that

7:25

drives every single chemical reaction in the body.

7:28

And you look at food, you look at

7:30

sleep, you look at chronic low grade

7:32

stress, you look at movement, you look at microbiome,

7:35

you look at the light we're being

7:36

exposed to,

7:37

you look at the temperatures we're being exposed to,

7:39

you look at the toxins we're

7:40

being exposed to.

7:42

On all eight of those vectors,

7:44

the way that society culture industry

7:47

has changed over the past 50 to 100 years

7:50

have all led to conditions in which we're basically

7:52

slaughtering mitochondrial health.

7:55

And so what that has led to is

7:57

an underpowered human body.

8:00

body. And, you know,

8:02

the body is made of somewhere between 30 and 100

8:04

trillion cells. It's hard to

8:06

know. We have about somewhere between

8:09

some, some say 37 trillion cells on

8:11

average in the human body and every single

8:13

cell is powered by cellular energy.

8:16

One of the key forms that energy is ATP. And

8:19

that's what the mitochondria make. And

8:22

unfortunately, that that process that

8:24

is foundational that underlies pretty much

8:26

everything is becoming

8:29

diminished. And so our life force,

8:31

our light, our power, our chi,

8:34

our yang, it's all it's all sort of diminishing.

8:37

And that's leading to both a metabolic

8:39

health crisis, a mental health crisis,

8:42

but I would also say a spiritual crisis in the

8:44

US because, you know, an underpowered

8:46

human is not one who is going to be able to,

8:48

you know, move towards their highest

8:50

purpose on this precious time on this planet.

8:53

And so we've got to really kind of fix this.

8:55

We have 200 plus cell

8:57

types in the body. So out of all these

9:00

trillions of cells, you know, we all started

9:02

as one cell, right? We've got this fertilized egg, it's

9:04

one cell. And from that we get trillions

9:06

and trillions of cells of over 200

9:09

types. And, you know,

9:12

a retina cell, many types of skin cells,

9:14

you've got your blood vessel lining

9:16

cells, muscle cells, all these different things. And

9:19

what's so interesting about our chronic disease epidemic, we've

9:21

got all these different diseases and all these different

9:23

symptoms. We've got, you know, we've got

9:25

depression and anxiety and gout and

9:27

polycystic ovarian syndrome and erectile dysfunction

9:30

and retinopathy and chronic kidney disease and Alzheimer's

9:32

dementia and cancer and strokes,

9:34

hemorrhagic strokes, ischemic strokes, heart attacks,

9:37

fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity. And

9:40

people are starting to be aware that at their root,

9:42

almost all of these are rooted, not

9:44

exclusively caused by, but fundamentally

9:47

rooted or accelerated by metabolic issues. They're

9:50

all interlinked by a trunk

9:53

of a tree, physiologically, that is mitochondrial

9:55

dysfunction. And so

9:58

people say, the way our tradition is, is that we're going to be able to do this medical

10:00

system approaches all of these, of course, is different specialists.

10:03

We have 42 plus medical specialties.

10:05

You're getting different doctors, different prescriptions

10:08

for different, basically, manifestations of diseases

10:10

in different cell types, liver doctor, brain

10:12

doctor, whatever. And what we really

10:15

need to do is totally shift this paradigm

10:17

to really what I would consider

10:19

more of a network and systems biology approach

10:22

to health, which is instead of looking at all these different

10:24

things as different silos based on the

10:26

cell specific manifestation of

10:28

metabolic disease, actually look at

10:30

the network and the connectivity between all these conditions,

10:33

the links between these conditions, which is metabolic dysfunction,

10:35

mitochondrial dysfunction, and really

10:38

focused medicine and health care on that.

10:40

And I think what we will find is that when

10:42

you do that, a lot of these things just

10:44

start melting away because you're actually getting to the

10:47

root cause. So that's kind of the problem

10:49

we're dealing with in a nutshell is underpowered

10:51

cells, underpowered bodies, underpowered lives.

10:54

And I think the root of it is that our

10:57

mitochondria are being attacked at every

10:59

single aspect

11:01

of our diet and lifestyle by our modern

11:04

industrialized

11:05

culture. The way

11:07

I tend to think about it, which may be simple and stupid

11:09

and not correct, but it's basically

11:12

metabolism is how we stay

11:14

alive. And if that is,

11:17

we're not doing well there, bad things can

11:19

happen. And this is depending on

11:21

the individual variability, genetic predisposition,

11:24

lifestyle, et cetera, that can look very

11:26

different for the individual. And this is why we get

11:28

siloed into these different areas of

11:31

heart, doctor, liver, doctor, like you said, et cetera, goes

11:33

down the list. But what do you think

11:35

is like exactly in the last 50, 70, 100 years

11:38

has led to the

11:41

acceler- like this has been creeping up

11:43

over a long period of time, but something seemed

11:45

to have happened in that timeframe specifically

11:47

that really accelerated this. Do you have any initial

11:50

takes? You rattle off exposure to light,

11:53

movement, sleep, stress, food. I'm

11:55

sure we could add in relational health issues, mental

11:57

health issues, spiritual health issues.

12:00

air quality, water quality, pesticides,

12:02

herbicides, toxins that we're exposed to,

12:05

on and on and on. Do you have

12:07

any singular thing that you think about

12:09

that maybe is one of the primary drivers?

12:12

Yeah. I think that across those

12:14

eight vectors that I mentioned, and I put a lot

12:16

of the ones you just added under that chronic low-grade

12:18

stress, the mental and psychosocial

12:21

element of it, I think

12:23

that a lot of it comes down

12:26

to maybe two main things. One

12:29

is equating comfort with

12:31

success, and the second

12:33

is, I think, equating unlimited wealth

12:36

with success. I think it's mainly

12:38

those two things. I think that the first

12:41

one is this idea

12:44

of comfort is what we're aspiring

12:46

to.

12:47

In a sense,

12:49

if

12:50

you look at something like sedentary

12:52

behavior, so sort of the exercise vector,

12:55

the average American is walking about 4,000 steps

12:58

a day. If

13:00

you just walk 8,000 steps

13:03

a day, you slash your risk of heart disease,

13:05

diabetes, obesity, depression, Alzheimer's

13:07

by close to 50%, and we're walking 4,000.

13:10

It takes about an hour to walk 8,000 steps a day. It's

13:13

not hard. It's also free, but

13:16

we love sitting. We love our couches.

13:18

We love not having to move. We

13:21

build our entire houses around areas

13:24

to sit. This comfort, this

13:26

being indoors, being comfortable,

13:29

it's killing us. You look at temperature.

13:32

Large swings in temperature are energetic

13:35

thermal signals that can tell our

13:37

body to basically be more resilient, whether

13:39

it's cold or hot. They're both energetic

13:42

signals to impact our cellular biology,

13:44

but we've equated the thermostat

13:47

being at 72 degrees all

13:49

the time as prosperity. Now,

13:53

I've heard couples fight

13:55

over whether the thermostat is set

13:57

to 68 or 72. at

14:00

nighttime. And it's like, we believe

14:02

that that this thermonuteral existence

14:05

is like, Oh, we've we've hacked the code,

14:07

but we actually haven't. It's

14:09

similar to with food,

14:11

you know, it's like, we love

14:13

the comfort foods, we think they're delicious, but

14:16

eating more of them is killing us. And so

14:18

it's just and it's, you know, I

14:20

think that it's really, there's a spiritual

14:22

disconnect in a sense, because I

14:24

think that traditionally, and in so many cultures,

14:27

especially Eastern cultures, like, there's

14:29

been this long term sense that

14:32

dualities are important, you know, we

14:34

need, it's like, we've got light and dark,

14:37

we've got cold and hot, we've got wet and dry,

14:39

you know, there's the appreciation

14:42

for the moon cycles, the cyclical nature

14:44

of things, the seasons, these are meditated

14:47

on in literature and poetry and art.

14:49

And it's sort of this appreciation and

14:51

reverence for cycles and dualities,

14:54

polarities is very much appreciated.

14:57

And, you know, so it's like, there's times

14:59

where things are painful. And there's times when things are

15:02

more flow state, and we learn from

15:04

the pain to have the joy, you know, you need

15:06

the darkness to have the light. And we

15:10

are sort of in a culture now where we just

15:12

want, we just want the yang and

15:14

the light and the the the

15:16

company, you know, we don't we don't want the

15:19

extremes, we want sort of like almost

15:21

like the neutrality. And I think

15:23

that that's honestly like going against

15:26

the sort of like natural rhythms of the world. You

15:28

look at this in industrial agriculture,

15:31

like we think we've outsmarted

15:33

nature by basically trying to make it like

15:35

summer all the time, you know, we're not allowing

15:38

the soil to rest, we're not allowing it to regenerate,

15:40

we're trying to, we see this life giving

15:42

force and we like, okay, instead of respecting

15:45

the harmony of that system, we're going to squeeze it,

15:47

we're going to get every last drop out of it. And

15:49

what does it do? It's basically saying to us like,

15:51

well, no, like, we're gonna stop

15:53

producing, we're gonna, you know, the topsoil

15:56

is diminishing, etc, etc.

