Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Have you seen the price of gold lately? It's
0:03
hitting all-time highs. And when it comes to
0:06
investing in gold, check out Noble Gold Investments.
0:08
They have a track record of excellence that's
0:10
second to none. Just look
0:12
at their thousands of 5-star reviews on
0:14
Trustpilot, Google, and the Better Business Bureau. Customers
0:18
rave about their knowledgeable staff, smooth investment
0:20
process, and life-changing results which you can
0:22
see for yourself online. That's the kind
0:24
of reputation you can count on. But
0:27
it's not just about the reviews. Noble Gold
0:29
Investments truly care about their clients. They
0:31
take the time to understand your unique needs
0:34
and goals, and they give expert guidance every
0:36
step of the way. That
0:38
level of personalized service is rare in this
0:40
industry. Look, when it
0:42
comes to securing your financial future, you can't afford to
0:44
take chances. Go with the gold
0:46
company that has earned the trust of countless investors.
0:49
Visit noblegoldinvestments.com/Tim
0:52
Pool today
0:55
and discover why Noble Gold Investments is
0:57
the only choice for smart, secure gold
0:59
investments. Or give them a call
1:01
at 877-646-5347. Again,
1:09
that number is 877-646-5347. Become
1:23
a member at timcast.com by
1:25
clicking Join Us to support
1:27
the work we're doing and
1:29
to get access to the
1:31
uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show
1:33
Monday through Thursday at 10
1:35
p.m. You don't want to miss it.
1:38
Now, let's get into the news. The
1:40
Republicans have voted to hold
1:42
Merrick Garland in contempt of
1:44
Congress for withholding Biden audio.
1:47
This stems to a conversation Biden
1:49
had with the prosecutor who decided
1:51
that Joe Biden's mental state, well,
1:55
because it's so poor, he cannot be
1:57
held criminally accountable for the crimes he
1:59
committed. Not kidding. They
2:01
said he's a doddering old man. He'll
2:03
look endearing to the jury and we can't convict
2:06
him. Joe Biden broke the
2:08
law clearly,
2:10
admittedly, with classified documents
2:12
that he withheld so he could write
2:14
a book and make money. But
2:18
he's just too old and out of it. So the
2:21
Republicans wanted this audio. They want to
2:23
know what this conversation had. And
2:25
it appears the issue is Joe
2:28
Biden will look like a doddering old fool
2:30
in the audio recording and that is, well,
2:32
it's bad for his campaign. But
2:35
Matt Gaetz last night brought up a
2:37
really great point and he said, there's
2:39
nothing in that audio that's going to
2:41
enlighten us any more than we already
2:43
are. The man appears to have taken
2:45
a crap in his pants at
2:48
the D-Day ceremony in France. So
2:52
I asked our good friend, Chad GPT. I
2:55
said, did Joe Biden, you know, is it
2:57
reasonable to assume that he suffered
2:59
an episode? And it said, no, absolutely
3:01
not. And then I said, if
3:03
an 81 year old man standing up,
3:05
squatted over, stood up, squatted over, is
3:08
it reasonable to assume that he's suffering
3:10
an episode? And it said,
3:12
yes, of course, absolutely. I
3:14
was like, OK, but now when it's Joe Biden,
3:16
thanks, Chad GPT. We love you, AI. What
3:19
we're currently at right now, Merrick
3:22
Garland has been held in contempt. Nothing
3:24
is going to happen. There's going to be they're
3:26
not going to go after him. He's not going to go to jail.
3:29
Steve Bannon, however, is facing prison. Peter
3:31
Navarro is in prison and
3:33
many are asking about Alvin Bragg's
3:35
connection with the DOJ and
3:37
the prosecution of Trump at the state level. Because
3:40
as it turns out, as most of you know, a high
3:42
ranking DOJ official stepped down from his
3:45
position at the federal level to go
3:47
be a local prosecutor. Interesting.
3:50
Well, Bragg's office is denying
3:52
having any conversation. It's a
3:54
conspiracy theory. Oh, please,
3:56
let's break this down and we'll explain exactly the
3:59
dirty game that's being Now,
4:01
I will stress, my friends, you
4:03
know, look, what we have here, I
4:05
guess, is another strongly worded letter. I can't
4:08
say I'm excited for it. Being
4:10
held in contempt, interesting. But we
4:13
know there's a double standard. And all
4:15
we seem to ever get is strongly
4:18
worded letters from the Republican Party. Now,
4:21
Matt Gaetz points out that subpoena power
4:23
actually has a tremendous impact. When
4:26
they subpoena these individuals and pull up their
4:28
conversations and communications, it actually changes
4:30
things. Gaetz pointed out
4:32
that after his grilling of Lloyd Austin, there ain't
4:35
going to be any Pride
4:37
Month events or Drag Queen story hours on
4:39
military bases. This public pressure
4:41
does work. I
4:43
say sure, if we're talking
4:46
about Drag Queen story hour, but
4:48
right now we are talking about the
4:50
highest law office in the land being
4:53
an abject criminal organization
4:57
and facing no repercussions or accountability.
5:00
Here's a story from the AP News. The
5:03
House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General Merrick
5:05
Garland in contempt of Congress. Now, let's just,
5:07
you know, look, nothing's going to happen.
5:11
For refusing to turn over audio of President Joe
5:13
Biden's interview in his classified documents case, Republicans
5:16
latest and strongest rebuke of the DOJ as
5:18
partisan conflict over the rule of law animates
5:20
the 2024 presidential election
5:23
presidential campaign. The
5:25
216 and 207 vote fell along party
5:28
lines. The Republicans coalescing behind the contempt
5:30
effort despite reservations among some of the
5:32
party's more centrist members. Only
5:34
one Republican Rep. David Joyce of Ohio voted against
5:36
it. Garland said in a statement late
5:38
Wednesday, It is deeply
5:41
disappointing that this House of Representatives
5:43
has turned a serious congressional authority
5:45
into a partisan weapon. Really? Steve
5:48
Bannon would like to have a word with you. Today's
5:51
vote disregards the constitutional separation
5:53
of powers. The Justice Department's
5:56
need to protect its investigations and the substantial amount
5:58
of information we have provided to the House. the
6:00
committees. Okay, so
6:03
Joe Biden cites executive privilege. As the president, he
6:05
doesn't need to turn over his communications to
6:08
Congress. When Donald
6:10
Trump said executive privilege pertaining to records that
6:12
Steve Bannon had, the January
6:14
6th committee said, we don't care and
6:16
you're going to jail anyway. And
6:20
now Steve Bannon has to report to jail in a
6:22
couple of weeks. Look,
6:24
man, everybody knows
6:26
double standard, double standard. The question
6:28
is, where is any red
6:30
state law enforcement to go after any of
6:33
these people? And when I bring this up
6:35
to Matt, he says, is that really what
6:37
we want? Extrajudicial
6:39
I never said extrajudicial. I
6:41
said judicial accountability. And
6:44
you know, we're big fans of
6:46
Matt because he's probably like, he's
6:49
the best member of Congress that we got Florida, you're
6:51
very lucky. But the perspective
6:53
is wrong. I don't
6:55
personally want any retribution, judicial, extrajudicial,
6:57
anything. I just want the law
7:00
to be enforced. I
7:02
don't understand how we can live in this world where
7:04
you have Donald Trump being charged
7:06
every which way six ways from Sunday
7:09
and not a
7:11
single Democrat. Oh, Hunter Biden. No,
7:13
we didn't vote for Hunter Biden, the Democrats. So yeah, I
7:15
don't care about Hunter Biden. In fact, I don't think he
7:17
should be charged for the gun stuff. Ridiculous.
7:20
How about the influence peddling the tax evasion?
7:23
How about collusion between state and
7:25
federal offices to go after the
7:28
front runner for this 2024
7:30
election? Now, Matt agreed. He said that's
7:32
the most egregious thing we have. Yes.
7:34
So let's see some law enforcement action. Any?
7:39
Any? No, we're
7:42
not getting any of that. He
7:45
added, I will always stand up for this department. It's
7:47
employees. It's vital mission. Oh, I just
7:49
want to say, thank God this man did not make
7:51
it to the Supreme Court. And
7:54
so they don't realize how, how, how
7:56
much, how good of the work they
7:58
were doing by blocking him despite it was a partisan. an effort,
8:00
but still. Garland is now the
8:02
third attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress. Yet
8:05
it's unlikely that DOJ, which Garland
8:07
oversees, will prosecute him. The
8:09
White House's decision to exert executive privilege over the
8:11
audio recording, shielding it from Congress, would make it
8:13
exceedingly difficult to make a criminal case against Garland.
8:17
If Steve Bannon would like to have a word with you about that, nonetheless,
8:20
Speaker Mike Johnson defended the decision to
8:22
push ahead with what is now a
8:24
mostly symbolic effort. Look, we
8:26
did our job on the contempt, and I think
8:28
it sends an important message. The Louisiana
8:30
Republican said following the vote, we'll see
8:32
what happens next, but I mean, the House has to
8:34
do its work, and I'm pleased with the outcome today.
8:37
We knew that this was a bunch
8:39
of nonsense. Mike Johnson, the
8:42
one ring, we talked about him too. Here's
8:44
a guy who seemingly was a good dude.
8:47
Up until he became Speaker, they brought him in the backroom,
8:49
flogged him up a little bit, and then he came out
8:52
saying, I love the deep state. Congratulations,
8:54
you're doing nothing. You're wasting our time, and we
8:56
all know it. I don't
8:58
know. The only strategy I
9:00
can see in not going after these
9:02
obvious criminals is that the
9:04
Republicans want to avoid stepping in
9:06
it like Democrats are. Democrats are
9:08
so desperate, they're launching these criminal
9:11
actions against Trump and Bannon, Navarro,
9:13
et cetera, and it makes them
9:15
look panicked and desperate. It also
9:17
turns Trump and Bannon into martyrs,
9:19
which rallies support and donations. We're
9:21
in the era of the, oh heavens me, I'm a victim.
