Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
So what we're going to do first is
0:02
we're going to look at a tweet that you are
0:04
familiar with because you wrote about it. So I'm going
0:06
to put the tweet in our little chat here. This
0:11
is a retweet of a
0:14
picture from Film
0:16
Updates. It's
0:19
a picture of Billy Crystal
0:21
in like a big, luxurious, white sweater
0:24
and jeans and like white
0:27
dad sneakers. His
0:29
like iconic outfit from When Harry
0:32
Met Sally. And then next
0:34
to him is Ben Schwartz doing
0:36
a similar look. And
0:39
the comment is from a user named
0:41
Ellery Smith. And it says, the quality
0:43
of sweaters has declined so greatly in
0:45
the last 20 years that I think
0:47
it genuinely necessitates a national conversation. What
0:50
do you spot immediately when you're looking
0:52
at the differences between the two? The
0:55
biggest difference. I mean, there's a lot of
0:57
like aesthetic differences here. I think Ben did
0:59
sort of a half-assed job of this,
1:01
if we're being totally honest. But
1:03
the biggest difference is what
1:06
Ellery refers to in her
1:08
tweet is that the sweater that
1:10
Billy Crystal is wearing from
1:12
Harry Met Sally is just this sort
1:15
of like voluminous, fluffy, comfortable
1:17
looking, thick, like richly cabled
1:20
sweater. And then Ben next
1:22
to him is wearing a
1:24
sweater that, first of all, has a different cut.
1:26
It's cut much closer to the body. It doesn't
1:28
have like the volume or the heft of
1:31
Billy's sweater. It has a bunch
1:33
of cabling on it, but everything about
1:35
it just looks sort of like thin
1:37
and flat and sort
1:39
of less rich compared to the sweater
1:42
that Billy was wearing. It's just
1:44
a worse sweater, honestly. This
1:48
is the Culture Study Podcast and I am
1:50
Anne Helen Peterson. I'm Amanda Malt. I'm a
1:52
staff writer at The Atlantic. We are
1:55
talking about clothes and all of their
1:57
very crappiness and moment
4:00
until they actually read that right so like I was
4:02
reading your article and I was like oh
4:05
my gosh my sweater is filled with
4:07
like weird stretchy material
4:10
that is like similar to stretchy
4:12
jeans like I didn't even think
4:14
deeply about it I'm looking
4:16
actually at my closet right now and right
4:18
next to one another there are two mint
4:21
green J. Crew sweaters one
4:24
of which was purchased for me as
4:26
like my big Christmas present from my
4:28
granddad in 2000
4:31
still going strong and
4:34
then the other one is a sweater from J. Crew purchased
4:36
two years ago that like
4:39
I kind of like because it's very resilient and
4:42
it's not really pilling too much but
4:44
it is it feels like it's from
4:46
a different company altogether different price points but
4:49
I think they probably in adjusted
4:52
dollars are probably kind of similar
4:54
but like you can see that
4:56
contrast even across the the trajectory
4:58
of one company right
5:01
like if you look at clothing
5:03
made in the early 2000s
5:05
or before versus clothing
5:07
made now you you genuinely get a lot
5:09
of differences even from like sort of a
5:11
surface level appraisal of that
5:14
clothing I when I go
5:16
home to visit my family my mom still
5:18
is in the house that like I grew
5:20
up in so there's still you know artifacts
5:23
of my high school wardrobe and my college
5:25
wardrobe in there and you know
5:27
you go through that stuff you look at
5:29
it you try to figure out like is there anything that
5:31
I would like to keep from this like is there anything I should bring
5:33
back to New York with me and I
5:35
always look at fiber tags because this is
5:37
just something I'm interested in and it's amazing
5:39
to me how often I will look at
5:42
a tag of a sweater from Old Navy
5:44
or from the Gap or something like that
5:46
from that era and it is like a
5:48
hundred percent wool or it's wool
5:50
and cotton or something
5:52
like that and it's all natural fiber and you
5:55
go to those same retailers today and it's just
5:57
very very difficult to find something that's not at
5:59
least part nylon, part
6:01
acrylic, part polyester, part viscose, something
6:03
like that. And
6:06
20 years ago when I was in high
6:08
school, it was just so, so much easier
6:10
to find those garments at like a really
6:12
reasonable price tag. J.Crew is a great example
6:14
of that. And I think that J.Crew is
6:16
among the retailers that is trying to get
6:18
back to like a more natural fiber based
6:21
inventory as we currently speak. And they've made some
6:23
progress on that in the last like year or
6:25
two, I think. But once
6:28
so much of the garment trade
6:30
moved to manufacturing overseas in poorer
6:32
countries, a couple of things
6:35
happened. The first thing is that
6:37
you're hiring from a workforce that you don't
6:39
want to pay very much and that you
6:41
don't want to train very much.
6:43
You just want to pump as much product out
6:45
of these people's time as they can
6:47
possibly make. So you
6:49
get workmanship that's not as good. You get
6:52
corners that are cut. You get people who
6:54
just do not have like the long term
6:56
skill acquisition that a more highly trained
6:58
long tenured garment worker would have.
