Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
I am very excited to introduce today's
0:02
guest, who is none other than the
0:04
host of the wildly popular Huberman Lab
0:06
podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman. Dr.
0:09
Huberman is a distinguished neuroscientist and
0:11
tenured professor at Stanford School of
0:13
Medicine holding positions in both the
0:15
Department of Neurobiology and by courtesy
0:17
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. His
0:20
extensive research has advanced our
0:22
understanding of brain development, functionality,
0:24
and neuroplasticity, the remarkable ability
0:26
of the nervous system to
0:28
adapt, learn new skills, and
0:30
improve cognitive functions. Dr.
0:32
Huberman's influential work has been featured
0:35
in leading scientific journals including Nature,
0:38
Science, and Cell. Anyone that is
0:40
familiar with Andrew's work knows that one of
0:42
the things that shines through is his incredibly
0:44
diverse repertoire of scientific knowledge. I
0:47
think it's safe to say that Andrew has
0:49
made a massive contribution to helping many people
0:51
understand science in a way that can improve
0:53
their lives. In light of
0:55
that, while this episode could have explored many
0:58
topics, one of the things
1:00
that I had hoped to emphasize and
1:02
I believe this episode captures is Dr.
1:04
Huberman's truly immense knowledge of the workings
1:06
of the brain's dopamine system. This
1:09
podcast is a tour de force
1:11
on understanding how the dopamine system
1:13
works so that you can use
1:15
it not only to understand how
1:17
your brain works, but also how
1:19
to improve motivation, focus, attention, mood,
1:21
cognition, and more so that you
1:23
can use that information to better
1:25
yourself personally and professionally. This
1:28
episode is so incredibly valuable from
1:30
that standpoint. However, we
1:32
don't stop there. We cover so
1:35
much. In this episode we
1:37
discuss why thinking about dopamine as a
1:39
wave pool can help us best understand
1:41
how to stay motivated and focused throughout
1:43
the day. Why spiking
1:45
dopamine without some intrinsic aspect of
1:48
effort is dangerous and why you
1:50
shouldn't rely on stimulants when you're
1:52
feeling unmotivated. Why
1:54
Andrew cautions against frequent dopamine
1:56
stacking with stimulants and nicotine. Thinking
2:00
of dopamine only as a
2:02
reward signal is misleading and
2:04
why recognizing the overlap between
2:06
neurochemical responses to exercise and
2:08
mental effort can help us
2:10
harness the same dopamine-driven systems
2:12
to improve both focus and
2:14
motivation. Why attaching
2:16
reward to effort itself is the
2:18
holy grail of learning. Why
2:21
parents should reward verb states instead
2:23
of adjectives, praising the child's effort
2:25
rather than their outcomes. How
2:28
to boost motivation with visualization of
2:30
negative outcomes and how to overcome
2:33
procrastination by doing something uncomfortable. Andrew's
2:36
practical tips for boosting motivation. How
2:39
non-sleep deep rest, also
2:41
known as NSDR, replenishes
2:43
dopamine levels. Why Andrew
2:46
recommends thinking of the discomfort of deliberate
2:48
cold exposure as a type of wall
2:50
or physical impediment to anticipate, overcome, and
2:52
surmount. The cold exposure
2:55
parameters for increasing dopamine. The
2:57
importance of viewing early solar angle
2:59
sunlight for setting the circadian rhythm
3:01
and whether indoor light panels can
3:03
replace viewing morning sunlight. How
3:06
bright light at night can impact our
3:08
sleep and how viewing outdoor evening low
3:10
solar angle light can help counteract these
3:13
effects. How to combat
3:15
extended laptop and phone use with long
3:17
distance viewing. Why Andrew
3:19
recommends limiting alcohol consumption to zero to
3:21
two drinks per week. Whether
3:23
or not smartphones and social media are increasing
3:26
the prevalence of ADHD and how
3:28
to cultivate a healthy relationship with social
3:30
media. Andrew's diet and
3:32
supplement routines and weekly workout regimen
3:34
and why Andrew limits most of his workouts
3:36
to 80 or 85 percent intensity
3:39
and so much more. But
3:41
before we dive into today's episode, I want
3:43
to highlight two invaluable resources available at no
3:46
cost to all who are listening today. The
3:49
first is the cognitive enhancement blueprint,
3:51
an evidence-based guide filled with protocols
3:53
to boost your brain derived neurotrophic
3:56
factor or BDNF and enhance cognitive
3:58
function. Exercise is
4:00
a powerful ally in enhancing aging,
4:02
particularly for maintaining cognitive health. At
4:05
the heart of this is
4:07
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a key
4:10
player in numerous cognitive functions.
4:12
BDNF impacts brain aging, functionality,
4:14
behavior, memory, and metabolism by
4:17
promoting neurogenesis and enhancing neuroplasticity.
4:20
This guide dives into the types
4:22
of exercise, as well as many
4:24
other lifestyle interventions ranging from diet
4:26
to mental training that either enhance
4:28
cognition or brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.
4:31
Make sure to download your free comprehensive
4:33
toolkit for the brain today at bdnfprotocols.com.
4:39
Again, that's
4:42
bdnfprotocols.com. Also
4:45
just released is a guide on how
4:47
to choose a high-quality omega-3 supplement. It
4:50
includes some brands that consistently pass
4:52
third-party testing for quality and also
4:54
cover some recent issues of concern,
4:57
like whether or not omega-3 promotes
4:59
AFib. You can
5:01
find that free guide
5:03
at fmfomegathriguide.com. Once
5:07
again that's fmfomegathriguide.com.
5:13
Finally, many of the magnificent
5:15
resources associated with this podcast
5:17
exist directly as a result
5:19
of our premium membership. As
5:21
a premium member, listeners get access to
5:24
our exclusive podcast, The Aliquot, with over
5:26
150 member-only episodes, monthly Q&As, and a
5:28
special summary of scientific research every other
5:30
week called the Science Digest, and more.
5:33
I'll tell you a little more about
5:35
that after the episode since I know
5:37
by now we're all ready to get
5:39
into the fantastic material of this episode.
5:42
But the bottom line is that
5:44
by becoming a premium member, you
5:46
gain access to a lot of
5:48
great content and extra resources, and
5:50
ultimately nurture the very existence of
5:52
all the otherwise free resources provided
5:54
by Found My Fitness. You
5:56
can learn more about that at
5:59
foundmyfitness.com. Once
6:04
again, that's
6:07
foundmyfitness.com/premium. Now
6:10
onto this fantastic podcast
6:12
with Dr. Andrew Huberman.
6:15
Andrew, this has been a
6:17
long time in the making. Super pumped to have you
6:19
on the podcast and have this discussion with you. It's
6:21
been a couple of years since we've talked. So
6:26
really excited to get into it. You've covered a
6:28
lot of really interesting
6:30
brain related things in your
6:33
podcast, but some
6:35
of the things that have jumped out to
6:37
me as very interesting is just understanding the
6:40
way our dopamine system works. So
6:42
I was wondering if we could just start by
6:47
talking about what dopamine is. A
6:49
lot of people think it's just
6:51
a neurotransmitter and why
6:53
it's so important for our everyday life.
6:57
Okay, happy to do that, but I'd be remiss
6:59
if I didn't express a debt of gratitude. I
7:02
love your podcast. I've been a fan for a very long, long
7:04
time. So for me, it's a dream come true to be here
7:06
as a guest on your podcast. I know you've been a guest
7:08
on mine and hopefully we'll be again in the not
7:11
too distant future. And also
7:13
I want to point out what should be
7:15
obvious to everybody, but in case it's not
7:17
that anytime people say with respect to public
7:19
science communication in the realm of podcasting, people
7:22
will say, who was the first man in? And I say, actually
7:24
it was a woman. Her name is Rhonda Patrick. You
7:27
are the first advanced agreed scientist to
7:29
step into the public facing education arena
7:31
and to do it in podcast format
7:34
at scale with your own podcast on Tim
7:36
Ferriss's podcast, Joe Rogan's podcast. And of course
7:38
you continue to do that. So I just want to say thank
7:41
you for being first one in
7:43
and yeah. And
7:46
just really remind people that that's the history
7:48
of this whole thing. So thanks for
7:50
paving the way. We all owe you. And
7:53
so thank you much gratitude. Thank you very
7:55
much. Dopamine.
7:59
Super interesting. neuromodulator, neuromodulator,
8:02
not neurotransmitter. I'm
8:04
not being overly nitpicky there. The
8:06
word modulator is key because
8:08
if you want to understand dopamine, it's
8:11
important to understand that it
8:13
basically adjusts the activity of
8:15
a lot of different circuits, meaning
8:18
it's less involved in
8:20
most cases in very local communication
8:22
between neurons. It can be, than
8:25
it is changing, say, how
8:28
much the reward and motivation circuits are ramped
8:30
up versus the circuitries in
8:32
the brain that are involved in
8:35
feelings of satisfaction. So
8:37
you can think of dopamine, because
8:39
it's a neuromodulator, as kind of
8:41
generating playlists, if you
8:43
will, of certain genres of neural
8:46
circuit function. And
8:48
that's distinctly different than a neurotransmitter
8:50
like glutamate or GABA, which
8:52
can also do the things I just
8:55
described, but are most often associated with
8:57
local communication between neurons. To use a
8:59
different analogy, if we
9:01
were to drop
9:04
a million microphones into a stadium filled
9:06
with people, each microphone
9:09
listening to the specific conversation between
9:11
two or three people, then
9:14
we could say the speech between those people
9:16
and what's going on there
9:19
is more like what neurotransmitters are responsible
9:21
for local communication. Whereas if
9:23
we were to have, let's say 10 or
9:26
15 microphones grabbing from a bunch
9:29
of different conversations and even shaping
9:31
those conversations by virtue of
9:34
pinging those conversations with certain keywords
9:36
like excited, motivation, et cetera,
9:39
well, that's more akin to what dopamine is
9:41
doing. It's working at a broader scale to
9:43
change the way that the circuitries in our
9:45
brain work. So when I
9:47
say neuromodulator, that's why. When
9:50
it comes to understanding what dopamine
9:52
does, specifically, it's important that
9:55
we note that it does different things in
9:57
different parts of the brain and body. So
9:59
there isn't one singular function. Dopamine is in
10:01
fact expressed in the eye.
10:03
It's involved in adaptation to light. So
10:05
that's a function that most people don't
10:07
associate with dopamine, but it performs that
10:09
role there. It modulates the activity of
10:11
retinal neurons so that under different luminance
10:13
conditions, brightness or darkness, the
10:16
eye can still make sense of the visual world.
10:18
As you go into the brain further, what
10:21
you find is that dopamine is expressed in
10:23
neurons that are exquisitely tied
10:25
to our ability to move. Most
10:28
notably in a brain area called
10:30
the ventral tegmentum, which just means the floor of
10:32
the midbrain, which is called
10:35
the substantia nigra, because the neurons there
10:37
are dark. And those
10:39
neurons are critically important for generating smooth
10:42
movements. Those are the neurons that degenerate
10:44
in Parkinson's, and that's why you see
10:46
a elevated resting tremor and
10:48
difficulty initiating movement in people with Parkinson's.
10:50
In fact, most of the treatments for
10:52
Parkinson's center around trying to replace that
10:55
dopamine or those dopamine neurons. And
10:57
then as you move into the
10:59
classic reward system of the
11:01
ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, these are all
11:04
just names of brain areas that are associated
11:06
with reward, motivation and pursuit.
11:08
And most people associate dopamine with a
11:11
sense of reward. We hear about dopamine
11:13
hits, the idea that, okay, I'm thirsty,
11:15
I take a sip of my tea,
11:18
and I get a dopamine hit. That's
11:20
the idea. Now in
11:22
reality, dopamine is more closely
11:24
tied to motivational states. The
11:26
pursuit of rewards. And
11:29
those rewards could be in the form of
11:31
something that you get or a punishing thing
11:33
that you remove. This is important. Either removal
11:35
of a painful stimulus or say
11:38
agitation or moving from a
11:40
state of being too cold to being comfortable
11:42
or too hot to being comfortably cool also
11:44
will release dopamine. So dopamine isn't really tethered
11:47
to any one thing. It's a currency that
11:50
is involved in generating movement, that's
11:53
not coincidental, and is involved in
11:55
motivation and pursuit of particular rewards.
11:57
And those rewards are contextual. in
12:00
an environment where it's exceedingly cold, finding
12:02
warmth is the reward. An
12:04
environment where it's exceedingly hot, you're hiking in the
12:06
Joshua Tree Desert, you've run out of water and
12:09
it's really, really warm. Getting into that cool
12:11
shower is going to feel fantastically good. And
12:13
dopamine is no doubt released
12:16
under both conditions, but dopamine
12:18
is released en route to goals
12:21
when we think or to
12:23
rewards, when we believe that
12:26
we are on the right path to those goals.
12:28
And this is critical. And this is why we
12:30
say it's involved in motivation. There's
12:33
a classic experiment that I
12:35
think summarizes the specific role of dopamine
12:37
and disambiguates it from the reward properties
12:40
of dopamine, because it does have reward
12:42
properties best. And the experiment
12:44
is essentially the following. You
12:46
take two groups of rats.
12:49
One group of rats has an
12:51
intact dopamine system. The neurons are alive and
12:53
thriving in this reward system and other
12:55
areas of the brain. And
12:58
you give them access to a
13:00
lever press or some other small
13:02
amount of work that then generates a food reward, like a
13:04
fruit loop or something. Rats and mice love these kinds of
13:07
things, as we know, as do
13:09
humans for all the wrong reasons, but
13:12
real ones nonetheless. Those
13:14
animals will work, they'll
13:17
lever press, they'll even work through a maze, they'll do
13:19
a number of different things. Some will even cross a
13:21
shock plate to get to food if they're hungry enough.
13:24
And the intact dopamine system helps
13:28
them do that. It's motivation-based reward
13:30
pursuit. A
13:32
second group of rats has a
13:35
specific category of dopamine neurons ablated,
13:37
neurochemically ablated. And
13:39
that particular category of neurons are the
13:41
neurons that are responsible for what
13:44
we classically think of as reward, this ventral
13:47
tegmental nucleus accumbens pathway that we can talk
13:49
about. And those
13:52
animals will not
13:54
motivate to get the reward. However, if
13:56
the reward is accessible to them, they'll
13:59
eat those fruits. it loops all day. In other words, it
14:02
appears that dopamine is required
14:04
not for the sense of pleasure
14:06
or reward, not
14:08
for the reinforcing properties of food
14:11
or other reinforcers, warmth
14:13
when it's cold, cool when it's too hot, et
14:16
cetera, but rather the
14:18
desire and especially
14:20
the ability to convert desire
14:23
into a physical movement or
14:26
in some cases a cognitive movement. We could talk
14:28
about what that would look like, cognitive effort to
14:32
reach a particular goal. So what that experiment
14:34
illustrates, and by the way, this has been
14:36
observed in a naturalistic type experiment
14:39
where people with Parkinson's have fewer dopamine
14:41
neurons, not just in Substantia Nigro, but
14:44
elsewhere, as evidence
14:46
that dopamine is most critically
14:48
involved in motivation and pursuit
14:50
of goals, not pleasure
14:53
itself. So
14:56
you've talked a lot about this
14:58
dopamine wave pool and
15:00
understanding how our dopamine levels are flexuring
15:03
throughout the day. So this dopamine dynamics,
15:05
can you talk a little bit about
15:07
that, like the peaks and the troughs
15:09
and our baseline levels and how that
15:12
does influence our motivation for
15:14
pursuing goals or in
15:17
some cases, maybe rewards in
15:19
general and how that just affects our
15:22
performance? Absolutely, so before
15:25
I do, I'll just mention that the dopamine
15:27
wave pool analogy is one that I
15:29
borrowed from Dr. Kyle Gillette, who is
15:31
a medical doctor who's been
15:34
on my podcast and focuses mainly
15:36
on things related to obesity and
15:38
hormone stuff. He
15:40
was the one that initially coined that phrase. I like
15:42
it very much because it embodies
15:44
a number of key features of
15:47
the dopamine circuitry at large, not
15:49
just one circuit, but how dopamine
15:51
works generally, psychologically and physiologically. It's
15:54
the following, first of all, dopamine
15:56
is a depletable, but
15:59
replenishable. In
16:01
other words, unless the dopamine neurons are destroyed,
16:03
like in a case like Parkinson's, or
16:07
rare exposure to
16:09
neurochemical that are involved in
16:12
certain pesticides, and that's not a dig
16:14
on certain pesticides per se, but there's
16:16
a history there of people taking certain
16:18
compounds in and destruction of dopamine
16:21
neurons. Those particular
16:24
cases aside, most
16:27
of us have dopamine neurons
16:29
that can readily release dopamine and do so
16:31
at what I would call a tonic level.
16:33
It's kind of what we could just refer
16:36
to as a baseline level of dopamine neurons
16:38
firing in the background, just
16:40
firing off action potentials, electrical signals,
16:42
releasing dopamine into the various
16:45
circuits that they're trying to modulate. Then
16:47
there are what we can call
16:49
for sake of this conversation, dopamine
16:52
peaks and dopamine troughs, which are
16:55
increases in dopamine release that ride on
16:57
top of that baseline and that influence
16:59
that baseline. Let's go
17:01
back to the wave pool. In the wave pool analogy,
17:04
you start with a
17:06
certain amount of water in this wave pool, and
17:08
then you start generating waves of different amplitudes. If
17:11
the waves are of a particular size, well,
17:14
then they rise and subside, rise and
17:16
subside, and you don't actually deplete the
17:18
total amount of water in this pool.
17:22
The baseline level doesn't change despite the fact that
17:24
you have these peaks and troughs. If
17:26
you get enough movement in that pool, you get
17:28
big waves, some starts to
17:31
splash out and the total amount
17:33
drops. In other words, the baseline level of
17:35
dopamine has dropped, or in this
17:37
analogy, it's dropped. So I like
17:39
the wave pool analogy because even though it
17:41
doesn't embody all of the dynamics of dopamine,
17:44
it embodies many of them that we can relate
17:46
to. For instance, if we take
17:48
the extremes of things that
17:50
cause massive amounts of dopamine
17:53
release, these are
17:55
typically illicit drugs, things like methamphetamine,
17:57
a thousand fold increase in dopamine
17:59
release. you know, cocaine, the combination
18:02
of different
18:06
highly reinforcing dopamine related
18:08
activities or drugs. So methamphetamine
18:11
plus sex, right? This is
18:13
common in certain addictions, right?
18:16
People will take stimulants like methamphetamine. They
18:18
will also engage in sexual activity. Now
18:21
you're getting way up past a thousand.
18:23
It's not always additive, but it often
18:25
can be additive or even synergistic. What
18:28
happens under those conditions? Well, neurons
18:30
in the, let's just call it the
18:32
motivation and reward pathway are releasing massive
18:34
amounts of dopamine, sometimes
18:36
to the extent that the readily
18:38
releasable pool of vesicles, or sometimes
18:40
called vesicles in the US, of
18:42
the little spheres filled
18:45
with neuromodulator, dopamine, actually get
18:47
depleted. And the neurons need
18:49
to manufacture more, and that takes time
18:51
before more can be created. There can
18:54
also be neurotoxicity where the neurons actually
18:56
are killed off, although that's in more
18:58
extreme cases. So what we're talking about
19:00
here are drugs of abuse, like methamphetamine,
19:03
cocaine, combination of dopamine releasing activities,
19:07
sometimes drugs, sometimes sex, sometimes
19:09
video games in excess, plus
19:11
maybe compounds like Adderall,
19:13
Vyvanse, et cetera, which clearly
19:15
increased dopamine release. And then
19:18
what happens is some hours
19:20
later, or days later, depending on
19:22
the frequency of the activity, the reservoir,
19:25
the pool, is essentially lowered its overall
19:27
level. So now in order to generate
19:30
waves of equivalent size, or even smaller
19:32
size, you need a lot more, let's
19:34
say movement. What is that movement? Well,
19:36
typically that's the pursuit of more reinforcing
19:39
stimuli, but guess what, with dopamine depleted,
19:41
that becomes harder to generate. And
19:43
so hopefully I've created a picture here. This
19:45
is obviously a kind of cartoon picture of
19:48
dopamine dynamics. It's not quantitative in any way.
19:50
But what it essentially says is big dopamine
19:52
peaks lead to lots of
19:54
dopamine release. And then what we know
19:56
is that the dopamine levels that follow
19:59
those... those peaks drop below baseline. And
20:01
if the peaks are high enough, they
20:04
will deplete that baseline. But remember we
20:06
said that the dopamine pool is
20:08
depletable, but replenishable. How is
20:10
it replenishable? With time and
20:13
with either lower or no
20:15
dopamine peaks. So
20:18
if we step back from real life and
20:21
we look at it and we can say, okay, if I pick
20:23
up my phone and I'm scrolling on Instagram, highly
20:25
reinforcing behavior. Videos
20:28
and images are so powerful to us. I mean,
20:30
a few years ago, there was a hack
20:33
that I think Tim Ferriss put out on his podcast.
20:35
If you shift your phone to black and white mode,
20:37
grayscale, I mean, all that stuff becomes far less
20:39
reinforcing. You kind of don't want to look at the thing. You
20:41
shift it back to full color and it's
20:44
like, whoa, it's just so much more compelling. So
20:46
you're scrolling, you're seeing things in. Yeah, if you
20:48
see something that you really, really like, maybe an
20:50
animal video that you really like, in my case,
20:52
then sure, there's very likely to be some
20:55
dopamine release. Is it going to deplete the
20:57
baseline of dopamine? Unlikely, but if you
20:59
engage in that activity for many, many hours,
21:01
you could imagine that it might. We don't
21:04
have exact data on this. Certainly,
21:06
if you're combining any kind of stimulants that
21:08
tap into the dopamine system, this is going
21:10
to happen. Certainly, if you're engaging
21:13
in drugs of abuse or just a
21:15
lot of, you know, exciting high
21:17
amplitude activity, it makes other
21:19
things seem more boring because
21:21
actually relative to what was going on
21:23
neurochemically, it is more boring. The brain
21:26
doesn't have a sense of exciting and
21:28
boring. It doesn't have a sense of
21:30
motivated, a motivated in the subjective sense.
21:32
It has a correlation between
21:35
the activity, these dopamine circuits and
21:37
other circuits, but certainly these dopamine
21:39
circuits and some subjective feeling
21:41
of either desire to engage, aka
21:44
movement or lack
21:46
of desire to engage, such as,
21:48
you know, just kind of apathy and just feeling
21:50
like, hey, there's nothing here for me, but here
21:53
I am continuing to engage in this activity over
21:55
and over. And we know that with most
21:58
all drugs of abuse, But
22:00
certainly with anything that releases dopamine, there's
22:02
nothing quite like the first time. And
22:05
that these circuits actually learn, they can become
22:07
reinforced in the sense that they build up
22:09
strength between particular synapses and things of that
22:11
sort. So that we continue to in a
22:14
seemingly logical way, go back to the original behaviors,
22:16
trying again and again, hitting that lever, hitting that
22:18
lever, trying to get back to that similar state.
22:21
And just like a slot machine, every once in
22:23
a while, we get what we're looking for, and
22:25
the whole thing is further reinforced. Now that's all
22:27
painting a very sinister and kind of dark image
22:30
of the dopamine system. And I want to be clear that
22:32
this wave pool analogy doesn't have any
22:34
valence to it, positive or negative. It's just one
22:37
analogy for how the system works. In a
22:40
different frame, if you understand that you have
22:42
some baseline level of motivation, desire to move
22:44
cognitively, physically, and
22:46
you understand a bit about how these dopamine peaks
22:48
and troughs work, well, then you can work with
22:51
it. I believe you actually can leverage it so
22:53
that things like procrastination become less likely, so that
22:55
you can engage in social media in a meaningful
22:57
and positive way, but then know, okay, I'm going
22:59
to put it away now, and I'm going to
23:02
take some of that elevated arousal
23:04
that I feel and put it towards some other enriching
23:07
activities. There's nothing good or
23:09
bad about dopamine, and we shouldn't fear
23:11
it. It's really about understanding the underlying
23:13
dynamics, and that if we've taken ourselves to
23:16
a place where we are just depleted, where
23:18
that baseline, the level of water in that wave
23:20
pool is way down, because we've had these huge
23:22
waves, huge waves, huge waves, well, then we need
23:25
to be patient. We just need to wait and
23:28
expect that at some point, pleasure and motivation will
23:30
return, but that we need to wait a period
23:32
of time as opposed to what most people do,
23:35
which is to go pursue things to get them
23:37
out of that somewhat subdued state. So
23:40
I have a few questions. First of all, a big thanks
23:42
to Dr. Gillette for that amazing analogy. I love it too.
23:45
It really makes it a lot
23:47
easier to understand how
23:49
this dopamine system's working in a general
23:51
sense, at least. Maintaining
23:54
the steady baseline levels, it sounded like
23:58
it's not so easy to deplete. the
24:00
baseline unless you're really going after something
24:03
that's either a substance that could really
24:05
sort of increase your dopamine in combination
24:07
maybe with other enjoyable things as well.
24:11
It is the effort that you're
24:14
putting in so like you are preparing for
24:16
a long term, like let's say you're preparing
24:18
for a wedding or something
24:20
big or a party and
24:23
you put in all this effort and planning for
24:25
a month and then you have the
24:27
party and it's fun, it's great, everyone has a great
24:29
time, it's a fun party and the party's
24:31
over and then you feel
24:33
kind of depressed. Can you deplete your
24:37
baseline levels just from like putting
24:39
in like having an
24:41
event like that or is
24:44
that effort that I put in kind of going to shield
24:46
me from the drop
24:48
in those baseline levels? Yeah, well, the
24:51
simple answer is the latter, that dopamine
24:55
that follows effort is generally good
24:57
for us. One would
24:59
hope that effort is in service to our own goodness
25:01
and the goodness of others, but that's generally true.
