Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
This is a Global Player
0:04
original podcast. Some
0:06
breaking news as well to bring you that
0:08
Everton have announced the departure of forward Lewis
0:11
Dobbin to Aston Villa for an undisclosed fee
0:13
a day after the transfer of Tim Orogonen
0:16
in the opposite direction. Well,
0:18
obviously, there's been a lot of focus on
0:20
what's going on the pitch at the Euros
0:22
in Germany, but there's been
0:24
a Premier League transfer story that we need
0:26
to focus on. And that's what we're going
0:29
to do today. For clubs with
0:31
concerns relating to their financial fair play, the
0:33
run up to June the 30th is a
0:35
crucial time. It's a crucial deadline because it's
0:37
one last opportunity to balance the books and
0:40
avoid the kinds of points deductions that both
0:42
Everton and Nottingham Forest were hit
0:44
with last season. So over the last
0:46
week or so, there have been a
0:48
few deals between clubs already thought to
0:51
be walking a pretty fine PSR line,
0:53
and they drew various headlines as academy
0:55
graduates, not far
0:57
off traded places, but for
1:00
transfer fees. It's
1:02
been described as a loophole being exploited
1:04
by the likes of Chelsea, Aston Villa
1:06
and Everton. But have any rules actually
1:08
been broken? Does the Premier League
1:11
need to investigate who decides the
1:13
fair market value of a player?
1:15
And are clubs really conspiring to
1:17
bend the rules? Welcome
1:19
to the sports agents. With
1:30
Gabby Logan and Mark Chapman. Hi
1:33
Mark. Hi Gabby.
1:36
All okay? Yeah, enjoyed the
1:38
last few days of matches, wrapping up
1:41
those groups and those little
1:43
countries in inverted commas that were supposed
1:45
to ruin the Euros
1:47
actually turn it into an amazing
1:49
party in the Great Danoumont. I
1:51
mean, Georgia have, for me, Georgia
1:53
are the story of this tournament.
1:56
We've done two of their games live for telly,
1:58
but that game against Port Portugal as well. And
2:00
that's the thing. I know it annoys both of
2:03
us, the, oh, what half of the draw are
2:05
you in? Oh, let's try and predict this, that
2:07
and the other. Oh, a few France aren't in
2:09
our half of the draw. Well, they aren't in
2:11
our half of the draw because when
2:13
I say our, I mean England, obviously aren't England's half
2:16
of the draw because Austria
2:18
were better than them and Austria top the group
2:20
and Austria have actually played better football. So I'd
2:22
be a little bit more worried about that. And
2:25
even like Slovenia came into that match, you
2:27
know, on an incredible run, including a victory
2:29
over Portugal. And, and so I think sometimes
2:31
the narrative obviously with fans, and it's not
2:33
just England fans, you know, I've been reading
2:35
about the French fans and the Dutch fans
2:37
kind of getting frustrated with their teams of
2:39
Belgian fans getting frustrated. We do live a
2:41
little bit in the past and kind of,
2:43
you know, perhaps need to have a greater
2:46
understanding of what is going on with these
2:48
players who most than playing in
2:50
the top leagues around Europe, including the
2:52
Premier League, which brings us nicely, I
2:54
think onto our lead story. Yes. And
2:56
that's the transfer deals that are going
2:58
on between a few clubs in the
3:00
Premier League ahead of this June the
3:02
30th deadline relevant to the PSR rules.
3:04
Yeah. And I would love to say
3:06
that I enjoyed chatting to our first
3:08
guest, Rob Wilson, Professor of
3:10
Applied Sports Finance. But Mark, you've
3:12
described me as having a Nana
3:14
moment. I'm still
3:17
in Berlin. You're in the sports agent's studio.
3:19
There was something of a kind of Basil
3:22
faulty moment as I was parading around my
3:24
hotel room, increasingly, but let
3:26
me tell you, I enjoyed listening
3:28
to this. So take it away.