9:25
But if it works, it works, right? That's
9:27
the only thing I can see. Now
9:30
here's, this is a good one. Merrick Garland
9:33
posted an op-ed in the Washington Post
9:35
omitting the truth. Well, because he's evil,
9:37
these people are evil, okay? Like
9:40
say whatever you want about Trump supporters you think are
9:42
evil. I don't care. You know, you get people, yeah,
9:44
but have you seen what Trump supporters have said? Trump
9:47
supporters ain't me. I say what I
9:49
say, and I say evil, okay?
9:52
Here's a story. Attorney
9:55
General Merrick Garland attempted Wednesday to
9:57
shut down criticism of the Biden DOJ with
9:59
an- op-ed in the Washington Post. But
10:02
his flat dismissal of concerns of the
10:04
DOJ's politicization of conspiracy as conspiracy theories
10:06
fails to engage the facts. Garland's
10:09
response in the Post came
10:12
the week after he testified during a
10:14
House Judiciary Committee hearing that he would
10:16
not be intimidated by attacks in the
10:18
department and ahead of a House
10:20
vote holding him in contempt of Congress for
10:22
declining to turn over the recording of President
10:24
Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Herr.
10:27
Below are annotated excerpts from the op-ed. Here's
10:30
a quote, Garland
10:50
ignores, I
10:55
don't know why they say former president, you
10:57
shouldn't. Everyone gets the honorific. It's President Trump.
11:20
The Biden DOJ also opposed efforts
11:22
to limit its settlement slush fund,
11:24
which enables it to direct funds
11:26
toward left-wing nonprofits. They come
11:28
in the form of conspiracy theories
11:30
crafted and spread for the purpose
11:32
of undermining public trust in the
11:34
judicial process itself. Oh heavens me.
11:37
Those include false claims that a
11:39
case brought by a local district attorney and resolved
11:42
by a jury verdict in a state trial was
11:44
somehow controlled by the Justice Department. Garland
11:46
forgets to mention that this so-called local
11:48
case was led by a former top
11:50
Biden admin official. You
11:53
know what man, you know all this. We
11:55
know all this. I don't
11:57
know what you do. There
12:00
are people who don't want to accept it.
12:02
We are years into the bifurcation in the
12:04
American psyche. And I know for effect
12:06
because y'all tell me, and I've experienced it too, you
12:09
bring this evidence to a
12:11
friend or family member who's liberal and say, Matthew
12:14
Colangelo, formerly
12:16
the third ranking official in the
12:19
Biden DOJ, joined the Manhattan's DA
12:21
office as senior counsel in
12:23
December, 2022, while Bragg's investigation
12:25
into Trump was ongoing. Bragg
12:28
campaigned on prosecuting Trump. And
12:31
they'll say, no, they
12:33
don't care. Well, so there
12:36
you go. I don't know
12:38
how this country survives with people who
12:40
will stand by watching illegal activities happen
12:42
and say, I don't care. It's
12:46
a conflict of interest at the very least. How
12:48
about we say this, conflict of interest,
12:50
wash our hands of it, start
12:53
over. How about that? New investigation
12:55
will start over. They
12:57
won't even accept that. No, it was a guilty verdict by,
12:59
see, even they went after Hunter Biden. I don't care about
13:01
Hunter Biden, literally don't. I
13:04
say free Hunter Biden. That gun charge is
13:06
bunk, okay? The tax
13:08
charges, okay, we'll see. But
13:10
I don't think you should be, I think you
13:12
should be pardoned. And I think actually every
13:15
two way rights organization should file an amicus
13:17
brief on behalf of Hunter
13:19
Biden in his defense, take
13:22
it to the Supreme Court and
13:24
get form 4473 abolished, charging
13:27
a guy because you
13:29
wanna charge him for the crime of being a crackhead, charge him
13:31
for the crime of being a crackhead, and then through due process
13:33
takeaways right to own a weapon. But not this
13:36
federal background check stuff. Well,
13:39
the DOJ said last week, this week, that
13:41
a search revealed no communication between department leadership
13:43
and Bragg's office. Many have questioned why a
13:45
top official would step down from one of
13:47
the most high ranking positions in the legal
13:50
world to take a role in the office
13:52
of a local prosecutor. And
13:54
we have this, let me see, we have DOJ
13:57
says, no contact between senior officials in
13:59
Manhattan. and DA brags office about the Trump case.
14:03
Your third ranking guy works there.
14:06
It's absolutely incredible. If
14:11
there was like a group
14:13
of thieves and one
14:16
of the guys who was part of this crew,
14:18
quits the crew and gets a job as a manager at
14:20
a bank and then a
14:22
year later the bank gets robbed by
14:24
them thieves, they're gonna go
14:26
ahead and say, I think this guy's in on
14:28
it. You get my point?
14:32
Anyone with a brain can see this.
14:35
There is a very serious conflict of
14:37
interest. A guy working in
14:39
the DOJ steps down, it's very
14:41
unusual and goes and joins Bragg
14:43
in targeting Trump. There was
14:45
no communication. What do you mean? The
14:47
communication's directly in your office. You hired
14:49
the guy. That's
14:52
direct collusion and communication. And
14:55
they'll make the argument, yes, but
14:57
technically there's nothing illegal about hiring
14:59
a Biden administration official to work
15:01
in a local prosecutor's office that
15:03
go after Donald Trump. Yeah,
15:06
okay. Colangelo
15:09
previously led the investigation to the Trump
15:11
Foundation and the investigation that became Trump's civil fraud
15:13
case while working for the New York district attorney's office in
15:15
2018. He received
15:18
$12,000 from the Democratic National Committee
15:20
for political consulting, according to
15:22
FEC records. They come
15:24
in another quote, they come in the form
15:26
of false claims that the department is politicizing
15:28
its work to somehow influence the outcome of
15:31
an election. Such claims are
15:33
often made by those who are themselves attempting
15:35
to politicize the department's work to influence the
15:37
outcome of an election. Garland
15:40
does not mention the extreme steps his DOJ has
15:42
gone through to bring the charges in the height
15:44
of the election season. Special
15:46
counsel Jack Smith pushed hard to get
15:48
Trump's January 6th case to trial before
15:50
the election, even asking the Supreme Court
15:52
to take up the presidential immunity appeal
15:54
before allowing the lower court to weigh
15:56
in. Former DOJ official
15:59
Jack Goldsmith. Smith, called Smith's rush to
16:01
trial wildly unfair, and suggested
16:03
it violated both the normal rules of
16:05
fairness to defendants and a DOJ rule
16:07
barring prosecutors from selecting the timing of
16:09
their actions for the purpose of affecting
16:11
any election. Moreover,
16:13
the DOJ has declined to turn over audio
16:16
of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Herder
16:18
Congress. According to the transcript of
16:20
that interview, Biden appeared to misremember key facts about
16:22
his life. And that's the thing. We
16:25
have the transcript, but they don't want us to hear the audio.
16:28
Because the audio, well, it's going to
16:30
make Biden sound very, very bad. But
16:33
Matt Gaetz made a great point. Like there's nothing
16:35
we're going to hear on that that we don't
16:37
already know. The man nearly, or at least appeared
16:39
to have crapped himself in public. And
16:42
so what I love, ladies and gentlemen, I
16:45
don't know that Joe Biden suffered about a
16:47
fecal incontinence. I don't. And I'm
16:50
not suggesting we have proof that he did. What
16:52
I'm suggesting is there is
16:55
more evidence that Joe Biden
16:57
defecated himself than there
16:59
is evidence that Hunter Biden's laptop is
17:01
part of a Russian disinformation campaign or
17:04
that Donald Trump was secretly working for
17:06
the Russians. How about that?
17:09
There's more evidence. There is
17:11
more evidence that Joe Biden
17:14
is involved with illicit business dealings,
17:16
untoward business dealings and influence peddling
17:19
with his children and their business
17:21
associates or his child than
17:24
there is that he defecated himself. I'd
17:26
be willing to take that one up if you want, but y'all don't seem
17:28
to care about that one. So when we
17:30
get a video that appears to show a
17:32
man who is 81, which according to
17:34
a standard probability,
17:38
15 to
17:40
30 percent of individuals over 80
17:42
suffer fecal incontinence. It's why adult
17:44
diapers exist. It's
17:47
why they're for sale. The
17:49
probability that Joe Biden suffers from this
17:52
is actually decently high. It's
17:54
either one in six or one in three. And
17:56
then you see the man who's over 80 squat
17:58
down in grimace and then. down
18:01
in Grimace and then stands there. Why
18:05
did he do it? We don't know. I'm
18:07
not saying it's proof. Some, you know, maybe he was
18:09
just, you know, oh, stretching the old back. Oh, I'm
18:11
an old man. I'm gonna stretch the old back. Sure,
18:14
maybe. Okay, but I'll tell
18:16
you what. Evidence is not proof. Evidence is
18:19
information that could lead us towards a
18:21
conclusion. And when you look at an
18:23
81-year-old man in this position, I say, it's
18:25
possible there's more evidence that he
18:27
crapped himself than there is that the Hunter Biden
18:29
laptop is part of some Russian disinformation scheme, but
18:31
they're still maintaining that. This
18:34
is the state of modern American politics
18:36
that will not survive. We
18:39
cannot function this way. It
18:41
won't work. I
18:44
mean, to have a
18:46
DOJ that exists solely for retribution
18:48
against Republicans. This is Mayor Garland's
18:50
story. He was supposed to be on the
18:52
Supreme Court. Ooh, he really wanted it. It
18:54
was a dream of a life, of
18:56
a lifetime. And Republicans blocked
18:58
him. And it was shady business
19:01
dealings. Absolutely. There was no reason to block
19:03
his appointment that made no sense. They
19:05
held out, and then I think it was Gorsuch,
19:07
right? Gorsuch. It was supposed
19:10
to be Mayor Garland. But I
19:12
think we're lucky, because the demeanor of
19:14
this man is that of a petulant child.
19:18
And heaven help us if this man was
19:20
on the Supreme Court. Now, don't get me
19:22
wrong, Supreme Court's got petulant children on it
19:24
as it is. Roberts, ain't getting no credit
19:26
from me. That dude is as flaccid a
19:28
man could be. Like,
19:31
I can look to the liberal justices and be
19:33
like, yeah, I see their perspective. I
19:36
think they're wrong. And that's OK. Katanji
19:39
Brown Jackson doesn't know what a
19:41
woman is. That's shocking. But
19:43
Mayor Garland has the demeanor of a
19:45
child, an petulant child who wants revenge.
