0:01

This episode is brought to you by Shopify,

0:03

whether you're selling a little or

0:05

a lot. Shopify. Shopify helps

0:07

you do your thing however you cha-ching, from

0:10

the launch your online shop stage all the

0:12

way to the we just hit a million

0:14

orders stage. No matter what stage you're in,

0:17

Shopify is there to help you grow. Sign

0:19

up for a $1 per

0:21

month trial period at shopify.com/special

0:24

offer, all lowercase. That's. That's

0:27

shopify.com/ special offer. Joe.

0:30

Biden snapped at this tic toc her

0:32

and threatened to throw his phone. Because.

0:35

He got asked about Israel. Was. A

0:37

touchy subject for the man who his ailing

0:39

and whose brain doesn't work. And there's an

0:41

update. I guess G Seven leaders are actually

0:44

really concerned it's the worst Bidens ever been

0:46

after he wandered off and now is a

0:48

fact check that's popped up on this is

0:50

Funny Lives of Tic. Toc posted this and

0:52

then Instagram. Sad fact check. Joe Biden wasn't

0:54

actually wandering off from the ceremony, he was

0:56

greeting someone else and it's like dude who

0:58

he can see him wandering away from the

1:01

ceremony. Even if it was the great someone

1:03

else, he's lost his train of thought. So

1:05

ah, what will job on that one? Five.

1:07

Thirty Eight has flipped. They were projecting a

1:09

biden Victory and now they are projecting a

1:11

Donald Trump Victory. basing their simulations and then

1:13

of course a real fun story. The At

1:15

they A is investigating counterfeit titanium and airplanes.

1:17

So if you weren't already scared to fly,

1:19

I think they're desperately trying to make you

1:21

scared to fly because they want you to

1:23

live in the pot, eat the bugs, and

1:25

they want to go to cow farts. So

1:27

we'll talk about all that. But before we

1:29

get started, head over Cast brew.com and pick

1:31

up your Eons, Graphene Dream or out Stein's

1:33

Primetime Grind. Of course, if Appalachian Nights if

1:35

you like to show support our. By buying our

1:37

coffee it is some of the best coffee if not

1:40

the best you will ever have it. Honestly, Appalachian.

1:42

I just my favorite song thing I'd like to drink. Also

1:45

had ordered some guess.com click join us, become

1:47

a member to support our work directly. As

1:49

a member, you are keeping the show alive

1:52

and you'll also get Act access to our

1:54

uncensored member calling show Monday through Thursday at

1:56

ten Pm. As you can see on the

1:58

screen we have a. typo I noticed

2:01

that just now in our Mike Ben says

2:03

on sessard which I don't know that means

2:05

it means I typed I typed wrong when I made the graphic

2:07

if you want to see the typos go away it means

2:09

we need your support because we can't we barely can't afford copy

2:11

editors don't forget to smash that like button

2:14

subscribe to this channel share the show with your friends joining

2:16

us tonight to talk about this and so much more is

2:18

Jim Antle good to be here Tim editor

2:21

and writer at the Washington Examiner been at the district

2:23

of criminals for a long time gonna pull

2:25

Mike a little bit closer surely yeah you can get right

2:27

up there and Jeremy's back from this morning that's

2:29

right I made it through the gauntlet I had to

2:31

eat the other two guests I

2:34

have made it I've made it through he actually did it

2:36

pretty quick yeah so we're good we're good he earned the

2:38

seat Ian is here you digested them

2:40

quickly well done and yes hello everyone

2:42

I'm back good to see you Ian crossland hello

2:45

everybody my name is Phil Lebont I'm the lead singer

2:47

the heavy metal band all that remains my anti-communist and

2:49

the counter-revolutionary how you doing Serge yo I'm good let's

2:52

get started yeah real quick too I guess we were

2:54

just really excited for modern horizon yeah I want to

2:56

talk about magic we're just going hard for about 20

2:58

minutes I attempted to ruin the show by telling them

3:00

a new magic set came out 30 seconds before I

3:03

mean I I knew I've been looking at the set

3:05

but I didn't know it came out today and Phil

3:07

plays that's kind of what got me he posted to

3:09

Ronnie Radt keys post you responded with a more fling

3:11

and I was like it's getting hot and you're fleeing

3:14

to Larian Academy was the best I know oh

3:16

wow and we have that it

3:18

is banned though isn't it well yeah we're in Academy

3:20

we probably have it in the we do unfortunately because

3:22

you and regular wouldn't play blue against those

3:25

are actually in the band list it's broken dude yeah

3:27

if it's banned I get it it's a powerful the

3:29

toyery in Academy I'm talking about it's a but

3:31

it's like it was the crux of so

3:33

many of my decks from the moment it came out

3:36

that's with artifacts in blue yeah I think listeners want

3:38

to hear you explain how magic the gathering is played

3:40

let's jump to this as an aside

3:42

did you know that

3:45

the gathering was supposed to be only the first set

3:48

and they were actually gonna call it magic colon Arabian

3:50

nights when the expansion came out all right here's the

3:52

real news for people who are constantly going like I

3:54

have no idea what to talk about nor do I

3:56

care from the Daily Mail what

3:59

triggered Joe Biden to lose his

4:01

temper at TikTok star and threaten to

4:03

throw his phone at a White House

4:05

party as the president scrambles to earn

4:07

love from influencers. How about

4:09

we just get rid of that what and write Israel? Israel

4:13

triggered Joe Biden to lose his temper. In fact, can I

4:15

just, we'll just, here you go. Let's, oh

4:18

man, that's, that's, what is this? This

4:20

is too much text. Okay. I'm

4:22

not, I normally like to change the headlines by inspecting, but I

4:25

don't know what they're going on with their inspection. So this is

4:27

the gist of it. Here's the

4:29

video. I'm a professor of

4:31

international policy. Oh, do you really? And

4:34

I'm wondering why, so

4:37

you made a statement the other day about

4:39

the student protesters on college campuses. Yeah. And

4:44

that you basically, and

4:47

I'm wondering if you still stand by

4:49

that statement and also why you just

4:51

signed a bill giving $26

4:53

billion in the launch of Israel in

4:56

the midst of what a

5:28

union. Can

5:53

barely hear the guy muttering. So apparently in

5:55

the next portion he says, I'm going to throw your

5:57

phone. Yeah, we just pulled a quote because I don't.

5:59

to listen to this guy mutter. So

6:01

here's the video of it. Here's him holding his phone. Do

6:05

they not have it? Is this it right here? Why are

6:07

they wasting our time with his watch to the end? He had

6:09

a chance. That's the same video. So

6:12

there you go. Biden grew angry at cats

6:14

suggesting he would throw his phone before AIDS

6:16

intervened. The New York Times reported Friday

6:18

that Biden and Democrat hours are working furiously to build

6:20

an army of social media supporters who will create pro-Biden

6:22

content for social media. The reason why it won't happen

6:25

is that the users of TikTok

6:27

who are in the appropriate age bracket despise

6:30

Israel. And so all that's going

6:32

to happen is they're going to bring in these woke progressives

6:34

and be like, hey, look, Biden, promote him. And they go,

6:36

you're a genocide, Joe. Yeah.

6:41

I mean, they're even having that problem with their White House

6:43

staffing. And that's, you know, a much

6:45

more thoroughly conventional group of

6:47

people that you're drawing from

6:49

than what you're going to need to have

6:51

like a successful social media campaign. And,

6:53

you know, the demographic that they're going to be hiring

6:55

from is just not going to want to make this

6:58

kind of pro Biden content. I don't

7:00

even know what the content would look like. What

7:02

do you see the future for the Democrats, like

7:04

the Democrats that are, you know, on the hill

7:06

now that are looking for staffers that are looking

7:08

for young people to actually do this stuff? I

7:10

mean, you're aware of the, what is the White

7:12

staffers, Twitter page and stuff, you know about that.

7:14

So it's like, if that, you know, yeah, bring

7:16

up the thing about a fist. What do you,

7:18

from your mouth, what do you

7:20

make of that kind of stuff being

7:23

in the government? I know that most

7:25

people don't understand that the, this kind

7:27

of attitude is something that's actually permeated

7:30

the federal government now. So this is a real, real

7:32

problem that we have to deal with. What do you

7:35

think of that? I mean, it's a huge generational change

7:37

in the Democratic Party. And it, you

7:39

know, both parties have to deal with generational

7:41

change. But I think when you're the more

7:44

progressive of the two political parties, you've always

7:46

got these people who are going to devour

7:48

the previous, you know, generation of the

7:50

revolution, you're always sort of being chased

7:52

further and further leftward. And it's

7:56

a real challenge in terms of staffing. And,

7:58

you know, the, the. staffers

8:00

in a lot of these offices really

8:03

do drive how the members

8:05

think about lots of things and I think that's

8:07

particularly true in the House where you

8:09

have lots of members who aren't very experienced who

8:11

haven't thought very deeply about issues before but it's

8:14

true to some degree in the Senate where you

8:16

have people are very old you have the opposite

8:18

problem there people have been there forever think the

8:20

internet is a series of tubes so if you're

8:23

going to you know do anything to internet this

8:25

internet thing it might be around for a while

8:27

guys it might be a real permanent thing so

8:29

we need to find some young folk to

8:31

do that huge problem for the Democratic Party

8:33

and you know I think

8:36

this is a particular issue where

8:39

the Democrats can't really

8:41

you know in

8:43

health care and other stuff where you've had young activists

8:45

have certain views the Democrats at least

8:48

know how to speak that language and

8:50

it's still a familiar language it's been a

8:52

familiar language with them to them since the

8:54

new deal but the Israel stuff is a

8:56

real rapid change and I think the members

8:59

are really trying to chase the staffers

9:01

at this point because they think that's you

9:03

know they believe that children are the future teach

9:06

them well I lead the way I think Democrats

9:08

are pulling a blockbuster blockbuster video

9:11

right they they had the internet early on

9:13

it really helped their campaigns but

9:15

now they're too heavily focused on

9:17

corporate press narratives and

9:19

what happens then is by ignoring the

9:22

development of social media the algorithms that

9:24

were on these platforms and what these

9:26

activists were up to they

9:28

have basically allowed the emergence of staunch

9:31

anti-israel sentiment which coincides with all

9:33

the woke policies it's the oppressed

9:35

versus oppressor and now they

9:39

they've lost which like they

9:41

have they have gone the path of blockbuster and ignoring

9:43

the advancements that were happening around them resting

9:45

too much on hey look we got

9:47

the older vote the older vote matters

9:49

more we're gonna win that vote they're

9:51

watching MSNBC and CNN and now

9:53

that young these young people are entering their

9:55

you got Gen Z and Millennials now younger

9:57

Millennials and they're all active on the social

10:00

platforms and the overwhelming

10:02

majority of younger Democrats hate Israel,

10:05

Biden's screwed. So this is why you're

10:07

seeing him actively now speak in

10:10

favor of Gaza and Palestine, opposing

10:13

Israel, whereas you

10:15

still have this issue where

10:18

most Americans are probably between

10:21

they like Israel or they're

10:23

Israel neutral and the left

10:25

is staunch anti-Israel. The Democrats aren't going to be

10:27

able to win a majority playing both sides. This

10:31

This episode is brought to you by Shopify,

10:33

whether you're selling a little or a

10:35

lot. or a lot. Shopify

10:37

helps you do your thing however you cha-ching,

10:40

from the launch your online shop stage all

10:42

the way to the we just hit a

10:44

million orders stage. No matter what stage you're

10:47

in, Shopify is there to help you grow.

10:49

Sign up for a $1 per

10:51

month trial period at shopify.com/special

10:54

offer, all lowercase. That's

10:57

shopify.com/ special offer. When

11:00

even before Gaza, Biden had a

11:02

lot of problems with younger Democrats. I mean, there was

11:04

a poll even before the midterm elections that

11:06

showed that 94% of Democrats think

11:08

they were aware of it. They were aware

11:10

of it, though. I don't know how aware of it there was,

11:12

but the New York Times had a poll that 94% of Democrats

11:16

under the age of 30 wanted a different nominee

11:18

in 2024. I doubt

11:20

that the numbers have gotten any better. If

11:22

anything, they're probably roughly the same or worse.

11:26

Young people, even when they didn't have

11:28

an ideological reason to not like Biden

11:30

other than that he was old and

11:32

not like them, now they have an

11:35

ideological reason. This has given them an

11:37

ideological reason. That's

11:40

why they have the big focus on student

11:42

loans, student loan forgiveness. They have to find

11:44

some hook to get these people to

11:46

show up and vote for Democrats and

11:48

for Biden. Not sure how much it's

11:50

going to work. Do you

11:52

think that this is mostly good for

11:54

the Republican Party, like bringing in more

11:56

of the sort of, you know, more

11:58

crazy leftists? bring the

12:00

billionaire Jews into the Republican,

12:03

pushing them out away

12:05

from the left is sort of my impression, but

12:07

I don't know. I'm not that deep.

12:11

You know, it's obviously anything

12:14

that's bad for your political opponents

12:16

is probably good for you, right,

12:18

to some degree. There have been

12:20

some polls, like New York is

12:22

not a state that's really in play, but there

12:24

have been some polls that show Trump doing very

12:26

well with Jewish voters in New York. You

12:29

know, Michigan obviously is

12:32

a state that Biden is

12:34

very worried about because of Muslim

12:36

and Arab American voters

12:38

in that state. You

12:40

know, I do think that at least

12:42

in the immediate term, some

12:45

of the Democrats' divisions on this

12:47

issue do play to the Republicans'

12:49

benefit. But obviously, you know,

12:51

if one party gets crazier, then

12:53

it isn't always necessarily

12:56

good for the country. Right. Sure.

12:59

But you've got like, what was it named, Claudine Gag? I

13:01

fired at Harvard and that was largely because I

13:03

think Bill Ackman and probably some other people who

13:05

weren't as public about it sort

13:08

of work because our work is straight about it. The

13:10

donor class. And so,

13:12

you know, there are obviously

13:15

trade-offs to having

13:17

those people in your coalition, but you know, they're

13:19

certainly more up for play, it appears, you

13:22

know, than they were in the past. And there's

13:24

not a big countervailing force that there was in

13:26

the Democratic Party in the Republican Party against that.

13:29

Going back to the first story that

13:31

brought this up, you know, Biden saying

13:33

he's going to throw the guy's phone.

13:36

Just shifting the conversation, I think this is indicative

13:39

of dementia. He couldn't throw a phone.

