Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
True crime enthusiasts, it's Rabia Chaudhry and
0:02
Ellen Marsh. You are invited to join
0:04
us on Rabia and Ellen Solve the
0:06
Case, a true crime talk show. Grab
0:08
a front row seat as we, along
0:11
with our special celebrity guest, dissect our
0:13
favorite true crime cases every other Thursday.
0:15
Between those episodes, join us as we
0:17
talk about current true crime headlines in
0:19
our About Damn Crime series. Skip the
0:22
ordinary and dive into extraordinary investigations and
0:24
conversations with us. Subscribe now on your
0:26
favorite podcast platform and let's unravel these
0:28
captivating stories together. Hello
1:00
everyone and welcome to episode 355
1:02
of the True Crime All the Time
1:05
Unsolved podcast. I'm Mike Ferguson and
1:07
with me as always is my partner in
1:09
true crime, Mike Gibson. Gibby, how are
1:11
you? Hey, I'm doing good. How about yourself? I'm doing
1:13
very well. Good. You know, you and
1:15
I were talking earlier about this Ohio
1:18
weather, kind of having a
1:20
warm spell. It'll turn cold again, but it's
1:23
like a little mini preview of
1:26
the spring into summer. Get
1:28
me excited. I know. I'm gonna go out there and
1:30
start hiking around. It does get you excited, but then
1:32
it'll go back down to like 30 degrees,
1:34
probably for a little while. Then I just want to sit
1:37
on my couch then. Let's
1:39
go ahead and give our Patreon shout
1:41
outs. We had Jessica Stamp. Hey Jessica.
1:43
Caleb De Bruin. Well, thank you, Caleb.
1:45
Bridget. Hey, what's going on, Bridget? Ann
1:48
O'Brien jumped out at our highest level.
1:50
Oh, awesome. Thank you, Ann. Jennifer O'Dell.
1:52
Hey, there's O'Dell. Cowgirl521.
1:56
What up, 521? Aggs. Hey,
1:58
Aggs. Abby Lovelace. appreciate that
2:00
lovelace. Benjamin Ashdown. Hey Ashdown. Kathy
2:02
Robinson. What's going on Kathy? Mark
2:05
Brockleman. Thank you Brockleman. Darby Landon.
2:07
Hey Landon. And last but not
2:09
least Rebecca. Good old Rebecca. Good
2:11
old Rebecca. And then if we
2:13
go back into the vault, this
2:17
week we selected Paul and Melissa
2:19
Hipperson. Those Hippersons. Yeah they've been
2:21
with us a long time. We
2:23
appreciate all the Patreon support. We
2:25
also had a couple of great
2:27
donations on PayPal. A
2:29
large donation from Melinda Worgacki. Well
2:32
thanks Melinda we appreciate that. Yep
2:34
we know Melinda. We love Melinda.
2:37
And one from Betty June Speth. Well
2:39
thank you Speth. So we appreciate all
2:41
of that. We have an episode
2:43
out right now on True Crime All the Time where
2:46
we're headed back to the 60s to
2:49
talk about a woman named
2:51
Lucille Miller and
2:53
the death of her husband Gordon Miller burned
2:56
alive in a car in San
2:59
Bernardino County very
3:01
quickly. The police looked at
3:03
his wife Lucille is the murderer
3:05
but there's a lot to this
3:07
case. Oh definitely
3:10
as you're thinking. Yes it's
3:12
not quite as wrapped
3:14
up in a nice
3:16
little bow as
3:18
many of the teacats are. There's a lot
3:20
to think about. All right buddy
3:22
are you ready to get into this
3:24
episode of True Crime All the Time
3:26
on Sol? I'm rainy. We're talking about
3:28
the murder of Eve Stratford. Eve
3:31
Stratford worked at the Playboy Club
3:33
in London and was featured
3:35
in Mayfair magazine days before
3:37
she was killed on March 18th 1975.
3:41
Eve was attacked and
3:43
murdered inside her apartment. Months
3:45
later 16 year old
3:47
Lynn Weeden was raped and
3:49
murdered while walking to her home in
3:51
West London. The two cases
3:53
were linked by DNA over
3:56
30 years later and some
3:58
investigators have connected a day cases
4:01
to these two murders, which has
4:03
led to the theory that the
4:05
victims were killed by an unidentified
4:08
serial killer. So interesting that they
4:10
were able to tie these together. Yeah, and
4:13
we'll talk about them more in detail. But
4:16
to think that after
4:18
30 years, you know, some
4:20
of the dots start to get connected.
4:23
There's the thought that there was
4:25
this unidentified serial killer. Well,
4:28
that brings hope that maybe someday that
4:31
will be an identified
4:33
serial killer and we'll
4:35
know all about that
4:37
person and what that person did.
4:40
Eve Stratford was born in Dortmund,
4:43
West Germany on December 28, 1953.
4:47
Eve's family moved a lot during her
4:50
childhood because her father Albert was an
4:52
army medic. They eventually
4:54
settled in the town of Warrington
4:57
in England. Eve moved out in 1972 to
4:59
live with her boyfriend, Tony Priest. They
5:03
shared a ground floor apartment
5:05
with Tony's bandmates in
5:07
Layton, East London. Tony
5:09
was a singer in the rock band Vineyard
5:12
originally called Onyx. They
5:14
supported bands like Queen and Thin
5:16
Lizzy. Oh, I
5:18
remember those bands. Yeah. So, I mean, those
5:20
were big bands. Queen was huge. So
5:23
obviously they were at least
5:25
on the right track, right? Sounds
5:28
like they were turning the right way. But
5:30
the band would split up by the
5:32
time Eve turned 21 and Tony eventually
5:34
got a job as a forklift truck
5:37
driver. And I think that happens
5:39
a lot. You know, bands start out. You
5:42
think if you're working with a band like
5:44
Queen, you're going to be signed.
5:46
You're going to do something. But it doesn't always
5:48
work out that way. You know, it's
5:50
kind of like trying to be an actor. Right.
5:52
You go out to Hollywood and
5:55
you're waiting tables, waiting for this
5:57
big break. And for some people
5:59
it comes. And for others, it never
6:01
comes. Or sometimes it comes and goes.
6:04
That happens as well. Yeah. I
6:07
think, you know, there's a
6:09
lot of weekend bands, you know, uh,
6:11
tribute bands and things like that, that
6:14
those guys, maybe they are driving a
6:16
forklift during the week and on the weekends, they're doing
6:19
what they wish they could have done on a
6:21
larger scale. Yeah. Yeah. I would say
6:23
that's probably accurate, but for, I think for a lot
6:25
of people, that might just be a hobby. It
6:28
sounds like they were really trying to make it
6:30
as a band and for whatever reason, it
6:32
didn't work out. I could see you trying to
6:34
be in a band. No, we've had
6:36
this discussion. I have multiple guitars
6:38
over here in the studio that
6:41
I still have yet to learn how to play. Like,
6:43
I see you trying to be in a band. I
6:46
can sing a little. Oh, you can sing,
6:48
but I don't play any instruments. Yeah. In
6:50
1973, Eve started
6:52
working as a waitress at the Playboy
6:55
Club in London. She was
6:57
19 years old at this time. Her dream
6:59
was to be a model and she hoped
7:01
this job would help her get started in
7:03
the industry. Now I'm sure
7:05
Gibbs, that you remember these Playboy
7:08
clubs. I don't, I don't
7:10
think I was old enough to ever
7:12
remember them. I mean, I knew of
7:14
them. I wasn't old enough to venture inside them.
