Podchaser Logo
Home
The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

Released Wednesday, 24th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

The Honesty of Our Economy with Allison Schrager

Wednesday, 24th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The future of America is

0:03

in your hands. This

0:05

is not a movie trailer and

0:08

it's not a political ad, but

0:10

it is a call to action.

0:12

I'm Mila Utmost and I'm passionate

0:14

about unlocking the power of everyday

0:16

citizens. On our podcast Future Hindsight

0:18

We take big ideas about civic

0:20

life and democracy and turned them

0:22

into action items for you and

0:24

me. Every Thursday we talked about

0:26

activists and civic innovators to help

0:28

you understand your power. And your

0:31

power to change the status quo.

0:33

Find out that future hindsight.com or

0:35

wherever you listen to podcasts. Hey

0:40

I am. Air and Haynes, the

0:42

host of The Amendment, a brand new

0:44

weekly podcast on gender politics empower, brought

0:46

to you by the Nineteenth News and

0:49

Wonder Media Network. You've probably heard the

0:51

news that this election year, our democracy

0:53

is at stake. Only amendment I'm breaking

0:55

down with that actually means specifically for

0:57

the March. Last folks who depend on

1:00

democracy the most. This.

1:02

Is a show that daf pass the headlines

1:04

and gets clear on the unfinished. Work of

1:07

our democracy. Was. Into

1:09

the Moment Now wherever you get your

1:11

podcast. Growth.

1:14

Become so much more important if you have been aging

1:16

society. Because society is will get

1:18

or if we don't have productivity. Increases

1:20

like productivity increases can make up for

1:23

a smaller population. You can stop positive

1:25

Gdp. Growth if you become more productive and

1:27

we're going to need that if we have. Fewer

1:29

people to do stuff as is it are. living

1:31

standards will start to really decrease if we don't

1:33

find a way to sort of continue to grow

1:36

in. we have fewer people. What

1:40

could go right? I'm

1:42

Zachary Care About the founder of The

1:45

Progress Network, joined as always by my

1:47

co host Emo Barber Lucas, the Executive

1:49

Director of The Progress That Work and

1:51

What Could Go Right is our weekly

1:54

podcast in conjunction with our weekly newsletter,

1:56

What you Go Right please scurry to

1:58

your computer and side. For the newsletter,

2:00

it's free. it's weekly. It's a good dose of

2:02

things that are going on in the world that

2:04

you may not have. Paid attention to

2:07

our attention had not been drawn

2:09

to that. Are. Going right

2:11

in the world. In a world where

2:13

we do tend to focus when we

2:15

focus on the news, And. The

2:17

news tends to be what's going wrong and what

2:19

are the crises are one of the challenges are

2:22

one of the problems. That. Accentuated

2:24

in an election year which we are

2:26

in in the United States and Sat

2:28

on the World is in an election

2:30

year. More people would get to the

2:32

polls and twenty twenty four. In

2:35

aggregate, democratically than has ever happened

2:37

ever in human history. That's.

2:39

Probably. A. Good thing and

2:41

should certainly be seen as a good

2:43

thing. Even of the results don't always

2:45

please everyone. Democracy.

2:47

Is after all a constant process

2:49

of that some part of the

2:51

population. Getting. What they want and

2:54

another part of the population not getting

2:56

what they want. There is no way

2:58

around that in a democracy is really

3:00

no way around that and life. Anyway,

3:03

Every week we try to look at. Different

3:06

issues: culture, politics, Economics,

3:08

International Relations and. Talk.

3:11

To people who has. Unique

3:13

perspectives on what's going on in the

3:15

world. Many of those people are members

3:17

of the progress that are. Many.

3:19

Are not and not all of them think that things

3:21

are going right and sat many of them are focused

3:24

on all the things that are going wrong. We.

3:26

Are not attempting in this to pretend that

3:28

there is not much that's going wrong and.

3:30

We. Want to talk about issues that

3:32

are animating people? One. Of the

3:35

issues that is admitting everyone in Twenty

3:37

Twenty Four, whether it's in the United

3:39

States or elsewhere, Is. The

3:41

Cost of living, The role of government,

3:43

The problem of inflation, What?

3:45

Inflation is going to be whether or not we

3:47

are going to be able to meet our needs

3:50

commensurate with what the price of things that we

3:52

need. Is and what, Income

3:54

we are earning. And.

3:57

The. Other questions of like what exactly

3:59

is this. We call economy

4:01

doing. Is one of the

4:03

great debates of our time, particularly given that most

4:05

people. Have a different personal sensibility

4:07

about what's going on economically them with

4:09

the data is telling us or he.

4:12

Many. People in many parts of the world

4:14

think things are quite bad economically. And

4:16

the economic data that we use as

4:19

a gauge is telling us that things

4:21

are quite good economically. And. There

4:23

is a huge gap there that

4:25

remains unanswered and hard to explain.

4:28

So. We're going to talk to someone today who

4:30

has. Unique. Insight into

4:33

his question. Emma.

4:36

Tell. Us are in the talked to today. Such

4:38

a hammer and talk to our and

4:40

trigger She's an economist and also senior

4:42

fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Writing has

4:44

appeared lotta different places that right now

4:47

she is a calmness for Bloomberg and

4:49

also writes for a City Journal. She's

4:51

also the author of a book called

4:53

and Economists walks into a Brothel If

4:55

she's the cofounder of the Life Cycle

4:57

Finance Partners which is at risk advisory

5:00

firm sorry ready to go with Lum

5:02

Als and for her with them yes.

5:04

We are. Awesome!

5:06

Show your what a pleasure to be having this conversation

5:08

with. Your least I assume it's going to be a

5:10

pleasure to have the conversation there were about our with

5:12

you. You. Are one of the

5:15

more eclectic, unique, unusual voices talking

5:17

about all things economic. For your

5:19

calls for Bloomberg and City Journal,

5:21

you also one of the unequivocally

5:24

best or titles of the past.

5:26

Decade. Plus that I can. Remember of

5:29

an economist walks into a brothel,

5:31

which is just such a delicious

5:33

title for a book. He did

5:35

a piece recently. On.

5:37

The. Negative economic long term consequences of

5:40

kids living with their parents. Movie expand on

5:42

that one cause I thought that is a

5:44

perfect interest in of all things Allison. Ah

5:47

thank you suspend words as do the column

5:49

to Bloomberg about finance set talk and are

5:51

not surprised by a couple things about it.

