Podchaser Logo
Home
The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

Released Thursday, 13th April 2023
 1 person rated this episode
The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

The Quiet Coronation of Joe Biden

Thursday, 13th April 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey, so what's Topgolf? Well,

0:02

it's golf, but it's also not golf. Not

0:04

golf? Yeah, not golf, but still

0:06

golf. And not golf. Yes. With

0:08

the golf. Exactly. So you're saying

0:10

it's golf. And not golf. Just to be clear,

0:13

Topgolf is 100% golf. And

0:15

also 100% not golf. But that's 200%. Right,

0:19

but it's like a million percent fun, so can we

0:21

stop doing math and just go play? It's

0:23

golf. It's not golf. It's

0:26

Topgolf. Download the app, book

0:28

a bay, and come play around.

0:32

This victory belongs to Joe

0:34

Biden. The midterms changed everything for

0:36

Joe Biden. The Biden track record

0:38

is a phenomenal track record of

0:40

accomplishment.

0:41

President Biden has been a great president

0:43

for our country. And he is a leader for

0:46

such a time as this. After

0:48

months of questioning his leadership and

0:50

the prospect of a second term. I'm

0:52

rooting for President Biden to run. I think he is

0:55

our strongest candidate. I think he has demonstrated

0:57

that he has deserved it, to re-election.

0:59

I hope that he does seek re-election.

1:02

Party leaders were now lining up behind

1:04

him. And against that backdrop,

1:07

the party made an announcement that caught my attention.

1:10

President Biden is proposing a major

1:12

change to the presidential nomination process.

1:14

They wanted to change the order in which states would

1:17

vote in the presidential primary.

1:18

His proposal would have South Carolina

1:21

voting first in the nation. Putting South

1:23

Carolina first. If it comes to pass,

1:25

Iowa would be no longer among the first

1:28

states, and New Hampshire would no longer have the

1:30

first primary. Biden

1:31

talked about it in terms of representation.

1:33

Mr. Biden says the current nominating

1:36

process does not reflect the diversity

1:38

of America. And

1:40

the importance of black voters in the Democratic

1:42

Party. This acknowledgment that black voters

1:44

have an early say-so in this

1:46

process, I think, is a thank you

1:48

to black voters as a whole. But I wondered

1:50

if there was another way of thinking about what was

1:52

going on. Okay,

1:56

Sted, where are we now? So

2:01

the week after the RNC's winter meeting,

2:03

we went to Philadelphia, where the DNC

2:06

was holding its winter meeting, and

2:08

where the only real agenda item was

2:10

making the change official.

2:14

South Carolina was the state that saved Biden's candidacy

2:17

in 2020 after initial losses

2:19

in Iowa and New Hampshire.

2:21

It's basically Biden's home turf.

2:23

So putting it first would

2:25

make it way harder for a serious

2:28

Democratic candidate to get past

2:30

the early stages of a primary. So

2:32

I'm wondering how much of this is

2:35

morally driven, racial representation

2:37

driven, or how much of this is politics driven?

2:40

Right, to give Biden more of an edge

2:42

in the primary, just in case somebody might

2:44

want to challenge him. Yeah, to just make things

2:46

a little easier for a president who

2:49

might need that boost. By the end of

2:51

this meeting, it would be a done deal.

2:53

More than a year and a half before

2:55

the presidential election, the Democratic

2:58

establishment would have locked in the party's plan

3:01

for 2024 to nominate an

3:03

80-year-old president

3:04

unpopular with much of the party's base, and

3:07

regardless of what might happen on the Republican

3:10

side. And I just wanted to

3:12

see if they'd acknowledge it.

3:15

From the New York Times, I'm Estette

3:17

Herndon. This is The Run-Up. Hey.

3:21

You're here. How was it? Hey.

3:24

You're here. How was it? Actually

3:27

boring everything

3:30

to get you into it. Just

3:32

a few days after we got back from the RNC

3:35

in California, I met up with my colleagues

3:37

Elisa Gutierrez and Luke Vander Ploek.

3:39

This is no Dana point. I will tell you that.

3:43

Yeah. And even before we got to

3:45

the convention hotel, it was already

3:47

clear. The vibe at the DNC

3:49

was completely different than the RNC. Number

3:52

one. We are in frigid Philadelphia.

3:55

freezing cold

3:57

in Philadelphia. The

4:01

conference was being held on two floors of a

4:03

Sheraton hotel, not a sprawling

4:05

resort in Orange County. Yeah.

4:10

And pretty much everything would be open to the press. Is

4:13

it your credential? These sort

4:15

of events usually attract protesters. Oh,

4:17

yeah, I mean, you know. Oh,

4:19

yeah. But there weren't any.

4:21

No grassroots outsiders holding signs.

4:24

There was one guy with a van that said, that said,

4:27

don't run Joe, circling the hotel.

