0:00

Oh Just

0:09

a hard knock young him from a

0:11

dead in town A

0:13

chip off my block. I couldn't slow

0:16

in town in the back of my

0:18

car I remember his

0:20

face. I put the pedal to

0:22

the floor in my own mustang

0:25

We would saw a knock

0:27

that he calls And

0:30

nothing ever stood in our way.

0:32

We were American He's

0:58

American He

1:10

was destined to fly it was

1:12

damn nearly That

1:14

eyes for the sky He

1:22

Exactly Oh

1:59

Oh I'm

2:01

never coming,

2:03

I'm never coming,

2:05

I'm never coming I'm

2:31

never coming, I'm never coming,

2:34

I'm never coming

2:47

American name, American

2:49

name Young,

2:52

wild and free American

2:56

name, American name

2:58

American name, American

3:01

name Young, wild

3:04

and free American

3:06

name, American name

3:08

My heart, knowing

3:10

me He is

3:12

American name, he

3:15

is American name

3:17

I am American

3:19

name, we're all

3:21

American name American

3:23

name, American name

3:27

American name, American name

3:31

American name I'm

3:53

not sure what the word is I'm

3:58

not sure what the word is you

4:01

know, so much rubbish

4:05

that I'm seeing online. And so, you

4:08

know, last night, you

4:11

know, as I was pondering about it,

4:13

this is something that I've been working

4:15

on. It's multiple stories actually that I

4:18

have put in the article. As you

4:20

know, mine are not in time. They're

4:22

just about fixed point in time. And

4:24

kind of just giving some clarity to the

4:27

people of the United States and those around

4:29

the world that are watching us. As

4:32

we realized, there were a lot of

4:34

people that were pushing the notion of

4:36

absolute presidential immunity. The thing

4:39

is, we already knew it was there. Now,

4:41

I didn't want to contradict what President Trump

4:43

was doing, because that allows the

4:45

media to kind of pander as if

4:48

he's dumb, which I find fascinating. Playing

4:51

dumb is a very

4:53

good tool. You know, you have to

4:55

look weak when you're your strongest. So I

4:58

wanted to share with you guys

5:00

my article here that

5:02

I put up this morning, and

5:04

kind of just tweaked it up.

5:07

But you know, this was one

5:09

of the biggest boomerangs that

5:11

we have ever seen.

5:16

This got his decision while everyone was waiting

5:18

to see that he has no immunity, which

5:20

is false. Because in

5:22

the past, with the Clinton case that

5:26

we have already had

5:28

at SCOTUS, it was determined

5:30

that presidents have absolute immunity

5:32

when it comes to matters

5:35

that are official acts. Now,

5:38

I don't mean to throw

5:41

too much shade, but most of

5:43

the people that have analyzed the

5:45

Hunter Biden laptop, or have put

5:47

together information, had done it great

5:49

disjustice. Miscarriage

5:51

of justice and not presenting

5:53

it for what it is,

5:55

which is, you know,

5:57

a keystone to almost everything.

5:59

thing. And this

6:03

article, while it's extremely

6:06

detailed in certain factions, I

6:09

was hoping would provide more clarity

6:12

to the actual

6:14

pundits that pretend to know

6:16

things, you

6:19

know, what, in

6:21

fact, happened. Now,

6:25

the case is

6:27

quite long, you know, the opinions were

6:29

quite, you know, on point.

6:32

And I wanted to kind of

6:35

walk you through this. So I

6:38

wanted to bring to the attention

6:40

the Presidential Records Act, like we've

6:42

talked about this before, when I

6:44

did my analysis in regards to

6:46

NARA, right, and this whole

6:48

Mar-a-Lago thing. Obviously, in my

6:50

Skyfall article, I told you how they set

6:52

it up, and they've been busted with it.

6:55

But having said that, there

6:57

was still a lot of

6:59

false narratives being pushed, a

7:02

lot of people pushing for

7:04

absolute immunity, which in

7:07

essence, you know, how

7:11

do I state this without being mean, shows

7:15

that they're kind of pedestrian, and

7:17

don't really understand what's happening. But

7:19

on the other hand, they're also

7:21

fed scripts. And, you

7:24

know, these people are organized

7:26

to silence the

7:28

actual truth, because they believe their plan

7:31

is best. And this is,

7:34

you know, something that I saw

7:36

with Natalie Denise, who is a

7:38

staunch reporter on, you know, child

7:41

trafficking, and crimes against children,

7:43

and she didn't tow the

7:45

line. And therefore, she's considered

7:48

not one of them. She

7:51

should be very proud. Being

7:53

one of them is not something that you

7:55

should aim for. Because very

7:57

quickly, a lot of people

7:59

are to die into the darkness and you'll see

8:02

how that goes. While many will

8:04

tell you that it's because of social

8:06

media stringencies and etc,

8:09

etc, even in this

8:11

article, I allude to how

8:13

all that kind

8:15

of came to be in regards to

8:17

censorship on social media because people again,

8:19

like I say, pretend they know what

8:22

they're talking about but they don't. One

8:25

might say, well, you haven't made

8:27

it extremely clear and there are

8:29

many reasons for that. One

8:31

of them going to the fact that maybe

8:33

people don't need to know, oh, by the

8:36

way, I wanted to point out, you see

8:38

that laptop behind me?

8:41

That's Hunter Biden's laptop. It literally says

8:44

Hunter Biden. Just wanted to showcase

8:46

that little piece of evidence right there. We've

8:50

been perusing it again today and putting

8:53

things together and I wanted to just showcase

8:57

this. The Presidential Records

8:59

Act was created so that

9:01

all presidential communications records are

9:04

preserved and thereby promoting

9:06

transparency, accountability within the

9:08

executive branch. We know

9:10

I went over this and I covered this with

9:12

the whole confefé stuff to

9:14

tell you about the bill

9:16

that acronym, the acronym I

9:19

would guess to

9:21

state it correctly was

9:23

confefé and that had

9:25

to do with microblogging such as Twitter. Now

9:29

I want people to understand the Presidential

9:31

Records Act, also known as PRA, mandates

9:34

that the official actions and communications

9:37

of the president, vice president, and

9:39

his immediate documented

9:41

and maintained part of historical

9:43

record that reflects the president's

9:45

constitutional and statutory duties. There

9:49

was an amendment to it that added

9:51

the vice president and

9:53

their immediate staff. That would include people

9:55

like Mike Pence. During

9:58

the Obama regime, we were would say

10:01

Vice President Biden. But that would

10:03

also include people like Valerie Jarrett.

10:05

And that would also include people

10:07

like Ron Klain. So

10:10

this is more expansive because

10:12

there needs to be a

10:14

cohesive and detailed

10:17

record of everything that

10:19

a presidential administration does.

10:22

Now, people

10:24

need to understand that the legal framework

10:26

in regards to the Presidential Records

10:29

Act distinguishes

10:32

in itself between official acts, those

10:34

that are conducted, in

10:37

the capacity of executing presidential

10:39

responsibility and unofficial acts, which

10:41

are like personal acts. And

10:45

that was actually found and discussed,

10:47

right? The personal

10:49

and political and that fall outside the

10:52

scope of these responsibilities in Nixon versus

10:54

Fichal. So you would think that

10:56

with the Clinton case and with the Nixon

10:58

case, we had enough to discern what is

11:01

considered an official act and what is an

11:03

unofficial. But we like

11:05

boomerangs. And we like to

11:07

bring them to the table. So

11:11

the one thing that I had

11:13

written was a long time ago

11:15

where I talked about Ciliza. Am

11:17

I pronouncing it right? He worked

11:19

for CNN. But before

11:21

CNN, he actually wrote an article, one

11:24

of the very few that you will

11:26

find that were written, where

11:28

he condemned. Well, I don't want to say,

11:30

well, he did kind of. And he said

11:32

that the first executive

11:34

order that President Barack Hussein

11:36

Obama signed into, in

11:41

as his first thing as president, like

11:43

five minutes into being sworn in, was

11:46

putting concrete boots on transparency.

11:49

Well, as we all know, transparency

11:51

and accountability are foundational principles in

11:53

a democratic society, and specifically for

11:55

us, democratic republic. Now, that ensures

11:58

that governmental action are open for

12:00

us to scrutinize and to oversee

12:02

them. And this is from the

12:04

Federalist Papers, as we know, with

12:06

Alexander Hamilton. Now, by

12:09

preserving all of these official records,

12:14

the PRA enables the public, you

12:16

and I, and

12:18

historians in the

12:20

future, which will hate you, and

12:23

legal authorities to evaluate these presidential

12:25

actions and what they've done. And

12:29

therefore, it would safeguard the integrity

12:31

of that office by promoting

12:33

trust in government. That's something that we

12:35

don't have right now, and it's well-warranted,

12:38

actually. Now, one,

12:42

people need to understand that communications

12:45

that are conducted through private channels, remember,

12:47

we went through this with the Hillary

12:49

Clinton email servers, right? And they're not

12:52

preserved as required by the PRA. It

12:55

actually undermines the principles, and

12:58

that suggests the intent to evade

13:00

accountability. And that was actually

13:02

founded in the case of

13:05

Clinton versus Paul Jones.

13:07

So these actions raise

13:09

significant concerns because

13:12

they involve non-official entities and

13:14

are rerouted through foreign

13:17

servers to avoid detections

13:19

in national security agencies.

13:21

Remember, I had written

13:23

an extensive article on that. It's

13:26

titled, hold on, I

13:29

have it cited in here. Gosh

13:31

darn it, where is it? Where's

13:34

the article cited? Let me zoom

13:36

out because I'm not able

13:39

to observe it easily. Maybe

13:44

I buried it further down. I thought I'd put

13:46

it back up. It

13:49

was about Biden's emails.

13:51

Now, I had

13:53

actually engaged with people

13:56

that surround President Trump and

13:58

or, you know. Obviously, hmm, is

14:02

it not cited in here? Gosh darn it. Oh,

14:05

Biden audio. No, where's the,

14:09

where is the Peter Henderson emails? Oh,

14:12

I better put it in there. I

14:14

think I didn't put the link in there. That

14:18

sucks. That would be, oh, there it is. Evidence.

14:20

Secret emails used by Obama and

14:23

Biden are hosted by German intelligence.

14:26

In that article, and I highly suggest you read it.

14:28

It actually highlights

14:30

and pinpoints the

14:33

intricate details that

14:35

people leave out. Specifically

14:37

the details of how the NSA

14:40

was actually circumvented because at the

14:42

time that Obama and Biden in

14:45

2015, and it's important, this date

14:47

is very important and you will

14:49

see by the end of the

14:52

show why it's so important. Uh,

14:55

Germany decided that they're going to kick out

14:57

the NSA and they are not going to

14:59

allow the U S government

15:01

to have access. So this deal

15:03

that they have under five eyes

15:05

to allow them to access our

15:07

communications and share information was hindered.

15:10

So president Obama

15:13

and vice president Biden started

15:15

using GMX email to communicate

15:17

things. Now GMX is

15:20

known to be part

15:23

of German intelligence. So

15:25

having said that and keeping all of that

15:28

in mind, they had the intention to evade.

15:30

Now many will say, no, no, no, it

15:32

was just the perfect storm of the NSA

15:35

doing this and you know, Germany and it

15:37

just so happened and you know, we didn't

15:39

know. Kind of treated it

15:41

like Gmail, which is complete BS

15:43

because they have a bunch of

15:45

security officers. And in fact, Ron

15:47

Klain knows that very, very well.

