Podchaser Logo
Home
Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Released Sunday, 23rd June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Keir Starmer: Up close and personal

Sunday, 23rd June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Ready to start talking to your kids about

0:02

financial literacy? Meet Greenlight, the

0:04

debit card and money app that teaches

0:06

kids and teens how to earn, save,

0:09

spend wisely, and invest with your guardrails

0:11

in place. Parents can send

0:13

instant money transfers, automate allowance, and

0:16

more. Plus, keep an eye on

0:18

spending with real-time notifications. Join

0:20

more than six million parents and

0:22

kids building healthy financial habits together

0:24

on Greenlight. Get your

0:27

first month free at

0:29

greenlight.com/ACAST. That's greenlight.com/ACAST. This

0:32

is a paid advertisement from BetterHelp. As

0:35

a podcast listener, you've heard from us before. Today

0:38

let's hear from our members about what online therapy has

0:40

done for them. I would recommend

0:42

my therapist 1,000 times over. She

0:45

has truly changed my life. The

0:48

day after my first session, my friends and

0:50

family said I sounded like myself again for

0:52

the first time in weeks. You

0:54

deserve to invest in your well-being. Visit betterhelp.com

0:56

to see what it can do for you. That's

0:59

betterhelp.com. betterhelp.com. From

1:06

The Times and The Sunday Times,

1:08

this is the story. I'm

1:10

Manveen Rana. He's

1:14

almost certainly going to be the

1:17

next prime minister. But

1:19

what do we really know about

1:21

Sakhir Starmer? The problem is that

1:23

I think for the public, no

1:26

one really trusts that we know who

1:28

he really is. A criticism has

1:30

been made many, many times of

1:32

Sakhir Starmer that he doesn't seem

1:34

to have, anyway, much of a personality coming

1:36

through. I think Angela Reynolds has described him

1:38

as an undersharer. What's

1:42

behind the controlled, cautious,

1:45

slightly wooden facade? You

1:48

get these off-the-cuff moments with him, and you think, oh, there

1:50

is a real person there that is

1:52

quite appealing that

1:54

isn't being shared. To

2:04

try to get a glimpse of the real

2:06

Kier Starmer, the Sunday Times has spent the

2:08

last few months on the road with him,

2:11

following him around the country, watching him

2:13

at work and sitting down for a

2:15

pint and a chat. I

2:19

would have loved for my kids to see my mum as

2:21

she was because towards the end of her life,

2:24

she not only had her leg amputated and

2:26

couldn't move her arms and couldn't

2:28

really feed

2:31

herself, but

2:33

she also couldn't speak. And

2:35

so one of the

2:37

saddest things for me personally is the fact that my

2:39

children never knew my mum. She

2:41

was still alive when they were born, but

2:44

they never had a conversation with

2:46

her. They could never see for themselves what

2:48

she was like. The

2:50

story today, inside

2:52

the campaign with Kier Starmer.

2:58

My name is Josh Glancy. I am the editor

3:00

of News Review at the Sunday Times, and I

3:02

also do a fair bit of writing around that.

3:04

You've also become a bit of a Kier Starmer

3:06

stalker in the last few weeks, last

3:09

few months. He's

3:12

been haunting my dreams slightly. I have

3:14

read, I think, everything about Kier Starmer now

3:16

and spent really quite a

3:18

lot of time with him, but also just

3:21

watching him move around the world on the

3:23

campaign trail, visiting schools,

3:25

hospitals, and all manner of

3:27

other public institutions. So yeah, I feel like I've

3:29

got a kind of masters in Kier Starmer now.

3:32

When did you actually first meet him? Well,

3:35

it's a funny story actually. I first met Kier

3:38

Starmer in about 2007 or eight, and

3:40

I was doing work experience at the

3:44

time. I was a student and I was

3:46

shadowing a judge around the

3:48

High Court. And there

3:50

was a big case about how officials

3:52

in mental health institutions should

3:55

restrain patients, and

3:57

acting against the government was Kier Starmer QC.

4:00

And I remember two things from that day. One

4:02

is even at the time he caught my attention.

4:05

He was very good looking. He was

4:07

obviously very ambitious and he just carried himself.