19:48
Now you say, ha, got you, Tim, because
19:50
so does Donald Trump. Yeah.
19:54
Uh-huh. Here's the thing. Mayor
19:57
Garland weaponizing the DOJ.
20:00
against Trump and his supporters, we
20:02
are not seeing the inverse. So
20:05
if Donald Trump wants to go in and bring
20:07
accountability, it's kind of like this. Donald
20:09
Trump is a petulant child with a bunch of holding a bunch
20:12
of rocks and he did not throw them. Merrick
20:15
Garland is angry because he got kicked off the
20:17
team so he started throwing rocks. Now
20:19
I'm saying, okay we got to stop the
20:21
guy if Donald Trump wants to engage in
20:23
petulant childish fighting, it's only after the fact.
20:27
But I can put it this way, what
20:29
we need is accountability. What Merrick
20:32
Garland is doing is not accountability,
20:34
it's politicking, it's corruption, it's abject
20:36
criminal corruption. Donald Trump
20:38
may be a petulant child in many rights
20:41
but at the very least when he gets in what we're
20:43
hoping for is you put a stop to this. School
20:47
yard bullies. You
20:49
may not like Donald Trump, he
20:51
may be loud, boorish and brash but
20:54
he ain't the one who started throwing rocks. They
20:57
accuse him of being a Russian spy. They
20:59
tried to lock him up, they're trying to lock him
21:02
up now. And what has he done? When
21:04
they were firebombing buildings, the far left, Trump
21:07
did not deploy. US Army,
21:10
National Guard invoked the insurrection, he didn't do any of that.
21:12
We wanted him to, he didn't do it. Trump
21:15
said, I ain't throwing rocks at nobody. And
21:18
now here we are. So I tell you this, when
21:20
Donald Trump gets an office, I hope
21:23
he just shuts it all
21:25
down. Merrick Garland should
21:27
be in jail, so should
21:29
many other Democrats. Hillary Clinton and her staff
21:32
who destroyed public records, smashing devices with with
21:34
hammers. That is clearly
21:36
and obviously criminal. Yet
21:39
here we are. The world that
21:41
we live in is one in which Democrats
21:43
break the law and Republicans do nothing. Holding
21:46
Merrick Garland in contempt. Sure,
21:49
if they'd actually do something, but they're not going to.
21:53
Because men, this
21:56
country is bifurcated and the power
21:58
structures are plainly obvious. When
22:00
Steve Bannon is held in contempt of Congress, they
22:02
say straight to jail. When Merrick
22:04
Garland is, they say, we're not going
22:06
after Merrick Garland because they're evil. Because
22:09
they're evil. They wield power to crush their
22:11
enemies and Republicans send strongly worded letters. That's
22:14
what this is, another strongly worded letter.
22:17
Oh, at the very least I
22:19
can say this. It raises a
22:21
question for regular people that could be politically
22:23
weaponized. Hey, did you hear that
22:25
Merrick Garland was held in contempt of Congress just like Steve
22:27
Bannon? And they'll say, really? Well, yeah,
22:29
it's because he had information
22:32
on Joe Biden's mental state or something that didn't turn
22:34
over. Well, why didn't he
22:36
turn it over? He cited executive privilege. Well, don't
22:38
they have that right? Donald Trump cited executive
22:40
privilege for Steve Bannon, but they said he didn't have that
22:42
right. Why not? Well,
22:44
the argument was that Trump's
22:47
out of office. Does
22:49
that make sense? That former
22:51
president's administrations must turn over communications as soon
22:53
as they leave office? If you
22:55
want to play that game, I got a lot of records from the
22:58
Obama administration. I'd like to go through. I'd
23:00
look forward to seeing how that plays out. But
23:02
the question is really simple. You don't even get that
23:04
in depth with the average person. You just say, yeah,
23:06
Merrick Garland didn't want to turn over records, so they
23:08
held him in contempt, and they're saying they're not gonna
23:10
lock him up. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon didn't want to turn
23:12
over records, and so they held him in contempt,
23:14
and now they are locking him up. He has to go to prison.
23:17
Why? Why is Steve Bannon going to
23:19
prison and Merrick Garland's not going to prison? I
23:23
don't think the average person is gonna get past that
23:25
level of thinking. They're gonna say, yeah, that's weird. And
23:27
so perhaps that's the GOP strategy. This
23:29
contempt of Merrick Garland is going to prove
23:31
the double standard or add more to it,
23:33
and which they can then claim we have
23:35
corrupt government with Joe Biden. It's going to
23:37
freak people out. At
23:39
the other day, however, it may freak some
23:42
people out, but I tell you this. The
23:44
average person ain't watching this video. This is
23:46
the nittiest of gritty in politics. Merrick Garland,
23:48
who cares? The average person wants
23:50
to know why a carton of eggs costs seven bucks. Dude,
23:53
I was watching Fox and Friends, and they were at
23:56
a supermarket, or it was like a market slash
23:58
restaurant, and they're like, oh, eggs, how much? cost
24:00
he's like seven dollars and they're like what
24:02
seven dollars that's what people care
24:04
about all right i'll leave it there next segment's coming
24:06
up at 1 pm on this channel thanks for hanging out and i'll
24:09
see you all then the
24:11
libertarian party has somehow managed
24:13
to blow itself up we
24:16
like the libertarian party ladies and gentlemen we
24:18
like the idea of ending the wars we
24:21
like ron paul we like the mises caucus
24:23
we love the message we want more people
24:25
to hear this message it is the correct
24:28
message and the lp went nominated the
24:31
far leftist to his pro-vaccine mandate
24:33
and child gender i'll
24:35
keep it light surgeries
24:37
well actually to be fair i think
24:39
he's opposed to surgeries but he's for
24:41
the medication which is very damaging and
24:44
um we're gonna do that now
24:46
a bunch of libertarians are outright saying
24:48
we're out in fact
24:51
two states have already
24:53
rejected chase oliver the
24:55
lp nominee as their presidential nominee and are
24:57
refusing to put him on the ballot thus
25:00
this is the cascade failure and
25:02
i have to wonder i have to wonder could
25:05
this be sabotage or could
25:07
it be i guess good fortune for
25:09
trump supporters because the mises caucus guys
25:11
the majority of the libertarian party are
25:13
likely now going to be voting for
25:15
donald trump for all
25:17
of the reasons they don't like the guy now
25:20
my friends i'll make it a little personal
25:22
make it a little personal we've
25:25
hosted many libertarians on tim
25:27
caste irl and
25:29
uh and even a few on the culture war
25:32
and we're going to be hosting more because we
25:34
like the libertarian party we like
25:36
the anti-war message we want to
25:39
end the federal reserve it is
25:41
a corrupt machine that manipulates the
25:43
buying power and facilitates let's just
25:45
call it monetary manipulation to the
25:47
detriment of the average person and
25:49
the libertarian parties are loud messages for them but
25:51
they became a joke when they
25:54
decided to nominate a guy who's pro-vaccine
25:56
mandate and then they think
25:58
you are all stupid And
26:01
come on, he's not for mandates because he
26:03
thinks the government shouldn't mandate. What
26:05
about private corporations? What about
26:07
all of the massive multinational
26:10
corporations working in lockstep to
26:12
mandate employees get forced medication?
26:15
That's fine by them. They
26:17
don't care about the voters. But the big news here,
26:20
the big news here, and there is a little personal because
26:22
they're coming after me, they're
26:24
mad. But
26:27
the big news is to hear that
26:29
two states, Colorado and Montana, are refusing
26:31
to put the nominee on
26:33
the ballot is tremendous. Donald
26:36
Trump showed up to the Libertarian Party convention and it
26:38
was amazing. He said, you can keep being losers, 3%,
26:41
or you can vote for your nominee. And
26:44
it was hilarious. Man,
26:46
I can't believe, you know,
26:48
the Libertarians with no sense of humor,
26:50
you guys are the problem, okay? Dave
26:53
Smith, that's why he's the man. Because
26:56
he's a comedian and he gets it and it's
26:58
relatable and he knows how to make it funny
27:01
and fun and I wish he was the nominee.
27:03
I wish he was. But
27:05
I suppose, I suppose, in the grand
27:07
scheme of things, we are
27:10
the individuals who are saying stop making
27:12
me defend Donald Trump. Me,
27:15
I'll look on the bright side. I look
27:17
at how bad things have gotten and I'm like, I'll
27:19
take it. I'll take a Donald Trump
27:21
presidency, hands down. He's the best president of my
27:23
lifetime, no question. I've seen
27:25
so much garbage and then Trump comes along
27:28
and, you know, I'm not going to sit
27:30
here and pretend like every little thing
27:33
Trump has ever done is good or
27:35
pretend like he hasn't done bad things. There's been
27:37
many bad things. But as I argued to Dave
27:39
Smith, probably one of the most
27:41
prominent Libertarians, Trump gave us
27:43
a net positive. Withdrawing our troops from
27:45
the Middle East, David doesn't like the Abraham
27:47
Accords but I think he's wrong on this one. Agree
27:50
to disagree. Donald Trump
27:53
crossed the demilitarized zone into North
27:55
Korea with no security detail. That
27:59
inspires. me tremendously. And
28:01
I am glad, I am glad that
28:04
Donald Trump feels a
28:06
warm fuzzy feeling when people like me
28:08
and you praise
28:11
him to no end for
28:14
doing that. This is the world
28:16
that I live in. A president
28:19
showed up to the
28:21
border between two warring nations, an ally
28:23
of ours where our troops are stationed
28:26
and an enemy nation we are at war with.
28:29
And he walked up to the leader who invited
28:31
him into his country with no security
28:34
and Trump said, let's do
28:36
it. I
28:38
don't think people understand how
28:40
tremendous that is. When
28:43
I saw Donald Trump cross the D mill, I'm
28:45
pulling this up, Trump
28:48
enters North Korea. The
28:51
story they told, Trump becomes
28:53
first sitting president. I
28:56
just, I nearly cried.