15:58

And so I think there's I sort of, it's

16:00

a sense of a desire for comfort

16:03

and a lack of appreciation for natural

16:05

cycles and for

16:08

the harder things, you know, the hormetic

16:10

stressors being super beneficial

16:13

to getting the most out of a system. There's an

16:15

amazing thing called a starling curve,

16:17

which is basically like the more pressure you add to the

16:19

system, the more efficient it is until a certain

16:22

point, and then it starts diminishing.

16:24

And so in many parts of our lives, we're

16:26

not really putting much pressure on the system at all,

16:28

the discomfort, like the movement

16:30

and the thermal extremes and whatnot, or

16:32

the fasting or whatever. So we're not getting the

16:34

best out of ourselves. We're not giving the cells the

16:37

signal that they need to adapt to

16:39

give us the best possible version of their self.

16:41

So that's one. And the second one that

16:43

kind of came to mind was

16:44

more of a... Yeah, that's the one with like really curious,

16:46

just like stay on that for a second is, I mean,

16:48

my answer to the whole, why are people so sick

16:51

generally comes down to our environment

16:53

is no longer matched with our genes. And

16:56

we've created a zoo cage for ourselves. And just

16:58

like when you throw animals in a zoo and try to replicate their

17:00

environment, but don't get it right, they get sick, they

17:02

get aggressive, they get depressed, they mutilate

17:04

themselves. There's a whole list of things that happen.

17:06

They get obese, they get it.

17:22

It's also something that used to be

17:24

inherent in our environment. Like our environment forced

17:27

us to be uncomfortable, but we manipulated

17:29

our environment because we thought we were smart

17:31

to get the comfort. And so now we have

17:34

to as we're rebuilding it, because I always try to ask, how

17:36

do we get here? And how do we go back? And I don't think

17:38

that's necessarily the same way. It's very

17:40

challenging now to think about all these factors

17:43

and have to consciously hold decision making

17:45

all day long to be uncomfortable in every

17:47

way possible. And so this is always fascinating

17:49

to me of how do you build a lifestyle? We

17:52

chat about interventions and how we think about getting back

17:55

later on. I think this is why farming, for

17:57

example, can be a really good lifestyle

17:59

because You have a certain set of responsibilities,

18:02

gets you outside, gets you in sunlight,

18:04

gets you physical, gets you in touch with the natural world. You

18:06

have to pay attention. There's so many things that

18:09

it sort of stacks all the things up for

18:11

you and you don't have to think about them every single

18:13

time. I saw somebody on Twitter a couple weeks

18:15

ago post, here's my sleep stack. It

18:17

was like four tweets around

18:20

every single thing they needed to do to get there at 96 or

18:24

a score or whatever. And thinking about applying

18:26

that to every single thing, now no

18:28

one has any sort of creative capacity

18:31

to do anything generative in the world. There's

18:33

no expression. There's no, like you said, taking advantage

18:35

of that precious life you have because you're

18:37

so preoccupied having to optimize

18:39

every single variable to be slightly

18:42

discomfortable, but not entirely so that

18:44

way it stresses the system. I don't

18:46

know how you think about that. We can come back to that a little bit

18:48

after we go to your number two point, but it's

18:50

something that I think about almost nonstop every

18:53

single day. Me too.

18:53

It's fascinating, especially what you just

18:55

said about the cognitive load. I think we're

18:57

living in this really funny, but also

19:00

brilliant from an economic perspective situation

19:03

where we've essentially culture has removed

19:06

a way of living that inherently pushes

19:08

ourselves essentially to do their best work, that

19:10

pushes them towards efficient

19:13

adaptation along every

19:15

part of that spectrum of different lifestyle

19:17

and dietary vectors. We've

19:20

taken it away and then we're selling

19:22

it back to people with products,

19:25

cold plunges, gym memberships, et

19:27

cetera. We've created

19:29

this whole scientific term

19:31

of non-exercise activity thermogenesis,

19:34

which is like neat. Basically

19:36

neat is just like, and if people do more

19:38

neat, they're much healthier and they're thinner

19:40

and whatever. They do more neat during the day, this

19:43

non-exercise activity thermogenesis, which basically

19:45

just means like moving around when you're not

19:47

exercised. It's literally

19:49

just moving

19:50

your body, doing the activities

19:52

of daily living. And so it's like, you need to get

19:54

this many minutes of neat per day. And it's like

19:57

what you're saying and what I think about a lot as well

19:59

is like within our. normal culture, and

20:01

being many of us knowledge workers who

20:04

work at a computer, how do you actually

20:06

redesign your life

20:09

such that across every one of these

20:11

vectors of food and lifestyle, you are just

20:13

naturally going to be getting

20:15

the stimuli you need. So that

20:17

might be like living in a I don't

20:20

know, like this is just examples, but like maybe

20:22

you live in a desert where it is actually very

20:25

cold at night and very hot during the

20:27

day and you're naturally exposed to more temperatures. Maybe

20:29

it's that you have

20:32

to walk outside to get from one part of your

20:34

house to the other side of the house such

20:36

that you have to get sunlight first

20:38

thing in the

20:40

morning. Maybe it's that you,

20:42

and again, these are just like totally random

20:45

examples that I haven't even thought about before, but maybe like

20:47

you don't have hot water in your house. So you like have to

20:49

take a cold shower or your

20:52

computer is drilled to a treadmill desk

20:54

and you literally can't use your computer if you're not on a treadmill

20:56

desk. I don't know, but it's like creating

20:58

situations where it's almost like you

21:00

have to do things. Like

21:03

you said, it's a huge cognitive load, but that's

21:05

definitely how I think about for myself. It's

21:07

like, you know, if you're going to build

21:09

these things in, you're going against culture. You

21:12

are just by definition, not doing

21:14

the normal pathway of American life.

21:16

And I, you know, you can make that fun and take

21:18

pride in it, but it is a lot of work. So I think

21:21

a lot of what you and me and other entrepreneurs

21:23

and are trying to do is find

21:26

ways to make it easier and simpler and,

21:28

you know, to build in some of these things. But I

21:30

think, you know, America, one thing

21:32

that I've thought about a lot as I was writing my,

21:35

my first book, which isn't coming out until next year was that

21:37

there's actually sort of this concept of exercise

21:39

is almost kind of problematic. I would say

21:42

like the concept of exercise didn't

21:44

really exist in the way it

21:47

does today. Like we just moved

21:49

a lot throughout the day. You know,

21:52

I think you spent time with like tribes in

21:54

Africa and I'm sure they were just moving naturally as

21:56

part of like the hunting process

21:58

and all of this stuff. It's just built into So now

22:00

we have this thing, exercise, that's

22:02

like one hour that

22:05

we need to check off every day. And

22:07

once we check that off, we think that we've done

22:09

the physical activity module for the day.

22:12

And it almost gives us this like free pass

22:15

of like, oh, well, I don't need to move for the

22:17

rest of the day, which is which is totally wrong.

22:20

If we exercise for one hour, but don't move

22:22

much the rest of the day, like that is

22:24

a that is a lifestyle that will lead to chronic disease.

22:27

We need to be moving our bodies regularly throughout

22:29

the day. And the US has

22:32

the most gyms of any country in the

22:34

world, yet we are amongst the fattest.

22:37

We spend like, what

22:39

is I think I don't have the number right in front of

22:41

me, but we spend about $2,000

22:44

on average on health and fitness memberships

22:47

per person annually. And we have an obesity and

22:49

overweight rate rate of 74% in our country. And 75%

22:54

of US adults do not engage in the minimum

22:56

recommended amount of exercise. So there's

22:59

not only are we not doing it, but even

23:01

if we do do it, it's not actually enough

23:03

because it actually there's actually kind

23:05

of an interesting framing that I really like that

23:08

comes down to the cell when we think about metabolic

23:10

health. If you think about two bodies, one

23:12

body that exercises for one hour a day and goes

23:14

hard, you know, they're lifting or they're doing high intensity

23:17

interval training, that's great. That's

23:19

a person who is basically going to, you

23:21

know, translocate intracellular

23:23

glucose channels to their cell membranes of their

23:26

muscles during that period. And

23:29

because exercise is the stimulus

23:31

to basically like clear glucose from the bloodstream.