4:30

But that was it. When we got inside,

4:33

DNC members were starting to gather for committee

4:35

meetings. We grabbed a spot in

4:37

a quiet corner on the second floor and

4:39

started texting people from the Rules and Bylaws

4:41

Committee. They've

4:43

been the first to approve Biden's proposal, ahead

4:45

of the full vote this weekend. What

4:47

I want to do today is figure out

4:50

if any of them have any reservations

4:53

about the speed at which the DNC is

4:55

really coalescing around the president's

4:58

re-election vision. Right. Yeah,

5:01

all right. You're just done it. How

5:03

are you? How are you? How are you? And

5:06

as they started coming by to talk... Hi, how

5:08

are you? It's nice to meet you. It's very good

5:10

to meet you. How's it going? Good. I'd

5:13

take your hand when I go to the mic. I

5:16

wanted to ask them all a version of the same

5:17

question. You still see polling say

5:19

that people are unsure about whether they want Biden to run

5:21

again. Biden to run again, have concerns about things

5:24

like age and health. How do you all

5:26

as DNC members square

5:28

both what seems to be a universal

5:32

carpet rollout for the president

5:34

and his party at the same time

5:36

that the public is not

5:38

necessarily there yet?

5:40

Aren't you ignoring your voters? We're

5:42

proud to run on the accomplishments of

5:44

this president and this administration.

5:48

We are proud to talk about

5:51

the changes that this president

5:53

is making in people's lives around

5:56

the country. I guess I'm saying every

5:58

objective measure for a different

6:00

voters are would not say is they're united

6:02

around Biden 2024 as the people are

6:04

in this building. Is there any way that

6:06

the people in this building are wrestling with that fact?

6:12

The re-election campaign has not begun.

6:15

We expect that when it begins and

6:17

when we have the opportunity to talk

6:20

more about what has been achieved, Joe

6:22

Biden is going to

6:23

do very well. Look, I

6:26

think that, look,

6:28

let me just say there,

6:32

the

6:34

idea about South Carolina

6:36

going first, first, first within

6:39

the early window was, you know,

6:41

something that the president really wanted. And

6:44

we just reflected

6:46

back because we

6:49

thought it made A lot of sense, the

6:51

president's wishes. And I

6:53

think it was, it is

6:56

a matter of

7:02

making a statement to

7:06

a community that

7:11

has felt excluded. And

7:17

it was a brilliant, thought

7:20

that the president had, and we

7:23

honored it. Sometimes you make

7:25

very, very, very important symbolic statements,

7:27

and it sends a message.

7:29

Is that how it was communicated

7:31

from the president? The

7:33

job of the DNC has always been to support

7:35

the president. But I was actually

7:38

a little surprised by how quickly committee

7:40

members were putting this decision all on

7:42

Joe Biden,

7:43

even while they were defending it. Because

7:46

obviously Biden has the most to gain from this

7:48

move. And so that only made

7:50

me more skeptical, that the reasons for

7:52

this change were purely around symbolism

7:55

and representation.

7:58

I just didn't buy it. why

8:08

isn't as a very valiant violently ill

8:10

or except and that's what brought me to leo doctor

8:13

can you tell us for audio just you

8:15

can you say your name and what title role as you've

8:17

had in the dnc

8:18

sure my name is leo daughtry

8:20

i am an at large member of the dnc

8:23

representing the great state of new york at

8:26

the dnc i've been the chief of staff for

8:28

howard dean and terry mcauliffe i've

8:31

been the ceo of the two thousand and eight and

8:33

two thousand and sixteen conventions

8:35

and the only person and party history do have been

8:37

sealed twice and

8:39

that's

8:39

my role now i'm a member of the

8:42

rules and bylaws committee so you've done it all

8:44

in terms of the dnc roles

8:46

were pretty much i

8:48

understand how the dnc works out

8:52

for you as a as a black woman the some who has been

8:54

influential and kind of black politics

8:56

and democratic party where are you looking

8:58

for i will new hampshire the change for a long time

9:00

well you know i

9:02

have always found it to be an

9:05

annoyance and something

9:07

that i as a black voter could

9:09

not understand how we were

9:11

allowing these

9:12

two small white

9:14

states to have such an outside

9:17

impact on the process but

9:20

it was considered sacrosanct and

9:22

you just didn't mess what iowa new hampshire was

9:24

like you know divine right so

9:26

this was a cycle after

9:29

the last thing

9:30

with the iowa debacle well

9:32

we didn't know who won for three weeks through

9:35

it was like a kick we

9:37

gotta do something here so

9:39

that really the base of our party african

9:42

american voters get to have the first say

9:44

that how much of that decision specifically

9:47

around south carolina going first is

9:49

a rules and bylaws this isn't vs a

9:51

president biden decision

9:52

well we had decided in the

9:54

rules and bylaws committee what five states it

9:56

was gonna be like the

9:58

white house had made their interests

10:01

known and what their criteria were. The

10:03

order we were still jiggering

10:06

around with, but the president settled

10:08

that question for us, so we did not have to endure

10:11

several more rules meetings

10:12

to beat

10:14

that horse in the glue. But let's look at the five

10:17

states. Georgia has a bunch of blackfolders. Certainly

10:19

Michigan's got blackfolders there. Why South

10:21

Carolina first?

10:23

I think because we already knew South

10:25

Carolina had the capacity to

10:27

run an early primary. We know that,

10:29

so it is a foolproof, tried

10:32

and true mechanism for

10:34

running an early primary. We don't have to

10:36

guess about whether they're going to do it well. We

10:38

know they do it well because they've done it before. That

10:41

was a big part of that process, too. How

10:44

do we separate those reasons from

10:46

the politics of it? Because at the same time,

10:48

Iowa, New Hampshire, states Joe Biden, Tibetan, South

10:51

Carolina's a state he did well in. But

10:53

couldn't this also be read as a president

10:56

rewarding a state or prioritizing

10:58

a state that serves his political interests?