7:17
Oh, I thought you were managing one at some
7:19
point in the seventies, but
7:22
I actually did watch, I can't remember if
7:24
it was a documentary. It was some type
7:26
of show about these Playboy
7:28
clubs and they had them in
7:30
big cities, you know, all around,
7:32
they were kind of upscale. I
7:35
guess you would call them gentlemen's clubs.
7:38
They were pretty popular back then. They
7:40
were, they were. While at
7:42
work, Eve went by the name
7:44
Bunny Ava. Her coworkers
7:46
described her as a gentle and friendly
7:49
person. She was popular with
7:51
the clubs regular. She and
7:53
some of the other Playboy girls
7:55
were photographed with famous people who
7:57
visited the club in
7:59
March. 1975 Eve was suspended
8:02
from the club for three months
8:04
for breach of contract. She modeled
8:06
for Mayfair magazine rival publication
8:09
and was featured on the cover
8:11
of that month's issue. She
8:13
used the name Eva van Borkes
8:15
for this publication. This edition
8:18
had over 460,000 subscribers. Almost
8:21
a half a million. That's a lot back there.
8:24
Yeah. So obviously it was a big deal
8:27
for her. And I'm sure very hard
8:29
to turn down. She didn't
8:31
turn it down, but apparently it was
8:33
also part of her playboy
8:36
contract that she wouldn't do it. Eve
8:39
had been looking for opportunities though,
8:41
to kickstart her modeling career. She
8:43
tried to model for playboys
8:45
American magazine, but was turned down. And
8:49
it was said, this is why she
8:51
accepted the job with Mayfair. Eve's
8:53
manager and former bunny mother, Aaron
8:55
Morris said Eve understood why she
8:58
was suspended and wasn't upset about
9:00
it. She explained that she did
9:02
it because she wanted to be
9:04
a model. Eve anticipated that
9:06
this would be the beginning of her
9:08
career and she wouldn't need
9:10
to come back to the club. Although she
9:13
was told she could return once
9:15
her suspension was over. Aaron
9:17
Morris said, as quoted by the mirror, she
9:20
wasn't just going to wait on tables.
9:22
She wanted to do something with her
9:24
life. And that's coming from her bunny
9:26
mother. It is. It also, I think
9:29
helps explain why she was
9:31
willing to kind of breach this contract
9:33
because she thought, it doesn't
9:35
matter. I'm not going back there anyway,
9:38
because this is going to shoot
9:40
me, you know, up the ladder
9:42
into, you know, some type
9:44
of startup. Yeah. Get her into the career.
9:46
She really wants to be, not be a
9:48
cocktail waitress. And you know, sometimes in
9:51
life, you just have to take a risk. You do.
9:53
If you want to change, you want something
9:56
different. You can't keep doing the same old
9:58
thing. I know two guys
10:00
who. did that about eight
10:02
years ago. Yeah. And so far it's
10:04
worked out pretty good. Yeah. Took a
10:06
big risk and Hey, thank goodness
10:08
you came up with that. We're still doing it. Eve
10:11
did two more photo shoots after
10:13
she was suspended, one for a
10:15
South African magazine and one for
10:17
a crime fiction novel where
10:19
she posed with a knife pointing at
10:22
her throat, which doesn't seem
10:24
all that strange until
10:26
you learn that Eve was killed just
10:28
days later. Then it seems
10:31
kind of foreboding and ominous. Well,
10:33
you're right. It's definitely ominous and
10:35
foreboding. That too. You
10:37
left that one out on March 18th, 1975. Eve
10:42
left her apartment to go see her
10:44
agent. After the meeting, she
10:46
started walking home and stopped to
10:48
buy herself flowers. The police
10:50
believe she was followed home from the
10:52
subway station in Leighton. Eve
10:56
left the station around three 45 and
10:58
was last seen walking alone near her
11:01
apartment. She arrived home at four 10
11:03
PM. And this is a very
11:05
scary thought to me. And
11:07
obviously Eve was an attractive woman.
11:10
She worked at the playboy club. She
11:13
was, you know, an aspiring model, the
11:16
thought that someone would see
11:18
her. And I don't
11:21
know if become fixated is the
11:23
right term, but make the
11:25
decision that I'm going
11:27
to follow her and
11:29
do something to her. That is
11:32
so scary. This is not
11:34
someone who, you know, has made
11:37
a plan or has been making
11:39
a plan for six months that
11:41
they're going to eliminate a rival
11:44
or something like that.
11:46
Not that any of that's good. This
11:48
is like a split second thing where
11:50
you see someone and you
11:53
make the decision. You
11:55
know, a predator makes the decision that
11:57
this is a person. They're going to go.
12:00
after they're going to target. That
12:02
it can happen that quickly, I guess is
12:04
what scares her. Yeah, that they decide that
12:07
I'm going to stalk this person. Because
12:09
someone catches their eye for whatever
12:11
reason. I mean, they see her, they're
12:14
attracted to her, then they want to stalk her and then
12:16
take it to another level after that. Detectives
12:19
believe the killer entered the house
12:21
as she opened the front door,
12:24
or they knocked and Eve opened the
12:26
door willingly. It appeared that
12:28
the killer grabbed her soon after she
12:30
got home because she dropped her flowers
12:32
in the hallway. And I could
12:35
see how police would make that assumption. She's
12:37
not going to buy these flowers, get
12:39
home, and as she's walking
12:41
inside the house, just drop them in the
12:44
hallway. No, that's not going to happen. She's
12:47
going to take them to the kitchen
12:49
or wherever, maybe grab a vase, put
12:51
some water. I mean, that's what most
12:53
people would do, but it
12:56
seems like she never got the chance
12:58
to do that. Around 5.15
13:01
PM, Eve's neighbor heard a man
13:03
and a woman talking inside the
13:05
apartment. It didn't sound like
13:07
an argument, but the conversation was followed
13:09
by a loud thud that sounded
13:12
like a chair falling over. The
13:14
neighbor then heard footsteps walking
13:16
downstairs to exit the apartment.
13:19
And this is something that we've talked about
13:22
in unsolved cases quite a bit, especially
13:24
if you're in an apartment setting.
13:27
You have neighbors who are
13:30
basically butting up right
13:33
next to you. You're sharing a wall with
13:35
them, a ceiling with them or whatever. And
13:38
so people are hearing
13:40
noises, but what are they making
13:42
of those noises? And what
13:44
would you make of a noise
13:46
like that? If it sounded like a
13:49
chair falling over, would you rush over? Would
13:51
you call 911? And
13:53
I don't think most people would. No. Especially
13:56
if it didn't sound like there was
13:58
some kind of heated argument. You
14:00
didn't hear a scream or anything like
14:02
that. I was just thinking, neighbors
14:05
are making some too much damn noise again. Because
14:08
most people don't want to be put
14:10
in that situation where, you know,
14:12
they, they ultimately find out they've, they've
14:15
called for no reason. Right. Exactly. And
14:17
so I think a lot of people
14:19
would err on the side of not
14:21
calling. I really do. Now, if you
14:23
heard a blood curdling scream, you heard
14:25
a gunshot, that would be, that would
14:27
be different. Eve's boyfriend,
14:29
Tony came home about 10 minutes
14:31
later and found her body in
14:34
the bedroom, a nylon stocking
14:36
was tied around one ankle and
14:38
a scarf was tied around her hands. Her
14:41
throat had been cut a dozen times.
