Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This begins part two of Unfound's coverage
0:03
of the disappearance of Brianna Maitland.
0:06
If you have not yet listened
0:08
to part one, please find it
0:10
on Unfound's feed in your podcast
0:13
application. Brianna
0:15
Alexandria Maitland was a
0:18
17 year old from Montgomery,
0:20
Vermont. She worked two
0:22
jobs and lived with
0:24
a friend. On the
0:26
night of March 19th 2004, Brianna left work at 11
0:28
20 p.m. 40 minutes later, witnesses
0:35
saw Brianna's car backed up
0:38
against an abandoned house. Brianna
0:41
wasn't there. She
0:44
was never seen again. I'm Ed
0:47
Dentsle and this
0:49
is Unfound. Okay.
1:06
Other than that, there's nothing. Nothing. You
1:09
know, and you wouldn't, you wouldn't like necessarily,
1:13
it was searched, but you could
1:15
look out in this field. Yeah,
1:17
it's pretty flat. Yeah. Yeah. So
1:20
they did go out and search,
1:22
of course, that field. They searched
1:24
that are extremely well, but
1:28
yeah. Alright, and we also should note
1:30
as far as the car goes, no
1:32
damage to it. For example, no paint
1:34
from like another car as if two
1:36
cars touched. Nothing like that. No bumper,
1:39
really messed up except for the rear
1:41
bumper that hit the house. Nothing
1:43
like that. But was the
1:45
car drivable? When they did get it back, I mean,
1:47
did somebody continue to drive it or
1:50
did they park it? What was the
1:52
status of the car? How badly was it messed up?
1:55
It didn't have, I mean, it was a car,
1:58
it was a beater, so it had damage,
2:00
but it was wasn't anything that was new,
2:02
nothing substantial, no paint like
2:04
that, transfer or anything like that.
2:07
It was drivable. And eventually,
2:09
after the police had
2:13
it there, they went up to the maintenance
2:15
and I eventually they jumped it. He,
2:18
you know, Bruce said after a while, it just
2:20
became an oddity, where people would just come to
2:22
stare at the car, they're all looking at
2:24
the same thing. And there's it was nothing to
2:27
decipher now today. Today, they
2:29
would never release the car back to the
2:31
family. You know, that was kind
2:33
of an odd thing to do. But
2:36
they did process it. And
2:39
they had prints
2:42
out of it, and biological evidence
2:44
out of it. That
2:47
stuff all ended up coming back to known people.
2:52
Ex-boyfriends, friends, stuff
2:55
like that. Which would not be a surprise
2:57
given that it was her car and probably
2:59
those people rode in it
3:01
at one time or another. Right.
3:04
Okay, one thing I once again, I'm not,
3:06
of course, an expert on Brianna's disappearance. But
3:08
one of the things that really caught me
3:10
by surprise and reading your book was
3:12
there was a lime so a fruit or
3:15
yeah, it's a fruit that usually, of course,
3:17
I guess I'm not a drinker, but usually
3:19
used like with tequila or something or corona
3:21
or something. A lime was found
3:23
on the trunk of the car like
3:25
a slice of lime or what
3:28
are we talking about here? So that's another one
3:30
of those weird things that, you
3:34
know, we're not even sure
3:36
definitively how this work, because there's no photos
3:38
of it or anything like that. You see, so
3:41
that's always been a thing that I personally I
3:43
just think it's an anomaly that means nothing. I don't
3:47
know if it could have gotten on there over the restaurant
3:49
or how it could have
3:51
gotten on there. They're drinking Peronas out of the
3:53
trunk of the car or something gets on there.
3:55
So I don't really know. But
3:58
yeah, it was it was That
4:01
was something that was that the kids
4:03
in the morning The
4:05
three young guys are kids in the morning.
4:07
So it was two guys and a girl. Huh? They
4:11
saw it they made note of it. Okay
4:14
That's an odd one. Okay, and we have to
4:16
remember it's on the day you are even though
4:18
the back of the car hit the house So
4:20
somehow the line was able to stay
4:23
on the car Despite this
4:25
this at least small collision that the
4:27
car had with him 18
4:29
degrees. I don't know if it was frozen to
4:31
it could have been frozen. Right? Very good. Okay,
4:34
but I don't really know where Yeah,
4:37
okay. So just something for everybody
4:40
to think about that is that
4:42
I've never heard before Yeah,
4:44
maybe a lot of other people not heard of
4:46
it Once again, it's in your book and we're
4:48
gonna talk about your book before we're done here
4:50
your opinion Just if you could save you don't
4:52
want to touch it totally fine. Do you think
4:54
the police? You
4:57
know, what do you think the police's Opinion
5:01
is on the disappearance of Brianna Maitland because we're
5:03
gonna get more into your side of it and
5:05
in the work that you've done Do you think
5:07
that they have an opinion on the theory as
5:09
to what happened to Brianna Maitland? If
5:14
you if you want to answer you can answer
5:16
we don't we can certainly move on yeah, I
5:18
don't speak for them I know I don't I
5:20
don't know Okay,
5:22
very good Very good.
5:25
Let's move on now to maybe you know your
5:27
side of it You've been involved now for about
5:29
18 years not quite 18 years summer of 2006
5:34
and You know over that time have
5:36
you or these other people who've been
5:38
helping you the family outside of the
5:40
police Have you organized your own searches?
5:43
Trying to search for her Whether
5:45
it was like recently or back in 2015 Just
5:48
pick a year and how far
5:50
have these searches gone how many miles in
5:52
each direction? And can you
5:54
talk a little bit more about that
5:56
your understanding of the searches with originally
5:58
and then since then? Have
6:01
we personally searched? Yeah, right. Oh,
6:04
so, oh, I don't know. We haven't
6:06
done boots on the ground searches. I
6:10
haven't personally. Police
6:12
have done many. You
6:15
know, we're more apt to
6:17
go and interview people
6:19
wherever we need to go. I
6:23
was going to go to Florida at one point
6:25
and the police ended up taking the interview over.
6:28
So, I mean, we get around. But
6:30
it's been pretty localized. Okay.
6:34
But there's been stuff that's stretched states
6:37
and states away. Yeah, okay. Okay.
6:41
Let's move on to this now. Regarding going back to James
6:43
and Keeley, just to kind of go over this a little
6:45
bit more. You actually had a
6:47
chance. Did you personally have a chance to
6:49
interview James one-on-one? You actually spoke to him,
6:52
like, face-to-face? Luted. Luted, at
6:54
least. You're a other assistant. More than one
6:56
occasion, yeah. More than one occasion. Of course,
6:58
we already know now that James
7:01
has some different stories. But maybe they kind
7:03
of make sense. Maybe we
7:05
should just clarify something about him seeing the
7:07
car. Because it's
7:09
kind of like a T intersection there where
7:12
the house was. He was
7:14
actually coming down like the T. He
7:16
wasn't like on the main road that went by the
7:19
house. My understanding, the way you explained it to me – and
7:21
this is something that I didn't understand until you said it –
7:24
he was actually coming down the T. So his headlights
7:26
kind of would have almost been right on the house
7:29
coming down this road. Am I right about that? Is
7:31
that correct? I
7:33
know at least in one of his stories that's what he
7:35
had said. I'm
7:38
pretty sure that's what he said. Either way, he
7:40
said he positioned his vehicle so that he'd put
7:42
his lights on it. And
7:44
he was looking at it, and he was thinking, what
7:47
the hell is their car doing there like that? And then
7:49
he got out with his lights on it. He went over
7:51
to it and looked through it and
7:53
everything. But I don't remember
7:55
if it was – I
7:58
can't remember if it was from the T. to you
8:00
or not. Okay. All right. Because you
8:02
know once again I don't know if
8:04
anybody's ever tested this over the last
8:06
20 years but my perception
8:08
even though I've never been I don't think I've ever even
8:10
been in the state of Vermont but
8:12
at night if somebody was driving
8:14
by there would he
8:17
have been able to tell at night
8:19
especially with the headlights on everything that
8:21
was actually Brianna's car being that it's
8:23
dark and everything else it seems unlikely
8:26
unless his headlights were actually on the car.
8:28
Of course she had a unique car so
8:30
maybe that's not a surprise but yeah that's
8:33
I was wondering if anybody tried to like
8:35
test that over the years to just see
8:38
if. Well I think he would actually because
8:40
the pictures are a
8:42
little deceiving to look at. The
8:44
car would have been pretty close to the road. The
8:47
house didn't sit very far off the road at all.
8:49
Very close. And when you're coming around this bend it's
8:52
really gradual. I think he would have had a really
8:54
good view of it actually. And
8:56
her car was very distinct and everyone knew that
8:58
it was wrong. Yeah I don't
9:01
think he would have had any problems seeing him.
9:03
Okay very good. And of course we talked about
9:05
Keely. I should ask you this being that you
9:07
did get to speak to Keely. Did
9:09
or maybe James too. Did James or
9:11
Keely being that they both
9:14
knew Brianna fairly well of course with
9:16
Keely you know they had a falling out.
9:19
Did either of them offer up their own
9:21
opinion as to what happened to Brianna being
9:23
that they would have known her as well
9:25
as anybody. Did they ever offer an opinion
9:27
in your interviews. Yeah they're
9:29
dumbfounded. They're dumbfounded they don't know.
9:33
And you know Keely yeah they had a
9:35
problem and everything but they were friends. Yeah
9:37
they've been friends for a long time so
9:39
they you know it wasn't they would have
9:41
blown over. But no they're dumbfounded. They
9:44
don't know. They never offered
9:46
up a you know a theory. She
9:48
ran off to L.A. or
9:50
somebody or anything like that. Once again
9:53
being that they knew her the best.
