Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Is it real? Oh yes it
0:02
is, a wild coyote in the heart
0:04
of the city. Anything can happen on the streets of
0:06
Chicago.
0:08
Not exactly where you might expect
0:10
to find a coyote. Just
0:13
before 2 o'clock, employees at this
0:15
downtown Quiznos say the
0:17
coyote simply walked in. And
0:19
why not? The front door was open.
0:22
Right into a fast food restaurant
0:24
full of people. An event so rare,
0:26
it made the evening news. Then
0:28
he went around and tried to jump over the soda cooler
0:31
and just fell back in. And he installed
0:33
himself there.
0:34
For one hour, the coyote sat
0:36
in the soda cooler. At times it
0:38
looked like he was sleeping. All the
0:41
while attracting a large crowd
0:43
of onlookers, people armed with
0:45
cell phones and cameras.
0:48
So it's not every day
0:49
that you see a wild
0:51
animal essentially say, ah,
0:55
this'll do, this is part of my territory too. This
0:57
is Professor Chris Schell, a researcher
1:00
who focuses on urban wildlife.
1:03
That is very aberrant behavior. For those
1:05
of y'all listening to this podcast, that's
1:07
not normal. So to
1:10
have that happen in downtown
1:12
Chicago was mind boggling. Why
1:14
did the coyote walk into the Quiznos?
1:17
How is it so tolerant of people? It's
1:20
not normal for a wild animal to
1:22
be less than six feet away from a human without
1:24
a care.
1:25
More questions that Chris has been asking
1:27
as part of his work as an urban
1:29
ecologist. Because most people thought that
1:32
cities were inhospitable, that they couldn't
1:34
foster any life. And what
1:36
we're finding is that no, in fact, life,
1:39
this is a Jeff Goldblum line, finds
1:41
a way. Right? Life is
1:43
finding a way in cities. So
1:45
much so that it is subverting
1:48
the
1:49
ways in which we thought about nature.
1:51
It is resulting in a paradigm shift for
1:54
how we understand our role in this
1:56
entire process.
2:01
Sometimes you start to think about
2:03
a story that you want to tell, but the story
2:06
itself takes you to unexpected
2:08
places. In this case, to some
2:10
of the biggest questions of our time
2:12
about urban ecology, race,
2:15
and our future relationship with nature, this
2:18
is one of those stories. And
2:21
really one of the most important lessons
2:23
in all of this is that we are connected to
2:25
almost everything, and by helping
2:27
to save the natural world in our cities,
2:30
it serves as a proxy
2:31
for the blueprint to saving
2:33
ourselves. Today,
2:36
we look at how a coyote in a refrigerator
2:39
can teach us to rethink our entire
2:41
relationship with nature, from
2:43
deep in the wilderness to deep downtown
2:46
in our cities.
2:49
From KUAW in Seattle,
2:52
I'm Chris Morgan. Welcome to
2:54
The Wild.
3:05
You think that's
3:08
one scat? Oh,
3:13
it's one scat, yeah. They can be huge.
3:16
Oh yeah, that's a massive quantity. Yeah,
3:18
they are not small by any means.
3:21
Oh yeah, that's wet. That's great. I'm out
3:23
with Sam Creeling. She's doing a PhD
3:26
under the guidance of Chris Schell. Sam
3:28
runs a research project called the Seattle
3:30
Coyote Study. Oh, we're going to have to
3:32
double bag that one. She
3:34
scoops a long, very soggy
3:36
piece of coyote scat into a plastic
3:38
bag. I've met her at a city park
3:40
in Seattle, tucked in between a football
3:42
stadium, a medical center
3:45
and some city housing. That
3:47
is a huge pile.
3:49
Yeah, so this one I'm going to collect.
3:51
I don't have a lot of hope for this one working out genetically,
3:54
but we might be able to get some diet genetics
3:56
off of it.
3:57
Sam's plan is to gather information.
3:59
on diet and genetics from
4:02
this scat and hundreds of other samples
4:04
just like it to help her and Chris
4:06
understand how these coyotes are
4:08
finding a way to survive in an urban
4:11
setting.
4:13
Coyotes are about as big as
4:15
a medium-sized dog
4:16
and then make it gray and
4:18
make the snout kind of elongated with big
4:21
ears. They're a part of the canid
4:23
family, a relative of the wolf and
4:26
your golden retriever, but
4:28
they usually max out at about 30 pounds.
4:30
So they're relatively small,
4:33
they just look really lanky. It's like a
4:35
lanky, a lanky dog.
