Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This message comes from NPR sponsor
0:02
Rosetta Stone, an expert in language learning
0:04
for 30 years. Right
0:06
now, NPR listeners can get Rosetta
0:08
Stone's lifetime membership to 25 different
0:11
languages for 50% off. Learn
0:14
more at rosettastone.com. Hi,
0:18
this is Rich. This is Siri. And
0:23
we're in Denver City Park celebrating our fourth
0:26
wedding anniversary in the same cluster of trees
0:28
where we got married at the beginning of
0:30
the pandemic. This podcast
0:32
was recorded at 11
0:34
50 a.m. on Friday, May 31st, 2024. Things
0:37
may have changed by the time you hear it. Enjoy
0:39
the show. Enjoy the show. Enjoy
0:42
the show. That
0:46
was so cute. I actually feel calmer. And
0:49
I didn't think that that was possible after
0:51
this week. So thank you for that. That
0:53
was lovely. Yes. Hey there, it's the
0:55
NPR Politics podcast. I'm Deepa Shivaram. I cover
0:57
the White House. I'm Jimena Busti and I
0:59
cover politics. And I'm Domenico Montanaro, senior
1:02
political editor and correspondent. Today
1:04
on the round up, how resilient
1:06
are our democratic institutions? Big
1:08
question, but let's start here. Donald Trump
1:11
is now a convicted felon and spent
1:13
this morning continuing his attacks on the
1:15
judicial system. So we're going to be appealing this
1:18
scam. We're going to be
1:20
appealing it on many different things. He wouldn't allow us
1:22
to have witnesses. He wouldn't allow us to talk. He
1:24
wouldn't allow us to do anything. The
1:27
judge was a tyrant. OK, there,
1:29
Jimena, you are in New York outside
1:31
Trump Tower, I believe, where Trump gave
1:33
his remarks. What was the scene like
1:36
this morning? So this morning, it all
1:38
started pretty calm and there weren't a
1:40
lot of people gathered outside yet. Obviously,
1:43
that's not the case right now. You
1:45
can probably hear a lot of talking,
1:47
people walking around. Different crowds have gathered
1:49
outside of Trump Tower, where Trump gave
1:52
his speech inside to a crew of
1:54
TV reporters, print reporters, us, of course,
1:56
on several reporters were gathered. And he
1:58
reiterated a lot of the. same claims that
2:01
he has been telling us outside
2:03
the courtroom down in downtown
2:05
Manhattan, which is that he believes that
2:07
the judge is biased. He believes that
2:09
this is a political tool against him,
2:12
all without evidence, of course. And
2:15
he continues to rail against the entire
2:17
process, the entire judicial system. And
2:20
calling the judge a tyrant, like we just heard in
2:22
his remarks. Domenico, I mean, these
2:24
attacks against the judicial system, the judge,
2:26
as we heard Trump say, they've kind
2:28
of been like par for the course
2:30
for a lot of Republicans at this
2:32
point. I mean, we've heard rhetoric like
2:34
this from House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican
2:37
Senator Josh Hawley, Representative Matt Gaetz basically
2:39
saying that this trial, the judicial system
2:41
overall is a sham, right? I mean,
2:43
Josh Hawley was on Fox this morning
2:46
saying that this was an assault on the Constitution.
2:48
I mean, it's kind of worth
2:50
noting how common now it is to
2:52
kind of make these refrains. Yeah, it's
2:54
not surprising, but still kind of shocking,
2:56
honestly. I mean, being able to consistently
2:58
and quickly, immediately move to saying that
3:00
this was a scam. You know, you
3:02
have the Speaker of the House saying
3:04
it was a shameful day in America.
3:07
Trump's allies and the cadre of Republican
3:09
officials who are trying out to be
3:11
VP, sort of unofficially, all saying the
3:14
same thing, speaking from the same playbook.
3:17
And you know, you wind up having this
3:19
hyper partisanship, mostly because of this
3:21
conservative insulation that we're seeing where
3:23
they have an entire media echo
3:25
chamber that's telling them this
3:28
is all made up, this is
3:30
just politics, and stick to the
3:32
playbook and stay on the team.
