Podchaser Logo
Home
Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Released Wednesday, 27th July 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Do we repeat ourselves? Very well then, we repeat ourselves.

Wednesday, 27th July 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

coming up on word matters when english

0:07

repeats itself, i'm

0:09

emily brewster and where it matters is produced

0:11

merriam in collaboration with

0:14

new england public media on

0:16

each episode merriam-webster, editors

0:18

m & j, peter, sokolowski, and

0:20

i explore some aspect of

0:22

the english language from the dictionary, is

0:25

vantage

0:25

point a

0:28

listener questions of tautology in

0:30

one of our definitions starts

0:32

us off on a discussion of all types

0:34

of repetition and redundancy

0:37

we have a nice note from leonard

0:40

and it has a christian

0:43

the june second word of the day

0:45

the finds the verb meld

0:48

as you blend or mix

0:50

together then the two examples

0:52

use that word with the word together

0:55

isn't to meld together

0:57

a tautology the of my favorite

0:59

startling examples of a tautology

1:01

our pin number and

1:04

please rsvp the

1:06

you think tautology is should be avoided

1:09

the great question

1:11

i told you we define as needless repetition

1:13

of an idea statement or word or

1:16

an instance of such repetition

1:18

and within logic a specialized definition

1:21

a statement that is true by virtue

1:23

of it's logical form alone

1:26

and it comes from the latin word

1:29

which plus from the greek word so tautology

1:31

essentially means in english today what it meant in greek

1:33

couple thousand years ago

1:35

the key there to me as his

1:37

needless members and

1:39

what does it mean for repetition

1:42

to be needless

1:44

i think that's an excellent point emily because

1:47

i don't have language keeps with the

1:49

language or have language peeves with

1:51

the peters is that when you hear

1:53

omits needless words what

1:55

does that mean we don't need any words

1:57

we could be pictographic insider

1:59

to me a word which

2:02

adds to the slow of the sense

2:04

of rhythm of the sentence or even just the mouthfeel

2:06

of the sentence it sounds fun to say so

2:08

i'm gonna say it's me that the needful bird

2:10

whereas other people might think it's needed

2:14

the thing is repetition bothers people and

2:16

this gets to something we've talked about before on

2:18

a logical level is not necessary linguistic

2:21

it might be just logic that bothers

2:23

people right

2:24

and in different circumstances

2:26

these kinds of repetition can be problematic

2:29

and in other circumstances they are not so

2:31

am and you're talking about the rhythm and mouthfeel

2:33

and certainly repetition in

2:36

musical lyrics or in poetry

2:38

is less troublesome two

2:40

people than i assume

2:42

a repetition and totalities

2:45

in defining text tend

2:47

to be we actually answer

2:49

this particular question is our

2:52

definition of meld problematic

2:55

my argument is that know it is not

2:57

problematic because the definition is

2:59

easier to understand with that

3:01

little hint of repetition their

3:04

efficiency is not a greater

3:06

good than efficacy

3:08

so in this case to mix together

3:11

i think that is clearer that is more

3:13

quickly understood by the reader

3:15

then simply defining meld as to mix

3:18

even a recipe you sometimes he mixed

3:20

together which is essentially unnecessary

3:23

but i find it helpful because he

3:25

relies okay these things are going

3:27

to be com one e

3:29

pluribus unum that phrase comes

3:31

from apparently a roman recipe for

3:34

salad that was admired by

3:36

benjamin franklin are one of the founders from

3:38

many one the idea is to make

3:40

one kind of substance out of these

3:43

others and i do find

3:45

it useful as a kind of sign post

3:47

or directions or instructions

3:49

the understand the impulse to want to strip things

3:51

down to their kind of barest

3:54

bones as communicative

3:56

ability to what is the most

3:58

efficient way you

3:59

in communicate something

4:01

twitter used to require that archer when

4:03

the catholic church sons were so small but

4:06

i think in general people

4:09

tend to values something that

4:11

isn't so onerous on the reader

4:13

or and the listener there's something about

4:15

a longer phrase that gives

4:17

the listener more time to follow

4:20

what you're saying bear efficiency

4:22

can be really hard to follow a low

4:24

and

4:24

lax dial efficiency is a style

4:26

and itself just for the sake of it what

4:29

are some of these annoying when he mentioned pin

4:31

number but also this a t m machine

4:33

right that people gas love to hate allen a

4:36

lot of times they are politically rich an acronym