4:09

You know, most people just, you just forget

4:12

them an hour later, but something about him,

4:15

something about him stuck in my memory. But the other thing

4:17

was that I was looking at becoming a lawyer at the

4:19

time. And that was the day that I gave up on

4:21

my legal ambitions because I was, why? Well,

4:24

I was a bit hungover. I

4:26

was doodling and I was struggling to pay

4:28

attention to this very forensic detailed case that

4:30

Stalmer was putting forward in the courtroom. And

4:33

a couple of times during proceedings,

4:35

he glanced over at me in a quite

4:37

sort of firm, slightly irritated way as if

4:39

to say, what are you doing

4:42

here? Why aren't you paying attention? And

4:44

I could kind of feel like, you know, it was almost

4:46

like you were back in school and you'd done something wrong

4:48

and hadn't done your homework or whatever. And at

4:50

the end of the day, I said to my parents,

4:53

I remember when I spoke to them, I, yeah, the

4:55

law's not for me, I'm afraid it's going to have to

4:57

find something a little bit more animating. And

5:03

just give us a sense of what it's been like for

5:05

you following him around. I mean, how far have you been? Which

5:08

parts of the country have you seen with him? We've

5:11

been all over. We went, we've been, we went to a hospital. How

5:13

long has it been now? It was about three

5:15

months. Where have we been?

5:17

We've been to hospitals in Mansfield. We've

5:20

been to a nursery in Harlow. Went

5:23

to the pub at the Celtic Manor Hotel

5:25

in Newport, Wales. It

5:29

is tiring being on the road. Yeah. But

5:31

I find it quite energizing. Yeah. I like

5:33

it. I like being out. I like doing

5:35

these events. I like being with people. And

5:38

therefore, I really, and I also like getting

5:40

across the country. So when I was,

5:42

I will say this about Kistarme. He has remarkable energy. I

5:44

mean, he's 61. He's

5:47

got a lot more energy than I do. He does

5:49

16, 17 hour days. He

5:52

doesn't seem to switch off much. Wow.

5:59

And for you. You know, you're getting

6:01

more access than most journalists. You're actually getting to

6:03

spend proper time getting to see his character, getting

6:05

to see how he works. What

6:07

made you want to do that? I thought that there

6:09

had been lots of interviews with Keir Starmer, where

6:11

you get an hour, an hour and a half if you're lucky. You

6:14

try and cover lots of conversations. He talks

6:16

a little bit like a barrister. He can be a little bit long-winded. And

6:20

cautious. Very cautious. And he doesn't give

6:22

a lot of way. And it all felt like

6:24

we haven't quite got under his skin. This

6:26

man who's very likely to be our next Prime Minister. And

6:29

so when I spoke to his press team, I said, well, look, what

6:32

if we did a kind of, you

6:34

know, access all areas, peace?

6:37

So you've written a profile where you've really

6:39

managed to get more of his character out

6:41

than I think anybody else so far. Take

6:44

us on that journey with you of discovering

6:47

more about him. And let's start with

6:49

a day in Portsmouth.

6:52

Just remind us of when this was and what you

6:54

were doing there. So it's June 5th and

6:56

we are in Portsmouth

6:58

Historic Dockyard. Tom

7:14

has just come from the big D-Day celebrations with the

7:16

King. Today we come

7:18

together to honour those

7:20

nearly 160,000 British Commonwealth and Allied

7:23

troops. And

7:27

this is before the D-Day disaster for

7:30

Ishi's United? It's the day before,

7:32

yeah. He's doing a trip

7:34

with some D-Day veterans and waiting for them

7:36

on the jetty is sort of the whole

7:38

press pack. All

7:43

these cameras lined up in a row and then all

7:45

the print journalists was lined up on the jetty. Almost

7:47

like we were sort of an honour guard of midshipmen.

7:51

And one thing I

7:53

noticed straight away, I've never really been a

7:55

Westminster journalist. It's just how weird the process

7:57

is. It was the day after the debate,

7:59

the first day. debate with Rishi Sunak where he

8:01

struggled to give an answer to this £2,000 tax that

8:05

Rishi Sunak had raised that £2,000 would

8:08

go onto everyone's tax bill with the Labour

8:10

government. Here's Stalmer is going to put

8:12

your taxes up by £2,000. £2,000. £2,000. £2,000

8:17

independent Treasury civil servants have costed Labour's policies

8:19

and it's £2,000. He

8:23

called it out for being a lie but very

8:25

late. He called it garbage but it took about half an

8:27

hour for him to get there. Yeah. He

8:32

does six different stand-ups to camera each

8:35

for a different channel and they all ask

8:37

him the same question and he gives them all the

8:39

same answer and he sort of stands there and he's

8:41

quite stout. He's not fat but he's kind of stout

8:44

unyielding, hence thumbs

8:47

by his side, fists clenched and

8:50

gives each of them the same

8:52

pre-cooked answer. That the Prime Minister

8:54

of the United Kingdom with his

8:56

back against the wall desperately trying

8:58

to defend their record in office

9:00

resorted to lies and

9:03

he knows he was lying and I don't say

9:05

that. Then he does the newspaper

9:07

reporters who will basically ask similar

9:09

questions and then I was

9:11

lucky enough that we sort of got to go into a back

9:14

office basically and have a proper interview.