23:33

And that's really good. But that body is

23:35

going to do that for that hour. And there may be some

23:37

lasting effect to that. But that's like pretty

23:39

much localized that time period. In

23:42

contrast, if you have a person who gets up and

23:44

walks for one and a half or two minutes,

23:47

every 30 minutes throughout the day,

23:49

which might add up to like 45 minutes

23:51

or an hour total of just like low grade movement

23:53

throughout the day, at every half hour

23:56

they have stimulated the muscles to bring those

23:58

glucose channels to the cell membrane. So

24:00

they are a body that is now constantly

24:03

having that stimulus to have

24:05

a physiologic different reality

24:07

on the cell membrane compared to the person who exercises

24:10

just one hour a day. So I want to be that

24:12

second person, you know, you kind of want to do both,

24:14

but by moving more even

24:16

low grade throughout the day by activating your muscles

24:19

every half hour, every hour, you're

24:21

actually changing the nature

24:23

of how your body is clearing glucose throughout the

24:26

whole day. So it's really

24:28

like a different, it's a different physiology. So

24:30

that's a big mission of mine is like, how do we inspire

24:32

people to just move more throughout

24:35

the day? So many of these

24:37

things also used to be provided

24:39

in an environment for free, right? If

24:41

not with a little help from our community. And there's

24:44

a good number of them that can still be had for free,

24:46

which is, I mean, and this is the thing that I

24:48

might be trying to like, there's a spectrum and yes, you can

24:50

get the $8,000 cold plunge if you want, you

24:52

could also just go outside when it's cold, you could take

24:54

a cold shower, you could jump in the creek, you

24:57

know, the light stuff like

24:59

just go outside as much as possible. I

25:01

mean, there's complexity with some people are literally

25:03

stuck in an office building in the middle of a cubicle

25:06

in the middle of a floor with

25:08

no access to windows. And I find that absolutely tragic

25:11

and should be criminal on several offenses. But

25:14

yeah, I mean, it's wild to think about the

25:16

human environment and how we bastardize it

25:19

and how to rebuild it and how much complexity

25:21

it takes. And even we got a new house here in Bend and

25:23

thinking through all of the ways that I'm having

25:26

to use my brain to create an environment

25:28

that's more like the outside. Yes.

25:30

Oh, you know, speaking of Bend,

25:32

you know, we were just talking about how I just moved from Bend, you

25:34

just moved to Bend. One thing that I

25:36

was obviously thinking about a lot of these things while I was living

25:39

there, and I did do a lot of walks

25:41

in the winter, like without a coat

25:44

on and jumped in the river a

25:46

lot in the winter because I didn't have a cold plunge.

25:48

And so we would do like I had some friends in

25:50

the area that love to do polar plunges. So

25:53

we would do that. So it's a great social event, totally

25:55

free. But there's also something really interesting

25:57

that shifts when you're just exposed to some of

25:59

these concepts. ups around how like how positive

26:02

some of these quote unquote like uncomfortable

26:04

things can be for your health.

26:06

It actually shifts the way you feel about them. So it

26:08

goes from I can remember being kid

26:10

and like if I didn't have my mittens or my jacket

26:13

or I was a little bit cold in the winter, it was like

26:15

horrible, right? Like you're like, Oh, this is so uncomfortable.

26:18

We have to fix this immediately. I have to buy a sweatshirt

26:20

somewhere. You know, it's very much like it's painful

26:23

because you think it's bad. And you think

26:25

it's wrong. If you shift your

26:28

mindset to realizing how helpful

26:30

it is, and how valuable it is to basically

26:32

be a signal to yourselves to do better,

26:35

then all of a sudden it becomes very enjoyable. And

26:38

you you know, if you actually are caught outside

26:40

in the winter without your coat, you're like, heck

26:42

yes, I'm getting my cold thermogenesis for

26:44

the day for free. And you don't want to get frostbite.

26:47

You don't want to like burn your skin with the cold. But it's

26:50

it's it's you can I think apply that more broadly

26:52

in life is if you can shift your perspective

26:55

about the benefit, it actually

26:57

can totally change the emotional

26:59

reaction to the stressor in a way that can

27:01

be really positive. And I think that applies also

27:03

to mental health things. I think when you shift

27:05

more towards like a growth mindset, or if you've done

27:07

some therapy or whatever personal development stuff,

27:10

you start to have arguments or triggers or whatever

27:13

you get triggered by someone at work or

27:15

in your family, and all of a sudden you can view it

27:17

as this doesn't mean there's you know, my

27:19

life sucks, and I don't have good relationships.

27:21

But like this is an opportunity for me

27:24

to unpeel the next layer of the onion

27:26

of my wounds and my reactivity.

27:29

And so reframing these bad

27:31

relational things happening from you

27:33

know, this is this is a negative in my life

27:36

to this is an opportunity. And I think that applies to

27:38

a lot of these like,

27:39

sort of health and wellness things we're talking about,

27:41

but certainly also to personal

27:43

challenges on the emotional level as well. Yeah,

27:46

mindset is another thing that used to be part

27:48

of our human environment in a certain way, and we

27:50

had a culture around it. And I think that's another way

27:52

we've created this artificial balance for ourselves. It

27:55

relates back to what your second

27:57

point was on this, which I'm really curious how you

27:59

put the two together.

27:59

of

28:00

comments. I think you was talking about wealth accumulation.

28:03

What was the point?

28:03

Yeah. So you were asking about like, what are

28:05

the real root causes of why over the last

28:08

100 years or so, like all of these things have

28:10

really gone off the rails. And I think that,

28:13

and some of it is just a sense of like unbridled

28:16

wealth creation. And more specifically,

28:18

the lack of accountability

28:21

in industry around owning the

28:23

externalities of the products

28:27

they're creating or the services they're

28:29

offering. So like an example of this would be,

28:31

and I'd say tied up in that is

28:33

just like a sense of hubris

28:35

or willful ignorance around

28:38

respecting the natural cycles

28:41

of the natural cycles of the earth and

28:43

feeling like we can outsmart them. I think

28:45

the biggest example of this would be like around

28:48

the food system and industrial agriculture.

28:51

And this is tied into the vector of environmental

28:53

toxins. They're all really super

28:55

related, where we have these industries

28:58

that are decimating

29:01

human health, they're decimating food, water,

29:04

air and soil. Many of these industries have

29:08

put a large percentage of the 80,000 plus

29:10

synthetic chemicals that now exist in our environment

29:13

into the ecosystem. And

29:15

they get federal subsidies and tax

29:17

breaks for a lot of their work. So it's just

29:20

a system that is not really based

29:22

in like normal economics. And

29:24

the wide and well

29:26

understood externalities of negative

29:29

impact they're creating in several other spheres

29:31

outside of their particular industry

29:34

are not held accountable for. And

29:37

so you get monumental

29:39

growth, you know, of things like

29:41

processed food companies, and

29:44

companies like Monsanto, and I would

29:47

put certain pharmaceutical companies in

29:49

that realm that haven't had to have

29:52

gotten legal immunity for side effects

29:54

for things that they've produced. And you

29:56

kind of get a system that gets unbridled

29:58

growth at great cost. cost

30:01

to human health and wellbeing. And

30:03

so I think that's driven, you know,

30:05

it's driven a lot of the issues with the, like the food, environmental

30:08

toxin, the microbiome decimation. And

30:11

then of course, just like the intense focus on productivity

30:14

and sort of this industrialized

30:16

human, you know, you have the, like the Rockefeller

30:19

quotes that you hear about, like, you know, you just want

30:21

to create these like workers that just

30:23

like, or go, go, go, go, go. And so you get, you know,

30:26

you've got artificial light on 24 hours a day, you've got, now

30:28

you've got sleep that's screwed

30:30

up. You've got, you know, just,

30:32

just on every level, kind of squeezing

30:34

every drop out of the human

30:36

being with no appreciation

30:39

for how biology actually

30:41

works in a harmonious way. And so

30:44

it almost feels like on many levels,

30:46

like humans are now this, this product

30:49

that can not only be like parade, like, like

30:51

every surface of the human body is

30:54

an opportunity for extracting

30:56

value to many industries.

30:59

And the working potentially with human is also

31:01

kind of able to be squeezed for maximal

31:03

value. And I think in the system that

31:05

we live in, that is what's, what's happening.

31:08

You see it even with children, like a child's

31:10

body now is essentially just like a platform

31:13

for several industries to extract value from,

31:15

whether it's social media viewership, whether

31:18

it's how many pharmaceuticals you can put in that child's

31:20

body, whether it's putting lunchables in school

31:22

lunches and vending machines in pediatric

31:25

children's wards. So I think

31:27

we just have to be aware of this because otherwise

31:30

you're, you're going to be the product

31:33

and the thing that, you know,

31:35

that, that sort of ground

31:38

upon which this, this economic sort

31:40

of milieu is taking place on. So

31:43

again, though, getting back to your point earlier, what

31:45

this creates is a world in which if you're aware of

31:47

this, you spend a lot of your time

31:49

thinking about how to protect yourself from

31:51

it. And then I think if you're, you

31:53

know, entrepreneurial minded, you think about ways to scale

31:56

ways to protect yourself from others

31:59

from this. Certainly what we're trying to do at

32:01

levels is scale

32:03

a way to get people to

32:05

be aware of what's happening with processed

32:08

food and refined sugar and refined

32:10

grains and all these things on their bodies so that they can

32:12

make better decisions. But the onus is

32:14

really on the individual because on the sort of more societal

32:16

and policy level, things are moving very

32:19

slowly and in some cases in the wrong direction.