7:02
And then you also end up manufacturing
7:04
in countries that just do
7:06
not hold you to the same environmental
7:08
standards as richer countries tend to hold
7:10
manufacturing to. So you get
7:12
countries where you can manufacture and use
7:14
a lot of synthetic materials. You
7:16
can make viscose or rayon, which
7:19
I think my understanding is that it's basically
7:22
impossible to manufacture that in the
7:24
U.S. because of environmental regulation here.
7:27
But you can manufacture it by the
7:29
ton in countries where their
7:31
government is willing to
7:34
let garment manufacturers sort of write
7:37
the regulations themselves. Is
7:40
viscose and rayon, like are they like basically plastics?
7:44
They're not plastics. Those are viscose
7:46
and rayon are interesting materials. My
7:49
coworker, Sarah Zhang wrote a really
7:51
interesting article about what all
7:53
these sort of bamboo based fabrics are and that's
7:55
how they're marketed, especially in baby clothing. Oh,
7:58
right. Right. basically
8:00
cellulose that gets extracted from often
8:02
bamboo, but other types of plants
8:04
sometimes as well. And then
8:07
highly, highly chemically treated in order to make
8:09
it soft and pliable and make
8:12
it into thread that can be used
8:14
in clothing. And the chemicals that are
8:16
required to make bamboo into something soft
8:18
and something that you want against your
8:20
body are like really incredibly caustic
8:23
and poisonous. And that creates
8:25
a lot of, you know, groundwater pollution. It's
8:27
bad for the textile workers. It's bad for
8:29
the garment workers, but it's very, very
8:32
inexpensive to manufacture. And because bamboo is
8:34
very easy to cultivate, you can make
8:36
it in really large, large quantities. So
8:39
it sort of might as well be plastic in that
8:41
way. The other thing that I really noted from your
8:43
article was the point that like, even
8:46
places that are selling like the Instagram
8:48
high end sweater, you know, like the
8:50
$300 Cézanne sweater,
8:53
I was like, certainly those
8:55
will be fully natural fibers.
8:57
And I went to the website and looked at the
9:00
most beautiful sweaters. It's like, nope, not
9:03
at all. Nope. Anybody who's manufacturing at
9:05
a really, really high scale, no matter how
9:07
expensive their products are, you're
9:09
going to find these corners cut
9:12
in their manufacturing. I used
9:14
as an example in the story, this Gucci
9:16
sweater that I found on their website that
9:18
is $3,200, I believe. And it
9:22
was fully half polyester. And
9:26
like there, there are good,
9:28
there are a few good arguments from
9:30
like sort of a textile technology standpoint
9:32
and putting like a little bit of
9:34
polyester in a knit blend. Like if
9:37
it's done well, it can make a product
9:39
a little bit stronger in certain ways. It
9:41
can, it can change some of the physical
9:43
properties of the yarn in ways that like
9:45
in certain situations you might want. But
9:48
if you're looking at that large of a volume
9:50
of polyester, it's not
9:52
doing anything that you want it to do. It
9:55
is just cutting the materials cost of that sweater.
9:57
And there's no like financial reason that Gucci has
9:59
to. product.
12:00
It is not a product that its
12:02
makers want to have any discernible history
12:04
or any discernible context except for the
12:06
marketing context. All right. So
12:08
one of the questions we got is from Megan
12:11
and she says that she recently went to Zara
12:13
because she needed something last minute. And like we've
12:15
been talking about, she was shocked at how much the
12:17
quality had declined since she last shopped there. And she
12:20
wants to know, is there anything consumers
12:22
can do to actually drive change in
12:24
this area? That's a
12:27
tough question because the thing that's going to
12:29
fix the fashion industry is regulation.
12:31
It's not consumer behavior, but
12:33
I think that like consumer
12:35
behavior is also the thing
12:37
that sort of makes people
12:39
realize that regulation is possible
12:42
and that there's a interest in the electorate for
12:44
this type of regulation. So I think that like
12:47
consumer behavior is not something that like
12:49
directly affects change, but I think that
12:51
it has to change if we want
12:53
a better world, if
12:55
we want things that serve our needs better. And I think
12:58
that like that is possible. So
13:00
what I would say is that like the best
13:02
thing you can do and the
13:04
simplest thing you can do is stop buying that
13:06
stuff if you can avoid it or
13:08
just like try to
13:11
reframe your approach to clothing away
13:14
from the one that you've been
13:16
sort of socialized into by these
13:18
brands. Because like everything about
13:20
the fashion industry is sort of made up.
