0:00

This is the story of the one. As

0:02

head of maintenance at a concert hall, he

0:04

knows the show must always go on. That's

0:07

why he works behind the scenes, ensuring every

0:09

light is working, the HVAC is

0:11

humming, and his facility shines.

0:14

With Granger's supplies and solutions for

0:16

every challenge he faces, plus 24-7 customer support,

0:20

his venue never misses a beat.

0:22

Call quickgranger.com or just stop by.

0:25

Granger. For the ones who get it done.

0:32

Music

0:51

Using free speech to free

0:53

minds. You're

0:56

listening to The David Knight

0:58

Show. As

1:14

the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the

1:17

2nd of July. You're of our Lord, 2024.

1:22

Well, today we're going to take a look at Civil War. Is

1:25

this what the great replacement about Biden

1:27

is really about? I mean,

1:29

we've had... These two guys have been

1:31

channeled through the system without

1:34

any debates, without any primaries.

1:39

They have a debate before. We've ever

1:41

had a debate before. They become the

1:44

nominees. What kind of a

1:46

selection process are we in? As

1:49

we see, the Trump has created a civil war within the

1:51

Republican Party. Now Biden is doing the

1:53

same thing within the Democrat Party. But

1:55

is there, as we

1:57

look at these rulings coming out, with the Supreme Court,

2:00

Court, are they setting everybody up

2:02

for an expectation and

2:04

they're going to be so disappointed if they don't get their

2:06

way? I mean, now everybody's

2:08

even more certain that Trump

2:10

is going to win. So we're going to take

2:12

a look at that. We're also going to take

2:14

a look at some updates with pharmaceuticals. There

2:17

may be something that can be done

2:19

about autism and some hope with

2:21

that. We'll take a look at the Supreme Court decisions. And

2:24

we have Eric Peters, who is going to be

2:26

joining us in the third hour. A lot of

2:28

things to talk about. We'll be right back. Yeah,

2:37

last night I was on late with Clyde

2:40

Lewis. He's on the West Coast and he's

2:43

in the late evening. And so it

2:45

was after midnight for me. So if

2:47

I have some Biden moments here, what's

2:50

going on with this stuff? I had like two

2:53

or three hours of sleep last night. But

2:57

as we were talking and he was going

3:00

through the different angles with what is happening

3:03

with the

3:05

great replacement, let's just call it that. Right. Great

3:08

replacement. That was a conspiracy. Well,

3:10

no, we know there is a

3:13

conspiracy. They are breathing together and all

3:16

these different globalist organizations, whether it's World Economic

3:18

Forum or the UN or these other things,

3:20

they want to replace indigenous people and

3:24

all of the different countries. They want to

3:26

replace them with somebody else. They want to

3:28

bring in a lot of different ethnic groups

3:30

and large numbers so we fight

3:32

amongst ourselves. They've got us

3:35

fighting amongst ourselves now within the political parties

3:37

as well. So you've

3:40

got to fight within the Democrats. So

3:43

it is kind of interesting. And

3:45

I see Trump, as I've

3:47

said many times, as the Mason

3:49

Dixon line. That was going to be the line

3:52

that's going to divide the two different parties. Right.

3:54

And he has been the line that divides these

3:56

two different parties. And so

3:58

when you look at this. long-term selection. And that's

4:00

what it is, folks. It's why I talk

4:03

about this. I don't want you to get caught up into

4:06

this show, into this production,

4:09

into the mythology of the

4:11

all-powerful and benevolent president who's

4:13

going to fix everything. Don't

4:17

get caught up into that. Don't follow

4:19

into that. And we see this

4:21

really happening a lot at this point in time. We've

4:24

got Trump amplifying

4:27

calls to jail top

4:29

elected officials. During the

4:31

song, his truth social. You've got a lot of people

4:33

out there saying, jail them all, jail them all. Of

4:35

course, that's what Bannon is saying. Bannon

4:38

is a very, very dangerous

4:41

grifter. He and

4:43

Jack Bassoviet, Alex Jones, people of that

4:45

ilk, what they're doing is the same

4:47

thing they did four years ago. And

4:51

I've played for you the clips of Bannon talking

4:53

to some Chinese

4:55

investors around this guy.

4:57

Is he a fraudster?

5:00

Is he a whistleblower?

5:03

Is he a freedom fighter, this

5:05

Guo guy that Bannon

5:08

hangs out with? He attaches

5:10

himself to these powerful billionaires

5:13

and he's already been caught

5:17

committing fraud. He was

5:19

the only one that got pardoned by Trump. So

5:21

he knows how to attach himself to powerful

5:24

people to get what he wants. All the rest of the people

5:26

who were involved in that Bill the

5:28

Walgift are in prison. But

5:31

Bannon's not in prison for that. And

5:35

so they're making all these statements,

5:37

rest them all. You get these

5:39

people. There's not anybody on the

5:41

Trump side that's saying, you know,

5:43

this law fair is wrong and

5:46

we're going to put some reforms in so this doesn't happen

5:48

again. We kind

5:50

of got that with the Supreme Court decision

5:52

yesterday, but that's not coming from the

5:55

political operatives in the Republican party at

5:57

all. No, they're out there saying, we're

5:59

going to get those guys. We're going to get them. We're going to do

6:01

the same thing to them. They're trying to do to us and worse, right?

6:05

That's the problem. You see that's

6:07

the problem. They want revenge not

6:10

reform That's the issue

6:13

And I'm not going to support them on that

6:16

and you understand why they're doing this. You need

6:18

to be very careful. Keep your distance emotionally

6:21

intellectually physically, especially

6:24

From people like Steve Bannon Jack the Soviet

6:26

Alex Jones. Don't let them do another January

6:28

the 6th to you and Trump Is at

6:30

the top of it? Passive

6:36

Passive-aggressive at the top doing

6:38

all this stuff and so

6:40

on true social Some

6:43

people put out stuff about arresting everybody and he

6:45

retweets it and so the New York Times, right?

6:47

It's a post about it. Drudge puts it at

6:49

the top of the drudge report. This is fuel

6:51

to the fire for the Civil War Does Trump

6:53

not know that does he not know

6:55

that if he repost these? threats

6:58

against people That

7:00

that's going to escalate the tensions does he want

7:02

a civil war to the people who run him?

7:05

He's run, you know, he's run by the

7:07

CIA. He's run by different factions of and

7:09

and so is Biden Is

7:12

this why these two guys have been picked? You

7:15

think about it as I said before whether Trump gets

7:17

in or gets out and it doesn't make it either

7:19

way There's going to be

7:21

a large segment of the country that wants to fight about

7:23

it already already and

7:27

So perhaps this is why you know,

7:29

if you look at why everybody wants

7:31

to look at this This

7:33

debate that happened last Thursday Yeah,

7:36

it is interesting as I said take a

7:38

look at how they cleared the decks for

7:40

these guys how they had the debate Before

7:44

the nominating conventions and all the rest of stuff.

7:46

But do you realize just

7:48

look at how abnormal this whole cycle has

7:50

been Trump

7:52

was able to skip all debates why because

7:54

the lawfare the lawfare cleared the decks for

7:57

him He wasn't a

7:59

victim of lawfare He was a

8:01

beneficiary of lawfare. Could

8:03

it be that the people

8:05

who are running this selection, the

8:07

CIA, wanted to put him forward?

8:10

They didn't want to have a discussion of issues? They

8:12

didn't want to have questioned what was done the last

8:15

four years? And of course, when you look at the

8:17

debate, there was no questioning of

8:19

any of the dictates and edicts

8:21

and executive orders. Don't

8:23

talk to me about a president as

8:26

king. Sotomayor is wringing her hands

8:28

about this kind of stuff. Where were you

8:30

four years ago when this stuff

8:32

was happening? You didn't care about any of that.

8:35

And the Supreme Court rubber stamped that stuff. Now the

8:37

one is like, oh, the president is king. Executive

8:40

order after executive order, now they notice because

8:44

it's specific to their

8:46

little lawfare, right? But

8:50

they have greased the

8:52

skids for both Biden shutting

8:54

down primaries, not having

8:57

any debates, same

8:59

thing with Trump. And it was

9:01

the Democrats' lawfare that did that. Everybody

9:03

saw it. Carville saw it. I

9:05

saw it. Everybody on left and right,

9:08

all of the opponents of

9:10

Trump and the

9:12

Republican Party were saying, what's going on?

9:14

I mean, this is, they're making a

9:16

hero out of him. I'll never forget

9:18

the press conference that DeSantis had to

9:20

talk about CBDC, digital

9:22

big brother, he said, with a sign that was there.

9:25

He spends 20 minutes talking about the evils

9:27

of CBDC and what he's doing at the

9:30

state level to stop it. Then they

9:32

go to questions. First question, what about Trump

9:34

and this Manhattan district attorney? Nobody

9:38

wanted to talk about any issue. That became

9:40

the issue. The lawfare

9:43

that they did against Trump shut

9:45

down any discussion of the past

9:47

four years about

9:50

the Marshall law, about the

9:52

vaccines, about the deaths, shut

9:55

all that stuff down, silenced

9:57

all of their opponents and put them through. So,

10:00

yeah, I see a rig going on

10:03

here. It's not just that this debate was

10:05

set up and rigged, and, you know, as

10:08

Dr. Shiva pointed out yesterday, so suddenly

10:11

they gave him all of his

10:13

puppy uppers, and he was just

10:16

fine. Biden was the next day

10:18

or so when he had that next rally. He's

10:21

missing for an entire week. Who's running

10:23

the government? Is our

10:25

king running the government? How does the government run

10:28

without a president? How do we all survive? I

10:31

don't know how I survive for a week

10:33

without Biden in the White House issuing orders

10:35

and commands. How did you

10:37

survive? God

10:41

bless and keep the czar far away from

10:43

us. I'm

10:45

fiddling on the roof. Yeah, that's the prayer for

10:47

the czar, the prayer for the emperor. God

10:50

bless and keep Biden far away

10:52

from us and Trump and

10:56

this imperial presidency and everybody in Washington. But look,

10:58

the whole thing is rigged to push these guys

11:00

forward. That's what you should be concerned about. And

11:02

think about the fact that this, they keep reasserting

11:04

2030, 2030, 2030. They're

11:07

now saying, even with some of these actions, you got

11:09

to accelerate this. We're going to be done by 2030.

11:12

Do this faster. They're seeing this type of stuff

11:14

coming out of multiple issues from the U.N. Well,

11:17

what gets us to 2030? Well,

11:21

this next presidency is going to go from 2025 to 2029. That's

11:27

when everything's going to accelerate. And

11:30

it's going to be one of these two guys. It's

11:32

going to be a disgruntled, divided America

11:34

that they're creating here. And

11:37

who knows what they're going to do with World War Three as well.

11:40

So Trump amplifies the

11:42

calls to jail. Top elected officials invokes

11:44

military tribunals, says the New York Times.

11:46

Trump over the weekend escalated his vows

11:49

to prosecute his political

11:51

opponents, circulating posts on

11:53

his social media website, invoking, quote,

11:55

televised military tribunals, calling for the

11:58

jailing of Biden. Hala

12:00

Harris, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer,

12:02

Mike Pence, and many other

12:05

politicians. He,

12:07

his account, promoted two posts from other

12:09

users of the site that call for

12:11

the jailing of perceived political enemies. But

12:14

it's not even that. It's the

12:16

rhetoric of people like Biden, Bannon, who

12:18

just went to jail and before he goes to jail,

12:20

he's out there, he's, we're gonna get all these guys,

12:22

we're gonna throw them in jail, you watch, we're gonna

12:24

get them all, and yeah, that type of thing. Full

12:28

of hubris, totally ignorant. If you wanna

12:30

go into civil war, do you wanna

12:32

get somebody that doesn't know how to

12:34

do anything? Well, then let Bannon and

12:36

Trump run the civil war for you.

12:39

You're gonna go into a civil war with two

12:41

of the worst generals ever. Trump,

12:44

who doesn't know that Gina Haspel, but he's put

12:46

in CIA, is stabbing

12:48

in the back or pulling his strings or whatever you

12:50

wanna, however you wanna view it. He

12:53

doesn't know any of that. He's totally clueless

12:55

about that. He's totally

12:57

clueless about Robert Barr. He doesn't understand.

13:01

And these Goldman Sachs bankers and the military

13:03

industrial complex generals, he doesn't know any of

13:05

that kind of stuff. And

13:07

you got Steve Bannon out there who doesn't

13:09

have the intelligence to go to a hearing

13:14

and to plead the fifth? That's all he had to

13:16

do. Well, I got

13:18

bad advice from my lawyer. Oh, okay, so you

13:20

don't know anything then? You know

13:23

nothing? I didn't need advice from a lawyer to know

13:25

that you just show up at the trial and plead

13:27

the fifth. Stupid.

13:30

He didn't do it because he got bad

13:32

advice. He did it because he wanted to

13:36

be a big guy. And now he got what he

13:38

wanted. He's a martyr now for

13:40

manga. And again,

13:42

there is a double standard. Hunter

13:45

Biden did exactly the same thing. There's no indictment

13:47

or anything coming, even from the Republicans who are

13:49

in the majority now. They're not gonna do that.

