Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This year, a very important public
0:02
figure turns Haiti. He sent us
0:04
his wish for his birthday. My
0:06
wish is for everyone to practice
0:08
wildfire safety, because only you can
0:10
prevent wildfires. That sounds easy enough,
0:12
but you don't know who it
0:14
is. Nah, of course you do.
0:17
It's Smokey Bear. Let's all make
0:19
sure Smokey's wish comes true by
0:21
learning his wildfire prevention tips at
0:23
smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives
0:25
within us all. Brought to you by the
0:27
USDA Forest Service, your state forester in the
0:29
Ad Council. The
0:32
street right over here looked a little
0:34
bit more shady to me. It's
0:37
not too bad though, thankfully. The breezes
0:39
make it nice. Yesterday
0:42
was so hot. It's
0:44
another spring day in Arizona. And
0:46
once again, we're following around a group
0:48
of organizers, trying to reach
0:51
voters on this November ballot initiative that
0:53
would enshrine the right to an abortion in
0:56
the Arizona State Constitution. But
0:58
these organizers, Catherine and Heather,
1:01
are targeting a more conservative suburb of
1:03
Phoenix. And they're trying to
1:06
convince people not to support the initiative. And
1:09
you work at Students for Life? I work for Students for Life, yeah.
1:11
How old are you? I'm 21. Okay. How old
1:13
are you? I'm 16. You're 16? Yeah. How
1:16
did you get involved in this? I got
1:18
involved through a club that's at my
1:20
school. I joined two years ago,
1:22
a year and a half ago, because they started it up and
1:24
I was like, oh, this is really cool. A Students for
1:26
Life club at school? Yeah. Was that high school or was that
1:29
middle school? For me, it was
1:31
eighth grade, yeah. It was eighth grade? Yeah,
1:33
middle school. Yeah. So we do a lot
1:35
with all ages and we also have community
1:37
things as well. For
1:41
decades, the Republican position on
1:43
abortion rights was crystal clear. Overturn
1:46
Roe v. Wade and
1:48
send the issue back to the states. But
1:51
since June of 2022, when
1:53
the Supreme Court's conservative majority did
1:55
exactly that, Republicans
1:58
have faced the question. What
2:00
comes next? In
2:03
Arizona, that question is especially
2:05
important. Because in
2:07
this battleground state, Democratic groups
2:09
have already mobilized around this ballot initiative,
2:13
which is expected to motivate a wide range
2:15
of voters to show up in November and
2:18
could be a boost for Biden. So,
2:21
after spending time with organizers who support
2:24
the ballot measure, this
2:26
week, we explored the anti-abortion movement in
2:28
Arizona, where a
2:30
powerfully motivated group of conservatives in the state
2:33
is continuing to push against the initiative
2:36
and punishing the Republicans, who
2:38
have sought a more moderate position on the issue. Today,
2:43
in part two of our reporting from Arizona, how
2:46
abortion rights are exposing the fractures on
2:48
the right. From
2:51
The New York Times, I'm Estet Herndon. This
2:53
is The Runout. The
3:02
street was your typical Arizona suburb. Quiet, not much grass, some palm
3:04
trees, even an orange tree. No
3:10
one answered at the first
3:12
few houses. We can't
3:15
answer the door right now, but if you'd like to leave a
3:17
message, you can do it now. But Heather and Catherine left
3:19
some flyers anyway. We'll just leave the
3:22
information on your door. The
3:24
most awkward part is when they,
3:26
like, your walkway. You're
3:28
walking away, and then they open the door, and
3:31
you have to decide, am I going to go back and talk to them,
3:33
or just be like, I left it on your door. How
3:36
do you decide? Depending on how
3:38
welcoming, they open the door. They're like,
3:40
hello? A lot of it sounds like journalism familiar.
3:43
I used to have to do a lot of door
3:45
knocking, and you're reading vibes in the moment. Yeah, oh,
3:47
so many vibes. Eventually.
3:56
It's all you know? Yeah, I guess. What can I do
3:58
for you? Hi. the door.
4:00
We're informing people about their local pregnancy resource
4:02
centers. Have you heard of any in area?
4:06
No, no. We can
4:08
just give you the information if you're
4:10
interested. Okay, all right. These pregnancy resource
4:12
centers offer free diapers, formula, pregnancy tests,
4:15
anything that a woman could need during
4:17
her pregnancy. They also offer like paternal
4:19
classes for men who are helping their
4:23
partner. And then we also have this. This
4:26
is our decline to sign information. Have you heard
4:28
of the ballot initiative that's going around in Arizona
4:30
right now for abortion access? Yeah, don't
4:32
worry, I'll sign that when I find it. Oh,
4:34
so we're actually encouraging people not to
4:36
sign it. Why? Generally
4:39
speaking, so this will allow abortion up until
4:41
the moment of birth. Is that something that
4:43
you're comfortable with? No,
4:46
most people aren't. So that's kind of like
4:49
we're offering that information. It'll also remove the
4:51
parental consent law. So the parental
4:53
consent law doesn't allow minors to be taken in
4:55
to get abortions without parental consent. If that law
4:57
is removed, then it'll allow people
5:00
that are trafficking children to go in. Stop with
5:02
that stupid argument. Okay,
5:05
that's a dumb ass argument. Yes, I will
5:07
support this bill actually. Thank you. Have a
5:09
good day. How
5:19
often do you get responses like that? Not
5:21
very often. Most of
5:23
the time, people are very receptive because they do
5:25
have kids and they're like, Oh, I wouldn't want
5:27
my daughter who's 13 years old to be able
5:29
to go in and get an abortion without me
5:32
knowing about it. You
5:34
know, the bill is technically 24 weeks.
5:36
Yes. So it's all viability. And so
5:38
viability, and then it has some exceptions that are
5:40
expanded from other ones. Yeah. Yeah. So
5:43
it says up until viability, but you can
5:45
interfere after for health of the mother. But
5:47
health of the mother is defined so broadly.
