Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Starship is ready for its fourth flight.
0:03
Webb finds the most distant
0:05
galaxy ever seen, a
0:07
new way to detect Hawking radiation
0:09
and fresh volcanoes on Venus. All
0:11
this and more in this
0:13
week's Space Bites. Well, are you ready
0:16
for the fourth attempt of
0:18
launching SpaceX Starship? We got
0:20
the news this week that
0:22
SpaceX is targeting June 5th,
0:25
at the earliest to take
0:27
another crack at launching Starship.
0:30
Once again, they're going to blast
0:32
off a Starship on top of
0:34
Super Heavy. It's going to separate.
0:37
Starship is going to fly to orbit. The
0:40
Super Heavy is then going to attempt to
0:42
return and land gently into the
0:44
water in the Gulf of Mexico, while
0:47
Starship is going to continue on to
0:49
orbit and then is going to attempt
0:51
to deorbit through the atmosphere and make
0:53
its own soft landing somewhere in the
0:56
Indian Ocean. And this is
0:58
sort of chosen because this is a way for
1:00
them to be able to have a trajectory where
1:02
they don't have any potential of getting your population
1:04
areas. That sounds safe
1:06
wise. Obviously, there's like a ton of
1:08
little changes that are going to make,
1:10
small lessons that were learned from the
1:12
previous launch attempts. One big change is
1:15
they're going to eject the hot fire
1:17
staging segments sort of in between the
1:19
top of the Super Heavy and the
1:21
bottom of Starship. And this is going
1:23
to be destroyed. And Anton, my
1:26
producer, really wants us to
1:28
sort of focus in that
1:30
this means that Starship is no longer going to
1:32
be fully 100% reusable if
1:34
they have to actually dispose of this
1:37
ring on every launch attempt. We'll see
1:39
whether they can figure
1:41
it out and bring that back
1:43
into the era of reusability. So
1:46
all eyes are on Starship for June
1:48
5th. Obviously, I'm going to be watching
1:50
the launch and if it whatever happens,
1:52
I'll try to provide you some coverage
1:55
after the launch is complete. Speaking of
1:57
human launches, even sooner than that, we
1:59
should. get a launch of
2:01
the Boeing Starliner carrying two astronauts
2:03
to the International Space Station. Now
2:05
we've been waiting a long time
2:07
for this launch there's a lot
2:09
of delays and we're finally there.
2:11
Now we're not entirely
2:14
out of the woods yet there
2:17
is an ongoing potential leak of helium
2:19
on the space craft but it's not
2:21
urgent enough that NASA thinks it's worth
2:23
canceling the launch so they're gonna keep
2:25
an eye on it and still launch.
2:27
The two astronauts Butch Wilmore
2:29
and Suni Williams have arrived in Florida and
2:32
they're getting ready to actually board the spacecraft.
2:34
If all goes well the rocket will blast
2:36
off on June 1st but we've
2:38
seen so many delays even just in the
2:40
last couple of months that I like don't
2:43
be surprised if it gets a
2:45
few more delays until they're finally ready to blast
2:47
off. Webb finds the most
2:49
distant galaxy ever seen. All right
2:52
here is a record that
2:54
I don't think it's gonna
2:56
last very long. James Webb's
2:58
Space Telescope has found the
3:00
most distant galaxy ever seen.
3:02
Now the galaxy is called
3:04
J's GSZ14-0 or J's Z14.
3:08
This is a galaxy that is
3:10
seen with a redshift number of
3:12
approximately 14 which
3:14
roughly correlates to about 290 million years
3:19
after the Big Bang and
3:21
we've heard a lot of announcements about
3:23
the most distant galaxy ever being seen. In
3:25
fact as soon as James Webb launched we
3:27
got some announcements of people seeing galaxies that
3:30
were potentially even less than that 250
3:33
million 230 million years after the Big
3:35
Bang but the big difference is that
3:37
this galaxy has been very heavily studied.
3:39
So back in January 2024 Webb stared
3:43
at this one galaxy for 10 hours
3:46
and that's the kind of length of
3:48
time that you need to be able
3:50
to do a really accurate spectroscopic analysis
3:52
of this Galaxy. You Stare
3:54
at this one galaxy long enough you can
3:56
start to see these chemical abundances.. You can
3:58
see the absorption line. The new mission
4:00
lines of different chemicals. You can detect
4:03
their current redshift and that tells you
4:05
how fast the gal he's moving away
4:07
from us and so what time in
4:10
the universe you are? See that? Only.