15:50

So, um, as

15:53

we see here in the article,

15:55

um, I highlight and

15:57

I source everything for all of you to

15:59

read. but these

16:01

actions should raise significant concerns,

16:04

mainly because they involve

16:06

non-official entities and

16:09

are routed through foreign servers to avoid

16:11

detection by national

16:13

security agencies, right? But these factors

16:16

strongly indicate that the actions in

16:18

question are unofficial. And I'll tell

16:20

you why. If an

16:23

act is considered official, right, the

16:27

actual PRA, the argument here

16:29

is, and I would

16:31

love to see President Trump's team

16:33

battle this, but unofficial

16:36

duties are executed in means that are

16:38

captured and seen. Therefore, if something occurs,

16:41

kind of like, I don't know, like

16:43

a quid pro Joe, and

16:45

that was all discussed

16:49

outside of the purview of

16:51

capturing those communications, well then,

16:54

that should be considered an unofficial, you

16:57

know, action. And

16:59

that's what should happen here, because, you know,

17:01

with this whole Mar-a-Lago raid, which a lot

17:03

of people were like, oh my gosh, I

17:05

was like, all right, let's see

17:08

where they're going with this, right? It was

17:10

interesting because I was looking at it from

17:12

the perspective of Hunter Biden's laptop and

17:15

the communication and the treasure trove in there, which

17:17

again, I say, I don't care how many of

17:20

you have this Hunter Biden laptop book, right, which

17:23

is amazing, you should buy it, it's a

17:25

piece of history. Though,

17:27

to be fair, you know,

17:29

his prostitution escapades and,

17:34

you know, his drug addiction stuff, you know,

17:36

of him doing crack and the crack horse

17:38

and stuff, I would personally

17:40

have omitted that, only

17:43

because I think it's about human

17:45

decency, regardless of how

17:47

you feel of Hunter Biden, because

17:49

he has engaged in criminal acts

17:52

and acts that would be considered

17:55

crimes against people, children,

17:57

whatever. So... So

18:01

as I kind of

18:03

was percolating on this, you know, when

18:05

this Mar-a-Lago raid happened, I

18:08

believe that one thing

18:10

that everyone should be looking at is

18:12

that a violation of the Presidential Records

18:14

Act indicates intent to evade official accountability.

18:17

I mean, that's the argument that Jack

18:19

Smith or whatever his name is, you

18:22

know, attests and hence why

18:25

they raided Mar-a-Lago, right?

18:27

So the intent

18:29

to evade official accountability therefore

18:32

means that action should be

18:34

considered unofficial. But official

18:37

acts are very specific, meaning

18:39

that there's no hidden agenda

18:41

and it's very difficult for

18:43

one to actually make the

18:45

assertion that that's not an

18:47

official duty. Like even Quid

18:50

Projo's discussion with Poroshenko on

18:52

that stage, well not Poroshenko, where he was like reflecting

18:54

years later, I think it was like with the Atlantic

18:56

Council where he was like, yeah, you know, I kind

18:59

of told him you want a million dollars, you better

19:01

get this done. I got the

19:03

authorization. Other people will

19:05

tell you that that's, you know,

19:07

part and parcel with strong arming,

19:09

even though it's methically dubious,

19:13

people might argue that. But here

19:15

I am to tell you, there's no

19:17

room for that argument because of the

19:19

way the events unfolded and what is

19:21

located in Hunter Biden's laptop. So

19:24

going further on this article, the

19:26

PRA, as we know, ensures that

19:28

all official actions are documented and

19:31

preserved. It mandates that any official

19:33

communication or action taken by the

19:35

president, and when I say president,

19:37

I mean vice president and immediate

19:39

staff, right? Because that's the way

19:42

the law is worded, must be

19:44

recorded and maintained so that people

19:46

can scrutinize it later. Now, routing

19:48

communications through private emails and foreign

19:51

servers indicates a deliberate attempt to

19:53

avoid this requirement when

19:55

presidential communications are conducted outside of

19:58

official channels and not preserved. as

20:00

a PRA requires, it suggests a

20:02

conscious effort to circumvent the law's

20:05

intent. This

20:07

is where we can ping back to

20:09

James Comey about the emails and intent,

20:11

right? So this

20:13

is particularly concerning when the

20:15

communications are routed to private

20:17

emails and foreign servers, which

20:19

are inherently less secure and

20:21

less subject to US governmental

20:24

oversight. And such actions raise

20:26

significant red flags about the

20:28

motives behind these communication. Now,

20:30

the deliberate use of private

20:33

channels to conduct official business

20:35

undermines the actual foundation of

20:37

the Presidential Records Act. And

20:39

this act of circumventing official

20:41

channels violates the law's letter

20:43

and spirit rooted in transparency

20:46

and accountability. Intentionally

20:48

avoiding official documentation suggests

20:50

an intent to evade

20:52

scrutiny and prevent responsibility

20:55

for potentially controversial or

20:57

unlawful activities. That

20:59

was actually founded and

21:02

discussed, get this, in

21:04

the Clinton versus Jones case in 1997. So there is no

21:06

question about

21:10

it. No question about it. So

21:13

here, let me

21:15

see if I can pull this

21:17

up bigger. Here, you will see

21:19

that there's an email. Why is

21:21

this coming up? Okay. Here,

21:23

let me see. Can I zoom into this? Oh, well,

21:25

I could probably just go zoom. Here,

21:28

we can see an email that

21:30

was sent by 67 string

21:32

ray at gmx.com, which is

21:34

Peter Henderson, which is, you

21:37

know, Joe Biden's, you

21:40

know, German intelligence server

21:42

email off

21:45

of a video that was done. And

21:47

you will see it was an Ohi video.

21:49

So it was, you

21:51

know, about the day of no for October

21:53

28 2016. And it was forwarded to Hunter.

21:56

And as you You

22:00

can see John Flynn, who

22:02

arranged most of these meetings,

22:04

FlynnJS17 at yahoo.com, was

22:09

the one that had sent that message to 67

22:12

Stingray. This

22:14

is quite important because this is where

22:16

we see the first indication of using

22:18

the German ISP provider that's

22:21

linked with German intelligence. Peter Henderson

22:23

was his incognito email between him

22:25

and Obama. And

22:28

Biden used this German ISP

22:30

provider. Furthermore,

22:32

when you route communications to foreign

22:34

servers to evade detection by the

22:37

NSA and other national security agencies,

22:39

this also exasperates the issue of

22:41

evasion of communication

22:43

detection. And these indicate

22:46

not just the intent to avoid

22:48

public accountability, but also

22:50

an effort to conceal communications

22:53

from domestic security and intelligence

22:55

oversight. This poses a

22:57

significant risk to the national security

22:59

of our nation, but also undermines

23:02

the integrity of what the presidential

23:04

office should stand for. So

23:06

foreign servers could

23:09

expose sensitive information to

23:11

adversaries, highlighting these

23:13

communications, unofficial and

23:16

potentially illicit nature. And

23:19

here we see another email on

23:21

your screen where it has GMX,

23:24

again, Joe Biden, communicating

23:26

with all these people

23:28

about the article about

23:32

Clinton's and the Emirates. So

23:35

they were sharing information about,

23:38

you know, Clinton's top

23:40

aid, paid to negotiate a private

23:42

deal in the Wall

23:44

Street Journal article. So here it's

23:46

being shared with everyone in the

23:49

family from Joe Biden about how

23:51

Hillary Clinton got caught. It's

23:55

essential to get background to things

23:57

that have occurred as used.

24:00

the people understand that the

24:02

importance of information being provided

24:04

today in SCOTUS' decision on

24:06

presidential immunity draws an

24:08

actual line between official

24:10

and unofficial duties. This

24:13

article, as

24:15

I said before, I've been working on for

24:17

a very, very long time. And

24:19

it has over a decade's

24:21

work of monitoring, observing, and

24:23

collating information to shed light

24:25

on a well-coordinated effort among

24:28

agencies that are loyal to

24:30

whatever plan they have to

24:32

abuse their position of power. Now,

24:35

while this may come off as a very staunch,

24:39

you know, statement and, like

24:42

I said in my article, robust assertation, you will

24:45

understand why this assertation

24:48

is actually valid. So,

24:52

as you know, I have mentioned many,

24:54

many times before the

24:56

appalling, unprecedented

25:00

declaration on January 6,

25:03

2017 by Jay Johnson. And

25:05

specifically, it is because, you know,

25:08

how he created SISA. But I wanted

25:10

to give you better context so you

25:12

understand what I'm saying. So,

25:14

it's more comprehensible because this

25:17

is to demonstrate to you one

25:21

thing that happened that is exactly

25:23

like another. So, hopefully you

25:25

can follow along. As

25:28

we know, DHS was created in 2002,

25:30

obviously, because of the 9-11 attacks, right?

25:32

We all know this with the whole

25:34

Patriot Act and all that jizz. Now,

25:38

SISA was created to oversee

25:40

cybersecurity, a federal

25:43

and civilian executive branch networks and

25:46

critical infrastructure. Key point, federal,

25:49

civilian, and executive

25:51

branch networks and critical

25:54

infrastructure. Federal,

25:57

civilian, executive branch,

26:00

branch and

26:02

critical infrastructure. Now

26:05

federal, we know what that is. Agencies,

26:07

blah, blah, blah. Civilian, what's

26:09

that? Private companies,

26:12

UNI, executive branch, the

26:14

presidential office, and

26:18

their networks. And critical infrastructure, you

26:20

mean like power grids and water

26:22

plants and down, down, down, down.

26:25

Satellites, whatever, whatever, whatever. Well,

26:27

space force would tend to disagree. No,

26:29

thank you. But while

26:31

DHS and Siza play significant roles

26:34

right now in the

26:36

broader contracts of federal cybersecurity, including

26:39

protecting critical infrastructure and ensuring

26:41

secure communication across government networks,

26:44

the direct oversight of

26:46

presidential communications, particularly

26:48

those of highly sensitive and

26:50

classified nature, remains primarily with

26:53

agencies like the NSA and

26:55

the White House Communications Agency. Now,

27:01

during the transition of President Barack Obama, the

27:06

transition period where Obama had to let go

27:08

of the reins and hand them over to

27:10

President Trump, he was extremely

27:12

salty. I think I was the only

27:14

person that had made

27:17

it clear that the problems

27:19

that he was gonna have and the

27:21

problems that he was having during his

27:24

campaign and election period was part of

27:26

the PTT, the Presidential Transition Team. And

27:29

this is extremely important and highlighted

27:31

and even reinforced with the action that

27:33

I'm about to voice to you. And

27:35

these are just two of many. So

27:39

first of all, the announcement by then

27:41

Secretary of Homeland Security, Jay Johnson, on

27:43

January 6, 2017, to

27:46

designate US election

27:48

infrastructure as critical infrastructure,

27:52

as a sub-sector of critical

27:55

infrastructure is extremely important. And

27:57

the reason is because this

27:59

was... done during the presidential

28:02

transition period. Now

28:04

it is unprecedented for such

28:06

declaration and substantial changes to

28:08

government and operations and

28:11

positions to occur during

28:13

the presidential transition team. So

28:15

that was one, January 6, 2017, Jay Johnson

28:17

comes down and he's like, yep, yep, Siza

28:19

and elections and we're taking over things. You

28:22

can have the government now, President Trump. But

28:25

before that, the other key point

28:27

that people need to remember is

28:30

that during the transition period,

28:32

President Barack Hussein Obama changed

28:36

something that is very

28:39

sensitive. He changed

28:41

and made that the IG

28:43

of the NSA position was no

28:45

longer kind of the way

28:47

it was with the IG's picking

28:50

it, but it was a

28:52

presidential appointment. When you make vital

28:54

decisions during that time period,

28:57

that should be looked at very,

28:59

very fine tooth comb because

29:02

of the sensitive nature

29:04

of transition of power.

29:06

And we all know

29:08

Barack Hussein Obama and

29:11

the agencies, his

29:14

agencies did not

29:16

want President Trump in office. We

29:19

saw this. Yet he

29:21

was allowed to affect the

29:24

next president by making these

29:26

changes. None of your media

29:28

talked about it because real

29:33

journalism guys really

29:36

doesn't exist. Most

29:39

of the people that put out information put

29:42

out information to suit their agenda. They

29:44

like this guy. They don't like this guy.

29:47

They like this gal. They don't like this

29:49

gal. Have lobbyists paid them to talk about

29:51

the topic. Do they appreciate the topic?

29:53

Is it natural to them? Is it something

29:56

they like? I'm going to tell you now. sponsored

30:01

and every single one of them is part of a

30:03

click and we're talking both left and right. So what

30:05

makes you think that they're gonna give you unfettered,

30:10

pure news? They're

30:12

not. They

30:14

are not because nobody

30:16

talked about this. Nobody talked

30:19

about Carlin. Nobody talked about

30:21

all of these discretionary changes

30:24

and these subtle things that

30:27

already told you where President

30:29

Trump's administration was

30:31

heading to and what they

30:33

were going up against. Nobody

30:36

did. And those that did

30:38

were quickly silenced if

30:40

they couldn't be bought. And the only reason

30:43

they would buy you is because your voice is

30:45

big enough. I mean, I could

30:47

tell you I've cleaned up over three and

30:49

a half thousand emails yesterday that were just

30:51

that. Offering the opportunities to

30:53

partner with people and or sponsorships

30:55

and or, hey, I like to

30:58

introduce you to the staff or

31:00

obviously they went into junk or

31:02

delete and I've done that. Because

31:05

this is the problem that we have.