25:04
Large amplitude peaks in
25:06
dopamine that don't require
25:08
effort are dangerous. Drugs
25:12
of abuse do this, one pill,
25:14
one shot and you've got a
25:16
thousand fold increase in dopamine release,
25:18
that's scary because
25:20
that's not the way the system
25:23
was designed to work under normal
25:25
conditions. These are drugs that
25:27
sure might mimic certain compounds in nature,
25:30
but let's face it, these circuits that
25:32
we're talking about evolved
25:34
for the pursuit of particular
25:36
rewarding activities, mainly
25:38
centered around food and
25:41
reproduction and keeping
25:43
us safe, avoiding extremes of temperature,
25:45
et cetera. I think
25:47
the critical thing is that,
25:50
well, in the example you gave, a
25:52
lot of effort put toward planning a
25:54
wedding and then hopefully a wonderful wedding,
25:57
that is all goodness, that is all goodness in the
25:59
sense. that there's going to be
26:02
dopamine released as one is making plans, see
26:04
the invitations, you like the invitations, maybe there's
26:06
a dispute, you resolve the dispute, which by
26:08
the way, remember the removal of a negative
26:11
stimulus, also dopamine, great, we're back on track,
26:13
we're doing all this and then wedding goes
26:15
fantastically well, maybe one glitch, okay, great, and
26:17
you have the photos and the memories, all
26:20
of that is great. If the
26:22
next day or in the days following, people
26:24
feel a bit of a low, a bit of a postpartum
26:27
type low, that could
26:29
be related to a
26:31
drop in the dopamine level, more
26:35
likely it's fatigue, it's also anticipation
26:37
itself, breeds this own kind of
26:40
let down once something follows. I mean,
26:42
this is the nature of true clinical
26:44
postpartum depression where post childbirth, this is
26:46
a real clinical syndrome as we know,
26:48
that sometimes people deal with unfortunately,
26:50
it needs to be taken really seriously. But
26:54
in the kind of more popular use
26:56
of the word postpartum depression, where post
26:58
wedding, post graduation, it's the
27:01
shift in arousal state from
27:03
anticipation and higher arousal, what's
27:05
next, I'm excited about what's next, what's going to happen
27:07
to, I don't know what's going
27:10
to happen, what now, it's the what now kind
27:12
of circuitry. So I think
27:14
that when it comes to understanding one's own dopamine
27:16
system, there are a couple of things to pay
27:18
attention to. First of all, we
27:20
all wake up in the morning, depending on how
27:23
we slept, but let's assume our typical good night
27:25
sleep for us, I need seven hours, some other
27:27
people need eight hours, others
27:29
nine, what is
27:31
your level of positive anticipation about
27:34
things to come, even if those are deadlines or things that
27:36
you might not want to do so much, how much get
27:38
up and go do you have? I move a bit slowly
27:41
in the morning, but once you're fully alert, how much get
27:43
up and go do you have? One
27:45
of the classic signs of depression is early morning
27:47
waking, that's one, the other is
27:49
a lack of positive
27:51
anticipation about future events, it's a
27:54
classic depression symptom. The
27:56
dopamine system might be involved in either
27:58
or both cases. But what is
28:00
the sort of classic representation
28:02
of a positive, highly motivated person?
28:05
It's somebody who is eager
28:07
to move. Like the ability and the desire to
28:09
move into action. I always, I borrowed this from
28:11
a friend who was a former SEAL team guy.
28:13
He always said, you know, in everything in life,
28:15
you can either be back on your heels, flat-footed
28:17
or forward center of mass. How much forward center
28:19
of mass? How much Goggins do you have in
28:21
you or Jocko do you have in you or
28:23
Rhonda do you have in you? At any given
28:25
moment, Rogan too, these, you know, you all seem
28:27
to have so much motivation. And I think that's,
28:30
I know that's why many people are inspired to pay
28:32
attention to the things you say. It's
28:34
also the underlying spirit of pursuit. It's exciting
28:37
to us. Other people have
28:39
more of a kind of lay back
28:41
and observe mannerism.
28:44
And I do believe that they too could
28:46
have perfectly fine levels of dopamine. They're just
28:48
more observant in the way they take in
28:50
life. And I would just
28:52
not say any of the other people I
28:54
just mentioned are not observant, but you know,
28:56
there's this business of cognitive movement or
28:59
this phenomenon of cognitive movement where we
29:02
aren't necessarily in movement in our
29:04
bodies, but we are reading voraciously.
29:06
We are thinking voraciously.
29:08
We are deconstructing ideas and being
29:10
reflective. All of those
29:13
patterns of what I'm calling movement,
29:15
cognitive or physical reflect underlying firing
29:17
off of dopamine neurons. It's
29:20
when we have a goal
29:22
in the short or long-term and we
29:24
are focused on that goal that the
29:27
dopamine system really becomes active
29:29
to generate these big peaks. Okay,
29:31
it's this, oh, I'm going to
29:33
get, you know, the company is going
29:35
to IPO or if
29:38
people post on Instagram and they start getting a lot
29:40
of positive feedback, like one of their clips happens to
29:42
go viral or something in a positive way, it's like,
29:44
whoa, you know, it's this thing like, oh my God,
29:47
it's like raining down on them or from within them
29:49
rather. In the same way that the slot machine and,
29:51
you know, in Vegas, it's, you know, the bells are
29:53
going off and you hear the coins just dropping, there's
29:56
all this excitement about here, here it comes, here comes
29:58
the rewards, here comes the rewards. that
30:01
process, as I mentioned before, is
30:03
not just quote unquote rewarding,
30:06
it reinforces the circuitry
30:08
that led to that behavior in a
30:10
very powerful way. It actually strengthens through
30:12
neuroplasticity. It strengthens the very underlying circuits.
30:15
And the brain is either
30:17
conscious or unconsciously or both, will
30:20
go back and repeat that behavior over and over
30:22
again in order to try and get back there,
30:24
even if we're not aware that we're doing it.
30:26
And so what I find so interesting about
30:29
the dopamine system is that it can create
30:31
its own plasticity, feedback form plasticity. Okay, there
30:33
are a number of different, you know, specific
30:36
seller events that underlie that. But what
30:39
it's essentially trying to do is know where
30:41
the water is, where the mates are,
30:44
where the warm locations are for when
30:46
we're too cool and where the cool
30:48
locations are from when we're too warm.
30:50
It's learning all that, but less than
30:53
recording the specific locations like the hippocampus
30:55
would or place that into the cortex,
30:59
it's trying to remember the algorithms that led to
31:01
specific patterns of mental or physical movement that allowed
31:03
that. So if we step back, I mean, I
31:05
hate to beat up on social media because you
31:07
and I both teach on social media and I
31:09
love social media. It has to be, you know,
31:11
controlled, but I love it. But if
31:13
we engage in social media and we get some positive
31:15
feedback, we've reinforced at an
31:18
unconscious level, all sorts of circuitries
31:21
that lead us to think, oh yeah, you know, I posted
31:23
that this one time. And I remember it was that that was a
31:25
text post. The other one was a slide, that was a video. And
31:28
your brain is trying to learn the patterns that got
31:30
you where you were before and it worked out so
31:32
well. So the dopamine system can learn, the
31:35
dopamine system can adjust its baseline, the
31:38
dopamine system can create these
31:40
peaks. And then we shouldn't forget
31:42
about the anticipation aspect of it
31:44
itself, which is what's called reward
31:46
prediction error. These are classic experiments
31:48
where essentially it
31:51
was discovered that dopamine is being released and root to
31:53
a reward while a monkey or human is working for
31:55
a reward. And that was itself was a cool discovery.
31:58
It was like, wow, dopamine is in just, you
32:00
know. when the monkey gets the juice or when the
32:02
person gets the monetary ward, it's when they think they're
32:04
on the right path or they might get a
32:06
reward. That's when dopamine is released. Then
32:08
they get the reward. If the reward is
32:10
equal to or in excess of what they
32:13
anticipated, boom, they get a bit more dopamine.
32:15
What better way to reinforce a behavior at
32:17
the neural level? But
32:20
if the reward is less exciting or
32:23
less money or less intense
32:25
than one anticipates, what happens?
32:27
Dopamine levels drop and then
32:29
they drop below baseline when
32:33
they are on their
32:35
way to eventually returning to baseline and
32:37
the duration of that drop is
32:40
proportional to how high the peak was. So
32:43
it's like you could imagine, you know,
32:46
planning the wedding, planning the wedding, planning the wedding,
32:49
plenty of dopamine, and then rainy day, thunderstorm, oh
32:51
goodness. Well, hopefully people are adaptable and they adjust
32:53
to that but it's such a bigger letdown if
32:55
you put in all this effort. It's such a
32:58
bigger letdown if you thought it was going to
33:00
be great because well,
33:02
the peak was bigger or
33:04
the sort of slope rather
33:06
was steeper and the
33:09
slope of the decline of dopamine is also
33:11
going to be steeper. So not all of
33:13
this works out to perfect math when it
33:15
comes to, you know, the dynamics of dopamine
33:17
but by and large, dopamine reward prediction error
33:19
says, if you think something's going to be
33:21
great, it better be that great or greater
33:24
to reinforce the behaviors that came first. If you
33:26
think something's going to be great and it's less
33:28
great or not great at all or even
33:30
punishing, well, then it's going to send
33:33
signals to alter the circuitry in
33:36
a way that says, whatever you did to get there,
33:38
don't do it again. It's going to discourage you. You
33:42
talked about people that have this sort of
33:44
intrinsic motivation, right? Where it's like they're motivated
33:46
to do, they have that maybe
33:48
even just initial motivation and then they have
33:50
that intrinsic motivation to sort of carry it
33:53
through that effort. Can you
33:55
talk a little bit about the differences between the
33:57
motivation and effort? I often, like, it's very easy
33:59
to confuse them. but
34:01
some people have a really hard time, even
34:03
if they want to do something, like I want to
34:06
do this thing, but I just can't
34:08
put that cognitive effort in to do it. Like,
34:10
are there any little ways
34:13
that people can, using the understanding of this
34:15
dopamine system, help themselves to kind of push
34:17
through and put that effort in? Yeah,
34:19
great question. And it starts to get a little
34:22
bit complex in ways that make it
34:24
hard for me to tack, you know, specific cellular
34:26
phenomenon too, but I'll do my best. So
34:29
dopamine is one of the
34:31
catecholamines. It's part of a
34:33
group of cousin molecules, dopamine
34:36
being one, epinephrine also
34:39
called adrenaline, and norepinephrine also
34:41
called noradrenaline. These are
34:43
released both in the brain and body from
34:45
the adrenals, from, in the case of norepinephrine,
34:47
from a brain area called the locus coeruleus,
34:49
which releases norepinephrine in kind of a sprinkler-like
34:51
manner into the brain, although it can direct
34:53
the release of norepinephrine as well. And of
34:55
course, all of this stuff is active and
34:57
released from neurons in our body as well.
35:00
It's not a coincidence. It can't be a
35:03
coincidence that these three neurochemicals, which by the
35:05
way, are very similar to one another and
35:07
actually are manufactured from one another biochemically. It's
35:09
very interesting. People can go look up, you know,
35:11
how is epinephrine made? How
35:13
is dopamine made? And you'll see that the
35:15
molecules are actually made essentially from each other,
35:18
you know, they're clued by enzymes and there's various
35:21
changes there, but they
35:24
work together to create motivation
35:28
and to heighten focus in
35:30
the case of norepinephrine. In
35:32
fact, these are the same neurochemicals that
35:34
cause the changes in our pupil size
35:36
under constant illumination to change the optics
35:38
of our eyes so that we narrow
35:41
our visual focus. Like when, if you,
35:43
people have heard, for instance, if
35:46
your pupils get really big, that's
35:48
a state of underlying autonomic arousal that
35:51
leads to a narrower
35:53
visual window and a heightened focus.
35:55
Okay. Whereas, you
35:57
know, a shrinking of the pupils.
36:00
causes something quite different. Norepinephrine,
36:02
epinephrine and dopamine are involved in all of
36:05
that. And that's not a coincidence. At the
36:07
same time, and I'll
36:09
answer your question directly in a moment, but
36:11
you said, some people tend to be highly
36:13
motivated. I'd be curious to run an experiment.
36:15
I haven't run this experiment, but some people have kind
36:17
of a resting bounce to them. It
36:20
looks like they're ready to go. Like they're just like
36:22
excited, they're ready to go. Other people have kind of
36:24
what looks to be like a more lethargic stance, they're
36:26
more still. That can be a bit
36:29
misleading because sometimes they're very active inside. Still
36:31
waters run deep kind of thing. But
36:34
it is interesting that some people are very, you
36:38
know, you say, hey, should we head out? And they go, yeah,
36:40
let's go. And then just sort of pop out of their seat.
36:42
Other people are like, you know, and this is independent of how
36:44
tired or alert we are kind of thing. So I think people
36:47
idle at different RPM. I've
36:50
noticed that certainly different dog breeds do that. They've
36:52
been bred for that. I had a bulldog, low
36:54
RPM, very low RPM. We also
36:56
had a pit bull years ago. The tail was
36:59
always going higher RPM, more likely to engage in
37:01
spontaneous movement. People are like that too. Okay,
37:04
so if people
37:07
lack motivation, does
37:10
that reflect some deficit in the
37:12
dopamine system? Sometimes yes, sometimes no.
37:15
What we know is that many
37:17
people have a hard time
37:19
initiating movement. Remember that in the Parkinson's
37:21
patient, it's not just resting tremor that
37:23
they have, you know, lack of smooth
37:25
movements, motor movements. They also
37:28
have a lot of difficulty initiating movement.
37:30
Okay, so this is in the neurons
37:33
that control movement, but it's a
37:35
similar thing in the motivation realm. This is why
37:37
I keep drawing this parallel between physical movement and
37:39
mental movement. We don't really have a better language
37:41
for it, at least not that I'm aware of,
37:44
but mental movement is the motivation to open a
37:46
book and start reading with a high degree of
37:49
focus to take in that information as opposed to,
37:51
you know, kind of opening in like,
37:53
I don't know, I don't want to do this, or, you know, just
37:56
kind of not necessarily apathy,
37:58
but challenges and leaning into mental. The
38:01
two things, meaning movement
38:03
and cognitive movement or
38:07
pursuit are both governed
38:09
by the same neurochemical systems, these
38:11
three catecholamines, mainly dopamine, with the
38:13
norepinephrine and epinephrine being involved in
38:15
generating focus. Other
38:17
systems involved too, of course, but this is still
38:20
true. So for people
38:22
that have a hard
38:24
time getting motivated, if we just make it that
38:26
simple, assuming there's in some
38:29
major underlying neurochemical or life situation
38:31
issue, oftentimes
38:33
it's a lot like exercise. You've probably
38:35
experienced this, that once you get going,
38:37
and once, in fact, if people accept that
38:40
there's going to be a transition phase of
38:42
maybe five to 10 minutes to get the
38:44
relevant circuits going for focus and for motivation,
38:47
things often get much better very quickly.
38:50
Now, this is a real
38:52
problem where we live in a world where
38:54
we can go on YouTube instantly and sort
38:56
of get something right away. Again, you get
38:58
a feedback or activation of these circuits for
39:00
getting information with essentially no effort. It's a
39:02
click, you just have to listen. I remember
39:04
a few years back hearing that it
39:07
wasn't going to be long before people
39:09
would generally have two screens in front of
39:11
them most of the time. And I noticed
39:13
nowadays, I've got two phones and often a computer,
39:15
and then there, I mean, screens everywhere. Most
39:17
people are dealing with at least one screen
39:19
all the time, often multiple
39:21
screens. So easy to get information.
39:24
Now, if you want to sit down and read a book or
39:27
listen to an audio book with a high degree of attention, I
39:30
think if you're somebody that doesn't get engaged
39:32
quickly into things, telling
39:35
yourself the truth, which is that this dopamine
39:37
system and the associated other catecholamines
39:39
take some time to get online for those circuits
39:41
to start firing can be very helpful. People can
39:43
realize, oh, you know, my attention and focus isn't
39:45
going to be great for the first five or
39:47
10 minutes. In fact, it might feel like it's
39:49
a bit of a kind of, like there's some
39:51
friction there. I feel like maybe my brain fog
39:54
or something like that. But after
39:56
a few minutes, people often will drop into a
39:58
groove where then they're in a steady. pursuit
40:00
of information and then sometimes it's actually hard for them
40:02
to transition out of it. In
40:04
the same way exercise, some people you say, hey, let's
40:07
go out for a hike and like, let's do it.
40:09
Other people, you know, you need to get into a
40:11
rhythm. You need to start activating those circuits in order
40:13
to feel like you can be in that forward center
40:15
of mass. I almost always feel this about running for
40:18
the first 10 minutes. I'm like, this sucks. Whatever
40:20
is, it's not that I'm not warmed up. Something's not
40:22
warmed up in my mind. And then it starts to
40:25
feel better and better and then I feel like I
40:27
could run all day. So, you
40:30
know, I'm using loose analogies here, but also
40:33
real life examples to explain that
40:35
the circuits that are responsible for
40:37
motivation, for effort
40:40
in the movement system and in the
40:42
cognitive space are similar, different circuits, but
40:44
they're also similar to the
40:46
extent that sometimes they need warming up. And
40:49
that will likely be more and more
40:51
the case if we are engaging
40:53
in activities in our, the rest of
40:55
our life where we can get what we're looking
40:58
for without any effort at all. We are, and
41:00
I'm not blaming social media or YouTube, love YouTube.
41:02
We're on YouTube. You're on YouTube. But
41:04
we live in a world now where
41:07
our brain has learned we can get things in
41:10
an instant. It doesn't
41:12
require effort. And so there's been a learning of
41:14
that as well. There's this into like, where's the
41:16
reward? Where's the reward? Where's the milestone that I'm
41:18
on the right path? Well, it's not there as
41:20
you crack open the book because
41:22
your circuits have essentially been trained to have
41:24
that just delivered to you in video form.
41:26
I mean, reading words on a page, I
41:30
love reading, but it's to your brain,
41:32
it's far more boring than watching a
41:34
movie. Nothing, you know, pictures
41:36
worth a thousand words and a movie is worth a
41:39
billion pictures, right? It's
41:41
just the brain loves motion. It loves visual
41:43
motion. It loves a visual motion with color.
41:45
It loves faces. It loves those dynamics. And
41:48
so we should not be surprised at all that when we tell
41:50
our kids or we ask ourselves to sit down
41:53
and read something, you know, my goodness, like, what's
41:55
going on with me? Give it a little
41:57
bit of time, five to 10 minutes and understand that it's.
42:00
you're asking something very different of your
42:02
brain under those conditions. Now, if
42:05
you get a text message from somebody and you're
42:07
anticipating that text message, what's the
42:09
diagnosis? Did you win this? Are you going
42:11
to see them and you're excited? Well, then
42:13
you're going to be wrapped with attention. But
42:15
again, text messages are this instant form of
42:17
communication that both
42:20
taps into, no doubt, the dopamine system, the
42:22
anticipation system. But I think what I'm saying
42:24
here is that a lot of the typical
42:27
daily activities that we engage in and that
42:29
we all love are
42:31
actually training our circuits to be less effective
42:33
at working through that initial friction. Less
42:36
effort. I've heard you talk
42:38
about attaching the reward to the effort itself
42:40
and how that can
42:42
help you and your
42:44
system sort of value more the effort,
42:46
right? Rather than the end reward. Do
42:48
you have some examples of like, how
42:51
would you attach a reward to the effort
42:53
itself? Okay, so there's the psychology
42:55
and then there's the physiology. The
42:58
idea of attaching a reward to
43:00
the effort process itself is kind of the holy
43:03
grail of learning anything and being human in my
43:05
opinion. And here we
43:07
can look to the beautiful work by my colleague,
43:09
Carol Dweck on growth mindset. You know, this notion
43:11
of attaching the word yet. You know, that somebody
43:13
isn't good at something and they can tell themselves
43:16
yet, that they can be, that there's a capacity
43:18
for growth and so on. There's
43:20
also the beautiful work of another colleague
43:22
of mine, Dr. Alia Crum at Stanford
43:24
and David Yeager, who's down at University of
43:27
Texas, Austin, which has combined a lot
43:29
of the discoveries about growth mindset with
43:31
the stress can be performance enhancing mindset
43:33
and to great success in my opinion,
43:36
in terms of cultivating better academic
43:38
skills and so on. So we'll get to that in
43:41
a moment. But the idea here is
43:43
that the dopamine system,
43:45
even though it's, you know, it's down in
43:47
the midbrain and it's involved with, and it's
43:49
also, you know, communicating with the striatum and
43:51
it's communicating down to the spinal cord and
43:53
it's involved in all this stuff that's evolutionarily
43:55
pretty old, right? Reward
43:57
exists in reward mechanisms and movement.
44:00
exist in other animals too. But
44:03
the amazing thing about these pathways is
44:05
that they are highly subject to
44:08
context dependent learning. So the prefrontal
44:10
cortex, the neural real estate behind
44:12
our forehead, it's
44:14
a bunch of different areas of the prefrontal cortex,
44:17
but it's essentially a context learning machine. It learns
44:19
what's appropriate in one situation and not another, and
44:21
it learns rules. It can teach and learn rules,
44:23
but it doesn't just teach and learn rules to
44:26
you. The circuits
44:28
involved in motivation and reward can
44:30
learn those rules even
44:32
so much, just even
44:34
so far as to say accurately,
44:37
that if you are in a process of trying
44:39
to learn something and you can't do it, you're
44:41
like, oh, like I can't figure this out, I
44:43
can't figure this out, but you have the knowledge,
44:46
the cognitive knowledge that that
44:48
feeling of what I call limbic friction, you know, I
44:50
made that term up, but this
44:52
feeling of friction, like this is tough, this is
44:54
agitating, I can't do it. If you are aware
44:56
of the reality, which is that that
44:59
reflects the release of neurochemicals involved
45:01
in attention and alertness, and
45:03
it's changed the milieu of your brain to
45:05
allow plasticity to occur, then you can tell
45:07
yourselves in those moments, the challenge
45:09
that I'm experiencing right now is the
45:11
gate to neuroplasticity, which it is. It's a way that
45:14
my brain knows this is different than everyday life because
45:16
I can't do what I'm trying to do, pay attention,
45:18
do something differently, keep drilling. And
45:22
that process, if you tell
45:24
yourself the simple, you know, self-talk
45:26
of I'm on the right
45:28
path, the fact that it's difficult means I'm
45:30
on the right path as opposed to the
45:32
wrong path. What that means is
45:35
that the dopamine system can start to
45:37
recognize those general themes of thinking, general
45:39
themes of internal arousal state in the
45:41
body and brain, so that
45:43
in the future, when you encounter those
45:45
states, you know, this
45:48
is good, this is good for me. In
45:50
other words, we can, it's not just that
45:52
the dopamine is released when we are in
45:54
pursuit of heat, when it's cold, cool, when
45:56
we're too hot, food, sex, et cetera. can
46:00
also learn based on knowledge that we are told
46:02
and that we believe. And there's actually a beautiful
46:04
paper in Neuron published a few years ago that
46:07
actually attaches beliefs to the dopamine system.
46:10
It can get a little scary because
46:12
what it essentially showed was that people
46:17
who get confirmation of their
46:19
preexisting beliefs get dopamine release under those conditions.
46:21
This explains a lot of what we see
46:23
out in the world, both online and elsewhere.
46:26
But the important point here is that what
46:28
we believe about how dopamine works, what
46:30
we believe about effort, those
46:33
things can be merged in a way that indeed
46:36
we can start to attach reward to
46:38
the effort process itself. As
46:40
we are striving, as we are trying to go from
46:42
flat footed to forward center of mass, if you will,
46:44
or from back on our heels to flat footed to
46:46
forward center of mass, as we're doing that, if we
46:48
tell ourselves, okay, this is
46:50
supposed to be painful, hopefully
46:52
in non-traumatic, non-physically or psychologically
46:54
traumatic way, but that I'm
46:56
doing this, this is it,
46:58
this horrible day that was so
47:01
difficult, this is part of growth, this is part of the
47:03
growth, I'm on the growth curve. That
47:05
knowledge can shape and will shape the
47:07
neural circuitry associated with dopamine reward so
47:09
that in the future, when you encounter
47:12
it, it's like, oh yeah, this is how
47:14
this works. And people hear
47:16
this and they go, wait, how do I do that? How many
47:18
times do I have to tell myself I got it right? There
47:21
hasn't been a deep exploration of
47:23
that, but everything we know about the psychology
47:25
of growth mindset, and then I mentioned the
47:27
stress is enhancing mindset, it's worth just noting,
47:30
the stress is performance enhancing mindset is
47:32
one in which it's beautiful experiments
47:35
where people watch a movie about
47:37
how stress diminishes performance, causes challenges
47:39
in immune system function, et cetera, et cetera,
47:41
it's all true. A different
47:44
group watches a video about how
47:46
stress can enhance performance, sharpens focus,
47:48
sharpens memory for specific things, et
47:50
cetera, and it improves performance. So
47:53
what it basically boils down to
47:55
is that what you believe about
47:57
a certain state in your brain and body has...
48:00
very much to do with how your
48:02
dopamine and other neurochemical systems react. And
48:05
that carries forward into other activities. That's why
48:07
I love so much about the
48:09
dopamine system or these other systems
48:12
is that they generalize. Dopamine is the
48:14
currency for all of this. There are
48:16
other currencies in there too. I want
48:18
to be fair to the biology, but
48:20
dopamine is the currency of motivation, reward,
48:23
and pursuit, but mostly reward, but
48:25
mostly motivation and effort. And
48:28
then additionally reward under certain
48:30
conditions. So I guess if
48:32
that was a two word dense, when
48:36
things get hard, tell yourself the
48:40
fact that they're hard means you're on the right
48:42
path. You might not be on the exact right
48:44
path, but think of yourself as cutting a wedge
48:48
through a map to get to a
48:50
certain destination. Sure, as you gain
48:52
more knowledge of right and wrong aspects of
48:55
your pursuit, you can sharpen up
48:57
or narrow up that wedge so that you
48:59
nail the location like a Google maps trajectory.
49:02
But understanding that as
49:04
you are in pursuit, you are tapping into
49:06
the dopamine system. Now, if you
49:09
hit a node, if
49:11
you will, in your pursuit, and it's like, oh, you got
49:13
the wrong thing. It was like, you didn't get the, you
49:15
didn't meet the goal. It didn't go the way you wanted.
