Podchaser Logo
Home
What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

Released Thursday, 20th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

What Republicans Lost When They Won on Roe

Thursday, 20th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This year, a very important public

0:02

figure turns Haiti. He sent us

0:04

his wish for his birthday. My

0:06

wish is for everyone to practice

0:08

wildfire safety, because only you can

0:10

prevent wildfires. That sounds easy enough,

0:12

but you don't know who it

0:14

is. Nah, of course you do.

0:17

It's Smokey Bear. Let's all make

0:19

sure Smokey's wish comes true by

0:21

learning his wildfire prevention tips at

0:23

smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives

0:25

within us all. Brought to you by the

0:27

USDA Forest Service, your state forester in the

0:29

Ad Council. The

0:32

street right over here looked a little

0:34

bit more shady to me. It's

0:37

not too bad though, thankfully. The breezes

0:39

make it nice. Yesterday

0:42

was so hot. It's

0:44

another spring day in Arizona. And

0:46

once again, we're following around a group

0:48

of organizers, trying to reach

0:51

voters on this November ballot initiative that

0:53

would enshrine the right to an abortion in

0:56

the Arizona State Constitution. But

0:58

these organizers, Catherine and Heather,

1:01

are targeting a more conservative suburb of

1:03

Phoenix. And they're trying to

1:06

convince people not to support the initiative. And

1:09

you work at Students for Life? I work for Students for Life, yeah.

1:11

How old are you? I'm 21. Okay. How old

1:13

are you? I'm 16. You're 16? Yeah. How

1:16

did you get involved in this? I got

1:18

involved through a club that's at my

1:20

school. I joined two years ago,

1:22

a year and a half ago, because they started it up and

1:24

I was like, oh, this is really cool. A Students for

1:26

Life club at school? Yeah. Was that high school or was that

1:29

middle school? For me, it was

1:31

eighth grade, yeah. It was eighth grade? Yeah,

1:33

middle school. Yeah. So we do a lot

1:35

with all ages and we also have community

1:37

things as well. For

1:41

decades, the Republican position on

1:43

abortion rights was crystal clear. Overturn

1:46

Roe v. Wade and

1:48

send the issue back to the states. But

1:51

since June of 2022, when

1:53

the Supreme Court's conservative majority did

1:55

exactly that, Republicans

1:58

have faced the question. What

2:00

comes next? In

2:03

Arizona, that question is especially

2:05

important. Because in

2:07

this battleground state, Democratic groups

2:09

have already mobilized around this ballot initiative,

2:13

which is expected to motivate a wide range

2:15

of voters to show up in November and

2:18

could be a boost for Biden. So,

2:21

after spending time with organizers who support

2:24

the ballot measure, this

2:26

week, we explored the anti-abortion movement in

2:28

Arizona, where a

2:30

powerfully motivated group of conservatives in the state

2:33

is continuing to push against the initiative

2:36

and punishing the Republicans, who

2:38

have sought a more moderate position on the issue. Today,

2:43

in part two of our reporting from Arizona, how

2:46

abortion rights are exposing the fractures on

2:48

the right. From

2:51

The New York Times, I'm Estet Herndon. This

2:53

is The Runout. The

3:02

street was your typical Arizona suburb. Quiet, not much grass, some palm

3:04

trees, even an orange tree. No

3:10

one answered at the first

3:12

few houses. We can't

3:15

answer the door right now, but if you'd like to leave a

3:17

message, you can do it now. But Heather and Catherine left

3:19

some flyers anyway. We'll just leave the

3:22

information on your door. The

3:24

most awkward part is when they,

3:26

like, your walkway. You're

3:28

walking away, and then they open the door, and

3:31

you have to decide, am I going to go back and talk to them,

3:33

or just be like, I left it on your door. How

3:36

do you decide? Depending on how

3:38

welcoming, they open the door. They're like,

3:40

hello? A lot of it sounds like journalism familiar.

3:43

I used to have to do a lot of door

3:45

knocking, and you're reading vibes in the moment. Yeah, oh,

3:47

so many vibes. Eventually.

3:56

It's all you know? Yeah, I guess. What can I do

3:58

for you? Hi. the door.

4:00

We're informing people about their local pregnancy resource

4:02

centers. Have you heard of any in area?

4:06

No, no. We can

4:08

just give you the information if you're

4:10

interested. Okay, all right. These pregnancy resource

4:12

centers offer free diapers, formula, pregnancy tests,

4:15

anything that a woman could need during

4:17

her pregnancy. They also offer like paternal

4:19

classes for men who are helping their

4:23

partner. And then we also have this. This

4:26

is our decline to sign information. Have you heard

4:28

of the ballot initiative that's going around in Arizona

4:30

right now for abortion access? Yeah, don't

4:32

worry, I'll sign that when I find it. Oh,

4:34

so we're actually encouraging people not to

4:36

sign it. Why? Generally

4:39

speaking, so this will allow abortion up until

4:41

the moment of birth. Is that something that

4:43

you're comfortable with? No,

4:46

most people aren't. So that's kind of like

4:49

we're offering that information. It'll also remove the

4:51

parental consent law. So the parental

4:53

consent law doesn't allow minors to be taken in

4:55

to get abortions without parental consent. If that law

4:57

is removed, then it'll allow people

5:00

that are trafficking children to go in. Stop with

5:02

that stupid argument. Okay,

5:05

that's a dumb ass argument. Yes, I will

5:07

support this bill actually. Thank you. Have a

5:09

good day. How

5:19

often do you get responses like that? Not

5:21

very often. Most of

5:23

the time, people are very receptive because they do

5:25

have kids and they're like, Oh, I wouldn't want

5:27

my daughter who's 13 years old to be able

5:29

to go in and get an abortion without me

5:32

knowing about it. You

5:34

know, the bill is technically 24 weeks.

5:36

Yes. So it's all viability. And so

5:38

viability, and then it has some exceptions that are

5:40

expanded from other ones. Yeah. Yeah. So

5:43

it says up until viability, but you can

5:45

interfere after for health of the mother. But

5:47

health of the mother is defined so broadly.

