Podchaser Logo
Home
Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Released Thursday, 13th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Democrat AG COMMITTED CRIME, Dems REFUSE To Prosecute Garland Despite Bannon Prison For SAME THING

Thursday, 13th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Have you seen the price of gold lately? It's

0:03

hitting all-time highs. And when it comes to

0:06

investing in gold, check out Noble Gold Investments.

0:08

They have a track record of excellence that's

0:10

second to none. Just look

0:12

at their thousands of 5-star reviews on

0:14

Trustpilot, Google, and the Better Business Bureau. Customers

0:18

rave about their knowledgeable staff, smooth investment

0:20

process, and life-changing results which you can

0:22

see for yourself online. That's the kind

0:24

of reputation you can count on. But

0:27

it's not just about the reviews. Noble Gold

0:29

Investments truly care about their clients. They

0:31

take the time to understand your unique needs

0:34

and goals, and they give expert guidance every

0:36

step of the way. That

0:38

level of personalized service is rare in this

0:40

industry. Look, when it

0:42

comes to securing your financial future, you can't afford to

0:44

take chances. Go with the gold

0:46

company that has earned the trust of countless investors.

0:49

Visit noblegoldinvestments.com/Tim

0:52

Pool today

0:55

and discover why Noble Gold Investments is

0:57

the only choice for smart, secure gold

0:59

investments. Or give them a call

1:01

at 877-646-5347. Again,

1:09

that number is 877-646-5347. Become

1:23

a member at timcast.com by

1:25

clicking Join Us to support

1:27

the work we're doing and

1:29

to get access to the

1:31

uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show

1:33

Monday through Thursday at 10

1:35

p.m. You don't want to miss it.

1:38

Now, let's get into the news. The

1:40

Republicans have voted to hold

1:42

Merrick Garland in contempt of

1:44

Congress for withholding Biden audio.

1:47

This stems to a conversation Biden

1:49

had with the prosecutor who decided

1:51

that Joe Biden's mental state, well,

1:55

because it's so poor, he cannot be

1:57

held criminally accountable for the crimes he

1:59

committed. Not kidding. They

2:01

said he's a doddering old man. He'll

2:03

look endearing to the jury and we can't convict

2:06

him. Joe Biden broke the

2:08

law clearly,

2:10

admittedly, with classified documents

2:12

that he withheld so he could write

2:14

a book and make money. But

2:18

he's just too old and out of it. So the

2:21

Republicans wanted this audio. They want to

2:23

know what this conversation had. And

2:25

it appears the issue is Joe

2:28

Biden will look like a doddering old fool

2:30

in the audio recording and that is, well,

2:32

it's bad for his campaign. But

2:35

Matt Gaetz last night brought up a

2:37

really great point and he said, there's

2:39

nothing in that audio that's going to

2:41

enlighten us any more than we already

2:43

are. The man appears to have taken

2:45

a crap in his pants at

2:48

the D-Day ceremony in France. So

2:52

I asked our good friend, Chad GPT. I

2:55

said, did Joe Biden, you know, is it

2:57

reasonable to assume that he suffered

2:59

an episode? And it said, no, absolutely

3:01

not. And then I said, if

3:03

an 81 year old man standing up,

3:05

squatted over, stood up, squatted over, is

3:08

it reasonable to assume that he's suffering

3:10

an episode? And it said,

3:12

yes, of course, absolutely. I

3:14

was like, OK, but now when it's Joe Biden,

3:16

thanks, Chad GPT. We love you, AI. What

3:19

we're currently at right now, Merrick

3:22

Garland has been held in contempt. Nothing

3:24

is going to happen. There's going to be they're

3:26

not going to go after him. He's not going to go to jail.

3:29

Steve Bannon, however, is facing prison. Peter

3:31

Navarro is in prison and

3:33

many are asking about Alvin Bragg's

3:35

connection with the DOJ and

3:37

the prosecution of Trump at the state level. Because

3:40

as it turns out, as most of you know, a high

3:42

ranking DOJ official stepped down from his

3:45

position at the federal level to go

3:47

be a local prosecutor. Interesting.

3:50

Well, Bragg's office is denying

3:52

having any conversation. It's a

3:54

conspiracy theory. Oh, please,

3:56

let's break this down and we'll explain exactly the

3:59

dirty game that's being Now,

4:01

I will stress, my friends, you

4:03

know, look, what we have here, I

4:05

guess, is another strongly worded letter. I can't

4:08

say I'm excited for it. Being

4:10

held in contempt, interesting. But we

4:13

know there's a double standard. And all

4:15

we seem to ever get is strongly

4:18

worded letters from the Republican Party. Now,

4:21

Matt Gaetz points out that subpoena power

4:23

actually has a tremendous impact. When

4:26

they subpoena these individuals and pull up their

4:28

conversations and communications, it actually changes

4:30

things. Gaetz pointed out

4:32

that after his grilling of Lloyd Austin, there ain't

4:35

going to be any Pride

4:37

Month events or Drag Queen story hours on

4:39

military bases. This public pressure

4:41

does work. I

4:43

say sure, if we're talking

4:46

about Drag Queen story hour, but

4:48

right now we are talking about the

4:50

highest law office in the land being

4:53

an abject criminal organization

4:57

and facing no repercussions or accountability.

5:00

Here's a story from the AP News. The

5:03

House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General Merrick

5:05

Garland in contempt of Congress. Now, let's just,

5:07

you know, look, nothing's going to happen.

5:11

For refusing to turn over audio of President Joe

5:13

Biden's interview in his classified documents case, Republicans

5:16

latest and strongest rebuke of the DOJ as

5:18

partisan conflict over the rule of law animates

5:20

the 2024 presidential election

5:23

presidential campaign. The

5:25

216 and 207 vote fell along party

5:28

lines. The Republicans coalescing behind the contempt

5:30

effort despite reservations among some of the

5:32

party's more centrist members. Only

5:34

one Republican Rep. David Joyce of Ohio voted against

5:36

it. Garland said in a statement late

5:38

Wednesday, It is deeply

5:41

disappointing that this House of Representatives

5:43

has turned a serious congressional authority

5:45

into a partisan weapon. Really? Steve

5:48

Bannon would like to have a word with you. Today's

5:51

vote disregards the constitutional separation

5:53

of powers. The Justice Department's

5:56

need to protect its investigations and the substantial amount

5:58

of information we have provided to the House. the

6:00

committees. Okay, so

6:03

Joe Biden cites executive privilege. As the president, he

6:05

doesn't need to turn over his communications to

6:08

Congress. When Donald

6:10

Trump said executive privilege pertaining to records that

6:12

Steve Bannon had, the January

6:14

6th committee said, we don't care and

6:16

you're going to jail anyway. And

6:20

now Steve Bannon has to report to jail in a

6:22

couple of weeks. Look,

6:24

man, everybody knows

6:26

double standard, double standard. The question

6:28

is, where is any red

6:30

state law enforcement to go after any of

6:33

these people? And when I bring this up

6:35

to Matt, he says, is that really what

6:37

we want? Extrajudicial

6:39

I never said extrajudicial. I

6:41

said judicial accountability. And

6:44

you know, we're big fans of

6:46

Matt because he's probably like, he's

6:49

the best member of Congress that we got Florida, you're

6:51

very lucky. But the perspective

6:53

is wrong. I don't

6:55

personally want any retribution, judicial, extrajudicial,

6:57

anything. I just want the law

7:00

to be enforced. I

7:02

don't understand how we can live in this world where

7:04

you have Donald Trump being charged

7:06

every which way six ways from Sunday

7:09

and not a

7:11

single Democrat. Oh, Hunter Biden. No,

7:13

we didn't vote for Hunter Biden, the Democrats. So yeah, I

7:15

don't care about Hunter Biden. In fact, I don't think he

7:17

should be charged for the gun stuff. Ridiculous.

7:20

How about the influence peddling the tax evasion?

7:23

How about collusion between state and

7:25

federal offices to go after the

7:28

front runner for this 2024

7:30

election? Now, Matt agreed. He said that's

7:32

the most egregious thing we have. Yes.

7:34

So let's see some law enforcement action. Any?

7:39

Any? No, we're

7:42

not getting any of that. He

7:45

added, I will always stand up for this department. It's

7:47

employees. It's vital mission. Oh, I just

7:49

want to say, thank God this man did not make

7:51

it to the Supreme Court. And

7:54

so they don't realize how, how, how

7:56

much, how good of the work they

7:58

were doing by blocking him despite it was a partisan. an effort,

8:00

but still. Garland is now the

8:02

third attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress. Yet

8:05

it's unlikely that DOJ, which Garland

8:07

oversees, will prosecute him. The

8:09

White House's decision to exert executive privilege over the

8:11

audio recording, shielding it from Congress, would make it

8:13

exceedingly difficult to make a criminal case against Garland.

8:17

If Steve Bannon would like to have a word with you about that, nonetheless,

8:20

Speaker Mike Johnson defended the decision to

8:22

push ahead with what is now a

8:24

mostly symbolic effort. Look, we

8:26

did our job on the contempt, and I think

8:28

it sends an important message. The Louisiana

8:30

Republican said following the vote, we'll see

8:32

what happens next, but I mean, the House has to

8:34

do its work, and I'm pleased with the outcome today.

8:37

We knew that this was a bunch

8:39

of nonsense. Mike Johnson, the

8:42

one ring, we talked about him too. Here's

8:44

a guy who seemingly was a good dude.

8:47

Up until he became Speaker, they brought him in the backroom,

8:49

flogged him up a little bit, and then he came out

8:52

saying, I love the deep state. Congratulations,

8:54

you're doing nothing. You're wasting our time, and we

8:56

all know it. I don't

8:58

know. The only strategy I

9:00

can see in not going after these

9:02

obvious criminals is that the

9:04

Republicans want to avoid stepping in

9:06

it like Democrats are. Democrats are

9:08

so desperate, they're launching these criminal

9:11

actions against Trump and Bannon, Navarro,

9:13

et cetera, and it makes them

9:15

look panicked and desperate. It also

9:17

turns Trump and Bannon into martyrs,

9:19

which rallies support and donations. We're

9:21

in the era of the, oh heavens me, I'm a victim.

