Podchaser Logo
Home
Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Released Monday, 10th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Will Tory manifesto contain any big surprises?

Monday, 10th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is the BBC. This

0:03

podcast is supported by advertising outside

0:05

the UK. So,

0:11

how do we get AI right? Well,

0:14

we need the right volume of data,

0:16

the software to train it, and massive

0:18

compute power, or... Another one

0:21

bites the dust. Are you ready?

0:23

Hey, are you ready for this? Are you hanging on the

0:25

edge of your seat? But with HPE

0:27

GreenLake, we get access to supercomputing to

0:29

power AI at the scale we need,

0:31

helping generate better insights. Nice

0:36

teamwork, guys. Search HPE GreenLake.

0:41

Ready to pop the question? And take advantage of

0:43

30% off? The

0:45

jewelers at bluenile.com have got sparkle

0:47

down to a science, with beautiful

0:49

lab-grown diamonds worthy of your most

0:52

brilliant moments. Their lab-grown

0:54

diamonds are independently graded and guaranteed

0:56

identical to natural diamonds. And they're

0:58

ready to ship to your door.

1:00

Go to bluenile.com to get 30%

1:03

off select lab-grown diamonds. That's

1:06

bluenile.com for 30% off

1:08

lab-grown diamonds. bluenile.com.

1:13

Hello, I'm Julian Warricker. Thank you

1:15

for downloading the BBC's World Tonight podcast

1:18

for Monday, the 10th of June. It's

1:21

the week of the election campaign when

1:23

the major party manifestos are published. The

1:25

Prime Minister has defended his record in

1:27

a BBC interview on the eve of

1:30

his party's detailed plans being scrutinised. And

1:32

we hear as well from the Liberal Democrats

1:34

as their manifesto hits the shelves. A

1:37

snap election in France. How much of

1:39

a gamble is President Macron taking after

1:42

his party performed so badly in the

1:44

European elections over the weekend? And

1:47

another diplomatic effort in the Middle East

1:49

by the US Secretary of State, Anthony

1:51

Blinken. It's his eighth visit to the

1:53

region since the Gaza War began. Can

1:56

he make a difference this time around?

2:00

of the election campaign, the week

2:02

when the sound bites and press

2:05

releases of the first fortnight are

2:07

crystallized by publication of the party

2:09

manifestos, crystallized but not necessarily clarified.

2:12

Today it was the Liberal Democrats' turn

2:14

to put their detailed plans out there

2:17

for public scrutiny and will focus on

2:19

one particular aspect of their proposals, the

2:21

crucial issue of housing, later in the

2:23

programme. Tomorrow the Conservatives launch

2:25

their manifesto, a key moment for

2:28

a governing party which is trailing

2:30

significantly in the opinion polls and which is

2:32

coming off the back of a difficult few

2:34

days. Well, the BBC is

2:36

interviewing all the major party leaders in the

2:39

run-up to the election in the Panorama interviews

2:41

with Nick Robinson and the

2:43

first of those was broadcast earlier this evening with

2:45

Rishi Sunak. In an

2:47

early exchange the Prime Minister was questioned

2:49

about Conservative policies announced in the campaign

2:52

so far and how they'll be paid

2:54

for. We've had endless promises.

2:56

I've got all your Tory press releases

2:59

here. A promise of national

3:01

service, a couple of billion there. A

3:03

promise for a tax cut for pensioners.

3:05

A promise of a tax cut for

3:08

parents. More apprenticeship, more police officers. Endless

3:11

promises of more and

3:13

more money from the Conservatives. Have you found

3:15

the magic money tree? No,

3:17

every single one of those policies that

3:20

you've just been through is fully funded

3:22

and costed, as is explained in every single one of

3:24

those press releases as indeed when

3:26

we've set out our manifesto tomorrow people will be able to

3:28

see all the details behind it even further. And

3:30

tomorrow you'll promise more tax cuts. We

3:33

will have a manifesto tomorrow that builds

3:35

on all the things that you've just

3:37

gone through that we've already announced in

3:39

this campaign that yes, does continue to

3:41

cut people's taxes because I believe in

3:43

a country where people's hard work is

3:45

rewarded. Well, Nick ended the interview by asking

3:48

Mr Sunak whether the Conservatives deserved another

3:50

five years in power. After

3:52

14 years, five Prime Ministers, Boris

3:54

Johnson lying about parties, Liz

3:57

Truss almost crashing the economy and you bunking

3:59

off DJ. After all

4:01

the broken promises, you really think you

4:03

deserve another chance? I've been

4:05

very clear in the past, no government gets everything

4:08

right, but I am proud of what has been

4:10

achieved over 14 years. This

4:12

election is also about the future. We

4:14

have a clear plan. I'm prepared to

4:16

take bold action to cut people's taxes,

4:18

protect their pensions and bring migration down.