13:23
And like I love clothing, I love
13:25
dressing up, I love the aesthetic possibilities
13:27
of it all. But it's
13:30
important to draw a distinction between that and
13:32
the constant
13:34
treadmill of consumption that
13:37
clothing companies have convinced us we need
13:39
to be on in order to achieve
13:41
this sort of like personal expression and
13:43
enjoyment of our day to day wardrobes
13:46
and of getting dressed and of being out in
13:48
the world and presenting ourselves to other
13:50
humans. I think that those things
13:52
often get conflated, but they're not the same. One
13:55
of the best things that you can do for yourself
13:57
is to develop taste. Yep. And
14:00
to believe in your personal taste, to understand what
14:03
it is that you feel good in and what
14:05
you like wearing, and understand that
14:07
especially as you get into your 30s and
14:09
40s and beyond, the
14:12
need to adhere to trends, to
14:14
adhere to changes in expectation,
14:17
is just something that you can
14:19
opt out of in large part.
14:22
There is a certain amount of it that you can't opt
14:24
out of because clothing is a
14:26
social language and it's how we communicate that
14:29
we understand the expectations of us in
14:31
the workplace, in social situations, in romantic
14:34
situations. But I think that
14:36
there's a way that you can sort of
14:38
roll with that and still keep your personal
14:40
taste and your personal point of view intact.
14:43
And the goal of trend marketing is to
14:45
draw you further and further away from your
14:48
personal understanding of how it is that you
14:50
like to look and how it is that
14:52
you feel comfortable looking in
14:54
public. And the more that
14:56
you can do to get back
14:58
to that, to sort of understand how
15:00
your own personal relationship with clothing, is
15:03
something that you can do to resist
15:05
this sort of constant bid for your
15:08
attention from these companies and for your
15:10
dollars, too. Beyond that, I
15:12
think that when you do need or want
15:14
something new, changing your consumption patterns is possible
15:16
for a lot of people. One
15:19
of the things when I was writing my story
15:21
about sweaters that basically everyone told me that I
15:23
interviewed for that story is that when they want
15:26
a new sweater, when there's like a gap
15:29
that they would like to fill in their
15:31
wardrobe, they shop secondhand. They look on eBay.
15:33
They look on Poshmark. They look in local
15:35
thrift stores because you're going to find
15:38
older brands that are better made, that
15:40
are made out of nicer materials,
15:42
that are more likely to be 100 percent natural
15:44
fiber. And like sweater styles
15:47
don't change that much over the years. Like if
15:49
you find a good a little bit of a poofy
15:51
shoulder and then the poofy shoulder goes away, that's
15:54
like the extent. Right. And like and
15:56
there can be also I think
15:58
some aesthetic pleasure in being a. a little bit out of fashion
16:00
in that way. People respect
16:03
that, I think, more than we
16:05
expect them to. I also
16:07
think the other thing that people can do is
16:09
participate in resale a little bit
16:12
more. And whether that's on a
16:14
site like Poshmark or Consignment, which
16:17
for a lot of people it's frustrating, it's certainly frustrating for
16:19
me every time. I've ever gone
16:21
to a, what's
16:24
the name of the store? That's for cool kids,
16:26
you bring your clothes and they don't take
16:28
anything. Buffalo Exchange? Yeah,
16:30
Buffalo Exchange. But where I've found
16:32
success, and I think that people
16:35
would find success even if they
16:37
don't have a larger Instagram following,
16:40
is just by putting stuff online
16:42
and also only putting it in an Instagram
16:44
story and being like, and pricing it pretty
16:46
low, and only selling stuff
16:48
that I would be proud to
16:51
give to a friend. And that allows
16:53
me to be like, this isn't going to the
16:55
garbage, it's not going to Goodwill, where it
16:57
might also go into the garbage. There's
17:00
going to be a new home for
17:02
it. And I didn't necessarily, quote unquote,
17:04
recoup my investment, but it
17:07
has a home. It's getting a second life, it's
17:09
getting a longer life. And also having
17:12
that in mind too, when I buy stuff, is
17:15
this something that I would feel comfortable selling
17:18
to a friend or selling to someone who follows
17:20
me on social media? Then okay, that's okay. Also,
17:23
Facebook Buy Nothing groups can be great. There's
17:26
a real opportunity to take some pictures, list some
17:28
stuff in there, and people don't necessarily, they don't
17:30
pay you for it, but it goes to somebody
17:32
who looked at it and decided they actually wanted
17:34
it instead of into
17:37
a landfill or something like that. And the
17:39
friend I have who I consider the best
17:41
dressed is someone who, as long as
17:43
I have known her, she has bought and sold all of
17:46
her clothes on eBay. I
17:48
don't know if I've ever known her to
17:50
have something brand new even. She
17:52
is someone who just has incredible
17:54
personal taste, decided long
17:57
ago what she likes, and does
17:59
not really like it. really waver
18:01
when it comes to trends or
18:04
what she's supposed to be doing. And like
18:06
she's a woman in her thirties who lives in Brooklyn,
18:09
just like I am. She lives in sort of like the
18:11
trend capital of the world. But
18:13
she saves a lot of money and she always
18:15
looks incredible and she always looks like herself. And
18:18
she was doing the resale thing before the Zoomer thought
18:20
it was cool. When she
18:23
gets sick of something or decides that she doesn't have any
18:25
use for it anymore, she e-bays it. A
18:27
lot of being well-dressed and being perceived
18:29
as well-dressed is just having the courage of your
18:31
convictions when it comes to getting dressed. And
18:34
that's hard. People feel
18:36
all kinds of different ways about their bodies.