5:53

One that I'm not on tic tacs, I

5:56

don't consume it often, but I was shocked

5:58

the financial advice is not terrorists. He

6:00

was actually a pretty standard personal finance advice

6:02

and in fact, Maybe more digestible. easier to

6:04

understand the normal check that your for one

6:06

second you're not on to talk because you're

6:09

against tic toc or you just down to

6:11

talk because you're not on to. Talk to

6:13

the ball. I mean, I am against it, but

6:15

I'm probably not against it. is I'm not on

6:17

it if I liked it and. Enjoyed it

6:19

as like twitter. I'd probably be like,

6:21

you know, It's not so bad but I'm

6:23

not on anyway so the to be against

6:26

it that's how I feel. I'm on to

6:28

talk and I love it. I've for personal

6:30

finance for every the he says yeah if

6:32

I was loving I'd probably rationalize everything but

6:34

because I'm not unlike is evil and is

6:36

corrupting the of but at least with Tic

6:38

tac steered me towards with as algorithms was

6:40

actually pretty reasonable. Blaze losing a shock me

6:42

about it was because talking about living at

6:44

home as a viable financial strategy or what

6:47

you are living at home this is I

6:49

do things this is a normal thing and

6:51

I'd look again and. I knew there's a

6:53

the upshot people living at home during the pandemic

6:55

but it's been trending up for a while and

6:57

it struck me it it was a tick tock

6:59

that this is a social norm now not everyone's

7:01

living at home but assault weird or a source

7:03

of shame to as opposed to what I was

7:05

in my twenties. this would have been only something

7:08

that happens at your life fall apart, you lost

7:10

your job, he got a divorce and you definitely

7:12

have had a a lot of issues on the

7:14

dating market but now assists lifestyle. financial choice that

7:16

seems totally acceptable and some ways I think about

7:18

on like I would have saved a lot of

7:20

money I guess if I didn't pay. All that

7:22

money for this terrible partners I had in

7:25

my twenties. But if you at home then

7:27

why don't you look they're perceived money. I

7:29

would have thought that was the same way.

7:31

I guess people live at home in Europe

7:33

for a long time or people blood omen

7:35

to they sort of their own families for

7:37

most of time. But it does seem to

7:40

me that striking out in your own is

7:42

an important part of adultery. Making rent know

7:44

big motivator to brush your career forward and

7:46

just general independence and risk taking. It seems

7:48

like something's being lost their or it's a

7:50

sign of people not really fully. Individuated are

7:52

being willing to take risk as at

7:54

my university board meeting and a new

7:56

theory was floated that I have No,

7:58

this is true, Because I don't like

8:01

to generalize too much as every generation has

8:03

a lot of different viewpoints and preferences that

8:05

universities get a lot of flak from investing

8:07

and really fancy dorm rooms. Because we were

8:10

in college, we lived not squalor. But it

8:12

wasn't exactly nice you at several people in a

8:14

room. easier to phone. In a bathroom and rooms

8:16

read that? Nice. They're like cinder block and kind

8:18

of dark. But. Now is like people

8:20

to live in really nice dorms or then

8:23

the apartments they can afford. You probably aren't

8:25

that great so living at home at also

8:27

be compelling because he can still live in

8:29

a nice place and the idea that you

8:31

live in a terrible partly with lots are

8:33

in it's just not a place you would

8:35

pay for. Independence is just feels not worth

8:37

it ends. There does seem like an important

8:39

cultural shift in terms of ambition and receiving,

8:41

although I guess we'll see how it plays

8:43

out what percentage of millennials his arm and

8:45

a so that it was rising but is

8:48

it as significant portion of the population. So

8:50

for men is a bow twenty

8:52

percent and burrow women is a

8:54

bow thirteen. Twelve and a half

8:56

percent is have a higher than

8:58

I was expecting mean how messy?

9:00

Think that's related to the general

9:02

story that we hear about owning

9:04

particularly Millennials and Jen see that

9:06

the of for an economic costs

9:08

of becoming a dollar the United

9:10

States are so high. That. It's

9:12

just not possible. Meaning the rents are

9:15

so high health so high College is

9:17

so high and it's just like Canada

9:19

Albatross around those two generations next. Well,

9:21

there's some validity to I mean first

9:23

of all, the health care costs I

9:25

don't buy because I mean you can

9:28

be. On your parents healthcare well in your twenties.

9:30

Now true, and even this student loan stuff.

9:32

I don't really buy that either. and in

9:34

this true that he will. They have much

9:36

more student loan debt than before, but I

9:39

mean, if you have a student loan that's

9:41

correlated with higher earnings so I'm not sure

9:43

that's the reason why. Also, and in obliteration

9:45

of these income based repayment plan ensure that

9:48

you can also pay rent and pay a

9:50

student loans. So I'm not entirely says it

9:52

is. It is true rents are higher and

9:54

significantly higher than they used to be, but

9:56

you have options You other than living with

9:59

your parents, you. Live with roommates are like

10:01

not live in a nice. Apartment or a move

10:03

in it's cheaper area a. Think. It's just

10:05

different norm that it wouldn't been an option for

10:07

me when I was young. Despite whenever financial situation

10:09

I was in. I just would have found a

10:11

way to live on my own because I just

10:14

would have been embarrassed. And now people are. And

10:16

again, maybe there's some advantages to that. I'm indecisive.

10:18

Be close to your parents when they do have

10:20

families. Maybe they'll be close your parents. There has

10:22

to be more involved. There's all sorts of evidence

10:24

that's a nice thing, but I think they're also

10:27

definitely. Gonna be downsized. This kind of

10:29

sideways and to another piece you wrote

10:31

recently about taking on the issue of

10:33

wages have been rising. Some was in

10:35

step with inflation going on which is

10:37

one of the push back for people

10:40

who are say hey, the economy's better

10:42

than people feel. Heroines focus on headline

10:44

inflation numbers. They don't focus as much

10:46

on the degree to which their wages

10:48

have gone up. An easterner the peace

10:50

saying it makes total sense of people

10:53

would simultaneously benefit from rising wages and

10:55

be upset about rising inflation. Some. Of

10:57

you expand a little. Been on that. He

10:59

are so I this is I

11:01

guess or what a financial economists

11:03

had called disconnect between macro and

11:05

finance a whole central premise of

11:07

financial markets. And how acid surprise

11:09

is that people are for or

11:12

don't like risk a whiskey stream

11:14

of income. All else being

11:16

equal is not as desirable as

11:18

usher stream. Of income and you will pay more

11:20

for that sir stream of income and we just sort of.

11:22

This is that of under her. It's. All financial

11:24

theory. So if you think about what it's

11:26

like when you're in a high inflation or

11:29

volatile inflation environment, Or. You just have

11:31

a big bump of inflation you don't know up

11:33

prices are going to be effectively. That turns your

11:35

income into a much. Risk your income. Though

11:37

point of income is what you can buy with it. So.

11:40

Every financial transaction or it sort of consumer

11:42

transaction you're having has a level of risk

11:44

in it. So even if you had a

11:46

real wage increase in risk adjusted terms is

11:49

what we would say it could still feel

11:51

like a decrease is. you know how all

11:53

this uncertainty like you to think the last

11:55

couple years eggs were like seven dollars and

11:57

they were three dollars in the two dollars

11:59

and is. No see as the said

12:01

a lot of volatility and sort of

12:03

consumer goods particularly around groceries. I also

12:05

wrote about how well grocery prices having

12:08

coming down quite a bit. And.

12:10

Are now like at a red blood

12:12

have fleet decent level deflation. Because.

12:14

The dining out is still high. A high

12:17

badly? Sure, it's still like five percent. And

12:19

and in. Is the new really

12:21

sooner happened the last couple decades as dining out

12:24

became a very said a big part of people's

12:26

lives of all income levels at a Good

12:28

Now accounts like fifty percent of food spending a

12:30

least going into the pandemic. So.

12:32

I mean this is also something as important

12:35

people's quality of life and things like that

12:37

are still very expensive. So I think it's

12:39

not surprising that you can have a real

12:41

wage increase that keeps and lamp inflation. but

12:43

if you're it exposed to more risk and

12:45

uncertainty, you're still gonna feel worse off. Not.

12:48

To mention that the things that matter to

12:50

your quality of life are still really expensive.