4:21

And in contrast, Labour are just going to put everyone's taxes

4:23

up. That's a choice. Well, Newsnight's

4:25

political editor Nick Watt is with me,

4:27

so that was this evening. Nick, how

4:30

does it throw forward, do you think,

4:32

to tomorrow? Well, it throws forward in

4:34

those very clear remarks from the Prime

4:36

Minister to Nick Robinson that that manifesto

4:39

will have further tax cuts. So it

4:42

looks highly likely that we will get

4:44

the third cut in employee national insurance

4:46

contributions. There have been two so far

4:49

in the last six months or so.

4:51

And if they do that, that

4:53

will allow them to say that they have halved that

4:56

rate. I also think

4:58

it's going to be no great surprise

5:00

if we look at that manifesto tomorrow and

5:03

find that there is some help for some first

5:05

time buyers. So we do know

5:07

that the government wants to ensure that if

5:09

you're a first time buyer, you do not

5:11

pay stamp duty on a property up to

5:13

£425,000. That

5:17

is known as the nil rate. That is the

5:19

current position, but that's due to be lifted next

5:21

April. And

5:23

it's pretty clear that that nil rate

5:26

will continue if that will be a

5:28

pledge from the Conservatives. And

5:30

it may well be that they want

5:32

to go further. I mean, for example,

5:34

the Labour Party last week talked about

5:36

how they would provide a guarantee for

5:39

a greater deposit for first time buyers

5:41

struggling to get a deposit. Rishi Sunak

5:43

in that Nick Robinson interview said, the

5:45

big challenge for young people is getting

5:47

a deposit. So it wouldn't surprise me

5:50

if we see something pretty serious in

5:52

that sort of area. that

12:00

this was an area that they said they'd do

12:02

something about. I mean, this is the problem with

12:04

a lot of the policies that they

12:06

can talk about, but ultimately it is

12:09

about the record and in

12:11

the interview again tonight, Rishi

12:14

Sunak did acknowledge that

12:16

it has become harder for first-time buyers to

12:18

get on the property line. But if there

12:20

was an incentive to go back to where we

12:22

were before on that, as has

12:25

been suggested, would that be a good

12:27

thing? Well, I think

12:29

the problem is that there are many

12:31

factors in why people can't

12:33

get on the housing ladder. There's an

12:35

argument over whether it's deposits or not,

12:38

there's an argument over whether it's salary

12:40

levels, but even if you put up

12:42

people's wages, the

12:45

gap to actually then be able to afford something

12:47

because there aren't enough homes being built is still

12:49

a challenge out there. And Daphne, you're hearing that message

12:51

from people you speak to on this one, are you? Yes,

12:54

I am hearing that. I think that's

12:56

true, as Jo has said. But I

12:58

also think it's no good just building

13:00

houses. You need a thriving and expanding

13:03

economy. You need people in work. That

13:05

is vital. The economy has to grow

13:07

and that will help house building and

13:09

everything else. Thank you both so

13:11

much, Jo Tanner, Daphne Bagshaw. Throughout the campaign,

13:14

you've been getting in touch to tell us

13:16

the issues that matter to you. So thank

13:18

you for doing that. This week, we're particularly

13:20

interested in hearing from you if you're still

13:22

making up your mind. If

13:24

that is you do, please get in touch. If you text

13:26

it's 84844, the charge 10

13:30

to 15 pence to do that. We're on WhatsApp

13:32

03700100444 or there's good old email world.tonight at

13:38

bbc.co.uk. And we return

13:40

to the election and how the parties are

13:42

dealing with that key issue of housing a

13:44

little later in the programme. Well

13:47

now to a political gamble being taken on the other

13:50

side of the channel. The

13:57

sound of protesters in the Place de

13:59

la République. in Paris this

14:01

evening demonstrating against the far-right national

14:03

rally. Marine Le Pen's party outperformed

14:06

all its rivals in the European

14:08

elections over the weekend and

14:11

in response, President Macron, whose

14:13

centrist party suffered big losses,

14:15

announced last night that he was

14:17

dissolving France's national parliament. The snap

14:19

election, taking place over two rounds

14:21

three weeks from now, could result

14:24

in him having to work alongside

14:26

a prime minister from Le Pen's

14:28

party. Claire Pakaland is a reporter

14:30

for France 24 in Paris. How

14:32

much of a surprise was that snap

14:34

election announcement, Claire? It

14:37

was a huge surprise. I was at

14:39

the headquarters of Emmanuel Macron's candidate, Valerie

14:41

Aye. So she was heading the list

14:43

in the European election. She's a member

14:45

of his party. She was heading the

14:47

Macron list, if you like, and there

14:50

were gasps in the room.