13:52

But the perception is that Trump

13:54

will do that, that

13:57

he will respond in kind, that he will escalate it in

13:59

the same way. He was

14:01

all against these

14:03

different voting measures. Now they're

14:05

going to jump in and do it even

14:07

better than the other guys did. So

14:11

Liz Cheney, guilty of treason said the post

14:13

returned, or retruth it if

14:16

you want televised military tribunals.

14:18

And so Trump retruth

14:21

it. The

14:24

separate post included photos of

14:26

15 current former elected officials.

14:30

In all capital letters, they should be the

14:32

ones going to jail on Monday, not Steve

14:34

Bannon. And

14:37

so it had all the people from the

14:39

January the 6th committee in it. In a

14:41

statement, the Trump campaign did not address Mr.

14:43

Trump's posts when they were

14:45

contacted by the New York Times. Shouldn't

14:48

we have a leader who's trying to bring

14:50

people together? Isn't that

14:53

what they say they always want to do? They don't

14:55

even pay lip service to that anymore. No,

14:57

he wants to divide people. Biden wants to

15:00

divide people. Both of these guys that they

15:02

have greased the skids for, both

15:06

of them want division chaos, warfare,

15:11

civil warfare. In

15:14

a statement, the Trump campaign did not address

15:16

these posts, instead repeating allegations of misconduct by

15:18

members of the committee. The

15:21

Trump campaign said, Liz Cheney and the

15:23

sham January the 6th committee banned key

15:25

witnesses, shielded important evidence and destroyed documents.

15:27

So they kind of doubled down on

15:29

it. Do you really want to put

15:31

her in jail? Well, Liz Cheney did all these things. So yeah,

15:34

the Biden campaign said Trump is doubling

15:37

down on the threats to our democracy

15:39

so they can present themselves as a

15:43

conciliatory when they're not, they're

15:45

not at all. So

15:47

is the New York Times exaggerating this? Yes,

15:49

to some degree. But

15:53

again, he's pushing revenge instead of

15:55

reform. And

15:57

he's doing it through Bannon. He's doing it

15:59

through other. surrogates. And

16:02

what Bannon has said is far

16:04

more threatening than what was done in

16:07

these posts that were retweeted. These

16:09

people are not fit for leadership. They don't

16:12

have the temperament for leadership. They don't have

16:14

the judgment for leadership. Do not follow them.

16:17

I hope people can see this and

16:19

see how you will be abandoned and

16:22

thrown under the bus just like

16:24

they did to all their followers

16:26

on January the 6th. Not a

16:28

pardon for any of them. Again,

16:30

Trump could have preemptively pardoned all

16:32

of them as

16:34

a class. Andrew

16:37

Jackson did it for hundreds of thousands,

16:39

not Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson did it

16:41

for hundreds of thousands of Confederate soldiers

16:43

because he wanted the Civil War to

16:45

stop. These guys

16:47

do not want the Civil War to be

16:49

headed off. They want to stoke it. So

16:54

what is happening with a great replacement? Well, you

16:57

have polls coming out. This one is

16:59

from something called SurveyUSA, which I don't

17:01

recall seeing them too much. But

17:04

they claim that the majority of Democrats want

17:06

to keep Biden on the ticket.

17:08

Like I said, there's something of a Civil

17:10

War there. So you see James Carville making

17:13

the rounds on CNN. He's exasperating, exasperated.

17:17

He is exasperating as well,

17:19

but he himself is exasperating

17:21

this time. Carville began by

17:23

citing recent polling saying

17:25

that 72% of Americans didn't believe Biden had the

17:27

mentally cognitive development to be president. We

17:29

got countries, 72% want something

17:32

different. If the Democrat party can't produce

17:34

something different than 72% of people want,

17:36

why do we exist? What are we

17:38

here for? I've been asking that about

17:40

Democrats all my life. Why

17:44

do they exist? What are they here for?

17:46

They hate all the principles that America was

17:48

founded on. Just go to a communist country.

17:51

You don't have to make this country. There's

17:53

plenty of communist authoritarian countries for you Democrats.

17:55

You don't have to do this

17:58

to America. I

18:01

mean, the country's clamoring for change. Why are they

18:03

going to offer them the same old stuff? You

18:06

said, so, you know, you

18:08

said the Democrat Party is so committed to

18:10

status quo, so committed sticking with something that

18:12

three quarters of the country doesn't even want.

18:15

Then we have to say, why do we exist? And

18:18

then they moved on to how they would

18:20

replace Biden. How

18:23

would you do that? Since you shut down

18:26

all the other candidates, since you shut down

18:28

the primaries, you shut down the debate, you

18:30

pushed RFK Jr. out. He's out there trying

18:32

to run as an independent. Other people who

18:35

wanted to run got shut down.

18:37

Same thing on the Republican side. Same

18:40

thing. Shut down by the

18:43

lawfare, making Trump a martyr, a

18:45

hero to his people. So

18:48

what are they going to do? Are they going to have open forums around the country?

18:51

Yeah, we used to call those debates. We

18:54

used to have primaries. Here's the Democrats. They don't

18:56

want to have any voting in their primaries. Yeah,

18:58

what are you there for? They

19:01

don't even want democracy.

19:05

They want dictatorship. Anyway,

19:08

it's scoffing at the

19:10

arguments that Biden had just had a bad night or

19:12

a cold or the staff had overworked him. He hadn't

19:15

been anywhere for seven days. That's

19:18

all utter nonsense we're hearing. President

19:21

Biden is a great guy, and I'm a great guy

19:23

too, but I don't have any business running any campaigns

19:25

anymore, he said. And he's getting pretty old. And

19:28

so when we

19:30

look at what is coming up in the future,

19:32

we look at the corruption, especially, you know, Biden.

19:36

Tens of millions, perhaps as

19:38

John Solomon's investigation showed, 120 million.

19:42

As I mentioned, the money laundering and how they

19:44

refinanced this house that they got for like $350,

19:46

$390,000 or something 20 years ago, they've been refinancing

19:49

it about every year

19:53

and a half. They've done about

19:56

15 of these things or something. And

19:58

so they bought this house for $350,000. They've

20:00

now got $4 million

20:03

in refinancing in it. Isn't

20:06

that strange? I mean, do

20:09

you refinance your house every year and a half on

20:11

a regular basis for a couple of

20:13

decades? That

20:16

is a technique

20:19

that some people have used to launder money.

20:21

So we got all this corruption on the

20:23

Democrat side. It's not just the $10 million

20:26

in Hunter's laptop and the 10% for the big

20:29

guy and all the rest of the stuff. Massive

20:31

amounts of corruption, but they're not gonna do anything

20:33

about it. And then

20:35

on the Trump side, Trump Tower is

20:37

gonna be going to Saudi Arabia. Trump

20:41

Organization revealed plans yesterday to develop a

20:43

luxury Trump Tower in Saudi Arabia. Is

20:45

this a fallback position now that the

20:47

line is not gonna be built anymore?

20:52

Yeah, they're gonna put it in Jeddah.

20:54

It's gonna be their first major

20:56

project in Saudi Arabia, but the Trump

20:58

Organization has already done one in Oman.

21:02

And I guess as people look at

21:04

it, I say, oh man. But Jared

21:07

Kushner, after he was out

21:09

of, Trump was

21:11

out of office for six months, Jared Kushner was

21:13

given $2 billion

21:17

by the Saudis and it was by Mohammed

21:19

bin Salman. It came

21:21

from the Sovereign Wealth Fund. The

21:24

Sovereign Wealth Fund. This is what

21:27

the Royal Family, quote unquote,

21:30

and Saudi Arabia, King Faisal, that

21:32

mob, it

21:36

got massive amount of money. They put

21:38

it into this investment fund and

21:40

they decided they'd invest in Jared Kushner and Trump.

21:44

And so $2 billion there

21:46

coming out of MBS's fund.

21:50

So this new project in Saudi Arabia comes

21:52

just days after the Trump

21:54

Organization unveiled a half

21:56

a billion dollar Trump

21:58

International Hotel complex. So Saudi

22:02

Arabia has a long history of

22:05

trying to influence

22:07

Donald Trump, said one person. Here, remember back

22:09

when we saw him doing the sword dance.

22:12

There we go. The

22:14

cringe moment where

22:16

you got, there's Wilbur Ross.

22:20

There's Rikes Tillerson, Secretary of State.

22:23

They look real comfortable doing that, don't they? Yeah.

22:26

They don't have the backbone

22:28

to say no to something like that. And

22:31

then this ominous picture of Trump

22:34

with his Saudi visit. This

22:37

is when they were unveiling the

22:40

surveillance network

22:42

technology that they're putting in

22:44

Saudi Arabia, because,

22:46

you know, that's such a democratic regime,

22:48

so respectful of human rights. Look

22:51

at this. Is that the Palantir

22:53

there? They got that glowing orb. They all got

22:55

their hands on it. It's like the Palantir, because

22:58

Palantir is really running

23:00

our data mining spying stuff for our

23:02

government. I am Leda. I work as

23:05

a content developer. We develop

23:07

videos, infographics and motion graphics

23:09

to combat extremist content. Yeah,

23:12

extremist. Yeah, combat extremist

23:15

content. I

23:20

guess it'd be everything in Saudi Arabia. Do

23:22

you have a Bible? Not extremist in

23:25

Saudi Arabia. Well, you get the idea. And

23:30

there he is. He's got his hand right there,

23:32

hand in hand with the Saudis. Got

23:35

their hands on that glowing orb. It's

23:40

just 4-D chess, folks. Nothing to be concerned

23:42

about. He knows exactly what he's doing. I'm

23:44

afraid maybe he does. We're

23:46

going to take a quick break, and we'll be right

23:48

back. Man.

24:00

They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They

24:04

created Common Past to track

24:08

and control us. Their Commons

24:10

Project to make sure the

24:12

commoners own nothing and

24:15

the communist future. They

24:18

see the common man as simple, unsophisticated,

24:20

ordinary. But

24:22

each of us has worth and dignity

24:25

created in the image of God. That

24:28

is what we have in common. That

24:31

is what they want to take away.

24:33

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception,

24:37

intimidation. They desire

24:39

to know everything about us while

24:41

they hide everything from us. It's

24:44

time to turn that around and

24:47

expose what they want to hide.

24:49

Please share the information and links

24:51

you'll find at thedavidnightshow.com. Thank

24:54

you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If

25:02

you can't support us financially, please keep us in

25:04

your prayers. thedavidnightshow.com.

25:08

Well, let's talk about the Supreme

25:11

Court case about immunity. Of course, this

25:13

is a big

25:30

one that everybody was waiting for. I really thought they were

25:32

going to release it on Friday because typically when they do

25:34

is release this stuff at the end of June. That

25:37

was the end of June. I didn't think they were going

25:39

to release it before the debate, especially with it being so

25:41

close. But I was really pretty surprised that they didn't release

25:43

it on Friday, but they

25:45

did release it yesterday. So

25:48

the Supreme Court rules that Trump

25:50

has some immunity from prosecution, and

25:53

they sent this January the 6th case back

25:55

to the lower court. So basically

25:58

this is going to move this This

26:01

passed the election. As

26:04

LifeSite News says, and perhaps its most consequential ruling

26:06

of its current session – this is one that

26:09

all the people were looking for

26:11

in the mainstream media as well

26:13

as the politics – they said

26:15

that presidents have, quote, absolute immunity

26:17

from prosecution regarding their core constitutional

26:20

powers, but that they

26:22

are not entitled to immunity for actions

26:24

undertaken in private. And so this begs

26:26

the question, what is an official act

26:28

and what is an unofficial act? And

26:32

so we get some hints here and there

26:35

in terms of this

26:37

decision. Most people see it as

26:39

a pushback against the lawfare

26:41

of the Biden administration. But

26:44

of course, the three liberal justices, two

26:46

from Obama, one from Biden, see

26:49

this as the end of the world. The

26:52

immunity applies equally to all occupants of the

26:54

Oval Office, they said. Sonia

26:57

Sotomayor had a

26:59

searing, dissenting opinion. She

27:02

said, let the president violate the law. Now,

27:05

where was she again in 2020

27:07

and 2021 when both of these presidents

27:09

were doing that kind

27:12

of stuff? Didn't have

27:14

a problem with that at all. Let the president

27:16

violate the law. Let him exploit the trappings of

27:18

his office for personal gain like

27:21

both Trump and Biden. Let

27:23

him use his official power for evil ends because

27:25

if he knew that he might one day face

27:27

liability for breaking the law,

27:30

he might not be as bold and

27:32

fearless as we would like him to

27:34

be, she said sarcastically. That's

27:36

the majority's message today. Even if these nightmare

27:38

scenarios never play out, and I pray they

27:40

never do, the damage has been

27:42

done. The relationship between the

27:45

president and the people he serves has

27:48

shifted irrevocably. The

27:50

president is now a king above

27:52

the law. If

27:55

he wants to order the Navy SEAL Team

27:57

Six to assassinate a political rival, immune. Organized

27:59

as a military. a coup to hold on

28:01

to power? Immune. Take subribe in exchange for

28:03

a pardon? Immune, immune, immune, immune." She writes.