4:37
Sam is out here in the Seattle
4:39
rain collecting bags of poop among
4:41
the dog walkers and joggers because
4:44
from these samples she's able to extract
4:46
DNA, a treasure trove
4:49
of information, not just about the individual
4:51
coyote that left it there, but
4:53
also DNA from the things that that
4:55
coyote consumed, like
4:57
the plants, animals, insects and other
5:00
stuff. From that she
5:02
can then build a picture of how they're surviving
5:04
in a place you wouldn't expect them to be,
5:07
how they're adapting. I
5:09
just think it's so cool that they can live in urban
5:11
areas because so many species can't
5:14
cope with it. Doesn't
5:17
take much more time on our walk around the park
5:19
before we spot another pile of
5:22
the fecal gold. There's
5:24
a cat right there. Right here.
5:28
Oh good eye, wow that one's really camouflaged.
5:31
This one's nice because you actually can really tell
5:33
what they've been eating. So you can see this fur right
5:35
here, it's got these
5:38
like little white and gray spots and that kind
5:40
of like little bit of orangey color and
5:43
this is almost definitely a rabbit.
5:45
So these eastern cottontails that they eat a lot of.
5:48
Oh
5:48
interesting. Yeah. So this is about
5:50
each one of these sort of mini logs
5:52
here is about the size of my index finger
5:55
and sort of very pinched off at one end, which
5:58
is fairly typical is it?
5:59
coyote scat you see? Yeah,
6:02
when they're eating a lot of vertebrates and they have a lot of fur,
6:04
this is what we see. If they're eating fruit, there's
6:06
no shape.
6:08
Right, it's more sort of segmented and
6:10
blunt at the end? Yeah, exactly, or
6:12
just kind of a pile. If they're eating cherries, it's
6:14
just kind of a... I'm going to use the word
6:16
sploop to best
6:18
describe that.
6:20
Are people cordiers a scat lady yet?
6:24
I've gotten Dr. Pupologist. That's
6:27
one. Usually
6:29
coyote lady, usually not scat
6:31
lady. Okay. I don't know
6:33
which I prefer. The key thing here
6:35
is that coyotes are opportunistic when
6:37
it comes to food, meaning they'll eat just
6:40
about anything they can find.
6:42
Sam tells me it's a common misconception
6:44
that coyotes are only meat eaters. And
6:47
really they're huge omnivores, just like our dogs.
6:50
We feed our dogs dog food, which is combinations
6:52
of, you know, usually some sort of grain
6:54
and meat and other vegetables. So
6:57
coyotes are the same way. They'll eat pretty much
6:59
anything that they can get their mouths on. But
7:02
a lot of that is fruit.
7:03
Sam has found some pretty curious
7:05
contents in some of the coyote scat that she's
7:07
analyzed, like chocolate and
7:09
even cannabis.
7:11
This ability to eat whatever,
7:14
whenever is part of the reason
7:16
coyotes have done so well in urban
7:18
environments.
7:20
Coyotes are really good at kind
7:22
of making use of human dominated systems.
7:25
They're just really adaptable.
7:27
We don't exactly know when coyotes
7:30
kind of first arrived in Seattle, but they've definitely been
7:32
here for quite a while.
7:38
But it's not just Seattle. Coyotes
7:41
have been on a march to take over pretty much
7:43
all of North America.
7:45
Coyotes know how to adapt
7:47
to multiple environmental conditions,
7:49
settings, climates, and
7:52
differences in human densities.
7:57
Chris shell tells me that coyotes weren't always
8:00
the city slickers they are today. And
8:02
it's extraordinary how they've been able to
8:05
expand their kind
8:07
of natal range from what was the Great Plains
8:09
out to many, many
8:12
reaches of the
8:14
continental US.
8:16
Before European settlers came to America,
8:18
coyotes were mostly in the wide open
8:20
plains of the Midwest. Grassland,
8:23
open spaces, ideal for
8:25
running down prey, just like your dog at home
8:27
loves to chase down a ball.
8:29
So in that range, that was the breadbasket
8:32
for coyotes. And then all of a sudden,
8:34
you know, in about the last 250 years,
8:37
they have moved to either ends
8:40
of the continental US up through
8:42
to Canada and have established themselves
8:45
in Central America as well. So they don't
8:47
just stay in grasslands anymore.
8:49
Many of the coyotes' ancient canid cousins
8:52
followed land bridges to other continents.
8:55
But the coyotes stayed.
8:57
For the last million years or so, these
9:00
coyotes have developed into North American
9:02
specialists.