14:52

People could not believe it. The outcome

14:54

of the result, that wasn't a big

14:56

surprise. We'd seen in the polls that

14:58

Jordan Badseler, so he was running this

15:01

for from Marine Le Pen's party, he

15:03

was really on top. The actual outcome of

15:06

the result wasn't a surprise.

15:08

But Emmanuel Macron going on TV live

15:10

in the evening shortly afterwards, that was

15:12

a huge surprise. And many politicians now,

15:15

of course, facing this prospect of having

15:17

to campaign in the next three weeks

15:19

to keep their seats. And many parties

15:21

having to find candidates pretty hastily as well, certainly.

15:24

I mean, this this week really will be

15:27

sort of horse trading, if you like, because

15:29

they the parties have until Sunday to name

15:31

their candidates. So there are meetings going on

15:33

today, tomorrow, for the rest of the week.

15:36

And and the big question really is, will

15:38

there be this was called a Republican front?

15:40

This is what we've seen in elections in

15:43

the past in France, whereby opposition parties club

15:45

together in order to block the far right

15:47

from coming to power. No opposition parties that

15:49

could be from the left or the right

15:52

or the center parties who don't

15:54

actually agree with each other on really anything, but they

15:56

all agree that they don't want the far right in

15:58

power. We saw that back into. 2002

16:01

when Jean-Marie Le Pen, so Marine Le Pen's

16:03

father, was up against Jacques Chirac in

16:05

the second round of the presidential election. We've seen

16:07

it in the past, but in the last few

16:10

years, certainly in the elections we had two years

16:12

ago, clearly that Republican

16:14

front is much weaker than it was.

16:16

It's quite possible that it's around. I was going to say, they

16:18

might not have the numbers for that, mind they? No, certainly not.

16:20

They might not have the numbers. You mentioned

16:22

Mr. Bardella. He

16:24

could be the next Prime Minister, couldn't he?

16:27

He could. At the moment, to

16:29

give you some context, the Rasson-Lemond-Nassonal,

16:31

that's called RN, it's now what

16:34

was the national front. It's changed

16:36

its name, it's rebranded to the

16:38

Rasson-Lemond-Nassonal. The RN has 88 seats

16:41

in parliament. If it wants to get an

16:43

absolute majority, it needs 289. There's

16:46

still a way to go. There's still a long way to

16:49

go, but when you look then at

16:52

previous elections, so these 88 seats, the

16:54

RN won them two years ago. Before

16:56

that, the party only had eight seats

16:58

in parliament. It jumped from eight to

17:01

88. It could jump

17:03

up to 289. Everything's possible, but then

17:05

again, the next few weeks, things

17:07

are going to move really fast here in

17:10

France. I think it's important not

17:12

to underestimate the left, the

17:14

left wing in France at the moment. It's

17:16

very fractured. There are politicians and parties all

17:19

vying for influence, but they're talking and they're

17:21

trying to unite to block the

17:24

far right, getting into power and that's their

17:26

goal. So if the left can come together,

17:28

there is a possibility that Jordan Badala won't

17:30

be the next prime minister. Well, we'll see.

17:33

We will. Claire Pakaland, thank you very much. And

17:35

at the end of the programme, we'll reflect on

17:38

those European election results more broadly and on the

17:40

growing support for parties from the far right. Now,

17:43

I mentioned at the start of this election

17:46

campaign, we asked you to get in touch

17:48

to tell us about the issues you want

17:50

the BBC to cover and time and again

17:52

housing came up. And in that panorama interview,

17:55

Rishi Sunak admitted it's got harder for people

17:57

to own their own home under a Conservative

17:59

government. and in response to that

18:02

Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner, described

18:04

that as a damning indictment of

18:06

14 years of housing failure. Well,

18:08

in the last few minutes, as

18:10

Nick Watt was suggesting earlier, the

18:12

Conservatives have announced that their manifesto

18:14

will include a new Help to

18:16

Buy scheme that will offer first-time

18:18

buyers a 20% government loan that

18:21

will allow them to buy a home with a 5% deposit.

18:25

Peter Felix and his partner Rebecca are both

18:28

in their 40s and from the West Midlands.

18:30

They would love to own their own home,

18:32

but can't get on to the housing ladder.