5:49

It could literally just mean, Oh, I don't

5:51

like that I gained weight from being pregnant,

5:53

which is like a natural consequence. That's

5:55

what you're saying is leading to argument. You're saying it's up until

5:57

birth, right? Because the law is technically 24 weeks. So

6:01

it is written in a way that persuades people to

6:03

think that it's 24 weeks, but when we really break

6:05

down the language, it would allow it up until the

6:07

moment of birth. Because the exceptions are so

6:09

brah. Right, yeah. This argument that

6:12

Heather makes, that the ballot

6:14

initiative's language would allow abortion up to the

6:16

moment of birth, it's

6:18

misleading. And it's one that

6:20

abortion rights groups reject. Current

6:23

state law permits abortion up to 15 weeks. The

6:26

Arizona ballot measure would allow abortion

6:28

up until the point of fetal

6:30

viability, which is usually defined

6:32

around 24 weeks. Less

6:35

than 1% of all abortions happen

6:37

after 24 weeks. And

6:40

under the ballot measure, any exemption

6:42

following viability will require sign-off

6:44

from a medical professional. But

6:47

that didn't stop Heather and Catherine from

6:49

making the argument. Let's definitely

6:51

try to get back to the house and let

6:53

somebody come back. We

6:55

walked up to a house that had to sign out from. It

7:00

said, grandkids welcome. Parents

7:03

by appointment. Hi, how's

7:05

your day going? That's where

7:07

we met Vicki. Hi, we're informing people about

7:09

their local pregnancy resource centers. Have you heard of

7:11

me in your area? Well,

7:14

no. Yeah, these pregnancy

7:16

resource centers offer free pregnancy tests,

7:18

free ultrasounds, free stuff after you

7:21

have babies and even during your

7:23

pregnancy. Yeah. We

7:25

can give you both of these. We're also asking

7:27

people if they've heard about the Arizona for

7:29

Abortion Access Act. Yes.

7:32

So we're asking people how they feel about

7:34

that. I

7:36

am against abortion. Okay, awesome.

7:40

We're out here asking people not to sign

7:42

for that. It would allow abortion up until the

7:44

moment of birth and it's something that's really scary and that

7:46

we don't want to see happen to Arizona. So

7:49

we're very grateful for your support. We

7:52

also have the New York Times with us if you

7:54

have a minute to share your

7:56

opinion. and

8:00

we're over for the New York Times. We actually

8:02

work for its Politics Podcast and we're following them

8:04

around today, partially to talk to Arizonans about how

8:06

they're feeling and only about this referendum about the

8:08

election because Arizona is such an important state. Maybe

8:10

a couple minutes, I'm just curious on how like,

8:13

you know, we're about to come into a very

8:15

crazy election period. Like how do you, how are

8:17

you feeling about that? How

8:19

are you feeling about the election? Just

8:22

like blue sky first word that comes to your mind.

8:26

I feel that many people

8:28

are deceived and don't really

8:30

understand everything that's going

8:32

on and that they'll listen to

8:35

regular news that is

8:37

not reporting both sides, sad to

8:39

say. Well, one of the reasons-

8:41

It frightens me. One of the reasons we're like talking to

8:43

people so they can tell us what they think we're missing.

8:45

Like what do you think are the things that folks aren't

8:47

reporting on that you're saying you wish they, you heard more

8:50

about? The other

8:52

side, I mean, there's

8:55

so many times they'll report like with

8:57

abortion. They'll report about, oh,

9:00

you know, we want to have more

9:02

abortions. We want to make it available

9:04

for people, but they're not reporting what

9:06

actually happens during an abortion or like

9:09

Israel. They'll

9:11

say, oh, these poor people

9:13

in Palestine and everything, nothing

9:15

about the hostages that were

9:17

abducted or, you know,

9:19

how Israel is just trying to protect themselves

9:21

and keep from being

9:24

annihilated. Do you have an issue

9:26

that you think is most important for you in this election? I

9:31

guess those are my two most important ones

9:33

right now. Can I ask you about

9:35

the specific candidates when you think about Trump and Biden likely to

9:37

be on the ballot again from 2020? Like,

9:39

do you know how you're going to vote? Are you

9:41

a Democrat, Republicans? Do you consider yourself one of those

9:43

identities? There's

9:45

a lot of corruption on

9:47

both sides, but I

9:50

will not vote for Biden. I mean,

9:52

he has just totally destroyed

9:55

this country, and he keeps sending money

9:57

to people. They

9:59

want to kill. us and annihilate us and

10:02

then open borders when you have so

10:04

many people that you don't know where

10:06

they're from and the fentanyl that's happening

10:08

and the child, not

10:11

prostitution, but human trafficking

10:14

and you know all of this that's

10:16

going on and then him and his

10:18

son and he is

10:20

very corrupt and I do not want him president.

10:23

Well, I have some question about Trump. You mentioned

10:25

how you feel about Biden. How do you feel

10:27

about Donald Trump? Well if

10:29

he's the only one running then yes I

10:31

will. I think that he did an awesome

10:33

job as a president. He

10:36

did a lot of stuff that again the

10:38

media just sort of overlooked. He

10:40

says stuff that he shouldn't say. I want to

10:42

smack him. But

10:45

he did so much good. Our economy

10:47

was better. Just overall.

10:49

One of the things that's been

10:51

interesting to me about Trump is he's backed away from

10:53

endorsing a federal abortion ban and

10:55

he's recently kind of been

10:58

like a couple other Republicans who've

11:00

stepped back from really leading on

11:02

a pro-life stance. Does that

11:04

as someone who feels strongly about

11:06

abortion like does that bother you

11:08

any that he seems to have

11:10

stepped away from that? I

11:13

wish he hadn't and yes

11:15

it bothers me but being the man

11:17

he is, he is out

11:19

for votes and sad to

11:21

say a lot of people support

11:23

abortion. So I do

11:25

not agree with

11:27

Trump not really supporting it

11:30

full-heartedly but

11:32

I understand why he's doing it.

11:36

Because for votes? Because many people

11:39

that is a deciding factor for them. If

11:41

they can't have an abortion then they don't

11:43

want that person in. Even if

11:45

it means that that person is going to

11:47

totally destroy America. I mean

11:50

I do think that a lot of elections have told

11:52

us that people are prioritizing that issue at the top.

11:54

The only question I have for you is Arizona has

11:56

changed so much to become a swing state. There's

11:59

been a lot of influx of new people. I

12:01

don't know how long you have been in this

12:03

state or anything. I guess I was just wondering,

12:05

has that been tangible? I mean, has it, does

12:07

Arizona feel like it's changing? Because the numbers would

12:10

tell us that it's becoming a little more liberal,

12:12

that it's becoming more open to Democrats. It

12:14

definitely has become more liberal. I've

12:18

been talking to my husband about moving

12:20

because too many Californians came with their

12:22

liberal ideas. They didn't like what happened

12:24

to California. But then they come here

12:26

and they still want the same thing.

