Podchaser Logo
Home
Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Released Thursday, 23rd March 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Jim Jordan - March 22nd, Hour 2

Thursday, 23rd March 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

A light hour two. Thank you, Scott Channon. Welcome

0:02

to the Sean Hannity Show. Eight

0:05

hundred nine Pole one. Sean our number if

0:07

he'll want to be a part of the program. By the way, this just

0:09

in. Joe Biden had

0:11

another well senior moment,

0:14

a cognitive mess that he is as president,

0:17

trying to read a poem, let

0:19

us listen. Richard

0:21

Blanco returned to

0:23

a poem he wrote from the second inaugural

0:25

of Rock and Mate, a poem one

0:28

today says, and always

0:31

one moon like a silent drum

0:33

tapping at every rooftop and

0:35

every window, on every kind of

0:38

every county, country.

0:41

Let me start this over again. I'm

0:44

getting so intimidated by being

0:46

here. And

0:48

always one moon like a silent

0:51

drum tapping on every rooftop and every

0:53

window of one country,

0:56

county, county, all

0:58

of us facing the stars. Who

1:00

a new constellation? Where you for us to map

1:02

him? Where you for us to name it? Together?

1:06

Oh boy, there's your president. No wonder,

1:08

the world's a mess. Congressman Jim

1:10

Jordan from the great State of Ohio

1:13

is with us. Congressman. He

1:15

is the head of the all important House

1:18

Judiciary Committee. In

1:21

line with what we've been talking about today,

1:23

and that is that he is now investigating,

1:26

rightly so whether our FBI has

1:28

been weaponized and our Department

1:30

of Justice is weaponized, and whether or

1:32

not the FBI has become politicized. Congressman,

1:35

welcome back, sir. Good to be with you, Sean.

1:38

And first of what you just played, it's it's

1:40

I mean, at some point, it just gets sad. It's

1:42

sad for the I mean, it's just sad for our

1:45

great country that that happened

1:47

so often. Now you feel I actually feel for

1:49

the president, but more important, I feel for the three

1:51

hundred and thirty some million American people. I

1:54

don't know what to say. Just like again,

1:57

it becomes down. We seem to see this every other

1:59

day. So it's unfortunate.

2:01

You know, when I first pointed out the obvious that

2:04

Joe was a cognitive mess and

2:06

week and frell, I was criticized

2:09

for it. And then I started making fun of it, and

2:11

you know, I was talking about sippy cup and warm

2:14

milky and night nine stories and bedtime

2:16

you know at seven and seven pm.

2:18

And then I realized it's not funny, No,

2:20

it's not it's it's I get

2:23

it. It's it's it's really sad for our great

2:25

and again, I think I think so many Americans see

2:27

the contrast, um, you know, between

2:29

what we had in strength projected

2:31

from the Oval Office under President Trump and

2:34

obviously what we have what we have now. Let

2:37

me start with the issue

2:39

of the day and very interesting

2:41

news foxnews dot Com reporting,

2:44

well, we knew that the grand jury was

2:46

scheduled to convene today in New York

2:49

at two pm. That was canceled. I

2:52

think they're gonna reconvene tomorrow,

2:54

or at least that was the plan. But

2:57

reports that there is chaos now in

2:59

the office of the Manhattan District Attorney.

3:02

Now, a couple of things have happened in the

3:04

last twenty four hours. I have in

3:06

my hand a letter

3:09

for a gentleman that stated

3:11

February eighth, twenty eighteen, to the FEC,

3:16

and it says I'm writing on behalf of my client,

3:18

Michael Cone, in response to your dated

3:20

January thirty, twenty eighteen letter.

3:23

Specifically, this letter responds to the

3:25

complaint. They give the number which was

3:27

filed with the FEC by Common Cause

3:29

and Paul Ryan in a private

3:32

transaction in twenty sixteen before the

3:34

US presidential election, Mister Kohne

3:36

used his own personal funds to facilitate

3:39

a payment of one hundred and thirty thousand

3:41

dollars to Miss Stephanie

3:43

Clifford. Neither the Trump Organization

3:46

nor the Trump campaign was a party to the

3:48

transaction with Miss Clifford, and neither

3:50

reimbursed mister Kohne for payment

3:52

directly or indirectly. And contrary

3:55

to the allegations and the complaint, which are

3:57

entirely speculative, neither mister

3:59

Kohne or Essentials Consultants

4:01

LLC made any in kind

4:03

contributions to Donald J. Trump for President

4:07

or any other presidential campaign. Mister Kohne

4:09

has not been a government employee during

4:12

any of the relevant time period. The payment

4:14

in question does not constitute a campaign

4:17

contribution or expenditure,

4:19

and therefore the FEC lacks jurisdiction

4:22

over this matter. The complainants

4:25

have not and cannot present any

4:27

evidence to the contrary. Accordingly,

4:30

the complaints should be dismissed. Now, the FEC did

4:32

dismiss it. The Department of Justice

4:34

looked into it. They chose not to prosecute.