9:04
And while other large mammals have been on the
9:06
decline, the coyote seems to have
9:08
cornered the market on population growth.
9:11
Chris tells me it's only a matter
9:13
of time before coyotes even make their
9:15
way into South America,
9:17
a place they have never been.
9:20
There are a few things that have enabled this
9:22
widespread expansion. First, we
9:24
killed off almost all the wolves. Wolves
9:28
and coyotes are cousins that don't really get
9:30
along. These two canid species
9:32
were competing for similar resources. But
9:35
the bigger, more dominant wolves kept
9:37
the coyotes out of the wolves' territory.
9:40
So wolves will oftentimes, if they see
9:42
a coyote, they will chase it out of
9:44
its territory or kill it. And that's oftentimes
9:47
to save resources, to essentially
9:50
conserve the same number
9:52
or type of resources that the two individual
9:54
organisms eat.
9:56
In other words, if you're a wolf, the
9:59
coyote is your concern. competitor and
10:01
has to be eliminated. But as
10:03
white settlers moved west, they practically
10:06
eradicated wolves and this created
10:08
a vacuum for the coyotes
10:10
to fill. The coyotes
10:12
were basically free to move into terrain
10:14
that wolves would have kept them from entering before.
10:18
Mountain lions were also widely exterminated,
10:21
which left their niche for the coyote to exploit
10:24
too. And the other
10:26
main factor in the coyote's success was
10:28
landscape conversion. European
10:31
settlement meant that a lot of dense forest
10:33
land, which is not ideal for coyotes,
10:36
was converted into open agricultural
10:38
land and urban developments, perfect
10:41
for coyotes and the diversity of prey
10:43
they enjoy.
10:45
Think rodents, think rabbits
10:48
and the like. And that would help a
10:50
ton for coyotes in their diet. So
10:53
it was kind of this dual exercise of
10:55
wolves weren't around anymore, which left a lot
10:57
of space for coyotes. And then now all
10:59
of a sudden these coyotes have more food
11:02
resources as a function of land
11:04
cover change. Who wouldn't take over the continent
11:07
with all that? You're feet, right?
11:09
That's like bingo. If
11:11
you're a coyote, you're thinking, okay, this is the best possible
11:14
world of these. That's just
11:15
opened up to me here. It's the new frontier for them,
11:17
right? In every direction, really. Yeah. And we like to joke
11:19
that coyotes, when they came into more human
11:21
dominated environments was essentially
11:23
like them walking into a country kitchen buffet. They
11:26
could choose a whole bunch of different things
11:29
that they would love to eat, right? Okay. Maybe
11:31
you can get the natural prey items, get
11:33
the small mice or get the
11:36
Norway rats, but then you also
11:38
could dine on berries. You also could dine
11:40
on say human food subsidies, whether
11:43
it's dog food that's left out by people
11:45
or trash that maybe was left on the floor
11:47
and anything in between. So
11:51
pretty good look for the coyote.
11:59
Grizzly back had just wander in and adjust
12:02
to city life.
12:03
Chris attributes the coyote's success
12:06
in cities to what he calls the Goldilocks
12:08
Effect. They're not too
12:11
big to the point where if they're seen
12:13
by people, they raise
12:15
alarm for the entirety of a city.
12:17
Take for instance, any mountain
12:20
lion moving through any city.
12:22
Alarm bells would be going off, wildlife
12:25
officials would be called in to remove or
12:27
kill a mountain lion in a major city.
12:29
But coyotes fit this niche where they
12:32
are just big enough to assume
12:35
the apex predator role inside
12:38
of cities. So they don't get out competed
12:40
by larger carnivores. See what I'm saying?
12:43
So they're just small enough. I love it. That's
12:45
the Goldilocks. Yeah, exactly. That's
12:47
the Goldilocks Effect. They're just small enough to not be perceived
12:50
as a tremendous threat to the entire
12:52
community. But they're
12:54
just large enough to not be bullied
12:56
out of their ecological niche by
12:58
other carnivores.
13:01
So we know that coyotes can adapt.
13:04
They're happily making cities like Chicago,
13:06
LA and Seattle home. But
13:09
now Sam Creeling's research is
13:11
revealing something else. She's looking
13:14
at way more than just what coyotes are eating.
13:17
She's digging deep into their DNA
13:19
too.
13:19
And with that we can tell a whole bunch of information
13:22
about who they are, how related are they
13:24
to each other, are they genetically
13:26
what we'd say like kind of healthy. Are
13:29
we seeing good gene flow across the city?