28:05

Now she's having a fit. AOC

28:08

did too. Engagement in

28:10

the cortex. Her

28:13

brain was firing but in

28:16

the wrong direction. Let

28:18

the president violate the law. Let him exploit the trappings

28:20

of his office for personal gain. Let

28:23

him use his official power for evil ends because he

28:27

will be able to do whatever he wishes.

28:30

That's the majority's message today, she

28:32

said. Well again,

28:34

you know, when we have all

28:38

of, when we use Ukraine or Afghanistan

28:40

as a site

28:42

for money laundering, when

28:44

we use Afghanistan as a

28:47

hub for massive drug trafficking

28:49

and manufacturing, if

28:51

it's not an official act, I mean, it's just, it's

28:53

okay. And so I'm

28:56

not completely on board with what these guys

28:58

do, but part of this is

29:01

that you don't remove

29:03

a president even, and this questioning about

29:06

assassinating a rival with SEAL Team Six,

29:09

the remedy has always been that

29:11

you remove the president from office

29:14

by impeaching him. And

29:16

then after he is removed, after

29:19

that impeachment is successful, then

29:22

you can try them for the crimes that

29:24

they have committed. And

29:26

so in one sense, it seems like

29:29

what they'd had before, but it is

29:31

a bit different. The

29:34

president has duties of unrivaled gravity

29:36

and breadth, wrote the majority has

29:38

authority to act necessarily stems either

29:40

from an act of Congress or

29:42

from the constitution itself. So

29:46

what happens when they do something like the

29:49

lockdown and the warp speed stuff and the

29:51

mandates and the other things like that? Is

29:56

that okay? Certainly isn't okay

29:58

with me. The fight

30:00

was described earlier by a former

30:02

attorney general from Arizona who said, I

30:04

think the court recognizes it might be

30:06

a dangerous precedent if future presidents can

30:08

prosecute their political rivals. That's what

30:10

this is really trying to address. That's

30:14

what Biden is obviously doing. Everybody sees

30:16

that. They

30:18

will set a limiting principle because under

30:20

the prosecutor's theory, future prosecutors would have

30:22

a lot of power to persecute their

30:25

rivals. So

30:27

the question now is what is an official

30:30

act and what is an unofficial act? Well,

30:32

this is what the court said. Nor

30:35

may the courts deem an action unofficial

30:37

merely because it allegedly violates a generally

30:39

applicable law. Otherwise, presidents would be subject

30:41

to trial on every allegation that an

30:44

action was unlawful. The

30:47

court said, for example, the indictment alleges that

30:49

as part of their conspiracy, this is what

30:51

gets to the specifics of this case. The

30:54

indictment alleges that as part of their conspiracy,

30:56

they would overturn the legitimate results of 2020

30:58

presidential election. Trump and

31:00

his co-conspirators attempted to leverage the

31:03

Justice Department's power and authority to

31:06

convince certain states to replace their

31:08

legitimate electors with Trump's fraudulent slates

31:10

of electors. According to

31:12

the indictment, Trump met with the

31:14

acting attorney general and other senior Justice

31:16

Department and White House officials to discuss

31:19

investigating purported election fraud

31:22

and sending a letter from the department to those

31:24

states regarding such fraud. The

31:26

executive branch has exclusive authority

31:28

and absolute discretion to

31:31

decide which crimes to investigate and

31:33

to prosecute, including with

31:35

respect to allegations of election crime.

31:39

So what they're saying is that was within his purview

31:42

to do that. And

31:45

they went on to say the

31:47

indictments allegations that requested investigations were

31:49

shams or proposed

31:51

for an improper purpose. Do not

31:54

divest the president of exclusive authority

31:56

over the investigative and

31:58

prosecutorial functions of the Justice Department

32:00

and its officials. Because

32:03

the president cannot be prosecuted for conduct

32:05

within his exclusive constitutional authority, in other

32:07

words, telling the Department of Justice to

32:09

investigate this or that. Trump

32:12

is absolutely immune from prosecution for alleged

32:14

conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department

32:16

officials. I'm kinda surprised the Democrats

32:18

would take exception of this, because what

32:21

this does is this gives Biden

32:24

immunity from using Merrick Garland to

32:26

attack his political enemies. You

32:30

know, he's just directing the, he's

32:33

just directing his attorney general to go after his

32:35

political enemies. What's wrong with that? What's

32:40

wrong with using the IRS to go after your political

32:42

enemies? And on

32:44

and on and on. I

32:47

understand that you don't want the president tied

32:50

down with

32:54

one allegation after the other, saying

32:57

that what they did was illegal. But

32:59

again, I think the appropriate response is not to

33:02

hold them harmless, but I think the appropriate response

33:05

is the impeachment process. And

33:08

of course, I think it did what it

33:11

should have done. You

33:13

had a partisan impeachment, a partisan indictment in

33:15

the House, and yet when it went to

33:17

the Senate, they

33:19

couldn't get a conviction in the Senate. So

33:21

it's done. It's a moot issue then. He

33:25

was not found guilty. AOC

33:27

melts down over the latest SCOTUS ruling.

33:29

Her response is impeach the court. That's

33:33

the, get those guys on the court now. Just

33:36

keeps it getting bigger and bigger. These Jacobins out

33:38

there. And

33:40

they're pseudo French revolution. She

33:43

files articles of impeachment against the Supreme

33:45

Court justices. Wait a minute. Weren't

33:47

they acting officially? This

33:50

is how messed up. There

33:53

isn't anybody who wants, can

33:56

we all just get along? The

33:59

Rodney. thing. Can't we all just

34:01

get along? There isn't anybody watching who wants to get along

34:03

anymore. They don't want to have any, you know,

34:07

congelliality there. They want to just lock

34:09

up or kill their opposition. And

34:12

that's where this is all, the spirit

34:14

of this is all coming from. And

34:17

so as we look at

34:19

that, and again, we'll have to see how this plays

34:22

out. But for the

34:24

most part, they have, they've

34:26

certainly given a victory to Trump in terms

34:28

of the timeframe that is there. And it

34:32

looks like they're going to shut down anything

34:34

and everything that had to do around January

34:37

the 6th. You still have the documents case,

34:39

I guess. A question

34:41

would be whether or not him taking these documents

34:43

after he's out of office, whether that's an official

34:45

act. But again, look at

34:47

the fact that Biden did

34:49

the same thing as a vice president.

34:53

He just takes these documents and sticks them

34:55

in his garage behind his Corvette. Mike Pence

34:57

did the same thing and so forth. This

35:01

is a crime that they

35:03

are selectively prosecuting. Everybody sees it. In

35:05

the same way that when you look

35:07

at Bannon and you look at Hunter

35:09

Biden, they are selective in their prosecution.

35:12

We all know that this is political

35:14

lawfare. It's persecution of their opponents. And

35:18

so in that sense, I think the Supreme Court decided

35:20

they had to do something about it. But

35:23

anyway, they have had

35:25

yet another bad decision about

35:28

free speech. Amy

35:31

Coney Barrett just doesn't get

35:33

it. She

35:35

didn't get it ever. She

35:38

didn't get it when she was being questioned.

35:40

She doesn't understand the context, the importance, the absolute

35:43

fundamental importance of free speech.

35:45

She doesn't understand government-directed censorship.

35:49

And now, we've had that case

35:51

go through. And again,

35:54

yesterday we had Dr. Shiva Iyer

35:56

do Ray. If you haven't seen the interview, it's interesting

35:58

because we spent most of the time talking about that

36:01

particular case and how he had

36:03

a much better case. And of course, RFK

36:05

Jr. also has a much better case. They

36:07

went with this other case. And

36:10

even though they didn't side in the other

36:12

direction, they sent it back saying, you don't

36:14

have standing. Well, clearly he did. Clearly he

36:16

had a win with that

36:19

in Massachusetts. They

36:22

should pay attention to that case.

36:25

But RFK Jr. is going to be bringing

36:27

a case up. Nobody, when they argue these

36:30

cases, nobody talks about

36:32

the absolute freedom

36:35

of speech that was respected as

36:40

recently as 1946. Yeah, I know,

36:43

80 years ago. However, we used

36:48

to at one point in time respect the Constitution of this

36:50

country. And we look

36:52

at Marsh versus Alabama. They said, even if

36:54

you privately own the public square, you

36:56

can't censor people in a public

36:59

square. That's what these social media

37:01

sites are. They're digital public squares.

37:03

It amazes me that

37:05

nobody brings that up. And

37:07

I know they say, well, that's been

37:09

overturned by laws about people

37:13

trying to do free speech in malls. And that's a

37:15

different thing, different thing entirely. A

37:18

mall is a private space, but it's not the

37:20

town square. It's retail space. That's

37:23

a very different thing. Anyway, the Supreme Court

37:25

on July 1st sent legal

37:27

challenges to laws in Florida and Texas

37:29

that regulate how social media platforms moderate

37:31

content back to lower courts. So

37:34

they have not done anything

37:36

to shut down. They said, we don't

37:38

have standing. So they punted on it. But

37:41

in that particular case, as well as Shiva's

37:43

case, as well as RFK Jr.'s

37:46

case, we all know, we knew

37:48

before we had documents. And

37:50

of course, Shiva has got really

37:53

the smoking documents of the

37:55

best of all of them.

37:58

But we know this stuff is being directed by government officials.

38:03

It was government officials who were telling these

38:05

corporations to do what they

38:08

wanted them to do, which was to censor. It's

38:11

like, come on, can't

38:13

we acknowledge that and stop that?

38:18

It's such a sham, and it has

38:20

been from the very beginning. And so

38:22

they declined to do anything about the

38:24

federal government directing these social

38:26

media companies to censor. Again,

38:28

Clarence Thomas, Lido Gorsuch, so

38:31

disgusted. They sat there with their face

38:34

on their hand, the desk. Gorsuch

38:36

didn't even show up for

38:39

the reading of that. And

38:41

so now we've got it the other direction.

38:43

You got Florida and Texas trying to protect

38:45

our speech on these

38:48

social media sites. And actually, they're

38:51

not even talking about protecting our

38:53

speech. The law in Florida protected

38:55

the speech of political candidates, not

38:58

you and I. Not

39:00

the free press, not free

39:03

speech of citizens, but the free

39:05

speech of a political candidate. And

39:08

even that was not

39:10

enough for the Supreme Court. They

39:13

sent the case back to the lower courts. Again, nine to nothing.

39:15

They didn't want to have anything to do with it. And

39:18

so this is the first time the Supreme Court has looked

39:20

at any of these state laws that are trying to protect

39:22

free speech from the technocracy,

39:25

from the fascist corporate and

39:29

corporate government partnership that

39:31

is doing this censorship.

39:35

These laws that deem

39:37

social media companies to be common

39:40

carriers. That's a

39:42

very different thing than to

39:44

say that it's the public square. And

39:47

again, I think they should have used a 1946 thing. At

39:53

stake, they said, this is coming

39:55

from Zero Hedge, their take on it.

39:57

And as I said, at stake is

39:59

the right of an... of individual Americans

40:02

to freely express themselves online and

40:05

the right of social media platforms to

40:07

make editorial decisions about the content that

40:09

they host. Well,

40:11

again, as we said yesterday, and we

40:14

had a couple of listeners who

40:17

pointed it out, I disagreed with

40:19

Shiva in the sense that

40:21

corporations don't have rights. Governments

40:25

don't have rights. Rights

40:27

are there because we're created in the image of God.

40:30

That's the fundamental idea behind the Declaration

40:33

of Independence. That's what's

40:35

different about rights and privileges and powers.

40:38

So these institutions that are created and

40:40

have certain powers delegated to them, that's

40:43

all spelled out in the 10th Amendment.

40:45

You know, we have the federal government

40:47

has certain powers delegated to it, the

40:49

state governments have certain powers delegated to

40:52

it. The people and

40:54

the states have retained the powers

40:56

that they've not specifically delegated to

40:58

the federal government. It's

41:01

not rights. We don't have

41:03

states' rights and we don't have

41:05

corporate rights. Corporations

41:08

are creatures of the

41:10

government and

41:12

they are granted privileges. You

41:15

know, when you set up a corporation or you

41:17

start to do business in a jurisdiction, you have

41:19

to buy a privilege license and

41:22

you get incorporated by the state. So they're

41:24

creatures of the state. They

41:27

don't have fundamental rights. And we need to really

41:30

clarify this understanding of the difference

41:32

between privileges and rights.

41:35

And so we don't have, this Zero Hedge article

41:38

was written by Epic Times. Epic

41:43

Times is wrong. We don't have competing

41:46

rights because corporations don't

41:48

have rights and governments don't

41:50

have rights. What

41:52

they're doing is the two of them are conspiring

41:54

together to destroy our rights

41:56

and we're the only people, only people

41:59

have rights. So,

42:01

these competing rights are both protected by the

42:03

First Amendment to the US Constitution. No,

42:06

it is not fundamentally, you have

42:08

to understand, it's not competing rights.

42:10

We're talking about censorship. End

42:13

of story. It's

42:15

the government in a very subversive

42:17

way, in

42:19

a very devious way,

42:23

doing government censorship. In

42:26

the same way that people can't get their

42:28

head around the fact that it was Trump

42:30

and Biden who were paying the states to

42:32

do certain things. You do

42:34

this and we'll give you some money. That's exactly what's going

42:36

on with the censorship. It's amazing to

42:38

me to see that you only have to have one

42:41

level of obfuscation

42:43

in order for people not

42:45

to be able to see through what's going on here. When

42:49

the federal government pays people to

42:51

do X and threatens to

42:53

take away their money if they don't do X, the

42:57

federal government is really calling

43:00

shots here. Same thing is

43:02

true of the social media companies.

