Podchaser Logo
Home
The murder of Brianna Ghey

The murder of Brianna Ghey

Released Tuesday, 6th February 2024
 1 person rated this episode
The murder of Brianna Ghey

The murder of Brianna Ghey

The murder of Brianna Ghey

The murder of Brianna Ghey

Tuesday, 6th February 2024
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is The Guardian. Today,

0:11

a mother's campaign and compassion

0:14

as her daughter's killers are sentenced. We're

0:30

ready for perfect collaboration. Our

0:32

teamwork keeps getting better. Yeah,

0:34

affirmations are great, but monday.com can really

0:37

get you the teamwork you desire. Work

0:39

together easily and share files, updates, data,

0:41

and just about anything you want all

0:43

in one platform. Affirm yes

0:46

to start. Or tap the

0:48

banner to go to monday.com.

0:50

www.monday.com Brianna

1:27

Jai was just 16 when she was killed. Despite

1:30

her anxiety and her struggling at

1:32

times in her adolescence, she

1:34

was outgoing and she was popular.

1:37

She had a whole life ahead of her. Good

1:41

times don't have to cost anything and the

1:43

best times are the times when you're

1:45

just completely relaxed and thinking

1:47

of her at home. Popping

1:51

her head in a little fluffy

1:53

pink pajamas. You've got to say,

1:56

mum, can we have a Domino's pizza? And

1:58

yeah, it's just being at home. and

2:00

being with her and because she was

2:02

such a home bird and she's why

2:04

it was so difficult because she was just

2:06

always there, she was always at home. When

2:08

I came home she would be home. Brianna's

2:12

mum Esther Jai is determined to try and

2:14

find a way to channel her grief. She's

2:17

petitioning for a change in law to ensure

2:20

child safety online and

2:22

as she told the BBC's

2:24

Laura Kansberg she holds compassion not

2:26

hate towards the parents of Brianna's

2:28

killers. I think that

2:32

I would like to say that

2:35

if she did want to contact

2:37

me and she does want to

2:39

speak then I'm open to that.

2:42

I'd like to understand

2:44

more how their

2:47

life was and what they went through

2:49

and I also want

2:51

her to know that I don't blame

2:53

her for what her child's done and

2:57

I also want her to know that I

3:00

understand how difficult being a parent is

3:02

in this current day

3:05

and age with technology

3:07

and phones and

3:09

the internet and how hard it is to actually

3:11

monitor what your child is on. So

3:15

yeah if she ever wants to speak to me I am I'm

3:17

here. The

3:24

families involved have had their lives ripped

3:27

apart. Where do they go

3:29

from here? And can

3:31

anything be learnt from Brianna's death? From

3:35

the Guardian, I'm Nashinik Bah.

3:38

Today in Vokis, the murder

3:40

of Brianna Jai. Alan

3:49

Pitt, you're north of England editor at the

3:51

Guardian and you've been covering the murder of

3:53

teenager Brianna Jai. It's

3:55

a really harrowing and unusual

3:57

case but can you

3:59

begin? with the day it happened back on

4:02

the 11th of February last year. So the

4:05

first information that came out was that a 16

4:07

year old girl had been stabbed to death in

4:10

Cultures Linear Park which is a park built on

4:12

an old railway line in Warrington.

4:15

Emergency services attended but the 16

4:18

year old was pronounced dead at the scene.

4:20

A post-mortem examination is taking place

4:23

to establish the exact cause of

4:25

death. The initial statement that the

4:27

police put out simply said that they were appealing

4:29

for witnesses, anybody who would have been there at

4:31

the time. It was about three o'clock in the

4:34

afternoon when Brianna was killed, the park was fairly

4:36

busy, they knew there would have been lots of

4:38

families there and people walking their dogs. It's

4:40

a well-known dog walking spot, we know that, we

4:43

know it's popular with families. I'd asked for anyone

4:45

who was in the area between around about half

4:47

past one in the afternoon and 4 p.m. to

4:49

contact us in relation to that. And then

4:51

we learned that two teenagers had been arrested

4:53

and were being questioned on suspicion of murder.