32:24

This episode is brought to you by Ion Layer,

32:27

which is a new project that I am helping

32:29

spin up. We are just getting

32:31

out of beta and starting to ship kits and

32:34

we are trying to make NAD

32:37

accessible and the experience way better

32:39

for people who want to boost energy, metabolism,

32:42

longevity, all this type of stuff. So what

32:45

is NAD? NAD is

32:47

nicotinamide adenine dienucleotide.

32:49

So quite a mouthful, but what it is

32:51

is basically the coenzyme that's

32:53

central to anything in your body working.

32:56

So it basically brings electrons

32:59

around to all cells naturally

33:01

occurring in all of the mammals especially and

33:04

it decreases as you age. Unfortunately,

33:07

it also decreases when you have some of

33:09

these environmental chronic

33:11

disease, etc. If you muscular

33:13

endurance, it's like anything that requires your

33:16

body to repair, NAD goes down.

33:18

So it goes down as you age and

33:20

I first found it and started using it to

33:23

help my mold toxicity issues.

33:25

So I was having symptoms, tried every single

33:28

supplement, every single medication and it wasn't until I

33:30

started doing high dose NAD IVs,

33:33

people might notice this also NAD plus

33:35

the IVs suck. So

33:37

you strap up to an

33:39

IV bag, you're there for a couple hours and it feels like your

33:41

insides are going through a literal meat grinder.

33:44

It is awful, you feel like you're going to throw

33:46

up. My wife Martha was by

33:48

my side, moaning and groaning. It's the

33:50

most I think I've ever seen her in pain. Luckily,

33:53

after it's done, you feel great

33:55

and amazing, but you have to do these quite a

33:58

lot. We felt incredible.

33:59

after we did these for our mold

34:02

issue. I know some people have done it for long COVID. There's

34:04

also a lot of evidence that supports longevity.

34:07

Look up David Sinclair's work for that type of stuff,

34:09

extending lifespan in animals, et cetera. So

34:12

it's very helpful for a variety of reasons,

34:15

but it basically increases energy output, helps

34:17

you recover from issues and can improve

34:19

longevity. So it's one of these master things. But again, how

34:22

much we'll get it currently is through

34:24

IVs and it makes you feel like

34:26

you are going to die. So I thought, how

34:29

can we make this one cheaper and

34:31

more accessible and not have it be

34:33

so awful? So it currently costs about $500,

34:36

$500 to $700. Yes,

34:38

that's right. $700 per IV. And

34:42

we did five in one week. So obviously

34:45

that price adds up quite a bit. We

34:47

found a way to use iontoforesis,

34:49

which is another fancy long word here

34:51

to explain this technology of a patch.

34:54

So this patch, something you can wear,

34:56

sort of like a continuous blood-glue monitor, but there's no

34:59

input, there's no needles. There's

35:01

a little battery that creates a charge that pushes

35:04

this across your skin barrier into

35:06

your bloodstream. So you can now get compounds

35:09

that you would likely need to get with

35:11

an injection or an IV without

35:13

any of that. And so we're able to also ship that directly

35:16

to you. What else does that mean? Well, that means we

35:18

bring the price down dramatically. So instead of $500 to $750

35:20

per IV, it's

35:23

about a tenth of that cost. Also,

35:25

what's great is that we figured out a way to do it, make

35:27

it the solution, make it bioavailable, as

35:30

bioavailable as a high dose IV, but

35:33

you don't get any symptoms because we're using a 12 to 16 hour patch.

35:36

These patches infuse over a much longer period of time, so

35:38

you don't get any of those awful symptoms. So

35:41

you don't have to go to an IV clinic. There's no

35:43

needles. It's tenth the cost and

35:46

you get no symptoms. To me, this is a no brainer.

35:48

Tons of people have tried it so far in our beta program, experiencing

35:51

crazy results, healing from long COVID,

35:54

getting over autoimmune conditions, performing

35:56

at their best, using it for workouts recovery,

35:59

the amount of testimony. we're getting of the short group that we

36:01

had, it's been absolutely mind blowing.

36:04

So if you want to try this out, we're doing a special promo

36:06

for blessers of the podcast. So if you want to

36:08

use code D R A G, which

36:11

just stands for my name, Dr. Anthony

36:13

Gustin, feel free to use that at checkout for

36:15

a hundred dollars off. Just go to ionlayer.com.

36:19

You can see the kits that we have there. It

36:21

says we're still in beta. Just feel free to go through it.

36:23

If you use this code, it will let you in. So

36:25

code D R A G, you'll get a hundred

36:28

dollars off your first kit. And

36:30

if you try it out, would love to know your experience. We're still

36:32

getting a lot of feedback from people and they're

36:34

telling us, you know, what has changed for them, what they've noticed,

36:37

et cetera. So I would love for you to just email

36:39

us over at hello at ionlayer.com

36:41

to hear about your experience with

36:43

NAD plus patches. So I've

36:46

been loving it. I tore my hamstring a couple of weeks ago,

36:48

used five patches and basically recovered like Wolverine.

36:51

So it's, it's been awesome. It's one of these things

36:53

where I scratched my own itch and

36:56

had to make something cause it didn't exist. So hope

36:58

you guys enjoy it. And again, it's D

37:00

R A G at ionlayer.com

37:03

for a hundred dollars off your first kit. Yeah.

37:08

I mean, I think that the insatiable quest

37:10

for wealth, which leads to this harvesting

37:13

of the planet and resources, including humans

37:16

is to me very sad because

37:19

it's a normal response to

37:21

isolation. And isolation

37:24

from people, isolation from skills

37:26

and being valuable isolation from

37:29

where you're harvesting materials from and land.

37:32

And I mean, this is a big takeaway when I

37:34

went to spend time with the hot tribe of how

37:36

at ease these people were, how content they were and

37:38

how abundant their life was

37:41

because they had each other and everything

37:43

that they depended on, they lived in

37:45

and around. And if they needed

37:47

a tool, they can make one immediately, but they also saw

37:49

the ramifications and they knew don't take too

37:52

much of this thing because we're going to need it later. And

37:55

if you are in a high rise in New York,

37:57

making decisions that someone else goes.

38:00

does over in the Congo, that's

38:02

going to be a very different outcome. You have no

38:05

relation to land in which you're harvesting from. I

38:08

don't know where that line, where you can really

38:10

cross it into a modern world, we're all isolated.

38:13

I think ultimately the problem of the,

38:15

I think like I said, the biggest

38:18

issue is the mismatch of your environment, your

38:20

biology. But I think preceding that is

38:22

actually our separation from nature. And

38:26

I think often around where did

38:28

this screw in this microphone come from?

38:30

And like, what cost is this really? And

38:32

then I look around in my house and

38:35

the things that I have to use in a day to day basis.

38:38

It's shocking. Like it can be very overwhelming. And

38:40

I think with anything else, the massive gradient,

38:42

as soon as you're aware of giving that concept,

38:45

you start living in a very different way. And I think

38:47

it's no people can be aware of that at

38:49

large, where it's going to keep repeating the same things

38:51

over and over and again. And that's, that's probably fundamentally

38:53

what I think is the issue. How to get that all

38:55

on my own now. Oh my God, that's a completely

38:58

different topic. And that's why I think we

39:00

need an army of people who are actually trying to do stuff

39:02

is not a singular cause. I think that

39:04

many people have different exposure levels

39:07

and different tripwires that they get exposed to

39:09

that sort of brings them out of the matrix, so

39:11

to speak, and wakes them up and unlocks that ZU

39:13

cage so they can step out and realize what's actually

39:16

going on. Obviously, you guys are

39:18

focused on metabolic health and awareness of

39:20

metabolic health continues. And the Gluebeth Monitor

39:22

is the initial thing that you guys have done a lot of

39:24

work on. I'm now starting to see

39:26

a lot of pushback, which is

39:29

not surprising, but I think a little unnecessary.