4:37

The previous Manhattan DA also

4:39

chose not to prosecute it, and

4:42

Now between that and I don't know if you saw

4:44

Bob Costello on my show last night, because

4:48

he contradicted. Now, Michael Kohn

4:50

was according to the Southern District

4:52

of New York when they made the announcement that he

4:54

pled guilty. He played guilty to

4:57

making false statements

4:59

and sealing money from the irs,

5:02

made false statements to a federally ensured

5:06

financial institution. So

5:09

you have somebody directly contradicting

5:11

their star witness. How do they bring a

5:13

case like this? They can't.

5:16

And even you're right, the Justice Department didn't

5:18

bring as the Southern District New York would bring the case. The

5:20

previous Manhattan District Attorney, mister

5:23

vance Wood and bring the case. More importantly,

5:25

or maybe most importantly, Alvin Bradwood,

5:27

and bring the case. Remember when he first got in office,

5:29

he wasn't going to bring it. And then two of his assistants

5:32

resigned in protests, write a book, start pressuring,

5:34

the left starts pressuring. And more importantly,

5:36

what happened in that timeframe, Oh, Donald Trump

5:39

announces he's running for president and suddenly now

5:41

he oh to them, I'm going to change my mind and we're

5:43

going to bring the case so that is the

5:45

only big intervening event that has changed.

5:48

As President Trump has announced he's going to

5:50

run again, the left has been trying to stop

5:52

him for seven years, and that is

5:54

why you see this case coming forward. I'm

5:56

convinced to that, and I think frankly most of America people

5:58

are convinced to that less they have the you

6:00

know, the Trump ter rangeing centry. Okay, so

6:03

this goes to the heart of your investigation.

6:07

Has the FBI been politicized?

6:09

Is the DOJ weaponized?

6:11

Do we have in this country? I believe we

6:13

do. And you can contradict me if

6:16

I'm wrong, or tell me that I'm wrong.

6:19

I believe we have a dual justice system.

6:22

I believe we have unequal justice under

6:24

the law. We don't have equal justice under the law.

6:26

We don't have equal application of our laws.

6:29

Am I wrong? No? It sure seems

6:31

that wish on And I think what we really have is

6:33

is a government focused on politics

6:36

instead of serving the American people. A government

6:38

willing to set up a disinformation a

6:40

governance board, as if some agency can tell

6:42

you what you can say what you can't say. A

6:44

government willing to say we're going to go after parents

6:46

we're going to go after pro lifers, We're going to go

6:49

after traditional Catholics and define them as as

6:51

domestic extremists. And

6:54

a government that will pressure big tech to say,

6:56

take down these posts, take down these tweets,

6:58

take down this information. Don't let the American people

7:00

see it, even though it came from Americans. Were good mistake.

7:04

That is a scary situation, but that is exactly

7:06

what's happening. And then you put it all together

7:08

and you see what this district attorney is thinking about

7:10

doing too, the guy who's leading in the polls,

7:13

one of the announced candidates for president.

7:16

That is truly the stuff that I think shows

7:18

the government in many ways has been turned against

7:20

the people it's supposed to serve. Now,

7:23

that is what you're spelling out. Is scary,

7:25

but it's at the heart of your investigation. And

7:28

this was why it was so critical that

7:30

Republicans take over the House, because

7:33

you have the power of subpoena, you get

7:35

to run the committee. My question

7:37

is, now, I have had not one

7:39

but a couple of FBI whistleblowers

7:42

that I've interviewed, and they're all

7:44

telling me the exact

7:46

same thing. It's not the same FBI,

7:49

that the FBI has been politicized

7:51

at a high level. You know, look at the twenty twenty

7:53

election and you

7:56

have all of these FBI agents meeting

7:58

weekly with big tech comp You might be

8:00

victims of disinformation and it may be

8:03

about Joe or Hunter and Biden that

8:05

was testified to in the case of Missouri. You

8:08

know, then go back to the FBI sends

8:12

agents over the pond to

8:14

Great Britain to meet with Christopher Steele. They offer

8:16

him a million bucks if he can corroborate as dossier.

8:19

He can't. He can't collect because he can verify.