3:35
And then on the other side of the equation here, I
3:37
mean, this isn't exactly something that the Biden White House or
3:39
a lot of Democrats are sort of trying to fill the
3:41
void with, right? Like you don't
3:44
really see a lot of strong rhetoric coming out saying
3:46
the opposite necessarily. And that has been interesting to
3:48
watch. Yeah, you know, nothing changes the fact
3:50
that a jury of Trump's peers, 12 people
3:53
unanimously convicted him. And no matter
3:56
what probably happens in this election,
3:58
there isn't probably an enough time
4:01
for a conviction, even if it's
4:03
overturned, before Trump winds up being
4:05
on the ballot in November, and
4:07
he has convicted felon as part
4:10
of his unofficial title. And
4:12
you know, that's definitely something Trump did not want,
4:14
had been prepping for. That's why you see the
4:17
sort of outrage on the right the way it
4:19
is, because they know that this is a serious
4:21
threat to him. On the other side, when you
4:23
have President Biden who has said basically nothing about
4:26
this at this point, even his campaign has said,
4:28
you know, it was really important here is voting
4:30
in November, which is something by the way Trump
4:32
agrees with saying that the real verdict is in
4:34
November. But
4:37
I'm curious to see how he winds up
4:40
using this or not in some of these
4:42
big tentpole events that we have coming up
4:44
the rest of this year. Yeah, and it's worth
4:46
pointing out that there is a sense from this White
4:48
House that like this is not a process that they're
4:50
involved in, right? Like they are being accused of making
4:52
a political that it's a political witch hunt. Of
4:55
course, Biden has nothing to do with the decisions
4:57
being made in that New York court. But
4:59
it is notable, I think, that that hasn't really been their
5:02
tendency to sort of jump back in and sort of
5:04
use different rhetoric to counter it. Jimena, I
5:06
mean, how much of this is going to be
5:08
part of the campaign message for Trump and
5:10
for Biden? I mean, when it comes to advertising,
5:13
messaging, fundraising, I mean, how is this factoring
5:15
in so far? Well, for
5:17
Trump, it already is a part of
5:19
the messaging. And it has been for
5:21
a while. We have heard him throughout
5:23
several campaign rallies and campaign stops talk
5:26
about what he perceives to be this
5:28
great injustice happening out in New York,
5:30
in this liberal city that is filled
5:32
with all this crime, allegedly. And he's
5:34
using that in every chance that he
5:36
gets. But we also saw as soon
5:38
as the conviction came down that
5:41
his website is auto directing
5:43
to a fundraising website where
5:45
he is labeling himself a
5:47
political prisoner and is asking
5:49
people to donate to help
5:51
him out. The
5:53
Trump campaign is already boasting having
5:56
raised millions of dollars through this
5:58
website overnight. However, it's important
6:00
to include the caveat that those
6:02
numbers, that total, cannot be fully
6:05
verified until we get the latest
6:07
FEC filings. You know, I think
6:09
what's interesting here when it comes to President
6:12
Biden is the title president, right? He's really
6:14
having to walk these two worlds because he's
6:16
both president and candidate Biden at the same
6:18
time. And he's been very reluctant to show
6:20
that he is going to be weighing in
6:22
on this, to talk about Trump as a
6:25
convicted felon, to talk about all of the
6:27
legal woes that Trump has because he hasn't
6:29
wanted to show himself to
6:31
at all be influencing the Justice Department or
6:33
to be influencing state prosecutors. But he's really
6:36
going to have to make a decision here.
6:38
We've only got five months to go. Yeah, I will
6:40
say one thing that will be really interesting to see
6:42
is if he talks about it a little more openly
6:45
in fundraising, where he doesn't have the cameras on, you
6:48
know, it's a different sort of scene. So we'll
6:50
be watching for that. And we have some big
6:52
events coming up that are going to show us
6:54
whether or not and how each of them frames
6:56
this because June 27th, less than a month from
6:58
now, we have the first debate that they agreed
7:00
to. Then you have both conventions over the summer.
7:02
Then finally, the September 10th debate. So those are
7:04
really going to be some big tentpole events to
7:06
watch. What does this really change at
7:09
the end of the day? Like the folks,
7:11
Domenico, who maybe were seeing coverage of this
7:13
or knowing that Donald Trump was facing some
7:15
kind of verdict, they
7:17
maybe already thought that he was guilty or there are
7:19
folks on their side who already thought, you know,
7:21
he was innocent. And then this was a political
7:24
scheme. So really, with this decision coming out, I
7:26
mean, does this actually change anyone's
7:28
minds at the end of the day? Yeah, it's tough.