28:59
I was welling up when I saw this story.
29:01
They got a YouTube clip. Here
29:03
we go. Here's the clip. One
29:07
of the most militarised borders on earth, an
29:12
historic handshake. Good
29:15
to see you again. I have
29:18
never expected to meet you at
29:20
this place. A
29:24
US president, a North Korean
29:27
leader and an extraordinary
29:29
invitation. President
29:31
Trump crosses into the DMZ,
29:34
meets Kim Jong-un. And
29:38
Donald Trump didn't disappoint. Everyone needs to
29:40
know this happened. But positively
29:43
striding into history books. The
29:45
first sitting American president to meet a
29:47
leader in the North. Wow. Who
29:54
is Trump surrounded by right now? He's surrounded
29:57
by North Korean. The
30:01
handshake on the other side, political
30:03
capital for chairman Kim, ensuring
30:06
both men had a win to show their people
30:08
as they boldly recrossed the border.
30:12
I believe just looking
30:14
at this action, this is an
30:16
expression of his willingness to eliminate
30:18
all the unfortunate past. And look
30:20
at the smile on Trump's face.
30:24
And you may say Trump's got an ego. Trump
30:28
is a, he's a negatist. He's only doing it
30:30
because, you know, it makes him feel good. He's
30:32
so important. Okay, I'll
30:35
take it. Trump loves it
30:38
when the people scream and cheer for his name
30:40
because he did something like that. So
30:43
I'll tell you this. Where am
30:45
I? I
30:47
like the libertarian party. I like Ron Paul. I
30:49
like freedom. I like small government. I'm
30:52
a traditional or social liberal leaning
30:54
in the libertarian spectrum, meaning there's
30:58
a lot of issues that are very difficult that,
31:02
you know, like abortion being one of them. Where
31:05
is the government's right or where
31:07
is their limit on the authority to
31:09
mandate, restrict or
31:12
even not to the Mises
31:14
caucus libertarians, Josh Smith, for instance, he says
31:17
it is the duty of the government to
31:19
protect life first and foremost. And
31:21
that includes babies we will never accept. Right.
31:23
I say, okay, right. Interesting. Yeah, I
31:26
don't know. Me, I lean
31:28
a little bit more left on some of these issues. I do. But
31:31
Chase Oliver is pro vaccine mandate. I
31:34
think that's wrong. I have no problem with the
31:36
government saying you can't do certain
31:38
things for a
31:40
large power structures. That
31:42
is when social media like Twitter
31:45
or Facebook suppress the speech of
31:47
individuals, including politicians,
31:50
Laura Loomer was running for
31:52
office and she was shut out of
31:54
one of the largest communication platforms. I
31:57
believe it's fine for us as a
31:59
collective. to say, you can't do
32:01
that. But
32:03
there's moral questions as well as principle
32:05
questions and I think morality matters. The
32:08
position of Chase Oliver, private
32:11
businesses should be allowed to mandate anyone
32:13
be forced to be medicated. The
32:15
problem, most of the mandates that we
32:17
are upset about were private. That's
32:19
what he supports. He is a machine
32:21
state, low libertarian.
32:24
Now we invited Chase Oliver several
32:26
weeks ago to appear in the
32:28
culture war. And
32:30
debate some of the other members of
32:32
the LP who are upset at his nomination. He
32:35
would then be able to defend his
32:37
positions and at first they never got
32:39
back to us. And then at like the 11th
32:41
hour, apparently
32:44
they emailed someone saying, not interested. Well,
32:47
none of our team had received the message. It's been
32:49
weeks. They said, he's not getting back to us. I
32:51
said, I'm gonna tweet about it. Cause this is laughable,
32:53
okay? The idea that we would be willing to platform
32:56
such an unknown like this guy, or that I'm even
32:58
talking about him now, shows
33:00
that we deeply care about the potential
33:02
for a third party to rise in
33:04
this country and the message that
33:06
libertarians can bring. And they said no.
33:09
And now we get some of the best. I'm gonna shout this guy
33:11
out. Or first here's the Montana
33:13
libertarian party. The
33:15
Montana libertarian party is officially rejected Chase Oliver
33:17
as our presidential candidate. We have maintained that
33:20
we will always prioritize Montana first. And we
33:22
do not believe his campaign advances our goals
33:24
in this state. Similarly situated
33:26
States should follow our lead and
33:28
we call upon the LNC to
33:30
consider suspending and replacing him. We
33:33
have this from amp America. Libertarian party
33:35
of Colorado refuses to put presidential candidate
33:37
on the ballot. Wow. The
33:39
LP is imploding. This is gonna
33:42
destroy all the hard work done by
33:44
the third party because they chose to
33:46
nominate this guy who is terrified. Terrified.
33:50
Here's where they're currently at. I love this one. So
33:54
Pennsylvania, Mises caucus says, at
33:56
the same time Chase is ignoring one of the
33:59
biggest alternative media networks. He's begging to be heard
34:01
in debate You'd think you'd take
34:03
any appearance that in more than four people
34:05
showed up to his campaign kickoff on Wednesday
34:08
evening They
34:10
said that why would they go on an
34:12
irrelevant podcast an irrelevant podcast? We'll
34:15
break the staff for you. This guy David
34:17
Mosskripp He's a
34:19
region 8 rep for LP, Florida
34:22
Relatively unknown. I don't mean that disrespectfully. There's
34:24
a couple hundred followers He says
34:27
no one outside of the party knows who
34:29
that Tim cast guy is Even
34:31
many within the libertarian party have never seen
34:33
a single episode. It is not worth the
34:35
time for a campaign to spend That's
34:38
interesting. I didn't realize we were so popular in the
34:40
libertarian party didn't realize our entire
34:42
audience was quite literally only the LP
34:47
Okay, so here's the thing no
34:49
one outside of the party knows who that guy
34:51
is Okay
34:54
You see what he's saying there. He's saying
34:56
that Tim cast as
34:58
a network is Only
35:00
well known in the libertarian
35:03
party Wow, I
35:05
didn't realize we were so popular in the LP and
35:08
then he goes on to say The
35:10
okay is it? Let's let
35:12
me know when I said the partners that guy is Someone
35:15
responded. It's one of the largest podcasts on the
35:17
internet. It isn't libertarian or LP related at all
35:20
Not sure blah blah blah He says
35:22
the MAGA folks have proven unreasonable and they
35:24
are already committed to their dear leader It
35:26
literally serves no purpose for any other candidate
35:28
to appear on the show Just
35:31
a fact of how campaigns work chases no
35:33
problem going into hostile environments. It just should
35:35
be beneficial Besides a
35:37
low-class podcast host you don't exactly get
35:39
to throw a toddler fit and constantly
35:41
insult the candidate Then throw a toddler
35:43
fit and cry that the same candidate
35:45
doesn't come on your show Maybe
35:48
just maybe if he took off his little beanie and
35:50
made his show more geared toward adults then it could
35:52
be beneficial This is why
35:54
the libertarian party is a joke. Now most of
35:56
you I get it. You are fans of the
35:58
work that I do That's why you're watching. Some
36:00
of you probably hate watch, but sure, I'll take
36:02
it. Ad revenues ad revenue, right? Many
36:05
of you are actually members over at timcast.com, but
36:07
the overwhelming majority of you are not. So
36:10
if you like the work we do, you should become
36:12
a member at timcast.com. But this is the libertarian party
36:14
in a nutshell. They are
36:16
whiny, irrational babies. They
36:19
don't understand voters. They don't understand core
36:21
issues. They don't care for what the
36:24
voters actually want. And that's
36:26
why they're imploding. But maybe,
36:28
let's have fun with it. It's a
36:30
conspiracy to destroy the only organizing force
36:32
outside of the two party system. How
36:36
sad is this? Well, first,
36:39
which is it? Are we a MAGA
36:41
podcast or are we only
36:43
known to the libertarian party? Which
36:45
one? Clearly, they
36:47
don't have an answer. But I'll
36:50
break it down for you. Let me tell
36:52
you how the numbers work. TimCast
36:54
IRL averages the highest nightly
36:56
live viewership on YouTube. I
37:00
would say 80% of the time 90 we have the most
37:04
viewers for any live stream on
37:06
YouTube. It's kind of crazy. We
37:09
are the top super chedded program
37:11
outside of Vtubers. I don't
37:14
know if that's still true, but we held that position for
37:16
several years. I don't really track those metrics. They're not super
37:18
important to me, but that was true. I was surprised in
37:21
the world. We were like number 11 or 13
37:23
or something. And
37:25
then the only other shows that beat us
37:27
on average were Vtubers, meaning like anime waifus
37:30
who are playing video games or something. Periodically,
37:34
there will be a show that beats us for sure. There
37:36
will be a special live event. Crowder will do
37:39
a special live and he'll get way more viewers
37:41
than us. I'm not saying we're the biggest podcast
37:43
in the world. I'm saying we average the most
37:45
live audience per episode.
37:47
TimCast IRL gets 3.5 million unique
37:51
viewers. These are metrics we
37:53
actually have to track across all platforms
37:56
because we sell ads to sponsors. That's
37:59
important, right? On
38:01
YouTube, I think we do around like 500K. We
38:03
have the live audience is around 150. And
38:06
then you get your, it's called VOD video on demand is
38:08
about 300 to 400. It
38:10
really depends. Like last night was bigger. We had Matt
38:12
Gaetz, it depends on the hosts. So
38:15
it's a big show. To
38:17
act like nobody knows who you are. This is
38:20
why the libertarian fails and deserves to fail. Because
38:22
this is the attitude they take. He
38:24
says, maybe if we are adults, all
38:27
right. We criticize Donald
38:29
Trump regularly. Luke Ritkowski
38:31
and Ian are accused of having Trump derangement
38:34
syndrome. And Donald Trump with a smile on
38:36
his face said, I will do the Tim
38:38
Kast podcast. We were supposed to get
38:40
a half hour. We got 17 minutes, I'll take it. But
38:42
we are in discussion about doing a longer forum show with
38:44
them when the time is right. We're not the
38:46
biggest podcast in the world. We're not as big as Logan
38:48
Paul, but enough that it matters to the
38:51
president and his supporters. We
38:53
host libertarians as well. We would
38:55
host more Democrats. They don't wanna come on
38:58
the show. Marion Williamson did. Now
39:00
the show in question in fact is not Tim
39:02
Kast IRL. It's the Culture War podcast on tenant
39:04
media. It's an irrelevant podcast. Okay,
39:06
this one gets like 300,000 unique viewers. It's
39:10
a Friday morning debate show where he would be able to come on
39:12
300,000. Chase
39:14
went on Austin Peterson's show. With
39:17
all due respect, I'm not trying to be a dick, but
39:19
our network is larger than that. They're
39:21
making excuses for one simple reason.