9:55
They just really just had nothing to
9:57
say. It's funny that you would They,
10:00
everybody had, would kind of
10:02
regurgitate rumors. Yeah.
10:06
And that's kind of how you would know that they, they
10:09
didn't know what, they didn't know anything because
10:11
they would, they would
10:13
kind of say, well, I kind of believe this, what
10:16
they're doing is they're hearing different stories. And they're going,
10:18
well, this is the one that sounds most likely to
10:20
me. We know that
10:22
it's not true. We know that it's
10:24
just the rumor and there's no truth to it
10:26
whatsoever. So they're like, Oh, well,
10:29
maybe it was this then. No, that's not true.
10:31
We know that it's not true. So they, now
10:33
they don't know. The
10:36
really weird thing. And we tell people
10:38
this a lot is that after 20 years,
10:43
not one piece of information that any other
10:45
locals have brought to us have ever any
10:48
fruit whatsoever. None. It's crazy how that works.
10:51
Yeah. Not one, not one bit.
10:55
Yeah. We don't think they know anything. And
10:57
the funny thing is just that people
10:59
will say, I know what happened. I mean,
11:01
it's really happening. You feel, okay, what
11:03
happened? And they'll tell you a story
11:06
to go. Okay. That's not true though. And
11:08
how well, what do you mean it's not true? And then you tell them
11:11
exactly why it's not true. But they're
11:13
really confident. And
11:15
it's weird that people will be so confident in something
11:17
that they just heard. You
11:19
know, somebody just told them they didn't, they didn't see
11:21
it firsthand or they didn't have anything to prove it.
11:24
It's just that someone told them and they, maybe they trust
11:26
that person. And so they like, well, this is true. No,
11:28
it's not. So it
11:30
reminds me of what you're talking about. Maybe you've seen
11:33
the movie. I know many of the listeners have seen
11:35
this movie. If you've seen the movie Zodiac, of course,
11:37
which is about trying to figure out who the Zodiac
11:39
killer was. And there's a montage in the middle of
11:41
the movie where they're interviewing
11:43
these different people who say they have
11:45
information and they're just pulling all
11:47
sorts of things that, you know, facts about
11:49
the Zodiac killer that aren't even true. Well,
11:51
you know, I cut off his hands and
11:53
everything else. Well that, you know, the Zodiac
11:56
killer didn't do that. This, when
11:58
we, when we tattered free our paracombs. Conversation
12:00
when you mentioned that I was thinking and that reminds
12:02
me of that scene in the movie But
12:05
it's that yeah that captured I think I run
12:07
into that a lot in the disappearances that I
12:09
cover too So it really rings true to me
12:11
and so you talking about it. Absolutely rings true
12:13
to me as well. Absolutely I
12:16
have a really really Newfound
12:18
respect for the police after all these years
12:20
of working. They did let's try them crazy
12:23
Just it's just a garbage Information that
12:25
comes to an you know, a lot
12:28
of it the people are they're giving the
12:30
information are they want to help? they're they
12:32
honestly are trying to do a good thing but God
12:37
it's got to drive the police crazy. Just go around
12:39
sir. It drives us crazy. We've had people
12:41
actually say to us It's a weird thing Did
12:46
say I know what happened I'll tell you exactly what happened Okay
12:48
I'm all ears and they'll tell you more
12:51
than one story literally who had one girl tell us three
12:53
stories right in her Oh And I'm
12:55
just listening she got done and I go Okay,
12:58
but they can't all be true. She's like, what do you mean? They
13:02
can't I'll be true. Just only three different stories, which
13:04
one's true. Just kind of looking at me like I'm an idiot We
13:07
walk away. I said the loo. I'm like are we gonna
13:10
talk about this? Is this weird? Cuz this is weird, right?
13:12
I Don't
13:14
know what that is Critical
13:18
thinking skills or what? Yeah, I
13:20
know a good way to put it. Yeah And
13:24
there are so many rumors I was hoping and
13:26
I think I did a pretty good job of
13:28
it in the book of dispelling these big rumors
13:31
Yeah toward the end you went
13:33
through some different theories and things kind of
13:35
kind of trying to do that, you know
13:37
doing that. Yeah This
13:39
is people people. I've had a lot of people
13:41
contact me on Facebook from up there and say
13:44
Thank you. You know this community
13:46
really needed this book and I Hate
13:49
to know these things weren't true. You know,
13:52
I always thought there's some truth to them And so
13:54
that helped that made me forget about that I
13:59
Want to give you an opportunity? It is probably other
14:01
than the car being bashed i think
14:03
into the building. This is one of
14:05
the other points the butter disappears like
14:07
think is the well known this whole
14:10
thing about her and her mother being
14:12
in a grocery store and her quote
14:14
unquote, freaking out or whatever people words
14:16
have been used over the years you
14:18
actually write about this in the book
14:20
we've talked about it. You have a
14:22
particular inside, in fact. Her
14:24
own parents have a particular insight
14:26
into this. And maybe
14:29
it's not a suspicious as with made the
14:31
bead you want to kind of bombs address.
14:34
Yeah you know the Kentucky Roof was a
14:36
grocery store for was a clothing store of
14:38
money but and stuff guys were so. That
14:41
was the dates there was a day ever
14:43
decide to parents and I think the was
14:45
shot by super super close. We're.
14:47
Close. But anyway, Ah, you
14:49
know. Tallied. Her
14:51
mother said that on the show disappeared. The.
14:56
Brand I notice something walked outside of
14:58
the stored which came back and she
15:00
was broken a nervous or something. Emerges
15:04
so cold and everybody went
15:06
crazy with that lap bubble
15:08
bath in. I ended up
15:10
talking to. Interview on
15:12
a guy who said ah, I.
15:15
Know who that was It. Did
15:18
she talk to any? Told her not to to work at
15:20
night. I'm. Now
15:22
I'd exodus our podcast and
15:24
I said. Ah,
15:28
I. Interviewed this person. This is what he
15:30
told me. It.
15:32
Doesn't mean I believe it. But
15:34
this is what he says. You know because
15:37
a big forgot it does me to happen
15:39
right? I just took root canal read you
15:41
know breezy. This is what great said that.
15:44
This is what happened so it's all gonna go
15:46
to work in my yep. It.
15:49
But we don't think there was a
15:51
to say whatsoever and I think kelly
15:53
me busy to reproduce. In.
15:55
I think she might have spitball on little
15:57
bit. And. He just got to.
16:00
it as fact
16:02
or whatever. We think she just went out to have
16:04
a cigarette and didn't want to get caught by her
16:06
mother. Okay.
16:09
There's nothing to prove there's any truth
16:11
whatsoever. And the guy that gave me
16:14
that information turned out to be not trustworthy
16:17
whatsoever. He gives a lot of other
16:19
information that was false. He gives a
16:21
lot of other information that was, you
16:24
couldn't prove or disprove it either way,
16:26
but it was just preposterous information, you
16:29
know. Okay. All right. So
16:31
I want to make sure I give you an opportunity to
16:33
talk about that. Something that maybe it
16:35
seemed like something to a lot of people,
16:38
but your opinion, of course, working on
16:40
this for 18 years is it just
16:43
is not much of anything as
16:45
far as you can tell. I don't
16:47
think so. Okay. I think she just, her
16:50
mother might have misinterpreted something. Okay. And it's
16:52
very possible. And of course, they, going back
16:54
to the cigarette, she's, you know, she's 17
16:56
and her parents don't want her smoking. You
16:58
know, maybe kids generate some lies so they
17:01
can kind of go do these, cover
17:04
these things up. Not unusual. Not unusual.
17:06
In all of your work over the last 18 years, I
17:09
just have to ask you this. Once again, this is right
17:11
in the outline from the interviews,
17:14
any talk about Brianna regarding
17:16
depression, anybody stalking her, mental
17:19
health issues, suicide talk,
17:22
meeting anybody. Has
17:24
any of this ever popped up in any
17:26
of the people you talk to regard whether
17:28
parents, friends, anybody else, any of those topics
17:30
ever point come up to the point that,
17:34
you know, you think it's something substantial?
17:39
No. Okay.
17:42
Never talked before. You
17:45
look going just specifically
17:47
stalking. She thought some
17:49
guy was stalking her.
17:51
John Smith was talking
17:53
or nothing like that.
17:55
No. Looking back at it, of course,
17:57
hindsight 2020. Um,
18:01
you look back at it now you are now
18:03
an expert on Brian is disappearance working on this
18:05
for 18 years But looking back in 2004 when
18:07
she went missing the things that were done a lot
18:10
of mistakes made things that
18:13
You know, you think of course we're all
18:15
human We know mistakes are going to be
18:18
made to buy it because we're human but
18:20
things that were like really Overshights that maybe
18:22
could have solved the disappearance at the time
18:25
Or maybe shortly thereafter Or
18:28
or not the way you look at it now Yeah,
18:31
well, I think you know the police
18:33
have acknowledged they did things wrong initially
18:35
and and and I
18:37
and to me That's huge that they would come out and
18:40
say yes. Okay, we did some things
18:42
wrong, you know, and they corrected do that
18:46
But just the fact that they just kind of Blew
18:49
that off. I mean they they even told
18:51
Bruce and Kelly at one point Yeah,
18:54
she probably went to Boston should be back kids
18:57
do that Bruce was like the
18:59
hell are you talking about her cars crashed?
19:02
There's paychecks on the sea. Sure migraine medicine.
19:04
Is it there? What are you talking about?