7:30
We're going to have to see. I mean, I think
7:32
this is a moment in American politics, a moment in
7:34
American history. I think there were a lot of people
7:37
who weren't paying that close attention to this trial who
7:39
are going to be starting to tune in to figure
7:41
out what was Trump convicted of. And
7:44
then they're going to go to their favorite news
7:46
outlet for that. And if they're Republican leaning independent,
7:48
for example, and they go to Fox News or
7:50
conservative media, you know, Trump did nothing wrong. And
7:52
they're going to be more on board if they're
7:55
going to maybe more mainstream outlets, they might have
7:57
a different take on this. But already
7:59
before. going into this, the latest NPR, PBS,
8:01
Newshour, Marist poll that came out this week, found that
8:03
only 17% of people
8:05
said that they would be
8:08
less likely to vote for Trump if he was
8:10
found guilty. Some of those are partisans. It also
8:12
less likely doesn't necessarily mean that's what they're going
8:15
to do at the end of the day. I'm
8:17
really looking at some of these voter
8:19
groups that Biden is struggling with, like younger voters,
8:21
for example, they were among the highest to say
8:23
that they could have their mind changed. One in
8:26
five said that they would be less likely to
8:28
vote for Trump if he was found guilty. One
8:30
in five also said that they'd be more
8:32
likely to vote for Trump if he was
8:34
found not guilty. And only 54% of them
8:36
said that they definitely have their minds made
8:38
up. So can Biden use this to try
8:40
to bring over some of the groups that
8:42
he's been struggling with, I think is an
8:44
important thing to watch over the next few
8:46
months. Yeah, we'll have to keep an eye
8:49
on that. All right, we're going to take
8:51
a quick break. Hemena, great work on covering
8:53
this trial. Thank you so much for joining
8:55
us. Thank you. And when we get back,
8:57
investigative reporting exposes a lot more questions on
9:00
behavior by Supreme Court justices. Hello
9:03
again. So after we take this, we did
9:05
get to hear from President Biden directly before
9:07
making remarks about Israel's war in
9:09
Gaza. He made a very brief
9:12
statement about the verdict in New
9:14
York. After careful deliberation, the
9:16
jury reached a unanimous verdict. They
9:20
found Donald Trump guilty on
9:22
all 34 felony
9:24
counts. Now he'll
9:26
be given the opportunity as he should to appeal
9:29
that decision just like everyone else has
9:31
that opportunity. That's how
9:34
the American system of justice
9:36
works. And it's reckless, it's
9:39
dangerous, it's irresponsible for anyone
9:41
to say this was rigged just
9:44
because they don't like the verdict. Biden
9:46
didn't take any questions. All right, we'll be back
9:48
in a moment. and
10:00
to figure out how to make them
10:03
better. Try BetterHelp Online Therapy, designed to
10:05
be convenient, flexible, and suited to your
10:07
schedule. Get it off your
10:09
chest with BetterHelp at betterhelp.com/NPR today
10:12
to get 10% off your first
10:14
month. Support
10:16
for NPR and the following message come
10:18
from IXL Online. Is your child asking
10:20
questions on their homework you don't feel
10:23
equipped to answer? IXL Learning
10:25
uses advanced algorithms to give the right
10:27
help to each kid, no matter the
10:29
age or personality. One subscription gets
10:31
you everything, one site for all the kids in
10:33
your home, pre-K to 12th grade. Make
10:36
an impact on your child's learning. Get
10:38
IXL now. And NPR listeners
10:40
can get an exclusive 20%
10:42
off IXL membership when they
10:44
sign up today at ixl.com/NPR.
10:47
This message comes from NPR
10:50
sponsor Charles Schwab with its
10:52
original podcast on investing. Each
10:54
week hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's
10:56
chief investment strategist, and Kathy
10:59
Jones, Schwab's chief fixed income
11:01
strategist, along with their guests,
11:03
analyze economic developments and bring
11:05
context to conversations around stocks,
11:08
fixed income, the economy, and
11:10
more. Download the
11:12
latest episode and subscribe
11:15
at schwab.com/on investing or
11:17
wherever you get your podcasts. And
11:21
we're back with Kerry Johnson. Hey, Kerry.