9:25

But if it works, it works, right? That's

9:27

the only thing I can see. Now

9:30

here's, this is a good one. Merrick Garland

9:33

posted an op-ed in the Washington Post

9:35

omitting the truth. Well, because he's evil,

9:37

these people are evil, okay? Like

9:40

say whatever you want about Trump supporters you think are

9:42

evil. I don't care. You know, you get people, yeah,

9:44

but have you seen what Trump supporters have said? Trump

9:47

supporters ain't me. I say what I

9:49

say, and I say evil, okay?

9:52

Here's a story. Attorney

9:55

General Merrick Garland attempted Wednesday to

9:57

shut down criticism of the Biden DOJ with

9:59

an- op-ed in the Washington Post. But

10:02

his flat dismissal of concerns of the

10:04

DOJ's politicization of conspiracy as conspiracy theories

10:06

fails to engage the facts. Garland's

10:09

response in the Post came

10:12

the week after he testified during a

10:14

House Judiciary Committee hearing that he would

10:16

not be intimidated by attacks in the

10:18

department and ahead of a House

10:20

vote holding him in contempt of Congress for

10:22

declining to turn over the recording of President

10:24

Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Herr.

10:27

Below are annotated excerpts from the op-ed. Here's

10:30

a quote, Garland

10:50

ignores, I

10:55

don't know why they say former president, you

10:57

shouldn't. Everyone gets the honorific. It's President Trump.

11:20

The Biden DOJ also opposed efforts

11:22

to limit its settlement slush fund,

11:24

which enables it to direct funds

11:26

toward left-wing nonprofits. They come

11:28

in the form of conspiracy theories

11:30

crafted and spread for the purpose

11:32

of undermining public trust in the

11:34

judicial process itself. Oh heavens me.

11:37

Those include false claims that a

11:39

case brought by a local district attorney and resolved

11:42

by a jury verdict in a state trial was

11:44

somehow controlled by the Justice Department. Garland

11:46

forgets to mention that this so-called local

11:48

case was led by a former top

11:50

Biden admin official. You

11:53

know what man, you know all this. We

11:55

know all this. I don't

11:57

know what you do. There

12:00

are people who don't want to accept it.

12:02

We are years into the bifurcation in the

12:04

American psyche. And I know for effect

12:06

because y'all tell me, and I've experienced it too, you

12:09

bring this evidence to a

12:11

friend or family member who's liberal and say, Matthew

12:14

Colangelo, formerly

12:16

the third ranking official in the

12:19

Biden DOJ, joined the Manhattan's DA

12:21

office as senior counsel in

12:23

December, 2022, while Bragg's investigation

12:25

into Trump was ongoing. Bragg

12:28

campaigned on prosecuting Trump. And

12:31

they'll say, no, they

12:33

don't care. Well, so there

12:36

you go. I don't know

12:38

how this country survives with people who

12:40

will stand by watching illegal activities happen

12:42

and say, I don't care. It's

12:46

a conflict of interest at the very least. How

12:48

about we say this, conflict of interest,

12:50

wash our hands of it, start

12:53

over. How about that? New investigation

12:55

will start over. They

12:57

won't even accept that. No, it was a guilty verdict by,

12:59

see, even they went after Hunter Biden. I don't care about

13:01

Hunter Biden, literally don't. I

13:04

say free Hunter Biden. That gun charge is

13:06

bunk, okay? The tax

13:08

charges, okay, we'll see. But

13:10

I don't think you should be, I think you

13:12

should be pardoned. And I think actually every

13:15

two way rights organization should file an amicus

13:17

brief on behalf of Hunter

13:19

Biden in his defense, take

13:22

it to the Supreme Court and

13:24

get form 4473 abolished, charging

13:27

a guy because you

13:29

wanna charge him for the crime of being a crackhead, charge him

13:31

for the crime of being a crackhead, and then through due process

13:33

takeaways right to own a weapon. But not this

13:36

federal background check stuff. Well,

13:39

the DOJ said last week, this week, that

13:41

a search revealed no communication between department leadership

13:43

and Bragg's office. Many have questioned why a

13:45

top official would step down from one of

13:47

the most high ranking positions in the legal

13:50

world to take a role in the office

13:52

of a local prosecutor. And

13:54

we have this, let me see, we have DOJ

13:57

says, no contact between senior officials in

13:59

Manhattan. and DA brags office about the Trump case.

14:03

Your third ranking guy works there.

14:06

It's absolutely incredible. If

14:11

there was like a group

14:13

of thieves and one

14:16

of the guys who was part of this crew,

14:18

quits the crew and gets a job as a manager at

14:20

a bank and then a

14:22

year later the bank gets robbed by

14:24

them thieves, they're gonna go

14:26

ahead and say, I think this guy's in on

14:28

it. You get my point?

14:32

Anyone with a brain can see this.

14:35

There is a very serious conflict of

14:37

interest. A guy working in

14:39

the DOJ steps down, it's very

14:41

unusual and goes and joins Bragg

14:43

in targeting Trump. There was

14:45

no communication. What do you mean? The

14:47

communication's directly in your office. You hired

14:49

the guy. That's

14:52

direct collusion and communication. And

14:55

they'll make the argument, yes, but

14:57

technically there's nothing illegal about hiring

14:59

a Biden administration official to work

15:01

in a local prosecutor's office that

15:03

go after Donald Trump. Yeah,

15:06

okay. Colangelo

15:09

previously led the investigation to the Trump

15:11

Foundation and the investigation that became Trump's civil fraud

15:13

case while working for the New York district attorney's office in

15:15

2018. He received

15:18

$12,000 from the Democratic National Committee

15:20

for political consulting, according to

15:22

FEC records. They come

15:24

in another quote, they come in the form

15:26

of false claims that the department is politicizing

15:28

its work to somehow influence the outcome of

15:31

an election. Such claims are

15:33

often made by those who are themselves attempting

15:35

to politicize the department's work to influence the

15:37

outcome of an election. Garland

15:40

does not mention the extreme steps his DOJ has

15:42

gone through to bring the charges in the height

15:44

of the election season. Special

15:46

counsel Jack Smith pushed hard to get

15:48

Trump's January 6th case to trial before

15:50

the election, even asking the Supreme Court

15:52

to take up the presidential immunity appeal

15:54

before allowing the lower court to weigh

15:56

in. Former DOJ official

15:59

Jack Goldsmith. Smith, called Smith's rush to

16:01

trial wildly unfair, and suggested

16:03

it violated both the normal rules of

16:05

fairness to defendants and a DOJ rule

16:07

barring prosecutors from selecting the timing of

16:09

their actions for the purpose of affecting

16:11

any election. Moreover,

16:13

the DOJ has declined to turn over audio

16:16

of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Herder

16:18

Congress. According to the transcript of

16:20

that interview, Biden appeared to misremember key facts about

16:22

his life. And that's the thing. We

16:25

have the transcript, but they don't want us to hear the audio.

16:28

Because the audio, well, it's going to

16:30

make Biden sound very, very bad. But

16:33

Matt Gaetz made a great point. Like there's nothing

16:35

we're going to hear on that that we don't

16:37

already know. The man nearly, or at least appeared

16:39

to have crapped himself in public. And

16:42

so what I love, ladies and gentlemen, I

16:45

don't know that Joe Biden suffered about a

16:47

fecal incontinence. I don't. And I'm

16:50

not suggesting we have proof that he did. What

16:52

I'm suggesting is there is

16:55

more evidence that Joe Biden

16:57

defecated himself than there

16:59

is evidence that Hunter Biden's laptop is

17:01

part of a Russian disinformation campaign or

17:04

that Donald Trump was secretly working for

17:06

the Russians. How about that?

17:09

There's more evidence. There is

17:11

more evidence that Joe Biden

17:14

is involved with illicit business dealings,

17:16

untoward business dealings and influence peddling

17:19

with his children and their business

17:21

associates or his child than

17:24

there is that he defecated himself. I'd

17:26

be willing to take that one up if you want, but y'all don't seem

17:28

to care about that one. So when we

17:30

get a video that appears to show a

17:32

man who is 81, which according to

17:34

a standard probability,

17:38

15 to

17:40

30 percent of individuals over 80

17:42

suffer fecal incontinence. It's why adult

17:44

diapers exist. It's

17:47

why they're for sale. The

17:49

probability that Joe Biden suffers from this

17:52

is actually decently high. It's

17:54

either one in six or one in three. And

17:56

then you see the man who's over 80 squat

17:58

down in grimace and then. down

18:01

in Grimace and then stands there. Why

18:05

did he do it? We don't know. I'm

18:07

not saying it's proof. Some, you know, maybe he was

18:09

just, you know, oh, stretching the old back. Oh, I'm

18:11

an old man. I'm gonna stretch the old back. Sure,

18:14

maybe. Okay, but I'll tell

18:16

you what. Evidence is not proof. Evidence is

18:19

information that could lead us towards a

18:21

conclusion. And when you look at an

18:23

81-year-old man in this position, I say, it's

18:25

possible there's more evidence that he

18:27

crapped himself than there is that the Hunter Biden

18:29

laptop is part of some Russian disinformation scheme, but

18:31

they're still maintaining that. This

18:34

is the state of modern American politics

18:36

that will not survive. We

18:39

cannot function this way. It

18:41

won't work. I

18:44

mean, to have a

18:46

DOJ that exists solely for retribution

18:48

against Republicans. This is Mayor Garland's

18:50

story. He was supposed to be on the

18:52

Supreme Court. Ooh, he really wanted it. It

18:54

was a dream of a life, of

18:56

a lifetime. And Republicans blocked

18:58

him. And it was shady business

19:01

dealings. Absolutely. There was no reason to block

19:03

his appointment that made no sense. They

19:05

held out, and then I think it was Gorsuch,

19:07

right? Gorsuch. It was supposed

19:10

to be Mayor Garland. But I

19:12

think we're lucky, because the demeanor of

19:14

this man is that of a petulant child.

