Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The future of America is
0:03
in your hands. This
0:05
is not a movie trailer and
0:08
it's not a political ad, but
0:10
it is a call to action.
0:12
I'm Mila Utmost and I'm passionate
0:14
about unlocking the power of everyday
0:16
citizens. On our podcast Future Hindsight
0:18
We take big ideas about civic
0:20
life and democracy and turned them
0:22
into action items for you and
0:24
me. Every Thursday we talked about
0:26
activists and civic innovators to help
0:28
you understand your power. And your
0:31
power to change the status quo.
0:33
Find out that future hindsight.com or
0:35
wherever you listen to podcasts. Hey
0:40
I am. Air and Haynes, the
0:42
host of The Amendment, a brand new
0:44
weekly podcast on gender politics empower, brought
0:46
to you by the Nineteenth News and
0:49
Wonder Media Network. You've probably heard the
0:51
news that this election year, our democracy
0:53
is at stake. Only amendment I'm breaking
0:55
down with that actually means specifically for
0:57
the March. Last folks who depend on
1:00
democracy the most. This.
1:02
Is a show that daf pass the headlines
1:04
and gets clear on the unfinished. Work of
1:07
our democracy. Was. Into
1:09
the Moment Now wherever you get your
1:11
podcast. Growth.
1:14
Become so much more important if you have been aging
1:16
society. Because society is will get
1:18
or if we don't have productivity. Increases
1:20
like productivity increases can make up for
1:23
a smaller population. You can stop positive
1:25
Gdp. Growth if you become more productive and
1:27
we're going to need that if we have. Fewer
1:29
people to do stuff as is it are. living
1:31
standards will start to really decrease if we don't
1:33
find a way to sort of continue to grow
1:36
in. we have fewer people. What
1:40
could go right? I'm
1:42
Zachary Care About the founder of The
1:45
Progress Network, joined as always by my
1:47
co host Emo Barber Lucas, the Executive
1:49
Director of The Progress That Work and
1:51
What Could Go Right is our weekly
1:54
podcast in conjunction with our weekly newsletter,
1:56
What you Go Right please scurry to
1:58
your computer and side. For the newsletter,
2:00
it's free. it's weekly. It's a good dose of
2:02
things that are going on in the world that
2:04
you may not have. Paid attention to
2:07
our attention had not been drawn
2:09
to that. Are. Going right
2:11
in the world. In a world where
2:13
we do tend to focus when we
2:15
focus on the news, And. The
2:17
news tends to be what's going wrong and what
2:19
are the crises are one of the challenges are
2:22
one of the problems. That. Accentuated
2:24
in an election year which we are
2:26
in in the United States and Sat
2:28
on the World is in an election
2:30
year. More people would get to the
2:32
polls and twenty twenty four. In
2:35
aggregate, democratically than has ever happened
2:37
ever in human history. That's.
2:39
Probably. A. Good thing and
2:41
should certainly be seen as a good
2:43
thing. Even of the results don't always
2:45
please everyone. Democracy.
2:47
Is after all a constant process
2:49
of that some part of the
2:51
population. Getting. What they want and
2:54
another part of the population not getting
2:56
what they want. There is no way
2:58
around that in a democracy is really
3:00
no way around that and life. Anyway,
3:03
Every week we try to look at. Different
3:06
issues: culture, politics, Economics,
3:08
International Relations and. Talk.
3:11
To people who has. Unique
3:13
perspectives on what's going on in the
3:15
world. Many of those people are members
3:17
of the progress that are. Many.
3:19
Are not and not all of them think that things
3:21
are going right and sat many of them are focused
3:24
on all the things that are going wrong. We.
3:26
Are not attempting in this to pretend that
3:28
there is not much that's going wrong and.
3:30
We. Want to talk about issues that
3:32
are animating people? One. Of the
3:35
issues that is admitting everyone in Twenty
3:37
Twenty Four, whether it's in the United
3:39
States or elsewhere, Is. The
3:41
Cost of living, The role of government,
3:43
The problem of inflation, What?
3:45
Inflation is going to be whether or not we
3:47
are going to be able to meet our needs
3:50
commensurate with what the price of things that we
3:52
need. Is and what, Income
3:54
we are earning. And.
3:57
The. Other questions of like what exactly
3:59
is this. We call economy
4:01
doing. Is one of the
4:03
great debates of our time, particularly given that most
4:05
people. Have a different personal sensibility
4:07
about what's going on economically them with
4:09
the data is telling us or he.
4:12
Many. People in many parts of the world
4:14
think things are quite bad economically. And
4:16
the economic data that we use as
4:19
a gauge is telling us that things
4:21
are quite good economically. And. There
4:23
is a huge gap there that
4:25
remains unanswered and hard to explain.
4:28
So. We're going to talk to someone today who
4:30
has. Unique. Insight into
4:33
his question. Emma.
4:36
Tell. Us are in the talked to today. Such
4:38
a hammer and talk to our and
4:40
trigger She's an economist and also senior
4:42
fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Writing has
4:44
appeared lotta different places that right now
4:47
she is a calmness for Bloomberg and
4:49
also writes for a City Journal. She's
4:51
also the author of a book called
4:53
and Economists walks into a Brothel If
4:55
she's the cofounder of the Life Cycle
4:57
Finance Partners which is at risk advisory
5:00
firm sorry ready to go with Lum
5:02
Als and for her with them yes.
5:04
We are. Awesome!
5:06
Show your what a pleasure to be having this conversation
5:08
with. Your least I assume it's going to be a
5:10
pleasure to have the conversation there were about our with
5:12
you. You. Are one of the
5:15
more eclectic, unique, unusual voices talking
5:17
about all things economic. For your
5:19
calls for Bloomberg and City Journal,
5:21
you also one of the unequivocally
5:24
best or titles of the past.
5:26
Decade. Plus that I can. Remember of
5:29
an economist walks into a brothel,
5:31
which is just such a delicious
5:33
title for a book. He did
5:35
a piece recently. On.
5:37
The. Negative economic long term consequences of
5:40
kids living with their parents. Movie expand on
5:42
that one cause I thought that is a
5:44
perfect interest in of all things Allison. Ah
5:47
thank you suspend words as do the column
5:49
to Bloomberg about finance set talk and are
5:51
not surprised by a couple things about it.
5:53
One that I'm not on tic tacs, I
5:56
don't consume it often, but I was shocked
5:58
the financial advice is not terrorists. He
6:00
was actually a pretty standard personal finance advice
6:02
and in fact, Maybe more digestible. easier to
6:04
understand the normal check that your for one
6:06
second you're not on to talk because you're
6:09
against tic toc or you just down to
6:11
talk because you're not on to. Talk to
6:13
the ball. I mean, I am against it, but
6:15
I'm probably not against it. is I'm not on
6:17
it if I liked it and. Enjoyed it
6:19
as like twitter. I'd probably be like,
6:21
you know, It's not so bad but I'm
6:23
not on anyway so the to be against
6:26
it that's how I feel. I'm on to
6:28
talk and I love it. I've for personal
6:30
finance for every the he says yeah if
6:32
I was loving I'd probably rationalize everything but
6:34
because I'm not unlike is evil and is
6:36
corrupting the of but at least with Tic
6:38
tac steered me towards with as algorithms was
6:40
actually pretty reasonable. Blaze losing a shock me
6:42
about it was because talking about living at
6:44
home as a viable financial strategy or what
6:47
you are living at home this is I
6:49
do things this is a normal thing and
6:51
I'd look again and. I knew there's a
6:53
the upshot people living at home during the pandemic
6:55
but it's been trending up for a while and
6:57
it struck me it it was a tick tock
6:59
that this is a social norm now not everyone's
7:01
living at home but assault weird or a source
7:03
of shame to as opposed to what I was
7:05
in my twenties. this would have been only something
7:08
that happens at your life fall apart, you lost
7:10
your job, he got a divorce and you definitely
7:12
have had a a lot of issues on the
7:14
dating market but now assists lifestyle. financial choice that
7:16
seems totally acceptable and some ways I think about
7:18
on like I would have saved a lot of
7:20
money I guess if I didn't pay. All that
7:22
money for this terrible partners I had in
7:25
my twenties. But if you at home then
7:27
why don't you look they're perceived money. I
7:29
would have thought that was the same way.
