0:01

Have you seen the price of gold lately? It's

0:03

hitting all-time highs. And when it comes to

0:05

investing in gold, check out Noble Gold Investments.

0:08

They have a track record of excellence that's

0:10

second to none. Just look

0:12

at their thousands of five-star reviews on

0:14

Trustpilot, Google, and the Better Business Bureau.

0:17

Customers rave about their knowledgeable staff,

0:20

smooth investment process, and life-changing results

0:22

which you can see for yourself

0:24

online. That's the kind of reputation you can

0:26

count on. But it's not just

0:28

about the reviews. Noble Gold Investments truly care

0:30

about their clients. They take the

0:33

time to understand your unique needs and goals,

0:35

and they give expert guidance every step of

0:37

the way. That level of

0:39

personalized service is rare in this industry. Look,

0:42

when it comes to securing your financial future, you can't afford

0:44

to take chances. Go with the gold

0:47

company that has earned the trust of countless investors.

0:50

Visit noblegoldinvestments.com/Tim Poole today

0:52

and discover why Noble

0:54

Gold Investments is the

0:56

only choice for smart,

0:58

secure gold investments. Or

1:00

call them at 877-646-5347. Again,

1:08

that's 877-646-5347. Y'all

1:15

called it. We called it. Everybody

1:17

saw it coming. Joe Biden is now

1:19

offering up various forms of amnesty and

1:21

pathways to citizenship for non-citizens as the

1:24

country is being massively, well, just say

1:26

invaded by millions of

1:28

illegal immigrants. And

1:30

the theory was that sometime before the election, Joe

1:32

Biden was going to offer up some kind of

1:34

path to citizenship for many of these people, and

1:37

he is, which actually is

1:39

leading to non-citizens and

1:41

illegal immigrants being given voter

1:43

registration forms. Surprise, surprise. Now,

1:45

what does this turn into? I don't know. But

1:48

I would look at this like, I would

1:50

say this. What's going to happen is they're going to they're going to

1:52

give work work permits. They're

1:55

going to be giving residency to illegal immigrants. And

1:57

then accidentally, they'll claim. And

2:00

they were filling out the paperwork. Of course, you know,

2:02

when you're getting your ID, you get a voter registration

2:04

form. And we didn't realize it, but

2:06

they signed up, registered, and then

2:08

voted. And who's actually going to audit the

2:10

election this November? So it's something everyone should

2:12

pay attention to. B,

2:14

paying attention to. We'll talk

2:16

about that, plus the HAVV, the Help America Vote Verification

2:18

story, which we have some updates on. And

2:21

then, of course, Fox News going

2:23

to war over the White House's

2:25

cheap fakes claim. It's actually interesting

2:27

because Fox says that this is

2:29

entering litigation territory because

2:31

the White House and many news outlets are

2:34

claiming that Fox is deceptively editing videos to

2:36

manipulate the public. And Fox is claiming these

2:38

are just pool report videos, meaning a single

2:40

camera films everything and every news outlet shares

2:42

the exact same thing. So

2:45

it's certainly getting interesting. And then, of course, the FBI

2:47

showed up to another whistleblower, saw this

2:49

big story where there was

2:51

a hospital worker blowing the whistle on

2:53

child surgeries, gendered surgeries that's still going

2:56

on, and a medication. And

2:58

apparently now the FBI showed up to the house of a nurse

3:00

who also may be blowing the whistle.

3:03

This is getting absolutely crazy, but it does show that

3:05

we're in, I don't want to

3:07

call it a two-tier justice system, but certainly

3:09

there's a political regime using law enforcement to

3:12

enact its agenda. Before we get

3:14

started, my friends, head over to castbrew.com and pick up

3:16

Cast Brew Coffee. Everyone's favorite Appalachian

3:18

Nights, of course, is available. And then

3:20

we got Ian's Graphene Dream, low-acidity now

3:22

available. This is our latest to be added.

3:24

And we're actually adding a couple new blends, which will be coming out

3:26

in the next few months. Again, castbrew.com, we sponsor

3:29

ourselves. It's our coffee company. If you want to

3:31

support our work, you can buy coffee from us.

3:33

And also head over to timcast.com, click join us,

3:36

become a member, and you can hang

3:38

out in the members-only uncensored call-in show.

3:41

That'll be coming up at 10 p.m. tonight. We do that Monday

3:43

through Thursday where you as members get

3:46

to call in and ask questions and be on

3:48

the show. So if you really want to be

3:50

involved, if you want to ask any serious questions,

3:52

by all means, become a member

3:54

because you're also supporting this show directly. The

3:56

show is only possible because you guys are

3:58

members. do is worth doing

4:00

and we should do more of it. timcast.com

4:04

click join us. Smash that like

4:06

button, share this show with your friends. It's the most important

4:08

way to do it. Joining us tonight to

4:10

talk about this and so much more is Kingsley Wilson. Great

4:13

to be with you guys tonight. I'm Kingsley Wilson. I'm

4:15

a Trump campaign alum. I currently do digital

4:17

media at the Center for Newing America in

4:20

DC and I'm also a national committee woman

4:22

for the DC Young Republicans. And

4:25

Ian Crossland in the house. Good to see you

4:27

guys. Actor, musician and co-hosts occasionally. How are you

4:29

doing Hannah Claire? Co-hosts when you're not

4:31

traversing Florida. I'm Hannah Claire Bremel. I'm a

4:34

writer for scnr.com. Let's get started. Okay. I

4:37

forgot what my intro is. Hi Serge. Hello. Yeah,

4:40

let's start again. All right. Let's

4:42

jump to this story from the New

4:44

York Post. Biden says every country must

4:46

secure its borders blames Trump as Republicans

4:49

decry new amnesty for 550,000. President

4:54

Biden declared himself a champion of national

4:56

sovereignty Tuesday insisting every country must secure

4:58

its borders as he announced new initiatives

5:01

that Republicans decried as amnesty for about

5:03

550,000 long-term US residents who

5:05

arrived illegally. The 81 year

5:08

old president who has presided over three years

5:10

of record-breaking illegal immigration at the US-Mexico border

5:12

tried to blame his predecessor and

5:14

general election rival Trump while unveiling

5:16

plans to quick and permanent residency for

5:18

people living in the country unlawfully while

5:21

married to Americans and to speed up

5:23

work permits for non-citizens who graduate from

5:25

US colleges. So this other story, Biden

5:28

announcing new measures to speed up work visas for

5:30

dreamers, this

5:32

is exactly what we thought was going to happen.

5:34

And I would not be surprised if in the

5:36

next couple of months, Joe Biden announces more and

5:39

more plans. He's already forgiven

5:41

student loans. He had no legal authority to forgive.

5:44

He is now offering up passive citizenship

5:46

through executive order, authority he does not

5:48

have. And the same time

5:50

we are seeing law enforcement go after

5:52

his political rivals. Biden would

5:54

surprise me at this point. It is crazy that he

5:57

was effectively like, we're going to go by squatters

5:59

rights if you've been here long enough, we'll just

6:01

say, okay, now you can be a citizen. So

6:05

the 550, it's 500,000 people who are married

6:07

to Americans who are here illegally,

6:09

meaning they are in the process of committing a

6:11

crime by being here illegally, and then also about

6:14

50,000 children whose parents are here illegally

6:17

but married to an American. They'll

6:19

be shielded from deportation and potentially

6:21

also given a pathway to citizenship because they're

6:23

saying permanent residency, but that ultimately leaves the

6:26

door open to citizenship. I think

6:28

it's a big slap in the face to anyone who's migrated

6:30

here legally, who has waited for the visa

6:32

or has had to go through the serious

6:34

process of being separated from your fiance or

6:36

anything like that. Biden doesn't

6:38

respect people who respect the law. I'm hearing

6:40

that, well, I think everybody knows

6:42

this. If you try to come here legally, it's

6:45

very difficult. And that's why, you know,

6:47

Fox News reporting from the southern border, they've

6:49

got people from China and other countries just walking

6:51

in. And they're

6:53

like, well, if we actually want to go the normal route, we

6:55

can't. So we'll just walk in. They let

6:58

us in. Then there's your criminal case

7:00

is dissolved, meaning you're in limbo. You're not

7:02

a citizen, but there's no action against you.

7:05

What they're going to do is they're going to

7:07

say permanent residency for

7:09

DACA and for illegal immigrants

7:11

that got married, you

7:13

will now be given permanent resident status in

7:15

this country. And then they're

7:18

going to say, we will now create a

7:20

path to naturalizing permanent residence. And the argument

7:22

they'll make is these are people who live

7:24

here. They've been here for a

7:26

long time. They're going to say, if you're a permanent

7:28

resident who has been in the United States for longer

7:31

than five years, we will give you a simple form

7:33

to fill out to gain your citizenship. Then

7:36

illegal immigrants who have been here for a long time will

7:38

be given permanent residency. And

7:40

then a week later, they can file for citizenship. And

7:43

I wouldn't be surprised if they then vote. Yeah. I

7:46

mean, this is ultimately what it's about, getting new voters for the Democratic

7:48

Party. Anyone who so they

7:50

think the application process will open at the

7:52

end of the summer. Anyone who applies will

7:54

get a work permit for the next three

7:56

years. And then also, again, it'll move on

7:58

to permanent residency. I

8:00

just don't understand why people would think

8:02

this is a good thing, right? Like,

8:04

I don't know, it doesn't make sense

8:06

to me that people are critical of

8:09

enforcing border law while also saying, well,

8:11

actually, we want to incentivize illegal immigration.

8:13

We know illegal immigration is linked to

8:15

drug trafficking, to human smuggling. It's

8:18

illegal, and it does not help the communities

8:20

that have to bear the burden of absorbing

8:22

tons of illegal immigrants. Like, this is against

8:24

your community. It's against the country.

8:26

And yet Biden is saying, I

8:29

am really handling this because the congressional Republicans couldn't. And

8:31

I think too, like it definitely is an attempt

8:33

to buy votes, right? Because Democrats are seeing the

8:35

same polling that we're seeing. They're seeing that 63%

8:38

of Americans support deportations of immigrants

8:41

who are here illegally. 53% of

8:43

Hispanic voters support

8:45

deportations as well. Those numbers are shocking. We've

8:48

never seen polling like that. So they're going

8:50

to have to try to offer out as

8:52

many goodies as they can up until November

8:54

because they need to lock in and secure

8:57

these votes. And I hate the term dreamers

8:59

as if American citizens don't have dreams, right?

9:01

Lake and Riley had dreams. Kate Steinle had

9:03

dreams. And those dreams need to be put

9:06

to the forefront. We can't just cater to

9:08

those who break our laws every day by

9:10

being here and just put Americans' wishes

9:12

and life goals to the back seat. That has to

9:15

end. I'm going to start using the term dreamer

9:17

to refer to someone who was victimized by an illegal

9:19

immigrant. I think it's a good idea because it happens

9:21

all the time. And yet they don't matter enough to

9:23

Democrats to do anything to enforce border security. Biden

9:26

said during his speech today when he's

9:28

addressing this, the majority of Americans support

9:30

this. Don't let the other side fool

9:32

you. And you want to be like,

9:34

this is literally not true. You are

9:36

just lying. The second biggest issue,

9:38

according to Gallup, behind Biden's

9:40

cognitive function. I could

9:43

see there are situations where ripping someone out of

9:45

a community, even if they're illegally there, will destroy

9:47

the community in a way that outbalances it. You've

9:49

got prosecutorial discretion. You don't

9:51

want to just throw everyone out. But

9:55

maybe if someone's been married for five years

9:57

and they're illegally here. But there's no minimum time

9:59

for marriage. That's messed up in my opinion because

10:01

if someone just broke in a year

10:03

ago and then got married for the no No, they have

10:05

to have resided in America for 10 years, but

10:07

it doesn't matter how long they've been married I

10:10

honestly don't care About

10:12

any time frame for illegal immigrants the

10:14

idea that someone broke into my

10:16

house and has been hiding in the attic And

10:19

then someone comes well to be honest they've been hiding

10:21

up there for 30 days, so they're legal residents No,

10:23

they are not it's the more Anarchistic

10:25

look of like the Americans were

10:28

illegal immigrants to this Landmass

10:30

and they were pretty badass and the ones that were

10:32

really bad as stayed to make a government So people

10:34

can figure out how to illegally get in here, and

10:36

they're that awesome that they set up a badass community

10:38

Well like I kind of want those people around so

10:42

The the colonists who came here were not illegal immigrants

10:45

They yeah, they weren't illegal or they

10:47

came to undeveloped underdeveloped territories They

10:50

were territorial disputes with many of the tribes that

10:52

were here, and it was conquest which is a

10:55

big difference now If you're arguing this people are

10:57

coming here for conquest I would completely agree with

10:59

you and then say hey we should reject conquest

11:01

and not let people conquer us Yeah,

11:04

I'm against being conquered by people especially of laws

11:06

on the books saying you can't do this I

11:08

don't understand why Biden would say I'm gonna reward

11:10

people who have been Time

11:13

is our most precious commodity and effort from so many

11:15

of my listeners who have asked for my advice about

11:17

how they can spend It wisely to improve themselves and

11:20

the people around them That's why I'm

11:22

so excited that Hillsdale College is offering more

11:24

than 40 free online courses in the most

11:26

important and enduring subject You

11:28

can learn about the works of CS Lewis the

11:30

stories in the book of Genesis the meaning of

11:32

the US Constitution The rise

11:34

and fall of the Roman Republic

11:37

or the history of the ancient

11:39

Christian Church with Hillsdale College's online

11:41

courses all Available for free that's

11:43

right free. I personally

11:45

recommend you sign up for Constitution 101 The

11:48

meaning and history of the US Constitution in

11:51

this 12 lecture course You'll

11:53

explore the design and purpose of the

11:55

Constitution the challenges it faced during the

11:57

Civil War and how it has been for

12:00

more than a century by progressivism and

12:02

liberalism. The course is self-paced

12:04

so that you can start whenever and

12:07

wherever. Enroll now in Constitution

12:09

101. Our country

12:11

needs more Americans who understand the

12:13

Constitution and can defend the freedom

12:15

of the American people against the

12:17

encroachments of an increasingly large and

12:19

unaccountable government. Go right

12:21

now to hillsdale.edu/Tim to

12:24

enroll. There's no cost

12:26

and it's easy to

12:28

get started. That's hillsdale.edu/Tim

12:30

to register. Hillsdale.edu/Tim.