39:24
The libertarian party nominated a guy
39:26
who was deeply unpopular, whose ideas
39:28
are despised by even the libertarian
39:30
party and Americans
39:33
overwhelmingly reject. They
39:35
are crackpot ideas that unfortunately
39:37
will not fly. And
39:40
so Chase Oliver talks to his
39:43
campaign and they say, if
39:45
you go on Tim Poole's show, you
39:47
will be eviscerated politically.
39:51
That's the reality. They nominated a
39:54
guy who can't stand up to scrutiny. Dave Smith comes
39:56
on the show and we argue and we debate. Think
39:59
about that. How many times have we
40:01
had Dave Smith on? And he goes,
40:03
Tim, we talked about this. You're wrong.
40:05
The Abraham Accord said it and I'm
40:07
like, okay, well, I disagree. It's awesome.
40:09
Dave's amazing. He's
40:11
funny, he's smart, he's tall. That's
40:14
good for a presidential candidate, it really is,
40:16
since the advent of cameras. Chase
40:18
Oliver's team says, we can't do it, we can't handle the
40:20
heat. Y'all
40:22
are not ready for prime time. I'm
40:25
sorry. But you know what? Part
40:28
of me says, I'll take it. I
40:30
don't come from a world where I
40:32
think Republicans should win and they're
40:34
the greatest party ever. I
40:36
actually despise the Republicans. But
40:39
I tell you what, I remember my mom called
40:41
me several years ago and she was like, how
40:43
come all your videos are complaining about Democrats? And
40:46
I was like, because the Democrats suck. She's
40:49
like, yeah, well, what are Republicans? And I was like, I don't
40:51
know, what are Republicans doing? I'll tell
40:53
you what they're doing sitting on their hands. There's
40:56
not a whole lot to complain about when they do nothing.
40:59
But we make fun of them too. Strongly
41:01
worded letters. They're
41:03
the Washington generals, the Democrats, Harlem
41:06
Globetrotters. The Democrats are in unison.
41:08
They vote for Pelosi. They stand
41:10
side by side. They support war.
41:12
They support the entire Democrat
41:14
agenda. You got, what's
41:16
his name? I mean,
41:18
I'm forgetting the guy's name. Bowman, who
41:21
pulled off the emergency and a door, pulled
41:24
the fire alarm and ran off and they're like, that's
41:26
totally fine. Ilhan Omar makes anti-Semitic
41:28
statements. I'm doing air quotes because it was like
41:30
she was, I call it crop dusting anti-Semitism. And
41:32
the whole party says, we're not going to condemn
41:35
her or censure her. Marjorie Taylor Greene
41:37
has a Facebook post from before she got elected
41:39
and they're like, we're ripping her from her committees.
41:42
The Democratic Party walks around
41:44
with sledgehammers and the Republicans
41:46
go, slow down there Democrats.
41:50
The Republicans are tepid and weak. But
41:54
I like Ron Paul. I like Thomas Massey. Matt Gaetz, I think
41:56
is the best. He's a fighter. And
42:00
we disagree on things, for sure. But
42:03
I'm not a big fan of the Republican Party. I
42:05
wish the Libertarian Party made sense, I really really
42:07
do. The Mises caucus, man,
42:09
they were hitting it out of the park. Now
42:12
some people blame Dave Smith. They
42:14
say that he should have stepped up to the plate. That's
42:17
tough, it really is. You
42:20
know a lot of people are mad at Dave. But
42:22
I get it man, I mean it's tough. I wish,
42:25
I would have preferred that Dave Smith
42:27
decide to run. But
42:30
let's think about that logically. Who
42:32
am I to say Dave Smith should have set aside
42:34
his career, his life, his safety to
42:37
run for a position in
42:40
the Libertarian Party to be president knowing
42:42
you're not going to win. You have a positive
42:44
impact, but taking tremendous risk
42:46
and causing damage to your personal life. I
42:51
wish he did run, but of course I do.
42:54
I'm not going to run. To be
42:56
fair, I would never get nominated by
42:58
the Libertarian Party. I disagree with the
43:00
Libertarians to such an extreme degree. But
43:04
Dave's right there. I
43:06
would never, I wouldn't do
43:08
it. Now I suppose it's fair to say we've
43:10
got 40 employees. If I were to run for office,
43:12
it would basically shut the company down because the principal
43:15
funding of this company is me hosting a
43:17
variety of shows. We do have other shows,
43:19
the other shows do make money. But
43:23
we invest more into them. We could certainly run
43:25
the other shows, Pop Culture Crisis, Tales From The
43:27
Inverted World, Gamer Maids, I'll
43:29
pause when I say it. We
43:33
could host those shows much
43:36
more cost efficiently and
43:38
they'd probably be in the black. But
43:40
we want the shows to be good, so we put a
43:42
little bit more into them and then we'll push them to
43:44
where they need to be. We're working on the boonies, securing
43:47
sponsorship for our new skate show
43:49
already in place, incredible. And
43:51
we're really excited about expansion. If
43:53
I were to leave to go and run for office, again,
43:55
to be fair, it would probably be very disruptive
43:58
to the company. That being
44:00
said, the Libertarian Party had nobody.
44:03
The Mises caucus did a tremendous job of bringing
44:05
Ron Paul's ideas to the forefront. And
44:07
still, but instead, they chose the guy
44:10
who's in favor of child, we'll just
44:12
call it child sex changes.
44:15
The guy who's in favor of corporations mandating
44:18
you get vaccinated. That was
44:20
the majority of vaccine mandates. I'll stress this. There
44:24
were venues across this country that required
44:26
people to get vaccines to play there. They
44:29
weren't forced to do that by the state.
44:31
They chose to do it. Do
44:34
you want to live in a country where
44:36
every business, because of
44:38
social pressure, decides you have to get
44:41
a medical treatment they've decided? No.
44:44
We need to say, hey, there's rules here. That's
44:48
why I'm not a big L-liberator that's like, corporations
44:50
can do whatever they want. And
44:52
then they say, those were monopolies, Tim. The government
44:54
made them. No. The
44:56
small local venue owned by one
44:58
guy that decided to do this,
45:00
it was political social pressure. Now,
45:03
if you put in place, you cannot
45:05
discriminate on the basis of medical treatment,
45:09
then. That's why I'm not a libertarian. Because
45:12
I don't think their ideas work. That's
45:14
fine. I'll put it this way. I wanted
45:16
to see the libertarian party succeed. Instead, I'll tell you what
45:18
we get. What we get
45:20
is the Mises caucus rushing to Donald
45:23
Trump, the true winner of the
45:25
Libertarian Party Convention. Chase Oliver's
45:27
nomination was probably the best thing Trump supporters
45:29
could have wished for. And
45:31
all of these libertarians have come out now saying,
45:33
Trump won. Because
45:35
the Mises caucus is voting for Donald Trump. They're
45:38
not going to vote for Chase Oliver, a
45:40
man who can't even defend his own ideas.
45:43
He couldn't do it. I'll
45:46
tell you this. They say
45:48
that I'm too hostile. I'm
45:50
too hostile to these people. They can't handle it.
45:54
That's the reality. I
45:56
will tell you this 100 percent. will
46:00
not come and sit down with me here
46:02
because their ideas cannot stand up to scrutiny.
46:06
Shout out to David Pakman. David Pakman has
46:08
agreed to come on one on one and have
46:10
this conversation. And I say, absolutely. And it's really
46:12
simple for me. Right? They
46:16
say, but what if you're wrong, Tim? Then
46:18
I'm wrong. That's it.
46:21
David Pakman can come here and say, I think X. And
46:23
I'll say, well, that's an opinion. What am I going to say? Your
46:25
opinion is your opinion. We're
46:28
trying to figure out what systems make the most sense.
46:30
If he says it's incorrect, I'll be like, I'll just
46:32
Google it right now. And then we'll say what the
46:34
combined sources believe. I use a news guard. Mainstream
46:37
media. Yeah. I got
46:40
a question for David Pakman. Politico
46:42
reported that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election
46:44
to help Hillary Clinton. That's
46:46
been reported by Politico. It's been backed up by other
46:48
outlets. They've never retracted it. I
46:51
have no problem saying it. There's a story. What
46:53
do you think? If he wants to come out and say, I think
46:55
this should be the way it is, I'll say, okay. If
46:58
he says, why do you think tax policy should be this way? I'll
47:00
tell him this is why. I have no problem having
47:02
a conversation on my ideas with literally anybody,
47:05
but most of the people on the left, people
47:07
who support child sex changes, for instance, they
47:10
know it makes no sense. They know it
47:12
doesn't work. They know it's wrong and
47:15
they refuse. They refuse to
47:17
be confronted on it. So
47:19
there you have it. So long
47:21
libertarian party. This could be the end. If
47:24
they're not putting the candidate on their ballots, they may lose
47:26
ballot access. They're going to have to put someone else on.
47:29
Figure it out. Best of
47:31
luck. I'll leave it there. Next segment is coming
47:33
up at, I guess we'll just put this one up at one. I
47:36
don't know. The next segment is coming up at 4pm
47:38
on this channel. Thanks for hanging out and I'll see you all then. It's
47:42
the gayest Star Wars ever. That's what they're
47:44
calling it. Apparently in the new show, lesbian
47:47
witches use the force to get pregnant. Apparently
47:51
the force is female. I don't know too
47:53
much about it, but apparently people are saying
47:55
like they created the force by chanting witchcraft
47:57
and impregnating women.