13:41

He couldn't throw a phone. But bursts of

13:43

anger. He could throw something. He

13:45

could. If he raised his arm fully above

13:47

his arm, I doubt it. Yeah. He

13:50

goes as Cornholio. Yeah, and

13:53

Cornholio hands is another sign of dementia. They

13:56

say bouts of anger are a result

13:58

of... Frustration

14:01

loss of temper is a sign

14:03

of dementia. It's a you

14:05

know for imagine this You

14:08

know the way the you I'm sure everyone's

14:10

had an experience where the words on the tip of

14:12

your tongue You just can't remember and it's frustrating. You're

14:14

like, oh, what's that word? Why can't I think of

14:16

it? No now? Imagine that's your day every five

14:19

times an hour You're struggling to remember

14:21

things and you're like I can't remember what

14:23

I was just doing you say the wrong

14:25

country You're getting frustrated with yourself Then

14:28

some dude walks up to you and says I want

14:30

an answer on an extremely complicated

14:32

and difficult political subject right right

14:34

now I'm recording you. Mm-hmm. Yeah,

14:37

he's the rage is

14:39

not because he's demented the dementia

14:42

Limits his capacity. He can't

14:44

think about how to respond. He knows he can't remember

14:46

He knows he can't give it give a good answer

14:49

and he's just been put in a position where he

14:51

cannot lift this heavy object So he snaps it remember

14:53

your phone Well, it actually makes me want to vote

14:55

for him a little bit though, you know because we

14:57

we've seen we're trying to tear down barriers We're seeing

15:00

new classes of people become president. We haven't had a

15:02

openly demented president yet. I'm like,

15:04

let's Know

15:07

it wasn't as obvious now everyone knows now

15:09

we can really say and prove that like

15:12

a mentally deficient man a literal

15:14

retarded man can Become

15:16

you can be present that they can be

15:18

present to you know And so that's a

15:20

chance for people who want to show that

15:22

that can that that's possible Biden had to

15:24

end his first presidential campaign 37

15:27

years ago because a guy came up

15:29

to him said things he didn't like and Biden

15:32

had to yell at the guy number one and

15:34

number two Try to convince

15:36

the guy he was much smarter than him

15:38

by like inventing all of these academic credentials

15:40

that he didn't have And so,

15:42

you know even as a

15:45

relatively young man He was yelling at people to get

15:47

off his lawn It was it was sort of a

15:49

political problem not gonna get better with age I was

15:51

in 1988 when he was running for president. It

15:53

was in 88. He didn't make it all the way to 1988 So

15:56

it was for the 88 cycle and he's yelling

15:58

at a voter in in 1987

16:01

and they found out even the

16:03

stuff he was yelling at the guy wasn't true. Wasn't

16:05

he liable for plagiarism and

16:07

that's why he dropped out of the campaign in

16:09

1988? He also had been

16:12

giving some speeches that were

16:14

actually speeches from the British labor

16:16

leader Neil Kinnock, talking about

16:18

being a young coal miner boy

16:21

and all this kind of stuff. Even

16:24

some of the tendencies that Biden

16:26

has now have been long term

16:28

tendencies, but the they really just

16:31

get worse if you're old and

16:33

you're sort of slower and the

16:35

jokes don't come as freely and

16:37

the back slapping seems a little

16:39

more awkward. But I mean some

16:41

of this stuff is just sort

16:43

of taking the Amtrak to

16:45

all of these historic events that maybe

16:47

didn't really happen. Biden

16:50

has had a lot of these tendencies for his

16:52

entire political career. Having him as an

16:54

80 something year old man as president, it's

16:56

really kind of terrible. There's

17:00

this guy, someone was mentioning part of the reason

17:02

why people can get demented in later life is

17:05

because they have a lot of secrets and they're

17:07

just constantly forcing themselves to shut their own thoughts

17:09

down because they don't want to accidentally

17:11

tell you their secrets. And

17:13

so if Biden's got all these family corruption

17:15

secrets of like what Hunter did, orders he

17:17

issued to Hunter to his brother, what is

17:19

it? His brother Joe? James. And

17:22

now he's like sun setting, you know, how

17:24

convenient for him. Let's ask him what corruption.

17:26

I don't remember. I can't recall. Like

17:28

Reagan apparently may have been going through some similar

17:30

stuff in his late career. May have been. Yeah.

17:33

Where he was like, Oh, I don't remember. I can't remember.

17:35

Sorry. No, that was that tire.

17:37

That was a tactic in court, but he was

17:39

he did have Alzheimer's and it's likely that it

17:41

was starting when he was finishing up his his

17:43

what's it called, but lying about what he knew

17:46

and what he didn't know. That was just a

17:48

court tactic. I don't buy that there was any

17:50

like I forgot and he actually forgot. I think

17:52

it was just in telling covering his butt. So

17:54

well, you know, plausible deniability is what it is

17:56

in the Sopranos when Uncle Junior beats

17:58

his first trial by faking dementia. but ultimately

18:00

by the end of the series he has dementia. Biden's

18:03

down to 83% on the betting market, 83 cents. So

18:06

there's a, you know, the markets have him, have

18:09

a someone that's a high... But that's the Democratic

18:11

Party. That's the... yeah, right, no, the presidential... So

18:13

the fact, I'm just saying that the perspective is

18:15

higher than it's ever been, that it might not

18:17

be Biden. I mean, 17% is not that high

18:20

still. To clarify, the betting markets are saying that

18:22

the Democrats will nominate someone else. 17% chances is

18:24

what the betting market is saying. Wow. That's

18:27

a value bet right there. That's a value bet. Yeah. Yeah,

18:30

you put in five bucks, you win 100 bucks. They

18:32

gotta run somebody else. What are they

18:34

waiting for? Announce, announce, give yourself

18:36

a chance. It's like 25 bucks on

18:38

half the way. I mean, just taking

18:40

him down is a complicated game. You

18:43

know, it's not... there's not one clear

18:46

way to do that. Superdelegates can pick whoever

18:48

they want. Yeah. So it

18:50

doesn't have to be incumbent. The Republicans don't have superdelegates,

18:52

right? Just the Democrats? Yeah, but it's the

18:54

way... Right. There are some uncommitted

18:56

delegates on the Republican side, but the Democrats are

18:58

the only ones that have all these elected officials,

19:00

party bosses who get to be superdelegates. Yep. They're

19:03

not bound to anybody. Rigged.

19:06

The Wall Street Journal came out and said Biden's

19:08

like mentally deficient recently. You know, so more and

19:10

more of these... Oh, did they? I

19:13

think it was that... Where's the New York

19:15

Times? The more institutions that are doing this,

19:17

that's actually what has to happen for... I

19:19

just say that because, you know, we had

19:21

Matt Gaetz on, and this was the

19:23

night that they held Garland in contempt

19:25

over the Her recording, which is

19:27

the investigation into Biden,

19:30

and they're saying it's executive privilege, we can't release the recording

19:32

despite the fact the transcripts come out. And

19:35

the reason is because people think Biden's going

19:37

to sound really bad, like his brain's failing.

19:40

And, you know, Matt was just like, really?

19:43

Do we really need that recording? The man

19:46

appeared to have crapped his pants on stage

19:48

at D-Day. There's nothing on

19:50

that tape that's going to be worse than

19:52

anything we've already seen from the man whose

19:54

brain does not work. And I'm like, that's

19:56

true. I

20:00

agree I'm pro Biden. I say Biden all

20:02

the way. It's one of those like at

20:05

what costs victory lost things like opera What's

20:07

the opportunity of cost of getting that guy

20:09

into into your party your wit your party

20:11

wins? But at what cost if that you

20:13

have a losing leader now so you don't

20:15

want to you don't want to promote a

20:18

loser or like in someone that's incontinent or Incapable

20:22

or someone that's gonna like just Misunderstand

20:25

mental come and go, you know, that's not a

20:27

consistent. That's true. I'm just assuming using continent. He

20:29

might not be I'm just looking for a chair

20:32

I don't that's that's makes no sense.

20:34

The chairs right behind know Everyone

20:37

is standing up dementia. You didn't know here.

20:40

Here's the issue with the whole D-Day thing. Okay, let's

20:42

just stop and try and be rational Logical

20:44

and do some math. There's

20:46

four people standing up. They are

20:48

to be standing for the beginning of the ceremony There

20:51

are chairs right behind them Joe

20:54

Biden does a weird squat with a

20:56

grimace Stretches upright a little

20:58

bit then squats down again The

21:01

first thing I thought was is is he

21:03

pooping like this is like a weird thing

21:05

to do instantly

21:08

Excuses begin to emerge for what it may

21:10

actually be I've heard his posture was was

21:12

hurting him and he was trying to straighten

21:14

his back and I'm like Okay,

21:18

I don't I mean it's maybe and the other

21:20

was there's an invisible chair he's trying to sit

21:22

in no There's a visible chair there right behind

21:24

him that he did not actually sit in So

21:28

if we're doing math to break down what we think

21:30

may be the most reasonable I don't know what is

21:32

what I can tell you is there's probably a double

21:34

digit probability crap his pants It could have been amalgam

21:36

like he started to sit down looking for a chair

21:38

But then when there was no chair He tensed up

21:40

and tried to stand back up in one of those

21:42

tents tensions where he like here right behind that We

21:44

crap myself. There's a chair right behind him, but it

21:46

was too far out of his view Like he can't

21:48

the chair that he eventually is right behind him That's

21:51

why I'm like, I don't understand where that that that is not in

21:54

the equation The chair is right there and

21:56

some argued that when Jill Biden wipes her

21:59

scratches her face She's actually going, Joe, don't

22:01

sit down, keep standing, keep standing. And I'm

22:03

like, that is making

22:05

many assumptions. We are

22:08

trying to make the least amount of assumptions

22:10

in this, in which case his back hurt

22:12

is a maybe, but it's kind

22:14

of a weird thing to do because your back hurts. That's

22:17

probably a lower probability. Then

22:19

there's 15 to 30% of men over the age

22:21

of 80 suffer fecal incontinence. That's why they sell

22:23

diapers. Biden has been accused on numerous

22:25

occasions of having cracked his pants. There's

22:27

been numerous reports that have flown around, rumors

22:29

are otherwise. And so I

22:32

think it's fair to say, I don't know, call it

22:34

10%, call 20% probability that Biden

22:36

actually cracked his pants. It's

22:38

like the question people really want to know. Everybody sat down afterwards.

22:40

I didn't watch the rest of the video, but he ended up

22:42

sitting after that because he wouldn't have sat in poopy pants. How

22:45

long was that ceremony for him to have to sit

22:47

there like that? Whose

22:49

vote is like hinging on how tight Biden's

22:51

butthole is? Are there really votes? It

22:54

factors into my decision. The

22:56

number one issue among voters for the month

22:58

of May was Joe Biden's mental ... Mental?

23:03

No, not mental. I'm

23:07

editorializing. It was failure in

23:09

leadership. Which

23:11

broadly put is Joe Biden is clearly

23:13

incapable of doing this job. Amazingly,

23:18

April immigration was the single largest factor,

23:20

according to Gallup. When

23:22

May came around, the capabilities

23:25

of the president became the number

23:27

one issue among voters. There's

23:30

only one conversation there. The

23:32

idea that it's no, no, they're concerned about

23:34

Trump now. I'm like, no, no, no, no.

23:36

The big conversation everyone's having is Biden keeps

23:38

having episodes. And I'll just pause here too.

23:41

Biden's back hurt. He was looking for a

23:44

chair. He was straightening his back out. Not

23:47

only have we had accusations that

23:49

he's cracked his pants off for, but he

23:52

can't speak properly. There's been numerous

23:54

occasions where he's wandered off in the wrong direction. In the

23:57

past two weeks alone, I think we've had two or three

23:59

videos. him going off the wrong

24:01

direction on a stage or at the G7 wandering

24:03

in the wrong direction. You add

24:05

all those things in, the solution

24:07

with the least amount of assumptions is the bumbling

24:10

old-doddard crapped his pants. Again,

24:13

I'm not saying I know for sure, I'm just saying it

24:15

is an absurdity to me to make an excuse

24:18

when – and I'll put it this way.

24:21

I ask chat GPT, because we

24:23

love that chat GPT, and I say, did

24:26

Joe Biden crap his pants? No, that's offensive

24:28

and speculative. I then say, is

24:30

it reasonable to conclude that Joe Biden, who's been rumored

24:32

to have crapped his pants, who was over the age

24:35

of 80 and – crapped his pants, and he said,

24:37

no, no, you can't assume that. I

24:39

then removed Joe Biden from it and said, is it

24:41

reasonable to assume that an 81-year-old man

24:43

who's standing at a ceremony, who bends down a

24:45

couple times and then grimaces and stands back up,

24:47

crapped his pants? Yes, absolutely reasonable to assume that.

24:51

When you add Joe Biden to it, everyone rushes to

24:53

the defense of, no, no, this is not

24:55

happening, this is not happening. But if you make it

24:57

any old man, people say, yes, probably. I

25:00

didn't hear the poop, and I didn't see

25:02

it coming out, so I can't make the

25:04

assumption. I know this is a

25:06

dark rabbit hole that we don't need that. That assumption,

25:08

I cannot – don't make assumptions. And that is not

25:11

how we operate. We do not from here

25:13

operate under the guise of, it is a

25:15

definitive fact that he did do it.

25:18

It's simply, when we know the probabilities

25:20

and percentages, we can make better decisions

25:22

moving forward. And what we have here

25:24

is – and again, to move on from the poop

25:26

jokes, because I get a funny story – is we

25:28

have a man who is clearly so physically incapable that

25:30

voters have become nervous about it, and it's become the

25:33

top issue in the United States. Part of – I

25:35

was going to bring up is, do you think this

25:37

is part of people in the deep state that are

25:39

top-level authorization at the deep state are

25:41

kind of like, good. Now people can see

25:43

how useless a single man as your leader is.

25:46

Now we'll take over by, like, our oligarchy

25:48

will take over, because you can't rely on

25:50

one guy. If the guy falls apart,

25:52

you're screwed. They want the president to

25:54

be like the king. A figurehead with no real power, and

25:56

that's what they got in Joe Biden. as

26:00

he's only a point or two down, I'm not sure

26:02

they will replace him. I think there are some Democrats

26:04

that would like to do that, but

26:07

if they think he can beat Trump, I

26:09

don't know. Not only that, but also one of

26:11

the things going against him is I feel

26:14

like it's likely that the polls are going to do the

26:16

same thing that they did in 2016 and again in

26:18

2020 where the

26:23

polls didn't show that Donald Trump was

26:26

doing anything. They looked really, really bad. He's

26:28

got the best polls that he's had so

26:30

far, now, but today is

26:32

the best polls that he's ever had. I

26:35

don't think that they're going to make any change because I don't think

26:37

they're going to believe any polls that say Donald Trump's going to win.

26:39

Well, the debate is now in front of the first- It's hubris. They

26:42

moved the

26:44

debate up. Isn't there a point of

26:46

interaction in front of the DNC primary?