8:22

But then they use the information for an entire

8:25

year and it says

8:27

verify on the top of a FISA application,

8:30

and they used it as a backdoor to get into

8:32

the Trump campaign and the Trump presidency

8:35

and nobody was held accountable. Congressman,

8:38

Yeah, what we're going to try to do is get all the facts on

8:40

the table. We've talked about this before, and then as a legislative

8:42

body, all we can do is proposed legislation

8:44

to correct the problem, to remedy the situation,

8:47

and maybe most importantly, use the

8:49

appropriations process, use the power of the purse

8:51

to limit how the money that's appropriated

8:54

these agencies gets used. But it's bigger

8:56

than the FBI. Just go back two weeks ago,

8:58

in a forty eight hour time frame, think

9:00

about what happened. Chuck Schumer tells

9:02

Fox, don't play the videos. The next day,

9:04

we released a report that says the FTC was

9:07

targeting a private company, Elon Muss's

9:09

company, asking him, who are the journalists

9:11

you're talking to? Named four journalists personally.

9:14

Two of those four journalists the very next day

9:16

came and testified in our committee Matt Taiebe,

9:18

Michael Schellenberger, two Democrats actually

9:20

who but two Democrats who believe in the First Amendment

9:22

like old school liberals used to believe in. They

9:25

testify in front of our committee, and what are Democrat members

9:27

of Congress do? They ask him? Who

9:29

are your sources now? About that?

9:31

That is a direct attack on the First Amendment

9:33

freedom of the press that we saw in a

9:36

forty eight hour time period. You couple

9:38

that with what the FBI has been up to, what the what

9:41

the Disinformation Government's Board they tried to form

9:43

at DHS has been up to. That is that

9:45

is why this is so darn important, because it's

9:47

in the end, it's about the First Amendment,

9:49

something that you you exercise make my living

9:52

off the First Amendment. Yeah, I

9:54

mean, but you go through all of it, you

9:56

go through Muller and the Russia

9:59

hopes. That's three years of Donald Trump's

10:01

presidency, and you know the Ukraine

10:04

impeachment, but will ignore the quid pro

10:06

quo and Joe Biden admitting

10:09

that he withheld a billion dollars unless

10:11

they fired a prosecutor who was investigating

10:13

his son, who admitted on GMA he

10:15

had no experience and energy. Yet he's

10:17

collecting a fortune. Never mind

10:19

how much money in business that did the

10:21

Bidens do with the communist Chinese? How

10:24

much money in business did they do with Russia,

10:26

Ukraine, Kazakhstan, And according

10:29

to James Colemar you know some twelve

10:31

or plus countries.

10:33

And is that impacting the

10:36

decision making of Joe Biden? Is

10:38

he compromised? Yeah? Well,

10:40

the fundamental questionnaire, I think Sean and

10:43

you said it, well, here is what

10:45

did they do? What service did they provide?

10:48

What value did they add? What were they doing

10:50

the Biden family for this this three

10:52

million dollars payment? We know of that, mister Khmer and the

10:54

Committee of Unveiled are uncovered

10:58

that that talks about the three and it was paid to Robinson

11:01

Walker and they given to the Biden for what what service

11:03

did they provide? What did they do? That's sort of the

11:05

fundamental question. If you can't answer that, it sort

11:07

of gives you the answer. So, yeah, this

11:09

is this is you look at that in

11:12

this double standard, and then you look at President

11:14

Trump with Russia. Then it was a phone call

11:16

with the Lynsky. Then it was they want his tax

11:18

returns, then his business records, then his children,

11:21

then they raid his home. Now the DA's coming

11:23

after him, and you're like, holy cow, this

11:25

is this is unbelievable. And the fact

11:27

that it's happening in the United States of America,

11:30

with our Constitution, with our First

11:32

Amendment, with our due product, that is that

11:35

is the part that is most frightening. And you

11:37

just unfortunately see it time and time again. And

11:40

it's again why I think it's so important, as you

11:42

said, that we do the work, get the

11:44

facts on the table, and then legislatively

11:46

and then via the appropriations process,

11:49

do what we should do as a legislative body. By

11:51

the way, did you notice Virginia Democratic

11:53

Senator Mark Warner complaining the Biden

11:55

administration refused to offer

11:58

vital details related to the president alleged

12:01

miss handling of classified documents. How

12:03

come we only hear about the one investigating

12:06

Trump. We never hear about the guy that

12:08

was appointed to investigate Joe Biden.

