Podchaser Logo
Home
Weekend Edition

Weekend Edition

Released Sunday, 30th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Weekend Edition

Weekend Edition

Weekend Edition

Weekend Edition

Sunday, 30th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

This is a Global Player original podcast. So

0:04

it's been the end of the second week

0:06

of the Euros with us in Germany and

0:08

we're back with another weekend edition of The

0:10

Sports Agents. The

0:20

Sports Agents. With Gabby Logan

0:22

and Mark Chapman. This

0:26

week we've been back to our favourite

0:28

old subject of profit and sustainability rules

0:30

in football but from the angle of

0:32

whether clubs are exploiting it with the

0:35

transfer of young players. So we'll get

0:37

onto that in a while. You'll hear

0:39

from the Chief Exec of the PFA.

0:41

But first of all after members of

0:43

the England squad fought back at media

0:45

scrutiny after lacklustre performances in the group

0:48

stages at the Euros, we spoke to

0:50

Connor Cody who's been in the last

0:52

couple of England squads at tournaments but

0:54

not in this one about what it's like trying

0:56

to block out the public reaction at a major

0:58

tournament. I

1:01

actually quite like it. I'll be honest from my own point

1:04

of view. Have the players have hit back? Yeah I quite

1:06

like it. I quite like it. I think it shows us

1:08

coming together a little bit. I can imagine they've sat down

1:10

and listened to a few things that were said and spoke

1:12

as a team and spoke as a unit and gone, we've

1:15

got to show people. And I quite like that. I

1:18

think that's a good thing. I think if we're looking

1:20

from the media side or from a supporters side and

1:22

you see the team doing that, coming together and hopefully

1:24

creating a little bit of a siege mentality, not against

1:26

the press, certainly not against the press, but a

1:29

little bit of a feeling to go into that game and

1:31

go right, now we need to show people. We need to

1:33

show people how we play, how we do things. We've seen

1:35

it a little bit with Belgium the other night with how

1:37

they played. They got a bit of stick after the first

1:39

game and they come back and they were fantastic. So I'm

1:41

hoping that that helps the team a little bit. The

1:44

cliche is isn't it? You get

1:46

criticism and it then gets pinned up

1:49

on the dressing room wall and managers will go, well,

1:51

I don't need to do anything else. This

1:53

is the criticism. Go and respond to it. Yeah,

1:55

I don't think that does happen,

1:58

but I don't think that's needed in this situation. because I don't

2:00

think you need to pin on the wall. Everybody when

2:02

you play for England, you're seeing, you hear everything and

2:05

you can say you shut it out, you can say that

2:07

you don't. Do you not? Because you

2:10

go into this tournament and they talk about shutting it

2:12

out, don't they? They talk about not being on social

2:14

media. You can't, can you?