5:49
It could literally just mean, Oh, I don't
5:51
like that I gained weight from being pregnant,
5:53
which is like a natural consequence. That's
5:55
what you're saying is leading to argument. You're saying it's up until
5:57
birth, right? Because the law is technically 24 weeks. So
6:01
it is written in a way that persuades people to
6:03
think that it's 24 weeks, but when we really break
6:05
down the language, it would allow it up until the
6:07
moment of birth. Because the exceptions are so
6:09
brah. Right, yeah. This argument that
6:12
Heather makes, that the ballot
6:14
initiative's language would allow abortion up to the
6:16
moment of birth, it's
6:18
misleading. And it's one that
6:20
abortion rights groups reject. Current
6:23
state law permits abortion up to 15 weeks. The
6:26
Arizona ballot measure would allow abortion
6:28
up until the point of fetal
6:30
viability, which is usually defined
6:32
around 24 weeks. Less
6:35
than 1% of all abortions happen
6:37
after 24 weeks. And
6:40
under the ballot measure, any exemption
6:42
following viability will require sign-off
6:44
from a medical professional. But
6:47
that didn't stop Heather and Catherine from
6:49
making the argument. Let's definitely
6:51
try to get back to the house and let
6:53
somebody come back. We
6:55
walked up to a house that had to sign out from. It
7:00
said, grandkids welcome. Parents
7:03
by appointment. Hi, how's
7:05
your day going? That's where
7:07
we met Vicki. Hi, we're informing people about
7:09
their local pregnancy resource centers. Have you heard of
7:11
me in your area? Well,
7:14
no. Yeah, these pregnancy
7:16
resource centers offer free pregnancy tests,
7:18
free ultrasounds, free stuff after you
7:21
have babies and even during your
7:23
pregnancy. Yeah. We
7:25
can give you both of these. We're also asking
7:27
people if they've heard about the Arizona for
7:29
Abortion Access Act. Yes.
7:32
So we're asking people how they feel about
7:34
that. I
7:36
am against abortion. Okay, awesome.
7:40
We're out here asking people not to sign
7:42
for that. It would allow abortion up until the
7:44
moment of birth and it's something that's really scary and that
7:46
we don't want to see happen to Arizona. So
7:49
we're very grateful for your support. We
7:52
also have the New York Times with us if you
7:54
have a minute to share your
7:56
opinion. and
8:00
we're over for the New York Times. We actually
8:02
work for its Politics Podcast and we're following them
8:04
around today, partially to talk to Arizonans about how
8:06
they're feeling and only about this referendum about the
8:08
election because Arizona is such an important state. Maybe
8:10
a couple minutes, I'm just curious on how like,
8:13
you know, we're about to come into a very
8:15
crazy election period. Like how do you, how are
8:17
you feeling about that? How
8:19
are you feeling about the election? Just
8:22
like blue sky first word that comes to your mind.
8:26
I feel that many people
8:28
are deceived and don't really
8:30
understand everything that's going
8:32
on and that they'll listen to
8:35
regular news that is
8:37
not reporting both sides, sad to
8:39
say. Well, one of the reasons-
8:41
It frightens me. One of the reasons we're like talking to
8:43
people so they can tell us what they think we're missing.
8:45
Like what do you think are the things that folks aren't
8:47
reporting on that you're saying you wish they, you heard more
8:50
about? The other
8:52
side, I mean, there's
8:55
so many times they'll report like with
8:57
abortion. They'll report about, oh,
9:00
you know, we want to have more
9:02
abortions. We want to make it available
9:04
for people, but they're not reporting what
9:06
actually happens during an abortion or like
9:09
Israel. They'll
9:11
say, oh, these poor people
9:13
in Palestine and everything, nothing
9:15
about the hostages that were
9:17
abducted or, you know,
9:19
how Israel is just trying to protect themselves
9:21
and keep from being
9:24
annihilated. Do you have an issue
9:26
that you think is most important for you in this election? I
9:31
guess those are my two most important ones
9:33
right now. Can I ask you about
9:35
the specific candidates when you think about Trump and Biden likely to
9:37
be on the ballot again from 2020? Like,
9:39
do you know how you're going to vote? Are you
9:41
a Democrat, Republicans? Do you consider yourself one of those
9:43
identities? There's
9:45
a lot of corruption on
9:47
both sides, but I
9:50
will not vote for Biden. I mean,
9:52
he has just totally destroyed
9:55
this country, and he keeps sending money
9:57
to people. They
9:59
want to kill. us and annihilate us and
10:02
then open borders when you have so
10:04
many people that you don't know where
10:06
they're from and the fentanyl that's happening
10:08
and the child, not
10:11
prostitution, but human trafficking
10:14
and you know all of this that's
10:16
going on and then him and his
10:18
son and he is
10:20
very corrupt and I do not want him president.
10:23
Well, I have some question about Trump. You mentioned
10:25
how you feel about Biden. How do you feel
10:27
about Donald Trump? Well if
10:29
he's the only one running then yes I
10:31
will. I think that he did an awesome
10:33
job as a president. He
10:36
did a lot of stuff that again the
10:38
media just sort of overlooked. He
10:40
says stuff that he shouldn't say. I want to
10:42
smack him. But
10:45
he did so much good. Our economy
10:47
was better. Just overall.
10:49
One of the things that's been
10:51
interesting to me about Trump is he's backed away from
10:53
endorsing a federal abortion ban and
10:55
he's recently kind of been
10:58
like a couple other Republicans who've
11:00
stepped back from really leading on
11:02
a pro-life stance. Does that
11:04
as someone who feels strongly about
11:06
abortion like does that bother you
11:08
any that he seems to have
11:10
stepped away from that? I
11:13
wish he hadn't and yes
11:15
it bothers me but being the man
11:17
he is, he is out
11:19
for votes and sad to
11:21
say a lot of people support
11:23
abortion. So I do
11:25
not agree with
11:27
Trump not really supporting it
11:30
full-heartedly but
11:32
I understand why he's doing it.
11:36
Because for votes? Because many people
11:39
that is a deciding factor for them. If
11:41
they can't have an abortion then they don't
11:43
want that person in. Even if
11:45
it means that that person is going to
11:47
totally destroy America. I mean
11:50
I do think that a lot of elections have told
11:52
us that people are prioritizing that issue at the top.
11:54
The only question I have for you is Arizona has
11:56
changed so much to become a swing state. There's
11:59
been a lot of influx of new people. I
12:01
don't know how long you have been in this
12:03
state or anything. I guess I was just wondering,
12:05
has that been tangible? I mean, has it, does
12:07
Arizona feel like it's changing? Because the numbers would
12:10
tell us that it's becoming a little more liberal,
12:12
that it's becoming more open to Democrats. It
12:14
definitely has become more liberal. I've
12:18
been talking to my husband about moving
12:20
because too many Californians came with their
12:22
liberal ideas. They didn't like what happened
12:24
to California. But then they come here
12:26
and they still want the same thing.