11:04

And okay, I don't have a problem with that. He's

11:06

the president, he's the head of the party. So he

11:08

gets to make the decisions that are best for the

11:10

party. Whether his personal

11:12

interests played a role in

11:15

line with our objectives, which is to shake

11:17

up this system to ensure

11:20

that the base of your party who

11:22

shows up every single cycle for

11:24

you have an

11:25

early set. That's interesting because sometimes

11:27

I've been asking folks that question. They've been asking like politics

11:30

is just not evolved to this. We're a political

11:32

party. Everything's political. This is just

11:34

about the, you know, representation. It

11:36

was just about, and so I appreciate you saying that

11:38

because I feel like

11:39

it has to be political. Well, I mean, for my,

11:42

this is the Democratic Party. We are political.

11:45

Every decision we make is political.

11:47

I think to say that it's not

11:49

is kind of disingenuous.

11:50

Yeah, yeah. Do you see

11:52

that the biggest reason that

11:54

this change was made is a symbolic?

11:57

I've heard some people talk about it in a kind of symbolic, us

11:59

putting black motors.

12:00

And I've also heard people use

12:02

kind of other constructions. How important was that

12:05

symbolism in making this decision?

12:07

For me, I kind

12:10

of put it in the mind of President Obama's presidency.

12:13

There's symbolism and

12:14

there's substance. And I think having

12:16

South Carolina first is a combination

12:18

of that. So there is the symbol of

12:21

black voters having an early say, but there's

12:23

the substance of what that means for

12:25

the party to have to invest

12:28

time for candidates, to have to

12:30

invest time, energy, and resources

12:33

in a state where black voters are

12:35

so important. Half of the argument about these early states, particularly

12:38

in the United States, is the economics of it. Millions

12:41

of dollars are spent by

12:43

media organizations and by campaigns

12:46

in those early states. So shifting

12:49

the order messes with their money. So

12:51

when you don't have millions of dollars going in, their economy's gonna be different

12:54

this year. this cycle

12:56

because they're not first. But what that

12:58

does in a state like South Carolina is

13:00

help to improve it. So now the money will be

13:02

spent there. And that's important.

13:04

Yeah. But if you look at the midterms,

13:07

black voters were one of the weaker spots

13:10

for Democrats in the midterm that was

13:12

pretty good for them. Has representation

13:14

in the way that Democrats have been prioritizing

13:17

it, is that actually the priority of black voters?

13:19

Is that actually translating to black

13:21

people as what they want?

13:22

I think black voters want to be represented

13:25

and they want to know that their needs and concerns

13:27

are being cared for and taken

13:29

into account. Nobody wants to

13:31

be negated and ignored. So

13:34

whether everybody agrees with the way it's

13:36

been done, I think it is

13:38

a far sight better than saying, I'm

13:41

not included, I don't see myself,

13:44

I don't hear myself. When I look

13:46

at that picture, where

13:48

am I?

13:49

Now we can argue about,

13:52

did he say it right? Did she say

13:54

it right? Is that the right word? Do I care

13:56

about that? But what I know

13:58

when I look at that stage, I see

14:00

Kamala Harris, when I look

14:02

at the Biden administration, I see

14:04

myself,

14:05

I see me at

14:07

the table, and that means something. And

14:10

so, you know, we can debate about the right

14:12

words, but I

14:14

see it and I feel it in my community. I

14:17

worked in the Clinton administration when black unemployment was

14:19

double digits. Try to hire

14:21

somebody these days, everybody's working. Yeah,

14:23

yeah. But it does feel as if there's

14:25

been a big shift from where Democrats were last year to this

14:27

year, right? There was not a universal

14:29

agreement or excitement about Joe Biden. There

14:32

was nervousness about whether that was the right

14:34

type of candidate to lead the party going forward.

14:37

How did that shift from there to now,

14:40

where universally folks

14:43

feel excited about, I

14:45

mean, people have talked about, we use words like coronation

14:47

for Joe Biden and looking ahead to this

14:50

one.

14:50

Because he's an excellent president.

14:54

He is very good at presidenting and

14:57

his policies have worked. We see

14:59

them, we feel them in our community.

15:01

And so you say, if it ain't broke,

15:05

why go with something unknown when this guy's such

15:07

a good president and you know, we

15:09

like Uncle Joe.

15:11

Thank you, I appreciate

15:13

that. A number

15:15

of people set a version of this to me. If

15:18

it ain't broke, don't fix it. And

15:20

to be clear, I'm not crazy.