39:32

True in some cases, because I think that's some orthorexia

39:34

where some people, if they don't go fully through

39:36

this awakening phase of

39:39

realizing all the stuff we just talked about over the last 30 minutes, they

39:42

can get very obsessed with data and

39:44

just think like Spike Bad. I'm

39:47

curious how you guys, I deep gone through this. It

39:49

seems to me, and I obviously know a lot of the rest of

39:51

the team, know how you guys think about this stuff, using

39:54

CGM amazing for creating

39:56

a feedback loop for people who generally don't have it before

39:59

of what I put in my mind. my mouth impacts

40:01

my body and how I feel. And as much as I think

40:03

there's a lot of different ways that people can initially have

40:05

that sense of, Oh, this thing

40:08

changed me in this way. And most people go around their

40:10

day to day life and go through these patterns

40:12

and rhythms and never separate these decisions

40:14

with how they feel. And it's never one

40:17

action in unison. So what tends to

40:19

happen though, is I think people can get otherwise before

40:21

otherwise healthy can make choices saying

40:24

like, I saw an example today on Twitter,

40:26

we were sorry, where somebody ate

40:28

blueberry and said, Oh, the blueberry spiked

40:30

my blood sugar. Therefore, not good. And

40:32

I think conversely, somebody could be chugging a

40:35

gallon of canola oil and say, well, I didn't spike

40:37

my blood sugar. So it must be good. How do you guys

40:39

obviously require a massive amount of education, but how

40:41

do you guys help parse through the nuance of the

40:43

data after you've maybe like giving somebody

40:45

the initial feedback? So that way they

40:48

can incorporate this into what's

40:50

a much larger conversation? Yeah,

40:53

it does a great question.

40:54

The way I think about it is

40:56

that like, we are not in the business

40:59

of like, getting

41:00

people no glucose spikes.

41:03

We're in the business of building metabolically healthy

41:05

bodies. And metabolically

41:07

healthy bodies are

41:10

going to clear glucose more

41:12

efficiently from the bloodstream because they're going to be

41:14

more insulin sensitive because their mitochondria

41:16

is are going to be functional. And

41:19

over time, what will emerge

41:22

is likely less erratic glucose

41:25

patterns and like lower spikes,

41:27

quicker return to baseline, less time

41:29

above range, all of that. Now

41:31

where it gets a little complex is that one of

41:33

one of the many ways

41:36

to improve mitochondrial function

41:38

and health is to stop overburdening

41:42

the cell with just a total

41:44

excess of this particular,

41:46

you know, this particular molecule to process,

41:49

which is glucose. And right now we're

41:51

just like inundating the body with far

41:53

too much refined grains and sugars,

41:56

which not only will often cause

41:58

spikes, but there it's just so much

42:01

for the cells to do. And so

42:03

you end up gumming up the system. And, you

42:06

know, a lot of it gets

42:08

converted to intracellular fat, it gets

42:11

converted to fat and gets exported other parts of the

42:13

body, it creates reactive oxygen species that's

42:15

damaged with mitochondria, all of this is a feedback

42:17

system to the insulin receptor to basically create insulin

42:19

resistance, then you've got hyperinsulinemia, you

42:21

aren't clearing glucose from the bloodstream properly.

42:24

So it's this whole. So one of the levers

42:27

in improving the overall metabolic health of

42:29

the body is to keep the spikes down.

42:31

But that's not the end all

42:33

be all like having just just getting rid

42:36

of the spikes does not necessarily mean you

42:38

are 100% metabolically healthy or

42:41

vice versa. So it's one part of it.

42:43

So what we want to do is help really

42:45

educate people on like the, you know, get

42:48

people acquainted with some of this biology

42:50

so that they really understand what they're working

42:52

towards here and that there are so many elements

42:54

of creating that metabolically healthy cell from

42:57

all the from from addressing all those

42:59

different pillars that we talked about food,

43:01

sleep, stress, exercise, microbiome,

43:03

light temperature, environmental toxins,

43:06

etc, and more, and

43:08

take stock in their own lives of

43:11

what

43:11

aspects of those are maybe

43:14

going really well,

43:14

not going really well for every

43:16

person, it's going to be sort of a different set

43:19

of intensity on which

43:21

ones of those need to be worked on the most.

43:24

And then, you know, work towards doing

43:26

better with those and and then also

43:29

on the food pillar, try

43:32

to keep the spikes down

43:34

as a proxy for sort of giving your body

43:36

a break on how much glucose it has to process,

43:39

of course, it's gonna feed forward into better mitochondrial health.

43:41

And then ultimately, over time lead to better glucose patterns

43:44

generally. So it's, it's, it's complex.

43:46

But I mean, we're all believers in the fact that

43:48

like people can handle this information, like it's

43:50

not it's not that complicated. And we really do

43:52

have to understand it. And like people, people,

43:55

we've really been so patronizing

43:57

to the average American patient of like

44:00

really keeping them from their health information and

44:02

sort of this kind of paternalistic medical

44:04

culture of like, you know, kind of really

44:07

separating people from their own data. And

44:09

we really feel like people absolutely

44:11

can handle this and understand this information and

44:13

should. And so, so yeah,

44:16

so I'd say big picture, it's about building a metabolic

44:18

healthy body. It's also, you

44:20

know, we really wanna really help

44:22

people understand this body awareness cycle that you

44:25

touched on of like really sort of solidifying

44:27

this link between what I'm doing, what's happening

44:29

with my data and how do I feel so that

44:32

when the data is not there, there's still a connection

44:34

between what I'm doing and how I feel.

44:37

And we hear this all the time. This is a concept called

44:39

interoception, which is basically like really

44:41

high level body awareness where after wearing

44:43

CGM for a little while, people

44:45

can actually just kind of intuit or sense sort

44:48

of where they are in terms of their blood sugar levels, which

44:50

is really interesting. The last thing I'd mention is

44:52

that to really understand,

44:55

I think where you are in terms of metabolic

44:57

health and where you stand, that's

45:00

where like actual blood-based biomarkers

45:02

are gonna be extremely helpful. Like CGM

45:05

can directionally tell you how you're doing in terms of

45:07

your metabolic health, but it's not a diagnostic tool.

45:10

I'd say it's most valuable as a biofeedback

45:13

tool, like a cause and effect type

45:15

tool. And you can kind of get a sense

45:17

of how metabolic health is by like where

45:19

generally is your glucose when you wake up

45:21

in the morning? Is it above a hundred, is it below a hundred? How

45:24

long generally does it take to come down

45:26

from a spike after a high carb meal? If

45:28

that's a really wide sort

45:30

of mountain and like it's a very long return

45:33

to baseline, that could be a signal that you're having trouble clearing

45:36

glucose in the bloodstream. So there's these clues

45:38

in the glucose dynamics of where

45:40

you stand metabolically. But to

45:43

really understand that you do need to

45:45

get the biomarker testing

45:47

from your doctor or from levels.

45:51

And that's really more of answering the question

45:53

of like, how is my metabolic health? So

45:55

what I tell people who are getting stressed about

45:57

their glucose data, like, oh my God, I'm so excited. spiking

46:00

so much and everything I eat seems

46:02

to spike me and this and that. It's like,

46:05

start by getting some of your biomarkers done

46:07

so you actually know how your metabolic

46:09

health is and then you'll have a better

46:12

sense of, you know, what your carb

46:14

tolerance is and, you know, how how officially

46:16

you might be clearing glucose. And so that's like tests like

46:19

the basic ones that you might get from your doctor

46:21

every year, like a fasting glucose, a hemoglobin

46:23

A1c, a cholesterol panel. These

46:25

are generally like free and covered by insurance and,

46:28

you know, many people get these with their physical, but

46:31

also some of the more advanced specialty

46:33

testing like fasting insulin, uric acid,

46:35

ApoB. There's

46:38

several others that can be valuable,

46:40

but like that together like a fasting

46:42

glucose, a cholesterol panel,

46:44

which can be really helpful because both triglycerides and

46:46

HDL are very indicative of metabolic

46:49

status. ApoB, which is sort of

46:51

an advanced cholesterol marker, fasting insulin,

46:53

which I think is the most important test that anyone in America

46:55

can get. And then uric acid, which is

46:58

sort of downstream of the fructose metabolism

47:00

pathway and can be really useful. So those

47:02

really, I think are great to start with

47:05

before even starting CGM because you can

47:07

really have ownership over knowing like

47:09

where you stand at the beginning and

47:11

then use the CGM more as a biofeedback tool

47:14

rather than a tool that like stresses you out making you

47:16

think that like

47:16

you have a problem or you don't without

47:19

actually the full picture. Yeah, makes a lot of sense. I think

47:21

that testing is, it's

47:23

like generally assessing where you're at on

47:26

many dimensions is very important. The way I

47:28

view health and how to return

47:30

to health is again, maybe a little simplistic,

47:33

but I think it helps people sort of frame around it is

47:35

when the conditions are right, we're talking about that when the environment's

47:38

right, you shouldn't have any problems. The natural

47:40

state is why the podcast name of the

47:42

organism is health and abundance

47:45

and vitality. You don't see, I

47:47

don't see crows flying around a blue jays

47:49

that are three times the other one. I don't see

47:52

them coughing. You don't see them limping. You don't see them sedentary.