12:36

Here illegally. Like if you

12:38

want to participate in our country, vote. You

12:40

should value citizenship and you should value the

12:42

nation, which means that you aren't gaming

12:45

the system for your own wants

12:47

and needs, right? Not coming to the country

12:49

illegally is not a great way to start

12:51

off your life here long-term. I just don't

12:53

think that should be reflective of the values

12:55

that we encourage. It shows to you that

12:57

you have no respect for the laws of

12:59

this country and a lot of these people

13:01

who are coming here, they make zero effort

13:04

to assimilate. Whereas, you know, earlier in our

13:06

country's history, people went to great lengths, changed

13:08

their last name even to sound more American,

13:10

learned English very quickly. Now these people don't

13:12

learn English at all. They have no, you

13:14

know, tethering to our history, to our constitutional

13:16

values and that has to be stopped.

13:18

And a lot of these people, they're

13:20

not contributing to society. They're living in

13:22

free housing, getting free phones, free healthcare,

13:25

and they're not working. So

13:27

they're really just a drain on the

13:29

economy. Dviden said

13:31

today that, you know, he said it and

13:33

also his White House put it up, statement

13:36

saying, you know, the average time someone

13:38

in this situation has been here is 23 years and

13:41

they're largely from Mexico. And I

13:43

think that was to soften it to the

13:45

American public. But ultimately what he is saying

13:47

is slowly by little by little, I'm going

13:49

to make it so that I can give

13:51

anyone citizenship in a way that benefits me.

13:54

And I don't think that that is a value

13:57

we would want to be. to

14:00

build our country in the future. I think the

14:02

values of our country mandate that

14:04

people believe in and assimilate to American

14:06

values. I also don't understand if you've

14:08

been here for 10 years and you

14:10

marry a US citizen, that automatically gives

14:12

you a pathway to citizenship. So were

14:14

these people just too lazy to fill

14:16

out paperwork? Like why are they still

14:18

not officially citizens? Yeah.

14:21

Well, let me go back to what you were saying, Ian, too, about

14:23

if someone was here for a long time, ripping them out of the community

14:25

is bad. I feel like that's kind

14:27

of like saying someone could be a functional heroin addict. You

14:30

know, like, hey, something bad is happening. They've

14:32

been doing it for a long time. It's

14:34

clearly not good for their health. But

14:36

if they stopped it, they'll go through withdrawals. So let's

14:38

just let them keep doing it. No, you actually get

14:40

them off of it. You put them in a rehab

14:42

clinic, they go through withdrawals. It sucks. You try to

14:44

give them methadone or other means of weaning them off

14:46

of this, but you ultimately stop. But it would kind

14:48

of be like if you had a heroin

14:51

addict in your work pool and they're serving a

14:53

function and you're just like, we got to get

14:55

that guy out of there. And he's just all

14:57

of a sudden removed from the work pool that

14:59

Cog no longer functions. The entire mechanism fails. No,

15:02

maybe Ian's right. If there's someone at your job

15:04

who does an important thing, you should let them

15:07

die of heroin addiction as opposed to suffer the

15:09

consequences of how you do extra work. No, this

15:11

is more of an argument. If you remove them

15:13

from the system entirely, the system may malfunction. So

15:16

ripping everyone out of their homes all at once

15:18

just because they're here legally isn't necessarily the best

15:20

thing for society. There are sometimes that

15:22

it is the best thing for society, but it's

15:24

not always the best thing. No one's saying do

15:26

it instantly all at once. That would be, you

15:28

know, people will die from withdrawal. Let's use alcoholism

15:30

too, because alcohol is less serious than heroin. You

15:32

got a guy at your work who's an alcoholic,

15:36

you're going to have to remove him. And

15:38

it's like, well, imagine this. Imagine

15:40

your boss came in and said, Rick

15:42

over there is a serious alcoholic, but

15:44

we need someone to pull the levers

15:46

to make the machine go. So we're

15:48

not going to send him to rehab.

15:50

He'll probably die of liver failure, but

15:53

at least we don't have to worry

15:55

about replacing him just yet. And

15:57

in the meantime, while he's dying, let's just find

15:59

a replacement. and then as soon as he

16:01

dies of liver failure or severe alcohol poisoning, no, no,

16:03

no, no, absolutely insane. You

16:05

go to the guy and say, we're gonna

16:08

have to send you to rehab because you're in serious trouble. This

16:10

is a bad thing and we're not gonna keep doing it just

16:12

because we're concerned about what the negative impacts the rest of us

16:14

is going to be. So if

16:16

you've got people who have come here illegally,

16:18

they've displaced the homes of Gen Z. Gen

16:20

Z can't afford houses now, the market is

16:22

insane. They can't afford rent because demand is

16:25

too high. Hotels are being given to illegal

16:27

immigrants. Low-skill labor, flooded. The

16:29

best example of this, when the meat processing plant

16:31

saw 800 or whatever deportations,

16:35

you get all these corporations saying, but Americans

16:37

don't want these jobs. And then local news

16:39

filmed a bunch of Americans showing up for

16:42

job opportunities and they said, excuse

16:45

me, sir, why are you coming here? This is an actual interview

16:47

you can watch and he goes, it pays 14 bucks an hour.

16:49

It pays more than the job I had before. And they're like,

16:51

you really wanna work at this plant? He's like, of course I

16:53

do. But these companies, you know

16:55

what the benefit is for the illegal immigration? For

16:58

these massive corporations, they don't gotta pay

17:00

wage taxes. They don't gotta pay the employment tax, which

17:02

is 7.5% of the income. They

17:04

can actually underpay these people below minimum wage

17:06

if they want to, but they usually don't.

17:08

That's a myth. They'll say, look,

17:11

we'll give you 13 bucks an hour. We

17:13

don't gotta pay the 7.5. We don't

17:16

gotta pay for insurance. We don't gotta worry

17:18

about unemployment. And then if you cause any

17:20

problems, we can throw you out and there's nothing you can

17:22

do because you're here illegally. An American

17:24

would get protections under the law and

17:27

the company would have to pay taxes for employment.

17:29

This is why they want the illegal immigrants. If

17:31

we were to deport the people who came here

17:34

illegally, there would be way more jobs for Americans

17:36

and those Americans would make more money and that

17:38

would bolster the economy. So we are being dragged

17:40

down by all these people skirting the system, not

17:42

to mention outsourcing. So I don't agree with, let's

17:45

just let it all keep happening because we don't

17:47

wanna be disruptive. When they deported all those people,

17:49

what happened? Within a week or two or whatever,

17:51

when they were reopening the plants, massive

17:54

hundreds of people were coming and trying to get

17:56

those jobs and they were able to replace the people

17:58

that were here illegally. I think two people.

18:00

freak out about deportations, ripping families apart out

18:02

of their homes. Chris Hayes was whining about

18:04

it on Twitter, how it's just going to

18:06

be so horrific to watch. A lot of

18:08

these people are going to self-deport as well.

18:10

When you stop giving them the free housing,

18:12

the free healthcare, the free phone, and

18:14

you stop just servicing their every need, a lot

18:16

of them are going to leave. I would be

18:18

willing to even give them a stipend perhaps to

18:20

leave. I'd be willing to say, here's $1,000, get

18:23

out. What

18:25

is it called? Perverse incentives though. Let's

18:27

see what happens, but if we stop catering to these people,

18:29

a lot of them aren't going to ... There's going to

18:31

be no benefit to being here, right? Of course.

18:34

That's why I would argue against ... Also, we can give

18:36

them time. We can say, hey, we're going to deport

18:38

people within the next two years. We advise

18:41

that you get out before you have to come

18:43

grab you, but if you're still here, that is

18:45

what will happen. If you offer money

18:47

to leave, then people will intentionally come here and then

18:49

ask for the money to leave. Right. Well,

18:52

you have to secure the board. It's a lot of moving parts. Let's

18:55

jump to this story. I have a real concern from

18:57

the New York Post how non-citizens are getting voter registration

19:00

forms across the US and how Republicans are trying to

19:02

stop it. Welfare offices

19:04

and other agencies in 49

19:06

states are providing voter registration forms to migrants

19:08

without requiring proof of citizenship, leading

19:10

Republicans and conservatives to call for swift

19:13

federal action to stop handouts. Every state

19:15

but Arizona has been doing this. There

19:17

is currently no requirement on federal voting forms to

19:19

provide proof of citizenship, though it is

19:21

illegal to falsely claim one is a citizen or

19:24

for a non-citizen to cast about in a federal election. Do

19:27

you see the system that's being set up? Illegal

19:29

immigrant comes in. Biden then

19:31

says, we are going to give

19:33

you a path towards citizenship. So for now, you

19:36

get insert benefit. Go apply for your

19:38

benefit. They do. When a

19:40

person applies for welfare, that office

19:42

will also give you a voter registration form. It

19:44

doesn't matter if that form goes to a non-citizen

19:46

because it's only illegal if they cast the ballot.

19:49

Well, that non-citizen just goes, I don't know, I'll fill out whatever

19:51

you give me. Now they're in the

19:53

system registered. If you get 100,000 illegal

19:56

immigrants voting, who's going to do that audit to

19:58

make sure every name... that system

20:00

is actually a person with an ID an

20:03

SSN and it's an actual citizen no

20:05

one's gonna do that no they're not supposed

20:07

somebody's supposed to or the federal elections committee

20:10

or something there's a committee that oversees Dominion

20:12

that's supposed to be involved in checking whether

20:14

or not that's the people who

20:16

voted our citizens nobody does that all

20:18

that matters is you're registered because this is

20:20

the game they are playing the assumption is

20:22

you have to be a citizen to register

20:24

otherwise you'll be voting when you vote it's

20:26

a crime but then people who

20:28

aren't citizens are being given these forms which they will fill out

20:31

and be on the voter rolls then when

20:33

they get their IDs because Biden's giving them amnesty in

20:35

some form they will show up and they'll be like

20:37

this is what I was told to do and

20:39

then no one's going to check this because they're gonna be

20:41

like you know John Smith here on this voter form he

20:43

had an ID when he voted he came in with voter

20:45

ID and people are gonna be

20:48

like okay I guess who's gonna actually go through

20:50

each name to determine the person's address name verify

20:52

their ID and if no ID their

20:55

social security number that's not happening so

20:57

this opens the door to a

20:59

large number of illegal immigrants voting in 2024 this

21:05

is the thing that I think people keep

21:07

waving off you know that oh well

21:10

because immigration illegal immigration is actually about

21:12

asylum and see helping people and whatever

21:14

else that no of course they won't

21:16

vote no of course there won't be any consequences no of

21:18

course it won't impact hospitals it

21:20

won't increase wait times when

21:22

you need emergency medical medical care but the

21:24

reality is that it's not

21:26

like people who come to this country illegally

21:28

are sort of done disappearing into the air

21:30

they obviously have an impact on the community

21:32

and I think any politician would be wise

21:35

to consider that and in this case the

21:37

Democrats I think largely feel

21:39

as though this is a pathway towards

21:41

controlling the population and the direction of

21:43

the ideological growth of population also to

21:45

how often do we hear the left

21:47

talk about you know how we need

21:49

to worship at the altar of democracy

21:51

it's every third word for them on

21:53

MSB NBC right but at the same

21:55

time they're pushing for something like this

21:57

that is actually actively subverting democracy

22:00

We are diluting the votes of American

22:02

citizens with the votes of non-citizens. And

22:04

in a democratic system, it can't work

22:06

unless all of the citizens are the

22:08

ones participating, and they're full-fledged citizens, and

22:10

they have rights, and they have stake

22:13

in what happens to that country. So they're

22:15

really the ones that are putting our democracy

22:17

at risk. But we've made it so that

22:19

asking for proof of citizenship is racist or

22:22

bad or something. You're

22:25

trying to do the best you can

22:27

on whatever level of the bureaucracy you're in

22:29

to ensure that the

22:32

government, any funding, is going towards American people

22:34

who are paying into the system. And

22:36

that's bad. This doesn't make any sense. It never made sense

22:38

to me why we couldn't

22:40

have this question on the census, why this was decried

22:43

as something that was hateful, when really it's about knowing

22:45

who is here, what is the population we are trying

22:47

to serve. Let's take a look at the Help

22:49

America Vote Verification thing. We've been following this story for a

22:51

little while. You guys may remember this. This is the Social

22:54

Security Administration's weekly data

22:57

for Help America Vote Verification Transactions

22:59

by State. What is this? If

23:02

someone tries to register to vote but does not have

23:04

an ID, they then

23:06

verify the person's information with the MVA,

23:08

no ID, gets sent to the SSA,

23:10

Social Security Administration, and they

23:12

check to see if the person's name, date

23:15

of birth, and social security number match in

23:17

the system. So I have a question

23:19

for you. We've been asking this for some time

23:21

now. Why are there certain states

23:24

that are experiencing tens of thousands or

23:26

hundreds of thousands of registrations of people

23:28

with no IDs? That's

23:30

the first question. It seems kind of odd. One

23:32

explanation was that they're doing voter roll cleanup. That

23:35

doesn't make sense. And I'll prove it to

23:37

you very simply. Pennsylvania.

23:40

Pennsylvania in the week ending June 1st

23:42

had 104,250 registration attempts, voter registration with

23:48

no ID. 6,582 came

23:50

back non-matches. Now

23:55

I can certainly understand. Some of

23:57

these may have had typos. Some of

23:59

them may have been, I don't know, wrong

24:02

birthday. But how

24:04

do you get 6,500 people

24:07

with no Social Security number trying

24:10

to register to vote? No ID and

24:12

no Social Security number. Is it

24:14

fair to say that there is a failure rate

24:16

of just above, just around 6%? No,

24:19

because we don't see that reflected in other

24:22

states. The numbers vary wildly. In South Dakota,

24:24

39 people attempted to register to vote. 26

24:27

came back no match. You mean to tell

24:29

me that almost all of the people wrote their birthdays down

24:31

wrong? No. So

24:33

who are these people with no ID

24:35

and not coming up the Social Security

24:38

Administration's database trying to register to vote?

24:40

Pennsylvania had 100,000 in the week ending June 1st.

24:45

97,563 came back with matches. 87,000

24:48

were dead. 6,582 were

24:50

non-matches. Arizona

24:53

had 29,000. 3,664

24:55

non-matches. Again,

24:59

who are those 3,664 people? I

25:02

mean, that's massive right there. That's over 10%

25:05

of the applicants. You're

25:07

not going to convince me they wrote their birthdays down

25:09

wrong. Well, Colorado is like 23% of the applicants. The

25:12

percentages go up when you go down to some of

25:14

these other states. When it's smaller. Connecticut's 20%

25:17

of the applicants. Right.