9:18

Yeah. You know how, yeah, and you

9:20

know you sort of like... Well you thought they're

9:22

all doing their own outlet. I

9:24

know. They're all not going to share the... The

9:26

moment. Well I'll let...

9:28

I'll crack on. I'd love this small talk but... So

9:31

I won't ask you all the same questions as I did because that would be boring. I

9:33

mean for you as somebody who doesn't normally

9:35

do Westminster, just seeing that lineup, seeing the

9:37

sort of the one question shouted again and

9:39

again by different people and the

9:41

same very controlled pre-prepared answer,

9:44

does that contribute to why he often

9:46

looks quite robotic? I think

9:48

it absolutely does. I came away from all of

9:50

this thinking a little bit anxious about how we

9:52

operate our politics in this country because I think

9:55

in some ways what Starmer's

9:57

doing is a logical response to

9:59

the... kind of the level of media

10:01

scrutiny and the relentlessness of the media

10:04

scrutiny he gets. Another logical

10:06

response in a funny way is the opposite, is

10:08

Boris Johnson, you kind of laugh it off, you

10:10

always have a joke, you almost play the

10:12

clown. Because

10:15

I don't think it's realistic for someone

10:17

to like give you genuine, thoughtful, original

10:19

answers and it's relentless. And I think

10:21

they're trying to come up with coherent,

10:24

sustainable ways to respond to the kind

10:27

of pressure they're under. And Starmer's slightly

10:30

wooden, mask-like appearance I think is one

10:32

of those things. And then

10:34

you managed to take him off for a private

10:36

word, how different is that? And what does he

10:38

say? He's remarkably different in

10:41

private to public. Now this has been true of

10:43

many public figures, probably all public figures to some

10:45

extent. People said that about

10:47

Ed Miliband, you know, who is quite genial

10:49

and funny in private. John Major was another

10:51

one, far less stiff in private. But

10:54

the delta between public care and

10:56

private care is just vast. You

10:59

get him one on one and he just, the

11:01

tension comes out the shoulders, he's quite funny. Really?

11:04

Yeah, he's quite, he's convivial. When you say quite

11:06

funny, I mean... I don't

11:08

know, I mean the first time I saw him

11:10

on this trail in Harlow back in March, when

11:13

I came off the train he said, oh we're

11:15

going to a school for eight and nine year

11:18

olds and the average age will drop considerably. Now

11:20

that isn't like absolute stand up funny, but

11:22

it's quite funny for a politician, you know,

11:25

off the cuff. I mean these things are

11:27

relative. Right, I chuckled, I chuckled.

11:30

You know the old test they used in America, would you

11:32

go for a beer with this guy? I think you would

11:34

quite happily go for a beer with Kirst Dahmer, but private

11:37

care, public care, I think you wouldn't fancy it. Not so

11:39

much. Yeah. Well we'll get

11:41

on to you having a beer with him because I

11:43

know that has happened. Before

11:45

we do this, so there you are in Portsmouth.

11:48

He has just been asked by 20-odd

11:50

journalists about his disastrous performance in the

11:52

debate the night before. What does he

11:54

say to you about it? He was pretty

11:57

guarded, he gave me a complete null answer. We're

12:00

doing speeches every other

12:02

day. We're doing lots of

12:04

interactive events. We've got more

12:06

than one debate and set

12:08

pieces on the television. So,

12:10

you know, it's all in

12:13

the mix in the sense of... He

12:15

basically just didn't answer the question. I did

12:17

ask him about it later on in the campaign again, and

12:21

he did acknowledge that the

12:24

format is not great. You know, they were

12:26

getting 45-second answers, and that he

12:28

doesn't really respond well to being asked for

12:30

sort of snappy off-the-cuff lines. He's very methodical.

12:33

He's about process. He's a barrister. He likes...