7:31
I guess people live at home in Europe
7:33
for a long time or people blood omen
7:35
to they sort of their own families for
7:37
most of time. But it does seem to
7:40
me that striking out in your own is
7:42
an important part of adultery. Making rent know
7:44
big motivator to brush your career forward and
7:46
just general independence and risk taking. It seems
7:48
like something's being lost their or it's a
7:50
sign of people not really fully. Individuated are
7:52
being willing to take risk as at
7:54
my university board meeting and a new
7:56
theory was floated that I have No,
7:58
this is true, Because I don't like
8:01
to generalize too much as every generation has
8:03
a lot of different viewpoints and preferences that
8:05
universities get a lot of flak from investing
8:07
and really fancy dorm rooms. Because we were
8:10
in college, we lived not squalor. But it
8:12
wasn't exactly nice you at several people in a
8:14
room. easier to phone. In a bathroom and rooms
8:16
read that? Nice. They're like cinder block and kind
8:18
of dark. But. Now is like people
8:20
to live in really nice dorms or then
8:23
the apartments they can afford. You probably aren't
8:25
that great so living at home at also
8:27
be compelling because he can still live in
8:29
a nice place and the idea that you
8:31
live in a terrible partly with lots are
8:33
in it's just not a place you would
8:35
pay for. Independence is just feels not worth
8:37
it ends. There does seem like an important
8:39
cultural shift in terms of ambition and receiving,
8:41
although I guess we'll see how it plays
8:43
out what percentage of millennials his arm and
8:45
a so that it was rising but is
8:48
it as significant portion of the population. So
8:50
for men is a bow twenty
8:52
percent and burrow women is a
8:54
bow thirteen. Twelve and a half
8:56
percent is have a higher than
8:58
I was expecting mean how messy?
9:00
Think that's related to the general
9:02
story that we hear about owning
9:04
particularly Millennials and Jen see that
9:06
the of for an economic costs
9:08
of becoming a dollar the United
9:10
States are so high. That. It's
9:12
just not possible. Meaning the rents are
9:15
so high health so high College is
9:17
so high and it's just like Canada
9:19
Albatross around those two generations next. Well,
9:21
there's some validity to I mean first
9:23
of all, the health care costs I
9:25
don't buy because I mean you can
9:28
be. On your parents healthcare well in your twenties.
9:30
Now true, and even this student loan stuff.
9:32
I don't really buy that either. and in
9:34
this true that he will. They have much
9:36
more student loan debt than before, but I
9:39
mean, if you have a student loan that's
9:41
correlated with higher earnings so I'm not sure
9:43
that's the reason why. Also, and in obliteration
9:45
of these income based repayment plan ensure that
9:48
you can also pay rent and pay a
9:50
student loans. So I'm not entirely says it
9:52
is. It is true rents are higher and
9:54
significantly higher than they used to be, but
9:56
you have options You other than living with
9:59
your parents, you. Live with roommates are like
10:01
not live in a nice. Apartment or a move
10:03
in it's cheaper area a. Think. It's just
10:05
different norm that it wouldn't been an option for
10:07
me when I was young. Despite whenever financial situation
10:09
I was in. I just would have found a
10:11
way to live on my own because I just
10:14
would have been embarrassed. And now people are. And
10:16
again, maybe there's some advantages to that. I'm indecisive.
10:18
Be close to your parents when they do have
10:20
families. Maybe they'll be close your parents. There has
10:22
to be more involved. There's all sorts of evidence
10:24
that's a nice thing, but I think they're also
10:27
definitely. Gonna be downsized. This kind of
10:29
sideways and to another piece you wrote
10:31
recently about taking on the issue of
10:33
wages have been rising. Some was in
10:35
step with inflation going on which is
10:37
one of the push back for people
10:40
who are say hey, the economy's better
10:42
than people feel. Heroines focus on headline
10:44
inflation numbers. They don't focus as much
10:46
on the degree to which their wages
10:48
have gone up. An easterner the peace
10:50
saying it makes total sense of people
10:53
would simultaneously benefit from rising wages and
10:55
be upset about rising inflation. Some. Of
10:57
you expand a little. Been on that. He
10:59
are so I this is I
11:01
guess or what a financial economists
11:03
had called disconnect between macro and
11:05
finance a whole central premise of
11:07
financial markets. And how acid surprise
11:09
is that people are for or
11:12
don't like risk a whiskey stream
11:14
of income. All else being
11:16
equal is not as desirable as
11:18
usher stream. Of income and you will pay more
11:20
for that sir stream of income and we just sort of.
11:22
This is that of under her. It's. All financial
11:24
theory. So if you think about what it's
11:26
like when you're in a high inflation or
11:29
volatile inflation environment, Or. You just have
11:31
a big bump of inflation you don't know up
11:33
prices are going to be effectively. That turns your
11:35
income into a much. Risk your income. Though
11:37
point of income is what you can buy with it. So.
11:40
Every financial transaction or it sort of consumer
11:42
transaction you're having has a level of risk
11:44
in it. So even if you had a
11:46
real wage increase in risk adjusted terms is
11:49
what we would say it could still feel
11:51
like a decrease is. you know how all
11:53
this uncertainty like you to think the last
11:55
couple years eggs were like seven dollars and
11:57
they were three dollars in the two dollars
11:59
and is. No see as the said
12:01
a lot of volatility and sort of
12:03
consumer goods particularly around groceries. I also
12:05
wrote about how well grocery prices having
12:08
coming down quite a bit. And.
12:10
Are now like at a red blood
12:12
have fleet decent level deflation. Because.
12:14
The dining out is still high. A high
12:17
badly? Sure, it's still like five percent. And
12:19
and in. Is the new really
12:21
sooner happened the last couple decades as dining out
12:24
became a very said a big part of people's
12:26
lives of all income levels at a Good
12:28
Now accounts like fifty percent of food spending a
12:30
least going into the pandemic. So.
12:32
I mean this is also something as important
12:35
people's quality of life and things like that
12:37
are still very expensive. So I think it's
12:39
not surprising that you can have a real
12:41
wage increase that keeps and lamp inflation. but
12:43
if you're it exposed to more risk and
12:45
uncertainty, you're still gonna feel worse off. Not.
12:48
To mention that the things that matter to
12:50
your quality of life are still really expensive.