4:55

And as soon as we learned that Brianna

4:57

was trans, of course the big question was,

5:00

was she killed for being trans and

5:02

was this a hate crime motivated by

5:04

transphobia? Very quickly within

5:07

48 hours of Brianna being killed, Cheshire

5:10

police came out and said, at

5:12

this time we have no information

5:14

to suggest that this was a

5:16

hate crime. And what was the

5:19

reaction locally and nationally? Well locally

5:21

people were horrified. It's obviously terrifying

5:23

when any murder happens, particularly when

5:26

it's a young person and

5:28

particularly when it was a girl. Once

5:30

it emerged that Brianna was transgender,

5:32

her murder became not just a

5:35

point of sadness locally but nationally

5:37

and even internationally. A lot

5:40

of you might already know about this, as it's been on

5:42

Facebook, ITV News, BBC,

5:45

everything. It's currently going viral.

5:48

We want to get justice for what happened to

5:50

Bri. Because it wasn't

5:52

right, she was taken innocently

5:54

for no reason. I think what

5:57

really stands out to me in my memory is

5:59

just the outpouring of grief

6:01

and sadness that there was for Brianna,

6:03

not just within her own community,

6:06

within her school in Warrington, but

6:08

also much further afield. There were

6:10

people in New York, in Canada,

6:13

in the Far East who were

6:15

making videos online expressing their sadness,

6:17

their grief, their anger. And

6:19

people were really suspicious with the police and

6:21

wondering why they were so quick to say

6:23

that they didn't think it was a hate

6:25

crime. Can you tell me

6:27

more about what the police said and did in their

6:30

investigation? How did it proceed over the coming weeks and

6:32

months? So, initially

6:34

after the murder, they put out an appeal

6:37

for witnesses, anybody who was in the park

6:39

at the time. And quickly a lot of

6:41

people came forward and lots of people saw

6:43

the two teenage suspects in the park, including

6:46

people who actually knew them. So

6:48

identity was not really at play

6:52

fairly early on and within 24 hours

6:54

they knew that Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Radcliffe

6:56

were the two teenagers who had been seen

6:58

meeting Brianna off the bus and then walking

7:01

to the park with her. There

7:03

was also CCTV of the pair of them

7:05

walking home, just the two of them with

7:07

no Brianna. So the two

7:09

of them were taken into custody 24 hours after

7:11

the murder and they

7:14

both had different stories. And

7:24

in the trial of Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Radcliffe,

7:27

who have only been known as Girl X and

7:29

Boy Y until last Friday, it started at the

7:31

end of November last year at Manchester Crown Court.

7:34

You were there for nearly every day of

7:37

the trial. Can you tell me what it was

7:39

like? Yeah, Court

7:41

2 at Manchester Crown Court. It was a

7:43

pretty tense place to be. My seat had

7:46

a fairly good view of the bulletproof

7:49

dock where Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Radcliffe

7:51

were sitting. They weren't sat right next

7:53

to each other. They had trained

7:56

intermediaries sitting either side of them who were

7:58

there to make sure that both of the

8:00

children understood the court process and were able

8:02

to participate in it. It was

8:04

quite noticeable that neither Starlet nor Eddie ever

8:07

looked at each other and they certainly didn't

8:09

say anything to each other, not least because

8:11

Eddie has actually been diagnosed with

8:13

selective mutism since he was charged

8:15

with the murder and hasn't spoken a word to anybody

8:17

apart from his mum. And there

8:20

were also security guards in the dock with them.

8:22

And the judge and the barristers

8:24

involved in proceedings took great care

8:27

to make sure that they were

8:29

tailoring their language so

8:31

that both Eddie and Scarlet understood what was going

8:33

on. They referred to them always by their first

8:35

names in court rather than Mr Ratcliffe and Ms Jenkinson,

8:37

which is what they might have done if they were

8:39

adults. So a lot of

8:41

accommodation for them both. And

8:44

so as the court heard the evidence,

8:47

what did you learn about how they planned

8:49

Brianna's murder? So Brianna

8:51

wasn't actually the first person that

8:54

Eddie Ratcliffe and Scarlet Jenkinson discussed killing.

8:56

They had a sort of informal kill

8:59

list of other children that they disliked

9:01

for various different reasons. The others were

9:03

all boys. They settled

9:05

on Brianna, it seems, because they had some kind

9:08

of cack-handed attempt to lure one of the boys out

9:10

to the park and using

9:12

a fake social media profile and he didn't

9:14

bite. And they said, oh, well, let's

9:17

just do the same plan, but we'll do it for Brianna.