15:23

I understand why the party wouldn't want to encourage

15:26

challenge to the sitting president. But

15:28

there's a reason I'm asking why South Carolina

15:31

specifically? It's a moderate

15:33

state filled with older black voters who

15:36

prioritize qualities like trust and

15:38

experience and often look to

15:40

community leaders

15:41

like Congressman Jim Clyburn for guidance,

15:43

and who typically back establishment

15:46

candidates they believe can win a general election,

15:48

like Joe Biden. So

15:51

what I'm driving at here is, is

15:53

the party using the language of representation

15:56

as a cover for protecting Biden. without

15:59

doing the much harder work a motivating

16:01

disillusioned black voters

16:05

lists of a long time

16:07

no say before

16:10

we even got to the meeting with as

16:13

to talk with the party chair jamie

16:15

here so it wasn't clear

16:17

if it was going to happen but then we got

16:19

a call from party officials telling

16:21

us to come to a conference room we were at

16:23

the rnc and they are quite so

16:26

boy yeah yeah for harrison is a

16:28

black democrat from south carolina because

16:30

it was handpicked for the role by president biden

16:33

as

16:33

chair he's function as the face

16:35

of biden state order change

16:37

so he's the person i wanted to ask directly

16:40

was the dnc reading the primary i

16:43

before voters had a chance to way i

16:45

hear the symbolic importance of south carolina

16:47

going far as what is the tangible importance

16:50

of how that will impact you think how people are

16:52

overpriced i think you will see

16:55

mean the think

16:57

about these past few years of having i

16:59

were new hampshire first and second people

17:02

probably heard more about ethanol than anything

17:04

else because

17:05

every presidential candidate had

17:07

to talk about because that was that something

17:09

that was important in iowa now

17:12

you come to south carolina nobody

17:14

ever talked about the maternal mortality

17:16

rate a black women in presidential

17:18

elections com the harris cory

17:21

booker talked about and then joe biden

17:23

hearing that when he went to the

17:25

beauty shops and when he went to the churches as

17:27

will south carolina

17:28

now rule

17:30

black folks urban black folks are going

17:32

to be able to we and on those people

17:34

who are running for president and expressed

17:37

in the issues that important to them they're

17:39

a quarter who they are and what

17:41

the struggle with all those things now

17:43

will be a part of the calculus and earlier

17:46

in the mindset of canada's is they come

17:48

into the states ah in

17:50

order to compete and therefore they're

17:53

going to make some promises on how they're going to address that

17:55

and

17:55

we're going to see those promises translate when

17:57

they get elected in off so it is just happened

18:00

that the political priorities of the president

18:02

also happened to align with the state

18:05

that he did the best in and the state that

18:07

is historically chosen candidates

18:10

who are more in line with the DNC

18:12

than said and the establishment. It just happens

18:14

to be happening. You were hanging out with the Republicans

18:17

and the conspiracy theorists too long at the RNC,

18:19

man, because in the essence,

18:21

South Carolina is earnest, its place

18:23

as an early state. So it wasn't- It

18:25

was already an early state. It was already an

18:27

early state. it already showed in the

18:30

last few elections that it, out

18:32

of all the

18:32

early states, chose the person

18:35

who ended up being the nominee and also

18:37

ended up being president of the United States. So

18:39

if you get good grades on your report

18:41

card, shouldn't you be rewarded for it? Poll

18:44

after poll says the majority of Americans do not want

18:46

Biden to run for reelection and includes

18:48

the majority of Democrats. How did the actions with the DNC

18:51

square with that reality? Listen, I

18:53

had a lot of polls also that said I was neck

18:55

and neck with Lindsey Graham and I didn't win, right? So

18:58

a poll is a poll, but what we do know,

19:00

concrete, is that Joe Biden has delivered

19:02

for the American people with

19:04

a very slim majority in both the House

19:07

and the Senate. So in the end of the day,

19:09

I hope folks understand, don't bet

19:11

against Joe Biden. I understand that. I guess it's

19:13

not a question about his accomplishments, not a question about

19:15

the midterms. But that's what you run on. No, no, no,

19:17

but it's a question about, do you want that person to be the person

19:19

going forward? Joe Biden would be 82 by the time of 2024. It

19:23

is very reasonable, and we have talked to voters who

19:26

like the last four years, but still have

19:28

questions about the next word. My question's

19:30

about the next four years. But instead,

19:33

why do you vote for somebody for president? I

19:37

think there's a lot of reasons. People have a lot of answers to the question.

19:39

But ultimately, people vote for somebody

19:41

who can deliver for them. This

19:44

man has been delivering for

19:46

the American people in a way that no president

19:48

has in recent history. And so

19:50

he has the record.

19:52

Now he intends to run for reelection. we

19:54

had the dnc are going to make sure that joe biden

19:57

stays in white house for another four years There

19:59

is no inkling. that

20:00

he will not be the nominee of our party.

20:03

I understand that. He deserves that. Joe

20:05

Biden's age does not come up at all, does

20:07

not, does not, because that comes up for voters. That

20:10

is a thing that they express that looks forward-looking

20:12

question for them. Something else that has come up

20:14

for voters is the fact that if you lived

20:16

in a rural community and didn't have wifi,

20:19

now you got it. Something else that has

20:21

come up is that if you didn't have healthcare, now we

20:23

have more people on healthcare in this country than ever

20:25

before, partly because of the work of Joe

20:27

Biden.

20:28

It's interesting. As you mentioned, we just came from

20:30

the RNC, and Republicans had a very bad

20:33

midterms, as we both know. Oh, they

20:35

do. And, but- I want to send Rona Flowers

20:37

and congratulate her, because I'm so happy

20:40

she got reelected. But the consequence of

20:42

that midterms is that they're very openly talking

20:44

about need to make changes for the future. They're

20:46

very openly talking about what they need to change

20:48

for 2024. What is that version

20:50

of that conversation in the Democratic Party? Because

20:53

there's a lot, while there are a lot of good signs for the midterms

20:55

for Democrats, it's not a universal

20:57

sweeping victory. Democrats lost the

20:58

House, right? Like, what are the changes for 2024?