19:18

And heaven help us if this man was

19:20

on the Supreme Court. Now, don't get me

19:22

wrong, Supreme Court's got petulant children on it

19:24

as it is. Roberts, ain't getting no credit

19:26

from me. That dude is as flaccid a

19:28

man could be. Like,

19:31

I can look to the liberal justices and be

19:33

like, yeah, I see their perspective. I

19:36

think they're wrong. And that's OK. Katanji

19:39

Brown Jackson doesn't know what a

19:41

woman is. That's shocking. But

19:43

Mayor Garland has the demeanor of a

19:45

child, an petulant child who wants revenge.

19:48

Now you say, ha, got you, Tim, because

19:50

so does Donald Trump. Yeah.

19:54

Uh-huh. Here's the thing. Mayor

19:57

Garland weaponizing the DOJ.

20:00

against Trump and his supporters, we

20:02

are not seeing the inverse. So

20:05

if Donald Trump wants to go in and bring

20:07

accountability, it's kind of like this. Donald

20:09

Trump is a petulant child with a bunch of holding a bunch

20:12

of rocks and he did not throw them. Merrick

20:15

Garland is angry because he got kicked off the

20:17

team so he started throwing rocks. Now

20:19

I'm saying, okay we got to stop the

20:21

guy if Donald Trump wants to engage in

20:23

petulant childish fighting, it's only after the fact.

20:27

But I can put it this way, what

20:29

we need is accountability. What Merrick

20:32

Garland is doing is not accountability,

20:34

it's politicking, it's corruption, it's abject

20:36

criminal corruption. Donald Trump

20:38

may be a petulant child in many rights

20:41

but at the very least when he gets in what we're

20:43

hoping for is you put a stop to this. School

20:47

yard bullies. You

20:49

may not like Donald Trump, he

20:51

may be loud, boorish and brash but

20:54

he ain't the one who started throwing rocks. They

20:57

accuse him of being a Russian spy. They

20:59

tried to lock him up, they're trying to lock him

21:02

up now. And what has he done? When

21:04

they were firebombing buildings, the far left, Trump

21:07

did not deploy. US Army,

21:10

National Guard invoked the insurrection, he didn't do any of that.

21:12

We wanted him to, he didn't do it. Trump

21:15

said, I ain't throwing rocks at nobody. And

21:18

now here we are. So I tell you this, when

21:20

Donald Trump gets an office, I hope

21:23

he just shuts it all

21:25

down. Merrick Garland should

21:27

be in jail, so should

21:29

many other Democrats. Hillary Clinton and her staff

21:32

who destroyed public records, smashing devices with with

21:34

hammers. That is clearly

21:36

and obviously criminal. Yet

21:39

here we are. The world that

21:41

we live in is one in which Democrats

21:43

break the law and Republicans do nothing. Holding

21:46

Merrick Garland in contempt. Sure,

21:49

if they'd actually do something, but they're not going to.

21:53

Because men, this

21:56

country is bifurcated and the power

21:58

structures are plainly obvious. When

22:00

Steve Bannon is held in contempt of Congress, they

22:02

say straight to jail. When Merrick

22:04

Garland is, they say, we're not going

22:06

after Merrick Garland because they're evil. Because

22:09

they're evil. They wield power to crush their

22:11

enemies and Republicans send strongly worded letters. That's

22:14

what this is, another strongly worded letter.

22:17

Oh, at the very least I

22:19

can say this. It raises a

22:21

question for regular people that could be politically

22:23

weaponized. Hey, did you hear that

22:25

Merrick Garland was held in contempt of Congress just like Steve

22:27

Bannon? And they'll say, really? Well, yeah,

22:29

it's because he had information

22:32

on Joe Biden's mental state or something that didn't turn

22:34

over. Well, why didn't he

22:36

turn it over? He cited executive privilege. Well, don't

22:38

they have that right? Donald Trump cited executive

22:40

privilege for Steve Bannon, but they said he didn't have that

22:42

right. Why not? Well,

22:44

the argument was that Trump's

22:47

out of office. Does

22:49

that make sense? That former

22:51

president's administrations must turn over communications as soon

22:53

as they leave office? If you

22:55

want to play that game, I got a lot of records from the

22:58

Obama administration. I'd like to go through. I'd

23:00

look forward to seeing how that plays out. But

23:02

the question is really simple. You don't even get that

23:04

in depth with the average person. You just say, yeah,

23:06

Merrick Garland didn't want to turn over records, so they

23:08

held him in contempt, and they're saying they're not gonna

23:10

lock him up. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon didn't want to turn

23:12

over records, and so they held him in contempt,

23:14

and now they are locking him up. He has to go to prison.

23:17

Why? Why is Steve Bannon going to

23:19

prison and Merrick Garland's not going to prison? I

23:23

don't think the average person is gonna get past that

23:25

level of thinking. They're gonna say, yeah, that's weird. And

23:27

so perhaps that's the GOP strategy. This

23:29

contempt of Merrick Garland is going to prove

23:31

the double standard or add more to it,

23:33

and which they can then claim we have

23:35

corrupt government with Joe Biden. It's going to

23:37

freak people out. At

23:39

the other day, however, it may freak some

23:42

people out, but I tell you this. The

23:44

average person ain't watching this video. This is

23:46

the nittiest of gritty in politics. Merrick Garland,

23:48

who cares? The average person wants

23:50

to know why a carton of eggs costs seven bucks. Dude,

23:53

I was watching Fox and Friends, and they were at

23:56

a supermarket, or it was like a market slash

23:58

restaurant, and they're like, oh, eggs, how much? cost

24:00

he's like seven dollars and they're like what

24:02

seven dollars that's what people care

24:04

about all right i'll leave it there next segment's coming

24:06

up at 1 pm on this channel thanks for hanging out and i'll

24:09

see you all then the

24:11

libertarian party has somehow managed

24:13

to blow itself up we

24:16

like the libertarian party ladies and gentlemen we

24:18

like the idea of ending the wars we

24:21

like ron paul we like the mises caucus

24:23

we love the message we want more people

24:25

to hear this message it is the correct

24:28

message and the lp went nominated the

24:31

far leftist to his pro-vaccine mandate

24:33

and child gender i'll

24:35

keep it light surgeries

24:37

well actually to be fair i think

24:39

he's opposed to surgeries but he's for

24:41

the medication which is very damaging and

24:44

um we're gonna do that now

24:46

a bunch of libertarians are outright saying

24:48

we're out in fact

24:51

two states have already

24:53

rejected chase oliver the

24:55

lp nominee as their presidential nominee and are

24:57

refusing to put him on the ballot thus

25:00

this is the cascade failure and

25:02

i have to wonder i have to wonder could

25:05

this be sabotage or could

25:07

it be i guess good fortune for

25:09

trump supporters because the mises caucus guys

25:11

the majority of the libertarian party are

25:13

likely now going to be voting for

25:15

donald trump for all

25:17

of the reasons they don't like the guy now

25:20

my friends i'll make it a little personal

25:22

make it a little personal we've

25:25

hosted many libertarians on tim

25:27

caste irl and

25:29

uh and even a few on the culture war

25:32

and we're going to be hosting more because we

25:34

like the libertarian party we like

25:36

the anti-war message we want to

25:39

end the federal reserve it is

25:41

a corrupt machine that manipulates the

25:43

buying power and facilitates let's just

25:45

call it monetary manipulation to the

25:47

detriment of the average person and

25:49

the libertarian parties are loud messages for them but

25:51

they became a joke when they

25:54

decided to nominate a guy who's pro-vaccine

25:56

mandate and then they think

25:58

you are all stupid And

26:01

come on, he's not for mandates because he

26:03

thinks the government shouldn't mandate. What

26:05

about private corporations? What about

26:07

all of the massive multinational

26:10

corporations working in lockstep to

26:12

mandate employees get forced medication?

26:15

That's fine by them. They

26:17

don't care about the voters. But the big news here,

26:20

the big news here, and there is a little personal because

26:22

they're coming after me, they're

26:24

mad. But

26:27

the big news is to hear that

26:29

two states, Colorado and Montana, are refusing

26:31

to put the nominee on

26:33

the ballot is tremendous. Donald

26:36

Trump showed up to the Libertarian Party convention and it

26:38

was amazing. He said, you can keep being losers, 3%,

26:41

or you can vote for your nominee. And

26:44

it was hilarious. Man,

26:46

I can't believe, you know,

26:48

the Libertarians with no sense of humor,

26:50

you guys are the problem, okay? Dave

26:53

Smith, that's why he's the man. Because

26:56

he's a comedian and he gets it and it's

26:58

relatable and he knows how to make it funny

27:01

and fun and I wish he was the nominee.

27:03

I wish he was. But

27:05

I suppose, I suppose, in the grand

27:07

scheme of things, we are

27:10

the individuals who are saying stop making

27:12

me defend Donald Trump. Me,

27:15

I'll look on the bright side. I look

27:17

at how bad things have gotten and I'm like, I'll

27:19

take it. I'll take a Donald Trump

27:21

presidency, hands down. He's the best president of my

27:23

lifetime, no question. I've seen

27:25

so much garbage and then Trump comes along

27:28

and, you know, I'm not going to sit

27:30

here and pretend like every little thing

27:33

Trump has ever done is good or

27:35

pretend like he hasn't done bad things. There's been

27:37

many bad things. But as I argued to Dave

27:39

Smith, probably one of the most

27:41

prominent Libertarians, Trump gave us

27:43

a net positive. Withdrawing our troops from

27:45

the Middle East, David doesn't like the Abraham

27:47

Accords but I think he's wrong on this one. Agree

27:50

to disagree. Donald Trump

27:53

crossed the demilitarized zone into North

27:55

Korea with no security detail. That

27:59

inspires. me tremendously. And

28:01

I am glad, I am glad that

28:04

Donald Trump feels a

28:06

warm fuzzy feeling when people like me

28:08

and you praise

28:11

him to no end for

28:14

doing that. This is the world

28:16

that I live in. A president

28:19

showed up to the

28:21

border between two warring nations, an ally

28:23

of ours where our troops are stationed

28:26

and an enemy nation we are at war with.