12:52

Always, you're going to make people unhappy and

12:54

I think that's understandable. Oh, it's remarkable how

12:57

fast sense yes to eating out. not as

12:59

a luxury item, but as an expected part

13:01

of everyday life happened because I am and

13:03

when I was growing up, we never ate

13:05

out. I mean, it was extremely rare. Yeah,

13:07

any thoughts on that, How quick that was?

13:10

Yeah, I mean I there. There's others. the

13:12

series like The Rise of Fast Casual is

13:14

one. and just as a said, like all

13:16

of this Liberation of sort of. Cheaper

13:18

restaurants, And you know,

13:20

maybe that wasn't good Because you know

13:23

we definitely. Got fatter and you know it's

13:25

good that already to home probably healthier. But.

13:28

You know I. I think we can deny that people find

13:30

it convenient and they like eating. Out I opened this

13:32

column or as if a Bloomberg and much

13:34

you know they indulged some taxi cab recording

13:36

which I he but I couldn't help myself

13:38

is a cannibal what city I was in.

13:41

Fenugreek. Driver: Who is this

13:43

Like Young? you know? I mean my wife and I's

13:45

always been very like secret Us that we have the

13:47

state. Eight once a week where we got like burger in a

13:49

beer. I've nothing fancy. I'm not trying

13:51

to invoke Pile Bass or David Brooks

13:53

about like ridiculous still had at a.

13:56

Or at are really isn't. This is just like

13:58

a normal guy. Who. You know

14:00

would go to help or burger in a beer with his

14:02

wife once a week in. This is very important to them

14:04

as is very. Like and their quality of life. And.

14:06

He's like it was forty dollars. now is eighty

14:09

and they still do it. but it's like kind

14:11

of the big financial strain. And.

14:13

His his address or inflation is still going up

14:15

so. You. Know before and in couple decades

14:17

ago maybe they would only do a date like

14:19

once every six months. The doing it once a week

14:21

has become like a thing for them and it's important

14:24

to them And now is feel. That a rich

14:26

or definitely bigger financial strain. So.

14:28

I don't think it's shocking that he would still be

14:30

upset about inflation, even if you've been told all the

14:32

time. Well, In. Over prices have gone

14:35

up like why are you complaining I've

14:37

spoken a lot over the years audiences

14:39

and tried to give some sense of

14:41

you can simultaneously be Shoes were discontent.

14:44

With. Your economic system in the

14:46

presence. And recognized

14:48

how dramatically. At

14:50

least in the material terms, things have improved

14:52

over whatever the past hundred years level and

14:54

the past one. It. Like that

14:57

that present tense discontent. With.

14:59

What rewards and or the lack

15:01

of them are. And

15:04

recognize change. Everyday work on this

15:06

or of people day work on

15:08

this or people cognitively able. collectively.

15:11

Are individually to step back and go? Oh

15:13

right on. Now eating out once a week.

15:15

I used to eat out every six months.

15:18

But. My once a week of more expensive than a was.

15:20

Two years ago but I'm still doing

15:22

a more than I was twenty years

15:24

ago. Like are people susceptible to and

15:26

a good way? that kind of toggling

15:28

between the bigger picture trend and the

15:30

immediacy think so. I haven't done any

15:32

rigorous work on it so I can't

15:34

like site any research or as as

15:37

the that reddit but. Ah,

15:39

think people willing if irregardless research

15:41

where the criteria for making Profound

15:43

and Conan the same as on

15:45

podcasts and television. There.

15:47

Be a lot of. Dead. Their time.

15:49

Yeah, so I'm I'm just gonna make

15:51

stuff up anecdotally. I'll see people do

15:54

that. awareness. Of what things were like twenty years

15:56

ago. I give anything you hear people

15:58

all the time talking about how much worse

16:00

things are as is the eighties were like

16:02

some like wonderful time like people don't remember

16:05

what the ease were like. I mean I

16:07

wasn't very old them but. I don't

16:09

remember them being back re I mean he did

16:11

not have any giggled air conditioning. And

16:13

you know we did have like

16:16

fools a you know it is

16:18

a curse were that safe. You

16:34

still gotta remember to prefer your

16:36

safety belt yourselves. Could learn a

16:38

lot from a dummy for your

16:41

safety belts. I mean it it was

16:43

better than of the safety is so like we are

16:45

happy because we like progress. So this is a lot

16:47

with a retirement as people had this like golden era

16:49

of retirement in their head. Were. Allegedly

16:51

everyone had this like wonderful rich defined

16:53

benefit plan, but I bet that never

16:55

happened Like people sort of sort of

16:57

romanticize the past and don't really realize

17:00

like things weren't not every any. I

17:02

think it's hard to argue that quality

17:04

of life now is worse than it

17:06

was in the eighties for I seem

17:08

to read a team articles. Claiming.

17:10

That things are worse and every way when

17:12

they seem to be better to be in

17:14

every way and any maybe there's a reason

17:16

for that needy. you know there's something evolutionary

17:18

reason to have humans always be. Striving.

17:21

For more. I mean, as

17:23

there's one thing that's been remarkable about

17:25

humankind's, and particularly since the Industrial Revolution,

17:27

Is. The sort of dramatic increases and

17:30

quality of life that has unfolded. Even.

17:32

In our lifetime and maybe that comes from

17:34

this constant feeling of not feel like things

17:36

are good. Nothing they should be better. I

17:39

mean I I think about forget. Asking

17:41

people to be a comprehensive about what the

17:43

data was like in eighties people are and

17:45

comprehensive with a bad as like. Now now

17:48

see how he said. people I care about

17:50

data is there. I find it difficult. For.

17:52

A lot of things to like. really get a clear picture

17:55

what's going. On yeah it is. and maybe

17:57

maybe we're meant to be unsatisfied and that's

17:59

healthy. can. That pushes us or more to

18:01

the greatest. And ten that wouldn't

18:03

be good. I mean it's It's like the D

18:05

Growth Earth the you know they're just like we've

18:07

had enough growth. We. Don't need to grow

18:09

more A find that more destructive and they

18:12

sort of toxic. Then. The while

18:14

you know things. Should be better than they

18:16

are people. Are the on that the

18:18

grocer question? One there somewhere

18:20

moralistic aspect of growth as destroy

18:23

is destroying the planet, material and

18:25

climate illogically and therefore. There.

18:28

Should be d Growth because it's growth

18:30

has been harmful or it is beginning

18:32

to consume. The. Very resource that we

18:34

need to continue growing a do as at on

18:36

that is. It is a kind of of. Relevant

18:39

one for the next ten to

18:41

twenty years that in large swaths

18:43

of the world right Japan, Korea,

18:45

China of Germany, England Population the

18:47

strike and we were in of

18:49

aging population than that of declining

18:51

population Should there be economic growth.

18:54

For. Declining aging population other systemically are

18:56

normal emitting fewer people presumably consume less

18:58

than. This is a totally separate question

19:00

to the do you are others who

19:03

are same? There should not be growth

19:05

because it's bad, Morally because we're destroying

19:07

the planet. Or. Because it's

19:09

leading us into a consumer culture that

19:11

removing us from the spiritual can activity

19:14

or though larger issues of life. I'm

19:16

just asking the question of in a

19:18

system where there's fewer people with fewer

19:21

material needs, why should there be growth?

19:23

I mean we still won a improving

19:25

it like improving life, improving prosperity and

19:27

am in until the degraders if. We

19:30

wanna that the definition. Of productivity.