12:35

He's not a soundbite man. He's not a

12:37

soundbite man. He likes a case. I

12:40

almost think he takes a slight pride in this

12:42

fact, actually, that actually he sees this process

12:44

as quite gimmicky, quite superficial, and he

12:47

sees himself as someone who is thoughtful,

12:50

methodical, a statesman. And so

12:52

when he walks into these environments, he knows that

12:55

he's not nailing it. But

12:57

I think a part of him does say, well, hang on, not

13:00

being good at this is because I'm

13:02

good at that, the stuff that really matters. I think that's how

13:04

he sees it. And when you do, you know,

13:06

have a beer with him in

13:08

Newport or wherever, what's

13:10

he like? I mean, what does he want to talk

13:12

about? Well, look, I mean, he's a serious

13:14

person who has a lot of serious

13:17

thoughts about the world, right? So he's very happy

13:19

talking about it. In Celtic

13:22

Man at Bar, we talked about Israel

13:24

Garza. We talked about Britain's

13:26

role in the world. We talked about

13:28

Brexit. But equally, you know,

13:30

there was one occasion where we were

13:32

off the record in a Starbucks in Stafford. And,

13:35

you know, I sort of bound it

13:37

up to him and said, OK, I've got a really big

13:39

question for you. It's controversial on there. And he looks at

13:41

me slightly panicked. And I said, Jack Riele,

13:43

should he have gone to the Euros? And

13:46

he just sort of relaxes. Like, yeah, I was quite surprised about

13:48

that. It always amazes me when

13:50

he talks publicly about football. He sounds so

13:52

strangled and insincere. But he really is a

13:55

football fan. He loves the chat. He can do the

13:57

banter. But he can't seem to bring that

13:59

to the point. public. What's

14:05

going on there? Why does he, you know,

14:07

people describe him as being opaque? He

14:10

doesn't quite fit the mold of a

14:12

traditional politician in many ways. But why?

14:14

Why is that? So

14:17

I became slightly fixated with this issue.

14:20

And so there's a number of things going on. One

14:22

is he came into politics late in his

14:25

50s, fully formed as a barrister,

14:27

really. And it's quite hard to change your

14:29

style and personality at that point. I

14:32

would also say that he doesn't want

14:34

to say anything he doesn't believe. He doesn't

14:36

want to grandstand for the public. He

14:38

wants to get into office, assume power and

14:40

fix things. He would say,

14:42

I'm not in it to be famous. In our house,

14:44

we don't have a single picture of

14:47

me with a political leader. Right. We've

14:49

got pictures of the kids. Not

14:51

even in the loo. People put it in the loo because I think it'd

14:54

be too often to put it on the mantelpiece. So put

14:56

it in the loo thinking that everyone will have to go

14:58

to the loo whilst they're here. And so they'll see it.

15:01

Not a single picture. So I'm not driven by this.

15:03

I must have this... So I think he both

15:06

instinctively and strategically just sort of

15:08

shies away from the performative

15:11

aspects of being a modern politician.

15:16

Is it also something about him being

15:18

less ideological than other politicians? Yeah.

15:22

So he, he

15:24

argues that he doesn't have a clear-ism,

15:27

that he's not a Blairite, but he's

15:29

not Corbynite. It's not so

15:32

easy to say, well, that's come from

15:34

ideology, because it doesn't come very often

15:36

from ideology for me, not particularly ideological.

15:39

I'm a pragmatist, but being

15:41

a pragmatist does require you to know the details

15:43

of what you're talking about. Yeah. Because otherwise you

15:45

can't be pragmatic. He's

15:47

obviously on the left, but he's not, he

15:50

doesn't fit into one obvious strata of the party.

15:52

I mean, he would describe himself as a pragmatist.

15:55

And so he would argue,

15:57

I don't always know what I think until I've seen the

15:59

brief in front of me. and I've assessed all the angles

16:01

and I've got to the core of the problem and then

16:03

I can start thinking about a solution. And

16:06

as a character, I mean, you know, in many ways

16:08

he sort of said he's funny, a good

16:11

normal bloke. Is

16:13

he also quite ruthless? I

16:15

think he's shown himself to be extremely ruthless and

16:17

I think he admitted that to me. I said,

16:19

you know, are you ruthless? I

16:21

take decisions, other people have said it's ruthless and I'm

16:23

not going to deny it. We've had to take some

16:26

difficult and probably ruthless decisions. I

16:28

don't think it would be sensible of me

16:30

to say otherwise. They mean really difficult decisions.

16:34

Taking their decisions is not difficult for

16:36

me. He argued that it's a

16:38

ruthlessness with a purpose, the

16:40

purpose being to win power. I don't want to be sort

16:42

of casual about this because this has got to report to

16:45

someone else that's sort of easy to be ruthless. I really

16:47

don't mean that. It's not

16:49

casual ruthlessness. It's

16:51

a ruthlessness with a stealing purpose. And

16:54

that the Labour Party and the left of the Labour Party

16:56

in particular is often its own worst enemy when it comes

16:58

to winning elections, which they don't do very often. And

17:02

in order to get there, he had to

17:04

take some pretty tough decisions. That

17:06

included, for example, demoting

17:09

his friends as well as his opponents.