28:29

And he walked up to the leader who invited

28:31

him into his country with no security

28:34

and Trump said, let's do

28:36

it. I

28:38

don't think people understand how

28:40

tremendous that is. When

28:43

I saw Donald Trump cross the D mill, I'm

28:45

pulling this up, Trump

28:48

enters North Korea. The

28:51

story they told, Trump becomes

28:53

first sitting president. I

28:56

just, I nearly cried.

28:59

I was welling up when I saw this story.

29:01

They got a YouTube clip. Here

29:03

we go. Here's the clip. One

29:07

of the most militarised borders on earth, an

29:12

historic handshake. Good

29:15

to see you again. I have

29:18

never expected to meet you at

29:20

this place. A

29:24

US president, a North Korean

29:27

leader and an extraordinary

29:29

invitation. President

29:31

Trump crosses into the DMZ,

29:34

meets Kim Jong-un. And

29:38

Donald Trump didn't disappoint. Everyone needs to

29:40

know this happened. But positively

29:43

striding into history books. The

29:45

first sitting American president to meet a

29:47

leader in the North. Wow. Who

29:54

is Trump surrounded by right now? He's surrounded

29:57

by North Korean. The

30:01

handshake on the other side, political

30:03

capital for chairman Kim, ensuring

30:06

both men had a win to show their people

30:08

as they boldly recrossed the border.

30:12

I believe just looking

30:14

at this action, this is an

30:16

expression of his willingness to eliminate

30:18

all the unfortunate past. And look

30:20

at the smile on Trump's face.

30:24

And you may say Trump's got an ego. Trump

30:28

is a, he's a negatist. He's only doing it

30:30

because, you know, it makes him feel good. He's

30:32

so important. Okay, I'll

30:35

take it. Trump loves it

30:38

when the people scream and cheer for his name

30:40

because he did something like that. So

30:43

I'll tell you this. Where am

30:45

I? I

30:47

like the libertarian party. I like Ron Paul. I

30:49

like freedom. I like small government. I'm

30:52

a traditional or social liberal leaning

30:54

in the libertarian spectrum, meaning there's

30:58

a lot of issues that are very difficult that,

31:02

you know, like abortion being one of them. Where

31:05

is the government's right or where

31:07

is their limit on the authority to

31:09

mandate, restrict or

31:12

even not to the Mises

31:14

caucus libertarians, Josh Smith, for instance, he says

31:17

it is the duty of the government to

31:19

protect life first and foremost. And

31:21

that includes babies we will never accept. Right.

31:23

I say, okay, right. Interesting. Yeah, I

31:26

don't know. Me, I lean

31:28

a little bit more left on some of these issues. I do. But

31:31

Chase Oliver is pro vaccine mandate. I

31:34

think that's wrong. I have no problem with the

31:36

government saying you can't do certain

31:38

things for a

31:40

large power structures. That

31:42

is when social media like Twitter

31:45

or Facebook suppress the speech of

31:47

individuals, including politicians,

31:50

Laura Loomer was running for

31:52

office and she was shut out of

31:54

one of the largest communication platforms. I

31:57

believe it's fine for us as a

31:59

collective. to say, you can't do

32:01

that. But

32:03

there's moral questions as well as principle

32:05

questions and I think morality matters. The

32:08

position of Chase Oliver, private

32:11

businesses should be allowed to mandate anyone

32:13

be forced to be medicated. The

32:15

problem, most of the mandates that we

32:17

are upset about were private. That's

32:19

what he supports. He is a machine

32:21

state, low libertarian.

32:24

Now we invited Chase Oliver several

32:26

weeks ago to appear in the

32:28

culture war. And

32:30

debate some of the other members of

32:32

the LP who are upset at his nomination. He

32:35

would then be able to defend his

32:37

positions and at first they never got

32:39

back to us. And then at like the 11th

32:41

hour, apparently

32:44

they emailed someone saying, not interested. Well,

32:47

none of our team had received the message. It's been

32:49

weeks. They said, he's not getting back to us. I

32:51

said, I'm gonna tweet about it. Cause this is laughable,

32:53

okay? The idea that we would be willing to platform

32:56

such an unknown like this guy, or that I'm even

32:58

talking about him now, shows

33:00

that we deeply care about the potential

33:02

for a third party to rise in

33:04

this country and the message that

33:06

libertarians can bring. And they said no.

33:09

And now we get some of the best. I'm gonna shout this guy

33:11

out. Or first here's the Montana

33:13

libertarian party. The

33:15

Montana libertarian party is officially rejected Chase Oliver

33:17

as our presidential candidate. We have maintained that

33:20

we will always prioritize Montana first. And we

33:22

do not believe his campaign advances our goals

33:24

in this state. Similarly situated

33:26

States should follow our lead and

33:28

we call upon the LNC to

33:30

consider suspending and replacing him. We

33:33

have this from amp America. Libertarian party

33:35

of Colorado refuses to put presidential candidate

33:37

on the ballot. Wow. The

33:39

LP is imploding. This is gonna

33:42

destroy all the hard work done by

33:44

the third party because they chose to

33:46

nominate this guy who is terrified. Terrified.

33:50

Here's where they're currently at. I love this one. So

33:54

Pennsylvania, Mises caucus says, at

33:56

the same time Chase is ignoring one of the

33:59

biggest alternative media networks. He's begging to be heard

34:01

in debate You'd think you'd take

34:03

any appearance that in more than four people

34:05

showed up to his campaign kickoff on Wednesday

34:08

evening They

34:10

said that why would they go on an

34:12

irrelevant podcast an irrelevant podcast? We'll

34:15

break the staff for you. This guy David

34:17

Mosskripp He's a

34:19

region 8 rep for LP, Florida

34:22

Relatively unknown. I don't mean that disrespectfully. There's

34:24

a couple hundred followers He says

34:27

no one outside of the party knows who

34:29

that Tim cast guy is Even

34:31

many within the libertarian party have never seen

34:33

a single episode. It is not worth the

34:35

time for a campaign to spend That's

34:38

interesting. I didn't realize we were so popular in the

34:40

libertarian party didn't realize our entire

34:42

audience was quite literally only the LP

34:47

Okay, so here's the thing no

34:49

one outside of the party knows who that guy

34:51

is Okay

34:54

You see what he's saying there. He's saying

34:56

that Tim cast as

34:58

a network is Only

35:00

well known in the libertarian

35:03

party Wow, I

35:05

didn't realize we were so popular in the LP and

35:08

then he goes on to say The

35:10

okay is it? Let's let

35:12

me know when I said the partners that guy is Someone

35:15

responded. It's one of the largest podcasts on the

35:17

internet. It isn't libertarian or LP related at all

35:20

Not sure blah blah blah He says

35:22

the MAGA folks have proven unreasonable and they

35:24

are already committed to their dear leader It

35:26

literally serves no purpose for any other candidate

35:28

to appear on the show Just

35:31

a fact of how campaigns work chases no

35:33

problem going into hostile environments. It just should

35:35

be beneficial Besides a

35:37

low-class podcast host you don't exactly get

35:39

to throw a toddler fit and constantly

35:41

insult the candidate Then throw a toddler

35:43

fit and cry that the same candidate

35:45

doesn't come on your show Maybe

35:48

just maybe if he took off his little beanie and

35:50

made his show more geared toward adults then it could

35:52

be beneficial This is why

35:54

the libertarian party is a joke. Now most of

35:56

you I get it. You are fans of the

35:58

work that I do That's why you're watching. Some

36:00

of you probably hate watch, but sure, I'll take

36:02

it. Ad revenues ad revenue, right? Many

36:05

of you are actually members over at timcast.com, but

36:07

the overwhelming majority of you are not. So

36:10

if you like the work we do, you should become

36:12

a member at timcast.com. But this is the libertarian party

36:14

in a nutshell. They are

36:16

whiny, irrational babies. They

36:19

don't understand voters. They don't understand core

36:21

issues. They don't care for what the

36:24

voters actually want. And that's

36:26

why they're imploding. But maybe,

36:28

let's have fun with it. It's a

36:30

conspiracy to destroy the only organizing force

36:32

outside of the two party system. How

36:36

sad is this? Well, first,

36:39

which is it? Are we a MAGA

36:41

podcast or are we only

36:43

known to the libertarian party? Which

36:45

one? Clearly, they

36:47

don't have an answer. But I'll

36:50

break it down for you. Let me tell

36:52

you how the numbers work. TimCast

36:54

IRL averages the highest nightly

36:56

live viewership on YouTube. I

37:00

would say 80% of the time 90 we have the most

37:04

viewers for any live stream on

37:06

YouTube. It's kind of crazy. We

37:09

are the top super chedded program

37:11

outside of Vtubers. I don't

37:14

know if that's still true, but we held that position for

37:16

several years. I don't really track those metrics. They're not super

37:18

important to me, but that was true. I was surprised in

37:21

the world. We were like number 11 or 13

37:23

or something. And

37:25

then the only other shows that beat us

37:27

on average were Vtubers, meaning like anime waifus

37:30

who are playing video games or something. Periodically,

37:34

there will be a show that beats us for sure. There

37:36

will be a special live event. Crowder will do

37:39

a special live and he'll get way more viewers

37:41

than us. I'm not saying we're the biggest podcast

37:43

in the world. I'm saying we average the most

37:45

live audience per episode.

37:47

TimCast IRL gets 3.5 million unique

37:51

viewers. These are metrics we

37:53

actually have to track across all platforms

37:56

because we sell ads to sponsors. That's

37:59

important, right? On

38:01

YouTube, I think we do around like 500K. We

38:03

have the live audience is around 150. And

38:06

then you get your, it's called VOD video on demand is

38:08

about 300 to 400. It

38:10

really depends. Like last night was bigger. We had Matt

38:12

Gaetz, it depends on the hosts. So

38:15

it's a big show. To

38:17

act like nobody knows who you are. This is

38:20

why the libertarian fails and deserves to fail. Because

38:22

this is the attitude they take. He

38:24

says, maybe if we are adults, all

38:27

right. We criticize Donald

38:29

Trump regularly. Luke Ritkowski

38:31

and Ian are accused of having Trump derangement

38:34

syndrome. And Donald Trump with a smile on

38:36

his face said, I will do the Tim

38:38

Kast podcast. We were supposed to get

38:40

a half hour. We got 17 minutes, I'll take it. But

38:42

we are in discussion about doing a longer forum show with

38:44

them when the time is right. We're not the

38:46

biggest podcast in the world. We're not as big as Logan

38:48

Paul, but enough that it matters to the

38:51

president and his supporters. We

38:53

host libertarians as well. We would

38:55

host more Democrats. They don't wanna come on

38:58

the show. Marion Williamson did. Now

39:00

the show in question in fact is not Tim

39:02

Kast IRL. It's the Culture War podcast on tenant

39:04

media. It's an irrelevant podcast. Okay,

39:06

this one gets like 300,000 unique viewers. It's

39:10

a Friday morning debate show where he would be able to come on

39:12

300,000. Chase

39:14

went on Austin Peterson's show. With

39:17

all due respect, I'm not trying to be a dick, but

39:19

our network is larger than that. They're

39:21

making excuses for one simple reason.