25:19

In Georgia, you had 6,000 registrations and 2,000 came back

25:21

as a non-match. It's a third 34%. Yeah,

25:24

it's not. That means they have no ID and

25:27

when their name, date of birth, and Social

25:29

Security number were entered in, the SSA said,

25:31

we don't have that in our database. So

25:34

who is this? I mean, there's only

25:36

one explanation or there's only one

25:38

probable illegal immigrants or

25:40

non-citizens. Many non-citizens and

25:42

permanent residents have tax ID numbers, so they'd be in the

25:44

system. So who are these people? I

25:48

think this is the issue, right? They're

25:50

saying it's not happening, it's not happening, but

25:52

obviously there are huge concerns about the safety

25:55

of the election and generally

25:57

ballot and voter integrity. to

26:00

say like oh because didn't you

26:02

didn't one of the states we talked about this like the

26:05

the federal government was like oh

26:07

it was it was voter all clean out and the

26:09

state came back Missouri no we're not doing that then

26:13

who is lying here and I think that

26:15

is one of the things

26:17

that feeds into the overarching problem of lack

26:19

of trust in society like both interpersonal trust

26:22

but also personal to institution people don't trust

26:24

the federal government is saying what it is

26:26

saying that it's actually using the funding for

26:28

this program the way it should be it

26:31

does we don't trust the numbers that are

26:33

coming out of this and I think that

26:35

only ushers more political tension and chaos there's

26:37

no honesty in anything's being said including like

26:40

I said Joe Biden who said the majority

26:42

of Americans support this move when that's not

26:44

true where where are Republicans to challenge

26:47

this I mean the story has been since

26:49

the beginning of the year I mean March is when it

26:52

really kicked off where are

26:54

the Republicans to demand the SSA

26:56

real investigate release documents where are

26:58

the hearings and it's kind of frustrating too

27:00

because I'm not convinced strongly word letters would

27:02

do anything about this I maybe

27:06

I got to reach out to a member of Congress

27:08

Marjorie Taylor Greene Matt Gaetz somebody and be like you

27:10

should subpoena the SSA administrators

27:12

who are in charge of this to have them

27:14

testify and it doesn't have to be adversarial you

27:17

know when they're when they're asking Fauci to testify it's very

27:19

adversarial this would just be we want to

27:22

have a conversation ask what these numbers are and you

27:24

could do a simple explanation it'll be very very boring

27:26

I imagine but they might come out

27:28

and be like yeah we don't know what this

27:30

is how about this how

27:32

about they subpoena the total

27:34

transactions let's find out Pennsylvania no

27:37

no let's let's start easy let's start easy in

27:40

Maryland there were two thousand six hundred and eighteen

27:42

registrations transactions they call

27:44

it two thousand five hundred and

27:46

thirty four nearly one hundred percent came back

27:49

with no match that's

27:51

not so how about we ask for those registration

27:53

forms I'd like to look at the names

27:55

so we can figure out did

27:57

ninety seven percent of the people who try to register

27:59

put their birthday down wrong? Or

28:02

are they non-citizens? Is that the reason why

28:04

they're not in the S.S.A.? A lot of

28:06

life is unpredictable, but a good life

28:08

insurance plan gives your family a financial safety net

28:10

to protect against some of the unknowns. PolicyGenius

28:13

is the country's leading online insurance

28:15

marketplace. It makes choosing the right

28:17

policy for your family easy and

28:19

quick. With PolicyGenius, you can find

28:21

life insurance policies that start at

28:23

just $292 per

28:26

year for $1 million of coverage. Some options

28:28

are 100% online and let you avoid unnecessary

28:32

medical exams. PolicyGenius helps

28:34

you easily compare your options from America's top

28:37

insurers in just a few clicks. The

28:39

reward-winning agents can even walk you through the

28:41

process step by step. Your

28:43

work life insurance policy may not offer

28:46

enough protection for your family's needs. Even

28:48

worse, it may not come with you if

28:50

you leave your job. PolicyGenius has

28:52

no incentive to recommend one insurer over another,

28:54

so you can trust their guidance. They

28:57

have thousands of five-star reviews on Google

28:59

and TrustPilot from customers who found the

29:01

best fit for their needs. Get

29:04

peace of mind by finding the right

29:06

life insurance with PolicyGenius. Head

29:08

to policygenius.com or click the link

29:11

in the description to get your

29:13

free life insurance quotes and see

29:15

how much you could save. That's

29:17

policygenius.com. It

29:23

has to

29:25

be something, right? And I don't understand why a

29:28

simple review would not be good. This is the weird

29:30

thing. When you're seeing a system that seems like it's

29:32

failing or inefficient, but it has

29:34

to do with anything related to illegal immigration,

29:36

they're like, no, we can't. You can't talk

29:38

about that. We can't check it. Why wouldn't

29:40

we constantly audit all of these Washington federal

29:42

bureaucracies and be like, hey, it seems like

29:45

you guys either have a terrible form that

29:47

no one can figure out or there is

29:49

something going on. We need to check it

29:51

out. I don't want money spent on programs

29:53

that are either allowing illegal immigrants to vote

29:55

in a system that they are not legally

29:58

a part of or is throwing. away

30:00

a ton of good money because the

30:02

system is apparently failing at its job.

30:05

Definitely. And I mean, American taxpayers are also funding

30:08

a lot of this stuff that's happening, you know,

30:10

and these different forms that are being filled out

30:12

that we're paying for the person who's reviewing those,

30:14

right? We pay their salary and their paycheck. So

30:16

I think it is incumbent on

30:18

Republicans to stop with the strongly worded letters,

30:20

actually find the courage to send a subpoena

30:23

and to haul these people in front of

30:25

the American people so that they can answer

30:27

for this and provide us the evidence that,

30:30

you know, we need because we need to

30:32

be confident in our election come November. We

30:34

need to know that the election was safe,

30:36

that it was secure. And the American people,

30:38

as you were talking about, really need to

30:40

have a restored trust in our institutions that

30:43

we have lost through COVID, through

30:45

the 2020 election and all of that

30:47

stuff. And this is the

30:49

first step is accountability. Bring these government

30:52

bureaucrats into Congress. Ask them

30:54

tough questions. Let's

30:56

jump to this next story. We have this from

30:58

the Daily Beast. Fox News goes to war with

31:00

White House over cheap fake videos. The

31:03

network's hosts warned rival news networks

31:05

that they would be in litigious

31:07

territory if they continued to criticize

31:09

Fox's coverage. Well, you know,

31:11

the Daily Beast is basically CIA beasts. So I'll correct

31:13

that for you. The network

31:15

is warning that if you accuse

31:17

them of producing false information intentionally,

31:20

they will sue you and they should. Fox

31:23

News fired back Tuesday after the White House

31:26

accused the conservative cable giant and Trump world

31:28

of peddling deceptively cut cheap fake videos to

31:30

make President Joe Biden look decrepit and feeble.

31:32

I really liked that cheap fake. You

31:35

got Brian Stelter appeared on cable and he's like, well, a

31:37

cheap fake is when it's a real video, but they edit

31:39

in a way so that you can mislead people. And it's

31:41

like, I like the very fine people hoax. Do

31:44

you think Corinne Jean-Pierre is going to start selling a

31:46

cheap fake merch? No, I think we are going to

31:48

appropriate the word cheap fake to accuse the corporate press

31:50

of every hoax they've ever done being a cheap fake.

31:53

I like that term. It's really great. There's

31:55

fake news and that's reference to a lot of the

31:57

work they do. But then you can take a look

32:00

at all of of the hoaxes we've had, Russia gate,

32:02

Hunter Biden's laptop. You can take a look at very

32:04

fine people hoax, the injecting bleach hoax, all

32:06

the cheap fakes being pumped out by the corporate

32:08

press. We ain't got nothing on

32:10

them, man. So my bigger concern

32:12

with cheap fakes is how the corporate press pumps

32:14

them out day after day. In fact, there's a

32:16

cheap fake video going around right now from MSNBC

32:19

or is it MSNBC? Nicole Wallace, where is she?

32:21

Is she CNBC? She's claiming

32:24

what they did was this, so the corporate press

32:26

is running this cheap fake video where

32:29

it shows Biden waving to the crowd and

32:31

then cuts away to this ultra wide shot

32:33

so you can't really see Biden or Obama

32:35

anymore. Then it cuts back as

32:37

they're walking away. When in the real video

32:40

that stays the same focal point the entire

32:42

time, you can see Biden freeze up for

32:45

about seven seconds before Obama pulls him away.

32:47

So they've been running this cheap fake trying to

32:49

convince people that Biden is totally fine. But

32:52

we've got all the videos of it. This is

32:54

what they do. They had this other

32:56

form of cheap fake where

32:59

they translate for Joe Biden and chat GPT

33:01

does this too, it's amazing. Yo,

33:04

I asked chat GPT what true and I shot at a pressure was

33:07

and it said Joe Biden was trying to say true international

33:09

pressure. How do you know that? Nobody

33:11

knows what he was trying to say. I said, what about

33:13

bada calf care? And it was like, it sounded like he was trying

33:15

to say better health care plans. And

33:18

I was like, why are you giving

33:20

me speculative opinion? You have no idea what

33:22

the gibberish meant. That's a cheap fake. These

33:24

media outlets, when Joe Biden

33:27

garbles, Joe

33:29

Biden comes out and says, we're gonna

33:31

lower taxes on lower working class. They

33:34

will write quote, Joe Biden says, they'll

33:37

write the exact quote. But when he goes, I

33:40

gotta tell Kim Jong, Kim

33:42

Jong, North Korea, the thing, they'll write, Joe

33:48

Biden gave stern words to Kim Jong Un. They

33:51

won't quote him if he speaks gibberish. That's

33:53

cheap fake. That's what they're doing. But

33:56

I will add as an aside, the bigger story here, and what we're

33:58

talking about is, but

34:01

over Fox News

34:04

opining on publicly

34:06

available video is that

34:08

the White House and corporate press outlets

34:10

have accused Fox News of intentionally and

34:12

deceptively editing videos and publishing them to

34:15

lie to people and make them think

34:17

Joe Biden is mentally unfit. Yo,

34:21

you're not going to convince people of this, but

34:23

they're also going to be entering legal territory because they can

34:25

get sued over this. So I

34:28

love this though. Let me read this. Over the

34:30

past two weeks, the Republican National Committee

34:32

and major conservative media outlets have amplified

34:34

several short video clips, supposedly showing the

34:36

81 year old president freezing on stage,

34:38

wandering off or even pooping his pants.

34:41

Wow. Really? They

34:43

showed that. Thank you, Daily Beast, for letting us

34:46

know those things happened. It is wild that

34:48

this was something that all kinds of mainstream

34:50

outlets were showing, but they're like, it's

34:52

all fake. And now everyone on the mainstream media

34:55

has to fall in line and be like, yes,

34:57

this never happened. Again,

35:00

with Obama tugging Joe and then escorting him

35:02

up, I was listening to MSNBC talk about

35:04

that and showing a clip of it. This

35:07

is a strange stance that the

35:09

White House has put their allies and

35:11

the corporate press into. I

35:14

think it's kind of funny. I would love to

35:16

see Fox News fire back, but I

35:18

feel as though it might just be yet another

35:21

angry letter, maybe a stern finger shaking. I

35:23

do love this word Trump world. I

35:25

just think that would be the most amazing amusement park

35:28

of all time right up there with Dollywood probably. But

35:32

it's it's undeniable that something is going on

35:34

with Biden. And I think the more they

35:36

try to say, oh, they're making it up.

35:38

It's almost like it's incentivizing young voters to

35:40

Google it themselves and find these video clips,

35:43

which will live on an infamy. Thanks to

35:45

the Internet forever. I think there's something to

35:47

building this term, cheap fake that they're trying

35:49

to create and control narrative,

35:51

which is obsessively what power hungry

35:53

regimes try and do is control

35:55

and your narrative and your thoughts

35:57

like deceptively editing video is. Is

36:00

what that is you now create a new term

36:02

and try and control people's perception of what they're

36:04

doing It's a very natural thing

36:06

to to edit a video the way You

36:09

would like people to perceive the video and just because

36:11

there's shadow from one angle didn't mean it wasn't sunny

36:14

Uh, I hope that those words came out, right? That so

36:16

I I don't like that. I don't like it. Well the

36:18

word cheap. I think is one of the funniest words I

36:21

like it. I love it. I love it when they the

36:23

corporate press made up fake news and that trump took it

36:25

It sounds like deep fake. It's supposed to be fake. It's

36:27

supposed to yeah But like what at what point does editing

36:29

a video become a cheap fake? Anything they

36:32

do is a cheap fake that's from now on

36:34

well That's how I felt when when biden put

36:36

up that video He was uh when he was

36:38

like i'm challenging trump to a debate or whatever

36:40

just a couple weeks ago And I heard it

36:42

first when I was driving so it was over

36:44

npr And it does sound kind of like biden's

36:46

being stirred And he's almost speaking at a regular

36:48

human pace, but actually when you watch it, it's

36:50

got all the jump cuts in it Yeah, cheap.

36:52

That's the intentional, uh aversion, right? So they're saying

36:55

well, we never do this and only bad conservative

36:57

media Actually, they do it. So this is the funny

36:59

thing they came out And

37:01

they started trying to use the term fake

37:03

news and trump and the right appropriated to

37:06

Accuse them of being the fake news. They lost their minds over it

37:09

Is it a cheap? So what is a deep fake a

37:12

deep fake is when you ask a computer to

37:14

ai render a fake video or image So you

37:16

can lie to people what is a

37:18

cheap fake when you edit a video that

37:20

is real to trick and manipulate people Okay, well

37:23

the video of joe biden freezing on stage not

37:25

edited. It's literally just the video of him on stage We

37:28

all saw that and said oh man. He kind

37:30

of just locked up for for about 10 seconds or so It's

37:32

a seven seven seven or eight seconds. Is it when I counted

37:34

it out? And uh, what does

37:37

it mean? Well, I don't know but you know, he kind of freezes

37:39

up and then obama grabs him They said that

37:41

never happened. Do you lie? That's a cheap fake. No,

37:43

the cheap fake was when you did

37:45

the up close shot The krasnsteins posted this

37:48

and then when the camera right before biden

37:50

freezes the camera switches To this

37:52

really far away view. You can't see that was deceptively

37:54

editing. So you could not tell he froze up Camera

37:57

change right when he freezes. What's a cheap

37:59

fake? As you mentioned, when Biden called out Trump for

38:01

a debate and there were five jump cuts in

38:03

14 seconds, that's a cheap

38:06

fake. They make, so let's

38:08

break this down. Joe

38:10

Biden needed five jump cuts

38:12

to challenge Trump to a debate. Meaning

38:14

if you actually had a raw unedited

38:17

video of him talking, you

38:19

would not get a coherent idea. So

38:22

they make a fake video by splicing these

38:24

clips together to make it seem like he

38:26

said a sentence when in fact it

38:28

took him probably a very long time to get those words

38:30

out. That's a cheap fake. It's

38:32

a real video, but edited to create the perception

38:34

that Joe Biden is speaking properly. They

38:36

make cheap fakes. That's what they do. And

38:39

a lot of us too, like Americans are watching a

38:41

lot of these videos live. I know I certainly am.