12:11

I know, no, I know, and and frankly

12:14

remember warners even said, like the

12:16

fact that they won't tell us what these

12:19

documents were, and won't even tell

12:22

weren't even willing initially to tell the Intel

12:25

committees in both the House and Senate. Like

12:27

wait a minute, I thought it was a government of

12:29

the people, by the people for the people,

12:31

where you elect folks to office and then

12:33

they make the decisions. They get the information so

12:35

they can make the decisions. But no, no, it's to be

12:37

rockers. They only get to see certain things. That

12:40

is not how our system is supposed to work,

12:42

and it is it is just flat out wrong

12:44

that you have these unelected folks

12:47

running the place. That is not because then

12:49

the people can't hold them accountable like they can.

12:51

Folks who put their name on the ballot have to run for

12:53

office. If you don't like what they do, you get to throw

12:55

them out the next election. Then that's a darn good thing.

12:57

That's how it's supposed to work, but unfortunately

13:00

doesn't seem to be doing that operating in that way

13:02

today. How confident are you

13:04

that you're going to get the information you

13:06

have been requesting. There's been a lot of stonewalling,

13:09

and how soon do you think you'll be able to

13:11

get these whistleblowers out front before the American

13:13

people. Well, it's always slow, and the whistle

13:15

blowers themselves coming out front. We've had three of them testify

13:18

in a transcribed interview. It's up

13:20

to them if they want to go into a public hearing. We anticipate

13:23

some of them are going to want to do that, and we look forward

13:25

to that down the road. As far as the information, we

13:27

know they're going to drag and defeat them. But we're getting some very

13:29

good information and we're just going to keep it up, keep pressure

13:32

and keep writing the letters, keep doing the subpoenas, keep

13:34

getting information both from government agencies

13:36

and from the private sectors. Specifically when

13:38

we're talking about the First Amendment issue, and some

13:41

of these private sector into these who were

13:43

in working with the government being pressured

13:45

by the government just to press certain types of speech. We're

13:48

getting some information from them now that's beginning to come

13:50

in. We're going to keep on it. We're not going to stop.

13:53

This is a very important investigation. You're

13:55

heading it up. You're taking a lot of heat for it. We appreciate

13:58

the truth seeking anyway.

14:01

Jim Jordan, thank you. Eight

14:04

hundred nine one, Sean on number. We have a

14:06

little over a minute. Jim in Los Angeles. Jim,

14:09

I'm gonna give it to you. Make it count.

14:11

You are a star for sixty seconds.

14:14

Thank you. My question is regarding

14:17

the issue of using a

14:20

campaign funds to pay the settlement to Daniels.

14:23

How what was the legal argument of the

14:25

prosecutor around the statute of limitation.

14:29

We've yet to hear one. However,

14:31

we do know that the

14:34

statute of limitations has rightly

14:36

pointed out by a professor, an attorney,

14:38

Jonathan Turley, has passed

14:41

on both the state level and the federal level.

14:43

So you know how they're gonna make an argument

14:46

that's interesting, it's

14:49

unreal actually, But anyway, we'll

14:51

cover all of this. You know what we'll do. We'll take a break,

14:54

we'll come back, We'll get to a lot of your calls. And

14:56

then we'll check in with all things. Simple man, Bill

14:58

O'Reilly, we'll get his take on this.

15:02

You know, the whole country's a mess, how sad, energy

15:05

a mess, the economy a mess. Interest

15:08

rates up again today. You know, China,

15:11

Russia, Iran, North

15:13

Korea, Saudi Arabian

15:15

out, Ukraine. Everything's

15:17

a mess. It's unbelievable.

15:20

What a difference two years makes. All

15:23

right, twenty five now to the top of the hour. Thank you for being

15:25

with us. Eight hundred and nine four one

15:27

sean if you want to be a part

15:30

of the program, simple

15:32

man, Bill O'Reilly at the top of the hour. You don't

15:34

want to miss that. You know, the IRS has

15:36

one job. You know what it is to get money from

15:39

all of us, you the taxpayer,

15:41

and they pretty much have unlimited power

15:43

to do it. You can't hide from these

15:45

guys. I tell everybody pay a taxes. Look,

15:48

the tax deadline is around the corner. If you

15:50

owe back taxes or have

15:53

years of unfiled returns like

15:55

forty three thousand federal employees

15:58

apparently have. It's not a matter

16:00

of if the IRS is going to take actions,

16:02

it's a matter of when they will take action. They will

16:05

they will catch up with you at some point.

