In April 2016, a woman who went by the pseudonym, Katie Johnson, filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, claiming that they both savagely raped her when she was 13 years old.  Just four days prior to the presidential election, the case was suddenly dropped and the plaintiff has been silent ever since.  Why did the plaintiff drop her case?  Is it true that the plaintiff was being threatened at that time?  Is what she alleged in her complaint credible?  Do you see differences between the complaint she filed in California when she didn't have an attorney and the complaint she later filed when she was represented by counsel that would make you doubt the veracity of her claim?  Does the affidavit from the assistant to Jeffrey Epstein, who confirms everything the plaintiff alleges convince you that the plaintiff is being truthful in her account?  Why did the media hardly cover this case?  Is it possible we will hear from this woman again, as a witness in the cases that have been filed by other women who claim they were raped and trafficked as young girls against Jeffrey Epstein's estate?  Could this woman possibly file her lawsuit again, now that New York has extended the statute of limitations to allow these suits to proceed?  Does the possibility that these rapes might have been videotaped provide sufficient "new evidence" that the plaintiff could move to reopen her case even though she voluntarily discontinued it?  Attorney Rosensweig discusses all of this and more in this episode.