38:44

We're seeing what's happening and we're being told by the

38:46

regime, don't believe your lying eyes. Every

38:48

voter knows that Biden does, you know, his best

38:50

Roomba impression is what people have started calling it

38:53

when he wanders around stage. Looks like he's totally

38:55

lost. You know, no one's home and

38:57

they see that. And a lot of, I think

39:00

Americans too have experienced that with their family members,

39:02

right? A lot of people have elderly relatives, perhaps

39:04

people who do have dementia and they know what

39:06

it looks like. And it looks like president Joe

39:09

Biden right now. So that's something that the

39:11

left, no matter how much try spin they try

39:13

and throw at this, they're not going to be

39:15

able to change that perception because Americans, thanks to

39:17

the internet are seeing it in real time and

39:20

they're seeing it unedited. Right. And

39:22

it's, it's not like it just started happening. I

39:24

mean, I feel like we've had a bunch of

39:26

gaffes and sort of lost moments on stage in

39:28

the past three weeks, but this has been true

39:30

his entire presidency. All, I mean, we could all

39:32

rattle off our favorite hits of this, right? Like

39:34

I remember one where he was, I believe at

39:37

the white house, there was a long red carpet

39:39

and he was obviously supposed to turn at one

39:41

point and it said he just kept walking onto

39:43

the grass. Like got complete lost and a secret

39:45

service member had to sort of like sheepdog guide

39:47

him back on course. It was crazy. You

39:50

know, there is a part where

39:52

you don't want to be dramatic. You

39:55

want to assume like, oh, maybe there

39:57

is an easy explanation, but when it's

39:59

happening this consistently. In

40:01

addition to, you know, the stiff gate, in addition to

40:03

sort of this, this change in his voice, in addition

40:05

to the slurred speech, like a certain point, it's

40:08

too much evidence to ignore. And I think

40:10

that's also true for independent voters. I think

40:12

they are the ones who are the most

40:14

affected by the idea that we are in

40:16

turbulent times, both economically and geopolitically. And at

40:18

the helm is a guy who needs to

40:20

be let off stage. Not a good look.

40:23

Also, now they're saying, you know, it's these cheap fakes

40:25

in 2020, they were saying, oh, President Biden just has

40:27

a stutter and you shouldn't make fun of people who

40:29

have stutters. That's really rude to do.

40:32

But if you look at old videos of Biden,

40:35

that stutter wasn't there. This type of wandering

40:37

around, this type of freezing up wasn't there.

40:39

He was very cognitively with it. And now

40:41

he's not. The American people can see that

40:43

as well, especially independent voters. They

40:45

can search, you know, videos of Biden when he

40:47

was in Congress, even when he was vice president.

40:50

And it is night and day. Yeah, it's very

40:52

good. Kamala Harris. We need her in. Put me

40:54

in, coach. I'm ready. Yes, I

40:56

would not like Kamala Harris presidency. It's not

40:58

even like I want. It's like these are

41:00

the rules when the president's mind is gone.

41:03

You initiate, put the next commander in because

41:05

the military needs a commander. Whoa, whoa, whoa,

41:07

whoa, whoa. The commander is still there. Obama's

41:09

perfectly healthy. I hope he's

41:11

in command. I

41:14

don't know what kind of legal authority he has to

41:16

negotiate on behalf of the president. Kamala is like the

41:18

Joker. Have you like if you have ever

41:20

watched her give a speech, she's sitting there

41:22

and she's like, well, how's it going,

41:24

everybody? We've got a big project

41:27

working on helping these starving children. It's

41:31

like, why are you laughing, lady? Like that's it's I'm

41:33

not kidding. Someone will ask me like there were 17

41:35

children that were killed in this horrible accident. She'll go,

41:38

well, you know, we're going to do what we have

41:40

to do to try and get supplies in. But sometimes

41:42

it's hard. It's like she's laughs

41:45

like her and Hillary Clinton were cackling fiends. That's

41:48

how I do of cackling. It's like their teleprompter is like laugh

41:50

here until they do it, but it feels very unnatural. And

41:52

then it's like get stern and they have the similar

41:55

hand gesture the whole time. It's very weird. And also

41:57

she's deeply unpopular. Right. Like

41:59

in terms of inspiration. retiring another generation of

42:01

voters. I don't think she's it. I don't

42:03

think that young Democrats look to her and

42:06

say, this is our gal, even though she

42:08

is, you know, a woman of color, which

42:10

they thought was the key to win everything.

42:12

I take the unpopular, deeply unpopular cackling fiend

42:15

to this, this creature of

42:17

the Biden White House. I can't, it's

42:20

too dangerous to have that thing. I'm sorry,

42:22

Joe. He's a legend. Have you in control

42:24

of the military now is insane. You

42:26

already messed it up with Afghanistan. I

42:29

cannot imagine you having some sort of debate with

42:31

Vladimir Putin right now. Be sad. We're

42:33

like less than a week away. He's resigned. We're

42:36

almost a week away from the Trump-Biden debate. I think

42:38

that would be very telling to the voters. If

42:41

they let that go normal, Trump's going to

42:43

humiliate him. It's going to be devastating to

42:45

Biden's legacy and he'll resign. He's got to

42:47

resign after that. We had someone on the

42:49

show a couple of weeks ago say

42:52

basically that Biden can focus his energy

42:54

for small bursts of time. He was

42:57

saying maybe he can handle an hour

42:59

or two on the

43:01

debate stage and it'll be okay. I

43:03

have a really hard time believing

43:06

that because it seems like in the last

43:08

couple of weeks, especially with the amount of

43:10

travel he's been doing, he's got these fundraisers

43:12

going everywhere that basically he has enough time

43:14

to get to that point. It really seems

43:16

like his energy levels and his focus are

43:18

not great right now. On the

43:20

other hand, if he is somewhat focused and is

43:22

able to get under Trump's skin, I think the

43:24

debate could backfire on Trump. I think Trump has

43:27

to really push Biden on his

43:29

record as president as opposed to answer

43:31

any questions about his

43:34

convictions or anything else. It has to be

43:36

about Biden answering for the consequences of his

43:38

actions. I hope it

43:40

goes that way, but it's hard to say. One

43:43

personality is very fiery and one personality, I guess,

43:46

depends on if the sun is up. Joe

43:48

Biden is a lich. Kamala Harris is

43:50

a cackling fiend. I just

43:52

view them as weird demon monsters. Trump

43:56

is a jester for sure, but

43:58

jesters were actually widely respected. to

44:00

the Kings that would say things that were shocking and

44:02

offensive to try and keep the perspective in alignment, you

44:04

know, thing outside the box. Well, in

44:06

like Shakespearean plays, the Falstaff character, which is typically

44:09

like the clown or jester, some people will stage

44:11

it as like a goofy, like very physical comedy,

44:13

whatever. And other interpretations,

44:15

it's sort of a calculated role. You

44:17

know, they are able to trick and,

44:20

you know, reveal things

44:22

in a way that other characters aren't because

44:24

of their position in the social

44:26

structure. Let's jump to this story. Speaking of

44:28

cheap fakes, we got one. No

44:31

lie with Brian Tyler Cohen.

44:34

And he lied. I can't believe it.

44:36

It's in his name. You know, he

44:38

said no lie. And then he lied, something must

44:40

be wrong. He says, here is a photo of

44:42

Trump having to hold someone's hand to guide him

44:44

off stage. I'm sure this will get just as

44:46

much coverage as the daily Biden old story gets.

44:48

First of all, when you look

44:50

at the image, it's very obvious. He's

44:52

holding his son's hand. He's

44:55

on a walkway. His son is below the

44:57

walkway. And he's grabbing his son's hand. His

44:59

weight is not shifted in any way to

45:01

be guided or anything like that. So

45:03

as soon as I saw the photo, I was like, he's just

45:05

grabbing Don Jr's hand as his son. Like, is he

45:07

giving a high five or like a handshake or something?

45:09

As it turns out, yeah, quite literally.

45:12

The actual footage, here you go. Here's

45:14

the actual video. ["The River," by The

45:16

Green and the Green Band plays in the background. Okay. Love

45:18

the walk on it. Yeah, we don't need the audio. There's

45:21

Trump walking just fine. You want a little

45:23

squeeze? Right. He walks by, he's waving.

45:26

There's Don Jr., his son. He grabs

45:28

his hand, gives him a little tug. Like, how's it going,

45:30

son? Walks away. And it's

45:32

so brief that you could miss it. Right. But

45:34

they're implying he had to be guided off. And this is what

45:37

they do with cheap fakes. Wow. This

45:39

guy, Brian Tyler Cohen, who was a

45:41

BTC, you know? I

45:44

think he used to work for MSNBC or something,

45:46

podcast covering top stories and interviews with the biggest

45:48

names in politics. This is what they

45:50

do. They accuse the...

45:53

We have raw footage from a press pool

45:56

showing Biden... Let me explain this ceremony. They're at

45:58

the G7. They're in Italy. Paratroopers

46:00

land. All of the G7 leaders

46:03

are looking at this one guy, clearly

46:05

there as a group, for

46:07

some reason, other press conference, press event,

46:09

be on camera. Biden, without

46:11

prompt, for no reason, turns around and then starts

46:13

walking away towards a different group of people. The

46:17

Italian prime minister, then they all start going like

46:19

this, looking around, walking over to him. The group

46:21

starts spreading around. She grabs him and pulls him

46:23

back to go back to the press. We

46:26

all saw that happen. We're like, oh, grandpa Joe's wandering

46:28

off again. The media then goes, Biden

46:31

was actually just greeting other paratroopers

46:33

and he was with a group for

46:35

a scheduled press event and wandered off to greet random

46:37

people. He has no idea what's going on. That's on

46:39

video. Then you get Brian

46:41

Tyler Cohen doing this because these people

46:43

are liars. I also like

46:46

this because, and like, if someone else had posted

46:48

it, it's like, look at this father-son relationship. Like

46:50

Trump's on stage, his son's supporting him. Like they

46:52

have this moment where they're like, hey, how you

46:54

doing? Like you're doing a great job. Like it's

46:57

actually sort of a nice moment. And

46:59

instead the left can't see happy family. So

47:01

they're like, well, this clearly means that he's

47:03

weekend old and this whatever. And don't look

47:06

at our guy too closely. It's very, very

47:08

weird. Well, it's a rock

47:10

and a hard place for Joe because

47:12

his son's facing prison time and

47:15

he can pardon his son and then make it look like

47:17

he's a crime family who's getting a son off the hook.

47:19

Or he can sacrifice his son and it looks like a

47:21

bad dad. It's tough, right? What

47:24

should he do in that situation? Would you

47:26

pardon your kid? Honest question, would you pardon your son if

47:28

they're on this, me, I would. Yeah, I

47:30

would. Not if they were Hunter. I think he

47:32

needs that. You know how they say like the best thing

47:34

for like. I would because the gun law is unconstitutional and

47:36

I'd come out outright and say this is an, but Biden

47:38

can't do that because he's not a two way guy. He's

47:40

a gun control guy. See me, it's easy.

47:43

I'm a two way guy. I'd be like, ain't

47:45

no way you're charging my kid because he incriminated

47:47

himself. That's a violation of the constitution. And these

47:49

forms are BS anyway. Pardon in two seconds, try

47:51

me. Can you pardon some of the crime, the

47:54

gun related stuff, but let them

47:56

go see damage for the tax evasion.

47:58

That's a totally different charge. You could

48:00

pardon for one charge, but not all. He

48:02

hasn't even got a trial for the text. You

48:05

could pardon Hunter Blanket for everything. Or

48:07

he could pick a charge and pardon that. He hasn't gone

48:09

to trial for the text stuff yet. We just asking. You're

48:11

saying like if he was convicted of the track stuff as

48:13

well, could you pardon him? Assuming he was convicted of multiple

48:15

charges, you could pardon one of them. Right. I

48:17

mean, a pardon doesn't mean any

48:20

crime you've ever committed has been absolved. But

48:22

it could, as far as I can tell.

48:24

You could do a Blanket Pardon of someone.

48:26

Right, you specify what the crimes are in

48:28

line with. And there's ways to word it

48:30

where it can be extremely broad. But

48:32

if they really wanted to. But the text stuff is

48:34

interesting. I would say right now, if I was Joe,

48:37

I'd come out right now and be like, pardon? Nah,

48:39

you're not getting gun charges. I ain't playing that game. Abolish

48:42

the ATF. You have to pardon everybody that violated that crime,

48:44

though. You have to find them all and give them all

48:46

pardons. Oh, bro. I will tell you, if I was president,

48:48

I would. I would be like,

48:50

get me a list of anyone who's ever

48:52

been charged solely and

48:54

for no other reason than lying on form

48:57

4473. And I

48:59

will just start rubber stamping pardons. Do

49:02

you owe back taxes? Pandemic relief is

49:04

now over. Along with hiring thousands of

49:06

new agents and field officers, the IRS

49:08

has kicked off 2024 by sending over

49:10

5 million pay up letters

49:13

to those who have unfiled tax returns or

49:15

balances owed. Don't waive your rights

49:17

and speak with them on your own. They

49:20

are not your friends. Tax Networks

49:22

USA, a trusted tax relief firm,

49:24

has saved over $1 billion in

49:26

back taxes for their clients. And

49:28

they can help you secure the best deal possible. Whether

49:31

you owe $10,000 or $10 million, they can help you. Whether

49:35

it's business or personal taxes, even

49:37

if you have the means to pay or

49:39

you are on a fixed income, they can

49:41

help finally resolve your tax burdens once and

49:43

for all. Call 1-800-245-600 for a private free

49:45

consultation. Or

49:54

visit tnusa.com/Tim

49:57

Pool. Bump,

50:04

bump, bump, bump, bump. Trump should be part

50:06

of his campaign. I don't know how tight he wants

50:08

to get with Hunter, but if he's like, I'm going

50:10

to pardon that because those crimes are unjust. It's

50:13

not personal. Trump should come out right now. I

50:17

don't know if Trump should do this. I shouldn't say this, but if it were

50:19

me, one of the things I'd

50:22

campaign on is I will pardon every single person

50:24

who has been arrested on gun charges at the

50:26

federal level. If you're a citizen

50:28

of this country and there's got to be

50:30

a review, it's not going to be overnight, you

50:33

were charged with possession of or distribution of

50:35

guns depending on

50:38

what the circumstances were because some people might

50:40

take plea agreements. They might have done

50:42

something violent and then said, I'll plea to just the gun charge.