17:11

So Nick Thomas Simmons, who was the

17:13

Shadow Home Secretary, wasn't quite working. He

17:16

got subbed out for Yvette Cooper,

17:18

which is pretty tough. They're

17:21

really good friends. They go for breakfast

17:23

together. Still? Yep, still, which is impressive.

17:26

But when it comes to the left, he's been willing

17:28

to take the slings and arrows and

17:30

has been quite brutal about

17:33

anyone who puts their toe over the line. They're gone. It's

17:36

as simple as that. Unusual for

17:38

somebody who, as you say, isn't an

17:40

ideologue to take such a hard line

17:42

on certain policy matters. And one of

17:45

them has been this sort of debate

17:47

around Israel Garza. How

17:49

did he talk to you about it? Because that was

17:51

a moment where he was going against a lot of

17:53

his party, or at the starts he was taking, made

17:55

a lot of them very uncomfortable. I

17:58

think Israel Garza has really... really

18:00

cut him up. A friend

18:03

of his told me this, that it's really tormented

18:05

him because on the one

18:07

hand he is a left-wing

18:09

human rights lawyer. So his

18:11

milieu and his background has probably led

18:13

him to be very conscious of Palestinian

18:16

rights, of the implementation of international

18:18

law. On the other hand, he

18:21

has promised the Jewish community to be a friend

18:24

and to be utterly rigorous about

18:27

stamping out anti-Semitism. His

18:31

wife is Jewish, his father-in-law is

18:33

Jewish, they go to synagogues sometimes. He's

18:37

met with hostages, hostage families from Israel. So

18:39

I think he really does feel both sides

18:41

of it. I think he feels very attacked

18:43

at times on both sides. He's had protesters

18:46

turn up at his house in North London,

18:49

meaning his wife and kids couldn't

18:51

get into the house. I

18:55

think he really does feel that the anxiety

18:57

and the angst of it all very deeply,

18:59

he's not going to show it very often.

19:02

But it's definitely there. Coming

19:09

up. Oh he's raging

19:11

torrent of emotions but it's all inside.

19:14

It's all kept in and then

19:16

occasionally you get little flashes of it. Josh

19:20

and Kirstarmer get into his difficult

19:23

childhood and the lasting impact it's

19:25

had. That's in

19:27

just a minute. How

19:35

does appreciation feel to you? A rising

19:38

rush of warmth? A

19:41

building wave of confidence? At

19:46

Reward Gateway Eden Red,

19:48

we know appreciation appreciates

19:50

in value. Starting

19:52

with people, radiating through

19:54

companies to transform their performance

19:57

and productivity. of

20:00

appreciation with our total employee

20:02

experience platform. Ready to start

20:04

talking to your kids about

20:06

financial literacy? Meet Greenlight,

20:08

the debit card and money app that

20:11

teaches kids and teens how to earn,

20:13

save, spend wisely, and invest with your

20:15

guardrails in place. Parents can

20:18

send instant money transfers, automate allowance,

20:20

and more. Plus, keep an eye

20:22

on spending with real-time notifications. Join

20:25

more than 6 million parents and

20:27

kids building healthy financial habits together

20:29

on Greenlight. Get your

20:32

first month free at

20:34

greenlight.com/ACAST. That's greenlight.com/ACAST. This

20:37

is a paid advertisement from BetterHelp. As

20:40

a podcast listener, you've heard from us before. Today

20:42

let's hear from our members about what online therapy has

20:45

done for them. I would recommend

20:47

my therapist 1,000 times over. She

20:50

has truly changed my life. The

20:52

day after my first session, my friends and

20:55

family said I sounded like myself again for

20:57

the first time in weeks. You

20:59

deserve to invest in your well-being. Visit betterhelp.com to

21:01

see what it can do for you. That's

21:04

betterhelp.com. Josh,

21:21

you talked earlier about how much of his

21:23

character is really

21:25

determined by his past. I

21:28

mean, what was his childhood like? Yeah,

21:30

so I went down to Rygate, which

21:32

is about an hour on

21:34

the train from London Bridge. And

21:38

it's Surrey commuter belt, but I think for some

21:40

people that conjures up images of gin and jags

21:43

and quite sort of wealthy suburbs.