12:29
And destroy our state. It
12:32
makes me angry. But we
12:35
all should have the
12:37
right to vote as we feel. How
12:39
long have you been in Arizona? Since
12:41
84. Thank
12:43
you so much. Do you mind telling us your
12:45
name or how old you are? My name is
12:47
Dickie. I'm in my 70s. Hey, that's all good.
12:50
We're good? Thank you. Thank you
12:52
so much. We really appreciate it. My name
12:54
is Heather. I work with Students for the
12:56
Life of America. Well, God
12:58
bless you. Thank you. I
13:01
just wanted to say we're so grateful
13:03
for your support. Thank you. Don't leave.
13:06
We need all of our Republican voters here.
13:08
We have a daughter and three grandchildren that
13:10
said, no, you can't go, grandma. You have
13:12
to say that. I
13:15
see your sign. Vicki
13:18
is representative of a lot of Republican
13:20
voters right now, who may
13:22
not love that Donald Trump is rejecting the
13:24
idea of a federal ban on abortion, but
13:27
who are unlikely to punish him for it. But
13:30
not everybody in the Republican Party gets
13:33
a pass from the anti-abortion movement. In
13:36
fact, on days when they're
13:38
not canvassing against the ballot initiative, Students
13:41
for Life had begun to target
13:43
a Republican state legislator named
13:45
Matt Gress, who had,
13:47
up until recently, been on their side.
13:51
Now they're handing out flyers with
13:53
his face on them that say wanted
13:56
for the death of countless Arizona
13:58
pre-born babies. And
14:00
we wanted to talk to him about why he's
14:02
become a lightning rod. So
14:09
we said goodbye to Heather and Catherine and
14:12
met up with Gress. Do
14:16
we sound okay? How do we feel?
14:18
Yeah, we're good. Do you have a
14:20
nice podcast voice? You have
14:22
a great podcast voice. And
14:26
we're going to talk to you about the conversation
14:29
that we're going to talk about in the conference
14:31
room at our hotel in Phoenix, right by his
14:33
district. Can you just introduce yourself and tell us what you
14:35
do? Yes, my name is Matt Gress and I'm a state
14:37
representative in the Arizona House representing
14:39
Scottsdale, Arcadia, Paradise Valley
14:42
and North Phoenix. Gress
14:44
is in his first term as a state legislator,
14:47
but he worked in state government before that, under
14:50
Republican Governor Doug Ducey. When
14:52
he initially ran, his platform didn't
14:54
have much to do with abortion. It
14:57
was about education. I'm
15:00
a former school teacher getting
15:02
more money into the classroom, safe
15:04
neighborhoods, ensuring that we
15:07
are supporting our police, as
15:10
well as addressing the serious
15:12
issues down on the border
15:14
and then just keeping taxes
15:17
and regulations low and
15:19
appropriate. Then on
15:21
April 9th, that's when everything
15:24
changed completely. I did not.
15:27
It was not on my bingo card. April
15:29
9th is when the Arizona Supreme Court
15:31
moved to change the landscape of abortion,
15:34
reviving an 1864 law that had been
15:37
on the books since before Arizona was
15:39
a state, a law
15:41
that banned any abortion at any time, except
15:44
if the mother's life was in danger. Yeah.
15:46
Can you tell me like what was
15:48
the immediate reaction when the law went
15:50
into place? So within a
15:52
few hours of the court ruling, I
15:55
came out with a video. I posted
15:57
it and basically said that. I
16:00
do not believe that the Supreme Court's
16:03
ruling can stand and that
16:05
the legislature now needs to engage and
16:07
repeal the territorial law because it is
16:09
not in alignment with the values of
16:11
Arizonans in 2024. Gress
16:14
was initially the only Republican in the
16:16
statehouse to side with Democrats in pushing
16:18
to repeal the law. Eventually,
16:21
two other Republicans joined him and
16:23
the law was overturned. But
16:26
Gress made some enemies in the process. The
16:29
reaction from
16:31
Republicans was
16:34
conflicted because many
16:37
of my Republican colleagues who did not vote with
16:39
me acknowledged why
16:42
I was doing what I was doing. They saw
16:44
the rationale. They obviously did
16:46
not agree with me. And
16:49
we're going to have to agree to disagree on
16:51
this particular issue. Most
16:53
people in the Republican caucus, the ones
16:55
who believed the 1864 law should stand, punished
16:59
Gress for his vote. If
17:01
I understand correctly, you were removed
17:03
from the Appropriations Committee after this vote, right?
17:06
Yes, I was. I mean, that's not
17:08
a small thing. Did the intensity
17:10
of the blowback surprise you any? I
17:23
really applaud the Senate for
17:26
keeping their cool on this. There
17:29
were members of the Senate that wanted Senator
17:32
Shope and Senator Bullock to
17:34
be removed from leadership posts. The
17:37
other folks who joined with Democrats to repeal
17:39
the senator. On
17:41
the Senate side. And they said, well, the
17:44
Speaker punished Matt Gress. You need to
17:46
punish these other Republicans in the Senate.
17:49
And the Senate president, Warren Peterson, said that's not
17:52
how the Senate works. Each member
17:54
gets to vote the way that they
17:56
believe their district wants them to vote. And we're not
17:58
going to punish them for that. So
18:00
I think it's unfortunate,
18:03
but I don't work for the speaker. I work for
18:05
the people of the fourth legislative
18:07
district. And I'm going to continue to do
18:09
what they want me to do, not
18:11
just on this, but on other issues as well. The
18:14
thing is, Gress really believes he's
18:16
helping his party win. And
18:19
that's what I ultimately wanted to talk to him about. For
18:22
you as a Republican, what have the
18:24
conversations been like amongst the party about
18:26
how to find a position
18:28
that both speaks to
18:31
values and has political relevance?
18:33
I think for too long, we
18:36
have seen the extremes
18:39
on both ends. Want
18:41
to pit women against
18:44
new life. I don't
18:46
think that it's a mutually exclusive situation.
18:49
I think we can respect women
18:52
and have policies that protect new
18:54
life, working simultaneously
18:56
together. There's no
18:58
doubt there are deeply held
19:00
views on the existential
19:03
question of abortion. And I'm not
19:05
going to dismiss what some of
19:07
my colleagues believe or review on
19:11
banning abortion outright. I'm
19:13
against abortion. And yet
19:15
I also recognize that abortion is
19:18
necessary with reasonable
19:20
timeframes and reasonable exceptions.