12:29

And destroy our state. It

12:32

makes me angry. But we

12:35

all should have the

12:37

right to vote as we feel. How

12:39

long have you been in Arizona? Since

12:41

84. Thank

12:43

you so much. Do you mind telling us your

12:45

name or how old you are? My name is

12:47

Dickie. I'm in my 70s. Hey, that's all good.

12:50

We're good? Thank you. Thank you

12:52

so much. We really appreciate it. My name

12:54

is Heather. I work with Students for the

12:56

Life of America. Well, God

12:58

bless you. Thank you. I

13:01

just wanted to say we're so grateful

13:03

for your support. Thank you. Don't leave.

13:06

We need all of our Republican voters here.

13:08

We have a daughter and three grandchildren that

13:10

said, no, you can't go, grandma. You have

13:12

to say that. I

13:15

see your sign. Vicki

13:18

is representative of a lot of Republican

13:20

voters right now, who may

13:22

not love that Donald Trump is rejecting the

13:24

idea of a federal ban on abortion, but

13:27

who are unlikely to punish him for it. But

13:30

not everybody in the Republican Party gets

13:33

a pass from the anti-abortion movement. In

13:36

fact, on days when they're

13:38

not canvassing against the ballot initiative, Students

13:41

for Life had begun to target

13:43

a Republican state legislator named

13:45

Matt Gress, who had,

13:47

up until recently, been on their side.

13:51

Now they're handing out flyers with

13:53

his face on them that say wanted

13:56

for the death of countless Arizona

13:58

pre-born babies. And

14:00

we wanted to talk to him about why he's

14:02

become a lightning rod. So

14:09

we said goodbye to Heather and Catherine and

14:12

met up with Gress. Do

14:16

we sound okay? How do we feel?

14:18

Yeah, we're good. Do you have a

14:20

nice podcast voice? You have

14:22

a great podcast voice. And

14:26

we're going to talk to you about the conversation

14:29

that we're going to talk about in the conference

14:31

room at our hotel in Phoenix, right by his

14:33

district. Can you just introduce yourself and tell us what you

14:35

do? Yes, my name is Matt Gress and I'm a state

14:37

representative in the Arizona House representing

14:39

Scottsdale, Arcadia, Paradise Valley

14:42

and North Phoenix. Gress

14:44

is in his first term as a state legislator,

14:47

but he worked in state government before that, under

14:50

Republican Governor Doug Ducey. When

14:52

he initially ran, his platform didn't

14:54

have much to do with abortion. It

14:57

was about education. I'm

15:00

a former school teacher getting

15:02

more money into the classroom, safe

15:04

neighborhoods, ensuring that we

15:07

are supporting our police, as

15:10

well as addressing the serious

15:12

issues down on the border

15:14

and then just keeping taxes

15:17

and regulations low and

15:19

appropriate. Then on

15:21

April 9th, that's when everything

15:24

changed completely. I did not.

15:27

It was not on my bingo card. April

15:29

9th is when the Arizona Supreme Court

15:31

moved to change the landscape of abortion,

15:34

reviving an 1864 law that had been

15:37

on the books since before Arizona was

15:39

a state, a law

15:41

that banned any abortion at any time, except

15:44

if the mother's life was in danger. Yeah.

15:46

Can you tell me like what was

15:48

the immediate reaction when the law went

15:50

into place? So within a

15:52

few hours of the court ruling, I

15:55

came out with a video. I posted

15:57

it and basically said that. I

16:00

do not believe that the Supreme Court's

16:03

ruling can stand and that

16:05

the legislature now needs to engage and

16:07

repeal the territorial law because it is

16:09

not in alignment with the values of

16:11

Arizonans in 2024. Gress

16:14

was initially the only Republican in the

16:16

statehouse to side with Democrats in pushing

16:18

to repeal the law. Eventually,

16:21

two other Republicans joined him and

16:23

the law was overturned. But

16:26

Gress made some enemies in the process. The

16:29

reaction from

16:31

Republicans was

16:34

conflicted because many

16:37

of my Republican colleagues who did not vote with

16:39

me acknowledged why

16:42

I was doing what I was doing. They saw

16:44

the rationale. They obviously did

16:46

not agree with me. And

16:49

we're going to have to agree to disagree on

16:51

this particular issue. Most

16:53

people in the Republican caucus, the ones

16:55

who believed the 1864 law should stand, punished

16:59

Gress for his vote. If

17:01

I understand correctly, you were removed

17:03

from the Appropriations Committee after this vote, right?

17:06

Yes, I was. I mean, that's not

17:08

a small thing. Did the intensity

17:10

of the blowback surprise you any? I

17:23

really applaud the Senate for

17:26

keeping their cool on this. There

17:29

were members of the Senate that wanted Senator

17:32

Shope and Senator Bullock to

17:34

be removed from leadership posts. The

17:37

other folks who joined with Democrats to repeal

17:39

the senator. On

17:41

the Senate side. And they said, well, the

17:44

Speaker punished Matt Gress. You need to

17:46

punish these other Republicans in the Senate.

17:49

And the Senate president, Warren Peterson, said that's not

17:52

how the Senate works. Each member

17:54

gets to vote the way that they

17:56

believe their district wants them to vote. And we're not

17:58

going to punish them for that. So

18:00

I think it's unfortunate,

18:03

but I don't work for the speaker. I work for

18:05

the people of the fourth legislative

18:07

district. And I'm going to continue to do

18:09

what they want me to do, not

18:11

just on this, but on other issues as well. The

18:14

thing is, Gress really believes he's

18:16

helping his party win. And

18:19

that's what I ultimately wanted to talk to him about. For

18:22

you as a Republican, what have the

18:24

conversations been like amongst the party about

18:26

how to find a position

18:28

that both speaks to

18:31

values and has political relevance?

18:33

I think for too long, we

18:36

have seen the extremes

18:39

on both ends. Want

18:41

to pit women against

18:44

new life. I don't

18:46

think that it's a mutually exclusive situation.

18:49

I think we can respect women

18:52

and have policies that protect new

18:54

life, working simultaneously

18:56

together. There's no

18:58

doubt there are deeply held

19:00

views on the existential

19:03

question of abortion. And I'm not

19:05

going to dismiss what some of

19:07

my colleagues believe or review on

19:11

banning abortion outright. I'm

19:13

against abortion. And yet

19:15

I also recognize that abortion is

19:18

necessary with reasonable

19:20

timeframes and reasonable exceptions.