19:06
She didn't show up for work, you know
19:09
And they're like, yeah, so it that was
19:11
an issue. That's why there was a big
19:13
problem there in the beginning there was an
19:15
incident where Bruce
19:18
went to Jillian's house she
19:21
went missing and said I'm on her stuff. Where's her
19:23
stuff? He wanted to see what was there or if
19:25
there's notes or anything like that and
19:27
uh, Jillian gave Bruce
19:30
the diary Bruce and Kelly and
19:33
um her diary So he had to
19:35
turn the diary over to the police and there were
19:37
some pages his rit deal and they went after Bruce
19:40
You know, they thought that he had
19:42
torn stuff out of there to
19:45
hide something And it
19:47
was a huge fight over that come
19:49
to find out Jillian tore the
19:52
stuff out because she was trying to save
19:55
ran a little embarrassment You
19:57
know, which she's a kid
20:00
You know, she just didn't want her to get
20:02
in trouble for something, or be embarrassed
20:04
about something. So, yeah, that
20:06
was an issue. Okay.
20:10
I guess what I'm asking you is that it
20:12
was a – I don't want to use the
20:15
word fake. But was
20:17
it just kind of a thing that
20:19
the way this all went down in
20:21
2004, no matter what people may particularly
20:23
be and believe about a particular theory,
20:27
the 20 years later that it was still
20:29
going to be unsolved no matter what anybody
20:31
did at the time, or do you have
20:33
a different insight into this? The
20:35
different things had been done at the time. The
20:38
disappearance would have been solved by now. Once again, you –
20:40
I don't know. That's so hard to say. I don't
20:42
know if that's something you can really predict, you know what
20:44
I mean? Okay. But
20:47
we all know from television and
20:49
whatever where it's important
20:51
to be right on top of this. If
20:53
this is what's happening in the first 48
20:55
hours, it's really crucial. Yeah.
21:01
Just the protocol there of just towing the
21:03
car away and stuff like that. Yeah. You
21:06
know, that came up – and, you know, again,
21:09
that comes up in like Maura Murray's case where I
21:11
was like, she's just a
21:13
drunk driver. She'll show up tomorrow. And
21:15
that's what they say. They say, you know, the next
21:18
morning they always show up and want their car back.
21:20
Yeah. Okay. That's
21:23
a really bad protocol because what if –
21:25
What if they don't show up? – or
21:27
something or she hit her head on
21:29
the windshield and she's off in the woods dying or something, you
21:31
know? So protocols got to be
21:33
– we're on it. That's got
21:35
to be – and they did change that. So
21:38
there was a disappearance after Brianna's
21:41
and I can't remember his name. I
21:44
can't remember his name, but they
21:46
hopped on it. Actually, there
21:48
was one of Hank Elberly's articles. They
21:50
talked about a disappearance of a girl, too, afterwards.
21:54
And they put a bunch of officers on
21:56
it full-time immediately and went after. And
21:59
that's – they really – because of Brianna's
22:01
case that this is what needed to be
22:03
done. Yeah, so
22:05
protocol there changed for
22:08
that kind of... Yeah, I
22:10
guess what I'm asking, we had a disappearance. It was
22:12
the oldest disappearance, still to this day, it's the oldest
22:14
disappearance we've ever featured on Unfound
22:17
and miraculously it got solved
22:19
here in February, a disappearance
22:21
from 1945, of a woman who
22:23
we now found out, even though she was married, had kids
22:25
walked out of her life, didn't
22:28
even change her first name, but she married a new
22:30
man, had additional
22:32
kids and through DNA, through Othrom
22:34
and of course other groups, they
22:37
were able to find out that
22:39
she moved to Arkansas and
22:42
started a new life and
22:44
she died in 1990 and before she died
22:46
she told one of her grandchildren, I
22:49
hope nobody ever finds out the secret that
22:51
I have. She lived with this for like
22:53
an additional 45 years till she died of
22:55
cancer. It wasn't until February of
22:57
2024 that a police officer
23:00
in Ohio, in Shelby, Ohio, Adam Turner was able
23:02
to figure this all out with DNA and everything
23:05
else and so what I mean like when I'm
23:07
the comparison is that there's nothing that anybody could
23:09
have done in 1945 that would have changed the
23:11
trajectory of that disappearance. There's nothing that could have
23:14
been done and in fact we needed to wait
23:16
till science caught up with the
23:18
disappearance all these years later. Well, I guess
23:20
what I'm saying is this kind of
23:22
the same thing with Brianna or is it something
23:24
different? No, I don't know.
23:26
First of all, each case
23:29
of someone disappearing is
23:31
individual. Yes, you can take
23:33
a thousand cases and you can say there are
23:35
things that are similar with these and whatever, but
23:37
each one is going to be different and
23:40
if an investigation started immediately when this
23:42
person that you're referring to began
23:45
immediately, they may have found
23:47
her wherever she went to. They may have found
23:49
her. She's not a ghost. How
23:53
old was this woman when she
23:55
went missing? I fell in her
23:57
late 20s early 30s or something.
24:00
something maybe 25 something like that she was
24:02
living in Shelby Ohio by herself she was
24:04
working for the war effort her husband and
24:06
kids were back in West Virginia so
24:11
that's rare yeah it is rare that's
24:13
rare that people disappear like that and
24:15
again Brianna was a child yeah
24:20
so yeah I think in
24:22
comparison once again saying you know they
24:24
you know they knew that she went
24:27
missing they did what they could in
24:29
1945 terms really nothing you could
24:31
do you know I don't know
24:33
how you attract somebody it
24:37
happens there's there's cases of
24:39
people voluntarily leaving when when
24:41
people voluntarily leave when
24:43
you look at them the majority of
24:45
them involves some kind of mental
24:47
health issue other ones
24:50
you'll see it with men men
24:52
usually want to escape their family they want to
24:54
escape their wife you want to keep the children
24:56
they want to go out be for
25:00
life I better probably explain it better
25:02
but they want to be
25:04
a guy they want to run off they want to run
25:06
off they want their single life or something back again or
25:08
something they want to
25:11
restrict their responsibility it
25:13
happens it's not the
25:15
norm it's not common yeah
25:19
I did not bring Mary Jane Van Gilder
25:21
up because I'm trying to say necessarily that that
25:24
Brianna ran off or walked off I'm
25:26
saying it's just from an investigation point
25:28
of view you know giving
25:30
the limitations of a particular you
25:33
know the science or the understanding or
25:35
everything sometimes some of these disappearances you
25:37
just have to sometimes you know wait
25:39
for them to be solved sometimes yeah
25:42
that's all I'm asking Brianna and you're
25:44
giving me the impression that maybe things
25:46
could have been done that might
25:48
have not caused this disappearance to be unsolved
25:50
for 20 years maybe I think so you
25:52
know so
25:55
whoever was responsible for this was
25:58
given time to leave
26:01
or fade back to normal in their
26:03
life or just
26:05
change things so that
26:08
people wouldn't notice or maybe take care of what they ever
26:10
needed to fade back into their life or whatever. When you
26:13
look at the fact that nobody
26:15
up there has ever been able to provide
26:18
anything substantial
26:20
that goes into
26:22
that conversation of is a lack of evidence,
26:24
evidence hypothetically, you know what I mean? Does
26:27
this mean that this is a stranger abduction?
26:29
Does it mean that it's
26:31
someone that's not from that area? Is it someone
26:33
that's a predator going into
26:36
those sparsely populated areas to do something
26:38
like this? You know what I mean?
26:40
So that may
26:42
make your mind lean to that kind of speculation,
26:45
I guess. But yeah, if somebody had
26:48
been able to hop on this immediately, it
26:50
seems like they would have been a better
26:52
chance. And I didn't investigate it. I'll tell
26:54
you that it should work typically. Okay.
26:58
So move on to this. Just some
27:01
questions right there in the outline. Any side
27:03
of the proof you've been able to find
27:05
to show that Brianna was murdered? No.
27:09
Okay.
27:11
Has anybody, you know, sometimes these things
27:13
happen, you know, maybe more and more
27:15
rural or urban areas, people taking credit
27:18
for disappearances that maybe they didn't have
27:20
anything to do with simply to build
27:22
up their street cred or something. Has
27:24
anybody ever taken credit for
27:27
taking Brianna murdering Brianna, abducting
27:29
Brianna, you know, just, you know,
27:32
just for the heck of it, just to, like I
27:34
said, build up their reputation as being a scary person,
27:36
anything that you found in the group that's
27:39
happened. A guy named Jorge Soto,
27:41
the joker, they call him the joker.
27:43
So he had his own chapter in the book. But
27:47
we resolve that, we kind of resolve
27:49
that issue. But it's interesting. And
27:52
he would tell anybody that would listen that
27:54
he killed Brianna. And then in
27:56
a setting barrier, the cornfield up behind his
27:59
house. near St.
28:01
Elizabeth. So yeah, there's people that came
28:03
forward like that and then there was people that came
28:05
forward and pointed at people that I definitely know that
28:08
this person was involved. And
28:11
as you know that the one chapter in
28:13
there where the
28:19
woman kind of confesses that she
28:21
knows what exactly what happened and tells the
28:23
story. Talking about Debbie. Yeah,
28:25
but we don't think there's a truth. Okay.
28:27
Yeah, right. And we're going
28:31
to talk about that. But once again, for everybody,
28:33
we don't want to give away everything in the
28:35
book, we're going to get to this book because
28:38
we want everybody to get the book. That's why
28:40
we're just kind of going over the general details.
28:42
We don't want to give anything away here because
28:44
once again, it's a good book.