26:48

Their first debate is on the- I

26:51

think that's what will be the

26:53

test, essentially. I think if there's any

26:55

move to get rid of them, it'll

26:58

be that- Let's talk about this.

27:01

There are many people speculating that

27:03

Democrats are using the debate, the reason why

27:06

they've decided, yes, we will have a debate

27:08

with Donald Trump, is so that they can

27:10

force Biden out. His

27:12

performance will be so bad or something will happen that they'll

27:14

have no choice but to do it because right now, Biden's

27:17

not backing out. He doesn't want to leave. Joe doesn't want to leave.

27:20

They need a major moment in front of

27:22

the nation to say Biden can't do this.

27:24

Or he'll prove he can do it. I

27:26

think it's okay to model some Democrats as

27:28

genuinely undecided who they care more than a

27:30

Democrat wins than who. Can

27:32

Biden do it or not? I could imagine being genuinely

27:34

uncertain about that and saying, well, I want to test

27:36

him and let's see if he can do it.

27:39

If I imagine being a Democrat, which is hard to do, but that's- There's

27:43

also just a question of if expectations

27:46

are so low, can he

27:48

just by not crapping his pants win the

27:50

debate? It's like Trump is mean and

27:52

Biden didn't crap his pants down. Right. Therefore, this

27:54

was a big win. A state of the union

27:56

address was kind of received in that way. Yeah.

28:01

I believe for a while now that they would swap

28:03

out Joe Biden and the only reason

28:06

they would not, in my opinion, is that they

28:08

want him to lose or they expect him to

28:10

lose in their plans or elsewhere. I

28:12

do think there's more comfort

28:14

with Trump this time around than

28:17

there was in the past. I don't think that the

28:19

reaction is the same and I think Trump

28:21

kind of, if anything, didn't do some of the

28:23

things that people would have been worried about him

28:26

doing. So, Orin

28:29

McIntyre had a great tweet. He said, Lord, give

28:31

me the Trump that leftists have crafted in their

28:33

delusional minds. Please, that's what I want. Trump's not

28:35

doing any of that stuff. He's

28:37

going to get in. It's going to be slightly above milk toast

28:39

in a lot of ways. We'll be satisfied with some of the

28:42

stuff he does. It'll be better than anything else we could get

28:44

from any of the other candidates and a lot of people are

28:46

going to be disappointed. I think

28:49

our fingers are crossed for a good AG,

28:51

a good deputy attorney general, a good attorney

28:54

general. I

28:56

think we're going to get 10% of what we're

28:59

hoping for and go, well, you know. His

29:01

strength is geopolitical negotiation, Trump's is, and I

29:03

think he would easily sue tensions

29:05

with the Russians and the Chinese. It sounds

29:08

like he wants the Israelis to go stomp

29:10

out Hamas, whatever that means. Absolutely. So,

29:13

like, that means maybe funding that war until

29:15

the ideology no longer exists? I don't know.

29:17

Like Hamas is a political ideology. Hamas is

29:20

made of people. There are people. You get those people

29:22

and you kill them. That communism is not a people.

29:24

No, no, no. Hamas is an

29:26

organization. There's an ideology that's anti-Zionism.

29:28

That's one thing. But

29:31

Hamas is made up of people. But people come and

29:33

go into that organization. It doesn't matter. It

29:35

doesn't matter because if you join Hamas, you are

29:37

Hamas. Yeah, but if you don't join Hamas until

29:39

in 20 days, then it mattered. And what you

29:41

did could cause more people to join Hamas, killing

29:43

their fathers and their friends. Listen,

29:46

whatever your opinion is, I'm telling

29:48

you how the Israelis are going to look at it. And

29:51

they say, these people are members of Hamas. Just like these

29:53

people are members of the mafia. So what if they just

29:55

say, I'm no longer a member of Hamas. We have a

29:57

new organization with a different name that does the exact thing.

30:00

Same thing. Come out with your

30:02

hands up. That's it? But I mean if you're saying

30:04

it only matters if you identify with the group. Ian, where's

30:06

ISIS? Where? Yeah.

30:09

It's a concept. I mean I don't know

30:11

where their base is. No, ISIS is a group. Yeah, but

30:13

where are they? It's their, they, they, they, your neighbor's home.

30:15

They might be in a cave somewhere. No, they're crushed.

30:18

Their resources are gone. Their control structures are

30:20

gone. Their fortifications have been wiped out. That's

30:23

the same, they're gone. The ideology, to be

30:25

honest, everything I know about, about, about ISIS

30:27

was told. They

30:30

were told to me by the media. I have no idea

30:32

who they were, where they were. Well, you have to, dude,

30:34

you can read Debeek. They have a whole, like, they had

30:36

a whole, like, magazine they were putting out the entire time.

30:39

There's this one, it's called Debeek. There's this

30:41

one issue they have, that they have that

30:43

is titled, Why, or there's an article they

30:46

wrote that's called, Why We Hate You and

30:48

Why We Fight You. And they list off

30:50

all the reasons why they hate the West.

30:52

There is all this idea that Hamas

30:54

and that there is no, no

30:57

violent fundamentalist

31:00

ideology, that's wrong.

31:02

And they not only, not only is it wrong, they

31:04

literally tell you. So what was going on in the

31:06

early, early part of the teens was like, Barack Obama

31:08

was like, oh, these people are just, actually, they're, it's

31:11

about economics and blah, blah, blah. It's like, no, they

31:13

really effing believe it. You listen to Sam Harris, and

31:15

not that I'm a big Sam Harris fan, but he

31:17

goes through the whole, the article

31:19

in Debeek talking about what they want. Basically

31:22

they're like, they think of themselves as like,

31:24

Jedi. Like they get to go and

31:26

be holy warriors. They can slaughter

31:28

people and feel good about it.

31:31

Because God said, this is real. This isn't make

31:33

believe it. It's not from the media. This

31:35

is from them. This is from ISIS themselves. You know,

31:38

ISIS, you can watch ISIS. You can find

31:40

their propaganda videos and they're like, they're like,

31:42

they're actually share some similarities with like US

31:44

Army recruitment videos. They're kind of, they're really,

31:46

there's some really interesting propaganda pieces that they're

31:48

decent production value. But that's try, come join

31:50

the cause. That was one of the things

31:52

that Sam Harris was saying. It was a

31:54

bit, it was a really, really bad thing

31:56

because Debeek had such good copy editing. The

31:58

copy editing was better. I think the New

32:01

York Times there was a typo in the New York

32:03

Times talking about the beat But if you look at

32:05

the actual article written in to be there was

32:07

no there was no typos like that means That's a

32:09

level of sophistication the word uncensored. Pardon me Even

32:11

the word uncensored when not typed I'm that was

32:13

my typo from on the front page of the

32:15

website. Fair enough Yeah, but the point is these

32:18

people these are not these are not Backwards

32:20

people that don't understand what they

32:23

believe they fully Oh, they're

32:25

fully aware of what they believe and they

32:27

actually Actually believe it the idea that oh,

32:30

it's just economics and blah blah blah. That's

32:32

horse shit That's that's liberals saying that they

32:34

don't want to believe what the actual terrorists

32:36

are telling them is the is the Mujahideen

32:40

Still a fighting force anywhere is that it's become a generic term

32:42

now. It's generic I mean, I actually think like a lot of

32:44

them are like these sort of like their

32:47

autism spectrum Of

32:50

the Middle East they take their beliefs really seriously a

32:52

lot of people don't but a lot like terrorists And

32:55

this speaks to a problem on the left, which

32:57

is they the whole like, you know, you can

32:59

just cogs that is Factually wrong.

33:01

You cannot do that Individual people matter if

33:03

the attributes and the traits that make you

33:05

up that make up Jeremy that make up

33:07

obviously These things are important

33:10

and they can't be just replaced Like I

33:12

can't just sit in Tim's seat and become

33:14

Tim pool Tim pool can monologue Tim is

33:16

Tim has knowledge and an ability that I

33:18

let's do that. It's a really great example,

33:20

right if If

33:22

everyone in this room were to get arrested right now and

33:25

then some other possibility to absolutely and

33:27

then The show gets off the

33:29

air and then a week later a handful of people no

33:32

one's ever heard of show up and begin talking Will it

33:34

be Tim cast IRL? No, maybe it

33:36

will succeed Probably it won't because the audience

33:38

coalesces around a certain format that we have

33:40

a certain production structure The way we communicate

33:42

with guests the way we time segments the

33:44

way we post segments later on It

33:46

would be something totally different funded in a totally different way

33:49

Likely would fail like the majority

33:51

of enterprises and organizations fail very

33:54

few succeed if Hamas is obliterated

33:56

And and and and you

33:58

know, we're not even talking in a context In the context of war,

34:01

let's just say Israel decides to go in

34:03

with plastic bullets and arrest each and every

34:05

one and then ships them off to a

34:07

different prison all around the world. They have

34:09

zero communication with each other. It has been

34:11

dismantled without violence other than imprisonment. There

34:14

is no reforming of that. Running

34:16

an organization like Hamas requires personal

34:18

connections for resources and it requires

34:21

strategic thinking and planning. Someone

34:24

else might come around eventually, but

34:26

to put it very simply, there

34:28

are many organizations, there

34:31

are many piracy

34:33

groups and countries that no

34:35

longer exist and never will because they lost

34:37

a war. I

34:39

think that what Israel is

34:41

really fighting against is terroristic threat in

34:44

whatever form it arrives. Right now,

34:46

it's in the formation of Hamas and

34:48

their people. They've been

34:50

terroristically threatening the Israelis, so they want to get rid of

34:52

that. There's ways to

34:54

get rid of terroristic threats. If you murder

34:56

all of the people that are involved in

34:59

the organizations, you may create more terroristic threat

35:01

down the line because of all their children

35:03

and cousins that you've pissed off. I

35:05

have a question for you. Do

35:08

you think the likelihood that Ireland attacks

35:11

and begins pulling a free Palestine-style

35:13

attack on the UK is imminent?

35:15

No. Are the children of

35:18

the Irish Republicans still angry? There

35:21

was massacres from the British Empire. What about the

35:23

British and the French? Are we

35:25

expecting any time soon, the British and the French, to go back to

35:27

war because they were warring for hundreds of years? No, not right now.

35:29

But why not? Because the liberal economic order

35:31

took over all of it. The

35:33

liberal economic order was way, way,

35:35

way after those conflicts had stopped.

35:38

Yes, I know. That's why they don't go to war anymore. And even right now,

35:40

actually, I've got to give a shout out to Star Trek The Next Generation because

35:47

in the episode where Data asked Picard about terrorism,

35:49

one of the examples he gives and again, this

35:51

is the late 80s, early 90s when the show

35:53

was made. Data

35:56

says there have been examples where terrorism has

35:58

worked, such as the Mexican independence from

36:00

Spain or the Irish reunification

36:02

of 2024. The funny

36:04

thing about that is in the 90s, the

36:07

writers were like, in their minds, the

36:09

troubles would have evolved into an actual

36:11

unification of the Irish state. That was

36:13

the prediction of the writers in the

36:15

early 90s that the troubles

36:17

would succeed. They didn't. What happened was

36:19

the EU came around and the weirdest

36:21

thing happened. Ireland and Northern Ireland just

36:23

became an open border through the Schengen

36:25

zone in the European Union. There

36:28

still is anger there. When

36:31

I was there several years ago in Belfast,

36:33

there's like Gaelic writing on the wall. The

36:35

peace wall is actually pretty weird, one side

36:37

Israel, one side Palestine. No joke. But

36:39

the likelihood, in my opinion, that

36:41

we see Irish

36:43

and British people reignite

36:46

800-year-old conflict because of the

36:48

killing, people have long forgotten

36:50

about it. They found prosperity.

36:52

The issue right now is

36:55

if in Gaza, Hamas

36:58

stopped firing rockets, things

37:01

would slowly start to dramatically improve for them. I'm

37:04

not saying Israel is right or wrong. I'm saying

37:06

you choose war, the winner gets it. I will

37:08

cite Ulysses S. Grant who wrote an amazing letter

37:10

after the Civil War. He said, and I'm paraphrasing,

37:13

it is the right of anyone to challenge their

37:15

government. If you lose, you

37:17

will be ruled over by your betters,

37:19

by those who have conquered you. If

37:22

Gaza chooses war, they

37:24

get war and they can't win that war. The

37:26

end result is going to be the desolation

37:30

or just the

37:32

destruction of what's left of Palestine.

37:35

Yeah, I don't think this excuses some of

37:37

the things that happen to people in Gaza, but

37:39

I think a lot of people can underestimate the

37:41

sort of quality or caliber of person and the

37:44

attitudes that they have there. This is a part

37:46

of the ideology. I think there

37:49

are people that are pretty morally backwards from

37:51

our standards and also just kind of dumb

37:53

and violent by our standards. Again, on average,

37:55

you can probably find exceptions, but there's

37:58

a reason you're not seeing... a

38:00

bunch of faces and people that

38:02

represent Western values leading the cause

38:04

for Gaza because they mostly don't

38:07

exist or they would be

38:09

there at the faces and leaders. They want

38:11

something that Americans, the vast majority of Americans

38:13

would not want. They're not good guys. That

38:15

doesn't justify what's happening to them necessarily either.

38:17

But the idea that Gaza is full of

38:20

good people, I think, is just not a

38:22

true claim. And I think it says something

38:24

too that the majority of people in the

38:26

United States who overwhelmingly are pro-Palestine, pro-Hamas, let's

38:29

say pro-Hamas specifically, are not particularly smart. And

38:31

then you have... Generally very anti-Western. Absolutely. They

38:34

don't really have a logic to their systems

38:36

or what they understand. Even the

38:38

people on the right who are critical of Israel and

38:40

are smart and knowledgeable about it, it's

38:42

more of a, yeah, fine, whatever, we shouldn't

38:44

be funding them. But the

38:47

pro-Hamas faction are not very

38:49

smart people. Ian, people

38:51

are tweeting... I tweeted about this earlier

38:53

and someone linked the actual article. Later

38:55

on you can go ahead and read it. It's called, Why We Bite You

38:58

and Why You Hate You. It's

39:00

by ISIS. It's someone who's

39:02

tweeting at you. So when you check out your

39:04

Twitter link, you can read the article. And they

39:06

go through exactly all the stuff that you hear

39:09

the conservatives say that a lot of people are

39:11

like, oh, they don't really think that stuff. It's

39:13

all there. We hate you because you don't... You're

39:15

not Islamic. We hate you because you have corrupted.