13:31
Good gene flow would mean good genetic
13:34
diversity, say from one city park
13:36
to another. This genetic diversity
13:39
helps keep a coyote population strong
13:41
to help them avoid disease and to
13:44
adapt to changes over time. Sam's
13:47
study looks at how genes are flowing
13:50
throughout the city and how movement
13:52
and reproduction might be affected
13:54
by things like highways or other
13:56
city infrastructure.
13:58
Seattle is kind of a special case where we're
13:59
surrounded by water and that kind of adds another
14:02
interesting element. I kind
14:04
of have a theory that urban areas act as
14:07
kind of pseudo-islands genetically,
14:09
so we'd expect to see limited
14:11
new individuals coming into the city and limited
14:14
kind of gene flow around the city.
14:16
Sam is expecting to find that these urban
14:19
populations of coyotes in Seattle show
14:22
reduced gene flow and genetic
14:24
diversity, and that the very DNA
14:26
of these coyotes will start to change
14:29
over time.
14:30
So theoretically in an urban area we
14:33
could have urban
14:35
coyotes as kind of like a different
14:38
group than non-urban coyotes.
14:40
In fact a recent study similar to
14:42
Sam's but in California found
14:44
just that.
14:46
The DNA of coyotes in Los Angeles
14:48
is distinct from their country cousins.
14:51
There isn't really evidence yet that this means they're
14:53
adapting into a new species, but
14:56
it does signal that there are elements of the
14:58
urban landscape that alter coyote
15:00
population dynamics. Overall,
15:04
Sam is hoping that her research into coyote
15:06
dia and genetics will reshape the
15:08
predominantly negative view the public
15:10
has of these canids. Do
15:13
you think that wild animals belong in our cities?
15:16
So this might go against your
15:18
whole podcast's title, but
15:21
I don't believe in wilderness. I
15:23
know! I
15:25
think wilderness is kind of a
15:28
dichotomy that doesn't necessarily exist,
15:30
so it kind of inherently says
15:33
things are wild or not wild. Things
15:35
are animal or human. Where
15:37
I kind of view urbanization
15:40
in cities as kind of this great confluence of
15:41
both. Nothing
15:44
in this world is untouched by human hands.
15:47
Sam tells me it's time we start viewing
15:50
our cities as wild places.
15:52
They are functioning ecosystems in
15:54
and of themselves. And I think that's kind
15:56
of a narrative that maybe a lot
15:58
of people don't expect.
15:59
Well,
16:02
let's explore that right after the
16:04
break.
16:20
I'm Wella Paskin, the host of
16:22
Dakota Ring, Slate's podcast about cracking
16:25
cultural mysteries. We have a whole
16:27
new season coming up, including a proper
16:30
Cold
16:30
War caper. Did Peter Falk,
16:32
star of the old TV show, Colombo, really
16:34
team up with the U.S. government to help
16:37
quell a communist revolution?
16:38
I got a ton of people put on your guns. And
16:41
why is it so hard to park your car,
16:44
even though we've built so much parking?
16:47
You can hear these episodes and more on the new season
16:49
of Dakota Ring, wherever you listen
16:52
to podcasts.
17:00
Early one evening, a few weeks ago, I made
17:02
this recording.
17:07
Two coyotes from a pack that
17:09
lived just down the hill from me.
17:14
I live in a pretty rural area on
17:16
the edge of the city of Bellingham. We have
17:18
bears and cougars passing through too,
17:20
so it's wild, but it's not wilderness.
17:24
And it's not the city either. It's
17:26
on the spectrum somewhere in between.
17:29
One thing was very clear
17:31
to me during my conversation with Chris Schell
17:33
over Zoom. He puts no limits
17:36
on his definition of wilderness.
17:38
It means everything to him,
17:40
literally. I have wilderness behind
17:43
my head as we're on this call with
17:45
plants just in front of the window
17:47
pane. Wilderness to me can
17:50
mean something as small as a small
17:52
plot of grass, a piece
17:55
of wood for fire, or it can mean a small
17:57
base of wood.
17:59
lot
18:01
because wilderness isn't something
18:03
that's separate from us.
18:05
That even includes the gray infrastructure
18:08
of our cities, causeways, skyscrapers,
18:11
sidewalks.