2:16

No, you can't. And I've said it a few times and

2:18

I think if you want the good stuff when

2:20

you play for England, which is the best thing in the world,

2:22

playing for England is the pinnacle of any football player's career. You

2:24

want all the good stuff that comes with it, but at the

2:26

same time, you need to take the rough with the smooth. You've

2:29

got to understand that you're there to be criticised. If you don't

2:31

play well, that's going to happen. And how do you react to

2:33

that situation? So I don't think it needs to be pinned on

2:35

the wall. I just think people need

2:37

to realise and players within the squad will realise

2:39

that we have to get better. But

2:41

also knowing that we've got a point to prove

2:43

here. And I think that's what we're hearing at

2:45

this moment. Are they just consuming it through social

2:47

media? Is it social media? Because it used to

2:50

be, as you say, you know, it was newspapers,

2:52

it was red tops. It was the image of

2:54

players in camp flipping through newspapers. Are they pouring

2:57

over social media? I think probably social media is also a

2:59

big part of it. But also I can speak from my

3:01

own point of view. And I've got papers on my phone

3:03

now. So I look at papers on my phone. Well, I

3:05

want to say that. I mean, it's obviously digitally, it doesn't

3:07

mean you're just looking at other people's accounts, because

3:10

everything is reported, isn't it? So everything that

3:12

people say on other podcasts, or people

3:14

say on TV stations is reported through

3:16

your phone. You don't need to have

3:19

a crime source. No, not at all. And

3:21

unless you're going to take your phone off people, but

3:23

you've got to remember in camp, you've got a lot of free time. So

3:25

if you sat in your room, you sat on a coffee, you sat doing

3:27

something, you sat on a physio bed, you're going to be

3:30

sat on your phone. And what do you do? You sat

3:32

on your phone, your message, your WhatsApp. And then when you

3:34

finish doing that, what do you do? All the papers, they

3:36

have a little bit of paper. And everything's England. Everything's England. So

3:38

you've got to be strong enough. My point with that is that

3:40

if you're going to play with England, you're going to play for

3:42

England, which is the greatest thing you'll ever do, you've got to

3:44

be strong. There was a slight intonation, wasn't there?

3:46

And I think from Harry Kane

3:49

that the press should support them.

3:51

Right. And I think that, you know,

3:53

there are sections of the media who would say, well,

3:55

our job is to critique, right? Do you

3:57

think that, you know, now you're on this side of the world?

3:59

Yeah. the fence. Do you think that is the

4:01

job of the media? I do think we can

4:03

give them more support if I'm being honest. I'm a player point of view.

4:06

Not just the media, I'm in the whole country. I don't

4:08

just mean the media. I think the media in our country

4:10

is actually really good. The relationship that the media now has

4:13

with the England team is so much

4:15

better than where it was. I think that's where it needs

4:17

to be and I think that's where it needs to stay.

4:19

You don't want people at loggerheads, the team and the media, the media

4:22

and the team. You don't need that at loggerheads. But I just

4:24

think the way they've come out the last few days,

4:27

I just think it's right to do that. There's a little

4:29

bit of bite, there's a little bit of we're together, so

4:31

stop worrying. I think that's where it

4:33

needs to be because again, we said on commentary about

4:35

let's just stay calm and see where we're at.

4:38

We're here, we're where we need to be going into the

4:40

next round and that's where it's at. From a media

4:42

point of view, because it has been such a different

4:44

atmosphere under Gareth Southgate and I did that England role

4:47

for quite a few championships and stopped after Russia,

4:49

which was a great place to stop because that

4:51

seemed to be the start of this whole new

4:53

experience. It was brilliant in that camp. Gareth was

4:56

very giving and the players just seemed to be...

4:58

You felt like you'd taken them as far as

5:00

you could in your role. It

5:03

was all the Gabby's doing. She'd laid the

5:05

foundation. I said, this is time for me

5:07

to go there. Because I got to the

5:09

Euros and of course, Kelly, someone started doing

5:11

my job and they got to the blinking final. So

5:13

I was like, you know what? I was peeling the

5:16

plaster and just ripped it off. But that

5:18

was such a joy to be in that camp

5:20

because the atmosphere was so great and the players

5:22

seemed to enjoy that interaction. Because previously it felt

5:24

like you were really having to drive them out

5:26

to do interviews. They didn't want to be there.

5:28

They felt suspicious of everything. So I'm really

5:30

mindful that we don't want to go back

5:32

to that feeling that the players are

5:35

suspicious of the media. They don't want to do

5:37

interviews. They don't want to give of themselves. And

5:39

you were saying your experience inside those camps with

5:41

Gareth has been really one of being quite

5:43

open and giving in terms of the... And

5:46

I think that relationship with the media has helped

5:48

England get to where they are. I really do.

5:50

I really think it's a big fact. We hear

5:52

stories of the past when people were clashing at

5:54

me. I could never imagine that because

5:56

I look at the England team now and go, the

5:58

experience I've had there with the media, with the... lads

6:00

inside the camp with the staff has just been incredible

6:02

and the way the manager has

6:04

meetings about everything, taking everything

6:07

on board, listening to the media,

6:09

using them, having the media there to help you

6:11

and respecting the media that's a massive part and

6:13

I think that's another big big thing of wearing

6:15

the dazs. Why we've been to a final, why

6:17

we got to the World Cup quarters and we

6:19

come this close to it in my eyes we

6:21

should have got through to the semis, the semis

6:23

in Russia I think it's a massive factor in

6:25

why there's been a feel-good factor around the national

6:27

team all these last few years. The sports agents.