39:18

Blah, blah, blah. We hate you for this. You

39:20

go through it. I think there's one mention

39:22

of Israel, but the majority of the

39:24

anger is not about Israel. Israel is

39:26

a convenient excuse for a lot of

39:28

people in the Middle East, but it's

39:30

not that Israel is

39:32

actually the driving factor. It's just about

39:34

colonization, imperial colonization. No, no, no, no.

39:37

Colonization is a Western concept, right?

39:39

No. People colonize... No,

39:41

no. The

39:44

idea of colonization. So colonization

39:46

is an actual thing that

39:49

has theory behind it and stuff like that.

39:51

So you'd have to read Franz van and

39:53

wrote a book called The Wretched of the

39:55

Earth, and that is talking about decolonization and

39:58

the things that are required to decolonize. Colonization

40:01

in the Middle East is not thought

40:03

of in the same way that the

40:05

West thinks of colonization. In the Middle

40:08

East, they're extremely used to violence creating

40:10

new countries. That is something that has

40:13

been all of history and the people in the

40:15

Middle East have a significantly longer outlook on history

40:17

than us in the West. So

40:19

the people in the Middle East don't

40:21

think of it like colonization like Western

40:23

colonization. They think of it as we

40:26

are being encroached upon by

40:29

your Western sensibilities.

40:31

So your LGBT

40:33

stuff, your promiscuity, your...

40:36

McDonald's, corporations. No,

40:38

no, not those things. Shockingly.

40:40

No, those things don't matter to them

40:43

because it's just like they're like, oh, we can get

40:45

burgers and stuff. The things that matter to them are

40:48

the things that make their daughters want to rip off

40:50

the hedge job, right? The things that make their daughters

40:52

want to go and be promiscuous

40:54

and dance and blah, blah, blah and make

40:57

you make a TikTok shake in there.

40:59

But those are the things because those

41:01

are what corrupt the actual society

41:04

as opposed to just corporate

41:06

stuff. The ideas that you

41:08

have are extremely Western centric

41:10

and fine. It's not that

41:12

they're invalid, but your perspective

41:15

is purely from the West and it doesn't

41:17

even acknowledge the perspective of the actual people

41:19

in the Middle East. Not

41:21

the power brokers, but the average person in the Middle

41:23

East and what they believe and how their culture forms.

41:26

I had a friend when I was younger who was Arabic.

41:29

His parents were immigrants. I don't remember exactly

41:31

where from, but men weren't allowed in

41:33

his house. Only the head

41:36

of the house, brothers, no stranger men

41:38

were allowed in the house and the women had

41:40

to stay in the house. They were very, very

41:42

conservative. Wow. Muslim. Yup.

41:45

The Ottoman war, hijab and all that

41:47

stuff. Derek Prince, who's the co-founder or

41:50

founder of Blackwater, military mercenary group, he

41:52

recently said that he thinks it's time

41:54

that we start recolonizing. Do

41:56

you guys think that he's far off? He says like some

41:58

of these countries in Africa are... so

42:00

barbaric that they're just governed by just menace

42:03

so that we should take them over militarily

42:05

and reinstitute. Pick up the white man's burden.

42:07

No, no. You, the trade bar, kept laying

42:09

in. And actually, I'm interested in your take

42:11

on this. Would you go ahead and- Israel

42:13

being one of those places. We've certainly not

42:16

proven very good at doing that in the

42:18

places where we've tried recently. And, you

42:20

know, certainly if we tried to do that in Africa

42:22

where we have less history and certainly

42:24

a lot of domestic opposition to do that, I

42:26

don't think it would work very well. But there

42:28

is a degree to which that some of

42:30

this isn't just about the ideas people have

42:33

in their head, but what kind

42:35

of territory that they control. And so

42:37

you might not be able to eliminate

42:39

Hamas-like sentiment,

42:41

and you certainly won't be able

42:43

to eliminate it as long as

42:45

the Israel-Palestinian situation is what it

42:47

is. But you can keep

42:50

Hamas from necessarily governing Gaza. You

42:52

can keep ISIS from having

42:54

parts of Iraq and having parts of

42:56

countries that they actually govern. Those are

42:58

things you can militarily achieve. Changing

43:01

people and changing the way they think

43:03

and they believe, that's a very difficult

43:05

thing to do, certainly not a military

43:07

thing to do. There are two kinds

43:10

of colonization that we should talk about. The first

43:13

is what everyone assumes today, which would be

43:15

militaristic conquest. The U.S. military and a group

43:17

of people go and take control of the

43:19

country and fight off the barbaric hordes that

43:21

are ruling on the land. No.

43:24

The other form of colonization is literally just people move

43:27

places. China is doing that

43:29

right now. China is engaged

43:31

in probably the most expansive colonization effort

43:33

humanity has ever undertaken. And what are

43:35

they doing? Chinese nationals are

43:37

moving to different countries. That's it.

43:40

And eventually they form massive voting blocks,

43:42

massive economic blocks, and this results in

43:44

them taking over. So let's

43:46

go back in time to the pilgrims who landed

43:48

at good old Plymouth Rock. What's the story there?

43:51

Well, the story back then was that they

43:53

were starving and cold and the Native Americans

43:55

came and they gave them turkey and stuffing

43:57

and corn and, you know, popcorn and all

43:59

this stuff. Purple corn and they popped

44:01

it and everybody was happy and lived in harmony

44:03

forever until the pilgrims started breeding Expanding rapidly took

44:05

over more and more space and what happens then

44:08

is the Native Americans are getting

44:10

pushed out because they can't compete technologically and

44:12

culturally and population wise

44:14

Technologically advanced populations that it the intention

44:16

of the colonists wasn't to come here

44:18

and massacre Native Americans What happens

44:20

was they said I'm coming here to find a place

44:23

to live because we're running out of land over there

44:25

and my government's Become oppressive whatever the reason may have

44:27

been there were a variety of reasons they come here

44:29

They're in a barren area and initially very cooperative

44:32

with many of the Native Americans not in the

44:34

Caribbean different story different colonizers Different form of colonization

44:36

you had a lot of this the conquistadors are

44:38

looking for treasures and bounty to bring back to

44:41

their to their To the crown and things

44:43

like this But you had settlers who came and it was like

44:45

we're gonna build houses and live here Once

44:47

it started expanding rapidly then it's hey you I need

44:49

that land I got kids and then they're like, but

44:52

this art doesn't matter now we fight and

44:54

then this becomes war and conquest What

44:56

we're likely going to see with China's expansion

44:59

and colonization is and they're already doing this

45:01

everywhere is In the

45:03

future you will see various governments completely

45:05

overtaken by Chinese influence simply because Chinese

45:08

people have moved there and have that influence Maybe

45:10

in 300 years you have

45:12

like in Africa a country that is 73%

45:14

ethnic You know

45:16

Chinese or whatever and they declare independence

45:19

or something and they're they're isolated from the

45:21

Chinese Communist Party Yeah, cuz they could come

45:23

to the US and then just become co-opted

45:25

by US culture if our culture is strong

45:27

enough That's like the culture war. That's like

45:30

Civilization. Yeah, that's right. It doesn't happen It

45:32

doesn't happen Well, like people get swayed in

45:34

one direction another every day of their lives

45:36

and you can become more into to a

45:38

gun rights freedom of speech or you can

45:40

become more into like oligarchic ownership of Humans

45:42

as cattle like it could be one or

45:44

the other depends on who you're surrounded by

45:47

What the media is telling you when you turn on

45:49

the TV what the music says? Let's let's just let's

45:51

we'll jump back to the various new subjects instead of

45:53

you know going off in the wide Foreign

45:56

policy stuff because we do have some stories. I want to talk about this

45:58

is from tenant media Nick Fuentes

46:00

and Jake Shields walk into Turning

46:02

Point's People's Convention and

46:04

are almost immediately

46:07

removed by security. So

46:09

I don't know the reason. I don't

46:11

think they know the reason. The guy

46:13

who walks up to Fuentes and Shields says he

46:16

knows why he's banned from here and Nick

46:18

then responds because of Israel. And

46:21

I think this is a big

46:23

problem for Turning Point in

46:26

not... I don't know if

46:28

they've issued a formal statement or what, but

46:30

I do think there should be a reason

46:32

why Nick Fuentes and Jake Shields, I believe

46:34

primarily Nick Fuentes, was removed from their conference.

46:36

This video, it's just from today, earlier at

46:38

the Turning Point, I think it was in

46:40

Detroit. They're doing a great event. Happy to see

46:42

it. But for what reason

46:45

was Nick turned away? Isn't he like a

46:47

leftist socialist kind of guy? Fuentes? Yeah.

46:50

National socialist. Yeah, he's like a socialist, isn't he? He's a

46:52

national socialist. I don't think he's a socialist. I don't think

46:54

he's a... I don't think he's a... If

46:57

you listen to... They have leftist journalists that

46:59

are allowed in there. And if

47:01

they don't want Nick there, that's absolutely fine. But

47:03

if they don't give a reason, then Nick decides

47:05

what the reason is. And Nick's decided the reason

47:07

was his criticism of Israel. Well, that's Nick's reason

47:09

for everything. He stuffs his toes like Israel does.

47:12

And great. And maybe that's true. Maybe it's

47:14

not. But Turning Point should say, here's the reason why

47:16

we don't allow Nick Fuentes. And maybe they did. I don't know.

47:19

I just didn't see it. I don't know. But I

47:21

mean, I'm pretty sure that he does believe in like

47:23

a big, strong central government. So he may be conservative,

47:26

but it's a conservative government with big, strong... So it's

47:28

not like... If his people wanted to win, he would

47:30

do it. Tim said, you do type two colonization. You

47:32

go, you take your people, you take over a place.

47:35

That's what free state is doing in New Hampshire. We've

47:37

moved in with... You take over. You

47:39

colonize it. If Christians want a nation, they should take

47:41

over their best state. They should target it. They should

47:43

all move there and they should enact their government. Well,

47:45

a lot of people have pointed out Iceland is

47:48

an overwhelmingly white country with eugenics

47:50

policy. And so... And

47:52

rare earth minerals, I think. Yeah. And

47:55

the geothermal is actually increased our standard

47:57

of living dramatically. And so there

47:59

have been white... nationalists who have proposed, people

48:02

need to, their proposal is

48:04

that if you're a white nationalist, keep it

48:06

to yourself, emigrate to Iceland

48:08

however you can, bring as many

48:11

people as you can, and take over the small

48:13

nation. And here's the reality, they don't want

48:15

to do that. Just like socialists, they're

48:17

like, nah, I want your stuff. Exactly. I

48:20

don't want to have to go and make my own thing, I want your

48:22

thing. Okay, well dude. And

48:24

I think that's a big problem with all this stuff is it's very

48:27

difficult to have a Fuentes narrative

48:29

that doesn't also involve everyone on your side

48:31

being a retard. Like you have

48:33

your conspiracy theory is that everyone on my side

48:35

is constantly tricked and it's not possible for them

48:37

to not get tricked. I

48:40

just don't get it. You know, like I'm very

48:42

mad that I can't do math, you know, like

48:44

if their complaints are just all involve them being

48:46

dumb. So it's like you want to build a

48:49

society where it's only for dumb people. But like

48:52

you're saying the argument that they're having is that Israel has

48:54

outsmarted them at every step of the way. Jews

48:56

are so smart that I can't even convince

48:58

my fellow white Christians who still make up

49:01

the predominant portion of America to just not

49:03

get tricked by Jews. Christians are too his

49:05

implicit and his theories is that Christians are

49:07

too dumb to not get tricked by Jews.

49:09

Therefore, Jews can't be near Christian. Literally.

49:13

Yeah, you're like, if you that is

49:15

what he believes. Because it starts as

49:18

a cheat code because, you know, they

49:20

believe that white people are a whole

49:22

lot smarter than non-white people. That's what

49:24

they believe ideologically. Well, not necessarily. They

49:28

actually just believe in racial racial

49:31

like a heavy correlation between race and

49:33

IQ. And they do believe

49:35

that there are some non-whites that are smarter

49:37

than. Yes. On an individual basis, but not

49:39

on a group basis. Oh, no, they actually

49:41

will outright say Asians are smarter than them.

49:43

Fair. Yeah, fair. But they won't say that

49:45

about blacks or they won't say about Hispanics.

49:47

OK, so the reason. So

49:50

how do you then explain why

49:52

you are politically losing to people

49:54

who you regard as inferior? Jews

49:57

are who you then bring in as

49:59

the explanation. real quick, this is why

50:01

I refer to Fuentes and them as it's

50:03

a form of wokeness that they're concerned about

50:05

Jewish privilege. The arguments that

50:07

they make about Israel, you can

50:10

take all of the arguments they make about

50:12

Jews and replace the word Jew with white

50:14

person and you get the woke ideology. He

50:17

sounds like Malma talking about the

50:19

boar in South Africa. Seriously,

50:22

if you listen to some of those South African

50:24

people talking about why are the boars so good

50:26

at running the power plants, they sound

50:28

exactly like Nick Fuentes complaining about journalists.

50:30

The joke I used to make is

50:34

take any one of these arguments and replace ... You

50:36

have Jews, you

50:38

have white people, you have the 1%, you have the bankers. You

50:45

can figure out which faction you belong to

50:47

by ascribing all of the conspiracy theories to

50:49

a select group of people because that's what

50:51

everybody does. You had during Occupy Wall

50:53

Street, the 1%. It's

50:56

the rich people that start all the wars, it's the

50:58

rich people that are stealing our wealth, the rich people,

51:00

a very generic vague thing to say. Then you get

51:02

the anti-Semitic groups that are saying like, it's the

51:04

Jews that run all the banks, it's the Jews that start all the

51:06

wars. Then you can take that,

51:09

then it's the white people. Now all of

51:11

a sudden, then it's the cis-heteronormative white males.

51:13

Whatever group you hate, you assign to

51:16

whatever bad thing is happening and there's

51:18

your conspiracy theory. An appealing

51:20

political narrative is one that justifies me hurting other people

51:22

and taking their stuff. Every

51:25

political narrative is selling some justification that we

51:27

need to help these people, hurt these other

51:29

people. Who helps and who

51:31

gets hurt? This is an

51:34

appealing political narrative to

51:36

go and take stuff from wealthy people or people

51:38

who have ... It's so appealing. We

51:40

want these theories to be true. Of course

51:42

it's appealing that billionaires are all evil. The

51:45

idea that billionaires are better than the average

51:47

person and mostly earn it through merit, that's

51:50

not a comfortable fact. I want to believe that they

51:52

cheated me somehow. I want to believe that they got

51:54

one over on me and therefore I need ... can go

51:56

and take their things. It's much more appealing. All

51:58

of my psychology is prime to one. to believe that.