11:23
Hey there. OK, so the theme for today's
11:25
roundup is the way public figures can and
11:27
can't be held accountable, right? And
11:30
just to lay out what's happening here, the New
11:32
York Times reported that two flags, one associated with
11:35
Trump's election denial movement and
11:37
another associated with the Christian nationalist movement,
11:40
were flown outside of homes connected to
11:42
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. Alito
11:45
says that the election denial flag, which
11:47
is basically the American flag flown upside
11:49
down, was raised up by his wife
11:51
in response to a dispute with neighbors
11:54
and isn't related to the Stop
11:56
the Steal movement. Kerry,
11:58
given the context of all this, though, So it's still
12:00
kind of concerning, right? Well,
12:02
a lot of Democrats in Congress
12:05
and a lot of people in
12:07
the legal community have raised questions
12:09
about this specifically about whether Justice
12:11
Alito should recuse himself, disqualify himself
12:14
from hearing or deciding at this
12:16
point two cases related to January
12:19
6, 2021, one involving former President Trump
12:21
and whether he enjoys some form of
12:23
immunity for his actions on and around
12:25
that day. And a second case involving
12:27
a January 6 rioter who argues the
12:29
Justice Department has misused a statute
12:31
against him. Depending
12:34
on how the Supreme Court rules in that
12:36
case, it could imperil convictions of hundreds
12:38
of other rioters on that day. Yeah.
12:41
And I mean, Alito is refusing to
12:43
recuse himself from any cases over this
12:46
and Democrats have responded, right? We did
12:48
see some movement about that in the Senate. What was
12:50
going on there? Yeah.
12:53
Several senators, including Dick Durbin, Democrat
12:55
from Illinois, chairman of the Judiciary
12:57
Committee and Sheldon Whitehouse of
12:59
Rhode Island had actually written on
13:01
John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the
13:04
United States, asking about all of these
13:06
issues. And this week, Justice
13:08
Alito responded, not the Chief Justice. Justice
13:10
Alito sent a letter saying he's not
13:12
going to step aside from deciding these
13:14
cases. He said he had nothing whatsoever
13:17
to do with the flying of the
13:19
upside down flag. He said
13:21
his wife makes her own decisions and
13:23
he respects her right to do that. He
13:25
also said, my wife is
13:27
fond of flying flags. I
13:29
am not. She was solely responsible.
13:32
He says that nothing in this
13:34
whole controversy implicates him
13:36
having to disqualify himself. And
13:39
so he's just not going to do it. And this is just
13:41
pretty unusual, all of this
13:43
to begin with. But like for a Supreme
13:46
Court justice to kind of go out on
13:48
his own, send this letter, like this is
13:50
not something we normally deal with. It is
13:52
not something that normally happens, although I will
13:54
point out that Justice Alito in the past
13:56
has reached out to reporters at Fox News
13:59
and has penned. op-eds in the Wall
14:01
Street Journal amidst criticism
14:03
of him by investigative outlets
14:05
like ProPublica and others. So
14:08
he does not exercise his right to remain
14:10
silent on the face of these controversies. He
14:12
seems to want to make his own case,
14:14
whether it's persuaded people who disagree with him,
14:17
hard to say at this point. You know, the
14:19
thing is, this is DC, right? Everyone's
14:21
spouses have jobs. Sometimes
14:23
they're high profile jobs. Sometimes
14:26
those lives intersect. This
14:28
is a flag at your home, right? And
14:30
you're saying that I couldn't really
14:32
tell her to take it down. She's half
14:34
homeowner. So, you know, what can I do
14:37
really? Shrug emoji. I mean, I know
14:39
that conservatives are buying this, but it's
14:42
hard for me to believe that a lot
14:44
of people, you know, are saying that that
14:46
makes a lot of sense to them. You
14:48
know, one thing that's interesting about this
14:50
whole debate is that a law professor,
14:53
Steve Vladek formerly of the University of
14:55
Texas about to join Georgetown has
14:58
argued that we're thinking about it
15:00
all wrong, that we shouldn't be
15:02
talking about recusal here. We should
15:04
be talking about good behavior and
15:06
how things look to reasonable people
15:08
and how justices respond to public
15:10
controversy is clearly in the
15:12
heartland of how we should evaluate them.
