Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
This is a Global Player original podcast. So
0:04
it's been the end of the second week
0:06
of the Euros with us in Germany and
0:08
we're back with another weekend edition of The
0:10
Sports Agents. The
0:20
Sports Agents. With Gabby Logan
0:22
and Mark Chapman. This
0:26
week we've been back to our favourite
0:28
old subject of profit and sustainability rules
0:30
in football but from the angle of
0:32
whether clubs are exploiting it with the
0:35
transfer of young players. So we'll get
0:37
onto that in a while. You'll hear
0:39
from the Chief Exec of the PFA.
0:41
But first of all after members of
0:43
the England squad fought back at media
0:45
scrutiny after lacklustre performances in the group
0:48
stages at the Euros, we spoke to
0:50
Connor Cody who's been in the last
0:52
couple of England squads at tournaments but
0:54
not in this one about what it's like trying
0:56
to block out the public reaction at a major
0:58
tournament. I
1:01
actually quite like it. I'll be honest from my own point
1:04
of view. Have the players have hit back? Yeah I quite
1:06
like it. I quite like it. I think it shows us
1:08
coming together a little bit. I can imagine they've sat down
1:10
and listened to a few things that were said and spoke
1:12
as a team and spoke as a unit and gone, we've
1:15
got to show people. And I quite like that. I
1:18
think that's a good thing. I think if we're looking
1:20
from the media side or from a supporters side and
1:22
you see the team doing that, coming together and hopefully
1:24
creating a little bit of a siege mentality, not against
1:26
the press, certainly not against the press, but a
1:29
little bit of a feeling to go into that game and
1:31
go right, now we need to show people. We need to
1:33
show people how we play, how we do things. We've seen
1:35
it a little bit with Belgium the other night with how
1:37
they played. They got a bit of stick after the first
1:39
game and they come back and they were fantastic. So I'm
1:41
hoping that that helps the team a little bit. The
1:44
cliche is isn't it? You get
1:46
criticism and it then gets pinned up
1:49
on the dressing room wall and managers will go, well,
1:51
I don't need to do anything else. This
1:53
is the criticism. Go and respond to it. Yeah,
1:55
I don't think that does happen,
1:58
but I don't think that's needed in this situation. because I don't
2:00
think you need to pin on the wall. Everybody when
2:02
you play for England, you're seeing, you hear everything and
2:05
you can say you shut it out, you can say that
2:07
you don't. Do you not? Because you
2:10
go into this tournament and they talk about shutting it
2:12
out, don't they? They talk about not being on social
2:14
media. You can't, can you?
2:16
No, you can't. And I've said it a few times and
2:18
I think if you want the good stuff when
2:20
you play for England, which is the best thing in the world,
2:22
playing for England is the pinnacle of any football player's career. You
2:24
want all the good stuff that comes with it, but at the
2:26
same time, you need to take the rough with the smooth. You've
2:29
got to understand that you're there to be criticised. If you don't
2:31
play well, that's going to happen. And how do you react to
2:33
that situation? So I don't think it needs to be pinned on
2:35
the wall. I just think people need
2:37
to realise and players within the squad will realise
2:39
that we have to get better. But
2:41
also knowing that we've got a point to prove
2:43
here. And I think that's what we're hearing at
2:45
this moment. Are they just consuming it through social
2:47
media? Is it social media? Because it used to
2:50
be, as you say, you know, it was newspapers,
2:52
it was red tops. It was the image of
2:54
players in camp flipping through newspapers. Are they pouring
2:57
over social media? I think probably social media is also a
2:59
big part of it. But also I can speak from my
3:01
own point of view. And I've got papers on my phone
3:03
now. So I look at papers on my phone. Well, I
3:05
want to say that. I mean, it's obviously digitally, it doesn't
3:07
mean you're just looking at other people's accounts, because
3:10
everything is reported, isn't it? So everything that
3:12
people say on other podcasts, or people
3:14
say on TV stations is reported through
3:16
your phone. You don't need to have
3:19
a crime source. No, not at all. And
3:21
unless you're going to take your phone off people, but
3:23
you've got to remember in camp, you've got a lot of free time. So
3:25
if you sat in your room, you sat on a coffee, you sat doing
3:27
something, you sat on a physio bed, you're going to be
3:30
sat on your phone. And what do you do? You sat
3:32
on your phone, your message, your WhatsApp. And then when you
3:34
finish doing that, what do you do? All the papers, they
3:36
have a little bit of paper. And everything's England. Everything's England. So
3:38
you've got to be strong enough. My point with that is that
3:40
if you're going to play with England, you're going to play for
3:42
England, which is the greatest thing you'll ever do, you've got to
3:44
be strong. There was a slight intonation, wasn't there?