19:32

Is. Using our existing resources more efficiently

19:34

and we wanna set of healthy environment Growth

19:37

is and for and could become so much

19:39

more important if you have an aging. Society.

19:41

Because society is will get were if

19:44

we don't have productivity. Increases like productivity

19:46

increases can make up for a smaller

19:48

population. You can still a positive gdp

19:50

growth. Is. He become more productive.

19:52

And. We're going to neither if we have

19:55

fewer people to do stuff as is it are living.

19:57

Standards will start to really decrease if

19:59

we don't. Find a way to sort of

20:01

continue to grow in we have fewer people. It's

20:03

only good for the environment is good for our

20:05

quality. Of life. I mean especially as we're all getting

20:07

old. I mean, innovations gonna be in poor and. We're.

20:10

Gonna needs that of different ways of technology to help

20:12

take care of us to and. Hopefully.

20:14

Live even longer. And. Sort of

20:16

live events that have higher quality. Think of

20:18

like what how old's your grandparents seems like

20:20

in their seventies vs people their seventies now

20:23

but it is true and a lot away

20:25

as improving our quality of life improving. Part

20:27

of Mississippi, economic growth is our best shot. To

20:29

me Fab. On. Facts: as as a

20:32

massive ted talk turned right now that

20:34

talks about how slowly Millennials are aging

20:36

compared to their forebears. So I like

20:38

to say that it's just like words

20:40

getting healthier. Blaze you say we're living

20:42

longer lives. And of course it does

20:45

bring issues as you're bringing up the on how. Are we

20:47

going to pay for everybody? But I.

20:49

Wanted. To. Talk about like

20:51

illuminate a show mod. I have see it.

20:53

I wasn't old enough to see my advice

20:55

eclipse of It. A

20:57

fee or other with forty seven. She.

21:00

Looks so oh yeah there's a massive that

21:02

you're going around on sept often as there

21:04

right now where someone brings up the cast

21:06

of two years there were supposed to be

21:08

like thirty years old and they look like

21:10

someone even imagine Fisa years old now. Yeah,

21:13

I've been easy like or as was

21:15

I'm James Bond villain was it's like

21:17

looked like he was about seventy five

21:19

and they're like is forty two. I

21:21

mean like of with weatherspoon like fifty

21:23

and she looks great. Everybody

21:33

I'm Skyscrapers and Emery saliva through the

21:36

hosts. A political breakdown or show that

21:38

pulls back the curtain on the people

21:40

and forces driving politics in the Golden

21:42

State. From Kid Cudi in San Francisco.

21:46

And now ahead of the Twenty

21:48

Twenty Four election, we are bringing

21:50

you even more more conversations with

21:52

the top movers and shakers that

21:54

the state capital and in national

21:56

politics. With the dyslexia was the greatest gift that

21:58

a rapid me nothing was road. Nothing was linear.

22:00

I had a work around. Thanks! Work differently.

22:03

See the world differently. can I? Say that

22:05

he can keep on. Faith know how

22:07

important your participation it and I

22:09

think it's a time for this

22:12

generation of afford divorces more. Reporting.

22:14

With analysis. Been a very good

22:16

session for organized labor, but I'm Labor Summer

22:18

Hot labor summer. It's turn out to be

22:21

a nice fall as well more. Politics

22:23

with Personality. Us: What Election Day My

22:25

entire life. We we

22:27

hear that political breakdown daily. Every

22:30

week they will break down what's happening

22:32

and why it matters. With news

22:34

that informs surprises and maybe

22:36

even inspires you, Political breakdown

22:39

goes daily starting January. History

22:49

doesn't repeat itself, but it off and

22:52

Ryan's. That maybe a Mark Twain

22:54

curb but assesses to today's when he recently

22:56

said at my history can beat up your

22:58

politics is the podcast The comparison contrasts history

23:01

to the current events at Today post Bruce

23:03

Cars and has recently done deep dives on

23:05

fascinating topics. I to follow the Soviet Union

23:07

which sets the stage for today's geopolitics, the

23:10

man who was in prison and still won

23:12

a million votes for the presidency and the

23:14

mystery behind George Washington's involvement or lack thereof

23:16

and a bill of Rights. My

23:18

his say can be if your politics offers

23:21

the contacts the all these historic stories especially

23:23

those that you may think you know wealth

23:25

and is particularly adept ever leading them to

23:27

current events. Sit on this out, listen to

23:29

my history, can beat up your Paul Sex

23:31

on all platforms. The

23:38

House. I want the as you in particular

23:40

about Social Security because it's definitely in

23:42

the news right now. With a presidential

23:44

election coming up. There seems to be

23:46

this fear that it's about to combust,

23:48

but she had it. In. One of

23:50

your retirement. Mets and a call know you are

23:52

not and an hour was actually south. Towards

23:55

the good news about Social Security. Or.

23:57

I don't think it's going anywhere. I

24:00

mean, first of all, worst case scenario, we just

24:02

sort of. Let. Like don't do

24:04

anything that would be a twenty two across

24:06

the board. Benefit cause for everyone, which wouldn't

24:08

be bad. I don't think we should do that at

24:11

all that as. A lot better. Than.

24:14

So security like going bus to not

24:16

getting anything. And I don't

24:18

think l a half and I feel like when you

24:20

look at pensions. Sickly. State pensions they

24:22

somehow always get paid in a we might

24:24

like to fall on bond holders will certainly

24:27

cut services to younger people that pensions though

24:29

he somehow get paid his. Older

24:31

people have a powerful and. Know and

24:33

like see them get their pensions cut so I think we'll find

24:35

a way. The question is are we going to find a

24:37

good way to do it? And are we gonna. Do.

24:40

It in a way that like most efficient like

24:42

as the said they. Are we gonna spend

24:44

more than we need you to fix it? And I

24:46

think that's a question and I are not her and

24:48

at all by that. Political. Debates on

24:50

it now I feel a the conversations that a terrible.

24:53

But. I am optimistic that people.

24:55

Get their money is just gonna be

24:57

more expensive. And that messy ends are

25:00

unpleasant. The that cincy. So. That are

25:02

two main things going on. One is and we

25:04

talked about this would be doing our podcast and

25:06

I figured you refer to on this. Whether

25:08

you call the vibe session and the disconnect

25:10

between. A How people feel

25:12

the same we call the economy is doing

25:15

and what our data says the economy's doing.

25:17

I said there's a huge. To.

25:19

Divide their but there's also a covert

25:22

some a scrambled a lot of macro

25:24

economic assumptions about spending about what the

25:26

effects will be. You know

25:28

they're stored. Completely. Unresolved I

25:30

imagine will continue to be unresolved

25:33

debate about was there. A

25:35

tipping point of all the spending that

25:37

was.and. Twenty Twenty And Twenty Twenty One.

25:39

And in Detroit to. Was.

25:42

The massive amount of spending and twenty

25:44

twenty not inflationary but the spending of

25:46

of the use inflation reduction out which

25:48

wasn't very about inflation at all it

25:50

was about climate change. That. Was

25:52

too much. Was. The

25:55

spike in inflation? Actually transitory except the

25:57

problem using the were trying to tourists.

26:00

No. One ever defined exactly how long transitory as

26:02

I'm in. Life. As transitory, right?

26:04

everything is transitory. Some. It's. The.