18:14
Even in those cracks you start
18:16
to see things grow out of the
18:18
cracks and it's an important reminder
18:20
that life is all around us and wilderness is all around
18:22
us if you just take the time to look for it. So
18:25
much so that we start to decenter ourselves
18:27
as a species and recenter everything
18:29
around us. Understanding that the same
18:32
atoms that create us are in
18:34
fact the same atoms that create the things that
18:36
we see across the way. I love that
18:38
reminder for all of us that we are made up
18:40
of the very same substances, all natural
18:43
things around us. That's
18:44
amazing as a connector isn't it? It's a really good
18:46
place to start. If
18:48
that's your foundation, like we should be saying
18:50
that to kids in kindergarten as we're teaching them ecology
18:53
in kindergarten, right? You know where that's
18:55
their understanding of the world around them that it's just
18:57
made of the same space to us as you are. And to
19:00
be fair my six and my four-year-old have really
19:03
helped me come back to that
19:05
narrative because they see nature
19:07
with fresh eyes, right? They aren't shackled
19:10
by the traditional notions
19:12
of what ecology should
19:14
be. They are growing up in an urban
19:16
environment where ecology just is. And
19:19
imagine that if ecology just is
19:22
from Jump Street,
19:23
from when you are young, then
19:26
everything around you is ecology.
19:29
Just what is ecology
19:31
in this context?
19:33
Ecology at its base level is
19:35
a study of organisms in
19:37
relationship to other organisms and organisms
19:39
to their environment.
19:41
And then in that definition why
19:44
would the city not be something we
19:46
study? Because we are interacting
19:48
with each other, interacting with other non-human
19:51
organisms and interacting with our environment.
19:53
Hence urban ecology.
19:55
It's the same thing. We just do it in a different
19:57
system.
19:59
understanding the notion of what their home can be,
20:02
Chris is expanding the ideas of
20:04
ecology, and what we include
20:06
in our conversations around communities
20:09
and cities. But
20:11
Chris didn't always think this way. He
20:13
told me he grew up with a mind for science,
20:15
but took the long road to find his calling
20:18
with urban coyotes. But
20:21
I'll say, like, many
20:23
of the folks that may be listening to this and
20:25
are people of color and interested in wildlife
20:27
sciences, when I was growing
20:30
up as an undergrad and
20:32
a graduate student kind of being academically
20:34
raised, a lot of what
20:37
I was thinking about in science was
20:40
medicine.
20:41
He had a family in the medical field, so it
20:43
seemed like the obvious choice. He
20:45
enjoyed studying the brain and behavior
20:48
and set his sights on becoming a neurosurgeon.
20:51
Of course,
20:51
as
20:53
a high schooler, you don't know. You
20:56
don't know that that's the hardest
20:59
level of the medical profession
21:01
to achieve. But whatever. I said, fine,
21:03
we'll go with it.
21:05
As Chris puts it, he tried for a hot minute
21:07
to volunteer at hospitals during his undergrad,
21:10
but quickly realized that medicine was
21:12
not for him. But in the summer
21:14
of his sophomore year, he went to the Dominican
21:17
Republic for an immersive environmental science
21:19
program
21:20
to study tarantulas.
21:22
After that, he was hooked on
21:24
environmental studies.
21:26
Then 15 years ago came grad school
21:29
and time to choose a specialty.
21:31
Remember the coyote in the cooler?
21:33
During his grad school interview at the University
21:36
of Chicago,
21:37
there were about 10 different professors that
21:40
came up to me and said, hey, had you heard
21:42
about this Quiznos coyote?
21:45
You should really take a look into this, Chris. I think you're going
21:47
to like this Quiznos coyote story. And
21:50
that's when I
21:51
went down the rabbit hole. Right. Or
21:54
the coyote. Pivotal. Wow.
21:56
Okay. God, that video, that
21:58
that one coyote,
21:59
it knew the effect that it's had on
22:02
your life saved us from another darn
22:04
brain surgeon. Right. Yeah,
22:06
it was one of those inflection
22:09
points, right?
22:13
That coyote in a cooler moment
22:15
marked the beginning of a long relationship
22:17
with this species for Chris. He
22:20
told me he admires their flexibility
22:22
and how they persist in a myriad
22:24
of environments, even where ecosystems
22:27
don't look healthy enough to support them.
22:30
What would you say to someone who says coyotes
22:33
don't belong here? I'll say that the question
22:35
of whether or not coyotes belong here doesn't matter.
22:38
It doesn't matter. They're here. They're not going
22:40
anywhere. So we need to be able to
22:43
build creative, imaginative, proactive
22:45
strategies that allow us to coexist
22:47
with these species. And it would be
22:49
a crying shame if we didn't figure
22:51
this out because having coyotes
22:54
in the city
22:56
is a great benefit. Coyotes
22:58
perform a lot of ecosystem services
23:00
for us in cities. They help to keep down
23:03
the rabbit population that might want to eat the
23:05
carrots in your garden. And they
23:07
eat the rats that might otherwise try to live
23:09
in your basement.