48:00
Like, through magic. Okay,
48:03
I guess. I mean, look, Star Wars was
48:05
fun in the first series,
48:08
but I never really cared that much for Star
48:10
Wars. It is a fun adventure. This
48:12
kid wants to join the Rebellion against the
48:15
Big Empire, and then, you know, he does.
48:18
Use the Force, and then he does, and then he blows
48:20
up the Death Star. And really,
48:22
I was never truly inspired by this story.
48:24
I mean, it felt too one-dimensional.
48:27
I suppose it was revolutionary at the time. I'm
48:30
a Star Trek fan, or at least I
48:32
was. They've certainly butchered that IP to oblivion.
48:35
So I do like what Seth MacFarlane
48:37
did with Orville. The Orville,
48:39
that was a fun show. Comedy at first, kind
48:41
of tried to get serious, but I respect Seth
48:43
MacFarlane for trying to make something more like Star
48:46
Trek The Next Generation. I
48:48
like the original series. I'm not as super familiar with
48:50
it, but The Next Generation
48:52
is some of the best stuff ever, some of
48:54
the manliest stuff ever, and I encourage you to
48:56
watch that show with your kids. It is sad
48:58
that we are losing touch with such
49:00
epic writing, and I will explain, and
49:03
I will compare and contrast to the gayest Star Wars
49:05
ever. The Post Millennial says, twins
49:07
Osha and Mae learn that
49:09
they were created by the head of
49:12
the coven and carried by another woman
49:14
within the group. All
49:16
right, here you go. Here's your... The
49:19
power of one, the power of
49:21
two, the power of
49:23
victory. Oh, no. The
49:25
power of one, the power
49:27
of two, the power
49:29
of victory. This
49:34
is Star Wars. Dude,
49:37
who wants to watch this? That's
49:44
it, huh? Jack
49:46
Mesopik says, this is Star Wars now thanks to Kathleen
49:48
Kennedy. Oh, man. Showrunner,
49:52
a little bit of a joke. Showrunner,
49:54
Leslie, how do you pronounce
49:56
it? Leslie. I'm sure
49:59
it's Leslie. Headland's newest addition
50:01
to the Star Wars universe in the form of the
50:03
Acolyte known as the Gay
50:05
Star Wars Ever features lesbian space-witch covens
50:07
who are able to immaculately conceive babies.
50:10
Not only is this causing concern for
50:12
being off-canon but it's a
50:15
further infiltration of woke identity politics into
50:17
the nerd universe of Star Wars. A
50:20
clip from the coven circulated on social
50:22
media with Blang being heaped on Kathleen
50:24
Kennedy, the showrunner and the
50:26
showrunner Headland and others. The
50:29
clip shows a group of women under cloak of darkness performing
50:31
some kind of ritual where they praise the power of one,
50:33
the power of two, and the power of many. The
50:36
new addition of the story changes the status of
50:38
the concept of midichlorians which is a
50:40
plentiful supply in one's blood, gives
50:42
them ability to wield the force. That
50:45
was also considered controversial by the way. The
50:47
presence of an abnormally high number of midichlorians
50:49
is what made Anakin Skywalker who
50:51
grows up to be Darth Vader so special when
50:53
he met Qui-Gon Jinn. Acolyte
50:55
episode 3, a prequel some
50:58
100 years prior to the beginning of George Lucas's
51:00
space opera, reveals that Anakin was not
51:02
the first child to have been conceived without the act
51:04
of reproduction in the Star Wars universe. Twins
51:07
Ausha and May learned that
51:09
they were created by the head of the coven
51:11
and carried by another woman within the group. In
51:14
a recent interview with Headland and one of the
51:16
stars of the new series, Amanda
51:18
Stenberg, Headland was asked about the sexual
51:20
orientation of the series and she said
51:22
that you know the gayest Star Wars
51:24
yet by a considerable margin. Headland
51:27
and Stenberg laughed. Stenberg laughed. People have told me
51:29
that it's the gayest Star Wars and frankly I
51:31
am into it. So people
51:33
are saying that when Kathleen Kennedy was was wearing
51:35
a shirt I think it was her that said
51:38
the force is female. She
51:40
meant it literally and I'm not watching
51:42
the Acolyte because Star Wars is trash. I
51:45
like the original movies they were fun space
51:47
adventures. Not really all that complicated. I
51:49
mean the first movie is basically about a kid
51:51
from a desert planet who gets radicalized by a
51:54
religious group to go and blow up a military
51:56
base killing untold numbers of civilians. I think hundreds
51:58
of thousands. I guess,
52:01
never really resonated with me all that much. Star
52:04
Trek The Next Generation on the other hand. Talk
52:07
about some of the greatest stuff ever. And the reason
52:09
why I bring this up is
52:11
because we also have this video by
52:14
Erin Wexler. And
52:17
she made this video about the birth control pill
52:19
saying it makes women like, you know, they
52:23
wanna date their brothers. When you're on the pill,
52:25
it makes you want soft men with round faces
52:27
and they're weaker because you wanna be near family
52:29
because it simulates pregnancy. Thus, you're trying to be
52:31
with your brother. And she said, I'm not
52:33
talking about your brother who says
52:36
you want more support, you wanna be around family. She
52:38
said, translation, you're trying to date your brother and
52:41
not the good looking brother who played football at
52:43
homecoming. No, no, your ambiguously
52:45
gay brother who was in the
52:47
band and watched Star Trek, sorry
52:49
Trekkies, wrong, wrong I say. Man,
52:53
there was no greater show than Star Trek The Next Generation. That's
52:56
it. If you have small
52:58
children, they should be
53:00
watching Star Trek The Next Generation. Not only is
53:02
it a fun and
53:05
entertaining space drama, but
53:08
it has some of the best moral
53:11
philosophy, technology. Ah,
53:14
man, I can't even begin to describe
53:17
the absolutely amazing storytelling
53:20
that is Star Trek The Next Generation. And in
53:23
every episode, it can get convoluted here and there
53:25
and it can get weird in some places, that's
53:27
fine. Not every show is perfect. Of course, they
53:29
have the Rikers Beard phenomenon. In
53:31
the first season of Star Trek The Next Generation,
53:34
Jonathan Frakes did not have a beard playing Commander
53:36
Riker. Season two, he grew
53:38
a beard and everyone said that's when the show
53:40
got really good. It was
53:42
the highest rated show at the time, I believe. It was syndicated
53:44
on multiple networks, meaning, and it's kind of weird to
53:46
me, it would come on, I think it
53:48
was a CBS show, and then
53:50
it would be like a few days later, it
53:52
would rerun on other networks. That's how popular it
53:55
was. But let me
53:57
compare and contrast. Disney
53:59
rights. now is producing the gayest Star
54:01
Wars ever. This
54:03
is what they want your children to grow up watching. It's
54:06
awful. I'll
54:08
tell you what I was inspired by. So
54:11
let me tell you a story. A story that
54:14
I think is a good message for your kids.
54:16
Now I know Star Trek is fiction. It's
54:18
not real stories and there are real stories of
54:20
sacrifice and honor that are probably better.
54:23
You want people to grow up to emulate
54:25
certain behaviors and to be inspired and I
54:28
don't necessarily know what
54:30
creates that drive within
54:32
people. What makes them connect
54:34
to certain ideas or stories? Honestly, I don't
54:36
know. But I'll tell you this.
54:38
I'll tell you. So in
54:41
Star Trek, the original series, there's bad guys,
54:43
the Klingons. What a silly name.
54:46
And the Federation fights them. There was a
54:48
war in the story between the Federation, which
54:50
is, you know, humans and their allies, and
54:53
the Klingon Empire, massive honor-based
54:57
society. When
55:00
they created The Next Generation, they
55:02
wanted to show that there was a passage of
55:04
time between the original series and the new show.
55:07
The fascinating thing is the original series
55:10
actually didn't have their budget was constrained. And
55:12
so as time went on, the show has
55:14
actually suffered for this. Nonetheless, even
55:16
though the show was canceled, it was still very popular. So
55:18
they made several movies. They decided
55:20
thanks to the popularity of the movies, hey,
55:22
like, why don't we do another Star Trek,
55:24
The Next Generation? That's what it's called. And
55:27
a lot of people thought it wouldn't work. When
55:31
Patrick Stewart was auditioning for
55:34
the role, his
55:36
agent was like, look,
55:39
you're going to do a couple of seasons.
55:41
It'll be canceled. You'll make some money. Just take the
55:43
role. And he ended up
55:45
doing, I think it was what, like eight seasons or seven
55:47
seasons? And it's been a long
55:49
time. I mean, I haven't watched the full series in a minute.
55:52
It's probably been, I don't know, eight years
55:54
or something, but I periodically will watch it.
55:56
And so they wanted to show the passage of time
55:59
between the original series. and the next generation. So
56:02
in the beginning, in the new
56:04
episode, you see a Klingon.
56:06
That's right, one of the former enemies
56:08
is now serving on board the new
56:10
ship. Ha ha, seems like
56:13
simple writing, right? They say, how about the people
56:15
they were fighting? We put one on the ship.
56:17
That's a twist for fans. Well,
56:20
how do you explain such a thing? Some
56:23
of the best writing ever
56:25
done by humans inspires me
56:27
to this day. I
56:29
will tell you the story. Maybe I'll embellish a little
56:31
bit, but I'll tell you the general story. So
56:33
the writers are basically trying to come up with what is
56:36
the circumstance by which the Federation and the Klingons warring factions
56:38
are now at peace. Now,
56:42
I do think, and I will stress again, that
56:44
there are real world stories of war and peace
56:46
that are inspirational, but we tell these tall tales
56:48
because we want to deeply inspire
56:52
and entertain. The story is this.
56:55
The Federation and the Klingons were at war, and
56:57
there was a forced peace by
56:59
an intervening force, but
57:02
still, there were routine skirmishes and
57:04
battles between Klingons and Federation forces.