28:46
I've read it. I think everybody should read it, but we
28:48
don't want to give everything away here because then people won't
28:50
get the book. And we're certainly here. I'm here to help
28:52
you out. So we want to
28:55
this besides James, anyone else
28:57
whose story has changed anybody? Maybe I
28:59
should say who knew Brianna well,
29:01
anybody else stories who have changed over the last
29:03
20 years? What are you whether want to use
29:06
their names or not up to you, but anybody
29:08
kind of like James like three or four different
29:10
stories? Nope. No.
29:14
Okay. Okay. Next
29:16
question. We've of course
29:18
talked about people seeing her car backed
29:21
into the house, multiple people. In fact,
29:23
eventually people started taking pictures. Did anyone
29:26
ever see a car parked at the
29:28
house before Brianna's car was
29:30
seen wrecked there? Have you ever been
29:32
able to track anybody down in that
29:34
timeframe between like 1120 and I guess
29:36
midnight who drove by and say, you
29:38
know what, I did see a car
29:40
parked there as if somebody was waiting
29:42
for somebody, you know, anything
29:45
like that. Of course, you've tracked down a lot of
29:47
people who did see the car, but did anybody actually
29:50
see anybody there before Brianna's car
29:52
was seen wrecked? No. And
29:54
I think people would have picked right up on that too,
29:57
because again, it wasn't some place that people would stop. Okay.
30:01
Interesting. Okay, very good. Let's
30:04
move on to this. You write about this extensively.
30:06
Mara Murray, we've already talked about her a few
30:08
times in this interview. You do
30:11
talk about the connection possibly
30:13
between Mara and Brianna, maybe
30:15
just in some sentences here.
30:18
You do have a suspicion that they are connected. Maybe you want
30:20
to talk a little bit about that. So
30:23
I get in a lot of trouble for
30:25
this. You ready? That's fine. It's your interview.
30:27
You get to talk about what you want.
30:29
So please make sure you talk about it
30:31
in the book too. I'm here
30:34
to facilitate this, please. Let's
30:36
see if I can explain this correctly. So,
30:41
of course, the two disciplines have
30:44
always been kind of related to people's
30:46
minds and they've been brought up together in
30:48
newspaper articles. And, you know, when
30:52
one is referenced, the other is usually
30:54
referenced. So,
30:58
Mara went missing in
31:00
Haverhill, New Hampshire, and
31:03
I believe it's like 85 miles away
31:06
from Montgomery, Vermont, where Brianna went missing.
31:08
So, Mara is February 9th,
31:10
Brianna's March 19th. 40 days
31:14
or something like that. So, they're
31:17
both in very sparsely populated areas. Their
31:20
cars are found by the side of the road and they're
31:22
gone and they're never seen again. Both
31:25
kind of crashed into band and they're gone. So,
31:28
in the book, I tried to... there's
31:30
so much information on both cases and so
31:33
much on Mara's, it's mind boggling. Yeah, I
31:35
know. But I tried to do
31:37
the best I could to just hit the highlights to
31:40
show the differences and how they're different and how they're
31:42
the same and how they're different. I
31:45
don't think I maybe explained it quite as
31:47
well as I could have. I would have
31:50
liked to revise that chapter a little bit.
31:54
And here's... there's a point here I
31:56
want to make. Let's see if I can do this correctly. Go ahead.
32:00
When more, for people who are familiar with more
32:02
as in grand cases, by
32:05
the way, I want to make it, I want to make this really
32:07
clear that I don't speak for other people.
32:09
I'm not speaking for Lou Barry or Bruce Maitland or you
32:12
know, anybody else. This is just my opinion.
32:16
And my point
32:18
of telling people this is
32:20
just because I think it's worth entertaining. Okay,
32:23
I'm not turning. I
32:26
just think it's worth making note of
32:28
that it makes sense. So if you're
32:35
familiar with Morris case, it's very, we
32:38
covered it about a year ago, and here I interviewed her,
32:41
she said, Julie, yes, yes. Okay,
32:43
yeah, Julie, Julie's great. So if
32:46
you're familiar with Morris
32:48
case, if the listeners are so more
32:51
was attending college, Massachusetts,
32:55
she enamors so she contacts
32:58
her in the middle of
33:00
the night, she contacts her instructors,
33:03
fabricates a story about a death in the family, so
33:06
that she can get some time off. It's obvious
33:09
that's what happened later on. She
33:11
ends up going to a liquor store
33:13
buying booze, getting on the road in
33:15
a car that is not trustworthy to
33:17
drive. Her father had been
33:20
found to try to purchase her vehicle. He
33:22
had told her specifically, do
33:25
not drive this car, they even parked it out behind
33:27
in parking lot way in the back out
33:29
behind the school, he said, only in an
33:31
emergency. Otherwise, there's no reason to drive this vehicle. She
33:34
drives it north. I can't
33:38
remember what it was maybe 150 miles or something like
33:40
a couple hours. Yeah, a and
33:43
she ends up on this, like, again,
33:46
not remote, but rural, all the
33:48
way, weird place on
33:50
this windy road, spins
33:53
off the road. And
33:55
that's where her cars found. So
33:57
she, she fabricates the
34:00
story leaves it an undesignated time to
34:02
an undesignated
34:05
destination. No one
34:07
that knows or knows where she would have
34:09
been going. There's nothing in her computer or
34:11
phone or anything to tell where she's going.
34:14
She leaves it an unpredictable time. She has an
34:16
unpredictable accident and she
34:20
disappears in moments. There
34:22
is a witness that stops and
34:25
says, are you okay? Do you
34:27
need to call police? She
34:29
says no, I called AAA, which
34:31
she knows isn't true because they don't give cell service. He
34:34
goes up into his driveway, walks in the house, tells
34:36
his girlfriend and mother to call it in and goes
34:39
back out and sits in the school bus he's driving. He's
34:41
filling out a log book and cars are going by and
34:45
when the cops get there, she's gone. It's
34:47
a very short window. Yeah, very short time.
34:50
So then you look
34:52
at Brianna who's staying in a home
34:57
with her friend and her friend's father. It's pretty,
35:03
I don't know if stable is the correct word,
35:05
but there's people
35:07
there. They're going
35:09
to work, they're going to school, they're getting up,
35:11
certain hours going to bed at certain hours, there's
35:14
a stable functioning home there. She drives 15
35:16
or 20 minutes to work, goes into
35:19
a small building where the people know her. She can
35:21
look outside and she can see her car. Nobody
35:25
sees anything amiss. When
35:28
she gets ready to leave, they ask her to stay and eat. She
35:30
says, no, I got to get up early early in the morning and
35:32
go and get to bed. She leaves her car's
35:34
final crash and a band-aid just down the road. Two
35:37
minutes, literally two minutes down the road and she's gone to
35:40
the receiving room. So the
35:44
Vermont State Police went to New Hampshire because
35:46
there was outcry that these two things were
35:48
related publicly.
35:51
So they went and the FBI said, and on the
35:53
two, so they were in New Hampshire and they came
35:55
out and they publicly gave
35:59
up public release. Now, I
36:01
wanted to put a picture from that into
36:03
my book and I couldn't get permission to
36:05
put it in for another reason. I just
36:08
figured out who to contact to get
36:10
permission from this principal. It
36:12
drove me nuts. I worked on it for a
36:14
long time. It was a picture of the
36:17
Maitland's and Fred Murray together at
36:20
this meeting outside and they were talking to the
36:22
reporters and stuff like that. But you can see
36:25
how young they were at the time, comparatively to
36:27
now and stuff like that. I
36:29
was actually holding a copy of the book, The
36:32
Shadow of Dap, which was an
36:34
unsolved serial killer that was operating in the
36:36
Connecticut River Valley, which is where more and
36:38
less missing but it was years prior, many
36:40
years prior. They
36:43
come out publicly and they say, we
36:46
do not believe these two things are related. There's
36:49
no serial killer or anything like that. These
36:52
two things are not the same.
36:54
And then they said it again shortly afterwards and
36:56
then you just really comment on it again after
36:58
that. But here's the
37:00
thing, that early on,
37:02
we know exactly what they had to
37:05
discuss because we know what they knew.
37:11
Both stories were pretty
37:13
cut and dry. We knew
37:16
the facts of the stories. So
37:18
when you look at Morris, what I just
37:20
explained to you, her odd set of circumstances
37:22
that's absolutely baffling to everyone. Then
37:25
you look at Brianna's set of circumstances, they're pretty
37:27
basic. We're going to work and leave and work
37:29
and all that stuff. And if you
37:31
look at those and hold one of these hands and you say, these
37:34
two things, they are not the same, right? They are
37:36
not the same.
37:38
But that's like falling for
37:40
a logical fallacy. That doesn't matter. A
37:43
stranger abduction, he doesn't give a where
37:46
you live, where you work, where
37:48
you're going, where you're coming from, who you're involved
37:50
with, if you're going to school, what your circumstances
37:53
were that day. He doesn't care about any of
37:55
that. All he cares about is in the
37:57
moment, is the circumstances
37:59
correct. to what he wants to do, which
38:01
is get you, that's it. He doesn't
38:03
care about this. So
38:06
I would, I
38:09
absolutely entertain the fact that
38:12
they could be related. Now,
38:17
people will instantly say to me, you have no proof
38:19
of it. I get that. So don't
38:21
yell that at me. People will shout
38:23
it in the comments, you don't wanna be proof.
38:25
I get that, I understand it absolutely entirely. What
38:28
I'm telling you is it's worth
38:30
entertaining. People will instantly say they're not related because of
38:32
A, B, and C, and D. There's
38:34
no way of knowing. It's
38:36
interesting that there's, they're
38:39
in sparsely populated North Country areas.