14:44
And we've heard this before, but it
14:47
was said that her injuries were so
14:49
severe that her head
14:51
was almost completely severed. Authorities
14:54
believe Eve was sexually assaulted
14:57
because she was found partially
14:59
unclothed and semen was
15:01
obtained from vaginal swabs, which
15:03
indicated intercourse occurred shortly before
15:06
she died. The DNA sample
15:08
was also collected from a piece
15:10
of Eve's clothing. Well, I
15:12
think it's safe to say she was sexually assaulted. Yeah.
15:15
Based on what we know, it
15:18
also sounds like they were able
15:21
to collect a pretty
15:24
good amount of evidence.
15:26
Yeah. Semen. Now
15:29
we said a DNA sample, obviously in
15:31
1975, they didn't know what DNA
15:33
was, but they
15:35
collected something from
15:37
a piece of her
15:39
clothing that would be today considered
15:42
a DNA sample. There
15:45
were no signs of forced entry and
15:47
no murder weapon. Detectives speculated
15:49
she might have known her
15:51
attacker. And I think this comes
15:54
up often when there's no forced
15:56
entry. But I
15:58
don't think that is something. assumption is
16:01
always correct. It can't always be
16:03
correct because if somebody knocks on
16:05
your door, are you going to answer? Maybe
16:08
yes, maybe no, maybe you look through
16:10
the peephole. You don't know who
16:12
the person is, but you decide you're going
16:15
to answer anyway and that person kind of
16:17
bum rushes you and is able
16:20
to get inside quickly and shut the door.
16:22
Or they follow you up to the door
16:24
when you come home and you
16:26
get in you see them coming you try to
16:28
close the door quick enough to try to lock
16:30
it, but they are able to get in.
16:32
So there wouldn't technically be forced entry
16:35
even though it was a forced entry.
16:37
There'd be no signs of it, I
16:39
guess is what I'm trying to say. Because you didn't get a chance
16:41
to throw the lock. Yeah. Eve's father Albert
16:43
was on a work trip in the Democratic
16:46
Republic of the Congo. His
16:48
employer sent him a message that Eve
16:51
was injured in an accident and
16:53
he needed to come home immediately. His
16:55
company sent a car to take him to the
16:57
airport. On the front seat, he
17:00
found the newspaper with a story
17:02
about his daughter's murder on the front
17:04
page. He later found out
17:06
it was put there deliberately because
17:09
nobody within the company knew
17:12
how to break the news to him. It would
17:14
be tough to break that news, but
17:16
it seems like a crappy way
17:18
to do it. Really cold. But
17:21
I understand. Nobody wants to
17:23
deliver that type of news,
17:26
but to tell a person
17:28
that their daughter was in
17:30
an accident when you already know
17:32
that they're dead, they
17:35
were murdered, and then to kind
17:38
of plant this newspaper so
17:40
that the person finds out that way, it's
17:44
kind of cowardly. I think so. I think
17:46
somebody at the company should have stood
17:48
up. Had the nerve to do
17:51
what should have been done. Yeah, I agree
17:53
with you. Sometimes you got to
17:55
do the hard thing because it's the right thing.
17:58
Albert spoke to the Times and said, in
18:00
2009 and said his wife,
18:02
Liza, never recovered after Eve's
18:05
death. She visited her grave
18:07
every day and turned their home into
18:09
a shrine to Eve. She
18:11
had to quit her dress shop business because
18:13
she couldn't handle seeing all the young women that
18:16
came in. She died suddenly in 1986,
18:20
and he believed it was due to her
18:22
stress and trauma. Albert said
18:24
he burned all photos of
18:26
Eve except for one. It's
18:28
tough. It's absolutely tough.
18:31
It's heartbreaking. It's something
18:33
that we do talk about, probably
18:36
don't talk about enough because we
18:38
don't have the experience. But
18:41
when you read or
18:43
hear things like this, you
18:45
do get a sense of it.
18:48
You can never fully put
18:50
yourself in a person's shoes
18:52
until something like that has happened to you,
18:54
but you get a really good sense of
18:57
what they went through. The
18:59
original investigative team worked based
19:01
on the theory that the
19:03
killer had sexual obsessions of
19:06
tying women up and had
19:08
read the article in the latest issue
19:10
of Mayfair magazine, which featured
19:12
an interview with Eve where she
19:15
talked about her sexual preferences. Maybe
19:18
it's how he found out, ignited
19:20
something in him. He
19:22
sought her out and we know what
19:24
happened after that. So if this
19:26
theory is correct, then there would
19:28
have been a little bit more
19:30
planning than just
19:33
seeing Eve at the subway
19:35
station. This would have
19:38
been more of seeing her in the
19:40
magazine, reading the article,
19:42
maybe becoming infatuated
19:45
with her through
19:47
that interaction. And then
19:50
following her, figuring out her
19:52
pattern, her routine
19:54
and finding a time to
19:57
strike. So
20:00
now at least that narrows
20:03
the potential suspect list,
20:05
but not by
20:07
a big number, right? I mean, they have
20:09
a subscription base of almost a half
20:11
million. Yeah, but you don't
20:13
know who's buying it at a newsstand. That's
20:17
true. So I, yeah,
20:19
I would narrow it, but I don't know
20:21
how you could narrow it specifically,
20:25
if that makes sense. I guess
20:27
it depends if it's a regional
20:29
magazine or where's this being shipped to.
20:31
Maybe if you just concentrate on the people
20:33
that have a subscription that live
20:35
in London and then like you
20:38
said, you still have the newsstand buyers. True
20:40
crime all the time unsolved is brought
20:43
to you by progressive insurance. Most of
20:45
you listening right now are probably multitasking.
20:47
Yep. While you're listening to Gibby and
20:49
I talk, you're probably also driving, cleaning,
20:51
exercising, or maybe even grocery shopping. But
20:54
if you're not in some kind of
20:56
moving vehicle, there's something else you can
20:58
be doing right now, getting an auto
21:00
quote from progressive insurance. It's easy and
21:02
you could save money by doing it
21:04
right from your phone. Drivers who saved
21:07
by switching to progressive save nearly $750
21:09
on average. And
21:12
auto customers qualify for an average of
21:14
seven discounts, discounts for having multiple vehicles
21:16
and your policy, being a homeowner and
21:19
more. So just like your favorite podcasts,
21:21
progressive will be with you. 24 seven,
21:23
365 days a year. So
21:27
you're protected no matter what multitask
21:30
right now. Quote your car insurance
21:32
at progressive.com to join the over
21:34
28 million drivers who trust progressive,
21:37
progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates.
21:39
National average 12 month savings of $744
21:41
by new customer survey who saved with
21:45
progressive between June, 2022 and May, 2023 potential
21:47
savings will vary. Discounts
21:51
not available in all States and situations.
21:55
David Brenner, the editor of Mayfair
21:57
was one of the men who was
21:59
questioned. He said he interviewed
22:01
Eve over the phone and
22:03
was later cleared after he provided
22:06
a DNA sample and
22:08
obviously we'll get into talking about DNA,
22:10
but This clearing would
22:12
have happened many many years later
22:14
because we're still many years away
22:17
from Being able to
22:19
use DNA Another
22:22
potential suspect was a man named
22:24
Abdul Kawaha a
22:26
Lebanese businessman who ate lunch at
22:28
the Playboy Club every day He
22:31
enjoyed talking to the girls at the club, but
22:34
especially he he was
22:36
devastated by Eve's murder and Deeply
22:38
upset that he was a suspect He
22:41
complained to one worker that the
22:43
police were following him and telling
22:45
his friends. He was a suspect
22:47
He too was cleared after
22:50
his son Provided a
22:52
DNA sample. So again,
22:54
we're talking about what the 70s here, right?