4:12
When you take that time and do
4:15
that spectroscopic data analysis can you get
4:17
that accurate number and Web just hasn't
4:19
had the time to analyze all these
4:21
galaxies. Who's probably other galaxies that he
4:24
has seen that are farther. It's just
4:26
that nobody is put in the time
4:28
to actually confirmed. But so far this
4:30
is the record breaker two hundred ninety
4:32
million years after the Big Bang. And
4:35
what's interesting is this is in a
4:37
time that astronomers referred to as cosmic
4:39
dawns. This is when those first galaxies
4:41
were coming together. To form the
4:43
larger structures, the more mature galaxies like
4:46
the Milky Way that we see today
4:48
this is one of the mean sign
4:50
schools of James Webb was to identify
4:52
these galaxies and try and figure out
4:54
that merger process to see how we
4:57
get these larger structures. A new way
4:59
to measure the rotational black holes. We
5:02
don't know much about the black
5:04
holes. really. We can know their
5:06
mass. And. their rotation maybe we
5:08
can other electrical charge and so there
5:11
are ways to measure the bass a
5:13
black holes and there are few ways
5:15
to measure the rotational black holes but
5:17
astronomers are always looking for new ways
5:19
to figure out how fast is that
5:22
black hole spinning as a researchers had
5:24
a wonderful event happened recently that they're
5:26
able to use to be able to
5:28
calculate the rotation speed of a black
5:30
hole hold the title disruption event and
5:33
this is where a star is consumed
5:35
torn apart by a black hole some
5:37
of the material is ejected off into
5:39
space and some of the imperial falls
5:41
down in joins the accretion disks that
5:44
is surrounding the black hole so couple
5:46
of years ago sonorous detected one of
5:48
these title disruption events around a supermassive
5:50
black hole and are able to observe
5:52
it for hundreds of days watching as
5:55
the light was changing overtime as the
5:57
black hole was adding this new stars
5:59
too it's accretion disk and they
6:01
were able to detect a wobble in
6:04
the accretion disk as this new material
6:06
was being added and from that wobble
6:08
they were able to calculate the
6:10
rotation speed of the black hole. What
6:13
they found was that the black hole
6:15
turning at 25% the speed of light
6:18
which sounds like a lot but in
6:20
fact that's relatively slow for black holes.
6:22
Black holes can spin much faster than
6:24
that really approaching the speed of light
6:26
itself essentially the maximum speed that is
6:29
predicted by Einstein. Many black holes
6:31
reach that maximum speed limit and then they
6:33
just can't spin any faster than that. So
6:35
it's exciting astronomers have a new way to
6:37
be able to measure the rotation speed of
6:39
black holes. They just need to watch stars
6:42
get sacrificed to be able to make that
6:44
speed calculation. A way to
6:46
detect Hawking radiation. The late great
6:48
Stephen Hawking an astrophysicist did a
6:50
lot of work thinking about a
6:53
black hole and one of his
6:55
best known predictions is that black
6:57
holes should evaporate over time. They
7:00
should release radiation other particles called Hawking
7:02
radiation and then as the black hole
7:04
does this it is decreasing in mass.
7:07
But the problem is that this happens
7:09
on an incredibly slow scale longer
7:12
than a human lifetime to be able
7:14
to detect these particles coming from individual
7:16
black holes and so we need a
7:18
place where black holes are evaporating more
7:21
rapidly. And so the amount
7:23
of Hawking radiations coming off from a black hole
7:25
is dependent on the mass of the black hole.
7:27
If you have something that is say the mass
7:29
of a small asteroid it's going to evaporate very
7:32
quickly. It's going to be releasing a pot
7:34
flash of gamma radiation and then it's going
7:36
to disappear but we don't have any black
7:38
holes like that. But maybe there's a way
7:40
to make them. Astronomers publish
7:43
a new paper where they propose
7:45
that if you had merging supermassive
7:47
black holes as these
7:49
black holes are coming together they might
7:51
release what they call morsels of
7:54
smaller black holes essentially the remnants
7:56
that are coming out of this
7:58
merger process. way
8:00
to get tiny black holes out of the
8:02
two black holes as they come together. And
8:05
then these morsels can have all kinds of
8:07
different masses and it might be that it's
8:09
small enough that they can then evaporate and
8:12
release a blast of gamma radiation. And so
8:14
the astronomers propose that if you watch the
8:16
mergers between various black holes you might be
8:18
able to detect the gamma radiation coming from
8:21
the morsel black holes that are being thrown
8:23
out and they're evaporating around this merger process.
8:25
And the cool thing is is that we
8:28
have the kinds of telescopes today that
8:30
could be able to detect this
8:32
radiation. Proof that massive stars are
8:34
disappearing. Over the last
8:37
decades astronomers are coming to
8:39
the conclusion that very massive
8:41
stars are just disappearing.