3:30
The sports agents. Professor
3:34
of Applied Sports Science at UCFB, Rob
3:36
Wilson joins us regular on the pod,
3:38
which sums up exactly where the state
3:40
of the game is at
3:43
the moment. We're going to have to go back
3:45
here. We're just going to have to lay the
3:47
groundwork and start with PSR.
3:50
Let's just look at profit and sustainability
3:52
regulations in the round. The reason they
3:54
were put in place was to improve
3:56
the fiscal decision making at football clubs
3:58
and make them more sustainable. So we
4:00
don't want another Leeds Portsmouth, Berry and
4:02
so on and so forth. So the
4:04
regulations in their purest sense only
4:07
permit a club to lose £105 million over three years.
4:11
We'll let that sink in just for a minute, £105 million
4:13
over three. And what clubs
4:15
do is they try to book profits through the
4:17
transfer of players. So if I was trying to
4:20
buy you, Mark, and it was a £50 million
4:22
transfer, your selling club would be able to book
4:24
£50 million on the date
4:26
of transaction. And then we
4:28
do this accounting trick called amortisation. So I
4:31
assign you £50 million over
4:33
five years. I only have to book
4:35
£10 million worth of cost
4:37
each year for five years. And
4:40
PSR adds all of that up. And if
4:42
you exceed the £105 million, you end up
4:44
in a situation like Everton,
4:46
Alotting and Forest did where they
4:48
exceeded that amount of permitted loss.
4:50
So it's designed to try and
4:52
limit losses. My personal view actually
4:54
is it should be zero, but
4:56
that's probably another podcast entirely. If
4:59
you were to sell one
5:01
of your own, because that's what we call
5:03
our academy players who come through, that
5:06
is more beneficial to your
5:09
accounts than selling a first
5:11
team squad member who you bought him
5:13
four years ago. Yes, absolutely right.
5:15
And so if you take the situation at
5:17
Chelsea over the last couple of years, they've
5:20
ended up accruing around about £200 million
5:22
worth of transfer fees owing.
5:24
So that counts against their
5:27
PSR calculation. And
5:29
if they've got a Connor Gallagher, for
5:31
instance, he represents 100% pure PSR profit
5:36
to them. So we were all expecting as
5:38
analysts before they did the hotel and the women's
5:40
training ground deal that they would have to sell somebody like
5:42
him. And of course, it's more efficient to do that, isn't
5:45
it? So you book £50, £60
5:47
million worth of PSR profit on Gallagher
5:49
rather than you sell four
5:52
or five other players to book the same
5:54
amount of profit. So it's a very efficient
5:56
way selling your academy
5:58
prospects, your homegrown talent. for
6:00
PSR purposes? They're
6:02
doing nothing wrong here, are they?
6:05
I mean, that's the important part to
6:07
say. Signing a young
6:09
academy prospect from another
6:12
club is perfectly fine. Manchester
6:14
United, I mean, a very, very famous example, Manchester
6:16
United signing Wayne Rooney at the age of 17,
6:19
18, who'd come through Everton's academy. And
6:21
there are so many other
6:24
examples that you can come up with.
6:27
But it does appear to be a loophole, doesn't
6:30
it? When you have clubs who
6:32
we are told are close to the
6:34
line on PSR involved
6:37
in this, and also,
6:39
I mean, if they were doing it on
6:41
July the 20th, as opposed to June the
6:44
20th, not sure it would have drawn
6:46
the attention that it has done. No, it
6:48
wouldn't. There'd be no eyebrows being raised if it
6:50
was in the next or the start of the
6:52
next PSR period. It's
6:54
not outlawed as part of
6:56
the regulation. The transfer of players, the
6:58
transfer of academy talent, the
7:00
buying and selling of young players is
7:03
nothing new, and it is entirely acceptable
7:05
within the realm of the regulation. The
7:07
issue we've got with the cases that
7:09
we've heard just recently are the size
7:11
of the transfer fees that are being
7:13
paid, presumably, for these players.