22:58
We know this DNA stuff is
23:00
not going to happen for many
23:02
many years So these people that
23:05
we're talking about right now would
23:07
have walked around Under
23:09
the a cloud of suspicion for
23:11
many many years. Yeah, and
23:13
obviously he must not have been around anymore because
23:15
the Sun had a provided yeah a sample to
23:18
clear his dad's name Initially the
23:20
police believed that Eve's flower bouquet
23:22
which was found in the hallway
23:25
Was a key piece of evidence
23:27
because similar flowers were used for
23:30
her Mayfair Photo shoot
23:32
the police later learned that she
23:35
purchased those flowers herself
23:37
as well Detectives still
23:39
place great significance on the
23:41
magazine which they believed enticed
23:43
the killer who possibly found
23:46
Eve's address and Stocked her
23:49
and I really don't think this is a bad Lead
23:52
theory. I'm not saying it's the
23:55
only one but you could
23:57
see why the police would work on it
23:59
or work from it, I
24:01
don't know what else they had to go on. The
24:04
interview was pretty recent, right?
24:07
The issue was recent. I
24:09
mean, I think you have to look at somebody that
24:11
read the interview, seen, seen
24:14
the photo shoot, maybe somebody at the
24:16
club. I mean, those should be like
24:18
your major points
24:20
of interest to investigate out of
24:22
the block. And I'm wondering, had they ever look
24:24
into the flower store too? I mean, if she's been
24:27
there a few times, maybe she got somebody's attention
24:29
there. That's a good point.
24:31
I didn't see anything in the research
24:34
about that. Detectives searched
24:36
the area around Eve's apartment
24:38
and they found a torn copy of
24:41
the magazine featuring Eve. And
24:43
they also found other pornographic
24:45
magazines in the same place.
24:48
Eve had previously complained about a
24:50
man following her, but the only
24:52
description investigators had was that he
24:55
had a strained and stiff walk.
24:58
Strained and stiff. So
25:00
either he was really excited at
25:02
the time someone saw him,
25:05
or he had an issue with
25:07
his legs or his gait or, you
25:09
know, something like that. Yeah. Very
25:12
strange. Investigators learned
25:14
that other young women working at
25:16
the club received obscene phone calls
25:19
leading up to Eve's murder. One
25:22
woman reported that she received death
25:24
threats after she was
25:26
featured in Mayfair. Yeah.
25:28
I don't think it's strange that
25:30
they're getting obscene phone calls at that
25:32
time. I think there was probably
25:34
a lot of perverts that
25:37
visit the club, read the
25:39
magazine, read the magazine, looked at the
25:41
magazine. Yeah. As opposed to the perverts
25:44
of today or, well,
25:47
you know, you know, they didn't
25:49
have the internet back then to do that. So they would
25:52
just call people up on the phone and.
25:55
Well, the technology and you and I have talked
25:57
about that before in the 1970. not
26:01
as easy to figure out who was
26:03
calling you, right? Today it is much
26:05
easier. Now, people can
26:07
block numbers, they can use
26:10
fake numbers, there's ways to get
26:12
around it, but I do believe
26:15
there are probably less obscene
26:17
phone calls today than
26:20
there were back then. I
26:22
think it would be hard to pull off an obscene
26:24
phone call today. It's harder. Yeah. It's harder,
26:27
I'm sure. But the
26:29
one girl gets a death
26:32
threat call, I'm not surprised by
26:34
that too, that maybe someone saw
26:36
her in the magazine and said, that's
26:39
not something good for you to do and
26:41
I'm gonna call and let you know. That's
26:44
obscene. Yeah. So now
26:46
you could delve into an area
26:48
of someone who was
26:51
not aroused by these
26:53
women, but maybe
26:55
upset with these women for
26:58
what they were doing. Took issue with
27:01
their morals? Maybe. I
27:03
mean, I think you can't rule it
27:05
out. Eve had also
27:07
received several harassing phone calls
27:09
before she died. The caller
27:11
hung up without speaking or
27:14
whispered obscenities to her.
27:16
Eve received three phone calls on the day
27:19
of the murder. Every time she
27:21
answered, the caller didn't speak and
27:24
ended the call. So either they were
27:26
too afraid to talk or they just
27:28
wanted to hear her voice. But either way,
27:30
that would be a very scary thing. You
27:33
don't know what the intentions
27:35
are of the person on
27:37
the other end of that line. Why
27:39
are you doing this to me? Now,
27:41
it's obviously much more
27:44
ominous because we know she was killed
27:46
later that day. Yeah, I mean,
27:48
could it be somebody that has a crush on
27:50
her and they're afraid to talk because
27:52
they get nervous? Maybe, but kind
27:55
of unlikely. Well, three times is a
27:57
lot. That is a lot in one day. I could
27:59
see. somebody maybe, you know, you
28:01
want to ask somebody out, you, you
28:03
make the call and you
28:06
chicken out and decide that you
28:08
just can't do it and you hang up the phone.
28:11
I don't think you're going to call
28:13
back two more times and you're certainly
28:15
not going to whisper obscenities. No,
28:18
that's true. In that scenario. Yeah. That's not going to
28:20
get you to date. Well, most
28:23
likely. Right. That would never work. Several
28:26
women reported that their job could
28:28
be dangerous. One young woman
28:31
told the Sunday people that she
28:33
was raped after leaving the London
28:35
Playboy club in November, 1974. Another
28:39
woman was assaulted near the club and
28:42
during the assault, a woman in
28:44
a car screened, kill her, kill
28:47
her. So again, I, I
28:49
think, you know, this theory
28:52
of people being upset
28:55
about what some of these young women
28:57
were doing. You can't
28:59
just discount it completely. Cause
29:01
there are things here that, that kind of back it
29:03
up. I mean, what kind of woman
29:06
sees another woman being assaulted and
29:09
screams, kill her, kill her. Unless
29:12
she knows what that woman
29:14
does for a living and believes
29:17
that. It's so bad.
29:19
It's so bad that she's not worthy
29:21
of being alive or it's okay to
29:23
assault her. The police wanted
29:25
to question all 240 women at the club about previous attacks
29:30
to build a list of suspects.
29:32
That's smart. Yeah, I think
29:34
it is. Six months later, a teenage
29:37
girl was killed in West London,
29:39
but it would take over 30 years for
29:42
her case to be linked to Eats
29:45
on September 3rd, 1975. 16
29:48
year old Lynn Wheaton was raped
29:50
and murdered while walking home in
29:52
Hounslow. West London. Lynn
29:55
went out with her friends that night. She
29:57
took the bus to meet them around 7 15. PM.
30:00
Her parents expected her to get back around 11
30:03
30, but Lynn never
30:05
came home. They went to sleep
30:07
and assume she missed the last bus.
30:10
See that's where me and you are a
30:12
little different. I don't think we
30:14
would have went to sleep. Yeah. And, and
30:16
again, I always hate to kind of
30:19
bad mouth the parents of
30:22
a murdered victim. It's really hard
30:25
to do. So what
30:27
I will say is I agree
30:29
with you because I was in
30:31
this situation many times with both my
30:34
kids. I just chose not
30:36
to go to sleep until I knew
30:38
for a fact they were home. Yeah.