9:19

It will be easier. They originally

9:21

wanted to kill Brianna two weeks earlier

9:23

than they actually did. They had

9:25

it all set up. It was the same plan,

9:28

same location, same park. But at the last minute,

9:30

Brianna contacted Scarlet Jenkinson, said, oh, sorry, I can't

9:32

come because she had to go to a family

9:34

meal. There were messages where Scarlet

9:36

says she's so pissed off about this, that

9:39

all the fun has been ruined. But

9:41

nonetheless, Eddie and Scarlet, on that particular day, they

9:44

still met up and they still went to Culture

9:46

Linear Park. There's videos of them messing around at

9:48

the park. And the detectives who

9:50

were investigating the case came to view this as something

9:52

of a dry run for the murder itself. So

9:55

after that aborted attempt, Scarlet

9:57

Jenkinson handwrote a

9:59

plan. for how they were going

10:01

to murder Brianna. So literally

10:03

wrote it out in her own handwriting. Yeah,

10:06

yeah, and it was headline

10:09

victim Brianna Jai. It had the date

10:11

and it had the location. Said that

10:13

they were going to meet her off the bus

10:15

at cultured library. They were going to walk to

10:17

the linear park. It detailed who was going to

10:19

stab her and where. So

10:21

really quite chilling level of detail. I remember we

10:23

saw this in court and we saw her tiny

10:25

childlike handwriting. There was just something that was just

10:27

so chilling about that. She hand wrote this plan.

10:29

She took a picture of the plan and she

10:31

texted it to Eddie. So this is how the

10:34

jury could have been in no doubt that they

10:36

were both in on the plan and both of

10:38

them knew exactly what they were going to do. What

10:40

about the conversations they had about Brianna? What did

10:43

we learn about their interest in her from those?

10:45

So Scarlett Jenkinson only met Brianna

10:47

a few months before the murder

10:49

when she was transferred to Birchwood

10:51

High School where Brianna was a

10:54

pupil. She'd been asked to leave

10:56

her previous school after bringing cannabis

10:58

edibles into school and giving them

11:00

to younger pupils. So she transferred

11:02

to Brianna's school and they became

11:04

friends apparently, Scarlett said,

11:06

because she complimented Brianna on her eyeliner.

11:08

So it was Scarlett who introduced Brianna

11:10

into the conversations. Eddie actually didn't meet

11:13

Brianna at all until the day of

11:15

the murder and in December, so a

11:17

couple of months before the murder, Scarlett

11:19

texted Eddie and said, I'm obsessed over

11:21

someone I know but don't have feelings

11:23

for them. She's called Brianna. I don't

11:26

know how to explain. So Eddie

11:28

only met Brianna for the first time on

11:30

the day of the murder but while he

11:32

and Scarlett were planning the killing, he repeatedly

11:34

referred to Brianna not as she but as

11:36

it. And when he gave

11:38

evidence, he insisted he wasn't transphobic but

11:41

the language that he used was

11:43

certainly transphobic and very

11:46

dehumanizing. Scarlett on the other hand almost

11:49

always referred to Brianna as she. There's

11:51

times when there's one message where she

11:53

says to Eddie, oh she's prettier

11:55

than me, that bitch. And when she gave evidence, she

11:57

said she thought Brianna was really pretty. She was actually

12:00

attracted to as she said.

12:02

Having pored through the details of this

12:04

case and of Brianna's life, did

12:06

you learn any new information in court? Yeah

12:10

I think perhaps I had

12:12

some preconceptions about what teenage

12:14

murderers would be like and

12:16

what their backgrounds would be like but

12:19

we learnt when they gave evidence about

12:21

their family backgrounds, about their siblings, so

12:24

Eddie for example, his mum who was

12:26

in court every single day. She's worked

12:28

as a ski instructor and graphic designer

12:30

and his dad was a manager at

12:32

a truck company and

12:34

Scarlett's mum was a secondary school

12:37

teacher and her dad runs a plastering and

12:39

building business. Some of Scarlett's brothers

12:41

used to come to court, she's got three big brothers.

12:44

Eddie is the middle child of three.

12:47

We learnt that they were both fairly

12:49

conscientious at school. Eddie was considered very

12:51

clever in particular, he loved science and

12:53

even since his arrest when he's been

12:55

held in a secure children's home he

12:58

studied for his GCSEs and he managed to

13:00

pass eight and he's doing 4A levels, teaching

13:02

himself really from the unit at the moment.