19:23

I mean, it is

19:26

undeniable that that needs to be available

19:28

to women going through certain

19:31

circumstances, especially in the horrific

19:33

situations of rape or incest.

19:36

I think I took the most pro-life position

19:38

that was available. What do you mean? So

19:41

if we were to allow the zero-week

19:44

territorial law to remain in

19:46

place, we would have

19:48

created the perfect conditions for

19:51

the Arizona abortion access to pass

19:53

overwhelmingly in November. You're saying if

19:55

that law was still there, it

19:57

would be easier for the progressive...

20:00

activists who are trying to push the referendum

20:02

in November that would expand

20:05

abortion access, it would be

20:07

easier for that to pass if it was up against

20:09

the 1864 law. Absolutely, because you have nothing

20:12

versus allowing abortion to be

20:14

legal and most people

20:17

recognize that abortion has to

20:19

be available in those

20:21

circumstances when it's warranted. So

20:23

we were going to create the perfect

20:25

condition for, in

20:28

my view, a pretty extreme

20:30

measure like the Abortion Access Act

20:33

to pass overwhelmingly. We have to

20:35

be strategic here because I think

20:37

that most people are in the

20:39

middle and I think

20:42

that since Roe v. Wade was

20:44

decided in 1973, we have done

20:46

a very bad job on the

20:49

Republican side of winning the hearts

20:51

and minds of

20:53

Americans, winning them

20:55

over to the pro-life side. Republicans

20:59

have kind of, they

21:01

had an easy out before Roe v. Wade

21:03

was overturned to say, yeah Roe

21:06

v. Wade should be overturned and

21:09

that was it because no one

21:11

thought that it would get overturned. So

21:13

you didn't really have to do the policy

21:16

exercise at what happens if

21:18

Roe v. Wade was overturned. Where do

21:20

you want the law to stand if it

21:23

was overturned? Exactly, and we didn't, we

21:25

as Republicans didn't have to do the work

21:28

around thinking through

21:30

real-life implications of

21:33

having a policy that is workable and

21:36

reflective of the reality on

21:38

the ground and that aligns with

21:41

the values of the people we serve.

21:43

And then there are those who are

21:45

like, this is a matter of principle,

21:48

this is a matter of moral

21:50

conviction, and despite

21:52

what the electorate thinks,

21:55

we have to stand firm on our

21:58

principles. We've been fighting for outwards. for

22:01

all of this time, now is the

22:03

time to stand firm, a life is a life. Yeah, I

22:05

was going to ask about what you do with

22:07

the kind of moral conviction slice of your party

22:10

because it's not insignificant, you

22:12

know, that's a driving activist and energy base

22:14

for a lot of Republicans. And

22:17

we've talked to so many activists, both

22:19

in Arizona and nationally, who

22:22

describe this in such human rights terms

22:24

that there is no, for them, sense

22:26

of compromise. Can you describe

22:29

how that was received by that wing? And then

22:31

in a larger way, what

22:33

can Republicans do if that group never

22:35

budgets? Well,

22:39

that group does not represent the

22:42

majority of the party. And

22:45

maybe it's going to take this election

22:48

to show some of these individuals and

22:50

even some of them have acknowledged that

22:52

they are in the minority. They acknowledged

22:54

that, but they have deeply held beliefs.

22:56

And again, I'm not going to dismiss

22:59

that, but I'm not going to go along

23:01

with that. It's not

23:03

appropriate for my constituency. And

23:06

when you're talking about widespread

23:08

policy shifts, like

23:12

completely banning abortion after it had been legal

23:14

for 50 years, the

23:19

electorate, the governed, are

23:22

not going to shift like that. Yeah,

23:24

you know, from our perspective, there's

23:27

a lot of interest in how this could affect a presidential

23:29

race. What do you think about that prospect? Like is the

23:31

reason this is happening now also to

23:33

help Joe Biden win in Arizona? I'm

23:37

not sure. I'm not sure the

23:40

reason why proponents picked 2024

23:43

to run the Arizona Abortion Access Act, but

23:45

that's the only issue that the Democrats have to run

23:48

on. It's not the border. It's

23:50

not foreign policy. It's not

23:52

the economy. I

23:55

mean, I'm straining

23:58

to think what else the Democrats Democrats

24:00

have to run on. The problem

24:02

is that voters

24:04

are not single issue voters. They

24:06

have a host of concerns. And

24:09

right now, President Trump is

24:12

in Arizona is leading President Biden.

24:15

And his views and viewpoints, especially

24:18

when it comes to the border, are

24:20

resonating with Arizonans. The Democrats can continue

24:22

to try to focus on abortion to

24:25

hopefully win additional votes. But

24:27

their absence and apathy on

24:29

the border is what will

24:32

ultimately do them in in November.

24:34

So I think as long

24:37

as we stay focused on

24:39

being responsive to where our

24:41

constituents want us to be

24:44

and being able to talk about abortion

24:47

in a responsible way, I do

24:49

think that Republicans have the edge.

24:52

Yeah. In one way, I see how,

24:54

what you're saying, that's all the Democrats have to run on.

24:56

It also makes it seem like that's

24:59

the vulnerability for Republicans in that

25:01

abortion and that the lack of

25:03

kind of a consistent message or

25:05

a lack of maybe a clear

25:07

position on what to do going

25:10

forward is maybe the sticking point

25:12

when we think about optimism come November. Do you

25:14

think by the time we get there, Republicans

25:17

will be united behind 15 weeks or

25:19

will there still be, you know, the

25:21

human rights faction versus another faction or

25:24

specifically on abortion? I think that

25:27

the pro-life coalition will come

25:30

together. The fact is

25:32

the 15-week law is the law of

25:34

the land for all intents and purposes.

25:36

We repeal the territorial law is

25:38

gone. So now the

25:41

pro-life movement has to think, okay,

25:43

we could have a constitutional amendment that

25:45

enshrines abortion in the Constitution, or

25:48

we can fight to defend the 15-week law, which

25:50

was good back in 2022. It

25:53

was considered very pro-life. I

25:56

think that's where the pro-life factions

25:58

are going to ultimately. end

26:00

up. They're upset right now,

26:03

but my hope is that they

26:05

will see the bigger picture. We

26:08

got to be focused on talking

26:10

about abortion in that

26:12

way versus continuing to

26:14

advocate for its complete ban and elimination.