38:44
They're, as far as someone that's a predator
38:46
and is out trolling for victims, they're not
38:48
that far apart. I
38:51
also find it very interesting that it was someone that
38:53
was caught
38:56
convicted and set to prison for
38:59
abducting and murdering a woman south
39:01
of there. When
39:05
he, when this took place, professionals
39:08
all said, this is not his first time. Nobody
39:12
said, where's the other victims? They
39:15
just moved on. They moved, he
39:18
went to prison and they moved on. Not
39:20
one person said, you know, we got two
39:22
really high profile missing persons cases up North.
39:26
Granted, it was a ways away. I get
39:28
that. But there's something that you miss
39:30
when you kind of look at Vermont. Vermont
39:35
has less people in the whole state
39:38
than the Albany, New York area. I mean,
39:40
that's very small. Yeah. If
39:43
you're not used to it, it's weird. It's very, it's
39:45
kind of a cool thing. When you're there, it's very,
39:49
I don't know how to put it. You
39:52
know, you can go into towns, it's like you're stepping back
39:54
in time. You
39:56
know, the real little hamlets and stuff. Yeah. But
39:59
it's kind of. They're all close knit,
40:01
they all know each other. And
40:03
there's a certain bonding there. The
40:06
people there are really kind of
40:08
fiercely independent. You
40:10
know what I mean? And
40:13
you know, when you look at the fact that it's, you
40:16
call a cop and it may be 20 minutes or
40:18
45 minutes till they get to your house. There's
40:21
a certain attitude that people take where you got to
40:23
take care of yourself. And they
40:25
all understand that. So it's, you know,
40:27
I'm not putting it down, it's just different. To
40:30
think that it's out of someone's stretch, someone's gonna
40:32
go, a predator's gonna
40:35
go trolling in these
40:37
different areas. This is beyond the realm of
40:39
comprehension. It
40:41
happens, we see it again and again. And
40:44
you actually bring up somebody toward the end
40:47
of your book. At
40:50
least one person that you think is a
40:52
pretty good choice. Yeah, absolutely.
40:54
So there's a whole chapter on
40:57
predators and there's a, you know,
41:00
looking back, I wish I had extended some of that too.
41:02
When I wrote it, a few people came
41:04
to me and said, I
41:06
had written books, they said, you
41:08
really wanna set it down and walk away from it for
41:10
six months before you publish it because you're gonna wanna, you're
41:12
gonna go back and you're gonna read it and you're gonna
41:14
go, okay, I wanna add stuff. And I'm like, I
41:17
don't have that opportunity where
41:19
I'm gonna just set a book aside for
41:21
six months and go about my
41:23
way. This is a project I'm on, I'm gonna finish
41:25
it, you know. But if I had done that, there
41:28
were some things that could have really expanded on and
41:31
that was one of them. So
41:38
Brianna had, you know, Brianna's
41:43
really close friend had said, a man had
41:45
come into the inn and
41:48
spoke to her and he
41:50
had said, he had expressed it,
41:52
he liked her and she
41:54
kind of expressed the fact, she kind of liked him
41:56
too. He was older and she thought he might be
41:58
from Canada. she's basing that on, she's
42:01
a 17 year old kid. But
42:03
that's all she knows. Now, in
42:08
order for Brianna for this to happen to her, when
42:12
she got in her car and she drove away and
42:15
she drives two minutes up the road and has whatever
42:17
cap takes place or takes place and she's gone. Nobody
42:20
came up to her at 1120 at night
42:23
when she leaves there, saw her in another
42:25
vehicle said, there's a girl alone, I'm an
42:27
abductor. They
42:29
had to be waiting. This had to be a plane which
42:33
could have very easily happened. There's a church kind of
42:35
kitty corner there and it's kind of like just a
42:37
little neighborhood. They could have waited
42:40
for her to leave. She's in a very distinct
42:42
vehicle. They see her vehicle there. They
42:44
know she's leaving. She's got to be leaving sometime soon. It's
42:46
getting near the end of the night. You're just
42:48
going to sit and wait. Now, we
42:50
don't know what transpired. But
42:53
that particular person is
42:57
interesting that they would say that, you know, I
42:59
was looking back. This is another thing I
43:03
didn't know prior to publishing
43:05
the book. I found a newspaper
43:08
article that had that exact information in
43:10
it and it was early on. Some
43:13
of her friends said someone spoke to her
43:16
at the end. Either
43:19
way, my point is that I
43:22
believe that it was not from someone
43:24
from that area. I believe that
43:26
it was someone that had come in there and
43:29
met her somehow, whether it was at the diner
43:31
or it was at the end. Now, if
43:33
that person met her at the diner in
43:35
the early morning hours when she was, you
43:37
know, waiting tables, training to
43:39
wait tables in the
43:42
breakfast. If
43:44
she had talked to someone and someone said, Oh, do you
43:46
like your job? She was the type of
43:49
person that said, Yeah, I got two jobs. I worked
43:51
at the diner too. You know,
43:53
she's driving this vehicle. It's
43:55
really noticeable. So it wouldn't
43:57
be a big issue.
44:00
to try to
44:02
go spotter there. So
44:04
what you're saying is you really,
44:06
really, really entertain the idea that
44:08
Mara's and Brianna's disappearances are connected.
44:13
I entertain them for sure. Maybe
44:15
more than the average person. Once
44:17
again, you're the experienced. Maybe you
44:20
haven't worked on Mara's, of course. You know it.
44:24
Maybe you've met Julia, talked to Julia,
44:26
everything. You're an expert on Brianna's disappearance.
44:29
Maybe not as much on Mara's, but you see enough connections
44:31
between them to really make you lean in
44:33
that direction. We actually work
44:36
for the Murray's and
44:38
we have for quite a while. But
44:42
again, I'm not speaking for Lou or
44:44
anybody else or whatever. What
44:48
I'm saying is that you
44:51
look at Mara's disappearance too. The
44:54
locals there. They
44:56
have just tapped that to
44:59
try to get information forever. Nothing's
45:03
been fruitful. I
45:07
get in trouble because people that
45:10
discuss on our Facebook page, I think they took
45:12
what I said kind of a little bit wrong.
45:16
There's a lot of information that gets gone over
45:21
ad nauseam. I think that just it's
45:25
minutia. The
45:31
information that you need just isn't there.
45:34
The piece of the puzzle, the finish the puzzle just
45:36
isn't there. It's
45:38
not something you can look at that information forever
45:40
and I don't think it's going to be productive. It's
45:42
just you need to have it. You
45:45
need to have all the information, but it's not what's
45:47
going to resolve this. It's
45:50
somewhere outside there. If
45:54
somebody was a local
45:57
did this and they
45:59
were like, alone and they have
46:01
the fortitude to keep this to themselves. They
46:05
could, you know, the deal you've done enough
46:07
of these. They
46:09
can keep it to themselves to like, you
46:11
know, we just did, uh, are you familiar
46:13
with Bill Thomas? It does.
46:15
Yeah. Yeah. I, I covered the, I know
46:17
I covered the colonial Parkway, uh, disappearances and
46:19
murders, uh, the end of 2022. So
46:22
I'm very, I've never, I've spoken to him like over
46:24
email. I've never talked to him on the phone or
46:26
over zoom, but we've had some email exchanges. Okay.
46:29
Well, they had, uh, a man
46:31
who died. That they realized
46:33
was responsible for a couple of those. I'm
46:37
not really up on it. They, uh, David
46:39
and Robin are the under
46:41
age, the 14 year old and 20 year old. David
46:45
knobbling and Robin, I
46:47
forget her last name, but those were the two
46:49
that they've shown proven through DNA. Yeah. Yeah.
46:52
So the point is though, that guy took
46:54
it to his grave, right? He didn't tell
46:56
anybody. Nobody knew. He operated alone and whatever.
46:59
So, I mean, if that's the case with
47:01
Brianna, if that's the case with more of
47:03
those, with one of those situations, again,
47:05
you may never know. I think within
47:08
his case, how did
47:10
they come up with that DNA? I forgot that in
47:12
his case, they had it from back, they had it
47:14
from back then. And
47:16
then he was connected to another murder. Remember
47:18
he murdered somebody else, another woman, and they
47:20
just eventually able
47:23
B, B, B, B, C. So
47:25
he will see type of situation. They couldn't do
47:27
it. So we died. So he passed away or
47:29
something. Um, put
47:34
me a little on a spike. I'm forgetting right at
47:36
this moment. But yeah, well, I
47:38
think it might've been he thinks of suspects when he
47:40
died. They took his DNA or something. Wasn't it? Yeah.
47:43
But he died. Either way, either way, 2016, you
47:45
think that would have been done. It was, I don't
47:47
know. It's a good question. Uh,
47:49
I probably should know that off the top of
47:51
my head, I don't, but it just seems to
47:54
me it was, had something though, to do with
47:56
this other murder, this woman murdered that did it.
47:58
I guess what I'm saying. not murdered
48:00
her and maybe they would have never connected him
48:02
to these two. Right. I think possibly. So,
48:06
you know, again, that's what are the chances
48:08
kind of thing, right? So, and
48:10
when you speak of what are the chances kind
48:12
of thing, stuff like that. So, the one death
48:15
in the book, do you remember the
48:17
boy named Craig Jack? Okay,
48:19
Craig Jackman was killed by Timothy Cruz. Five
48:23
years later, a man
48:26
stumbled upon Craig Jackman's skull, and
48:28
he brought it home with him. He called the police.