6:33

The sports agents with Gabby Logan

6:36

and Mark Chapman. With

6:40

the financial year for Premier League clubs now

6:42

at an end there's been a flurry of

6:44

transfer activity between teams thought to be concerned

6:47

with the state of their profit and sustainability.

6:50

Have they found a loophole by

6:52

buying academy graduates from each other

6:54

with limited top flight experience? We

6:57

spoke to Professor of Applied Sports

6:59

Finance, Rob Wilson. So

7:02

if you take the situation at Chelsea over the

7:04

last couple of years they've ended

7:06

up accruing around about £200 million

7:08

worth of transfer fees owing so

7:10

that counts against their PSR calculation

7:14

and if they've got a connegalaga

7:16

for instance he represents 100% pure

7:18

PSR profit to them

7:22

so we were all expecting as analysts before they

7:24

did the hotel and the women's

7:26

training ground deal that they would have to sell

7:28

somebody like him and of course it's more efficient

7:31

to do that isn't it so you book 50-60

7:33

million pounds worth of PSR profit on

7:35

Galaga rather than you sell

7:37

four or five other players to book

7:39

the same amount of profit so it's

7:42

a very efficient way selling your

7:44

academy prospects your homegrown talent

7:46

for PSR purposes. They're

7:48

doing nothing wrong here are they? I

7:51

mean that's the important part to

7:53

say you know signing a young

7:55

academy prospect from another

7:58

club is perfectly fine. A

8:00

very, very famous example, Manchester United signing Wayne

8:02

Rooney at the age of 17, 18, who

8:06

come through Everton's Academy. There are

8:08

so many other examples

8:10

that you can come up with, but

8:13

it does appear to be a loophole, doesn't

8:16

it? When you have clubs who

8:18

we are told are close to the

8:20

line on PSR involved

8:23

in this, and also, I

8:25

mean, if they were doing it on July

8:27

the 20th as opposed to June the 20th,

8:29

not sure it would

8:31

have drawn the attention that it has done. No,

8:33

it wouldn't. There'd be no eyebrows being raised if

8:36

it was in the next or the start of

8:38

the next PSR period. I

8:40

think it's not outlawed as part of

8:42

the regulation. The transfer of players, the

8:44

transfer of academy talent, the buying

8:47

and selling of young players is nothing

8:49

new, and it is entirely acceptable within

8:51

the realm of the regulation. The issue

8:53

we've got with the cases that we've

8:55

heard just recently are the size of

8:57

the transfer fees that are being paid,

9:00

presumably, for these players. There's a lot

9:02

of trading going on, remember? The clubs

9:04

that are involved in an almost three-stroke,

9:07

four-way kind of pathway of players, and

9:09

critically for me, the valuation that's being

9:12

put on those players that have essentially

9:14

had very, very few first-team minutes. That

9:17

opens up to question and debate the

9:19

rationale behind the setting of that transfer

9:21

fee, because for example, of Wayne

9:23

Rooney, I think he was 30 million, wasn't he,

9:26

when he transferred to Manchester United? You would say

9:28

he was probably worth that in the current market,

9:30

given his playing performances, that Wonder goalie scored, I

9:32

think it was against Arsenal, wasn't it, back in

9:34

the day. Very different context

9:36

to the players that we've seen moving

9:39

between those three or four clubs. I

9:42

think that's why, when we talk

9:44

about regulation, yes, it's a

9:46

loophole. We'll all find loopholes in regulations, but

9:49

the spirit of the regulation is not being followed,

9:51

I don't think, in this context. paid

10:00

how much for Anthony? Who the

10:02

hell valued that in any deal? You

10:04

could question the value. Yeah, you can.

10:06

And we do a huge amount of

10:08

analytical work at the university. So we're

10:10

trying to data drive some of these

10:12

decision makings. But I'll be quite honest

10:14

with you, Mark. The reality is that

10:16

it's more of an art than a

10:19

science in valuing a player because there's

10:21

the CIS of football observatory that's based in

10:24

Switzerland, for instance, will track young player movement.