50:45

So after review, if you

50:48

were supplying guns to a gang conflict, no

50:50

pardon for you. I'm talking

50:52

about if you're a guy who bought a short-barreled

50:54

rifle with a suppressor and you didn't go through

50:56

the NFA, that's a pardon stamp out the door,

50:59

out the door. Trump should say that Trump

51:01

should create a, if I were Trump, this

51:04

is what he should do, I will create a

51:06

pardon review panel that will begin

51:08

looking at all federal criminal cases and

51:10

we will begin the process of parting

51:12

everyone who was convicted of nonviolent offenses

51:14

that did not contribute to violence. So

51:18

federal level pot charges, nonviolent,

51:20

no violent circumstances. A

51:23

guy at the federal level was driving with a car with pot in

51:25

it and they pulled him over and they caught him, rubber stamp, you're

51:27

out the door. Gun charges,

51:29

oh, that's the easy one. Don't

51:31

care what they think, rubber stamp, out the door. It's

51:34

really interesting to me that Hunter Biden's

51:36

tax trial comes up in

51:38

September, right? Because I think you're

51:40

right, these like 2A charges are really passionate people,

51:42

people really strongly and I don't

51:45

know that it behooves Trump to specifically speak out

51:47

on what he's going to do until we're a

51:49

little bit closer to the election. On

51:51

the other hand, it's not like this

51:53

is the only thing Hunter Biden is tracing. He

51:55

is the first child of a sitting president to

51:57

go, to be tried in this.

52:00

manner, but this is just his

52:02

first first rodeo. Like he he oh he

52:04

owes one point four million dollars in in

52:06

taxes. And, you know, I don't know that

52:08

I believe in taxes. On the other hand,

52:10

like interesting that this one guy is has

52:13

so many issues in so many different states. What

52:15

if Trump said like right now to

52:17

rally, I'm going to pardon anyone

52:19

who is convicted

52:22

on tax tax charges of

52:24

any kind? Be fascinating, right?

52:26

Because they're all nonviolent, assuming nonviolent,

52:29

like if there's like Al Capone or something, okay, no.

52:31

But if it's just like tax

52:33

fraud, tax evasion, whatever, it's like rubber stamp.

52:35

Nope. No tax crimes anymore. You're all getting

52:37

blanket pardon. I don't I

52:40

can't see that there being a downside of that

52:43

because regular people are going to be like we don't

52:45

like taxes at all. And then you're going

52:47

to have like some dude's going to be in jail for like

52:49

tax evasion and his family is going to be like we're voting

52:51

for him. He's getting our husband or our boyfriend or dad or

52:53

whatever out of jail. Right. The only downside I

52:55

could see possibly is just you have to already

52:57

know exactly how you're going to execute this because

53:00

if you promise something like that and then you

53:02

don't deliver, it's really bad. And I know he

53:04

would only be able to serve for four more

53:06

years. But in terms of like the legacy of

53:09

the political movement he's leading, it would be

53:11

not good to become the representation of false promises

53:13

on really significant releases from prison

53:15

because you're right, like it could change someone's life

53:17

if you are on, you know,

53:19

very minor tax charges, but you're incarcerated. The

53:22

release of your father, someone who could

53:24

potentially be contributing to the household, anyone

53:26

suffering from the weight of

53:28

inflation, like having another person to help support

53:31

your family is really key. And so the

53:33

only downside would be if you make promises

53:35

so big, you can't keep them. But I

53:37

think there's enough time where Trump and whoever

53:39

is he's interested in staffing could

53:41

put this together and deliver to the plan in

53:43

a way that really, really excites

53:46

voters. People that have like

53:48

minor tax charges, then you actually free them up

53:50

to create revenue. Then you can actually then tax

53:52

them for real rather than make them pay money

53:54

for them to be in a jail. So right,

53:57

exactly. The taxpayers aren't paying for them to be,

53:59

you know, how and fed and all that

54:01

stuff. I think that this age is a

54:03

time when global people, global interests, whatever you

54:05

want to call this machine that's trying to

54:07

create this world order, they're going to use

54:09

the people in the United States as like

54:11

pawns to get your emotions to go and

54:13

behave a certain way because of how

54:16

I feel about that guy. So like Hunter

54:18

Biden, maybe your emotional fervor kicks on. You're

54:20

like, I want him to feel punishment because

54:22

of what that means to me personally. But

54:24

like they'll use that to set up situations

54:26

where you'll do something that you think is

54:28

not right, just to get at someone out

54:30

of vengeance. And then you'll create a precedent

54:32

for that thing to be done again and

54:34

again and again. So be careful

54:36

with your persecution eyes right now. If you end

54:38

up persecuting someone because you don't like them because

54:41

that can be reciprocated and used

54:43

again and again. We got to be real

54:45

careful. That's why I'm into pardons. I'm doing

54:47

something unexpected. Like, oh, wow, we're

54:49

really going to stop going at each other

54:51

for a minute. And then

54:53

I'll give us a chance to like cool

54:56

down and not sign this global. Trump should

54:58

be like, I'm going to prosecute everyone who

55:00

committed crimes in federal government and I'm

55:02

going to pardon everyone else. I

55:05

would be open to everyone in the prisons out

55:07

and walk them in. If

55:09

it was so easy, if you could just flip a

55:11

switch and everything. I don't know, but I think that

55:13

the systems create corruption. It's a big part of the

55:16

problem. So we could get rid of all

55:18

these people that have done the bad thing. You put all

55:20

these new people into those systems. They're going to do bad

55:22

thing again. Justin Timberlake got arrested for a DUI, I guess.

55:25

And that's the news. And apparently he didn't

55:28

want to get it breathalyzed. I don't know a lot about the

55:30

story, but it's just like, why would a dude so wealthy and

55:32

successful even bother with that stuff? It's because people

55:34

with power just do what people with power want to do. They want to

55:36

do whatever they want. You'd be

55:38

like, oh, I can't believe that guy would do that. No, when

55:40

people get power, they're like, I can do that. That's the point.

55:43

I mean, take a look at how we handle speeding tickets. If

55:46

you're worth a billion dollars, you do

55:48

not care about speeding. Not only that,

55:50

you'll get a driver. You'll get a driver, you put him in there

55:53

and you'll be like, I'm paying you six figures. I want you to

55:55

go double the limit. He's going to be like, I get pulled over

55:57

and I'll pay for any of your legal troubles. You got nothing to

55:59

worry about. And the guy goes. Okay, they

56:01

do, I think it's like in Switzerland, I

56:03

could be wrong, it's one of these countries in Europe,

56:06

your speeding tickets are a percentage of your income. Yeah,

56:09

so if you're making 10 million a year, it's like you get it,

56:11

you'll get like a $100,000 ticket, you're

56:13

gonna be like, whoa. That's kicking the balls. In

56:16

Chicago, at the CUBS games,

56:19

people would do this, they'd probably still do

56:21

this, they double park, they park illegally, they

56:23

park in front of fire hydrants, because

56:26

the cost of the ticket, or the

56:28

damage to the car or the towing is cheaper than finding

56:30

parking for the game. So they're like, usually they

56:32

don't tell you because there's too many cars that do it. I'd

56:35

walk outside my apartment, and there'd be

56:37

like eight or so cars,

56:39

I might block double parked blocking us in, with

56:42

their blinkers on, and they'd walk to the game, because

56:44

there's so many, the tow companies struggle to get all

56:46

of them, so people are like, I'll probably be fine

56:49

if I park on this street. And

56:51

then we actually had a car towed once, we were

56:53

like, dude, it's blocking two of our cars, and

56:55

they were watching, but the average person,

56:58

oh, I'll take the $100 parking ticket, it's paid parking,

57:00

that's how it works. So when people

57:02

have power, that's what happens

57:04

when they get an office. So we're wondering, why

57:06

are they doing all these things? Why are they trying to

57:08

arrest Trump? Dude, it's like some dude won the lottery, and

57:10

the government came and said, we want to take the money

57:13

away from you, and they're thinking, I could use this money

57:15

to stop that from happening. The issue is,

57:18

they have supreme power, right? If

57:20

you win a million bucks in the lottery, you don't got more money

57:22

or resources in the government, so you lose, and you go, okay, I

57:24

can't win this fight. The people in

57:26

the Democratic Party at the state level and the federal

57:28

level have access to the highest

57:30

level of law enforcement, nothing supersedes this. So

57:33

their attitude is, we don't want to give this up,

57:35

we won, we won the lottery, just

57:38

start arresting them all, no one can stop us, so

57:40

they will. It

57:42

is a fact, if there was

57:44

no law enforcement for

57:46

taxation, nobody would pay taxes, no

57:49

question. It is only through the

57:51

threat of force, violence, and arrest,

57:54

do people pay taxes. The

57:57

people who are in the highest seats of government have no

57:59

one to worry about. about. So they're thinking,

58:01

as long as we win in November, we can do

58:03

whatever we want. I

58:05

think that's sad. I think that's one of the reasons that Americans

58:08

feel so disenchanted with our with our nation

58:10

right now, which is also sad, right? I

58:13

think that people feel as though, no matter how

58:15

hard they try, if they follow the rules or

58:17

they don't follow the rules, ultimately

58:20

powerful people are not working for their

58:22

best interests and are often looking to

58:24

capitalize off their suffering. And

58:26

I don't want to live in a country where

58:28

that's the theme, right? When we have to do

58:30

something to change that. There's different levels

58:32

of like corrupted power. There's the, do you know

58:34

who I am? I saw that Drake was at

58:37

a party that he didn't get invited to. And

58:39

they're like, who are you? She was getting arrested for a

58:41

DUI one time. And it's all that just like

58:43

nails on a chalkboard. And then Drake was like, do you

58:45

know who I am? Like, Oh my God, that that kind

58:47

of power corruption, where you actually think your

58:49

body's worth more than other bodies. You know, but you

58:51

know why they're saying that? Because they're right. Yeah.

58:55

It's sort of like sub subtle threat of

58:57

like, are you, can you imagine the

58:59

humiliation you're going to face if you don't let me do whatever

59:01

I want to do? It's you are going to

59:04

be so inundated with death threats. Your insurance companies

59:06

are cancel your, your venue will get shut down.

59:08

All my people are you're picking a fight with

59:10

all my people too. Do you even know who I

59:12

am? But then the other one is

59:14

like the utilitarian power, crazy corruption,

59:17

where you just see people as ants as

59:19

like pebbles to be moved around in a

59:21

pile to better organize the weight of the

59:23

system. And you're so detached from the plebe

59:25

the common man. That's another kind

59:28

of inept, like

59:31

inevitable corruption, maybe being separated

59:33

from the system you're trying to create or work

59:35

on. It just leads to,

59:37

you know, malfeasance because you

59:39

don't understand the system because you're separate from it.

59:42

I think there is a problem where

59:44

we have a justice

59:46

system where it's a huge roll of the

59:49

dice. And depending on your circumstances

59:51

and who you like, what judge you appear in

59:53

front of, if you get a sympathetic jury, if

59:55

you're being tried in a state that's or in

59:57

an area that's very liberal when you're conservative or

59:59

or vice, like whatever, that

1:00:02

it's potentially destroying your life

1:00:05

when you could have been a productive citizen.

1:00:07

I think there is a question of like,

1:00:10

I think we need law and order and I

1:00:12

think that there are people who must be locked up.

1:00:15

They are threats to the people around them. On

1:00:18

the other hand, we

1:00:20

need a system that separates people

1:00:22

who can bounce back from a minor

1:00:24

offense and become healthy, productive members

1:00:26

of our society rather than

1:00:28

being tagged in a way that ultimately means they can

1:00:31

never recover from it. This

1:00:33

is one of the challenges that I think

1:00:35

Democrats talk about but don't actually do enough

1:00:37

for. They'll say like, oh, we're campaigning for

1:00:39

votes for felons or we're doing whatever. But

1:00:42

also, as we have seen with their treatment of

1:00:44

Trump, they are the first people to use judicial

1:00:47

pressure to ruin someone's life. It

1:00:49

seems horrible to me. Well, with

1:00:52

that in mind, let's jump to the story. We got a tweet from Alx. Joy

1:00:55

Behar is worried Trump will pull Maddow

1:00:58

and the view off the air. I

1:01:01

saw that meme. I can't remember who said it. They

1:01:04

said, Lord, it was R.Mackintosh. He said, Lord, give me

1:01:06

the Trump the left has created in their delusional minds.

1:01:09

So here's the clip. Let's

1:01:11

play it. So you said recently that

1:01:13

you thought that you, as an outspoken

1:01:15

critic, could be a target yourself. Some

1:01:18

people think that sounds overdramatic, but I'm right there

1:01:20

with you. I think that he is so vindictive

1:01:23

that he will go after however he

1:01:25

has to do the IRS maybe or

1:01:28

even, you know, through sponsors to get

1:01:30

us off the air, maybe or you.

1:01:34

How seriously should we be taking that? Well,

1:01:38

so I was asked, am I worried about me? And

1:01:40

my answer was I'm worried about all of us. I'm

1:01:42

no more worried about me than I am worried about

1:01:44

everybody in the country. I think it's bad to

1:01:46

have somebody saying, give me as much

1:01:48

power as you can in

1:01:50

this country so I can use it

1:01:53

to go after other Americans so I

1:01:55

can use it to go after the

1:01:57

subhuman internal enemies and I'll destroy them.

1:02:00

That's just not a good system for anybody. And

1:02:02

I don't think anybody's safe if that's

1:02:04

the sort of basis on which he

1:02:07

wants to get more power. Well, remember when

1:02:09

Nixon had an enemies list? That was a proud moment for

1:02:11

a lot of people if they were on the enemy list.

1:02:13

Maybe we need to turn it around like that. Well, I

1:02:15

don't, I mean, I think that if he decides that he's going

1:02:17

to go after you or me

1:02:19

or anybody who's well known, you know,

1:02:23

we have resources, we'll likely be fine. But

1:02:26

I think there's a pattern where he

1:02:28

picks out individual people and effectively terrorizes

1:02:30

that. I mean, there's Stormy

1:02:32

Daniels wearing a bulletproof vest to get into

1:02:35

the courthouse. Once you have political violence, you

1:02:37

have fascism following that. So Stormy Daniels chose

1:02:39

to be in this space,

1:02:41

but I just want to point out how they're telling

1:02:43

on themselves. Yeah, the things they are doing. They're like,

1:02:45

oh, Trump might do what we do. Yeah,

1:02:47

Trump might do the exact things that we have done. I don't

1:02:50

know. Let's say to Mike Lindell,

1:02:52

who all had all the products pulled out of

1:02:54

stores or I don't know Donald Trump, who's been

1:02:56

the target of specific persecution. Or when she mentions

1:02:58

the little guy, we have resources, we'll be fine.