15:15
And by that standard, he seems to argue
15:17
that Justice Alito is not doing a
15:19
very good job and that there are
15:22
plenty of reasons to question why he's
15:24
hearing these cases and whether
15:26
he's truly impartial about them. The weird
15:28
thing, I guess, about these interesting
15:31
times that we live in where we
15:33
are having these conversations, I mean, there's
15:35
not exactly like a system to necessarily
15:37
hold these justices accountable or maybe there
15:39
is and it's not really be used
15:41
before. Like how do we deal with
15:44
this? You know, the Supreme Court has
15:46
really resisted any kind of oversight from
15:48
Congress or anyone else. In
15:50
fact, Chief Justice John Roberts has been
15:52
out there saying, including earlier this week,
15:54
that these are matters of judicial independence
15:56
and separation of powers. He refused to
15:59
even meet with Democratic lawmakers because he
16:01
basically told them it would be a
16:03
really bad look and so the justices
16:05
have adopted some kind of Ethics
16:08
code for themselves, but there's no
16:11
enforcement mechanism And it's going
16:13
to be very very hard for Democrats in
16:15
Congress or even Litigants who have cases before
16:17
the Supreme Court to make these justices do
16:19
anything They do not want to do because
16:22
they're in charge of whether they want
16:24
to recuse or not individually You know
16:26
the Supreme Court is like the last
16:28
stop in American democracy in a lot
16:30
of ways, right? They settle the disagreements
16:32
on the biggest issues that we have
16:34
in this country and public perception is
16:37
really really important Trust in the Supreme
16:39
Court is really important and that's been
16:41
on the decline in recent years Not
16:43
just since the Dobbs ruling that overturned
16:45
Roe But before that after Ruth Bader
16:47
Ginsburg died and Amy Coney Barrett was
16:49
appointed to take her place and Democrats
16:52
were upset because Mitch McConnell
16:54
Republican leader had stopped Merrick
16:56
Garland from being appointed that when Barack Obama
16:58
tried to appoint him so this goes back
17:01
away even before that because Republicans will say
17:03
that this goes back to the 80s and
17:06
Appointments that Democrats blocked back then so there's
17:08
been a lot of You
17:11
know really partisan feelings on this
17:14
But it hadn't bled over necessarily
17:16
into the public the public had
17:18
trusted the Supreme Court the FBI
17:20
a lot of other pillar institutions
17:22
in a democracy and now it
17:24
has bled over into the public where they're sort
17:26
of You know looking at the Supreme Court in
17:29
a way like it's another political branch Well,
17:31
yeah And because it is now all politicized
17:33
folks are thinking of the Supreme Court as
17:35
a political entity Which it never was supposed
17:37
to be a political entity in
17:39
theory It's kind of coming
17:41
up on the campaign trail a little bit to
17:43
Mexico. How is that sort of factoring in for both
17:45
Biden and Trump? Well, I mean, you know,
17:48
I mean I go when I think about the
17:50
campaign trail and I think about judges I often
17:52
tell people that you know people vote on things
17:54
like the economy which a president has very little
17:57
control over and they Don't vote on things like
17:59
judges and foreign policy, which a president has
18:01
much more control over. It's hard to
18:03
argue that there wouldn't be a very
18:05
different Supreme Court today had Hillary Clinton
18:07
won. And certainly we saw in the
18:09
2020 election, Democrats saying they wanted to
18:11
pack the Supreme Court, they wanted to
18:13
expand the court to be able to
18:15
add justices so that they could water
18:17
down the strength of conservatives on
18:19
the court. It is a huge
18:21
issue and it should probably be a voting issue. You
18:25
know, Deepa, President Biden famously
18:27
was in charge of the Senate
18:29
Judiciary Committee for many years. Some
18:33
people on the left, to the
18:35
left of Biden for sure, has been kind
18:37
of critical of the White House and Biden
18:39
himself for not taking on the Supreme Court
18:41
more often. What's coming out of
18:43
the White House these days? It's pretty silent overall.
18:45
This is not something, especially with this whole upside
18:47
down flag Alito situation. You know,
18:49
this is not a White House that really wants
18:51
to weigh in. They sort of like to keep
18:53
those boundaries in place, if you will. But
18:56
I will say one place where like Biden and
18:58
Harris too, they don't hesitate to bring up the
19:00
Supreme Court is on reproductive rights. Like they talk
19:02
about it in regards to dobs all the time.
19:04
And that I feel like is their campaign
19:06
kind of connector with voters where they
19:08
say you're angry about, you
19:10
know, all these abortion restrictions coming up all over
19:12
the country. Well, look who put those justices on
19:14
the court. This is Donald Trump. So that's their
19:17
kind of connector to bring the court
19:19
back into the picture. But you're right. We don't
19:21
really see Biden weighing in.