49:18
It's also useful to understand that that
49:21
is valuable knowledge. The lack of reward, the disappointment
49:23
you feel will also reinforce not doing many of
49:25
the things that led up to that. We just
49:27
have to be careful that we don't generalize too
49:30
much, right? There were exams that
49:32
I studied for in university that
49:34
I didn't do as well as I would have liked.
49:36
In fact, one course in particular, and I still remember
49:38
the course, I still remember exactly what went wrong, but
49:40
that's exactly the point. We have
49:43
a heightened memory for where effort led
49:45
to the thing we didn't want. And
49:48
we can use that to make sure that
49:50
we remember that information going forward. We
49:53
apply that information going forward. In fact, as
49:55
you know, in a qualifying exam, they keep
49:57
asking the graduate student
49:59
questions. until you say what? Until you say, I
50:01
don't know. And at that point,
50:03
they found your limit. And the answer to
50:05
that question, inevitably, people go look up. And
50:07
it's the one thing from your qualifying exam
50:09
that you never forget. So in
50:12
any case, that's the best sort of
50:14
topical description I can provide. And
50:16
some of it really sounds very much
50:19
like the placebo effect too, right? I mean, the
50:22
placebo effect where you believe something is,
50:25
you know, going to be positive, it's going
50:27
to happen. And I believe
50:29
you also released dopamine, right? Absolutely.
50:31
So I mean, a placebo effect is amazing.
50:34
Right. And scares certain people,
50:37
but I don't think it should. I think
50:39
that we should look at the placebo effect
50:41
as proof positive that the
50:43
circuitries in the brain that are involved in primitive things,
50:47
dopamine release, temperature regulation, hunger,
50:49
etc., are highly prone to
50:51
contextual learning. You know, this
50:53
drink is going to do blank, and it does. This
50:57
gives someone else the same drink. Again, Alia
50:59
Crum's work, give the milkshake study,
51:01
right? Give people milkshake, tell them it's
51:03
high calorie, tell them
51:05
it's very nutrient dense. You get
51:08
more satiety than if you tell them
51:10
it's nutrient sparse. Right. And it's the
51:12
same calorie drink. But you
51:14
can look at the level of ghrelin
51:16
secretion and see that is pure placebo
51:18
slash belief effect. And I think that makes
51:20
sense if you are in the middle, like if you're wanting
51:23
to reward
51:25
effort, then while you're
51:27
in that, when you're doing it, when you're
51:29
in the effort part, where you're like in
51:31
motion, right? Then thinking about
51:33
like, this is working, like this is like, you
51:35
can then there's the dopamine, right? Attached the effort.
51:38
I mean, am I thinking about it? Right?
51:40
Absolutely right. It's, you described it
51:42
far better and more succinctly than, than I ever could.
51:45
It's important to pay attention to what effort feels
51:47
like in the brain and body. And
51:49
to remind ourselves in those moments, I'm on the
51:51
right path. I might not be on the exact
51:53
right path, but I'm headed in
51:56
the right direction. And sure enough, when
51:58
you hit a milestone, whatever the that milestone
52:00
is, you should pay attention to that milestone,
52:02
the reward, the grade, et cetera. I'm a
52:04
big believer of also sometimes not
52:07
paying too much attention to that. I'll never
52:09
forget in graduate school, we got
52:12
our first paper published and I
52:14
thought we would go celebrate. And I asked
52:16
my PI, my lab
52:18
head, I said, you know, are we going to
52:20
celebrate? And she said, I don't know, wasn't the
52:23
celebration doing the experiments? I was like, well, those
52:25
are a lot of fun. Yeah. And
52:27
she said, well, I guess we could get a pizza or something, but
52:29
how about just go do more experiments? And
52:32
so that's what I did. And at the time I
52:34
remember thinking, oh, that's no fun, but she had a
52:36
long commute home and, you know, maybe, maybe who knows,
52:38
she didn't have the time. Looking back, it's like, what
52:40
a great gift because it was like, no, you do
52:42
the, it was the doing of the experiments that was
52:45
the reward. The paper, yeah, that's super cool.
52:47
It's fun. You know, first paper is
52:49
always a thrill, but no, the real
52:51
thrill is in doing the experiments, doing science.
52:53
And so let's not introduce anything to this
52:56
picture that doesn't map onto that. And
52:58
I don't know to what degree it
53:00
played a role in my pursuit of goals, but
53:03
I really enjoy effort. In fact, I love building
53:06
stuff as much or more
53:08
than I do indulging in the final product. And
53:10
you do an excellent job. I guess as
53:12
a parent, you know, like it, if you're
53:14
trying to attach a reward to effort
53:17
to kind of help facilitate tenacity, willpower,
53:21
like if a child, like you're not going to be able to
53:23
tell a child to do what we were just talking about, but
53:25
like if a child was like learning a new language, then
53:28
you would reward the studying time,
53:30
right? Like, so it's like they're studying, okay,
53:32
every study session they get a quarter or
53:34
whatever, like, so then they're like rewarded for
53:37
studying, not for like the fact
53:39
that they can say the words properly or,
53:41
you know, get the language
53:43
correct or whatever. So. Exactly.
53:45
Reward verbs and
53:48
verb states as opposed to providing
53:51
adjectives. So when we tell
53:53
kids, you're so smart, you're so smart, we
53:56
think we're doing a great job of
53:58
reinforcing their psychology. but actually what
54:01
a lot of data, not all data to
54:03
be fair, but what a lot of data
54:05
show is that leads to a state where
54:07
if that kid or adult gets
54:10
something wrong, then what's the opposite of
54:12
smart? They think they're stupid. Whereas
54:14
if you reward, it's incredible. And
54:16
I'm so impressed by the effort you
54:19
put in, how hard you worked. The
54:21
fact that you really
54:23
double checked everything before turning
54:26
in your paper. The fact
54:28
that you were really, I
54:31
noticed how carefully
54:34
you blanked, right? You went through each
54:36
thing. And you're also reinforcing the
54:38
specific things that they can repeat. Just
54:41
telling a kid that they're smart, then they go through
54:43
all that thinking they're smart. Well, the first time, and
54:45
listen, it's going to happen sooner or later, the first
54:47
time they get evidence to the contrary, they just take
54:49
the opposite of that. So much
54:51
so that I remember also my graduate
54:53
advisor saying, with students you want
54:55
to say, what
54:57
was it, instead of be careful, be
55:00
mindful or something. Like there was this idea that,
55:03
trying to get students to
55:05
pay attention to things in a certain way,
55:08
as opposed to rewarding people
55:11
based on bins, like smart or less smart
55:13
or something like that. So with kids, I
55:15
think rewarding and reinforcing
55:17
verb states that led to the
55:20
sort of categorization is what's going to be most
55:22
effective. At least that's what the data show. Yeah.
55:25
Going back to procrastination, I've heard you talk
55:28
about some interesting
55:30
visualization, you know,
55:32
techniques, where if
55:34
a person's in a state
55:36
of mind where they're there, yes,
55:38
they want to do this goal, whatever
55:41
the fill in the blank project is or goal, then
55:45
they can use a visualization technique. But
55:47
if they were not, they could also
55:49
do something, but they could
55:51
use the pain and discomfort to
55:54
help themselves get into that
55:56
do, like
55:58
actually do it. Can you talk
56:00
a little bit about that? Yeah, Tim Ferriss was right
56:02
with fear setting. So
56:04
there's a really
56:07
fantastic scientist, professor
56:09
at NYU, Emily Balchettis, who
56:12
talked about this and continues
56:14
to research it, which
56:16
is that oftentimes fearing
56:18
the worst or feeling
56:20
negative outcomes, if we don't do something,
56:22
can be very beneficial as a motivator.
56:26
So that's not to say, you know,
56:28
fearing the worst case, it's
56:31
placing some real time on fearing
56:34
the negative thing that
56:37
happens if we don't do something. Okay,
56:39
so that's kind of unique to that
56:41
case, as I understand it. Visualization
56:44
of positive outcomes is great as a
56:46
motivator, but there are data
56:48
that suggests that it might not sustain motivation
56:50
over time. I think it's probably fair to
56:52
say that having both in your toolkit
56:55
is great, you know, visualizing
56:57
success can be
56:59
useful in some contexts, visualizing the
57:02
negative effects of not staying in pursuit of
57:04
a goal also can
57:06
be very motivating. That's essentially what
57:09
the data show. Now, when
57:11
it comes to the underlying circuitry and
57:13
what's going on in the brain, that's a
57:15
little bit harder to know, but
57:19
what we do know is that
57:21
the pain system and so-called negative
57:23
reinforcement and punishment the psychologists really
57:25
parse these carefully. So I want
57:28
to acknowledge that I'm
57:30
not using the exact operational definitions here, that
57:33
the dopamine system, as
57:35
I mentioned earlier, is also very tightly
57:38
woven to avoiding punishment,
57:40
to escaping punishment, to being under
57:42
conditions of discomfort and then no
57:45
longer being under conditions of discomfort. So
57:48
we could hypothesize or we
57:50
don't know, but we could hypothesize that for instance,
57:52
if you imagine, goodness, if I don't
57:54
do this, a bunch of negative
57:57
things are going to happen and that
57:59
itself could. trigger a certain form of
58:01
internal arousal that would put you into motion
58:03
for that. And that whole process would be
58:05
rewarding. So that makes logical sense,
58:07
at least in the kind
58:09
of top contour, it makes logical sense. The
58:11
other thing is that if
58:14
we try and think about ways
58:16
that we can avoid procrastination, we
58:19
can go back to the dopamine wave pool,
58:21
baseline peaks, troughs, and return to baseline kind
58:24
of stuff that we were talking about earlier.
58:26
And there's some interesting ideas out there and
58:28
data, although right now it's still being sculpted
58:30
out in humans, meaning the experiments
58:33
are still underway. It's a little bit tougher to
58:35
do in a scanner to
58:38
get at exact mechanisms. But I think there's enough
58:41
logical basis and mechanism to propose
58:44
the following, which is that if there's
58:46
something you need to do, that you
58:48
know you need to do, but that you're finding yourself very
58:51
unmotivated to do, it
58:53
can be useful to do something
58:55
even more uncomfortable than waiting
58:58
and procrastinating. I didn't say even more uncomfortable
59:00
than the thing, said even more uncomfortable than
59:03
the thing that you happen to be doing
59:05
at the moment, which is just waiting
59:08
and procrastinating. So what
59:10
would that be? Well, we've all seen the
59:12
opposite where we have a deadline and suddenly
59:15
we find ourselves cleaning our home. We
59:17
find ourselves doing these things that are kind of low
59:19
level effort that for whatever reason, if you think about
59:21
it's kind of wild, we weren't motivated enough to do
59:24
a day before, an hour before, but suddenly we're
59:26
motivated. It's almost as if the
59:28
motivation circuits are sort of getting ramped up,
59:31
trying to figure out what to direct it
59:33
toward, but clearly that's easier than focusing and
59:36
directing one's effort toward the deadline,
59:38
toward the cognitive or physical effort of something
59:41
else. So there's this idea that many
59:44
people have put to good use, would go
59:46
do something that's really uncomfortable. Again, don't make
59:48
it psychologically or physically traumatic. But
59:51
if you really don't want to exercise in
59:53
that moment, that'd be a great moment to
59:55
exercise, to engage those circuits. Remember it's a
59:57
generic circuit. There isn't a
59:59
circuit. for motivation for one thing versus
1:00:01
a circuit for motivation for another is all
1:00:03
just the general same circuitry is applied to
1:00:06
different things. So I
1:00:08
happen to hate the cold. I don't like
1:00:10
doing cold. I love the sauna, I hate the cold.
1:00:12
So for me, getting in the cold plunge anytime ever,
1:00:14
unless I'm getting out of a very hot sauna and
1:00:16
I want cold is like the
1:00:19
least exciting thing to me and the
1:00:21
thing I'd like to avoid most. So if I'm finding
1:00:23
myself in a state of procrastination, so
1:00:26
some writing, some whatever posting, researching,
1:00:28
et cetera, I will
1:00:30
often do the cold plunge as
1:00:32
a motivator. Now we need to be fair
1:00:34
to the biology and acknowledge
1:00:36
that when we get into cold, uncomfortably
1:00:39
cold water, the catecholamines are released dopamine,
1:00:41
epinephrine, norepinephrine. We know that there's this
1:00:43
beautiful study in European journal physiology, you
1:00:45
know far more about this, this work
1:00:47
than I do, but I've spent some
1:00:49
time with that paper and there's a
1:00:51
pretty remarkable and significant long
1:00:53
lasting increase in the three
1:00:56
catecholamines, dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine.
1:00:58
So we can't know
1:01:01
that it was the discomfort of being
1:01:03
in the cold plunge itself that led
1:01:05
to more motivation. It could be the
1:01:07
discomfort led to the release of these
1:01:09
catecholamines, which led to a different brain
1:01:11
state, which allowed for more pursuit of
1:01:14
whatever this other task that one was
1:01:16
procrastinating on. But I think it's
1:01:18
reasonable to assume that all of that stuff together
1:01:20
had a significant effect. We're
1:01:22
not talking statistically significant. This study
1:01:24
hasn't been done yet about evaluating
1:01:26
procrastination versus cold plunge versus
1:01:28
no cold plunge. That'd be an interesting study. But
1:01:33
the point is the same three
1:01:35
catecholamines involved, the discomfort
1:01:39
of one thing leading to the post
1:01:41
discomfort state of less discomfort, but elevated
1:01:43
catecholamines bringing one into a state of
1:01:46
more motivation. To me, it makes perfect
1:01:48
sense. Like it all holds up logically.
1:01:50
And why cold? Well,
1:01:54
cold is always provided
1:01:56
it's uncomfortable but safe. water
1:02:00
exposure always
1:02:03
deploys these catecholamines is sort of a core
1:02:05
part of our physiology. There are probably other
1:02:08
ways to do it, exercise, et cetera. Exercise
1:02:10
hard, I mean. Exercise hard. Because going on
1:02:12
a zone two run is not like that uncomfortable. No.
1:02:15
I think like. Zone two is a cakewalk. But going
1:02:17
hard, doing a hard hit. Right. Is,
1:02:20
like I don't want to do it. The assault bike. Yeah,
1:02:23
the assault bike. I do a Friday workout for
1:02:25
me, it falls on Friday, where it sounds
1:02:28
so easy, but it always sucks to start
1:02:30
it. 10 seconds hard pedaling on
1:02:32
the assault bike. 20 seconds rest, 10 seconds on,
1:02:34
20 seconds off, and just do that eight times.
1:02:37
Just get my heart rate just way, way up once a
1:02:39
week. I never want to
1:02:41
do it. I never want to
1:02:43
do it. And then afterwards you always feel
1:02:45
terrific for many, many hours. It's wild. Yeah.
1:02:48
It has to be the catecholamines. I definitely want to
1:02:50
go into a little bit more on exercise and cold exposure
1:02:52
and dopamine. So
1:02:57
kind of, I guess if I'm understanding this correctly,
1:02:59
really like there's something about
1:03:01
doing and embracing something that's more
1:03:04
uncomfortable to you than just, I guess, sitting
1:03:06
and waiting. And then you do
1:03:08
it, and let's, okay, let's forget
1:03:11
the fact that cold plunge also releases
1:03:13
dopamine. Right. But let's say you do
1:03:15
it, and then you go back to your task and it's like,
1:03:17
okay, you did this really hard thing. Is there like a contrast
1:03:19
now where it's like? I
1:03:21
think it's actually that,
1:03:24
and I think it's also just
1:03:26
that the ending of the difficult
1:03:28
thing creates an increase. We
1:03:31
know this, the removal of pain creates
1:03:33
an increase in the catecholamines that it's
1:03:36
like the, you know, one, I'm interrupting
1:03:38
myself, but from an evolutionary standpoint, we
1:03:40
go back to what this circuitry really
1:03:42
evolved for. It's like, you just survived
1:03:44
the effort. You just survived
1:03:46
something, which is a tremendous relief, which
1:03:49
is, it's a lift. But
1:03:51
when I say it's a lift, as a
1:03:53
biologist, I have to acknowledge it's a neurochemical
1:03:55
lift. Dopamine, epinephrine, nor epinephrine, no doubt involved.
1:03:57
Now, if you go too hard, too long,
1:04:00
You exercise too hard, too long. Well, then
1:04:02
you get the post exercise dip in energy
1:04:04
and you might feel a motivated. But what
1:04:06
we're really talking about here is generating a
1:04:08
wave front in that dopamine pool that then
1:04:10
you can devote to other things. So
1:04:12
it's interesting talking about the thing that you don't
1:04:14
like. So you talked about cold exposure or like
1:04:16
going really hard in the exercise. How
1:04:20
does exercise generally affect the dopamine
1:04:22
system and does it depend on
1:04:24
how much you enjoy doing it?
1:04:26
Like the nice run on
1:04:28
the beach? Great question. There is
1:04:30
unfortunately not as much data about
1:04:32
this, about the
1:04:34
influence of exercise on dopamine. There's
1:04:36
some, but because
1:04:38
it requires ideally brain imaging
1:04:41
and exercise involves movement, it's been harder to
1:04:43
do those sorts of experiments because people are
1:04:45
in the magnet often with a bite bar
1:04:47
and like it has to stay stable. But
1:04:50
in the case of cold water exposure and
1:04:52
looking at the catecholamines, it was by blood
1:04:54
draw. And I want to be
1:04:56
fair, the levels of dopamine and other chemical
1:04:59
increases by blood draw in the body
1:05:01
don't always correlate directly. In
1:05:03
fact, they never correlate
1:05:05
directly with brain level changes
1:05:07
in these chemicals, but they're loosely
1:05:09
correlated. As one goes up, the other goes
1:05:12
up. As one goes down, the other goes down. But unfortunately
1:05:15
we don't have great real time
1:05:17
imaging of dopamine release or dopamine
1:05:19
levels with like a skull
1:05:21
cap that you could run without a
1:05:24
bunch of equipment next to you. So there aren't as
1:05:26
many studies about this, but there are some using blood
1:05:28
draws because people can run on a treadmill, take
1:05:31
blood and look. And certainly people can be
1:05:33
scanned in the scanner as well. We
1:05:36
know that intense exercise deploys the catecholamines. We
1:05:38
know that. We know cold water does it
1:05:40
as well. And a number of other things
1:05:42
will as well. People playing a monetary reward
1:05:44
game is the typical way this has been done in
1:05:47
the lab while people are in a scanner. There's
1:05:49
also some interesting data. I just want to
1:05:51
mention in two sentences where the
1:05:54
way that the dopamine system is kind of
1:05:57
checking off a milestone.
1:06:00
I talked before about pursuit milestone, pursuit milestone.
1:06:02
The human brain has a capacity to like
1:06:04
create long milestones like a four year degree
1:06:06
or a marriage or, you know, raising a
1:06:08
kid and also moment to moment milestones. There
1:06:11
was an interesting experiment also published, I believe in neuron,
1:06:13
I have to go back and check, but certainly cell
1:06:15
press journal by my recollection, that had
1:06:18
people watching a sports game and
1:06:20
it was a basketball game. And every time
1:06:23
their favorite, the subject's favorite team got
1:06:25
the ball and there was an opportunity for
1:06:27
another basket, another score
1:06:29
to take place. The dopamine
1:06:31
circuitry sort of reset itself, if you
1:06:33
will, toward anticipation of that particular drive
1:06:36
down court. Now
1:06:38
that's a perfect experiment in many ways because basketball
1:06:40
has a very, it's a very constrained environment, right?
1:06:42
You know which team is going for which basket,
1:06:45
you know, when there's a turnover, you know, when
1:06:47
the turnover got reversed, you know, it's not like
1:06:50
most of life where you're in pursuit of things
1:06:52
that is very dynamic, a lot of interwoven
1:06:55
goals throughout the day, et cetera. But
1:06:57
the point being that as
1:06:59
we move through our pursuits,
1:07:02
the dopamine system is constantly updating, okay,
1:07:04
here's, if you will, a
1:07:06
drive down court, right, toward, and
1:07:09
it's paying attention or it has knowledge
1:07:11
of even the shorter milestones, like,
1:07:16
you know, as we move through this podcast, you
1:07:18
know, I'm not tracking where we are, I don't
1:07:20
track time very well, I'm tracking whether or not
1:07:22
I can answer your questions coherently enough, right? That's
1:07:25
how my dopamine system right now is tacked to
1:07:27
this as opposed to people
1:07:29
who are, you know, gambling on a game in
1:07:33
Vegas and who, you know, final score is
1:07:35
really what matters, but you know, talk about
1:07:37
dopamine and reward prediction error. I mean, that's
1:07:39
what Vegas is all about, right? It's basically
1:07:42
the town should be called reward,
1:07:44
dopamine reward prediction error town USA, because that's
1:07:46
what's going on there. So, okay, so that
1:07:49
was a little bit of a divergence into
1:07:51
that one particular study. When it comes to
1:07:53
exercise, there are a number
1:07:56
of ways in which dopamine can be released
1:07:58
in response to effort. Remember the catecholamines. norepinephrine,
1:08:00
epinephrine, and dopamine, close cousins,
1:08:02
biochemically related, all of which
1:08:04
are involved in height and state of arousal,
1:08:07
focus, movement, effort. Okay, it's
1:08:09
just the kind of perfect cocktail that
1:08:11
nature created. If
1:08:14
we engage in vigor, we know
1:08:16
that if you engage in vigorous exercise, exercise
1:08:19
that requires effort, and you complete it in
1:08:21
a way that feels satisfying to you, no
1:08:23
doubt, you're going to get a dopamine increase
1:08:25
from that. Now, is it the long elevated
1:08:28
increase in dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine that one
1:08:30
sees with deliberate cold exposure? That's
1:08:32
going to be pretty nuanced. It's going to
1:08:35
depend on the nature of the exercise. I
1:08:37
don't know, I suspect no. Now,
1:08:40
I will say that I
1:08:43
feel very different after
1:08:45
a good long morning run,
1:08:47
or 30 minutes jogging, versus
1:08:50
a hard weight workout. It's just a, like,
1:08:52
it's a subjectively distinct feeling in
1:08:54
the hours afterwards. What's interesting about
1:08:56
deliberate cold exposure, cold
1:08:59
plunge or what have you, is that people
1:09:02
generally report feeling very good, almost
1:09:04
like a mild euphoria, for many
1:09:06
hours afterwards, elevated focus, many hours
1:09:08
afterwards. And that maps beautifully onto
1:09:10
the, I can see those images
1:09:13
in the paper now, of
1:09:15
the big dopamine increase and the norepinephrine increase, and I
1:09:17
think it's three graphs set above one another vertically
1:09:20
in that paper, where, I mean,
1:09:23
this is long arcs of dopamine
1:09:25
release, way above baseline, distinctly
1:09:27
different from what one sees with, like, cocaine
1:09:30
or amphetamine, which has also been measured in
1:09:32
humans. You know, the big amplitude, big drop
1:09:35
below baseline. In fact, I'm not aware of,
1:09:38
but base of that, in
1:09:40
fact, I'm not aware that what I'm about to
1:09:43
say is always true, but in that paper about
1:09:45
deliberate cold exposure, I did not see,
1:09:47
probably because they didn't look out that far, a drop in
1:09:50
those catecholamines below baseline. It may be that
1:09:53
it just elevates and then tapers down to
1:09:55
baseline again. Remember, the slope of line, the
1:09:57
faster you get up to a peak. the
1:10:00
more of a drop below baseline. This is
1:10:02
why people who smoke crack cocaine faster
1:10:06
into the system than if they bring
1:10:08
cocaine into their system by snorting it
1:10:11
orally. We know this, the
1:10:13
route of administration has a
1:10:15
lot to do with the amplitude of
1:10:17
the dopamine peak and how
1:10:20
far below baseline it drops afterwards. This is
1:10:22
one of the reasons why certain forms of
1:10:24
drugs of abuse are far more reinforcing than
1:10:26
others. It's not just that they create a
1:10:29
bigger dopamine increase, it's how quickly
1:10:31
they get there and then how
1:10:34
quickly and long that trough lasts.
1:10:36
So with exercise, I get a
1:10:38
clear state shift from exercise, I'm sure you
1:10:41
do as well, and it's wonderful,
1:10:43
but it's distinctly different from the kind of
1:10:45
state shift that one gets from deliberate cold
1:10:47
exposure. Again, less data, but
1:10:50
one thing that's kind of fun that I
1:10:52
don't think I've talked much about, if at all
1:10:55
on podcasts, is the entrainment and anticipation
1:10:57
of exercise, this is kind of neat. If
1:10:59
you exercise at more or less the same
1:11:01
time each day for three days, it doesn't
1:11:03
even have to be consecutively. What you'll notice
1:11:05
is going forward, at
1:11:08
least for a short period of time, 15
1:11:10
to 30 minutes before that exercise, you'll notice
1:11:12
kind of an increase in arousal where your
1:11:14
body is entrained to that movement. The
1:11:17
neurochemicals that were released, the state
1:11:19
of arousal, there's some learning there
1:11:21
between the memory systems, the hypothalamus
1:11:23
and the autonomic nervous system, and
1:11:26
the body starts to anticipate being ready.
1:11:28
If you then don't exercise, you can
1:11:30
also apply that elevated readiness to mental
1:11:32
work. People oftentimes will say
1:11:34
they wake up right before their
1:11:36
alarm clock goes off. Wild,
1:11:38
right? You wake up, you look at your clock, say, one
1:11:40
more minute, what's going on? Well, assuming the
1:11:42
clock didn't make some sort of noise, like a click
1:11:44
or something like that, it's
1:11:47
the entrainment to that waking up time. Even
1:11:49
in sleep, your body is clocking time, your
1:11:51
brain is clocking time, and then you wake
1:11:53
up and then the alarm goes off. The
1:11:55
same thing is true if you exercise at
1:11:58
the same time, and this is what- what's
1:12:00
really interesting. If you
1:12:02
exercise at more or less the same time, you can use
1:12:05
that elevated arousal at that time to
1:12:07
exercise or do other things. But then
1:12:09
there's the post exercise increase in whatever
1:12:11
mental state you happen to exit
1:12:14
that exercise from. Again, I say it that way.