1:03:00

Yeah. When the big tech

1:03:02

companies for leftist reasons went after all of these

1:03:04

smaller Trump supporting accounts or when the gen sixers

1:03:06

list could go on. It's crazy to me. But

1:03:09

what's interesting to me is it feels like Joy

1:03:11

Baird has no idea. She's like it hadn't even

1:03:14

occurred to her that the things that she is

1:03:16

describing are things that they're actually whereas Rachel Maddow

1:03:18

feels like she's like, well, you know, as these

1:03:20

are strategies we have observed, they might turn them

1:03:22

on us. And it makes me think that there

1:03:24

is sort of a level of

1:03:26

sheep minded Democratic voter that is like, no,

1:03:28

but like when we're doing it or this

1:03:31

stuff is different because it's for justice and

1:03:33

those people are bad. And she's like throwing

1:03:35

out political violence because, you know, 2020 was

1:03:37

marked by left wing

1:03:40

rioters that destroyed cities. But that is not

1:03:42

political violence to her. It's very weird. Whereas

1:03:44

Rachel Maddow knows this is something that's happening

1:03:46

and that's why she's fearful of it. She

1:03:49

is at least is it peeringly cognizant of the

1:03:51

fact that she is describing things that her

1:03:53

side, so to speak, is actively already doing.

1:03:56

Yeah. And I mean, I think clips

1:03:58

like this have started to become. more

1:04:00

common in the past two weeks. I

1:04:02

honestly think this is them sweating. They

1:04:04

see that we're seeing through the lies.

1:04:06

They know what's coming and they're fearful

1:04:08

of it. And they're trying their best

1:04:10

to position themselves and defend from attacks

1:04:12

and spin. But at the end of

1:04:14

the day, I think they know that

1:04:17

MAGA is an unstoppable force and it's

1:04:19

a popular one and they're up against

1:04:21

a real fight and they're freaking out

1:04:23

because their lies are about to come

1:04:25

crumbling down. Yeah,

1:04:27

I thought it was interesting when Joy was like, talking

1:04:30

about a list. She said, oh yeah, they

1:04:32

had Nixon had lists of people that maybe

1:04:34

we should go ahead and do that before

1:04:36

they do that to us. She's saying Nixon

1:04:38

had an enemies list and it was like

1:04:40

honorable to be on it. So

1:04:42

maybe we should consider it being a privilege and an

1:04:44

honor to be deemed an enemy. Oh, I see, okay.

1:04:46

Rather, she's not saying to create an enemies list. No,

1:04:49

they already got them. I just felt something at the level of

1:04:51

narcissism. The first thing Trump is

1:04:53

gonna do, he's top priority in getting the view

1:04:55

off the air. He never took a show off

1:04:57

the air as far as I know when he

1:05:00

was president. No, he's not gonna take a show

1:05:02

off the air. He never shut a radio station

1:05:04

down, not like Zelensky did. He never got, did

1:05:06

he get anybody fired from their role in the

1:05:08

news industry? I don't think he got one person

1:05:10

fired. As far as I know, but we do

1:05:12

know that that reporter from what, the Tennessee Star,

1:05:14

who was publishing the manifesto, he's facing legal

1:05:17

retribution for that. Of course, for what?

1:05:19

He was publishing Audrey Hale's manifesto and

1:05:22

she's the shooter from the Christian

1:05:24

school shooting at a covenant

1:05:26

school and he is now facing legal

1:05:29

consequences for this from the local

1:05:31

government. So what you're saying is

1:05:33

that the government does go after

1:05:35

journalists, just left wing governments. It's

1:05:37

crazy. I think what Don would

1:05:39

do, Donald Trump, is he would go personal at people

1:05:42

he didn't like. He wouldn't be like, from the power

1:05:44

invested in me, I'm stripping you of your wealth and

1:05:46

putting you in prison for these. He would just be

1:05:48

like, you're fat, deal with it. But

1:05:52

the problem is, when he became president,

1:05:54

he had all these people behind him,

1:05:56

this new crowd of sycophants that were

1:05:58

willing to live and die by the

1:06:00

words. hypothetically, theoretically, or whatever, metaphorically. And

1:06:03

so when he would insult people, there's this armada

1:06:06

of people that would come and insult the person

1:06:08

in addition that he didn't have before he ran

1:06:10

for president. When he went from popularity one to

1:06:12

100 magnitudes, 100

1:06:15

times more popular. So that, I think, when

1:06:18

people criticize his bullying tactics or

1:06:20

his going to people one on one, it

1:06:24

became kind of spiraled out of his control when

1:06:26

he would insult someone. It wasn't just

1:06:28

like a one on one anymore. So

1:06:31

I see why people are concerned with that behavior. But

1:06:33

he didn't exhibit it that much. Like Rosie O'Donnell, he

1:06:35

would duke it out with her. But

1:06:37

that was only pre-2016. It was real

1:06:39

early in his career as a politician. If even he

1:06:41

didn't really do it, did he do it after his

1:06:43

president a little bit? Other

1:06:46

people, he didn't go too hard in the, I mean, I don't know.

1:06:48

I don't watch his stuff. But he wasn't like

1:06:50

too hard in the paint with individuals.

1:06:53

I mean, the question is, does Joy Bear

1:06:55

think that Biden has the power to be

1:06:57

able to, you know, and

1:06:59

I mean, if Tyler Carlson was still on Fox or

1:07:01

anyone else, like could he

1:07:04

shut down a station that's

1:07:06

privately owned? Does she think that's how this

1:07:08

works? Or she thinks that Trump

1:07:10

is suddenly going to invent powers that Biden

1:07:12

doesn't already have? It's so illogical because it's

1:07:15

ultimately deeply emotional. Because again, and I say

1:07:17

this, I feel like too often, but I'm

1:07:19

going to be a broken record here. All

1:07:22

of this is just fear mongering, right? Democrats don't

1:07:24

have anything positive to run on. So they have

1:07:26

to run on fear mongering and compliance. They need

1:07:28

their voters and their base to be so

1:07:30

scared that they will leave their houses and go to the

1:07:32

polls. I think that they'd shut down Parler.

1:07:36

I don't know exactly what the order of requests

1:07:38

was to the, was it on Amazon Web Service?

1:07:40

Parler was hosting on Amazon Web Service. And then

1:07:42

the administration came in and was like, we don't

1:07:44

like what Parler is happening on Parler. So pull

1:07:46

it. And Amazon was like, we'll pull it, because we

1:07:49

don't want to get screwed over by the US government.

1:07:51

So they colluded with the US government. I don't know

1:07:53

who exactly, but this is the story I've been told.

1:07:55

So that's like Biden overseeing an

1:07:57

administration that shuts down a media company.

1:08:00

company. Like that's the fear of what

1:08:02

Trump is going to do to the view is like

1:08:04

what Biden did to Parler. So

1:08:07

it's you're staring in the mirror. It's looking right at

1:08:10

you guys, Joy and Rachel. And

1:08:12

if you, if you're pretending not to see it, that's a painful way

1:08:14

to live. I'm not super familiar

1:08:16

with them with Parler, but again, I know

1:08:19

that there are all kinds of federal and

1:08:21

state level agencies that go after groups that

1:08:23

discuss things that make left wing

1:08:25

politicians uncomfortable. And so I think that this is

1:08:27

the reality that we're in. Like they

1:08:30

know this is already happening and they're trying to

1:08:32

say, oh, it's the other side. Like

1:08:34

it bothers me so much when, so they had

1:08:36

that statement that the Kamala Harris, or I said

1:08:38

the Kamala Harris campaign when it's really the Biden

1:08:41

Harris campaign, uh, released after, after Trump was convicted

1:08:43

in New York and they were like, well, he's,

1:08:45

he really is a felon

1:08:47

and this, that and the other. And you know,

1:08:49

but the other side is, is talking about political

1:08:52

violence. I have never ever heard of it. I

1:08:54

don't know what they're talking about, but always,

1:08:57

always, always the left is warning

1:08:59

us that apparently conservatives are planning

1:09:01

political violence. Doesn't that

1:09:03

seem like they are trying to scare their

1:09:05

own vase in being to be ready to,

1:09:08

I don't know, perpetrate their own political violence.

1:09:10

It seems crazy to me. Um,

1:09:12

I, I get

1:09:14

tired of the, the fear mongering

1:09:16

because I think, again, it is damaging long

1:09:18

term to the American public psyche. I think

1:09:20

it's bad, uh, for

1:09:22

Americans to live in fear. And I think they should

1:09:25

be encouraged by a leadership that says like,

1:09:27

we are able to work through our differences

1:09:29

and we are able to come to compromise

1:09:31

when we have a strong culture that we

1:09:33

all believe in and participate in. And that's

1:09:36

not the message that the democratic party sends.

1:09:38

And the fear living in fear, it's

1:09:40

bad for people's cortisol. Their endocrine systems are

1:09:42

all messed up. Their decision making is terrible,

1:09:44

but also when there's something that comes along

1:09:46

that's actually legitimately reasonable to be

1:09:48

afraid of, like nuclear war with Russia

1:09:50

or something, people are so muted and

1:09:52

desensitized to the fear. You're unable to weigh

1:09:54

what's really dangerous. You also aren't able to like build

1:09:57

community, right? If you think your neighbor is out to

1:09:59

get you because they. fly the American flag and

1:10:01

you fly the pride flag, then you are

1:10:03

probably always driving down the street thinking they're

1:10:05

bad, they're judging me, this, that, neither. Like

1:10:07

you are living in

1:10:09

a way that does not draw you to other

1:10:11

people and I think that's really destructive.

1:10:14

I don't know how you

1:10:16

feel about this. If you're hoping

1:10:18

that Joy Bear is gonna get pulled

1:10:20

from the air or if you're, you know, thinking

1:10:22

that perhaps it's Biden who's perpetrating this. Lord give

1:10:24

me the Trump they've made up in their delusional minds. That's

1:10:26

how I feel. I mean like I was already gonna

1:10:28

vote for Trump but like if he's gonna get rid

1:10:30

of the view that's gonna make me run to the

1:10:32

polls on November 5th. To be

1:10:34

fair I think the views getting rid of themselves. Like

1:10:37

all these networks are just... They're dying out. Yeah they

1:10:39

don't know what... They're

1:10:41

addicted to their audience but their audience is dramatically

1:10:43

changing and so they don't have to do. They

1:10:45

should have Trump on weekly. That would be rating

1:10:48

the world for them. I mean they

1:10:50

should honestly be thanking him even now.

1:10:52

He provides the entire content for their

1:10:54

I think three hour long show. It's

1:10:56

just Trump talk all day long. It'd

1:10:58

be so great. Even if he was president and he

1:11:00

went on there just talk policy for an hour and

1:11:03

they're just yelling at him to shut up and he's

1:11:05

like no you listen to me. Like without it being

1:11:07

coming cruel. That'd be so entertaining. They

1:11:09

all kind of know each other. They're

1:11:11

all like Joy and Don are like me old broken

1:11:14

New York. Not really broken but that's the

1:11:16

funny thing. These people like Whoopi Goldberg they

1:11:18

all used to fawn over President Trump. They

1:11:20

loved him. He was a Hollywood icon but

1:11:23

now you know he runs for president puts

1:11:25

America first and they hate him. Alright

1:11:28

let's jump to this story from the post-millennial. House

1:11:30

GOP moves to reverse J6 committee subpoena against

1:11:32

Trump advisors days before Steve Bannon is set

1:11:35

to report to prison. So this

1:11:37

is Thomas... I believe it's Thomas Massey and Matt

1:11:39

Gaetz. I believe Marjorie Taylor Greene has also signed

1:11:41

on. This is what Matt Gaetz

1:11:43

laid out on this show. He said basically

1:11:46

you nullify those subpoenas because they control the

1:11:48

house and they can and then there's

1:11:50

no convictions. So this is

1:11:52

GOP rep Eric Burleson, Thomas Massey and others in the house

1:11:55

have co-sponsored a resolution to rescind subpoenas from

1:11:58

the J6 committee that were brought against... Steve

1:12:00

Bannon, Mark Meadows, Dan Scavino, and Peter Navarro should

1:12:02

also immediately remove the contempt of Congress convictions as

1:12:05

if there were no subpoenas, there would be no

1:12:07

contempt. Bannon is required to report to prison

1:12:09

to begin his four month sentence July 1st. Quote,

1:12:13

it's past time for the House of Representatives

1:12:15

to take action to begin undoing the harm

1:12:17

that was caused by the illegitimate January 6th

1:12:19

committee, Rep Burleson said in a press

1:12:21

release. This is the right thing to do, and

1:12:23

I hope all members of the House will join me in this effort. All

1:12:26

right, I'm not super confident, but I

1:12:28

don't see why this would not pass. Yeah,

1:12:31

I think it absolutely should pass. I think it's

1:12:33

much needed support. We saw

1:12:35

Garland, you know, just months ago on

1:12:37

tape, the Attorney General of the United

1:12:39

States say that he can defy and

1:12:41

ignore congressional subpoenas that he doesn't agree

1:12:43

with. So there is an obvious double

1:12:45

standard here in two tiered system of

1:12:48

enforcement. If you're a conservative like Steve

1:12:50

Bannon or you know, Peter Navarro, and

1:12:52

you defy an illegitimate, that's another crucial

1:12:55

point, I think, that people need to

1:12:57

realize. The January 6th committee

1:12:59

is not a legitimate committee. It had

1:13:01

no authority to send subpoenas. It didn't have a

1:13:03

ranking minority member. There are a lot of other

1:13:05

issues with it, so it didn't have any authority

1:13:08

to send these subpoenas in the first place. But

1:13:10

when Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro defied those, they

1:13:13

weren't doing anything wrong. And for them to

1:13:15

be held accountable for that, but not Merrick

1:13:17

Garland, I think it leaves the American voter

1:13:19

totally confused, and they're able to see through

1:13:21

it, and they're able to see that this

1:13:24

is just weaponization of the judicial system. I

1:13:27

like this because it is action, right? I

1:13:29

think it's an interesting, rather

1:13:32

than saying like, oh, darn, they've defeated us, and

1:13:34

I guess you gotta keep appealing or whatever. Like

1:13:36

it is the Congress saying like, we have a

1:13:38

way to do something about this. They

1:13:41

do send a lot of strong-willed letters, but

1:13:43

in this case, it seems like they are moving forward in a

1:13:45

way that could help people that are

1:13:47

being unfairly targeted and punished, in my opinion.

1:13:50

Yeah, they say they're very specific that the

1:13:52

committee, this January 6th committee was operating without

1:13:54

a ranking minority leader, which you mentioned Kingsley.