30:40
It's just what I always did. Now,
30:42
my wife would go to sleep, but
30:44
she had to get up much earlier than
30:46
I did. And she knew that
30:49
I was going to stay up. So Lynn
30:51
and her friends went out to a pub
30:54
in Hounslow and left at 10 30
30:57
Lynn left the group at a junction
30:59
and started walking her normal route home.
31:02
She was walking along great West point
31:04
road and took a shortcut
31:06
through an alley called the short hedges
31:09
detectives believed she was followed on foot
31:11
and attacked in the alley, which
31:14
was just 50 yards from her home.
31:16
According to the paper, the evening
31:18
standard, this led the police
31:21
to theorize that the killer was a
31:23
local or someone who knew the area
31:25
very well. Lynn was hit on
31:27
the head with a heavy blunt object. The
31:30
killer then threw her over a
31:32
fence into the grounds of
31:34
an electricity substation and
31:36
raped her around 7 30 AM on September
31:38
4th, the
31:41
daughter of a school caretaker whose
31:44
house overlooked the substation found Lynn.
31:47
She was unconscious and
31:49
seriously injured. Lynn had
31:51
two skull fractures, facial
31:54
lacerations and was
31:56
experiencing hypothermia. She'd been
31:59
outside for over. seven hours. Wow.
32:01
Long time. Lynn
32:03
never regained consciousness. She
32:06
died at the West Middlesex hospital
32:09
on September 10th. Her cause
32:11
of death was determined to be a
32:14
brain hemorrhage. No murder
32:16
weapon was ever found at the crime scene.
32:18
So again, this was
32:21
a very brutal, rape
32:23
and murder. Two
32:25
skull fractures, lacerations to
32:27
her face, and then, you
32:30
know, essentially just left to
32:33
die. But I can see the thought
32:35
behind thinking that it's somebody local, knowing
32:37
the streets, knowing maybe
32:39
where that substation was. The
32:42
alley, the shortcut, the short
32:44
hedges. Yeah, I could see
32:46
that. Now, could it be that
32:49
this person just followed her? Absolutely.
32:51
On her way home from,
32:53
you know, being out. That's
32:56
possible as well. Around the
32:58
time of the murder, the man was out
33:00
walking his dog and saw a
33:02
man walking down the alley where Lynn was
33:04
attacked. Other witnesses reported seeing
33:07
a man running across the road
33:09
into the alleyway. It's
33:11
believed that this unidentified man was
33:13
the killer. In October, 1975, the
33:16
Liverpool police found newspaper
33:18
reports about Eve's murder. Smeared
33:21
with lipstick in an
33:23
empty apartment. There were
33:25
also photos of Eve that looked like
33:27
they had been stabbed with a dart.
33:30
A landlord found them while cleaning
33:32
up after two male tenants moved
33:34
out. It's a little strange, but
33:36
is it that strange? I
33:38
think it's pretty strange. I got to be
33:40
honest with you. Now, could it be
33:42
that, you know, these photos came
33:45
out of a magazine and they just
33:47
needed something to throw the darts at?
33:49
I guess so. But it
33:52
does seem as though maybe
33:54
somebody had an issue with her.
33:57
And maybe she rejected him or them. them
34:00
at one time? Yeah, it doesn't mean
34:02
that they were killers, but it seems like they
34:05
had an issue. By 1976, all
34:08
leads in Eve's case were exhausted.
34:11
Over the years, the murders of Eve
34:13
Stratford and Lynn Whedon have
34:15
been linked to other cases
34:17
like the 1977 murder of
34:20
Elizabeth Parra-Vincena, which
34:23
occurred just one mile away from where
34:25
Lynn was attacked. She was killed
34:27
under similar circumstances. And
34:30
detectives immediately speculated the two
34:33
murders were connected. On
34:35
September 9th, 1977, 27-year-old Elizabeth Parra-Vincena was
34:37
attacked and
34:42
murdered while walking home alone. Like
34:44
Lynn, Elizabeth was walking
34:46
home late at night along
34:48
Great West Road. She
34:50
was attacked from behind when she turned
34:53
on to Osterley Road. The
34:55
killer hit her on the head with a blunt
34:57
object and dragged her into
34:59
some shrubbery. There was no
35:01
evidence of sexual assault. Detectives
35:03
believed the attacker was disturbed
35:06
before he could rape Elizabeth and
35:09
fled. And that's always a
35:11
possibility. And I do think
35:13
this is something to
35:15
talk about. You know, the
35:17
fact that someone, a victim
35:20
is not sexually assaulted, doesn't
35:22
necessarily mean that the
35:25
murderer didn't have designs
35:27
on doing that. You
35:29
know, they, they could have been disturbed.
35:32
Somebody could have driven by. They
35:34
were afraid of getting caught.
35:37
And so they weren't able
35:39
to do everything they, they wanted
35:41
to do. And I guess, you
35:44
know, what that leads me into is
35:46
comparing cases. Yeah.
35:49
So if you have someone who's
35:51
murdered and sexually assaulted, and
35:53
then you have a subsequent murder,
35:56
but there is no sexual assault,
35:59
I don't think you can.
36:01
automatically say that the two
36:03
aren't related or connected
36:05
because they have different
36:08
components or they don't have the same
36:10
component because the police could be right
36:12
here. They could be. It's
36:14
not like this perpetrator
36:17
took Elizabeth to a
36:19
secluded location or back to
36:22
you know some. How
36:25
was right when he
36:27
could have complete privacy
36:30
is that on the side of the road in
36:32
some shrubs so it's not
36:34
inconceivable that somebody could have
36:36
been walking their dog or
36:38
you know driving by any
36:40
got scared. You can't discount it
36:43
no i don't think you can. In
36:45
nineteen eighty three the public
36:47
learn that detective interviewed in
36:50
imprisoned police officer is part
36:52
of an inquiry into the
36:54
murders of eve strafford when
36:56
we didn't and
36:58
elizabeth paravansina. Officer
37:00
paul thomas was jailed for over
37:02
five years for sex crimes and
37:05
had a history of targeting
37:07
schoolgirls. He also had
37:09
a history of harassing women
37:11
with anonymous phone calls however
37:14
he had an alibi for the
37:16
time of elizabeth murder. Another
37:19
case that has been connected to
37:21
ease strafford is the nineteen
37:23
seventy nine murder of linda ferrer
37:25
who was murdered inside her home
37:28
she lived only about five miles from
37:30
me. Linda was a twenty
37:32
nine year old mother of two she
37:35
was four months pregnant with her third child
37:38
when she died linda worked as
37:40
a group a. Person
37:42
who manages a gambling table
37:45
and establishment in the west end
37:47
of london she was stabbed
37:49
to death on january nineteen nineteen
37:51
seventy nine. As she came
37:53
home from her ship according to
37:55
the mirror linda heard the
37:57
phone ring and when inside. forgetting
38:00
to shut the door behind her. Two
38:02
girls passing by heard a
38:05
woman shriek and saw the
38:07
front door slam. The killer cut her
38:09
throat with a knife. Like
38:11
Eve, her wounds were so
38:13
severe that her head was
38:15
almost severed. Maybe this
38:17
perpetrator was in the West End,
38:20
visited the Playboy Club, and
38:23
also visited this
38:25
gambling establishment. Yeah. And
38:28
it's very possible. You know,
38:30
and at those two places,
38:33
saw Eve, saw Linda,
38:36
and decided to target
38:38
them. But I want to go
38:40
back to, you know, these two girls
38:42
passing by, hearing a woman shriek
38:45
and then the front door slamming.