12:52
Always, you're going to make people unhappy and
12:54
I think that's understandable. Oh, it's remarkable how
12:57
fast sense yes to eating out. not as
12:59
a luxury item, but as an expected part
13:01
of everyday life happened because I am and
13:03
when I was growing up, we never ate
13:05
out. I mean, it was extremely rare. Yeah,
13:07
any thoughts on that, How quick that was?
13:10
Yeah, I mean I there. There's others. the
13:12
series like The Rise of Fast Casual is
13:14
one. and just as a said, like all
13:16
of this Liberation of sort of. Cheaper
13:18
restaurants, And you know,
13:20
maybe that wasn't good Because you know
13:23
we definitely. Got fatter and you know it's
13:25
good that already to home probably healthier. But.
13:28
You know I. I think we can deny that people find
13:30
it convenient and they like eating. Out I opened this
13:32
column or as if a Bloomberg and much
13:34
you know they indulged some taxi cab recording
13:36
which I he but I couldn't help myself
13:38
is a cannibal what city I was in.
13:41
Fenugreek. Driver: Who is this
13:43
Like Young? you know? I mean my wife and I's
13:45
always been very like secret Us that we have the
13:47
state. Eight once a week where we got like burger in a
13:49
beer. I've nothing fancy. I'm not trying
13:51
to invoke Pile Bass or David Brooks
13:53
about like ridiculous still had at a.
13:56
Or at are really isn't. This is just like
13:58
a normal guy. Who. You know
14:00
would go to help or burger in a beer with his
14:02
wife once a week in. This is very important to them
14:04
as is very. Like and their quality of life. And.
14:06
He's like it was forty dollars. now is eighty
14:09
and they still do it. but it's like kind
14:11
of the big financial strain. And.
14:13
His his address or inflation is still going up
14:15
so. You. Know before and in couple decades
14:17
ago maybe they would only do a date like
14:19
once every six months. The doing it once a week
14:21
has become like a thing for them and it's important
14:24
to them And now is feel. That a rich
14:26
or definitely bigger financial strain. So.
14:28
I don't think it's shocking that he would still be
14:30
upset about inflation, even if you've been told all the
14:32
time. Well, In. Over prices have gone
14:35
up like why are you complaining I've
14:37
spoken a lot over the years audiences
14:39
and tried to give some sense of
14:41
you can simultaneously be Shoes were discontent.
14:44
With. Your economic system in the
14:46
presence. And recognized
14:48
how dramatically. At
14:50
least in the material terms, things have improved
14:52
over whatever the past hundred years level and
14:54
the past one. It. Like that
14:57
that present tense discontent. With.
14:59
What rewards and or the lack
15:01
of them are. And
15:04
recognize change. Everyday work on this
15:06
or of people day work on
15:08
this or people cognitively able. collectively.
15:11
Are individually to step back and go? Oh
15:13
right on. Now eating out once a week.
15:15
I used to eat out every six months.
15:18
But. My once a week of more expensive than a was.
15:20
Two years ago but I'm still doing
15:22
a more than I was twenty years
15:24
ago. Like are people susceptible to and
15:26
a good way? that kind of toggling
15:28
between the bigger picture trend and the
15:30
immediacy think so. I haven't done any
15:32
rigorous work on it so I can't
15:34
like site any research or as as
15:37
the that reddit but. Ah,
15:39
think people willing if irregardless research
15:41
where the criteria for making Profound
15:43
and Conan the same as on
15:45
podcasts and television. There.
15:47
Be a lot of. Dead. Their time.
15:49
Yeah, so I'm I'm just gonna make
15:51
stuff up anecdotally. I'll see people do
15:54
that. awareness. Of what things were like twenty years
15:56
ago. I give anything you hear people
15:58
all the time talking about how much worse
16:00
things are as is the eighties were like
16:02
some like wonderful time like people don't remember
16:05
what the ease were like. I mean I
16:07
wasn't very old them but. I don't
16:09
remember them being back re I mean he did
16:11
not have any giggled air conditioning. And
16:13
you know we did have like
16:16
fools a you know it is
16:18
a curse were that safe. You
16:34
still gotta remember to prefer your
16:36
safety belt yourselves. Could learn a
16:38
lot from a dummy for your
16:41
safety belts. I mean it it was
16:43
better than of the safety is so like we are
16:45
happy because we like progress. So this is a lot
16:47
with a retirement as people had this like golden era
16:49
of retirement in their head. Were. Allegedly
16:51
everyone had this like wonderful rich defined
16:53
benefit plan, but I bet that never
16:55
happened Like people sort of sort of
16:57
romanticize the past and don't really realize
17:00
like things weren't not every any. I
17:02
think it's hard to argue that quality
17:04
of life now is worse than it
17:06
was in the eighties for I seem
17:08
to read a team articles. Claiming.
17:10
That things are worse and every way when
17:12
they seem to be better to be in
17:14
every way and any maybe there's a reason
17:16
for that needy. you know there's something evolutionary
17:18
reason to have humans always be. Striving.
17:21
For more. I mean, as
17:23
there's one thing that's been remarkable about
17:25
humankind's, and particularly since the Industrial Revolution,
17:27
Is. The sort of dramatic increases and
17:30
quality of life that has unfolded. Even.
17:32
In our lifetime and maybe that comes from
17:34
this constant feeling of not feel like things
17:36
are good. Nothing they should be better. I
17:39
mean I I think about forget. Asking
17:41
people to be a comprehensive about what the
17:43
data was like in eighties people are and
17:45
comprehensive with a bad as like. Now now
17:48
see how he said. people I care about
17:50
data is there. I find it difficult. For.
17:52
A lot of things to like. really get a clear picture
17:55
what's going. On yeah it is. and maybe
17:57
maybe we're meant to be unsatisfied and that's
17:59
healthy. can. That pushes us or more to
18:01
the greatest. And ten that wouldn't
18:03
be good. I mean it's It's like the D
18:05
Growth Earth the you know they're just like we've
18:07
had enough growth. We. Don't need to grow
18:09
more A find that more destructive and they
18:12
sort of toxic. Then. The while
18:14
you know things. Should be better than they
18:16
are people. Are the on that the
18:18
grocer question? One there somewhere
18:20
moralistic aspect of growth as destroy
18:23
is destroying the planet, material and
18:25
climate illogically and therefore. There.
18:28
Should be d Growth because it's growth
18:30
has been harmful or it is beginning
18:32
to consume. The. Very resource that we
18:34
need to continue growing a do as at on
18:36
that is. It is a kind of of. Relevant
18:39
one for the next ten to
18:41
twenty years that in large swaths
18:43
of the world right Japan, Korea,
18:45
China of Germany, England Population the
18:47
strike and we were in of
18:49
aging population than that of declining
18:51
population Should there be economic growth.
18:54
For. Declining aging population other systemically are
18:56
normal emitting fewer people presumably consume less
18:58
than. This is a totally separate question
19:00
to the do you are others who
19:03
are same? There should not be growth
19:05
because it's bad, Morally because we're destroying
19:07
the planet. Or. Because it's
19:09
leading us into a consumer culture that
19:11
removing us from the spiritual can activity
19:14
or though larger issues of life. I'm
19:16
just asking the question of in a
19:18
system where there's fewer people with fewer
19:21
material needs, why should there be growth?
19:23
I mean we still won a improving
19:25
it like improving life, improving prosperity and
19:27
am in until the degraders if. We
19:30
wanna that the definition. Of productivity.