13:05

So they're clearly very high functioning and

13:07

intelligent young people and that made it

13:10

sort of all the more baffling

13:13

and incomprehensible how and

13:15

why they would do something like this. And

13:30

Helen, what about the relationship between Scarlett and Eddie

13:32

themselves? What did we learn about them? Before

13:35

the trial started a lot of people who

13:37

didn't know the situation wrongly assumed

13:39

that Eddie Ratcliffe and Scarlett Jenkinson

13:42

were boyfriend and girlfriend, that it

13:44

was some sort of twisted plot

13:46

by two lovers but it wasn't

13:48

and both of them when they gave

13:51

evidence said that they were just friends. So they'd met

13:53

when they were in year seven when they were just

13:55

11 at Cultured High School in

13:57

Warrington and it wasn't

13:59

a sort of... instant friendship. Scarlett described their

14:01

relationship initially as frenemies, so they

14:03

were like friends but also enemies.

14:06

She said Eddie was weird and Eddie said,

14:08

well, she was weird and that she was

14:10

always saying weird stuff. There was

14:12

one bit that really sticks in my mind where he said,

14:14

well, in year eight she used to go around claiming that

14:17

she was a Satanist and she seemed to

14:19

revel in saying kind of

14:21

outrageous things. And nonetheless, they became firm

14:24

friends. A lot of their friendship was

14:26

conducted online. They lived about five miles

14:28

apart from each other. So after school,

14:30

they would communicate on WhatsApp. They used to

14:33

play video games together. And

14:35

from the age of about 14, they

14:37

started discussing what Scarlett's

14:39

barrister referred to as dark

14:41

materials. And she told the

14:43

jury that she'd developed this interest in

14:45

watching videos of torture and murder online

14:47

aged 14 and that she'd worked out

14:49

how to download a special browser onto

14:51

her phone to access the dark web.

14:53

And she boasted to Eddie that she

14:55

liked going in these so-called red rooms

14:57

where you could watch real,

15:00

apparently real murders and real torture taking

15:03

place. That

15:05

sounds really dark. I mean, did no one

15:07

else notice that she had these interests or

15:09

obsessions at the time? There

15:12

seemed to be particularly two sides to

15:14

Scarlett Jenkinson. There was a Scarlett Jenkinson

15:16

who was pretty quiet at school and

15:18

used to hang around in the inclusion

15:20

room, which is where she was often

15:22

found with Brianna at school. She said

15:24

she didn't socialize much. She

15:26

had this boyfriend who we can't name who was

15:29

a year older than her, went to the local

15:31

sixth form college and Eddie told

15:33

police that Scarlett was absolutely obsessed with this

15:35

boyfriend to the extent that she carved his

15:37

name on her arm with

15:40

a knife. And that, I

15:42

mean, Brianna wasn't the only child

15:45

that these two teenagers talked about

15:47

killing. There were actually at

15:49

least four other children who they discussed

15:52

in quite detail, murdering. And

15:54

two of them were boys who Scarlett

15:56

had taken against because she said that

15:58

they'd been mean to her boyfriend. friends

16:01

and therefore they deserved death. Eddie

16:04

as well, Eddie's obsession mostly seemed to be

16:06

focused on a girl that he fancied at

16:08

school who was known in court simply by

16:10

the letter A and throughout their

16:12

messages there are thousands of messages that the

16:14

police recovered between Eddie and

16:16

Scarlett where they're discussing murder

16:19

techniques, the best ways of killing people.