31:07

People that actually speak the truth are

31:09

locked up, dead

31:12

and even worse.

31:15

The only people that are still around are the people

31:17

that they don't know

31:19

what they have and

31:22

taking them out would be more dangerous because

31:25

what if it all came

31:27

out? So let's

31:29

go back to the article that was awkward. So

31:34

the announcement

31:37

after he did this was particularly

31:40

during that transition period

31:42

was something that's

31:44

never happened before. He created,

31:46

he captured elections under DHS's

31:48

authority because he said so.

31:50

There was no congressional act.

31:53

He just exercised and flexed himself

31:56

as he saw fit. He decided that he's

31:59

making this. And that's the way it

32:01

goes. So what's

32:04

funny is, is that he created

32:07

something called

32:09

the Protected Critical Infrastructure Information

32:11

Program. And that's actually managed

32:13

by CISA within

32:15

the Department of DHS. And it's

32:17

designed to enhance information sharing between

32:20

private sector and the government. Pay

32:22

attention to this point, okay? Private

32:25

sector and the government. The

32:29

program, and I want you to hear this

32:31

very carefully, offers

32:34

legal protections for

32:36

sensitive information about

32:39

critical infrastructure voluntarily

32:41

shared with the government,

32:44

ensuring that such information

32:47

is not publicly disclosed and

32:49

used solely for Homeland

32:52

Security purposes. Now, I wanna

32:55

take you back in time. Pay

32:57

attention. So private

32:59

companies like Facebook, like Think

33:02

of America, like Twitter,

33:05

right? Now,

33:08

critical infrastructure. When you think of

33:11

infrastructure, you think of bridges, roads,

33:13

you know? But apparently, according to

33:15

the laws, it involves breastfeeding and

33:19

people that wanna protest and

33:21

power grids and people

33:23

that don't like what the government has to

33:25

say. I hope

33:28

you're catching it. This

33:30

is where you can see how everything

33:34

Christopher Wray has been telling you all

33:36

this time. It has been accurate

33:38

100%, but the feeble little minds of

33:42

the talking heads, even the ones that

33:44

you have on high pedestals, can't

33:47

wrap their minds around it, unfortunately.

33:50

So when you wanna see why an

33:53

account will be banned from Twitter

33:55

or suspended temporarily when they put

33:57

out critical information about someone else,

34:01

Their accounts are suspended because

34:03

the law says so, the federal

34:05

law says so. They capture all

34:07

their communications. And if it

34:09

has not violated the rules

34:11

of X or

34:14

Facebook, then they will let

34:16

the account come back. Now,

34:18

this is usually done when someone calls out

34:20

and screams out something like, holy crap, I

34:23

just found this Senator on a video with

34:25

a little child. How do you

34:27

know it's not AI? You don't, right? This

34:30

is where we're going with this. Pay attention to what I'm

34:32

telling you. So what do they do? They

34:35

capture the video. They check to see. Is

34:37

it a modified video? Is it edited? Is

34:40

it real? And can we

34:42

find locations and data and metadata on

34:44

both the people, the victim and the

34:46

perpetrator? Are they real? Because

34:50

this just happened today. This is why I'm giving it as

34:52

an example. Once they pull

34:54

all the data and

34:56

once they verify that it's real, they

34:59

can't do anything, but obviously

35:01

they can shut it down if the child's

35:03

identity hasn't been concealed or anything

35:06

like that. Or if it's false and

35:08

it's AI, well, that person has a big

35:10

problem on their hands. So

35:14

going back to the article, now

35:17

that you understand why Twitter and Facebook

35:19

give away your information, it's

35:21

because it's baked into what

35:25

DHS did with

35:27

SISA, with the PCII program

35:31

and critical infrastructure information.

35:36

Almost like protected critical

35:38

information, PCI. See

35:40

I kind of butted heads a little

35:42

bit with Garrett when we had this

35:44

exchange, when I wrote my article about

35:46

Joe Biden's

35:48

identity and there are

35:51

so many misinformation pieces

35:54

out there talking about PCI.gov. Now

35:58

it's important that we understand. on why

36:00

this is so and why

36:02

this existed. So

36:07

the primary goal of the

36:09

PCII program is to protect

36:11

critical infrastructure information from public

36:14

disclosure under the Freedom

36:16

of Information Act and other state

36:18

and local disclosure laws. Meaning that

36:20

if Bank of America decides

36:22

to give your information to

36:25

the police because I don't know,

36:27

you were somewhere and

36:29

they never asked for it. They just handed

36:31

it over, right? Said, oh, we're gonna be

36:34

a good bank and give you everybody's data

36:36

that was there, right? Everybody's, right? You

36:39

can't fly that shit. In fact, they

36:41

can confirm that someone gave it to them

36:44

but they can't tell you how it was

36:46

done and why it was done and who

36:48

prompted it. So if you're pissing someone off

36:50

in social media or at your bank, like

36:54

key bank, CCP bank, anyway,

36:57

they will do things to make

37:00

sure that they can protect their

37:02

identities when they do it. This

37:04

protection encourages that private entities, people

37:07

in companies share information

37:09

about vulnerabilities and threats

37:12

without the fear of public

37:14

exposure or misuse of regulatory

37:16

actions and civil litigation. In

37:19

other words, there

37:21

could be no private company or

37:23

private entity providing any information and

37:25

they'll just make that shit up

37:27

and claim, well, we're protecting our

37:30

source. Are you

37:32

picking up what I'm putting down right now? Thank

37:35

you. I hope you

37:37

are because it's very important. Now, the

37:40

predecessor to PCI is PCI and

37:42

you're gonna be like, but it

37:44

doesn't match. Mm,

37:46

kinda, kinda. But

37:50

before the creation of SISA, it

37:52

was asserted that domains such as

37:54

PCI.gov existed as precursors to the

37:57

formal establishment of the PCII program.

38:00

These would have been aimed at

38:02

managing and protecting critical infrastructure information.

38:05

The PCI program as it

38:07

stands today formalizes these efforts under

38:10

regulated framework, ensuring that the information

38:12

shared between the private sector

38:15

and the government are safeguarded. Now

38:18

going further to that, I need people to

38:20

understand. There's a lot of

38:22

people that are saying, oh, PCI.gov is

38:25

like bullshit. It was just created to

38:27

give a false thing of them having

38:29

protected emails. Well actually, it

38:33

was exactly that. It wasn't fake though.

38:36

We have to have a better understanding.

38:38

The PCI.gov is a way that they

38:40

cloaked. For

38:46

those of you that are iPhone users, let me make it easy.

38:50

When you sign up to subscriptions and stuff, it says, do

38:52

you want to hide your email? If you

38:54

sign up for something or do you

38:56

want to show it? If you hide it,

38:58

it gives them this bullshit email that only

39:01

iCloud knows is yours. That

39:03

way you can cover it up. This is

39:05

basically what PCI.gov did. It

39:07

gave emails that would cloak the real

39:09

email for security purposes

39:12

because they're communications with foreign

39:14

governments and foreign entities too by

39:16

DHS. This

39:19

was done during the

39:21

tenure of Obama and Vice President

39:23

Biden. But

39:26

that still doesn't offer clarity on

39:29

why they use German intelligence service

39:31

for communication. And again, I

39:33

point out to you, there

39:35

is no real media. There

39:37

is no person that understands

39:39

this enough to explain

39:41

it to you. Those are two different things,

39:43

but for some reason, everybody

39:45

and their mother is co-mingling

39:48

the GMX emails and

39:50

the PCI.gov when they are completely

39:52

two separate issues. They

39:54

were two separate issues and what

39:57

they're doing is they're completing it either

39:59

because they're idiots. It's kind of

40:01

like Red State that

40:03

said Mikola Zatovsky was a

40:05

fucking Russian agent, right? Because

40:07

they're idiots, or it's because

40:10

they're doing it on purpose to

40:13

cover up an ethical and legal acts conducted

40:15

by the Obama administration. And that's happened before.

40:17

So here's where I'm gonna prove that to

40:20

you. So I have

40:22

told you guys that my period

40:25

of time when I worked for the

40:27

Obama administration, and I have

40:29

also made clear to you about the

40:31

dismissal of Dennis Blair on other occasions.

40:33

So what happens is that, during

40:36

Barack Obama's administration, John

40:39

Owen Brennan served as the deputy

40:42

national security advisor for Homeland Security

40:44

and Counterterrorism, right? He

40:46

was involved in various covert operations,

40:48

set up a lot of companies,

40:50

right? Remember, he was the advisor

40:53

to Senator Obama before he became

40:55

president Obama. Now, he

40:58

was initially tapped to lead the CIA,

41:01

but withdrew due to opposition, bullshit.

41:03

He wasn't done doing what he

41:06

was doing, that's why. So

41:08

instead, he was like a critical

41:11

advisor where he

41:13

was involved in Counterterrorism, allegedly. But

41:16

here's the thing, Brennan not

41:18

only created private global companies, for

41:21

five eyes, nine eyes, 14, et

41:23

cetera, et cetera, around

41:25

the world, right? But he

41:28

created agencies and sub-agencies without formal

41:30

charters. Now, what does that mean?

41:33

That means, if the president

41:35

decides to have five people

41:38

working for him to spy

41:40

on Americans, right? He's

41:43

not gonna say, I'm creating a local

41:45

spy agency because it's illegal, they'll

41:47

just work. And if they

41:49

get caught, they'll say, oh, they were doing something else. Well,

41:52

this is exactly what happened. So,

41:56

entities that he has

41:58

created. And

42:00

so as tenant and many others,

42:03

right, we're in like these

42:05

legally gray areas. They

42:08

would engage in surveilling

42:10

US citizens, you know,

42:12

to get back at them. We can go back to the Tea

42:14

Party shit, you know, and

42:16

everything that happened with Enron as well. Now,

42:19

they're to gather intelligence on

42:21

people with information about ambiguous

42:24

activities that are funded by

42:26

US taxpayer dollars. Basically,

42:28

anyone that was calling shit out or

42:31

anyone that was investigating real journalism, right,

42:34

it had started to choke after 9-11.

42:37

And these were one of the ways that they would choke

42:39

it. I mean, I got fired

42:41

and I thought I was slick. But anyway,

42:46

so I want to bring the

42:48

group that I used to work

42:50

with. A notable incident occurred when

42:52

Dennis Blair, the then director of

42:54

national intelligence inadvertently mentioned

42:56

these operations in an interview. In

42:58

fact, he didn't say much of the operations. He

43:01

just said the high value intelligence group, what

43:03

people called HVIG or HIG, which was, which

43:05

I was actually a part of it. And

43:10

that led to his dismissal, legit. He said

43:12

it, resign, bitch. Now,

43:15

what happened was the

43:17

problem that the media saw at the time

43:19

when they were alleging accountability, right, and

43:21

this was the Republicans pushing back and forth, because

43:23

what people don't realize is that these two parties,

43:26

work together. And

43:28

so when they call out what the

43:31

other party is doing wrong, but not

43:33

hold them accountable, they

43:37

tend to smack them. Hey, you got to, you got to

43:39

fix this. This was a hole in it going forward. This

43:42

is how we patch it. We got to do

43:44

this. You understand? So

43:48

this is how they auto correct themselves

43:50

in the public eye while alleging scrutiny

43:52

and, oh, look what they're doing. They're

43:54

all working together. Now,

44:01

I remember that, you know, Obama's

44:03

people along with Brennan had a

44:06

shit fit. When that went down,

44:08

I was actually, oh, CONUS,

44:13

completing an assignment. And it

44:15

was the most insane thing because they

44:17

were trying to cover up that

44:20

he had an agency within

44:22

his White House that had

44:24

no charter, that had no

44:26

oversight, no budget, no nothing,

44:29

right? So, this is what

44:31

prompted John Brennan to

44:33

oversee the capture of Senate and

44:35

Congressional communication networks, right? Because

44:38

they got busted, okay?

44:41

So, this is where he caught Senate

44:43

and Congressional servers. Now, if you all

44:45

remember, I told you Shadowgate was my

44:47

idea. I pitched it to Millie and,

44:49

you know, she was saying, oh, you're

44:51

handling me. Maybe I was. Maybe I

44:53

was giving you real information because I

44:55

wanted you to be a journalist. But

44:57

this part I gave her, right?