43:04

And sometimes it involves money. Sometimes it

43:07

involves preferential treatment

43:09

or government contracts or

43:11

whatever is down the

43:13

line. The Florida law

43:15

made it a violation for a social

43:17

media platform to deplatform a political candidate.

43:20

They could still censor your

43:23

speech or my speech on politics.

43:26

They could still censor your speech or my speech on

43:28

religion. The

43:31

U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of the 11th

43:33

Circuit halted part of the

43:35

Florida law and Florida appealed

43:37

to the Supreme Court. The

43:39

circuit court struck down part of the

43:42

Florida statute finding that, quote, with minor

43:44

exceptions, the government can't

43:46

tell a person, a private

43:48

person, or an entity what

43:51

to say or how to say it. Except

43:55

that's exactly what they did. That's exactly what they

43:57

supported. First of all,

44:01

A private person is the

44:04

only one that has rights. The entity doesn't have

44:06

the rights, but the federal government is telling the

44:08

entity to tell a person

44:10

what they can or cannot say. It's

44:14

frustrating. I feel like I'm beating

44:16

my head against the wall. I know

44:18

you understand it. Even

44:21

the biggest platforms are private actors

44:24

whose rights the First Amendment protects.

44:27

No. No. Each

44:29

and every one of these persons, the CEO of

44:33

Twitter or Facebook or what, Zuckerberg or Musk, they

44:36

can say whatever they want, right? But

44:40

when the corporations start shutting down other

44:42

people's speech because they're

44:44

being coerced and told to

44:46

by the government, that's simply

44:49

censorship. And the

44:51

rest of the stuff is just obfuscation

44:54

trickery. Their

44:56

so-called content moderation decisions

44:59

constitute protected exercises of

45:01

editorial judgment. You

45:04

see, they were given Section 230 to say

45:08

they were a third

45:10

party public. They were not publishing the stuff.

45:12

They were just a public square

45:14

where things were going up, and they were not

45:16

going to be held responsible for

45:18

anything that was set on their site. But

45:21

then that Section 230, they were

45:23

supposed to protect them

45:25

as a free speech public

45:28

square, was used by

45:30

the government. Even that was used by the

45:32

government as a threat. You

45:35

do always say, we're going to take away your Section 230

45:37

protections. It

45:40

is an individual public square. End

45:42

of story. The U.S. Court of

45:44

Appeals for the Fifth Circuit took

45:46

the Texas anti-depplatforming

45:49

law. They

45:52

found it to

45:54

be constitutional, and they

45:56

rejected the idea that corporations have a free-wheeling First

45:58

Amendment right to the right to the right. to

46:00

censor what people say. So the Fifth Circuit Court

46:02

got it right. The Eleventh Circuit got it wrong.

46:05

And they have competing

46:07

opinions here. And the Supreme

46:09

Court doesn't want to rule

46:12

on that. I'm

46:14

not telling you this whole idea

46:16

of judicial supremacy, this whole idea of

46:19

the Supreme Court, Marbury

46:21

versus Madison, all the rest of this

46:23

stuff. Jefferson was right.

46:25

That's the end of our government as long

46:27

as we allow the Supreme Court to have

46:29

the final say on these things. We

46:32

could fix this problem if

46:35

Florida and Texas

46:37

were to say, well, we're not going

46:40

to pay any attention to what the

46:42

Supreme Court says. The problem is that

46:44

these sites stretch

46:46

over interstate

46:48

lines. And so that creates a

46:50

problem. It'll be interesting to see what

46:55

happens when Ireland

46:57

or some other dictatorship decides that

46:59

they're going to shut down free

47:01

speech entirely and criminalize behavior

47:04

and threaten these social media

47:07

companies with penalties, including imprisonment,

47:10

if they allow people to say certain things. So

47:13

that's the next step. Not

47:15

just banning somebody, not just censoring somebody's

47:18

speech, but imposing massive

47:20

fines or locking up the

47:22

social media site if they

47:24

allow free speech. So

47:27

you'll shut down who we say, or we're

47:29

going to lock you up or fine you

47:31

massively. And that's going to have international issues.

47:33

It's not just like, you know, here's Florida

47:35

and Texas and they're talking about you

47:38

can't censor this and you can't censor

47:40

that. Oh, we can't have that because

47:42

people in California and New York want

47:44

censorship. But what about when Ireland demands

47:46

censorship? Both

47:50

state laws require platforms to explain

47:52

their content moderation decisions. They

47:54

mandate that the platform's considered to

47:56

be overly burdensome. They

48:02

don't have to do content moderation. They're

48:06

only doing it because the federal

48:08

government is holding a gun to their head. So

48:11

if they were to not

48:14

censorship at all, if they were to not

48:16

do content moderation, you'd be back

48:18

to these things as a

48:20

digital public square. And then

48:22

we, just to go back

48:24

and take a look at the civil asset forfeiture

48:27

case, a reason headline that we talked about this

48:29

last week, so I'm not going to go back

48:31

into it. Supreme Court issues flawed

48:33

ruling in an asset

48:35

forfeiture case. Gorsuch's

48:37

concurring opinion suggests though that

48:40

the court may curb asset

48:42

forfeiture in the future. But

48:45

why not now? You see, what was

48:47

that issue was the governments would come in and they

48:49

would steal property, typically

48:51

a property that was

48:53

about a thousand dollars while they charged

48:56

them a thousand dollars to challenge the

48:58

theft of their property. They

49:01

didn't even charge anybody with a

49:03

crime, let alone find them guilty.

49:05

And as I said before, due

49:07

process means that the process

49:10

is due before you

49:12

access a penalty. It

49:15

isn't due process if you take the guns and do

49:17

the due process later. No, the due process has to

49:19

be done before you take the gun, before you take

49:21

the car, before you take the house or the cash

49:24

or the plane or whatever it is that you're going

49:26

to steal as a penalty. And

49:29

then, of course, we've already had the

49:31

Supreme Court come in and rule

49:33

on somebody's car being stolen. They

49:36

said that's an excessive,

49:39

unproportional penalty for that. That's

49:41

another part of the due process, that you don't have

49:44

excessive penalties. The

49:47

due process is due when it's due, and

49:50

that's before any punishment, before any confiscation. In

49:53

this particular case, they were taking

49:56

property from people and

49:58

then they were taking years. years to

50:01

go through the process. And

50:04

they said, no, you got to do it

50:06

faster. And the court

50:08

said, no, they don't have to at all. They

50:10

don't have to do it faster. I mean,

50:13

this Supreme Court has,

50:16

I don't know why MAGA would listen to Trump bragging

50:19

about his Supreme Court appointments at

50:21

all. On Rumble, Dr.

50:23

Freese, thank you very much for the tip. He says,

50:27

make the Constitution law and punishable by law. Hello, David,

50:29

I've been to the Virginia Bilderberg

50:35

protests with you. Well, good. That was a frustrating

50:37

one. I really didn't like

50:41

that. I tell you, especially because the first one

50:43

that I went to was in Denmark. And

50:45

for the people who had gone to the Bilderberg things, they

50:47

were always frustrated, kept at

50:50

such a distance. I couldn't see anything at all. And, you know, we

50:52

were just right across

50:56

a four lane road from the entrance into the hotel, which

50:58

was right at the edge of

51:01

the road. I mean, there wasn't even a long

51:03

driveway to it. You could see everything that was

51:06

going on. And to keep people from taking pictures through the windows.

51:08

I mean, you could

51:12

get up within about 20, 30 feet of the hotel

51:14

and take pictures through the windows. So

51:19

the day before everybody started their meetings,

51:21

the hotel went around and put

51:23

up dark film on

51:28

all the windows, kind of like a polarized

51:30

film that you couldn't, they could see out, but

51:32

you couldn't see in type of thing. So it

51:34

was really frustrating in Virginia, about the

51:39

only thing we could do was to play

51:41

Bonnie Python's song about Henry Kissinger on a

51:44

bullhorn to

51:47

Henry Kissinger. I'm sure he's

51:49

heard that before. Rockfuhn

51:53

had Solakat 1980. So, U.S. presidents

51:55

have immunity from prosecution. for

52:00

their war crimes too. They

52:02

will not escape justice from God's

52:04

wrath. That's right. Yeah, I mean,

52:06

you know, when, when Sotomayor was saying,

52:08

you know, he could use SEAL Team Six

52:10

to assassinate his political rival. What about his

52:12

geopolitical rival in Iran? Or

52:15

anywhere else, for that matter? Oh,

52:18

well, no, assassinations and coups, wars, those

52:20

are all fine. Those

52:23

are just fine. Rambo Sigmund was

52:25

a Freud, a fraud,

52:27

rather. He was a Freud as well, but

52:29

he was also a fraud. Property

52:32

tax is the ultimate proof

52:34

that we own nothing. That's right. We're ultimately

52:36

renters. And property tax

52:39

proves that. Well, we're gonna

52:41

take a quick break and we'll be right back. I guess

52:43

they were talking about Civil War and played Shenandoah. You're

54:01

listening to The

54:03

David Knight Show. Well

54:20

one other thing I didn't mention with the

54:23

Supreme Court stuff, the Chevron case, which I've

54:25

really not talked about a great deal. That

54:28

might have some positive influences in terms

54:30

of pulling back the regulatory

54:34

state that does regulation with our

54:36

representation and all the rest of this stuff. But again,

54:38

it remains to be seen. When

54:41

you look at something like the FISA Act that

54:43

was put in after the church

54:45

committee hearings and the Pike committee

54:48

hearings in the House, immediately

54:51

after their creation, both the CIA

54:53

and the NSA began spying on

54:55

Americans unconstitutionally. And so

54:58

that's why they had those cases. They then spun

55:00

it to make it about heart

55:03

attack guns and other things like

55:05

that, assassinations and coups, the

55:07

sensational stuff. And

55:10

yet the legislation that came out of it

55:12

was still about Foreign Intelligence Surveillance

55:15

Act, still about trying to limit

55:17

the CIA and the NSA from

55:19

spying on Americans. But

55:22

then they turned and that was

55:24

pretty clear what that was about. And

55:27

yet these organizations turned that around for their

55:29

own purposes and used it to give themselves

55:32

legal cover to spy

55:34

on people. So it's hard to

55:36

say that the Chevron case or any of these other

55:38

cases are a win or a

55:41

defeat until we

55:43

see how these somewhat vague

55:45

principles that they have mentioned in here,

55:48

how they're going to roll out. Anything

55:50

that clips the wings, even a little bit of

55:53

the bureaucracies, I think is a good idea

55:55

because these things are unconstitutional to begin with.

55:59

And they've become cancerous. Let's talk a little bit

56:01

about the pharmaceutical stuff. We

56:04

had a Tennessee woman who was

56:06

fired by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee

56:08

because she wouldn't take the

56:10

vaccine. She has now won

56:12

in court a $700,000 judgment. Good

56:17

for her. As I said

56:19

over and over again, the fraud, the criminal

56:21

fraud that is a part of this vaccine

56:25

stuff, something they didn't want to talk about. And

56:28

the debates, of course, because CNN is brought to

56:30

you by Pfizer, they didn't want to bring up

56:32

the vaccine. Trump brought it

56:35

up briefly when they started

56:37

to blame the massive deficits that

56:39

we have on Trump's tax code.

56:41

When you think about that, that's

56:44

a typical Democrat approach.

56:47

Nothing that the government spends, they

56:49

don't care about the war in

56:51

Ukraine, the money spent there, or

56:53

in Israel or whatever. They don't

56:55

care about Biden handing

56:58

out, trying to buy votes with

57:00

student loan forgiveness. They don't care about any of that

57:02

stuff. They don't care

57:05

about the PPP or the CARES

57:07

Act or Biden's

57:09

equivalence of that. They don't care about any of

57:11

that stuff. That's the tax cuts. That's

57:14

what it was all about. No, we didn't get that big

57:16

a tax cut. Even the corporations didn't get that big a

57:18

tax cut. There was a trillions

57:21

of dollars that they spent over this so-called pandemic

57:23

stuff. And so Trump brings that up and he

57:25

talks about the vaccine, but only about the vaccine

57:27

mandate. And then they dropped it. Biden

57:29

didn't want to say anything about it. There was no

57:31

follow up from CNN. They're not going to talk about

57:33

the vaccines. But

57:35

it is fraud and it is murder.

57:39

And that's what we should be concerned about. A

57:42

federal jury has determined that a woman who was

57:44

fired for refusing to get a COVID vaccine, a

57:47

Trump shot, mandated by her employer, got

57:49

$700,000. The jury found that

57:51

her refusing to get the shot was

57:53

quote, based on sincerely held religious

57:55

belief. Her federal lawsuit

57:58

said it was not part of her job to regularly. come

58:00

into contact with people. She hardly

58:02

ever had any contact with people to begin with.