18:38
They feel all kinds of different ways about the cost
18:42
of getting dressed and how to use their money
18:44
and how they'll be perceived at work. But the
18:46
people who ultimately are thought of
18:49
by everyone as being incredibly stylish
18:52
are the people who are not as concerned with trends. And
18:54
I am here to tell you today that you do not have
18:56
to really care about trends. That
18:59
is a young woman's game, first
19:01
of all. None of us are in
19:03
high school anymore. And when you're young,
19:06
you're sort of figuring out what it is
19:08
that you feel good in. That's one reason that it
19:10
makes a lot of sense to sort of jump around to
19:12
trends because you're trying to figure out who you are. But
19:15
at this point in life, I feel like try
19:17
to be comfortable in who you've learned yourself to
19:20
be so far and try to dress that person
19:22
and not the person that Zara
19:24
wants her to be. Okay,
19:26
our next question is from Chris who did not know
19:28
that you were going to be the guest on this
19:30
episode, but he linked to your sweater piece and
19:33
he asked this. So now that we
19:35
know sweaters are mostly garbage, how
19:37
do we go about buying okay sweaters? I
19:40
wear men's tall sizes, which makes finding
19:43
sweaters even harder. Do you have
19:45
any advice for me? Okay, I think I
19:47
know what you're going to answer here, but
19:49
I want to hear your tip. What
19:51
we already discussed about looking at eBay, looking
19:53
at consignment stores, stuff like that is all
19:55
like great advice. But if you need something
19:58
new and if you are a size. that
20:00
was not commonly made in the 80s or the
20:02
90s or before, like that might be the case.
20:04
It's the case for me on plus size. What
20:07
you probably want to do is find
20:10
like smaller labels, smaller
20:13
stores, and sort of rely
20:15
on them. Yeah. The
20:17
United States is still full of
20:19
sort of like interesting, knowledgeable,
20:23
small retailers. They're
20:25
harder to find than they used to be. In
20:27
my sweater story, I mentioned O'Connell's in Buffalo,
20:29
which is a long
20:31
standing, long time menswear store in Buffalo
20:35
that has a sort of
20:38
rickety web presence in a
20:40
charming way. People
20:42
that run and work at stores like
20:44
that are excited to help out people
20:46
who have questions and who need guidance. I
20:50
have no problem believing that you could call O'Connell's and be
20:52
like, I'm a men's tall. What
20:55
do you carry in a men's tall? If you don't carry
20:57
it, where do you think I could find it? I have
20:59
no doubt believing that they'd be excited to help you out
21:01
or tell you where they think that you
21:03
can get more options. Wolf's
21:06
letters don't have to be
21:08
fantastically expensive. A lot of
21:10
the ones that O'Connell's carries cost less than $200. $200 is a lot
21:13
of money,
21:15
but a lot of retailers, J.Crew,
21:18
Gap, et cetera, that are sort
21:20
of like mid-price small retailers are going to get you up
21:22
around $100 for a sweater anyway. A lot of times, it's
21:25
going to have plastic in it.
21:28
This is the point at which
21:30
becoming a little bit more discerning
21:32
in how often you're shopping and
21:35
what it is you're buying can be useful because buying
21:38
one really gorgeous merino wool
21:40
sweater instead of three or
21:42
four random things from J.Crew or from
21:44
wherever it is that you might be
21:48
inclined to shop is going to be in
21:50
your long-term best interest. My partner,
21:52
Charlie, who's also your coworker, his
21:54
solution has been to find a
21:56
maker of Irish sweaters.
21:59
You know, like the Irish fishermen sweaters, they
22:02
look like that, like that belly crystal sweater.
22:05
And they're bulky, like they're not svelte.
22:09
That is not the word to say. But they
22:11
are amazing sweaters. And so like every two years,
22:14
he gets one. And they're what makes him
22:16
feel like him in the winter. So
22:18
it's like the perfect solution. When
22:20
you're looking at any kind of garment, I
22:22
think a good rule of thumb is to
22:24
look for garments made in places that people
22:26
need those types of garments. Scotland
22:29
and Ireland and New Zealand produce a lot of
22:31
incredible wool. They have a lot of sheep. And
22:34
they have the climates where people
22:36
need garments like the ones they're
22:38
creating. So there are still
22:40
like, you know, sort of like old
22:42
style heritage makers in those countries that
22:45
are making sort of like the old
22:48
style garments that you're not going to find
22:50
in your average online retailer. But
22:53
they're out there. And they're available. And this
22:56
is, again, one of those situations where like these
22:58
sort of like small companies
23:00
that care about the product and care
23:03
about ensuring that the product can continue
23:05
to be made for a long time
23:07
and that people understand why
23:09
it's different are oftentimes quite
23:12
willing to help you out if you need something,
23:15
if you need advice, if you're looking for something
23:17
in particular. So our next question, gosh, I just
23:19
love we have so many dude questions about
23:21
fashion. This is from someone just thinking
23:24
about care of clothing. And
23:26
his name is Ted. So
23:29
let's go for it. Why do so few of
23:31
us seem to iron our clothes or
23:34
have them professionally cleaned or laundered?