18:34

They've been speaking to Naftaj Johar. We're

18:36

not struggling, but at the same time, the rent will

18:38

keep going up and we know that every time the

18:40

rent goes up, it means there's less and less in

18:42

our pocket to save. How long do you think it

18:44

will be before you're actually able to afford a deposit

18:47

that you can put towards a house? Well, at this

18:49

rate, to get £12,000, it'll take us five years. If

18:53

we put £100 a month away each, right over five

18:55

years, that's £12,000. How

18:57

close are you to just giving up? Giving up

18:59

the idea that you'll ever be homeowners? I don't

19:01

want to give up. I really don't, because I

19:03

really, really would love to have some cover of

19:05

my own. I'm at

19:07

the opposite end of it, I think. I'm pretty much

19:09

ready to give up, because it just

19:12

feels like we're fighting a losing battle.

19:14

So, yeah, I'm kind of losing hope.

19:17

I never own my own home. While

19:19

housing was one of the areas included

19:21

in the Liberal Democrat manifesto launched today,

19:24

Vicki Spratt, housing correspondent for the i-newspaper,

19:26

has been telling me what they're offering.

19:29

I think one of the most interesting things

19:31

is that they've done something that no other

19:33

major party has done for a

19:35

long time, which is commit to how many

19:37

social homes they would build every year. So

19:40

the Libdams say they want to build 380,000

19:42

homes a year, which

19:45

is higher than the now-scrapped Tory target of

19:47

300,000 was. And

19:49

they say that 150,000 of those would be social homes. Now,

19:55

I think there's so much

19:58

agreement across the housing sector. that

20:00

social housing is the key to easing

20:02

the housing crisis. So I think lots

20:04

of people will be very, very happy

20:07

to see that. And I think

20:09

there's one other thing that's really stood out

20:11

to me, which has separated them from what

20:14

I believe Labour are considering, and

20:17

what the Conservatives certainly were

20:19

doing when we had a

20:22

parliament, which is they

20:24

want to bring in local powers to

20:26

end right to buy in any

20:28

given area. Now right to buy, of course, is

20:30

the policy that was brought in under

20:33

Thatcher's government, which allows for

20:35

social housing and council housing to

20:37

be bought by its tenants at

20:40

a discount on market rate. In

20:42

theory, fine, in practice, disaster, because

20:44

what it has done is lead

20:46

to one of the biggest sell-offs

20:49

of social housing ever. We

20:51

have lost more social homes than

20:53

have been replaced, and that has

20:55

created the social housing shortage we

20:57

have today, with more than a

20:59

million households on waiting lists in

21:01

England alone. Obviously, we're at

21:03

a stage where only one party

21:06

manifesto has been published, others to come. How

21:09

much of an overlap do you

21:11

anticipate when you see the other

21:13

proposals being put forward by the

21:15

other main parties? This

21:18

is a really interesting question.

21:20

The honest answer is, I

21:22

think we could yet be

21:24

surprised. In the last couple

21:26

of hours, Bloomberg have actually

21:28

run a story with

21:31

a scoop on what Labour are rumoured to

21:33

be including in their manifesto. Now, if this

21:35

is true, I think this will be something

21:37

that really sets them apart from the

21:40

Lib Dems and the Conservatives. Now, the

21:42

rumour is that Angela Rayner is planning,

21:44

and I quote, a powerful Blair-style unit

21:46

to tackle homelessness. Now, when Tony Blair

21:48

was Prime Minister, there was a rough

21:50

sleeping unit, which was actually based in

21:52

number 10. And during that

21:54

period, we did get rough sleeping down.

21:56

It is now going back up. prized

22:00

by Labour. What of the Greens reform

22:03

UK? Any clues from them at this stage?

22:05

Let's do reform first. One of their policies

22:07

is to make sure that British people live

22:09

in social housing but if you look at

22:12

the stats, mostly tenants are British citizens. They

22:14

also want to abandon the renters reform bill.

22:16

In terms of the Greens, something that I

22:19

thought was very interesting in their manifesto was

22:22

rent control. And in London,

22:24

they wanted to bring in an immediate rent freeze.

22:26

Now, neither of the

22:28

main political parties nor the Lib

22:30

Dems have mentioned it. But I

22:32

really wouldn't be surprised if there

22:34

wasn't some form of rent regulation

22:36

in years to come. Perhaps not

22:38

what the Greens are proposing, but

22:40

private rents are still rising above

22:42

the consumer rate of inflation and

22:45

people really simply can't afford to pay them.

22:48

Vicki Spratt of the i newspaper. Well, as

22:50

I mentioned at the start of the programme,

22:52

it was the Liberal Democrats' turn to publish

22:54

their manifesto today. And with me

22:56

is the party's Chief Whip and spokesperson for

22:58

work and pensions, Wendy Chamberlain. Good evening to

23:01

you. Good evening. Let's look

23:03

at some of those housing figures in a

23:05

bit more detail. As Vicki Spratt was saying,

23:07

you've set a target of building 380,000 homes

23:09

a year across the UK. Nothing like that number

23:15

has been achieved since the 1960s.