10:26

They'll look at how many minutes those players

10:28

have played, the type of level that those

10:30

players have played at, and they will put

10:32

an assumed value on them. Clubs

10:35

use transfer market, which is essentially a

10:37

Wikipedia of how you value a player,

10:39

completely spurious in terms of valuation. I

10:42

guess ultimately, the player value

10:44

is determined by the buying club being

10:47

prepared to put up X amount of

10:49

million and the selling club being prepared

10:51

to sell that player. So use the

10:54

example of Anthony there. The reality was he

10:56

was probably on a data driven metric worth

10:58

25 to 30 million. But then you need

11:00

to add in the Manchester United premium, the

11:03

timing of the particular transfer, the fact that

11:05

I didn't want to sell him, and

11:07

the fact that they knew Manchester United were probably desperate

11:10

for that right in your field. So all of a

11:12

sudden, you add, add, add, add, add

11:14

to the transfer fee. And ultimately, they executed

11:17

that deal at that value. The sports

11:19

agents. The

11:24

sports agents with Gabby Logan and

11:26

Mark Chapman. Then

11:30

we had a chat about the players at the

11:32

heart of these deals. What did the PFA have

11:34

to say about it? What do they have to

11:36

say about the state of the transfer market as

11:38

a whole, and the impact on the welfare of

11:41

a young footballer? The PFA managing director, Mahita Malanga,

11:43

joined us. I

11:46

think what we've been concerned for a while about

11:48

is the lack of involvement

11:51

of players in certain decisions, which ultimately

11:53

have consequences on them. And this is a

11:55

very good example as to how on

11:57

paper for someone who may not be acquainted with football,

11:59

he may. he or she may think

12:01

that this is only a financial rule, but

12:03

in reality that financial rule has a direct

12:05

implication on the players because

12:07

then they get involved into transactions sometimes

12:09

which are sensible, sometimes they're not, but

12:12

most importantly because those may have

12:14

an impact on their career. So for

12:16

us it's yet again another reminder, it's

12:18

not just a nice to have, it's

12:20

important to understand what the consequences are

12:22

on players and most importantly what could

12:24

be the side effects or unintended consequences

12:26

of a regulation on the player and

12:29

I think that's what we're seeing now

12:31

over the last few days. Does a

12:33

transfer market work for

12:35

a player? It's a question that will

12:37

come to the front very shortly because

12:40

as you know there's an important case that

12:42

has gone under the radar called the D'Ara

12:44

case which is precisely discussing

12:47

whether the transfer

12:49

system is or not in line with

12:52

ordinary laws and the freedom of worker

12:54

to move around and it's a case

12:56

where there's been an opinion issued by the attorney general

12:58

a couple of months ago which has gone under the

13:00

radar but that case would

13:02

be adjudicated probably by mid-September

13:04

of next year, of this year sorry by

13:07

the European Court of Justice and that very

13:09

same question will be asked. If the system

13:11

is declared unlawful, what's next? That's

13:13

something that we as PFA are working on, we

13:16

try to be ready for that scenario because

13:18

I think what we've learned over the last

13:21

few months is that for as much as

13:23

football is special, it is not above the

13:25

law. It's European courts so it wouldn't pertain

13:27

to the UK would it? Yeah but ultimately

13:29

it would have effect on European

13:32

clubs at large irrespective of whether you

13:34

are part of the EU strictly

13:36

speaking or not and as you know typically

13:38

and this happened with Bosman, Bosman was a

13:40

European case yet to the extent that the

13:42

European market is the biggest then it will

13:44

have effect throughout the world including England. We

13:47

were in the EU obviously weren't

13:49

we? Did Bosman rule? Yes but Bosman applies

13:51

also in Latin America and it happens in

13:53

other markets so what I'm trying to say

13:55

is this is the reason why people

13:57

go to the European Court of Justice because it's the

13:59

most... important market. So in the end, FIFA

14:01

cannot have a situation where the biggest market is

14:03

regulated by certain rules and the rest by different

14:06

rules. Ultimately, they will fall in line. Can we

14:08

talk about young players and the welfare of

14:10

young players and how they are

14:13

potentially being used within the

14:15

system here as

14:17

make-weights in deals, being

14:20

asked to go potentially to places they

14:22

don't want to go. You've got a

14:24