44:59

And it's in the Shadowgate thing, right? Where

45:03

not only did Brennan capture Senate and

45:05

Congressional communications, but he was housing them

45:07

in Germany. I

45:10

repeat, in Germany. And this

45:12

is showing the trademark details,

45:14

but you can also see

45:16

on USSpending.gov, where all the

45:18

government receipts are, that we

45:21

are actually paying to store

45:23

the Congressional Knowledge database,

45:26

right? The management system, everything

45:29

in Germany, okay? So,

45:32

this is all being stored in Germany.

45:34

So, everything Congress and Senate talks about

45:37

is housed in Germany. Now, is

45:39

it housed by Talia? You

45:42

know, through there, I mean, we can always open

45:45

up Hurricane and Electric and take a look, but

45:47

that goes above a lot of people's heads. So,

45:49

I digress. But having said

45:51

that, this is exactly

45:53

the same notion that

45:56

they got caught with PCII,

45:58

right? people

46:00

understood that, they knew

46:02

that, and it was very subtle, no

46:05

one talked about it, therefore we create

46:07

the PCII, and that kind of patches

46:09

it up. Like it was a predecessor,

46:11

there was a charter, we were kind of doing it.

46:13

So I want people to understand

46:15

that they had an

46:18

agency off the books like PCI,

46:20

which was legit, right? Presidential Communications

46:22

infrastructure, but also doubled as very

46:28

important information that they need

46:30

to maintain under the radar, that's

46:34

basically it. So it

46:36

is important that all of us understand how

46:39

they operate. I'm showing you methods right now.

46:41

Now, I want you

46:44

then to then think and understand, and please

46:47

listen to me when I tell you this. James

46:51

Clapper, John Brennan, and the other

46:53

49 spies that

46:55

lied will never admit

46:57

to the lie. They will

46:59

never admit that they lied about

47:01

Hunter's laptop, because what

47:03

people don't seem to understand is that

47:07

Hunter Biden's laptop implicates

47:09

a shit ton of agencies, a

47:12

bunch of officials, a bunch of

47:14

different governments, and it

47:16

destroys every single bit of

47:18

credibility of the US

47:20

government, which in turn is

47:23

a tremendous national security risk. Like, you know,

47:26

your enemy nations are watching you and they're

47:28

like, holy crap, like this is a banana

47:30

republic. These guys are idiots. They're going to

47:32

be eaten alive by their people. How can

47:35

we charge these people and fund something so

47:37

we could destroy them so the enemy is

47:39

destroyed from within? This is what your enemy

47:42

is thinking. How do you

47:44

do it? You go from

47:46

inside. How do you destroy a tank from the

47:48

inside, right? So

47:51

even though they lied, the lie

47:53

has been forced

47:55

on them for national security reason.

47:57

So you have to appreciate it.

48:00

that. Even though it's completely wrong,

48:02

we have to appreciate that. And

48:06

I'm not making excuses because they're all out,

48:08

right? They're all done. They're toast. But

48:11

I want to explain it to you so that

48:13

you understand it because people

48:16

don't seem to want to know

48:18

the truth. They like to know

48:20

what's meme-y and, you know, fun.

48:24

Now, given the context of

48:26

what I told you in regards to PCI and

48:28

the explanation provided

48:30

by US officials and their

48:32

conduit, I want you to

48:34

understand that it's very clear that the

48:37

choice of words and

48:39

underlying tensions are in these statements

48:41

that they've made. James

48:44

Comey himself highlighted intent

48:46

is critical in determining

48:48

criminal activity, demonstrated by

48:50

multiple factors, not just a single

48:53

instance. That's why Hillary was innocent,

48:55

of course. So let's

48:57

take a look at what the

49:00

SCOTUS decision tells us about what

49:02

we find in Hunter Biden's laptop.

49:06

Involvement of non-official entities.

49:09

Now, it

49:12

is very important to restate

49:15

that non-official entities in communications

49:17

stops, will actually

49:19

support the declaration that

49:22

communication is unofficial. For example,

49:25

if I'm having communications with my

49:27

attorney and my boyfriend decides to

49:29

hop into the phone call, at

49:31

that point, it is no longer

49:33

official communication and covered by

49:35

attorney-client privilege. In

49:37

the same essence, if President

49:39

Trump was on a phone call and I'm not

49:41

employed by him in any shape or form or

49:43

capacity, I just walk in and I hang out

49:45

and I'm like, yo guys, and I say it

49:48

on the speakerphone, at that point, that

49:50

conversation is no longer in his

49:52

official capacity. It's in unofficial capacity.

49:55

Does that make sense? All

49:58

right. So having Having

50:00

said that, official communications

50:02

involved interactions with government

50:04

officials and agencies to

50:06

ensure adherence to established

50:08

protocols and accountability standards,

50:11

almost like the attorney-client

50:13

privilege. So when private

50:15

individuals or foreign actors not engaged

50:17

in diplomatic roles are part of

50:19

these communications, the exchanges serve as

50:22

personal or political purposes

50:25

rather than official executive

50:27

office duties. I

50:30

hope you see where I'm going with this. Now

50:32

over here, you're going to see an email on

50:34

your screen. Let me see if I can make

50:37

this bigger for you. And

50:40

again, this is from John Flynn, 17

50:42

at Yahoo, but this time he

50:44

sends it from the office of the

50:46

vice president, executive office of

50:48

the president.gov. So

50:50

he's like, I don't know, scheduler. So

50:53

he's working with both. I've gotten a few

50:55

of these emails myself. So

50:58

here he is, a subject Friday

51:01

schedule card, May 26, 2016, 7

51:03

0 8 PM. He

51:05

sends out an email to Robert

51:08

Peters, the cloaked email, official

51:10

cloaked email by the government

51:12

cloaked. So it's fair. He

51:15

can use that. That's what PCI

51:17

is for to protect his actual

51:19

email address, right? So protected

51:22

email address captured by PCI.gov to

51:24

not allow other entities to see

51:27

what email it is. He

51:29

sends him, but he also sees these Hunter

51:31

at a private company about a

51:34

meeting boss 8

51:37

45 AM prep for 9 AM

51:39

phone call with president Poroshenko. Then

51:42

we're off to Rhode Island for infrastructure

51:44

event. And then Wilmington for

51:47

university of Delaware commencement. It

51:49

will have your draft remarks delivered later

51:52

tonight or with your press

51:54

clips in the morning, respectfully, John. Now

51:57

in that document that's attached to it is

51:59

a debris. for

52:01

the scheduled call with President

52:03

Poroshenko, the President of

52:06

Ukraine, with Hunter Biden on

52:08

that communication. Are you seeing that?

52:10

So now, as we

52:13

see that, why would

52:15

Hunter Biden be cc'd on

52:17

official communications with the President

52:19

of Ukraine and given

52:21

a rundown debrief doc of what's

52:24

going to be discussed? That sounds

52:26

unofficial, but with official

52:28

resources and official results.

52:31

Okay? Like, you get

52:34

this now? So the non-involvement,

52:36

and this is where it gets

52:38

fun, the non-involvement of non-official entities

52:40

in these communications further

52:43

supports such communications unofficial

52:45

nature. So those were unofficial.

52:48

Immediately, the minute Hunter Biden was put on

52:50

it, since he's not a diplomat, unless they

52:52

admit that he was actually working

52:54

as a front for the CIA, he's not

52:56

protected. Therefore, Vice President

52:59

Biden made officially

53:04

funded acts and

53:07

actions and discussions with his

53:09

official capacity for unofficial

53:12

reasons. So again,

53:15

official communications is mandated by the

53:17

presidential record to actually involve interactions

53:19

with government officials and agency directly

53:22

related to executing presidential or vice

53:24

presidential duties. Communications extend

53:27

to private individuals or foreign

53:29

actors in a non-diplomatic capacity.

53:31

They fall outside of

53:34

official, presidential, or vice presidential

53:36

responsibilities. Now, this deviation from

53:38

standard protocol indicates that communications

53:40

and questions are not part

53:43

of the president's official duties,

53:46

but serve personal and

53:48

political interests. And I will demonstrate that to

53:50

you. I will show

53:52

this to you because I have been

53:54

walking through all of this for

53:56

every one of you for so many years. And I have

53:58

been so. frustrated with

54:00

the potato of an

54:03

alt media, right media, left media.

54:05

No one's in the middle to say, hey,

54:07

yo, hold on a second. Because I even

54:09

reference the stuff they say about Jared Kushner

54:11

in this article. So it's important that we

54:13

bring it up. So official

54:15

acts versus non-official acts. This is

54:18

the distinction. This is what happened

54:20

with the Supreme Court. The distinction

54:23

between official acts and

54:27

unofficial act is critical to

54:30

understand executive office communications. Understand when

54:32

the president and the vice president

54:34

are talking about shit that pertains

54:36

to themselves. Is it politically motivated,

54:39

you know, privately motivated, you know, family issues,

54:42

or is it just like line their pockets,

54:44

right? So such as

54:46

the president's family members in

54:48

sensitive communications with foreign leaders.

54:50

Here, that distinction was

54:52

also pulled in the Nixon

54:54

versus Fitzgerald case. And it

54:56

provides that a sitting president

54:58

or vice president is entitled

55:00

to absolute immunity, get this,

55:02

for civil damages for actions

55:04

taken within the outer perimeter

55:07

of his official responsibility. So one

55:10

might argue, and they do,

55:12

that Joe Biden was just

55:14

like in the outer perimeter

55:16

of his official responsibilities, which

55:20

includes constitutional statutory duties. No, he wasn't.

55:22

And I'm going to prove it to

55:24

you right after we go through this

55:26

article. Okay, I'm going to show you,

55:28

because sometimes, you know, people are very

55:30

visual. Unfortunately, the people

55:32

of today have the attention span

55:35

of a fash, hence why TikTok

55:37

so popular. So here's

55:40

what happened. The United

55:42

States Supreme Court today reinforced

55:44

that ruling and made it

55:46

further hardcore. In the context

55:48

of Hunter Biden, who had

55:51

no official role in his

55:53

father administration, his communications with

55:55

foreign leaders determine their nature.

55:57

So since Hunter Biden was not a

55:59

government official, His involvement

56:01

in such communication could not

56:04

be part of any official

56:06

duty. Well, it was part of the quid

56:08

pro joe, but we'll get into that later. So

56:11

official presidential communications involve

56:14

policy discussions, diplomatic negotiations,

56:16

and national security matters

56:19

conducted by designated officials.

56:21

Again, highly outlined

56:24

in the Nixon versus Fitzgerald case. But

56:26

here, the media and

56:28

the Obama Biden camp and the

56:30

people that think President Trump is

56:32

the devil, or people that think

56:35

Jared Kushner is like some evil

56:37

Jew. I like the

56:39

theories are insane, right? The

56:42

theories are insane, completely

56:44

insane. They

56:47

keep complaining about Jared Kushner's involvement

56:49

in such communications. He

56:52

helped bring the Abraham Accords to the table,

56:54

right? But there's no merit because

56:56

Kushner had an official position in

56:59

the Trump administration. Hunter Biden never did.

57:02

In fact, Joe Biden said, I never

57:04

knew what he was. No,

57:06

Joe, we have those recordings. I

57:10

can't wait. So this is

57:12

where we're going to get into these recordings. Now, as

57:15

we all know, everyone, all the

57:17

shilly ones and the really maggot

57:19

cringe people that were talking about

57:21

things they don't understand, were like,

57:23

John Durham. Yeah, he's so busy.

57:25

He hasn't finished yet. I'll tell

57:28

you why. So we

57:30

all know EDNY, Eastern District of New York. Well,

57:32

there's people there that you probably don't

57:34

know by name, but I'm very sure

57:36

that John Durham does. So

57:39

let's talk about Andrei Derkasz. He's

57:41

a Ukrainian politician who apparently lied

57:44

about the laptop and also stated

57:46

was a Russian agent. And

57:51

they indicted him for violating US sanctions. His

57:55

actions were part of the

57:57

broader falsely purported by the

57:59

same. 51 spies who

58:01

lied on alleged disinformation

58:03

campaign to influence the 2020

58:05

US presidential election. In

58:08

other words, this guy leaked a

58:10

couple of calls that we're gonna get into at

58:12

the end of this, kind

58:16

of walkthrough, right? Which

58:19

everyone purported were edited, which they

58:21

were because they were leaks of

58:23

three different calls. And

58:25

everyone kind of just, right?