16:21

Throughout these conversations there's also Eddie just

16:23

being obsessed with this girl asking Scarlett for

16:26

love advice when should he ask her out

16:28

and it

16:30

was just the sort of banality of those sorts of

16:33

questions mixed in with this murderous chap

16:35

which would have been pretty sick in itself

16:38

but the fact that we know that they actually went

16:40

on to murder Brianna makes it

16:42

just completely chilling. Helen,

17:00

in the end the jury was out for

17:02

just over four hours. Can you tell me

17:04

that when they came back and delivered their

17:06

verdict? Although I think those

17:08

of us who'd sat through all of the evidence thought

17:10

that it was very likely that both

17:12

teenagers would be found guilty, you know the

17:14

stakes are just so high in any

17:17

murder case particularly involving such young

17:19

people. So we

17:22

were all sort of collectively holding our

17:24

breath really when the jury filed in

17:26

and the judges clerk asked if

17:28

the jury had reached verdict on which

17:30

they were unanimous and the

17:32

four men stood up and said yes they had

17:36

and they actually spoke very quietly it was kind of

17:38

weird we couldn't hear the verdicts at first and nor

17:40

could Eddie and Scarlett so they had to be delivered

17:42

twice and I was trying to look in the dark

17:44

and see if either of the teenagers were

17:46

reacting at all they didn't as far

17:48

as I can see that their parents were in

17:51

bits in the court crying I mean

17:53

just just horrendous. And what about

17:55

Brianna's mum? How did she

17:57

respond? There was this moment

18:00

after the convictions just before Christmas

18:02

when she walked out of court

18:05

to be confronted with a wall

18:07

of photographers and microphones and she

18:09

gave this incredibly powerful and moving

18:11

statement where she urged compassion

18:13

and empathy for the parents of the

18:15

teenagers who had taken her daughter's life

18:17

and said that they'd lost a child

18:20

too. Brianna was larger

18:22

than love. She

18:24

was funny and witty and fearless.

18:27

We miss Brianna so much and

18:30

our house feels empty without her lost her. You

18:34

know how scared of my usually

18:36

fearless child must have been? When

18:40

she was alone in that park with

18:43

someone that she called her friend will

18:45

haunt me forever. Please

18:50

have some empathy and compassion for

18:53

the families of the young people convicted of

18:55

this horrific crime. They too

18:57

have lost a child and they

19:00

must live the rest of their lives knowing what

19:02

their child has done. My

19:05

family and I request some healing space for

19:07

the next few weeks. However,

19:10

I will be back at the end of January

19:12

to continue my campaigning for better

19:14

mental health support for young people and their

19:16

families. Thank you. Helen,

19:28

just before Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe

19:30

were due to be sentenced last Friday,

19:32

we heard new reports about what Scarlett

19:35

was saying had happened. Can

19:37

you tell me more? Yeah, it

19:39

was quite a moment in court. We

19:41

heard that there had been a new

19:43

psychiatric report commissioned by Scarlett's legal team

19:45

and it turned out that Scarlett was

19:47

completely changing her story and she had

19:49

told a psychiatrist that she had in

19:51

fact carried out the murder,

19:54

that she was responsible for at least some of

19:56

the stab wounds. She said that she had enjoyed

19:58

it and this was a real about turn

20:00

because the entire time, including during the trial,

20:02

she insisted that she hadn't actually taken part

20:05

in the killing and that it was Eddie

20:07

who was responsible for the stab wounds. She

20:10

also gave some sort of insight into

20:12

potentially her motives and she said that

20:14

she killed Brianna because she thought Brianna

20:16

was her friend but that one day

20:18

Brianna was going to leave her and

20:20

therefore if she killed her, Brianna would

20:23

somehow be with her always. It was

20:26

deeply shocking to hear that in court. What

20:30

sentence did the judge impose? Very

20:32

long sentences for children. Scarlett

20:35

Jenkinson was sentenced to a minimum of 22 years

20:38

and Eddie Radcliffe 20 years. They

20:42

both got life sentences, although children don't

20:44

officially get life sentences, they're called sentences

20:46

at His Majesty's pleasure. And

20:49

the judge told them that if they were adults,

20:51

those minimum terms would be much higher. I've

20:53

rarely heard of children this young

20:55

getting such long sentences. Both of them were only

20:57

15 when they carried out this murder last year.

21:01

Well what did Justice Yip say

21:03

about her decision? Well she told

21:05

them that they had both taken part in

21:07

what she said was a brutal and planned

21:09

murder which was sadistic in its nature. This

21:12

was undoubtedly a very serious

21:15

offence with multiple aggravating suits

21:17

too. This is

21:19

the context in which I impose

21:21

minimum terms which are lengthy

21:24

for offenders of your age, albeit

21:26

significantly less than an

21:29

equivalent sentence for an adult. And

21:31

what I found very interesting is that she

21:33

said there was a secondary motive at play

21:36

which she said was hostility towards Brianna because

21:38

of her transgender identity. Your

21:40

messages about Brianna were

21:42

transphobic. You consistently

21:45

referred to her in a way

21:47

that was dehumanising, calling her I.