Newcastle midfielder, Jan Kuberminte is refusing to

14:26

move to Lyon. How much can

14:28

the PFA get involved and protect those

14:31

players? Unfortunately, for the players of the

14:33

academies, they are the most attractive ones

14:36

because in terms of the books, whenever

14:38

you sell an academy player, it's all profit. To

14:41

me, the concern is obviously leaving aside the

14:43

impact on the player himself and his career

14:45

because sometimes that move is not forcing the

14:47

best for his or her career. The

14:50

point is also, is he in the best interest of

14:52

the club itself. The academy players are

14:54

not just valuable assets and for

14:56

those of them who are perceiving

14:59

assets, those are very much important for

15:01

the fans. It is a connection to

15:03

the local community. It's a connection to

15:05

the values that makes football what it

15:07

is, a community asset. Every

15:10

union has a duty of care,

15:12

doesn't it, to its workers and its

15:14

members. Do you worry that

15:18

your young members, your

15:20

young players could

15:24

be used to make up,

15:27

to cover reckless spending of club

15:30

owners? You need to be worried

15:32

because a lot of time when you're young, it shouldn't

15:34

be about the money. It should be

15:36

about the sports project that

15:38

the club offers you. The reality is that

15:41

normally the best sports project is the one that the

15:43

old club offers you because they know you, because they'll

15:45

have a bit more patience with you, because normally unless

15:48

something crazy happens, the best solution is to stay at

15:50

your club and to grow at your club. And then

15:52

whenever you're ready and mature enough, then you move elsewhere.

15:54

You must worry because you must think

15:56

whether it is in the best interest of the career

15:59

of that specific player. And this is a sort

16:01

of broader subject because there are so many things that are

16:03

affecting players at the moment. And we've

16:05

talked before about number of games and

16:07

this, this show isn't this specific pod

16:09

isn't about that issue, but I am

16:11

aware, I think we're becoming more and

16:13

more aware of there are so many

16:15

different things that are really affecting players

16:17

at the moment that don't seem to

16:19

necessarily be right. And, and we

16:22

could throw this conversation into that. Whenever

16:25

strike action gets mentioned, is that

16:27

a genuine viable proposition for football

16:31

to settle their

16:33

disputes and grievances?

16:35

When you have an England

16:38

player that enters the

16:40

pitch on Tuesday and he has played the

16:42

126th game over

16:44

the last two years, I mean, you know, it comes

16:46

to a stage where it is, you know, and again,

16:48

money does not solve that situation. It's not the question

16:51

of, of, of having money is, you know, they feel

16:53

very privileged. It's an honor to play for

16:55

your country in honor to play football and to

16:57

make your hobby passion into a job, but

17:00

you cannot play 126 games in two years and be expected

17:05

to perform. It's, it is

17:08

just not humanly possible. So, and

17:10

what really annoys me is that then we're very quick to,

17:12

to, to judge those guys and I think that, you know,

17:14

you need to put yourself into their, their shoes, you need

17:16

to understand what they're going through and you need to understand

17:18

that and for these not a question of turning up at

17:20

the game. It's a question of delivering

17:22

a 90 minute performance at

17:25

the highest standards with, with, you know, with a

17:27

shirt that weights a lot and, and it's, it's

17:30

extremely tough and I'm full of admiration for them, but

17:32

it comes to a stage where I understand when they

17:34

say to me enough is enough and maybe we need

17:36

to strike because, because we left with

17:38

no other option. And, and the

17:40

first step for us was to take a legal

17:42

action because, because there was no, there was no

17:44

other choice and you'd be amazed by the number

17:46

of messages we received, not just by players, executives

17:49

from clubs, you know, managers,

17:52

because it, you know, it takes a toll

17:54

on everyone. The sports agents. And

17:56

so that's it. They have it scroll back through the

17:59

sports agents feeds. up with all of

18:01

our episodes in full, Global Player or wherever

18:03

you get your podcasts. We always

18:05

love to hear from you. We'll do a Q&A show

18:07

shortly, I'm sure. We need your questions. We'll work them

18:09

into the shows. Sportsagents.global.com.

18:11

New episodes every Tuesday

18:13

and Thursday. Enjoy the

18:16

weekend. The Sports Agents with Gabby

18:18

Logan and Mark Chapman.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features