58:28

To the side because they couldn't get clicks because

58:30

people are just, people

58:32

were too dumb to know. Actually, no, you were

58:35

too dumb not to know what to say. That's

58:37

the thing. People aren't stupid, but you know, some

58:40

of the audience that follow these people. So,

58:44

well, so it's good

58:47

right now that

58:50

we have John Durham there because he's

58:52

watching Breon's fantastic, he should have his

58:54

own clean talk. Breon should have

58:56

a clean talk for cleaning

58:59

up shit for the Obama administration. I

59:01

mean, cleaning up the Malaysian stuff, cleaning

59:03

up the leaked phone calls. I

59:06

mean, what else is he working on? Now,

59:11

the call that he put in there that I

59:13

referenced is

59:18

actually discussed in the email to which

59:20

Hunter Biden was invited to sit in

59:22

and briefed on the executive office. So,

59:25

the email where he's like invited to

59:27

this meeting, and

59:31

whatever, well, those phone calls were

59:33

recorded too. So, so, so,

59:36

so. One

59:39

has to wonder, where's Andre?

59:41

I mean, they're just lawfaring the crap out

59:43

of him right now. Sanction

59:45

him here and there. What

59:48

all he did was open, official, took

59:53

the communications because if the United

59:55

States records conversations between two presidents,

59:57

you don't think Ukraine does that?

1:00:01

So, like I said, if it

1:00:03

was my idea, I'd hire an actor

1:00:05

that danced in heels to pretend he's

1:00:07

president, totally take advantage of it while

1:00:09

his wife buys a Bugatti while they're

1:00:11

supposedly poor. Totally. Just

1:00:13

to troll the shit out of everyone to

1:00:15

be like, damn, you're still not waking up

1:00:17

after this. You're still listening to these politicians.

1:00:19

You're still okay with this. But I digress.

1:00:23

So, Andre Durkheim released audio

1:00:25

of conversations of then Vice

1:00:27

President Biden conversing with President

1:00:29

Poroshenko throughout the months

1:00:31

of 2016 into which Hunter

1:00:33

Biden was also involved at

1:00:35

least once on these phone calls.

1:00:39

Now, well, actually the first one that I'm going to

1:00:41

play for you, he was on it. But

1:00:46

I mean, uh, evidence.

1:00:50

Just saying, but

1:00:53

you'll see what I mean. So

1:00:55

the Vice President was conversing with him

1:00:57

and had these phone calls, the

1:01:00

law fair and the target right

1:01:02

now that's on Durkheim's back is insane.

1:01:04

He's a whistleblower for the Ukrainian government

1:01:07

and has deterred, you know, any

1:01:09

further commentary for him. Right.

1:01:13

And Rudy Giuliani actually spoke with him. This is why

1:01:15

they hate Rudy. That's why they went after him. But

1:01:17

as someone like myself who has spent time prior

1:01:20

to my erasure, right? My

1:01:23

disappearance and having one

1:01:25

of the Hunter Biden laptops in whole

1:01:27

and parts of the others, I

1:01:29

can piece this together for you. So

1:01:32

there's an audio that I'm going

1:01:34

to play and the media and

1:01:36

the US government employed one of

1:01:39

the founders of the disinformation initiatives

1:01:41

that originated in Ukraine, Nina Yakowitz

1:01:43

to take flight on this. I

1:01:46

want you to listen very carefully to what I'm going to tell you now.

1:01:50

And the Ministry of truth. Yes,

1:01:53

DHS created it. I just demonstrated to

1:01:55

you how they put it in there

1:01:58

with the critical infrastructure. demonstrated

1:02:00

to you the protections that they're giving to

1:02:03

private companies that provide this information,

1:02:05

correct? Well, Nina

1:02:07

Jankowicz was in Ukraine doing

1:02:09

all of this back in the day. Ask

1:02:11

me. Now, she's

1:02:13

the one that came up and as you

1:02:15

can see here, says, it's certainly an influence

1:02:18

campaign. I wonder if she's saying when she

1:02:20

did this. Nina Jankowicz,

1:02:22

a disinformation fellow at

1:02:24

the non... I

1:02:26

can't even say nonpartisan without

1:02:28

laughing. Stop. Wilson Center about

1:02:30

these recordings, that the recordings

1:02:33

were completely misleading to an audience that doesn't

1:02:35

have the full picture. You know what? She's

1:02:38

actually right because the majority of the audience

1:02:40

and the right wing media that reported on

1:02:42

this shit totally half-assed this bitch and totally

1:02:44

talked about things that had nothing to do

1:02:46

with what was going on. So I'm going

1:02:48

to put it in order for you, okay?

1:02:51

So that way you already know

1:02:54

what's really going on here. So there

1:02:58

are three distinct recordings. Everyone can see

1:03:00

that because even the recordings that were

1:03:02

actually disseminated by some people that were

1:03:05

independent journalists demonstrated that by

1:03:07

putting the dates of them. So

1:03:09

what Derkosz did, he

1:03:11

released portions of

1:03:13

recordings of multiple recordings. Stop

1:03:16

it. Look, we have everything. Everything.

1:03:20

But in the media, they're

1:03:22

making it look like one phone call. Even though

1:03:25

they know it's three and we're listening to three,

1:03:27

they're just like, no, it's just one and it's

1:03:29

totally disinformation. But

1:03:33

in this, you're going to see that the

1:03:35

US government blackmailed the Ukraine to appoint their

1:03:37

choice of prosecutor in order to obtain the

1:03:39

monies by the IMF that they've required to

1:03:42

deter governmental collapse. It's important

1:03:44

again to note that at least these

1:03:46

three phone calls are in audio and

1:03:48

I'm analyzing it to you today. So

1:03:51

can anyone foyer these communications? Nobody

1:03:53

probably has. Probably not, you know,

1:03:56

but a prosecutor observing clear

1:03:59

as day. blackmail of our

1:04:01

government upon another may have

1:04:04

those communications, right? A prosecutor

1:04:06

may have those communications to

1:04:09

demonstrate how the Obama Biden

1:04:11

administration strong-armed another government for

1:04:13

their benefit. Now you're going to say,

1:04:15

no, strong arming is normal. It's part

1:04:17

and parcel, you know, with the stuff

1:04:20

that happens, you know, everything around here,

1:04:22

whatever happens, it's like, it's normal. We

1:04:24

have to like strong arm these people.

1:04:26

We have to keep them in check.

1:04:28

It must heal, right? Is

1:04:31

that right? Am I saying that right? So

1:04:33

the reason I say this is because that's the

1:04:35

argument they're giving you. They're saying

1:04:37

that it's part and parcel and people

1:04:39

should do it and that's

1:04:42

it and stop complaining and don't

1:04:44

say things that are not right

1:04:47

because, you know, when

1:04:49

he was telling him to put in this

1:04:51

prosecutor, it was fine. You know, it's

1:04:54

totally fine because that's something that people

1:04:56

do, right? So if you, you know,

1:04:58

because I've had this conversation, hey, you

1:05:01

know, I mean, Joe

1:05:04

Biden kind of forced,

1:05:06

you know, Poroshenko to

1:05:09

the directive who to hire for a prosecutor

1:05:11

and it's like, yeah, well, it

1:05:14

could, we could see it this way. Dead

1:05:17

serious is the response that I've gotten. I

1:05:21

mean, we can scrutinize Biden's

1:05:23

actions suggesting that he exerted

1:05:25

more influence over Ukraine's judicial

1:05:27

appointments than typically acknowledged and

1:05:30

critics like the MAGA crew

1:05:32

will argue that constitutes inappropriate

1:05:34

interference in the sovereign nation's

1:05:37

internal matters. Okay.

1:05:40

But what about conflict

1:05:42

of interest? Well, you know, if it's

1:05:44

shown that Biden had a specific candidate

1:05:47

in mind, particularly if this candidate had

1:05:49

any connections to Biden or his family,

1:05:51

it could heighten

1:05:54

the concerns about conflicts of interest, especially

1:05:57

given Hunter Biden's role in barisma.

1:06:00

So now we're going to pass that off. Well, what

1:06:03

about diplomatic norms and

1:06:05

practices? Well, it's

1:06:07

not uncommon for major international

1:06:09

donors to express preferences or

1:06:12

make recommendations about key appointments

1:06:14

to countries receiving significant aid.

1:06:17

Wait, what? You mean

1:06:20

we can strong arm countries

1:06:22

and hold money hostage, you

1:06:25

know, to make them do what we want? Yeah,

1:06:27

especially when those appointments are critical to

1:06:30

the success of anti-corruption efforts

1:06:32

and other reforms. See,

1:06:35

we can have all the evidence we want, but

1:06:37

it can be explained away. Now, what I'm going to

1:06:40

show you really can't be explained away. And then

1:06:42

you're going to have to ask yourself, why the fuck

1:06:44

is in Congress doing anything? When is Jim Jordan going

1:06:46

to send another strongly worded letter that ends up being

1:06:48

a potato? Right? So

1:06:52

now there

1:06:54

are, and I

1:06:56

want to be nice, but I really can't right now. There

1:07:00

are a few

1:07:02

things further that I want to say. So

1:07:05

I have talked to

1:07:07

people about the historical context of

1:07:09

all these things and, you know,

1:07:11

the international support. And people say,

1:07:13

well, it's really important that

1:07:15

we just examine

1:07:17

historical context. You know, what was

1:07:19

going on in Ukraine, would that

1:07:21

happen? And at the time, there

1:07:24

was significant international consensus on the

1:07:26

need for Ukraine to address the

1:07:28

corruption issues, the ones that we

1:07:30

created, by the way, right? And

1:07:33

then the European Union, the

1:07:36

IMF, and other international bodies

1:07:38

were also pushing for

1:07:40

significant reform, including changes

1:07:43

in the prosecutor general's office.

1:07:45

Well, then if he helped

1:07:49

Poroshenko pick the prosecutor, why did

1:07:51

he try to hire Jeffrey Pyatt

1:07:53

from the DOJ to work for

1:07:55

the Ukrainian prosecutor's office? Well,

1:07:59

if there's such evidence, which I'm going to

1:08:01

show you there is. And then

1:08:03

Joe Biden helped President Poroshenko kind

1:08:05

of hire Jeffrey Pyre or alluded

1:08:07

to that, who was a US

1:08:09

ambassador to Ukraine at the time

1:08:12

from the Department of Justice to

1:08:14

work in the Ukrainian prosecutor's office.

1:08:16

It would raise significant issues and

1:08:19

questions like, you know, could

1:08:21

be seen as a clear instance of

1:08:24

the US exerting influence over Ukraine's internal

1:08:26

judicial processes. But Poroshenko asked for

1:08:28

him, yeah, but still, you know, you

1:08:32

have to understand, yeah, he asked for

1:08:34

him. So it's not uncommon for countries

1:08:36

to offer technical assistance or advisory support,

1:08:38

you know, kind of like the fucking

1:08:40

2,000 people that I hired to

1:08:42

usher the elections for the Ukrainians in

1:08:44

2014, but I digress, you know, and

1:08:47

directly placing an American official in a

1:08:49

key position with the foreign government's judicial

1:08:52

system would be highly unusual and controversial,

1:08:54

but it all depends on, you know,

1:08:56

what's going on. Thank

1:09:01

you for trusting USAA Life Insurance Company

1:09:03

with your policy. As you continue the

1:09:05

great life you've built, make sure your

1:09:07

coverage is keeping up with your dreams.

1:09:09

USAA's budget-friendly life insurance can be adjusted

1:09:11

to fit every new stage of life.

1:09:13

Call 1-800-531-LIFE to review your coverage and

1:09:17

find the right fit for you and your

1:09:19

budget. Life insurance and annuities provided by USAA

1:09:22

Life Insurance Company, San Antonio, Texas. All insurance

1:09:24

products are subject to state availability, issue limitations,

1:09:26

and contractual terms and conditions. Guys,

1:09:30

I've had these conversations. I've had to keep

1:09:32

a straight face, dead serious, because

1:09:35

you have to listen to them to see,

1:09:38

you know, when is it enough, right? Literally,

1:09:40

Poroshenko said, yo, I need that Jeff guy.