52:01

And you know, we're, this is the

52:03

narrative of so many revolutions, so

52:05

much, so many genocides,

52:09

blaming a group for all of your problems. Which

52:11

is why as a libertarian, I believe that the government is

52:13

the fault of all their problems and we need to take

52:15

the government stuff. So I want to be clear, this is

52:17

a good strategy, it works, and I am using it. Government

52:20

stuff is your stuff. Well, right, I mean, think about it,

52:22

if the government owns an incredible amount of land, we should

52:24

take it and distribute it to the people, right? The government

52:26

is taking an incredible amount of money, we got to take

52:28

the control of the land, we're going to take it back.

52:30

I got an idea. Take it from that.

52:33

Let me, I want to ask what you think. How

52:35

about all of the land that is controlled

52:37

by the federal government on the west coast and the Rockies, like

52:39

you know how they have control over all of it? What

52:42

if we divide up 40 acres each and

52:44

a mule and pay the reparations to

52:46

the descendants of slaves through seizing federally

52:48

held lands and distributing it to private

52:50

individuals? Sure, we all, you know, what

52:54

you expect would happen, you know, would happen, you

52:56

know, win lottery winners, win million dollars, where are

52:58

they ten years later? Well, that's changed actually. So people

53:00

who don't have anything generally don't have anything as a

53:02

result of their choices. If you give them a bunch

53:05

of things, they'll just end up without anything. Yes,

53:07

yes, yes, but I don't know if I care

53:09

because I'm like, we've had this

53:11

argument about that. Oh yeah, let it, shut

53:13

them up. Sure, yeah, if they, but they wouldn't shut up, they just

53:15

ask for more. I don't care if they ask for more. We're taking

53:17

the land from the government and stripping the power from the land they've

53:20

seized. So, you know, we've had a

53:22

lot of arguments about reparations, it's a bad idea. I

53:24

certainly think the general idea that they proposed, like

53:26

how about scholarships, how about community centers, how about

53:28

tax? And I'm like, dude, growing

53:31

up in racially segregated areas, I

53:33

tell you how bad it will be. It

53:36

will be nightmarish if you implement direct

53:38

reparations policy that either is cash, cash

53:40

able mental, or community specific

53:42

in cities. That being said, if

53:45

the reparations plan was we're going to

53:47

seize all of the Bureau of Land

53:49

Management's land and then distribute it among

53:52

private citizens who are descendants of slaves,

53:54

that's just taking away from the government and I don't care

53:57

what happens after the fact. Do they get the

53:59

land or do they get the value? of the land. The

54:01

land is the federal government has seized effectively

54:03

a bunch of land in the United States.

54:06

They just declared ownership under the Bureau of Land Management. And

54:08

I'm like, no, how about this? And

54:11

you know, we had one guy on the culture war who

54:13

was like a woke lefty guy. And I

54:15

was like, perhaps here's the agreement, the compromise. The

54:18

government has basically seized this land from the people.

54:20

We don't really have an effective means of

54:23

just restoring that to private ownership. But

54:26

if we play the reparations angle, we get a 50-50. It

54:29

does kind of suck that we have this race-based

54:31

payout system. But it is

54:33

just seizing the land back from the federal government into

54:35

the hands of private citizens, which in the end can

54:38

find its way into the market and then find its

54:40

value. I'm kind of

54:42

okay with that. Yeah, but this idea that if you just

54:46

give people assets that they won't be poor guys. I'm

54:48

not saying that. I literally don't. They can go live

54:50

in the mountain with the mule and then run out

54:52

of food and go back to the city for all

54:54

I care. But the government has lost control of the

54:56

land they seized. So it's like

54:58

whatever. Sure. Yeah. No,

55:01

I get it. I'm with you now. And what will

55:03

happen? Yeah. But you know what will

55:05

happen? We told

55:07

you all, 200 individuals, we told your ancestors that

55:09

there would be 40 acres and a mule. You

55:12

are getting it. And then what will they do? They'll sell

55:15

it. So all that would really happen is land

55:17

would open up for sale at a competitive market

55:19

rate because there would be so much of it.

55:22

It actually wouldn't be too expensive. And

55:24

then you'd see the private market come in and say, we will

55:26

now buy this from all of you. I'm

55:28

not saying that it'll be good in terms of what happens

55:30

to the people who sell the land after the fact.

55:33

It just strips the asset away from the federal government

55:35

and puts it in the private market. And probably would

55:37

help someone. It may not help the actual initial beneficiaries,

55:40

the initial recipients. The

55:42

process of selling all that land might actually help someone. It'll

55:44

help BlackRock. You could just sell the land directly though and

55:47

like use that to pay down the debt or use it

55:49

to pay down the debt. That would be nice to pay

55:51

down the debt. Well, that's crazy. Geez. I'm

55:53

sorry. I didn't mean to bring prudence. I'm

55:55

sorry. There's no place for prudence in America. It's

56:00

the absolute solution. I'm just like, as an

56:02

idea that was presented, it's like,

56:04

would you weigh the wokeness of the race-based

56:06

policy versus the stripping the government of resources?

56:08

It's like, libertarians are the most depressed class

56:10

in America is something I say a lot,

56:12

because we're the ones who actually view the

56:15

government as illegitimate. You guys view it as

56:17

legitimate, so you deserve it. We don't deserve

56:19

it. We I

56:21

think are the ones who really deserve the reparations. I

56:23

think if we can get lumped in with the blacks,

56:25

I'm in. And

56:27

blacks get reparations, and then this is

56:30

the deal. I've got to deal with it

56:32

right now. My attitude is just like, if you strip $200, $400

56:35

billion from the federal government in their

56:38

land holdings and deliver it to the private market

56:40

to be utilized in some way, I'm

56:43

kind of like, I've got a high threshold for what

56:45

I would be willing to accept in that. I

56:47

don't see a detriment to myself, where I

56:49

am, the work I'm doing, or anybody else,

56:51

by giving mostly barren, rocky mountain territories to

56:53

various people to figure out what they want

56:56

to do with. Oh, we combine

56:58

this with the Vakes plan for firing administrators.

57:00

So all the administrators, the two thirds that

57:02

get fired, they get the federal land as

57:04

like their severance package. Well

57:06

actually, okay. My

57:08

idea was, instead of firing everybody,

57:10

you just relocate the entirety of the

57:13

FBI to like the Rockies, just in

57:15

the mountains somewhere and just we'll

57:17

invest in building a mountainside

57:21

hovel. And that's where you work from now

57:23

on. And they're going to be like, we quit. They're office

57:25

is the cave. That's right. Bottom of

57:27

some mountains. We're quitting. We don't want to work here

57:30

anymore. Oh no, don't quit. Oh, I guess they're gone.

57:32

There you go. That's how you do it. Because

57:34

the argument was it's really difficult to

57:37

fire federal bureaucrats and employees. And

57:39

it's like, well come on, anybody who knows anything about running a company, you

57:42

don't just fire them, you just make

57:45

a job that nobody wants to work. They'll quietly

57:47

quit. Yeah, there you go. I first said put

57:49

them in Alaska. Because then what

57:51

we have is federal investment into building a city in the

57:53

middle of Alaska. But then the Alaskans got

57:56

mad and they were like, we're going to ruin our state. And I'm

57:58

like, oh, well that's true. I got a question. a

58:00

wider question based on what we're talking about

58:02

Nick Fuentes earlier like do you guys think

58:04

that there's ever a situation where you can

58:06

blame a group of people and they really

58:08

are that group of people

58:10

whether it's a class of people I

58:13

don't know how you would group these people

58:15

together a race of people well language speaking

58:17

no that's our answer is family a government

58:19

yes the answer is yes but it's small-scale

58:22

not large-scale like I don't think it's

58:24

fair to blame America for

58:26

what our oligarchic military industrial complex

58:28

machine is doing against our wishes

58:31

that we desperately fight every day

58:33

you can you

58:35

can pass some of the blame to some of

58:37

these people who are passively voting

58:39

and supporting you know corruption but the I

58:41

would say the active political class in the

58:43

United States left or right are very much

58:45

opposed to all of this war and conquest

58:47

and then they say America's doing this America's

58:49

doing that it's like hey guys the people

58:51

follow politics back home in the United States

58:53

are opposed to all of that we don't

58:55

want it and then there's a warm hunger

58:57

class that just operates

58:59

off of special interest that being said

59:02

if there was a group of six

59:04

people that called themselves the cabal and they

59:06

were ultra wealthy and they were enacting a

59:08

plan to like rob a bank you can

59:10

blame the group for the robbing of that

59:12

bank yeah

59:15

it must be historically that that is the

59:17

case that it has happened we're like that

59:19

family is the root of all of our

59:21

problems collectively let's go take out that family

59:23

and then they did and the

59:26

solution was oriented and then

59:29

after the removal of

59:31

the threat whether it was an external

59:33

governance a family a religious sect

59:36

a cultural sect I mean it's sad and terrifying

59:38

to think that ever that you would target a

59:40

race of people and that would be the end

59:42

of your problem a race doesn't make sense ethnic

59:45

groups don't matter Ted it doesn't make sense but when we

59:47

say groups we don't mean a group of six people right

59:50

but that's why I'm getting into semantics of it

59:52

like the argument of a generic group only up

59:55

you could only blame a group when you're talking

59:57

about like an ideological faction so

59:59

dance but dance The answer is yes. If

1:00:01

there's a group of 100 people that have formed a

1:00:03

faction called like Antifa, yes,

1:00:06

you can blame Antifa. They operate themselves to support each

1:00:08

other. There's not that many of them. There's several thousand.

1:00:11

They share an ideology. They share tactics. They communicate with

1:00:13

each other. They fund each other and they engage in

1:00:15

violence. So if a group

1:00:17

of people in Black Bloc show up

1:00:19

and start smashing things, I say it's

1:00:21

fair to blame Antifa, but that's an

1:00:23

ideological faction. I'll take individual people. It's

1:00:25

not like you're blaming the grandchildren of

1:00:28

Antifa lovers or the great grandchildren of

1:00:30

them for the windows that were smashed

1:00:32

before they were even born. So that's

1:00:34

what happens with a lot of

1:00:36

what you do it over, religion,

1:00:39

race, ethnicity. You're often blaming people

1:00:41

who weren't even alive whenever the

1:00:43

original sin was committed. I

1:00:46

think as someone who talks

1:00:48

about groups sometimes, I think the question is how

1:00:50

you're doing it and what

1:00:52

you mean by it. There

1:00:54

are eight billion people in the world. You're going to have to be able

1:00:56

to categorize them in some way. Even

1:00:58

statements like men are stronger than

1:01:00

women is obviously a group-based statement.

1:01:03

That statement is generally not heard

1:01:05

as all men are stronger than

1:01:07

all women. It's a statement about

1:01:10

a general statistical truth. When

1:01:13

do you want to cut off the ability to

1:01:15

make claims like that? To

1:01:17

me, I think it is okay to make group-based statements that

1:01:19

are true the vast majority of time are

1:01:21

true in general, to be able to talk

1:01:24

about averages. If you're reading these group-based statements

1:01:26

as on average rather than all, when

1:01:28

we talk about groups, do you mean on average

1:01:30

or all? This is unclear when we talk about

1:01:32

groups. If you're going to talk about

1:01:34

groups, you need to make sure that you're saying, I'm saying

1:01:37

this as an average thing, as something

1:01:39

that's true in general, not something that's

1:01:42

always true. That's where group-based thinking gets

1:01:44

dangerous. I'm Jewish. There's

1:01:47

a lot of talk about, I'm half Jewish anyway, there's a

1:01:49

lot of talk about Jewish responsibility

1:01:51

for various things. I have no

1:01:54

problem acknowledging that Jews are more

1:01:56

progressive on average than

1:01:58

other groups of people. And so therefore, if

1:02:00

an area is

1:02:02

more disproportionately Jewish, on average,

1:02:04

it's likely to be more

1:02:06

progressive. If you're going to say, well,

1:02:08

therefore, just because Jews are more progressive on

1:02:10

average, no Jews can be in my conservative

1:02:12

coalition or no Jews can be in my

1:02:14

conservative coalition. And so it's fine to make

1:02:17

the statement, Jews are more progressive, saying

1:02:19

on average. If you're using that to say, and therefore

1:02:21

I can't work with Jews, that's the problem. And so

1:02:23

how do you mean your group statements is very important.

1:02:26

And there's the what are you going to do about

1:02:28

it question. So if you're just

1:02:30

making a factual observation about something that might

1:02:32

be true on average, men

1:02:35

are stronger than women, for example. Okay,

1:02:38

men are stronger than women, therefore, to make

1:02:40

women safe, we need to lock all men

1:02:42

in cages. Well, that's kind of a problem,

1:02:44

right? So what you're going to do

1:02:46

about it matters a lot too. It's

1:02:48

important when you make claims about

1:02:50

groups that people know you're talking

1:02:52

about averages. It's like an annoying thing

1:02:54

to have to add on to it on average,

1:02:57

when I say that they're taller than the other

1:02:59

group on average, but like, because

1:03:01

it's just to say they are taller than

1:03:03

them, you're assuming it assumes all. It's an

1:03:05

IQ test. And I can't remember

1:03:07

who brought this up. It might have been Michael Malice or

1:03:09

whatever. Fortune test. If I have to, if

1:03:11

you respond to my statement, I say men are stronger

1:03:14

than women. If you respond with not all, I immediately

1:03:16

know I'm talking to Warren. There's

1:03:19

actually a really funny bell curve meme. You know the bell curve

1:03:21

meme where like there's a really dumb guy, the average guy and

1:03:23

then the smart guy. The

1:03:26

meme was something like the dumb guy

1:03:28

and the smart guy both talk in as

1:03:30

simple terms as possible and

1:03:32

the midwit and the average guy try to

1:03:34

sound as intelligent as possible. So

1:03:37

like the midwits like, well, not all you mean on average

1:03:39

is the midwit, but like the dumb guys like, yeah, they

1:03:41

are all taller, stronger than the other. Not all, but yeah,

1:03:43

they are stronger than the other. The dumb guy goes, but

1:03:46

are stronger than women. And the smart guy goes, this is

1:03:48

correct. The smart guy's picturing. And the midwit goes, actually on

1:03:50

average is around a 20% increase. It's

1:03:52

like nobody needs that context. The

1:03:55

idiots need it. No, they don't. They think

1:03:57

when they hear men are stronger than women, they think all men are stronger You

1:04:00

see you're pulling the midwood on me. No, that's what the

1:04:02

idiot thinks That's why the midwit says it is so just

1:04:04

for the idiots. No. Yeah, you're trying to try the point

1:04:06

I'm making I think it is no

1:04:09

Point is let me tell you what you're

1:04:11

thinking No, we're IQ people can can

1:04:14

speak in simple terms to get the gist of

1:04:16

it It's communicating through memes the smart people know

1:04:18

you don't need to elaborate what is common sense

1:04:21

The midwits try to over explain because they think

1:04:23

they're smarter than everybody Well, I think they think

1:04:25

they're smarter than the idiots and maybe they think

1:04:27

they're smarter than the smart people Like

1:04:29

if Jeremy says men are stronger than women and

1:04:32

then some idiot low IQ is like yeah

1:04:34

and pictures all men now stronger than all

1:04:36

Women then the midwit comes in

1:04:38

and is like well, actually he's not being

1:04:40

very specific. It's on average The

1:04:43

smart guy already knew what he was saying the dumb

1:04:45

guy is proving my point the dumb guy misinterpreted what

1:04:47

the smart guy was Saying I'd be

1:04:49

in I bet you literally just proved my point. So I

1:04:51

think it's actually kind of a well Not all Midwest.