23:37
Is it a time issue, a money issue,
23:40
or some sort of deliberate statement? Gosh,
23:44
I was ironing on a
23:46
Ghostbusters logo onto my Ghostbusters
23:50
costume earlier this last month.
23:53
And I realized that that was the first time that
23:55
I had used iron in like nine months. Think
23:58
about this all the time, right? Like I love it. I
24:00
love my clothes when they're
24:02
ironed. I hate ironing. The
24:04
apparatus for ironing are so
24:07
cumbersome, but also
24:09
I live on an island. There's no such
24:11
thing as dry cleaning. And even when I lived in New
24:13
York and dry cleaning was all over the place, I would
24:15
pay to have my clothes laundered, but I wouldn't pay
24:17
for them to get dry cleaned. What are your thoughts
24:20
on why? Is it just like
24:22
the spread of stuff that's more ready to wear that
24:24
doesn't need it, but all that linen shit needs it?
24:26
I don't know. Yeah, where do we go here? I
24:29
think that part of it, this is
24:31
a question that spans several generations of
24:33
history, I think. Because I
24:35
think a lot of it goes back to
24:37
women getting jobs. This
24:41
sort of laundering and ironing and
24:44
mending and tailoring, these little care
24:46
tasks, domestic care tasks, that
24:48
go along with maintaining your clothing are
24:51
things that women did for a really
24:53
long time. And if
24:55
you go back further, making clothing, spinning yarn,
24:58
making textiles, and then making clothing out
25:00
of them was all like that was
25:02
women's work long before
25:04
industrialization. And it is
25:06
just like real work. It takes
25:09
elbow grease, you're standing up, you're
25:11
doing physically skilled labor. Ironing
25:13
things is not easy. It
25:16
takes skill, it takes experience, and
25:18
it takes the tools and
25:21
space necessary to do it.
25:23
And I think that as women went into the workplace,
25:25
a lot of those skills were not passed
25:27
down to daughters. I think
25:30
for reasons that are both sort of practical
25:33
and that are emotional, because a lot of
25:35
our mothers did not want us saddled with
25:37
that work. My mom didn't
25:39
teach me how to cook because she hated cooking and
25:41
she didn't want me stuck in a situation where I
25:43
had to cook for everybody, just because I had
25:46
been taught. That's so interesting because when I think about
25:48
it, I learned to iron, I think
25:50
I was mostly bored. And
25:53
my mom had been like sending out my
25:55
dad's shirts to get pressed. And
25:58
she said, I'll pay
26:00
you a quarter for each,
26:02
if you press each of these shirts. So
26:05
little money, but when you're a kid, you're like, yeah,
26:08
I'm super bored anyway, and I'll
26:11
learn how to do this thing. But
26:13
I think that that speaks to one, she never did
26:15
it herself or refused to do it herself. And
26:18
two, that there's like, I think a lot of
26:21
families have to do this sort of analysis of
26:23
like, well, if the shirt
26:25
has to be pressed, like if men are going to be
26:27
wearing these shirts that need to be pressed, who is going
26:29
to do it? Are we going to send it out? Is
26:31
someone in the family going to make time in their lives
26:33
to make it happen? And I also think
26:35
there's a shift in menswear that
26:37
like, there are fewer things that
26:39
need to be pressed just generally,
26:41
that that also opens up all this space.
26:44
So if you don't have a whole bunch of things to
26:46
take to get pressed to get dry cleaned, then
26:48
it disincentivizes taking that one thing. Right.
26:51
The history of clothing in modern times
26:54
is a history of casualization, where we
26:56
are less and
26:59
less put together, quote unquote, in
27:01
ways that require the sort of
27:03
precision that ironing and dry cleaning
27:05
give us. And then
27:07
also with that, and with the sort
27:09
of shift in women's labor from unpaid
27:11
to paid, you get
27:13
materials technology that sort of fills in
27:16
those gaps. And you can see
27:18
this happening in other areas of domestic work as
27:20
well with like dishwashers and washing
27:22
machines themselves and things like that, where
27:25
the sort of changing lives of
27:27
women are sort of met by
27:29
technology. There's also this like,
27:33
the materials technology has changed. Brands
27:35
are always looking for an opening to market a
27:38
new product and to develop something that might like
27:40
be marketable to a particular need
27:42
that they've sensed. So materials technology has
27:44
advanced in a way that like wrinkle
27:47
free stuff is more common. A
27:49
lot of this is because plastic is added to clothing
27:52
in some way. So a lot of things that
27:54
would have been not washable at home in the
27:56
past or that would have needed hand washing can
27:58
now be thrown in the water. washing machine, a
28:00
lot of things that would have required ironing
28:04
before now, as long as you dry them
28:06
with heat, they are much less
28:08
wrinkled. So you get just like a lot
28:10
less need to do these like particular skills
28:12
that you like might not have been developing
28:15
anyway. I have this,
28:18
this romper that absolutely needs to
28:20
be like deeply steamed and pressed.