21:02

Less than 6,000 votes across six

21:04

districts, right? Kevin McCarthy is the speaker of the

21:06

House. So I understand that. All I'm saying is what

21:08

is the Democratic Party's lesson going forward?

21:10

We know also the history. We were supposed to

21:12

lose the House by a lot. What, 20, 30 votes? We

21:16

didn't lose the Senate seat. We actually gained Senate

21:18

seats. But that's

21:19

not to say that we are not assessing

21:22

what our strengths are and where our weaknesses

21:25

are. We are doing that. I'm saying to look

21:27

for that assessment, where should I look?

21:29

I mean, I can tell you one of the things that

21:31

we want to do is to make sure that we increase turnout.

21:33

We want to make sure that we solidify the coalitions

21:36

that we rely upon in a word to win our

21:38

elections. We need to shore up

21:40

the black and brown and AEPI coalitions

21:43

that

21:44

are made up of the Democratic Party, black men,

21:47

Latino men, I mean, different groups. Right,

21:49

because to that question, we have certainly seen a growth

21:51

in the way Democrats talk about prioritizing

21:54

black voters. Even, I would say, this week as

21:56

another example, in South Carolina to

21:58

the front of the primary. But

22:00

the midterms

22:01

turnout among black voters was not one of the Democrats'

22:03

bright spots. How do you reckon the

22:06

rhetoric that is coming from the Democrats

22:08

about improvement

22:09

and prioritizing black voters with

22:11

the reality that that's not really translated

22:14

into growth in black votes? Well, I think

22:16

we have to just continue to do the work and

22:18

we will continue to do the work. That

22:20

means being in the community all the time instead

22:22

of just popping into the community a few months

22:25

before the election. Because that's how you rebuild

22:27

trust. That is how folks

22:30

then see the value of

22:32

actually registering and then going out

22:34

to vote for you because then they know that

22:36

it's gonna translate into some improvements

22:38

in the communities that they live in.

22:39

Thank you, guys. Yeah, thank

22:42

you. I appreciate it. I really appreciate

22:44

it. Yeah, no, no, no. You know, I'm gonna ask.

22:46

I know you're gonna

22:46

answer. I know you're gonna answer. I don't know.

22:49

I know you brought it to you. Yeah. There's

22:52

some subtext going on here. A

22:55

lot of Black Democrats in places like

22:57

South Carolina resent

22:59

the characterization that they're being used,

23:03

that they're followers of the establishment, or

23:05

just a pawn in Biden's game.

23:08

They think it has racist undertones, makes

23:11

it sound like Black voters don't think for themselves,

23:14

and flattens the diversity between Black

23:16

voting groups. And of course,

23:19

if a Democrat wanted to run against Biden

23:21

in 2024, they could still

23:23

go to South Carolina and make that case

23:26

directly.

23:29

Can you introduce your name and what you do

23:31

for the audio? The second

23:33

day of the meeting, there was new energy in the

23:35

hotel. That evening, President

23:38

Biden and Vice President Harris were gonna speak.

23:40

I'm Elaine K. Mark. I'm a senior

23:43

fellow at the Brookings Institution. And there was

23:45

one more DNC member we wanted to talk to. And

23:47

I'm the author of Primary Politics,

23:50

Everything You Need to Know about How America

23:52

Nominates Its Presidents.

23:54

That seems like a pretty relevant

23:56

discussion for this week. It's a relevant discussion

23:58

to this. I'm also a member of the. How

24:00

long have you been on the rules committee? Oh,

24:03

since 1997. So

24:05

you do the math. Elaine

24:07

K. Mark is another DNC lifer. And

24:10

I didn't just want to talk to her because she's an expert

24:12

on the topic. I'd also read

24:14

her work and knew that she had more complicated

24:17

views on the state of the party than a lot

24:19

of what I was hearing. It seems as

24:21

if some of this is informed by

24:23

a Democratic party that has largely,

24:26

largely caught less than Biden, right? Right?

24:28

That a year ago, there was not

24:31

the same level of

24:33

unity around his

24:36

administration. There was certainly fear

24:38

around the midterms, and there

24:40

was much more kind of open

24:42

discussion of presidential liabilities,

24:44

things like age and health and the like. That's

24:47

kind of evaporated. Yeah. It feels

24:49

like. It's gone. It's a

24:51

very different feeling. And

24:53

I think it was the legislative wins

24:56

and he was just like a dog

24:59

with a bone. He just kept doing it

25:01

and doing it and doing it and getting these wins.

25:03

He got the wins. The midterms

25:05

were a terrific success for him

25:08

and validation for him. And

25:11

so the party is saying, okay, Joe, you

25:13

know, this is great. We're with you. And

25:16

I think everybody will be with him for the next

25:18

two years.

25:18

In your view as a Democrat, in

25:20

your view as kind of a political expert, how

25:23

should we view that coalescing. It's not as if the

25:25

things that made people nervous have changed.

25:27

Yeah. Look,

25:29

I think we should view it as follows. The

25:32

man has done a good job. He's

25:35

not senile. He's done

25:38

a very, very difficult

25:40

dance on Ukraine that we should

25:42

all be really pleased with. And

25:45

that, by the way, is the

25:47

thing you do when you have experience. And

25:49

I think so So everybody sort of say,

25:52

okay, yeah, he's old, big

25:54

deal. There are advantages

25:57

that

25:57

come with age as well as

25:59

the density.