58:05

And then for a year and a half, she was able to

58:07

do her job from home. And she

58:09

was still gonna be doing her job from home. But

58:11

Blue Cross Blue Shield said, you're gonna get the jab, even if

58:13

you're gonna work from home. She

58:17

said she had a portfolio of 10 to

58:19

12 clients each year with whom she only

58:22

interacted with infrequently and

58:24

sometimes not in person. They

58:27

also pointed out that she never came into

58:29

contact with any patients as part of her

58:31

job. But of course, all

58:34

this is really irrelevant since these Trump

58:36

shots never prevented

58:39

illness or transmission. Like

58:42

many others, the pandemic changed her job. She worked from

58:44

home for nearly a year and a half. But

58:47

then when Blue Cross Blue Shield announced that

58:49

it would require vaccines for all employees, she

58:51

refused. She said

58:53

in her lawsuit, she firmly believes

58:56

that all COVID-19 vaccines are

58:58

derived from aborted fetus cell lines.

59:01

They are tested with them. So

59:04

in a sense, they are derived from that. She

59:06

said, I cannot in good conscience consume the

59:08

vaccine, which would not only defile

59:11

my body, but it would

59:13

also anger and dishonor God. Yeah.

59:17

Blue Cross Blue Shield, Tennessee denied her request,

59:20

saying she could not continue

59:22

her job as a biostatistical

59:24

research scientist. She

59:26

appealed, they ultimately fired

59:29

her. She filed a lawsuit. The

59:31

vaccine requirement was

59:34

the best decision, says Blue Cross Blue

59:37

Shield, for the health and

59:39

the safety of our employees and members, some

59:41

of whom are the most vulnerable in the

59:43

state and our communities. Well,

59:46

if that's what this health insurance company

59:48

says, you

59:51

really got to question their medical judgment and their

59:54

sanity, don't you? They're still holding to that. And

59:57

this is 2024. Anyway,

59:59

they gave... for $177,000 in back pay, $10,000 in compensatory damages, and $500,000 in

1:00:01

punitive damages. So,

1:00:09

good for her. And

1:00:12

then there's a follow-up article from Brian

1:00:14

Schilhavi at Health Impact News.

1:00:18

I talked about his previous article

1:00:20

about Robert Redfield, Trump's CDC director,

1:00:22

how this guy has become the

1:00:25

chicken little of bird flu. The

1:00:28

sky has fallen, the sky has fallen, and we're all going

1:00:30

to die, you know? That's

1:00:32

Robert Redfield, the chicken little. And

1:00:35

he's doing it for money. And

1:00:38

it truly is amazing. When Brian

1:00:40

Schilhavi at Health Impact News, the previous

1:00:42

article that he did, he looked at

1:00:44

the financial connections between Robert Redfield and

1:00:46

this company that had created a

1:00:49

testing device. This testing

1:00:51

device that they wanted to push out, they would

1:00:53

test not just for COVID, but it would test

1:00:55

for RSV, and it

1:00:58

would test for bird flu, presumably other

1:01:00

things as well. So,

1:01:02

you know, new and improved abuse

1:01:04

of the PCR test. Because

1:01:08

that's what this is. It's nonsense. Yeah,

1:01:12

we got something that will lie to you about

1:01:14

several different respiratory viruses now, not just one. And

1:01:18

so he found that financial connection, but he

1:01:20

said the financial

1:01:23

statements that are

1:01:26

due on a regular basis, the

1:01:29

site that publishes who's

1:01:32

getting paid what these current

1:01:34

former officials are getting paid, that

1:01:38

it's called openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

1:01:44

They had not updated that.

1:01:46

He said, I want to see

1:01:48

if there's something else going on. Well, it turns out

1:01:50

that he went back and checked. And

1:01:52

yes, there is something else going on. He's

1:01:55

been predicting this bird flu thing now for three

1:01:58

years. The previous saying was... is

1:02:00

he got $360,000 in consulting fees from

1:02:03

Roche Diagnostics Corporation. Maybe we ought

1:02:05

to pronounce that Roach. From

1:02:08

2020 through 2022, same

1:02:11

time that he's going around there is Mr. Chicken

1:02:13

Little with a bird flu. He

1:02:16

said also reported that they're working

1:02:18

on a new PCR test, thinking

1:02:20

test multiple respiratory viruses. So

1:02:24

he says, as I mentioned in that article, the data for

1:02:26

2023 had not been published yet. So

1:02:30

they only had stuff going back to 2022. And

1:02:33

so now openpaymentsdata.cms.gov updated

1:02:36

the 2023 statistics this week. He

1:02:39

goes to look at it and voila, what we see

1:02:41

is it's not just the PCR

1:02:44

test company that

1:02:46

he's making money from, but

1:02:48

he's also being paid by

1:02:50

one of the vaccine companies,

1:02:52

Novavax. He got $160,000

1:02:54

in consulting fees last year from

1:03:00

Novavax, and he also got another 180,000 from Roche.

1:03:04

They'd already previously gotten 360,000 from. Novavax

1:03:09

didn't really get any

1:03:11

successful product out during

1:03:15

the, as he calls it, the vaccine bonanza

1:03:17

under Trump. That's what it

1:03:19

was. It was a gold

1:03:21

rush, wasn't it? So he said,

1:03:24

I searched to see if Novavax has a bird

1:03:26

flu vaccine in the works, and apparently they do.

1:03:28

Imagine that. And

1:03:30

so he said, well, these

1:03:33

biotechs, their stocks

1:03:35

were surging at the end of May, as

1:03:37

we remember the panic about, oh,

1:03:39

look, we found somebody in Australia

1:03:42

that tested positive with a

1:03:44

PCR test. Remember these PCR tests now, the

1:03:47

magnification is even greater than it was with

1:03:49

the absurd 40 cycles. You

1:03:54

can find anything with 40 cycles. And

1:03:57

so they now

1:03:59

have a, a digital version of the

1:04:01

PCR thing that is even, does

1:04:04

even more magnification than 1.1 trillion times. And

1:04:08

so at the end of May, when they

1:04:10

said, oh, we got somebody who has bird flu in Australia.

1:04:13

Do you really? Do you really? I

1:04:16

don't think so. But the news

1:04:18

sent the stock up of a

1:04:20

lot of these companies. BioNTech, working

1:04:23

with Pfizer on the

1:04:25

previous COVID shot, their

1:04:27

stock went up 11%. Novavax

1:04:30

stock rose 5% up to $15.70. But

1:04:37

then in a statement Novavax told

1:04:39

the Financial Times that

1:04:41

his vaccine platform could be an

1:04:44

attractive asset from a

1:04:46

pandemic preparedness perspective, because

1:04:48

the currently available avian influenza

1:04:50

vaccines, bird flu, produce

1:04:53

limited immune response. And

1:04:55

so then earlier this month, about

1:04:58

the same time Redfield is making all the

1:05:00

rounds and corporate news and predicting that it's

1:05:02

inevitable that it's going to get to humans.

1:05:04

And when it does, 25 to 50% of

1:05:07

us are gonna die. That

1:05:10

kind of absurd, that's why I

1:05:13

call them chicken little Redfield. That

1:05:16

is so patently absurd

1:05:18

and unscientific, no proof

1:05:20

whatsoever. This guy is

1:05:24

as untrustworthy in his

1:05:26

predictions as Julie Green, and

1:05:30

to be ignored in the same way. Anyway,

1:05:32

after that latest round in June,

1:05:36

their stock went up from 1570 to $27. They

1:05:41

had an 80% increase in just one month

1:05:43

in their stock. But

1:05:45

it's even more than that. If you

1:05:47

go back a couple of months and look to see where

1:05:49

their stock was, it

1:05:51

was down at $8.60 per share,

1:05:54

just a couple of months ago. Now

1:05:56

it's up to $27 per share. three

1:06:00

times, three times,

1:06:02

more than three times. So

1:06:06

with all this bird flu stuff. So

1:06:08

Redfield is really working out well for them. It's

1:06:11

just a propagandist. And

1:06:13

as Brian Schilhavi points out, just

1:06:16

look at the stream of people that

1:06:19

went from the Trump administration and

1:06:21

to these vaccine companies. He

1:06:24

talks about Scott Gottlieb, but

1:06:26

of course you also have the guy

1:06:28

that replaced Gottlieb. Gottlieb went with

1:06:31

Pfizer. The other guy went with Moderna. Are

1:06:34

we perhaps beginning to see a repeat of what happened in 2020? Where

1:06:38

former Trump government health officials joined

1:06:40

vaccine manufacturers and got billions of

1:06:43

dollars to develop COVID vaccines. And

1:06:46

so after Scott

1:06:49

Gottlieb left, he

1:06:51

got $2 billion from the

1:06:53

Trump administration for his company. And

1:06:57

Brian has written articles against Trump,

1:07:00

the most pro pharma president

1:07:02

in history. Well,

1:07:04

demonstrably yes. He

1:07:07

says even pardon big pharma executives

1:07:09

who were serving prison terms for

1:07:11

committing fraud against the US

1:07:13

government on

1:07:15

his last day in office. When

1:07:17

many of his supporters foolishly

1:07:19

thought that he's gonna pardon Julian Assange or

1:07:21

Ed Snowden. Why'd they think that?

1:07:25

Well, Alex is saying that, Alex

1:07:27

Jones said, yeah, Trump, I

1:07:29

got it from inside source. He's

1:07:31

gonna pardon Julian Assange before

1:07:34

midnight, before his term expires. Well,

1:07:37

didn't happen, did it? Trump

1:07:39

pardons included healthcare executives behind

1:07:41

these massive frauds. His

1:07:44

personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, selling pardons

1:07:46

to people. Yeah, wanted to

1:07:48

sell it to John Kiriaku for a million some people

1:07:51

he asked $2 million for. After

1:07:54

leaving the FDA in 2019, Gottlieb

1:07:57

joined the board of directors of Pfizer just two months

1:07:59

later. then helped them to secure two billion

1:08:02

from Trump to develop the vaccine. That's

1:08:04

just to develop it. Of course, then

1:08:06

he bought it, delivered it, all

1:08:08

the rest of the stuff. Uh,

1:08:10

former FDA director Gottlieb is now a

1:08:12

Pfizer board member. He said

1:08:14

the U S government's alphabet health agencies serve

1:08:17

big pharma, not the American public. And you

1:08:19

have people like Robert Redfield and

1:08:22

Scott Gottlieb and Cohen and all

1:08:24

the rest of these, uh, making

1:08:27

these media appearances, getting everybody worked up

1:08:30

and causing the stock to triple.

1:08:35

He says, no fall for it. Don't fall

1:08:37

for the political entertainment industry, which wants the

1:08:39

American public to continue to believe that they

1:08:42

actually have the power to vote somebody into

1:08:44

office as the next president. It's

1:08:47

all just show to keep

1:08:49

a highly medicated society engaged in

1:08:51

meaningless gossip. That's

1:08:53

what this is. Look at the current

1:08:55

two choices. Uh, they're the

1:08:58

same two men who have served

1:09:00

the wall street and Silicon Valley

1:09:02

billionaires since 2020 and

1:09:04

they started all this stuff. So,

1:09:08

um, who's really running the country? Well, just

1:09:10

take a look at who's making the money

1:09:12

behind it. And,

1:09:14

uh, the report that was censored and now

1:09:16

it's back up, 74%

1:09:19

of the autopsies that had 325 autopsies and 74% of

1:09:21

the people died from the

1:09:28

vaccine. And so that

1:09:30

was put up, uh, Lancet took

1:09:32

it down and now

1:09:34

it is back up again. But

1:09:37

74% of the people that they

1:09:39

looked at 325 deaths, 74%

1:09:42

of them killed by the Trump shots.

1:09:44

The main cause of death, of course,

1:09:46

in these things was heart attack and

1:09:49

clots, uh, all the usual

1:09:51

things that we see all the time.

1:09:54

Uh, so, um, the

1:09:58

good news is the good news

1:10:00

is that there are

1:10:02

some things that can be done, as a matter of

1:10:05

fact. And I'm

1:10:07

going to get to that in a moment. If

1:10:09

I can find this. Here we go.

1:10:14

If we look at a

1:10:17

case of autism, I

1:10:20

had two twin girls, and

1:10:23

they're now four years old. This is a case that

1:10:26

was reported

1:10:28

by Children's Health Defense. And

1:10:33

it was a case study that showed

1:10:35

that they could actually reverse a lot

1:10:37

of these problems. But it's

1:10:40

also interesting, I think, in

1:10:42

terms of when this manifested. They

1:10:45

apparently were okay until they were

1:10:48

about 20 months old. And

1:10:51

so I thought, I wonder how many vaccines kids

1:10:54

get by the time they're

1:10:56

20 months old? Well, they have it set up

1:10:59

like three, six, nine, 18 months and things

1:11:01

like that. I counted them up. Thirty

1:11:04

shots. If you follow

1:11:07

the government's vaccine schedule, the CDC's vaccine

1:11:09

schedule, because the CDC is selling these

1:11:11

vaccines. Thirty shots by the

1:11:13

age of 18 months. And

1:11:17

many of these shots are a

1:11:19

second, a third, a fourth

1:11:21

shot. For some of

1:11:23

these things, they give them four shots before

1:11:26

they're two years old. And

1:11:30

so these are two twins that

1:11:32

are not identical

1:11:34

twins. They're fraternal

1:11:36

twins. And

1:11:39

so the twins received routine

1:11:41

vaccinations at three and at

1:11:43

six months. But they didn't get

1:11:45

any more vaccines until they got to 14 months

1:11:48

because of the COVID lockdown. And

1:11:51

then they caught them up. Because

1:11:53

they don't care if they give you 20 of

1:11:55

them all at once, I guess.