19:32
Is. Using our existing resources more efficiently
19:34
and we wanna set of healthy environment Growth
19:37
is and for and could become so much
19:39
more important if you have an aging. Society.
19:41
Because society is will get were if
19:44
we don't have productivity. Increases like productivity
19:46
increases can make up for a smaller
19:48
population. You can still a positive gdp
19:50
growth. Is. He become more productive.
19:52
And. We're going to neither if we have
19:55
fewer people to do stuff as is it are living.
19:57
Standards will start to really decrease if
19:59
we don't. Find a way to sort of
20:01
continue to grow in we have fewer people. It's
20:03
only good for the environment is good for our
20:05
quality. Of life. I mean especially as we're all getting
20:07
old. I mean, innovations gonna be in poor and. We're.
20:10
Gonna needs that of different ways of technology to help
20:12
take care of us to and. Hopefully.
20:14
Live even longer. And. Sort of
20:16
live events that have higher quality. Think of
20:18
like what how old's your grandparents seems like
20:20
in their seventies vs people their seventies now
20:23
but it is true and a lot away
20:25
as improving our quality of life improving. Part
20:27
of Mississippi, economic growth is our best shot. To
20:29
me Fab. On. Facts: as as a
20:32
massive ted talk turned right now that
20:34
talks about how slowly Millennials are aging
20:36
compared to their forebears. So I like
20:38
to say that it's just like words
20:40
getting healthier. Blaze you say we're living
20:42
longer lives. And of course it does
20:45
bring issues as you're bringing up the on how. Are we
20:47
going to pay for everybody? But I.
20:49
Wanted. To. Talk about like
20:51
illuminate a show mod. I have see it.
20:53
I wasn't old enough to see my advice
20:55
eclipse of It. A
20:57
fee or other with forty seven. She.
21:00
Looks so oh yeah there's a massive that
21:02
you're going around on sept often as there
21:04
right now where someone brings up the cast
21:06
of two years there were supposed to be
21:08
like thirty years old and they look like
21:10
someone even imagine Fisa years old now. Yeah,
21:13
I've been easy like or as was
21:15
I'm James Bond villain was it's like
21:17
looked like he was about seventy five
21:19
and they're like is forty two. I
21:21
mean like of with weatherspoon like fifty
21:23
and she looks great. Everybody
21:33
I'm Skyscrapers and Emery saliva through the
21:36
hosts. A political breakdown or show that
21:38
pulls back the curtain on the people
21:40
and forces driving politics in the Golden
21:42
State. From Kid Cudi in San Francisco.
21:46
And now ahead of the Twenty
21:48
Twenty Four election, we are bringing
21:50
you even more more conversations with
21:52
the top movers and shakers that
21:54
the state capital and in national
21:56
politics. With the dyslexia was the greatest gift that
21:58
a rapid me nothing was road. Nothing was linear.
22:00
I had a work around. Thanks! Work differently.
22:03
See the world differently. can I? Say that
22:05
he can keep on. Faith know how
22:07
important your participation it and I
22:09
think it's a time for this
22:12
generation of afford divorces more. Reporting.
22:14
With analysis. Been a very good
22:16
session for organized labor, but I'm Labor Summer
22:18
Hot labor summer. It's turn out to be
22:21
a nice fall as well more. Politics
22:23
with Personality. Us: What Election Day My
22:25
entire life. We we
22:27
hear that political breakdown daily. Every
22:30
week they will break down what's happening
22:32
and why it matters. With news
22:34
that informs surprises and maybe
22:36
even inspires you, Political breakdown
22:39
goes daily starting January. History
22:49
doesn't repeat itself, but it off and
22:52
Ryan's. That maybe a Mark Twain
22:54
curb but assesses to today's when he recently
22:56
said at my history can beat up your
22:58
politics is the podcast The comparison contrasts history
23:01
to the current events at Today post Bruce
23:03
Cars and has recently done deep dives on
23:05
fascinating topics. I to follow the Soviet Union
23:07
which sets the stage for today's geopolitics, the
23:10
man who was in prison and still won
23:12
a million votes for the presidency and the
23:14
mystery behind George Washington's involvement or lack thereof
23:16
and a bill of Rights. My
23:18
his say can be if your politics offers
23:21
the contacts the all these historic stories especially
23:23
those that you may think you know wealth
23:25
and is particularly adept ever leading them to
23:27
current events. Sit on this out, listen to
23:29
my history, can beat up your Paul Sex
23:31
on all platforms. The
23:38
House. I want the as you in particular
23:40
about Social Security because it's definitely in
23:42
the news right now. With a presidential
23:44
election coming up. There seems to be
23:46
this fear that it's about to combust,
23:48
but she had it. In. One of
23:50
your retirement. Mets and a call know you are
23:52
not and an hour was actually south. Towards
23:55
the good news about Social Security. Or.
23:57
I don't think it's going anywhere. I
24:00
mean, first of all, worst case scenario, we just
24:02
sort of. Let. Like don't do
24:04
anything that would be a twenty two across
24:06
the board. Benefit cause for everyone, which wouldn't
24:08
be bad. I don't think we should do that at
24:11
all that as. A lot better. Than.
24:14
So security like going bus to not
24:16
getting anything. And I don't
24:18
think l a half and I feel like when you
24:20
look at pensions. Sickly. State pensions they
24:22
somehow always get paid in a we might
24:24
like to fall on bond holders will certainly
24:27
cut services to younger people that pensions though
24:29
he somehow get paid his. Older
24:31
people have a powerful and. Know and
24:33
like see them get their pensions cut so I think we'll find
24:35
a way. The question is are we going to find a
24:37
good way to do it? And are we gonna. Do.
24:40
It in a way that like most efficient like
24:42
as the said they. Are we gonna spend
24:44
more than we need you to fix it? And I
24:46
think that's a question and I are not her and
24:48
at all by that. Political. Debates on
24:50
it now I feel a the conversations that a terrible.
24:53
But. I am optimistic that people.
24:55
Get their money is just gonna be
24:57
more expensive. And that messy ends are
25:00
unpleasant. The that cincy. So. That are
25:02
two main things going on. One is and we
25:04
talked about this would be doing our podcast and
25:06
I figured you refer to on this. Whether
25:08
you call the vibe session and the disconnect
25:10
between. A How people feel
25:12
the same we call the economy is doing
25:15
and what our data says the economy's doing.
25:17
I said there's a huge. To.
25:19
Divide their but there's also a covert
25:22
some a scrambled a lot of macro
25:24
economic assumptions about spending about what the
25:26
effects will be. You know
25:28
they're stored. Completely. Unresolved I
25:30
imagine will continue to be unresolved
25:33
debate about was there. A
25:35
tipping point of all the spending that
25:37
was.and. Twenty Twenty And Twenty Twenty One.
25:39
And in Detroit to. Was.
25:42
The massive amount of spending and twenty
25:44
twenty not inflationary but the spending of
25:46
of the use inflation reduction out which
25:48
wasn't very about inflation at all it
25:50
was about climate change. That. Was
25:52
too much. Was. The
25:55
spike in inflation? Actually transitory except the
25:57
problem using the were trying to tourists.
26:00
No. One ever defined exactly how long transitory as
26:02
I'm in. Life. As transitory, right?
26:04
everything is transitory. Some. It's. The.