1:09:42

Oh yeah, no problem. I'll get to do

1:09:45

J and see what I could do for

1:09:47

you, Poroshenko. Good boy, you listen

1:09:49

to me, woof. Here's a

1:09:51

treat. Now, the

1:09:54

nature of that type

1:09:56

of action, of that type of

1:09:58

action, then Vice President

1:10:00

Joe Biden, would it

1:10:03

be official or unofficial? The conversations

1:10:05

and him pushing the prosecutor, one

1:10:07

would have to think, was that

1:10:09

an official act or an unofficial

1:10:11

act? Right? That's key here. Is

1:10:14

it an official act or an unofficial act? Well,

1:10:17

over here, bring

1:10:20

the receipts right here, okay? So

1:10:23

Biden DOJ is going after Durkog

1:10:25

for conducting obscure shell company business

1:10:28

activities, right? The

1:10:30

same stuff. It's the same law fair playbook, what

1:10:32

they did to Manafort, what they were trying to

1:10:34

do to President Trump. But

1:10:37

in Ukraine, just so you know, that's

1:10:39

actually part and parcel. In order to

1:10:41

survive, they have to have like these

1:10:43

shenanigans of the shell companies because it's

1:10:45

almost necessary to operate effectively in Ukraine.

1:10:48

In fact, Joe Biden's son

1:10:51

says the exact same thing

1:10:53

in this email, right? And

1:10:56

I'll read that out to you. We

1:10:58

cannot kid ourselves into thinking that any

1:11:00

successful business in Ukraine in the past

1:11:02

20 years was created without some shenanigans

1:11:05

that we in the US would find

1:11:07

questionable at best. I really

1:11:09

want you guys to push them to radically

1:11:11

alter the way they are thinking about how

1:11:13

they will do business going forward. Hunter

1:11:15

Biden said in the above email. So

1:11:19

they already know that that was part and

1:11:21

parcel on how they worked, but apparently they're

1:11:23

just going after the guy because he, you

1:11:26

know, kind of just released

1:11:30

their calls. Now, I

1:11:34

want people to understand that the

1:11:36

Federalist Paper 70, where the principles

1:11:39

of transparency and accountability are outlined,

1:11:41

it's to ensure that public officials, including

1:11:44

a president, vice president and immediate staff

1:11:46

of the president like Karl Rove. Oh

1:11:49

my God, Karl, I am coming for

1:11:51

you so hard. You are

1:11:53

going to just absolutely love this.

1:11:55

You not only recollections with

1:11:58

machines and what you did in 2004,

1:12:02

but you did more. It's a

1:12:04

tickety-tock. So Ron Klain,

1:12:06

John Flynn, the guy that was

1:12:08

sending those emails, you

1:12:10

have to make sure that you can scrutinize their

1:12:12

communications to see if they're acting in the best

1:12:14

interest of the nation. That's what transparency is, that

1:12:17

we self-govern so we get to check them. Fortunately,

1:12:19

that's not the case. We're not allowed to see

1:12:21

anything. As you

1:12:23

know, NARA sits on it and is like, yeah, I

1:12:25

can't give that to you. But

1:12:27

that goes back to the first executive

1:12:30

order that Obama boom dropped five

1:12:32

minutes into his administration. So

1:12:35

the preservation of records is a

1:12:37

critical aspect of maintaining transparency and

1:12:39

accountability. I'm sorry. Can you guys

1:12:42

all see just how this whole

1:12:44

thing is boomeranging back on the

1:12:46

Biden administration with this whole Mar-a-Lago

1:12:48

thing? Wait for it, because all

1:12:50

of you will be singing praises

1:12:52

to Jack Smith, whoever the fuck

1:12:54

he is. Just hold up

1:12:56

and you'll see, you'll see, you'll see. Now,

1:13:01

evasion of accountability occurs when

1:13:03

communications are conducted through private

1:13:05

channels and not preserved as

1:13:08

required by the PRA. And

1:13:10

this undermines the principles of transparency

1:13:13

and accountability and the Supreme Court

1:13:15

in Clinton highlighted the importance of

1:13:18

maintaining official records. In

1:13:20

fact, in this Supreme

1:13:22

Court case, the Donald J. Trump

1:13:25

versus the United States, the Supreme

1:13:27

Court emphasized that private actions by

1:13:29

a president are not shielded by

1:13:32

private, by absolute immunity, which

1:13:34

then you have to think, how does this

1:13:36

SCOTUS decision come back with the Stormy Daniels?

1:13:38

Because all that shit happened before he was

1:13:40

president. So if he did that before he

1:13:42

was president, how is that

1:13:45

coming into where they were like, he doesn't have immunity.

1:13:47

And it's like, wait a minute. He was proud citizen.

1:13:50

I'm just spitballing here. I don't

1:13:52

know. Maybe I'm off mark. Go

1:13:54

say. So this

1:13:56

indeed today underscores the necessity for transparency

1:13:59

and accountability. accountability even at the highest

1:14:01

levels of government. So consider

1:14:04

the implications of Hunter Biden

1:14:07

laptop controversy, where private emails

1:14:09

revealed discussions that would be

1:14:11

considered presidential communications. Such

1:14:14

incidents demonstrate the dangers of

1:14:16

bypassing official communication channels and

1:14:19

potential significant breaches in accountability and transparency kind

1:14:22

of like the way Hillary Clinton server was

1:14:24

in a toilet in an outhouse, you

1:14:27

know, being taken care of by some one

1:14:30

wannabe. We should get to

1:14:32

the one brothers damn. Not yet.

1:14:34

Not yet. We got to take this step by step.

1:14:36

So now, you know,

1:14:38

we have the Supreme Court that

1:14:40

has provided us with the necessary

1:14:43

tools to investigate illicit misconduct. Because

1:14:46

we're armed with the Supreme Court's decision

1:14:48

of Clinton versus Jones, to understand the

1:14:50

critical importance of maintaining official records. And

1:14:53

this landmark case emphasized that private

1:14:56

actions by a president are not

1:14:58

shielded by absolute immunity, reinforcing the

1:15:00

necessity for transparency and accountability, even

1:15:02

at the highest levels of government,

1:15:05

you almost have to think for

1:15:08

a second, holy crap. They

1:15:11

got set up massive

1:15:14

sting operation. Let's take a

1:15:16

quick break. From

1:15:26

this day forward, it's

1:15:28

going to be only America

1:15:31

first. You

1:15:33

are going to be so proud of

1:15:35

your country, because we're going to turn

1:15:37

it around. And we're going to start

1:15:39

winning again, we're going to win so

1:15:42

much, we're going to win at every

1:15:44

level, we're going to win so much,

1:15:46

you may even get tired of winning.

1:15:48

And you'll say, please, please, it's too

1:15:50

much winning. We can't take it anymore.

1:15:52

Mr. President, it's too much.

1:15:54

And I'll say no, it isn't. We

1:15:57

have to keep winning. We have to

1:15:59

win more. We're gonna win more! I'm

1:16:02

gonna bomb the shit out of him. It's

1:16:05

true. I don't care. 2024

1:16:16

is the final battle to save our

1:16:19

country from destruction. We

1:16:21

will make America wealthy

1:16:23

again. We

1:16:26

will make America strong

1:16:29

again. We

1:16:31

will make America

1:16:33

proud again. We

1:16:36

will make America safe

1:16:39

again. And we

1:16:41

will make America

1:16:43

great again. Thank

1:16:46

you. I

1:16:50

am here as your president to proclaim before

1:16:52

the country. And before

1:16:54

the world, this monument

1:16:56

will never be desecrated.

1:16:59

These heroes will never be

1:17:02

defaced. Their

1:17:05

legacy will never, ever

1:17:07

be destroyed. Their

1:17:09

achievements will never be

1:17:12

forgotten. And Mount

1:17:14

Rushmore will stand forever

1:17:17

as an eternal tribute to

1:17:19

our forefathers and to

1:17:21

our freedom. We are the nation

1:17:24

that gave rise to the Wright brothers,

1:17:26

Harriet Tubman, George Patton,

1:17:29

the great Louis Armstrong,

1:17:31

Elvis Presley, Ella

1:17:34

Fitzgerald. We said all the

1:17:36

wild west, won two world

1:17:38

wars, landed American astronauts on

1:17:40

the moon. Centuries

1:17:42

from now our legacy will be

1:17:45

the cities we built, the champions

1:17:47

we forged, the good that we

1:17:49

did, and the monuments we

1:17:52

created. Americans' destiny

1:17:55

is in our sights. America's

1:17:58

heroes are embedded. In

1:18:00

our hearts America's future is

1:18:03

in our hands and ladies

1:18:06

and gentlemen The

1:18:09

best is yet to come

1:18:18

I really want to know which one of you salty

1:18:20

fucks paid for this Trump

1:18:23

won like are you guys crazy?

1:18:27

Trump won. No, he didn't For

1:18:30

that Who paid

1:18:32

for that I? Paid for

1:18:34

that No, I didn't we

1:18:37

did the people did want

1:18:39

to see it again. Look what it says Yeah,

1:18:42

I really want to know which one of you salty

1:18:44

fucks paid for this Trump

1:18:47

won like are you guys crazy? Trump

1:18:51

won. No, he didn't paid

1:18:53

for that Who

1:18:55

paid for that I Did and

1:18:59

all the people now have taken

1:19:01

the strategies we the people Grassroots

1:19:03

with no sponsors no selling gold

1:19:05

and silver none of that actually

1:19:08

got that done That was on

1:19:10

the Chicago Highway years ago We

1:19:12

did the banners in the games

1:19:15

that everyone then did we put the

1:19:17

floating banners in the waters in California

1:19:19

And in Florida we did the

1:19:22

flying airplane banners We

1:19:24

did that and not only that We

1:19:27

literally created the I did that

1:19:29

stickers and when I say we it's

1:19:31

the people not some celebrity Not

1:19:34

some social media influencer. It was the people

1:19:36

I want you to remember that it was

1:19:38

we the people and they were really upset

1:19:40

When other people were getting credit for the

1:19:42

work that they did just remember

1:19:44

that now, let's get back to

1:19:46

the corruption now Here's

1:19:50

where the good stuff is The

1:19:52

recent Supreme Court ruling has defined

1:19:54

the distinction between official acts and

1:19:56

unofficial acts of a president vice

1:19:58

president and immediate staff of the

1:20:00

president. This decision

1:20:02

underscores that while the president is

1:20:05

entitled to immunity for official action,

1:20:08

within the outer perimeter of their

1:20:10

responsibility, I don't know, like bombing

1:20:12

people unauthorized with drones for now,

1:20:15

there is no such immunity for

1:20:17

unofficial acts, you know, like helping

1:20:20

your son's business, make sure

1:20:22

that they could get rid of a prosecutor

1:20:24

that's causing them a few problems. They didn't

1:20:26

do that. I hope

1:20:28

I have some people from the left

1:20:30

watching because this is important because clarity

1:20:33

is crucial for investigating and holding the

1:20:35

former and current presidents and

1:20:38

their administrations accountable

1:20:40

for misconduct committed under the guise of their

1:20:42

office, you know, abuse of power and all.

1:20:45

So these judicial decisions, all of them

1:20:48

that we've had, actually bring that

1:20:50

up. In conclusion, with

1:20:52

the Supreme Court's ruling in Clinton

1:20:54

versus Jones and Donald Trump versus

1:20:57

United States, we are better equipped

1:20:59

to distinguish between official and unofficial

1:21:01

acts of a president, vice

1:21:03

president, and immediate

1:21:05

staff like Ron Klain, Karl Rove,

1:21:07

Karl, oh my God, Karl,

1:21:10

I know

1:21:12

someone's going to send you this and I want to put

1:21:15

my face full on the camera. I

1:21:17

can't wait. And you know what? I

1:21:19

want to release the sex tape you have with

1:21:21

Ali Akbar. It's a lot of

1:21:23

fellatio, not much. You guys can envision

1:21:25

that. Not something that I would do because

1:21:28

that's a private moment, I

1:21:30

guess, between two boys, I

1:21:33

guess. But what you did in

1:21:35

2004, I remember very,

1:21:38

very well and what you've

1:21:40

done after. So

1:21:42

now let's again take a

1:21:44

look at this. The cover up

1:21:46

is worse than the lie. And

1:21:49

always remember, be careful what

1:21:51

you wish for, right? Because

1:21:54

you might actually get it. Have you

1:21:56

guys not heard the story of the

1:21:58

genie and the lamb? Have

1:22:02

you? You should watch

1:22:04

it again. And I would like to

1:22:06

say a special thanks to Jack Smith

1:22:09

for making all of this happen. Thank

1:22:12

you on behalf of America. Now

1:22:16

allow me let me see is this it? Let

1:22:19

me see if this is it. Nope, it's

1:22:21

not. Let me get

1:22:23

the right video on.