4:38

iq settings so personal identification

4:40

number number that's what bothers people

4:43

but i would argue that even

4:45

though it is of redundancy

4:47

it doesn't matter

4:48

and

4:49

it is redundant but it's just a new

4:51

word pin number part of

4:53

the way that language work is it works an illogical

4:56

ways rsvp please

4:58

i think that's totally fine yes we're doubling

5:01

the please that's okay what

5:03

is being lost by the dublin,

5:05

microsecond of your

5:07

time, know what is being lost by

5:09

your quibble far greater a microcephaly

5:11

the time while sitting around talking about

5:13

how the line with shouldn't work, that way english

5:16

is going to hell in a handbasket, whatever i know

5:18

how everybody feels bad about himself in

5:20

the language to me that's a far greater

5:22

than just being like i have, we repeated

5:24

the police and

5:25

that case, and it may apply

5:27

to the pin number and atm machine also, they

5:30

rsvped has become lexicalized

5:32

in a way that we don't even recognize in the dictionary

5:35

because we acknowledge it's an abbreviation

5:37

meaning please reply but to rsvp

5:40

used as an absolute just a reply

5:42

and rcp doesn't necessarily include

5:44

the idea of please or thank you it's

5:47

just a reply that's not yet

5:49

in the dictionary and yet as english speakers

5:51

we don't think of what those initials really

5:53

stand for we just take it to mean a reply

5:56

right rcp as a french fray and

5:58

to sell english speakers most of us

5:59

don't speak french and the phrase

6:02

rsvp that abbreviation

6:04

the acronym really means tell me if you're

6:06

coming i'm inviting you to something tell

6:08

me if you're coming and i feel like

6:11

if i don't say please rsvp

6:13

it's rude

6:14

what's also interesting there is not

6:17

only is our to p become less slice

6:19

but it's taken from another language and one of the things

6:21

that english is very good up is that when we borrow

6:23

another language we put our own stocked with structure

6:26

on a classic case of this is why

6:28

likes his face and the greek meaning the

6:30

many and some people when they like to show off

6:32

their knowledge a creek say well you shouldn't say though

6:34

if only because it's another many

6:37

for and means the employment many people

6:39

when i actually speaking in britain

6:41

reason agree craze in english context

6:44

and so does what lawyer is actually

6:46

quite natural and it's in line with

6:48

what english does minute faros phrases

6:50

or words from other languages quite often you

6:53

remind me of a favorite in house joke

6:55

and the bilingual department at merriam webster

6:57

of years back to this day i

6:59

still use this although all of my colleagues

7:01

from those years of moved on there was a restaurant

7:03

downtown in springfield

7:05

they used to have a little slater chalk

7:08

board outside that would have a super today and

7:11

it would say soup does your of the day

7:14

of course my colleagues or lexicography we would go in

7:16

there once a week or whatever and we didn't have a conversation

7:18

about they would just say the suit is your of the day

7:20

and so that became like a fixed phrase

7:22

soup deserves it acres cause soup soup

7:25

but you have means of the day and

7:27

but clearly these people had felt that soup to

7:29

soar simply meant special soup the soup

7:31

that is not on the menu and again it was

7:34

there for them for them lexical eyes and away

7:36

the had nothing to do with the word's meaning

7:38

in france because who cares or express

7:40

how that senses and sectors your the

7:42

day was easily understood it is all of that sony

7:44

i have to say to this day i still reflexively

7:47

say soup to your of the day if it ever comes

7:49

into my conversations dense a great example

7:51

again like rsvp insists ryan phrasing

7:54

that is being

7:54

brought into the language and taking

7:57

on a youth that's really actually distinct

7:59

from it

7:59

course it interesting because it's english now

8:08

you're listening to where it matters i'm

8:10

emily brewster next up more

8:12

on the languages repetitious knees

8:15

where it matters is produced by merriam webster

8:18

in collaboration with new england

8:20

public media

8:23

word matters listeners get twenty five

8:25

percent off all dictionaries and books

8:27

at shop dot mary i'm hyphen webster

8:29

dot com

8:30

the using the promo code matters

8:33

at checkout

8:34

that matters m a t t

8:36

e r s at shop don't

8:38

marry him hyphen webster dot com

8:40

i'm am in shea do you have a question

8:43

about the origin history or meaning of

8:45

a word email us at where

8:47

it matters at m hyphen w

8:49

dot com

8:50

and peter sokolowski join me every

8:52

day for the word of the day a brief

8:54