26:06
Matter what, your. Your. Your time frame
26:09
is. So. In a
26:11
in a completely like big picture
26:13
way. Given. That governments that
26:15
more money and twenty twenty into twenty two
26:17
than had been spent certainly in the entirety
26:19
of whatever we call the new deal? Some
26:21
more more keynesian spending than ever Before that
26:23
a flurry lifted people out of poverty. It
26:26
had an inflationary effect, but maybe the of
26:28
I share fight was just as a result
26:30
of like a lot of money before people
26:32
could spend it on what do you make
26:34
of all this? Did it? Did it show
26:36
the government's could spend more money they're spending
26:38
and we should be worrying so much about
26:40
spending. Did it proves that governments spend too
26:42
much Or traits of ice and. I I don't
26:45
know I was. Is there? Is there ever going to be
26:47
any consensus of others? I think
26:49
there is a consensus about at least for
26:51
like credible people. Who. Know. Order
26:54
for it's it's. Complicated because inflation?
26:57
That a lot of father's. It
27:00
was. To. Some degree that kobe disruptions
27:02
and you know issues with the supply
27:04
chain that got resolved and taking the
27:06
hobby on and putting it back online.
27:08
And I think that. It was transitory
27:10
her read this. Guy. That I
27:12
think there was also a big piece of
27:14
inflation that was from government spending and inches
27:16
And Berman says as a two or three
27:19
percentage points of the eight percent inflation that
27:21
we had. Was. Due to government.
27:23
Spending so it out there. There are a lot
27:25
of different things going on at once. And
27:27
I see like honestly like a
27:29
monk. Like. A lot of economists
27:32
consensus about that. I mean, you have. You.
27:34
Know Olivier Blanchard who pandemic was a we
27:36
the spend. It's great being like you know
27:38
maybe we can and I think the spending
27:40
when a little out a control. This is
27:42
an easy. Democrats and Republicans Larry Summers. You
27:45
know it. Definitely was concerned about. This
27:47
I think a lot of economist do think it's
27:49
and I am among them was justified to do
27:51
a lot of spending. And twenty twenty I mean.
27:54
We. We shut down the economy and like
27:56
of unemployment was really high. And.
27:59
Ill eat. You do. To do something. And
28:01
financial markets where where we're freezing ends. I
28:03
even amount of to a fan but I
28:06
understand why that was done then. The.
28:08
Question is is: why are we still doing this And
28:10
Twenty Twenty One? Little on Twenty Twenty Two. And
28:12
particularly as a com is taking off while. we
28:15
were more fuel on out fire. So.
28:18
I think it gets confusing because
28:20
it's you. Can't just say inflation
28:22
was. All the government's fault it wasn't. An
28:25
easy he can't say. Inflation
28:27
of as completely transitory because it was.
28:30
It. It was a lot of different things going on
28:32
and I think what you have to do is sort of
28:34
separate them out. I think in general. People.
28:36
Get up to wake up. In a couple years
28:38
that we sort of the last ten years. So.
28:41
Lived in this world where there were no economic
28:43
trade off. And I think that's
28:45
what happens when you have effectively as your
28:47
rate environment is you don't he for rescue,
28:50
don't pay for capital. So. You
28:52
end up in a world where people think there's just no
28:54
trade off that you can spend as much as you want
28:56
and you don't have to pay for. That.
28:58
You know you should be able
29:00
to get upside without risk of
29:02
downsides. And. I think this is
29:04
became for pervasive and a lot of things.
29:06
It didn't last though I don't. Think we're
29:08
going back to zero rate environment. I see a
29:10
lot of consensus around that to be doubtful that that's
29:12
gonna happen. And if that's the
29:14
case then we do start having trade off than we
29:17
do see that. You. Know if you do
29:19
run up dead you know it does have an
29:21
impact on the economy is interest rates go up
29:23
and i can be contraction or or even if
29:25
you do wanna take you know have you know
29:27
higher wages and sort of take risk or have
29:29
higher as it returns you are going to have
29:31
to face downside risk. So. I
29:33
think people are. The vibe became
29:35
this. I sort of. So.
29:37
The idea that you know we can
29:39
do all these things and the there
29:41
was a free lunch everywhere. My my
29:43
colleague at Bloomberg just wrote a great
29:45
column I love that was called like
29:47
say it loud as a problem of
29:49
Neoliberal Usa How they this is the
29:51
non neoliberalism. The Statism is this idea
29:53
that a weekend just. Had. This
29:55
relaunch like the government can direct
29:58
resources. To. Into. The
30:00
it it lights and will have more growth. And
30:02
no downside risks to that. I said we
30:04
can stand without inflation or raising interest rates.
30:07
You can take risks and you will have
30:09
any downsides Any a new. I like Neoliberalism
30:11
he argues is always about acknowledging that there
30:13
were straight off and you know with we
30:15
have to sort of. The. Long run
30:17
be a little bit more prudent thoughtful that our
30:19
policies I think that era is coming to an
30:22
end. Not right now. we're still sort of living
30:24
in it. For. I think we definitely
30:26
see elements. That you know currently the high rate
30:28
environment that isn't going away suggest the best I can,
30:30
the sick or on forever. Thousand and One or
30:33
either tease out another piece of the economic
30:35
puzzle for me to. you're talking about how
30:37
inflation honey fathers and he can he to
30:39
tease out what caused what. Something. And
30:41
I have not been able to see you're out in
30:43
the posts coded environment and I'm not by any. Means
30:45
economics expert so it's might be
30:47
very obvious. Question is. All.
30:49
These are papers are coming out now that
30:52
wage growth sir skyrocketed between two thousand and
30:54
nineteen. and Twenty Twenty three, you know, is
30:56
used to be pretty stagnant outside. Ten Twelve
30:58
percent. What? Caused that.
31:01
Well. Again, Different fathers
31:03
I think. You. Know Twenty
31:05
nineteen, the Trump Trump era. I just
31:07
did this data thing for Bloomberg
31:09
and. But. It's from
31:12
regime. Actually it
31:14
was the only regime of all
31:16
the presidents since two thousand the
31:18
had positive wage growth for everybody.
31:20
all income levels mint not everyone
31:22
but like all income levels to
31:25
securely. Lower. Income people. Who. Hadn't
31:27
seen a lot of wage growth
31:29
in years now. I think
31:31
on the margin maybe the tax reform had
31:34
some benefit but I'm of the view that
31:36
was just together with different reasons for everything.
31:38
Most the reason was it is it a
31:40
really long time to kind of the financial
31:43
crisis. And I think trump had
31:45
some good timing. Of. Yeah.
31:47
Financial crisis. I think the economy had
31:49
finally recovered. I. Think a lot
31:51
of technology. Initially impasse id a higher
31:54
wage people. I think it started to
31:56
trickle down. Finally the lower wage people.
31:58
So I think people. The Hundred. We.
32:01
Saw just a lot about like just been timing
32:03
and I think on the margin I I think
32:05
the tax. That the tax reform to do some
32:07
nice things, but I think it was marginal
32:09
but useful. but. Really? Was just where
32:11
we were in the cycle. and then the pandemic came
32:13
and I feel like we're now and and. Into for
32:15
a very different economy. Where. Sears.