21:50

And Helen that's significant because up until this point

21:52

Brianna's death has been quite politicised and I wonder

21:55

if you could tell me more about that and

21:57

the significance of what the judge has now said.

22:00

very quickly after Brianna was murdered

22:02

last February, Cheshire Police caused quite

22:04

a lot of controversy by saying

22:06

they had no information to suggest

22:08

that Brianna's murder was motivated by

22:10

transphobia. A lot of people found

22:12

that very difficult to believe. And

22:14

then once the trial started and

22:16

we heard details of thousands of

22:18

messages that were shared between Scarlett

22:20

and Eddie, and that

22:23

anger only built once the trial started

22:25

and we heard all of the messages

22:27

that were shared between Scarlett and Eddie,

22:29

and particularly the language that Eddie used

22:31

to describe Brianna, he always referred to

22:34

her as it rather than she. He

22:37

called her a femboy thing and

22:39

he discussed wanting to know if she would scream

22:41

like a man or a girl and said he

22:44

just really wanted to see what size dick

22:46

that she had. And that

22:48

was clearly transphobic language but that wasn't

22:50

framed as such for the jury. So

22:52

it was quite a moment that the

22:54

judge came out on the record and

22:56

said that that language was transphobic and

22:59

that the murder was partially motivated by

23:01

a hatred of Brianna's transgender identity. It

23:04

does feel like, I mean quite aside from that, that there's

23:06

been this really ugly, prorient

23:08

sideshow running alongside this case. It says

23:10

something about our culture, our

23:12

appetite for outrage. Did

23:15

you get a sense of that as you were reporting it as

23:17

a month went on? Yeah, I

23:19

think so. I mean, I don't know if it's the

23:21

rise of true crime documentaries. I mean,

23:23

The Daily Mail is actually running a

23:25

daily, almost daily podcast about this case

23:27

that kind of makes everybody feel like

23:29

they are also detectives and that they

23:31

know more than the police or that

23:33

they have extra information that the jury's

23:35

not listening to. So people

23:38

were commenting all over the place and often getting

23:40

in trouble with the judge actually by passing

23:42

their own sort of judgment on what was really

23:44

going on here. What's

23:48

going on? How Brianna Jai's death

23:50

has been politicised and what

23:52

we can learn about how it's been covered. Have

24:07

you ever Googled your own name? Prepare

24:09

for a shock because your personal info,

24:11

including addresses and phone numbers, is all

24:13

out there. It's all harvested by data

24:15

brokers and sold legally. Aura

24:18

is a personal digital security service

24:20

that scans the internet for your

24:22

sensitive information and provides a full

24:25

suite of privacy enhancing tools. For

24:27

a limited time, Aura is offering

24:29

listeners a 14-day free trial at

24:32

aura.com/safety. That's aura.com/safety to learn more

24:34

and activate the 14-day trend period.

24:41

Today in Focus is supported by the

24:43

Boston Consulting Group podcast In

24:45

Her Element. In

24:48

Her Element is a podcast that talks

24:50

to women at the vanguard of business,

24:53

digital and technology, so

24:55

that's Element, spelt with two

24:57

L's. The show

24:59

asks, how did these powerhouse leaders get to

25:01

where they are today, and covers

25:03

everything from the joy of projects gone

25:06

right, to the realities of

25:08

family responsibilities. Crucially, what was

25:10

the moment they knew they weren't merely

25:12

getting there? They'd arrived.

25:15

That's when you know you're in your Element. At

25:18

the moment, the podcast is focusing on

25:20

incredible women on the frontlines of the

25:23

AI revolution, such as

25:25

Hyatt Gallott, corporate vice president,

25:27

commercial solution areas at Microsoft.