3:46
And I think from Harry Kane
3:49
that the press should support them.
3:51
Right. And I think that, you know,
3:53
there are sections of the media who would say, well,
3:55
our job is to critique, right? Do you
3:57
think that, you know, now you're on this side of the world?
3:59
Yeah. the fence. Do you think that is the
4:01
job of the media? I do think we can
4:03
give them more support if I'm being honest. I'm a player point of view.
4:06
Not just the media, I'm in the whole country. I don't
4:08
just mean the media. I think the media in our country
4:10
is actually really good. The relationship that the media now has
4:13
with the England team is so much
4:15
better than where it was. I think that's where it needs
4:17
to be and I think that's where it needs to stay.
4:19
You don't want people at loggerheads, the team and the media, the media
4:22
and the team. You don't need that at loggerheads. But I just
4:24
think the way they've come out the last few days,
4:27
I just think it's right to do that. There's a little
4:29
bit of bite, there's a little bit of we're together, so
4:31
stop worrying. I think that's where it
4:33
needs to be because again, we said on commentary about
4:35
let's just stay calm and see where we're at.
4:38
We're here, we're where we need to be going into the
4:40
next round and that's where it's at. From a media
4:42
point of view, because it has been such a different
4:44
atmosphere under Gareth Southgate and I did that England role
4:47
for quite a few championships and stopped after Russia,
4:49
which was a great place to stop because that
4:51
seemed to be the start of this whole new
4:53
experience. It was brilliant in that camp. Gareth was
4:56
very giving and the players just seemed to be...
4:58
You felt like you'd taken them as far as
5:00
you could in your role. It
5:03
was all the Gabby's doing. She'd laid the
5:05
foundation. I said, this is time for me
5:07
to go there. Because I got to the
5:09
Euros and of course, Kelly, someone started doing
5:11
my job and they got to the blinking final. So
5:13
I was like, you know what? I was peeling the
5:16
plaster and just ripped it off. But that
5:18
was such a joy to be in that camp
5:20
because the atmosphere was so great and the players
5:22
seemed to enjoy that interaction. Because previously it felt
5:24
like you were really having to drive them out
5:26
to do interviews. They didn't want to be there.
5:28
They felt suspicious of everything. So I'm really
5:30
mindful that we don't want to go back
5:32
to that feeling that the players are
5:35
suspicious of the media. They don't want to do
5:37
interviews. They don't want to give of themselves. And
5:39
you were saying your experience inside those camps with
5:41
Gareth has been really one of being quite
5:43
open and giving in terms of the... And
5:46
I think that relationship with the media has helped
5:48
England get to where they are. I really do.
5:50
I really think it's a big fact. We hear
5:52
stories of the past when people were clashing at
5:54
me. I could never imagine that because
5:56
I look at the England team now and go, the
5:58
experience I've had there with the media, with the... lads
6:00
inside the camp with the staff has just been incredible
6:02
and the way the manager has
6:04
meetings about everything, taking everything
6:07
on board, listening to the media,
6:09
using them, having the media there to help you
6:11
and respecting the media that's a massive part and
6:13
I think that's another big big thing of wearing
6:15
the dazs. Why we've been to a final, why
6:17
we got to the World Cup quarters and we
6:19
come this close to it in my eyes we
6:21
should have got through to the semis, the semis
6:23
in Russia I think it's a massive factor in
6:25
why there's been a feel-good factor around the national
6:27
team all these last few years. The sports agents.
6:33
The sports agents with Gabby Logan
6:36
and Mark Chapman. With
6:40
the financial year for Premier League clubs now
6:42
at an end there's been a flurry of
6:44
transfer activity between teams thought to be concerned
6:47
with the state of their profit and sustainability.