8:44
The traditional idea of what happens at the
8:46
end of a massive star, like something with
8:49
more than eight times the mass of the
8:51
Sun, is that it uses up all the
8:53
fuel in its core, it
8:55
then implodes, produces a supernova
8:57
and forms a black
8:59
hole or neutron star at the
9:01
heart. But astronomers have found that
9:03
a lot of the kinds of
9:05
stars that should be detonating as
9:07
a supernova are just disappearing. They
9:09
call them annovas as
9:11
opposed to a supernova. But the problem is
9:14
they're really hard to find. I mean you've got
9:16
a star and then you do a survey a
9:18
decade later and you notice that star is missing.
9:20
Now it could be that it's just dust in
9:23
the way or that there
9:25
was dust in the beginning or there was
9:27
some mistake in the observations. So there's lots
9:30
of reasons to explain why a star might
9:32
have disappeared. But in a recent study
9:34
astronomers looked at a binary star system that has
9:36
a star with about 25 times
9:38
the mass of the Sun and a
9:40
black hole with 10 times the mass
9:42
of the Sun. And the two stars
9:45
are orbiting a common center of
9:47
gravity. But what they found is
9:49
that the orbit is too perfect,
9:51
too circular. In other words, that
9:55
you could have a star with that kind of mass and
9:57
a black hole with that kind of mass. So obviously the
9:59
black hole was the result of
10:01
a star that went supernova, you
10:03
could get that if the
10:05
star didn't die violently, if
10:08
it just was a star
10:10
and then it was a black hole and
10:12
just collapsed in on itself and just kept
10:14
going in the exact same orbit that it
10:16
was going before. It
10:18
wouldn't be the exact same orbit because it would have lost some mass,
10:20
but I guess it didn't explode as a supernova. Okay, I'm gonna go
10:22
with that. And so
10:25
this very perfect star system gives
10:27
an evidence that you can get
10:30
giant stars collapsing into black
10:33
holes without that pesky supernova
10:35
in between. So hopefully
10:37
we will find more and more examples of
10:39
this and it gives us another way that
10:41
stars can die. Every week we do a
10:43
vote on our channel where you tell us
10:45
what you thought was the best space news
10:48
of the week, the most intriguing space news
10:50
of the week. And the winner
10:52
this week was that Voyager 1 is back
10:54
online. So thank you everybody who took the
10:56
time to vote in last week's poll. Now
10:59
we will post the new poll onto
11:01
our community tab on our YouTube channel, but if
11:03
you're just scrolling on YouTube, you shouldn't see the
11:05
votes. Go ahead, take a second, give us a
11:07
vote, tell us what you thought. The best chance
11:09
to be able to see this vote is to
11:11
subscribe to the channel and then watch a bunch
11:14
of our videos to tell the algorithm that you
11:16
want more of our sweet space news. Chang'e
11:18
6 is about to land on the moon. In
11:21
addition to Starliner blasting off on June
11:23
1st, we should get a landing on
11:25
the moon on June 1st. And
11:28
that is the Chinese space agency Chang'e 6
11:30
mission, which is going to be landing at
11:32
the South Pole of the moon in
11:35
the Apollo crater in the South
11:37
Pole Econ Basin. If
11:39
Chang'e 6 lands safely, its
11:42
job is to scoop up two kilograms
11:44
of lunar regolith. It's then going
11:46
to package that up and put it into an
11:48
ascent module that's going to fly up into lunar
11:50
orbit. It's going to meet with an orbital
11:53
spacecraft, which will then bring that capsule
11:55
back down to Earth so that scientists can
11:57
analyze this. And this is scientifically
11:59
fascinating. I mean you're seeing samples that are coming
12:01
from the South Pole of the Moon Near
12:04
to the permanently shadowed craters at the Moon
12:06
and so we can learn about how much
12:08
water Ice is mixed in with the regolith
12:10
in those southern regions Scientifically the far side
12:13
of the Moon the South Pole of the
12:15
Moon I mean these are regions that geologists
12:17
would love to get their hands on to
12:19
be able to analyze these samples, but also
12:22
Think about like what this is I
12:25
mean you've got a spacecraft that is
12:27
launching to the Moon It is separating
12:29
part of it is going into orbit around
12:31
the Moon It is then sending a lander
12:33
down to the surface of the Moon. It is
12:35
collecting samples It's sending an ascent module back up
12:37
to space and that is returning so if you
12:39
the earth That sounds like
12:42
the Apollo missions, right? These are all the
12:44
pieces of the technology that you would master
12:46
in order to be able to send humans
12:48
to the moon And of course this is