23:17

So how in reality are you

23:19

going to achieve that? Well,

23:22

I think it's quite clear that across

23:24

the political spectrum that we need to

23:26

be dealing with the housing crisis. And

23:29

that does mean building more homes. I'm

23:31

obviously speaking to you from Scotland, where

23:33

the Scottish government has been forced into

23:35

declaring a housing crisis, because some of

23:37

the same challenges that Vicki was referring

23:39

to are the

23:41

same here in Scotland as well. And I

23:44

think the key thing about our manifesto pledges

23:46

today is around social housing. Listening to the

23:48

two members of the public who are looking

23:50

to buy, we should be trying to ensure

23:53

that they can save up to buy because

23:55

they should be able to access affordable social

23:57

housing while they do so. if

24:00

we can reach those targets and deliver

24:02

those targets through our manifesto

24:04

proposals, I think that will leave the

24:06

whole sector in a better position. But

24:09

why has your party changed its stance

24:11

on targets? Only last year at your

24:13

party conference, your housing spokesperson Helen Morgan

24:15

said, and I quote, a

24:17

national target has never delivered the housing

24:19

we need. Well,

24:22

what I would say is what

24:24

you've captured there is the fact

24:26

that Liberal Democrats say policy is

24:28

created and agreed by our members

24:30

at conference. Helen said that

24:33

and the policy was changed so that we

24:35

had the target and we are committed to

24:37

listening to our members and we've worked closely

24:40

to think about how we will deliver on

24:42

that pledge. But at that conference, the

24:45

leadership attempted to scrap national housing

24:47

targets, but members voted in favour

24:50

of keeping them. That's what you ended up being

24:52

forced into doing. Well, you

24:55

may call it force, but I think

24:57

it's one of the great strengths of

24:59

our party that our members are so

25:01

involved and engaged in delivering our policy

25:03

because those are the very members who

25:05

knock on doors, speak to people and

25:07

hear the challenges. And for myself up

25:09

until recently, as a constituency MP, if

25:11

I think about my case workload, it

25:13

usually is because of housing and lack

25:15

of access to social housing that is

25:17

the biggest challenge for me to deal

25:19

with as an MP. Can

25:21

we look at the practicalities of

25:23

hitting that target? Because clearly you

25:25

need local authorities on board for

25:28

this to work. And in a

25:30

Times investigation last month, it

25:32

was found that of the 10 council areas

25:34

in the country most likely to block a

25:37

major planning development, four

25:39

of them were controlled by your

25:42

party, including the council area most

25:44

likely to block, namely

25:46

Mole Valley. So these two

25:48

individual things, the national

25:51

plan and the local evidence, do

25:53

not match, do they? Well,

25:56

I think what is always the case, and

25:58

I'm sure anybody across the political spectrum would

26:00

say. this is it's about having the right

26:02

housing in the right place. And we've been

26:04

very clear, for example, that Greenbelt is not

26:07

something that we would be looking to permit

26:09

housing developments on because there's plenty of brownfield

26:12

sites that we can be looking at. But

26:14

again, if I look at my own experience

26:16

in Northeast Tife and St Andrews, it is

26:18

about finding that right balance because in somewhere

26:20

like St Andrews, you've obviously got private rentals

26:23

for people in tourists and students coming to

26:25

visit. You've got people looking to buy in

26:27

the community as well. And all that builds

26:29

into the local community too. So I do

26:31

think at a local level, you have to

26:33

take all of those things into account. But

26:35

it's quite clear that we need to deliver

26:37

so that we can solve this housing crisis

26:39

that is true across the UK. But would

26:41

liberal Democrats, if they were

26:43

in power or had some influence over power,

26:46

push through a housing development in an area

26:48

where it's desperately needed in the teeth of

26:50

local opposition, presumably from your own party? Well,

26:53

that's where we need to listen to

26:55

local communities and those local representatives and

26:57

ensure that we are finding the right

26:59

places. Look, the ambition of this policy

27:01

is very clear. And I'm sure colleagues

27:03

in whatever level, whether that be local

27:06

or national government, would be looking to

27:08

see how we can best deliver it.