1:04:54

I just want to point out that not all Okay

1:04:58

Hashtag not all midwits I

1:05:02

would rather go towards the trend that groups like

1:05:04

when we talk about groups that on average is

1:05:06

the default Context I think it's I

1:05:08

think it's easier because otherwise it's

1:05:10

really hard to use group-based labels And so

1:05:12

I actually think we've gotten too defensive. We've

1:05:14

gotten so concerned about Racism

1:05:16

we've gotten so concerned about bigotry

1:05:19

that we're now afraid to

1:05:21

make statements that are True

1:05:24

because we're so worried about these claims

1:05:26

being meant as all

1:05:28

and going in these places that are we do

1:05:30

have dark aspects of Human history, so I'm not

1:05:32

saying there's not no reason to be concerned But

1:05:35

if we've stopping our ability to talk about truths

1:05:37

if we can't talk about group differences and then

1:05:39

we go Well, gosh, you know, there sure does

1:05:41

seem to be some racism in them in help

1:05:43

in police violence So there sure does seem to

1:05:45

be some racism and who's getting certain jobs. There

1:05:48

should be sexism and who becomes a Fortune

1:05:51

500 CEO and we can't

1:05:53

explain why because we've tabooed

1:05:55

all discussion of group differences

1:05:58

Like this is a real problem So there have

1:06:00

been negative outcomes with good

1:06:02

intentions. We've maybe to do some group based

1:06:05

discussion, but it's had some really negative outcomes

1:06:07

is you can't explain important truths about the

1:06:09

world. Yeah, I think what they call race

1:06:12

realism. I love the idea that

1:06:14

you would just be genetically accurate. All you're

1:06:16

doing is taking someone talking about their genetics

1:06:18

and then making accurate claims about that. It's

1:06:20

not about grouping them in with other people

1:06:22

with similar genetic numbers. What do you mean?

1:06:24

Like some genetics lead to certain height differentials

1:06:26

perhaps and that derives from your ancestry which

1:06:28

maybe came from one area of the world

1:06:30

where they needed to be taller to get

1:06:32

along. Stuff like

1:06:35

that. And just to so you could

1:06:37

say like that person's bone structure has

1:06:39

this quality or the tends to have.

1:06:42

I'm a phrenology. That might be

1:06:44

part of it. There's a

1:06:46

meme where it shows two skeletons and an

1:06:48

x-ray kissing and then some leftists

1:06:50

captioned like this is so beautiful because right now you

1:06:53

can't tell if it's a man or a woman or

1:06:55

a black person or a white person and then someone

1:06:57

respond with actually we can based on the mandibular blah

1:06:59

blah blah and the forehead pronunciation. This appears to be

1:07:01

a person from this region in this region and it's

1:07:04

a male and a female and I think the conclusion

1:07:06

was based off the skull alone they could tell it

1:07:08

was a white man and an Asian woman. So

1:07:10

like in video games if you have like a one

1:07:13

race is like a big rock man and he can

1:07:15

live in fire. You put him in the fire room

1:07:17

because he can survive in that environment. So in reality

1:07:19

if you've got a white dude and a black dude

1:07:21

and an Asian dude what environments do they thrive in

1:07:23

on average. I know them who live in a fire

1:07:25

room. None of them live in a fire room. There's

1:07:27

no big rock man in this reality but like that

1:07:30

conversation is okay to have without a racist

1:07:32

bone in your body like just a genetic

1:07:34

observation like how are we different. Let's talk

1:07:36

about it. You understand that most of the

1:07:38

time accusations of

1:07:41

racism are less about what you're saying and

1:07:43

more about a vector of

1:07:45

attack right nowadays most of

1:07:47

the time when people say accused

1:07:49

someone of racism or whatever it's

1:07:51

not they have a problem with talking

1:07:54

about racial differences or whatever

1:07:56

because you can see it when they if it's

1:07:58

a person that's a progressive you can see that

1:08:00

progressive. are completely comfortable with racism because they're racist

1:08:02

against white people, right? So it's not that the

1:08:05

problem is racism, it's that calling

1:08:07

someone racist is a vector of

1:08:10

attack. There are always going

1:08:12

to be people that are going to

1:08:14

be racist and have racist ideas or

1:08:16

racially biased ideas and you can have

1:08:18

those without having mouths towards the groups

1:08:20

you're talking about. But when people are

1:08:22

going to accuse

1:08:25

you of racism because you're saying things, it's not that

1:08:27

they have a problem with what you say so much

1:08:29

as they want to use that as a vector of

1:08:31

attack to shut you down. That

1:08:35

anecdotally functions with one of my

1:08:37

experiences, yeah. I think the issue

1:08:39

with race realists

1:08:41

is that they take it too

1:08:44

far. They make assumptions

1:08:46

about individuals based on... Not

1:08:49

necessarily that. Biological essentialism.

1:08:51

They believe that race is the

1:08:53

most pressing factor in an individual's

1:08:56

development and I think

1:08:58

genetics certainly plays a role in development but

1:09:01

nature and nurture probably have some kind of

1:09:03

back and forth depending on the individual. So

1:09:06

I remember in Berkeley arguing with race realists and

1:09:08

their argument was the

1:09:11

race of the person is indicative of their

1:09:14

genetics and their genetics determine everything. And I'm

1:09:16

like, yeah, that's not true. If you take

1:09:19

a South Korean child, on average South

1:09:21

Koreans have higher IQs, and you leave

1:09:23

him in the woods and only occasionally

1:09:25

drop off just raw food

1:09:27

for him to eat. No education, no

1:09:29

access to math. By the age of

1:09:31

15, he will be completely incapable of

1:09:33

learning language. We've seen this already. It

1:09:36

doesn't matter your race, it doesn't matter your genetics.

1:09:38

With a lack of neural development, muscular development, this

1:09:40

person as an adult will not be able to

1:09:43

develop those things later on. So

1:09:45

when these people argue about

1:09:47

the race and the IQ, I'm like, environmental

1:09:50

factors can override almost all of that. And

1:09:52

that's the issue with making presumptions about race

1:09:54

and genetics. Negatively but not positively. It's

1:09:58

easy to come up with negative interventions. as

1:10:00

you say, and race

1:10:02

is clearly not deterministic, but if

1:10:04

there were positive interventions that could

1:10:06

equate, could cause racial outcomes in

1:10:09

the United States to be equivalent

1:10:11

to your, this is a billion dollar industry that

1:10:13

people have been looking for for 50 years or

1:10:15

80 years or 100 years. Well, elaborate, example. Well,

1:10:17

I mean, we know that the, whatever

1:10:20

you wanna estimate the mean IQ difference

1:10:22

between your various races or ethnicities to

1:10:24

be, it's clearly there, it's in the

1:10:26

SAT data, it's in the GRE data,

1:10:28

it's in every standardized test data, it's

1:10:31

in every IQ test data, it replicates itself

1:10:33

in every country, it's like one of the

1:10:35

most well replicated facts in the world. So

1:10:37

the problem from there is, they then say

1:10:39

Harvard, for instance, we're going to now do

1:10:41

admittance based on race. And the

1:10:45

reason why that's so extremely racist is

1:10:47

that you'll end up with an

1:10:49

Asian kid from, I don't know, from

1:10:51

the Bronx or something, low income family,

1:10:54

and they're gonna say, you look too much like those

1:10:56

people so you can't go to Harvard now. A

1:10:59

chance for someone who is poor, of

1:11:01

an individual circumstance, to move

1:11:03

up in their life, I'm not saying you should go to Harvard to

1:11:05

be honest, but the general idea is there, based

1:11:07

on group race policies. This

1:11:10

is what happens. The left looks at the

1:11:12

schools and says, there's too many Asians, too

1:11:14

many whites, not enough blacks, not enough Latinos,

1:11:16

start kicking Asian people out. And I'm like,

1:11:18

why is, you know, little

1:11:21

Jimmy from the Bronx being denied access to higher

1:11:23

education based on his race? It

1:11:25

doesn't solve the problem of racism, it

1:11:28

is literally them exacerbating racism. Because their

1:11:31

argument is they don't like the fact

1:11:33

that too many Asians score well on

1:11:35

tests and get into these schools. I don't

1:11:37

care who gets into schools, take the test, get into the school, do

1:11:39

whatever you want. I don't think it's racist to have an outcome where

1:11:41

you have predominantly Asian and white people. And it

1:11:44

creates more racism. You guys have been

1:11:46

covering this story out of UCLA with

1:11:48

all this malpractice around how people

1:11:50

have been admitted. You're gonna have outcomes, you're

1:11:52

not gonna have situations where people have been

1:11:54

gaming things to let people

1:11:57

that are under qualified and not as able

1:11:59

in on the... basis of their race. And

1:12:01

what are you supposed to do on the

1:12:03

other side of that? How do those people

1:12:05

end up getting – if you don't want

1:12:07

racism, you need strict meritocratic tests. If you're

1:12:09

creating different standards for different races, then the

1:12:11

rational thing for people on the other side

1:12:13

of that is to say, oh,

1:12:16

you're a race that got preferential bonuses to

1:12:18

get into college, well, then I can't judge

1:12:20

your college degree as an employer as equally

1:12:22

worthy. I have to – I mean, now

1:12:24

you can – of course, I'm not saying

1:12:26

you just credit them, go deeper, assess

1:12:29

them more seriously, but if a college

1:12:31

is clearly lowering its

1:12:33

standards on the basis of race, then the

1:12:35

degree can't be worth

1:12:37

the sit. It does that, and it

1:12:39

also creates resentment among the people who don't

1:12:41

get in because they're held to a different

1:12:44

standard. And it creates –

1:12:46

actually, because I saw it some in my school

1:12:48

– you also have people who are struggling, and

1:12:50

it also can create racial resentment on that axis.

1:12:52

So you have – if it ends up being

1:12:55

that you are boosting races to get into a

1:12:57

college, and then they get into the college, and

1:12:59

they're in the bottom 20 percent, whereas they could

1:13:01

have been in the middle at the top somewhere

1:13:03

else. At a different college. Yeah. And that this

1:13:06

also – so it's like – Setting

1:13:08

them up for academic failure. Yeah. The idea

1:13:10

that people that – getting

1:13:12

into the wrong school makes

1:13:15

it more likely that they're going to

1:13:17

fail is obviously not a positive for

1:13:20

the people that are actually getting it. Well, and

1:13:22

then they see that they fail, and they're like,

1:13:24

well, we better get rid of the grades. Are

1:13:26

we better – what they were doing in UCLA,

1:13:28

like letting people just through like medical

1:13:30

school that couldn't pass tests, and

1:13:33

they're giving them degrees. It's the

1:13:35

first I heard. What's the U.S.

1:13:37

story? There's a big scandal. There's

1:13:39

a guy on Twitter covering it

1:13:41

like Aaron Silverbaut. He broke

1:13:43

the story. All these

1:13:45

professors leaked all this internal data

1:13:47

about the racial admission standards and

1:13:49

the outcomes of the students, and

1:13:52

the professors had tried – they tried to have

1:13:54

an internal investigation, and they could not get a

1:13:56

promise from the school that there would not be

1:13:58

a retaliation against – any individuals who

1:14:01

acted. So this whistleblower went to a

1:14:03

journalist with all of the data and

1:14:05

it's pretty damning what

1:14:07

UCLA has been doing. Letting

1:14:10

basically unqualified people into the school in the first

1:14:12

place and then gaming the system to basically

1:14:14

be either giving them degrees or letting them through,

1:14:16

just completely unqualified just so that they could have

1:14:19

racial equality in students.

1:14:21

It's crazy. You don't do it with athletes

1:14:23

either. It was kind of just accepted they

1:14:26

would push athletes through the curriculum just because

1:14:28

they needed a powerhouse front linemen,

1:14:30

offensive linemen. They're going

1:14:32

to play ball. They're not going to be

1:14:34

a medical student. I want to shift to

1:14:37

this story, which is only tangentially related. The

1:14:39

Post-Millennial FAA investigates counterfeit titanium

1:14:42

used in Boeing Airbus jets

1:14:44

report. So we had all these problems

1:14:46

with Boeing, but now it's Boeing and

1:14:48

Airbus and I don't know how

1:14:50

serious this is, but they say the FAA is investigating

1:14:52

how counterfeit titanium has been used in some components on

1:14:54

Boeing and Airbus jets. Weapons have been

1:14:56

raised at the structural integrity of some of the aircraft. As

1:14:58

a result, this comes as whistle

1:15:00

blowers have been sounding the alarm on faulty

1:15:03

safety practices in Boeing manufacturing facilities and practices.

1:15:06

The reason why I want to jump in this is because we're

1:15:08

kind of talking about DEI and race stuff. This

1:15:11

is a component. What's happening in

1:15:14

airlines with diversity high, what's happening

1:15:16

in medical field. Last

1:15:18

week when I was over at

1:15:20

the poker tables, as you know I always am, there

1:15:23

was an older guy who was like a retired airline

1:15:25

worker who was complaining to

1:15:27

some of the people at the table about how he's glad

1:15:29

he's out of the industry because they've completely

1:15:32

stopped the safety test. He was

1:15:34

basically saying the barriers that

1:15:36

were put in place to make sure these

1:15:38

things are working have been slowly stripped away

1:15:41

and people who are not qualified are now in these

1:15:43

positions. This is how you end

1:15:45

up with fake titanium in jets, which may

1:15:47

be not so structurally sound. The

1:15:50

fascinating thing is we know the diversity

1:15:52

hiring where the goal is to

1:15:54

get a person based on race instead of merit.

1:15:57

We know it's been happening and it will result

1:15:59

in problems. problems and these problems keep popping up.