1:12:16
I'm not trying to be wishy
1:12:18
washy here because I find that
1:12:21
a eight minute HIIT workout is
1:12:23
distinctly different from a long jog, is
1:12:25
distinctly different from a hard leg day
1:12:27
in the gym when it comes to
1:12:29
how you feel afterwards. Each one has
1:12:31
to be neurochemically distinct and hormonally distinct.
1:12:33
And in the laboratory, unfortunately, most
1:12:35
of the studies have been done like, treadmilling
1:12:37
or swimming. There aren't a lot of studies
1:12:40
looking at the neurochemical changes that are the
1:12:42
consequence of different types of exercise, especially things
1:12:44
like HIIT and resistance
1:12:47
training. I'm sure there are a few, I'm
1:12:49
not aware of them, but they're far fewer
1:12:51
than just cardio because it's harder to get
1:12:53
people to come in and do a hard
1:12:55
hack squats or something like that. I
1:12:57
think the biggest changes that's been done really with high
1:13:00
intensity exercise versus lower intensity or
1:13:02
moderate would be looking at lactate
1:13:04
and how that affects norepinephrine and
1:13:06
other things. But
1:13:09
the entrainment thing is interesting because I'm
1:13:11
wondering if, let's say you have someone
1:13:13
who is not motivated to exercise. And
1:13:16
the best thing you can do is get them a
1:13:19
coach. That's gonna help. But if you can get them
1:13:21
to do the three or four days in a row
1:13:23
at the same time, then on
1:13:25
the fifth or sixth day, are
1:13:27
they gonna now, because they have that, like
1:13:30
you were saying, that motivation, like
1:13:33
that anticipation which is tied
1:13:35
to the dopamine system, then
1:13:38
maybe you're gonna tap into that, like okay,
1:13:40
we're gonna get some of that motivation. So
1:13:42
it would be interesting to come up with a
1:13:45
protocol. How long, how many
1:13:48
days of training the same time of day
1:13:52
can we get someone who is completely
1:13:54
unmotivated to exercise? They haven't experienced
1:13:56
it, right? I would say three to
1:13:58
seven days. Based
1:14:00
on our understanding, excuse me, of
1:14:03
how the autonomic nervous system can
1:14:05
learn and how the dopamine
1:14:07
system plays into that. Three to seven days,
1:14:09
maybe not even consecutively. I mean, I always
1:14:11
say that the most important thing with exercise,
1:14:13
if I were gonna write a chapter on
1:14:15
exercises, number one, don't get hurt. But
1:14:17
that doesn't mean don't do it, but don't get hurt. Because the
1:14:20
best way to get and stay in great shape in your life
1:14:22
is to not get hurt. So
1:14:24
you don't want the new exerciser to
1:14:26
injure themselves. But three to seven days,
1:14:30
they should then on the eighth day or
1:14:32
on the fourth day, left
1:14:34
to their own devices, feel the energy in
1:14:36
their body 15 to 30 minutes
1:14:40
before doing that exercise.
1:14:43
And hopefully they would just do that. I
1:14:45
mean, I think that people relied often
1:14:48
too heavily on psychological motivators. And
1:14:50
we overlook this entrainment phenomenon and the
1:14:52
ability for our body to entrain to
1:14:54
certain times. For
1:14:57
instance, it's a terrible thing,
1:14:59
but I like to get up, hydrate, caffeinate,
1:15:01
slowly do some mental work. And then my
1:15:03
ideal training time, if I ever retire, I
1:15:06
don't know that I ever will, but would
1:15:08
be to train mid-morning like 10 30. Amazing,
1:15:11
I love it. My workouts are always best, et
1:15:13
cetera. But my life isn't organized
1:15:15
that way. So I like to try and
1:15:17
exercise within an hour of waking up. But
1:15:21
I have to drink caffeine first. I don't do my
1:15:23
90 minute delay thing. I drink my caffeine first if
1:15:25
I'm going to exercise right away. And
1:15:27
I should say that for people that
1:15:29
feel a motivated, what do we do
1:15:31
generally? We consume things like
1:15:34
caffeine, which as
1:15:36
we know disrupts the adenosine system.
1:15:38
So adenosine being a molecule of
1:15:40
sleepiness or fatigue. Also
1:15:43
upregulates dopamine receptors incidentally.
1:15:46
It was actually shown in human dopamine receptors,
1:15:48
pretty interesting there. Regular
1:15:50
caffeine consumption very likely increases the
1:15:53
sensitivity and or number of dopamine receptors
1:15:55
available. So whatever dopamine is released can
1:15:57
have quote unquote more of an effect.
1:16:00
in terms of motivation and reward. People
1:16:02
will take nowadays, and I'm not passing
1:16:04
judgment here, but there's a lot of
1:16:06
use of things like Adderall, Modafinil, Vyvanse,
1:16:08
Stimulants. What do all those stimulants do?
1:16:11
They release the catecholamines, mainly dopamine and
1:16:13
epinephrine. They
1:16:15
are amphetamines, okay? People go, oh, am I going
1:16:17
to see no speed? Yep, that's what they are.
1:16:20
Again, not passing judgment. They can have
1:16:22
certain positive effects for certain clinical issues
1:16:26
in some cases. Again, not
1:16:28
promoting or discouraging, just stating
1:16:30
the reality. But what do
1:16:32
people do? They take stimulants. What did I do right
1:16:34
before this podcast? I'll come clean. I don't hide these
1:16:37
things. I've been experimenting
1:16:39
lately with two milligrams of
1:16:41
Nicorette, nicotine, in
1:16:43
the form of gum. I don't smoke, vape, dipper,
1:16:45
snuff. Those are all bad, carcinogenic, et cetera. I
1:16:48
know people say vaping's not as bad as smoking.
1:16:50
Vaping's bad, okay? As bad as smoking, probably not,
1:16:52
but it's not good for you. Don't vape. I
1:16:54
just got some enemies, but that's my read
1:16:56
of the data. More coming. Nicotine
1:17:02
taps into the acetylcholine system, increases
1:17:04
focus. It also will tap into
1:17:06
the epinephrine and dopamine system. It's
1:17:08
highly reinforcing, so I limit myself
1:17:10
to two milligrams, maybe
1:17:13
four times a week total. And I'm thinking
1:17:15
about stopping altogether because I'm just running this
1:17:17
as an experiment on myself. And it really,
1:17:19
really works for me. What does it do?
1:17:21
It makes me more alert, more motivated. That
1:17:23
also scares me. And
1:17:26
many people I know that take, they're these pouches
1:17:28
that come in canisters. I've
1:17:30
never tried them. I don't want to. Those are generally
1:17:32
four to eight milligrams of nicotine per pouch.
1:17:35
I hear over and over again that people
1:17:37
take one, they love it,
1:17:39
take one pouch. They then will
1:17:42
do two a day, three a day, and
1:17:44
pretty quickly they're consuming a canister. So if
1:17:47
not every day, every couple of days. So it's a
1:17:49
very quick route to, let's
1:17:51
just call it habit. Is it addictive?
1:17:53
Maybe. Is it habit forming? Clearly. And
1:17:57
this is becoming all the rage. Now,
1:18:00
I don't recommend it. nicotine
1:18:02
is a vasoconstrictor, which
1:18:04
isn't good raises blood pressure, et cetera. There's
1:18:07
some evidence that nicotine can be
1:18:09
a cognitive enhancer and maybe
1:18:11
later in life, it might be something that I'll return
1:18:13
to for that reason, but
1:18:16
it does have certain health hazards. Clips
1:18:19
always get cut of me saying the cognitive
1:18:21
part, the cognitive enhancing part. But the point
1:18:23
here is that when people feel a-motivated, they
1:18:25
tend to look for something that they can
1:18:27
ingest. Remember no effort, get the
1:18:30
molecules going. There's nothing wrong with that.
1:18:32
A cup of coffee, your espresso or
1:18:34
your bomate, I'll do all
1:18:36
three sometimes and you're more alert,
1:18:39
you're more arousal. You
1:18:41
need to do something with that energy and then try
1:18:43
and lean into work. The problem is with pharmacology, it's
1:18:45
hard to get the dose just right so that you
1:18:47
have the ideal level of focus, ideal level of alertness,
1:18:49
but not so much that you have agitation and your
1:18:52
mind is kind of darting all over the place. So
1:18:56
my typical thing is I will
1:18:58
use coffee or your bomate or
1:19:02
both prior to a hard weight
1:19:04
workout. But when it comes
1:19:06
to cardio, I try and do my cardio without any
1:19:10
caffeine or even and certainly no excessive caffeine,
1:19:12
maybe a half a cup of coffee, maybe
1:19:14
a yerba mater too, and then just get
1:19:17
out and go run in my case or
1:19:19
do the HIIT workout and let the workout
1:19:21
itself be its own source of neurochemicals. But
1:19:24
that's just me. I know some people are doing
1:19:26
the energy drinks combined with nicotine, combined
1:19:29
with all sorts of stuff. And it's wild
1:19:31
because then what they find is in the
1:19:33
absence of those things, they're a-motivated.
1:19:35
Well, why? It was minimal
1:19:38
to zero effort followed by
1:19:40
high amplitude dopamine release and
1:19:42
probably less directly from the exercise
1:19:45
that you're doing. Right, you
1:19:47
talked about the stacking of things that
1:19:49
are releasing dopamine either because
1:19:51
you enjoy them or they're something that can release
1:19:53
dopamine a substance is what will cause you to
1:19:56
have the really high amplitude peak. And then you
1:19:58
can go below baseline. How does caffeine... from
1:20:01
coffee effect, so you mentioned the dopamine
1:20:03
receptors. Is that, so
1:20:05
is there like long-term, cause then you
1:20:07
start to like, you never feel as
1:20:10
good as like, if you take a break from caffeine, then
1:20:12
you have that first cup of coffee, right? I
1:20:15
know, I can't say I relate, cause I can't remember
1:20:17
the last time I took a break from caffeine. I've
1:20:19
done it when I had flus or I was cold,
1:20:21
you know, I had colds or flus, cause I just
1:20:23
don't want to drink caffeine under those conditions, usually like
1:20:25
chamomile tea, and I'm just huddling in bed or something.
1:20:30
I love caffeine. I don't drink that
1:20:32
much of it, you know, but probably
1:20:34
total out about four or 500 milligrams a day.
1:20:37
You know, I weigh 215 to 20 pounds, so
1:20:41
that's not that much, and I'm pretty caffeine acclimated,
1:20:43
and I tend to drink caffeine in the early
1:20:45
part of the day, and not so much in
1:20:47
the evening, certainly not after
1:20:49
3 p.m., so I can sleep well. But, you know,
1:20:51
the stacking is something that, you know, I don't want
1:20:53
to give the impression that if, you know, you have
1:20:55
an energy to drink like a pre-workout, and you've got
1:20:58
the music blasting, and you're hydrated, and you slept great,
1:21:00
have a great workout, like crush a workout every once
1:21:02
in a while, but don't be surprised if the next
1:21:04
time you're walking into the gym, you don't feel quite
1:21:06
as motivated. And I don't think one should rely on
1:21:09
that every single time. You know, that
1:21:11
you need to, if you need a stimulant every
1:21:13
time you're going to exercise, you
1:21:15
are creating a pattern
1:21:18
of behavior, and likely some underlying neurochemical habits
1:21:20
that are not going to serve you well
1:21:22
in the long run. You're going to feel
1:21:24
less motivation to do the thing that itself
1:21:26
can generate feelings of motivation, and that's what
1:21:29
we've been talking about. A cold
1:21:31
shower would be a great one. Because of that
1:21:33
long, I'm just fascinated by this. I've
1:21:36
never seen anything else, no drug, prescription
1:21:39
or otherwise, no supplement, no
1:21:43
workout that I'm aware of, but
1:21:46
I haven't explored every single one, that creates
1:21:49
that long arc of dopamine, epinephrine,
1:21:52
and norepinephrine release, that one
1:21:54
minute, one minute, of being uncomfortably cold
1:21:56
can create. Now in that study, it
1:21:58
was a longer. they
1:22:01
used warmer temperatures and it was much longer.
1:22:03
But I think based on my understanding of
1:22:05
things you presented and as I understand
1:22:08
it, the shorter colder exposure no doubt
1:22:10
creates similar subjective experience.
1:22:12
Yeah, well I was gonna ask you about that
1:22:15
because there's
1:22:17
a lot more papers looking at norepinephrine release
1:22:19
with respect to cold exposure and that can
1:22:21
be even 20 seconds, like at
1:22:23
39 degrees Fahrenheit. That's
1:22:26
the, that quickening of the breath,
1:22:28
adrenaline is an incredible
1:22:30
molecule. But I'm wondering with
1:22:32
the dopamine, what you think,
1:22:34
and this can be some of your
1:22:36
opinion, is the
1:22:39
minimum duration and what the
1:22:41
temperature should
1:22:45
be to get an increase
1:22:49
in the dopamine peak above what you're
1:22:51
at, like you're talking about. Yeah,
1:22:53
so unfortunately there hasn't been a lot
1:22:55
of exploration of this and there needs
1:22:57
to be. At one point my colleague
1:22:59
at Stanford, Craig Heller, who's done a
1:23:02
lot on cold exposure and in particular
1:23:04
polymer cooling for lowering core body temperature
1:23:06
before exercise as a way to increase
1:23:08
and prolong effort. A lot of Stanford athletes do
1:23:10
this, other athletes, pro athletes do this
1:23:13
as well. Interesting topic.
1:23:16
And I were considering doing some work on
1:23:18
this, but we
1:23:20
haven't gotten around to it. I guess we've both been busy
1:23:22
with other things. But here's
1:23:24
how I approach deliberate cold
1:23:26
exposure. And people
1:23:29
might scoff and say, well, that's completely
1:23:31
subjective. But what I like
1:23:33
about it, or what I'm about to say, is
1:23:35
that it's highly individual. It doesn't
1:23:37
say 40 degrees for three
1:23:40
minutes, because 40 degrees for
1:23:42
three minutes at 8
1:23:44
a.m. is going to feel very different than 40 degrees at
1:23:46
three minutes at 3 a.m. No
1:23:48
one's doing cold punch at 3 a.m. unless they're in SEAL
1:23:50
team training or something. But if you're
1:23:53
tired, you're stressed, people have
1:23:55
different levels of excitement about
1:23:57
the cold or fear of the cold. and
1:24:00
so on. Here's how I approach it. I
1:24:03
think of everything in life as it relates
1:24:05
to the stress system as
1:24:07
coming at you as like a wall, an
1:24:09
event, right? It's not, you're
1:24:12
not thinking temperature and duration. You're not thinking,
1:24:14
oh, how intense is this difficult
1:24:16
conversation on a scale of one to 10 and
1:24:18
how long is it lasting? That's not how the
1:24:20
stress system works. We tend to be
1:24:22
confronted with stressors that we either know are coming or are
1:24:25
not coming. So the way I approach
1:24:27
cold is I look at the cold plunge
1:24:29
and I think, how resistant am
1:24:31
I psychologically to getting in it? And
1:24:33
usually it's very, I'm not excited to get in.
1:24:35
I'm excited about the feeling I know
1:24:38
will exist when I get out. So I think
1:24:40
of getting in as the first wall. It's like
1:24:42
climbing over a wall. Okay, this is the first
1:24:44
wall. I get over that first wall and then
1:24:46
I get in, I like to lower myself to
1:24:48
my neck. I like to put my hands in.
1:24:51
I try and move my arms away from my body because
1:24:53
I notice when the cold water gets to my armpits, that's
1:24:55
when it really starts to be uncomfortable. And
1:24:58
I pay attention to my
1:25:00
breathing a bit or maybe I'll distract myself. I
1:25:02
find it doesn't really matter. And what I'm waiting
1:25:04
for is the first impulse to get out. So
1:25:07
that's the second wall. And then
1:25:09
I force myself to get over that second wall.
1:25:11
Again, this is assuming that the water isn't so
1:25:13
cold that it's going to be damaging. And then
1:25:15
what I start doing is I start counting walls
1:25:17
and most importantly, I start paying attention to how
1:25:19
far apart in time those walls are. Now,
1:25:22
eventually you just go numb and you're not going to feel any
1:25:24
wall. You'll go hypothermic. So you don't want to do that. But
1:25:26
what I generally try and do is five to 10 walls. And
1:25:29
it's very interesting to notice how the waves
1:25:31
of desire, these what
1:25:33
I'm calling walls too, I want to get out now.
1:25:36
Now I'm going to just go over this next wall
1:25:38
and this next one. What that
1:25:40
seems to do, and I realize I'm not answering your
1:25:42
question directly, but the reason I'm describing this is that
1:25:44
so much has been put to the
1:25:46
time and the temperature, but ultimately where
1:25:49
we are all highly individual in terms
1:25:51
of how we react to stressors in
1:25:53
a given moment. And what I find
1:25:55
is that there's tremendous learning in noticing
1:25:57
stress coming toward us. us
1:26:00
confronting that stress, getting past that stress
1:26:03
and then moving through it. And
1:26:05
then when I get out, I
1:26:08
always feel much better. It's like, okay, there's a
1:26:10
relief there. You get that arc
1:26:13
of dopamine release that's quite long lasting. There's no
1:26:15
question, I mean, you can like feel it in
1:26:17
your body. I'm not trying to be too, you
1:26:19
know, anecdotal about this, but everyone
1:26:22
feels different after cold. Maybe you're just relieved you
1:26:24
got out, but and that's it,
1:26:26
but you feel different. And then what
1:26:28
I'm trying to do is attach
1:26:30
the fact that there was a feeling of
1:26:33
accomplishment in having gone over a certain number
1:26:35
of walls and paying attention. So again, this
1:26:37
is not answering your question. I acknowledge this,
1:26:39
but the
1:26:42
ability to notice how stress hits you and how
1:26:44
you move through stress and then
1:26:46
how your adrenaline system is like, it's
1:26:48
trying to create agitation. So you get the hell
1:26:50
out of the stressor. That's what it's doing. And
1:26:52
your ability to stay calm and to ride through
1:26:55
that in a safe way, that is
1:26:57
a skill that I think is invaluable. Far
1:26:59
more than sitting there and just watching the
1:27:01
clock tick down, getting out, and then enjoying
1:27:03
the feeling of being out. Now to directly
1:27:05
answer your question, what are the
1:27:07
different parameters that lead to different patterns of dopamine
1:27:09
release? We don't know. Would
1:27:11
30 seconds at a very, very cold,
1:27:14
but still safe temperature do it? My guess
1:27:16
is it would. My guess is that the
1:27:18
catecholamines are released in a bolus in
1:27:21
parallel from the locus coeruleus norepinephrine,
1:27:23
from the adrenals, adrenaline, from
1:27:25
the various sources in the brain that can
1:27:27
release dopamine, that they are just released in
1:27:30
parallel. And we
1:27:32
know they have different time courses. Well, that's
1:27:34
even seen in that European journal physiology paper.
1:27:36
You see, they have different time courses, different
1:27:38
amplitudes. They're not released as a little kit
1:27:40
of like, of Blue Angel
1:27:42
planes flying right next to one another on those
1:27:44
graphs. They have very different dynamics over
1:27:46
time, but they
1:27:49
are released in parallel. And then,
1:27:52
would it be that five
1:27:54
minutes at a 50% cold would release X
1:27:56
more dopamine? I
1:28:00
mean, very likely the problem is right now in
1:28:02
2024, we
1:28:04
don't have great ways of measuring these things
1:28:06
in real time. We just don't.
1:28:09
We're just now getting to the point where you
1:28:11
can measure things like insulin and your blood glucose
1:28:13
in real time in really careful ways while people
1:28:15
are moving about. So the short answer is we
1:28:17
don't know, but I do think
1:28:20
that there's great value in paying attention to
1:28:22
how one encounters
1:28:24
stress, moves
1:28:26
through stress. And then when you get
1:28:28
out of the cold plunge, I don't tend to spend too
1:28:30
much effort thinking about how I
1:28:32
feel in that time. I just know that
1:28:34
it's a complete state shift. I also know
1:28:36
based on my reading of my sleep, on
1:28:39
my eight sleeper whoop, that
1:28:42
doing cold plunge in the morning dramatically increases the
1:28:44
amount of rapid eye movement sleep I get at
1:28:47
night. And I don't know the exact reason for
1:28:49
that. Not
1:28:51
incidentally, certain forms of pharmacology,
1:28:54
not drugs of abuse, but
1:28:56
that I've, I don't use regularly, but
1:28:58
that I've used in the past that
1:29:01
increased dopamine and norepinephrine, like
1:29:04
pryrion, will increase my rapid
1:29:06
eye movement sleep dramatically. I currently don't take it.
1:29:08
I took it years ago for a short amount
1:29:10
of depression. I don't take it any longer, but
1:29:12
I decided to take 50 milligrams of pryrion as
1:29:15
a focus aid at one point of doing an
1:29:17
experiment there. It didn't work well for me, but
1:29:19
I noticed that my rapid eye movement at sleep
1:29:21
just at night just spiked like crazy. The
1:29:24
amount of the duration increased by, I think it was about
1:29:26
15%. Then I
1:29:28
stopped taking it and went back to its
1:29:30
previous value. So
1:29:32
there's something about adrenaline release, perhaps
1:29:36
even just early in the day that seems to impact sleep
1:29:38
at night. For people that
1:29:40
don't have a cold plunge, and
1:29:43
that are experiencing maybe a perhaps drop
1:29:45
in their baseline dopamine, what
1:29:48
are some other behaviors
1:29:50
like that can help to
1:29:52
replenish the dopamine pool? I mean, we're talking about
1:29:55
sleep. That would be one. You
1:29:58
were talking about just... Like
1:30:01
how long do you have to wait to
1:30:03
experience that? Yeah, well, cold shower is always great and
1:30:05
it's not just zero cost. It'll save you on your
1:30:07
heating bill. Cold shower sucks
1:30:10
because it's almost like the
1:30:12
fact that part of you can be out of the cold makes
1:30:14
it worse. You don't like it. Like part of you can be
1:30:16
a slightly warmer, whereas with the cold plunge, you're
1:30:19
all in up to the neck, hopefully. Sometimes
1:30:22
people get their hands out and I don't judge. I
1:30:24
think that's fine. People
1:30:27
have different levels of vasoconstriction and pain from
1:30:30
the cold. So you want it to be fair. It does
1:30:32
not a problem to keep your hands out as I understand
1:30:34
it. Cold shower is
1:30:36
great. I think the high
1:30:38
intensity interval training that I know you're a
1:30:40
big fan of, that's a remarkable tool. Not
1:30:43
only is it brief, but it deploys
1:30:45
all these systems, these neurochemical systems that
1:30:47
create alertness. Also because it's brief and
1:30:49
it does that, you're unlikely to fatigue
1:30:52
yourself to the point where cognitive work
1:30:54
is harder. Now this is something
1:30:56
that isn't often discussed, but a
1:31:00
good hard leg workout mid-morning for me is great.
1:31:03
But then I eat a meal and then
1:31:06
by two or three in the afternoon, I
1:31:08
haven't measured my brain oxygenation levels at those
1:31:10
times, but I am not focused. It is
1:31:12
really hard to focus. Whereas it's interesting if
1:31:14
I exercise earlier in the day, I notice
1:31:16
a significant increase in energy all day long.
1:31:18
I don't know why that is, or if
1:31:20
anyone else has experienced that. But certain resistance
1:31:23
training regimens can be
1:31:26
really depleting. Especially if
1:31:28
you're doing sets to failure and I try and limit
1:31:30
my resistance training, I do it three times a week,
1:31:33
ideally. And I try and do 10
1:31:35
minutes or 15 minutes of warmup, usually
1:31:37
a smaller movement or something like
1:31:39
that, some warmup sets, and then
1:31:41
45 to 55 minutes of work. And
1:31:45
that's it. And the reason is
1:31:47
if I leave the gym then, I
1:31:49
have energy to spare, mental and physical energy.
1:31:52
Whereas if I take it to the point where
1:31:54
everything's left on the mat, I'm
1:31:56
just depleted. I actually am depleted
1:31:59
for several. if not
1:32:01
days afterwards. Maybe my recovery quotient
1:32:03
is isn't as good. Maybe I'm not hydrating enough,
1:32:05
but I try and do all the things. So,
1:32:09
and still that's the case. So what I recommend people do,
1:32:12
this is just what's worked for me. If they are
1:32:14
a person that has other demands in life, they're
1:32:16
not an athlete or solely devoted to their physical fitness,
1:32:19
is I try and make 80 to 85% of my workouts
1:32:23
about 80 to 85% intensity. Meaning
1:32:26
I'm not doing forced repetitions. I'm not
1:32:29
pushing past an hour of total work, maybe even more
1:32:32
like 45 to 55 minutes of total work. I
1:32:36
try and do an additional 10% of workouts
1:32:40
at higher intensity, 90% intensity. And
1:32:43
this is all subjective, but this would mean more
1:32:45
sets to failure. This would mean a couple of
1:32:47
advanced things like force reps or drop sets at
1:32:50
the last set of exercise. And then maybe just
1:32:52
5% of workouts, resistance
1:32:54
or cardiovascular workouts are all out everything I
1:32:56
can give. And so that really ends up
1:32:58
being like, I don't know, just
1:33:01
a few per year. For me this last year,
1:33:03
the hardest workout I did maybe ever
1:33:06
was that 72 pound rock carry that
1:33:08
Cam Haynes had me do. Because
1:33:10
there were moments during that thing, I told myself I
1:33:12
wasn't gonna put the rock down. And then when you
1:33:14
say it on camera, you better not put the rock down
1:33:17
and Cam's there. And I just decided, that's
1:33:19
it. This is the one, this is for me is like
1:33:21
an 11 out of 10 effort. You know,
1:33:24
I don't know what more I had
1:33:26
in me. Goggins would probably say, I was only at 40%
1:33:28
of what I could give, but it felt to me like
1:33:30
everything I could possibly give. I
1:33:32
don't do that sort of training very often. And
1:33:35
I find it takes us back to a couple
1:33:37
of important things. One is the best way to
1:33:39
get in and stay in great shape is to
1:33:41
not get hurt. You do those kinds of workouts
1:33:43
too often, you're the person, the guy or
1:33:45
gal with the injury that you're always talking about, right? That
1:33:48
we hear from, you know, my back, my this, my that.