39:24

The libertarian party nominated a guy

39:26

who was deeply unpopular, whose ideas

39:28

are despised by even the libertarian

39:30

party and Americans

39:33

overwhelmingly reject. They

39:35

are crackpot ideas that unfortunately

39:37

will not fly. And

39:40

so Chase Oliver talks to his

39:43

campaign and they say, if

39:45

you go on Tim Poole's show, you

39:47

will be eviscerated politically.

39:51

That's the reality. They nominated a

39:54

guy who can't stand up to scrutiny. Dave Smith comes

39:56

on the show and we argue and we debate. Think

39:59

about that. How many times have we

40:01

had Dave Smith on? And he goes,

40:03

Tim, we talked about this. You're wrong.

40:05

The Abraham Accord said it and I'm

40:07

like, okay, well, I disagree. It's awesome.

40:09

Dave's amazing. He's

40:11

funny, he's smart, he's tall. That's

40:14

good for a presidential candidate, it really is,

40:16

since the advent of cameras. Chase

40:18

Oliver's team says, we can't do it, we can't handle the

40:20

heat. Y'all

40:22

are not ready for prime time. I'm

40:25

sorry. But you know what? Part

40:28

of me says, I'll take it. I

40:30

don't come from a world where I

40:32

think Republicans should win and they're

40:34

the greatest party ever. I

40:36

actually despise the Republicans. But

40:39

I tell you what, I remember my mom called

40:41

me several years ago and she was like, how

40:43

come all your videos are complaining about Democrats? And

40:46

I was like, because the Democrats suck. She's

40:49

like, yeah, well, what are Republicans? And I was like, I don't

40:51

know, what are Republicans doing? I'll tell

40:53

you what they're doing sitting on their hands. There's

40:56

not a whole lot to complain about when they do nothing.

40:59

But we make fun of them too. Strongly

41:01

worded letters. They're

41:03

the Washington generals, the Democrats, Harlem

41:06

Globetrotters. The Democrats are in unison.

41:08

They vote for Pelosi. They stand

41:10

side by side. They support war.

41:12

They support the entire Democrat

41:14

agenda. You got, what's

41:16

his name? I mean,

41:18

I'm forgetting the guy's name. Bowman, who

41:21

pulled off the emergency and a door, pulled

41:24

the fire alarm and ran off and they're like, that's

41:26

totally fine. Ilhan Omar makes anti-Semitic

41:28

statements. I'm doing air quotes because it was like

41:30

she was, I call it crop dusting anti-Semitism. And

41:32

the whole party says, we're not going to condemn

41:35

her or censure her. Marjorie Taylor Greene

41:37

has a Facebook post from before she got elected

41:39

and they're like, we're ripping her from her committees.

41:42

The Democratic Party walks around

41:44

with sledgehammers and the Republicans

41:46

go, slow down there Democrats.

41:50

The Republicans are tepid and weak. But

41:54

I like Ron Paul. I like Thomas Massey. Matt Gaetz, I think

41:56

is the best. He's a fighter. And

42:00

we disagree on things, for sure. But

42:03

I'm not a big fan of the Republican Party. I

42:05

wish the Libertarian Party made sense, I really really

42:07

do. The Mises caucus, man,

42:09

they were hitting it out of the park. Now

42:12

some people blame Dave Smith. They

42:14

say that he should have stepped up to the plate. That's

42:17

tough, it really is. You

42:20

know a lot of people are mad at Dave. But

42:22

I get it man, I mean it's tough. I wish,

42:25

I would have preferred that Dave Smith

42:27

decide to run. But

42:30

let's think about that logically. Who

42:32

am I to say Dave Smith should have set aside

42:34

his career, his life, his safety to

42:37

run for a position in

42:40

the Libertarian Party to be president knowing

42:42

you're not going to win. You have a positive

42:44

impact, but taking tremendous risk

42:46

and causing damage to your personal life. I

42:51

wish he did run, but of course I do.

42:54

I'm not going to run. To be

42:56

fair, I would never get nominated by

42:58

the Libertarian Party. I disagree with the

43:00

Libertarians to such an extreme degree. But

43:04

Dave's right there. I

43:06

would never, I wouldn't do

43:08

it. Now I suppose it's fair to say we've

43:10

got 40 employees. If I were to run for office,

43:12

it would basically shut the company down because the principal

43:15

funding of this company is me hosting a

43:17

variety of shows. We do have other shows,

43:19

the other shows do make money. But

43:23

we invest more into them. We could certainly run

43:25

the other shows, Pop Culture Crisis, Tales From The

43:27

Inverted World, Gamer Maids, I'll

43:29

pause when I say it. We

43:33

could host those shows much

43:36

more cost efficiently and

43:38

they'd probably be in the black. But

43:40

we want the shows to be good, so we put a

43:42

little bit more into them and then we'll push them to

43:44

where they need to be. We're working on the boonies, securing

43:47

sponsorship for our new skate show

43:49

already in place, incredible. And

43:51

we're really excited about expansion. If

43:53

I were to leave to go and run for office, again,

43:55

to be fair, it would probably be very disruptive

43:58

to the company. That being

44:00

said, the Libertarian Party had nobody.

44:03

The Mises caucus did a tremendous job of bringing

44:05

Ron Paul's ideas to the forefront. And

44:07

still, but instead, they chose the guy

44:10

who's in favor of child, we'll just

44:12

call it child sex changes.

44:15

The guy who's in favor of corporations mandating

44:18

you get vaccinated. That was

44:20

the majority of vaccine mandates. I'll stress this. There

44:24

were venues across this country that required

44:26

people to get vaccines to play there. They

44:29

weren't forced to do that by the state.

44:31

They chose to do it. Do

44:34

you want to live in a country where

44:36

every business, because of

44:38

social pressure, decides you have to get

44:41

a medical treatment they've decided? No.

44:44

We need to say, hey, there's rules here. That's

44:48

why I'm not a big L-liberator that's like, corporations

44:50

can do whatever they want. And

44:52

then they say, those were monopolies, Tim. The government

44:54

made them. No. The

44:56

small local venue owned by one

44:58

guy that decided to do this,

45:00

it was political social pressure. Now,

45:03

if you put in place, you cannot

45:05

discriminate on the basis of medical treatment,

45:09

then. That's why I'm not a libertarian. Because

45:12

I don't think their ideas work. That's

45:14

fine. I'll put it this way. I wanted

45:16

to see the libertarian party succeed. Instead, I'll tell you what

45:18

we get. What we get

45:20

is the Mises caucus rushing to Donald

45:23

Trump, the true winner of the

45:25

Libertarian Party Convention. Chase Oliver's

45:27

nomination was probably the best thing Trump supporters

45:29

could have wished for. And

45:31

all of these libertarians have come out now saying,

45:33

Trump won. Because

45:35

the Mises caucus is voting for Donald Trump. They're

45:38

not going to vote for Chase Oliver, a

45:40

man who can't even defend his own ideas.

45:43

He couldn't do it. I'll

45:46

tell you this. They say

45:48

that I'm too hostile. I'm

45:50

too hostile to these people. They can't handle it.

45:54

That's the reality. I

45:56

will tell you this 100 percent. will

46:00

not come and sit down with me here

46:02

because their ideas cannot stand up to scrutiny.

46:06

Shout out to David Pakman. David Pakman has

46:08

agreed to come on one on one and have

46:10

this conversation. And I say, absolutely. And it's really

46:12

simple for me. Right? They

46:16

say, but what if you're wrong, Tim? Then

46:18

I'm wrong. That's it.

46:21

David Pakman can come here and say, I think X. And

46:23

I'll say, well, that's an opinion. What am I going to say? Your

46:25

opinion is your opinion. We're

46:28

trying to figure out what systems make the most sense.

46:30

If he says it's incorrect, I'll be like, I'll just

46:32

Google it right now. And then we'll say what the

46:34

combined sources believe. I use a news guard. Mainstream

46:37

media. Yeah. I got

46:40

a question for David Pakman. Politico

46:42

reported that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election

46:44

to help Hillary Clinton. That's

46:46

been reported by Politico. It's been backed up by other

46:48

outlets. They've never retracted it. I

46:51

have no problem saying it. There's a story. What

46:53

do you think? If he wants to come out and say, I think

46:55

this should be the way it is, I'll say, okay. If

46:58

he says, why do you think tax policy should be this way? I'll

47:00

tell him this is why. I have no problem having

47:02

a conversation on my ideas with literally anybody,

47:05

but most of the people on the left, people

47:07

who support child sex changes, for instance, they

47:10

know it makes no sense. They know it

47:12

doesn't work. They know it's wrong and

47:15

they refuse. They refuse to

47:17

be confronted on it. So

47:19

there you have it. So long

47:21

libertarian party. This could be the end. If

47:24

they're not putting the candidate on their ballots, they may lose

47:26

ballot access. They're going to have to put someone else on.

47:29

Figure it out. Best of

47:31

luck. I'll leave it there. Next segment is coming

47:33

up at, I guess we'll just put this one up at one. I

47:36

don't know. The next segment is coming up at 4pm

47:38

on this channel. Thanks for hanging out and I'll see you all then. It's

47:42

the gayest Star Wars ever. That's what they're

47:44

calling it. Apparently in the new show, lesbian

47:47

witches use the force to get pregnant. Apparently

47:51

the force is female. I don't know too

47:53

much about it, but apparently people are saying

47:55

like they created the force by chanting witchcraft

47:57

and impregnating women.