1:16:02

This apparently, and I didn't read this

1:16:04

from the post-millennial, I'm reading it from

1:16:06

the artificial intelligence that answered my search

1:16:08

query, says that the titanium, counterfeit titanium

1:16:10

is purchased from a little-known Chinese company

1:16:12

and was sold with falsified documents then

1:16:16

used in parts and went into jets from

1:16:18

both Boeing and Airbus including landing gears, blades,

1:16:20

and turbine discs. This is actually, if I

1:16:22

understand correctly, this is typical of China, right?

1:16:24

Like they have, I mean obviously they'll go

1:16:26

ahead and spoof or make their own versions

1:16:29

of Apple products and they sell them all

1:16:31

over China and stuff like that. So the

1:16:33

idea that they counterfeit things, I mean, that's

1:16:35

kind of standard operating procedure in China, you

1:16:37

know? I wonder if they sold them domestically

1:16:39

to themselves or if this is like an

1:16:41

external. I bet they didn't. Well actually,

1:16:44

no, I take that back because I've heard their buildings fall down sometimes

1:16:46

too, so. I don't

1:16:48

know. Who was this little-known Chinese company?

1:16:50

Give me a name. I

1:16:53

don't know, but I probably can't pronounce it. Whenever I

1:16:55

ride on these, take these airplanes now, I'm like,

1:16:57

oh dear God, what am I doing?

1:16:59

Why am I not flying frontier? I feel like that's the

1:17:01

point though. It kind of

1:17:03

seems strange that we had this big green new

1:17:05

deal thing where they said people need to stop flying on planes

1:17:07

and then all of a sudden we get wave after wave of

1:17:10

stories suggesting that the planes are going to fall out of the

1:17:12

sky. You know what I do? Every time I

1:17:14

buy a flight on Google, it gives you the CO2. I

1:17:16

just buy the highest one. Paying

1:17:19

it forward. Got to warm up new hands for a little bit.

1:17:22

I'm pro global warming because I hate the

1:17:24

winter in New Hampshire. Exactly. If you

1:17:26

can push winter back to starting at the

1:17:29

end of November and finishing by March 1,

1:17:31

I'm in. If India wants to

1:17:33

complain that we're ruining their farming, I want

1:17:35

a payment because this is good

1:17:37

for America. Global

1:17:40

warming is good for America. It's going to

1:17:42

improve arable farmland in North America. This is

1:17:45

good for us. I think these countries who

1:17:47

don't want it, they got to pay us.

1:17:49

It's something that people don't think about. Apparently,

1:17:52

the CO2 does make plants grow better. If

1:17:59

you have a higher CO2... level it does make plants

1:18:01

actually grow better. There's a great study out of

1:18:03

MIT that compares the relative productivity changes of land

1:18:06

under various global warming scenarios and a bunch of places get

1:18:08

better. There are clearly areas that get worse, but

1:18:11

there are clearly areas that get better. Again, stopping

1:18:14

global warming is a real cost because energy

1:18:16

is an input to everything. If

1:18:18

we're doing it to help the places that are getting worse,

1:18:21

I think the places that would have gotten better

1:18:23

should deserve payments from the places that would have

1:18:25

gotten worse. This would be the

1:18:27

equitable way to address the problem. Opportunity

1:18:30

costs, right. Because

1:18:32

Canada is set to become a blooming

1:18:35

ecosystem. Right, and Russia too. Why

1:18:38

would you be aligned with this?

1:18:40

Canada has got a lot of land. Talk

1:18:42

about a nation being cucked. I can't imagine

1:18:44

being a Canadian and being against global warming.

1:18:46

That's pathetic. Well, it's because you're going to

1:18:48

have a bunch of southern border migration. You'll

1:18:50

have a border crisis in no time. I've

1:18:53

made the open statement that Canada actually becomes full

1:18:56

communist and they lock everything down. People on

1:18:58

the way through, they can get over the border

1:19:00

into New Hampshire. I will give them a place

1:19:02

to stay for the night, wash their clothes, and

1:19:04

they can't stay at my house forever. They have

1:19:06

to keep going. You can sleep. You

1:19:09

can get a good night's sleep, and I'll let you

1:19:11

use the bathroom and wash and stuff like that. I

1:19:13

know a guy in New Hampshire who says he'll pick

1:19:15

up any Canadian, no questions asked. So you get across

1:19:17

the border, he'll pick you up, drop you. We need

1:19:20

to get people out of that failing country. Absolutely. Before

1:19:23

Trudeau gets them. I'm not for some kind

1:19:25

of migrants coming here, but if you're a

1:19:27

pro-gun Canadian, get here. Come on, Canadians. Get

1:19:29

here. Come on down. I will help you

1:19:31

out. I will make sure that you have

1:19:33

a safe place to go, and I will

1:19:35

make sure that the broiled mounted Canadian police

1:19:37

are not welcome on my property. We need

1:19:39

an underground railroad. The

1:19:41

Americans could not have broken away from the

1:19:43

British Empire without the French, and now I

1:19:45

think we owe it to the Canadians to

1:19:48

break away from the British Empire. No, no,

1:19:50

no, no. We

1:19:52

asked Quebec if they wanted to join.

1:19:55

There were 14 colonies. It wasn't just 13. Quebec

1:19:57

said no. Yeah. And it could

1:19:59

have been the United States. States with Quebec. But they

1:20:01

don't want to do it. Look, I encourage the

1:20:03

English-speaking Canadians to get through Montreal, all of you

1:20:05

French-speaking Canadians, you can stay up there. We almost

1:20:07

took Montreal as well. Also, as Western Europe falls,

1:20:09

some of those people could come over here too.

1:20:12

You're the better ones, again. A lot of them

1:20:14

we don't want. A

1:20:16

couple of Western Europeans will take some of those. There's some good,

1:20:18

you know? Yeah, too many communists in the

1:20:21

East. America sucked other good people

1:20:23

out of Europe for like several centuries, right?

1:20:25

You kind of left with all the... Yeah.

1:20:28

They're good migrants. They're good immigration

1:20:30

come from anywhere. I do... You brought all

1:20:32

the smart minds here and then poisoned them with high fructose corn

1:20:34

syrup. What? Fluoride. Oh

1:20:37

my God. That's what we were

1:20:39

doing. Plastics, fluoride, pesticides, atrazine, etc.

1:20:42

I think it's a good indictment of your country

1:20:44

if the biggest failure is cheap, abundant calories. It

1:20:47

is kind of crazy. We have fat homeless people.

1:20:49

That's wild. I saw a chart

1:20:51

that it's something like 60 or

1:20:54

70% of Americans now are overweight,

1:20:56

like at least some kind

1:20:58

if they're not like obese. The average... And I

1:21:00

think that's a big reason why people aren't having

1:21:02

more kids. Nobody finds anybody attractive. It's

1:21:05

also hard to get it up if you're fat. All that

1:21:07

blood flow circulation gets cut off and that makes it challenging

1:21:09

to just get it on in general, I

1:21:12

heard. Yeah. Keep that blood

1:21:14

flow. Studies say. I heard.

1:21:18

Keep your lower gut calisthenics active.

1:21:20

Stay healthy. Stay stretched out. So

1:21:22

check this out. According to

1:21:24

GPT, an American male is 5'9 and

1:21:26

the average weight is 197.9 pounds. What

1:21:29

the hell? Oh wow. Oh

1:21:31

yeah. Let's do... What's the

1:21:33

BMI? Let's do women. What's the average weight

1:21:35

of a dad? The average height of an American

1:21:38

female is 5'4 inches and the average weight is

1:21:40

170 pounds. Oh god. Oh

1:21:42

my god. Let's let's adults assume this

1:21:44

is adults. This is one of those

1:21:46

things where you like... Ladies. You

1:21:48

end up in such bubbles, you're so out of touch.

1:21:50

Yup. Wow. Wow

1:21:53

dude. That's crazy. I've been

1:21:55

eating a lot of cholesterol. I'm pretty

1:21:58

meticulous with my diet. last weekend a bunch

1:22:01

of cheese puffs. They're healthier cheesy puffs, but like

1:22:03

a lot of them. And the cholesterol has caused

1:22:05

me to gain a type of weight that I'm

1:22:07

not used to gaining. It's like a type of

1:22:09

fat that's like, ooh, my skin's getting thin. This

1:22:11

gross fat, like I think it's a

1:22:13

lot of cholesterol on people's diets I got to cut

1:22:16

back on, do some healthy cholesterol. Phil, I'll go first

1:22:18

to give you safety. I weigh less than the average

1:22:20

American woman. Do you? Are you also? So

1:22:22

I had a rough weekend this past weekend.

1:22:24

I lost about 10 pounds because of a

1:22:27

trip to the hospital. Normally I weigh around 165

1:22:29

and I'm five six. So. Okay.

1:22:32

So you weigh less than the average woman. Not a

1:22:34

surprise. No, no, no. Here's the

1:22:36

thing. The average weight of

1:22:40

an American male at five nine probably shouldn't be 160.

1:22:42

It probably should be maybe 170, 175 because

1:22:44

of muscle mass. But we're also

1:22:47

seeing people who are not eating enough protein and not

1:22:49

exercising at all. So the issue is, so

1:22:51

the joke I just had to GPT was that makes me

1:22:53

sad. I'm just going to assume it's all raw muscle. Just

1:22:56

all these super ripped women and men

1:22:58

just bringing the average up. They're all

1:23:00

very healthy. They got good blood pressure,

1:23:03

low sodium. We put

1:23:05

we already put Florida in the water. Let's

1:23:07

just add like some testosterone and some is

1:23:09

empic. You know, you see our team full

1:23:11

suite of whatever you need. Just put it

1:23:13

in the government puts in the water. Go

1:23:16

straight to straight Colombian. What if there are

1:23:18

societies where they do that isolated pockets where

1:23:20

they're like, let's just dose the entire population

1:23:22

locally just for his life. I

1:23:24

wouldn't put it past humans to do something like that.

1:23:27

This is our good chat GPT about for us.

1:23:30

I did all the time. Does

1:23:32

Atrazine turns, turn frogs gay

1:23:35

claim that Atrazine a herbicide turns frogs

1:23:37

gay is a misinterpretation of scientific research.

1:23:40

The studies, particularly those of Tyrone Hayes have

1:23:43

shown that Atrazine can cause hermaphroditism

1:23:46

and other reproductive abnormalities and amphibians at certain

1:23:48

concentrations. This means that actually an exposure can

1:23:51

lead to the development of both male and

1:23:53

female sex organs and some frogs potentially affecting

1:23:55

their reproductive behavior and success. However,

1:23:57

the phrase turns frogs gay is an simplification

1:24:00

and misrepresentation of the scientific findings.

1:24:02

Why does chat GPT think everyone's

1:24:05

turning gay? Why is

1:24:07

everyone turning gay chat GPT? Why do

1:24:09

you think rates

1:24:11

of self-identified LGBTQ

1:24:13

are going up

1:24:16

among younger generations of

1:24:18

Americans? Nowism. Let's see what that

1:24:20

does. What kind of answers can it give us? Greater

1:24:24

social acceptance, increased awareness and

1:24:26

education, cultural shift, support of environments and

1:24:28

changing definitions and understandings. Yes,

1:24:31

okay, hold on. Do you think maybe

1:24:34

endocrine disruptors could be playing a

1:24:36

role? I

1:24:45

do. I think it's

1:24:48

endocrine disruptors. There are some evidence that exposure to

1:24:50

certain endocrine disruptors can affect sexual development. There was one study

1:24:52

that found there was a birth control in the 80s that

1:24:55

was very effective. However, in the instance that

1:24:57

a woman did get pregnant while on the

1:24:59

birth control, the likelihood that her baby would

1:25:02

be female and a lesbian was like 90%

1:25:04

or something. Endocrine

1:25:07

disruptors are real. There's microplastics in

1:25:09

everything. We know that they're endocrine disruptors and

1:25:11

we know that they're having a serious impact.

1:25:14

The thing is, it's funny when a lot

1:25:16

of conservatives say things like, oh,

1:25:19

this is all social contagion or whatever. I'm

1:25:21

like, maybe a lot of it, but I do think it's possible.

1:25:24

When did we

1:25:26

shift into heavy plastics for all of our products? When

1:25:29

I was a kid, we got our lunches served

1:25:31

in aluminum foil. It was a

1:25:33

tray made of metal. You

1:25:36

go to an antique store, everything was metal and glass.

1:25:39

Into the 80s and 90s, plastics just took

1:25:41

over everything. I was like, kid, we stole

1:25:43

a glass bottle of sodas at all the

1:25:45

corner stores. Now I go into the gas

1:25:47

station, all plastics. Glass is infinitely recyclable, correct?

1:25:50

Or am I wrong? Yeah, it's a rock,

1:25:52

I guess. Because I know metals aren't. What

1:25:54

is it, like, bifenals and stuff? And PCBs

1:25:56

or whatever, and the plastics are leaching into

1:25:59

everything we consume. And so, you

1:26:02

know, I think a large component of why we're seeing

1:26:04

a big uptick is like we've

1:26:06

we've Hyper-dosed this

1:26:08

generation our generation the next generation on

1:26:10

endocrine disruptors. I've got this hypothesis you

1:26:12

hear about the what is it? Microplastics

1:26:15

and the human testicles is like off the charts

1:26:17

right now They're testing guys and almost every guy

1:26:19

to come up with has some level of plastic

1:26:22

Microplastics, I know mostly plastic mostly plastic at this

1:26:24

point. So I'm like, well, there's this mushroom that

1:26:26

eats plastic and turns it into sugar Microsporin

1:26:30

if you could get this stuff into the nuts

1:26:33

and get it on those plastics It would digest those

1:26:35

into sugar keep your fungus out of my nuts So

1:26:37

you put take these little graphene Bucky balls these 60s

1:26:39

and you put the fungus in the Bucky ball and

1:26:41

then send it through the body to locate the plastics

1:26:43

And then let the stuff out. I don't know if

1:26:45

it's gonna work. I don't know people get fungal infections

1:26:47

in their body I'm like worst. Yeah, that'd be terrible.