16:07

You need to be proactive and you

16:09

need to call our friends at Rush Tax

16:12

Resolution. I've been talking about Rush Tax

16:14

Resolution and all of the

16:17

money and headaches that they have saved

16:19

you my listeners for years now. The

16:22

pros at Rush Tax, they know how

16:24

to deal with the irs and win. You

16:27

need an advocate. If you're an individual or

16:29

business owner, maybe are behind on personal

16:32

income taxes or payroll taxes. Well,

16:34

the experts at Rush Tax can protect

16:36

you and your business today. That's

16:38

why they have an A plus rating from the Better Business

16:41

Bureau, zero complaint

16:43

history, and they're the only one I trust

16:46

and recommend. Call the toll free

16:48

nuber It's eight hundred two nine nine eighty

16:50

seventy seven. Rush will tell

16:52

you upfront and four free if

16:55

they can help you now. They will only

16:57

take their take your case if

16:59

they know, oh, they can help you. Eight

17:01

hundred two nine nine eighty seventy seven.

17:04

On the web, it's Tax Resolution dot

17:07

Com. All right, let's get to our busy

17:09

phones. Let us

17:11

say hi to Rob in Cleveland. Rob,

17:14

how are you glad you called Sean?

17:17

How are you today? Thank you? By

17:20

the way, it says next to your name liberal?

17:24

Are you a liberal? I'm liberal.

17:26

Rum Now. The reason I'm saying this is because

17:28

people think, oh, we screen out a liberals. No,

17:30

we don't. We seek them out and they're

17:32

usually afraid to come on the show. And we appreciate

17:34

that you call in. And even though you have a different

17:37

point of view. I listen all the time.

17:39

I try to get my news sources from many different angles.

17:41

So I'm not your typical liberal. I guess, by

17:44

the way, a lot of people hate listen and hate watch.

17:46

Trust me, no, I get

17:48

it. I just want to let you in a little secret. If Trump

17:50

really wanted a conservative in office in twenty

17:53

twenty four and do what's best for the country, he

17:55

would sit this one out. Okay, this technically

17:58

isn't about America first. It's about Trump first.

18:00

Because so let me ask you a question. So you feel

18:03

as a liberal Democrat that likes Joe Biden?

18:05

You like Biden? Right, not necessarily?

18:09

Okay, do you think Joe Biden? Name me

18:11

two things that he's done that's successful. I

18:15

definitely think entering back into the Paris Climate

18:17

Agreement. Wait a minute, you think the Paris

18:20

Climate Agreement that classifies

18:22

China and India as developing

18:25

nations and we pay the

18:28

bulk of money for that accord

18:30

and they're the bigger polluters. You

18:33

think that's a good deal for the US. Well,

18:35

I think it's good to bring. Yes,

18:38

there are parts of it that I don't agree with you. Yeah,

18:41

No, you don't really know a lot about the Paris Accords.

18:43

Because we're paying billions of dollars, China

18:45

and India pay next to nothing. Why

18:47

is that a good deal? Do you think that? Would you classify

18:50

China with all the military might that

18:52

they have as a developing

18:54

nation? I think they're fully developed

18:56

China, Yes, but they're class they are

19:00

according to the Paris Accords, they

19:02

are classified as a developing

19:05

nation. Well, we don't

19:07

have that same classification. And because

19:10

they're developing nation nation,

19:13

they pay next to nothing, and

19:15

we paid the bulk of the moneies

19:17

that went into that agreement. What do they

19:20

pay in comparison to what we pay next

19:22

to nothing? A tiny percentage? All

19:24

right, Well, I would like to So, what's give

19:27

me one more thing that you think Joe was successful

19:29

because you kind of failed on the first one. Well,

19:31

I mean I gave you my opinion, whether you agree

19:33

with it. That's one. Yeah, but you didn't know

19:35

that. You didn't know that China and India

19:37

were classified as developing country.

19:40

So that's a big deal. Yeah, but it's

19:42

a small percentage of what actually transpired.

19:44

Billions of dollars is a lot of money, especially

19:47

when we owe as much money as we do as a country.

19:50

So let me give me another success

19:52

of Joe Biden. I'm just interested in what you think he's

19:54

doing. That successful, that's fine.

19:56

I think I can give you two. I can. I

19:58

can see a little bit of gun form um

20:00

that needs to be done. And I also think that, you

20:03

know, legalizing gay marriage and passing

20:06

um, the Equality Act

20:09

is important. So I

20:12

think marriage was legal. Well,

20:15

I'm sorry, same sex marriage. I apologize.

20:18

Okay, I think it was legal, right,

20:20

but we passed at the quality that's on the federal

20:22

level. We're talking about the federal level, not at the state level.