25:30

In Her Element, spelt with

25:33

two L's, subscribe wherever you

25:35

get your podcasts. Ellen,

25:43

alongside the intense publicity around this

25:45

case, there was also this huge

25:48

clamour to name the perpetrators, something

25:50

that isn't normal in cases where

25:52

the defendants are minors. The

25:55

judge did agree to it, and it's why we've been able

25:57

to name them throughout this episode so far. Why

26:00

did she lift the usual restrictions to allow

26:02

their names to become public? Yeah,

26:05

she decided to lift the restrictions because

26:07

they would have fallen away anyway when

26:10

both Eddie and Scarlett turned

26:12

18 and she felt that there

26:14

was significant public interest

26:17

in this case and not just interest

26:19

as in it's interesting but

26:21

also she felt that there was a

26:23

real need in society to try to

26:25

understand how to apparently

26:27

fairly normal stable teenagers could commit

26:29

such a crime and she felt

26:31

that by allowing full reporting including

26:33

photos and the names of these

26:35

young people we might be able to get to

26:37

the bottom of why on earth they committed such

26:40

a brutal murder. But what

26:42

does the public gain? What can

26:44

we understand knowing the identities

26:46

and the pictures and who

26:48

their families are at this stage? Yeah,

26:52

I feel quite uneasy to be honest

26:54

about the naming of young people. I

26:56

think if you believe in rehabilitation which

27:00

I definitely do, then it can

27:02

only be hampered by two

27:04

young people being branded as murderers and they are

27:06

murderers, we don't need to sugarcoat that. But

27:10

if we hope that one day they're going to be able

27:12

to be released and not be a day into society it's

27:14

not going to be helpful if their photos are all over

27:16

the internet. If you look

27:18

at what happened in the James Bulger case in

27:21

the 90s, John Venables and Robert Thompson in

27:23

Liverpool they had to be given entirely

27:25

new identities when they were released because

27:27

there were genuine fears that they would

27:29

be hunted down and potentially killed. So

27:33

does the public learn anything? I suppose it means

27:35

that we can report a bit more fully about

27:37

what happened in

27:39

terms of these two young people at their school,

27:41

the fact that Scarlett went to school with Brianna

27:44

and that she only turned up at Brianna's school

27:46

after getting in trouble at her old school. So

27:48

it allows us to fill in a few blanks

27:50

in the story. Is

27:52

it really necessary or is it mostly

27:54

just feeding our desire to name and

27:56

shame? I'm not sure. And

28:00

then how will Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Rickliffe be

28:02

serving their sentences? So

28:04

ever since their arrest, both Scarlett and

28:06

Eddie have been kept in separate, secure

28:08

children's homes and they will stay

28:10

there until they are 18, at which point

28:12

they will transfer to the adult estate. These

28:15

two young people are going to be in their late

28:17

30s at the very earliest when they're released,

28:20

so they've got a long stretch ahead of them in

28:22

the prison system. Ellen,

28:24

do you think there is anything that could have been

28:26

done differently? Was there any sense at the end of

28:28

all of this that Brianna's murder could have been prevented?

28:31

I've thought about this a lot and

28:33

the conclusion that I've come to is

28:36

probably not. During

28:39

the trial I was sat very near

28:41

Eddie's parents and I was looking at them trying

28:43

to work out what might be going through their

28:45

minds and I'm sure they're racking their brains thinking,

28:48

is there anything we could have done? I suppose

28:50

theoretically they could have looked at his phone. Scarlett's

28:53

parents could have looked at her phone and if they

28:55

had they would have found these horrendous messages and

28:58

maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe they would have taken

29:00

them seriously and nipped it in the bud.

29:03

Apart from that, there were no outward signs

29:05

that these were two children who were going

29:08

to commit a terrible, terrible murder. Although

29:10

Scarlett had been in trouble and had

29:13

been suspended from her previous school for

29:15

this incident involving cannabis edibles, it

29:17

wasn't like she'd brought a knife into school. It's

29:19

not like she had a history with violence. And yes,

29:21

some of her school friends have since come out and

29:24

say, oh, she used to say loads of sick things. Let's

29:26

be honest, a lot of teenagers say some sick,

29:28

stupid things and it doesn't mean that that is

29:30

going to translate into real life violence. And

29:34

one of the things that's really stayed with

29:36

me in this case is actually Brianna's mum

29:38

and the response that she's had to Brianna's

29:40

killing, which is a lot of compassion, so

29:42

much dignity and a response to the killers

29:45

and their parents. Can you tell me more

29:47

about what she said and how she'd like

29:49

Brianna to be remembered? Yeah,

29:52

I think Esther Jai is

29:55

an incredibly dignified and compassionate

29:57

person. There was a victim impact

29:59

statement read on... her behalf in court at

30:01

the sentencing. And she

30:03

said that her motivation was to want

30:05

to help to make society a safer

30:07

place and that she

30:09

wanted something good to come out of this

30:12

murder. So I'd like

30:14

to see mobile phone companies take

30:16

more responsibility. It's so

30:19

difficult for parents now to

30:22

safeguard their children, which we'd like our

30:25

families and parents to back and sign.