26:00

So maybe he's not the

26:02

most exciting speaker every day. Who cares, right? Look

26:05

at the other things that he's doing. And

26:08

I think that's where people come out and why the party is so unified.

26:11

Yeah, I mean, and I

26:11

definitely feel that argument here. I mean, that seems to be

26:13

where the party has really landed. And

26:17

that feels, honestly, true for progressives, people

26:20

who did not support him initially. Definitely feels like folks

26:22

have come around to that point. At the

26:24

same time,

26:25

you know, we read poll after poll. That

26:27

tells us Americans are not there. that

26:29

Americans are mixed about

26:32

the prospect of a Biden nomination

26:34

for the next presidency, even if they feel good about

26:37

what he did as president. Right. And

26:39

I think that one of the things we're seeing in the polls,

26:41

and we saw this in the midterm polls, is

26:43

that saying that you are

26:46

not crazy about Biden is

26:48

not the same as saying you're not going to vote for

26:50

him. You say that that's where I think

26:52

all the pundits went wrong. Yep. It

26:55

was they assumed that, oh, yeah, you disapprove

26:57

to the president so you weren't going to vote for them. No, that's not

26:59

the case. Or you didn't like the Democratic

27:02

Party for this or that. That didn't necessarily

27:04

mean you weren't going to vote for

27:05

them. Or you just didn't like the economy, so you weren't going

27:07

to vote for the party in power. Those were all old

27:09

rules that kind of got jumped in. They got all

27:12

thrown away. I mean, that

27:14

was a big problem. And

27:17

I don't think that's true anymore. Part

27:19

of this is because the

27:21

Republican Party has sort of gone off the rails.

27:23

This is where I'm going. So thank you for leading. Yeah,

27:25

is this where you're going to go? Yeah, I mean, part

27:27

of this is we have a crazy Republican party

27:30

run by lunatics who are extremists.

27:33

And I'll tell you an interesting anecdote.

27:36

After the election, I was at a panel talking

27:39

to some diplomats in Washington, and there was a nice

27:42

young Republican man there who said

27:44

to me, well, you know, we did

27:46

a good job. We recruited a lot of normal

27:48

Republicans. Normal.

27:51

It stuck in my mind, right?

27:53

And he was talking about his House candidates. And

27:56

I said, you know, I've been doing this for 30

27:59

years longer than. you'll have been and

28:01

i have never heard any representative

28:03

of a political party have to

28:05

call their candidates normal

28:09

okay now the fact that they called

28:11

did the normal and i've heard other

28:13

republicans do this too is an indication

28:16

that they know they've

28:17

got a lot of nut cases either

28:19

marjorie taylor green so the world scary

28:21

crazy people in their party and

28:24

that is you know i i warn

28:27

democrats all the time is that

28:29

party returns to a normal republican

28:31

party were

28:32

in trouble okay this is also where

28:34

i'm going i mean heard so you're

28:36

say like because it does feel

28:38

as if so much of this coalescing is

28:40

based off of books confidence

28:43

that republican stay where they are yeah that

28:46

and i'm i appreciate someone here

28:49

admitting that i think of it does

28:51

feel at the center of all of this is

28:53

a look around to the other side we were just at the rnc

28:55

so know you're angry enough kind of to go around

28:58

but it does feel as if the here is slightly

29:00

predicate it off of that republican

29:03

path continuing in a crazy

29:05

direction

29:06

right and the and that's why some of us

29:08

and in our writings you know argue

29:10

to fix the problems with the democratic party

29:13

okay don't assume that we're always

29:15

going to have a bunch of wackos to run against

29:17

because they will get over this american political

29:20

parties they learn their slow

29:22

learners but they learn okay so

29:25

just as they're getting rid of the

29:27

trump be people in the party

29:29

which i do believe they will do eventually

29:31

we have to make sure that we're not out there talking

29:34

about open borders and defending the police

29:37

and things that really hurt us in

29:39

elections so we have our own work

29:41

to do it's not just the republicans but

29:43

we have our own work to do because at some point

29:46

they're going to nominate somebody who is not

29:48

trump and then we

29:50

may have a real race on our hands

29:51

he is is a risk

29:54

for democrats to coalesce

29:56

around biden at the same time

29:58

republicans are having an open car where

30:00

they might do what you're talking about right now?

30:03

Well, it's that there is obviously some risk

30:05

in that. I mean, there always is. You know, you

30:08

get a great candidate on the other side. Listen,

30:11

you're talking to somebody who worked at the DNC

30:13

for Jimmy Carter when Ronald

30:15

Reagan appeared out of the

30:18

Republican Party, and, you know, he

30:20

was a superstar. I mean, he was just a superstar,

30:22

and so we lost that 1980 election right

30:26

across the board. It was pretty bad.

30:28

I mean, a very like landscape-shifting

30:31

election. Landscape-shifting, those do

30:33

happen, right? Those do happen. You

30:36

can't really

30:38

prepare for them.

30:39

Thank you. I really appreciate this. This was

30:41

really helpful. Yeah. We

30:44

found each other. Yeah, I think we. We

30:47

appreciate the honesty around here. Have

30:49

a sit down. A

30:55

few hours later, After

30:58

Secret Service swept the hotel. Go, go,

31:00

go, go, go, go. And

31:06

I present the Jill

31:25

Biden, I'm Jill Biden's husband. One

31:31

real Twitter. She's a Philly

31:33

girl. And he hammed it

31:35

up for the friendly crowd.