28:23
It is sat at the bottom of
28:25
my hamper. Just like, you
28:27
know, I dump it out and then I put it back into the
28:29
bottom and then I do my laundry and I put it on it.
28:31
Like it just, I'm not kidding you
28:33
18 months. Oh, I
28:35
have. Very cute. You
28:38
know, I have felt like that too. And I live
28:40
down the street from a, from a dry cleaner. I
28:42
live in Brooklyn. Like there's places to get your dry
28:44
cleaning done all over the place, but it's just not
28:46
like a part of my routine. And
28:49
it feels like a special task. And like I have lots
28:51
of other tasks I need to do. So it's
28:54
one of those things where it's like, it's far
28:56
enough outside the realm of normalcy because the composition
28:59
of people's wardrobes have changed. The
29:01
value of any particular piece of clothing has
29:04
gone down so much. So there's, there's not
29:06
as much people own more pieces of clothing
29:08
than they ever have before. What
29:10
is the real motivator in
29:12
taking this thing to get dry cleaned and paying $10 for
29:15
it to be dry cleaned? It would only cost $30 to
29:17
begin with. And like you've got all this other
29:19
stuff in your closet. The last thing I'll say is that I
29:21
live in a house that was built in 1904 and it has tiny
29:24
closets. And like a lot of people who live
29:26
in older houses, they bitch about the closets constantly.
29:28
When really what it is, is a reflection of
29:31
the fact that like that closet was a big
29:33
closet when the people lived here before, right? Like
29:35
they were like, this is ample space for
29:38
two people's clothing. And
29:40
now I have to like lug the fall
29:42
clothes up from downstairs. And that to
29:44
me is just a testament more
29:46
than any other of how, like, as you
29:48
said, like the, the real wage comparison with
29:51
how much clothes costs, like how that's changed,
29:53
how our understanding of like how many types
29:55
of clothing that we need has changed, all
29:58
that sort of thing. Okay. So here is a great segue
30:01
to our next question, which I don't necessarily
30:03
agree with, but it's going to be a
30:05
good, like, way for us to have a
30:08
conversation. So one of the prompts that I
30:10
gave to readers when we were coming up with questions
30:13
was just this very open-ended,
30:15
why are clothes the way that
30:17
they are? And we've
30:19
gotten into the substance and the fabrication of
30:22
clothes, so I think we should talk a
30:24
little bit about style. And this question is
30:26
from Sarah. I love the recent push
30:28
to make more clothes comfortable and
30:30
younger generations embrace slash insistence on
30:33
it. But why have we gone so far
30:35
from clothing that's flattering? Why
30:37
wear leggings that show every roll and
30:39
cellulite dimple? Why wear colors that make
30:41
your skin look bad? Why are
30:44
glasses so big? So
30:47
I think this concept of flattering is
30:50
something that people have begun
30:52
the work of unpacking, but
30:55
it's almost like diet culture in
30:57
that it takes a long time to
31:00
move away from even that idea of,
31:02
like, flattering is a static
31:04
thing, right? Like, that there is such thing
31:06
as, like, this is a flattering
31:09
silhouette and this isn't like when
31:11
I talked to Heather Radke a couple weeks ago
31:13
about her book about butts, like, she did this
31:15
whole section about bustles and how you just, like,
31:17
put, like, a huge second butt on your butt.
31:20
And that was considered incredibly flattering.
31:23
So how do you think about this question
31:25
and just the general idea about flattering? And
31:27
also, I think there's a lot of millennial
31:29
stuff going on in this question, too. Yeah,
31:32
I think there is. Like,
31:34
the first thing I would say is that when
31:36
it comes to looking at other
31:38
people and deciding if what they're wearing
31:41
is flattering or appropriate or whatever,
31:43
like, you've got to kill the cop on your head. Stop
31:45
it. Like, like, just stop
31:47
it. Knock it off. It's like the
31:50
grandma on your head, too, right? Like, for a lot
31:52
of people. Yeah, you've got to you've got to kill
31:54
that voice in your head that goes, it is inappropriate
31:56
if I am presented with information
31:58
about somebody's butt. that I
32:00
don't necessarily find enjoyable. Because
32:03
when you're looking at someone who's wearing
32:06
a tank top, wearing a short skirt, something like that,
32:08
and you can see the bones in
32:10
their shoulders or their collar bones sticking out or something
32:12
like that, that is just as much visceral information
32:15
about their bodies as being
32:17
able to see someone's cellulite or being able to see a
32:19
fat roll or whatever, but
32:22
one of those is good and nice and
32:25
the other one is somehow inappropriate. Those
32:27
are just two bodies, those are just bodies different
32:29
shapes and different parts and different
32:32
compositions and one of
32:34
them is not inherently superior or more valuable
32:36
to view than the other one. And
32:39
I think flattering is like a fake concept
32:41
in so far as it is
32:43
like a negotiated collective
32:45
understanding of what we expect out
32:47
of people's bodies. So
32:50
in order for something to be flattering, you have
32:52
to know what standard you're holding it against. And
32:55
the standard often is that someone should
32:57
have a small waist and medium sized
32:59
hips and a medium sized bust and
33:01
be tall and not be too muscular
33:03
but also not be too fat and
33:06
that flattering things are things that mold
33:09
your body or negate your body
33:11
in some way toward this shared
33:13
ideal. And I
33:16
think that when you look
33:18
at something and go that's flattering, that's
33:20
unflattering, why is this person not more
33:23
ashamed of their cellulite? Why aren't they covering it up?