32:18
Just a real shortage of labor. Particularly low
32:20
skill labor. So. You're just making
32:22
a lot more money has there's not that many of
32:24
them and. Here's. A huge demand for
32:26
service jobs right now it I think that's why
32:29
people are putting. A lot now on immigration
32:31
sort of filling that whole, but still
32:33
not a not. The. Actually, since
32:35
the pandemic. Higher
32:37
and middle high. Earners haven't had
32:39
a huge wage increase. in fact, I think
32:42
they're sobbing Had a real reach decreased. But
32:44
we are seeing in the lower end us and
32:47
the wage. Gains Just I think discuss is a
32:49
shortage of their labour. Government
32:58
of Kenya pledged to and gender based
33:00
violence by Twenty Twenty Six. The.
33:02
Ministry of Health and Uganda is trying
33:04
to eradicate Yellow Fever. It's ambitious to
33:07
make these kinds of pledges, but it
33:09
is much harder to achieve this lofty
33:11
goals. Are these leaders really delivering on
33:13
his promises for women and girls? Tune
33:15
into a new season of the hidden
33:17
economics of remarkable Women. A podcast from
33:19
Foreign Policy As Reporters Across Africa Me
33:22
courageous woman holding leaders accountable and various
33:24
sectors including healthcare start ups and the
33:26
government listen to hit an economics of.
33:28
Remarkable Woman. wherever you get your
33:30
podcasts, Hey. It's mm
33:32
they say to learn something new every
33:34
day. It's those I spoke with.
33:36
So much to do in your daily life.
33:39
How are you going to make the time
33:41
to learn and say curious about our world?
33:43
Well, with everything everywhere daily you can easily.
33:45
Meet that goal and actual reality. Everything
33:48
Every daily is one the world's most
33:50
popular daily education podcast, and a top
33:52
three History podcast. About ten
33:54
minutes you can learn something new
33:57
everyday. so covers history, science, Yard,
33:59
Athena. Eccentric knowledge he has was
34:01
biographies from some of the world's most
34:03
interesting people. Fans. Of the
34:05
show are so passionate the universe He joined
34:07
the completion of club. The. Group of
34:09
dedicated listeners who have listened to every single
34:12
one of the shows more than a thousand
34:14
and counting. Episodes. All
34:16
the episodes are informative, interesting, and best
34:18
of all, Always under fifteen
34:20
minutes sick. I had learned something
34:22
new every single day with everything
34:25
everywhere daily. find it on Apple
34:27
podcasts. Modify or every get your
34:29
podcasts. Come
34:33
back to where we began to discuss of a
34:35
recent piece about. People. Can simultaneously
34:37
benefit from rising wages and
34:40
also legitimately be a discontent
34:42
with rising inflation. Nonetheless, it's.
34:45
Almost. Impossible have significantly rising
34:47
I wages and zero inflation
34:49
to the scobey a level
34:51
of inflation. Where.
34:55
He. Kind of go. This is a good say.
34:59
An end and zero inflation probably isn't a good
35:01
thing unless you are d gross or of or
35:03
if you believe that there should be no growth
35:06
because. You yes you could continue have
35:08
lots of productivity growth and low inflation. The.
35:10
Pride can have wage growth and low inflation
35:12
rate you know, lots of productivity and known
35:14
for his. And.
35:17
You. Know we could debate whether or not the
35:19
cost of capital of kept artificially low for the
35:21
ten years prior to the pandemic, or whether. It.
35:24
Was just a product to code technology and
35:26
globalization Worth. It cause. Of capitals
35:28
low because it was actually just while many not
35:30
because central banks from manipulating and it just. There's.
35:33
A lot of capital. Other so, it was a
35:35
cap on the we Live in a Soul a largely. Capital.
35:38
Rich world even with. Butter. Four
35:40
percent interest rates are than zero. We're not talking about
35:42
the Nineteen eighties. here. we're not. I'm of the Nineteen
35:44
seventies. Or for much of the time
35:46
before that a minute just rates are still historically
35:49
on the low end. Tried that sully, not anywhere
35:51
near. Liar. So.
35:53
Maybe this whole idea of we who did get back
35:55
to two percent inflation rate which is what the Fed
35:57
and all central by as well. We're saying. Maybe.
36:00
that's the wrong number. You know, maybe it's 4%. I
36:02
don't know but why isn't that
36:04
conversation being had more actively?
36:07
Like, there's
36:09
a normative sense of inflation is high
36:11
because that number with that we decided that
36:13
inflation should be is below
36:17
what it currently is. But
36:19
we just made that number up anyway. Yeah,
36:23
we did. I think we're starting to
36:26
have that conversation. I'm starting to notice that it's
36:28
going to take a couple more inflation reports. I
36:30
think the Fed is hoping it was going back
36:32
to 2 and now it seems to be stalling
36:34
out. And I personally don't see how
36:36
it goes down lower. Like, it was
36:38
going down because we had all these deflationary
36:40
forces partially from coming back online from COVID,
36:42
but we saw a lot of goods price
36:45
deflation. And I'm
36:47
not sure I see, but we still
36:49
had high service inflation, which
36:51
again, largely driven by wages and
36:53
things like that. So now
36:56
that goods price deflation has pretty much moderated,
36:58
we still have the high service inflation. So
37:00
I'm not sure if I
37:02
see inflation then stalls out around like
37:04
2.5%, 3%.
37:06
But I think you're right. Like, there's no reason why
37:08
3 is worse than
37:11
2. In fact, even before the
37:13
pandemic, a lot of people were arguing for 4. So
37:15
I'm of the
37:17
view again, like inflation is a sign of
37:19
a healthy economy. We don't inflation it to
37:21
be zero, but we want inflation to be
37:23
as relatively low and predictable. The predictive stability
37:25
is key. We want it relatively stable and
37:28
we want it to like in theory, I
37:30
mean inflation was 5% and everyone knew
37:32
it was going to be 5% and
37:34
we could like constantly, you know, not to
37:36
worry about that. That wouldn't be a bad thing. Although higher inflation
37:38
does tend to be more volatile. So it's not a good thing.
37:41
But assuming it could be, it doesn't really
37:43
matter. It matters that it's predictable. And
37:47
it seems like the Fed can credibly has chosen
37:50
it, I guess. Although I'm starting
37:52
to rethink that I was a big fan
37:55
of inflation targeting. And Yeah, we
37:57
chose to although we the Fed's never really gotten to
37:59
2. It was my follow to announce
38:01
above to and like it's never really been
38:03
at to so how did sure the fed
38:06
has as much control room place and I
38:08
am sure to think them blaze she was
38:10
so low from two thousand on just as
38:12
we had a huge deflationary shock called trade
38:15
with China. And. Now.
38:17
That the gains in that are. Are not
38:20
so apparent going forward. So.
38:22
Inflation might just be higher. And.
38:24
Now the fed has to have this
38:27
conversation of oh well, maybe to.two maybe
38:29
three and said, and in theory, that's
38:31
fine. If. We're just say it's three and
38:33
it's see that three in the centre gets three.
38:35
Then you know there's nothing wrong with that. And. Ability
38:38
economies and pretty good shape as it really
38:40
worth taking it into a recession just so
38:42
we can go from. Three.
38:45
To Two especially the economy just naturally wants to
38:47
be a real assuming to just we can prove
38:49
the Fed can do it. So we would say
38:51
yes because I guess I credibility is important. although
38:53
I'm starting to feel like does anyone really think
38:56
the said if you look carefully when is the
38:58
Fed ever made it's inflation target and so if
39:00
they just go to three because like what we
39:02
can't make to. Then. I mean, what's
39:04
the point of inflation targeting and seems like you
39:06
can't make it so. People who are
39:09
smart people I know we're in. this are
39:11
like, well, I assume you're gonna
39:13
see them starting to massage the language. It's.