19:23
I mean, it is
19:26
undeniable that that needs to be available
19:28
to women going through certain
19:31
circumstances, especially in the horrific
19:33
situations of rape or incest.
19:36
I think I took the most pro-life position
19:38
that was available. What do you mean? So
19:41
if we were to allow the zero-week
19:44
territorial law to remain in
19:46
place, we would have
19:48
created the perfect conditions for
19:51
the Arizona abortion access to pass
19:53
overwhelmingly in November. You're saying if
19:55
that law was still there, it
19:57
would be easier for the progressive...
20:00
activists who are trying to push the referendum
20:02
in November that would expand
20:05
abortion access, it would be
20:07
easier for that to pass if it was up against
20:09
the 1864 law. Absolutely, because you have nothing
20:12
versus allowing abortion to be
20:14
legal and most people
20:17
recognize that abortion has to
20:19
be available in those
20:21
circumstances when it's warranted. So
20:23
we were going to create the perfect
20:25
condition for, in
20:28
my view, a pretty extreme
20:30
measure like the Abortion Access Act
20:33
to pass overwhelmingly. We have to
20:35
be strategic here because I think
20:37
that most people are in the
20:39
middle and I think
20:42
that since Roe v. Wade was
20:44
decided in 1973, we have done
20:46
a very bad job on the
20:49
Republican side of winning the hearts
20:51
and minds of
20:53
Americans, winning them
20:55
over to the pro-life side. Republicans
20:59
have kind of, they
21:01
had an easy out before Roe v. Wade
21:03
was overturned to say, yeah Roe
21:06
v. Wade should be overturned and
21:09
that was it because no one
21:11
thought that it would get overturned. So
21:13
you didn't really have to do the policy
21:16
exercise at what happens if
21:18
Roe v. Wade was overturned. Where do
21:20
you want the law to stand if it
21:23
was overturned? Exactly, and we didn't, we
21:25
as Republicans didn't have to do the work
21:28
around thinking through
21:30
real-life implications of
21:33
having a policy that is workable and
21:36
reflective of the reality on
21:38
the ground and that aligns with
21:41
the values of the people we serve.
21:43
And then there are those who are
21:45
like, this is a matter of principle,
21:48
this is a matter of moral
21:50
conviction, and despite
21:52
what the electorate thinks,
21:55
we have to stand firm on our
21:58
principles. We've been fighting for outwards. for
22:01
all of this time, now is the
22:03
time to stand firm, a life is a life. Yeah, I
22:05
was going to ask about what you do with
22:07
the kind of moral conviction slice of your party
22:10
because it's not insignificant, you
22:12
know, that's a driving activist and energy base
22:14
for a lot of Republicans. And
22:17
we've talked to so many activists, both
22:19
in Arizona and nationally, who
22:22
describe this in such human rights terms
22:24
that there is no, for them, sense
22:26
of compromise. Can you describe
22:29
how that was received by that wing? And then
22:31
in a larger way, what
22:33
can Republicans do if that group never
22:35
budgets? Well,
22:39
that group does not represent the
22:42
majority of the party. And
22:45
maybe it's going to take this election
22:48
to show some of these individuals and
22:50
even some of them have acknowledged that
22:52
they are in the minority. They acknowledged
22:54
that, but they have deeply held beliefs.
22:56
And again, I'm not going to dismiss
22:59
that, but I'm not going to go along
23:01
with that. It's not
23:03
appropriate for my constituency. And
23:06
when you're talking about widespread
23:08
policy shifts, like
23:12
completely banning abortion after it had been legal
23:14
for 50 years, the
23:19
electorate, the governed, are
23:22
not going to shift like that. Yeah,
23:24
you know, from our perspective, there's
23:27
a lot of interest in how this could affect a presidential
23:29
race. What do you think about that prospect? Like is the
23:31
reason this is happening now also to
23:33
help Joe Biden win in Arizona? I'm
23:37
not sure. I'm not sure the
23:40
reason why proponents picked 2024
23:43
to run the Arizona Abortion Access Act, but
23:45
that's the only issue that the Democrats have to run
23:48
on. It's not the border. It's
23:50
not foreign policy. It's not
23:52
the economy. I
23:55
mean, I'm straining
23:58
to think what else the Democrats Democrats
24:00
have to run on. The problem
24:02
is that voters
24:04
are not single issue voters. They
24:06
have a host of concerns. And
24:09
right now, President Trump is
24:12
in Arizona is leading President Biden.
24:15
And his views and viewpoints, especially
24:18
when it comes to the border, are
24:20
resonating with Arizonans. The Democrats can continue
24:22
to try to focus on abortion to
24:25
hopefully win additional votes. But
24:27
their absence and apathy on
24:29
the border is what will
24:32
ultimately do them in in November.
24:34
So I think as long
24:37
as we stay focused on
24:39
being responsive to where our
24:41
constituents want us to be
24:44
and being able to talk about abortion
24:47
in a responsible way, I do
24:49
think that Republicans have the edge.
24:52
Yeah. In one way, I see how,
24:54
what you're saying, that's all the Democrats have to run on.
24:56
It also makes it seem like that's
24:59
the vulnerability for Republicans in that
25:01
abortion and that the lack of
25:03
kind of a consistent message or
25:05
a lack of maybe a clear
25:07
position on what to do going
25:10
forward is maybe the sticking point
25:12
when we think about optimism come November. Do you
25:14
think by the time we get there, Republicans
25:17
will be united behind 15 weeks or
25:19
will there still be, you know, the
25:21
human rights faction versus another faction or
25:24
specifically on abortion? I think that
25:27
the pro-life coalition will come
25:30
together. The fact is
25:32
the 15-week law is the law of
25:34
the land for all intents and purposes.
25:36
We repeal the territorial law is
25:38
gone. So now the
25:41
pro-life movement has to think, okay,
25:43
we could have a constitutional amendment that
25:45
enshrines abortion in the Constitution, or
25:48
we can fight to defend the 15-week law, which
25:50
was good back in 2022. It
25:53
was considered very pro-life. I
25:56
think that's where the pro-life factions
25:58
are going to ultimately. end
26:00
up. They're upset right now,
26:03
but my hope is that they
26:05
will see the bigger picture. We
26:08
got to be focused on talking
26:10
about abortion in that
26:12
way versus continuing to
26:14
advocate for its complete ban and elimination.