6:50
Have they found a loophole by
6:52
buying academy graduates from each other
6:54
with limited top flight experience? We
6:57
spoke to Professor of Applied Sports
6:59
Finance, Rob Wilson. So
7:02
if you take the situation at Chelsea over the
7:04
last couple of years they've ended
7:06
up accruing around about £200 million
7:08
worth of transfer fees owing so
7:10
that counts against their PSR calculation
7:14
and if they've got a connegalaga
7:16
for instance he represents 100% pure
7:18
PSR profit to them
7:22
so we were all expecting as analysts before they
7:24
did the hotel and the women's
7:26
training ground deal that they would have to sell
7:28
somebody like him and of course it's more efficient
7:31
to do that isn't it so you book 50-60
7:33
million pounds worth of PSR profit on
7:35
Galaga rather than you sell
7:37
four or five other players to book
7:39
the same amount of profit so it's
7:42
a very efficient way selling your
7:44
academy prospects your homegrown talent
7:46
for PSR purposes. They're
7:48
doing nothing wrong here are they? I
7:51
mean that's the important part to
7:53
say you know signing a young
7:55
academy prospect from another
7:58
club is perfectly fine. A
8:00
very, very famous example, Manchester United signing Wayne
8:02
Rooney at the age of 17, 18, who
8:06
come through Everton's Academy. There are
8:08
so many other examples
8:10
that you can come up with, but
8:13
it does appear to be a loophole, doesn't
8:16
it? When you have clubs who
8:18
we are told are close to the
8:20
line on PSR involved
8:23
in this, and also, I
8:25
mean, if they were doing it on July
8:27
the 20th as opposed to June the 20th,
8:29
not sure it would
8:31
have drawn the attention that it has done. No,
8:33
it wouldn't. There'd be no eyebrows being raised if
8:36
it was in the next or the start of
8:38
the next PSR period. I
8:40
think it's not outlawed as part of
8:42
the regulation. The transfer of players, the
8:44
transfer of academy talent, the buying
8:47
and selling of young players is nothing
8:49
new, and it is entirely acceptable within
8:51
the realm of the regulation. The issue
8:53
we've got with the cases that we've
8:55
heard just recently are the size of
8:57
the transfer fees that are being paid,
9:00
presumably, for these players. There's a lot
9:02
of trading going on, remember? The clubs
9:04
that are involved in an almost three-stroke,
9:07
four-way kind of pathway of players, and
9:09
critically for me, the valuation that's being
9:12
put on those players that have essentially
9:14
had very, very few first-team minutes. That
9:17
opens up to question and debate the
9:19
rationale behind the setting of that transfer
9:21
fee, because for example, of Wayne
9:23
Rooney, I think he was 30 million, wasn't he,
9:26
when he transferred to Manchester United? You would say
9:28
he was probably worth that in the current market,
9:30
given his playing performances, that Wonder goalie scored, I
9:32
think it was against Arsenal, wasn't it, back in
9:34
the day. Very different context
9:36
to the players that we've seen moving
9:39
between those three or four clubs. I
9:42
think that's why, when we talk
9:44
about regulation, yes, it's a
9:46
loophole. We'll all find loopholes in regulations, but
9:49
the spirit of the regulation is not being followed,
9:51
I don't think, in this context. paid
10:00
how much for Anthony? Who the
10:02
hell valued that in any deal? You
10:04
could question the value. Yeah, you can.
10:06
And we do a huge amount of
10:08
analytical work at the university. So we're
10:10
trying to data drive some of these
10:12
decision makings. But I'll be quite honest
10:14
with you, Mark. The reality is that
10:16
it's more of an art than a
10:19
science in valuing a player because there's
10:21
the CIS of football observatory that's based in
10:24
Switzerland, for instance, will track young player movement.