26:06

Matter what, your. Your. Your time frame

26:09

is. So. In a

26:11

in a completely like big picture

26:13

way. Given. That governments that

26:15

more money and twenty twenty into twenty two

26:17

than had been spent certainly in the entirety

26:19

of whatever we call the new deal? Some

26:21

more more keynesian spending than ever Before that

26:23

a flurry lifted people out of poverty. It

26:26

had an inflationary effect, but maybe the of

26:28

I share fight was just as a result

26:30

of like a lot of money before people

26:32

could spend it on what do you make

26:34

of all this? Did it? Did it show

26:36

the government's could spend more money they're spending

26:38

and we should be worrying so much about

26:40

spending. Did it proves that governments spend too

26:42

much Or traits of ice and. I I don't

26:45

know I was. Is there? Is there ever going to be

26:47

any consensus of others? I think

26:49

there is a consensus about at least for

26:51

like credible people. Who. Know. Order

26:54

for it's it's. Complicated because inflation?

26:57

That a lot of father's. It

27:00

was. To. Some degree that kobe disruptions

27:02

and you know issues with the supply

27:04

chain that got resolved and taking the

27:06

hobby on and putting it back online.

27:08

And I think that. It was transitory

27:10

her read this. Guy. That I

27:12

think there was also a big piece of

27:14

inflation that was from government spending and inches

27:16

And Berman says as a two or three

27:19

percentage points of the eight percent inflation that

27:21

we had. Was. Due to government.

27:23

Spending so it out there. There are a lot

27:25

of different things going on at once. And

27:27

I see like honestly like a

27:29

monk. Like. A lot of economists

27:32

consensus about that. I mean, you have. You.

27:34

Know Olivier Blanchard who pandemic was a we

27:36

the spend. It's great being like you know

27:38

maybe we can and I think the spending

27:40

when a little out a control. This is

27:42

an easy. Democrats and Republicans Larry Summers. You

27:45

know it. Definitely was concerned about. This

27:47

I think a lot of economist do think it's

27:49

and I am among them was justified to do

27:51

a lot of spending. And twenty twenty I mean.

27:54

We. We shut down the economy and like

27:56

of unemployment was really high. And.

27:59

Ill eat. You do. To do something. And

28:01

financial markets where where we're freezing ends. I

28:03

even amount of to a fan but I

28:06

understand why that was done then. The.

28:08

Question is is: why are we still doing this And

28:10

Twenty Twenty One? Little on Twenty Twenty Two. And

28:12

particularly as a com is taking off while. we

28:15

were more fuel on out fire. So.

28:18

I think it gets confusing because

28:20

it's you. Can't just say inflation

28:22

was. All the government's fault it wasn't. An

28:25

easy he can't say. Inflation

28:27

of as completely transitory because it was.

28:30

It. It was a lot of different things going on

28:32

and I think what you have to do is sort of

28:34

separate them out. I think in general. People.

28:36

Get up to wake up. In a couple years

28:38

that we sort of the last ten years. So.

28:41

Lived in this world where there were no economic

28:43

trade off. And I think that's

28:45

what happens when you have effectively as your

28:47

rate environment is you don't he for rescue,

28:50

don't pay for capital. So. You

28:52

end up in a world where people think there's just no

28:54

trade off that you can spend as much as you want

28:56

and you don't have to pay for. That.

28:58

You know you should be able

29:00

to get upside without risk of

29:02

downsides. And. I think this is

29:04

became for pervasive and a lot of things.

29:06

It didn't last though I don't. Think we're

29:08

going back to zero rate environment. I see a

29:10

lot of consensus around that to be doubtful that that's

29:12

gonna happen. And if that's the

29:14

case then we do start having trade off than we

29:17

do see that. You. Know if you do

29:19

run up dead you know it does have an

29:21

impact on the economy is interest rates go up

29:23

and i can be contraction or or even if

29:25

you do wanna take you know have you know

29:27

higher wages and sort of take risk or have

29:29

higher as it returns you are going to have

29:31

to face downside risk. So. I

29:33

think people are. The vibe became

29:35

this. I sort of. So.

29:37

The idea that you know we can

29:39

do all these things and the there

29:41

was a free lunch everywhere. My my

29:43

colleague at Bloomberg just wrote a great

29:45

column I love that was called like

29:47

say it loud as a problem of

29:49

Neoliberal Usa How they this is the

29:51

non neoliberalism. The Statism is this idea

29:53

that a weekend just. Had. This

29:55

relaunch like the government can direct

29:58

resources. To. Into. The

30:00

it it lights and will have more growth. And

30:02

no downside risks to that. I said we

30:04

can stand without inflation or raising interest rates.

30:07

You can take risks and you will have

30:09

any downsides Any a new. I like Neoliberalism

30:11

he argues is always about acknowledging that there

30:13

were straight off and you know with we

30:15

have to sort of. The. Long run

30:17

be a little bit more prudent thoughtful that our

30:19

policies I think that era is coming to an

30:22

end. Not right now. we're still sort of living

30:24

in it. For. I think we definitely

30:26

see elements. That you know currently the high rate

30:28

environment that isn't going away suggest the best I can,

30:30

the sick or on forever. Thousand and One or

30:33

either tease out another piece of the economic

30:35

puzzle for me to. you're talking about how

30:37

inflation honey fathers and he can he to

30:39

tease out what caused what. Something. And

30:41

I have not been able to see you're out in

30:43

the posts coded environment and I'm not by any. Means

30:45

economics expert so it's might be

30:47

very obvious. Question is. All.

30:49

These are papers are coming out now that

30:52

wage growth sir skyrocketed between two thousand and

30:54

nineteen. and Twenty Twenty three, you know, is

30:56

used to be pretty stagnant outside. Ten Twelve

30:58

percent. What? Caused that.

31:01

Well. Again, Different fathers

31:03

I think. You. Know Twenty

31:05

nineteen, the Trump Trump era. I just

31:07

did this data thing for Bloomberg

31:09

and. But. It's from

31:12

regime. Actually it

31:14

was the only regime of all

31:16

the presidents since two thousand the

31:18

had positive wage growth for everybody.

31:20

all income levels mint not everyone

31:22

but like all income levels to

31:25

securely. Lower. Income people. Who. Hadn't

31:27

seen a lot of wage growth

31:29

in years now. I think

31:31

on the margin maybe the tax reform had

31:34

some benefit but I'm of the view that

31:36

was just together with different reasons for everything.

31:38

Most the reason was it is it a

31:40

really long time to kind of the financial

31:43

crisis. And I think trump had

31:45

some good timing. Of. Yeah.

31:47

Financial crisis. I think the economy had

31:49

finally recovered. I. Think a lot

31:51

of technology. Initially impasse id a higher

31:54

wage people. I think it started to

31:56

trickle down. Finally the lower wage people.

31:58

So I think people. The Hundred. We.

32:01

Saw just a lot about like just been timing

32:03

and I think on the margin I I think

32:05

the tax. That the tax reform to do some

32:07

nice things, but I think it was marginal

32:09

but useful. but. Really? Was just where

32:11

we were in the cycle. and then the pandemic came

32:13

and I feel like we're now and and. Into for

32:15

a very different economy. Where. Sears.