57:07
At some point, there's a third
57:09
faction called Romulans, and
57:12
they're effectively meant to
57:14
emulate Roman Empire, honor,
57:17
not honor, passion, passion and drive. Klingons
57:20
are honor. And then you have,
57:22
as I decide, the Ferengi, which are capitalists. Anyway,
57:25
digress. The Federation,
57:27
despite being enemies with the Klingon
57:29
Empire, the Enterprise, the flagship of
57:31
the Federation fleet, receives a dis,
57:33
intercepts, I should say, a distress signal
57:36
coming from a civilian outpost, mostly
57:39
women and children. The
57:41
Romulans, who were seemingly supposed
57:43
to be aligned with the
57:45
Klingons, had decided to wipe out
57:48
a Klingon colony, predominantly civilians.
57:51
The Enterprise, despite being enemies
57:53
with the Klingons, saw
57:55
this as egregious, and of course, there
57:58
is honor within. in humans as well.
58:02
So the Enterprise rushed at
58:04
maximum warp as fast, full acceleration, to
58:07
the outpost at Kitimer. That's what
58:09
they called it. Upon
58:12
arriving, they encountered four warships. As
58:15
the story goes, the Enterprise knew it stood
58:18
no chance against four enemy
58:20
warships from the Romulan Empire. The
58:24
Enterprise, despite this, fought
58:26
and refused to do back down,
58:28
eventually getting destroyed in the process
58:31
in an attempt to save the
58:33
civilians of their own enemy. Such
58:36
a powerful story. The
58:38
Klingon Empire outraged at
58:41
the unprovoked attack on civilians by the
58:43
Romulans, showing no honor, and
58:45
recognizing the sacrifice and the
58:47
bravery of the Federation entered
58:49
into peace talks and formed an
58:52
alliance with the Federation knowing the
58:54
Romulans were a real threat and
58:56
having been shown that
58:58
humans were brave, honorable,
59:02
and capable of self-sacrifice. What
59:06
a story to tell. Amazing
59:08
writing. And in The
59:10
Next Generation, this happens
59:12
all beforehand. It's just ancillary
59:14
background stuff. In an
59:17
episode of The Next Generation to
59:19
kind of portray the conflict,
59:22
they do an episode where, again, it's
59:24
a little convoluted. The
59:26
Enterprise in the past that rushed to
59:28
save the Klingons, despite being enemies, was
59:31
forced through a temporal rift for
59:33
a short period of time. But in
59:35
doing so, created an alternate timeline where
59:39
they never sacrificed themselves, the Klingons viewed them
59:41
as cowardly and was still at war, and
59:44
the Federation was losing. They
59:49
reexamined the idea of self-sacrifice in this episode.
59:52
And it is sci-fi mumbo jumbo, but basically what
59:54
happens is the new Enterprise
59:57
encounters the — oh, and Whoopi Goldberg is like a
59:59
huge — has a huge role in this. They
1:00:02
encounter the old enterprise coming through the
1:00:04
time rift, and they decide to save
1:00:06
them. But Guinan,
1:00:08
played by Whoopi Goldberg, is some
1:00:10
kind of like higher dimensional being of
1:00:13
some sort. She has perceptions beyond.
1:00:15
She realizes that the timeline has shifted,
1:00:18
and they decide, well,
1:00:20
they have the conundrum of if they send the
1:00:22
enterprise back, it will be destroyed, and they will
1:00:25
all die. And this is great. Because
1:00:28
once again, the crew of the
1:00:30
enterprise know that even
1:00:32
though they're going to die, they're given
1:00:34
a second chance, you
1:00:36
rushed into battle headfirst facing
1:00:38
death to save your own
1:00:40
enemies. You have now been
1:00:42
given a second chance, and you can leave. And
1:00:45
they say, we have to go back.
1:00:48
They decide to go back to the temporal rift, get
1:00:50
blown up, massacred,
1:00:54
and this restores the timeline. A
1:00:57
lot of it is silly sci-fi mumbo jumbo.
1:01:00
That I can understand. A lot of people aren't going
1:01:02
to be fans of that. But
1:01:04
take a look at what they're offering up your children. Lesbian
1:01:07
space switches immaculately conceiving a
1:01:10
baby and the
1:01:12
force being female and all that, or
1:01:15
a story about honor and
1:01:18
sacrifice for the betterment of
1:01:21
your people. And sometimes not even
1:01:23
your people. There's
1:01:26
so much more in The Next Generation.
1:01:28
I mean, one of the most amazing
1:01:30
conversations, of course, is Data is an
1:01:33
android trying to understand humanity. And
1:01:35
he asks Captain Picard about terrorism,
1:01:39
referencing actual historical references to
1:01:42
when terror worked. Notably
1:01:44
he mentions the Mexican independence from the
1:01:46
Spanish state. And
1:01:48
they have this conversation around the difficulties
1:01:51
of recognizing the effectiveness of
1:01:53
terror in forcing change, but also the
1:01:55
immorality of it and the problems it
1:01:58
creates. where
1:02:01
there's a trial held to determine
1:02:04
whether or not an Android that purports
1:02:06
to be sentient is actually a sentient
1:02:08
entity. They ask such
1:02:10
amazing questions. Now again I'll
1:02:12
stress many of you are fans and you're probably cheering
1:02:15
this stuff on. Many of you aren't. By
1:02:17
all means if you don't want them watch Star
1:02:19
Trek have them watch war
1:02:21
documentaries and learn of the true heroes who
1:02:23
sacrifice themselves in the real world that I
1:02:25
can respect. Audie
1:02:28
Murphy, is that the guy? Audie
1:02:31
Murphy let me let me see
1:02:33
if I can pull that one up. Maybe I'm getting the name wrong. This
1:02:36
is the let
1:02:38
me pull up this guy. There we go. Audie
1:02:41
Murphy, an American soldier actor-songwriter widely celebrated
1:02:43
as the most decorated American combat soldier
1:02:46
of World War II. Described as the
1:02:48
most highly decorated soldier in US history.
1:02:51
He received every military combat award for
1:02:53
valor available in the US Army as
1:02:55
well as the French and Belgian awards for
1:02:57
heroism. Murphy received the Medal of
1:02:59
Honor for valor that he demonstrated the age of 19
1:03:01
for single-handedly holding off
1:03:03
a company of German soldiers for an
1:03:06
hour at the Colmore pocket in France
1:03:08
in January 1945 before
1:03:11
leading a successful counter attack while
1:03:13
wounded and out of ammunition. There's
1:03:16
a story for your kids too. These
1:03:18
are the things we want to emulate. These
1:03:21
are the things we want to share with with
1:03:23
children. The story of
1:03:25
Audie Murphy is just absolutely incredible. Maybe it's not true.
1:03:28
Maybe it's just war propaganda. I don't know.
1:03:31
But I tell you this, if we don't
1:03:33
get good messaging to the next generation you're gonna have
1:03:35
a bunch of weak pathetic... I don't
1:03:37
know, cowards. We got
1:03:40
to change that. Me? I like Star
1:03:42
Trek. Whatever. Have
1:03:44
fun with your gay Star Wars. If you like it, you like
1:03:46
it. I won't watch it. I won't advocate for it. I'll
1:03:49
leave it there. Next segment is coming up at 6 p.m. on this
1:03:51
channel. Thanks for hanging out and I will see you all then. I
1:04:00
gotta tell you, the difference between the
1:04:02
right and the left is that
1:04:05
if you had a statue that was 200 years
1:04:07
old and the left wanted it gone, they'd
1:04:10
show up and mask 200 people all
1:04:12
wearing black hoodies, jeans, and masks, smash
1:04:15
it to bits, and
1:04:17
then no one would go to jail for it. No criminal charges.
1:04:20
The right, however, doesn't do
1:04:23
any of that. I guess they spill paint. These
1:04:25
kids who got criminally charged for writing their screws on
1:04:28
it apparently didn't even do anything. This
1:04:30
is how insane it is. You know, look, I'll say this.
1:04:34
Don't go vandalizing people's stuff. If
1:04:36
you live in the community and you have problems with it,
1:04:39
you have an opportunity now to
1:04:41
speak up and complain and generate
1:04:43
public attention. Vandalizing
1:04:45
it actually doesn't do anything. Going
1:04:48
up to the Pride mural and vandalizing it may
1:04:50
feel good, but I think it's
1:04:52
a missed opportunity. Not from the area.
1:04:54
I don't actually like people going in,
1:04:58
you know, ruining these pride flags. I don't
1:05:00
like the pride flags, but if I want
1:05:02
to fly a Gazan flag, I don't want someone throwing a brick
1:05:04
through my window. But I get it. I
1:05:06
get it. It's a culture war. Here's
1:05:08
what I'd say to the people of Spokane who live there and are upset with
1:05:10
it. You have an opportunity right now
1:05:12
to go around collecting videos of people being like, we
1:05:15
don't want this, we don't want to pay for it,
1:05:17
it's causing undue attention, and just list all of your
1:05:19
grievances with what they're doing. Make
1:05:21
it a big issue of debate. Make
1:05:24
it something that they'll have to publicly defend.
1:05:27
And then put the pressure on them for
1:05:29
going after people who vandalized it. Now, especially,
1:05:31
I would say particularly these kids, they didn't
1:05:33
vandalize anything. Yo, it's insane.