26:16

That's just not where voters are going

26:18

to be. Yeah. Yeah. Great.

26:21

Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. And I

26:23

think this was really helpful for us. Okay. Thank you.

26:25

Have a great day. Thank

26:27

you. For

26:30

Gress, the most pro-life thing a

26:32

Republican can do is find

26:35

a consensus position on abortion rights that

26:37

meets voters where they are, where

26:40

some abortions are allowed up

26:42

until a reasonable timeframe and

26:44

with reasonable exceptions. And

26:47

its thinking seems to mirror Trump's. It's

26:49

pragmatic and calibrated for

26:51

Republicans to win elections. But there's

26:55

another group that has an increasingly

26:57

loud voice in this debate, pushing

27:00

more extreme measures where people

27:02

like Gress see compromise. These

27:05

are the abortion abolitionists, the

27:07

radicals who refuse to give

27:09

an inch and in doing so

27:12

are boxing the Republican party in. That's

27:16

after the break. This

27:22

year, a very important public figure

27:24

turns Haiti. He sent us his

27:27

wish for his birthday. My wish

27:29

is for everyone to practice wildfire

27:31

safety because only you can prevent

27:33

wildfires. That sounds easy enough, but

27:35

you don't know who it is.

27:38

Of course you do. It's Smokey Bear.

27:40

Let's all make sure Smokey's wish comes

27:42

true by learning his wildfire prevention tips

27:44

at smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives within

27:46

us all. Brought to you by the

27:49

USDA Forest Service, your state forester and

27:51

the Ad Council. Alright

27:53

guys, how would you describe our podcast?

27:55

Matter of opinion. Uh,

27:58

extremely civilized, exchanged. of

28:00

high-minded ideas. I swear, if

28:02

somebody says dinner party conversation, I'm slapping them.

28:04

It's an airing of grievances, right? Somewhere

28:07

in between, I hope. Maybe the easiest way

28:09

to explain what Matter of Opinion is is

28:12

actually to share what our listeners have to

28:14

say about us. Listener Tobias

28:16

said, Matter of Opinion

28:18

is a great podcast for anyone

28:20

engaged with social issues and politics

28:23

on any level. The

28:25

lighthearted but testy conversations about

28:27

truly divisive topics pique my

28:30

interest. Lighthearted but

28:32

testy. That's totally you, Ross.

28:34

I'm putting that on my headstone. My back is getting

28:36

a little sore from all this padding. From

28:40

New York Times Opinion, I'm Michelle Cottle. I'm

28:42

Ross Douthit. I'm Carlos Lozada. I'm Lydia

28:44

Polgreen. And don't just take our work for it.

28:47

Make up your own mind and follow Matter of Opinion

28:49

wherever you get your podcasts. I think you were going

28:51

in there.

28:54

A couple days after talking with Gress and

28:56

going out with Students for Life, Caitlin

28:58

and I drove to Tempe, Arizona, to

29:01

an unassuming office whose location we've been

29:03

asked to keep private. Where? Is

29:06

that over there? We were there to

29:08

meet the pastor of Apologia Church, a

29:10

church focused on anti-abortion advocacy. It

29:14

also has a studio space where

29:16

they broadcast their

29:18

message to more than 500,000 YouTube followers. The

29:22

studio space was in the back of the building. And that's

29:24

where we set up. That's OK. That's all

29:26

I understand. Take your time. There you go. All

29:29

set. There were classic movie posters

29:32

on the wall next to another poster that said, babies are murdered

29:35

here. Can

29:38

you introduce yourself on mic? Yeah. Can you just tell

29:40

me what you do? Yeah, I'm passing the mic.

29:42

I'm going to do it. I'm going to do

29:44

it. I'm going to do it. Tell me what

29:46

you do. Yeah, I'm pastor Jeff Durbin, a pastor

29:48

at Apologia Church. I'm also the head of End

29:51

Abortion Now and Apologia Studios. Jeff

29:53

Durbin is 46, a

29:55

father of seven, including three

29:57

adopted children. and

30:00

their two newest babies were waiting in the

30:02

lobby of the building as we spoke to him. He's

30:05

also a grandfather of six, and

30:08

he has a colorful backstory. Yeah,

30:10

so I wasn't raised in an explicitly

30:13

Christian home and heard the gospel for

30:15

the first time when I was

30:17

16, had a profession of faith, moved to

30:19

Arizona because at the time I was the

30:22

national champion in martial arts.

30:24

I was a full-time professional competitor and did

30:26

a lot of different projects. Like when I

30:28

was, I turned 18, first thing

30:30

I did was I was with Mortal Kombat, the

30:32

live tour. Did a lot

30:34

of different projects like stuff in the Ninja Turtles

30:37

franchise and video games and things like that. So

30:39

that brought me out to Arizona to

30:41

teach martial arts and be closer to LA.

30:43

And my life had a real

30:46

transformation after about a year long

30:48

pursuit of drug addiction, drug and

30:50

alcohol addiction. God got a

30:52

hold of my life and my heart and changed my

30:54

life. Durban started Apologia

30:56

Church in 2010. He says about a thousand

30:58

people come

31:01

to services on a good day. Durban

31:03

and Apologia have become synonymous

31:06

with anti-abortion activism in Arizona

31:09

and what's called abortion abolition. Yeah,

31:12

so the issue of abortion

31:14

abolition is an issue that

31:16

focuses in upon equal protection

31:18

for all humans. It's a

31:20

focus upon consistency, no

31:23

compromise. The abolitionist says it

31:26

is fully human and in the image

31:28

of God from fertilization and we must

31:30

protect all humans and give them equal

31:32

protection. In Durban's view, people

31:35

who seek abortion should be punished.

31:37

Abortion should be considered a crime.

31:39

It should be considered a murder.