26:16
That's just not where voters are going
26:18
to be. Yeah. Yeah. Great.
26:21
Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. And I
26:23
think this was really helpful for us. Okay. Thank you.
26:25
Have a great day. Thank
26:27
you. For
26:30
Gress, the most pro-life thing a
26:32
Republican can do is find
26:35
a consensus position on abortion rights that
26:37
meets voters where they are, where
26:40
some abortions are allowed up
26:42
until a reasonable timeframe and
26:44
with reasonable exceptions. And
26:47
its thinking seems to mirror Trump's. It's
26:49
pragmatic and calibrated for
26:51
Republicans to win elections. But there's
26:55
another group that has an increasingly
26:57
loud voice in this debate, pushing
27:00
more extreme measures where people
27:02
like Gress see compromise. These
27:05
are the abortion abolitionists, the
27:07
radicals who refuse to give
27:09
an inch and in doing so
27:12
are boxing the Republican party in. That's
27:16
after the break. This
27:22
year, a very important public figure
27:24
turns Haiti. He sent us his
27:27
wish for his birthday. My wish
27:29
is for everyone to practice wildfire
27:31
safety because only you can prevent
27:33
wildfires. That sounds easy enough, but
27:35
you don't know who it is.
27:38
Of course you do. It's Smokey Bear.
27:40
Let's all make sure Smokey's wish comes
27:42
true by learning his wildfire prevention tips
27:44
at smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives within
27:46
us all. Brought to you by the
27:49
USDA Forest Service, your state forester and
27:51
the Ad Council. Alright
27:53
guys, how would you describe our podcast?
27:55
Matter of opinion. Uh,
27:58
extremely civilized, exchanged. of
28:00
high-minded ideas. I swear, if
28:02
somebody says dinner party conversation, I'm slapping them.
28:04
It's an airing of grievances, right? Somewhere
28:07
in between, I hope. Maybe the easiest way
28:09
to explain what Matter of Opinion is is
28:12
actually to share what our listeners have to
28:14
say about us. Listener Tobias
28:16
said, Matter of Opinion
28:18
is a great podcast for anyone
28:20
engaged with social issues and politics
28:23
on any level. The
28:25
lighthearted but testy conversations about
28:27
truly divisive topics pique my
28:30
interest. Lighthearted but
28:32
testy. That's totally you, Ross.
28:34
I'm putting that on my headstone. My back is getting
28:36
a little sore from all this padding. From
28:40
New York Times Opinion, I'm Michelle Cottle. I'm
28:42
Ross Douthit. I'm Carlos Lozada. I'm Lydia
28:44
Polgreen. And don't just take our work for it.
28:47
Make up your own mind and follow Matter of Opinion
28:49
wherever you get your podcasts. I think you were going
28:51
in there.
28:54
A couple days after talking with Gress and
28:56
going out with Students for Life, Caitlin
28:58
and I drove to Tempe, Arizona, to
29:01
an unassuming office whose location we've been
29:03
asked to keep private. Where? Is
29:06
that over there? We were there to
29:08
meet the pastor of Apologia Church, a
29:10
church focused on anti-abortion advocacy. It
29:14
also has a studio space where
29:16
they broadcast their
29:18
message to more than 500,000 YouTube followers. The
29:22
studio space was in the back of the building. And that's
29:24
where we set up. That's OK. That's all
29:26
I understand. Take your time. There you go. All
29:29
set. There were classic movie posters
29:32
on the wall next to another poster that said, babies are murdered
29:35
here. Can
29:38
you introduce yourself on mic? Yeah. Can you just tell
29:40
me what you do? Yeah, I'm passing the mic.
29:42
I'm going to do it. I'm going to do
29:44
it. I'm going to do it. Tell me what
29:46
you do. Yeah, I'm pastor Jeff Durbin, a pastor
29:48
at Apologia Church. I'm also the head of End
29:51
Abortion Now and Apologia Studios. Jeff
29:53
Durbin is 46, a
29:55
father of seven, including three
29:57
adopted children. and
30:00
their two newest babies were waiting in the
30:02
lobby of the building as we spoke to him. He's
30:05
also a grandfather of six, and
30:08
he has a colorful backstory. Yeah,
30:10
so I wasn't raised in an explicitly
30:13
Christian home and heard the gospel for
30:15
the first time when I was
30:17
16, had a profession of faith, moved to
30:19
Arizona because at the time I was the
30:22
national champion in martial arts.
30:24
I was a full-time professional competitor and did
30:26
a lot of different projects. Like when I
30:28
was, I turned 18, first thing
30:30
I did was I was with Mortal Kombat, the
30:32
live tour. Did a lot
30:34
of different projects like stuff in the Ninja Turtles
30:37
franchise and video games and things like that. So
30:39
that brought me out to Arizona to
30:41
teach martial arts and be closer to LA.
30:43
And my life had a real
30:46
transformation after about a year long
30:48
pursuit of drug addiction, drug and
30:50
alcohol addiction. God got a
30:52
hold of my life and my heart and changed my
30:54
life. Durban started Apologia
30:56
Church in 2010. He says about a thousand
30:58
people come
31:01
to services on a good day. Durban
31:03
and Apologia have become synonymous
31:06
with anti-abortion activism in Arizona
31:09
and what's called abortion abolition. Yeah,
31:12
so the issue of abortion
31:14
abolition is an issue that
31:16
focuses in upon equal protection
31:18
for all humans. It's a
31:20
focus upon consistency, no
31:23
compromise. The abolitionist says it
31:26
is fully human and in the image
31:28
of God from fertilization and we must
31:30
protect all humans and give them equal
31:32
protection. In Durban's view, people
31:35
who seek abortion should be punished.
31:37
Abortion should be considered a crime.
31:39
It should be considered a murder.