look at the history and definition

8:56

of one word available at marry

8:58

him hyphen webster dot com or wherever

9:00

you get your podcasts and for more

9:03

podcasts from new england public media

9:05

visit the n e p m podcast

9:07

hub at any p m

9:13

we continue our discussion of

9:15

tautology is read done didn't seize

9:17

and repetitions there

9:19

are lots of other redundancies

9:22

taught holidays repetitious

9:25

phrases that writers are

9:27

warned against we've talked about

9:29

pin number and eighty a machine

9:32

in both of those cases the word

9:34

that has been repeated has been kind of swallowed

9:36

up by the acronym which signal it's

9:38

own function really and so the

9:40

repetition is not so obvious the

9:43

people also warn against phrases

9:45

like advance planning

9:47

basic fundamentals

9:49

yeah yeah another one is free

9:52

gifts theory go for like to say

9:54

but he says but they want

9:56

a sense of gift to be set

9:58

in stone when fact the untethered

10:00

as all words aren't and is

10:03

shifting in lot of cases is a sign

10:05

of discomfort with semantic drift

10:07

that when people say title like free gift

10:09

for the mean his gift is taking on

10:12

new an extended broader meaning said

10:14

i am uncomfortable with

10:15

i mean do you charge for your gift

10:17

why to give gifts to people but i'm happy

10:19

i'm sure instruments just

10:21

, nobody wants gifts from me he

10:25

pays in friendship

10:27

redundancy is useful

10:30

sometimes and it can also be

10:32

over done

10:32

and here's the thing with the case of free gift

10:35

i think you start on a slightly different

10:37

path which is the language of marketing

10:39

or salesmanship people can become

10:41

sensitive to and be annoyed by because they feel

10:44

like okay you're kind of bending the language

10:46

to sell me something and i think there

10:48

is a kind of marketing tactic to

10:51

use any which in this way to kind of induce you

10:53

in one way or another ensign of it's laughable

10:55

and funny as some of it's on of gray

10:58

and boring see that is noticeable

11:00

and annoying a free gift kind of falls

11:02

into that category because no one would really

11:04

say that in the context of a birthday party

11:06

or christmas or whatever but they would

11:08

in the case of off you buy this you get this

11:10

say and so says a transaction

11:13

so it becomes as a kind of a different sects not

11:15

just a language p for or problem

11:17

but my kind of a conceptual ideas

11:19

that you might feel defensive about or wary

11:21

about

11:22

i think you're exactly right and again this is about context

11:25

we are i think especially

11:28

wary of language from

11:30

advertising and from business

11:32

those are i think two kinds jargon that

11:34

turn people off new more than other kinds

11:36

of jargon it because you think we

11:38

feel like were liable to be victimized

11:41

in some way i afraid that they are using

11:43

their tricky language to put us in

11:45

circumstances that we did not mean to

11:47

sign

11:47

for many examples of these one

11:49

i remember just as a kid we just

11:52

repeated it all the time because it was so funny it

11:54

was it was a dinner knives table

11:56

settings that we had and leader

11:58

label as a package said jenny

12:00

simulated plastic would handles

12:03

that , just someone in marketing just basically

12:05

using words to sell space yes

12:08

it is a handle because of that sequence

12:10

of words was funny to us as kids

12:12

so i still remember to this day gave

12:14

auto mechanic or of this marketing mass

12:16

of language the word tautology

12:19

i think has a negative connotation

12:21

for sure if something's pleasant then

12:23

you want to revisit it you don't want to

12:26

regurgitate it rigors is another negative

12:28

way of experiencing are

12:31

repeating something and something i told

12:33

you a clear to me negative connotation

12:35

right as does redundancy or and there's the

12:37

department of redundancy department the

12:39

point is you don't need it

12:41

meanwhile repetition i think is looked

12:43

upon more charitably again a your turn

12:45

to song

12:46

eric for example britain

12:47

listen and rhythm

13:02

wherever you get your podcasts or

13:04

email us at word matters as

13:06

am a hyphen w dot com you

13:09

can also visit us at any p

13:11

m dot org and for the word

13:13

of the day and

13:14

there are generally dictionary means there's

13:16

a very

13:20

the music if i tobias point

13:22

artwork by any jacobson where

13:25

it matters is produced by john's o sea

13:27

and me sir and and say i'm

13:29

peter sokoloski i'm emily brewster

13:32

word matters is produced by merriam webster's

13:35

and new england

13:36

media

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features