47:55

It's just the natural state of our environment

47:58

allows what we should be, which is

48:00

healthy individuals and organisms. And

48:02

once you have an interaction there, you typically

48:04

need two things. One of them is the intervention

48:07

to get back on path. And then number two

48:09

is the restoration of that natural environment. And

48:11

so a lot of the stuff that we initially talked about for 30 minutes

48:14

was about our environments messed up,

48:16

here's all the ways we could fix it being more uncomfortable,

48:19

light movement, all these types of things. But

48:21

a lot of times, I mean, if you think about it like a train

48:23

running on tracks, the tracks are fine, the

48:25

wheels are good, they'll be totally in

48:27

harmony, and that will be a healthy environment,

48:30

it's a couldn't put natural state. If there's a track

48:32

that bends, now that environment is

48:35

aberrant, and it flies off. If you

48:37

fix the tracks, and the cars are

48:39

still on the side of the road or a side of the tracks burning,

48:42

not good either. So I think that what Western

48:44

medicine typically has focused on exclusively

48:46

is interventions. How do we get the train

48:48

back on the tracks? But it does not focus on how

48:51

do we fix tracks, how do we fix the environment as

48:53

well. I think they're both necessary sometimes. Most

48:56

people wait until they have symptoms

48:58

to realize that the car is burning and you're off

49:00

the tracks and you need an intervention to get back

49:02

on tracks. And most people are off

49:05

and are not in a natural state and need an intervention

49:07

to sort of like get back on track, but

49:10

also need to restore their environment. And again, if the

49:12

environment isn't restored, and this is why you see people

49:15

on chronic medications, medications for the rest

49:17

of their lives, as well as you see people I think

49:19

in talk therapy, and definitely I think you see

49:21

people who are taking psychedelics, which

49:23

are like can be helpful, but also are taking them

49:25

over and over and over again, definitely because they're not actually

49:28

doing the intervention, which is helpful in

49:30

the short term, they're never fixing the long term thing,

49:32

convertly not doing intervention and just

49:35

doing sort of like what paleo man would have done

49:37

is also not enough typically in

49:39

assessing where you're at to know the

49:41

severity of either environment correction

49:44

or the intervention you need is

49:46

really helpful. So with that in mind, I'm curious,

49:49

do you guys ever recommend people

49:52

take any short term medications to help out with

49:54

things and that in some of the bioactive

49:56

community things like that format etc are

49:58

used? ever recommend

50:01

that or suggest that for any reason? Is

50:03

it people? I've seen food is a huge

50:05

part of what you guys do and how you help people get back

50:07

to normal. What are some of the other things that interventions

50:09

that you would have that would help people get back on

50:11

track?

50:11

Yeah, I mean, well,

50:14

levels as it stands now is

50:17

exclusively a health and wellness company. So it's

50:19

actually not at all in the clinical

50:21

space of like disease reversal, disease

50:24

management, disease diagnostics.

50:27

So really our

50:28

market still is the consumer

50:30

market of people who are pre-disease,

50:33

but trying to feel

50:34

their best, trying to understand their diet.

50:36

So for us, well, get

50:38

levels for the first time and realize that they're pre-diabetic or diabetic.

50:41

Oh, that's a great question. I actually don't know the

50:43

answer to that question. And I actually, we probably wouldn't

50:45

even be able to answer that question because the tool

50:48

is not, it's not meant to diagnose,

50:50

you know, because it is a wearable, just like

50:52

pretty much every wearable, there is a margin

50:54

of error compared to gold standard.

50:56

So like the gold standard of diagnosing diabetes

50:58

or pre-diabetes would be a venous

51:01

blood draw of fasting glucose

51:03

or hemoglobin A1c, or an oral glucose

51:06

tolerance test with a venous

51:08

blood draw of glucose. So that's really

51:10

like the most accurate, the way to diagnose

51:13

it. Do you have the data on the levels

51:15

labs? If you're the same percentage

51:17

of people?

51:17

I don't think we have that yet, but

51:19

we absolutely, we're just ramping

51:22

up the labs program. And

51:24

that would be really, really interesting to see like,

51:27

because people, when they become customers,

51:29

they're answering a consultation

51:32

form where they do indicate

51:34

where they've ever, if they've ever been

51:36

diagnosed with diabetes or before,

51:38

and so, or pre-diabetes.

51:40

So, yeah, it would be interesting

51:42

if, if, if we be able to see,

51:44

you know, for those people

51:46

that maybe thought that they had never been diagnosed

51:48

with pre-diabetes or type two diabetes, like how many actually

51:51

fall into that category from the lab standpoint,

51:54

it would be a lot. Well, and what we know from

51:56

the broader data is that 90% of people with diabetes,

51:59

they're not going to be diagnosed prediabetes don't know that they have

52:01

it. So, and there was just like,

52:03

oh my God, the most like horrifying study

52:06

that came out that was done

52:08

with the United States

52:11

Preventative Task Force. And

52:13

it was from their data, but it was published

52:16

one or two years ago. And basically it was 21,000 patients

52:19

who were eligible for prediabetes screening. And

52:22

they followed them over a little bit of time. And

52:25

of the 21,000 patients who were eligible

52:28

for prediabetes

52:28

screening,

52:29

I think 5% got appropriate, 5%

52:31

I believe got

52:34

appropriate treatment. I might be getting these numbers wrong. The

52:37

punchline, which is the one that

52:39

is most important is that

52:42

of the people who were actually screened,

52:44

which was a very small percentage, the ones who

52:46

are identified as having prediabetes, zero

52:49

out of 21,000 people got

52:51

appropriate prediabetes treatment. And

52:53

so like not a single person in

52:55

the entire study. So we are just

52:57

like abjectly failing on

53:00

every level at identifying

53:02

prediabetes, which is in no way a predisease.

53:05

Once someone has reached the prediabetes threshold

53:07

of

53:07

a hold of a fasting glucose of 100, 125 milligrams through

53:11

less liter, that is full blown insulin resistance.

53:14

That's probably been going on for years where

53:17

their body has actually been compensating

53:19

to keep their blood sugar looking fairly

53:21

normal by pumping out

53:24

lots of extra insulin to overcome

53:26

the insulin resistance to sort of drive

53:28

glucose into the cells in the face of cells

53:30

that are insulin resistant and kind of keeping

53:33

the blood sugar looking pretty normal or

53:35

high normal. And then they eventually tip

53:37

into the prediabetes range. But the

53:39

term

53:39

is just so, so

53:42

problematic

53:42

because prediabetes

53:44

is full blown advanced insulin

53:46

resistance.

53:46

So the whole

53:49

landscape

53:49

of prediabetes

53:51

is a shambles in the United States. And

53:53

given that metabolic diseases and

53:55

issues are underlying the nine to the 10 leading

53:58

causes of death in the United States, like. this

54:00

should be front page news, it should be our

54:02

literally first order priority that we're talking about

54:04

in the upcoming election. It's

54:07

so odd that it's so sort

54:09

of under the radar, but that's one of the reasons

54:11

why we are so passionate about getting

54:13

the labs out to people in an accessible

54:16

way, because anyone who wants to

54:18

answer the question, what is

54:20

my level of metabolic health, should

54:23

be able to answer that question. We believe

54:25

the answer to that question should be democratized,

54:28

easy and cheap. And that's where this

54:31

very focused five

54:31

biomarker panel came

54:34

from. You guys doing HbA1c, fasting

54:36

insulin, uric acid. HbOb triglycerides

54:38

and uric acid,

54:39

which is kind of like striking this balance between

54:42

what tests can you put together and

54:44

kind of read the tea leaves of being able to say like

54:46

I am or I'm not optimally metabolically

54:49

healthy, and also striking that

54:51

balance with cost and accessibility

54:54

and ease. And so we

54:56

worked with our team of medical

54:58

advisors to really

55:01

pick five tests that triangulated

55:03

all those things. But yeah,

55:06

so that's how we came up with that one. And we also give

55:08

people like expert opinion on optimal ranges

55:11

for where the test should be. So the

55:13

average lab slip for fasting

55:16

insulin will say that anything less than 25 million

55:18

IU per mil is normal. But

55:20

the research strongly suggests

55:22

that it's more like two to five, two

55:25

to six is optimal.