27:10

Wendy Chamberlain, thank you very much indeed for coming on. The

27:14

US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, is on his

27:16

eighth visit to the Middle East since the

27:18

start of the war in Gaza. The

27:21

itinerary is a familiar one. He's held talks

27:23

with President Al Sisi in Egypt and has

27:25

since gone on to a meeting with the

27:28

Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. But the backdrop

27:30

has some different elements since he was last

27:32

in the region. First, there's

27:34

the three-phase peace plan set out 10

27:37

days ago by President Biden described by

27:39

him as Israel's proposal, which Mr Blinken

27:41

wants to promote. Then there's

27:43

the resignation from the Israeli War

27:45

Cabinet of the former General Benny

27:48

Gantz, who's criticised Mr Netanyahu over

27:50

a lack of any meaningful plan

27:52

for a post-Hamas Gaza. Speaking to

27:54

the cameras after meeting President Al

27:56

Sisi, Mr Blinken said he hoped

27:58

Hamas gave a positive... of response

28:00

to the proposal. The

28:02

best way to ensure that there's

28:04

not another civilian casualty is for the

28:06

ceasefire deal to go forward, for Hamas

28:08

to accept it. It's as

28:11

basic and as simple as that. That's

28:13

what's on the table now. That's what we need to

28:15

see an answer to. That's what would end the

28:17

conflict in Gaza. Let's see if we get an answer from

28:19

Hamas. Well Hamas has said

28:21

it's ready to cooperate with mediators over

28:24

implementation of principles of the ceasefire proposal,

28:26

and there's been that UN Security Council

28:28

vote in the last little while

28:30

in favor of an American resolution calling

28:32

for that immediate ceasefire by Israel

28:35

and Hamas in Gaza. Fourteen countries

28:37

voted in favor and Russia abstained.

28:39

Well, Frank Lowenstein is a former

28:41

United States Special Envoy for Middle

28:43

East Peace. And joins me, Frank,

28:45

good evening. Thanks

28:47

for having me. The resignation of Benny

28:49

Gantz. What impact does that have specifically

28:51

on the American approach to this? So

28:55

the resignation of Gantz probably makes it more

28:57

difficult for our secretary Blinken to achieve the

28:59

ceasefire that he's working so hard to advance.

29:02

And the reason for that is because Gantz

29:04

has been a voice of moderation inside of

29:06

Netanyahu's war cabinet. He's provided really a counterbalance

29:09

to some of the far-right ministers

29:11

who really hold a lot of

29:14

political power over Netanyahu. So without

29:16

him, the far-right ministers will get it.

29:19

I'm just treading carefully, Frank, because your line

29:22

is just breaking up momentarily. Let's stay with

29:24

you. Ah, I was about to say

29:26

let's stay with you. Maybe we won't stay

29:28

with you while we're addressing that issue. We'll go

29:30

on to other matters and hopefully come back to

29:32

you in the next few moments. Back

29:35

to Europe. As the dust settles

29:37

on this weekend's elections to the

29:39

European Parliament, the verdict seems to

29:41

be along these lines. The center

29:43

ground mostly held, but the

29:45

far right made striking if uneven

29:48

gains across the continent. Earlier,

29:50

I spoke to two close observers

29:52

of European politics. Natalie Tocci is

29:54

director of the Institute of International

29:56

Affairs in Rome and former special

29:58

adviser to two EU High

30:01

Representatives. And Dr Mariana Graffini is

30:03

an assistant professor in the Department

30:05

of Politics and International Relations at

30:07

North Eastern University London, and her

30:09

research includes the far right in

30:12

Europe. So first, Mariana's assessment of

30:14

the results. I do

30:16

think that we are witnessing, I wouldn't

30:18

say a surge, but

30:20

a consolidation of the far right

30:23

at EU level. Indeed, I think

30:25

that we could see this coming.

30:27

At the same

30:29

time, I wouldn't qualify

30:32

this consolidation as

30:34

cataclysmic or catastrophic, because if

30:36

we look at the projections

30:38

about the number of seats

30:40

that the far right will

30:42

have in the next European

30:45

Parliament, of course,

30:48

they did enjoy a resounding

30:50

victory. But there is not

30:52

such a staggering difference between

30:54

the number of seats they

30:56

will have and the

30:58

number of seats that they did

31:01

have in the previous Parliament. What

31:04

are young people doing? And those who

31:06

are moving further right amongst young people,

31:08

why are they tending to do that?

31:11

Regarding the far right

31:13

itself, it is discontent,

31:15

disaffection, disconnection, the housing

31:18

crisis, the economic crisis.

31:21

Natalie Tocci, when you look at

31:23

the makeup of the European Parliament now

31:25

as a result of these elections, the

31:28

parties in the centre and the centre

31:30

right are still the biggest ones. But

31:33

how much should they feel threatened by the

31:35

results of the last few days? Well,

31:38

I think Mariana's absolutely right.

31:40

I mean, these elections have

31:42

been a story of consolidation.