20:25

Okay, but it was legal pretty much. I

20:27

think it was legally. We

20:30

did have federal legislation years ago. We

20:32

did, and then Trump reversed it and then now

20:34

Biden. All right, so look, you're hardcore

20:37

liberal. I can accept that. Fine, you

20:39

love you're a woke

20:41

liberal. Understand. I don't have a problem

20:43

with either issue that you talked about.

20:46

I really don't. It's not my We

20:48

have a lot of problems economically and in

20:50

foreign policy that are all at a lot

20:52

of problems out of border. It was a disaster

20:55

to give up energy independence. And don't

20:58

you think it's dumb to import oil from Venezuela

21:01

when we can do a cleaner, cheaper and

21:03

more efficiently in this country. Isn't that dumb

21:06

unless it's safer, which I don't

21:08

believe that we were going through

21:11

Indian preservations and ruining the

21:13

wildlife, so at what cost? If

21:15

you look at most Native Americans

21:18

that are in the energy business, they

21:21

want to stay in business. They're making a lot

21:23

of money. That's every

21:25

company that I don't I don't see. I've never seen

21:27

any sources that well, I've never seen any

21:29

sources that said that, you know, there are

21:31

particular areas that are energy

21:34

environmentally unfriendly. The

21:37

Keystone Pipeline wasn't even done yet. There's

21:39

listeners. Yeah, if we finished the Keystone pipeline,

21:41

every day we get nine hundred thousand barrels

21:44

of oil into this country from

21:46

Canada. Why why did we not finish that, So

21:49

that was crude oil that was going to be sent through

21:51

Mexico from Canada, so it wasn't even

21:54

our pipeline anyway, and it was going

21:56

to damage and it has damaged multiple

21:59

of You're right, you know what, We shouldn't

22:02

have taken the nine hundred thousand barrels of oil

22:05

and importitive from Canada when

22:07

it was almost complete, which

22:09

would lower the price of oil worldwide

22:11

because we've artificially reduced the demand.

22:14

But it was certainly brilliant on Joe

22:16

Biden's part to give a waiver to

22:19

Vladimir Putin for the nord

22:21

Stream two pipeline. Right, John,

22:23

you're all over the place. It was twenty percent done. But

22:25

I want to get back to my point. No, it

22:27

would have been. The pipeline would have been done

22:29

about a year ago, so let's be accurate

22:31

here. So yeah, three

22:33

years after Joe Biden said,

22:36

okay, no, I'm saying it would

22:38

have been. It would have been up and

22:40

running within less than a year, according

22:43

to the Premiere of Alberta and Canada.

22:47

And Canada's furious at Joe Biden

22:49

for this, But you're okay with the with

22:51

the waiver that he gave Vladimir Putin to finish

22:54

his pipeline, right, you're okay with that. I'm

22:56

not informed in that side of things. I was talking

22:58

about the Keystone, so I don't want to talk well.

23:01

While he was canceling high paying career

23:03

American jobs and creating

23:05

more energy dependence than ever before

23:08

because he inherited an energy program

23:10

in this country where we were a net exporter

23:13

of energy and energy independent for

23:15

the first time in seventy five years. He destroyed

23:18

all of that, and he gave a waiver

23:20

for a pipeline to Russia and

23:22

Vladimir Putin and

23:25

you, oh, you don't know about that part. You

23:27

see, I think you have this. This is what liberals

23:30

do all the time. You have like this selective you

23:32

know, memory bank, and Sean you

23:34

have this selective memory bank. No, I remember

23:36

everything. I just asked

23:38

you what percentage or what amount that?

23:41

Oh my gosh, I can get you the

23:43

exact percentage. But pay close

23:45

attention. Follow the bouncing ball

23:48

that China and India

23:50

are classified in the Paris

23:52

Climate Accords as developing

23:55

nations. We don't have that

23:57

classification. Having classification

24:01

means they pay dramatically less

24:04

for the Accord Agreement. They're

24:06

not developing countries. That is

24:08

a bad deal for the US. We

24:10

shouldn't be paying more when

24:12

China is a far greater polluter

24:15

of the environment than the US, is also

24:18

a dictatorship, and they're not considered

24:21

what we are as as

24:23

a country. That's not the that's not the

24:25

determining factor in this. All

24:28

right, Well, anyway, what else do you have on your

24:30

mind? We'll give you another thirty seconds. Go

24:32

ahead. Yes, So Donald Trump will

24:34

never be president again. Here's why, because he'll never

24:36

get the Democratic votes. Right. I would vote

24:39

personally for Ronda Santis. So if you put

24:41

forth the right candidate, you're going to win in twenty

24:43

twenty four. You're saying that if it's

24:45

Joe Biden versus Ronda Santis, you vote

24:48

for Rohnda Santis, and

24:50

a lot of Democrats would. So what I'm trying

24:52

to tell you is if you want to win, Wait a minute, why would

24:54

Democrats be voting for Rhonda Santis,

24:56

who's a pretty strong conservative?