1:12:00

caught them up, then they started

1:12:02

to have some problems. So,

1:12:05

you know, even if you went to three and six months,

1:12:08

I went back and looked at that as well. You

1:12:10

get 16 doses

1:12:14

shots by the sixth month. And

1:12:17

again, many of those are three times

1:12:20

of the same shot. This

1:12:22

is just criminal. This is just, people in

1:12:24

the future are going to are

1:12:26

going to criticize those of us

1:12:28

at this time. How could people do this to their own

1:12:30

children? How could they let

1:12:32

this happen? Don't

1:12:34

let it happen to your kids or your grandkids. Anyway,

1:12:38

so after they got them caught up

1:12:41

at 14 months, one

1:12:43

twin had sensitivity to changes,

1:12:45

had eczema, digestive issues. Another

1:12:48

one had problems making

1:12:50

eye contact, babbling, communication,

1:12:52

difficulty, breastfeeding, decreased muscle

1:12:54

tone. In March of

1:12:56

2021, the girls received a

1:12:59

series of vaccines that have been delayed

1:13:01

due to the pandemic. After this round

1:13:03

of vaccinations, their parents noticed a worsening

1:13:05

of some symptoms, including significant

1:13:08

language loss for one of the

1:13:10

girls, who then

1:13:12

became communicating only in one

1:13:15

single word. Due

1:13:17

to the worsening symptoms, the twins were

1:13:19

evaluated for autism and they

1:13:21

met the criteria. So

1:13:23

what is the happy

1:13:26

ending to this? Well, it turns out that

1:13:29

they went to a child health

1:13:31

inventory for resilience and

1:13:34

they started making dietary changes. They started

1:13:36

getting very careful about things that they're

1:13:38

exposed to and their

1:13:41

environment. They followed

1:13:43

their reduced excitatory,

1:13:46

inflammatory diet, eliminating

1:13:48

glutamate, gluten, casein,

1:13:50

sugar, artificial colors, processed foods.

1:13:53

They focused on organic, fresh

1:13:55

home cooked meals from local

1:13:58

sources. food

1:14:00

be your medicine. That

1:14:02

was the wisdom from

1:14:04

Greek physicians. Let food be your

1:14:07

medicine. They incorporated dietary

1:14:09

supplements. The girls took supplements

1:14:11

that included omega-3 fatty acids,

1:14:13

vitamins, homeopathic remedies, and

1:14:17

they have had some really

1:14:19

good results. Due

1:14:22

primarily to the implementation of lifestyle

1:14:24

and environmental changes over two years,

1:14:26

the twins achieved a reversal of

1:14:28

their diagnosis of level 3 autism

1:14:31

spectrum disorder. They

1:14:33

said both twins improved dramatically with one going from a score

1:14:35

of 76 to 36 in seven months.

1:14:38

The other one went from 43 to 4

1:14:42

over the same period. They

1:14:44

said the improvements were so profound that the

1:14:46

pediatrician exclaimed that one of the girls had

1:14:48

undergone some kind of miracle. I'm

1:14:51

kind of miracle, just getting rid of the

1:14:54

toxic stuff in our environment. I've

1:14:57

mentioned before when Karen and I went

1:15:00

to the UK, I mean, on

1:15:02

our honeymoon we stayed there for

1:15:04

about six weeks because I

1:15:07

graduated in December, didn't start my job

1:15:10

until March. And

1:15:13

so we didn't have any money, but we were

1:15:15

just going from one free museum to the other.

1:15:17

We spent the time in museums. And

1:15:20

so there was a class of kids, and I

1:15:23

think it was at the Victorian Albert because they focus

1:15:26

on clothing and how

1:15:28

people lived, architecture, things like

1:15:30

that. And so

1:15:32

they had a class there and had

1:15:34

some kids that put them in these

1:15:36

Elizabethan clothes and they have a

1:15:39

Velcro in the back to

1:15:41

get it on them really quickly. And

1:15:43

so they were going through the different stuff they

1:15:45

had, and they talked about the fact they're eating

1:15:48

off of lead plates. How do you think it'd

1:15:50

make you feel if you ate off a lead

1:15:52

plate when the kid says, heavy? It's a hit

1:15:55

in my eye. You look at the expression on his

1:15:57

face, I really think he was

1:15:59

kind of... serious about that, but we've

1:16:01

always laughed about that. But, you know,

1:16:03

people, the common people would eat

1:16:05

off of lead plates and they would drink out

1:16:07

of lead containers, just like we do the same

1:16:10

thing with plastic today. And

1:16:13

people look at that in the future. How do

1:16:15

you think you would feel if

1:16:18

you drank corrosive drinks that had been

1:16:20

stored in plastic for a long time?

1:16:24

But of course the really rich people ate

1:16:26

off of silver, which

1:16:28

not only did not do anything negative

1:16:31

to them, but it protected them against

1:16:34

bacteria and things like that. So, you

1:16:36

know, big difference. People in the future

1:16:38

are going to look at what we're

1:16:40

doing and with the

1:16:42

same astonishment, we look back. They're going to

1:16:44

look at modern medicine, with

1:16:46

the same astonishment that we

1:16:48

look at the physicians who attended

1:16:50

George Washington when he got the

1:16:52

flu and killed

1:16:54

him with leeches. And

1:16:59

mercury. And that's

1:17:01

what our doctors today are doing. Dramatic

1:17:03

improvement and reversal of autism

1:17:06

for the twins. The

1:17:09

executive director of epidemic answers. This is

1:17:11

something you might look for, for resources,

1:17:13

epidemic answers. So we're trying

1:17:16

to create a platform where we can give

1:17:18

solutions to parents. We're trying to educate them

1:17:21

and we have an online community. Okay.

1:17:24

We're going to take a quick break before

1:17:26

we do a couple of comments here. Rockfin,

1:17:28

a Syrian girl, pharma is getting pretty slick

1:17:31

with its verbiage. Their

1:17:33

products will now give

1:17:35

us limited immune response.

1:17:38

Notice that they don't say prevent anymore. Yeah.

1:17:40

It either works or it doesn't work. Oh,

1:17:43

but it doesn't work. It's your, it's

1:17:45

your neighbor's vaccine that works for you. Right.

1:17:48

Never forget that. Never

1:17:50

forget how they did that for years

1:17:53

with all these childhood vaccines and

1:17:56

how they did that with the masks.

1:17:58

And we knew that we're going to do it. with the Trump

1:18:00

shots as well. And on Rock

1:18:02

fan Dustin Helm, thank you very much for the tip.

1:18:04

I really do appreciate that. We're

1:18:06

gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.

1:19:09

Thank you very much. You're

1:19:45

listening to The David Knight Show. Let's

1:19:49

take a look at the technocracy. We spent

1:19:51

a couple of days, everybody wants to

1:19:53

talk about all this obvious rigging of

1:19:55

this so-called election again. It's never been

1:19:57

more obvious that these elections are going to be the

1:19:59

same. elections are selections, that they

1:20:02

are pageants, wag the dog

1:20:04

type of pageants. And

1:20:06

so it's important to talk about that. It's important to talk about

1:20:08

the fact that these

1:20:12

people have got this whole thing

1:20:14

so corrupt, so controlled, you're

1:20:17

not gonna get anything out of Washington that's gonna protect

1:20:19

yourself or your family. You gotta do that from the

1:20:21

ground up. That's one of the things I really

1:20:23

liked about Shiva's message,

1:20:26

the fact that he's trying to encourage people. And

1:20:29

I think that's a point to meet them, right? People want,

1:20:31

oh, well, who are we gonna have in his present? Well,

1:20:34

let's talk about me running his present. And then he gets

1:20:36

them to talk about fixing things from the ground up. I

1:20:39

think that's a positive thing. Anyway,

1:20:42

let's talk about IDs. And

1:20:45

of course, Elon Musk is

1:20:48

now talking about using digital

1:20:50

ID verification for people to use

1:20:53

X. He

1:20:56

has at first selected

1:20:58

a company out of Israel, but

1:21:01

the Israeli identity verification

1:21:03

company seemed

1:21:06

to have a data leak. Nice

1:21:08

way of saying that they got hacked. And

1:21:10

so he dropped them, but

1:21:12

he did not drop the idea of

1:21:14

a digital ID system. He

1:21:17

just switched companies. And

1:21:20

so as Wine Press reports that

1:21:23

X now works with Stripe to

1:21:26

identify your identity. You

1:21:29

can scan a valid photo ID, then take

1:21:31

a selfie to make sure that it's yours.

1:21:34

X will only have access to

1:21:36

this verification data. Stripe

1:21:39

uses biometric technology on

1:21:41

your images to make sure that it is you.

1:21:43

And you can delete your data at any time.

1:21:45

Isn't that nice? Mr. Free

1:21:48

Speech. No, actually

1:21:50

he's Mr. Technocracy. Starting

1:21:53

to introduce digital IDs for social media use

1:21:56

can severely inhibit free speech

1:21:59

by stripping away the protection. layer of

1:22:01

anonymity and pseudonevity.

1:22:03

Yeah, I don't like anonymous trolls, but hey,

1:22:06

I like it even less.

1:22:08

We've got to get, we've

1:22:10

got to prove ourselves to these

1:22:12

people that they require identification. So

1:22:16

I think that's the greater problem, frankly. It

1:22:19

does affect people if they know

1:22:21

that they're anonymous, you don't know who they are, they

1:22:24

can get really nasty, but people get really nasty anyway,

1:22:26

even if you know who they are. So he

1:22:29

says, um, on winepress, our

1:22:31

previous reported Musk has said he

1:22:33

wants to turn Twitter into an

1:22:35

emulation of China's surveillance state, all

1:22:38

in one app. That's

1:22:41

WeChat, WeChat. And

1:22:44

so that's what this digital ID stuff is

1:22:46

truly about. He wants to make it into

1:22:48

a financial system. He wants to,

1:22:50

uh, grow

1:22:52

X and add, attach

1:22:55

different modules, different functions to it.

1:22:58

And of course in Ukraine, and we

1:23:00

talked about this before, but now

1:23:02

they're taking another step towards having

1:23:04

digital ID for everybody in Ukraine.

1:23:08

Uh, they want to, um, allow

1:23:11

veterans access to services and to

1:23:13

receive benefits via digital ID. I

1:23:16

think it's important to take a look at Ukraine because

1:23:18

Ukraine is going to kind of roll this out in

1:23:21

a subtle way in the same way the United States will.

1:23:23

As I said before, uh, it'll

1:23:25

begin not with a mandate. Well, okay.