31:42

You're unjustly taking the life of a human

31:44

being and so that's murder. And

31:46

what I've said is what is the historic

31:49

position of the Christian church, that

31:51

if you take the life of a

31:54

human being unjustly, then what the state

31:56

owes you, if it's proven and it's

31:58

true, is capital punishment. forfeits your

32:00

right to live. However,

32:02

in this nation right now,

32:04

we have strayed so far

32:06

from just standards of accusation

32:08

and prosecution that I

32:10

can't even say, and I won't say

32:13

that I want capital punishment in any

32:15

particular state because it could have an

32:17

unjust system that leads to that capital

32:19

punishment. So do I believe in capital

32:21

punishment for murder? Do

32:23

I believe that we are in the place

32:26

right now or we can employ that with

32:28

trust to our judicial system? Absolutely not. Members

32:31

of Durbin's Church have done some things you'd

32:33

expect, like protesting at Planned

32:35

Parenthood. But one of the things

32:37

that makes them different is that

32:39

they also focus their efforts on pressuring

32:41

conservatives who seek to compromise on

32:44

abortion rights. The pro-life lobby will

32:46

really boast in the fact that they are

32:48

not explicitly Christian. They're opposed

32:50

to using the biblical worldview

32:52

and biblical standards as explicit

32:55

in the legislature. The

32:57

pro-life establishment does

32:59

not want to abolish abortion. They

33:01

do not believe in equal protection for all humans

33:03

from fertilization, though they say they do. They do

33:05

not. So you'll see pro-life

33:07

legislation, like you can kill

33:10

the children under 15 weeks, but not

33:12

over, or 12 weeks, or heartbeat. So

33:14

the pro-life lobby, the pro-life establishment

33:17

actually believes in partiality. They're

33:19

inconsistent, wholly inconsistent, and

33:22

that's the issue. I really

33:24

wanna talk about actually the post-stops, but

33:27

I think that was helpful context. When the decision

33:29

came down, what was your initial thoughts? Thankful

33:33

that God strikes straight blows with

33:35

crooked sticks. Am I glad that

33:37

Roe is out of the way via that decision? I'm

33:40

glad it's no longer gonna be able to be used

33:42

as an excuse by pro-life

33:44

legislators and leaders. I

33:47

believe that the decision itself, however,

33:49

was evil in

33:53

terms of the justices actually

33:55

just washing their hands of it and saying to

33:57

the states, you decide if you wanna kill them.

34:00

I don't think that was a consistent or just

34:02

decision. I think that it was cowardly. To be

34:04

clear, you're saying that the delegation

34:07

to the states is

34:09

one that you find cowardly because you

34:11

would prefer them to just to outlaw

34:13

abortion directly. I would prefer the Supreme

34:15

Court be consistent, even the judges that

34:17

have pro-life commitments, that they'd

34:19

be consistent with how they address an

34:22

issue like abortion and not simply say,

34:24

I believe it's fully human from fertilization,

34:27

but I'll go ahead and let the states decide if they

34:29

want to go ahead and oppress these human beings. To

34:32

your point, it has really thrown

34:34

the Republican pro-life position in flux.

34:37

For so many years, it

34:39

was just the refrain of eliminating Roe,

34:41

and now we have seen a kind

34:44

of open question in a lot of

34:46

states about where a lot of these

34:48

legislators fall. This is a big issue

34:50

here in Arizona, but I first wanted

34:53

to ask about national folks, too. We've

34:56

seen Donald Trump, frankly, step away

34:58

from calls for a federal abortion

35:00

ban. We've seen Republicans in a

35:02

Kerry Lake step away from calls

35:05

for a federal abortion ban.

35:07

What is your reaction to just

35:09

the way national or kind of

35:11

big name Republicans who were pro-life

35:13

and anti-abortion four or five years

35:16

ago have kind of become pro-state

35:18

decide on its own? Yeah. I

35:22

think it's demonstrating that a lot of

35:24

these politicians are not as committed to

35:26

the principles they say they are, and

35:28

they're, in fact, charlatans. I

35:30

believe this for votes. I believe this for the

35:32

crowd, but I don't actually believe it in principle.

35:34

And so I think what Donald Trump

35:36

did and how he came out

35:38

was it exposes his inconsistency, but it also

35:40

demonstrates that he doesn't really believe what he

35:43

says he believes, and the same for Kerry

35:45

Lake. And so you're right.

35:47

There's been a big revealing after

35:49

Dobbs as to whether or

35:51

not people actually believe this. I

35:54

have no affinity for the Republican Party.

35:56

My challenge to them

35:58

all would be to say, you guys.

36:00

don't really believe what you say you

36:02

believe. You're inconsistent and that

36:05

inconsistency is so obvious, your opposition

36:07

knows you don't really believe it.

36:10

The pro-life establishment is not working for abolition

36:12

in the end of abortion. They're not ultimately

36:14

aimed at equal protection and

36:17

abolishing abortion like say

36:19

we did slavery. It's a

36:21

crime. It doesn't matter who does it.

36:23

There is no one getting out of the

36:25

justice that will be served. If you kidnap

36:27

and enslave any of our black brothers

36:29

and sisters, you will be punished. And we

36:32

don't care who you are or where you're

36:34

involved in the process, right? You're all guilty

36:36

and we're going to punish you. That's

36:39

abolition. And these

36:41

pro-lifers don't actually want abolition. Like

36:44

looking ahead to November in Arizona, 1864 law is

36:46

gone. Yep. Like

36:49

what's the plan in terms of the current

36:51

political reality around abortion in Arizona? Yeah,

36:53

that's a good question. So in

36:56

terms of methodology and strategy and

36:58

establishing justice, if you're consistent

37:00

at the bottom, you don't need to

37:02

change your strategy. You're aiming at the same

37:04

thing. Equal protection for every human being. Nobody

37:07

is to be treated differently. And

37:09

so in terms of what we're trying to do, it's

37:11

the same thing we've been doing. Bills of abolition, equal

37:13

protection, in whatever way we can get it. But

37:16

in terms of this ballot measure, the

37:18

ballot measure would mean that

37:21

post-Roe, we would have

37:23

the bloodiest and most brutal part of

37:25

this Holocaust just beginning from my perspective.

37:28

So it's very serious that we focus on

37:30

the ballot measure. And

37:32

we are, we are working

37:35

very, very hard right now around the clock.

37:37

And I cannot say what

37:39

we're doing to make sure that this

37:42

ballot measure doesn't take place. Why

37:44

can't you say what you're doing? Because there's too

37:46

many people working on it. And I

37:48

know that the opposition has a lot

37:50

of money and they have, I'm

37:53

not gonna reveal them and I mean

37:55

what my plans are. And they're all

37:57

peaceful and all legal remedies to deal

37:59

with. with the ballot measure. But we're

38:01

working very hard right now. And there are a number of

38:03

organizations that are working together with us. As a matter of

38:05

fact, Apology at Church is leading this. And

38:08

if we get to the point where it is on

38:11

the ballot, or is the goal right now to just keep it

38:13

off the ballot? The goal right now is to

38:15

kill the ballot measure. Yeah.