25:00

Are you? Are you? Are you saying

25:02

that? Is that a tacit admission that

25:05

in fact you that Joe Biden has failed?

25:07

Why would you leave your great liberal climate

25:10

alarmist cult hero the

25:12

less of two evils. Okay, So, so

25:15

rohnds sans So Joe Biden is

25:17

worse for the country than rohnds Santis. I'm

25:20

okay with that. That's fine if that's your opinion.

25:23

Yeah, I just wanted to give you a secret that if you wanted

25:25

to win and not cry about the election again, gotta

25:28

put rohn de Stantis in. Because Trump will get zero

25:30

Democrat votes. Rohnd Santis will get

25:32

thirty percent. So if you get thirty percent

25:34

of Democrats that are voting on top of

25:37

the Republicans that are voting, listen, you go ahead,

25:39

and I will tell you this to your

25:41

own peril. You can underestimate Donald

25:44

Trump all you want. I wouldn't underestimate this

25:46

man. However, they absolutely

25:48

are out to destroy the guy. That

25:51

part may happen, and you know what,

25:53

that would be a shame for the country. I'll

25:56

you know, think about this. If

25:58

Biden were smart, here's

26:00

an idea I'll throw out at you. If

26:03

Biden was smart and

26:05

he cared about his own family, I believe

26:08

that the evidence will show over

26:10

time that the amount of money

26:13

that the Biden family made from China

26:15

Russia, Ukraine, just on the Ukraine

26:18

deal alone, where he leveraged, leveraged a billion

26:20

taxpayer dollars to

26:22

get a prosecutor fired so his son could

26:24

keep getting You know all these you

26:27

know, all this money and he had no

26:29

experience in that. You do find that corrupt,

26:31

right, I do find a certain part

26:33

percentage of what he's doing. But we don't know all the family.

26:36

No, we know that. We know the fact because Joe

26:38

Biden bragged about it in his own words

26:40

on tape that he withheld a billion taxpayer

26:43

dollars unless they fired a

26:45

prosecutor within six hours. Son

26:47

of a bee. They fired him, and then Hunter

26:50

went on Good Morning America and admitted he

26:52

had no experience in Ukraine in

26:54

oil and gas, coal or

26:56

energy in any capacity. Whitey,

26:59

and he was asked, well, why do you think they paid

27:01

you? Why did they hire you? I do know? And

27:04

then I, whoever was doing

27:06

the interview, says, maybe because your daddy

27:09

is in charge of Ukraine policy. And

27:11

then Joe Biden says, you're not going to get a billion

27:13

dollars unless you fire the prosecutor investigating

27:16

my son. Does that not sound like a quid

27:18

and a pro and a quote from Joe to you, it

27:22

does. But what I'm trying to tell you is that

27:24

Donald Trump Junior and Eric Junior have zero,

27:27

zero experience in running. But

27:29

then there's no example

27:32

you can cite where they're making. First of all,

27:34

they do have experience, and I can tell you that firsthand.

27:37

I've known Donald Trump for nearly thirty years,

27:40

and when I would go to his office when his kids

27:42

got out of school, they his

27:44

office was here, and their office

27:46

was right next to his Eric's

27:49

office, Ivanka's office, Don

27:51

Junior's office. They've they've

27:53

been working with their father all their adult

27:55

life. What about Stephanie? What

27:57

happened to her? Stephanie? Who his

28:01

daughter? Tiffany? What do you mean

28:03

Tiffany? What happened to her?

28:07

All right? You know this was a very value

28:10

I know some people are driving right now and they're grabbing

28:12

the steering real harder. By the way, thank you, Rob

28:14

for the call. And I know you're getting

28:16

angry, but this is this is

28:18

how liberals think. This is your

28:20

typical liberal you know, it's

28:23

it's fascinating to me anyway,

28:25

an exercise and utility. If you asked

28:27

me at this point, all

28:33

the breaking news for the analysis

28:36

to help you make sense of it all.