10:26
They'll look at how many minutes those players
10:28
have played, the type of level that those
10:30
players have played at, and they will put
10:32
an assumed value on them. Clubs
10:35
use transfer market, which is essentially a
10:37
Wikipedia of how you value a player,
10:39
completely spurious in terms of valuation. I
10:42
guess ultimately, the player value
10:44
is determined by the buying club being
10:47
prepared to put up X amount of
10:49
million and the selling club being prepared
10:51
to sell that player. So use the
10:54
example of Anthony there. The reality was he
10:56
was probably on a data driven metric worth
10:58
25 to 30 million. But then you need
11:00
to add in the Manchester United premium, the
11:03
timing of the particular transfer, the fact that
11:05
I didn't want to sell him, and
11:07
the fact that they knew Manchester United were probably desperate
11:10
for that right in your field. So all of a
11:12
sudden, you add, add, add, add, add
11:14
to the transfer fee. And ultimately, they executed
11:17
that deal at that value. The sports
11:19
agents. The
11:24
sports agents with Gabby Logan and
11:26
Mark Chapman. Then
11:30
we had a chat about the players at the
11:32
heart of these deals. What did the PFA have
11:34
to say about it? What do they have to
11:36
say about the state of the transfer market as
11:38
a whole, and the impact on the welfare of
11:41
a young footballer? The PFA managing director, Mahita Malanga,
11:43
joined us. I
11:46
think what we've been concerned for a while about
11:48
is the lack of involvement
11:51
of players in certain decisions, which ultimately
11:53
have consequences on them. And this is a
11:55
very good example as to how on
11:57
paper for someone who may not be acquainted with football,
11:59
he may. he or she may think
12:01
that this is only a financial rule, but
12:03
in reality that financial rule has a direct
12:05
implication on the players because
12:07
then they get involved into transactions sometimes
12:09
which are sensible, sometimes they're not, but
12:12
most importantly because those may have
12:14
an impact on their career. So for
12:16
us it's yet again another reminder, it's
12:18
not just a nice to have, it's
12:20
important to understand what the consequences are
12:22
on players and most importantly what could
12:24
be the side effects or unintended consequences
12:26
of a regulation on the player and
12:29
I think that's what we're seeing now
12:31
over the last few days. Does a
12:33
transfer market work for
12:35
a player? It's a question that will
12:37
come to the front very shortly because
12:40
as you know there's an important case that
12:42
has gone under the radar called the D'Ara
12:44
case which is precisely discussing
12:47
whether the transfer
12:49
system is or not in line with
12:52
ordinary laws and the freedom of worker
12:54
to move around and it's a case
12:56
where there's been an opinion issued by the attorney general
12:58
a couple of months ago which has gone under the
13:00
radar but that case would
13:02
be adjudicated probably by mid-September
13:04
of next year, of this year sorry by
13:07
the European Court of Justice and that very
13:09
same question will be asked. If the system
13:11
is declared unlawful, what's next? That's
13:13
something that we as PFA are working on, we
13:16
try to be ready for that scenario because
13:18
I think what we've learned over the last
13:21
few months is that for as much as
13:23
football is special, it is not above the
13:25
law. It's European courts so it wouldn't pertain
13:27
to the UK would it? Yeah but ultimately
13:29
it would have effect on European
13:32
clubs at large irrespective of whether you
13:34
are part of the EU strictly
13:36
speaking or not and as you know typically
13:38
and this happened with Bosman, Bosman was a
13:40
European case yet to the extent that the
13:42
European market is the biggest then it will
13:44
have effect throughout the world including England. We
13:47
were in the EU obviously weren't
13:49
we? Did Bosman rule? Yes but Bosman applies
13:51
also in Latin America and it happens in
13:53
other markets so what I'm trying to say
13:55
is this is the reason why people
13:57
go to the European Court of Justice because it's the
13:59
most... important market. So in the end, FIFA
14:01
cannot have a situation where the biggest market is
14:03
regulated by certain rules and the rest by different
14:06
rules. Ultimately, they will fall in line. Can we
14:08
talk about young players and the welfare of
14:10
young players and how they are
14:13
potentially being used within the
14:15
system here as
14:17
make-weights in deals, being
14:20
asked to go potentially to places they
14:22
don't want to go. You've got a
14:24