31:45

The two outliers, in many respects, are

31:47

actually France and Germany. And of course,

31:49

they are the largest member states, which

31:52

then explains why there is a net

31:54

positive effect for the far right. But

31:57

it's actually not that

31:59

significant. considering that the overall share

32:01

has increased from 20% to 23%. Having

32:03

said that, I think that

32:08

there is a sense that

32:10

the pro-European forces need to

32:13

work together. I think this

32:15

has and is particularly having

32:17

an impact on actually

32:19

the Greens, which together with the Liberals

32:21

is one of the big losers. Do

32:23

you think specific Green policies will now

32:25

have to be revisited and watered down?

32:27

There's already talk of that happening, isn't

32:30

there? To be honest, actually,

32:32

I think this is an overblown concern.

32:34

The reason why I think so is

32:36

that I find it very difficult to

32:39

see how the actual legislative

32:41

acts are going to be

32:44

reversed. It's a question of

32:46

implementation. But it's also a question of it

32:48

rubbing up against the cost of living crisis, isn't

32:50

it? The fear among voters that the more they

32:52

go Green, the more it will cost them money.

32:54

Yes. I think there are two, in

32:57

fact, three probably big aspects. The first

32:59

where there is going to be a

33:01

slowdown is on questions like agriculture reform

33:03

and environmental protection. You've seen plenty

33:05

of angry farmers in recent times, for example. Exactly.

33:08

In all honesty, there is a

33:10

reason why these issues were left

33:12

until last. It was because they

33:14

were the hardest issues right from

33:16

day one. But then I think

33:18

you put your finger on another big aspect, which

33:20

is the transition costs

33:22

money. It costs money to

33:25

compensate the potential losers from

33:27

the transition. In

33:30

the last five years, yes, we've been

33:32

talking about just transition and a social

33:34

climate fund, but really, there wasn't a

33:36

lot of money behind these initiatives. A

33:38

lot more will have to be done.

33:40

Now, of course, the snag is that

33:43

even a slightly more right-leaning EU, is

33:45

it really an EU which is willing

33:47

to put real money at European level

33:49

to pursue some of that financial compensation

33:52

to the losers? I'm not so sure.

33:54

Marianne Graffini, the body the European

33:56

Parliament is often criticised for being

33:58

very remote. How well

34:00

is it able to communicate, particularly

34:03

with those young voters, in

34:05

what it is trying to do? And is

34:07

that part of the consolidation of the far and

34:09

the hard right story in all of this, do

34:11

you think? Yeah,

34:13

I think that you actually

34:15

pinpointed a quite topical issue

34:18

right now. So the far

34:20

right has extended its appeal,

34:22

cutting across different demographic categories

34:24

thanks to the use of

34:26

social media. So the far

34:28

right now appeals to the

34:30

new generations who can vote,

34:32

but also the ones who

34:34

will be voting in the

34:36

next elections through TikTok or

34:38

Instagram. So there is, I

34:40

think, what we would call

34:42

a spectacularization of politics as

34:45

well, with these glittering and

34:47

very charismatic politicians adopting a

34:49

very down-to-earth and emotional language

34:51

in order to appeal to

34:54

the youth. I know that,

34:56

for instance, the I've Done

34:58

in Germany or the Assembleman

35:01

Nationale with Barthelaf exerts

35:03

a lot of attraction on the

35:06

youth. And indeed, these parties were

35:08

counting on this particular demographic sector

35:10

in order to amass their gains.

35:13

And Natalie Tocci, have the traditional parties got to

35:15

play catch up in that specific area, do

35:17

you think? Yes, I

35:20

mean, I think there are some traditional

35:22

parties that do this better than others.

35:24

I mean, I wouldn't say that the

35:26

far right is necessarily more communication savvy.

35:28

I think it really boils down to

35:31

the personalization of politics.

35:33

I think this is something which is

35:35

true across the political spectrum. It

35:37

is not exclusive to the

35:39

far right. And of course,

35:41

there are some political personalities that are

35:43

better than others that you think, for

35:46

instance, social media. I do,

35:48

though, think that for a long time

35:50

we took for granted this idea that

35:52

youth was progressive.

35:55

I mean, it's clear that youth is

35:57

perhaps more prone to dabbling

35:59

with different alternatives, but these don't

36:01

necessarily have to be of the

36:03

progressive and liberal kind. And I

36:05

think this is probably one

36:08

of the rather newer trends, which

36:10

is emerging, not just from these

36:12

elections, but from national elections in the

36:14

last few months. Director

36:16

of the Institute of International Affairs

36:19

in Rome, Natalie Tocci, before her

36:21

doctor Mariana Graffini from Northeastern University,

36:23

London. Now, a few moments

36:25

ago, I was having what turned out to

36:27

be a brief conversation with Frank Lowenstein,

36:29

former United States Special Envoy for Middle

36:31

East Peace about Anthony Blinken's latest diplomatic

36:34

efforts in the region. Frank is back

36:36

on the line. Apologies, Frank. You were

36:38

in the middle of talking about Benny

36:40

Gantz's resignation and its significance in the

36:43

context of the American approach to all

36:45

of this. Pick up where you

36:47

left off. Okay. Thank

36:49

you, sir. Yeah. So I think it's a

36:51

setback to Secretary Blinken's already very difficult efforts

36:53

to achieve the ceasefire. And the reason is

36:55

because Benny Gantz played a very

36:57

moderating role within Netanyahu's war cabinet.