23:10
Chris tells me this can be a mutually
23:13
beneficial relationship.
23:15
We might as well just keep it going and figure
23:17
out ways for us to change our behavior
23:19
in the same vein as
23:22
us figuring out ways to change their behavior.
23:25
In other words, when we think about our
23:27
cities, we need to think of them as functioning
23:30
ecosystems. It goes beyond
23:32
just the coyote.
23:33
Chris says we are all interconnected
23:36
and how we decide to use the land has
23:38
an impact from where we put roads,
23:41
construct buildings, and even
23:43
what we plant in our own yards.
23:46
So completely disregarding our
23:49
part in this equation essentially
23:52
is missing the entire link
23:55
of how we exist on this planet and
23:57
are a part of this planet and why that's
23:59
criminal.
23:59
is because for a long
24:02
time, we have thought of ourselves as
24:04
a species separate from nature, which
24:06
is
24:07
part of the reason why up until
24:10
the 1990s, the majority of ecological
24:12
research was outside of cities.
24:15
ALICE
24:15
The relationship that Chris has developed
24:17
with coyotes runs deep beyond
24:19
the science. He tells me
24:22
he has a kind of kinship with them.
24:25
Seeing coyotes living in these urban environments,
24:27
similar to the Black experience
24:29
in America, and how
24:32
essentially coyotes have made
24:34
lemonade out of lemons, which is
24:37
very analogous to the ways in which Black
24:40
people and Black community has created
24:42
solutions, really creating
24:45
something out of nothing. Coyotes
24:48
are oftentimes in cities and loved by
24:50
many, but hated by a lot.
24:58
So for instance, many of the folks that
25:00
have cats and have their pets
25:03
that are injured or killed
25:05
by a coyote attack will
25:07
instantly jump to vilify the
25:09
entire coyote population or all
25:12
coyotes generally and say that they need to be eradicated,
25:14
that they're vermin, that they're pests.
25:17
And that
25:19
stereotyping, it's also something
25:21
that the Black community faces day
25:23
in and day out.
25:25
And yet finding a way to persist through
25:27
all of that chaos across
25:29
many different cities, environments,
25:33
institutions, right, is akin
25:36
to what it's like to be Black
25:38
in America. ALICE
25:40
Chris now heads up his own research
25:43
lab at the University of California, Berkeley,
25:45
with a laser focus on the intersection
25:48
of society, ecology,
25:50
and evolution,
25:51
to try and understand how coyotes
25:54
and other species are rapidly adapting
25:56
to life in cities.
25:59
is predominantly black,
26:02
queer, fem, and we have these
26:04
conversations quite extensively
26:06
because of the fact that we see
26:08
a lot of what we love
26:11
about our people, our community,
26:14
ourselves, our ancestors, imbued
26:16
in this species.
26:18
I only have half of your story, too. I
26:20
can't relate to the things that you relate to as a
26:22
person of color, and that whole element
26:25
to it is just something I want to understand
26:28
and lean into and learn more about
26:30
and know about, you know, like
26:32
all of us should be doing, especially
26:35
when it comes to this, like you say, this all-inclusive
26:37
science-called ecology, right? Right, and
26:40
that's the way it should be,
26:41
all-inclusive, right?
26:43
Chris says it's not only a parallel story
26:46
between coyotes and underrepresented
26:48
members of society. It's essential
26:51
to have these views in ecology,
26:53
especially when it comes to urban ecology,
26:56
because for so long, the impact
26:58
that systemic racism and oppression
27:00
have had on nature and wildlife in
27:02
cities has been invisible.
27:05
Chris points to redlining as an example.
27:08
Redlining was a discriminatory
27:10
practice the US government used in the 1930s to
27:13
help mortgage lenders determine areas
27:15
considered risky for investment.
27:18
Color-coded maps drew red lines
27:20
around black and immigrant neighborhoods,
27:23
suppressing home loans and development in those
27:25
areas.
27:26
And Chris's research sees that
27:28
reflected in the green spaces that existed,
27:31
then and now. So if we just
27:33
take, for instance, the parks that exist
27:35
within redline neighborhoods,
27:38
there are fewer parks, the parks are smaller,
27:40
and they have less plant diversity. You
27:43
may be asking, OK, well, why is that important?
27:46
Well, if they have less plant diversity, that
27:48
means that they can host less
27:50
wildlife diversity.