33:26
I think that you are assuming that everybody
33:28
has the same understanding of what they should
33:30
be trying to accomplish with their clothes that
33:32
you do and I think that that's not
33:34
true. And I think the faster we understand
33:37
that that's not true, the better because
33:40
I think it's just really, really limiting. I
33:42
feel for people who look at clothing and
33:44
look at other people and think this way
33:47
because I think it suggests a lot of
33:49
internalized shame about what they're allowed to wear
33:51
and what they are comfortable showing to other
33:53
people and what they are comfortable doing with their clothing.
33:56
But clothing is
33:58
inimaginative. thing. Clothing
34:01
is something that gives you a lot
34:03
of power to tell the world about
34:05
yourself or not tell the world
34:07
about yourself in like whatever ways you choose. And
34:11
it's a way to demonstrate your feelings about
34:13
or understanding of a particular situation you're in,
34:15
which like, you know, comes up a lot
34:17
when you're getting dressed for a wedding or
34:20
is a guest or as a ride or whatever.
34:22
Like this is this is a really powerful language
34:24
that we have. And I feel for
34:26
people who feel like they
34:29
are not allowed to like speak fully with
34:31
it or through it. Yeah.
34:34
Because that's a really limiting thing. And that's a really hard way
34:36
to look at your own body. And it's a hard way to
34:38
look at other people's bodies and look at
34:40
other people's self expression. Also
34:43
what people are reacting to in this is that
34:45
like looking
34:47
at something that is different than
34:49
what you're used to seeing is challenging.
34:52
And when I see garments that are not on
34:54
a body that are just like laid
34:56
flat in like a stock photo or
34:58
whatever, when it's something that I
35:00
am not expecting to see and something that I have
35:02
not seen in a while or like a new idea,
35:04
like I find myself going, I don't
35:07
know about that. That's a little bit much that I
35:09
don't know if that would look good. I don't know
35:11
like who that looks good on. I
35:14
think that that is a really natural
35:16
process for people when confronted with new
35:18
aesthetic ideas. And but
35:21
it's also like a real opportunity. Like whenever I
35:23
find myself reacting to something that way, I'm always
35:25
like, okay, like what what is bothering me about
35:27
this? What is totally,
35:29
totally different about this? What is rubbing me in the wrong
35:31
way? It's kind of like I used
35:33
to tell my students when I was teaching
35:35
film history, like when you're watching
35:37
something that's avant-garde, you can't think about
35:40
watching it the same way that you
35:42
would watch a blockbuster. Like the most
35:44
interesting part of watching this film is
35:46
watching your own reaction to it. Right.
35:50
And then also, I've just followed a lot of
35:52
people. on
36:00
Instagram who are doing interesting things with fashion is
36:02
almost like a normalization
36:04
process. Seeing
36:06
all sorts of people who feel really at home
36:09
in their bodies and in
36:11
the fashion that they're choosing is
36:13
like a different way of
36:18
understanding even what that
36:20
word flattering could be. Like what if flattering was wearing
36:22
clothes that make you feel like you? Something
36:24
that has always struck me as interesting in
36:26
that I don't think that people totally understand
36:29
but that I learned while working
36:32
in fashion is that people
36:34
who work in fashion and who care deeply about clothing
36:36
and who are really interested in trying
36:38
new things and who are really stylish and who
36:40
are like the person in the room where you
36:42
go like I wonder where she got that or
36:44
like I wish I could wear that. Like those
36:46
are the people in life who are the least
36:48
judgmental of other people's fashion choices. Well and
36:50
there's there's pleasure and dissonance too you know part
36:52
of this question is like why would you wear
36:54
colors that quote don't look good on you or
36:57
glasses that are so big. If you
36:59
think of fashion as more of an
37:01
experimentation and less of a how do
37:03
I look like other people then
37:06
it becomes clear like oh there's
37:08
something really fun about doing something that
37:10
doesn't work. Right and I think that
37:13
something that Gen Z has
37:15
sort of seems to embrace
37:17
that that older people people of other
37:19
generations could could stand to take
37:22
an interest in is the sort of embrace of
37:24
these like sort of
37:26
disparate slew of like aesthetics
37:29
of like cottage core or dark
37:31
academia or like whatever like these all these
37:34
entire different ways of like allowing yourself to
37:36
be a little bit costumey and be a
37:38
little bit campy and be a little bit
37:40
silly with clothing I think is
37:42
really good and healthy and fun.