48:00

Like, through magic. Okay,

48:03

I guess. I mean, look, Star Wars was

48:05

fun in the first series,

48:08

but I never really cared that much for Star

48:10

Wars. It is a fun adventure. This

48:12

kid wants to join the Rebellion against the

48:15

Big Empire, and then, you know, he does.

48:18

Use the Force, and then he does, and then he blows

48:20

up the Death Star. And really,

48:22

I was never truly inspired by this story.

48:24

I mean, it felt too one-dimensional.

48:27

I suppose it was revolutionary at the time. I'm

48:30

a Star Trek fan, or at least I

48:32

was. They've certainly butchered that IP to oblivion.

48:35

So I do like what Seth MacFarlane

48:37

did with Orville. The Orville,

48:39

that was a fun show. Comedy at first, kind

48:41

of tried to get serious, but I respect Seth

48:43

MacFarlane for trying to make something more like Star

48:46

Trek The Next Generation. I

48:48

like the original series. I'm not as super familiar with

48:50

it, but The Next Generation

48:52

is some of the best stuff ever, some of

48:54

the manliest stuff ever, and I encourage you to

48:56

watch that show with your kids. It is sad

48:58

that we are losing touch with such

49:00

epic writing, and I will explain, and

49:03

I will compare and contrast to the gayest Star Wars

49:05

ever. The Post Millennial says, twins

49:07

Osha and Mae learn that

49:09

they were created by the head of

49:12

the coven and carried by another woman

49:14

within the group. All

49:16

right, here you go. Here's your... The

49:19

power of one, the power of

49:21

two, the power of

49:23

victory. Oh, no. The

49:25

power of one, the power

49:27

of two, the power

49:29

of victory. This

49:34

is Star Wars. Dude,

49:37

who wants to watch this? That's

49:44

it, huh? Jack

49:46

Mesopik says, this is Star Wars now thanks to Kathleen

49:48

Kennedy. Oh, man. Showrunner,

49:52

a little bit of a joke. Showrunner,

49:54

Leslie, how do you pronounce

49:56

it? Leslie. I'm sure

49:59

it's Leslie. Headland's newest addition

50:01

to the Star Wars universe in the form of the

50:03

Acolyte known as the Gay

50:05

Star Wars Ever features lesbian space-witch covens

50:07

who are able to immaculately conceive babies.

50:10

Not only is this causing concern for

50:12

being off-canon but it's a

50:15

further infiltration of woke identity politics into

50:17

the nerd universe of Star Wars. A

50:20

clip from the coven circulated on social

50:22

media with Blang being heaped on Kathleen

50:24

Kennedy, the showrunner and the

50:26

showrunner Headland and others. The

50:29

clip shows a group of women under cloak of darkness performing

50:31

some kind of ritual where they praise the power of one,

50:33

the power of two, and the power of many. The

50:36

new addition of the story changes the status of

50:38

the concept of midichlorians which is a

50:40

plentiful supply in one's blood, gives

50:42

them ability to wield the force. That

50:45

was also considered controversial by the way. The

50:47

presence of an abnormally high number of midichlorians

50:49

is what made Anakin Skywalker who

50:51

grows up to be Darth Vader so special when

50:53

he met Qui-Gon Jinn. Acolyte

50:55

episode 3, a prequel some

50:58

100 years prior to the beginning of George Lucas's

51:00

space opera, reveals that Anakin was not

51:02

the first child to have been conceived without the act

51:04

of reproduction in the Star Wars universe. Twins

51:07

Ausha and May learned that

51:09

they were created by the head of the coven

51:11

and carried by another woman within the group. In

51:14

a recent interview with Headland and one of the

51:16

stars of the new series, Amanda

51:18

Stenberg, Headland was asked about the sexual

51:20

orientation of the series and she said

51:22

that you know the gayest Star Wars

51:24

yet by a considerable margin. Headland

51:27

and Stenberg laughed. Stenberg laughed. People have told me

51:29

that it's the gayest Star Wars and frankly I

51:31

am into it. So people

51:33

are saying that when Kathleen Kennedy was was wearing

51:35

a shirt I think it was her that said

51:38

the force is female. She

51:40

meant it literally and I'm not watching

51:42

the Acolyte because Star Wars is trash. I

51:45

like the original movies they were fun space

51:47

adventures. Not really all that complicated. I

51:49

mean the first movie is basically about a kid

51:51

from a desert planet who gets radicalized by a

51:54

religious group to go and blow up a military

51:56

base killing untold numbers of civilians. I think hundreds

51:58

of thousands. I guess,

52:01

never really resonated with me all that much. Star

52:04

Trek The Next Generation on the other hand. Talk

52:07

about some of the greatest stuff ever. And the reason

52:09

why I bring this up is

52:11

because we also have this video by

52:14

Erin Wexler. And

52:17

she made this video about the birth control pill

52:19

saying it makes women like, you know, they

52:23

wanna date their brothers. When you're on the pill,

52:25

it makes you want soft men with round faces

52:27

and they're weaker because you wanna be near family

52:29

because it simulates pregnancy. Thus, you're trying to be

52:31

with your brother. And she said, I'm not

52:33

talking about your brother who says

52:36

you want more support, you wanna be around family. She

52:38

said, translation, you're trying to date your brother and

52:41

not the good looking brother who played football at

52:43

homecoming. No, no, your ambiguously

52:45

gay brother who was in the

52:47

band and watched Star Trek, sorry

52:49

Trekkies, wrong, wrong I say. Man,

52:53

there was no greater show than Star Trek The Next Generation. That's

52:56

it. If you have small

52:58

children, they should be

53:00

watching Star Trek The Next Generation. Not only is

53:02

it a fun and

53:05

entertaining space drama, but

53:08

it has some of the best moral

53:11

philosophy, technology. Ah,

53:14

man, I can't even begin to describe

53:17

the absolutely amazing storytelling

53:20

that is Star Trek The Next Generation. And in

53:23

every episode, it can get convoluted here and there

53:25

and it can get weird in some places, that's

53:27

fine. Not every show is perfect. Of course, they

53:29

have the Rikers Beard phenomenon. In

53:31

the first season of Star Trek The Next Generation,

53:34

Jonathan Frakes did not have a beard playing Commander

53:36

Riker. Season two, he grew

53:38

a beard and everyone said that's when the show

53:40

got really good. It was

53:42

the highest rated show at the time, I believe. It was syndicated

53:44

on multiple networks, meaning, and it's kind of weird to

53:46

me, it would come on, I think it

53:48

was a CBS show, and then

53:50

it would be like a few days later, it

53:52

would rerun on other networks. That's how popular it

53:55

was. But let me

53:57

compare and contrast. Disney

53:59

rights. now is producing the gayest Star

54:01

Wars ever. This

54:03

is what they want your children to grow up watching. It's

54:06

awful. I'll

54:08

tell you what I was inspired by. So

54:11

let me tell you a story. A story that

54:14

I think is a good message for your kids.

54:16

Now I know Star Trek is fiction. It's

54:18

not real stories and there are real stories of

54:20

sacrifice and honor that are probably better.

54:23

You want people to grow up to emulate

54:25

certain behaviors and to be inspired and I

54:28

don't necessarily know what

54:30

creates that drive within

54:32

people. What makes them connect

54:34

to certain ideas or stories? Honestly, I don't

54:36

know. But I'll tell you this.

54:38

I'll tell you. So in

54:41

Star Trek, the original series, there's bad guys,

54:43

the Klingons. What a silly name.

54:46

And the Federation fights them. There was a

54:48

war in the story between the Federation, which

54:50

is, you know, humans and their allies, and

54:53

the Klingon Empire, massive honor-based

54:57

society. When

55:00

they created The Next Generation, they

55:02

wanted to show that there was a passage of

55:04

time between the original series and the new show.

55:07

The fascinating thing is the original series

55:10

actually didn't have their budget was constrained. And

55:12

so as time went on, the show has

55:14

actually suffered for this. Nonetheless, even

55:16

though the show was canceled, it was still very popular. So

55:18

they made several movies. They decided

55:20

thanks to the popularity of the movies, hey,

55:22

like, why don't we do another Star Trek,

55:24

The Next Generation? That's what it's called. And

55:27

a lot of people thought it wouldn't work. When

55:31

Patrick Stewart was auditioning for

55:34

the role, his

55:36

agent was like, look,

55:39

you're going to do a couple of seasons.

55:41

It'll be canceled. You'll make some money. Just take the

55:43

role. And he ended up

55:45

doing, I think it was what, like eight seasons or seven

55:47

seasons? And it's been a long

55:49

time. I mean, I haven't watched the full series in a minute.

55:52

It's probably been, I don't know, eight years

55:54

or something, but I periodically will watch it.

55:56

And so they wanted to show the passage of time

55:59

between the original series. and the next generation. So

56:02

in the beginning, in the new

56:04

episode, you see a Klingon.

56:06

That's right, one of the former enemies

56:08

is now serving on board the new

56:10

ship. Ha ha, seems like

56:13

simple writing, right? They say, how about the people

56:15

they were fighting? We put one on the ship.

56:17

That's a twist for fans. Well,

56:20

how do you explain such a thing? Some

56:23

of the best writing ever

56:25

done by humans inspires me

56:27

to this day. I

56:29

will tell you the story. Maybe I'll embellish a little

56:31

bit, but I'll tell you the general story. So

56:33

the writers are basically trying to come up with what is

56:36

the circumstance by which the Federation and the Klingons warring factions

56:38

are now at peace. Now,

56:42

I do think, and I will stress again, that

56:44

there are real world stories of war and peace

56:46

that are inspirational, but we tell these tall tales

56:48

because we want to deeply inspire

56:52

and entertain. The story is this.

56:55

The Federation and the Klingons were at war, and

56:57

there was a forced peace by

56:59

an intervening force, but

57:02

still, there were routine skirmishes and

57:04

battles between Klingons and Federation forces.