12:50
China's goal This is them demonstrating that they
12:53
have the various technology pieces figured out to
12:55
be able to send astronauts eventually to the
12:57
surface of the moon of course it will
12:59
be hundreds of kilograms of astronauts and
13:01
not two kilograms of Lunar
13:04
samples, but you know this
13:06
is how it starts Vulcan isn't a
13:08
planet after all It looks like Spock
13:11
is homeless again back in
13:13
2018 astronomers found evidence that there is
13:15
a super earth exoplanet in the system
13:17
40 Eridani and According
13:19
to science fiction lore to Star Trek lore This
13:22
is the whole world for Spock
13:25
and so plenty of news outlets
13:27
Possibly even us reported that Spock's
13:29
home world had been found of
13:31
course You couldn't last
13:33
and so researchers did a
13:35
bunch of double-checking and some
13:37
very intensive Observations using
13:39
the radial velocity method to observe
13:41
the star they found
13:44
that the evidence of an exoplanet passing
13:46
in front of 40
13:48
Eridani was perfectly explained by a
13:50
large group of sunspots on the
13:52
surface of the star which matches
13:54
its 42 day Rotation
13:58
period in other words What
14:00
looked like a planet was actually a bunch
14:02
of sunspots on the surface of the star
14:05
and as it was turning Those
14:07
sunspots were coming back into view every 42 days.
14:09
So Spock's
14:12
homeworld has disappeared again.
14:15
Didn't that happen in the movie? Wasn't
14:18
Wasn't Vulcan destroyed? Was it Romulus
14:20
was destroyed? Yeah, Vulcan was also
14:22
destroyed Yeah,
14:25
it's canon. Yeah, so this is how
14:27
it happens. Their active volcano's on Venus
14:29
Now it's long believed that the surface
14:31
of Venus isn't volcanically active. We got
14:33
NASA's Magellan mission that went to Venus
14:36
it used Radar to
14:38
scan the surface of Venus and
14:40
it didn't find any active volcanoes,
14:42
but not so fast researchers
14:44
have been looking through the data returned
14:47
by the Magellan spacecraft very carefully and
14:50
Fortunately, it took a bunch of images
14:52
over the course of several years from
14:54
1990 to 1992 and
14:56
an image many places on the surface
14:59
of Venus multiple times and so if
15:01
there was some kind of volcanic eruption
15:03
then they would be able to see
15:05
the changes and Upon
15:07
careful inspection and by comparing the data
15:09
sets over those multiple years Scientists
15:12
have actually found evidence of active volcanism
15:14
on the surface of Venus So there's
15:16
two regions where they found that vents
15:18
were releasing lava out onto the surface
15:20
of Venus and it was creating
15:23
lava flows between 3 and
15:25
20 meters deep across dozens
15:27
of hectares on the surface of
15:29
Venus and So
15:32
actually it turns out Venus is a lot
15:34
more active than we thought I'm gonna talk
15:36
some more about Venus at the end of
15:38
this Episode so stay tuned for that and
15:40
speaking of Venus We've learned
15:42
that the Japanese Space Agency has lost
15:44
contact with their Akatsuki mission This was
15:46
the only operational mission that we had
15:49
at Venus right now It was a
15:51
300 million dollar mission that
15:53
the Japanese Space Agency sent to explore and
15:55
understand the cloud tops of Venus and Unfortunately,
15:58
it failed to be able
16:00
to make its original orbital insertion. But then the
16:03
folks at JAXA were able to use a
16:05
bunch of gravitational sling shots and five years
16:07
later it was able to limp
16:10
finally into the orbit of Venus and perform
16:12
a lot of observations and send home what
16:14
I think are some of the most beautiful
16:16
images of the cloud tops
16:18
of Venus. And unfortunately this week JAXA
16:21
told that they have lost contact with the
16:23
spacecraft. They're gonna attempt to restore contact but
16:25
don't be surprised if this is the last
16:27
week year of it. But like I said
16:30
I'm gonna check some more about this at the
16:32
end of this episode. Now I try to
16:35
wrap up these episodes with a really cool
16:37
picture or video and today I'm able to
16:39
give you both. So first let's take a
16:41
look at a really cool image that comes
16:43
from James Webb. This is of the dwarf
16:45
galaxy NGC 4449 and this is an example
16:49
of a starburst galaxy. In other
16:51
words it's a galaxy that is
16:53
undergoing an intense amount of star
16:55
formation. You can see that at
16:57
the center you've got all of the
16:59
stars and then surrounding that just these
17:01
giant clouds of gas and dust which
17:04
are the fuel for this galaxy. And
17:06
you don't normally get a starburst galaxy
17:08
without some kind of event happening. So