1:22:28

Now I'm gonna walk you through this. I'll

1:22:30

pause and probably tell you a couple

1:22:33

things because it's pretty interesting

1:22:35

how things work out. Let's see where

1:22:37

is my video? I have

1:22:39

like a million things going on here. Let's see.

1:22:43

Let me look at

1:22:45

my other screen because

1:22:47

I'm like where is

1:22:50

it? Okay, there we go.

1:22:53

Where is it? I found

1:22:55

it but show me open file location.

1:22:57

There it is. Okay, there we go.

1:23:00

So wait, is that it? I'm sure

1:23:04

it is. Yes, it is. Okay,

1:23:07

guys, I'm gonna let it run the first time

1:23:09

by itself. Not much voiceover.

1:23:11

Just want you to digest it without

1:23:13

my commentary. And then we're gonna

1:23:15

play it again with my commentary. Get

1:23:18

ready. Yesterday,

1:23:29

I met with the general

1:23:32

prosecutor Soto. And

1:23:35

despite of the fact that we

1:23:37

didn't have any corruption charges, we

1:23:39

don't have any information about doing

1:23:43

something wrong. I

1:23:45

especially asked him, no,

1:23:47

it was the day before yesterday. I

1:23:50

especially asked him to

1:23:52

desire that. As

1:23:55

his position, as

1:24:01

a state person

1:24:04

and despite

1:24:06

of the fact that he has a support in

1:24:09

the power and

1:24:11

as a finish of my meeting

1:24:15

with him he

1:24:17

promised me to give

1:24:22

me the statement on resignation

1:24:25

and one hour ago he

1:24:27

bring me the written

1:24:32

statement of

1:24:34

his resignation. This

1:24:36

is my second

1:24:38

step for keeping

1:24:40

my promises. I

1:24:44

agree. President Poroshenko? Yes.

1:24:47

One moment for Vice President Biden. Thank you.

1:24:57

Introducing President Poroshenko. Hey Mr.

1:24:59

President Joe Biden, how are

1:25:02

you? Very

1:25:04

well indeed. All the time when I

1:25:06

hear your voice, it's a great pleasure

1:25:08

for me. Well

1:25:11

I'm on Air Force 2 and I

1:25:13

think we're going to stay connected. We

1:25:15

just took off and I'm hoping this

1:25:18

connection will stay open. Assuming that

1:25:23

there is a new government and

1:25:26

a new prosecutor general,

1:25:29

I am prepared to do a public

1:25:33

signing of the

1:25:35

commitment for the billion dollars. Again,

1:25:38

I'm not suggesting that that's what you want

1:25:40

or don't want. I'm just suggesting that that's

1:25:43

what we're prepared to do and

1:25:45

again it wouldn't be finalized until

1:25:48

you know the IMF pieces are

1:25:50

written. Extremely strong

1:25:52

motivation. One of the

1:25:54

possible candidate was leader of my faction

1:25:56

Luke Senter who is the public figure.

1:25:58

If you think that the political political

1:26:01

motivated figure would be not very

1:26:03

good from your point of view. I

1:26:05

recall this proposal I do not propose

1:26:07

because nobody knows that I want to

1:26:09

propose Wusanka. In this situation I take

1:26:13

all the political motivated figures out

1:26:15

from this process. Alright

1:26:21

well look, let

1:26:23

me, when you and I

1:26:25

finish speaking, let me

1:26:27

huddle with my team, talk

1:26:30

over what you and I just talked about.

1:26:33

I agree with you there is a sense of

1:26:35

urgency here. Mr.

1:26:38

President Joe Biden, how are you? Very

1:26:41

well indeed. As usual when

1:26:43

I hear your voice. Thank

1:26:45

you. Well you are doing

1:26:47

very well. Congratulations on

1:26:49

getting the new prosecutor general. I know there is

1:26:52

a lot more that has to be done but

1:26:54

I really think that's good. And

1:26:58

I understand you are working with

1:27:00

the rod in the coming days on a number

1:27:02

of additional laws to secure

1:27:04

the IMF. But congratulations on

1:27:07

installing the new prosecutor general. It is

1:27:09

going to be critical for

1:27:11

him to work quickly to repair the damage

1:27:13

that Shokin did. I am a

1:27:15

man of my word that now

1:27:17

that the new prosecutor general is in place we are

1:27:19

ready to move forward in signing that new one

1:27:22

billion dollar loan guarantee. And

1:27:24

I don't know how you want to go about that. I

1:27:26

am not going to be able to get to Kiv

1:27:31

anytime soon. It

1:27:33

will be the next month

1:27:35

or so. And I

1:27:37

don't know whether you could either

1:27:39

sign it with our ambassador or if you

1:27:42

came here we could sign it or if

1:27:44

you want we are

1:27:46

inviting Joyce Maniere later. I

1:27:48

am going to be talking to him later

1:27:50

this morning. Not for that purpose. We are

1:27:52

inviting him to Washington. And

1:27:55

so I will leave it up to you as

1:27:57

to how you want that done and when you

1:27:59

want it done. First

1:28:03

of all, thank you very much indeed for

1:28:05

these words of support. Believe me

1:28:07

that it was a very tough

1:28:10

challenge and very difficult job.

1:28:13

And Mrs. Timoshenko

1:28:15

and Mr. Leshkor Fraction

1:28:18

tried to brave

1:28:20

this because we not only voted

1:28:22

for the new prosecutor general, which

1:28:24

we do in a very

1:28:26

short period of time, within one

1:28:29

day we changed the law. By

1:28:32

the way, in this

1:28:34

law we presented the

1:28:37

new structure of the

1:28:39

General Prosecutor Office, including

1:28:42

the general inspection. The

1:28:45

second thing I immediately

1:28:48

invited was that he

1:28:51

should contact your embassy

1:28:54

and I would be very pleased if you will

1:28:56

have a certain person

1:28:59

who can come either from

1:29:02

Washington or whenever

1:29:04

we have here, I

1:29:06

don't remember his name, the

1:29:08

Ukrainian origin, American

1:29:12

prosecutor. He is a

1:29:14

little bit of old. I sent

1:29:16

to Jeffrey his name and

1:29:19

he was ready to come to be

1:29:21

assistant and advisor. Got

1:29:24

a very good experience in the

1:29:26

American system and he can be

1:29:28

the person of trust within

1:29:30

your prosecution system. I

1:29:33

think this is exactly right time to do

1:29:35

that and if he is

1:29:37

still ready to come and to cooperate

1:29:39

from the very first step, from the

1:29:42

very first meeting of the

1:29:44

new prosecutor, that is exactly what I am looking

1:29:46

for. provide

1:30:00

professional assistance as quick as we can

1:30:02

so this gets up and started in

1:30:04

the right direction. So I

1:30:06

will move on as soon as we hang up.

1:30:09

I'll put that in train and I'll get back to you as

1:30:11

to what I'm able to do. Absolutely.

1:30:16

Thank you very much indeed. This is exactly what I'm

1:30:18

looking for. The second thing is

1:30:21

that I want to thank you that you

1:30:23

gave me a word that immediately when we

1:30:25

changed the station and I appoint the

1:30:28

new prosecutor general and it would be

1:30:30

you did it as we agreed on

1:30:32

our previous meeting in Washington and when

1:30:34

it happened we can have

1:30:38

it this long here. Thank you very much.

1:30:41

Alright so let's begin February 18, 2016. Let's

1:30:46

listen to this conversation

1:30:48

again because it's important

1:30:51

because the context of it is also

1:30:53

important. Hold on, sorry. There we go.

1:30:57

It went too far. Sorry. This

1:31:00

is going to be really interesting. I hope you like

1:31:02

it. Yesterday I met

1:31:05

with the general prosecutor so to go.

1:31:09

And despite of the fact that

1:31:11

we didn't have any corruption charges,

1:31:14

we don't have any information

1:31:16

about the doing something wrong,

1:31:19

I especially asked him, no it

1:31:22

was the day before yesterday, I

1:31:25

especially asked him to

1:31:27

resign. As

1:31:32

his position

1:31:35

as a state person

1:31:40

and despite of the fact

1:31:42

that he has a support in the power of

1:31:46

the government and as a finish of my meeting

1:31:50

with him, he

1:31:52

promised me to give

1:31:56

me the statement on resignation. One

1:32:00

hour ago he bring me

1:32:03

the written statement

1:32:08

of his resignation. Great.

1:32:12

This is my second step for

1:32:15

keeping my promises. I

1:32:18

agree. So

1:32:20

now let's look at Hunter

1:32:22

Biden's emails and see what those

1:32:25

have to tell us. What was

1:32:27

going on before the demand of the

1:32:29

resignation of Shokin? Let's

1:32:33

take a closer look for those of

1:32:35

you that didn't catch it. Here's

1:32:38

an email between Vadim Podarsky

1:32:40

and Hunter Biden. And

1:32:43

Vadim is expressing his concerns

1:32:45

of how they're able to

1:32:48

work. Hope you are well. Thank

1:32:51

you for the docs provided. I have

1:32:53

analyzed them most carefully and came up

1:32:55

with the following observations. The first thing

1:32:57

is that suggested the scope of work

1:33:00

is largely lacking concrete tangible results. And

1:33:03

we're set out to achieve in the first

1:33:05

place mostly focusing on the process. Also,

1:33:08

it doesn't offer any names of

1:33:10

top US officials. What? OK.

1:33:15

Top US officials here in

1:33:17

Ukraine. For instance, the US

1:33:19

ambassador, Ukrainian officials, the president

1:33:21

of Ukraine, Chief of Staff,

1:33:23

prosecutor general as key targets

1:33:25

to improving Nikolai's case and

1:33:28

his situation in Ukraine. Now

1:33:30

allow me to kind

1:33:32

of throw more shade to red state

1:33:35

and reinforce how misinformation, either

1:33:38

because it's fed to them and

1:33:40

they put it there to put

1:33:43

false information or because they think they're

1:33:45

smart and they're fucking stupid. Nikolai

1:33:48

was arrested in the

1:33:52

United Kingdom for fraud that Ukraine,

1:33:55

because Ashokan, was going

1:33:58

after him. It

1:34:00

was John Kerry and Joe Biden

1:34:02

that actually helped him and the

1:34:04

UK government released him. So

1:34:07

here his business partner is

1:34:09

expressing to Hunter

1:34:12

Biden that they have a problem. In

1:34:14

addition, if you read further down, it

1:34:16

says, my only concern for us to

1:34:18

be on the same page, re our

1:34:20

final goals with this in mind, I

1:34:22

would like us to formulate a list

1:34:25

of deliverables, including but not limited to

1:34:27

a concrete course of actions, including meetings,

1:34:29

communications, resulting in high ranking

1:34:31

US officials and Ukraine, US

1:34:33

ambassador, and in US publicly

1:34:36

or in private communications common

1:34:38

expressing their positive opinion and

1:34:40

support for Nikolai, Mikola, right,

1:34:42

that they call a barisma

1:34:45

to the highest level of

1:34:47

the decision makers here in

1:34:49

the Ukraine, president of Ukraine,

1:34:52

president of chief of staff

1:34:54

and prosecutor general. So basically,

1:34:56

what Hunter Biden's

1:34:58

business partner said, we

1:35:00

need to put pressure on US

1:35:03

government officials to lay off of

1:35:05

the prosecution that Shokin is bringing

1:35:07

on Mikola. Now this is Hunter

1:35:10

Biden and his daddy is the

1:35:12

vice president. And just a couple

1:35:14

months later, he has to submit

1:35:16

his resignation. And he just got

1:35:18

the paper resignation in February of

1:35:21

2016 after that email and Hunter

1:35:25

saying, yo, we can't move forward, we need

1:35:27

to get rid of this prosecutor, he's a

1:35:29

problem. And Mikola

1:35:31

needs to be freed, the fraud is

1:35:33

okay, because we're okay with it. But

1:35:35

my business is going to take the

1:35:37

businesses here that we have, you know,

1:35:39

with everyone with the Romney kids, the

1:35:41

Pelosi kids, all the kids, right, all

1:35:43

of us in the clique are getting

1:35:45

fucked because of this prosecutor, we got to

1:35:47

get rid of him. Okay, let's

1:35:51

continue. It's

1:35:54

so much easier. See, even when

1:35:56

I was talking about it, no one understood it. But

1:35:59

now Sometimes looking at it with

1:36:01

fresh eyes. You can understand

1:36:03

the fraud upon the people and

1:36:05

even by those that claim they're our friends.