7:15
There's a lot of trading going on,
7:17
remember? The clubs that are involved in
7:20
an almost three-stroke, four-way kind of pathway
7:22
of players, and critically
7:24
for me, the valuation that's being put
7:26
on those players that have essentially had
7:29
very, very few first-team minutes. That
7:31
opens up to question and debate the rationale
7:33
behind the setting of that transfer fee, because
7:36
your example of Wayne Rooney, I think he
7:38
was 30 million, wasn't he, when he transferred
7:40
to Manchester United? You would say he was
7:42
probably worth that in the current market, given
7:44
his playing performances that Wonder goalie scored, I think
7:47
it was against Arsenal, wasn't it, back in the
7:49
day. Very different context to
7:51
the players that we've seen moving
7:53
between those three or four clubs,
7:55
and I think that's why, when
7:57
we talk about regulation, yes. It's
14:00
not level playing field, is it? And
14:02
we're talking lawyers again. We're talking, you know, kind
14:04
of making the best of a situation and make
14:07
it work for you. Lawyers,
14:09
accountants, businesses, chief
14:11
execs, loopholes, very
14:14
little of it is about what is
14:16
going on on the field. And
14:19
when we're talking about the footballers involved, it's
14:21
all to do with valuations and
14:24
contracts. But we are going to look
14:26
at it from a footballer's point of
14:28
view next. The
14:30
PFA CEO, Mahita Malango, will join
14:33
us. And in case you're wondering,
14:35
Gabby's Wi-Fi worked for this interview.
14:38
So they'll both join us next.
14:40
The sports agents. The
14:45
sports agents. With Gabby Logan and
14:48
Mark Chapman. Mahita
14:52
Malango, managing director of the
14:54
Professional Footballers Association, the PFA.
14:57
It's good to speak to you. Thank you very much for coming on
14:59
the sports agents. Mark was just channelling
15:01
there to Rob about how difficult
15:03
it is to make a valuation of
15:05
a player generally, never mind what's going
15:07
on at the moment. Is that something
15:09
that you have been concerned about, the
15:11
PFA, for a while? I think
15:14
what we've been concerned for a while about is
15:17
the lack of involvement of players in certain
15:19
decisions which ultimately have consequences on them. And
15:21
this is a very good example as to
15:23
how on paper for someone
15:25
who may not be acquainted with football, he
15:27
or she may think that this is only
15:29
a financial rule. But in reality,
15:31
that financial rule has a direct implication on the
15:33
players because then they get
15:36
involved into transactions sometimes which are sensible, sometimes
15:38
they're not. But most importantly, because those may
15:40
have an impact on their career. So
15:43
for us, it's yet again another reminder. It's not
15:45
just a nice to have. It's
15:48
important to understand what the consequences are on
15:50
players and most importantly, what could be the
15:52
side effects or unintended consequences of a regulation
15:54
on a player. And I think that's what
15:57
we're seeing now over the last few days.
16:00
Generally though, in terms
16:02
of valuations, Mark
16:04
and I were just discussing offer. You
16:06
hear the price of a player and
16:08
you're crying, that's huge. How did they
16:11
get to that valuation? It doesn't matter
16:13
what club, what age, where they're from.