38:47
And that same question kind of comes
38:49
up. What do you do with that
38:51
information? What does it mean to you? Could
38:54
it mean that somebody dropped
38:56
a glass and
38:58
cried out because they were
39:00
upset? Or, you know, I don't know. It
39:03
depends on what the shriek sounded
39:06
like to me. Right. Because
39:08
there are different types of shriek.
39:10
There's the, oh my gosh,
39:13
I'm about to die shriek. And
39:16
there's the, you know, there's the surprise
39:18
shriek. And again, we don't know
39:20
how old these girls were. It
39:23
could have made a difference. That could make a
39:25
difference of whether they would even
39:27
think to go back and maybe tell
39:29
an adult what they heard. And
39:31
maybe they did tell an adult, and the adult said,
39:33
I don't know what that means. I
39:36
didn't hear it. I don't want to get involved. Or
39:38
by the time they told the adults, maybe
39:40
she was already discovered. And
39:42
so there was no reason for them
39:44
to do anything besides the fact, tell
39:47
the police, oh yeah, my daughter's walked
39:49
by and heard. Yeah. Yeah. That's, that's
39:51
a possibility as well, because
39:53
unfortunately Linda's eight and 11 year
39:56
old daughters came home from school
39:58
around 20 minutes. And
40:01
it's believed that the killer was still in
40:03
the house at this point and
40:05
escaped out the back door. The
40:08
girls peeked through the letterbox and
40:10
saw Linda's body in the hall. So
40:13
unbelievably tragic, you know,
40:15
to lose your mother.
40:18
Extremely tragic to
40:20
lose your mother in such a horrific
40:22
way. Yeah, and to discover the body
40:25
laying in the hallway by looking through the
40:27
letterbox. Another level of tragedy. Yeah. The
40:31
police saw footprints leading to Linda's front
40:33
door, which were made by a Wellington
40:35
boot. Papers from
40:37
1979 compared the case
40:40
to the murder of Eve Stratford because
40:42
of the method of murder and
40:44
the fact that they worked in clubs in London.
40:47
So you pointed out that similarity.
40:50
There was also the similarity
40:52
of how badly both
40:55
women's throats were cut to
40:58
the point that each of
41:00
their heads were almost severed. At the
41:03
time, it was reported that detectives
41:05
were seeking a man who was seen
41:07
running near Linda's home. He was
41:10
described as being in his
41:12
late 30s, 5'9 with dark
41:14
but graying curly hair and
41:17
long sideburns below his ears. He
41:19
was wearing a navy blue jacket,
41:21
dark jeans, and Wellington
41:23
boots. A bus driver
41:25
spotted the man running and stopped because
41:27
he thought he wanted to board the bus,
41:30
but he just kept on running. Now,
41:32
I don't do a lot of running. I
41:34
think I've made that very clear.
41:39
But when I did run, I
41:42
definitely wasn't going out in jeans and, you
41:44
know, like a work boot. That
41:47
wouldn't be most people's choice of
41:49
footwear to go out jogging, not
41:52
the proper running attire. No,
41:54
you don't see a lot of people competing in
41:56
the Olympics in construction
41:58
boots. Well, that could be a new
42:01
fun version of the Olympics. Like every
42:03
participant in that event has to wear
42:05
construction boots. Yeah, I get you. It'd
42:08
be good for the boot makers out
42:10
there. I think it could also
42:12
severely jack up your feet. Well,
42:14
that's true too. And I don't think they're made for
42:16
running. Another
42:19
murder that is often referenced in
42:21
connection to the murders of Lynn
42:23
Weeden and Eve Stratford is the
42:26
murder of 14 year old Patricia
42:28
Morse. Patsy was killed less
42:30
than two and a half miles from Lynn
42:32
Weeden at a nature reserve
42:34
called Hounslow Heat. Patsy
42:36
went missing on June 16th in 1980. She
42:40
disappeared during her lunch break at
42:42
Feltham comprehensive school. Her
42:45
body was found on June 18th in
42:47
some undergrowth. Her clothing had been
42:50
pushed up, but there was
42:52
no additional evidence of sexual
42:54
assault. Patsy was tied up
42:56
in a similar manner to Eve Stratford.
42:59
A pair of tights with a missing leg
43:01
was tied around her leg and
43:03
wound up until it nodded around her
43:05
neck. Her hands were tied behind
43:08
her back with the leg of her
43:10
tights. And another leg was tied
43:12
around her ankle. Kind
43:14
of complex there. Yeah, but
43:16
you can see why police
43:18
are drawing similarities. The
43:21
slashing of throats in some cases,
43:23
the, the tying up
43:26
using, you know, tights, pantyhose,
43:28
whatever, and in other cases.
43:31
In 2004, the London
43:33
Metropolitan Police's murder review
43:35
group reopened Lynn Weeden's
43:37
case and conducted new
43:39
DNA testing. In July,
43:42
2006, her murder was linked to
43:44
the murder of Eve Stratford based
43:47
on a DNA sample obtained
43:49
from Eve's dressing gown cord
43:51
and her ankle binding. So
43:54
we mentioned DNA earlier
43:57
on, but had to say it would
43:59
be many, many years. before the
44:01
authorities actually knew what DNA was and
44:04
before they could use it, it
44:06
sounds like they did a pretty good
44:09
job of collecting
44:11
and storing evidence. Yeah, great job
44:14
preserving it. To the point where
44:17
they were able to use it 30
44:19
plus years later. But even Lynn
44:21
didn't know each other. So
44:24
I mean, I think that just even
44:26
furthered the police's
44:28
belief that their cases
44:30
were connected, very unlikely
44:33
that they somehow
44:35
would have transferred DNA between
44:38
the two of them. So after all
44:40
this time, they finally were able to connect the
44:42
cases and they actually have something
44:44
to work with. Based on the
44:47
evidence in both cases, the police obtained
44:49
a list of 16 suspects. That's
44:52
a good list, I think. I think it
44:54
is. After all those years, Eve's
44:57
case was reopened in 2007 in
45:00
response to the unexpected DNA
45:02
connection. Additionally, investigators
45:05
took DNA evidence from the Linda
45:07
Farrow case and uploaded it
45:09
to the national database in 2007. Her
45:13
murder was not linked to
45:15
Eve, Stratford, or any other cases.
45:18
In April 2008, a man
45:20
walked into the Norfolk Police
45:22
Department and confessed to the
45:24
murder of Patsy Morris. He was
45:27
charged and released on bail. It
45:29
was later reported that he was mentally ill and
45:32
the charges were dropped. Later that
45:34
year, it was reported that Patsy had
45:36
a potential connection to
45:38
serial killer Levi Bellfield.
45:41
That year, Bellfield was convicted of two
45:43
murders and attempted murder.
45:45
In 2011, he was convicted
45:47
of murdering a schoolgirl and
45:50
he's a suspect in several unsolved
45:52
crimes. Bellfield lived
45:55
near the Patsy Morris crime scene. Now,
45:58
he would have only been 12 years old. when
46:00
Patsy was killed, but he did
46:02
receive his first conviction for burglary
46:04
at the age of 13. So
46:08
is it inconceivable? No,
46:11
we've seen people kill at very
46:13
young ages. Sure have. You know,
46:16
he was known for his truancy
46:18
in school and he
46:20
did frequent Hounslow Heat when
46:22
he should have been in class. And it
46:25
was known that he did not attend school on
46:27
the day of Patsy's murder. I
46:29
mean, 12 years old seems really young, but
46:32
we've seen it before. Yeah, it's not
46:34
impossible. Some sources reported
46:36
that he and Patsy were classmates, but
46:39
the police later established that he was
46:41
enrolled at a different school when she
46:43
was murdered and did not
46:45
move to her school until after she died.