1:36:07

Let's go to March 22nd, 2016. Here's

1:36:11

the conversation between President

1:36:13

Poroshenko and Vice President

1:36:16

Joe Biden in regards to

1:36:18

this whole shenanigans about Shokin. Here's

1:36:21

where he suggests, hey, I'm thinking about this guy. What

1:36:23

do you think? President

1:36:27

Poroshenko? Yes. One moment

1:36:29

for Vice President Biden. Introducing

1:36:39

President Poroshenko. Hey

1:36:42

Mr. President Joe Biden, how are you? Very

1:36:46

well indeed. All the time when I

1:36:48

hear your voice, it's a great pleasure

1:36:50

for me. Well,

1:36:53

I'm on Air Force 2 and I think

1:36:55

we're going to stay connected. We just took

1:36:57

off and I'm hoping this connection will stay

1:36:59

open. So

1:37:01

let me explain to you why he was on Air

1:37:04

Force 2, right? There were a lot of

1:37:06

things going on on that date. There

1:37:08

were a bunch of things

1:37:10

going on in regards to Joe Biden

1:37:12

and that specific date. But

1:37:15

I want you guys to, you know what? Wait, dammit.

1:37:18

I skipped over what I wanted to say,

1:37:20

which was, you know, the, well, no, I

1:37:23

talk about it. Just listen. On

1:37:25

March 22nd, 2016, right? We

1:37:28

had Joe Biden addressing the

1:37:30

aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Brussels.

1:37:34

It was those specific terror attacks

1:37:36

that I talked about where, you

1:37:38

know, on March 22nd, 2016, it

1:37:40

involved coordinating bombings at the Brussels

1:37:42

airport and the metro session resulting

1:37:44

in like 32 deaths and 300

1:37:46

injuries. And

1:37:49

the attackers were allegedly part of an Islamic

1:37:51

State cell that also had been involved in

1:37:53

the November 2015 Paris attacks. Remember,

1:37:56

I highlighted this because it was important.

1:38:00

suspects was Mohammed Abrini, known as

1:38:02

the man with the hat, that

1:38:04

was identified, get this, using facial

1:38:06

recognition of the FBI. How

1:38:08

did the FBI have this guy

1:38:11

on their software? Because the software

1:38:13

helped Belgian authorities confirm his identity

1:38:15

after facing difficulty with fingerprints in

1:38:17

DNA analysis. But we forget another

1:38:19

person was identified from a bomb

1:38:21

proof passport, just like the same

1:38:23

bomb proof passports they had in 9-11. So

1:38:27

that was all going on in 2016, when

1:38:29

Joe Biden was talking

1:38:33

to the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on

1:38:35

Air Force Two. And

1:38:37

both of them on that phone call, actually,

1:38:41

not only discussed what you're going

1:38:43

to hear, but, you know, they

1:38:45

condemned, you know, the conviction of

1:38:48

the Ukrainian pilot, Nadia Zreshenko, and

1:38:50

they emphasize the importance of Ukraine quickly

1:38:53

reestablishing a stable government and a parliamentary

1:38:55

coalition committed to implementing necessary reform. You're

1:38:57

going to hear that conversation. None of

1:38:59

that shit was said, but okay. But

1:39:02

they also expressed deep sorrow for the

1:39:04

victims of Belgium. None of that was

1:39:06

on that fucking call either. But

1:39:10

during that time, Obama was

1:39:13

in Cuba, and he was

1:39:15

expressing solidarity and condolences to

1:39:17

Belgium, highlighting the resilience of

1:39:20

people, you know, in the

1:39:22

face of terrorism. And then the Bidens

1:39:24

also visited the Belgian Embassy in Washington,

1:39:26

DC to offer condolences to the victims

1:39:29

and their families on behalf of

1:39:31

the American people, of course. So

1:39:35

just to clarify about this

1:39:37

pilot, and this is very

1:39:39

important to Nadia Zreshenko

1:39:42

was a Ukrainian politician and

1:39:44

former military pilot, who became

1:39:46

internationally known after her

1:39:49

capture by pro Russian forces during

1:39:51

the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Here's

1:39:55

some really important facts. She

1:39:57

was an MI-24 helicopter pilot. in

1:40:00

the Ukrainian armed forces. Also,

1:40:03

she was captured on June 2014 by pro-Russian

1:40:07

separatists in Ukraine. Now,

1:40:11

she actually went to trial and she

1:40:13

was accused of being involved in the

1:40:15

deaths of two Russian journalists who were

1:40:17

killed during the mortar attack in eastern

1:40:19

Ukraine. That's true. She denied the charges.

1:40:22

Now, her trial in Russia attracted

1:40:24

significant international attention and condemnation. Like,

1:40:27

why are you putting her on

1:40:29

trial for killing people? It's like,

1:40:31

okay. Because

1:40:33

that was part of the strategy, you know, make

1:40:36

Russia look like a villain when they're trying to

1:40:38

hold people that killed journalists accountable. In March

1:40:42

2016, after, you know, this phone call, right,

1:40:45

well, at the time of this phone call, she

1:40:48

was sentenced to 22 years in prison. But

1:40:52

two, three months later, right, she

1:40:56

was released. And I'll explain to you

1:40:58

because she has, she was elected to

1:41:00

parliament while imprisoned. She was

1:41:02

elected to parliament and Zvenka was elected

1:41:06

to the Verkovarada, the Ukrainian parliament,

1:41:08

as a member of the

1:41:11

Batkivya. Am I

1:41:13

saying that right? I remember party. Anyway,

1:41:16

and she became a symbol of like,

1:41:18

Ukrainian resistance against Russian aggression. So, they

1:41:20

kind of tried to make her a

1:41:22

G.I. Joe figure. But she was actually

1:41:25

released in May of 2016 because they

1:41:28

swapped her with two

1:41:30

Russians. And the two

1:41:32

Russians that were released

1:41:34

in her exchange were

1:41:36

Russian soldiers, Alexander Alexandrov

1:41:38

and Yevieny, Yerefeyi,

1:41:41

is that right? Because

1:41:45

they were part of a group referred to as

1:41:48

members of the Russian military intelligence. So, though

1:41:50

Russia claimed they were no longer active servicemen

1:41:52

at the time of capture. Basically

1:41:54

what happened, these guys lived in eastern

1:41:56

Ukraine and they freaking just fought,

1:41:58

you know, the Ukrainians off

1:42:01

that were stealing the... I'm

1:42:03

not going to get into the details. Just... Let's just

1:42:06

say what they were doing, they believed they were right.

1:42:08

Eastern Ukraine is Russian anyway, so

1:42:10

that's my position, so there. So,

1:42:14

let's move it along. Now, listen a little

1:42:16

bit more. ...

1:42:22

that there

1:42:25

is a new government and

1:42:27

a new prosecutor general,

1:42:31

I am prepared to do a public

1:42:34

signing of the

1:42:36

commitment for the billion dollars.

1:42:39

Again, I'm not suggesting that that's what you

1:42:41

want or don't want, I'm just suggesting that

1:42:44

that's what we're prepared to do, and

1:42:47

again, it wouldn't be finalized until,

1:42:49

you know, the IMF pieces are

1:42:51

written. Extremely strong

1:42:54

motivation. One of the

1:42:56

possible candidate was leader of my fraction,

1:42:58

Luke Senter, who is the public figure.

1:43:00

If you think that the political motivated

1:43:02

figure would be not very

1:43:05

good, from your point of view, I

1:43:07

recall this proposal I do not propose,

1:43:09

because nobody knows that I want to

1:43:11

propose with Senter. In this situation, I

1:43:14

take all the political motivated

1:43:16

figures out from these provinces.

1:43:19

Now, it's important to note that

1:43:21

the recording that you're hearing has

1:43:24

Biden on a line, but has

1:43:26

Poroshenko in open, which means that

1:43:28

the whistleblower was actually in the

1:43:30

room with Poroshenko and or received

1:43:32

the recording from the

1:43:35

in the room recording that

1:43:37

is filed away for the

1:43:39

Ukrainian transparency presidential records stuff.

1:43:43

So that's number one. Number two, here he is

1:43:45

saying I like Luchenko. He's a friend of mine.

1:43:48

He's a bit of a political

1:43:50

figure. He's public figure. Are

1:43:52

you cool with him? Can I propose him?

1:43:54

Because I'm suggesting him. So this is a

1:43:57

president of a fucking country kissing

1:43:59

Joe Biden. Biden's asked for a billion

1:44:01

dollars asking him, are you happy with

1:44:03

this dude? Cause he's my friend. And,

1:44:06

you know, if you think he's too much of a public

1:44:08

figure and you want me to put someone else, let me

1:44:10

know, right? This is the translation

1:44:12

of swamp speak, okay? This is like

1:44:14

corporate speak, you know, like when you

1:44:16

want to be passive aggressive with your

1:44:18

HR person, right? This is it. Hey,

1:44:20

I kind of like this guy. He's

1:44:23

my friend. He'll do what I say. You

1:44:25

know, he's a public figure, but if you think

1:44:27

it's too much politics because we're supposedly getting rid

1:44:30

of this anti-corruption stuff, allegedly, let

1:44:32

me know. And this is what Joe

1:44:34

Biden said. All

1:44:38

right, well, look, let me, let

1:44:41

me, when you and I finished

1:44:43

speaking, let me huddle

1:44:46

with my team, talk

1:44:48

over what you and I just talked about.

1:44:51

I agree with you. There is a sense of

1:44:53

urgency here. Now, as you

1:44:55

heard, he's like, all right, I heard the name,

1:44:57

I'm a huddle with my people. We're gonna run

1:44:59

his name through some checks. We'll let you know

1:45:01

if it's okay. We'll see what we got on

1:45:04

the dude so we can control him and if

1:45:06

we like him. And I'll let you know, this

1:45:08

is kind of urgent. So two days later, this

1:45:13

happens. Sally

1:45:15

Painter, my God, that woman,

1:45:18

he has destroyed everything,

1:45:20

hasn't she? That woman

1:45:22

thinks, I don't know what

1:45:24

she thinks. That woman

1:45:26

is horrific. But I

1:45:28

want you to understand what

1:45:31

is being said here. Ukraine is getting

1:45:33

plenty of bad press, she says. This

1:45:36

is, again, on the 24th, right? But

1:45:40

she is talking about the

1:45:43

other nation's business, right? Talking

1:45:46

about how this is happening. This

1:45:49

is on March 24th, 2016. This

1:45:53

is a key point in time,

1:45:55

very, very, very key. What

1:46:00

do we know about Sally Painter? What

1:46:02

do we know about her? She

1:46:04

has been given a pass on

1:46:06

her FARA issues. We

1:46:09

all know this. But why in

1:46:11

specific is this kind of

1:46:15

important? Because

1:46:17

it is. Think about it. Why

1:46:20

do you think that Sally Painter did all this? Think about it.

1:46:24

Think about why she would sit there

1:46:27

and do this. This

1:46:29

is a real, real, real question.

1:46:32

Because here she talks

1:46:35

about battles that are

1:46:37

raging within the country's political system.

1:46:40

And she explains how

1:46:42

it's important that these

1:46:44

discussions be had correctly. Excuse

1:46:47

my French. So.

1:46:51

Now four days later, what do we have?

1:46:54

We have a communication about

1:46:57

the meeting on May 26, 2016. That

1:47:03

I mentioned in my article, invited

1:47:05

Hunter Biden to sit in on

1:47:07

this meeting with President Poroshenko. Okay.

1:47:11

This is where you know that this isn't about

1:47:13

official duties. These are unofficial

1:47:15

duties. Okay. Now, let's

1:47:18

move it a little bit more forward. After

1:47:20

that phone call, we go fast forward. So

1:47:23

we had Sally Painter commenting on

1:47:25

Lucchenko and other things.

1:47:28

And then we had Joe Biden

1:47:30

being invited. Right? This is

1:47:32

what we had. Look at it. The email

1:47:34

is right there in front of you. He was invited to

1:47:36

have these. And he had a

1:47:38

debriefing document for the scheduling. Right there. Sent

1:47:41

to him for what's going to happen. Okay.

1:47:44

So he invited the son of President. Seven

1:47:47

days later. This is interesting. Gokens

1:47:51

revenge. Ukraine's Audius

1:47:53

prosecutor general fires honest

1:47:55

deputy before Parliament sacks

1:47:57

him. Now that.

1:48:00

the thing. Victor

1:48:02