38:18

There's no insight legally, or to not

38:20

get enough signatures and validate the signatures,

38:22

we can't get any visibility there? You can't.

38:25

Okay. Is there any point of

38:29

defeat here? Like if we get enough of these

38:31

in a row, like let's say Arizona backs the

38:34

access bill. That is so far

38:36

from abolition. Would

38:38

that change anything that you all do? No. No.

38:42

Because the problem is the same, the message is the same. And

38:44

I keep bringing it back to this, just

38:47

in terms of it's something fresh in many people's minds,

38:49

in terms of in our own nation's history, people

38:51

still fill the wounds from it, right? The issue of

38:53

slavery. There was a heck of

38:56

a lot of resistance to the abolition of

38:58

slavery. And a lot of people are

39:00

saying, this isn't gonna end, it's just gonna keep going. And

39:03

it was, I think, just a grace of God

39:05

that light really started to shine in people's hearts

39:07

and minds to love another person like God calls

39:09

us to. And that's how it happened. Also a

39:11

huge war. Well,

39:14

and where we are in the civil war.

39:16

Yeah. Yeah. And I actually

39:18

believe that the civil war was judgment

39:21

in our nation for doing such a

39:23

wicked thing for so long. Yeah. Do

39:26

you vote? Yeah. When I

39:28

think about the presidential election, like how do you view this

39:30

issue in terms of, I imagine,

39:32

two choices now that at least

39:34

in terms of major party candidates have

39:36

stepped away from the idea of

39:39

a federal abortion ban or really embracing abortion

39:41

as a thing to be restricted at the

39:43

national level. Where does that leave you? So

39:47

you heard me say that I have no affections

39:49

ultimately for the Republican party or anything like that.

39:51

What I'm looking for is consistency and principle. But

39:54

we're obviously, from my perspective as a

39:56

Christian, as a pastor in a very

39:58

difficult moment because it would seem like

40:00

a very difficult moment. seem to be

40:03

that both candidates, whether it's Biden or

40:05

Trump, both have radically unchristian worldviews on

40:07

so many issues. And so

40:09

it becomes very challenging. I'm not saying that as

40:11

a Christian you need to have the perfect candidate.

40:14

But you're right on this issue, it becomes very challenging

40:16

for someone like me. I don't

40:19

idolize Trump. I'm thankful for some of the things that

40:21

he did that are consistent with the Christian worldview. I'm

40:23

thankful for a lot of those things. But

40:25

at the same time, I think it's important to

40:28

call out where he is inconsistent and where he

40:30

demonstrates that I'm more concerned with votes than I

40:32

am lives. I think the

40:34

idolatry of Trump amongst Christians in America

40:36

is shameful. But

40:38

I'm hearing he's more likely to get your

40:40

vote. Trump? Yeah. Right

40:43

now I do not have any position on

40:45

it at the moment. I'm hoping to see

40:47

light and consistency

40:50

happen. But yeah. The

40:53

last question I have is it

40:55

seems like the Republican Party, even

40:57

though it's not something you personally

40:59

identify with, is in a rock

41:01

and a hard place, partially because

41:04

of the advocacy of abortion abolitionists.

41:06

That has historically been a huge

41:08

energy and activism base for them

41:10

and a source of money. And

41:13

they have really calibrated their message around

41:15

some of that activism. And

41:18

it does seem like right now

41:20

their desire to reposition is being

41:23

pulled from the desire to

41:25

win votes as you have identified and

41:27

folks like you who are,

41:30

as they do that pivot, calling them out.

41:34

Right. In their dream world, I imagine you

41:36

all become more open to compromise and just

41:38

let them pivot. Yeah. But that

41:40

doesn't seem likely. Not if your

41:43

commitments are first and foremost to

41:45

the authority of Christ and the

41:48

word of God. No, we're not going

41:50

to change because the word of God doesn't

41:52

change. The Christian worldview is consistent in this

41:54

area. The problem we have right

41:57

now politically is there's so many people who

41:59

are just in this as a career and

42:01

it's just pretend. It's just something you say

42:04

for votes. And I

42:06

don't wanna live that way. I wanna live in such a way that

42:08

I actually believe what I say I believe. And

42:11

if I say this human being is valuable, I act like

42:13

that's true. Would you rather Carrie

42:16

Lake and Donald Trump lose with

42:19

endorsing abortion abolition or

42:21

win if it required stepping away? I'd

42:24

rather see them lose being consistent. Yeah,

42:27

because I think what God shows

42:29

us over and over and over again is that

42:32

what he blesses is faithfulness in

42:34

his people. And at times he

42:36

will change history with the smallest

42:38

numbers of people through faithfulness. So

42:40

yeah, would it be

42:42

devastating to this nation to see more

42:45

from my perspective, economic

42:48

injustices that are promoted by socialists

42:50

and Marxists and things like that,

42:52

would it be devastating to have

42:54

them employ more of their worldview

42:57

with regard to children and sexuality?

43:00

Yeah, that'd be devastating. And I don't want

43:02

that for our nation. But what

43:04

I do want is to see actual transformation

43:06

take place. And if that means that you

43:08

have to lose an election because you're being

43:11

faithful and consistent, I'd say God will

43:13

bless that. Yeah, cool.

43:15

Thank you so much. I really appreciate it. This

43:17

was helpful. Absolutely. I really enjoyed talking to you.

43:20

Your point about the idolatry of Trump is interesting.

43:22

Yeah, yeah. And I do think the way that a

43:24

lot of like conservative evangelicals

43:26

have started to talk about Trump feels different

43:29

than any kind of politician relationship I've seen. It

43:32

is interesting. And the thing I thought was the most disturbing

43:34

thing to me is we went during

43:36

the Capitol breach, wasn't there,

43:38

I didn't do that. We

43:41

were there just on the ground that day to

43:43

just provide like Christian media coverage of like this

43:45

whole thing. And then that

43:47

whole thing went off. We were a ways away. We

43:50

did some stuff saying, this is not the way you do

43:52

things. This is not the way Christians should approach this. But

43:55

the thing that was, I think most disturbing to me the whole

43:57

day was the

43:59

idolatry. It was Christians with

44:02

big signs of like, you know, Jesus hugging

44:04

Trump or like a Trump and Jesus on

44:06

a cross. It was like the most disturbing.

44:09

You see it in some of the rallies. Gross thing imaginable.