48:31
They went out, this professional dig. They found a lot
48:33
of phones. The majority of his bones and some clothing
48:35
and stuff like that. Had that
48:37
man not stumbled upon that skull in
48:39
76% worsted Vermont, you know, Cruz
48:45
never would have been held responsible for that. For sure.
48:47
And he would have gone on to do whatever he
48:49
would have done, right? Yeah. We
48:52
don't know. There's a lot of things to play here. All
48:54
I'm saying, I guess, is that it's
48:57
worth entertaining. Okay. Alright,
49:01
that's your professional opinion. You know, of course,
49:03
like you said, you're an expert on Brianna's.
49:05
You have experience with Morris. This is kind
49:07
of a conclusion that you say, you know
49:10
what? This is something that really
49:12
needs to be considered. It's
49:14
absolutely should be considered. Okay. For sure.
49:16
And there's no proof of that. Okay.
49:19
Let's move on to this. We've talked about the
49:21
book so much. Let's talk about that book right
49:24
now. First of all, what
49:26
is the title of the book? And
49:29
before we get into it, where can people get it?
49:31
How can they buy a copy? What's the title? Where
49:33
can they get it before we talk? Just going to
49:35
ask you a few questions about your writing and everything.
49:37
But what's the title? Where can they get it? It's
49:41
called The Hunt for Brianna Maitland. And
49:43
it's only sold through
49:45
my publisher. So if you Google the title,
49:47
it'll come up. My publisher, small publisher. Great
49:50
people. Really? And if you go to this
49:52
guy's store,
49:55
he's an author. He's written some fantastic books
49:57
on crimes in the Adirondacks. One of them.
50:00
was the escape from Dan Amora, Prison
50:03
Break, which was wild. And
50:07
Robert Garo, it's called Terror in
50:10
the Adirondacks, was a serial killer back in
50:12
the 70s who terrorized the Adirondacks and was
50:14
in Syracuse and stuff too. He ended
50:16
up escaping from Fishkill Prison. But
50:19
yeah, you
50:21
can get it from him. I mean, if
50:24
you go on his site, it'll list the
50:26
stores too that sold at Vermont. Or
50:28
you can just send me a message on Facebook and
50:30
I'll send you a signed copy if you purchase it
50:32
directly from me. Great.
50:35
All right. So the hunt for Brianna Maitland and
50:38
you just do a Google search for that
50:40
or you can find Greg on
50:42
Facebook or whatever if you want to get a signed copy
50:44
if they want one. Absolutely.
50:48
Okay. Let's talk just a little bit about what
50:50
motivates you after so many years. You didn't write
50:52
this book like in 2008. This is something more
50:54
recently. What was the final deciding factor
50:57
that said, you know what, I think it's time. I
51:00
had talked about it for a while and when
51:02
I was, when the pandemic hit, I was really
51:05
isolated. I mean, really bad. So
51:07
my brother said, you know, you got to do it now.
51:09
You've got time, you've got the material,
51:11
you know what you want to write.
51:14
Because I did, I just took it up as a project,
51:16
gave me something to do. It's kind of
51:18
stuck at home 24 seven for months and
51:20
months and months on end.
51:23
And it was an
51:25
experience. Yeah, for sure. Yeah. But
51:27
I think it needed to be done just
51:29
to dispel some rumors and stuff like that.
51:31
You know what I mean? I
51:33
thought so. How long did it take you to
51:35
do it for the like the day you actually
51:37
made, you know, for me, I've written some books.
51:40
Of course, my unfound books, but I've written some
51:42
novels and things going back many, many,
51:44
many years. Me, I'm more of an outline guy.
51:46
Here's what I'm good. Here's the outline
51:48
for the book. And then I sit down to write
51:50
it kind of the same thing, or is this more
51:52
of a stream of conscious? How much did you plan
51:55
out? Which, you know, I knew
51:57
the story so well. I think that was
51:59
the thing. I knew
52:01
the story so well that
52:03
I just knew what I would want to tell people
52:05
if I was going to accept it. You know, when
52:08
people ask me about it, I'll say it's such a
52:10
long story. You know, you got a week, you
52:12
know, and they're like, oh, and I said, I'll say, reference
52:14
this or reference that and then let me know what questions
52:16
you have. Now, with the
52:19
book, I'm like, okay, if I was going to tell
52:21
somebody the story, this is what I would do. And
52:23
that's how I wrote it. But I
52:26
had like paperwork strewn everywhere
52:28
around the house. And so
52:31
I could just come back in the house and
52:33
just refer right to it and just start fresh
52:35
and just start right left off and just go,
52:38
you know, and
52:40
I wanted it to be all facts. And
52:45
so that when people read it, they knew they
52:47
learned something, they wanted the truth and they wanted to
52:49
know the deal, this was where you were going to get it
52:51
from. You know what I
52:53
mean? All right. So I don't really know what last
52:55
year, 2023 came out last year, correct? September
52:59
15th. I don't
53:01
even know how long it took me. I didn't even keep track.
53:04
But I mean, it wasn't
53:07
a long long time. I
53:10
just hammered away. Okay,
53:12
very good. Once again, the hunt
53:14
for Brianna Maitland, Google it
53:17
to get it from the actually the publisher, you have
53:19
a small publisher who has published it for you. But
53:22
if you'd like to get a signed copy from
53:24
Greg, you can try to track him down on
53:27
Facebook. I know he has a Facebook, you know,
53:29
his private Facebook page. And
53:31
maybe you can reach him that way if you'd
53:33
like to get a signed copy from him. Of
53:35
course, people do that for
53:37
some of the books that I've written
53:40
as well. So please, everybody, go check
53:42
that out. The hunt for Brianna
53:44
Maitland written by today's guest, Greg
53:47
O'Racker. One more question, and then we'll
53:49
get into all the social media stuff.
53:51
Question, now that you've been working on
53:53
this for 18 years, why has Brianna's
53:56
disappearance captured so much more attention than
53:58
most great, quote unquote, regular
54:00
people's disappearances. You've been in this, you've
54:02
been living this for 18 years. Your
54:04
best opinion on that. I,
54:08
you know, we never saw it that way.
54:10
We were always, we're
54:13
like, why did Morris case get so much
54:15
more attention? Well, I think I have the
54:17
answer. I think I have that answer. Initially,
54:20
the police said, you know, Brianna
54:22
was involved in drug activity in
54:25
Franklin County. And
54:27
I think consciously and subconsciously, people just said, oh,
54:29
it's a drug thing. You know, and
54:31
they moved on from there. And the mystery was
54:33
kind of gone, you know what I mean? But
54:36
the attention that's
54:38
gotten at this point, after all these
54:41
years, is because we just don't let
54:43
it go. You know, we've
54:45
gone out and done the work. And
54:48
we've been on podcasts and we've put
54:51
out a book and been on shows
54:53
and, you know, Lou goes out and
54:55
does podcasts too, you know, and we
54:57
did some together. So yeah,
55:00
we've kept it that way. And the
55:02
families built this relationship with the police
55:04
and, you know,
55:06
they've done rewards and press
55:09
releases and stuff like that. So it's work. That's
55:12
why it's that way, you know. How
55:17
can people reach you?
55:19
Of course, we already talked about your personal
55:21
Facebook page if they wanna get the book,
55:23
but there is a Facebook page set up
55:26
for Brianna's disappearance, website, maybe
55:28
your email address to somebody. If
55:30
somebody, you know, has some information,
55:32
they wanna contact you. Maybe
55:34
you wanna give out all of that right
55:36
now. So
55:38
my email's in the book. It's in
55:40
the beginning of the book. If anybody
55:42
wants to contact me, it says if
55:44
you wanna contact the author. It's hopsig
55:47
or HOP, S-I-C-K-E-R,@gmail.com. Okay.
55:49
You can go to private investigations for the missing website,
55:51
which is a very cool website. You can see all
55:53
the cool work they do. And you can
55:55
always reach out to someone to get my information from there. It's
55:58
not actually listed on there, but anyone would... answer you
56:00
tell you how to get ahold of me. If
56:02
you look me up on Facebook, all
56:04
I can tell you is I don't really, I'm not a big Facebook
56:07
guy, but I can tell you that my picture there
56:09
is Black Sabbath. It's a picture of a Black Sabbath
56:11
album with a little flying devil
56:13
angel there. What
56:16
else? You know, Lou
56:19
is the administrator of one of the brand of Facebook
56:21
pages. I'm not sure the exact name of it is to
56:23
be honest with you. There's three of them. But you reach
56:25
out on there, somebody will
56:28
get ahold of me, certainly can get ahold of me on
56:30
there. Okay. Greg,
56:33
any final words before we complete this interview?
56:37
I don't think so. I appreciate you having me on.
56:39
This was a great interview. And I love,
56:42
I love when people read the book and
56:44
give me some feedback. You
56:47
know, there's a lot of followers of Morris Case that
56:49
have read it. Got a lot
56:51
of good feedback from them. And she's got some
56:53
really steadfast
56:55
army there. Yeah.
56:57
Working on her behalf. And Brianna does too.
56:59
Brianna's got a lot of followers too. People
57:02
that are really nice. There's kind of a
57:04
cross over there, which is really cool. Yeah.
57:07
And you know,
57:10
okay, it's nice, it's nice
57:12
that there's all these people out there that want
57:14
the same result. You know,
57:18
right. Given that
57:20
I cover so many disappearances where, you
57:22
know, so many missing people don't have
57:24
armies like that. Yeah. You know,
57:26
we wish everybody there was a book like
57:28
you've written about Brianna. We wish there was
57:30
a book written about for all these disappearances.