17:10
it's believed that this galaxy either merged
17:12
with another one or came too close
17:14
in some kind of tidal interaction with
17:16
another galaxy and that kicked off this
17:18
era of star formation. And then a
17:21
video of flying
17:23
over the Niele-Fosse region
17:25
on Mars. And
17:27
this was made based on orbital
17:29
imagery from Esa's Mars
17:32
Express mission which has been there forever
17:34
and has taken a lot of really
17:36
high resolution images of the surface of
17:38
Mars. And. Then they were able to
17:41
turn that into this sort of virtual
17:43
flyover above Mars. The region is called
17:45
Niele-Fosse and it comprises parallel trenches that
17:48
are hundreds of meters deep across the
17:50
surface beside a massive impact crater.. And
17:52
In fact, these trenches are known as
17:54
Grabbin where you've got the ground in
17:57
between two faults fractures up and breaks
17:59
apart. Hard and you get these
18:01
your slumping and trenches and really
18:03
interesting terrain and so to shows
18:05
you that more as a lot
18:07
of really fascinating place is it
18:09
need to explore Now you're watching
18:11
this video. But right now I'm
18:13
writing my weekly email newsletter. I
18:15
do every Friday and I send
18:17
it out sort of at the
18:19
end of the day and in
18:21
a were reporting on half dozen
18:23
to ten interesting story here in
18:25
Space Bite but we cover many
18:28
many more dozens and dozens stories
18:30
on universities and I write them
18:32
up for the news or gonna
18:34
get to the great overview of
18:36
every recovering on university. It's definitely
18:38
sign up for my weekly email
18:40
newsletter to see give you some
18:42
examples of what recovery are you
18:44
member of the announcement of Dyson
18:46
Spheres? Well there's a more boring
18:48
explanation for what might cause. Some
18:50
starlings can be surprisingly bright if
18:52
you're a pilot. And.
18:54
How much water would a self sustaining
18:56
moon base require? Soaked fine
18:58
of the answers to all that you get
19:00
to subscribe to the newsletter. The newsletter go
19:02
though to more than seventy thousand of my
19:05
close friends. It's completely free. I. Write
19:07
every word you can unsubscribe if you
19:09
don't like it for whatever reason. So
19:11
go ahead, go to Universe to the
19:13
the com sessions or two hundred smell.
19:15
Like I said, I want a couple
19:17
Venus some more. But first or think
19:19
our patrons sixty eight Kings of Andrew
19:21
Gross David Gilson in in a suburb
19:23
doesn't cable gerrymandered Timber Durden, Young Stossel
19:25
Mods or Paul Robach Stephen Curry's hockey
19:27
team follow him on the and flagship.
19:29
Linda support us at the Master of
19:31
Universal and all over the supporters on
19:33
Patriot. When. i think about
19:35
the work that's being done on
19:37
venus this other reporting on this
19:39
week about potential active volcanism i
19:41
think about that fleet of spacecraft
19:43
that are on their way to
19:45
venus over the next decade we've
19:47
got two missions coming from nasa
19:49
de vinci plus in their tests
19:51
and so for example when you
19:53
had that ground radar scan the
19:55
came from the magellan missions or
19:57
have a much higher resolution version
20:00
of that from one of those missions. And
20:02
when you think about that scanning of the
20:04
surface of Venus from the Magellan mission, we're
20:06
going to get a much higher resolution version
20:09
of that. And so we're also going to
20:11
be able to compare the original surface features
20:13
back in 1990, 1992 to
20:17
the surface today. And so hopefully with
20:19
artificial intelligence, with various techniques, they should
20:21
be able to spot all of the
20:23
weird new stuff that's appeared on the
20:25
surface of Venus. We're getting a much
20:27
better understanding of the atmosphere of Venus.
20:29
We're going to search for the
20:31
conditions of life in
20:33
the atmosphere of Venus. So
20:36
many missions, two missions from NASA, one mission
20:38
from the European Space Agency, the Indians are
20:40
sending a mission and there's going to be
20:43
a private mission going to Venus in probably
20:45
first compared to all of the other missions. And
20:48
so Venus is going to go from
20:50
this world that has just been chronically,
20:53
tragically, underexplored to a place that's going
20:55
to feel as vibrant and scientifically exciting
20:58
as what we've seen on
21:00
Mars. So stay tuned, get
21:02
ready for just an avalanche
21:04
of cool new space science that's
21:06
going to be coming from Venus over
21:09
the next decade or so.
21:11
All right, we'll see you next week.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More