31:36

There's no way I could stand here

31:38

today without saying, Go Eagles, bye.

31:43

Then, he basically took a victory lap.

31:46

Remember the midterms? Remember

31:48

how our friends in the press said, the pundits

31:51

alike, and even some of our own party, predicted

31:53

a giant red wave? Oh,

31:57

guess what? What? It never happened. He

32:02

talked up the Democrats' victories in the midterms.

32:12

His legislative accomplishments. And

32:21

then. Biden

32:30

turned yet again to the other side.

32:33

This is not your father's Republican Party. No,

32:36

really, think about it. He's not conservatives.

32:38

He's not conservatives.

32:41

He's disruptive people. Last

32:43

year, he updated his anti-Trump

32:45

message to be an anti-Maga message.

32:49

Now he was updating it once again. Just

32:51

take a look at what they're doing. They can't

32:53

pay non-fiscal responsibility, but

32:55

the first bill to pass the House of Representatives

32:58

added $114 billion to the deficit. First

33:02

one. He framed Republicans as extreme

33:05

and dangerous,

33:07

not because of January 6 or election

33:09

denial, but because of their agenda

33:11

in the House of Representatives. I intend to get it

33:14

done more now, so let me ask you

33:16

a simple question. Are you with

33:18

me? Yeah!

33:21

It sounded like a stump speech for 2024.

33:24

We are more here! We are more here! We

33:27

are more here! We are more here! We are more here!

33:29

We are more here! We

33:33

are more here! On this cold Friday

33:36

in Philadelphia, one thing has become

33:38

clear.

33:39

This is Joe Biden's Democratic Party now.

33:42

His

33:42

message, his priorities,

33:44

and his voter coalition, which

33:47

helped the party remake itself after the shock

33:49

of 2016.

33:51

It may not be the party that Democrats envision for themselves

33:53

themselves before Trump.

33:55

But it's working.

33:58

So imagine the game of presidential black.