32:18

Just a real shortage of labor. Particularly low

32:20

skill labor. So. You're just making

32:22

a lot more money has there's not that many of

32:24

them and. Here's. A huge demand for

32:26

service jobs right now it I think that's why

32:29

people are putting. A lot now on immigration

32:31

sort of filling that whole, but still

32:33

not a not. The. Actually, since

32:35

the pandemic. Higher

32:37

and middle high. Earners haven't had

32:39

a huge wage increase. in fact, I think

32:42

they're sobbing Had a real reach decreased. But

32:44

we are seeing in the lower end us and

32:47

the wage. Gains Just I think discuss is a

32:49

shortage of their labour. Government

32:58

of Kenya pledged to and gender based

33:00

violence by Twenty Twenty Six. The.

33:02

Ministry of Health and Uganda is trying

33:04

to eradicate Yellow Fever. It's ambitious to

33:07

make these kinds of pledges, but it

33:09

is much harder to achieve this lofty

33:11

goals. Are these leaders really delivering on

33:13

his promises for women and girls? Tune

33:15

into a new season of the hidden

33:17

economics of remarkable Women. A podcast from

33:19

Foreign Policy As Reporters Across Africa Me

33:22

courageous woman holding leaders accountable and various

33:24

sectors including healthcare start ups and the

33:26

government listen to hit an economics of.

33:28

Remarkable Woman. wherever you get your

33:30

podcasts, Hey. It's mm

33:32

they say to learn something new every

33:34

day. It's those I spoke with.

33:36

So much to do in your daily life.

33:39

How are you going to make the time

33:41

to learn and say curious about our world?

33:43

Well, with everything everywhere daily you can easily.

33:45

Meet that goal and actual reality. Everything

33:48

Every daily is one the world's most

33:50

popular daily education podcast, and a top

33:52

three History podcast. About ten

33:54

minutes you can learn something new

33:57

everyday. so covers history, science, Yard,

33:59

Athena. Eccentric knowledge he has was

34:01

biographies from some of the world's most

34:03

interesting people. Fans. Of the

34:05

show are so passionate the universe He joined

34:07

the completion of club. The. Group of

34:09

dedicated listeners who have listened to every single

34:12

one of the shows more than a thousand

34:14

and counting. Episodes. All

34:16

the episodes are informative, interesting, and best

34:18

of all, Always under fifteen

34:20

minutes sick. I had learned something

34:22

new every single day with everything

34:25

everywhere daily. find it on Apple

34:27

podcasts. Modify or every get your

34:29

podcasts. Come

34:33

back to where we began to discuss of a

34:35

recent piece about. People. Can simultaneously

34:37

benefit from rising wages and

34:40

also legitimately be a discontent

34:42

with rising inflation. Nonetheless, it's.

34:45

Almost. Impossible have significantly rising

34:47

I wages and zero inflation

34:49

to the scobey a level

34:51

of inflation. Where.

34:55

He. Kind of go. This is a good say.

34:59

An end and zero inflation probably isn't a good

35:01

thing unless you are d gross or of or

35:03

if you believe that there should be no growth

35:06

because. You yes you could continue have

35:08

lots of productivity growth and low inflation. The.

35:10

Pride can have wage growth and low inflation

35:12

rate you know, lots of productivity and known

35:14

for his. And.

35:17

You. Know we could debate whether or not the

35:19

cost of capital of kept artificially low for the

35:21

ten years prior to the pandemic, or whether. It.

35:24

Was just a product to code technology and

35:26

globalization Worth. It cause. Of capitals

35:28

low because it was actually just while many not

35:30

because central banks from manipulating and it just. There's.

35:33

A lot of capital. Other so, it was a

35:35

cap on the we Live in a Soul a largely. Capital.

35:38

Rich world even with. Butter. Four

35:40

percent interest rates are than zero. We're not talking about

35:42

the Nineteen eighties. here. we're not. I'm of the Nineteen

35:44

seventies. Or for much of the time

35:46

before that a minute just rates are still historically

35:49

on the low end. Tried that sully, not anywhere

35:51

near. Liar. So.

35:53

Maybe this whole idea of we who did get back

35:55

to two percent inflation rate which is what the Fed

35:57

and all central by as well. We're saying. Maybe.

36:00

that's the wrong number. You know, maybe it's 4%. I

36:02

don't know but why isn't that

36:04

conversation being had more actively?

36:07

Like, there's

36:09

a normative sense of inflation is high

36:11

because that number with that we decided that

36:13

inflation should be is below

36:17

what it currently is. But

36:19

we just made that number up anyway. Yeah,

36:23

we did. I think we're starting to

36:26

have that conversation. I'm starting to notice that it's

36:28

going to take a couple more inflation reports. I

36:30

think the Fed is hoping it was going back

36:32

to 2 and now it seems to be stalling

36:34

out. And I personally don't see how

36:36

it goes down lower. Like, it was

36:38

going down because we had all these deflationary

36:40

forces partially from coming back online from COVID,

36:42

but we saw a lot of goods price

36:45

deflation. And I'm

36:47

not sure I see, but we still

36:49

had high service inflation, which

36:51

again, largely driven by wages and

36:53

things like that. So now

36:56

that goods price deflation has pretty much moderated,

36:58

we still have the high service inflation. So

37:00

I'm not sure if I

37:02

see inflation then stalls out around like

37:04

2.5%, 3%.

37:06

But I think you're right. Like, there's no reason why

37:08

3 is worse than

37:11

2. In fact, even before the

37:13

pandemic, a lot of people were arguing for 4. So

37:15

I'm of the

37:17

view again, like inflation is a sign of

37:19

a healthy economy. We don't inflation it to

37:21

be zero, but we want inflation to be

37:23

as relatively low and predictable. The predictive stability

37:25

is key. We want it relatively stable and

37:28

we want it to like in theory, I

37:30

mean inflation was 5% and everyone knew

37:32

it was going to be 5% and

37:34

we could like constantly, you know, not to

37:36

worry about that. That wouldn't be a bad thing. Although higher inflation

37:38

does tend to be more volatile. So it's not a good thing.

37:41

But assuming it could be, it doesn't really

37:43

matter. It matters that it's predictable. And

37:47

it seems like the Fed can credibly has chosen

37:50

it, I guess. Although I'm starting

37:52

to rethink that I was a big fan

37:55

of inflation targeting. And Yeah, we

37:57

chose to although we the Fed's never really gotten to

37:59

2. It was my follow to announce

38:01

above to and like it's never really been

38:03

at to so how did sure the fed

38:06

has as much control room place and I

38:08

am sure to think them blaze she was

38:10

so low from two thousand on just as

38:12

we had a huge deflationary shock called trade

38:15

with China. And. Now.

38:17

That the gains in that are. Are not

38:20

so apparent going forward. So.

38:22

Inflation might just be higher. And.

38:24

Now the fed has to have this

38:27

conversation of oh well, maybe to.two maybe

38:29

three and said, and in theory, that's

38:31

fine. If. We're just say it's three and

38:33

it's see that three in the centre gets three.

38:35

Then you know there's nothing wrong with that. And. Ability

38:38

economies and pretty good shape as it really

38:40

worth taking it into a recession just so

38:42

we can go from. Three.

38:45

To Two especially the economy just naturally wants to

38:47

be a real assuming to just we can prove

38:49

the Fed can do it. So we would say

38:51

yes because I guess I credibility is important. although

38:53

I'm starting to feel like does anyone really think

38:56

the said if you look carefully when is the

38:58

Fed ever made it's inflation target and so if

39:00

they just go to three because like what we

39:02

can't make to. Then. I mean, what's

39:04

the point of inflation targeting and seems like you

39:06

can't make it so. People who are

39:09

smart people I know we're in. this are

39:11

like, well, I assume you're gonna

39:13

see them starting to massage the language. It's.