55:27

So like,

55:28

it is normal for an average

55:30

American, right, right, which

55:33

they establish the reference range based on exactly

55:35

mean that's healthy and ideal and

55:38

optimal for a human. No,

55:39

exactly. Like triglycerides, the optimal

55:41

range or sorry, the range that people will

55:43

be told is normal is less than 150. And

55:47

we have some advisors who think it should be less than 70, less

55:49

than half of

55:51

what the normal range is. And,

55:54

you know, triglycerides in terms of increasing your risk

55:56

ratio for future heart attack is higher

55:59

than LDL. But it's 1.8 for

56:01

high triglycerides and 1.3 for high LDL,

56:04

and yet we've totally villainized LDL as

56:06

the big problem. And Robert Lustig, one of our advisors,

56:09

talks a lot about this in his book, Metabolical, which

56:11

is like the reason for that is because we had

56:13

a medication for LDL. So we

56:15

really pushed LDL as like bad cholesterol

56:18

because we could prescribe something for it. There's

56:20

not been a great medication for triglycerides, although

56:22

you can get triglycerides to drop rapidly

56:24

in a month with dietary changes. But

56:26

triglycerides are actually seem to be more dangerous

56:29

in terms of heart disease risk. So theoretically,

56:31

we could have made triglycerides the bad cholesterol.

56:34

But of course, that's what LDL kind of emerged as.

56:37

And his thought is that that had a lot to do with the

56:39

pharmaceutical industry, you know,

56:41

wanting to get people more aware of that one.

56:43

But of course, we know LDL is like not necessarily

56:46

the best biomarker for understanding cardiac risk

56:48

because there's not just one LDL. There's

56:50

two LDLs in the bloodstream that are put together

56:53

when you create the total LDL number. And

56:56

one of those two species of LDL

56:58

is less atherogenic, it's less

57:00

promoting of heart blockage and heart disease than

57:02

the other. And so it's a little bit

57:04

of a fuzzy biomarker, because

57:06

even if it's high, you don't have a sense

57:09

of what the fractionated whether you

57:11

know, how much of the not so bad LDL

57:13

there is versus the really dangerous one.

57:15

So in very, very

57:18

few people are looking at oxidized LDL

57:20

either, which yeah, actually it's

57:22

good here. But I mean, I think we talked

57:24

about LDL for probably four hours. Right.

57:26

But that's why we don't have it on our panel, because it's

57:28

just not, you know, people

57:30

will balk at that. Like, why is there not

57:32

LDL or why is there not CRP

57:35

or whatnot? And I mean, there's a lot of biomarkers

57:37

that we'd love to test vitamin D, like several

57:39

others. But I think with the five that

57:41

are on there, people can really

57:44

get a good sense of where where they stand.

57:46

So why? Why?

57:48

I mean, APO B is, you know,

57:50

a phenomenal cardiac risk marker.

57:54

And a lot of cardiologists, I think, feel like it's got

57:56

a lot more signal and clarity and than LDL.

58:00

because basically all ApoB containing

58:02

molecules are atherogenic.

58:05

And so it's giving you a little bit more of a close sense

58:07

of like problematic cholesterol

58:10

in the bloodstream. So slightly

58:12

more specific for cholesterol

58:14

particles that could cause

58:16

problems in the blood vessels, essentially. ApoB

58:19

is one of the proteins that sits on, you

58:21

know, cholesterol molecules. And

58:24

the ones that it sits on are not.

58:26

Do you consider that to be part of metabolic

58:29

health as itself or is it more

58:31

as a part of like general health?

58:33

I think like very much so. It's

58:36

in that sort of like metabolic health

58:39

nexus, which I would sort of, you

58:41

know, you're looking at, you're

58:43

trying to get a signal on cardiovascular

58:46

health, liver health, how the body

58:48

is packaging and processing energy,

58:50

mitochondrial

58:51

health, blood sugar,

58:53

insulin, pancreas, like all these different things.

58:55

And so it's kind of finding biomarkers that give

58:57

you a signal of some of that. So I think with ApoB,

59:00

you're getting a signal of cardiovascular health,

59:03

you know, insulin sensitivity and

59:05

liver health in some capacity.

59:07

So compared to LDL, we

59:09

felt that it was a much stronger biomarker.

59:12

So, but I

59:12

think in there, like the ones that

59:15

I kind of, the ones that I feel like

59:17

I would, this is just my personal opinion, like

59:19

that every single person in the world should just be able

59:21

to rattle off if asked, like

59:23

you're at a dinner party and you just go around and like,

59:25

do you know this number? Like I think everyone needs to

59:27

know they're fasting insulin, they're trying to survive

59:30

levels. Like we should be able to answer that. Like we answer

59:32

like, what is your phone number? Because they're

59:34

just so, and maybe if the two of them,

59:36

I would even say fasting insulin. Cause

59:38

if your insulin levels are going up, it's a clear sign

59:41

that you're becoming insulin resistant, which is a clear sign

59:43

that your cells are

59:44

having a problem with processing energy. So

59:46

yeah, that's one that I really care

59:48

a lot about. And I don't know, I wasn't

59:51

aware of how you guys incorporate it. And I'm very

59:53

ignorant compared to most of my friends who have really

59:55

dug into this subject that it seems to be

59:57

still some disagreement. with

1:00:00

different camps around the validity of

1:00:02

it and if the presence of it means

1:00:04

underlying pathology or not and some

1:00:07

of the other ones that you have in your panels, like

1:00:09

absolutely, I feel like you

1:00:11

cannot be metabolically healthy or

1:00:14

even like metabolically unhealthy and have

1:00:16

that number be normal. And from

1:00:18

what I have understood from other people who are far

1:00:20

smarter than I am, what this stuff is that you could potentially

1:00:23

have fine underlying health and still

1:00:25

have aberrant ABOB, but you

1:00:27

need to get into the weeds, or like the, I was

1:00:30

just curious how you guys thought about incorporating

1:00:32

it, but that makes sense. Regarding

1:00:34

other things that people can do,

1:00:37

obviously I think education is a huge part

1:00:39

that's overlooked when at the face level

1:00:41

you guys probably look like a product company. You're adding the labs

1:00:43

and services obviously, but one thing I really

1:00:45

appreciate is what you've done in education. Where

1:00:48

would people even start if they're thinking about

1:00:50

this type of stuff? Is it, I've sort of changed

1:00:52

my mind a little bit on education and I think that people

1:00:54

should start wherever they're most excited and interested.

1:00:57

Yeah. But if people are interested

1:01:00

broadly in how I become metabolically healthy,

1:01:02

there are so many things that we've covered already in

1:01:04

the last hours. Like do you guys have a guide?

1:01:08

Here's how you start thinking about this stuff. Like do

1:01:10

you have any easy entries? Like what are

1:01:12

you thinking about? Is it like so deep to get

1:01:14

a mitochondria? Is it, prior

1:01:16

to that? One thing I've

1:01:18

really learned from talking to so many customers

1:01:21

is that the entry point or the gateway

1:01:23

to interest in this is so varied. And

1:01:26

I actually love what you just said, which was like find

1:01:29

what's lighting you up and

1:01:31

then follow that thread. And

1:01:33

I actually really am a believer in the fact that

1:01:35

we need a lot of different messengers for this

1:01:37

particular topic of

1:01:40

metabolic health because people are gonna

1:01:42

respond to different people, different mediums,

1:01:45

all these different things. And so there's

1:01:47

some people who are gonna hear it best from Peter Atiyah

1:01:49

and some people are gonna hear it best from Andrew Huerman

1:01:52

and some people are gonna hear it best from Sarah Gottfried, Mark

1:01:54

Hyman, you, me, and

1:01:56

so I'm very heartened by how many

1:01:59

voices there are. in the space and how many

1:02:01

different mediums you can go to. You know, like,

1:02:03

even if you're, you know, a Mark Hyman

1:02:06

follower, it's like you could start with

1:02:08

his newsletter, one of his 14, 15 books, his

1:02:12

YouTube channel, his podcast

1:02:15

or social media. And frankly, like any

1:02:18

of those, by osmosis, you're gonna start

1:02:20

to get some of the key messages. And

1:02:22

the funny thing is, is that the key messages

1:02:25

across pretty much everyone, this

1:02:27

stuff is not that complicated. Like if you wanna

1:02:29

go down the whole like mitochondrial function,

1:02:32

oxidative stress, intercellular cilium pathways, AMPK,

1:02:34

you know, Glute 4 channels, all

1:02:37

that, like go for it. But

1:02:39

like, if you also just kinda wanna like know

1:02:41

the answer, like you're gonna

1:02:43

get 90% of the way there by focusing on

1:02:45

some of the simple, like high yield

1:02:48

behavioral and food interventions, like eating

1:02:50

real food, ideally growing in good soil and

1:02:53

eliminating refined grains and refined

1:02:55

sugars and ideally industrially processed seed oils

1:02:58

by moving low grade movement throughout the day,

1:03:01

lifting heavy things, multiple times per

1:03:03

week, getting seven, eight hours

1:03:05

of sleep, which is the amount that seems to be associated

1:03:07

with the best metabolic health, like figuring

1:03:09

out how to manage your chronic stress, which

1:03:12

could mean a lot of different things, spiritual development,

1:03:14

overcoming trauma, improving relationships, developing

1:03:17

a growth mindset, going to therapy, doing

1:03:19

psychedelic therapy, whatever, but basically

1:03:21

overcoming limiting beliefs that are gonna make you

1:03:24

feel limited and therefore dependent on things outside

1:03:26

of yourself for like health and wellbeing and

1:03:28

then able to be preyed upon by industry and

1:03:31

sort of living in fear, which hurts our metabolic health. So

1:03:34

those are kind of the key things, they're all simple, like they're

1:03:38

simple but not easy. Then it's like avoiding

1:03:40

the environmental toxins, like clean up your house, clean

1:03:42

up your products, get rid of the pesticide

1:03:44

covered food, stop using artificial scents

1:03:46

and all of your soaps and lotions and shampoos

1:03:49

and conditioners, like get rid of all the artificial coloring

1:03:51

and this stuff, like try to buy more non-toxic

1:03:53

products if you can, use vinegar

1:03:55

and water as a cleaning solution for everything. Like

1:03:57

it's simple stuff like that and then like, you know.