1:33:51
And they're not training or they're in surgery or
1:33:53
they have to deal with pain stuff, which
1:33:55
fortunately I don't. The
1:33:58
other reason is that if you leave, When we use
1:34:00
some gas in the tank, when we say
1:34:02
gas in the tank, I don't think
1:34:04
we're just talking about glycogen and caloric
1:34:06
energy. I think we're talking about the
1:34:08
riding of that neurochemical wave front, and
1:34:10
no doubt endocrine hormonal wave front also,
1:34:13
and using that for other things. I mean, I use the
1:34:15
cold plunge because I like the way
1:34:17
it makes me feel and I can apply it
1:34:19
to work. I can apply it to energy, I can apply it
1:34:21
to mood. Outside of the
1:34:23
cold plunge, I don't live to get in the cold plunge.
1:34:26
I use the cold plunge to live. That
1:34:28
wasn't meant to be a saying, but
1:34:30
same thing with working out. I use the gym,
1:34:32
I enjoy working out. I love running, but I
1:34:35
use it as a stimulus for the brain that
1:34:37
then I can go apply and be more present
1:34:39
for other things. And I think if
1:34:41
people looked at physical exercise that way, I
1:34:44
think A, it would be less daunting. B,
1:34:47
they'd really start to understand and
1:34:50
appreciate how our physiology in
1:34:52
one endeavor tethers
1:34:54
to another endeavor. And you start to learn a
1:34:56
lot about yourself. I mean, this is becoming a
1:34:58
bit more subjective as I described it,
1:35:00
but for me, learning
1:35:03
how one's body works and
1:35:05
how the brain and body interact and
1:35:07
how exercise influences cognitive function and mood.
1:35:09
And I find it so
1:35:11
important because that's how you navigate
1:35:13
the challenges and also the
1:35:15
great stuff of life. Whereas getting really tacked
1:35:18
to just performance in the workout and then
1:35:20
constraining it like that's it, doesn't
1:35:22
do much for me. Put
1:35:25
differently, I have
1:35:27
a little note on my laptop, which says,
1:35:31
completing a short bout of hard work always makes
1:35:33
me feel better. And I have to remind myself
1:35:35
that. Yeah, it's kind of cheesy, it's corny, I
1:35:37
get it. But I wrote it, so
1:35:39
I put it there. And
1:35:41
I know that in the morning, there's this time when
1:35:44
I can drift into doing things that are very passive
1:35:46
consumption. But if I do one thing,
1:35:48
read one chapter of a book, put
1:35:50
together a post that is hard to deliver in
1:35:52
one take or go and read
1:35:55
a paper or do something that's challenging.
1:35:57
It's like this lift in my brain and body that.
1:36:00
I can't describe it's like I did the
1:36:02
cold plunge. I have a long arc
1:36:04
of elevated sense of accomplishment
1:36:06
and wellbeing and motivation. And
1:36:08
I, we haven't done the
1:36:10
brain imaging experiment, but no doubt it's the translation
1:36:12
of these, of the activation of
1:36:15
these very generic all form circuit, or I
1:36:17
should say circuits for all forms of motivation
1:36:19
to other things that I pivot into. So
1:36:22
again, it's subjective. I'm not talking about a peer
1:36:24
reviewed study in that case, but I find it
1:36:26
to be very useful just to learn how to
1:36:28
do something challenging. And along those lines, forgive me
1:36:30
for going long, that I just so excited about,
1:36:32
there's this literature that's emerged recently on
1:36:35
the anterior mid-singulate cortex, which
1:36:37
is a brain area most neuroscientists aren't aware of,
1:36:39
but my colleague at Stanford, Joe Parvizi, who's a
1:36:42
neurosurgeon, was poking around
1:36:44
in this brain area, stimulating it in a patient, and
1:36:47
then subsequently other patients, and found that
1:36:50
if he stimulated in the anterior mid-singulate
1:36:52
cortex, these patients would describe a feeling,
1:36:55
a subjective feeling of like a storm coming or
1:36:57
a challenge, and they felt like they were going
1:36:59
to lean into it. Super interesting. Move
1:37:01
the electrode back a little bit further, they
1:37:04
don't report anything like that. Stimulate
1:37:06
again in anterior mid-singulate cortex. It's like, there's
1:37:08
a challenge coming, but I can take it.
1:37:10
That's amazing, right? This is a state shift
1:37:13
and a cognitive shift into forward
1:37:16
center of mass. There
1:37:18
are other studies showing that this brain
1:37:20
area is maintained in size, in volume,
1:37:22
in people that maintain cognitive
1:37:24
function later into life. It
1:37:26
increases in size and even activity in
1:37:28
people who are successful dieters. It atrophies
1:37:31
in people that fail to reach certain
1:37:33
goals. There's now, not a huge,
1:37:35
but a decent-sized body of work, supporting the
1:37:37
fact that the anterior mid-singulate cortex, which by
1:37:39
the way, is a hub that gets input
1:37:41
from lots of systems, including the dopamine system,
1:37:43
memory, lots and lots of different brain areas,
1:37:45
inputs and outputs to anterior mid-singulate
1:37:48
cortex, but it's a brain
1:37:50
area that is engaged and
1:37:52
that seems to increase in
1:37:54
activity and maybe even size when
1:37:56
we engage in effort that we
1:37:59
don't want. to engage in.
1:38:01
So if you love working out, probably less
1:38:03
activation of this brain structure. If you force
1:38:05
yourself to do something, more activation
1:38:07
of this brain structure, it seems to be related
1:38:09
to its tenacity, willpower,
1:38:12
and possibly, again,
1:38:14
possibly the desire to live.
1:38:16
It might even be part of the circuitry
1:38:18
to continue pushing on in life, you
1:38:21
know, kind of a high level concept, but these,
1:38:23
what they call super-agers have, if
1:38:25
you look at the brain areas that
1:38:28
maintain size into later adulthood as compared
1:38:30
to age-match controls, the anterior mid-singulate cortex
1:38:32
is one of the two
1:38:34
that represents the most significant difference. So
1:38:37
I find this brain area to be really cool, and if ever
1:38:39
there was motivation for taking on some hard
1:38:41
things or a hard thing that you don't want to
1:38:43
do, maybe it's resisting doing
1:38:45
something, maybe it's doing something, I
1:38:48
think it's the data on the anterior mid-singulate
1:38:51
cortex. Along the same lines, it
1:38:53
kind of reminds me of some of, and I'd be curious
1:38:55
to know what your thoughts are on the quality of data.
1:38:58
If you've looked at it, doing something
1:39:00
like direct, transcranial direct stimulation,
1:39:04
or transcranial magnetic stimulation,
1:39:07
maybe that brain region, or, you know, I
1:39:09
think the prefrontal cortex, and in terms of
1:39:11
motivation, I mean, I think I came across
1:39:14
a study, it was like people, they stimulated
1:39:16
a certain brain region and they were motivated
1:39:18
to work out. Like they were motivated to
1:39:20
exercise. Yeah, I haven't seen that paper, but
1:39:22
I said sure, because it makes perfect sense,
1:39:25
you know, transcranial magnetic stimulation, non-invasive
1:39:27
approach, which originally was used to
1:39:29
quiet brain areas, now can
1:39:31
be used to stimulate brain areas, ultrasound now
1:39:34
can do this as well. My
1:39:36
colleague, Nolan Williams at Stanford is using
1:39:38
this in combination with studies of psychedelics
1:39:41
to increase plasticity in certain brain regions.
1:39:43
I mean, it's a wonderful, in principle, wonderful
1:39:45
non-invasive way to activate or deactivate certain
1:39:48
brain regions. Makes perfect sense to me
1:39:50
that, if one were to stimulate certain
1:39:52
brain regions, they would feel more alert,
1:39:55
more ready to go. In fact, there's a beautiful
1:39:57
description of vagal nerve stimulation
1:39:59
in. I think it's a New Yorker article about
1:40:02
my colleague, Carl Diceroth, one of the greatest
1:40:04
neuroscientists of all time. He's a bio engineer
1:40:06
or a psychiatrist. And in
1:40:08
that article, they describe an interaction he had with
1:40:10
a patient. She has a stimulator on her vagus
1:40:12
nerve. A lot of people think the vagus nerve
1:40:15
stimulation always leads to states of calm. That
1:40:17
is not true. Vagal nerve stimulation is one
1:40:19
way to increase arousal and
1:40:21
alertness. So we need to revise our understanding,
1:40:24
the sort of popular understanding of vagus. There's
1:40:28
a conversation that's recorded in that article
1:40:31
where this patient is sadly, suicidally depressed.
1:40:33
She's saying, you know, I don't want
1:40:35
to live. I don't anticipate much of
1:40:37
a future. I can't get excited
1:40:39
about things. They ramp up the stimulation
1:40:41
on her vagus nerve,
1:40:44
which feeds into a number of the
1:40:46
sort of core arousal
1:40:49
circuits within the brain, hypothalamus,
1:40:52
locus coeruleus, and elsewhere, either indirectly
1:40:54
or directly. And in
1:40:56
real time, she starts saying, yeah,
1:40:58
you know, I could imagine myself going out and
1:41:00
applying for a job or pursuing some, you know,
1:41:02
it's like you're watching
1:41:05
this depressive tone peel
1:41:07
away and not just peel
1:41:09
away to a place of neutrality, but peel away
1:41:11
to a place of forward center of
1:41:13
mass. If ever there was
1:41:15
evidence that like what goes on in our brains
1:41:17
is influencing these broad motivational
1:41:20
and psychological states, it's that. And
1:41:23
I realize as people hear that, a lot of people
1:41:25
say, well, of course it's the brain, right? To stimulate
1:41:27
one brain region, you get rage, stimulate another brain region,
1:41:29
people lean into efforts, stimulate another brain region, people start
1:41:31
crying and are sad and they don't know why. It
1:41:34
all makes sense, but what's so exciting
1:41:37
about transcranial magnetic stimulation is that
1:41:39
it's noninvasive. So we're not
1:41:41
talking about a surgery. I think the issue
1:41:43
is how precisely the stimulation can be delivered
1:41:45
and then how persistently it needs to be
1:41:47
delivered. So do people have to
1:41:49
return to the clinic over and over again? And I really
1:41:51
think in the next five, 10
1:41:54
years, thanks to the efforts of
1:41:56
Neuralink and other laboratories, I mean, to
1:41:58
be fair, you know, you know,
1:42:00
brain augmentation through electrodes is something that's been
1:42:02
going on in academic laboratories for a long
1:42:04
time. Neuralink is making great progress there as
1:42:06
well. But I think the
1:42:09
development of non-invasive tools, maybe it'll
1:42:11
be, you know, you go
1:42:13
in and they, you know, shave a small
1:42:15
patch of hair, God forbid, a little bit,
1:42:18
it'll grow back. And then they put a
1:42:20
little, let's say dime-sized stimulator on the surface
1:42:22
of the skull and close that
1:42:24
up. And then by Bluetooth, every once in a
1:42:26
while, someone is just stimulating magnetic
1:42:29
stimulation of some brain area and they're
1:42:31
feeling better. I imagine that will happen
1:42:33
within five years or so. I don't
1:42:36
think that it's going to require a
1:42:39
wire down deep into the brain in
1:42:41
every case. There will be cases where
1:42:43
that's required, neurosurgery, but I think we're
1:42:45
very quickly headed towards a time where
1:42:49
non-invasive tools for directed brain
1:42:51
stimulation in everybody who needs
1:42:53
it is going to be the reality.
1:42:56
And the beauty of neuroscience over the last 10
1:42:58
years is that the circuitries are being identified. I
1:43:00
mean, you need to know which brain areas to
1:43:02
target, right? The anterior mid-singular cortex
1:43:05
has been on the anatomy charts for a long
1:43:07
time, but it wasn't
1:43:09
clear what it did. And so all this poking
1:43:11
around with electrodes in neurosurgery patients is
1:43:14
with purpose. And
1:43:17
goodness, I mean, I can't think
1:43:20
of a more important thing. And
1:43:23
also, if you think about it, you're talking
1:43:25
about the release of neurochemicals from
1:43:27
specific circuits to get specific results.
1:43:29
When people take a drug, which
1:43:32
is one of the best tools we have now,
1:43:34
people take a drug like, let's say, well butrin
1:43:36
to increase dopamine and norepinephrine, it's
1:43:38
doing that all over the brain. It's doing
1:43:40
that in wherever those neuro modulators are
1:43:44
able to be released. It's not selective for
1:43:46
one particular circuit. It's also causing changes in
1:43:48
the body. It has
1:43:51
some positive effects, hopefully, but
1:43:54
potentially some negative effects, it depends. And
1:43:56
dosages are hard to
1:43:59
adjust in a very... in a very precise way.
1:44:01
It's also hard to know in real time
1:44:03
what's going on because you adjust the dosage
1:44:05
and it takes two or three days or
1:44:08
more for the changes to occur with
1:44:10
transcranial magnetic stimulation, you can know instantly.
1:44:14
And so I'm very excited about this also
1:44:16
that the polarity of the stimulation can be
1:44:18
switched from activation to inhibition. You
1:44:20
always would love that double dissociation in
1:44:22
any experiment. Activate this brain area,
1:44:24
get effect X. Deactivate
1:44:28
the area, get the exact opposite
1:44:30
effect, right? Somebody feels worse when
1:44:32
you deactivate it. They feel better when you
1:44:34
activate it as compared to baseline. Great, you
1:44:36
now have pretty clear understanding what this brain
1:44:38
area is involved in, probably involved
1:44:40
in other things, but at least that. Awesome, and
1:44:43
that's not far off. And it's
1:44:45
happening in labs now. It's super exciting
1:44:47
and fascinating. I
1:44:50
wanna like talk kind of shift
1:44:52
gears for a minute and talk about, you know, like I
1:44:54
didn't get a good sleep, I don't know, for a couple
1:44:56
of nights in a row and I have deadlines and things
1:44:58
to work on. I was feeling very A-motivated,
1:45:00
as you like to say. And so I was,
1:45:02
you know, of course, deep in some of your
1:45:04
stuff and came
1:45:06
across this non-sleep deep
1:45:08
rest. And I had
1:45:11
never heard of it. I mean, I'm
1:45:13
sure it's become popular since you've talked
1:45:15
about it, but I would love
1:45:17
for you to talk about the
1:45:19
non-sleep deep rest and SDR. And,
1:45:22
you know, so sleep is important for
1:45:25
replenishing dopamine. I didn't get that replenishment
1:45:27
of dopamine. And so some tools that
1:45:29
people can do, again, we're
1:45:32
talking about behavioral tools that we've just
1:45:34
mentioned a few, but this
1:45:37
non-sleep deep rest is interesting to me
1:45:39
and how it can help replenish
1:45:41
the baseline pools. Yeah,
1:45:44
so I first thought
1:45:46
about and learned about something called
1:45:48
yoga nidra. Yoga nidra means yoga sleep.
1:45:50
There's a thousand year old or more
1:45:54
protocol where you lie
1:45:56
down and you try to stay
1:45:58
awake while remaining completely. it involves some
1:46:01
long exhale breathing, which we know slows the heart
1:46:03
rate through respiratory sinus arrhythmia,
1:46:06
which is a good thing, it slows the heart rate. And
1:46:08
it had
1:46:10
long been used as a way to offset
1:46:12
sleep loss, as well
1:46:15
as to just create states of replenished
1:46:17
mental and physical vigor, even if
1:46:19
you slept well. And there
1:46:21
were a bunch of theories and some
1:46:23
actually interesting writings about yoga nidra potentially
1:46:25
allowing people to tap
1:46:28
into intentions and things like that.
1:46:30
Okay, great. I learned
1:46:32
about this process, by the way, I went and
1:46:35
somewhere around 2015, 2016, I
1:46:37
decided to shift a significant portion of my
1:46:40
lab from animal studies to human studies. And
1:46:42
I was very interested in stress mitigation and
1:46:44
trauma. So I went to visit a
1:46:46
trauma treatment center in Florida where they were doing yoga
1:46:48
nidra with people every morning for an hour. They would
1:46:50
wake up, they would do this yoga nidra for an
1:46:52
hour. I decided to
1:46:55
participate once or twice. And I
1:46:57
found it to be incredibly restorative because I wasn't sleeping
1:46:59
well on that trip and I would come out of
1:47:01
it thinking like, I just felt like I slept eight
1:47:03
hours. I only slept four or five broken hours. I
1:47:05
do this one hour of yoga nidra and whoa, I
1:47:07
feel amazing. Like this is wild. This is a big
1:47:09
effect. What is this? Go back
1:47:11
to my laboratory. We're studying stress mitigation
1:47:14
techniques. And for
1:47:17
whatever reason, I decided, okay, we
1:47:20
could talk about yoga nidra, but it's a little bit
1:47:22
like talking about meditation. And then you have these name,
1:47:25
which is, you know, a little complicated for the
1:47:27
scientific literature because it's not clear exactly what it
1:47:29
is. And I want to be very clear. I'm
1:47:31
not trying to take anything away from yoga nidra
1:47:33
or those practices. I have tremendous respect for them.
1:47:36
But I came up with this thing called non-sleep
1:47:38
deep rest or NSDR for short, which A,
1:47:41
gives people some sense of what they're doing.
1:47:44
And B, strips away the
1:47:46
intentions and any kind of mysticism
1:47:48
whatsoever. And it really just involves lying down
1:47:50
for anywhere from 10 to 30 minutes or
1:47:52
an hour, I suppose. And
1:47:55
people are doing long exhale breathing to slow their heart rate
1:47:57
and calm down, doing a sort of body scan of ping
1:47:59
and tang. attention to different parts of their body, trying
1:48:02
to stay awake, but
1:48:04
if they fall asleep, it's okay. We
1:48:07
observed that it creates very
1:48:10
dramatic decreases in sympathetic autonomic
1:48:12
arousal, AKA alertness, and
1:48:14
places the brain into and body into
1:48:16
kind of a shallow state
1:48:19
of sleep, not surprising, but a state
1:48:21
that is unusual and at least to
1:48:23
my knowledge, not observed in other meditative
1:48:25
states that at least, you know, to
1:48:27
my knowledge, but to be fair, we didn't do neuroimaging
1:48:29
of this, so we didn't have a lot of insight
1:48:31
into it. I started digging
1:48:33
around in the literature and it turns out
1:48:35
there's a study out of a medical hospital
1:48:37
in Denmark that had people doing a yoga
1:48:39
nidra for an hour. So
1:48:42
a very similar protocol, but an hour. And
1:48:46
using what's called PET, positron emission,
1:48:48
tomography, measuring the amount of dopamine
1:48:50
in the reserve pool in
1:48:53
a certain key area of the brain called the striatum,
1:48:55
which is involved in the generation of movement. It's also
1:48:57
part of the reward and motivation pathway,
1:49:00
although, you know, there are
1:49:02
a bunch of different pathways for dopamine, so I want to be clear
1:49:04
about that. We talked about that earlier. So what
1:49:06
they observed was really interesting. They
1:49:08
observed at least by positron emission tomography, that
1:49:12
people who did this one hour yoga
1:49:14
nidra protocol experienced a
1:49:16
60% above baseline increase in
1:49:18
dopamine in these key brain areas,
1:49:20
just from this hour of lying
1:49:22
there completely still, trying to stay
1:49:24
awake, listening to this script, relaxation.
1:49:28
I think like this is wild. And then there's some other
1:49:30
studies showing that post yoga
1:49:32
nidra performance on memory tasks or
1:49:34
other cognitive tasks is improved. I
1:49:37
got very excited about this and
1:49:39
started whittling down the non-sleep
1:49:42
deep rest protocol to what we hope
1:49:45
is the minimal effective dose, which is about
1:49:48
10 minutes of non-sleep deep
1:49:50
rest. We've done
1:49:52
some exploration of that in my lab. Currently,
1:49:55
there is a collaboration brewing between
1:49:57
myself and Dr. Matthew Walker. the
1:50:01
author of Why We Sleep, the great sleep bridge
1:50:03
researcher, the great Matt Walker, to
1:50:05
explore what is happening at a
1:50:07
neural level using brain imaging during
1:50:09
non-sleep depressed. Matt has
1:50:12
some, my understanding is some
1:50:14
insight or hypotheses, I don't know
1:50:16
what exactly is based on,
1:50:18
so I want to be very clear, this
1:50:20
is all very, very preliminary, that certain pockets
1:50:22
of the brain might be able to undergo
1:50:24
sleep-like states in things like NSDR,
1:50:27
yoga nidra, that is not
1:50:29
whole brain sleeping, but it might
1:50:31
be pockets of brain areas going
1:50:33
to sleep-like states. But
1:50:35
the whole purpose of doing these experiments going forward,
1:50:37
this collaboration, is to figure out exactly what's happening
1:50:40
at a neural level during
1:50:42
non-sleep depressed and how closely it mimics sleep.
1:50:45
Can you recover sleep that you lost? We don't
1:50:47
know. Here's what we do know subjectively, and again,
1:50:49
this is ANAK data, if you will. These are
1:50:51
people who have challenges
1:50:54
falling asleep, often benefit from doing non-sleep
1:50:56
depressed, a 10-minute or 20-minute protocol at
1:50:58
any time of day or night because
1:51:00
it's teaching you to self-direct your own
1:51:02
relaxation. It's different
1:51:04
than meditation because meditation involves
1:51:06
focusing. Meditation is really
1:51:09
a focusing perceptual exercise. Think
1:51:11
about your third eye center, focus on your
1:51:13
breath, redirect your focus every time it drifts.
1:51:16
Meditation is a focus exercise, and work from
1:51:18
Wenny Suzuki's lab at NYU has
1:51:20
shown that it can improve performance in different
1:51:22
cognitive tasks, but the traditional forms of meditation
1:51:25
sometimes can disrupt people's ability to sleep well.
1:51:28
Why? Well, your increasing focus
1:51:30
capacity. To fall asleep, you need to kind of
1:51:32
defocus and let go of your thoughts. It's kind
1:51:34
of interesting. At the beginning of all yoga, need
1:51:36
your scripts, at least the ones I've heard, you
1:51:38
hear, you're going to
1:51:40
move from thinking and doing to being and
1:51:43
feeling, very new agey language, but let's explore
1:51:46
that. Thinking and doing is about anticipation.
1:51:49
It's about memory, to
1:51:51
feeling and being. You're going into
1:51:53
as much as possible, purely sensory
1:51:55
state, right? You're focusing on just how things
1:51:57
feel. You're not thinking into the
1:51:59
future past. You're just thinking future
1:52:01
or past, you're just feeling sensation
1:52:03
in your body. Very
1:52:05
interesting. So different
1:52:08
than meditation, different than hypnosis, hypnosis is
1:52:10
a sort of meditation designed to solve
1:52:12
a specific problem. Quit smoking,
1:52:15
relax, less pain, okay? Meditation more of a
1:52:17
focus exercise. Non-sleep deep rest is used to
1:52:19
restore mental and physical vigor and to teach
1:52:21
you to relax yourself. So it can be
1:52:23
done in the middle of the night if
1:52:25
you're having trouble sleeping. It can
1:52:27
be done in the morning. This is when I typically like to
1:52:29
do it. This morning I woke up at five,
1:52:31
that's a little early for me. I actually had a
1:52:33
phone call for about an hour. And
1:52:35
then I realized, oh goodness, I got to get up soon.
1:52:38
I'm going to take 30 minutes and do a 30 minute non-sleep
1:52:41
deep rest. Or in this case, it was yoga nidra.
1:52:43
I come out of that and I
1:52:46
recall being in a
1:52:48
pseudo sleep state and I personally just feel
1:52:50
as if I've slept eight hours and many
1:52:52
people report this similar sensation. And
1:52:54
again, it's subjective, but I think if ever
1:52:57
there was a protocol that is useful for
1:52:59
people to explore, given that it's safe at
1:53:01
zero cost and that sleep is so important
1:53:03
and mental and physical vigor are so important
1:53:06
and the date on dopamine, it's a 10 to
1:53:08
20 minute yoga nidra or NSDR script. We've put
1:53:11
a few of those out there on YouTube and
1:53:13
there are a lot of them out there. I
1:53:15
really like, if I want a female voice, I'll
1:53:17
listen to the ones by Kamini Desai, D-E-S-A-I, or
1:53:20
Kelly Boy's B-O-Y-S, she's on the Waking
1:53:23
Up app. She has terrific NSDR scripts
1:53:26
and yoga nidra scripts and then there's some with
1:53:28
my voice. I can't bear to hear the sound
1:53:30
of my own voice, believe it or not. So
1:53:33
we have a 10 minute and 20 minute one at
1:53:36
our clips channel and there are a bunch of
1:53:39
Spotify scripts and you can find them out
1:53:41
there. But to
1:53:43
me, it's one of the more interesting aspects of
1:53:46
protocols, meaning, we have
1:53:49
exercise protocols, we
1:53:51
have nutrition protocols, we've got deliberate
1:53:53
heat exposure, deliberate cold exposure protocols.
1:53:55
What about protocols for restoring
1:53:57
mental and physical vigor that aren't meant
1:54:00
to be that aren't hypnosis, that aren't
1:54:02
pharmacology. And what does that
1:54:04
look like? It's taking the brain out
1:54:06
of that anticipatory modes. So if we
1:54:08
speculate, go, okay, move from thinking
1:54:10
and doing to being and feeling, again,
1:54:12
very new agey, but what are
1:54:15
we doing? We're deliberately shifting our
1:54:17
thinking away from the very types
1:54:19
of thought and action that deplete
1:54:21
the dopamine reserve pool, right? And
1:54:25
should we be surprised that there's this significant
1:54:28
increase in dopamine and the striatum post-Yogan-Eger
1:54:30
or NSDR? Probably not, because you're
1:54:32
not tapping into that neural
1:54:34
circuitry for a period of time. It
1:54:37
also underscores the extent to which in our waking
1:54:39
life, we are constantly in goal-directed behavior, even when
1:54:41
we don't realize it. And so
1:54:44
I find NSDR to be among
1:54:47
the most potent and important tools or protocols
1:54:49
that I've used in my own life. I've
1:54:52
continued to do it about once a day,
1:54:55
anytime of day or night, sometimes based on need
1:54:57
to get more sleep, sometimes just as a practice.