1:05:36
These woke people are like, look at the skids on
1:05:38
the ground. Look what they were doing. Are
1:05:41
you saying that the kids held the breakdown
1:05:43
and were burning out? They clearly weren't. The
1:05:46
skids were just because the kids were riding around in the
1:05:48
street on scooters playing. This is
1:05:50
where we're at. People are upset. My
1:05:54
opinions don't really matter on this. I don't live there
1:05:56
fine. Okay. But they're
1:05:58
vandalizing it. crosswalk
1:06:00
vandalized days after teens charged with
1:06:02
felonies for leaving scooters skid marks
1:06:04
on rainbow pavement. The
1:06:07
Pride crosswalk was also set on fire
1:06:09
in March. That's crazy. I'm
1:06:11
not a fan of that. Sorry. The
1:06:13
infamous Spokane LGBTQ Pride crosswalk
1:06:15
was vandalized again on Tuesday,
1:06:17
this time with paint. The
1:06:20
new incident occurred less than a week after three
1:06:22
teenagers were charged with felonies for riding scooters of
1:06:24
the Pride crosswalk. We know that. On
1:06:26
Tuesday morning, officials discovered yellow and white paint
1:06:29
splashed on the crosswalk after the city worked to
1:06:31
have it repainted over the weekend ahead of Spokane's
1:06:33
annual Pride parade. I just want to
1:06:35
stress this to these
1:06:38
people who are painting this. You
1:06:42
have two options. Continually maintain
1:06:44
the flag and
1:06:47
repaint it every day because
1:06:49
of this or... Well,
1:06:53
I should say three options, I guess. I was
1:06:55
going to say the other thing is leave the
1:06:57
desecrated flag as is to be a
1:06:59
symbol of the disdain people have for it. I
1:07:02
accept either. You're
1:07:04
going to come out every day and pay money
1:07:06
because people clearly are upset. Again,
1:07:09
I don't agree with vandalizing. You
1:07:11
know, I don't think kids were vandalizing, but someone who
1:07:14
splashed paint on it, I don't
1:07:16
agree if someone does it intentionally. That
1:07:18
being said, if they stole
1:07:20
taxpayer money and never got this approved, now you've
1:07:22
got an interesting problem like they did with Black
1:07:24
Lives Matter in front of Trump's Fifth
1:07:26
Avenue building. But the
1:07:28
other issue is like, we don't
1:07:31
even know this is vandalism. What if there's like
1:07:33
some dude who's carrying a bucket of paint and he trips
1:07:35
and he falls and drops the bucket? Are you going to
1:07:37
be like, we're going to arrest you, you're going to jail? Or it's
1:07:39
like, come on. It's the street.
1:07:42
Nobody would care if they didn't
1:07:44
paint their flag on the street. Look how disgusting
1:07:46
it is. There's skid marks all over it and
1:07:48
the kids aren't the only ones who did that.
1:07:52
David J. Riley says, how much is this costing taxpayers?
1:07:55
First of all, to paint the flag and repaint
1:07:57
it, but also to police it, investigate and prosecute
1:07:59
it. hundreds of thousands, millions. SpokeMPD
1:08:03
said they're investigating the incident, but announced
1:08:05
they will no longer be commenting or issuing press
1:08:07
releases on vandalism in the Pride Crosswalk in an
1:08:09
effort to deter future incidents. In
1:08:11
response to the initial incident of vandalism, Lyme,
1:08:14
come on, post-monial, is it really even,
1:08:16
look at this video. These
1:08:19
kids are just riding scooters, they're not doing anything.
1:08:22
They're riding scooters everywhere, not even just on
1:08:24
the flag. I don't think they even thought
1:08:26
twice about, they're just doing wheelies and riding
1:08:28
around the waterfront. Insane
1:08:30
they're being charged with felonies over this. Democrat
1:08:33
Gov. Jay Inslee signed legislation to make it a
1:08:36
felony to deface public pride
1:08:38
symbols in March, which took effect
1:08:40
on June 6th. The charges come with a maximum penalty of
1:08:42
at the five years in prison. Look at this. Teens
1:08:46
left scooter marks on freshly
1:08:48
painted LGBTQ Pride mural. They were
1:08:50
later arrested for first-degree malicious mischief.
1:08:53
They were just like teenagers, like
1:08:55
deliberately making marks and scratch marks
1:08:58
with their Lyme scooters, like
1:09:00
just all around. Several witnesses confronted
1:09:03
the group and called police. Wow. We're
1:09:06
not going to sit by as we watch
1:09:08
people deliberately commit a hate crime, like right
1:09:10
in the middle of downtown. After looking at
1:09:13
security footage, officers arrested three teenagers. Two were
1:09:15
minors and one is 19-year-old Ruslan Turko. You
1:09:18
are charged with one count, malicious mischief.
1:09:21
The judge was in court this afternoon. The judge
1:09:23
released him under the condition he doesn't go near
1:09:25
the crosswalk or the other teenagers. Prosecutors,
1:09:27
though, had asked the judge to set a $15,000 bond
1:09:31
since that's how much it costs to repaint the mural. The
1:09:34
community really came together to raise the money
1:09:36
for them to be able to do it
1:09:38
before the parade on Saturday. Now
1:09:40
this vandalism, just hours after that repaint
1:09:43
and only a few weeks after someone else, set
1:09:45
fire to the mural. Wow. It's
1:09:47
actually reminded in moments like this that there are still people out there
1:09:50
that... Take a look at this. Now
1:09:52
this vandalism just hours after that repaint
1:09:54
and only a few weeks after someone
1:09:56
else, set fire to the mural. It sucks
1:09:58
if you're right here. Look at these skid, they're
1:10:01
not telling us everything about what's going
1:10:03
on. Look at these massive tread marks.
1:10:06
There is very serious outrage over
1:10:08
this and it's getting crazier. I'll
1:10:10
tell you why. But
1:10:13
first let me throw it to our good friend,
1:10:15
Brian Krasenstein. This is a guy
1:10:17
who professionally plays the heel on acts pretending
1:10:19
to be a liberal but clearly knows what's
1:10:22
really going on. He says,
1:10:26
in reference to Gunther Eagleman
1:10:28
showing a truck peeling out on a pride flag
1:10:30
mural in the street, he
1:10:33
says, imagine spending your time on
1:10:35
acts trying to make a group of people who
1:10:37
have a significantly higher rate of suicide feel even
1:10:39
more hated and unwelcome in their own skin. You
1:10:42
truly have to be a horrible person to post something like
1:10:44
this. I just ask people to
1:10:46
put themselves in other people's shoes before trying to
1:10:48
monetize off hate. This
1:10:50
is why I say the Krasensstienes are evil because
1:10:53
they're comic book villains. They know the
1:10:55
real reason people are upset with pride
1:10:57
flag murals in the street, but
1:10:59
they pretend like you're trying to make
1:11:02
a group of people feel unwelcome in
1:11:04
their own skin. Brian
1:11:07
Krasenstein knows exactly what's going on. Cities
1:11:10
are painting an ideological symbol. This
1:11:13
is not a trans pride flag.
1:11:15
This is a progress pride flag
1:11:18
that represents an ideology. Brian,
1:11:21
notice the black and the brown stripe. Are you
1:11:23
saying that black people don't like being black and
1:11:25
have a problem with it? What's your implication? I
1:11:28
can't stand these racist liberals. The
1:11:31
problem people have with it is
1:11:33
it is a symbol of an
1:11:36
ideology that is being forced on
1:11:38
them while at the same time
1:11:40
the proponents of that ideology have
1:11:42
desecrated war memorials and ripped statues
1:11:44
from their bases. You
1:11:48
have, my friends, a culture war. People
1:11:51
are very unhappy. But I tell
1:11:53
you this, there have been some people who
1:11:55
have been criminally charged for damaging statues. That's true.
1:11:58
But take a look at the extreme. degree
1:12:01
they go for people driving
1:12:03
on the road. Those
1:12:06
kids that were riding the scooters around, there's
1:12:09
no video we have of them sitting there and
1:12:12
holding their tires and scuffing it up. The
1:12:15
scuff they've presented in media appear to
1:12:17
just be scuffs from riding
1:12:19
scooters. That just
1:12:21
happened. They also don't, we've
1:12:23
never gotten a story about what those big massive
1:12:25
tread streaks are. They're gonna have to keep
1:12:27
repenting this thing because people are pissed off. But
1:12:30
I tell you what, the stupidest
1:12:32
thing I think is this, driving
1:12:36
across it and peeling out. The
1:12:39
reason why these people keep winning these
1:12:41
cultural battles is because they
1:12:44
use the police.
1:12:46
That's right. You
1:12:49
go and you vandalize it and the cops, because
1:12:51
they're scumbags, will arrest you for it. I
1:12:54
am sick of people blindly defending police.
1:12:58
The leftists go to the cops and
1:13:00
the cops bend their knees to kiss
1:13:02
the feet because they're spineless scumbag cowards.
1:13:06
Here's what should happen. The
1:13:08
next time some kid rides a scooter across the
1:13:10
Pride mural and they say go arrest those
1:13:12
kids, every single cop should go
1:13:14
no, but they won't.
1:13:17
And the conservatives will just keep blindly supporting
1:13:20
communist police officers. Now,
1:13:23
cops are people. They're
1:13:25
cops who are not communist. They
1:13:28
are cops that have met good people, fans of the show
1:13:30
too. But in
1:13:32
places like Spokane, places like Florida, you
1:13:34
have communist cops that will defend. And
1:13:37
you know what? These cops will
1:13:39
be like, well, I don't agree with it, but you shouldn't be vandalizing.
1:13:41
You're a communist. They
1:13:44
got their garbage ideology painted on your roads. I don't
1:13:46
see you going and arresting people for
1:13:49
throwing eggs, bricks, graffiti. You
1:13:51
ain't doing none of that. But my boss
1:13:53
told me. Okay, so you're a communist. Whatever,
1:13:56
man. Just admit it. You
1:13:59
can... argue all day that you don't like
1:14:01
it, but when you march
1:14:05
at the whip crack of
1:14:07
these neocoms, there's no
1:14:09
difference. You're their
1:14:11
servant. And I'm done protecting
1:14:13
cops over this stuff. It
1:14:15
is the cops that are in Florida that are
1:14:18
going and arresting people. Here's what
1:14:20
I'd do. If I was governor of Florida, you
1:14:22
know what I'd
1:14:25
do? I'd say, pardon. Who vandalized the
1:14:27
pride mural in Palm Beach? It's
1:14:29
Palm Beach, I think, right? Pardon.
1:14:32
I'd say, no, no, no. You guys, you want
1:14:34
your, you do it. You take care of it. You
1:14:37
clean it up. Ron DeSantis needs to be pardoning all these guys.
1:14:40
Why isn't he? I just, I hate Republicans
1:14:42
so much. Ugh,
1:14:45
weak. Anyway, I'll leave it there.
1:14:48
Next segment is coming up tonight at 8pm
1:14:50
over at youtube.com/timcast IRL. Thanks for hanging out
1:14:52
and I'll see you all then. Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More