21:47

It's not particularly wealthy, particularly when he was growing up in

21:49

the 70s. They lived in a three-bedroom

21:51

house. He shared a bunk bed with

21:53

his brother Nick. They weren't well off

21:55

at all. He talked about the phone bill sometimes

21:58

going unpaid. There were holes in the masonry. one

22:00

of his friends has described. And then his father,

22:02

as he has told everyone at Infinitum, was

22:04

a toolmaker. I did actually ask him

22:06

what tools his dad made, which were... What

22:08

did he say? Well, he really came alive when I

22:11

asked him that. I thought it was just going to

22:13

be... It was my last ever question to him. And

22:16

he kept me there for about five, ten

22:18

minutes of describing it. He

22:21

made injection moldings, which are

22:23

basically, if you want to make, say, a million Starbucks

22:25

coffee cups, and he picked up a Starbucks coffee cup

22:27

to show me this, in order to

22:29

do so, you create a metal mold, which

22:32

is customized to the shape of the coffee cup. And

22:35

then you inject molten plastic in it again and

22:37

again and again, and you get the little cups.

22:40

So it's quite a high skilled work. And he

22:42

was telling me how they now

22:44

do it very differently. And he went to visit

22:46

the factory in Filton near Bristol. He was really

22:49

incredibly knowledgeable about it, but also quite emotional.

22:51

He said, it was one of

22:53

those moments I really wish my dad was still around because I'd love

22:55

for him to see it. He's

22:59

still got the... When

23:01

I saw that, I just, in Filton, which

23:03

I found is fascinating place, by the way.

23:08

That's one of the moments I really wanted

23:10

my dad to still be alive. Yeah. To

23:12

see what's happened. To see

23:14

the modern way of doing what he did.

23:16

Yeah, yeah. Brilliant. And

23:19

he would be fascinated by it. And

23:21

that actually really struck me because to

23:23

get back to your question, he

23:26

is, and we're all forged by a

23:28

childhood, but he really carries this stuff with him. He

23:30

carries the resentment

23:32

that his father felt towards local snobs who

23:34

looked down on him as a manual laborer.

23:37

Just as I carried the disrespect my

23:39

dad felt by the fact he

23:41

worked in a factory, it really

23:44

impacted him. It made

23:46

him recoil from company, become

23:49

quite isolated. And

23:51

I'm not sure I completely appreciated that at the time, but

23:54

it is amongst the reasons that I

23:57

will never treat people with disabilities. He carries

23:59

the stuff with him. Stoicism of his mother

24:01

she had stilts disease, which is a kind

24:03

of very aggressive form of inflammatory arthritis She

24:07

nearly died on several occasions But

24:10

was very sort of stoic about it and would

24:12

go climbing in the Lake District If you ever

24:14

asked her how she was Even

24:17

if what I knew she was an intense

24:19

pain. Yeah, she would never

24:21

ever complain. Yeah She

24:24

would always say absolutely classic the exact

24:26

words. I'm alright. How are you? This

24:28

is almost a classical stoicism. It's

24:30

a very I mean it is But

24:34

it was to her core and it's

24:36

gone a bit into the core of me. Yeah,

24:38

he carries the difficulties

24:40

his brother Nick had Difficulties

24:42

learning and the bullying that

24:45

he received and I learned to hugely

24:47

respect the progress he had made given

24:50

the opportunities that he was handed in

24:52

life and therefore I Recoil

24:55

when anybody uses the word thick That

25:00

the holes he's had to get over

25:02

in his life whether it's that

25:05

resilience from my mom whether it's this Value

25:08

of respect and dignity which does

25:11

come I think from my dad. I don't

25:13

know for me. I just need Anchors

25:16

like it's a rough

25:18

old sea out there. Yeah And

25:21

these are as he said as he put it to me these are my anchors There's

25:24

this Ferocious aversion to snobbery or

25:26

grandness. He really doesn't like having doors open for

25:28

him. He likes to carry his own bag I

25:31

spoke to a security detail at one point about this.

25:33

He'd sent out a bunch of snacks for them in

25:35

a school And I said

25:37

does he do that a lot? They're like, oh he always makes sure you're

25:40

well-fed I was like what's he like? They

25:42

were always he's great because he'll stand in a queue

25:44

for 20 minutes quite happily He

25:47

always says thank you. He was asked after your kids or your

25:49

family Not like some of

25:51

the other ones who were born to rule what an interesting

25:53

phrase it was really interesting That

25:56

because again, it goes back to this point. He has this kind

25:58

of There's that awful phrase, we

26:00

have a chip on his shoulder. But

26:03

you saw that in a recent interview where he was

26:05

slightly not quite mocked, but this point was raised, like

26:08

you keep banging on about your dad being a toolmaker.

26:10

I think it was even in the Sky debate as

26:12

well. And he got quite defensive and

26:14

flustered. When I grew up, my

26:16

dad was a toolmaker. He worked in a factory.