46:48
However, he reportedly bragged to a
46:50
cellmate that he did murder Patsy
46:53
when he was only 12 years old.
46:55
And you gotta ask why? Unless
46:57
he actually really did it. Yeah,
47:00
but if he's already caught, he knows he's
47:02
never getting out. Maybe, maybe he's, you know,
47:04
he's just trying to puff himself
47:07
up, get some more cred. Who knows?
47:10
Once the media reported this
47:12
information, Patsy's father, George, revealed
47:14
that after she was killed,
47:17
he received the death threat over
47:19
the phone from an unidentified boy.
47:21
He thought he sounded like a
47:23
vocal. Bellfields, former partners
47:26
mentioned that he hated Blondes and
47:28
targeted them as victims. Patsy
47:31
Morris was Blondes. I
47:33
mean, it sounds like you can make a
47:35
convincing case. Yeah, there's, I
47:38
mean, it's circumstantial, but there's a
47:40
lot of smoke there. I would
47:42
definitely say that. Obviously,
47:44
he was a very bad guy
47:46
for sure. Now, could he
47:48
have killed or began his, you
47:50
know, killing at the age of 12? Absolutely,
47:54
he could have. You
47:57
know, most killers don't start that early, but...
48:00
Some do. Some do. Another
48:02
potential suspect was serial killer
48:05
Peter Tobin, who was sentenced for
48:07
rape and murder in 2006. We
48:10
covered him, right? Yep. On
48:13
TCAT? I thought we did. The police found the
48:15
bodies of two girls who went missing in 1991 at his home in
48:17
Kent. Tobin
48:20
previously served 14 years in prison
48:23
for a double rape conviction and
48:25
was in London when Patsy was murdered. Tobin
48:28
died in 2022. He
48:30
was a bad dude. Yeah, he was. But
48:33
this is natural, right? If
48:35
you have a known killer
48:38
or serial killer who
48:40
operated or was
48:43
in the location around
48:45
the time of these
48:47
murders, that person is going to be
48:49
looked at. Oh yeah. Especially
48:52
if the victim
48:54
fits kind of their MO,
48:56
their profile, something
48:59
like that. And
49:01
if there's any type of connection.
49:03
You look at this Levi Bellfield,
49:06
well, he lived really close to the
49:08
Patsy Morris crime scene. It's
49:11
not like this guy lived four hours
49:13
away. Yeah, he was in the same
49:15
neighborhood. So pretty
49:17
natural that you would at least take a
49:19
look at him. Now, can you prove it
49:21
was him? That's a different story. Same
49:23
with Peter Tobin. He was
49:26
in London. Now that's a
49:28
big city. So how
49:31
close he was to Patsy, I
49:33
don't know, but you're at least
49:35
going to take a look at it. In
49:38
2015, the police issued a public
49:40
appeal for information and offered a
49:42
40,000 pound reward. And
49:44
in the Eve Stratford and Lynn Weeden cases,
49:47
DCI Noel McHugh told
49:49
the Guardian, DNA
49:51
work is complex and lengthy. And
49:54
we are still following this line of
49:56
inquiry. However, I firmly believe
49:58
there is someone out there. who has
50:00
information about who carried out these
50:02
murders. It's inconceivable the
50:05
killer of Eve and Lynn has
50:07
kept the perfect secret for 40 years.
50:10
It's a heavy burden to carry and
50:12
he must have let details slip over
50:14
the years, maybe to a partner or
50:17
friend, even a cellmate. And
50:19
I would appeal to anyone with information
50:22
to contact us. He went on to say,
50:24
the man who carried out these murders is
50:27
now of a different older generation.
50:30
I would imagine he must have reflected
50:32
upon his actions every day over
50:35
the past 40 years. So
50:37
this is an interesting subject to
50:39
me. You have
50:42
someone who kills one
50:44
or multiple people at
50:46
an early age. I don't know if it's 12, but let's say it's
50:48
18, 19, 20 and
50:51
40 years goes by. Now they're 60 years
50:54
old. People change a lot
50:56
from 18 to 60. Does
51:01
this person feel a
51:03
lot differently today if
51:05
they're still alive about what they did? Now,
51:08
I don't know that the self
51:10
preservation thing changes all that much.
51:13
Nobody really wants to go to prison for
51:15
the rest of their life. So,
51:19
this one investigator said, well, he kept the
51:22
perfect secret. To me, if you're a
51:24
lone killer, I
51:26
don't see why you would ever tell anyone what
51:28
you've done. Yeah, because there's no
51:30
reason to. There's no benefit. I
51:33
get it. It's a heavy burden, but
51:35
there's no benefit in telling anyone. There's
51:37
only a very, very
51:40
big downside, which is that
51:42
person could rat you out. And
51:44
the next thing you know, you're never
51:46
seeing daylight again. Some have
51:48
speculated that the women could be
51:51
victims of Peter Sutcliffe, also
51:53
known as the Yorkshire Ripper. We
51:55
did him as well, and man, he was
51:57
a nasty guy too. He was. Sutcliffe
52:00
died from COVID in November of 2020.
52:03
He was convicted of 13 murders and
52:06
seven attempted murders. And
52:08
the police suspect that he's involved in
52:10
at least 30 unsolved murders. According
52:13
to the mirror. I think
52:15
he's one that is easy to try to
52:17
box these unsolveds. Oh
52:20
yeah, because he was such a bad
52:23
guy and he
52:25
did have a high number of known
52:27
murders and even a higher
52:29
number of murders that
52:32
it's thought he could be connected to.
52:35
So yeah, if something happened
52:37
anywhere that he was around and
52:40
he was active during that time, which we know
52:42
he was, then he
52:45
definitely is going to be
52:47
someone that's brought up. What I do think
52:49
is interesting is that with a
52:51
lot of these guys, we did the episodes
52:53
so many years ago, that
52:55
they've now died. Yeah. And
52:58
they were alive. I believe at the
53:00
time we probably did the episode. I
53:02
know Peter Sutcliffe was, and
53:04
I believe that Tobin was alive
53:06
as well when we did the
53:08
episode. A
53:10
government mandated report about
53:13
the West Yorkshire Police's investigation
53:15
stated that Sutcliffe was probably
53:17
responsible for numerous attacks on
53:19
other women between 1969 and
53:21
1980. I
53:25
don't think they're going very far out
53:27
on the limb on that one. No.
53:29
I think that is a given. I
53:32
think with a guy like Peter Sutcliffe, if
53:35
you can pin X number
53:37
of murders and assaults on him,
53:39
the number that you
53:41
don't know about is
53:43
probably even greater. I truly
53:45
believe that. According to X
53:48
intelligence officer Chris Clark, who
53:50
wrote a book titled The Secret Murders,
53:53
Sutcliffe was near Eve's home for
53:55
his sister-in-law's wedding, which
53:57
took place four days after she was murdered.
54:00
And her murder had the same signature
54:03
as other confirmed victims.