36:59

He was very much in favor of this ceasefire.

37:01

And I think he really helped move

37:04

BB in that direction with him no longer

37:06

a part of the coalition, the voices of

37:08

the far right of Smotrich and Ben Gevir

37:10

and some of the religious ideologues who are

37:12

in his coalition will only be heard louder

37:15

by Netanyahu. The pressure that he feels will

37:17

come much more from them than it has

37:19

in the past. So I think it's going

37:21

to make Tony's job even more difficult. And

37:23

the ceasefire proposal, I mean, when President Biden

37:25

outlined it, he said it was an Israeli

37:27

proposal, but you've now identified as others have

37:29

the voices within the top

37:31

of the Israeli government that don't

37:34

like it. Mr Netanyahu has vowed to

37:36

resist any such deal until Hamas's military

37:38

and governing capabilities are destroyed. So how

37:40

much of an Israeli proposal is this

37:43

in reality? Well,

37:45

it's really the same proposal that's been out there

37:47

for three or four months now. The parties have

37:49

gone back and forth over this three phase deal.

37:51

And you can talk about the small changes that

37:53

have been made here and there. But the bottom

37:55

line is neither side really wants a ceasefire right

37:57

now. I think the Israelis will do everything they

37:59

can. to avoid being bound by

38:02

that ceasefire agreement while still not

38:04

formally disavowing it. And Hamas is making their lives

38:06

a lot easier because they don't want this deal

38:08

at all. And so they'll continue to do everything

38:10

they can to prevent a deal from coming to

38:12

fruition. Because Hamas will always highlight the difference between

38:14

permanent and temporary when it comes to

38:17

a cessation of violence. Exactly. And

38:20

that's been the core of the disagreement between Israel

38:22

and Hamas for the last three months, whether it's

38:24

permanent ceasefire or temporary ceasefire. The Biden administration has

38:26

gone to literally heroic lengths to try to create

38:29

constructive ambiguity so each side could claim that it

38:31

represented what they stood for. The problem is that

38:33

Netanyahu keeps coming out and saying, no, I'm not

38:35

really going to end this war. I'm going to

38:38

resume it as soon as the hostages are released,

38:40

which leads Hamas to simply say, well, this is

38:42

not a permanent ceasefire then and we're not signing

38:44

on to something temporary. OK. Thank

38:47

you very much for coming back on, Frank Lowenstein,

38:49

with his views on the situation in the Middle

38:51

East. Before we go, a quick look at tomorrow's

38:53

front pages. The Times headline, Tories offer lower taxes,

38:56

help for homebuyers. The paper says

38:58

Sunak makes election pitch as heir

39:00

to Thatcher. The Telegraph front page

39:02

says Sunak offers tax breaks to

39:04

landlords in the Tory manifesto. A

39:07

reminder of our closing headline, the prime minister

39:09

has admitted renting and home ownership has got

39:11

harder under the Conservatives. That in an interview

39:14

with BBC Panorama. And that's the world tonight.

39:16

I'm back tomorrow. Have a good

39:18

night. Selling a little. Or a lot. or

39:25

a lot. Shopify helps

39:27

you do your thing however you chiching.

39:29

Shopify is the global commerce platform that

39:31

helps you sell at every stage of

39:33

your business. From the launch your online

39:36

shop stage to the first real-life store

39:38

stage, all the way to the did

39:40

we just hit a million orders stage,

39:42

Shopify is there to help you grow.

39:45

Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers

39:47

with the Internet's best converting checkout. 36%

39:49

better on average compared

39:52

to other leading commerce platforms. So,

40:00

how do we get AI right? Well,

40:06

we need the right volume of

40:08

data, the software to train it,

40:10

and massive compute power or... Another

40:12

one bites the dust. Are you ready? Hey, are you

40:15

ready for this? Are

40:17

you hanging on the edge of your seat? But with

40:19

HPE GreenLake, we get access to supercomputing

40:21

to power AI at the scale we

40:24

need, helping generate better insights. All

40:27

right. Nice teamwork, guys. Search

40:30

HPE GreenLake.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features