57:32
You know, just an example, just doesn't happen.
57:34
You know, that was kind of a thing
57:36
with the organization that Bruce Maitland set up
57:38
private investigations for the missing that started years
57:40
ago with him and I talk and we'd
57:42
be together, you know, and just having
57:46
dinner or something. And I would say, people
57:48
can't afford, how would you ever afford this? You
57:50
know, because I did it for expenses only for
57:52
still 18 years. And
57:55
he's, I think we were like, we got to start
57:57
a nonprofit. He ended up doing it. And
58:00
It's helping tons of people. It's just an amazing thing
58:02
that that would come out of this, you know? Um,
58:07
yeah, it's been a long
58:09
road now. It's been a long, you
58:11
know, there's something
58:14
that people should know is that with
58:18
us and the police, we're
58:21
always working on this. I can call Lou almost
58:23
any day of the week and say, what's
58:25
new. And he'll tell me something that he did
58:27
on Brianna's case or Morris. And
58:30
it's not inconsequential stuff. You
58:32
know, if he's making phone calls, he's setting up
58:35
interviews, he'll call me. Are you ready?
58:37
Let's go Saturday. Well, I'll pick him up and
58:39
get a hotel room and start asking questions. We're
58:41
knocking on doors. There's a ton of stuff that
58:43
people don't see that happens. There's a ton of
58:45
motion. We
58:48
don't know all the stuff that the police says we know some of it,
58:50
but there, they
58:52
will tell you, you don't know
58:55
what you don't know. And
58:57
they've done a lot of work on it.
58:59
So there's just a lot of stuff that,
59:01
you know, I
59:03
would love to at some point expand on my
59:05
book and just add to it. As
59:10
time goes by, there's so much stuff I'd like to add
59:12
to it now. And there's so many experiences
59:14
and there's so many people that we've talked to. There's
59:17
so many open, there's so much open
59:19
ended stuff where we will
59:21
sit down and we'll go, do you remember the interview
59:23
with this person and this person? We're very
59:25
familiar in this person. Yeah,
59:28
there's nothing, there's nothing
59:30
evidence to connect these people. They came to
59:33
us as tips or whatever. But
59:37
unfortunately we're in that weird situation of, well, you can't rule
59:39
them out and man, some of this is
59:41
convincing stuff, really
59:44
convincing stuff. You know,
59:46
it's the same thing with Lawrence. There's
59:50
people that come up to us, they're on our radar. You're
59:53
like, this is compelling. This
59:55
is compelling. There's
59:58
no evidence of anything. and
1:00:00
there's pieces are missing and
1:00:03
that's stuff that's never made public so
1:00:07
it's it's mind-bending times you know
1:00:09
yeah it's a lot it's a
1:00:11
lot to think about all the time and to
1:00:13
try and as time goes on it gets bigger
1:00:16
and bigger sometimes yeah Greg
1:00:19
I appreciate you being on this episode
1:00:21
of Unfound thank
1:00:24
you for having me this is awesome I feel like I
1:00:26
made a new friend buddy oh
1:00:28
you're very welcome thank you and
1:00:31
that was my May 7th 2024
1:00:34
interview with Greg Overacker longtime
1:00:37
private investigator for the
1:00:39
Maitland family I
1:00:41
thank him for joining me and all
1:00:44
of you on this episode
1:00:46
on both audio and
1:00:49
video there
1:00:51
have been many map videos made
1:00:53
concerning Brianna's disappearance even
1:00:56
so I've made my own
1:00:59
please find it on
1:01:01
Unfound's YouTube channel before
1:01:04
I get into my long
1:01:06
summation I want to
1:01:08
remind all of you as to what
1:01:10
Greg said about the Maitland family being
1:01:12
asked to go on some of
1:01:14
those daytime talk shows the
1:01:17
shows requested that the family had
1:01:19
to act a certain way in
1:01:22
fact just about insisting that
1:01:24
the family cry this
1:01:27
is the exact reason I've counseled
1:01:29
my guests to never
1:01:32
go on those shows ever and
1:01:35
for all of you stop
1:01:37
watching them Dr. Phil
1:01:40
all of them you
1:01:42
are being manipulated these
1:01:44
are not good people running
1:01:47
these shows okay
1:01:50
now my summation and
1:01:52
I don't know how long this will go and given
1:01:55
its length I'm just using notes and
1:01:57
not reading for the next video from
1:02:00
the screen, so please bear with
1:02:02
the ums, you knows, etc. As
1:02:06
you would expect, I have been reading a
1:02:08
lot of analysis on Brianna's disappearance over the
1:02:10
past couple of weeks. WebSloos,
1:02:12
blogs, Greg's own book,
1:02:14
newspaper accounts going back
1:02:17
to 2004-2005. A
1:02:20
lot of reading because a lot
1:02:23
of coverage has been done on her disappearance
1:02:25
over the past 20 years, unlike
1:02:28
a lot of disappearances that we have
1:02:30
featured on Unfound. So
1:02:32
for my own analysis, I'm going to
1:02:34
use what I know best, Unfound's
1:02:37
own disappearances, and
1:02:40
some of the conclusions about missing people
1:02:43
that I've deduced from them. And
1:02:46
I hope this will assist you
1:02:48
with your own analysis. Left
1:02:52
and foremost, disappearances are
1:02:54
about people, not circumstances.
1:02:57
If you give me the background
1:02:59
of a missing person, addict or
1:03:01
not, rich or poor, mental health
1:03:04
issues or not, kinds of relationships,
1:03:06
education, on and on
1:03:08
and on, just
1:03:11
from those items, the most probable
1:03:13
reason for a person's disappearance can
1:03:15
be predicted to a high
1:03:17
degree of certainty. How
1:03:20
can we apply this theory to Brianna? Well,
1:03:23
there are warning signs. No
1:03:26
constant home dropped out
1:03:28
of school. That's a big one. Drug
1:03:31
use all around her. Recent
1:03:34
breakup with James. The
1:03:36
dust up with her friend Keely. In
1:03:39
fact, overall, seemingly, she
1:03:42
was surrounded by a bunch of losers. It
1:03:46
only started the jobs she
1:03:48
had recently, although I
1:03:50
won't note that she was only 17. Yep,
1:03:54
I know she loved her family. They were
1:03:56
close. I don't doubt that. However,
1:03:59
we also have to remember that parents
1:04:01
are committing suicide all the time.
1:04:04
That doesn't necessarily mean they don't
1:04:06
love their children. And
1:04:09
I think we all learned quite a bit when
1:04:11
we found out about what happened to
1:04:13
Mary Jane Van Gilder, who
1:04:15
was married, had children, but disappeared
1:04:18
in 1945 only for Adam Turner to find out
1:04:23
here in the 21st century in February
1:04:25
of 2024 that Mary Jane found a
1:04:27
new husband and
1:04:31
had new children and
1:04:33
lived with it till her death in 1990. That
1:04:35
doesn't mean she
1:04:39
didn't love her first children.
1:04:41
Remember that. Overall,
1:04:43
regarding who Brianna was as
1:04:45
a person, she
1:04:48
falls into a category where running
1:04:50
off becomes a real possibility, still
1:04:53
percentage-wise low, but
1:04:55
still much much higher than kids
1:04:58
who don't have anything in the
1:05:00
above list going on. Well
1:05:03
then, I guess that means she staged
1:05:05
her disappearance. She ran her own car
1:05:07
into the house. Brianna put the lime
1:05:09
on the trunk. She ripped up her
1:05:11
own necklace, left the doors open, left
1:05:13
the lights on, all of it. Well,
1:05:16
maybe, but it's not that
1:05:18
simple. Going back through Unsound's catalog
1:05:20
of now 330 disappearances, I can only cite four where
1:05:28
the belief is that the missing
1:05:30
people or person staged their own
1:05:32
disappearances. Four out of 330.
1:05:34
That's only just over 1%. Which ones are they?
1:05:42
Gregory Howes, Flight
1:05:45
370, Dale
1:05:47
Kerstetter, and maybe Bernard
1:05:49
Rusnus and Peggy McKay.
1:05:52
That's it. To
1:05:55
make sure we're all clear here, what
1:05:57
exactly do I mean by staged?
1:06:00
That the missing people themselves did
1:06:03
things, actions and
1:06:05
or statements, to
1:06:07
mislead friends and family and
1:06:09
then investigators as to what
1:06:11
actually happened. This
1:06:14
is in contrast to when husbands say,
1:06:16
yeah, my wife took off
1:06:18
with somebody I don't know in
1:06:20
a white truck. That
1:06:22
is a different kind of staging.
1:06:25
That is being done by a third party,
1:06:27
not by the missing person himself or herself.