19:23
To my mind, this issue
19:25
is really underappreciated on the campaign trail.
19:28
You know, Justice Alito is 74. Justice Clarence Thomas is
19:30
75 years old.
19:34
Justice Sonia Sotomayor is 69 years
19:37
old. The next president of the United
19:39
States could have the opportunity,
19:42
depending on the decisions of these justices and
19:44
their health, to a point two or three
19:46
more justices. And that would be that would
19:49
be an enormously consequential move for either party.
19:51
I'm really shocked that hasn't come up more
19:53
in this campaign season so far. But again,
19:56
we still have five months to go. All
19:58
right, we're going to leave and
20:00
when we get back, it's time for Can't Let It Go. This
20:04
message comes from NPR sponsor
20:06
Charles Schwab with their original
20:08
podcast Choiceology, hosted by Katie
20:10
Milkman, an award-winning behavioral scientist
20:13
and author of the best-selling
20:15
book How to Change. Choiceology
20:17
is a show about the
20:19
psychology and economics behind people's
20:22
decisions. Hear true stories from
20:24
Nobel laureates, historians, authors, athletes,
20:26
and more about why people
20:28
do the things they do.
20:30
Download the latest episode and
20:33
subscribe at schwab.com slash podcast
20:35
or wherever you listen. Sorry
20:42
I has gear, clothing, classes and
20:44
advice for a camping and glamping,
20:47
biking and hiking, axeing and snack
20:49
ing. Visit your local are yeah
20:51
co op or are ya.com for
20:53
the million and one ways to
20:55
opt. Outside. and
21:09
another outdoor thing that rhymes with
21:12
backpacking. Visit your local REI Co-op
21:14
or rei.com for the
21:16
million and one ways you can
21:18
opt outside. Support
21:20
for NPR and the following message come
21:22
from Scholastic with Hummingbird by Natalie Lloyd.
21:25
Now in paperback, Hummingbird is a funny
21:27
magical tale about Olive, a girl with
21:29
brittle bone disease who refuses to let
21:31
her disability stand in the way of
21:33
adventure. And
21:35
we're back and now it's time for Can't Let It Go. That's
21:37
the part of the show where we talk about the
21:39
things that we just cannot stop thinking about,
21:41
politics or otherwise. Domenico, kick it off for
21:43
us. So what I can't let go of
21:46
is the spelling bee which took place in
21:48
the DC area. I'm always amazed with these
21:50
kids who wind up doing this because I
21:52
can't. The winner was Bruhut
21:55
Soma And I Just want you
21:57
to kind of listen a little bit to the
21:59
final. The of the round here where
22:01
he had to decide how to spell some
22:03
of these words which I would just you
22:05
know for myself off the stage where you
22:07
know. He's
22:10
a. Job
22:13
our sales. Or
22:16
pathology. A
22:19
high? yeah I know. lightning. I didn't
22:21
really do like I was reading. Be
22:23
a visit. Satisfy her. Fine. I thought
22:25
I saw. A bad dream? Have you
22:27
know the words that aren't words that's actually
22:29
crazy? Okay, wait, so do you have the
22:32
definition of what. Abs. Sale mean luckily
22:34
for that and winning word and Sale was
22:36
the winning words I wasn't as try spell
22:38
it. Breathing. As the he already
22:40
did I think. He said there wasn't even there are
22:42
better than I did in their. Says it's not
22:44
about an accounting. Apparently it's about descending.
22:47
It's descent and mountaineering by means of
22:49
a rope looped over a projection above
22:51
I omitted. are you oh so I
22:53
don't even sapphire time mountain climbers use
22:55
of so. I'm going to have
22:58
sale no such as from think so.
23:01
Oh and let their breaker.
23:04
That was the. Tie breaker: I think of lightning around
23:07
with the cyber. oh my gosh, Yeah. Okay
23:09
also let's just take a be and point out
23:11
that this is a twelve year. Old kid out.
23:13
I heard a story I think on
23:15
Npr some years ago about House Daily
23:17
to study the dictionary. read it over
23:19
and over again. You gotta know the etymology
23:22
to my ago, come on. In the
23:24
through Clary Wow, I'm from and
23:26
friends won't Congrats to brought that's
23:28
pretty amazing. Carried take it
23:30
away. My. Can't let it
23:32
go is that alcohol is no
23:35
longer going to be served in
23:37
the stands of the French Open
23:39
the same as tennis tournaments. After
23:42
multiple episodes where players complained about
23:44
unruly behavior, the worst to my
23:46
mind was that a player complained
23:48
that somebody in the stands. Spit.