1:55:00
And even 10 minutes of NSDR for me,
1:55:02
I emerged from that feeling completely different and
1:55:04
always better. I did your
1:55:06
10-minute, one of your 10-minute NSDRs the other day. How
1:55:09
did it impact you? It made me feel better. And
1:55:11
I did it, like I said, I hadn't gotten sleep
1:55:13
in the last two nights, good sleep. It
1:55:16
was like my sleep was disrupted. And
1:55:19
so I stopped and I did
1:55:22
your protocol and listening to your voice
1:55:24
was very soothing. And it
1:55:27
also helped me, like I was able to shift right back into my
1:55:29
work. And I don't
1:55:31
know if it's because I was understanding, I was
1:55:34
trying to read, you know, how it's affecting dopamine
1:55:36
or replenishing dopamine. And so I
1:55:38
sort of believed myself into it or if
1:55:40
it just actually worked, right? I mean, so.
1:55:42
I hope so. It's also not a nap.
1:55:44
Well, I'm glad you had a good experience
1:55:46
with it. If people don't, of course, there's
1:55:48
no obligation to do it again. It's different
1:55:50
than a nap because it does not create
1:55:52
sleep inertia. Matt Walker's talked
1:55:54
about the fact that not everyone needs to nap,
1:55:56
but a nap can improve cognitive performance. If you're
1:55:58
going to nap, don't let. not up too late
1:56:00
in the day, or certainly not if it's going
1:56:03
to disrupt your nighttime sleep, a 20 minute nap
1:56:05
seems to be the limit beyond which it
1:56:07
can increase sleep inertia. You can wake up
1:56:09
feeling groggy, have trouble waking up, and then
1:56:11
people then will use caffeine and then it
1:56:14
disrupts their sleep. I like a 20 minute to
1:56:16
30 minute nap. I'm guilty of
1:56:18
sometimes taking a 30 minute nap, but Yoganidra is being
1:56:21
awake while deeply relaxed. And that's a
1:56:23
very unusual state. I also want to
1:56:25
just speculate a little bit further.
1:56:29
There's some interesting ideas out
1:56:31
there about how body still
1:56:33
mind active states can be
1:56:36
very useful for creativity. We
1:56:39
had a couple of guests on the podcast,
1:56:42
including Karl Diceroth. He has a practice, believe
1:56:44
it or not, where he sits completely still,
1:56:46
deliberately completely still, and forces himself to think
1:56:48
in complete sentences for about
1:56:50
an hour at night as a way to
1:56:52
sort of practice thinking.
1:56:56
Very interesting. Is body still mind active? Then Rick
1:56:58
Rubin, when he was on the podcast, not
1:57:00
a scientist, but, and we've,
1:57:02
I'm fortunate to be friends with Rick,
1:57:04
he does something similar. What
1:57:08
is a part of life
1:57:10
where the brain is very active,
1:57:13
the body is completely still and
1:57:15
is known to be associated with ideas, learning
1:57:17
and creativity, rapid eye movement, sleep. So
1:57:20
there's something about the body being still and
1:57:22
the mind remaining active that
1:57:24
may lend itself to certain types of
1:57:26
cognitive effort or cognitive
1:57:29
endeavors. I don't know, this hasn't
1:57:31
really been explored using neuroimaging, but
1:57:34
I'm excited about this as a potential tool.
1:57:36
And non-sleep, deep rest and yoga, nidra,
1:57:39
again, the writing about it tends to
1:57:41
be from these more ancient traditions, but
1:57:45
starts off talking about replenishment
1:57:47
of sleep, learning how to relax, et cetera.
1:57:49
But remember they were doing this at a
1:57:52
trauma treatment clinic and
1:57:54
I asked them why, is it to just calm
1:57:56
everybody down, make sure they get enough sleep? And
1:57:58
they said, no, we're doing so much work here.
1:58:00
trying to get people to remap their relationship to
1:58:03
traumas. And they were
1:58:05
really ahead of their time in
1:58:07
understanding that the actual rewiring of neural circuits
1:58:09
occurs during sleep. So they want to maximize
1:58:11
the amount of deep rest that people were
1:58:14
getting to maximize the rewiring. But
1:58:16
also that in these states
1:58:18
of deep rest, you also replenish the
1:58:20
ability to lean into what really is
1:58:22
the hard work of trauma therapy. It's
1:58:25
not easy. And does
1:58:28
the brain rewire itself
1:58:30
more readily if we're doing NSDR, yoga
1:58:32
nidra? I don't know. I
1:58:34
suspect yes, based on the
1:58:36
similarity to sleep, but that's one of the things
1:58:38
that Matt and I would like to explore. Can
1:58:41
it replace sleep that one's lost? Can
1:58:43
it enhance the speed of learning? Can
1:58:45
it reinforce learning in the same day? Because
1:58:47
there's this thing called the first night effect
1:58:49
where the first night of sleep after about
1:58:51
of learning is really critical for consolidating that
1:58:53
learning. But let's face it, sometimes we
1:58:55
don't get that night of sleep. So can you wake
1:58:57
up the next morning and do a 30 minute NSDR
1:58:59
and consolidate learning? Sometimes that learning is
1:59:01
new information. Sometimes that learning is the dumping
1:59:04
of information you don't want, right?
1:59:06
This is why people who are rapid eye movement, sleep deprived,
1:59:09
often carry forward a lot of emotionality that
1:59:11
frankly they would like to unload. Then you get a great
1:59:13
night's sleep and you're like, that thing that was bothering me,
1:59:15
that's like nothing now. So
1:59:17
rapid eye movement sleep is incredibly
1:59:20
important. And yoga nidra, AKA NSDR,
1:59:22
I should say NSDR is
1:59:24
a build out from yoga nidra in fairness, I
1:59:29
think is a super powerful technique. And
1:59:32
10 minutes is pretty minor investment.
1:59:35
Awesome. So we've been talking a lot
1:59:37
about things that are positive behaviors
1:59:39
to engage in to improve
1:59:41
our motivation, our focus attention,
1:59:44
dopamine system, replenishing the
1:59:47
baseline. There's also behaviors
1:59:49
to avoid as we kind of touch
1:59:52
on a little bit and probably one of
1:59:54
the biggest elephants in the room here
1:59:56
would be the technology, our smart devices,
1:59:58
our smartphones. You mentioned the
2:00:00
brain loves visual information and
2:00:02
also the fact that we're addicted to getting,
2:00:04
looking at our likes. And when we get
2:00:07
a lot of likes, I mean, we get
2:00:09
a dopamine peak and it's, it's
2:00:12
rewarding, right? And so- Hugely rewarding
2:00:14
and sets the expectation
2:00:16
for the next time. Right.
2:00:18
And the algorithms are very clever, right? Every once
2:00:21
in a while and a new account comes up.
2:00:23
I know someone who recently started posting and
2:00:25
posts get some feedback, posts get some feedback
2:00:28
and then boom, something takes off, gets a
2:00:30
million and a half views. That will change
2:00:34
their relationship to social media, maybe
2:00:36
forever. You're just chasing that thing. And
2:00:39
it's very clever, it's very clever.
2:00:41
Not always diabolical, but very clever,
2:00:43
yeah. So, I mean, what is that? There's
2:00:46
a couple of questions. One is, you know,
2:00:48
like, what is that doing for our ability
2:00:50
to live in like everyday life that isn't
2:00:52
like that, right? First of all, the visual
2:00:55
information isn't there. It's not as, you
2:00:57
know, moving rapidly and
2:00:59
all that things. And also, you
2:01:02
know, get that huge peak from a million and
2:01:04
a half views. I mean, like everyday life isn't
2:01:06
usually like that. And then the second is, how
2:01:09
can someone have a more healthy habit?
2:01:11
Like you and I, we have to
2:01:14
use social media for our work. And
2:01:16
a lot of people are like that, you know?
2:01:19
And so there's, like, what's
2:01:21
the healthy balance? How can you
2:01:23
find it? Have you found it? Have
2:01:25
I found it? Most of the
2:01:27
time, not all the time. I think two
2:01:31
things. One is an observation. One is perhaps
2:01:33
a suggestion to
2:01:36
everyone. The observation
2:01:38
is that disengaging from social
2:01:40
media takes time, but
2:01:43
it happens very readily every
2:01:46
single time. So for instance, get
2:01:49
off work. You're still on your phone. You're still on your
2:01:51
phone. You're with family still on your phone. They're like, hey,
2:01:53
want to engage? You put it away, expect
2:01:56
some agitation. Expect like something's been
2:01:58
taken away from you. It's this kind of. low
2:02:00
level malaise, other things aren't as
2:02:02
interesting. I mean, hopefully one's life is interesting
2:02:04
and hopefully isn't just drawing us out of
2:02:07
like, urgent demand. But
2:02:09
it requires a little bit of time. If
2:02:12
you've ever gone camping or you don't have access to your
2:02:14
phone, in fact, this coming weekend, I'm going to take three
2:02:16
days away from my phone. And
2:02:19
I'm sure getting back to the phone will feel
2:02:21
a little bit oppressive. It'll feel like a little
2:02:23
bit oppressive. But once the phone
2:02:25
is away, expect, I don't know,
2:02:29
20 minutes to an hour during which
2:02:31
you don't feel quite right, maybe even
2:02:33
some underlying anxiety because it's that unconscious
2:02:35
anticipation. So that's the observation. The
2:02:39
suggestion I have for
2:02:41
people to have a healthy relationship with social media,
2:02:44
it's one actually that I learned from
2:02:46
a professional poker player, which
2:02:48
is play for time. Don't,
2:02:51
you know, if you're winning, don't stay there, right?
2:02:53
You're losing, don't, I mean, I guess, I don't
2:02:56
want to suggest people gamble, but this is all
2:02:58
just translating to social media. Play
2:03:00
for time, designate how much time you're going to
2:03:02
spend on there in a given bout. You know,
2:03:05
so for me, getting a post up once every
2:03:07
day or so, maybe four times a week is
2:03:09
kind of the goal. And I try and mix
2:03:11
up the form of post. And
2:03:13
I have rules for myself. Most
2:03:15
specifically, I try and make sure
2:03:18
that 90% of posts are
2:03:22
so the audience can learn something useful,
2:03:24
hopefully also interesting and
2:03:26
actionable, et cetera. 10%
2:03:29
are kind of from my delight. I can't help it. Or
2:03:31
where I'm curious
2:03:33
about, I'm kind of pinging the audience for their
2:03:35
thoughts because I genuinely want to know. Like I
2:03:37
was walking up the Upper East Side with my
2:03:39
girlfriend a few weeks ago and saw this sign
2:03:41
outside a store and said, we
2:03:44
have Ozempic and Monjaro. And I took
2:03:46
a picture of it and thought, that's kind of weird.
2:03:49
It's normally you see like we have lattes or something.
2:03:51
And I just kept walking. Then when I got back
2:03:53
to California, I posted that on social media. I thought
2:03:55
kind of curious, what do people think of Ozempic and
2:03:57
Monjaro? I know it's controversial. I'll just ask people. and
2:04:00
it just, it was tons of engagement. I didn't
2:04:02
even expect it, but I'm learning a lot from
2:04:04
all those comments. So I have rules, but the
2:04:06
main rule is I don't
2:04:08
let myself, or I try
2:04:10
to not let myself pick up the phone
2:04:12
and just at any old time and go
2:04:14
into social media. I really try. I
2:04:17
don't always succeed, but I really try. And if I'm going
2:04:19
to be on there, I'm like, okay, I'm on here now
2:04:21
for an hour, or I give myself an
2:04:23
hour. That's the best thing I
2:04:25
can do. I also know that if I answer a
2:04:27
few comments, I'm kind of
2:04:29
a runaway train when it comes to people pinging
2:04:32
me with questions about science. It's
2:04:34
very hard for me not to reply. So I have to
2:04:36
limit myself to five to 15
2:04:38
responses. And then I actually
2:04:40
feel some anxiety as I go to do my
2:04:42
life activities. I have to tell myself, they'll be
2:04:44
okay. It's just kind of like you ask a
2:04:47
professor, at least this professor, a question about something. If
2:04:49
I know the answer, I'm going to try and tell
2:04:52
you. So there's always that agitation for
2:04:54
me. So expect that agitation when you set it away
2:04:57
and play for time. Don't
2:04:59
base it on any particular mode of engagement or whether
2:05:01
or not it feels good or doesn't feel good. Play
2:05:03
for time. So decide I'm going to be on here
2:05:05
for 30 minutes. And it's
2:05:08
interesting because when I don't do that, when I start
2:05:10
to notice is I'm scrolling, but I
2:05:12
don't even know what I'm doing. Like, what am I doing
2:05:14
here? Like, what the hell am I doing here?
2:05:16
Like, I don't even know that I care about this thing
2:05:18
or that thing. It's nice to see people in their events.
2:05:20
I love the baby pics and the animal
2:05:23
pics and our friends
2:05:25
in the podcast space. It's always great to see
2:05:28
and to learn. I learn a lot from your
2:05:30
posts. I genuinely do. I learn a lot from
2:05:32
Lane Norton's posts. I genuinely do. And
2:05:35
I really enjoy the podcasters, the public
2:05:37
facing health folks. But
2:05:39
I know also, and I remind myself that
2:05:41
for me, the real raw materials
2:05:43
for the podcast, unless
2:05:45
it's a post from you, to be honest, I'm not
2:05:47
just saying that. The real raw
2:05:50
materials tend to come from PubMed. They come
2:05:52
from books. They come from papers
2:05:54
that I'm reading, thoughts that I'm
2:05:56
gonna have, like conversations I'm gonna have. And so
2:05:58
those are the raw materials. for my work
2:06:01
and that social media is more of a
2:06:03
mode of consumption and occasionally broadcast. X and
2:06:05
Twitter, totally different picture because I now go
2:06:07
on X and Twitter and I know they're
2:06:09
going to try and get me through
2:06:12
a, let's
2:06:16
just call it a psychosocial dynamic. Someone
2:06:19
like you're on there
2:06:21
to see how people are going to engage. It
2:06:23
is a little bit more combative. It
2:06:26
also can be really supportive because of the immediate retweet
2:06:28
function. You see something you like, you can get out
2:06:30
to a lot of people, you can link out to
2:06:32
things, but it's more of
2:06:34
a like the center of the
2:06:36
town square where everybody's interacting. And
2:06:40
so I have very clear cognitive
2:06:43
pictures of like Instagram feels pretty
2:06:45
benevolent to me. People
2:06:47
have to generally show their face, right?
2:06:49
X feels like, okay, do I really
2:06:51
want to engage in this very intense
2:06:53
dynamic? So I go on X far
2:06:56
less and I've had much more
2:06:58
polarized responses to things that I've put up there.
2:07:00
I've had things clipped out of context. I've had
2:07:03
attacks and I just don't enjoy
2:07:05
being angry. I don't
2:07:07
enjoy feeling that friction. It
2:07:09
just sucks for me. And I don't
2:07:11
like seeing other people suffer. So on
2:07:14
X, I see just a lot more of that and
2:07:17
I've got nothing against it and I think
2:07:19
they've done great things with the platform, but
2:07:21
I just, I have to just be really
2:07:23
protective of myself to not go there terribly
2:07:25
much. Is there studies
2:07:27
that have shown that
2:07:29
there's a maximum amount of time
2:07:32
that adults, maybe children versus adults
2:07:34
should spend with their
2:07:36
smart devices to prevent
2:07:39
these huge amplitude and peaks and dopamine
2:07:41
where they're just getting really rewarding things
2:07:44
or even just, like you're saying, negative
2:07:46
things that can be in a way.
2:07:48
It's very, you're getting that engagement and
2:07:50
then it's- The clap back. If
2:07:52
you get a good clap back on
2:07:54
somebody, I mean, there's a neuroscientist at
2:07:56
the University of Washington, Sam Golden, who's
2:07:58
shown that animals will- work for
2:08:00
the opportunity to fight. Don't
2:08:03
work for it. We never understood this
2:08:06
until recently. I mean, you could say
2:08:08
we always understood that, but no, like
2:08:10
humans probably do that, engaging
2:08:12
in those kind of high intensity ways can
2:08:15
be rewarding for some folks, even for people
2:08:17
who don't like that, unless they're
2:08:19
really conflict averse. It has
2:08:21
a certain level of a route, like arousal
2:08:23
itself can become rewarding, right? Just the engagement,
2:08:26
when I say arousal, like the level of
2:08:28
cognitive engagement, especially if the rest of life
2:08:30
feels kind of passive and uninteresting. There
2:08:33
have not been clear studies that I'm aware of, but
2:08:36
at the same time, if I think of something like
2:08:38
virtual reality, like my colleague at Stanford, Jeremy Bailenson, has
2:08:41
done, he's one of the early pioneers of virtual reality.
2:08:44
And as virtual reality came to be, they
2:08:47
established, and I'll get the numbers wrong here, so forgive
2:08:49
me, Jeremy, I have to look this up, but you
2:08:51
know, limits of, you know, kids should only be in
2:08:53
the VR goggles for X number of
2:08:55
minutes per day, and it was minutes. Otherwise,
2:08:58
there's rewiring of the visual
2:09:00
system and vestibular system, the balance system, in ways
2:09:02
that might not be healthy. They had real clear
2:09:04
limits and guidelines with social media, sort of like
2:09:06
as much as you want. And then of course,
2:09:08
there's the intrusion of social media and
2:09:11
tablet use and phone use into sleep,
2:09:13
where then you're depleting the replenishment,
2:09:16
where you're undermining the replenishment of the
2:09:18
dopamine reserve, right? So then there's all
2:09:20
that contextual stuff. I think an
2:09:23
hour a day on Instagram, if you think
2:09:25
about it, that's a pretty significant investment. And
2:09:30
with X, I can't even make a recommendation. I do
2:09:32
go on there and post. I have kind of a
2:09:34
bittersweet relation to it right now. Lex Friedman, my
2:09:37
buddy, our buddy, has a far more
2:09:39
kind of symbiotic relationship
2:09:41
with X. It
2:09:44
just sort of like works for him, whereas I feel
2:09:46
that more on an Instagram platform. And
2:09:49
it's just, it's different cultures, and maybe
2:09:51
I need to adjust my follows and
2:09:54
so on. But I think an hour a day to me
2:09:56
just seems like, okay, that's plenty and
2:09:59
is enough. What role do
2:10:01
you think that going
2:10:03
to things like Instagram, Twitter,
2:10:05
and TikTok, this
2:10:08
context switching where you're working
2:10:10
but then you're checking Twitter and then like
2:10:13
what role is that
2:10:15
playing in our ability to focus and
2:10:17
attention ADHD like symptoms?
2:10:20
I mean there was like a – I read last night, like one in nine
2:10:22
children has ADHD. Wow.
2:10:25
What that actually
2:10:27
means but yeah wow exactly. Yeah
2:10:31
I think because
2:10:33
I grew up and spent still a fair amount
2:10:35
of time in the Bay Area, although I'm in
2:10:38
Los Angeles far more now, an
2:10:40
interesting question is always to ask the
2:10:43
heads of these companies or the CEOs how
2:10:45
long they let their kids be on social
2:10:47
media and you'll often find that it's a
2:10:49
very, very small number.
2:10:52
And that tells you something
2:10:54
right there. Okay so I think the task
2:10:57
switching, the context switching,
2:10:59
no doubt is impairing adults
2:11:02
ability to – adults' ability
2:11:04
to engage and
2:11:06
stay engaged in one thing. Reading
2:11:08
a book unless it's extremely engaging is
2:11:11
going to be less attention
2:11:15
harnessing than social media. Why is
2:11:17
social media is movies? Why you're scrolling? I mean
2:11:19
the brain has never seen this kind of thing
2:11:21
before. Even if you have 300 channels on your
2:11:23
television, you know, and you're
2:11:25
scrolling, scrolling, scrolling at short distance
2:11:28
with the feedback of people you
2:11:30
recognize and which isn't true for most
2:11:33
people watching television or and feedback and
2:11:35
likes and comments and clap backs and
2:11:38
attacks and reward. I mean
2:11:40
it's incredible. I think I'm
2:11:45
a content consumer but I'm a content creator as
2:11:47
you are of course and I like to think
2:11:49
in terms of our content. I think in terms
2:11:51
of are we consuming content or are we creating
2:11:53
content and just being very judicious about consumption of
2:11:55
content. I mean I think it's great fun and
2:11:57
I encourage people to put stuff out on social
2:11:59
media. In fact, recently
2:12:02
a clip was cut, there
2:12:04
was like a math gaffe that I did, and
2:12:06
I came out and apologized for the error. I
2:12:08
occasionally make errors in podcasts and we put them
2:12:10
in the captions. But anyway, put something out there,
2:12:12
but the caption to that post was, I
2:12:15
would hate for anyone to resist
2:12:18
posting their creative thoughts,
2:12:20
their creative outlet for
2:12:23
fear of attack or making mistakes. I think we need
2:12:25
to, I sound kind of like, it's
2:12:27
sort of party line now, but to foster
2:12:29
a community of people, like encouraging people to
2:12:32
create stuff and put it online. But that's
2:12:34
different than just passive consumption all the time.
2:12:36
I think there's so much good to be
2:12:38
had with social media, but I think an
2:12:40
hour a day on Instagram, maybe 30 minutes
2:12:42
a day on X and you're
2:12:45
good. And even there 90 minutes out of your waking
2:12:47
day, and then what part of your day? This is
2:12:49
important. You know, when I look at my day, I
2:12:52
know that when I wake up in the morning, I'm
2:12:54
a little groggy, but then I've got three or four
2:12:56
hours that if I can get, if I'm going to
2:12:58
get really quality work done, it's in that three or
2:13:00
four hours or the three or four hours right after
2:13:02
lunch. And that's it. I'm not the
2:13:04
kind of person that's doing quality work now between
2:13:06
the hours of 8 p.m. and midnight. It's just
2:13:08
not happening anymore. It happened years
2:13:10
ago, but it's not happening anymore. So where
2:13:13
is that 60 to 90 minutes falling is
2:13:15
also key. Maybe it should be for
2:13:17
an hour or so before bedtime, provided it's not too
2:13:19
stimulating. Maybe it should be over your lunch break and
2:13:21
you just handle it then. But when
2:13:23
it's first thing in the morning, then several times throughout
2:13:25
the morning, and then later in the afternoon, and then
2:13:27
in the evening, I think what
2:13:29
I'm describing is not unusual. And
2:13:31
not unusual, not just for kids. Jonathan
2:13:33
Hates' work that's being discussed so much
2:13:35
now about social media consumption
2:13:38
and the challenges and concerns with
2:13:40
that, but also in adults.
2:13:43
I mean, since when I'm 48 years old and
2:13:45
it's kind of remarkable. I mean, I see people from
2:13:48
my high school class and like I'm one of them,
2:13:50
so I can only laugh at myself here, but it's
2:13:52
like we're grown adults,
2:13:54
like posting what we did and
2:13:57
like showing it off to the world. There's a kind of teenage element to
2:13:59
it. kind of silly if I really
2:14:01
step back from it. I go, wait, are the
2:14:03
adults behaving like kids and the kids are behaving
2:14:05
like adults? What's going on
2:14:07
here? And again, there's use of
2:14:09
sharing science and other creative crafts.
2:14:13
Well, aren't they chasing the dopamine? The dopamine like?
2:14:15
They're getting likes. Yeah, it just shows that
2:14:17
adults are just as prone to it. But
2:14:19
it's sort of, if we step back and
2:14:21
look at ourselves like an experiment, we'd say,
2:14:24
wow, you know, the people in the
2:14:26
35 to 60 year
2:14:28
old range of this species that we call human is
2:14:30
kind of like doing the same stuff that the kids
2:14:32
are doing. It's, and maybe
2:14:34
you just say, well, duh, but it's
2:14:36
interesting. I mean, you know, and you say, well,
2:14:39
like how good or poor
2:14:41
of one's life is that? And as I think
2:14:43
about this stuff a lot, but I'm
2:14:45
on there and I teach and I enjoy it and I learn
2:14:47
and, you know, and I'll continue, but I
2:14:50
think one has to be really discerning and
2:14:52
set constraints. Absolutely. I mean, if
2:14:54
it's tapping into your dopamine system and you're, I
2:14:57
mean, if it's kind of like that
2:14:59
substance, right? It's technology, it's not methamphetamine,
2:15:01
it's not cocaine, but it
2:15:04
sure as heck is affecting your dopamine system.
2:15:06
And so. It absolutely is. And it
2:15:08
also has the potential for a lot of problems.
2:15:10
You know, this isn't a domain that, you know,
2:15:12
I have expertise in or that is covered on
2:15:14
the podcast, but, you know, there's this guy on,
2:15:17
he's done some podcasts with Lex Friedman and
2:15:19
he's been on a few others, James Sexton,
2:15:21
he's a divorce lawyer in New York. And
2:15:23
he talks about how the advent of social
2:15:25
media has created this huge surge in,
2:15:29
I don't know if overall divorce rates, but then, you know, he
2:15:31
talks about the trajectory of a lot of the failures of a
2:15:33
lot of marriages. And it's like, you know, that,
2:15:35
and actually people have talked about
2:15:38
Instagram as like one of the main
2:15:40
dating apps. It's not sold as a date. It's not offered
2:15:42
as a dating app, but this is where a lot of
2:15:44
people meet. They see people that used to know, hey, how's
2:15:46
it going? And then the conversation converts. I mean, this is,
2:15:49
you know, I'm not either saying, I'm
2:15:51
not passing judgment. I'm just saying, you know,
2:15:54
there's a lot in the landscape of social
2:15:56
media that lends itself to too much. in
2:16:01
certain types of human interaction.
2:16:03
And that inhibits our ability
2:16:05
to do things that are really
2:16:07
functional for our relationships and for
2:16:09
our professional lives and for family.
2:16:11
I mean, you know, or just
2:16:13
presence, you know, just like
2:16:15
being there, not to get sentimental here,
2:16:17
but that graduate advisor I was talking
2:16:19
about before, unfortunately passed away young. She
2:16:21
had the BRCA mutation, died at 50.