28:38

This is the Sean Hannity

28:41

Show. You

28:46

may not know this, but one in five pregnancies

28:48

will end an abortion, and with the

28:51

abortion pill now accounting for over fifty

28:53

percent of all abortions. Well, you

28:55

have all over the country Preborn

28:57

Network clinics and they've rescued over

29:00

two hundred thousand babies lives

29:03

by loving mothers with unplanned pregnancies

29:06

through the science of ultrasound. It's

29:08

amazing work that they're doing. They

29:11

don't get a penny from the federal government, and

29:13

what happens is kind of magical. Because

29:15

of four D you can see fingers

29:18

and toes and facial features and hear

29:20

the heartbeat. And without

29:22

the ultrasound, the odds are much greater

29:25

that people might consider abortion. So through

29:27

the science of ultrasound, babies lives are

29:29

being saved. And it's only happening

29:32

because of the generosity of people like

29:34

you in the pro life community, people

29:36

that believe in the sanctity of life like I do.

29:39

And one ultrasound is only twenty

29:41

eight bucks, and every tax deductible

29:43

donation bigger, small helps to save

29:45

the unborn. Preborn doesn't

29:47

get a penny of any government

29:50

funding. Nothing, so they're really dependent

29:52

on all of us. Anyway, I hope you'll join

29:54

this effort. Just pound two fifty

29:57

on your cell phone, say the keyword baby, pound

29:59

two fift, keyword baby, or

30:01

check out their website. It's Preborn dot

30:04

com slash Shawn sea

30:06

N. That's Preborn dot com slash

30:09

shawn s e A N. And

30:11

this is a great organization that really

30:14

needs your help, and they're doing great work that

30:16

represents your values. All

30:19

right. By the way, the symbolman himself

30:21

self proclaimed anyway, Bill O'Reilly

30:23

at the top of the hour, it will be interesting

30:26

to get his take on all of this. He'll join us. Coming

30:28

up straight ahead. We got, by the way, an amazing

30:30

Hannity tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox

30:33

News Channel that you're not gonna want to miss. We

30:35

have the President's attorney, Joe Takapina

30:38

and the head of the FEC. Remember

30:40

the FEC passed on this, you

30:42

know, any charges as related

30:45

to the Stormy Daniels issue. And then

30:47

the letter that we broke exclusively

30:50

on this show. It's also on

30:52

Hannity dot Com. We'll go over that.

30:54

Jim Jordan is on tonight, We'll

30:56

check in with him. Kevin O'Leary is back

30:58

tonight. Interests are up, Daga

31:01

McDowell, Charlie Hurt, We got an audience show

31:04

nineties Stern set DVR Hannity on the Fox

31:07

News Channel. First listen to Alvin Bragg

31:09

promising to investigate Trump

31:12

as a candidate, and then listen to the media

31:14

even poking holes in Alvin

31:16

Bragg's case against Trump. A

31:19

lot of people are wondering, whoever

31:21

has this job? Are they going to

31:24

convict Donald Trump? Look, that

31:27

is the number one issue.

31:30

I'm the candidate in the race who has the experience

31:33

with Donald Trump. I was the chief

31:35

deputy in the Attorney General's office. We

31:37

sue the Trump administration over a hundred

31:40

times. I'd be hard to argue with the fact that that's

31:42

that'd be the most important, most high profile

31:44

case. And I've seen him up front and seeing

31:47

the lawlessness that he can do, and you believe

31:49

it should happen. I believe

31:51

we have to hold him accountable. The facts

31:54

are old, they're six or seven years old. And the

31:56

star witness here in the form of Michael Cohen, donald

31:58

Trump's former attorney, has credibility

32:00

issues has been convicted of crimes, and so you know your

32:02

point, Abbey. As far as the strength of

32:05

a case, it's certainly not the kind of slam

32:07

dunk that many people would wish that it

32:09

were. You have to be careful when you put

32:11

a witness on the stand who has

32:14

a motive for revenge. And Michael

32:16

Cone has said many times he would

32:18

like to get Donald Trump in one way

32:20

or another. So does it concern me?

32:23

Yes? Have I done things like that? Sure?

32:25

In this New York case, the facts of this case,

32:29

going on almost seven years now,

32:31

are really stale. You wouldn't start

32:34

with an eight year old porn star

32:36

payoff. I hear my conservatives friends

32:38

saying he's being overcharged. It's

32:40

so aggressive, it's so terrible. Welcome

32:43

to my world, folks. Prosecutors

32:47

overcharging, being overaggressive, being

32:49

ridiculous with minor stuff and turning it into

32:52

major stuff. Happens every single day

32:54

in America, every courthouse in America.

32:56

Hi, quick break, bill, O'Reilly next and

32:58

your calls final straight ahead,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features