27:53
That means there will be fewer wildlife species
27:55
in those areas. Chris tells
27:58
me that this has impacted the relationship. that
28:00
people in these communities have when it comes
28:02
to the wildlife around them.
28:04
You can imagine for many of the communities
28:06
of color, many of the communities I've been
28:09
in and interacted with that I'm a part of,
28:11
they may see wildlife, right? They
28:13
may see
28:15
rodents, raccoons,
28:17
other species like pigeons as pests because
28:20
they're causing considerable damage
28:23
and us not giving any credence to
28:26
their experiences
28:27
and invalidating
28:29
their perspectives is essentially just
28:32
reifying the maps that were
28:34
created over 60
28:35
years ago. These
28:37
race-based redline maps were
28:39
abolished in the 1960s, but
28:42
the effects of that housing segregation
28:44
created inequalities that we still
28:46
see today.
28:48
Take air pollution, for example. Residents
28:50
of Seattle's South Park neighborhood will
28:52
live eight years less on average than
28:55
the rest of the city.
28:56
These areas where redlining held
28:58
back family wealth and urban development
29:01
have higher rates of cancer, higher
29:04
rates of asthma, preterm births,
29:07
less tree canopy cover,
29:09
less nature.
29:11
Chris calls these negative factors disturbances.
29:15
So take all of those disturbances together
29:17
and any urban ecologist, any wildlife ecologist
29:20
will quickly realize, oh,
29:22
all of these disturbances are
29:25
concentrated
29:26
in one area of a city? Of
29:29
course we're not going to be able to see wildlife be
29:31
able to establish themselves in those areas
29:34
because they're trying to deal with
29:36
just living in the city generally. And then all
29:38
of a sudden in that one hotspot
29:40
of the city, there are all of these disturbances
29:43
all at once.
29:44
Are you able to bring, I mean,
29:46
your experiences as a black man
29:49
and being part of the black community, do
29:51
you have the opportunity to bring what
29:53
you've just told me, bring people
29:55
into the fold of coyotes for the reasons you've
29:57
just explained? Does it get that direct? the
30:00
opportunity to present that to youth
30:03
in the black community, for example, as a species
30:05
that they might be interested in or like
30:08
you in some ways have
30:10
a kinship with, like you said. Right.
30:13
I think
30:14
just being able to take
30:16
the science that I have learned in
30:19
predominantly white spaces and
30:21
being able to share that with my family and
30:23
friends back at home has been some
30:26
of the most profound,
30:28
and I call it work, but really it hasn't
30:30
been work. It's been me sharing
30:32
my life
30:33
with the people I grew up with, the
30:36
people I'm in community with.
30:38
Chris had an experience with his own family
30:40
that shows how the knowledge he's bringing back
30:42
helps his community.
30:44
His mother lives in LA and one
30:47
morning she let her small dog out into the
30:49
backyard to go for a pee. She
30:51
carried on getting ready to go to work, turned
30:53
around and right there
30:55
was a coyote
30:57
on top of the cinder block fence in her backyard.
30:59
And the coyote was eyeing the dog
31:04
as if to say, Oh, you're
31:07
alone. So of course my
31:09
mom's dog makes a lot of noise.
31:11
My mom runs outside and
31:15
she had told me
31:16
that she raised herself
31:19
up,
31:19
made a lot of noise and walked
31:22
straight towards the coyote. She
31:24
would have never done that in the past. And
31:27
she's told me as much. His mom
31:29
scared the coyote away by being dominant.
31:32
It's called hazing or reverse of conditioning,
31:35
teaching the coyote,
31:37
making it back away.
31:38
So my mom effectively hazed a
31:40
coyote and then she proceeded to tell
31:42
me I would have never known to do
31:45
that if you weren't doing
31:47
this work, Chris. So that made me just
31:49
take a minute to think about even
31:52
in those small little moments that
31:56
I feel like I'm making a difference in
31:58
a way that allows for for people
32:00
in my community, specifically my family,
32:04
to coexist with wildlife. And here's
32:06
the kicker to all of this, right? With
32:08
climate change, with increasing,
32:10
say, drought, wildfires, flooding,
32:13
there are lots of wildlife species
32:16
that are going to start interacting with people more
32:18
and more frequently. So having these
32:20
conversations is necessary.
32:24
Bingo.
32:32
There we go. Beautiful.
32:35
Pretty fresh, too. A popular coyote scout. Yeah,
32:39
this is actually quite nice. Back
32:41
on the front line in the city park with Chris's
32:43
protege, Sam Creeling, we
32:46
find one more coyote scout for her genetic
32:48
sampling study. She's slowly
32:51
figuring out the puzzle of the urban coyote
32:54
as these creatures reshape themselves
32:56
for city life in Seattle.