57:07

At some point, there's a third

57:09

faction called Romulans, and

57:12

they're effectively meant to

57:14

emulate Roman Empire, honor,

57:17

not honor, passion, passion and drive. Klingons

57:20

are honor. And then you have,

57:22

as I decide, the Ferengi, which are capitalists. Anyway,

57:25

digress. The Federation,

57:27

despite being enemies with the Klingon

57:29

Empire, the Enterprise, the flagship of

57:31

the Federation fleet, receives a dis,

57:33

intercepts, I should say, a distress signal

57:36

coming from a civilian outpost, mostly

57:39

women and children. The

57:41

Romulans, who were seemingly supposed

57:43

to be aligned with the

57:45

Klingons, had decided to wipe out

57:48

a Klingon colony, predominantly civilians.

57:51

The Enterprise, despite being enemies

57:53

with the Klingons, saw

57:55

this as egregious, and of course, there

57:58

is honor within. in humans as well.

58:02

So the Enterprise rushed at

58:04

maximum warp as fast, full acceleration, to

58:07

the outpost at Kitimer. That's what

58:09

they called it. Upon

58:12

arriving, they encountered four warships. As

58:15

the story goes, the Enterprise knew it stood

58:18

no chance against four enemy

58:20

warships from the Romulan Empire. The

58:24

Enterprise, despite this, fought

58:26

and refused to do back down,

58:28

eventually getting destroyed in the process

58:31

in an attempt to save the

58:33

civilians of their own enemy. Such

58:36

a powerful story. The

58:38

Klingon Empire outraged at

58:41

the unprovoked attack on civilians by the

58:43

Romulans, showing no honor, and

58:45

recognizing the sacrifice and the

58:47

bravery of the Federation entered

58:49

into peace talks and formed an

58:52

alliance with the Federation knowing the

58:54

Romulans were a real threat and

58:56

having been shown that

58:58

humans were brave, honorable,

59:02

and capable of self-sacrifice. What

59:06

a story to tell. Amazing

59:08

writing. And in The

59:10

Next Generation, this happens

59:12

all beforehand. It's just ancillary

59:14

background stuff. In an

59:17

episode of The Next Generation to

59:19

kind of portray the conflict,

59:22

they do an episode where, again, it's

59:24

a little convoluted. The

59:26

Enterprise in the past that rushed to

59:28

save the Klingons, despite being enemies, was

59:31

forced through a temporal rift for

59:33

a short period of time. But in

59:35

doing so, created an alternate timeline where

59:39

they never sacrificed themselves, the Klingons viewed them

59:41

as cowardly and was still at war, and

59:44

the Federation was losing. They

59:49

reexamined the idea of self-sacrifice in this episode.

59:52

And it is sci-fi mumbo jumbo, but basically what

59:54

happens is the new Enterprise

59:57

encounters the — oh, and Whoopi Goldberg is like a

59:59

huge — has a huge role in this. They

1:00:02

encounter the old enterprise coming through the

1:00:04

time rift, and they decide to save

1:00:06

them. But Guinan,

1:00:08

played by Whoopi Goldberg, is some

1:00:10

kind of like higher dimensional being of

1:00:13

some sort. She has perceptions beyond.

1:00:15

She realizes that the timeline has shifted,

1:00:18

and they decide, well,

1:00:20

they have the conundrum of if they send the

1:00:22

enterprise back, it will be destroyed, and they will

1:00:25

all die. And this is great. Because

1:00:28

once again, the crew of the

1:00:30

enterprise know that even

1:00:32

though they're going to die, they're given

1:00:34

a second chance, you

1:00:36

rushed into battle headfirst facing

1:00:38

death to save your own

1:00:40

enemies. You have now been

1:00:42

given a second chance, and you can leave. And

1:00:45

they say, we have to go back.

1:00:48

They decide to go back to the temporal rift, get

1:00:50

blown up, massacred,

1:00:54

and this restores the timeline. A

1:00:57

lot of it is silly sci-fi mumbo jumbo.

1:01:00

That I can understand. A lot of people aren't going

1:01:02

to be fans of that. But

1:01:04

take a look at what they're offering up your children. Lesbian

1:01:07

space switches immaculately conceiving a

1:01:10

baby and the

1:01:12

force being female and all that, or

1:01:15

a story about honor and

1:01:18

sacrifice for the betterment of

1:01:21

your people. And sometimes not even

1:01:23

your people. There's

1:01:26

so much more in The Next Generation.

1:01:28

I mean, one of the most amazing

1:01:30

conversations, of course, is Data is an

1:01:33

android trying to understand humanity. And

1:01:35

he asks Captain Picard about terrorism,

1:01:39

referencing actual historical references to

1:01:42

when terror worked. Notably

1:01:44

he mentions the Mexican independence from the

1:01:46

Spanish state. And

1:01:48

they have this conversation around the difficulties

1:01:51

of recognizing the effectiveness of

1:01:53

terror in forcing change, but also the

1:01:55

immorality of it and the problems it

1:01:58

creates. where

1:02:01

there's a trial held to determine

1:02:04

whether or not an Android that purports

1:02:06

to be sentient is actually a sentient

1:02:08

entity. They ask such

1:02:10

amazing questions. Now again I'll

1:02:12

stress many of you are fans and you're probably cheering

1:02:15

this stuff on. Many of you aren't. By

1:02:17

all means if you don't want them watch Star

1:02:19

Trek have them watch war

1:02:21

documentaries and learn of the true heroes who

1:02:23

sacrifice themselves in the real world that I

1:02:25

can respect. Audie

1:02:28

Murphy, is that the guy? Audie

1:02:31

Murphy let me let me see

1:02:33

if I can pull that one up. Maybe I'm getting the name wrong. This

1:02:36

is the let

1:02:38

me pull up this guy. There we go. Audie

1:02:41

Murphy, an American soldier actor-songwriter widely celebrated

1:02:43

as the most decorated American combat soldier

1:02:46

of World War II. Described as the

1:02:48

most highly decorated soldier in US history.

1:02:51

He received every military combat award for

1:02:53

valor available in the US Army as

1:02:55

well as the French and Belgian awards for

1:02:57

heroism. Murphy received the Medal of

1:02:59

Honor for valor that he demonstrated the age of 19

1:03:01

for single-handedly holding off

1:03:03

a company of German soldiers for an

1:03:06

hour at the Colmore pocket in France

1:03:08

in January 1945 before

1:03:11

leading a successful counter attack while

1:03:13

wounded and out of ammunition. There's

1:03:16

a story for your kids too. These

1:03:18

are the things we want to emulate. These

1:03:21

are the things we want to share with with

1:03:23

children. The story of

1:03:25

Audie Murphy is just absolutely incredible. Maybe it's not true.

1:03:28

Maybe it's just war propaganda. I don't know.

1:03:31

But I tell you this, if we don't

1:03:33

get good messaging to the next generation you're gonna have

1:03:35

a bunch of weak pathetic... I don't

1:03:37

know, cowards. We got

1:03:40

to change that. Me? I like Star

1:03:42

Trek. Whatever. Have

1:03:44

fun with your gay Star Wars. If you like it, you like

1:03:46

it. I won't watch it. I won't advocate for it. I'll

1:03:49

leave it there. Next segment is coming up at 6 p.m. on this

1:03:51

channel. Thanks for hanging out and I will see you all then. I

1:04:00

gotta tell you, the difference between the

1:04:02

right and the left is that

1:04:05

if you had a statue that was 200 years

1:04:07

old and the left wanted it gone, they'd

1:04:10

show up and mask 200 people all

1:04:12

wearing black hoodies, jeans, and masks, smash

1:04:15

it to bits, and

1:04:17

then no one would go to jail for it. No criminal charges.

1:04:20

The right, however, doesn't do

1:04:23

any of that. I guess they spill paint. These

1:04:25

kids who got criminally charged for writing their screws on

1:04:28

it apparently didn't even do anything. This

1:04:30

is how insane it is. You know, look, I'll say this.

1:04:34

Don't go vandalizing people's stuff. If

1:04:36

you live in the community and you have problems with it,

1:04:39

you have an opportunity now to

1:04:41

speak up and complain and generate

1:04:43

public attention. Vandalizing

1:04:45

it actually doesn't do anything. Going

1:04:48

up to the Pride mural and vandalizing it may

1:04:50

feel good, but I think it's

1:04:52

a missed opportunity. Not from the area.

1:04:54

I don't actually like people going in,

1:04:58

you know, ruining these pride flags. I don't

1:05:00

like the pride flags, but if I want

1:05:02

to fly a Gazan flag, I don't want someone throwing a brick

1:05:04

through my window. But I get it. I

1:05:06

get it. It's a culture war. Here's

1:05:08

what I'd say to the people of Spokane who live there and are upset with

1:05:10

it. You have an opportunity right now

1:05:12

to go around collecting videos of people being like, we

1:05:15

don't want this, we don't want to pay for it,

1:05:17

it's causing undue attention, and just list all of your

1:05:19

grievances with what they're doing. Make

1:05:21

it a big issue of debate. Make

1:05:24

it something that they'll have to publicly defend.

1:05:27

And then put the pressure on them for

1:05:29

going after people who vandalized it. Now, especially,

1:05:31

I would say particularly these kids, they didn't

1:05:33

vandalize anything. Yo, it's insane.