1:23:28

As of tomorrow, you've got to have

1:23:30

a digital ID in order to get

1:23:33

your VA benefits or to get

1:23:35

social security. They're not going to do it that way. First

1:23:37

they're going to come out and say, well, you know, uh,

1:23:39

we now accept a digital ID and they'll do that for

1:23:41

a few years as people get used to it. And then

1:23:43

they will drop the hammer. Yeah. You know, we're just not

1:23:45

going to do a paper

1:23:47

ID or physical ID anymore. It's all going to

1:23:49

be digital ID and

1:23:52

going back now two years. This,

1:23:56

uh, was put out by Ukraine in 2022 as a

1:23:58

war with Ukraine. was beginning they

1:24:00

said you know in eight years what's that 2030

1:24:02

in eight years

1:24:04

this war is all over

1:24:06

we've got our UN utopia this

1:24:10

is what it's going to look like in Ukraine let's

1:24:12

look eight years ahead 2030 the

1:24:15

history of the new Ukraine

1:24:18

is studied all over the globe

1:24:21

why because Ukraine became the most

1:24:23

digital and convenient country in the

1:24:25

world scripts have replaced bureaucrats 500,000

1:24:29

former public servants are successfully integrated

1:24:31

in the new economy no more

1:24:33

red tape but paperless no more

1:24:35

bank notes but cashless yes this

1:24:37

is all what the US government

1:24:39

wants to abandon paper money they

1:24:41

are the beta test site best

1:24:43

tax system for the IT industry

1:24:45

and the most affordable e residency

1:24:47

thanks to Ukrainian engineers and programmers

1:24:49

the R&D centers of the world's

1:24:51

top technology companies operate successfully and

1:24:54

Ukraine ranks first in the world

1:24:56

by the number of startups per

1:24:58

capita Ukrainian courts are guided by

1:25:00

artificial intelligence and all notarial customs

1:25:02

is fully automatic and the fastest

1:25:06

in the world customs clearance and

1:25:08

car that's exactly what you want

1:25:10

is that a hallucinating judge I

1:25:15

think many of us have seen many

1:25:17

cases where we think the judge

1:25:19

was hallucinating but of course and literally

1:25:21

happening yeah what are we

1:25:23

fighting for don't ask me

1:25:26

I don't give a but

1:25:28

yeah that's that's what they're

1:25:30

fighting for there they're

1:25:32

fighting for the 2030

1:25:34

dystopia pushed by the UN and world

1:25:36

economic forum they're fighting for

1:25:39

the nightmare society that these people want

1:25:41

to impose of course they're fighting for

1:25:44

the LGBT agenda we saw that

1:25:46

from the the NATO

1:25:49

officials especially in the UK and the

1:25:51

United States you know this

1:25:53

is your flag that you're fighting under the

1:25:55

rainbow flag so they're fighting for the

1:25:58

rainbow flag and for pride and they're fighting

1:26:00

for the 2030 dystopia. Gonna

1:26:03

make the world safe for

1:26:06

technocracy. Currently a

1:26:08

paper ID card is mandatory. In

1:26:11

the future, the electronic document will be

1:26:13

created automatically and the physical document will

1:26:15

become additional. On Rumble,

1:26:17

Atomic Dog says Huxley's dystopia coming in

1:26:19

2030. Yeah, yeah,

1:26:22

just make it easy for you, right? And

1:26:25

that's really, when you look

1:26:27

at Huxley's position, he's gonna control people by

1:26:30

making things easy for

1:26:32

them. Where,

1:26:34

you know, his thing was sex and

1:26:36

drugs, how he's gonna control people. And

1:26:40

break up the family by

1:26:42

having hatcheries rather than families,

1:26:44

that type of thing. But

1:26:46

control them with pleasure. And

1:26:49

so, you know, you have this debate back and forth. So is the

1:26:51

future, are these people trying to set up Orwell's

1:26:54

1984, they're trying to set up Huxley's Brave

1:26:56

New World? Well, I think the vast majority

1:26:58

of people can be conquered with Huxley's Brave

1:27:00

New World approach. We're

1:27:02

just gonna make this easier for you. You don't have

1:27:04

to carry around paper ID anymore. We'll just scan

1:27:07

your face, all the rest of this stuff. Well,

1:27:10

that's going to be the

1:27:12

effective thing for most

1:27:14

people. The people who don't

1:27:17

want that, the people who see through that, they

1:27:19

will get the 1984 treatment. I

1:27:22

really do believe that. So

1:27:24

the document can be checked by QR

1:27:26

code and just one click.

1:27:28

This protects against counterfeit or outdated paper

1:27:31

documents. Certificates will

1:27:33

always be at hand, but

1:27:36

this biometric thing cannot

1:27:38

be forgotten, lost or damaged, but it

1:27:41

can be stolen. You notice that they

1:27:43

don't say that? Isn't that

1:27:45

interesting? It can be stolen. Again,

1:27:48

this is from Wine Press. And

1:27:51

the original document that they

1:27:53

reference is coming from the

1:27:55

Ukrainian government and also a document

1:27:58

from the UN. because

1:28:00

this was jointly constructed with the

1:28:03

aid of the UN. They

1:28:05

said, we're waiting for parliament to approve this,

1:28:08

but it's coming from the globalist, the UN,

1:28:10

it's coming from America, and that's what you're

1:28:12

going to see rolling out. Google,

1:28:15

by the way, oh, by the way, before we move

1:28:17

on, like I said, it can be stolen. You

1:28:20

can't lose it, but somebody can steal it. And once they

1:28:22

steal your biometric data, what do you do at that point?

1:28:25

If they steal your credit card or some other form of

1:28:27

ID, that can be canceled, they can issue you another, what

1:28:29

are they going to do with your face and

1:28:32

other biometric parameters that can't

1:28:35

change once that

1:28:37

information is stolen? That's

1:28:39

perhaps going to be our salvation maybe, I

1:28:41

don't know, we'll see. Google

1:28:44

though is now pushing facial

1:28:46

recognition for employees

1:28:49

and there is no opt out. Google

1:28:52

is guinea pigging its own employees, part

1:28:54

of a wider push by the

1:28:57

corporation to position itself in the

1:28:59

expanding AI driven surveillance development and

1:29:01

deployment, regardless of

1:29:03

this being yet another privacy

1:29:06

controversy being added to Google's

1:29:08

already existing huge privacy controversy

1:29:11

portfolio. And

1:29:13

yeah, so they're

1:29:16

going to use their own employees as

1:29:19

guinea pigs. And so the question is,

1:29:21

what about artificial intelligence in

1:29:23

the tower of Babel, for example?

1:29:26

It's the title of an article from David Bonson who

1:29:29

is a financial advisor. His father, you

1:29:31

might remember, was

1:29:33

a very intelligent Christian

1:29:36

apologetic debater, Greg

1:29:39

Bonson, but he

1:29:41

died at an early age. David Bonson

1:29:44

is focused on financial advising, but

1:29:46

he is a Christian and so he says,

1:29:49

when it comes to artificial intelligence, he said it's

1:29:51

kind of another tower of Babel, isn't it? He

1:29:54

said, we can debate if chat GPT

1:29:56

and other language learning models can even

1:29:58

do the transactional and generative work they're

1:30:01

said to be doing. He

1:30:03

said, so far I'm skeptical of a lot

1:30:05

of this stuff, but he said, there is

1:30:07

no scenario whereby the

1:30:09

virtue and the humanity of

1:30:11

market activity are going to be

1:30:13

disintermediated by computers. To

1:30:16

suggest otherwise would make God a liar, and

1:30:19

to believe that an entire

1:30:22

reordering of God's creation is

1:30:24

underway. That's what

1:30:26

the World Economic Forum tells us, that's what Yuval Harari

1:30:28

tells us all the time. But

1:30:30

it's not, it's not underway.

1:30:34

He said, from the Tower of Babel forward,

1:30:36

there's been no shortage of high profile incidents

1:30:38

of mankind wanting to play God. Indeed, modern

1:30:41

technology has always faced a

1:30:43

certain God-like aspiration, from

1:30:45

some of its more arrogant zealots, as

1:30:48

even leading industrialists in the pre-digital

1:30:51

era fancied themselves to be miniature

1:30:53

deities on occasion. The

1:30:55

AI moment is an

1:30:57

odd twist to this babble-like idolatrous

1:31:00

tendency, where rather than

1:31:02

elevate humans to the role

1:31:04

of God, some believe that machines can be

1:31:07

elevated to the role of humans. And

1:31:10

of course he doesn't say it, but these

1:31:12

people like Kurzweil

1:31:15

and others believe that they are going

1:31:17

to merge with the machine. Musk

1:31:20

believes that, Peter Thiel

1:31:22

believes that. Peter Thiel is one of the major

1:31:24

sponsors of the singularity,

1:31:26

the merging of man and machine. They

1:31:29

see that as their ability to live

1:31:31

forever. They think they're gonna be merging

1:31:34

with the machine somehow. They

1:31:36

don't even know what they are. So

1:31:38

I said before, when I talked

1:31:41

to these people, talked to the Zoltan Isfand, who

1:31:43

started the transhumanist party, he's written some

1:31:45

fiction books that he wanted to push,

1:31:47

and he started a

1:31:50

party, the transhumanist party, they never got on

1:31:52

the ballot anywhere. But he was making a

1:31:54

tour through Austin. And so

1:31:56

I interviewed him, I said, so what

1:31:59

is man? What is man? You

1:32:01

know what? Whether the day, when you transfer yourself

1:32:03

into one of these machines, what are you transferring?

1:32:07

Are you making a copy of yourself or are you

1:32:09

actually transferring something in? If

1:32:11

you're transferring something in, then

1:32:13

there's something about you, fundamentally about

1:32:15

you that is immaterial, right? So

1:32:18

what is that? Is it

1:32:20

a spirit? Is it a soul? Are

1:32:22

you just a collection of, you

1:32:25

know, binary, some kind

1:32:27

of approximation of

1:32:31

like a computer memory or something like that

1:32:33

that's being transferred in? What

1:32:36

is your essence? Well, David Monson

1:32:38

said it all ends in the same place, with

1:32:40

God on the throne and humans as His

1:32:42

subjects. So

1:32:44

you choose today whom

1:32:46

you will serve and who you will

1:32:48

trust. Zuckerberg, however, is warning AI companies

1:32:52

that they are trying to create God. And

1:32:55

he's kind of putting himself in

1:32:57

the position to save us

1:33:00

from these people who imagine themselves to

1:33:02

be God. It's

1:33:04

a common thing. It's not just the technocrats. It's

1:33:06

not just the captains of industry, of course, but

1:33:09

it's also all the dictators

1:33:11

of history in the past. When

1:33:13

you look at Mao or Stalin, Hitler,

1:33:16

where you can go back to Herod or whatever,

1:33:18

they think that they are God. And

1:33:22

that has always been a common self-deception

1:33:24

of these people. It's

1:33:27

a tragic comedy, says

1:33:29

Technocracy News in their comments in this

1:33:31

article. Zuckerberg

1:33:33

seems jealous that his industry cohorts

1:33:36

are creating God without him, not

1:33:38

casting him in the role of Messiah. Well,

1:33:41

he's pretty sure that he can save us

1:33:43

from being misled because his AI is inspired

1:33:45

far beyond the others. His

1:33:48

holographic Google-wearing future, a goggle-wearing

1:33:51

future, promises we can all

1:33:53

be successful YouTube or Instagram creators. Isn't that

1:33:55

what we all want to do? He

1:34:00

says he's got a different approach. He said

1:34:02

we need to have different approaches all these

1:34:04

different AI need to be Specialized

1:34:07

in some way there needs to be a

1:34:09

lot of different AI's they get created to

1:34:11

reflect people's different aspirations But he said I

1:34:14

find it a pretty big turnoff from people in the

1:34:16

tech industry kind of talk about building this one true

1:34:18

AI It's almost as

1:34:21

if they think that they're creating God or something and

1:34:23

it's like that's not what we're doing

1:34:26

Well tell that to you will

1:34:28

hooray tell that to Ray Kurzweil and all

1:34:30

the rest of this stuff You

1:34:32

know you talk about somebody wanting to be God Zuckerberg

1:34:37

there was even a cover. I think it was Time

1:34:39

magazine about Eight

1:34:43

or nine years ago. They said he has this

1:34:45

obsession with Caesar Augustus even named

1:34:48

his daughter a some

1:34:51

derivative of Augusta or something like

1:34:53

that and so they They

1:34:57

dressed him up Put

1:34:59

him in a toga that put a wreath on

1:35:01

his head you know seated on a chair with

1:35:03

his arm out like he is Caesar Augustus and

1:35:08

He's gone to Rome and he's

1:35:10

you know really studied Caesar Augustus

1:35:12

and he tried to Put

1:35:16

out the first global ID He

1:35:19

also tried to put out a global currency Libra. Do

1:35:21

you remember that he did a white paper and There

1:35:24

was one line and that white paper. He's trying to tell

1:35:26

all the central banks of the world look I can do

1:35:29

this for you Of course

1:35:31

you know the Bank of International Settlements the central

1:35:33

bank of the central banks is already working on

1:35:35

that but he said I can

1:35:37

I can do this for you and There

1:35:40

was one sentence in that white paper. He said

1:35:42

this if

1:35:45

we create a global Digital

1:35:47

currency it can be

1:35:50

used as a de facto digital ID for

1:35:52

everybody So we know what

1:35:54

his aspirations were and have been for

1:35:56

the longest time and when you look at

1:35:59

a they want to go with this again, as I said

1:36:01

over and over again, the thing

1:36:04

that you want to, what can you

1:36:06

do to prepare against this? Well,

1:36:09

there's going to be a lot of coercion. Try

1:36:11

to get independent, try to get off the grid

1:36:13

as much as you can, but also make sure

1:36:15

that you've got some way that you

1:36:17

can have financial transactions

1:36:20

that are independent of

1:36:22

their net, of

1:36:25

their grid, of their entrapment.

1:36:28

And of course, that's gold and silver

1:36:30

is one thing that's really going to,

1:36:32

I think, be very valuable from that

1:36:34

perspective. It may help

1:36:37

it to increase in value because

1:36:39

it'll be an antidote to this

1:36:42

global digital ID to the

1:36:44

CBDC. If you want

1:36:46

to do that, you can go

1:36:48

to davidknight.gold. That'll take you to Tony Aardvins'

1:36:50

Wise Wolf Gold. It can help

1:36:52

you with any transactions of silver

1:36:55

or gold, small or large, as well

1:36:57

as help you to accumulate it on

1:36:59

a regular basis. You can join

1:37:02

Wolf Pack from $50 a month on up. You

1:37:05

can gradually begin accumulating gold and silver, and

1:37:08

as part of the buying group, you can

1:37:10

get a better price on it than you

1:37:12

would if you bought it individually. But

1:37:14

he can also sell you gold, small or large

1:37:17

amount. He can help you with a metal IRA,

1:37:19

all those things. Davidknight.gold, we

1:37:21

really do appreciate Tony's support of this

1:37:23

program. He's been a long-term supporter. And

1:37:28

then finally, let's close this out. When

1:37:31

we talk about the anthropomorphism, trying

1:37:34

to pretend that robots are

1:37:36

conscious, that they're like human

1:37:38

beings, that the AI and

1:37:41

the chat programs are like us and all the rest

1:37:43

of this stuff, this is being

1:37:45

pushed, especially by a lot of the tabloid

1:37:47

press. But I saw this article picked up

1:37:49

by a lot of different places. This particular

1:37:52

one was picked up by a tabloid and

1:37:54

the UK Daily Star. And

1:37:57

I think they were probably the most... ridiculous

1:38:00

in terms of their anthropomorphism,

1:38:03

depressed slave robot

1:38:06

hurls itself down the

1:38:08

stairs in a shocking bid to

1:38:11

end its life. It

1:38:14

wasn't even a lot. South Korean

1:38:16

civil servant slave

1:38:18

cyborg, which was designed to

1:38:21

deliver documents, flung

1:38:23

itself over a stairwell, apparently to

1:38:25

escape the boredom of working for

1:38:27

a city council. Maybe

1:38:30

these people watched Titchiker's Guide to the Galaxy,

1:38:32

Marvin the Robot. Yeah,

1:38:54

our entire future was already scripted in the

1:38:57

movies a long time

1:38:59

ago, wasn't it? A

1:39:19

depressed slave robot, feared

1:39:21

to have committed suicide by hurling itself

1:39:23

down a fly to stairs a civil

1:39:25

service cyborg, which looked like

1:39:27

a white trash can. Was

1:39:30

it white trash? Was that what it was upset about? Everybody

1:39:33

calls me white trash with

1:39:35

a screen on its side

1:39:38

designed just to deliver documents.