16:16
There seems to be, obviously, self-interest on
16:18
both sides. A club really wants a
16:20
player. They need to fill that
16:22
position. They're prepared to pay perhaps a bit
16:24
more than the market value would be. Then
16:26
what is the market value? Does
16:29
it depend on what time of the season it is? Does it
16:31
depend on the need of a club? That's
16:34
not something that you can ever really
16:36
have any kind of fair play for,
16:38
can you? Everybody's needs
16:40
and wants are different at different times. It's
16:43
a fascinating question and fascinating topic. Maybe the
16:46
fact that I was myself the CEO of
16:48
a club makes me look
16:50
at this in a slightly different way because I had
16:53
a very long conversation with the owners that I
16:55
had myself in Mallorca. Those
16:59
are American owners, NBA owners. We
17:02
had long conversations, how much should we invest in
17:04
the player? What is this player
17:07
really worth? Can we predict what we should spend
17:09
on the marketplace? It's very difficult because like
17:12
in any other open market, those are the
17:14
rules of the market. It's not possibly a
17:16
question of how good or bad that player
17:18
is. It's also how
17:20
badly we need him. It's also a question
17:22
of what else is available. For
17:24
example, back in the days, we could see
17:26
a shortage, for example, of left-cent rost because
17:29
you just don't have them. There are very
17:31
few of them in the market. All
17:33
of a sudden, you find yourself paying something that
17:35
maybe would not be the normal price, but
17:38
it's a question of demand and offer as well
17:40
and timing as to when you go to market
17:42
to find what you need. As
17:45
you say, I think it's very difficult. Some people
17:47
talk about algorithm, but again, this is a misunderstanding
17:49
of the way that football works and
17:52
it's a misunderstanding as to
17:54
how any free market works, really. Is
17:56
it a free market for the players,
17:58
though? transfer market
18:02
work for a player? It's a question
18:04
that will come to the front very
18:06
shortly because as you know,
18:08
there's an important case that has gone under
18:10
the radar called the D'Ara case, which
18:12
is precisely discussing
18:15
whether the transfer
18:17
system is or not in line with
18:19
ordinary laws and the freedom of worker
18:21
to move around. And it's a
18:23
case where there's been an opinion issued by the attorney general
18:25
a couple of months ago, which has gone under the radar.
18:28
But that case would be adjudicated probably
18:31
by mid-September of next year, of this year,
18:33
sorry, by the European Court of Justice. And
18:36
that very same question would be asked. If
18:38
the system is declared unlawful, what's next? That's
18:41
something that we as PFA are working on. We
18:43
try to be ready for that scenario because
18:46
I think what we've learned over the
18:48
last few months is that for as
18:50
much as football is special, it is
18:52
not above the law. That's European courts.
18:54
So it wouldn't pertain to the UK,
18:56
would it? Yeah, but ultimately it would
18:58
have effect on European clubs at large,
19:00
irrespective of whether you are part of
19:02
the EU, strictly speaking or not. And
19:04
as you know, typically, and this happened
19:06
with Bosman, Bosman was a European case,
19:09
yet to the extent that the European market is
19:11
the biggest, then it will have effect throughout the
19:14
world, including England. We were in the EU, obviously,
19:16
weren't we? Did Bosman rule? Yeah, yes, but Bosman
19:18
applies also in Latin America and it happens in
19:20
other markets. So what I'm trying to say is
19:23
this is the reason why people go to the
19:25
European Court of Justice because it's the most important
19:27
market. So in the end, FIFA cannot have a
19:29
situation where the biggest market is regulated by certain
19:31
rules and the rest by different rules. So ultimately,
19:33
they will fall in line. I mean, if this
19:36
case went the way of D'Ara,
19:38
if this case went the way of
19:40
the player and it was deemed that
19:42
the transfer market wasn't fit for purpose
19:44
for legal reasons, I mean,
19:46
crikey, that could blow the whole, that
19:48
could blow the sport wide open. You're
19:50
working on plans at the moment, are
19:52
you, for if that happens
19:54
and how that would affect your members?