2:16:23
Her name was Barbara Chapman, had two
2:16:26
lovely daughters. Actually, the second one just finished
2:16:29
university in neurosciences, so I was super happy
2:16:31
for her. And I'll never forget
2:16:33
at her, it wasn't her funeral, but
2:16:35
it was a kind of like celebration of life thing after she
2:16:37
ended, that her
2:16:40
daughters, maybe it was one or both, talked
2:16:42
about how one of the best things about their
2:16:45
mom and their memories of their mom was
2:16:47
unstructured time with her, where she would
2:16:49
just like sit with them and hang out, and they would just like
2:16:51
do stuff. And she wasn't heavy user
2:16:54
of the phone, so that was 2014 she
2:16:56
passed away. So phones
2:16:58
were kind of really beginning to pick
2:17:00
up in terms of their use, smartphones.
2:17:02
But that wrung in my mind because
2:17:04
I was thinking, wow, like of all the things for
2:17:06
children to remember about their deceased mom, it
2:17:09
was the unstructured time. It wasn't the Giants
2:17:11
game, although they probably remember that they were big
2:17:13
Giants fans or other things, but it's the unstructured time
2:17:16
that we spend with people where they
2:17:18
are giving us their full presence and we're giving them
2:17:20
our full presence. And then you look around at
2:17:22
like dinner tables now and restaurants, you look around
2:17:24
and like everyone's on their phones. Anyway, I'm saying
2:17:27
what everyone already knows and I'm guilty of it
2:17:29
too, but I think the world is due for
2:17:31
an adjustment. I mean, so
2:17:33
kind of on the same lines of this
2:17:36
technology thing, but shifting gears more to light,
2:17:40
circadian rhythm. I mean, this is vision.
2:17:42
Perhaps my favorite topic. Yeah, perhaps your
2:17:44
favorite topic. I am obsessed, yeah. I
2:17:50
spend a lot of time at my computer,
2:17:52
as do you and many people, and we're
2:17:54
all, we spend a lot of time indoors, working
2:17:58
on our laptops, our computers. whatever.
2:18:00
And I've heard you talk about something
2:18:03
very interesting, which is this low angle,
2:18:07
low solar angle viewing.
2:18:10
And I'd love to
2:18:13
have you elaborate on that because I've always heard
2:18:15
and Sachin Panda was the first to
2:18:17
really kind of get me interested
2:18:19
in this topic, our mutual friend,
2:18:22
wonderful chronobiologist, yes, talking
2:18:25
about early morning bright light exposure and
2:18:27
how important it is for resetting our
2:18:29
circadian rhythm, which is for
2:18:31
people listening is our 24 hour clock and
2:18:34
everything is on this cycle as you
2:18:36
know more than I do about our
2:18:38
metabolism, getting sleepy or wakefulness
2:18:40
as you mentioned, our arousal, all this stuff.
2:18:43
But I would love to know about this low
2:18:46
solar angle light and how that
2:18:48
ties into our circadian rhythm. Yeah.
2:18:51
So some just
2:18:53
real quick overview of some very simple biology
2:18:56
lining the back of your two eyes like
2:18:58
a pie crust is your neural retina. These
2:19:00
are the neurons that transmit information
2:19:03
about the amount
2:19:06
and quality of light in our environment
2:19:08
to the brain. And then the brain
2:19:10
does various things with it. There's a
2:19:12
pathway directly from the eyes to the
2:19:14
hypothalamus. There's a collection of neurons
2:19:16
they are called the suprachiasmatic nucleus that
2:19:20
dictate our master circadian rhythms that
2:19:22
set, you know, essentially cause all the other
2:19:24
cells of our body to be on a similar
2:19:27
schedule or control
2:19:29
the clocks within all the other cells
2:19:31
of our body. There's a pathway from
2:19:33
our neural retinas of course, to areas
2:19:35
of the thalamus, which is essentially a
2:19:37
relay station up to the visual
2:19:40
cortex for conscious perception of things like color, shape
2:19:42
and edges and things like that. And
2:19:45
this system is the main
2:19:47
system by which we know where
2:19:49
we are in space, vision, in
2:19:51
physical space and time. Now
2:19:54
the time part is a little bit more mysterious to
2:19:56
most people, but the way it works is the following, obviously.
2:20:00
the sun rises and the sun sets. And
2:20:05
our bodies, our internal milieu need to
2:20:07
know where we are in time within
2:20:10
the course of a day and
2:20:12
longer within the course of a year as well. We
2:20:15
can talk about circadian rhythms in a bit,
2:20:17
but there's a special category of neuron called
2:20:20
the retinal ganglion cell, which is the cell that
2:20:22
actually passes electrical information into
2:20:24
the brain. And
2:20:27
that cell has a bunch of different types,
2:20:29
some of them respond to edges,
2:20:31
to colors, et cetera. But there's a
2:20:34
specific type called the intrinsically photosensitive melanops
2:20:36
and retinal ganglion cell, a real mouthful,
2:20:38
that Satchin and Semarhatar and Iggy Provencio
2:20:40
and David Burson and others characterized
2:20:43
in the early 2000s and
2:20:45
for the subsequent years, I'm still characterizing, that
2:20:49
is a neuron that's
2:20:51
not as concerned with the
2:20:53
shapes of things or the
2:20:56
colors of things, although we'll talk about color in
2:20:58
a moment, but rather how bright it is in
2:21:00
a given environment. And it is those cells and
2:21:02
the activation of those cells that so-called sets our
2:21:04
circadian clock so
2:21:07
that we have elevated daytime mood
2:21:09
focus and alertness and
2:21:11
that we fall asleep at
2:21:13
night and stay asleep. Okay, so
2:21:16
low solar angle sunlight turns
2:21:18
out to be the optimal
2:21:20
stimulus for these cells. What
2:21:23
do I mean by low solar angle? I mean, when the
2:21:25
sun is low in the sky. So that's
2:21:27
twice a day, it's in the morning and in the
2:21:29
evening, low solar angle
2:21:32
sunlight, even on cloudy days, okay,
2:21:34
even on overcast days is distinctly
2:21:36
different for this system than
2:21:38
when the sun is overhead. Why?
2:21:41
Okay, so we
2:21:44
have in humans, we are trichromats, unless we're
2:21:46
red, green, colorblind, which is like one in
2:21:48
80 males, I think, we are trichromats, we
2:21:50
have a, what sometimes is called
2:21:52
a blue cone, a green cone and a red
2:21:55
cone, but that really means that they respond, they
2:21:57
absorb short wavelength, medium wavelength or long wavelength light.
2:22:00
And from that, we generate this incredible thing
2:22:02
in our brain, which is trichromacy, the ability
2:22:04
to see the difference between reds and greens
2:22:06
and grays and purples, it's incredible. A
2:22:09
man to shrimp can see far more of those things, but
2:22:11
we can see a lot of different color variation based
2:22:14
on the absorption of those different wavelengths of light.
2:22:17
The intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells
2:22:20
have their own pigment within them. They don't need input
2:22:22
from these cones, but they get it and they use
2:22:24
it. This is important, they get it and they use
2:22:26
it. So these cells are
2:22:28
brightness detectors. Such that if you shine a really
2:22:30
bright light on your eyes, let's say in the
2:22:33
middle of the day, you walk outside in San
2:22:35
Diego, Los Angeles, even overcast day, like before we
2:22:37
came in here today, really bright, tons
2:22:39
of photon energy coming in, far
2:22:41
brighter than even under these bright artificial lights here. Even
2:22:43
though here it looks really bright, if
2:22:46
we were to measure this, the environment we're in now is probably,
2:22:48
I don't know, 1500 to 2000 lux. Outdoors
2:22:51
is probably 10,000 to 50,000 lux. You
2:22:55
know, it's just a wild difference. And
2:22:58
again, that's even behind cloud cover. The
2:23:01
middle of the day constitutes what's called the
2:23:03
circadian dead zone. Meaning bright light
2:23:05
at that time is known to improve mood on
2:23:08
the skin provided you don't burn. Maybe we talk
2:23:11
about sunburn and sunscreen. Maybe we don't ever avoid
2:23:13
that third rail. By the way,
2:23:15
I use sunscreen, the right ones. As
2:23:17
does Rhonda, despite what you might read or hear about on
2:23:20
the internet, we both said it. We both use sunscreen and
2:23:22
we just use the right ones and avoid the
2:23:24
wrong ones. The light
2:23:27
in the middle of the day will improve mood by
2:23:30
activating these melanopsin cells. It
2:23:32
will improve alertness on
2:23:34
the skin. There's evidence that it can improve
2:23:36
the output of certain hormones like testosterone and
2:23:38
estrogen, feelings of wellbeing, study out of Israel
2:23:40
a few years ago in Cell Press. But
2:23:44
that light in the middle of the day,
2:23:46
if you see the sun, don't stare at
2:23:48
the sun, but if you see it, it looks like white
2:23:50
and blue light, right? All
2:23:52
wavelengths essentially coming at you. Full
2:23:55
spectrum. In the morning when
2:23:57
the sun is low in the sky, you'll notice that
2:23:59
there are blues and there are like
2:24:01
yellows and oranges, maybe even reds if
2:24:03
it's a beautiful desert sunrise. And
2:24:06
then the evening, of course, the sunset has all that
2:24:08
richness of the long wavelength
2:24:11
light, orange, red, et
2:24:14
cetera, and blue. And it turns
2:24:16
out that the cells that set
2:24:18
your circadian clock, these melanopsin intrinsically
2:24:20
photosensitive ganglion cells, yes, they respond
2:24:23
to bright light, very high intensities
2:24:25
of light, such as at midday
2:24:27
or from a, maybe a sunlight
2:24:29
simulator, just blue light in a
2:24:32
home environment if you purchase a so-called sad
2:24:34
lamp. But the optimal
2:24:36
stimulus is that low solar
2:24:38
angle sunlight in the morning especially and in
2:24:40
the evening, because those
2:24:42
cones, and in particular, the
2:24:45
short wavelength responsive cones, the blue,
2:24:48
AKA blue light, and
2:24:51
the longer wavelength, the reds, the orange,
2:24:53
they converge in terms of driving the
2:24:55
activation of those cells. Those
2:24:58
melanopsin cells, and they activate
2:25:01
those cells robustly early in the day,
2:25:04
meaning when you see
2:25:07
contrast between blue and orange, or blue
2:25:09
and red, which is characteristic of low
2:25:11
solar angle sunlight, you
2:25:13
are driving the activation of those
2:25:15
intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells the most,
2:25:17
and you are sending the
2:25:21
primordial, evolutionarily conserved, robust
2:25:23
signal to your brain,
2:25:26
the day is starting. You're going
2:25:28
to activate a huge number of
2:25:30
different endocrine, neural, and other systems,
2:25:33
immune functions in the body.
2:25:35
Now, what this translates to
2:25:37
is, even if it's overcast, get
2:25:39
out as soon as the sun is up. Sorry,
2:25:41
I should restate that. Even if it's
2:25:43
overcast, as close to waking
2:25:45
as possible, get some sunlight
2:25:48
in your eyes. Now, notice I said
2:25:50
sunlight. You don't have to see the sun as
2:25:52
a physical object. Get the light in your eyes.
2:25:55
Early day sunlight is going to be most valuable
2:25:57
for setting your circadian.
2:26:00
rhythm. Now what's interesting is
2:26:02
that all species that we are aware of,
2:26:04
like dogs for instance, they're not trichromats, they're
2:26:06
dichromats, but they have a short wavelength cone
2:26:08
and a long wavelength cone. Look at
2:26:10
a dog in the morning or in the afternoon and they will
2:26:12
look in the direction of the sun. Birds
2:26:14
have the pineal that can get light through
2:26:16
the skull, so slightly different, but most
2:26:19
all species have some, excuse
2:26:22
me, all species have a dedicated system
2:26:24
in the eye and brain to
2:26:26
extract the specific qualities
2:26:29
of light that are present at
2:26:32
early in the day, low solar angle sunlight and again
2:26:34
in the evening low solar angle sunlight to
2:26:36
convert that into neural and hormone signals that
2:26:38
the brain can understand. Put very simply, get
2:26:40
outside for five minutes or so in the
2:26:42
morning, maybe ten minutes if it's overcast. Don't
2:26:44
wear sunglasses for this, don't stare at the
2:26:46
Sun, eyeglasses and contacts are fine. Don't try
2:26:49
and do it through a window, that's not
2:26:51
going to work, too much is filtered out
2:26:54
and just look in the direction of the Sun,
2:26:56
the general direction and you will improve
2:26:58
daytime mood focus and alertness and it sets a
2:27:00
timer for your nighttime sleep. Now
2:27:02
people say, well I wake up before the Sun comes
2:27:04
out, what can I do? I was just say, well
2:27:06
listen, unless you have powers I'm not aware of, you
2:27:08
got to wait. If you don't
2:27:10
have access to sunlight for whatever reason, for
2:27:13
about $100 I don't have any relationship to any of
2:27:15
these companies, you can get a 10,000 lux light panel
2:27:18
and you can make your coffee in front
2:27:20
of that. It's not quite as good as
2:27:22
the yellow blue orange blue
2:27:24
contrast system that's going to come from low
2:27:26
solar angle sunlight, but it's going
2:27:29
to be better than nothing. Now there's
2:27:31
a diabolical twist in all of this and
2:27:34
then there's a solution also based on low
2:27:36
solar angle sunlight. The diabolical twist is that
2:27:39
early in the day and throughout the day
2:27:42
bright artificial lights are not sufficient for
2:27:44
all the good stuff that you want from light. You
2:27:47
either need a sunlight simulator or ideally you just get
2:27:49
outside for a bit in the morning. After
2:27:53
say 16 hours of being
2:27:56
awake or so, however, it only
2:27:58
takes a small amount of bright light. to
2:28:00
quash the amount of melatonin that's
2:28:03
present and to disrupt your nighttime sleep. So
2:28:06
you need a lot of light early and throughout the day,
2:28:09
but don't get sunburned and don't damage your
2:28:11
eyes. And you want a minimal amount of
2:28:13
light at night. In fact, I've vastly improved
2:28:15
my transition into sleep and sleep by,
2:28:18
I'm not talking about red light panels, but
2:28:20
just buying some red light bulbs. There
2:28:22
are a couple of companies that make these. You can
2:28:24
look for the inexpensively and just going
2:28:26
to amber or red lights before sleep for
2:28:28
about half an hour. It's known to be
2:28:31
to prevent some cortisol increase that can come from
2:28:34
bright lights of the blue variety. Some people will
2:28:36
just use blue blockers and I have no objection
2:28:38
to that. Now, what do you do if
2:28:40
you're going to be under bright lights at night? Viewing
2:28:43
evening light can
2:28:47
partially offset the negative effects of bright light
2:28:49
later at night. And this was shown in
2:28:51
a really nice paper where they looked at
2:28:53
the degree of melatonin suppression to bright light
2:28:55
at night, depending on whether or not people
2:28:57
had seen some bright light
2:29:00
in that study design to mimic sunlight in
2:29:02
the evening for, I believe
2:29:04
it was somewhere between 10 and 30 minutes in the
2:29:07
evening. Now, not everyone has time to watch a
2:29:09
sunset in the evening, but just getting outside, popping the
2:29:11
sunglasses off while you're walking to your car after
2:29:13
work is going to partially offset some of the negative
2:29:15
effects of artificial lights at night. And
2:29:17
now we could get into a whole description about what's
2:29:20
actually happening with low solar angle sunlight. And
2:29:23
I'm happy to do that. But suffice to
2:29:25
say that the contrast between these oranges
2:29:28
and blues or yellows and blues or reds and
2:29:30
blues that are occurring when
2:29:32
the sun is relatively low in the sky, you
2:29:34
don't actually have to see it crossing the horizon,
2:29:36
but if you do, great, relatively low in the
2:29:38
sky. It's that contrast at about 19 Hertz,
2:29:41
believe it or not, that's the optimal stimulation for
2:29:43
these cells. And there is one company, I
2:29:45
don't have an affiliation called 2O Life that
2:29:48
has developed a bulb that mimics this.
2:29:50
It's actually built by some absolutely spectacular
2:29:52
circadian biologists up at the University of
2:29:54
Washington. The
2:29:57
bulb, unfortunately for me,
2:29:59
is a little bit cumbersome because it
2:30:01
involves an app and hopefully they'll make
2:30:03
an app-free version, but it flickers at
2:30:05
19 Hertz between blue
2:30:08
and orange. Blue and orange is designed
2:30:10
to mimic the sunrise and sunset. So
2:30:13
people can, if you like geeking out on light
2:30:15
technology, you can do that, but I think there's
2:30:17
still some improvements that need to be made, and
2:30:19
I'm saying this specifically so they'll make those improvements
2:30:21
because I do like the technology. It's the only
2:30:23
one that I'm aware of that's grounded in the
2:30:25
logic of how the biology actually is organized with
2:30:27
this contrast between long and short wavelength light. But
2:30:31
all this is to say, get morning sunlight in your eyes,
2:30:33
try and get it again in the evening, great during the
2:30:35
day, but don't burn, and at night, try and dim the
2:30:37
lights as much as you can, meaning
2:30:39
as is reasonable for whatever activities. And don't sweat
2:30:41
it if you don't get bright light in your
2:30:43
eyes or sunlight early in the day once. This
2:30:45
is a slow integrating system, but after about two
2:30:47
or three days, you'll notice that things
2:30:50
like your sleep will start to
2:30:52
drift later. Your morning
2:30:54
energy will drift later. There's also a really interesting
2:30:56
effect of cortisol where bright light
2:30:58
exposure early in the day increases the total amount
2:31:00
of cortisol by about 50%. People
2:31:03
hear cortisol and they go, oh, I don't want elevated
2:31:06
cortisol. You want your cortisol elevated early in the day,
2:31:08
and then you want to taper off end of day.
2:31:11
Spikes or increases in late day cortisol
2:31:13
are associated with depression and anxiety. Work
2:31:15
from our psychiatry department at Stanford has
2:31:17
shown that and others have shown that.
2:31:20
So you want that big amplitude and then
2:31:22
cruising down out of that cortisol
2:31:24
release early in the day, and bright light
2:31:26
is one way to do it. That cortisol
2:31:29
increase will provide some important
2:31:31
activation of certain immune system
2:31:33
components, alertness, of focus.
2:31:35
We don't want to treat cortisol as
2:31:37
the enemy. It's just about timing and
2:31:40
amount. Right. You
2:31:42
mentioned the five, even five minutes being
2:31:44
enough, like early morning bright light exposure.
2:31:46
And it's like, is it
2:31:49
an hour and a half? How long is this
2:31:51
low anger? In the morning, how long is the
2:31:53
low anger angles? Yeah,
2:31:55
probably until, it depends on time of
2:31:57
year, of course, and location where, probably
2:31:59
until. about 10 a.m.
2:32:01
or so, you know, just if I had to
2:32:03
put a rough number out there. So
2:32:05
if you're waking up at nine, just get outside. If
2:32:08
you wake up at six, get outside. If you can
2:32:10
catch the sunrise, amazing. I mean, that's
2:32:12
the ticket, but most of us are
2:32:14
not doing that. Or not
2:32:16
because we were not waking up early enough necessarily, but
2:32:18
we get up and if you're in an apartment, can
2:32:20
you get to a place where you can see the
2:32:23
sunrise across the horizon? But look, if it's combined with
2:32:25
a walk, some hydration, some caffeine, and maybe even social
2:32:27
time or time with your dog, even better, there's no
2:32:29
reason why you can't combine these things. And
2:32:31
so also the cortisol
2:32:34
one, is that like, how
2:32:36
much light was, do you remember how much light
2:32:38
was needed in the morning? It was quite a bit.
2:32:40
Yeah, and they used artificial light because it was
2:32:42
a laboratory situation, but it was designed to mimic
2:32:44
sunlight. I have
2:32:46
to go look it up. I'm sorry, I don't recall. Hours. Top
2:32:49
of my head. I don't think it was hours. I think it was
2:32:51
on the order of minutes. I'd be surprised if it was more than
2:32:53
an hour. If you get in front of one
2:32:56
of these 10,000 lux light panels, and I have
2:32:58
one, I bought it on Amazon. It
2:33:00
sits actually on our shelves in
2:33:02
the morning in the kitchen. So I'm making
2:33:04
coffee or something. It's right there. I'm in
2:33:06
front of my supplements actually. So I'm there,
2:33:08
I'm doling out my supplements. And
2:33:10
there it is. It's about the size
2:33:13
of a computer monitor. And
2:33:15
after about five, 10 minutes in front of that thing,
2:33:17
you kind of want to get away from it. It's
2:33:19
really bright. And some
2:33:21
people get a little bit too much activation if they're in
2:33:23
front of it for too long. And then of course at
2:33:25
night, you don't want to be anywhere near that thing. I
2:33:28
have one in my gym as well. So if I go into
2:33:30
my gym, the lights in my house aren't particularly bright. I'll
2:33:33
turn that thing on. And so getting a lot
2:33:35
of photons, but of course nothing beats sunlight. Nothing
2:33:38
beats sunlight. And if you get a morning
2:33:40
walk in the direction of the sun in the morning as
2:33:42
the sun is rising, that's I mean, then you've done something
2:33:44
right in life. Right. I mean, or if
2:33:46
you just want to go outside and drink your coffee out on
2:33:49
your porch or patio or in the yard, whatever.
2:33:51
Exactly. So along
2:33:54
those same lines with, the
2:33:58
technology and viewing things. It's
2:34:03
the topic of
2:34:05
the short distance viewing and
2:34:07
that's something that you're
2:34:09
really, I think pretty much, I haven't heard a
2:34:11
lot of people talk about this in taking breaks
2:34:13
from because we're always, again, everything is
2:34:15
so different than it was decades ago when people
2:34:18
were not inside all the time looking at
2:34:20
a computer or a screen, something
2:34:24
that is very, very short distance away from
2:34:26
our eyes. What
2:34:28
is that doing to our vision and
2:34:30
how does something like long distance viewing, as
2:34:32
you call it, help counter that? How much
2:34:35
do you need to do? Yeah, it's wild.
2:34:39
The rates of myopia, nearsightedness,
2:34:41
are going way up. Okay,
2:34:43
nearsightedness is not just a
2:34:45
throwaway phrase. Basically, as light
2:34:47
enters the eye, the
2:34:49
lens focuses that light onto the neural retina.
2:34:52
Nearsightedness is a change in the shape of
2:34:54
the eyeball and there's some other things too
2:34:57
that have that image landing closer
2:34:59
to the lens, too close, nearsightedness, as opposed
2:35:01
to farsightedness where it lands behind the neural
2:35:03
retina, the neural retina being the detector of
2:35:05
that light. So there are a
2:35:07
couple of different ways to manage that. One is
2:35:09
to put a lens
2:35:12
in front of the eye, an eyeglass or a contact,
2:35:14
that then adjusts the position that it
2:35:16
arrives to the neural retina. One
2:35:19
thing I should say is that there
2:35:21
are some big studies, many, many thousands of
2:35:23
subjects. These are still somewhat preliminary, but they're
2:35:25
exciting enough that most ophthalmologists who read the
2:35:28
literature are into this, that
2:35:30
show that kids mostly
2:35:32
that spend two hours or more of
2:35:35
time out of doors during the day, even if
2:35:37
they're on tablets or computers or phones, have
2:35:40
a lower incidence of myopia. Now, that's
2:35:42
not perfectly, it's not causal, right? But
2:35:44
it's an interesting correlation. So get outside,
2:35:46
maybe kids should be doing some of
2:35:48
their work outside again, don't sunburn, but
2:35:51
very interesting. The
2:35:53
other thing is that early in development and
2:35:55
really up until our, let's say our
2:35:57
mid twenties, if we do a lot of close viewing,
2:36:00
the eyeball actually changes shape and lends
2:36:02
itself to things like myopia. Some
2:36:05
people think like, how could that possibly be?
2:36:07
Well, these classic studies mainly done in chickens,
2:36:10
but then it carries over to humans as well where they would put
2:36:13
glasses on these animals, where they would essentially
2:36:16
view something up close or
2:36:18
further away or natural viewing, and the
2:36:20
shape of the eyeball lens and therefore
2:36:22
the position that light is focused into
2:36:24
the eye changes. So you can
2:36:27
create myopia by looking at things too closely for
2:36:29
too long. And it's probably again,
2:36:31
probably the case that even in adulthood, if
2:36:33
you're not myopic or nearsighted early
2:36:36
in life, that too much close viewing causes some
2:36:38
changes in the shape of the eyeball that does
2:36:40
this. Okay. So the
2:36:43
idea is pretty simple. If
2:36:46
you're going to be looking at things up close
2:36:48
a lot, which we all are nowadays, you
2:36:50
would be wise to also take a few minutes each
2:36:53
day and try and view a horizon.
2:36:55
I mean, how often do we do
2:36:57
that now to get some horizon viewing
2:37:00
and or panoramic vision? So when we
2:37:02
look at something so-called foveate to it,
2:37:04
we're like directing our vision towards it.
2:37:07
And if we really sharp that
2:37:09
to a point, we're doing what's called a virgins eye movement.