Newcastle midfielder, Jan Kuberminte is refusing to
14:26
move to Lyon. How much can
14:28
the PFA get involved and protect those
14:31
players? Unfortunately, for the players of the
14:33
academies, they are the most attractive ones
14:36
because in terms of the books, whenever
14:38
you sell an academy player, it's all profit. To
14:41
me, the concern is obviously leaving aside the
14:43
impact on the player himself and his career
14:45
because sometimes that move is not forcing the
14:47
best for his or her career. The
14:50
point is also, is he in the best interest of
14:52
the club itself. The academy players are
14:54
not just valuable assets and for
14:56
those of them who are perceiving
14:59
assets, those are very much important for
15:01
the fans. It is a connection to
15:03
the local community. It's a connection to
15:05
the values that makes football what it
15:07
is, a community asset. Every
15:10
union has a duty of care,
15:12
doesn't it, to its workers and its
15:14
members. Do you worry that
15:18
your young members, your
15:20
young players could
15:24
be used to make up,
15:27
to cover reckless spending of club
15:30
owners? You need to be worried
15:32
because a lot of time when you're young, it shouldn't
15:34
be about the money. It should be
15:36
about the sports project that
15:38
the club offers you. The reality is that
15:41
normally the best sports project is the one that the
15:43
old club offers you because they know you, because they'll
15:45
have a bit more patience with you, because normally unless
15:48
something crazy happens, the best solution is to stay at
15:50
your club and to grow at your club. And then
15:52
whenever you're ready and mature enough, then you move elsewhere.
15:54
You must worry because you must think
15:56
whether it is in the best interest of the career
15:59
of that specific player. And this is a sort
16:01
of broader subject because there are so many things that are
16:03
affecting players at the moment. And we've
16:05
talked before about number of games and
16:07
this, this show isn't this specific pod
16:09
isn't about that issue, but I am
16:11
aware, I think we're becoming more and
16:13
more aware of there are so many
16:15
different things that are really affecting players
16:17
at the moment that don't seem to
16:19
necessarily be right. And, and we
16:22
could throw this conversation into that. Whenever
16:25
strike action gets mentioned, is that
16:27
a genuine viable proposition for football
16:31
to settle their
16:33
disputes and grievances?
16:35
When you have an England
16:38
player that enters the
16:40
pitch on Tuesday and he has played the
16:42
126th game over
16:44
the last two years, I mean, you know, it comes
16:46
to a stage where it is, you know, and again,
16:48
money does not solve that situation. It's not the question
16:51
of, of, of having money is, you know, they feel
16:53
very privileged. It's an honor to play for
16:55
your country in honor to play football and to
16:57
make your hobby passion into a job, but
17:00
you cannot play 126 games in two years and be expected
17:05
to perform. It's, it is
17:08
just not humanly possible. So, and
17:10
what really annoys me is that then we're very quick to,
17:12
to, to judge those guys and I think that, you know,
17:14
you need to put yourself into their, their shoes, you need
17:16
to understand what they're going through and you need to understand
17:18
that and for these not a question of turning up at
17:20
the game. It's a question of delivering
17:22
a 90 minute performance at
17:25
the highest standards with, with, you know, with a
17:27
shirt that weights a lot and, and it's, it's
17:30
extremely tough and I'm full of admiration for them, but
17:32
it comes to a stage where I understand when they
17:34
say to me enough is enough and maybe we need
17:36
to strike because, because we left with
17:38
no other option. And, and the
17:40
first step for us was to take a legal
17:42
action because, because there was no, there was no
17:44
other choice and you'd be amazed by the number
17:46
of messages we received, not just by players, executives
17:49
from clubs, you know, managers,
17:52
because it, you know, it takes a toll
17:54
on everyone. The sports agents. And
17:56
so that's it. They have it scroll back through the
17:59
sports agents feeds. up with all of
18:01
our episodes in full, Global Player or wherever
18:03
you get your podcasts. We always
18:05
love to hear from you. We'll do a Q&A show
18:07
shortly, I'm sure. We need your questions. We'll work them
18:09
into the shows. Sportsagents.global.com.
18:11
New episodes every Tuesday
18:13
and Thursday. Enjoy the
18:16
weekend. The Sports Agents with Gabby
18:18
Logan and Mark Chapman.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More