44:12

And it was just one sign after another

44:14

that was so offensive. So

44:21

when it comes to Republicans and abortion rights, there's

44:24

enough finger pointing to go around. People

44:27

like Matt Gross want compromise, which

44:30

is anger pro-life activists like Students for Life. And

44:33

hardliners like Pastor Jeff Durbin are

44:36

upset with both groups for not going

44:38

far enough. This

44:41

division could represent a problem for Republicans

44:43

in November, the first

44:45

presidential election since Dobbs. Because

44:49

now that Roe is overturned, the

44:51

anti-abortion movement has lost its chief

44:53

organizing principle. And

44:56

in doing so, created one

44:58

for the Democrats. This

45:13

year, a very important public figure turns

45:15

Haiti. He sent us his wish for

45:17

his birthday. My wish is

45:19

for everyone to practice wildfire

45:21

safety because only you can

45:24

prevent wildfires. That

45:26

sounds easy enough, but you don't know who it is. Of

45:29

course you do, it's Smokey Bear. Let's

45:31

all make sure Smokey's wish comes true

45:33

by learning his wildfire prevention tips at

45:35

smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives

45:38

within us all. Brought to you by the

45:40

USDA Forest Service, your state forester, and the Ad

45:42

Council. Hi. That's

45:45

the run-up for Thursday, June 20th, 2024. And now, the

45:47

rundown. The

45:52

work Jeff Durbin is doing in Arizona is just one

45:54

piece of how religious conservatives are organizing to push abortion

45:56

abolition and other causes

46:00

and oppose for a world, to

46:03

understand how that work is unfolding nationally

46:05

and how it might show up in

46:07

November. I called a

46:09

colleague. I'm Elizabeth Dias.

46:11

I am the national religion

46:13

correspondent for The Times, and

46:15

I write about the anti-abortion

46:17

movement and especially the conservative

46:20

Christian power involved

46:23

in advancing the anti-abortion

46:26

cause. Yeah, and we

46:28

recently just spoke to Lisa Lehrer, who

46:30

co-authored a book with you that is

46:32

titled The Fall of Roe, specifically around

46:35

these issues. How would you describe the

46:37

goal of the anti-abortion movement in this

46:39

post-row era? Well,

46:41

their ultimate goal is the end of

46:43

all abortion, right? The fall of Roe

46:45

was the beginning in a way, not

46:47

the end. And it's

46:50

a movement that thinks in these

46:52

long arcs, right? I think in

46:54

generational terms. So even though now

46:56

there's been this enormous backlash to

46:58

the overturning of Roe from liberals,

47:01

moderates, even some conservatives who were not

47:03

happy with that decision, they are

47:06

looking ahead to

47:08

what are the kind of tactics that they

47:10

need ultimately to push ahead with

47:12

their goal. So they're

47:15

finding some success, of course, in

47:18

conservative pockets and conservative

47:20

states and among

47:22

the true believers of

47:24

their cause. You

47:26

know, I know you covered the religious angle

47:28

of this. You actually talked to the pastor

47:31

that we spoke to in our episode today.

47:33

How is this issue playing out amongst the

47:35

religious right? Are they aligned on what to

47:37

do next regarding abortion rights? They're

47:41

splits. The pastor, Jeff Durbin,

47:43

that you spoke with for your episode,

47:46

he's on what many would

47:49

consider the fringe of the

47:51

anti-abortion movement, but it's

47:53

a fringe that's been gaining a

47:55

lot of traction. And that's a

47:58

segment of the movement. this whole

48:00

movement that we see doubling

48:03

down, hardening across areas

48:06

of politics, public

48:08

policy efforts that

48:11

really is doubling

48:13

down with the conservative

48:16

Christian vision and following

48:18

it through to its logical conclusion. We

48:21

see that in places like the

48:23

Southern Baptist Convention, opposing IVF. We

48:26

see it with some of the

48:29

Republican lawmakers who are in the

48:31

MAGA movement and the anti-abortion movement

48:33

where those things kind of mingle

48:35

together in states and places like

48:37

Arizona, for example. Are

48:40

there any notable anti-abortion candidates running on

48:42

further restrictions in this climate? What are

48:44

you watching for when it comes to

48:46

November? Well, it's been

48:48

really interesting watching Republicans, even

48:50

those who have been staunch

48:52

anti-abortion supporters, even former President

48:54

Trump, who made so much

48:58

of his platform was his support for

49:01

the anti-abortion movement. They've been really

49:04

running away from the cause in many

49:06

ways. What was the political advantage to

49:08

them before Roe fell is

49:11

clearly not right now. And I think

49:13

the politicians often see that, especially if

49:15

they're in moderate districts, restrictions

49:18

on abortion, cracking down on

49:21

IVF. These are very unpopular

49:23

positions and Republicans

49:25

know that. Thank

49:28

you so much, Elizabeth. We appreciate your time.

49:31

Thanks so much for having me. It's good. There

49:36

are 25 days to the Republican National Convention,

49:38

60 days until

49:40

the Democratic National Convention and 138 days

49:43

until the general election. We'll

49:47

see you next week. Thanks

49:57

for watching. Run

50:00

Up is reported by me, Esteb Herndon, and

50:03

produced by Elisa Gutierrez, Kaitlyn O'Keefe,

50:05

and Anna Foley. It's

50:08

edited by Rachel Dry and Lisa Tobin,

50:11

with original music by Dan

50:13

Powell, Marion Lozano, Pat McCusker,

50:16

Diane Wong, Sophia Landman, and

50:18

Alicia Beitout. It was

50:20

mixed by Sophia Landman and Fact Check

50:23

by Will Paisho and Kaitlyn Love. Special

50:26

thanks to Paula Schumann,

50:28

Sam Dolnick, Larissa Anderson,

50:30

David Halfinger, Maddie Masiello,

50:32

Mahima Chablani, Jeffrey Miranda,

50:34

and Elizabeth Brista. Do

50:37

you have questions about the 2024 election? Email

50:40

us at therunupatnytimes.com. Or

50:43

better yet, record your question using the voice

50:45

memo app in your phone. That

50:47

email again is therunupatnytimes.com.

50:51

Thanks for listening, y'all. Of

51:16

course you do, it's Smokey Bear. Let's

51:18

all make sure Smokey's wish comes true

51:20

by learning his wildfire prevention tips at

51:22

smokeybear.com. Because Smokey Bear lives

51:24

within us all. Brought to you by the

51:27

USDA Forest Service, your state forester, and the Ad

51:29

Council. Council. Hi.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features