23:51
Out chewed gum at the
23:54
player with cs. now oh
23:56
that's unhinged. disgusting. And then
23:58
there were other. complaints about
24:00
loud comments and other stuff.
24:03
So no more booze for you
24:05
in the sands at this uh... Dang
24:07
it! I was trying to go to the French
24:09
oven. But also does this just mean people
24:11
are like sneaking in little flasks as they
24:13
enter? Like I kind of love the potential
24:15
for nonsense to happen. You're taking me back
24:17
to college days and I'm going to take
24:19
the fifth. Yeah. Deepa,
24:21
what about you? Okay, so I have kind of a funny
24:23
can't let it go, but I feel like it really works
24:26
for today specifically because it
24:28
is the last day of AAPI
24:30
Heritage Month. And my thing that
24:32
I can't let go of is that earlier this week
24:34
our lovely colleague Asma Khalid just came up to
24:36
me in our office and was just like, hey,
24:38
do you want this mango from Pakistan? And
24:41
obviously you would never say no to
24:43
a question like that. And Asma had
24:46
the incredible opportunity to obtain
24:48
a lot of mangoes from
24:50
Pakistan, which if you guys don't know, mangoes
24:52
they are just... they hit different.
24:55
They are made different, the fibers are
24:57
different, it's sweeter, it's just better all
24:59
around, and you can't buy them here.
25:01
So it is a genuine treat to
25:03
have had just one tiny little mango
25:05
this week, absolutely made my day. I
25:07
have so many memories of like cutting mangoes
25:10
in our kitchen with my family and like the way
25:12
you kind of score the mango and eat it with the spoon
25:14
and you suck on the seed and there's just
25:16
like fibers in your teeth and juice running down
25:18
your arms. Like it is just the epitome of
25:20
summer to me and just such a fun way
25:22
to like feel really connected with your culture and
25:25
your homeland and your family and things like that.
25:27
So all of that from like a tiny little
25:29
fruit that I got today
25:31
was very kind of her to share. And
25:33
that is what I can't let go of.
25:35
That sounds so amazing. But central question, did
25:37
she share her source with you? Are
25:39
you going to get your own secret? All I heard
25:42
is that involved a guy with like a
25:44
trunk full of mangoes potentially outside the airport. I
25:46
don't know any details. This mango
25:48
fell off a truck. Yeah, amazing. I
25:50
need to do some digging, some
25:52
potential investigative journalism to learn more. I will let
25:55
you know or maybe I won't and I'll just keep
25:57
them all for myself. Okay, too. All
26:00
right, we're going to leave it there for today.
26:02
Our executive producer is Muthoni Maturi. Our editor is
26:04
Eric McDaniel. Our producers are
26:06
Jenn-Yoon Han, Casey Morel, and Kelly Wesinger. Special
26:09
thanks to Kelsey Snell and Lexi Schapittle. I'm
26:12
Deepa Shivarom. I cover the White House. I'm
26:14
Divinika Muntanar, our senior political editor and correspondent. And
26:16
I'm Kerri Johnson. I cover the Justice Department. And
26:18
thank you for listening to the NPR Politics podcast.
26:29
This message comes from NPR sponsor Mint
26:31
Mobile. From the gas pump to the
26:33
grocery store, inflation is everywhere. So
26:36
Mint Mobile is offering premium wireless starting at
26:38
just $15 a month. To
26:40
get your new phone plan for just $15, go
26:43
to mintmobile.com/switch. Support
26:47
for NPR and the following message come
26:49
from IXL Learning. IXL Learning uses advanced
26:51
algorithms to give the right help to
26:54
each kid, no matter the age or
26:56
personality. Get an exclusive 20% off
26:59
IXL membership when you sign
27:01
up today at ixl.com/NPR. Last
27:04
year, over 20,000 people joined
27:07
the Body Electric Study to
27:09
change their sedentary, screen-filled lives.
27:12
And guess what? We saw amazing
27:14
effects. Now you can try
27:16
NPR's Body Electric Challenge yourself.
27:19
Listen to updated and new episodes
27:21
wherever you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More