19:57
We are part of that case because remember
19:59
that. In addition to my role at the
20:01
PFA, I'm also on the board of FIFPro,
20:04
both the European level and the
20:06
global level. And this was a case initiated by D'Arra
20:08
himself, but then supported by the French
20:11
Union and by FIFPro. So, we
20:13
are part of those discussions and obviously
20:15
we want to try to be ahead of the
20:17
curve and be ready for that. What would an
20:19
alternative system look like? Has that been discussed
20:22
at all within this case? We are
20:24
working on it. I don't think
20:26
that I've got an answer right now because we believe
20:28
that ultimately it shouldn't be a question of opinions. It should
20:30
be a question of facts and figures. And
20:32
I think you need to really be careful about what
20:35
you wish for and how things will work
20:37
because as I was saying just before, I think
20:40
you need to think about unintended consequences to
20:43
shy away from populist visions or
20:45
from short-sighted kind of conclusions. So,
20:47
we are working on understanding what would be the
20:50
best possible alternative. What the Attorney
20:52
General says is, look, this behavior
20:54
can be anti-competitive or against
20:56
the law. Fine. What
20:59
is the best way to do that? Which
21:01
is to have employees and employers sit down
21:03
and have a collective bargaining agreement like in
21:05
any other works of life. One
21:07
of the outcomes could be to keep
21:09
the transfer system but no longer as
21:11
UF and FIFA sit, but rather how
21:13
the employees and the employers sit as
21:15
part of the collective bargaining agreement. Mahita,
21:17
that's a really interesting point. Is there
21:19
no, at the moment, there's
21:22
no collective bargaining agreement in place within
21:25
football, is there? No. People
21:29
roll their eyes. I'm going back to
21:31
American sports. In the NFL, that's a
21:33
massive thing and a collective bargaining agreement
21:35
will be negotiated every five
21:37
years, six years between owners and the
21:39
league and the players. Therefore,
21:41
everything is there then. You know exactly
21:44
where you stand, don't you, for the
21:46
next period of time. For example, in
21:49
the NFL at the moment, there may be rumors that
21:51
they'll go to playing a regular season that has 18
21:53
games. At the moment, they're at 17 games.
21:56
They couldn't do that without a
21:58
new collective bargaining agreement. he
26:00
decided to make the switch and play for
26:02
Germany, but also was with Chelsea and decided
26:04
to start his professional career with Bayern Munich.
26:06
And I heard an interview with him talking
26:08
about his reasons for that, and it was
26:10
to do with what Bayern Munich had kind
26:12
of set out for him. And in the
26:14
interview he said, and they've done that,
26:16
they've done everything they said they were going to do
26:19
with regards to my development. And
26:21
we also know other English players who've
26:23
chosen to start, I mean, Jude Bellingham
26:25
obviously starting their professional careers properly, if
26:27
you like. He's moved from Birmingham obviously
26:29
at a very young age. Are they
26:31
doing something different in terms of how
26:34
they're caring for their younger players that's making
26:36
it so attractive to top talent? It
26:39
doesn't depend on the country, it depends on
26:41
the action club. And I remember
26:43
going back to my days when I was in Mallorca,
26:45
we took a player on loan from Liverpool and they
26:47
were doing a brilliant job. At the time, Julian Ward
26:49
was in charge of the loan players and what they
26:52
were doing in terms of picking the right fit for
26:54
that specific player and then following up. I
26:56
even remember Chelsea, we took a player
26:59
on loan from them and Carlo
27:01
Cudicini was in charge of the loan
27:03
players and he's doing an unbelievable job,
27:05
really on top, very professional, really kind
27:07
of caring, coming towards the lads. So
27:09
I don't think that other people
27:11
in other countries do forced to be a better
27:14
job, but he's the culture of the club and
27:16
the understanding that a player is not just a
27:18
commodity and just an asset, it's not just a
27:20
question of sending Chapman on loan to Reksum. Is
27:23
Reksum really the right fit for Chapman now? I
27:26
think what I've seen over the years is the best clubs are
27:28
the ones who really have career plans for their players. If
27:30
Ryan Reynolds is listening, I'm more than
27:33
happy to consider a move
27:35
to Reksum, if that's a
27:37
possibility. Do you think this is
27:39
just the tip of the iceberg with some of these