34:00

jack democrats

34:02

are pretty sure they have a good hand a president

34:04

biden but more

34:06

than anything else they're confident

34:09

the dealer they're playing against has a

34:11

much worse one and the

34:13

result is a party

34:15

that all in

34:28

thousands of spring deals just arrived

34:31

at your nordstrom rack store save big

34:33

on the seasons best new arrivals from

34:35

adidas nike made well steve

34:37

madden current geiger london and more

34:39

starting at only thirty dollars seriously

34:42

great brands great prices so

34:45

rak your look for spring and get first

34:47

dibs on a warm weather sales you

34:49

want now starting it just thirty dollars

34:51

at or nordstrom rack storm my

34:55

name is abdul latif to hear on the

34:57

east africa correspondent of the new york times

35:00

speaking to someone in their own

35:02

local language opens up

35:04

a level of honesty and transparency

35:06

that would not be present when

35:08

i speak to somebody in english when

35:11

i come into someone's home and greet them in somali

35:13

or swahili you know like her body or her

35:15

body their know it brings you into the room

35:18

i understand the culture coming from and i'm speaking

35:20

to you in the language than you understand

35:23

that level of familiarity i use

35:25

that to really get deeper into

35:27

what's going on what i'm trying to

35:29

do is help our readers understand

35:32

what's happening he in east africa

35:34

and see how it plays a role

35:36

in the bigger picture near term subscribers

35:39

keep a journal is reporting from across the

35:41

map to help you understand the

35:43

issues shaping our world if

35:46

you'd like to subscribe you could do that

35:48

at n y times dot com slash

35:50

subscribe

35:53

the

35:53

next morning

35:54

stat where are we headed

35:57

now we're headed

35:59

back to the shared set out

36:09

that the next morning take to

36:12

where

36:12

i live back to this air then and

36:14

philadelphia for the final day

36:16

of the dnc winter meetings

36:19

today is going to be the day

36:21

that we get the formal boat to

36:23

officially changed the primary order

36:25

for democrats we know that this

36:27

is just a formality and

36:29

the states are gonna shift devo

36:32

forest and nominating for president will

36:37

be get back inside all the dnc members

36:40

or cap

36:42

on

36:45

the road

36:46

rules are rules of not last

36:48

minute all approving

36:50

the reports that the

36:55

eyes it's

37:03

an anticlimactic into a weekend

37:05

that's been defined by the absence

37:07

of drama and it's

37:09

in especially stark contrast to the week before

37:12

with

37:12

it's protests for the energized

37:15

grass roots and an establishment

37:17

that remained beholden to them regardless

37:19

of the mid term results here

37:22

there's no pressure to stop democrats from lining

37:24

up behind biden and no pressure

37:26

to stop the establishment from changing

37:28

the rules to lock in his nomination by

37:31

holding some other but then

37:33

after all the voting was over how

37:35

are you i'm a guy that i did i am

37:38

i found this guy so

37:40

know that rises her sitting

37:42

alone on the couch wearing a cowboy

37:44

hat no no

37:46

surprises we all know shan

37:48

is a progressive member of the dnc from michigan

37:51

about dumb you gotten involved with the democratic

37:53

party after being inspired by bernie

37:55

sanders and

37:56

it's not the specific changes to the state

37:58

order who takes issue with there's

38:00

lots of good reasons for those states or maybe good reasons

38:02

rather state area for michigan's i'm

38:04

glad that we're you know earlier

38:07

it's how was done they had a process

38:09

that was directed by the president from the top

38:11

down jimmy harrison like

38:13

the guys really person bone and andrei

38:16

he and i target and a couple conversations

38:19

but you know he goes around talking in a way

38:21

that

38:22

can easily be interpreted to mean

38:25

he's taking orders from the president and

38:27

it's are really are so i put

38:29

this i think it's really important

38:32

to have a distinction between the party

38:34

and the elected because the party

38:37

has to be the organization that holds you electrodes

38:39

accountable because if

38:41

the party isn't the one that organizes holding

38:43

them accountable what other organisation

38:46

is do that has significant power

38:49

over candidates over

38:51

elected people are your biggest subject said

38:53

with how this process

38:55

change was that it was directed

38:57

tops out from the president to the dnc

39:00

yes i get like is that these people are

39:02

nice people and you know they're not they don't

39:04

actually think that they're doing anything wrong

39:06

with they think that they're doing everything

39:08

the way that it's supposed to be done because they're doing it the way

39:10

that we've always done it but that doesn't make

39:12

it right okay what makes it right is whether

39:15

it's democratic or not you know whether or not

39:17

the people from the grass roots have

39:19

their voices heard and respected

39:21

and actually follow okay

39:24

the dnc does not represent

39:26

the grassroots the party you know that there's

39:28

all this raw raw stuff about how great

39:30

and wonderful we were we didn't twenty twenty two

39:32

which to me is nuts because

39:36

we didn't win

39:36

so much as they lost a

39:38

question i have is about the progressive movement

39:40

itself it would seem as if

39:43

the left would be the one who are be the most

39:45

upset by something like this that

39:47

the left would be a place where abiding

39:50

primary challenger could come from that

39:53

the left would be the sense of energy

39:55

that will push back against the coordination of

39:57

joe biden

39:58

and i don't see

40:00

any of that pushback. Where is it? Well,

40:02

so what left? I

40:04

mean, I call myself a leftist. I

40:06

don't have a problem with that. And I'm a progressive

40:08

and I'm even farther to the left than that. I'm a leftist,

40:11

okay? But there isn't an organized left.

40:14

I mean, I talk to leftists all the time who are like,

40:16

I don't want nothing to do with the Democratic Party. They

40:19

see the party as intractable. And

40:22

so there isn't a lot of energy towards

40:25

building something like that up. The people that

40:27

have gone into the party, like Bernie and AOC

40:30

and folks like that, a lot of them

40:32

have been, the

40:34

party has marginalized. Do you want to see

40:36

Biden face a primary challenger? Do you want

40:38

to see Biden face a primary challenger? I want

40:41

to see everyone face a primary challenger because

40:43

if we don't have a choice about who to vote for, it's not

40:45

a democracy. Do you go into 2024 with

40:47

Biden as the nominee

40:49

feeling good about the Democratic Party's chances

40:51

against the Republicans? So

40:55

it depends entirely on what the Republicans do,

40:58

because this is one of

41:00

the problems with the Democratic Party strategy,

41:02

is that we're relying on the Republicans

41:05

being Trumpians. So if we're relying

41:07

on them to be that bad, then

41:11

who we have is largely irrelevant.

41:14

What's the question is, how bad are they going to be and how

41:16

well are we going to be able to turn that? That's actually

41:18

the thing we should be looking at, what happens on

41:20

the other side, because you're saying that's some of the

41:22

assumption that this is working off of. Yeah.

41:25

Yeah, I mean, so for example, if the Republicans

41:27

figure out, hey, you know, Trumpianism is a

41:29

loser, which it is, and

41:32

they manage to organize around somebody who isn't

41:34

an obvious Trumpian, likely somebody

41:36

who has the same basic philosophy but is smarter

41:38

about how to cover it over, how to paper it up, then

41:41

we're going to be in real trouble.

41:42

Thank you so much. I really appreciate

41:45

your time. It's been a pleasure. No problem. No

41:47

problem. So as the

41:49

winter meetings come to an end, the

41:52

biggest realization for me is that

41:54

both parties continue to be shaped

41:56

by this group that the midterms seem to reject.

42:00

Republicans, because they

42:02

think they have no choice. Democrats,

42:05

because they think it helps them win.

42:07

And in

42:07

these closed-door meetings, the

42:10

parties have been quietly planning their 2024 strategies,

42:14

based off assumptions of what this group wants.

42:16

So

42:18

next week... Good morning and

42:20

welcome to CPAC 2023, protecting America now.

42:25

we go inside the America First

42:28

movement

42:29

to find out for ourselves.

42:36

at

42:59

your Nordstrom

43:00

Rack store.

43:03

The run-up is reported by me, Estette

43:05

Herndon, and produced by Elisa

43:07

Gutierrez, Caitlin O'Keefe, Luke

43:10

van der Ploeg, and Anna Foley.

43:13

It's edited by Franny Karthoff

43:16

and Lisa Tobin, with original

43:18

music by Dan Powell, Marion

43:20

Lozano, and Alicia Beitoupe. It

43:23

was mixed by Corey Schrepple and Fact

43:25

Check by Caitlin Love. Special

43:28

thanks to Paula Schumann, Sam Donick,

43:31

Larissa Anderson, David Halfinger,

43:33

Mahima Chablani, Desiree Ibbakwa,

43:36

Renan Barelli, Jeffrey Miranda

43:39

and Maddie Masiello.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features