1:26:50

I don't want to be an early adopter I'm

1:26:52

not gonna sit around and wait and cry and

1:26:55

say nothing can be done Let's let's get proactive

1:26:57

about this and get the plastic out of our

1:26:59

nuts. I think I think is what RFK jr

1:27:01

Hits that he nails perfectly and this is clearly

1:27:04

what he cares about the most in his campaign

1:27:06

is environmental toxins that have been there everywhere from

1:27:08

pesticides to plastics and more we are eating this

1:27:10

stuff and so, you know We

1:27:13

have glass bottles that we refill with filtered water that

1:27:15

we have from a well here And then we also

1:27:17

have plastic some people don't care and so it's easy

1:27:19

for us to just say okay fine whatever we'll get

1:27:21

plastic but we also have the glass people who want

1:27:23

glass instead and then You

1:27:26

know trying to be a cognizant of

1:27:28

this will go to farms and get

1:27:31

wax paper wrapped meat products But it's

1:27:33

becoming increasingly impossible even local farms will

1:27:35

vacuum seal their meat and plastic Yeah,

1:27:37

I just I'm not I'm not saying

1:27:40

all this stuff is false It's I found

1:27:42

it hard to sort fact from fiction because you get

1:27:44

a lot of spurious health claims and you get a

1:27:46

lot of Not to are convinced all kinds of things, you

1:27:48

know hurt them Right you get the people who are

1:27:50

like worried that thought you know The 5g is is

1:27:52

hurting them and all these things that are like clear You

1:27:55

know, and I'm not trying to put this in the

1:27:57

same class as those kinds of things, but I found

1:27:59

it really hard to get good data,

1:28:01

maybe this is just the state of science,

1:28:03

maybe these things haven't been studied. So,

1:28:06

I found it really hard to start fact from, I don't know how

1:28:08

other people here do it. I have a

1:28:11

science background, I find it hard to start fact from fiction in these areas.

1:28:14

Ridiculously challenging. I'll make, like, I don't even know

1:28:16

if the microplastics are in the nuts. I just

1:28:19

heard that it was. The number was like 96%

1:28:22

of men tested, so I assumed it was more real

1:28:24

because it was more extreme. I bought metal plates for

1:28:27

all my kids, we use all metal

1:28:30

in my house now, so I'm like, well, might as

1:28:32

well be sick, but it's like, I don't really know,

1:28:34

I'm just kind of doing the parenting, I'm worried and

1:28:36

I want my, you know, so I just do it.

1:28:39

But figuring it out is really hard. Do

1:28:41

you ever get the receipts now? I tend

1:28:43

not to touch receipts, that plastic film that

1:28:45

goes on the receipt. Apparently, Luke Ruchowski's like,

1:28:47

I don't want it, I trust you. I

1:28:50

heard the story too. I can feel it,

1:28:52

estrogen on it or whatever. It also doesn't

1:28:54

get the food tests, so yeah, the fact

1:28:56

that it gets... What are you talking about?

1:28:58

Receipts, printed receipts apparently have some new plastic

1:29:00

film that gets into your skin and goes into your bloodstream. What?

1:29:03

They have it for a long time. It's all the heat

1:29:06

receipts. I mean Target was using these 20 years ago when

1:29:08

I worked at Target. It goes into your skin. I should

1:29:10

read more about it. It's just one of those things where

1:29:12

like, I don't know if it's true, but I can feel

1:29:14

that filmy crap on the retouch. It's so low cost to

1:29:16

just not to handle those receipts less and it's like, well,

1:29:18

I could just... I haven't taken

1:29:20

a receipt intentionally in a long time, man. Yeah, I

1:29:23

like the... Oh, check this out. I asked GPT, do

1:29:25

receipts have plastic that gets into your skin? Yes.

1:29:28

Receipts can contain chemicals like Bisphenol A, BPA,

1:29:30

and Bisphenol S, which are used in

1:29:32

thermal paper. These chemicals are considered

1:29:34

endocrine disruptors and can be absorbed through the

1:29:36

skin upon contact with the receipts, while occasional

1:29:39

handling of receipts is generally considered low risk.

1:29:41

Frequent or prolonged exposure may increase the potential

1:29:43

for these chemicals to enter the body. Using

1:29:46

alternatives like digital receipts or handling receipts

1:29:48

minimally can reduce exposure. What? And

1:29:51

finally enough, we have... So CVS is like really

1:29:53

screwing with people. Absolutely. Those are like a mile

1:29:55

long. Especially the people that work there. We have

1:29:57

federal laws on drug laws about things being chem...

1:30:00

So if I go cheat and I change the

1:30:02

chemical a little bit and it gets you high,

1:30:04

I can charge you under opioid loss without …

1:30:06

well, you can be charged under opioid loss without

1:30:09

literally being the same

1:30:11

chemical. My understanding

1:30:13

is the same standards don't exist for

1:30:15

some of these plastics and various things.

1:30:19

So there'll be a study that comes out and it's like, oh,

1:30:21

bicep and all A is an endocrine disruptor. They're

1:30:23

like, oh, well, we'll alter the molecule to

1:30:25

something that's very likely to be biologically similar

1:30:27

but because the evidence isn't there and the

1:30:30

burden is in the opposite direction that they're

1:30:32

able to do some of this. You know

1:30:34

what's funny is that every generation in the

1:30:36

past hundred years had something seep into their

1:30:38

body. We can go back. Remember

1:30:41

the radium girls? The radium,

1:30:43

they were putting radium on everything. Then you get

1:30:45

to asbestos and people got mesothelioma. Then

1:30:48

you had lead. The lead paint craze. The lead paint

1:30:50

craze but also the lead and gas in the air,

1:30:52

everyone's breathing in. Now we

1:30:54

have our plastic endocrine disruptors. Lead

1:30:57

is an example. To me, that one's still an

1:30:59

open question whether that was a selection effect or

1:31:01

real. It's really hard with all these statistical things

1:31:03

whether it's just a selection effect. If it turns

1:31:05

out that lead was in poorer areas where there

1:31:07

was more likely to be crime and more likely

1:31:09

to be ... Again, I'm not saying the lead

1:31:11

hypothesis is false but even when I try to

1:31:13

dig into that one, it's actually how do you

1:31:16

disentangle statistical claims when you can

1:31:18

factor in the fact that there can be all

1:31:20

kinds of selection effects in terms of what's producing

1:31:22

these disparities and it just ends up being so

1:31:24

hard to figure out what's true. The Romans used

1:31:26

lead pipes. I think they did. Romans

1:31:28

... Was that what caused the downfall of the

1:31:30

empire? I'm just kidding. No, it was a pick

1:31:32

up. No, it was a pick up.

1:31:35

Everyone making everyone a citizen is what caused the downfall of the

1:31:37

empire. There's a lot of things. That was a big one. Yeah.

1:31:40

Whatever is a turning point. I'm the most mad about right now is

1:31:42

what caused the downfall of the Romans. I know what it

1:31:44

is. I was just thinking. The

1:31:47

Romans used lead pipes extensively. The Romans

1:31:49

received some turned gates. Yes. Everyone

1:31:53

knows that. Then what, asbestos? You mentioned the

1:31:55

asbestos nastiness. Oh, this is brutal because

1:31:57

we were looking at a building in West Virginia to buy

1:31:59

a while And it was

1:32:01

great. It was moderately priced. And then they said, but

1:32:04

there's asbestos everywhere. And I was like, okay, bye.

1:32:06

There's no way. Unless you want to give me the building because

1:32:08

I'm going to spend that much money fixing this. Even

1:32:11

if it's exposed asbestos, they'll be like, don't worry about

1:32:13

it because unless you brush up against it, you're fine.

1:32:15

But like just bang it on the wall will cause

1:32:17

it to vibrate and come off the wall. It's nasty.

1:32:20

Yeah, the Romans, they were at

1:32:22

peak production producing about 80,000 metric tons

1:32:24

of lead per year for

1:32:26

their water irrigation supply network.

1:32:28

Why? Lead. Just

1:32:31

so easy to use metal. Yeah, isn't it

1:32:34

like easy to press? Yeah, soft.

1:32:36

You can make it. It was very easy for them to make it

1:32:38

into pipes and stuff like that because

1:32:40

of how soft it is. Wow. So they just rotted

1:32:42

their brains until everything fell apart. They

1:32:44

were all crazy as hell. Matter than

1:32:46

a hatter comes from the fact that hatters used

1:32:48

to use lead in the house and you'd end

1:32:50

up... Oh, those mercury. Oh, that's right. Oh,

1:32:53

I'm sorry. Yes, you're right. I'm sorry. My bad. It wasn't mercury, right? Yeah,

1:32:56

they would use mercury and then eventually go insane. Yeah.

1:32:59

Matter than a hatter. You're correct. What

1:33:01

a wild time when they would just be like, you

1:33:03

have syphilis, drink this mercury. And they'd be like, okay.

1:33:06

And did it work? I mean, like, why would

1:33:08

they do it? Right, but all of history is

1:33:10

us being insane about all health and medical claims.

1:33:12

Why do I believe that that's not true now?

1:33:16

You only have one body, so I appreciate being

1:33:18

conservative about it and wanting to be safer about

1:33:20

things. But I kind of

1:33:22

assume that we're basically just as wrong about

1:33:24

everything as we have been always. And so

1:33:26

the odds are that any given claim is

1:33:29

probably insane. I saw a meme in what

1:33:31

Tim was talking about. He said, you

1:33:33

got ghosts in your blood, so you should do cocaine

1:33:35

about it. Man, I don't know what's wrong with you.

1:33:37

You got ghosts in your blood. Use some cocaine about

1:33:40

it. All right, everybody. We're going to go to a

1:33:42

Super Chat. So smash that like button, subscribe to the

1:33:44

channel, share the show with your friends. Head over to

1:33:46

timcast.com, click join us to support the show if you

1:33:48

like the work we do and you want to make

1:33:50

sure it keeps going. We rely on you as members

1:33:52

to make everything keep functioning. In the

1:33:55

meantime, we will read your Super Chats. And

1:33:57

if anybody wants to Super Chat some questions for our

1:33:59

good friend... Check GPT depending on the reasonableness

1:34:02

of the question we will ask our friend

1:34:04

Check GPT to answer Just

1:34:06

buy some good ones Alright, Alpha

1:34:08

Turkey says somehow Disney managed to create a show

1:34:10

where in a galaxy far away Black

1:34:13

kids are born with no father Star Wars

1:34:15

has woke Marvel has woken the boys lost

1:34:17

it with season four it's season for

1:34:19

the new season or was that last season I? Mean

1:34:23

that's if that's racist why would Star Wars do that? That's

1:34:25

so racist they have kids come from broken

1:34:27

homes No, they just had their

1:34:29

lesbian space witches who used to use the

1:34:32

force to make a baby why

1:34:34

I? Don't know oh

1:34:36

my god. That's oh. That's like um How

1:34:39

does the force to marry was conceived of

1:34:41

the Holy Spirit kind of? Yeah,

1:34:43

not magic witches though. Yeah apparently Togon

1:34:46

black eyes is how do you how do people fill the

1:34:49

new track let you go is dope? Thank you so very

1:34:51

much. I appreciate it could be good course. So

1:34:53

that's the new one You let it

1:34:55

go let you go let you go

1:34:57

All Right Karen Manning

1:34:59

says can you have Joe Neiman good

1:35:01

logic on he's he's trying to unspeech

1:35:03

Trump. He's friends of viva fry He's

1:35:05

an interesting person. We'll take a look

1:35:09

Look at this. We got quantum strange cork.

1:35:12

He says Jesse Waters mentioned Tim cast on the five today.

1:35:14

Oh, did he? What did he say member from 39 months

1:35:17

rock on brother? Did

1:35:19

he mention a good thing about us or

1:35:21

did he say that guy's awful? What a terrible show

1:35:23

don't watch it watch Fox News instead No

1:35:26

such thing as bad publicity. No. I've

1:35:28

been on Jesse's show several times. He's a good dude. I like him Yeah, he's

1:35:31

a guy. He's a guy good show He's

1:35:33

funny, too. This is great. Let's go Joseph

1:35:35

says Tim huge fan since 2020. Can you

1:35:37

please shut up? My brothers go phone to

1:35:39

me. He's 31 years old single father of

1:35:41

two their mom died two years ago And

1:35:44

I was in the hospital bedridden with end-stage

1:35:46

liver failure hoping for a transplant. Thanks at

1:35:49

Dempsey OST VIG Sorry

1:35:53

to hear a man best of luck. Yeah, I just

1:35:55

did a liver flush which was really really life-changing

1:35:57

if you've never done anything Like that, it's worth

1:36:00

looking into. Gallstones. You

1:36:02

released a bunch of gallstones. T-Rex

1:36:04

Pet Shop says we're moving to Arizona to

1:36:07

vote for Kerry Lake. If you want to

1:36:09

give our to our moving fund, I'll even

1:36:11

send some mealworms for your chickens if you

1:36:13

put an address in Venmo. T-Rex Pet

1:36:16

Shop. Best of luck. We have to build

1:36:18

the new coop. The chicken coop? Yeah,

1:36:21

a little central planning. I was talking to

1:36:23

Kim about that. Yeah, it's gonna be relatively

1:36:25

simple but good. Designed better knowing our

1:36:27

restrictions and limitations and what the chickens need.

1:36:29

Would it be an irrigation canal? Yeah,

1:36:32

I think we're planning. Yeah, so the last, when we

1:36:34

built Chicken City, we actually built pans where you could

1:36:36

easily, it was a sewer system that had a pipe going

1:36:38

out, so when you ran the hose it would just

1:36:40

wash it away but the chickens did not want to

1:36:42

sleep above it. They wanted to

1:36:44

sleep in a different spot because they just like to go

1:36:46

up high and so we're like we built this thing where

1:36:48

they could perch. So now we're adapting. We're going to build

1:36:50

the same thing where they can perch because they like to

1:36:53

sleep high and then put the pan underneath that and

1:36:55

then you'll be able to hose it out

1:36:57

and they'll funnel through the tubes, the chicken

1:36:59

sewer system. Wow. Oh, this is big news

1:37:01

we didn't get to. Draxis Storm Shadow says

1:37:04

breaking news Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban

1:37:06

in 6-3 ruling and a

1:37:08

federal court overturned the pistol brace ruling

1:37:10

as well. So

1:37:12

we are winning. Yes, too

1:37:15

much action. I'm getting sick of it. I'm getting sick of winning.

1:37:18

Just get used to it, man. Well,

1:37:20

as soon as Trump gets back in. Cameron

1:37:23

Keir says they need to broadcast the debate from

1:37:25

a retirement home. That's the only way people are

1:37:27

going to watch. I'm

1:37:30

really excited about this debate. Isaac

1:37:33

Vanderbilt says the debate needs to be at the Roman

1:37:35

Coliseum. Yeah, something. It

1:37:37

sounds more exciting than it would be though. They're standing there.

1:37:39

You know what I mean? Some

1:37:42

say it's the best Coliseum, the greatest Coliseum.

1:37:44

Matthew Hammond says Woodrow Wilson was the first

1:37:46

demented president. It has been said that his

1:37:48

wife signed some bills. Really? Is that

1:37:50

true? Yeah, I think he had a stroke.

1:37:53

He had a stroke while he was in

1:37:55

office. That's actually as well as every president

1:37:57

was a demented president. Maybe not every. Joe

1:38:02

La Kyle says, Phil, let you go. More

1:38:04

please. Thank you very much for coming. There

1:38:06

will be another video coming in probably a