39:15

Like what we meant arrange. Like.

39:17

One hundred basis points and that's probably.

39:20

Where we're going to end up? Did we say to. I

39:22

am in the I guess we said to him

39:24

about you know week we didn't really mean to

39:26

women. Women: To as a as

39:29

can I'm I'm not a notion of

39:31

to. The. Could be three but

39:33

it could be one but it could be for my be

39:35

zero. Women between one in three with

39:37

to in the middle. Thousand.

39:41

Island as he will. marquise them are retiring

39:43

because of topic. It's really all my mind

39:46

right now. You play on

39:48

words aren't close with you Do for your better

39:50

Owners are Manila. Well, ah, I haven't

39:52

tried earlier. Tarzan's I was. Twenty.

39:54

one years old so that's a fun fact my

39:57

me but i was something else of of worry

39:59

we started recording that I recently

40:01

realized that I made an incredibly down

40:03

mistake calculating for my retirement. And

40:06

fortunately, it was in the category of oversaving

40:08

instead of undersaving. But it did bring the

40:10

question to mind for me because I started

40:12

reading a book about it, which is

40:15

what is the state of

40:17

American in terms of

40:19

retirement? Because I feel like the popular narrative

40:21

is that they're a disaster and they don't

40:23

save enough. There's

40:26

also, I mean, the rise of employer

40:28

matching, the rise of automatic enrollment into

40:31

401k. Apparently, the younger generations

40:33

are doing better with this. So I was wondering if

40:35

you have any data points to share with us about it.

40:38

Well, it's like we were saying earlier about you don't

40:40

want to romanticize the past. It's like, I

40:43

think people should have more money for retirement. They probably

40:45

don't have enough money to have the retirement they want,

40:47

but they still have way more money than anyone else

40:49

ever has had for retirement. So

40:51

things are better than before, but could

40:53

still be better. Like the old days,

40:55

I guess the defined benefit days in

40:57

the 70s and to some degree, the 80s, the

41:01

only 30, 40%, depending on your measure,

41:03

people had defined benefit plans. And

41:06

they only really were valuable if you stayed at

41:08

a company for most of your career. And even

41:10

then you had the risk. Defined

41:12

benefit plans went away because they

41:14

were very expensive and companies didn't want

41:16

to acknowledge how expensive it was to

41:18

bear that risk. Like people were finding

41:20

out what's a lot of risk to

41:23

manage your retirement. Yeah, it's

41:25

expensive and it's hard to provide a

41:27

risk-free retirement. And when companies had to

41:29

do it, they kind of were in denial of how expensive

41:31

it was. And then they kept

41:33

like you have these big blowups, people didn't get

41:35

their pension. And that's really bad. So

41:38

the government pretty much, we

41:40

did the regulation and forced companies to realize how expensive this

41:42

really was. And once they did that, they're like, oh, we

41:44

don't want to do this anymore. We're going to put

41:46

this on individuals. And the benefit

41:49

of that was that it was cheaper.

41:51

So way more people now have retirement

41:53

accounts than ever had defined benefit plans.

41:56

More people have savings than ever before. So

41:58

that's good. And that's one of the reasons I... Like, evidence does

42:00

show that retirement income is higher than it used

42:02

to be. Of course, people also live

42:04

longer. People are very reluctant to increase their

42:06

retirement age further. So they need more money

42:09

and healthcare costs are a much bigger deal

42:11

and long-term care costs are enormous and not

42:13

covered by Medicare and a lot of people

42:15

haven't really thought that through. I think all

42:17

these problems are fixable. We just aren't really

42:19

focused on it right now. But

42:22

it could be worse. It could be, you know,

42:24

before. And somehow people did get by. So

42:26

I think people will be okay. There's

42:29

more we could do to make it better. Adamus

42:59

you kind of have a way of looking at

43:01

things that is unusual and I find continually

43:04

insightful, makes me

43:06

think about what's going on

43:08

in the world in a different way. And that's of

43:11

immense value to everyone. So for whoever has

43:13

not read Alison's work, she doesn't call it

43:16

for Bloomberg as we said, she also does

43:19

some stuff for City Journal. I think the Bloomberg stuff

43:21

you probably have to pay for, which is a good

43:23

thing. Content should not always be

43:25

free even though this podcast is. I

43:28

look forward to continuing to learn from you

43:31

as I have in the past and thanks

43:33

for joining us tonight. Thanks

43:35

so much for having me. Yeah, thanks Alison.

43:38

So that was really fun conversation. I feel like

43:40

we were dipping in and out of a lot

43:42

of different topics and we kind of went around

43:44

her major topic, which is risk.

43:46

That's what her book was about. We didn't

43:48

get to ask her so much about it.

43:53

I feel like she is

43:55

a rare economist who is

43:58

interesting to listen to. She's

44:00

not a very serious person as you

44:02

mentioned in the beginning and she's fresh

44:05

and she's clear. She

44:07

explains things in a way that I think

44:10

makes sense to people who are in the

44:13

web of intellectual, economist,

44:15

whatever the heck and just

44:18

the normal people. So she can

44:20

say that while people want to eat out

44:22

more, duh, that's why they're upset about inflation.

44:26

Yeah, and this idea of risk, you know, again, as

44:28

you said, we didn't really get into

44:30

it with her because there

44:32

were much more immediate things to talk about. But

44:36

the thing is like people's attitudes

44:39

about risk and we did talk about this a little

44:41

of what a zero cost

44:43

capital environment for a decade led to.

44:47

You know, we all essentially want the

44:49

benefits of taking risks without the taking

44:52

risks. Like

44:54

we want all the things that come with

44:56

outsized risks, i.e. the outsized gains, but none

44:58

of us really want to take those risks

45:00

because we don't want outsized losses. We

45:03

all want everything but not at the cost of having

45:05

nothing. And then

45:08

we can lionize a few people who

45:10

seem to take outsized risks. I mean, whether

45:12

or not you love or hate Elon Musk,

45:14

part of what made him so enchanting

45:16

to so many people for a while is that he

45:18

did put everything on the line at one

45:21

point in time to build Tesla and

45:23

to go for SpaceX. And we think

45:25

that's cool, right? That someone's risks paid

45:27

off. Of course, we never really lionized

45:31

the gazillion numbers of people who

45:33

wanted to do that and wanted to be that and it

45:36

didn't work. Like there are lots

45:38

of unwritten books about lots of human beings

45:40

who tried and risked everything

45:43

and got nothing. There's

45:45

no book about that, oddly enough. Yeah,

45:47

I mean, I've met a decent number of

45:49

startup founders, you know? You

45:51

meet them three years later, you're like, what happened?

45:54

It's nothing. No one's going to write

45:56

any book about that. They basically

45:58

had a job that led. to nowhere.