1:05:36

These woke people are like, look at the skids on

1:05:38

the ground. Look what they were doing. Are

1:05:41

you saying that the kids held the breakdown

1:05:43

and were burning out? They clearly weren't. The

1:05:46

skids were just because the kids were riding around in the

1:05:48

street on scooters playing. This is

1:05:50

where we're at. People are upset. My

1:05:54

opinions don't really matter on this. I don't live there

1:05:56

fine. Okay. But they're

1:05:58

vandalizing it. crosswalk

1:06:00

vandalized days after teens charged with

1:06:02

felonies for leaving scooters skid marks

1:06:04

on rainbow pavement. The

1:06:07

Pride crosswalk was also set on fire

1:06:09

in March. That's crazy. I'm

1:06:11

not a fan of that. Sorry. The

1:06:13

infamous Spokane LGBTQ Pride crosswalk

1:06:15

was vandalized again on Tuesday,

1:06:17

this time with paint. The

1:06:20

new incident occurred less than a week after three

1:06:22

teenagers were charged with felonies for riding scooters of

1:06:24

the Pride crosswalk. We know that. On

1:06:26

Tuesday morning, officials discovered yellow and white paint

1:06:29

splashed on the crosswalk after the city worked to

1:06:31

have it repainted over the weekend ahead of Spokane's

1:06:33

annual Pride parade. I just want to

1:06:35

stress this to these

1:06:38

people who are painting this. You

1:06:42

have two options. Continually maintain

1:06:44

the flag and

1:06:47

repaint it every day because

1:06:49

of this or... Well,

1:06:53

I should say three options, I guess. I was

1:06:55

going to say the other thing is leave the

1:06:57

desecrated flag as is to be a

1:06:59

symbol of the disdain people have for it. I

1:07:02

accept either. You're

1:07:04

going to come out every day and pay money

1:07:06

because people clearly are upset. Again,

1:07:09

I don't agree with vandalizing. You

1:07:11

know, I don't think kids were vandalizing, but someone who

1:07:14

splashed paint on it, I don't

1:07:16

agree if someone does it intentionally. That

1:07:18

being said, if they stole

1:07:20

taxpayer money and never got this approved, now you've

1:07:22

got an interesting problem like they did with Black

1:07:24

Lives Matter in front of Trump's Fifth

1:07:26

Avenue building. But the

1:07:28

other issue is like, we don't

1:07:31

even know this is vandalism. What if there's like

1:07:33

some dude who's carrying a bucket of paint and he trips

1:07:35

and he falls and drops the bucket? Are you going to

1:07:37

be like, we're going to arrest you, you're going to jail? Or it's

1:07:39

like, come on. It's the street.

1:07:42

Nobody would care if they didn't

1:07:44

paint their flag on the street. Look how disgusting

1:07:46

it is. There's skid marks all over it and

1:07:48

the kids aren't the only ones who did that.

1:07:52

David J. Riley says, how much is this costing taxpayers?

1:07:55

First of all, to paint the flag and repaint

1:07:57

it, but also to police it, investigate and prosecute

1:07:59

it. hundreds of thousands, millions. SpokeMPD

1:08:03

said they're investigating the incident, but announced

1:08:05

they will no longer be commenting or issuing press

1:08:07

releases on vandalism in the Pride Crosswalk in an

1:08:09

effort to deter future incidents. In

1:08:11

response to the initial incident of vandalism, Lyme,

1:08:14

come on, post-monial, is it really even,

1:08:16

look at this video. These

1:08:19

kids are just riding scooters, they're not doing anything.

1:08:22

They're riding scooters everywhere, not even just on

1:08:24

the flag. I don't think they even thought

1:08:26

twice about, they're just doing wheelies and riding

1:08:28

around the waterfront. Insane

1:08:30

they're being charged with felonies over this. Democrat

1:08:33

Gov. Jay Inslee signed legislation to make it a

1:08:36

felony to deface public pride

1:08:38

symbols in March, which took effect

1:08:40

on June 6th. The charges come with a maximum penalty of

1:08:42

at the five years in prison. Look at this. Teens

1:08:46

left scooter marks on freshly

1:08:48

painted LGBTQ Pride mural. They were

1:08:50

later arrested for first-degree malicious mischief.

1:08:53

They were just like teenagers, like

1:08:55

deliberately making marks and scratch marks

1:08:58

with their Lyme scooters, like

1:09:00

just all around. Several witnesses confronted

1:09:03

the group and called police. Wow. We're

1:09:06

not going to sit by as we watch

1:09:08

people deliberately commit a hate crime, like right

1:09:10

in the middle of downtown. After looking at

1:09:13

security footage, officers arrested three teenagers. Two were

1:09:15

minors and one is 19-year-old Ruslan Turko. You

1:09:18

are charged with one count, malicious mischief.

1:09:21

The judge was in court this afternoon. The judge

1:09:23

released him under the condition he doesn't go near

1:09:25

the crosswalk or the other teenagers. Prosecutors,

1:09:27

though, had asked the judge to set a $15,000 bond

1:09:31

since that's how much it costs to repaint the mural. The

1:09:34

community really came together to raise the money

1:09:36

for them to be able to do it

1:09:38

before the parade on Saturday. Now

1:09:40

this vandalism, just hours after that repaint

1:09:43

and only a few weeks after someone else, set

1:09:45

fire to the mural. Wow. It's

1:09:47

actually reminded in moments like this that there are still people out there

1:09:50

that... Take a look at this. Now

1:09:52

this vandalism just hours after that repaint

1:09:54

and only a few weeks after someone

1:09:56

else, set fire to the mural. It sucks

1:09:58

if you're right here. Look at these skid, they're

1:10:01

not telling us everything about what's going

1:10:03

on. Look at these massive tread marks.

1:10:06

There is very serious outrage over

1:10:08

this and it's getting crazier. I'll

1:10:10

tell you why. But

1:10:13

first let me throw it to our good friend,

1:10:15

Brian Krasenstein. This is a guy

1:10:17

who professionally plays the heel on acts pretending

1:10:19

to be a liberal but clearly knows what's

1:10:22

really going on. He says,

1:10:26

in reference to Gunther Eagleman

1:10:28

showing a truck peeling out on a pride flag

1:10:30

mural in the street, he

1:10:33

says, imagine spending your time on

1:10:35

acts trying to make a group of people who

1:10:37

have a significantly higher rate of suicide feel even

1:10:39

more hated and unwelcome in their own skin. You

1:10:42

truly have to be a horrible person to post something like

1:10:44

this. I just ask people to

1:10:46

put themselves in other people's shoes before trying to

1:10:48

monetize off hate. This

1:10:50

is why I say the Krasensstienes are evil because

1:10:53

they're comic book villains. They know the

1:10:55

real reason people are upset with pride

1:10:57

flag murals in the street, but

1:10:59

they pretend like you're trying to make

1:11:02

a group of people feel unwelcome in

1:11:04

their own skin. Brian

1:11:07

Krasenstein knows exactly what's going on. Cities

1:11:10

are painting an ideological symbol. This

1:11:13

is not a trans pride flag.

1:11:15

This is a progress pride flag

1:11:18

that represents an ideology. Brian,

1:11:21

notice the black and the brown stripe. Are you

1:11:23

saying that black people don't like being black and

1:11:25

have a problem with it? What's your implication? I

1:11:28

can't stand these racist liberals. The

1:11:31

problem people have with it is

1:11:33

it is a symbol of an

1:11:36

ideology that is being forced on

1:11:38

them while at the same time

1:11:40

the proponents of that ideology have

1:11:42

desecrated war memorials and ripped statues

1:11:44

from their bases. You

1:11:48

have, my friends, a culture war. People

1:11:51

are very unhappy. But I tell

1:11:53

you this, there have been some people who

1:11:55

have been criminally charged for damaging statues. That's true.

1:11:58

But take a look at the extreme. degree

1:12:01

they go for people driving

1:12:03

on the road. Those

1:12:06

kids that were riding the scooters around, there's

1:12:09

no video we have of them sitting there and

1:12:12

holding their tires and scuffing it up. The

1:12:15

scuff they've presented in media appear to

1:12:17

just be scuffs from riding

1:12:19

scooters. That just

1:12:21

happened. They also don't, we've

1:12:23

never gotten a story about what those big massive

1:12:25

tread streaks are. They're gonna have to keep

1:12:27

repenting this thing because people are pissed off. But

1:12:30

I tell you what, the stupidest

1:12:32

thing I think is this, driving

1:12:36

across it and peeling out. The

1:12:39

reason why these people keep winning these

1:12:41

cultural battles is because they

1:12:44

use the police.

1:12:46

That's right. You

1:12:49

go and you vandalize it and the cops, because

1:12:51

they're scumbags, will arrest you for it. I

1:12:54

am sick of people blindly defending police.

1:12:58

The leftists go to the cops and

1:13:00

the cops bend their knees to kiss

1:13:02

the feet because they're spineless scumbag cowards.

1:13:06

Here's what should happen. The

1:13:08

next time some kid rides a scooter across the

1:13:10

Pride mural and they say go arrest those

1:13:12

kids, every single cop should go

1:13:14

no, but they won't.

1:13:17

And the conservatives will just keep blindly supporting

1:13:20

communist police officers. Now,

1:13:23

cops are people. They're

1:13:25

cops who are not communist. They

1:13:28

are cops that have met good people, fans of the show

1:13:30

too. But in

1:13:32

places like Spokane, places like Florida, you

1:13:34

have communist cops that will defend. And

1:13:37

you know what? These cops will

1:13:39

be like, well, I don't agree with it, but you shouldn't be vandalizing.

1:13:41

You're a communist. They

1:13:44

got their garbage ideology painted on your roads. I don't

1:13:46

see you going and arresting people for

1:13:49

throwing eggs, bricks, graffiti. You

1:13:51

ain't doing none of that. But my boss

1:13:53

told me. Okay, so you're a communist. Whatever,

1:13:56

man. Just admit it. You

1:13:59

can... argue all day that you don't like

1:14:01

it, but when you march

1:14:05

at the whip crack of

1:14:07

these neocoms, there's no

1:14:09

difference. You're their

1:14:11

servant. And I'm done protecting

1:14:13

cops over this stuff. It

1:14:15

is the cops that are in Florida that are

1:14:18

going and arresting people. Here's what

1:14:20

I'd do. If I was governor of Florida, you

1:14:22

know what I'd

1:14:25

do? I'd say, pardon. Who vandalized the

1:14:27

pride mural in Palm Beach? It's

1:14:29

Palm Beach, I think, right? Pardon.

1:14:32

I'd say, no, no, no. You guys, you want

1:14:34

your, you do it. You take care of it. You

1:14:37

clean it up. Ron DeSantis needs to be pardoning all these guys.

1:14:40

Why isn't he? I just, I hate Republicans

1:14:42

so much. Ugh,

1:14:45

weak. Anyway, I'll leave it there.

1:14:48

Next segment is coming up tonight at 8pm

1:14:50

over at youtube.com/timcast IRL. Thanks for hanging out

1:14:52

and I'll see you all then. Bye.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features