1:04:00

some of the more advanced things I would say is like

1:04:02

light hygiene, like stop, you know, try

1:04:04

and get more in touch with natural cycles of light, like

1:04:06

seeing light during the day from the

1:04:08

sun and not being berated

1:04:11

with blue light when the sun is down. Like,

1:04:14

very important, actually very important

1:04:16

for circadian metabolic pathways, free,

1:04:18

simple, you know, and then I think another like

1:04:20

one of the sort of higher level ones is like the thermal one.

1:04:23

So like, see if you can expose your body

1:04:25

to more regular cold and heat because it's

1:04:27

a signal to your body to adapt and become more

1:04:29

metabolically efficient. So it's like,

1:04:32

you go to any of these people, Peter

1:04:34

Tia, levels, Mark Hyman, you

1:04:36

know, you're gonna hear a lot of these same things.

1:04:39

And you're going to also hear some more advanced things like

1:04:41

the NAD drips and ozone therapy

1:04:44

and peptides and all this stuff. But the

1:04:46

basic stuff around the sort of core

1:04:48

pillars of diet and lifestyle, it's

1:04:51

I believe it will get people 90% of the way there.

1:04:54

But going back to what

1:04:56

you talked about earlier about isolation and nature,

1:04:59

I think like for me, and I believe

1:05:01

this, like it all of this has to

1:05:03

start with a sense of deep, I think curiosity

1:05:06

and appreciation, gratitude and awe for

1:05:08

both the human body and the natural world

1:05:10

and how those two are constantly in conversation with each other.

1:05:12

So I think, honestly, like getting outside

1:05:15

and being more in nature and

1:05:17

starting to have open your eyes to like

1:05:20

the beauty that's around you and having

1:05:22

gratitude and awe for it for me,

1:05:24

that's kind of like underneath all of this behavior

1:05:26

change, because when you can kind of get to that place

1:05:29

of your connectedness with everything around you

1:05:31

and how your body is this like miraculous engine

1:05:34

that's constantly in conversation with everything around

1:05:36

you. I think it actually makes these health behaviors

1:05:38

a lot easier to implement because, you know, it's

1:05:40

coming from a place of a real like appreciation

1:05:43

for the miraculousness of this experience of

1:05:46

life rather than a sense of like fear

1:05:49

and scarcity and all

1:05:50

of that. Yeah, like reverence and

1:05:52

sacredness, which I think are two things that are very

1:05:54

much in deficiency in our modern culture. I mean,

1:05:57

you said it's really simple and then you list.

1:06:00

to like 580 things right in a row,

1:06:02

which I agree with all of them. Each

1:06:04

one of themselves is pretty simple. It's like

1:06:06

walk, lift, eat

1:06:07

real food. I totally agree.

1:06:09

I just think it could be a little overwhelming for people

1:06:11

who aren't as obsessed with this stuff.

1:06:14

But it's simple,

1:06:17

but it's complex and it can be confusing.

1:06:19

And I just urge anybody to pick the things that

1:06:21

they're most interested in and go one at a time.

1:06:24

I always try to communicate

1:06:26

like there's no perfect endpoint.

1:06:29

And you'll always be optimizing and I'm always

1:06:31

finding things that change because I'm

1:06:34

getting really into light stuff. And I've

1:06:36

finally appreciated it. Now

1:06:38

I did the work to actually learn about the thing and now

1:06:40

I'm doing like I did enough learning to do

1:06:42

the behavior change. Yeah. Dabbling

1:06:45

in a bunch of stuff and never changing behavior

1:06:48

is less important than I think diving

1:06:50

into one thing and changing one thing at a time. Yeah.

1:06:53

Yeah. And one thing I thought

1:06:54

this

1:06:56

is just one more random aside on that. Like it's that

1:06:59

like it is hard to bring

1:07:01

all these things into your life and

1:07:03

it is adopting

1:07:05

almost like a different identity because it's an identity

1:07:08

of doing things differently and

1:07:10

having to say no to a lot of things that are normal

1:07:13

and yes to a lot of things that can seem counterculture

1:07:15

or weird. And so I think there

1:07:17

is an element of personal work

1:07:19

that also is sort of foundational of

1:07:22

one like really figuring

1:07:24

out like what your motivation is and what that

1:07:26

means to you and to like really understanding

1:07:29

the concept of boundary setting which I think really

1:07:31

comes down to doing the personal work

1:07:33

to understand why your boundaries might

1:07:35

be slippery. You know like with people or

1:07:38

with choices I think a lot of that

1:07:40

often comes down to wounds you know wounds that we carry

1:07:43

from childhood that make us adopt

1:07:45

behaviors that can be you know people pleasing

1:07:48

or you know like just

1:07:51

sort of accommodating or

1:07:53

not standing up for ourselves or whatever. And I think

1:07:56

once you can start to set really clear

1:07:59

boundaries with your choices with people,

1:08:02

a lot of this becomes easier. So I

1:08:04

think that, I think something I've evolved to

1:08:06

really feel over the past several years of working

1:08:08

in this behavior change space is, you

1:08:11

know, how much some of the sort of foundational

1:08:13

psychological stuff like actually really does

1:08:15

matter to, to be able to implement

1:08:17

some of these things long term and, you know, start small.

1:08:21

And obviously, you know,

1:08:23

yeah, I would say, you know, start small

1:08:26

and don't overlook like sort

1:08:28

of some of the psychological elements of this

1:08:31

as well. And if you feel like it's really

1:08:33

hard to adopt some of these changes, like sometimes

1:08:35

getting a coach or working with

1:08:37

an accountability partner, like a friend, you

1:08:39

know, or really starting with

1:08:41

like, why is this challenging and work

1:08:43

backwards from there like can kind of lead sometimes

1:08:45

down a really

1:08:46

great personal growth path. Journey never

1:08:48

stops. It never stops. Yeah.

1:08:50

Thank you so much for all the wisdom. It was a great conversation.

1:08:54

And where can people find your work? I

1:08:56

think it's Casey's kitchen on Instagram.

1:08:58

Where else?

1:08:59

Yeah. So a lot of stuff on

1:09:01

the levels blog. So levels health.com slash

1:09:03

blog. We also are

1:09:06

at levels on Instagram and Twitter. We

1:09:08

have a great newsletter that you can sign up for

1:09:10

levels health.com. I met Dr. Casey's

1:09:13

kitchen on Instagram and Twitter. And

1:09:15

we have an amazing YouTube channel with a

1:09:17

lot of the metabolic health thought

1:09:18

leaders that's at levels health. So

1:09:20

lots of different resources. So yeah,

1:09:23

that's where you can find

1:09:23

us. Well, thank you so much for being in

1:09:26

the trenches and doing the work. Appreciate it. Thank

1:09:28

you, Anthony.

1:09:29

Thanks for listening to this episode of the Natural Estate

1:09:31

Podcast. Hope you enjoyed it. And if you did,

1:09:34

I'd really appreciate you heading over to whatever

1:09:36

service you're listening to this podcast on, dropping

1:09:39

me a five star review in

1:09:41

your thoughts in the show. This helps us get discovered

1:09:43

by more people and spreading the good gospel

1:09:45

of health. And if you want to stay plugged into all

1:09:47

of my self health experiments, recent

1:09:49

research in books that I'm reading and my interpretations

1:09:51

of those things, products that I'm testing and

1:09:54

thoughts on all things related to health, check

1:09:56

out my free weekly newsletter called The

1:09:58

Feed. You can sign

1:09:59

up for that at

1:09:59

dr.anthonygustin.com

1:10:02

slash the feed. That's dr.anthonygustin.com

1:10:06

slash the feed. Thanks again for tuning

1:10:08

in in your support of the Natural State

1:10:10

Podcast.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features