1:06:30
And to clarify, the staging by the
1:06:33
missing person has to be overt, not
1:06:36
just a car being left on a logging
1:06:38
road or something. And we
1:06:40
certainly have that with the scene at the
1:06:42
abandoned house. Well
1:06:45
then, I guess since the percentage is so
1:06:47
low that there's hardly any chance that Brianna
1:06:49
could have staged her own disappearance. But
1:06:53
wait. You
1:06:55
have to remember something about the way
1:06:57
this podcast goes about its business. A
1:07:00
disappearance has to be a year old to be
1:07:02
featured in it. In
1:07:04
addition, and probably more importantly, the
1:07:07
average age of a disappearance on
1:07:09
Unfound is between 20 and 22
1:07:12
years old, so right around the age
1:07:14
that Brianna's disappearance is. In
1:07:16
addition to both those facts, as
1:07:19
a guy who reads missing person's
1:07:21
news every day, probably
1:07:23
once a month I do read a story
1:07:26
about somebody who tried to fake his or
1:07:28
her disappearance but did not
1:07:30
succeed. Thus my
1:07:32
perception is maybe this isn't
1:07:35
as uncommon as Unfound's own
1:07:37
stats might show. Well
1:07:40
how could that be? Well
1:07:42
it is possible that the reason Unfound
1:07:45
has only featured four staged
1:07:47
by the actual missing persons
1:07:49
themselves disappearances is
1:07:51
because all the other people who tried it
1:07:53
failed. Maybe in the
1:07:55
first month, the sixth month, the first
1:07:57
year, the fifth year, whenever. Meaning,
1:08:00
yes, the successful attempts at people staging
1:08:03
their own disappearances that stayed unresolved to
1:08:05
the point that Unfound can feature them
1:08:07
is just 1%. However,
1:08:10
the overall attempts, failed
1:08:13
or not, is a
1:08:15
much, much higher percentage. In
1:08:18
a nutshell, people attempting to stage
1:08:20
their own disappearances is more common
1:08:23
than Unfound's stats may show due
1:08:26
to Unfound only featuring
1:08:28
unsolved disappearances, not
1:08:31
botched staged ones. Overall,
1:08:35
no matter how you look at it, staged
1:08:37
disappearances by the missing people
1:08:40
themselves is a very small
1:08:42
sliver of the overall entire
1:08:44
disappearance pie. Well
1:08:47
then, that settles it. Somebody abducted
1:08:49
her that night. See,
1:08:52
that's not clear either. Why?
1:08:57
Going back to Unfound's catalog, and I
1:08:59
should state, I do believe that Unfound's
1:09:02
entire 330 rep-retoir of
1:09:04
disappearances is a random sample
1:09:06
of disappearances that occur. Of
1:09:08
course, we mostly cover disappearances
1:09:10
in the United States. But
1:09:14
myself, my assistants, other
1:09:17
people out there who bring families to
1:09:19
me and introduce me to families, I'm
1:09:23
not looking for particular types of
1:09:26
disappearances. Everybody knows I will talk
1:09:28
to anybody. Any
1:09:31
type of person, as long as I believe
1:09:33
that person is being honest, is
1:09:35
welcome to come on Unfound. That
1:09:38
is why I believe that we have
1:09:40
a random sample of disappearances. And
1:09:43
it very well may be, we may be off
1:09:45
on the
1:09:47
gender percentage, or ethnicity,
1:09:49
or race, anything like that. But
1:09:52
that's not planned. This
1:09:54
has just been how randomly it has
1:09:57
happened. And yes, I do believe, due
1:09:59
to that, that unfound
1:10:01
catalog of disappearances can be
1:10:03
used for scientific and
1:10:06
statistical purposes. And I
1:10:08
will remind you, even in a country of 330 million
1:10:11
people, all that
1:10:13
pollster has to do is poll 100
1:10:15
random likely voters. And
1:10:20
that pollster has a pretty good chance of predicting who
1:10:22
the next president of the United States would be. So
1:10:24
100 people out of 330 million, I realize only adults
1:10:26
can vote, so let's say 250 million. So
1:10:32
100 out of 250 million
1:10:35
people, if you
1:10:37
poll them, you have a pretty good chance of
1:10:40
determining who the next president will be. Well,
1:10:43
we've featured 330 disappearances on Unfound,
1:10:45
and at least in the United
1:10:47
States, there are considered to be
1:10:49
100,000 unsolved disappearances. So
1:10:52
if those pollsters are using science,
1:10:56
statistical science, then
1:10:58
we here at Unfound are
1:11:00
surely using statistical science too. So
1:11:04
going back to Unfound's catalog, once again, 330 disappearances in
1:11:06
which about 10% of those have been resolved at this
1:11:08
point. I
1:11:14
picked out females' disappearances that
1:11:16
were most likely abductions. Well,
1:11:19
how do I define abduction?
1:11:22
I define it this way. Where
1:11:24
there is ample reason to believe
1:11:26
a female was forcibly taken away
1:11:29
from wherever she is to be
1:11:31
killed elsewhere, meaning she
1:11:33
wasn't lured away. She
1:11:35
didn't choose to go with her
1:11:38
abductor or abductors or the people
1:11:40
or the group or whoever. In
1:11:43
addition, there is no scientific evidence
1:11:45
to think she was killed in
1:11:47
her own home, car, apartment, etc.,
1:11:49
wherever the abduction started, then transported
1:11:52
elsewhere already deceased. This
1:11:54
definition rules out one of the most common
1:11:57
types of disappearances featured on Unfound. That
1:12:00
type is females killed under their
1:12:02
own roofs or roofs By
1:12:05
the men in their lives who also
1:12:07
live there There are 16
1:12:10
unfound disappearances that meet this
1:12:13
general criteria of abduction Yes,
1:12:16
I think a much lower number than many of you
1:12:18
would think We've featured
1:12:20
the disappearances of 189 females so women and
1:12:23
girls on unfound So
1:12:28
only about 8% were abductions
1:12:31
That's it So
1:12:34
somewhat rare the
1:12:36
names of those females Susie
1:12:38
Lyle Regina Marie boss Linda
1:12:41
K. Carroll Debbie low
1:12:43
Evelyn Hartley McKell Biggs
1:12:46
Kimberly Ramer Dorianne Myers
1:12:48
Tiffany Johnson Julie Weflin
1:12:50
unique Harris Jody
1:12:52
who's intrude Pearl pinson
1:12:54
Brenda Condon Angela
1:12:56
Freeman page Rancosky
1:13:01
There are some things about this list though
1:13:03
that need to be
1:13:05
understood out of that 16
1:13:07
there is reason to believe that at least 10
1:13:09
of them knew their attackers well Lyle
1:13:13
boss Carol low Ramer
1:13:15
Myers Johnson Weflin Harris
1:13:18
and Freeman
1:13:20
and Really there's only
1:13:22
two where we can say for
1:13:24
sure that the females didn't know
1:13:26
their attackers at all before the
1:13:28
abductions happened That
1:13:30
would be page Rancosky and Pearl
1:13:33
pinson Also of
1:13:35
that 16 six are
1:13:37
underage at least by US standards
1:13:39
like Brianna was low
1:13:42
Hartley Biggs Ramer pinson
1:13:45
Freeman in In addition
1:13:47
the idea I got from Greg in
1:13:49
the interview his best insight is
1:13:51
that there is reason to believe Brianna at
1:13:54
least had casual knowledge of her abductor a
1:13:56
guy who had come in to her workplace looking
1:13:59
for her Meaning Brianna's
1:14:01
disappearance should most likely be put
1:14:03
with remaining four on
1:14:05
the preceding list. Hartley,
1:14:08
Biggs, Hoosentrut, Condon.
1:14:12
So coincidentally, we come down to
1:14:15
that four number, just like we
1:14:17
did with staged disappearances. That
1:14:20
was not planned. In
1:14:23
a nutshell, out of 189 female
1:14:26
disappearances featured on Unfound,
1:14:29
only four excluding Brianna's
1:14:32
is most likely an abduction by a
1:14:35
person or group the
1:14:37
woman or girl casually knew.
1:14:41
That's it. Granted,
1:14:43
if you think James caused
1:14:45
Brianna's disappearance, then Brianna
1:14:48
could be put in with Susie Lyle and
1:14:50
that group. Still,
1:14:53
it's only ten. In
1:14:55
addition, if you're wondering how many of those 16 abductions
1:14:58
had situations where the victim's vehicles
1:15:00
were left in odd locations, granted
1:15:02
some of these were little girls
1:15:04
so they couldn't drive, but the
1:15:07
answer is four, although a
1:15:10
different four. Myers,
1:15:13
Weflin, Freeman, Wrenkoski.
1:15:17
My point on this is,
1:15:19
yes, I think most people
1:15:21
somehow inherently understand that staged
1:15:23
disappearances by the missing people
1:15:25
themselves are rare. However,
1:15:29
what I think the public doesn't
1:15:31
appreciate is how rare disappearances are
1:15:34
in which a man abducted a
1:15:36
female he barely knew, and that
1:15:39
case lasted unsolved for over
1:15:41
20 years. And
1:15:44
oh, do males get abducted? Stevie
1:15:47
Hammerly and Joe Grashner had that
1:15:49
happen to them. We just recently
1:15:51
covered their disappearances. So they
1:15:54
do, but at a much
1:15:56
lower rate than women and girls, according
1:15:59
to Unfound. What
1:16:03
neither of these statistical examinations cover
1:16:05
is this. Factually,
1:16:09
it is possible that Brianna drove to
1:16:11
somebody's house after work, something
1:16:13
of a violent nature happened there, I
1:16:16
guess within minutes of her arriving, and
1:16:19
then that killer or killers backed her car
1:16:21
into that house to
1:16:24
make it look like Brianna did it or
1:16:26
something. There is
1:16:28
not one fact to
1:16:30
dispute that possibility. Yeah,
1:16:33
I know, crazy, but
1:16:35
hey, never
1:16:38
say never. And
1:16:40
that's the program. Right
1:16:42
now, while you are in
1:16:44
your podcast platform, Spotify, YouTube,
1:16:46
iTunes, wherever, give
1:16:48
Unfound a five star review, a thumbs
1:16:51
up, whatever that platform
1:16:53
allows. I thank you
1:16:55
for listening. I'm at
1:16:57
Denzel, and you've
1:16:59
just finished this episode
1:17:01
of Unfound.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More