26:19

That's true. My mom was a nurse,

26:21

and actually we couldn't make ends meet,

26:23

which actually isn't a laugh thing. Matter,

26:25

we couldn't make ends meet. Because, okay,

26:27

yes, he's making political caps out of it. Of

26:29

course he is. But he actually really cares about

26:32

the tools his dad used to make. And

26:34

he really cares about the fact that people

26:37

didn't value that work as much as they

26:39

should do. And about the dignity of

26:42

working people. And that's

26:44

why he sometimes gets a bit snippy. Because there

26:47

is this hot current of emotion running

26:49

through him. You don't see it very often. I was just

26:51

going to say, that's probably the last way most people

26:53

would describe him. Oh, he's raging, torrent

26:56

of emotions, but it's all inside. It's

26:58

all kept in. And then occasionally

27:00

you get little flashes of it. And I think

27:03

when it comes to issues around his parents, his

27:05

family, and working

27:07

class or lower middle class people who are trying

27:09

to get by in life, I

27:12

think that really, really motivates him. Quite

27:15

clearly, his experience with his family

27:17

growing up lives with him

27:19

every day. In terms of

27:21

his family now, his wife and children, how

27:24

close are they all? How is that sort of playing

27:26

out in terms of his career?

27:29

Because we don't see much of them on the campaign. No,

27:32

we don't. And the absence of his

27:34

wife, Vic Stalmer, has become a talking

27:36

point certainly in the sort of right

27:39

leaning media. Vic's

27:41

fantastic. Yeah. Understands

27:44

it. She's grounded, she's

27:46

street wise. Yeah. And

27:49

she's very understanding. But I'm not going to pretend that

27:51

it's easy for her. Because it isn't. Because

27:53

she gets thrusted

27:56

for limelight, conference, et cetera, that

27:58

she has. to

28:00

play her part, to be there, etc. She

28:03

wants to get on with her life. I don't

28:05

get the sense that she loves that side of

28:07

things. She doesn't want to push herself into the

28:09

light, there's a necessary minimum. He's

28:12

pretty close with his wife and kids. I

28:14

think he's a very loving, doting father. That's certainly

28:16

an impression I get. And

28:18

everyone says, you know, he doesn't come out to

28:20

the pub after work, really. He's not a

28:23

social politician. He goes home, leaves his bag

28:25

at the door, and then he's a

28:27

father. But he's very,

28:30

very, very, very protective of them. Yeah,

28:32

but again, just as we haven't put

28:34

the kids names and photographs in the

28:36

public mind, so Vic's never done an

28:39

interview. And we'll

28:41

keep it that way, because we

28:43

want that boundary. But I

28:46

sensed with him, it's a kind of hot rail

28:48

every time you ask about his family. There's

28:50

certain things he'll say quite comfortably, but he doesn't want

28:52

to go deep into it. That's

28:55

fair enough. I wish him luck with that, honestly,

28:57

because to an extent, it isn't our business. If

29:00

they're all living in number 10, in

29:02

a few days' time, really, how much

29:04

does that change? Well, there are

29:07

limits. I mean, and I think they've got to be

29:09

pragmatic about, there are limits to your privacy

29:11

in that fishbowl. And that's good, and that's

29:13

the right decision, and all the rest of it. Oh, I have to change

29:15

at some point when you know that. Yeah, but what it does is,

29:18

it means that you and others can't see me

29:21

with my family, which would give you an insight

29:23

which you can't have, because we're not

29:25

allowing you to have. They

29:28

will try and maintain it as much as possible. His

29:31

son's doing a CCSE at the moment. He's been quite

29:33

worried about how the campaign is affecting that. So

29:35

I think that's going to be an issue for them. And

29:38

I think he knows that. And he's been quite vocal

29:40

about the fact that he's worried about what it will

29:42

do to his kids, whose names he never uses in

29:44

public, what

29:47

it will do to them inevitably to

29:49

become known to the country at

29:51

large. All of that's going

29:53

to have to be addressed quite soon, I suppose. For

29:56

you, as someone who went on the

29:58

road with him all over the world,

30:00

the place to try and work out

30:02

that gap between the public and

30:05

the private. What did you

30:07

make of him by the end? Well,

30:10

I wouldn't say we've become friends. There

30:12

were certain things you just frustrated

30:14

that he's not more open about.