27:42
young players that we've seen on the move in the
27:44
last week or the bids coming in? I
27:46
know June the 30th is the deadline for this
27:48
year's PSR, but do you think
27:50
we are going to see this more and
27:53
more? I am concerned that more
27:55
and more, instead of talking about football, we talk
27:57
about finances, we talk about economics, we talk about
27:59
everything. but the show on
28:01
the pitch. And all those people
28:04
who seem to have brilliant idea about how things
28:06
should be sold should remember that when they paid
28:08
what they paid for those clubs it was because
28:10
something was working. The concern
28:12
for us is to see an excess of
28:15
people who just do not understand the actual
28:18
product, the actual show and what it takes
28:20
to make it a successful thing. And
28:22
and fourthly you run the risk of having
28:24
people come here to milk the cow as
28:27
they've been doing and then depart and leave
28:29
the industry in the worst state and what
28:31
it was when they entered. And then the
28:33
final thing on that and this is a
28:35
sort of broader subject because there are so
28:37
many things that are affecting players at the
28:39
moment and we've talked before about number of
28:42
games and this this show isn't this specific
28:44
pod isn't about that issue but I am
28:46
aware I think we're becoming more and more
28:48
aware of there are so many different things
28:50
that are really affecting players at the moment
28:52
that don't seem to necessarily be right and
28:54
and we could throw this
28:57
conversation into that. Whenever strike action
28:59
gets mentioned is that a genuine
29:01
viable proposition for football
29:04
to settle their disputes
29:07
and grievances? Would
29:09
it work? Would you be able
29:11
to do it? When you have
29:13
an England player that
29:15
enters the pitch on Tuesday and he has played the
29:17
126th game
29:20
over the last two years I mean you know it comes to
29:22
a stage where you know and
29:24
again money does not solve that situation is not
29:26
the question of having money is you know they
29:29
feel very privileged it's an honor to play for
29:31
your country in order to play football and to
29:34
make your hobby passion into a job but
29:36
you cannot play 126 games
29:40
in two years and be expected to
29:42
perform it's it's just
29:44
not humanly possible so and
29:46
what really annoys me is that then we were quick to
29:48
judge those guys and I think that you know you need
29:50
to put yourself into their shoes you need to understand what
29:52
they're going through and you need to understand that and for
29:55
this is not a question of turning up at the game
29:58
it's a question of delivering a 90-minute
30:00
performance at the highest standards
30:02
with a shirt that weights a
30:04
lot and it's extremely tough and I'm full of
30:06
admiration for them but it comes to a stage
30:08
where I understand when they say to me enough
30:11
is enough and maybe we need to strike because
30:13
we're left with no other option and
30:16
the first step for us was to take a legal action because
30:19
there was no other choice and
30:21
you'd be amazed by the number of messages we received
30:23
not just by players executives from
30:26
clubs you know managers
30:28
because you know it takes a toll on
30:30
everyone on everyone. The
30:32
Sports Agents. The
30:37
Sports Agents. With Gabby Logan and
30:39
Mark Chapman. Thanks
30:42
so much to Mahetta and to Rob and
30:45
to you Mark for doing all of that interview on
30:47
your own. Do
30:49
you know there's so many interesting points
30:51
that come out of that that
30:53
I think we will revisit over the course
30:55
of the summer. Not least the D'Ara case.
30:57
Not least that D'Ara case and the future
30:59
of the transfer market. We all love the
31:02
speculation, we love the rumors, I go to
31:04
the gossip stuff first every morning when
31:06
I wake up you know some I
31:08
believe, some I don't believe but
31:11
it's a very strange time for
31:14
transfers in football and it'll
31:16
probably get stranger before if
31:19
ever it gets better. Yeah do send
31:21
us your thoughts and your questions as well to the
31:23
sports agents at global.com or you can contact us via
31:25
our socials, leave us a review, remember to hit follow
31:27
or subscribe so you never miss a show. Catch
31:30
up with all of our episodes on
31:33
Global Player or wherever you get your
31:35
podcasts we'll be back next week, Wi-Fi
31:37
permitting, have a good weekend. The Sports
31:39
Agents. With Gabby Logan and Mark Chapman.
31:43
Thanks for watching. We'll see you next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More