39:15
Like what we meant arrange. Like.
39:17
One hundred basis points and that's probably.
39:20
Where we're going to end up? Did we say to. I
39:22
am in the I guess we said to him
39:24
about you know week we didn't really mean to
39:26
women. Women: To as a as
39:29
can I'm I'm not a notion of
39:31
to. The. Could be three but
39:33
it could be one but it could be for my be
39:35
zero. Women between one in three with
39:37
to in the middle. Thousand.
39:41
Island as he will. marquise them are retiring
39:43
because of topic. It's really all my mind
39:46
right now. You play on
39:48
words aren't close with you Do for your better
39:50
Owners are Manila. Well, ah, I haven't
39:52
tried earlier. Tarzan's I was. Twenty.
39:54
one years old so that's a fun fact my
39:57
me but i was something else of of worry
39:59
we started recording that I recently
40:01
realized that I made an incredibly down
40:03
mistake calculating for my retirement. And
40:06
fortunately, it was in the category of oversaving
40:08
instead of undersaving. But it did bring the
40:10
question to mind for me because I started
40:12
reading a book about it, which is
40:15
what is the state of
40:17
American in terms of
40:19
retirement? Because I feel like the popular narrative
40:21
is that they're a disaster and they don't
40:23
save enough. There's
40:26
also, I mean, the rise of employer
40:28
matching, the rise of automatic enrollment into
40:31
401k. Apparently, the younger generations
40:33
are doing better with this. So I was wondering if
40:35
you have any data points to share with us about it.
40:38
Well, it's like we were saying earlier about you don't
40:40
want to romanticize the past. It's like, I
40:43
think people should have more money for retirement. They probably
40:45
don't have enough money to have the retirement they want,
40:47
but they still have way more money than anyone else
40:49
ever has had for retirement. So
40:51
things are better than before, but could
40:53
still be better. Like the old days,
40:55
I guess the defined benefit days in
40:57
the 70s and to some degree, the 80s, the
41:01
only 30, 40%, depending on your measure,
41:03
people had defined benefit plans. And
41:06
they only really were valuable if you stayed at
41:08
a company for most of your career. And even
41:10
then you had the risk. Defined
41:12
benefit plans went away because they
41:14
were very expensive and companies didn't want
41:16
to acknowledge how expensive it was to
41:18
bear that risk. Like people were finding
41:20
out what's a lot of risk to
41:23
manage your retirement. Yeah, it's
41:25
expensive and it's hard to provide a
41:27
risk-free retirement. And when companies had to
41:29
do it, they kind of were in denial of how expensive
41:31
it was. And then they kept
41:33
like you have these big blowups, people didn't get
41:35
their pension. And that's really bad. So
41:38
the government pretty much, we
41:40
did the regulation and forced companies to realize how expensive this
41:42
really was. And once they did that, they're like, oh, we
41:44
don't want to do this anymore. We're going to put
41:46
this on individuals. And the benefit
41:49
of that was that it was cheaper.
41:51
So way more people now have retirement
41:53
accounts than ever had defined benefit plans.
41:56
More people have savings than ever before. So
41:58
that's good. And that's one of the reasons I... Like, evidence does
42:00
show that retirement income is higher than it used
42:02
to be. Of course, people also live
42:04
longer. People are very reluctant to increase their
42:06
retirement age further. So they need more money
42:09
and healthcare costs are a much bigger deal
42:11
and long-term care costs are enormous and not
42:13
covered by Medicare and a lot of people
42:15
haven't really thought that through. I think all
42:17
these problems are fixable. We just aren't really
42:19
focused on it right now. But
42:22
it could be worse. It could be, you know,
42:24
before. And somehow people did get by. So
42:26
I think people will be okay. There's
42:29
more we could do to make it better. Adamus
42:59
you kind of have a way of looking at
43:01
things that is unusual and I find continually
43:04
insightful, makes me
43:06
think about what's going on
43:08
in the world in a different way. And that's of
43:11
immense value to everyone. So for whoever has
43:13
not read Alison's work, she doesn't call it
43:16
for Bloomberg as we said, she also does
43:19
some stuff for City Journal. I think the Bloomberg stuff
43:21
you probably have to pay for, which is a good
43:23
thing. Content should not always be
43:25
free even though this podcast is. I
43:28
look forward to continuing to learn from you
43:31
as I have in the past and thanks
43:33
for joining us tonight. Thanks
43:35
so much for having me. Yeah, thanks Alison.
43:38
So that was really fun conversation. I feel like
43:40
we were dipping in and out of a lot
43:42
of different topics and we kind of went around
43:44
her major topic, which is risk.
43:46
That's what her book was about. We didn't
43:48
get to ask her so much about it.
43:53
I feel like she is
43:55
a rare economist who is
43:58
interesting to listen to. She's
44:00
not a very serious person as you
44:02
mentioned in the beginning and she's fresh
44:05
and she's clear. She
44:07
explains things in a way that I think
44:10
makes sense to people who are in the
44:13
web of intellectual, economist,
44:15
whatever the heck and just
44:18
the normal people. So she can
44:20
say that while people want to eat out
44:22
more, duh, that's why they're upset about inflation.
44:26
Yeah, and this idea of risk, you know, again, as
44:28
you said, we didn't really get into
44:30
it with her because there
44:32
were much more immediate things to talk about. But
44:36
the thing is like people's attitudes
44:39
about risk and we did talk about this a little
44:41
of what a zero cost
44:43
capital environment for a decade led to.
44:47
You know, we all essentially want the
44:49
benefits of taking risks without the taking
44:52
risks. Like
44:54
we want all the things that come with
44:56
outsized risks, i.e. the outsized gains, but none
44:58
of us really want to take those risks
45:00
because we don't want outsized losses. We
45:03
all want everything but not at the cost of having
45:05
nothing. And then
45:08
we can lionize a few people who
45:10
seem to take outsized risks. I mean, whether
45:12
or not you love or hate Elon Musk,
45:14
part of what made him so enchanting
45:16
to so many people for a while is that he
45:18
did put everything on the line at one
45:21
point in time to build Tesla and
45:23
to go for SpaceX. And we think
45:25
that's cool, right? That someone's risks paid
45:27
off. Of course, we never really lionized
45:31
the gazillion numbers of people who
45:33
wanted to do that and wanted to be that and it
45:36
didn't work. Like there are lots
45:38
of unwritten books about lots of human beings
45:40
who tried and risked everything
45:43
and got nothing. There's
45:45
no book about that, oddly enough. Yeah,
45:47
I mean, I've met a decent number of
45:49
startup founders, you know? You
45:51
meet them three years later, you're like, what happened?
45:54
It's nothing. No one's going to write
45:56
any book about that. They basically
45:58
had a job that led. to nowhere.