46:00

But anyway, she writes a lot

46:03

too, which we kind of got into,

46:05

but didn't get deeply into the question

46:07

around risk and retirement. It's a fascinating

46:09

topic to me because on the one hand, you don't

46:11

want to under save, right? You don't want to be

46:13

90 years old realizing you live longer

46:15

than you meant to and that you have these enormous

46:17

healthcare bills that you can't pay for. But you also

46:20

don't want to have all this money waiting

46:22

for you and then you die when you're 75 and you

46:24

retired when you were 70. Maybe if we have her on

46:26

the phone again, she can give us some negative wisdom for

46:29

how to plan in the best way. So

46:32

shall we look at some of the news,

46:34

Dejure? Yeah, let's go. So

46:38

Zachary, I'm sure you remember that not too

46:40

long ago, there were a lot of freakouts

46:42

in the news, and with individual sort

46:45

of activists around colony

46:47

collapse that we were going to

46:50

basically lose the support of honeybees in the

46:52

United States and our agricultural systems were going

46:55

to collapse because we were running out of bees.

46:57

Do you remember that? I

46:59

do remember that. There was like the whole, oh my God, the

47:01

bees are dying. It's like the

47:04

beginning of one of those apocalyptic sci-fi

47:06

films where someone casually sees the bees

47:08

dying and thinks nothing of it. And

47:10

then the next scene, society has

47:12

collapsed utterly and we're all living in huts

47:15

in the Mojave Desert. Exactly.

47:17

So we lived through the first scene, but we

47:19

did not make it to the second scene. And

47:21

new data has come out that we actually have

47:23

a record number of honeybees in the United States.

47:26

And that is talking about

47:28

livestock bees. So honeybees, they're essentially

47:31

like cattle. Their

47:33

populations are taken care of by a vast

47:35

industry. So that data is for those honeybees,

47:38

but they also think that feral

47:40

honeybees or wild honeybees are also

47:42

populous, reaching high numbers. So long

47:45

story short, no need to worry anymore. The

47:47

honeybees have been handled. Honeybees

47:51

are here. They are more abundant now in

47:53

the world than they have ever been. There

47:56

are honeybees everywhere, including social

47:59

media. beekeeper has

48:01

racked up billions of views. With

48:03

more people picking up beekeeping as

48:05

a hobby and booming demand from

48:07

the pollinator from the almond milk

48:09

industry, honeybees are now the fastest

48:11

growing livestock segment, according to analysis

48:13

from the Washington Post. And

48:16

do we know why there has been this sudden reversal? There's

48:19

a few different reasons, one of them being agricultural

48:22

tax breaks, not such a sexy

48:24

answer, but the sexier answer and

48:26

a big reason actually has to

48:28

do with the supercharging of almond

48:30

tree farms. Oddly enough, the

48:32

American public got obsessed with putting almond

48:35

milk into everything that led

48:37

to people trying to meet the demand,

48:39

as that led to hyperpollination which led

48:41

to the health of honeybee colonies.

48:44

So there you have it. Wow. Yeah.

48:47

Wouldn't have expected that one. Huh. Yeah.

48:50

If people are interested, Washington Post has a

48:52

really interesting article on it, their Department of

48:54

Data. Because they want to read

48:57

the whole story. Well, alright. Alright.

49:00

Yeah. So honeybees are back

49:02

and flourishing. Moving on, it is

49:04

becoming readily apparent that Thailand is

49:06

going to become the first

49:09

Southeast Asian nation to legalize

49:11

same sex marriage. Their lower

49:13

house of parliament passed a

49:15

bill not too long ago

49:18

and they expect that there is not going to be any

49:20

resistance that bill passing through the

49:22

Senate and then being signed into law by the

49:24

king. So that's pretty historic. It is pretty historic.

49:27

I mean, granted the king of Thailand

49:29

is... Okay, we won't even

49:31

go into Thailand's incredibly messy

49:33

political system. But at least for the

49:35

time being, the king has

49:37

done something that we would consider to be

49:39

correct. Yes. And to be fair, Para Lind

49:41

did put it through before we got

49:45

into the king signing. Anyway,

49:47

good for human rights. We won't

49:49

get into the other governmental 40 questions

49:52

about Thailand. And

49:54

then last but not least, not sure

49:56

how far this news traveled around, but

49:58

it's very interesting. The. Census.

50:02

Bureau has updated. The

50:04

Obamas for the first time and

50:06

twenty seven years for the census.

50:09

Around the questions or how to do with race. And

50:11

ethnicity so they did

50:13

some. Policies. That

50:15

really need to be done a long time and

50:17

co like strike the word negro. From

50:19

Forums paranoid they and up without which

50:22

is wilde but also what they did

50:24

was supplied actually affect people's responses is

50:26

that you can now take multiple boxes

50:29

so they combined all of race as

50:31

as the person's into one so I

50:33

say you're black and hispanic you can

50:35

sit both say. Also added a lot

50:38

more categories for people that might be

50:40

Middle Eastern and North Africa and heritage.

50:42

Previously they were just sold to. Check

50:45

the white box, which obviously it's a little bit

50:47

of a. Overly

50:49

broad brush to paid for people

50:52

that say from Lebanon. So

50:54

now there has been a demarcation

50:56

of categories, and they. They

50:58

think that people have been much more accurately able

51:00

to say. What Is

51:02

a race? ethnicity? Yeah.

51:04

Corseted say about that is. At

51:07

the same time you have a greater value. Tosh

51:09

identify where you're from and who you are. Let.

51:12

Alone the whole June. Twenty.

51:14

Three and me effect of people now

51:16

have been. Where have. All. These

51:18

things that they were unaware of before and

51:20

simultaneous. I mean, I'd say so. Not.

51:23

Be able to use those categories

51:25

anymore because of the rollback of

51:27

affirmative action that was for some

51:29

pre racial preferences. I

51:31

don't know to make a that other than. Ever.

51:34

More sales like more information, less policy,

51:36

more policy was information around. The.

51:39

Music. I think.

51:42

Any time you have something that leads to

51:44

more comprehensive data, it's a good thing. I

51:47

just think there's like with the more that I

51:49

look into data yeah I'd say the more I'm

51:51

convinced that there is an absolute dearth of had

51:53

had a particularly on the federal level. So I

51:55

am actually just one hundred percent pro. This. Or

51:58

that. More. Dr. Debra Hixson

52:00

That's what we got for today. More data, more

52:03

data, more problems. We say no. Dr.

52:05

Gilbert So thank you all for listening. We will

52:07

be back with you next week. Please

52:09

sign up for the newsletter,

52:12

What Could Go Right? It's free, shows

52:14

up weekly, gives you a dose of things

52:16

going on in the world that are a little more constructive,

52:19

all the brief rapid

52:21

fire headlines that we just discussed.

52:24

Please send us ideas, send us

52:26

critiques, send us comments about the

52:28

newsletter, about the podcast, things you

52:30

would like to have addressed that

52:33

we have not, or that you want us to delve into

52:35

more that we have. We hope

52:37

this is a conversation with you, at least

52:39

as much as possible and not just a

52:41

conversation at you. So

52:43

we look forward to the feedback and

52:46

the engagement and continuing to build an

52:48

idea movement that hopefully leads to a more

52:51

constructive future rather than a worse one. So

52:54

thank you for your time and we will be

52:56

back next week. Dr. Debra Hixson Thanks, everyone.

53:00

What Could Go Right? is produced

53:02

by The Podglomerate. Executive produced by

53:04

Jeff Umbrough. Marketing by The Podglomerate.

53:06

To find out more about What

53:08

Could Go Right? The Progress Network

53:11

or to subscribe to the What

53:13

Could Go Right? newsletter, visit theprogressnetwork.org.

53:18

Thanks for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features