30:28

We'd like a law introduced so

30:30

that there are mobile phones that

30:32

are only suitable for under

30:35

16. So if you're over 16, you can

30:37

have an adult phone, but then under

30:39

the age of 16, you can have a

30:41

children's phone, which will not have all of

30:43

the social media apps that are out

30:45

there now. And also

30:48

to have

30:50

software that's automatically downloaded on a

30:52

parent's phone, which links the children's

30:54

phone and it can highlight keywords.

30:58

And ever since Brianna was killed, Esther

31:00

has been raising money. She's raised over

31:02

50,000 pounds now for

31:05

mindfulness training in schools. And she really believes

31:07

that young people need time to sort of

31:09

take a breath and to think through their

31:11

feelings and what they want to do. So

31:14

she's raising money for that. And

31:16

along with Brianna's head teacher, Emma

31:18

Nichols, she's set up a community

31:21

interest company called Peace and Mind,

31:23

which is all about spreading the

31:25

word of mindfulness and empathy and

31:28

compassion and understanding. And

31:30

this week in parliament, her local MP Charlotte

31:32

Nichols is going to start a debate on

31:34

the issue. She's absolutely determined that

31:36

Brianna's death cannot be in vain and

31:38

that something positive must come out of

31:40

something so dreadful. Helen,

31:43

thanks so much for your time. Thanks

31:45

for having me. That

31:49

was Helen Pidge, the Guardian's North of England

31:51

editor. You can follow

31:53

her reporting of this case and

31:55

more all at theguardian.com. That's

31:59

it for today. I'm Nacinac

32:01

Bal and this episode is produced by Lucy

32:03

Hoff. Sound Design was by Rudy

32:05

Zagatlo. The Executive Producer

32:07

was Phil Maynard. We'll be back

32:09

again tomorrow. This

32:19

is The Guardian. Just

32:29

head to amazon.com/ad-free news podcast to

32:31

catch up on the latest episodes

32:34

without the ads. Enjoy thousands of

32:36

A-Cast shows ad-free for prime subscribers. Some

32:38

shows may have ads. jamesallen.com is the

32:40

online destination to easily design a customized

32:42

engagement ring. James Allen has over 200,000

32:45

conflict-free stones. Then

32:47

you pick your ring setting and metal. And if

32:49

you need some help, they have real-time diamond consultations

32:51

available, where an expert can walk you through it all.

32:54

Get 25% off your order at jamesallen.com code ACAST. That's

32:59

jamesallen.com code ACAST.

Rate

From The Podcast

Today in Focus

Hosted by Michael Safi and Helen Pidd, Today in Focus brings you closer to Guardian journalism. Combining personal storytelling with insightful analysis, this podcast takes you behind the headlines for a deeper understanding of the news, every weekday. Today in Focus features journalists such as: Aditya Chakrabortty, Alex Hern, Alexis Petridis, Andrew Roth, Emma Graham-Harrison, George Monbiot, Jim Waterson, John Crace, John Harris, Jonathan Freedland, Kiran Stacey, Larry Elliott, Luke Harding, Marina Hyde, Nesrine Malik, Owen Jones, Peter Walker, Pippa Crerar, Polly Toynbee, Shaun Walker, Simon Hattenstone and Zoe Williams. The podcast is a topical, deep dive, explainer on a topic or story in the news, covering: current affairs, politics, investigations, leaks, scandals and interviews. It might cover topics such as: GB, Scotland, England and Ireland news, the environment, green issues, climate change, the climate emergency and global warming; American politics including: US presidential election 2024, Biden, Trump, the White House, the GOP, the Republicans and the Republican Party, the Democrats and the Democratic Party; UK politics including: UK election 24, Parliament, Labour, the Conservative Party, the Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, Rishi Sunak, Keir Starmer; culture; the royals and the royal family, including King Charles III and Prince Harry; HS2; the police and current affairs including: Ukraine, Russia, Bangladesh, Israel, Palestine, Gaza and AI.

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features