31:42
You're unjustly taking the life of a human
31:44
being and so that's murder. And
31:46
what I've said is what is the historic
31:49
position of the Christian church, that
31:51
if you take the life of a
31:54
human being unjustly, then what the state
31:56
owes you, if it's proven and it's
31:58
true, is capital punishment. forfeits your
32:00
right to live. However,
32:02
in this nation right now,
32:04
we have strayed so far
32:06
from just standards of accusation
32:08
and prosecution that I
32:10
can't even say, and I won't say
32:13
that I want capital punishment in any
32:15
particular state because it could have an
32:17
unjust system that leads to that capital
32:19
punishment. So do I believe in capital
32:21
punishment for murder? Do
32:23
I believe that we are in the place
32:26
right now or we can employ that with
32:28
trust to our judicial system? Absolutely not. Members
32:31
of Durbin's Church have done some things you'd
32:33
expect, like protesting at Planned
32:35
Parenthood. But one of the things
32:37
that makes them different is that
32:39
they also focus their efforts on pressuring
32:41
conservatives who seek to compromise on
32:44
abortion rights. The pro-life lobby will
32:46
really boast in the fact that they are
32:48
not explicitly Christian. They're opposed
32:50
to using the biblical worldview
32:52
and biblical standards as explicit
32:55
in the legislature. The
32:57
pro-life establishment does
32:59
not want to abolish abortion. They
33:01
do not believe in equal protection for all humans
33:03
from fertilization, though they say they do. They do
33:05
not. So you'll see pro-life
33:07
legislation, like you can kill
33:10
the children under 15 weeks, but not
33:12
over, or 12 weeks, or heartbeat. So
33:14
the pro-life lobby, the pro-life establishment
33:17
actually believes in partiality. They're
33:19
inconsistent, wholly inconsistent, and
33:22
that's the issue. I really
33:24
wanna talk about actually the post-stops, but
33:27
I think that was helpful context. When the decision
33:29
came down, what was your initial thoughts? Thankful
33:33
that God strikes straight blows with
33:35
crooked sticks. Am I glad that
33:37
Roe is out of the way via that decision? I'm
33:40
glad it's no longer gonna be able to be used
33:42
as an excuse by pro-life
33:44
legislators and leaders. I
33:47
believe that the decision itself, however,
33:49
was evil in
33:53
terms of the justices actually
33:55
just washing their hands of it and saying to
33:57
the states, you decide if you wanna kill them.
34:00
I don't think that was a consistent or just
34:02
decision. I think that it was cowardly. To be
34:04
clear, you're saying that the delegation
34:07
to the states is
34:09
one that you find cowardly because you
34:11
would prefer them to just to outlaw
34:13
abortion directly. I would prefer the Supreme
34:15
Court be consistent, even the judges that
34:17
have pro-life commitments, that they'd
34:19
be consistent with how they address an
34:22
issue like abortion and not simply say,
34:24
I believe it's fully human from fertilization,
34:27
but I'll go ahead and let the states decide if they
34:29
want to go ahead and oppress these human beings. To
34:32
your point, it has really thrown
34:34
the Republican pro-life position in flux.
34:37
For so many years, it
34:39
was just the refrain of eliminating Roe,
34:41
and now we have seen a kind
34:44
of open question in a lot of
34:46
states about where a lot of these
34:48
legislators fall. This is a big issue
34:50
here in Arizona, but I first wanted
34:53
to ask about national folks, too. We've
34:56
seen Donald Trump, frankly, step away
34:58
from calls for a federal abortion
35:00
ban. We've seen Republicans in a
35:02
Kerry Lake step away from calls
35:05
for a federal abortion ban.
35:07
What is your reaction to just
35:09
the way national or kind of
35:11
big name Republicans who were pro-life
35:13
and anti-abortion four or five years
35:16
ago have kind of become pro-state
35:18
decide on its own? Yeah. I
35:22
think it's demonstrating that a lot of
35:24
these politicians are not as committed to
35:26
the principles they say they are, and
35:28
they're, in fact, charlatans. I
35:30
believe this for votes. I believe this for the
35:32
crowd, but I don't actually believe it in principle.
35:34
And so I think what Donald Trump
35:36
did and how he came out
35:38
was it exposes his inconsistency, but it also
35:40
demonstrates that he doesn't really believe what he
35:43
says he believes, and the same for Kerry
35:45
Lake. And so you're right.
35:47
There's been a big revealing after
35:49
Dobbs as to whether or
35:51
not people actually believe this. I
35:54
have no affinity for the Republican Party.
35:56
My challenge to them
35:58
all would be to say, you guys.
36:00
don't really believe what you say you
36:02
believe. You're inconsistent and that
36:05
inconsistency is so obvious, your opposition
36:07
knows you don't really believe it.
36:10
The pro-life establishment is not working for abolition
36:12
in the end of abortion. They're not ultimately
36:14
aimed at equal protection and
36:17
abolishing abortion like say
36:19
we did slavery. It's a
36:21
crime. It doesn't matter who does it.
36:23
There is no one getting out of the
36:25
justice that will be served. If you kidnap
36:27
and enslave any of our black brothers
36:29
and sisters, you will be punished. And we
36:32
don't care who you are or where you're
36:34
involved in the process, right? You're all guilty
36:36
and we're going to punish you. That's
36:39
abolition. And these
36:41
pro-lifers don't actually want abolition. Like
36:44
looking ahead to November in Arizona, 1864 law is
36:46
gone. Yep. Like
36:49
what's the plan in terms of the current
36:51
political reality around abortion in Arizona? Yeah,
36:53
that's a good question. So in
36:56
terms of methodology and strategy and
36:58
establishing justice, if you're consistent
37:00
at the bottom, you don't need to
37:02
change your strategy. You're aiming at the same
37:04
thing. Equal protection for every human being. Nobody
37:07
is to be treated differently. And
37:09
so in terms of what we're trying to do, it's
37:11
the same thing we've been doing. Bills of abolition, equal
37:13
protection, in whatever way we can get it. But
37:16
in terms of this ballot measure, the
37:18
ballot measure would mean that
37:21
post-Roe, we would have
37:23
the bloodiest and most brutal part of
37:25
this Holocaust just beginning from my perspective.
37:28
So it's very serious that we focus on
37:30
the ballot measure. And
37:32
we are, we are working
37:35
very, very hard right now around the clock.
37:37
And I cannot say what
37:39
we're doing to make sure that this
37:42
ballot measure doesn't take place. Why
37:44
can't you say what you're doing? Because there's too
37:46
many people working on it. And I
37:48
know that the opposition has a lot
37:50
of money and they have, I'm
37:53
not gonna reveal them and I mean
37:55
what my plans are. And they're all
37:57
peaceful and all legal remedies to deal
37:59
with. with the ballot measure. But we're
38:01
working very hard right now. And there are a number of
38:03
organizations that are working together with us. As a matter of
38:05
fact, Apology at Church is leading this. And
38:08
if we get to the point where it is on
38:11
the ballot, or is the goal right now to just keep it
38:13
off the ballot? The goal right now is to
38:15
kill the ballot measure. Yeah.