1:13:57

That's not customary for the committees. I don't know

1:13:59

if that might actually discuss. qualify them for being

1:14:01

able to order subpoenas. And also that

1:14:03

the Republicans on board were Adam Kinzinger and Liz

1:14:05

Cheney who were not supported by the GOP at

1:14:07

the time, but they were just put

1:14:09

there by Nancy Pelosi. So

1:14:12

I don't know if this operating

1:14:14

without a ranking minority leader is enough on its

1:14:16

face. Matt said it was. I'm pretty sure he

1:14:18

was saying that it was. I don't, honestly, I don't know that it

1:14:20

matters. The House can

1:14:23

pass it. It's the House. They

1:14:26

can just say, we do because we

1:14:28

vote. There are subpoenas. There

1:14:31

you go. Gone. So

1:14:33

the House votes to rescind the subpoenas that doesn't go to the Senate. Just

1:14:35

that's it. Well, because this is a House action, it's

1:14:37

only into itself. They're not passing a law. The

1:14:40

House subpoenaed the JSICS committee subpoenaed these

1:14:42

people and the House is now

1:14:44

going to say, no, we're doing away with those. And

1:14:48

they should. But I'm wondering, do you think Republicans will

1:14:50

vote for it or they'll say no? Ryan

1:14:58

Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. With the price of

1:15:00

just about everything going up during inflation, we thought

1:15:03

we'd bring our prices down. So to help us,

1:15:05

we brought in a reverse auctioneer, which is apparently

1:15:07

a thing. Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium Wireless! Having to

1:15:09

get 30, 30, better get 30, better get 20,

1:15:11

20, 20, better get 20, 20, better

1:15:14

get 15, 15, 15, 15, just

1:15:17

15 bucks a month? Sold! Give

1:15:19

it a try at mintmobile.com/switch. $45

1:15:21

up front for three months plus taxes and fees. Promote

1:15:23

for new customers for limited time. Unlimited more than 40

1:15:25

gigabytes per month. Slows. Full terms at mintmobile.com. Full terms at

1:15:28

mintmobile.com. To put their money where their mouth is. We

1:15:30

see a lot of people on the campaign trail talk

1:15:33

about the weaponization of the justice system and

1:15:35

they give lip service to what's happening to

1:15:37

Trump, what's happening to Steve Bannon. But

1:15:39

if we put this to a vote, we're going to

1:15:42

actually see which members believe what they're saying and are

1:15:44

willing to put their money where their mouth is. So

1:15:47

I hope to see that they're all the patriots

1:15:49

they claim to be. Steve Bannon is someone who

1:15:51

is a wonderful America first

1:15:53

hero. I think he is really the

1:15:55

architect of the Trump movement and he's

1:15:58

someone that we need in

1:16:00

the ring as we approach November 5th, absolutely.

1:16:02

And that is why they're trying to take

1:16:04

him out, right? They know that he is

1:16:06

instrumental in this presidential campaign cycle and they

1:16:09

want to put him on the sidelines. It's

1:16:11

been so obvious that that's, you know, the

1:16:13

entire game for them. That's why they're taking

1:16:15

out conservative lawyers. They don't want to have

1:16:17

a DOJ that's full of competent attorneys. So

1:16:19

they're going after the ones that we do

1:16:22

have. They're just trying to make sure that

1:16:24

basically our entire bench is wiped out so

1:16:26

that we have no personnel if we do

1:16:28

win in November. What

1:16:31

does it mean, this resolution? Is

1:16:33

there a name for it? I don't know that it has a name, does it?

1:16:35

Look. Sorry, Hannah Clare, what were you about to

1:16:37

say? Probably does. They always do, don't

1:16:39

they? Yeah, I don't know if they included the

1:16:41

name here. I

1:16:43

think that that

1:16:45

is sort of the

1:16:48

crisis mode activity of

1:16:51

government right now. And I

1:16:53

think it almost speaks to how strongly,

1:16:56

how strong Trump is perceived

1:16:58

by people, especially entrenched

1:17:01

bureaucrats, because they're saying

1:17:03

we need to make it difficult for them

1:17:05

to start off on a strong foot, right?

1:17:08

If going into 2025, these agencies are

1:17:10

already staffed by confident conservative people who

1:17:12

have American first values, then it'll be

1:17:14

much easier to get things going. If

1:17:17

you have to spend the first couple

1:17:19

of months, you know, three months weeding

1:17:21

everyone out, readjusting it, fixing

1:17:23

staffing issues, then you are starting

1:17:25

three months behind. You

1:17:27

know, a lot of presidencies have to do it. It's not crippling

1:17:30

necessarily, but it's a delay. And

1:17:32

it's sort of like saying, well, we don't think

1:17:35

we'll be in positions of power come January 2025.

1:17:39

Definitely. And I think this is also what they're

1:17:41

doing to Steve Bannon, Pierre Navarro, and others. I

1:17:43

think it's also a warning

1:17:45

sign from the regime

1:17:47

to other conservatives, right? This

1:17:49

is what happens if you defy us, and

1:17:52

they're trying to kind of scare us into submission. So

1:17:55

I think all of us, you know, from the

1:17:57

January 6th attendee who's being harassed

1:17:59

to... you know, Steve Bannon and

1:18:01

Peter Navarro have to be willing

1:18:03

to continually defy the system and

1:18:06

you know, not submit and not be afraid

1:18:08

of the crushing weight that it can exact

1:18:10

on you. Do

1:18:12

you think that the American

1:18:14

people watch Congress closely enough

1:18:16

to feel like actions like

1:18:18

this are a good

1:18:21

sign or is it all sort of, you know,

1:18:24

drama within an already kind of enclosed circle?

1:18:26

I think they pay attention and I think

1:18:28

that they want to see some action. Like

1:18:30

you were saying, you know, there's been a

1:18:32

lot of strongly worded letters, stern

1:18:35

finger shakings, but there really hasn't been

1:18:37

any action from the GOP. And I

1:18:39

think it's been frustrating for voters, right?

1:18:41

Because we have had the House, the

1:18:43

118th Congress hasn't really sent any subpoenas.

1:18:46

They haven't prosecuted people. They haven't,

1:18:48

you know, done anything. I think

1:18:51

that the American people thought they were going to

1:18:53

do. We thought when we set up the Weaponization

1:18:55

Committee that we were going to have, you know,

1:18:57

a new church committee, that we were going to

1:18:59

really go after these government bureaucrats, that we were

1:19:01

going to defund these woke and weaponized agencies. And

1:19:03

now the American people with, you know, just a

1:19:05

few months left in this Congress are seeing that

1:19:07

that hasn't happened and they're demanding action. So I

1:19:09

think something like this is going to go a

1:19:11

long way for voters who just want to see

1:19:13

the GOP put up some sort of fight. Because

1:19:16

as I was saying, we've been kind of

1:19:18

all talk, no walk and voters are really

1:19:20

frustrated with that and they see through it.

1:19:22

I think we used to, pre-Trump, politicians used

1:19:24

to be able to talk nice and

1:19:27

we didn't really think much of it. But

1:19:29

now Trump has exposed both left

1:19:32

and right how the system works,

1:19:34

how politicians sell out. They

1:19:36

tell you one thing, they get to DC vote the other way. And

1:19:39

people post Trump are really just

1:19:42

available. They're aware of that. And

1:19:45

they're done with these kind of, you know,

1:19:47

just polished politicians that give them the right

1:19:49

talking points, but then don't actually do

1:19:51

the votes that they need to be making. That's

1:19:54

what I liked about Tommy Tuberville, his hold on

1:20:00

any military appointments and promotions

1:20:03

because of the

1:20:05

DOD's policy regarding, you know, paying for people's

1:20:07

travel when they're leaving, you know, whatever state

1:20:09

they're stationed in to go get an abortion.

1:20:11

And he was like, I don't believe in

1:20:13

this. They should not be involved. That is

1:20:15

ultimately funding abortion. And

1:20:17

it made me laugh because everyone would

1:20:19

be like, he is holding up hundreds

1:20:21

of nominations, which he was. On the

1:20:23

other hand, actually, they always could have

1:20:25

called the votes to the floor. It

1:20:27

would have just gone more slowly. If

1:20:30

they had wanted to spend a little

1:20:32

extra time working, they could have kept

1:20:34

moving promotions and appointments along. And so

1:20:36

they allowed this blockade to happen

1:20:38

because ultimately they didn't want to

1:20:40

have to compromise on abortion. He

1:20:43

said, you know, if we hold a vote to

1:20:45

codify this into law, two

1:20:47

roles, like, then I'll drop my thing.

1:20:50

But they never called it to the floor. They

1:20:52

didn't continue with appointments. And instead he single-handedly held

1:20:54

up one of these things and became a huge

1:20:56

enemy for leftists over this issue. And I always

1:20:58

liked it because it was like, oh,

1:21:00

you are protesting in a way that I

1:21:03

think is effective. I like this bill because

1:21:05

we should take action, especially if there are

1:21:08

easy ways. If the judicial system is unfairly

1:21:11

treating people because of this

1:21:13

subpoena, then doing something about

1:21:15

it on the congressional side is perfect. I wish

1:21:18

that we saw this kind of creative movement more

1:21:20

often with Republican lawmakers. I mean, to be honest,

1:21:22

I don't even know how creative it is. It

1:21:25

seems kind of basic, but I'm glad they're doing

1:21:27

it. But they're doing it. I have nothing to

1:21:29

say on that. It's something. Well, and they could

1:21:32

have done this a little while ago, right? Before

1:21:34

Peter Navarro went to prison. Yeah. Eventually someone stepped

1:21:36

up and thought of it. If rescinding the community's

1:21:38

ability to issue subpoenas in general, would that then

1:21:40

negatively impact other people that they'd subpoenaed? Would they

1:21:43

have to start removing testimony, letting people out of

1:21:45

prison? I think once things are in record, that's

1:21:47

all. Well, it's just Navarro, right? Navarro

1:21:50

is the only one who's incarcerated right now. There's obviously

1:21:52

other people who hang people out. Three other people, I

1:21:54

think? Incarcerated? No, no, no. Three other people that are

1:21:56

going to be affected by this. Right. And Bannon's got

1:21:58

to go to prison. in a couple weeks. Yeah,

1:22:02

if this doesn't get rescinded. Yeah. Right. Yeah.

1:22:05

So, again, maybe it would have been nice if we came

1:22:07

up with this idea a couple of

1:22:09

months ago. Peter Navarro was on the show shortly before he

1:22:11

had to. I know he was in the middle of his

1:22:13

final appeal, I think. And I wish

1:22:15

we had come up with this then, but,

1:22:18

you know, better late than never. And I hope

1:22:20

he sees some sort of restitution for it. Let's

1:22:22

get a subpoena for this. We got the surf

1:22:24

in the post-millennial. Secret service destroyed video evidence of

1:22:26

Biden's dog attacking agent. White House

1:22:28

tours stopped to clean up the blood.

1:22:31

Yikes. Who is this, Commander Biden?

1:22:33

Is that his name? Yeah, yeah, Commander. And he

1:22:36

like he bit a bunch of people apparently, right?

1:22:38

Oh, he's been like he has, I think, almost

1:22:40

30 bite records. And to be totally clear, I

1:22:42

do not hold this against the dog. I hold

1:22:44

it against the Biden family for having a dog

1:22:46

in an environment where it is not thriving. I

1:22:50

mean, sometimes you get bad dogs. Right. And

1:22:53

I don't know what the appropriate response is for a dog

1:22:55

that bites a whole lot of muzzle. I

1:22:57

think usually what most jurisdictions do is if

1:22:59

a dog bites multiple times, they put it

1:23:01

down. Right. They've had two dogs that have

1:23:03

had this problem in the White House. It's

1:23:06

not. I mean, maybe they got two dogs

1:23:08

back to back or maybe German Shepherds are

1:23:10

specific breed that have qualities for protection. And

1:23:12

in this environment, it's not being trained to

1:23:14

queue for protective behaviors like this

1:23:17

is not rocket science. The Obamas had what?

1:23:19

Like a labradoodle. They had like a tiny

1:23:21

fluffy dog. Maybe this is

1:23:23

not the place to have German Shepherds. You know,

1:23:25

I just got to point out something weird. Secret

1:23:27

service spokesman Anthony Googly-Elmey told the outlet that the

1:23:29

agency abides by law for federal records retention schedule

1:23:31

that defines when certain types of records can be

1:23:33

archived, destroyed, et cetera. However, Googly-Elmey did

1:23:36

not have direct knowledge of the video in question, according

1:23:38

to a statement. You know, this guy

1:23:40

has popped up a lot. Googly-Elmey

1:23:42

is a familiar name. Wasn't he the spokesperson

1:23:44

in the Justice Millet case to me? Look,

1:23:47

I swear there's like that would be interesting. He is. There's

1:23:50

a couple other stories where he's just been

1:23:52

like the spokesman for these different law enforcement

1:23:54

agencies when these stories come up. So

1:23:57

I don't know. But I can't say.

1:24:00

You know, the Biden dog was

1:24:03

Biden people, and they reportedly destroyed

1:24:05

all the evidence. When was

1:24:07

this? This was recent? This was a

1:24:09

couple years ago. Wasn't it? 20, 20, 20, a year ago.

1:24:13

I'm also curious about like what happened with Joe hurting

1:24:15

his leg. It says Anthony Guglielmi. Is

1:24:18

that how you say his name? Guglielmi. The

1:24:20

Chicago Police Department spokesperson. He

1:24:23

had a bunch of other jobs too. You can look up his records. He

1:24:25

obviously has some sort of law enforcement PR

1:24:27

thing where he's getting shifted around. But

1:24:29

he pops up at all the biggest stories.

1:24:31

Mm-hmm. Yeah. So you know, remember

1:24:33

when Biden hurt his foot and he was like, oh,

1:24:36

the dog. In the shower? Yeah, what happened with that?

1:24:38

Like the dog. I don't know. He was fighting the dog or

1:24:40

something. You want to see the other dog? He said he like

1:24:42

fell over the dog or something. And

1:24:44

like the dog was in the bathroom. He was getting out of

1:24:46

the shower and tripping the dog. Yeah. Why

1:24:48

was the dog in the bathroom? The dog was, I don't know. Well,

1:24:51

we know that Biden has weird boundary issues, so. Yeah,

1:24:53

I guess he left the door open. Occam's razor

1:24:55

says he left the door open. That's not unreasonable, I

1:24:57

guess. He's an old man who lives with just his

1:24:59

wife. He had the door open when he was showering. And

1:25:01

some people's dogs will be like, no, but I have to be

1:25:03

near you. Like, it could be normal stuff. Dog. The

1:25:06

bite issues. Because what I remember is they had an

1:25:08

older drone shepherd when they moved in. And they had

1:25:10

a younger one. And the

1:25:12

older one passed very sad, you know, long

1:25:15

life. The younger one always had bite issues.

1:25:18

You talking about Commander? Let me double check,

1:25:20

but I think it's Commander. Yeah,

1:25:22

because I have on Scanner News that

1:25:24

Dog Commander was involved in his 11th

1:25:26

bite incident in

1:25:29

September of last year. And so this

1:25:31

is an ongoing issue. But if I'm, they

1:25:34

had to, yes, they had to rehome their previous

1:25:36

dog Major after he bit a bunch of people.