54:05
The murder of Lynn Whedon also
54:08
had the same MO and he was in
54:10
London at that time as well. He
54:12
visited a home in North London and
54:14
took a flight from the Heathrow Airport,
54:17
which was four miles from the crime
54:19
scene. So making a
54:22
good case for it. Yeah, I mean
54:24
it's it's not definitive. It doesn't prove
54:26
that that Sutcliffe
54:28
was involved in these murders. What
54:30
you know for sure is that
54:32
he was capable of
54:35
the murders. We know that. And
54:38
now it sounds like he was at
54:40
least in the area at
54:43
the time that the murders took place. So I think
54:45
you have to take that pretty seriously. The
54:48
Mirror reported that the police have
54:50
Sutcliffe's mouth swab and hair in
54:53
their national database, but not a blood
54:55
sample. Not surprised that
54:57
they would have that. No, neither.
55:00
I would think as
55:02
long as it's not completely
55:04
degraded, they could get a
55:06
DNA sample off of that.
55:08
I'm surprised they don't already have a DNA
55:11
sample. Well, they could. They're just keeping
55:13
it under wraps. But
55:15
it's probably what it's going to take right at
55:18
this point to conclusively
55:20
say that this person
55:22
or that person committed the murders. I
55:24
mean, you can talk about all
55:27
the serial killers who
55:29
operated in and around that area
55:31
all you want. You know, you
55:34
can bring up Peter Sutcliffe, Levi
55:37
Bellfield, Peter Tobin, all
55:39
these different people. And
55:41
you could really say that all of them could
55:44
have done it. They were
55:46
capable of doing it, no doubt.
55:48
But it could be someone else
55:51
entirely. I just
55:53
think to definitively say
55:56
that this person was the
55:59
killer It's going to take
56:01
something in the area of DNA and
56:03
it's good because they have DNA. We know
56:05
they do, but we do a lot
56:08
of unsolved cases where they have DNA. And
56:10
a lot of times, you know, you think, well, okay,
56:12
if you got DNA, we're going to be able
56:14
to solve the case, but that doesn't
56:17
always happen. You know, if you
56:19
can't match that DNA to someone,
56:23
meaning the perpetrators DNA
56:25
is not in the database or
56:27
you can't, you know, figure
56:29
out something using like
56:31
genetic genealogy, and maybe
56:33
they could, and they just haven't, you know,
56:35
gone down that route yet, then
56:37
you're never going to most
56:40
likely solve some of
56:42
these really old cases. I
56:44
just don't believe somebody's going to come forward at
56:46
this point. I don't think so either. They
56:49
would have come forward by now. Yes. Yes.
56:52
Most likely, unless the
56:54
killer is still alive and there's somebody
56:56
who knows who it is, but
56:58
they won't come forward until that person is
57:00
dead. I do think
57:03
in some cases there is
57:05
that possibility. Either they're
57:07
afraid that this person is going to kill them.
57:10
Yeah. Or they
57:12
just want to wait until this person
57:14
dies and then they'll come forward and make
57:16
the statement, make the statement or tell what
57:18
they know. It's been over 40 years.
57:21
Since the murders of Eve
57:24
Stratford, Lynn Weeden, Elizabeth Paravancina,
57:26
Linda Farrow and Patsy Morris.
57:28
I mean, there's a very
57:30
good chance that the
57:32
killer or killers, depending
57:35
on what you believe, they're either
57:37
dead or they're pretty
57:40
old at this point. Oh yeah. I
57:42
would think unless they killed when
57:44
they were 12, 15, even 20, that would put them
57:48
at still maybe in their 60. Right.
57:51
It's not that old. I mean,
57:53
there's a chance that one or
57:55
some of these could be solved. Yeah. There's
57:57
always a chance. But. The
58:00
further we go to me
58:03
the more chance that the time
58:05
runs out before the
58:07
killer dies and then okay
58:10
great maybe years down the road
58:12
you solve it you can name
58:14
the killer but you really
58:16
can't do anything to the right.
58:19
But even if that was the case
58:21
let's say the killer was already dead
58:23
or is that at the time they
58:25
solve it i still think it's important
58:28
absolutely. Give you some type of
58:30
closure yeah because there's there's
58:32
still family members of
58:35
the victims who are living and they're
58:37
living with that burning question
58:40
yeah who did this why did
58:42
they do it now they met now they may
58:44
never get the why. What they might
58:46
get to who at some point in the
58:48
who might lead to the why we don't
58:50
know also kind of scary how many serial
58:53
killers were operating in the area. Law
58:56
me but we find the same thing here
58:58
in the state every time we research it's
59:00
like there was three or four serial killers
59:02
operating in the same area at the same
59:05
time. But that's it for our
59:07
episode on the murder of eve
59:09
stratford we got some voicemails give you
59:11
a check those out and hear. Hey
59:13
mike and gibi this is thomas
59:16
calling again from montreal canada i
59:19
called before but i just
59:21
keep getting farther and farther into the podcast
59:23
and i absolutely love you guys. I
59:26
want to let you know that i had a rough start
59:29
to the year and i just want to say that literally
59:31
you guys and your podcast have gotten me
59:33
through the last couple of months. And
59:36
i'm in a much better place now i've got
59:38
a new job and i'm really really happy so
59:41
i just want to thank you guys for you know just
59:43
being there for me and. And
59:46
really really just enjoying the podcast so keep
59:48
up the great work and keep your own
59:50
time ticking guys thanks guys. Yeah
59:52
thanks for the very positive voicemail we love
59:54
you too sorry to hear that you had
59:56
a rough start but it sounds like things
59:59
have turned around. down already. Yeah, doing
1:00:01
better and that's a great job. That's
1:00:03
awesome. Yeah. We appreciate it
1:00:05
very much. David, and he's
1:00:07
like, don't ever, for any reason, do
1:00:09
anything to anyone, for any reason, ever.
1:00:12
All right, you're right. No one should have
1:00:14
anyone. Goodbye. So
1:00:18
I might have cut off the beginning. It was a little hard to
1:00:20
hear, but basically,
1:00:23
I think she was talking about something that you
1:00:25
were saying in an episode and
1:00:28
what she was referring to, and I don't
1:00:30
know if you remember, there's an episode of
1:00:32
The Office where Michael
1:00:36
is being asked by the big
1:00:38
boss like how he's doing it. How's
1:00:40
he making the branch so
1:00:42
good? And he said, I have like this
1:00:45
thing that I live by. And that's kind of, and
1:00:47
then he just goes into this ramble. Oh, okay. Never,
1:00:50
ever, ever, under any circumstances,
1:00:52
do anything to anyone at
1:00:54
any time. I
1:00:57
got a kick out of it, but I think
1:00:59
I cut off the first part. Now we all
1:01:02
know. Now we all, I had to explain it,
1:01:04
but it was funny. So appreciate that voicemail. All
1:01:06
right, buddy, you got anything else? No. All
1:01:09
right, that is it for another episode of
1:01:11
True Crime All the Time Unsolved. So for
1:01:13
Mike and Gibby, stay safe and keep your
1:01:15
own time ticking. Thanks
1:01:52
for watching. Fluto TV is TV the way
1:01:55
it should be, free with over 300 channels,
1:01:57
thousands of movies and TV shows costing zeros
1:01:59
of dollars. So if you want to watch
1:02:01
shows like Ghost, The Walking Dead, CSI, Star
1:02:03
Trek, or The Price is Right, well, The
1:02:05
Price is Right, it's free. Hit
1:02:08
movies like Braveheart, Sonic the Hedgehog, Anchorman, The
1:02:10
Legend of Ron Burgundy, or Mean Girls won't
1:02:12
cost you a thing because everything is free.
1:02:15
All you have to do is download the app, which, by
1:02:17
the way, is also free. Pluto
1:02:19
TV. Stream now. Pay never.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More