38:18
There's no insight legally, or to not
38:20
get enough signatures and validate the signatures,
38:22
we can't get any visibility there? You can't.
38:25
Okay. Is there any point of
38:29
defeat here? Like if we get enough of these
38:31
in a row, like let's say Arizona backs the
38:34
access bill. That is so far
38:36
from abolition. Would
38:38
that change anything that you all do? No. No.
38:42
Because the problem is the same, the message is the same. And
38:44
I keep bringing it back to this, just
38:47
in terms of it's something fresh in many people's minds,
38:49
in terms of in our own nation's history, people
38:51
still fill the wounds from it, right? The issue of
38:53
slavery. There was a heck of
38:56
a lot of resistance to the abolition of
38:58
slavery. And a lot of people are
39:00
saying, this isn't gonna end, it's just gonna keep going. And
39:03
it was, I think, just a grace of God
39:05
that light really started to shine in people's hearts
39:07
and minds to love another person like God calls
39:09
us to. And that's how it happened. Also a
39:11
huge war. Well,
39:14
and where we are in the civil war.
39:16
Yeah. Yeah. And I actually
39:18
believe that the civil war was judgment
39:21
in our nation for doing such a
39:23
wicked thing for so long. Yeah. Do
39:26
you vote? Yeah. When I
39:28
think about the presidential election, like how do you view this
39:30
issue in terms of, I imagine,
39:32
two choices now that at least
39:34
in terms of major party candidates have
39:36
stepped away from the idea of
39:39
a federal abortion ban or really embracing abortion
39:41
as a thing to be restricted at the
39:43
national level. Where does that leave you? So
39:47
you heard me say that I have no affections
39:49
ultimately for the Republican party or anything like that.
39:51
What I'm looking for is consistency and principle. But
39:54
we're obviously, from my perspective as a
39:56
Christian, as a pastor in a very
39:58
difficult moment because it would seem like
40:00
a very difficult moment. seem to be
40:03
that both candidates, whether it's Biden or
40:05
Trump, both have radically unchristian worldviews on
40:07
so many issues. And so
40:09
it becomes very challenging. I'm not saying that as
40:11
a Christian you need to have the perfect candidate.
40:14
But you're right on this issue, it becomes very challenging
40:16
for someone like me. I don't
40:19
idolize Trump. I'm thankful for some of the things that
40:21
he did that are consistent with the Christian worldview. I'm
40:23
thankful for a lot of those things. But
40:25
at the same time, I think it's important to
40:28
call out where he is inconsistent and where he
40:30
demonstrates that I'm more concerned with votes than I
40:32
am lives. I think the
40:34
idolatry of Trump amongst Christians in America
40:36
is shameful. But
40:38
I'm hearing he's more likely to get your
40:40
vote. Trump? Yeah. Right
40:43
now I do not have any position on
40:45
it at the moment. I'm hoping to see
40:47
light and consistency
40:50
happen. But yeah. The
40:53
last question I have is it
40:55
seems like the Republican Party, even
40:57
though it's not something you personally
40:59
identify with, is in a rock
41:01
and a hard place, partially because
41:04
of the advocacy of abortion abolitionists.
41:06
That has historically been a huge
41:08
energy and activism base for them
41:10
and a source of money. And
41:13
they have really calibrated their message around
41:15
some of that activism. And
41:18
it does seem like right now
41:20
their desire to reposition is being
41:23
pulled from the desire to
41:25
win votes as you have identified and
41:27
folks like you who are,
41:30
as they do that pivot, calling them out.
41:34
Right. In their dream world, I imagine you
41:36
all become more open to compromise and just
41:38
let them pivot. Yeah. But that
41:40
doesn't seem likely. Not if your
41:43
commitments are first and foremost to
41:45
the authority of Christ and the
41:48
word of God. No, we're not going
41:50
to change because the word of God doesn't
41:52
change. The Christian worldview is consistent in this
41:54
area. The problem we have right
41:57
now politically is there's so many people who
41:59
are just in this as a career and
42:01
it's just pretend. It's just something you say
42:04
for votes. And I
42:06
don't wanna live that way. I wanna live in such a way that
42:08
I actually believe what I say I believe. And
42:11
if I say this human being is valuable, I act like
42:13
that's true. Would you rather Carrie
42:16
Lake and Donald Trump lose with
42:19
endorsing abortion abolition or
42:21
win if it required stepping away? I'd
42:24
rather see them lose being consistent. Yeah,
42:27
because I think what God shows
42:29
us over and over and over again is that
42:32
what he blesses is faithfulness in
42:34
his people. And at times he
42:36
will change history with the smallest
42:38
numbers of people through faithfulness. So
42:40
yeah, would it be
42:42
devastating to this nation to see more
42:45
from my perspective, economic
42:48
injustices that are promoted by socialists
42:50
and Marxists and things like that,
42:52
would it be devastating to have
42:54
them employ more of their worldview
42:57
with regard to children and sexuality?
43:00
Yeah, that'd be devastating. And I don't want
43:02
that for our nation. But what
43:04
I do want is to see actual transformation
43:06
take place. And if that means that you
43:08
have to lose an election because you're being
43:11
faithful and consistent, I'd say God will
43:13
bless that. Yeah, cool.
43:15
Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. This
43:17
was helpful. Absolutely. I really enjoyed talking to you.
43:20
Your point about the idolatry of Trump is interesting.
43:22
Yeah, yeah. And I do think the way that a
43:24
lot of like conservative evangelicals
43:26
have started to talk about Trump feels different
43:29
than any kind of politician relationship I've seen. It
43:32
is interesting. And the thing I thought was the most disturbing
43:34
thing to me is we went during
43:36
the Capitol breach, wasn't there,
43:38
I didn't do that. We
43:41
were there just on the ground that day to
43:43
just provide like Christian media coverage of like this
43:45
whole thing. And then that
43:47
whole thing went off. We were a ways away. We
43:50
did some stuff saying, this is not the way you do
43:52
things. This is not the way Christians should approach this. But
43:55
the thing that was, I think most disturbing to me the whole
43:57
day was the
43:59
idolatry. It was Christians with
44:02
big signs of like, you know, Jesus hugging
44:04
Trump or like a Trump and Jesus on
44:06
a cross. It was like the most disturbing.
44:09
You see it in some of the rallies. Gross thing imaginable.