1:25:38

Because this is, they had their

1:25:40

older dog Major move into the White House,

1:25:42

Major bit people. They would send

1:25:44

it back to Delaware for trainings or

1:25:47

whatever else. Like, you have to

1:25:49

do something. And then eventually they rehomed behind

1:25:51

her with like Major with family friends. And

1:25:53

then they got this new German Shepherd puppy

1:25:56

that they named Commander. Now Commander also has bite

1:25:58

issues. And again, I go back to. to maybe

1:26:01

they should switch breeds. Maybe they need a lap.

1:26:03

Maybe they need a dog that isn't often used

1:26:05

in police service for protection. Like why are we

1:26:07

doing this to these dogs? Obviously this environment is

1:26:09

not good for them. Or you

1:26:11

guys aren't able to effectively train

1:26:13

and manage your dogs. Either way, this is

1:26:15

a situation they keep creating. And

1:26:18

I feel bad for these secret service members who are

1:26:20

probably being told like, do not talk about this. No

1:26:22

one talk about these bites. We cannot make the

1:26:24

Bidens look like bad German Shepherd owners.

1:26:27

Yeah, they're doing it for optics. They want

1:26:29

a big strong dog with the name Commander.

1:26:31

So that we actually looks like we have

1:26:34

a Commander in the White House, which is

1:26:36

sad to tell that. But then the other

1:26:38

observation is that the guy can't lead it. I

1:26:41

mean obviously his brain's not there to raise

1:26:43

a child right now. He can't raise a

1:26:45

dog. He can't raise a German Shepherd especially.

1:26:47

Those things need massive attention. And they need

1:26:49

massive discipline. And their teeth are so sharp.

1:26:51

And they're so big and strong. You cannot

1:26:54

mess with those. You can't slip. Luke has

1:26:56

one. You gotta watch that guy the way

1:26:58

he trains that dog. It's impressive. And it

1:27:00

requires daily attention, literally. They're great dogs. But

1:27:02

they deserve to also be in the correct

1:27:04

environment. And they need an owner. They need

1:27:06

a Commander. They need someone in charge of their behavior.

1:27:08

They're going to go wild and just start smacking it

1:27:11

and everything. Maybe the dog wasn't charged. Like

1:27:13

you were trying to figure out who's running Biden. Maybe it was a dog. Dogs

1:27:15

have been in charge the whole time. The dog is the Commander in Chief. Biden

1:27:18

was just there. He was in the way. There's a

1:27:20

Roman Emperor that did that. Caligula,

1:27:22

did he make his horse? Oh,

1:27:24

made his horse a senator or something like that? Yeah, I think that might

1:27:26

have been Caligula. There's that town that

1:27:29

made the Labrador, the mayor. It's

1:27:31

funny stuff. I think that's a good idea. I think they

1:27:33

should get rid of the dog. I think

1:27:35

it's one by too many. Didn't they already get

1:27:37

rid of it? Oh. I think they've rehomed both

1:27:39

of them at this point. They definitely had re- they

1:27:41

were like, they have sent Commander back for trainings. And

1:27:43

ultimately, they also rehomed it as well. 25

1:27:47

recorded attacks from Commander. That's crazy. And

1:27:49

then remember, they had Major before that who

1:27:51

also had a series of bites and had

1:27:53

to be made. Major and Commander. It's like

1:27:56

what? We're pushing at least 30, maybe

1:27:58

more bites. At what point? to the

1:28:00

Secret Service agents, you know, get together and say,

1:28:02

look, we have rights. You guys can't have a

1:28:04

German Shepherd anymore. You have to have, you know,

1:28:06

a pug or something. Yeah. What was

1:28:08

that? What were they? There's a

1:28:11

in Vietnam when the if the lieutenant,

1:28:13

if they're coming to commander, kept getting

1:28:15

guys killed, they'd be like, they'd wake up one night with

1:28:17

a grenade in their tent. It's like, what are they? I

1:28:19

don't know what they would call that. Fragging the commander was

1:28:21

terrible. Yeah, that dog bites enough Secret Service agents. They're like,

1:28:23

you know, is someone going to take care of this dog?

1:28:26

What the hell? But

1:28:29

I think they should get rid of it. I guess I'm working on

1:28:31

their dog, but they did. But I'm more concerned, I guess, with the

1:28:33

destruction of evidence. Yeah. Yeah.

1:28:36

Like, is there going to be responsibility for this? I mean,

1:28:38

well, again, you pointed out that in

1:28:41

other cities, you know, dogs have

1:28:43

like a two bite, you know, if that

1:28:45

and then they can be potentially put down,

1:28:47

which is really sad and deadly weapons. What

1:28:50

are deadly weapons or euthanized is what I'm

1:28:53

saying. Dog. I'm sorry to interrupt, but dogs, you treat

1:28:55

them like deadly weapons. But sure, in

1:28:57

this case, Joe Biden doesn't

1:28:59

have to write, even when people that are basically

1:29:01

in his employ are in danger, he doesn't have

1:29:04

to abide by rules that other people would. And

1:29:06

again, to already talked about Hunter, like,

1:29:08

why is this the case? Why why are we allowed to

1:29:10

do this? And why does the American public turn a blind

1:29:12

eye to it? Like, if you love dogs, you look at

1:29:14

the story and say, this dog is not in a good

1:29:16

environment. It doesn't deserve to be here. It's probably stressed out.

1:29:18

It's not being, you know, managed the way it needs to

1:29:20

be, whatever. Also, if you work for

1:29:22

the Secret Service, I'm sure you're like, oh, my

1:29:25

gosh, please do not assign me to the detail

1:29:27

wherever commander is, because I will probably get bitten

1:29:29

and I don't want to deal with that. It

1:29:32

seems it seems like an obvious

1:29:34

fix, but for whatever reason, Biden doesn't feel like it's worth

1:29:37

doing. I guess they fixed it. They got rid of the dog.

1:29:39

They rehomed the dog. Eventually. Yeah. I think they

1:29:41

just have cats now. Oh, well,

1:29:43

that's good. But the evidence, they're showing evidence to protect

1:29:45

him. I wonder what else they're doing

1:29:48

that for. What are the evidence you think they're destroying

1:29:50

to protect all of it? President Biden. Public

1:29:52

records, emails, cell phones. You

1:29:55

know, they got bleach meant for that. I have to

1:29:57

imagine, you know, when Hillary Clinton destroyed all those emails, it's not

1:29:59

the first time it's. ever happened or

1:30:01

the last. It's just the one you know about.

1:30:04

We were mentioning Justin Timberlake earlier about the DUI.

1:30:07

And I'm like, I mean, in my opinion, I'd

1:30:09

imagine he drives drunk all the time. Like

1:30:12

on Fox News, they're like, why would he do that? And

1:30:14

I think it was Gutfeld, he's lucky nobody got hurt. And

1:30:16

I'm like, I

1:30:18

can't imagine it's the first time he did it. You know what I mean?

1:30:21

He just doesn't care. Damn, that's

1:30:23

what you were for, bro. I

1:30:26

mean, but when you're ultra wealthy, would you care? So

1:30:29

I have to imagine when it comes to government records, Democrats be

1:30:32

just destroying everything. I'd

1:30:34

be willing to bet Biden's got so many classified

1:30:36

records just all over the place and never even

1:30:38

found. I mean, and we were talking about the

1:30:40

January 6 committee, they destroyed all of their records.

1:30:43

So much of their footage from different depositions that

1:30:45

they took is just gone. They've destroyed

1:30:47

it. We'll never see it. Evil. It's

1:30:50

crazy. Welcome to modern America. That's why I'm

1:30:52

just like, you

1:30:54

know, 4th of July is coming up. But

1:30:57

I don't feel like there's a functioning country anymore. We're

1:31:00

being occupied by oligarchs. They

1:31:03

just do whatever they want. I know. It's been like I've

1:31:05

learned about it in 2007 and

1:31:08

got so black-pilled. This

1:31:10

is what we are. This is what we have become

1:31:13

is the hollowed out tip of

1:31:15

the economic oligarchy. That's a

1:31:17

good point, Ian. Maybe what's

1:31:19

really happened is that we shouldn't be

1:31:22

black-pilled. The reality is we should be

1:31:24

white-pilled because before Trump, the

1:31:27

deep state oligarchs were in control of everything

1:31:29

with no say whatsoever. And

1:31:32

people right now may be looking at it like, oh, no, we're losing.

1:31:35

Actually, for the first time, we're winning. So

1:31:38

2007, well before Trump, the deep state's in control, 100%.

1:31:42

Nothing's changing that. Trump comes around

1:31:44

wins, and now they're panicking. So

1:31:46

we're actually facing the only real opportunity we've had in 30

1:31:48

or 40 years or longer to

1:31:51

actually get a real president in who's far from

1:31:53

perfect but a real president. Yeah, I think so

1:31:56

much of American politics and so much of life

1:31:58

is deciding the mentality with which you're going to

1:32:00

face. face challenges and so if you say like,

1:32:02

well it's all over, you know, you just can't

1:32:04

change anything then you are definitely not changing anything.

1:32:07

Whereas if you look to this as like an

1:32:09

opportunity to change some of the damage that's

1:32:11

being done to steel ship in a different direction

1:32:13

then you should feel really motivated going into November.

1:32:16

Like you should be looking at this as like

1:32:18

the most critical time and the

1:32:20

actions that you're doing whether that's you know campaigning

1:32:22

for local people that you support or talking to

1:32:24

your friends and family about voting like you should

1:32:26

look at that as a critical activity which you

1:32:28

can then look back on and say like I

1:32:30

made a difference because I did those things. Yeah

1:32:33

and I think now too more people are aware

1:32:35

and awake like they understand what's going on you

1:32:37

know pre-Trump like I had no idea how

1:32:40

the deep state functioned I had no idea

1:32:42

that it even existed or that you know

1:32:44

people in DC and the beltway hated me

1:32:46

and my values and were actively working against

1:32:48

me even if they were Republicans I just

1:32:50

had no conceptualization of that but Trump in

1:32:52

many ways was a great revealer and he

1:32:54

pulled back the curtain and showed people that

1:32:56

the swamp is real it's aimed directly at

1:32:58

you and this is how we drain it

1:33:00

and we fix it so I think more

1:33:02

people are engaged and informed than

1:33:05

ever before and that should be a huge

1:33:07

white pill for Americans everywhere. Yeah

1:33:09

with the knowledge of what's going on

1:33:11

that's the white pill because we're tasked

1:33:13

with creating a global government like we're

1:33:15

involved in the crafting of the mind

1:33:17

of every human on earth that's listening

1:33:19

right now and if we didn't

1:33:21

know how corrupt things have become the US it could

1:33:23

be very easy just to want to replicate it but

1:33:26

there's a lot of things we can change. I

1:33:30

like voting I kind of like voting for the politicians.

1:33:32

What if we get rid of voting? Yeah voting's a

1:33:34

little weird. And what if we get rid of like.

1:33:37

Popularity context. Let's just let Trump be in charge

1:33:39

for as long as he's alive and then just

1:33:41

to make sure we're good once he once he

1:33:43

passes on he can he can. He can come

1:33:45

back whenever he wants. He can abdicate the chair

1:33:48

the Resolute desk to Don

1:33:50

Jr. you know and that

1:33:52

will just make sure that you know

1:33:54

the the you know Trump and Trump Jr. can take

1:33:57

care of this country and we don't need voting. Yeah,

1:34:00

because they've done a great job and then and then

1:34:02

you know after Trump jr. Of course it can go

1:34:04

to Trump jr Kid and we'll just

1:34:06

do that from now on come on Sounds

1:34:10

crazy now, but like Hamilton had an

1:34:12

idea very similar to that. He

1:34:15

wanted basically an elected monarch So you would

1:34:17

you would have someone you know that was

1:34:19

Elected and then they would serve for life

1:34:21

and the check on them was basically that

1:34:23

they could be impeached Oh,

1:34:26

if you set up a viceroy, then you pick your

1:34:28

your heir But then

1:34:30

there's they don't have any claims they just

1:34:32

serve the role and then when they died

1:34:34

their void viceroy takes over Mm-hmm. That's one

1:34:36

way to do it be interesting. I

1:34:39

think one of the I don't literally think

1:34:41

a monarchy is a good idea I don't

1:34:43

either we're just spitball. We're just brainstorm ideas.

1:34:46

It's just a conversation democracy. It's a nice

1:34:48

up to this point It's been good enough,

1:34:50

but like just mob rule popularity contest isn't

1:34:52

necessarily the best way to get the best

1:34:55

leaders in into office I'm sorry to

1:34:57

interrupt you say something. I think too

1:34:59

like we've become much

1:35:02

more democratic as Our

1:35:04

country's history has gone on and I don't

1:35:06

know that that's necessarily a good thing And

1:35:08

I think that it's kind of a rejection

1:35:10

of what we were meant to be like

1:35:12

to me What's the point of having a

1:35:14

bicameral legislature the Senate and the House of

1:35:16

Representatives that are both basically the same? They're

1:35:18

both just directly elected senators used to be

1:35:20

appointed by the governors and to me that

1:35:22

makes sense, right? You have two different chambers

1:35:24

who are different They're elected different

1:35:27

ways and they do different things and now

1:35:29

they're basically just the same thing just one

1:35:31

serves longer than the other And I think

1:35:33

that doesn't to me Sign

1:35:35

up to the economist for in-depth curated

1:35:37

expert analysis of world events and topics

1:35:39

ranging from business and culture to science

1:35:42

and technology You'll

1:35:44

get the weekly digital edition

1:35:46

online only articles curated newsletters on

1:35:49

politics the markets science culture

1:35:51

in China And full

1:35:53

access to the Economist podcast plus the

1:35:56

Economist is independent journalism for

1:35:58

independent thinking Go to

1:36:00

economist.com and get your first month

1:36:02

free. Make a whole

1:36:05

lot of sense. Yeah, we

1:36:07

were talking about this the other day. You know,

1:36:09

it'd be interesting to see if, you know, your

1:36:11

state legislator legislators voted and picked your state,

1:36:14

your federal senator, because then at that point, people

1:36:16

are going to be really invested or at least

1:36:18

in local in their more in their local representation

1:36:20

because it will have this direct pipe way to

1:36:23

the pipeline to the federal government that we don't

1:36:25

have right now. If they had senators for

1:36:27

four years only, they're appointed by governors. Then I'm

1:36:29

into it. If they're in there for 12 years,

1:36:31

then I feel like the senator is going to

1:36:33

put their buddy in there and they're just going

1:36:36

to set up a little co-op. But if

1:36:38

it's a short term, short Senate seats, maybe two years,

1:36:41

you go in there, you're appointed by your governor, you

1:36:43

go in there for two years, next guy. That might

1:36:45

be way, way better than putting people in long term.

1:36:48

I think my ultimate

1:36:51

interest is not having as

1:36:53

much focus on federal politics. Like I think empowering

1:36:55

the states more than we do right now is