32:58
There's also something to be said for
33:02
how adaptive coyotes are and how
33:05
well they're able to cope
33:07
with change. Coyotes
33:10
are a mirror to ourselves. So
33:13
we can look at the advances
33:15
that coyotes make and understand ourselves as
33:18
well.
33:19
And then for the coyote, they'll continue
33:21
to expand and adapt. They're
33:24
pretty good at it. After all, they've
33:26
been doing it for a million years. For
33:28
the rest of us, it's about recognizing
33:30
the impact we have on our natural world,
33:33
whether it's outside or inside
33:36
of the city.
33:38
There
33:38
is no place on this planet that is not
33:40
touched by people. So if we
33:43
disregard that part of the equation, we
33:46
will almost always fail.
33:50
It makes me think about the future and
33:53
how our understanding of urban wildlife
33:56
might be needed even more in the future.
33:58
It's almost a year.
33:59
certainty that urbanization and urban
34:02
development is going to continue. It's almost
34:04
a certainty that the human population
34:06
is also going to continue to grow. And
34:09
because of those realities, it's
34:12
important for us to acknowledge and recognize
34:15
the fact that many wildlife species
34:17
are going to have to grapple with interacting with us.
34:20
Along the way, we might even be able to
34:22
learn from the coyote. It's
34:25
a paradigm shift that we face in
34:27
our relationship with nature, where
34:30
every species is valued as part
34:32
of an ecosystem and absolutely
34:34
including those that find themselves making
34:37
a life in the urban parts of our planet.
34:40
Building better future cities that
34:42
will be more hospitable to both people and wildlife.
34:46
We may not get to see it Chris, right?
34:48
With you and I, Oomers,
34:51
Gen Xers, Millennials,
34:53
Gen Zers, we may not see that. We
34:57
may not see the fruits of our labor. And
34:59
yet we
34:59
have to work hard in order
35:02
to prepare our kids and
35:04
our kids kids for a future that's going to look
35:07
very different or for giving
35:09
them the same flexibility that that coyote
35:11
has to adapt to whatever is next.
35:15
Knowing full well that part of our
35:17
mission is to make sure
35:19
that we help continue to reconnect
35:21
them back to the planet so we
35:23
can start healing the planet. So
35:26
we can start again healing ourselves.
35:54
For some lovely coyote content
35:56
head over to our Instagram at the wild
35:58
pod and you can find me
35:59
at Chris Morgan Wildlife. The
36:02
Wild is inspired not just by nature
36:05
but by the people who work in it, love
36:07
it, protect it. The Wild
36:10
is a production of KUAW in Seattle and
36:12
me, Chris Morgan, with support from
36:14
Wildlife Media. Our producers
36:16
are Matt Martin and Lucy Sucek. Jim
36:19
Gates is our editor.
36:20
A very special thank you for their kind
36:23
financial support to Jill and Scott Walker,
36:25
Rose Lettwin, Ellen Ferguson, Anna
36:28
Kimball, John Taylor, Paul Lister,
36:31
Mark Wilkins and Rebecca Badger, Bob
36:33
Yellalese, Barbara Stollman and
36:35
Annie Mize. Our
36:37
production team includes Juan Pablo Chiquiza,
36:40
April Craig, Michaela Gianotti Boyle,
36:43
Tatiana Latre, Kyra McDermott,
36:45
Darcy Riggin-Schmidt and Brendan
36:47
Sweeney. Our theme music is by
36:49
Michael Parker. I'm Chris Morgan.
36:52
I hope you're enjoying The Wild. We love
36:55
making it for you so feel free
36:57
to share it with a friend or two. You might just
36:59
inspire them and it helps us too. Thanks
37:02
so much for listening and take care of
37:04
each other.
37:17
I told some random
37:20
people that I saw a coyote and they're like I
37:22
just ran into someone that was looking for coyotes.
37:24
I was like who are
37:26
they and she was like I think
37:29
they're they're from some podcast maybe
37:31
I was like and they they mentioned the word
37:33
wild I was like the wild podcast. If
37:35
you're looking for coyotes I just saw coyote. So
37:37
yeah, there's the coyote.
37:39
Two men of color vanished after
37:42
last being seen in the same deputies patrol
37:44
car.
37:45
I knew something was wrong. Your mother
37:47
knows. It's the strangest
37:49
case, the most unsettling case. Listen to
37:51
the Last Ride podcast, part of the NPR
37:54
Network.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More