44:12
And it was just one sign after another
44:14
that was so offensive. So
44:21
when it comes to Republicans and abortion rights, there's
44:24
enough finger pointing to go around. People
44:27
like Matt Gross want compromise, which
44:30
is anger pro-life activists like Students for Life. And
44:33
hardliners like Pastor Jeff Durbin are
44:36
upset with both groups for not going
44:38
far enough. This
44:41
division could represent a problem for Republicans
44:43
in November, the first
44:45
presidential election since Dobbs. Because
44:49
now that Roe is overturned, the
44:51
anti-abortion movement has lost its chief
44:53
organizing principle. And
44:56
in doing so, created one
44:58
for the Democrats. This
45:13
year, a very important public figure turns
45:15
Haiti. He sent us his wish for
45:17
his birthday. My wish is
45:19
for everyone to practice wildfire
45:21
safety because only you can
45:24
prevent wildfires. That
45:26
sounds easy enough, but you don't know who it is. Of
45:29
course you do, it's Smokey Bear. Let's
45:31
all make sure Smokey's wish comes true
45:33
by learning his wildfire prevention tips at
45:35
smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives
45:38
within us all. Brought to you by the
45:40
USDA Forest Service, your state forester, and the Ad
45:42
Council. Hi. That's
45:45
the run-up for Thursday, June 20th, 2024. And now, the
45:47
rundown. The
45:52
work Jeff Durbin is doing in Arizona is just one
45:54
piece of how religious conservatives are organizing to push abortion
45:56
abolition and other causes
46:00
and oppose for a world, to
46:03
understand how that work is unfolding nationally
46:05
and how it might show up in
46:07
November. I called a
46:09
colleague. I'm Elizabeth Dias.
46:11
I am the national religion
46:13
correspondent for The Times, and
46:15
I write about the anti-abortion
46:17
movement and especially the conservative
46:20
Christian power involved
46:23
in advancing the anti-abortion
46:26
cause. Yeah, and we
46:28
recently just spoke to Lisa Lehrer, who
46:30
co-authored a book with you that is
46:32
titled The Fall of Roe, specifically around
46:35
these issues. How would you describe the
46:37
goal of the anti-abortion movement in this
46:39
post-row era? Well,
46:41
their ultimate goal is the end of
46:43
all abortion, right? The fall of Roe
46:45
was the beginning in a way, not
46:47
the end. And it's
46:50
a movement that thinks in these
46:52
long arcs, right? I think in
46:54
generational terms. So even though now
46:56
there's been this enormous backlash to
46:58
the overturning of Roe from liberals,
47:01
moderates, even some conservatives who were not
47:03
happy with that decision, they are
47:06
looking ahead to
47:08
what are the kind of tactics that they
47:10
need ultimately to push ahead with
47:12
their goal. So they're
47:15
finding some success, of course, in
47:18
conservative pockets and conservative
47:20
states and among
47:22
the true believers of
47:24
their cause. You
47:26
know, I know you covered the religious angle
47:28
of this. You actually talked to the pastor
47:31
that we spoke to in our episode today.
47:33
How is this issue playing out amongst the
47:35
religious right? Are they aligned on what to
47:37
do next regarding abortion rights? They're
47:41
splits. The pastor, Jeff Durbin,
47:43
that you spoke with for your episode,
47:46
he's on what many would
47:49
consider the fringe of the
47:51
anti-abortion movement, but it's
47:53
a fringe that's been gaining a
47:55
lot of traction. And that's a
47:58
segment of the movement. this whole
48:00
movement that we see doubling
48:03
down, hardening across areas
48:06
of politics, public
48:08
policy efforts that
48:11
really is doubling
48:13
down with the conservative
48:16
Christian vision and following
48:18
it through to its logical conclusion. We
48:21
see that in places like the
48:23
Southern Baptist Convention, opposing IVF. We
48:26
see it with some of the
48:29
Republican lawmakers who are in the
48:31
MAGA movement and the anti-abortion movement
48:33
where those things kind of mingle
48:35
together in states and places like
48:37
Arizona, for example. Are
48:40
there any notable anti-abortion candidates running on
48:42
further restrictions in this climate? What are
48:44
you watching for when it comes to
48:46
November? Well, it's been
48:48
really interesting watching Republicans, even
48:50
those who have been staunch
48:52
anti-abortion supporters, even former President
48:54
Trump, who made so much
48:58
of his platform was his support for
49:01
the anti-abortion movement. They've been really
49:04
running away from the cause in many
49:06
ways. What was the political advantage to
49:08
them before Roe fell is
49:11
clearly not right now. And I think
49:13
the politicians often see that, especially if
49:15
they're in moderate districts, restrictions
49:18
on abortion, cracking down on
49:21
IVF. These are very unpopular
49:23
positions and Republicans
49:25
know that. Thank
49:28
you so much, Elizabeth. We appreciate your time.
49:31
Thanks so much for having me. It's good. There
49:36
are 25 days to the Republican National Convention,
49:38
60 days until
49:40
the Democratic National Convention and 138 days
49:43
until the general election. We'll
49:47
see you next week. Thanks
49:57
for watching. Run
50:00
Up is reported by me, Esteb Herndon, and
50:03
produced by Elisa Gutierrez, Kaitlyn O'Keefe,
50:05
and Anna Foley. It's
50:08
edited by Rachel Dry and Lisa Tobin,
50:11
with original music by Dan
50:13
Powell, Marion Lozano, Pat McCusker,
50:16
Diane Wong, Sophia Landman, and
50:18
Alicia Beitout. It was
50:20
mixed by Sophia Landman and Fact Check
50:23
by Will Paisho and Kaitlyn Love. Special
50:26
thanks to Paula Schumann,
50:28
Sam Dolnick, Larissa Anderson,
50:30
David Halfinger, Maddie Masiello,
50:32
Mahima Chablani, Jeffrey Miranda,
50:34
and Elizabeth Brista. Do
50:37
you have questions about the 2024 election? Email
50:40
us at therunupatnytimes.com. Or
50:43
better yet, record your question using the voice
50:45
memo app in your phone. That
50:47
email again is therunupatnytimes.com.
50:51
Thanks for listening, y'all. Of
51:16
course you do, it's Smokey Bear. Let's
51:18
all make sure Smokey's wish comes true
51:20
by learning his wildfire prevention tips at
51:22
smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives
51:24
within us all. Brought to you by the
51:27
USDA Forest Service, your state forester, and the Ad
51:29
Council. Council. Hi.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More