46:00
But anyway, she writes a lot
46:03
too, which we kind of got into,
46:05
but didn't get deeply into the question
46:07
around risk and retirement. It's a fascinating
46:09
topic to me because on the one hand, you don't
46:11
want to under save, right? You don't want to be
46:13
90 years old realizing you live longer
46:15
than you meant to and that you have these enormous
46:17
healthcare bills that you can't pay for. But you also
46:20
don't want to have all this money waiting
46:22
for you and then you die when you're 75 and you
46:24
retired when you were 70. Maybe if we have her on
46:26
the phone again, she can give us some negative wisdom for
46:29
how to plan in the best way. So
46:32
shall we look at some of the news,
46:34
Dejure? Yeah, let's go. So
46:38
Zachary, I'm sure you remember that not too
46:40
long ago, there were a lot of freakouts
46:42
in the news, and with individual sort
46:45
of activists around colony
46:47
collapse that we were going to
46:50
basically lose the support of honeybees in the
46:52
United States and our agricultural systems were going
46:55
to collapse because we were running out of bees.
46:57
Do you remember that? I
46:59
do remember that. There was like the whole, oh my God, the
47:01
bees are dying. It's like the
47:04
beginning of one of those apocalyptic sci-fi
47:06
films where someone casually sees the bees
47:08
dying and thinks nothing of it. And
47:10
then the next scene, society has
47:12
collapsed utterly and we're all living in huts
47:15
in the Mojave Desert. Exactly.
47:17
So we lived through the first scene, but we
47:19
did not make it to the second scene. And
47:21
new data has come out that we actually have
47:23
a record number of honeybees in the United States.
47:26
And that is talking about
47:28
livestock bees. So honeybees, they're essentially
47:31
like cattle. Their
47:33
populations are taken care of by a vast
47:35
industry. So that data is for those honeybees,
47:38
but they also think that feral
47:40
honeybees or wild honeybees are also
47:42
populous, reaching high numbers. So long
47:45
story short, no need to worry anymore. The
47:47
honeybees have been handled. Honeybees
47:51
are here. They are more abundant now in
47:53
the world than they have ever been. There
47:56
are honeybees everywhere, including social
47:59
media. beekeeper has
48:01
racked up billions of views. With
48:03
more people picking up beekeeping as
48:05
a hobby and booming demand from
48:07
the pollinator from the almond milk
48:09
industry, honeybees are now the fastest
48:11
growing livestock segment, according to analysis
48:13
from the Washington Post. And
48:16
do we know why there has been this sudden reversal? There's
48:19
a few different reasons, one of them being agricultural
48:22
tax breaks, not such a sexy
48:24
answer, but the sexier answer and
48:26
a big reason actually has to
48:28
do with the supercharging of almond
48:30
tree farms. Oddly enough, the
48:32
American public got obsessed with putting almond
48:35
milk into everything that led
48:37
to people trying to meet the demand,
48:39
as that led to hyperpollination which led
48:41
to the health of honeybee colonies.
48:44
So there you have it. Wow. Yeah.
48:47
Wouldn't have expected that one. Huh. Yeah.
48:50
If people are interested, Washington Post has a
48:52
really interesting article on it, their Department of
48:54
Data. Because they want to read
48:57
the whole story. Well, alright. Alright.
49:00
Yeah. So honeybees are back
49:02
and flourishing. Moving on, it is
49:04
becoming readily apparent that Thailand is
49:06
going to become the first
49:09
Southeast Asian nation to legalize
49:11
same sex marriage. Their lower
49:13
house of parliament passed a
49:15
bill not too long ago
49:18
and they expect that there is not going to be any
49:20
resistance that bill passing through the
49:22
Senate and then being signed into law by the
49:24
king. So that's pretty historic. It is pretty historic.
49:27
I mean, granted the king of Thailand
49:29
is... Okay, we won't even
49:31
go into Thailand's incredibly messy
49:33
political system. But at least for the
49:35
time being, the king has
49:37
done something that we would consider to be
49:39
correct. Yes. And to be fair, Para Lind
49:41
did put it through before we got
49:45
into the king signing. Anyway,
49:47
good for human rights. We won't
49:49
get into the other governmental 40 questions
49:52
about Thailand. And
49:54
then last but not least, not sure
49:56
how far this news traveled around, but
49:58
it's very interesting. The. Census.
50:02
Bureau has updated. The
50:04
Obamas for the first time and
50:06
twenty seven years for the census.
50:09
Around the questions or how to do with race. And
50:11
ethnicity so they did
50:13
some. Policies. That
50:15
really need to be done a long time and
50:17
co like strike the word negro. From
50:19
Forums paranoid they and up without which
50:22
is wilde but also what they did
50:24
was supplied actually affect people's responses is
50:26
that you can now take multiple boxes
50:29
so they combined all of race as
50:31
as the person's into one so I
50:33
say you're black and hispanic you can
50:35
sit both say. Also added a lot
50:38
more categories for people that might be
50:40
Middle Eastern and North Africa and heritage.
50:42
Previously they were just sold to. Check
50:45
the white box, which obviously it's a little bit
50:47
of a. Overly
50:49
broad brush to paid for people
50:52
that say from Lebanon. So
50:54
now there has been a demarcation
50:56
of categories, and they. They
50:58
think that people have been much more accurately able
51:00
to say. What Is
51:02
a race? ethnicity? Yeah.
51:04
Corseted say about that is. At
51:07
the same time you have a greater value. Tosh
51:09
identify where you're from and who you are. Let.
51:12
Alone the whole June. Twenty.
51:14
Three and me effect of people now
51:16
have been. Where have. All. These
51:18
things that they were unaware of before and
51:20
simultaneous. I mean, I'd say so. Not.
51:23
Be able to use those categories
51:25
anymore because of the rollback of
51:27
affirmative action that was for some
51:29
pre racial preferences. I
51:31
don't know to make a that other than. Ever.
51:34
More sales like more information, less policy,
51:36
more policy was information around. The.
51:39
Music. I think.
51:42
Any time you have something that leads to
51:44
more comprehensive data, it's a good thing. I
51:47
just think there's like with the more that I
51:49
look into data yeah I'd say the more I'm
51:51
convinced that there is an absolute dearth of had
51:53
had a particularly on the federal level. So I
51:55
am actually just one hundred percent pro. This. Or
51:58
that. More. Dr. Debra Hixson
52:00
That's what we got for today. More data, more
52:03
data, more problems. We say no. Dr.
52:05
Gilbert So thank you all for listening. We will
52:07
be back with you next week. Please
52:09
sign up for the newsletter,
52:12
What Could Go Right? It's free, shows
52:14
up weekly, gives you a dose of things
52:16
going on in the world that are a little more constructive,
52:19
all the brief rapid
52:21
fire headlines that we just discussed.
52:24
Please send us ideas, send us
52:26
critiques, send us comments about the
52:28
newsletter, about the podcast, things you
52:30
would like to have addressed that
52:33
we have not, or that you want us to delve into
52:35
more that we have. We hope
52:37
this is a conversation with you, at least
52:39
as much as possible and not just a
52:41
conversation at you. So
52:43
we look forward to the feedback and
52:46
the engagement and continuing to build an
52:48
idea movement that hopefully leads to a more
52:51
constructive future rather than a worse one. So
52:54
thank you for your time and we will be
52:56
back next week. Dr. Debra Hixson Thanks, everyone.
53:00
What Could Go Right? is produced
53:02
by The Podglomerate. Executive produced by
53:04
Jeff Umbrough. Marketing by The Podglomerate.
53:06
To find out more about What
53:08
Could Go Right? The Progress Network
53:11
or to subscribe to the What
53:13
Could Go Right? newsletter, visit theprogressnetwork.org.
53:18
Thanks for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More