30:17

For example, supporting Corbyn in 2019, which

30:22

I think was an example of his pragmatism

30:24

really, but he's got this kind of slightly

30:26

tortured answer as to why he

30:28

supported Corbyn. He's now

30:30

saying, oh, it's because I sort of expected us to

30:32

lose. It doesn't really hold. It's a weakness in his

30:35

armor. But we did sort of reach

30:37

the point where I would

30:39

quite look forward to seeing him, which is

30:41

odd in a way because his power can be quite

30:43

uncomfortable to be around. I

30:46

know that people who work in the

30:48

Labour Party, he's like when the head master walks

30:50

past, people are sort of head down working and

30:53

stuff. He's a demanding manager. He hates it when

30:55

people are late. He hates it when

30:57

people haven't prepared their brief. There's a kind

31:00

of gravity that he projects into

31:02

the world. But again, you

31:04

get these off the cuff moments with him and you

31:07

think, oh, there is a real person there that is

31:09

quite appealing that

31:11

isn't being shared widely. So the last interview I

31:13

did with him, I said, I've got three

31:16

quick five questions, then I will leave you alone

31:19

forever. But. Was the first one. You're very welcome

31:21

to come. Well, maybe not before

31:23

I die.

31:26

Yeah. You can stay in touch if you want. I was like, shit,

31:28

I should stay in touch. I

31:30

mean, if he's in number 10, it might be quite good for you. Bad

31:34

source maintenance. And

31:36

then I sort of wandered off

31:38

to the loo on the train. And as

31:41

I come out the loo, there's a sort

31:43

of medium sized middle aged man

31:45

standing there kind of waiting vaguely and patiently for

31:47

me to come out. And

31:49

it's like a star and he just looks at

31:51

me like, oh, I'm not following you. I promise.

31:53

It's just again, the stalk

31:55

is stalks. Yeah, like fairly

31:57

funny for a politician. And that was our sort of last interview.

32:00

interaction. Do

32:03

you think he's cut out for the role

32:05

of Prime Minister if he never quite learns

32:07

to relax into the job? Well,

32:10

I mean yes you have to be able to sell your policies, you have

32:12

to be able to win elections and you

32:14

want to be able to charm the nation or

32:17

uplift the nation now and then and he

32:19

is capable of giving a bondstorming speech, he has done

32:21

them in the past so we may see one

32:23

at some point but ultimately

32:27

he sees the

32:29

job and what he'll be judged by as can

32:31

you restore growth to Britain, can

32:34

you fix our public services and

32:37

can you steer the country through what's like

32:39

to be pretty turbulent few years on the

32:41

global stage and if

32:44

he can do those with a modicum of success

32:47

I don't think he cares about the other stuff and

32:52

I think that if he can win a

32:54

big election victory without being a

32:57

charming performer then

33:00

does it really matter and is that just something we're demanding

33:02

of him that actually is

33:05

fundamentally not that important. That

33:18

was Josh Glancy, editor of the news

33:20

review at the Sunday Times and you

33:22

can read his full profile of Seqir

33:25

Stama at thetimes.com with a subscription. If

33:30

you want to know more about the

33:32

current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, he recently

33:34

sat down to do an interview for

33:37

this podcast with the Times columnist, former

33:39

Foreign Secretary, former leader of the Tory

33:41

Party and now one

33:43

of the presenters here at the story,

33:45

William Hague. It's hard to balance being a

33:48

good dad and doing the job well and

33:50

obviously you have to prioritise this job because

33:52

it's an important job and you're doing it

33:54

on behalf of the whole country so you

33:56

know not being there for them as much

33:58

as any dad would like to be is

34:00

a challenge. and there's particular moments where you

34:02

really feel that acutely because there's something very

34:04

difficult going on that you just can't be

34:07

there for them at, and that's tough. But

34:09

that's the job. We'll

34:11

put a link to that episode in the description

34:13

of this podcast. The

34:15

producer today was Sam Chantaraszak. The

34:17

executive producer was Cape Ford, and

34:20

sound design and theme composition were

34:22

by Mao Lassetto. If

34:24

you're enjoying our election coverage or any of

34:26

the other podcasts we've done recently, then do

34:28

leave us a review. It'll help others to

34:30

find us. Thanks for listening. See

34:32

you tomorrow. This

34:50

is a big year. The

34:52

Ohio Lottery's golden anniversary. 50

34:55

years of excitement of growing

34:57

jackpots and crossed fingers. 50

34:59

years of funding for schools, of changed

35:02

lives and brightened days. 50

35:04

years of fun. And that is

35:06

worth celebrating. So watch

35:08

for can't miss promotions, huge events

35:10

and new games that will make

35:12

the Ohio Lottery's 50th year its

35:15

biggest one yet. Learn

35:17

more at funturns50.com. When

35:29

you see flashing lights, remember they're not

35:32

just roadside workers. Thank you for moving

35:34

over and slowing down.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features