37:44
I wear glasses and my favorite
37:47
glasses for a long time have been like
37:49
aviator glasses and I think of
37:51
them as like Jeffrey Dahmer glasses or Ted
37:53
Bundy glasses there was once 70s serial killer
37:55
that wore the the aviator glasses that you
37:57
look like you look
37:59
like some sort of sex criminal in them. But
38:01
it's fun. No, it seems you
38:03
look like a sex criminal, but
38:06
also you look like my fifth
38:08
grade teacher, Mr. Bearlocker, had those
38:10
glasses and they have very positive
38:12
associations for me. Yeah. And
38:15
I like it. Yeah. Things that
38:17
are purposefully a little bit ugly are
38:19
some of the most interesting aesthetic propositions
38:21
in life, I think. Because
38:23
they are what people emotionally respond to. They
38:26
are what sort of challenge you to open your mind. If
38:28
I wear the Jeffrey Dahmer glasses, am I still hot? I think
38:30
I'm still hot. So what
38:33
does everybody else think about this? Just
38:35
challenging the world to understand me as
38:37
a person who is both attractive and
38:39
a young woman and who wears the
38:41
Jeffrey Dahmer glasses. Oh, man.
38:43
That's how I think about Paul Mescal's
38:46
kind of rat tail situation that he's got
38:48
going on right now. He's like, what
38:50
if I did this? Am I still
38:52
incredibly hot? The answer is yes. Right.
38:55
And I think that there's a lot of fun
38:57
to be had there. And I think that
38:59
whether or not you want to participate in that
39:01
fun is totally up to you. You don't have
39:03
to. You can wear whatever it is you feel
39:06
comfortable in. But I would say that try
39:08
to give grace to people who are having
39:10
fun with things and who are
39:13
not taking things serious in the same way that you
39:15
are. Because
39:18
life is more fun that way.
39:20
And give yourself some grace, too. I
39:23
think giving other people grace allows you
39:25
slowly to give yourself grace as well. Yeah,
39:28
I think that that's absolutely true. And
39:31
on a material perspective, if you want
39:33
to know why stretch things are more
39:35
common, why leggings are more common,
39:37
they're easier to manufacture and easier to size. A
39:41
lot of the material reality of our clothing goes
39:43
back to fast fashion and how do you make
39:45
things that are inexpensive that can be sold in
39:48
large quantities. And adding stretch to stuff is
39:50
the fastest way to do that. All
39:52
right. So if you are a paid subscriber, stick
39:55
around because Amanda and I are going to
39:57
do advice time. We're answering a question about
39:59
how to... crop when everything
40:01
sucks. Amanda, this has been such
40:04
a delight. Where can people find more
40:06
of you if they want to find more of
40:08
you on the internet? Well, I am a staff
40:10
writer at The Atlantic. That's everything I publish goes
40:12
there. I still put my story updates on Twitter
40:14
at Amanda Mull. And I'm also
40:16
on Blue Sky under my full name.
40:18
So I have an Instagram account, but it's
40:21
private. I have some for myself. If
40:25
you're actually Amanda's friend, you get to
40:27
see lots of football updates. But
40:29
sorry, guys, it's just for
40:32
me. If you want the same amount of
40:34
information about Georgia football that I put on
40:36
my Instagram, you can just follow Georgia football
40:38
at Georgia football on Instagram. And
40:40
you will get basically the same information that I
40:42
disseminate that way. This
40:48
has been the first episode of the
40:51
Culture Study podcast. Thank you so much
40:53
for listening. Be sure to
40:55
subscribe, like actually hit that subscribe button
40:57
wherever you get your podcasts. We
41:00
have so many great episodes in the works, and I promise
41:02
you don't want to miss any of them. This
41:05
show is going to examine all of
41:07
the different nooks and crannies of culture.
41:09
We're going to get super weird, super
41:11
interesting. It's going to be amazing. And
41:14
if you want to support the show and
41:16
get bonus content and
41:18
be able to participate in
41:21
a really great thread
41:23
about this episode, head to
41:25
culturestudypod.substack.com. It's just
41:27
five bucks a month or $50 a
41:29
year, and you'll get ad-free episodes, an
41:31
exclusive advice time segment, weekly discussion threads
41:33
for each episode, and a link to
41:36
a special Google forum so that your
41:38
questions go to the front of the line. And
41:40
if you're already a Culture Study, just
41:43
a normal newsletter subscriber, look
41:45
in your email. There's a special promo code just
41:47
for you. And even if
41:49
you don't want to pay, you can still get in
41:51
touch to ask questions and suggest episode topics. Just
41:54
check the show notes for the link. The
41:56
Culture Study Podcast is produced by me, Anne
41:58
Helen Peterson, and Melody Rowe. Our
42:01
music is Zanzigas by Pwnington Bear. You
42:03
can find me on Instagram at Anne Helen
42:05
Peterson and you can find the show at
42:07
Culture Study Pod. Just remember,
42:09
stay curious about the culture that surrounds
42:12
you and that everything, everything
42:14
is interesting.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More