1:39:41

Witnesses said it was found smashed up

1:39:43

after they saw it circling in one

1:39:46

spot as if someone were there. They

1:39:48

said pieces have been collected and they

1:39:50

will be analyzed. So I guess they

1:39:53

will do some kind of a post-mortem

1:39:56

bot-topsy or something. It

1:39:58

was one of us said, One

1:40:01

of the people working there in civil service, we're

1:40:03

all robots, I guess. It was one of us.

1:40:06

It worked diligently. It

1:40:09

was designed to be smart enough to call an

1:40:12

elevator to move between

1:40:14

floors by itself. South

1:40:17

Korea has the highest robot density in the

1:40:19

world with one robot

1:40:21

for every 10 employees.

1:40:25

You know, it was, let's

1:40:27

see, it would have been a few years

1:40:30

before 2018, maybe going back

1:40:36

to about 2015 or so. They were talking

1:40:38

about what South Korea's job market was going

1:40:40

to look like by 2030. And

1:40:42

they said with artificial intelligence and robotics, we

1:40:46

think that, and they went down

1:40:48

profession by profession. And

1:40:51

the professions that had

1:40:54

the least amount of

1:40:56

replacement by robots were

1:40:58

things like delivery drivers and truck drivers and

1:41:00

things like that. So

1:41:02

they're kind of spot on because everybody here in

1:41:05

the United States was saying, oh, well, they're going

1:41:07

to replace all the drivers first. It's like, no,

1:41:09

that's actually a pretty difficult thing to do. But

1:41:13

in South Korea, they said that was going to be about

1:41:15

50% of people in transportation shipping

1:41:17

related industries would lose their job. But

1:41:20

they said that the white collar jobs, doctors,

1:41:23

lawyers, other things like that, they

1:41:25

would lose about 70% of their jobs. And

1:41:29

that seems to be more along the lines of what we're seeing here.

1:41:32

On Rumble, Atomic Dog, oh, I read that

1:41:34

one. Stella39,

1:41:37

thank you very much for the tip. Bye-bye

1:41:39

X. Yeah, if they're going to require digital ID

1:41:41

to do it, forget about it. I mean, I

1:41:44

have been, as I said yesterday,

1:41:46

I've been frozen there for the

1:41:48

last six years. And

1:41:51

so when I did that search and

1:41:54

somebody, the search engine on

1:41:56

Brave pulled up a

1:41:58

David Knight who is a... a journalist

1:42:01

professor in the Pacific Northwest.

1:42:04

And they pulled him up, it didn't pull up me. It's

1:42:07

like, okay, so where's the hiding

1:42:09

going on? Is it going on in their search thing

1:42:11

or is it going on from X? Because

1:42:13

he had 950 people following him. I

1:42:16

had six years ago, 136,000, I haven't changed since then. So

1:42:21

it's like, so where is it being canned? But

1:42:25

the same type of thing happened. It

1:42:27

didn't even show up that guy on

1:42:30

the Google search engine. So I

1:42:32

don't know if it's X or

1:42:35

if it's something else, but yeah,

1:42:37

it's, what do you expect from

1:42:39

a guy who

1:42:42

puts himself in a Bafamet costume, number one? Number

1:42:44

two, likes that so much that he makes that

1:42:46

his profile picture. What does that tell you? On

1:42:49

Rumble, AP Rumble seat, they had

1:42:52

a tremendous problem with malfunctions and

1:42:54

fraud. When Gates pulled this

1:42:56

in India as a beta test, you have

1:42:58

the odd harsh system. And

1:43:00

of course the way they did it was

1:43:03

coercion, right? You wanna get

1:43:05

welfare, you wanna get healthcare, take

1:43:08

the number. Yes, they did it

1:43:10

to the poorest people and they

1:43:13

still had a lot of problems, a lot

1:43:15

of problems with that. By the way, Gates never

1:43:18

stops talking about

1:43:20

how he is going to redesign everything and

1:43:22

put us into some kind of a techno

1:43:24

hell. And so now he's

1:43:26

back talking about how he's got to redesign cows. God

1:43:30

just didn't do it right. Isn't

1:43:32

it funny? You know, we have, it's

1:43:34

become a thing since Watergate. Every time there's some kind of

1:43:36

a scandal, somebody says it's

1:43:38

such and such gate, such and such a gate. Well,

1:43:40

I think we need to start doing that with Bill

1:43:42

Gates. Instead of

1:43:45

it being Gates Gates, or Gates

1:43:47

Gate, I think we just have

1:43:49

to say that when he starts talking about

1:43:52

getting rid of livestock and cattle and meat

1:43:54

and dairy and things like that, we should

1:43:56

call this a scandalous idea.

1:44:00

this Fart Gate. The atmosphere now is caused by

1:44:02

the electricity grid, which is about 25% or so.

1:44:05

Exactly. So, 24%

1:44:08

it comes from agriculture and forestry. Why

1:44:10

is that causing such a big increase

1:44:12

in carbon? Cows

1:44:14

and other grass-eating species

1:44:17

have a digestion system

1:44:20

that emits methane, and

1:44:23

methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas.

1:44:26

And so cows alone account

1:44:28

for about 6% of

1:44:31

global emissions. So

1:44:34

we need to change cows.

1:44:36

Just cows alone. How are we

1:44:38

going to do that? Well,

1:44:40

actually of all the categories, the

1:44:44

one that has gone better

1:44:47

than I would have expected five

1:44:49

years ago is this work to

1:44:51

make what's called artificial meat. And

1:44:54

so you have people like Impossible or Beyond

1:44:56

Meat, both of which I

1:44:59

invested in. You eat it as well?

1:45:01

Yeah. I get the... Absolutely.

1:45:04

Invested in it. You can go to Burger King and buy

1:45:06

the Impossible Burger. All right. Is it

1:45:08

healthier for you or just healthier for the atmosphere? It's

1:45:10

slightly healthier for you in terms

1:45:12

of less cholesterol. It's

1:45:15

of course dramatic reduction in

1:45:18

methane emissions, animal

1:45:20

cruelty, manure management,

1:45:23

and the pressure that meat consumption

1:45:25

puts on land use. The

1:45:27

main reason why we need to

1:45:29

increase the agricultural output over the rest

1:45:32

of this century is not the population

1:45:34

increase. It's that as countries

1:45:36

get richer, they eat more meat. And

1:45:38

meat is a very inefficient way

1:45:42

of creating calories. No,

1:45:45

it's very efficient. And you get a

1:45:47

lot of nutrients in the meat that you don't get in anything else.

1:45:49

We'll talk more about this when we come back. defending

1:48:29

the American Dream.

1:48:31

You're listening to The David

1:48:33

Knight Show. Of

1:48:36

course, what Bill Gates

1:48:38

conveniently ignores is

1:48:40

the fact that man-made and even

1:48:42

cattle-made CO2.

1:48:45

What it reminds me of, when I look at that,

1:48:48

I was talking to a friend over the weekend, he

1:48:50

said, why these people never talk about how many tens

1:48:53

of millions of bison were

1:48:56

roaming the country before

1:48:58

we had the Industrial Revolution. So

1:49:00

if cattle are really a

1:49:03

big problem, if they're right up there along

1:49:05

with a private car, we've got to get rid of them.

1:49:08

That's not

1:49:11

what these people want. They don't want to

1:49:13

just get rid of the industrialized society. They

1:49:16

want to get rid of the agrarian society as well.

1:49:19

They want to get rid of the animals. They

1:49:21

want to get rid of everything. They're nihilists. They're

1:49:23

not alarmists. They're not grifters. They're nihilists. They want

1:49:26

to kill everybody. Gates coming from a family that's

1:49:28

always focused on abortion and the

1:49:30

rest of this stuff. So yeah,

1:49:32

when we look at that, here's where they're

1:49:35

headed, and it's very concerning. If

1:49:38

you look at the number of bison, estimates

1:49:41

range from 30 to 60 million

1:49:45

before they started taking them

1:49:47

down. They're very easy to hunt, and

1:49:50

they nearly hunted them to

1:49:52

extinction. And you

1:49:54

find them now predominantly around the Yellowstone area

1:49:56

that we're just looking at there. And

1:50:00

we've had these types of things for a

1:50:02

long time. I remember when they were trying

1:50:04

to focus on fine particulate

1:50:06

matter. And to

1:50:08

say we've got to eliminate diesel

1:50:10

engines, we've got to eliminate fireplaces, we've

1:50:12

got to eliminate outdoor grills and all

1:50:14

the rest of this stuff. If

1:50:17

you went to the EPA's website, they actually showed a

1:50:19

picture of the Smokies. It's

1:50:21

like, well, you do realize that the Smokies, that's

1:50:23

not why they're smoky. And

1:50:26

it's because of clouds and things like that. And

1:50:29

it was always that way. Even

1:50:32

before there was any

1:50:34

industrialization, even before Europeans came to this

1:50:36

area. The Indians called it something

1:50:39

equivalent to that. But here's

1:50:41

where they're rolling this out. And it truly

1:50:43

is amazing to look

1:50:46

at the schemes of these people. And I

1:50:48

think they can be easily defeated. We've seen

1:50:50

defeats of them. And yet when

1:50:52

you see people like Mark Ruda who tried

1:50:54

to shut down all the farms in the

1:50:56

Netherlands and tried to control food distribution as

1:50:59

well, again with gates, he

1:51:02

got voted out. But then what

1:51:04

did they do? The globalists put him in in charge

1:51:06

of NATO. He's going to take Jen

1:51:08

Stoltenberger's place at NATO. He's

1:51:11

going to be our wartime constellieri. These

1:51:14

people always have a backup

1:51:16

position, even if they get thrown out.

1:51:19

But we still don't have to let them get away

1:51:21

with what they're doing. One Health is

1:51:24

something that is being sold to us

1:51:28

by the globalists, the One Health Agenda. And

1:51:31

here's the key thing. They're talking about having doctors

1:51:34

writing grocery prescriptions. And

1:51:37

of course it'll be through your CBDC, that

1:51:40

type of thing. They have

1:51:42

plans for doctors to write prescriptions based on

1:51:44

what you are allowed to have. But it's

1:51:46

not even really about your health. It's

1:51:49

about the health of the planet. I'm sorry,

1:51:51

you've had too much protein or whatever. We're

1:51:55

going to have to cut it back.

1:51:57

It's not just the bugs. DARPA wants you

1:51:59

to eat plastic. Now, One

1:52:02

Health Framework extends beyond healthcare,

1:52:04

infiltrating all aspects of life.

1:52:07

Central Bank digital currencies and a

1:52:09

totalitarian biosecurity system could dictate where

1:52:12

individuals live, travel, what they buy,

1:52:14

how they spend their money, what

1:52:16

they eat. The combination

1:52:18

of these control measures with genetic manipulation of

1:52:20

the food supply raises the alarm further. You

1:52:22

see, all of these things converge.

1:52:26

They can come up with different justifications,

1:52:28

different MacGuffins. They can say that we've

1:52:30

got to have complete

1:52:32

centralized control, total surveillance of everybody's movement because of the pandemic,

1:52:34

or we've got to do it because we've got to save

1:52:37

the planet, or we've got to do it because of, you

1:52:39

know, we've got to control the food supply. But

1:52:43

One Health, interestingly enough,

1:52:45

goes back to the first SARS

1:52:48

outbreak in the early 2000s. And

1:52:52

that's when they started talking about planetary

1:52:54

health. And so

1:52:56

they started talking about this as a holistic

1:53:00

solution to everything, but

1:53:03

it's all the usual suspects. It's

1:53:06

the WHO, it's Bill Gates, it's the

1:53:08

World Bank, it's the Rockefellers, it's the

1:53:10

NIH, the CDC, the USDA, the FDA,

1:53:12

all of the usual suspects that

1:53:14

are there. And these are

1:53:17

going to be the same people who told you, well, you can't

1:53:19

have ivermectin, you

1:53:21

can't have HCQ. You're

1:53:24