2:37:11
If we were to track the movements of your eyes, you
2:37:13
notice that they can focus inward a little bit and they
2:37:15
really directed at something. That's
2:37:18
fine and good. In fact, it's great. It's part of
2:37:20
our primate evolution to be able to do that as
2:37:22
opposed to animals with lateralized eyes that can't really do
2:37:24
that. But it
2:37:27
does create a state of heightened
2:37:29
internal arousal. There's an associated, it's
2:37:33
really activation of locus coeruleus, that brain
2:37:37
area that we talked about before
2:37:39
for release of norepinephrine
2:37:41
and other things. But
2:37:43
it's really creating a ramp up in attention. So
2:37:45
when you're on your phone scrolling, you're foveating to
2:37:47
this small box, independent of what's
2:37:49
in that small box and what you're viewing and how that's
2:37:51
affecting you. And you just imagine
2:37:53
the amount of time that you're doing that or
2:37:56
texting while walking into
2:37:58
your car, while on the bus, while while commuting
2:38:01
or in any kind of environment. Whereas for
2:38:03
the many, many hundreds of thousands of years
2:38:05
or more prior to that, you would just
2:38:07
walk between things and your vision would go
2:38:09
into what's called panoramic vision where you're not
2:38:11
really foveating or placing a virgin's eye movement
2:38:13
to anything in particular, unless you're interested in
2:38:15
it, you're pursuing it, analyzing
2:38:17
it, et cetera. So it
2:38:20
can be very relaxing and beneficial to just
2:38:22
take a walk with a couple of minutes
2:38:24
of just letting your head and eyes go
2:38:26
wherever they want to go, not directing them
2:38:28
to any one location in particular, meaning not
2:38:31
looking at your phone, right? You can look
2:38:33
at whatever you want as long as you
2:38:35
want, appreciate things around you, appreciate people around
2:38:37
you, but going to panoramic vision, long distance
2:38:39
viewing, very useful. And if you're stuck in
2:38:42
an indoor environment and you're finding that you're
2:38:44
feeling anxious, sometimes that's related to all sorts
2:38:46
of things in the room, temperature, error, people,
2:38:49
agitation, whatever. But
2:38:52
if you want to calm down, I've talked
2:38:54
a lot about physiological size, two inhales followed
2:38:56
by a long exhale, fastest way
2:38:58
I'm aware of to shift
2:39:00
your nervous system to a
2:39:03
more parasympathetic mode, excuse me, and
2:39:05
calm down. But also you can dilate your
2:39:07
gaze, even without moving your head or eyes,
2:39:09
you don't have to be rigid with your
2:39:11
head or eyes and let you fix them
2:39:13
in place, but you can just try and
2:39:15
view the ceiling, the walls, the floor and
2:39:17
everything around you in sort of more of
2:39:19
a global manner. And that releases
2:39:21
this intense, what
2:39:24
I'm calling foveation or virgins eye movements. It's a
2:39:26
little bit of a trick. It's kind of nice
2:39:28
because it's completely covert, whereas
2:39:31
physiological size, too deep inhales through the nose, followed
2:39:33
by a long exhale through the mouth, a little
2:39:35
bit harder to hide if you're trying to, cloak
2:39:39
whatever level of anxiety one might be feeling. So
2:39:41
if I right now went, given
2:39:45
that it's me, it might not be so strange, but it's
2:39:47
a little weird to do in a meeting, but you can
2:39:49
just kind of relax yourself through going from
2:39:52
virgins to panoramic vision, but
2:39:54
even better would be get
2:39:56
outside view horizon. Let
2:39:59
your eyes, sort
2:40:01
of let them relax so that
2:40:03
you're not looking at one particular thing for too long.
2:40:05
And you'll notice undoubtedly a
2:40:07
pretty major state shift to a state of
2:40:09
more calm. If people are
2:40:11
in, let's say, an office building or something, is
2:40:14
this a scenario where they can look out the
2:40:16
window? Yes. Okay. Yes,
2:40:18
this would be a good case for looking out the window. And
2:40:20
for students who were looking out the window in class, you can
2:40:23
just say, I was trying to catch some anxiety relief and then
2:40:25
maybe your teacher will let you get away with it. Speaking
2:40:27
of anxiety, I'm trying to be mindful of your time.
2:40:29
I know you have to go soon. I just want
2:40:31
to try to dive into one last
2:40:34
topic. Sure. No, I'm enjoying this so
2:40:36
much. Alcohol. Alcohol, okay. It's
2:40:39
a topic that you really,
2:40:41
I think, have changed the
2:40:43
public perspective in terms of
2:40:45
public health with respect to
2:40:47
the effects of alcohol, particularly on the brain. I
2:40:52
don't think there's any controversy about
2:40:55
heavy alcohol use and how it's
2:40:57
negative for every organ
2:40:59
that we have, right? It's
2:41:01
just very bad. There's
2:41:04
been a lot of, I would say,
2:41:06
conflicting ideas and conflicting
2:41:09
research and just disagreement with
2:41:11
respect to what would
2:41:13
be considered maybe perhaps moderate alcohol,
2:41:15
which many, many people do, one
2:41:18
glass of wine a night or something with dinner, or
2:41:21
even less than that would be
2:41:23
light alcohol consumption. Maybe less than
2:41:25
two or three, less than three
2:41:27
drinks, three or less. Per
2:41:29
week. Per week, yes. First
2:41:33
of all, I want to talk about anxiety that triggered
2:41:35
me, but I want to
2:41:37
ask you about someone that's
2:41:39
doing, let's say, moderate
2:41:42
drinking. They're doing the glass of wine a night.
2:41:46
What's that doing to parts of their brain
2:41:48
in terms of the
2:41:50
structure and the function? Yes.
2:41:53
First of all, do as
2:41:55
you wish, but know what you're doing.
2:41:57
That's my stance. I am not anti-alcohol.
2:41:59
I'm not an alcoholic. I don't particularly like
2:42:01
alcohol, so I can drink or not drink. I
2:42:04
don't tend to drink. I might have a
2:42:06
sip of alcohol. Well, it's been
2:42:08
a long time since I've had a sip of
2:42:10
alcohol, but there are certain white tequilas I've
2:42:12
enjoyed and occasionally one of those and
2:42:15
you know, or a vodka and
2:42:17
soda or something. So just to be
2:42:19
clear, like I'm not anti-alcohol. My read
2:42:22
of the data are, as you pointed
2:42:24
out, that yes, alcohol is a poison, but many things
2:42:26
are a poison and the dose determines the poison. It
2:42:30
seems that our threshold
2:42:33
for what we call moderate or
2:42:37
low amounts of drinking is
2:42:40
shifting nowadays. I don't know if that had something to
2:42:42
do with the alcohol episode that we did, but
2:42:45
here's what I do know. The data
2:42:47
say that zero
2:42:50
to two drinks per week, you're
2:42:54
probably fine, provided you're not an alcoholic and
2:42:56
you're of age, okay? And you're
2:42:58
not pregnant or dealing with some other, something
2:43:02
that would make it a case
2:43:04
where you wouldn't want to drink at all. Zero to
2:43:06
two drinks per week. Now what happens past
2:43:08
two drinks per week depends
2:43:10
on a lot of other contextual factors,
2:43:13
okay? First of all, how well
2:43:15
or poorly you metabolize alcohol. How
2:43:17
much alcohol dehydrogenase you tend to express. Why do
2:43:19
I say that? Well, a lot of the so-called
2:43:22
negative effects of alcohol are due
2:43:24
to disruptions in sleep and gut
2:43:26
microbiome. So those are indirect, right?
2:43:28
Alcohol is changing for the worse,
2:43:30
the gut microbiome and sleep
2:43:32
patterns. We know this, people that track their sleep,
2:43:34
they have one drink and they're like, holy cow,
2:43:36
my sleep is so much worse. Not just sleep
2:43:38
score, but amount of REM sleep, amount of deep
2:43:41
sleep, et cetera. Is
2:43:44
that the direct or indirect
2:43:46
cause of any kind of disruption in
2:43:48
brain structure or in neuronal health? We
2:43:50
don't know. But what these larger
2:43:52
scale studies show is that if you look at
2:43:54
the amount of gray matter thinning, which
2:43:57
occurs with age
2:43:59
regardless of age, Regardless, gray
2:44:01
matter being the neurons in the brain, white
2:44:04
matter being the fiber tracks, the
2:44:07
axons and myelin in the brain, this is how they're image,
2:44:09
so they show up as gray or white. The
2:44:11
amount of gray matter thinning starts
2:44:14
to increase as
2:44:16
you get out past two drinks per week. Now,
2:44:19
is it significant enough that people
2:44:21
should be concerned about cognitive decline as a consequence
2:44:24
of three drinks per week induced gray matter thinning?
2:44:27
Probably not. So
2:44:29
then should we set the threshold at three drinks per week or
2:44:31
four drinks per week? I don't know, and I'm not here to
2:44:33
say that one way or the other. What I'm saying is my
2:44:36
read of the data, and I know there are people that disagree
2:44:38
with me, is that
2:44:40
zero is better than any. And
2:44:43
that, I think, I'm
2:44:45
told, has brought great relief to a number of
2:44:47
people that didn't want to drink, but that actually
2:44:49
were drinking red wine specifically to try and get
2:44:51
some, quote unquote,
2:44:53
health benefits. It also brought great relief
2:44:55
to a number of people because they tell
2:44:57
me that did not like drinking.
2:44:59
They didn't like the way drinking made them feel
2:45:02
either while they were under the influence of it,
2:45:04
or maybe taste or
2:45:06
just general malaise the next day, or due
2:45:08
to disruption in sleep. I don't really know
2:45:10
the reasons, but for people who don't like
2:45:12
drinking or who don't want to drink, I
2:45:15
think there's ample evidence that
2:45:17
zero is great, that you don't need
2:45:19
to drink, okay? It might
2:45:21
seem like a kind of silly statement, but I
2:45:23
think a good number of people kind of doing
2:45:25
it because they thought there were health benefits. Now,
2:45:28
to be fair, most people were drinking and if
2:45:30
they were talking about the health benefits, because they
2:45:32
like the way alcohol makes them feel. And
2:45:34
to me, it's clear that
2:45:36
if you care very much about your
2:45:39
brain, that more than two
2:45:41
drinks per week on a consistent basis, probably
2:45:43
not a good idea. Now, are there exceptions
2:45:46
to that? Sure. Are there people who,
2:45:48
you know, everyone says, well, I had a grandparent and
2:45:50
they're, you live to be 98 and they're super sharp
2:45:52
and they drank, you know, a shot of vodka every
2:45:54
night. Great, like great. I just say, well, how much
2:45:56
better would they have been had they not? But I
2:45:58
also understand you need to live life. and for
2:46:00
many people alcohol is one route by which they
2:46:02
enjoy life more because of its relaxing effects. And
2:46:05
that's important to note that anxiety is
2:46:07
bad, anxiety that disrupts sleep is bad.
2:46:09
So many people will drink to provide
2:46:12
a segue
2:46:14
from the work day to the
2:46:17
evening, and they find it helps them calm down and
2:46:19
sleep better, but we know it disrupts your sleep. Would
2:46:22
it be better to not drink at all? Probably,
2:46:24
but I want to be respectful of
2:46:26
that scenario as well. If
2:46:29
we look at four drinks per week,
2:46:32
five drinks per week, let's say a drink a night, seven
2:46:34
drinks per week, I just
2:46:36
don't see where the debate is. To
2:46:38
me, you look at the gray matter thinning, you look
2:46:40
at some of the other metrics on gut microbiome, you
2:46:43
look at the disruption in sleep, and again, people should
2:46:45
do as they wish, but know what they're doing. And
2:46:47
it's just, oh, so clear that it's
2:46:49
not good for people and
2:46:52
that they're doing at least some degree of
2:46:54
harm. Now, there's also the
2:46:56
business of offsetting harm. I
2:46:58
always say, listen, if you're the kind of person who wants to have a drink
2:47:00
every night, be my guest
2:47:02
if that serves you well, but you might
2:47:05
be wise to also do some things that
2:47:07
offset some of the, for instance, gut microbiome
2:47:09
disruption. Perhaps pay a bit more attention to
2:47:11
consuming one to four servings of low
2:47:14
sugar fermented foods per day to really feed the
2:47:16
gut microbiome. Maybe be extra
2:47:18
thoughtful about a consistent sleep
2:47:20
schedule. Maybe be extra
2:47:22
thoughtful about a number of other things
2:47:25
to offset whatever negative effects are sure
2:47:27
to be introduced by that kind of regimen. So
2:47:30
zero's best, two's probably fine.
2:47:34
Three, four, five, six, seven is where you're, are
2:47:36
you going to shorten your life by a significant
2:47:38
amount? Well, provided you don't drive while you're drunk,
2:47:41
probably not. Are you going
2:47:43
to be disrupting your health? Probably,
2:47:45
mainly indirect effects through
2:47:48
disrupted sleep or gut microbiome, try and offset
2:47:50
those effects. But then once you get past
2:47:53
a drink per night, which many, many people
2:47:55
are consuming, then I think there's general agreement,
2:47:58
higher incidence of cancers, especially in one. women,
2:48:00
higher incidence of cancers generally, and
2:48:03
a number of other things relate to immune
2:48:05
system disruption, and on and on. And
2:48:09
just as a final statement, I don't have anything against
2:48:11
alcohol. I
2:48:14
understand it's part of the fabric of
2:48:17
most every culture, and that says something,
2:48:19
but to my mind, alcohol,
2:48:22
if you don't like it, or you care about your
2:48:24
health more than you care about alcohol, I
2:48:27
say, don't drink, it's pure and simple. What
2:48:30
does alcohol do to our serotonin
2:48:33
system, dopamine system? I mean,
2:48:37
while we're drinking, while we're consuming it, you
2:48:39
feel good, I don't know exactly what's
2:48:42
happening at that moment, but also long-term,
2:48:44
like after you're done
2:48:47
with the alcohol, like what happens to
2:48:49
that serotonin system? Lots of animal
2:48:51
data, not a lot of human data. Here's what
2:48:53
we do know. Most people
2:48:55
experience the, what
2:48:58
they, you know, subjectively report as
2:49:00
pleasant feelings of alcohol, as disruption
2:49:02
of inhibition, relaxation, et cetera. That's
2:49:04
mainly through the GABA system, and
2:49:07
there are a couple other systems as well. There
2:49:10
is a subset of people for
2:49:12
whom, for whatever reason, it seems
2:49:14
they get more activation of the
2:49:16
dopamine system from alcohol. These
2:49:19
people may be, and
2:49:22
very likely are, more prone to becoming
2:49:24
alcoholics. One of the strongest
2:49:26
determinants of whether or not somebody becomes an
2:49:28
alcoholic is the age at which
2:49:30
they took their first drink. So
2:49:32
very, very young, higher
2:49:34
likelihood they'll become an alcoholic and so on.
2:49:38
But there does seem to be
2:49:40
some genetic predisposition or some other
2:49:42
predisposition for folks that drink and
2:49:45
seem to be very energized by alcohol. There's
2:49:47
kind of a coordinate release of dopamine from
2:49:50
the dopamine system that's not always observed in
2:49:52
other people. But again, there aren't a ton
2:49:54
of human studies on this, but there's
2:49:57
some, what I think, logical speculation that can be
2:49:59
had that. those are likely going to be the
2:50:01
people that are drinking and staying up
2:50:03
drinking throughout the night. I knew these people in college,
2:50:05
it was kind of interesting to see that some of
2:50:07
you would just like drink and drink and drink and
2:50:10
they're upright and they're clear. You're thinking, gosh, is their
2:50:12
tolerance very high? Well, surely that's the case. But
2:50:14
it also seemed as if alcohol was affecting them
2:50:16
differently. And then of course
2:50:18
there's the whole notion of blackout drunk where people
2:50:21
are awake and alert and they don't realize what's
2:50:23
happening and that's super scary. So the dopamine system
2:50:25
is involved in perhaps, so
2:50:28
the dopamine system is involved at a low level, we
2:50:31
can say almost certainly in everybody
2:50:33
when it comes to alcohol, it has reinforcing
2:50:35
properties, especially if people like the feeling, they
2:50:37
like the circumstances. Again, it's that contextual learning
2:50:39
about what happens when they drink. A
2:50:42
number of people, proven by the
2:50:44
way, that if somebody gets really, really sick
2:50:46
after drinking a certain type of cocktail, they're
2:50:48
very likely to be averse to that cocktail
2:50:50
forever after. There's
2:50:53
the subset of individuals, maybe a little
2:50:56
less than 10% or so that perhaps
2:50:58
it experiences heightened increases in dopamine
2:51:00
release in response to alcohol that
2:51:03
other people don't. So that's interesting and certainly needs
2:51:05
more study. And then you
2:51:07
asked about the serotonin system. Here,
2:51:10
I have to apologize. I'm not
2:51:12
aware of the direct relationship between
2:51:14
alcohol consumption and the serotonin system.
2:51:17
But I am aware that
2:51:19
there's this phenomenon of anxiety where
2:51:22
people, yes, achieve some relief
2:51:24
from anxiety while they're under the effects
2:51:26
of alcohol, but that the next day,
2:51:28
the part of the hangover effect seems
2:51:30
to be a elevation
2:51:33
in anxiety, the so-called anxiety. Is
2:51:35
that directly due to depletion of
2:51:37
or some disruption in the serotonin
2:51:39
system? I don't know, seems
2:51:41
likely. One of the phrases that we have to
2:51:44
keep in mind, there
2:51:47
was a professor of mine where I was a graduate student.
2:51:50
He used to say, a drug
2:51:53
is a substance that when injected into an
2:51:56
animal or consumed by a human produces a
2:51:58
scientific paper. What I think he was, is
2:52:00
that when it comes to the neuromodulators, there's
2:52:02
a lot of interaction. So that I have
2:52:04
to imagine that if you took two groups
2:52:06
of people and you gave one group alcohol
2:52:10
or you titrated and you give some high
2:52:12
alcohol, moderate alcohol, low alcohol, and then you
2:52:14
looked at circulating serotonin, I wouldn't be at
2:52:16
all surprised to see differences. The question is
2:52:19
whether or not those differences can be tacked
2:52:21
directly to any kind of subjective change. So
2:52:23
there I have to admit
2:52:25
being naive. And so I'm sure
2:52:27
someone will tell us in the
2:52:29
comments that what alcohol
2:52:32
is doing to the serotonin system. Serotonin,
2:52:35
I think for a long time was
2:52:38
looked at only as kind of a calming neuromodulator
2:52:40
or something like that. And I think we now
2:52:42
appreciate that it's doing a lot of different things
2:52:44
in a lot of different brain structures, not unlike
2:52:46
dopamine, but perhaps even more so. Because
2:52:49
you see evidence out there for
2:52:51
serotonin and resilience, but also serotonin
2:52:54
and pair bonding. It's involved
2:52:56
in so many things. And so what we
2:52:59
need to ask is what circuits in the
2:53:01
brain of serotonin modulating? And certainly it's modulating
2:53:03
a lot of them and in many ways
2:53:05
in a much more widespread manner than is
2:53:07
dopamine. Well, I've read
2:53:11
a lot of the literature with alcohol as well and come to
2:53:13
the same conclusion as you where, I
2:53:15
mean, it's not like it's good for you. I
2:53:17
haven't been, I couldn't convince myself that drinking alcohol
2:53:20
is actually good for you, but I think I
2:53:22
found that two drinks a week doesn't
2:53:24
seem to have a lot
2:53:26
of the negative effects of brain atrophy and cancer
2:53:29
and other things. And perhaps- Great, I'm glad
2:53:31
we agree. I'm glad we agree. I
2:53:33
mean, not that if we disagree, it
2:53:35
would be a problem, but I, you
2:53:37
know, consensus is great, even if it's
2:53:39
a small group in consensus. I think
2:53:41
attitudes towards alcohol are changing. And
2:53:44
as our attitudes towards cannabis, you know,
2:53:46
has certain health benefits and medicinal benefits
2:53:49
and also can be problematic for certain
2:53:51
people. And I think more
2:53:53
understanding of genetic and
2:53:55
other predispositions to alcoholism, to psychosis,
2:53:58
to things like that. are
2:54:00
going to be really valuable as we go forward. We just really
2:54:02
don't know what to look for yet. But
2:54:04
again, it's been a while. Maybe I'll have a
2:54:06
drink at some point. There's a dopamine connection
2:54:09
to being predisposed to
2:54:11
being an alcoholic. So I
2:54:13
don't remember if it was, which
2:54:16
one it was, one of the
2:54:18
dopamine receptor ones or another one. There's
2:54:20
a handful of them, I would say
2:54:22
five, that are known
2:54:24
that affect likelihood
2:54:27
to be ADHD to
2:54:30
have substance abuse disorders, alcoholism. I mean, all
2:54:32
this makes sense, right? Everything that we were
2:54:34
talking about. Being
2:54:37
able to deal with stress and anxiety. I'm
2:54:39
very interested in that interaction with the genetics
2:54:41
and also like, okay, well, if you have
2:54:43
ADHD, so these things that
2:54:45
we've been talking about in the podcast, in the episode,
2:54:49
not limiting the phone to one hour a day and
2:54:53
doing the NSDR, the non-sleep deep rest, and
2:54:57
the exercise and the cold shower,
2:55:00
cold plunge if you have it, and all these
2:55:02
things can help
2:55:04
even people with ADHD. Yeah, they
2:55:06
tap into the dopamine and norepinephrine system.
2:55:08
And I also want to acknowledge that
2:55:10
a lot of the prescription drugs for
2:55:12
ADHD can really help people, children
2:55:15
and adults. I did two episodes on
2:55:17
dopamine and focus and ADHD. The
2:55:19
first one was mainly focused on behavioral,
2:55:22
nutritional, supplementation-based approaches. And I would
2:55:24
say about 50% of the comments
2:55:27
were, love,
2:55:29
love, love this, thank you. The other 50% were, I hate this,
2:55:33
what about all the drugs that are really valuable for it? So we
2:55:35
did a second episode, as we were originally planning
2:55:37
to do, on Adderall,
2:55:39
Vyvanse, Ritalin, Dioxin, which
2:55:42
is actually methamphetamine, prescription methamphetamine. These
2:55:45
things are prescribed to try and
2:55:47
help people with ADHD and
2:55:49
other attentional issues. And the
2:55:51
response was exactly inverse. 50%
2:55:53
of people saying, this is fantastic. Thank you,
2:55:56
parents thanking us for doing that because
2:55:59
a lot of them were living in pain. kind of quiet
2:56:01
shame about the fact that they were giving these drugs to
2:56:03
their kids, but observing that their kids were feeling better and
2:56:05
doing better and performing better. And so, and then the
2:56:07
other 50% were saying, this is terrible,
2:56:09
we're putting kids on speed. And so again, I don't
2:56:12
come to any of this with any kind of judgment.
2:56:16
I think it's highly individual, but what
2:56:18
it all comes back down to are
2:56:21
these neuromodulators, right? And the various circuits involved,
2:56:23
it's the catecholamines in both cases, whether or
2:56:25
not it's a cold plunger, whether or not
2:56:27
it's Adderall, it's not the
2:56:30
same route to it. It's not the same
2:56:32
level. It's not the same predictability. So I'm
2:56:34
not trying to equate those two things, but
2:56:36
they all funnel into the same mechanistic
2:56:38
system. So we shouldn't be surprised at
2:56:41
all that, yes, there are behaviors. There
2:56:43
are things to avoid. There are prescription drugs
2:56:45
and yes, there are
2:56:47
supplement-based compounds that tap into these
2:56:50
pathways. Mecunopurines, for instance. What
2:56:52
do you think of that? Well, it's L-DOPA.
2:56:54
L-DOPA is a precursor to dopamine. And so
2:56:56
if people now are, it's true, supplements are
2:56:59
not as regulated, as we both know. Sourcing
2:57:02
becomes an issue. I've
2:57:04
tried Mecunopurines. I don't have ADHD, but I've
2:57:06
tried it. It gives you a clear state
2:57:08
shift. I mean, you're taking L-DOPA, it
2:57:11
produced a pretty big crash for me afterwards. And I'm like,
2:57:13
I never want to try that again. But
2:57:16
I think people are very individual.
2:57:19
I think getting the baseline things
2:57:21
right, sleep, stress modulation, exercise, nutrition.
2:57:24
Look, there's absolutely no way that that
2:57:26
can't serve a person, young or old, for
2:57:28
the better. And so that
2:57:30
should be the place to start. But
2:57:32
in many situations where there's a clinical
2:57:34
urgency to get a kid focusing
2:57:37
so that they don't fall behind in school, I'm
2:57:40
of the mind that, yeah, makes perfect sense for
2:57:42
parents to safely explore
2:57:45
some of the pharmaceutical approaches. But if they don't
2:57:47
work, they also need other places to turn. And
2:57:49
while they're doing that exploration of what's going to
2:57:51
really work best for this kid or this adult,
2:57:55
one would hope they're doing all the things
2:57:57
to bolster that system, that catecholamine system with
2:57:59
great sleep, NST. maybe cold
2:58:01
plunges, exercise, nutrition, et cetera, so
2:58:03
that the whole system doesn't crash while they're
2:58:05
doing it. And that's really what I believe,
2:58:07
I can't speak for you, but I really
2:58:09
think that your work and my work is
2:58:11
really what we're trying to do, is trying
2:58:13
to get all of that information out to
2:58:15
people for people to look at,
2:58:17
evaluate and make decisions for
2:58:20
the best situation in their
2:58:22
hands. And does
2:58:24
that mean that certain drugs are being over
2:58:26
prescribed? No, they are in some cases. And
2:58:28
in some cases, they're being under prescribed and
2:58:30
somebody's really tortured by their inability to focus
2:58:33
and they could do well with some
2:58:35
low dose of some particular drug. And then we
2:58:37
say, well, are we creating, excuse
2:58:39
me, a generation of addicts? Again,
2:58:42
depend on these things, maybe, but maybe it's
2:58:44
also encouraging the kind of neuroplasticity in the
2:58:46
intentional systems that's going to allow them to
2:58:48
be able to focus without these compounds. Yeah,
2:58:51
I think my concern is the, who
2:58:54
is diagnosing it? Like I read a study when
2:58:57
I was trying to decide like, like my
2:58:59
son was born in, it was like
2:59:01
in the summer. And so all
2:59:04
parents are kind of faced with this, when do I start
2:59:06
kindergarten? So I was starting- I'm
2:59:08
a September baby, so I'm always the youngest in my class. Right,
2:59:11
and so that was exactly what I was looking into.
2:59:13
And I was looking into reading
2:59:15
what's out there and published data. And
2:59:17
I read a couple of studies where teachers,
2:59:20
so children that were boys, that were
2:59:22
born in July and August were three
2:59:24
times more likely to be diagnosed with
2:59:27
ADHD. Than boys that
2:59:29
were not born in July and August. So
2:59:31
they were the youngest, they were going to be the youngest in
2:59:33
their class. There's nothing about being
2:59:35
born in July and August that makes a
2:59:37
child susceptible to ADHD. Let's be
2:59:39
real, right? So it has to be the early
2:59:42
struggle with keeping up with kids. Well, what's happening-
2:59:44
Yeah, exactly. Cognitively more mature.
2:59:46
Teachers are comparing younger kids, school readiness for
2:59:48
boys is not the same as a girl,
2:59:50
for one. And then on top of that,
2:59:53
you add youth, where they're younger. And
2:59:55
so you have a child that can't sit
2:59:57
still and focus and then-
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More